ome on board!
>
--
Daniel Watford
BIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz#ReleaseManagementGuideforOFBiz-Creatinganewreleasebranch
>
--
Daniel Watford
benefits and negatives to the
above as I think they are mostly still relevant even if only bundling a
subset of plugins into ofbiz-framework.
Thanks,
Dan.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/jhjohny4ovb2tnpo6qpcwmz5m6513f57
--
Daniel Watford
acopo's proposition?
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 02/11/2023 à 11:18, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> > Yes, the plugins are included in all the releases of 18.12; for newer
> > release branches we can definitely revisit this decision (in fact I
> > think it would be nice to have framework only distributions).
--
Daniel Watford
ment community.
> >
> > Thank you for your efforts in driving this conversation forward.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pranay Pandey
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 13:36, Daniel Watford wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
>
in the void. Again, what are those tasks precisely?
> And WHAT are their situations?
>
> Sorry, typo
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
cussed. We should have some deadlines for new features though, just
> to be able to create the next feature branch in the planned time periods.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
gt; > The advantages i see in migrating as soon as possible would be that we
> > could put it behind us.
> >
> > Any thougts ? The ticket has been created some days ago [3]
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy7y96nmdr0rl43bss3sjm0jkcf2s2gz
> > [2] https://tomcat.apache.org/migration-10.html
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12989
> >
>
--
Daniel Watford
rmat}
> >
> > It also works at
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/8399944524/job/23006661250
> > bq. Java CI with Gradle #2887: Commit aa459fd pushed by asfgit
> >
> > But not at
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/8399944523
> > bq. Analyze (java)
> > bq. We were unable to automatically build your code. Please replace the
> call to the autobuild action with your custom build steps. Encountered a
> fatal error while running
> "/opt/hostedtoolcache/CodeQL/2.16.5/x64/codeql/java/tools/autobuild.sh".
> Exit code was 1 and last log line was: Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS:
> -Dhttp.keepAlive=false -Dmaven.wagon.http.pool=false. See the logs for more
> details.
> >
> > nor https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/8399944544
> > bq. Build and push OFBiz docker container images
> > bq. buildx failed with: ERROR: failed to solve: process "./gradlew
> --console plain distTar" did not complete successfully: exit code: 1
> >
> > And last bu not least in BB:
> > https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/49/builds/824
> >
> > Very weird ans sad situation :/
> >
> >
> >> Upgrade Apache Shiro from 1.13.0 to 2.0.0
> >> -
> >>
> >> Key: OFBIZ-12961
> >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12961
> >> Project: OFBiz
> >> Issue Type: Improvement
> >> Components: framework
> >> Affects Versions: Upcoming Branch
> >> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> >> Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
> >> Priority: Minor
> >> Fix For: Upcoming Branch
> >>
> >>
> >> At first glance there is no security vulnerability implied.
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> > (v8.20.10#820010)
>
--
Daniel Watford
would end up registering thin adapter layers to their standard
services.
Looking forward to seeing the new component and contributing where possible.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
the enhancements we have developed
> over the last 2 years (still waiting for me to find time to provide a PR).
>
> For the historical view, I would need more time to dig into the past
> discussions...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
ogs".
> I mean you can't see the access_logs. They are sometime very useful too.
>
> So yes I agree this would be something we could do.
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 29/02/2024 à 16:15, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was just checking the demo-stable lo
.
I'm sure there will be other benefits and negatives to consider. Please let
me know what you think.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
ight make it easier for ofbiz developers to check on the demo logs from
time to time.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
;>> it depends on base/util and base/crypto - but nothing else from OFBiz).
> >>> - It will facilitate the developement of proper java API's - now
> >>> OFBiz is an implementation only - the API is the implementation.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to build some import tooling that uses the OFBiz code
> >>> (so I don't reinvent the weel).
> >>> Currently I don't see a way on how to do that.
> >>>
> >>> See the https://github.com/ieugen/ofbiz-tooling-demo I just did for
> >>> Crypto. It can help people migrate data from/to OFBiz by using the
> >>> same crypto code and the same xml data processing code.
> >>> I do not need to bring whole OFBiz if all I want is to push / pull
> >>> data from DB or to some files.
> >>> To my knowledge that is not possible with OFBiz right now (unlesss
> >>> you reimplement the code). It will be possible once we publish
> >>> libraries.
> >>>
> >>> There is much more that this can help with but we will see if OFBiz
> >>> to accepts some changes.
> >>> And again, my changes don't break ANY integration test from the 780?!
> >>> tests.
> >>>
> >>> I am very excited of finding this way of breaking OFBiz into smaller
> >>> parts without breaking OFBiz runtime.
> >>> There will be work to be done to streamline the code as libs but I am
> >>> optimistic.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Eugen Stan
>
> +40770 941 271 / https://www.netdava.com
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
gt; As a side note, if you want, I can also create the ones missing for
> the previous releases.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jacopo
>
> PS: did anyone else experience the same issues that Jacques is
> reporting about the hash and signature?
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:09 PM Daniel W
st 5 days.
>
> For more details about this process please refer to
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
--
Daniel Watford
OFBIZ-12901 created to address the Node.js upgrade:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12901
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 17:50, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Jacques,
>
> Upgrading sounds a good idea to me.
>
> We only use Node.js as part of our build process, so we should catch
>
> > After installing Scorecard as a GH actions (OFBIZ-12899), we got a
> suggestion to upgrade node.js from 16 to 20 version.
> >
> > Do we want to do that?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Jacques
>
> node.js 16 is EOL: https://github.com/nodejs/Release/#end-of-life-releases
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
gt; ofbiz.log
> error.log
> etc.
>
> in Docker ?
>
> TIA
>
> Jacques
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
gt; Le 04/01/2024 à 19:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > Yes you are right Daniel, I remember having seen 7.62 Mb for trunk. I'll
> change that tmrw :)
> >
> > Le 04/01/2024 à 18:57, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> >> Hi Jacques,
> >>
> >> Using depth=1 mean
should try and only retrieve needed data if doing so does not introduce
too much complexity.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 09:43, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Reviews are always appreciated :)
>
> Inline...
> Le 04/01/2024 à 09:23, Daniel Watford a écrit :
>
&g
;
> >>> Le 01/12/2023 à 11:18, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12868
> >>> for > that... WIP...
> >>> >
> >>> > HTH
> >>> >
> >>> > Jacques
> >>> >
> >>> > Le 27/11/2023 à 13:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >>> >> Hi,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> As you may have noticed*, the SvnCheckout Gradle plugin will not
> >>> be >> usable after January 8, 2024.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> So we need a replacement and it's clearly suggested by GitHub in
> >>> the >> link below
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Jacques
> >>> >>
> >>> >> * https://lists.apache.org/thread/08kwg2ovjt4qyfybhf1qzsvq42jsy2wz
> >>>
> >>
>
> --
> Eugen Stan
>
> +40770 941 271 / https://www.netdava.com
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
t;>>
> >>> As you may have noticed*, the SvnCheckout Gradle plugin will not be
> usable after January 8, 2024.
> >>>
> >>> So we need a replacement and it's clearly suggested by GitHub in the
> link below
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> * https://lists.apache.org/thread/08kwg2ovjt4qyfybhf1qzsvq42jsy2wz
>
--
Daniel Watford
oon not
> > usable SvnCheckout plugin?
> Actually this last sentence was more directed to Daniel
>
--
Daniel Watford
Biz improvement quality this year on groovy and deployment process.
> >>
> >> I saw two issues [1][2] to solve before run a release process. Do you
> >> saw other element before try to release the 22.01.01 ?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Nicolas
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12726
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12868
>
--
Daniel Watford
://www.netdava.com
>
--
Daniel Watford
container build.
> >
> >
> > Thanks & Regards
> > --
> > Deepak Dixit
> > ofbiz.apache.org
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 2:22 PM Deepak Dixit wrote:
> >
> >> Sure Daniel!!
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
I just realised I gave this thread the wrong subject. It should have been
'Lazy consensus: Host demo-stable in a container.'
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:45, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Over the last few months we have been experiencing more frequent restarts
> of the VM used
will look to amend the demo-trunk site to be
hosted by a container in about 7 day's time.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
:?]
at
org.apache.ofbiz.entity.transaction.GeronimoTransactionFactory.getConnection(GeronimoTransactionFactory.java:79)
~[ofbiz.jar:?]
at
org.apache.ofbiz.entity.jdbc.SQLProcessor.getConnection(SQLProcessor.java:261)
~[ofbiz.jar:?]
... 8 more
--
Daniel Watford
--
Daniel Watford
there any specific reason to disable http/2 on demo-trunk?
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
> ofbiz.apache.org
>
--
Daniel Watford
ding the gradle config
> correctly, the version of Groovy seems to be 2.5.18 and that appears to not
> support try-with-resources syntax. Is that expected?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul Foxworthy
>
--
Daniel Watford
pi3
>
> Le 28/07/2023 à 17:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Ho many time do you think we need?
> >
> > Maybe a month is indeed short. Though actually the changes are pretty
> simple and we should not cross much issues
> >
> > L
accordingly.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 16:32, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Ho many time do you think we need?
>
> Maybe a month is indeed short. Though actually the changes are pretty
> simple and we should not cross much issues
>
> Le 28/07/2023 à 17:17, Daniel
.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 16:08, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Le 03/05/2023 à 09:45, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel Watford wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I'll ask one more question (and then run for cover!): Rather than carry
> out
> >>
We should install a cron job to run the clean up automatically.
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
umber: none
> Revision: 3b427b1481e46232107303c90be7b05079b05b1c
>
> Groovy: 2.4.4
> Ant: Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.6 compiled on June 29 2015
> JVM: 1.8.0_333 (Oracle Corporation 25.333-b02)
> OS: Windows 11 10.0 amd64
>
> Can anyone please help me, why gradlew applyCuystomPatch -Penv=dev is
> failing.
>
> Best Regards,
> Sahana S
>
--
Daniel Watford
Hi Jacques,
What was the cause of the outage?
Thanks,
Dan
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, 12:47 Jacques Le Roux,
wrote:
> All is OK now
>
> Le 01/06/2023 à 12:40, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > The stable demo is back but not the trunk and next yet.
> >
> > Le 01/06/2023 à 12:07, Jacques Le Roux a écrit
o support the groovy script return (better
> than what it did currently) would be cover all case ?
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/blob/64d012d2c20d76200cedd3e1861b720d55a61398/framework/webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/webapp/event/GroovyEventHandler.java#L1
40 Java Problem
> >>>>>>>>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type CCPaymentServices.java
> >>>>>>>>>>
> /ofbiz/applications/accoun
t; Jacques
>
> Le 28/04/2023 à 12:30, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > The reason for checking is that groovyScripts are loaded as independent
> > scripts and compiled at runtime by OFBiz (See
> > GroovyUtil#getScriptClassFromLocation), rather than being loaded from a
> > pre-compiled JAR.
>
--
Daniel Watford
Groovy 3)
> >>> that bots and demo uses could have generated.
> >>>
> >>> I tend to agree about having GroovyBaseScript::success deprecated
> >>> and replaced with methods GroovyBaseScript::scriptSuccess
> >>> GroovyBaseScript::serviceSuc
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> line 304 Java Problem
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type CCPaymentServices.java
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
&
Hi Michael,
Demo-trunk and demo-next have now been refreshed with builds containing
OFBIZ-12808.
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 at 07:40, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> The demo instances do get updated overnight - around 02:35 from memory.
>
> Just in case there was a race co
Issue Type: Bug
> >>>>>> Components: ALL APPLICATIONS, ALL COMPONENTS, ALL PLUGINS
> >>>>>> Affects Versions: 22.01.01, Upcoming Branch
> >>>>>> Reporter: Michael Brohl
> >>>>>> Assignee: Michael Brohl
> >>>>>> Priority: Major
> >>>>>> Fix For: 22.01.01, Upcoming Branch
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Due to improper dependency configurations and the JPMS (Java
> >>>>>> Plattform Module System) which was introduced to Java since
> >>>>>> version 9, the Eclipse build and running/debugging is not working
> >>>>>> with JDK 17 (trunk and release22.01).
> >>>>>> The reason is that there are dependencies to libraries which are
> >>>>>> also shipped with the JDK which causes a conflict leading to
> >>>>>> ignore those packages/classes in the build.
> >>>>>> We have a working solution for this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> >>>>> (v8.20.10#820010)
>
--
Daniel Watford
> Hi Daniel,
>
> It's OK for trunk build but how to cleanly differentiate ?
>
> https://ci2.apache.org/badges/ofbizTrunkFramework.svg
> from
> https://ci2.apache.org/badges/ofbizTrunkFrameworkRat.svg
>
> https://ci2.apache.org/badges/ gives nothing :/
>
> Jacques
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
propose to name the environment variable more explicitely, e.g.
> DO_DOCKER_PUSH. DO_PUSH sounds too broad to me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 20.04.23 um 12:25 schrieb Daniel Watford:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > I have
r images
> buildx failed with: ERROR: denied: permission_denied: The requested
> installation does not exist.
>
> ===
>
> Is it possible to configure this in a way that this is optional or must
> be triggered explicitely?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify G
> As Gil reported, Jacopo's comment of the related commit* contains
>
> < groovy method executed as services or events in a transparent way.>>
>
> What would be your opinion about a best solution?
>
> TIA
>
> Jacques
>
> * http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1298908
>
--
Daniel Watford
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
>
> Am 19.04.23 um 08:17 schrieb Daniel Watford:
> > Thanks Jacques and Jacopo for your responses.
> >
> > Jacques, like you I found the path to the functionality through
> > controller.xml, but was not
;
> > I guess it's used to resize images but it does not seems to work well
> (at least a jpg file was blurred)
> >
> > This was initially put in in 2010 : https://s.apache.org/ak8s6 (can be
> seen in https://markmail.org/message/udi25j4wyqyrowcu)
> > Not sure of the current
: BUILD FAILED: failed './gradlew --no-daemon ...' (failure)
> './gradlew --no-daemon ...' (failure)
> > Worker used: bb_worker4_ubuntu
> > URL:https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/46/builds/507
> > Blamelist: Aditya Sharma, Benjamin Jugl<
> benjamin.j...@ecomify.de>,
s://www.jetbrains.com/community/opensource/#support .
>
> I have OFBiz up and running with IntelliJ Idea which works flawlessly
> but we are mainly using Eclipse for the whole team and trying to get it
> running there also.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael
>
> Am 14.04
?
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
java
> >>>> /ofbiz/plugins/ebay/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ebay line 230 Java
> >>>> Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EbayOrderServices.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/plugins/ebay/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ebay line 267 Java
> >>>> Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EbayOrderServices.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/plugins/ebay/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ebay line 454 Java
> >>>> Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EbayOrderServices.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/plugins/ebay/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ebay line 681 Java
> >>>> Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EbayOrderServices.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/plugins/ebay/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ebay line 993 Java
> >>>> Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EntitySaxReader.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity/util
> line 112
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EntitySaxReader.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity/util
> line 339
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EntitySaxReader.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity/util
> line 556
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EntitySaxReader.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity/util
> line 561
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EntitySyncServices.java
> >>>>
> /ofbiz/framework/entityext/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entityext/synchronization
> >>>> line 483 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type EntitySyncServices.java
> >>>>
> /ofbiz/framework/entityext/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entityext/synchronization
> >>>> line 561 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type FedexServices.java
> >>>>
> /ofbiz/applications/product/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/shipment/thirdparty/fedex
> >>>> line 381 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type FedexServices.java
> >>>>
> /ofbiz/applications/product/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/shipment/thirdparty/fedex
> >>>> line 1020 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type FormFactory.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model
> line 58
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type FormFactory.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model
> line 71
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type FormFactory.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model
> line
> >>>> 101 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type FormFactory.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model
> line
> >>>> 114 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type FormFactory.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model
> line
> >>>> 142 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GatewayResponse.java
> >>>>
> /ofbiz/applications/accounting/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/eway
> >>>> line 170 Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GenericDelegator.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity line
> 2182
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GenericEntity.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity line
> 1230
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GenericEntity.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity line
> 1231
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GenericEntity.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity line
> 1241
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GenericEntity.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity line
> 1245
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GenericEntity.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity line
> 1268
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GenericEntity.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/entity/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/entity line
> 1277
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>> Document cannot be resolved to a type GridFactory.java
> >>>> /ofbiz/framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model
> line 60
> >>>> Java Problem
> >>>>
> >>>> Any clue on how to fix these issues?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> Carlos Navarro
> >>>>
>
--
Daniel Watford
delaying its eventual release. However again, if these
changes are useful for system integrators, then it could be years before
they can use them in a future 23.xx/24.xx release.
Please give the PRs a try and let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
t;> Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> >> Priority: Major
> >>
> >> See https://nightlies.apache.org/ofbiz/trunk/rat-output.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> > (v8.20.10#820010)
>
--
Daniel Watford
t; "RUN-DEMOS-AS-ofbizDemo-USER-ONLY-NOT-ROOT"?
> >
> > cf. https://lists.apache.org/thread/92ylovhsh9jl9r37448s487blvzq3vfy
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > Le 06/04/2023 à 21:25, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> >> Hello,
> &
at this time.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
at least 5 days.
>
> For more details about this process please refer to
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
--
Daniel Watford
oux pushed a change to branch ofbiz-12723
> >> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz-framework.git
> >>
> >>
> >>at 5267532fde Improved: Removed unused oldQOH and oldATP fields
> from InventoryItem (OFBIZ-12723)
> >>
> >> No new revisions were added by this update.
> >>
>
--
Daniel Watford
er%3Adate-forward+page:1+state:facets
> ** https://markmail.org/message/fj7tpwdbcv6e3isa
>
> Le 29/03/2023 à 12:38, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anyone on the dev mailing list 'own' the OFBiz page at OpenHub? (
> > https://www.openhub.net/p/Apache-
Biz-AdminServer |ContainerLoader
> |I| Stopping container admin-container
> 2023-03-28 15:41:40,139 |OFBiz-AdminServer |ContainerLoader
> |I| Stopped container admin-container
> 2023-03-28 15:41:40,139 |OFBiz-AdminServer |ContainerLoader
> |I| Stopping container component-container
&
.
If anyone has access to the page, could they update the source code
repositories to point at the GitHub versions:
https://www.openhub.net/p/Apache-OFBiz/enlistments
I think this should get more up to date information displayed and better
report the activity on the project.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel
her minor question: how works and special is
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pkgs/container/ofbiz ? I can't
> see it locally nor
> from https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework
> I guess it's not related to Docker Hub, right ?
>
> TIA
>
> Le 29/03/2023 à 09:33, Daniel
ed
> in a previous email:
> Le 22/03/2023 à 17:49, Daniel Watford a écrit :
>
> If consensus is established, then changes shall be initially made in a way
> allowing them to be quickly reversed if needed. Once the demo-trunk site is
> observed as running correctly, and with refr
/control/main and see if Solr
is operating as expected.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
in the container. There is no dependency on the
JDK installed globally on the host.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
vclass.com/2023/03/15/docker-to-users-of-free-team-orgs-one-month-to-pay-up-or-we-freeze-account-and-images-go/
>
> This looks like things that happened in the past with other "free"
> "organisations" (if it's free your are the product, don't do evil, etc.)
>
> Jacq
> Thanks for all your work,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> > Am 14.03.2023 um 14:47 schrieb Daniel Watford :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > In my recent email regarding Docker and OFBiz [1] I included some
> proposed
> > next steps.
> >
> > This email is
] https://lists.apache.org/thread/njg7fgwxjxt1vsfs6df8rrwvyp5pwv9p
[2] https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
--
Daniel Watford
permissions to
be mapped to.
Thanks,
Dan.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 14:22, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Le 09/03/2023 à 12:34, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Difficulties experienced along the way:
> >
> > The biggest problem we hit was a capacity issue on the OFBiz project's
> VM,
emo site AND as a
convenience for users to try out OFBiz.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
> The widget-screen.xsd file does not give detailed annotation.
> For example,,
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> honestch...@163.com
>
--
Daniel Watford
others to see your
comments. Please also update the confluence document to show there is an
issue to be addressed.
Many thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
Hi Michael,
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 09:43, Michael Brohl
wrote:
> Hi Dan, all,
>
> maybe we can find a way to experiment on this outside the productive
> VM's for our demos?
>
>
The alternative to working on ofbiz-vm1.apache.org would have been to work
on our own hosts, or get a second host from
hould be faster
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 11/02/2023 à 10:42, Michael Brohl a écrit :
> > Hi Dan, all,
> >
> > maybe we can find a way to experiment on this outside the productive
> VM's for our demos?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
&
the
RAM lift at the same time.
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
nowledge there (maybe others as well?).
>
> To sum up, I propose to migrate our blog and also the Apache OFBiz
> website to be an integrated, Hugo based website.
>
> Opinions?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael Brohl
>
> ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22461
> [2] https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-site/pull/8/files
> [3] https://gohugo.io/
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
preparing their financial statements? Perhaps users export accounting
entries to another accounting tool?
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
let other see
> > your comments and suggestions.
>
> Does it mean that you need to review ALL before others see what you
> commented ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
t i
> did not find comments about the StatsSinceStart.groovy and other files
> you noted as unpassed.
>
> Did I miss something ?
>
> Gil
> On 06/02/23 09:10, Daniel Watford wrote:
> > Hi Gil,
> >
> > The Review Approach section of the tracking document says that c
best to use github comments in pull request ?
>
> I'm curious about the reason, and would like to help solve them.
>
> I will try to advance this week in the review process.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gil
>
> On 28/01/23 08:46, Daniel Watford wrote:
> > Turns out I was able to impo
t things fully
specified if possible.
Therefore, do we have a general rule on whether thruDates in OFBiz are
inclusive or exclusive of the thruDate value itself? Or does the
inclusivity of the thruDate depend on context?
Thanks for reading :)
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
Thanks all - I appreciate the invitation and am happy to be here :)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 16:33, gil.portenseigne
wrote:
> Welcome Daniel, and Congrats !
>
> Gil
> On 28/01/23 11:57, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> > The OFBiz PMC has invited Daniel Watford as a new PMC member a
You might also find this page useful: ofbiz-framework/themes.adoc at trunk
· apache/ofbiz-framework (github.com)
<https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/blob/trunk/themes/docs/themes.adoc>
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 19:19, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> I think yo
955-2528)
>
> On Jan 26 2023, at 4:04 am, Daniel Watford wrote:
> > Hi Douglas,
> >
> > There isn't normally a single HTML file. Instead, OFBiz pages are
> rendered
> > by combining a number of elements.
> >
> > If you let us know which page you want to alter
Turns out I was able to import the list of files into Excel and copy and
paste the table from Excel to Confluence.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 08:37, Daniel Watford wrote:
> Hi Gil,
>
> I don't think a checklist is quite enough, assuming we want to track the
> status of each file review
> > > I wonders the same, the "Review changes" do not seems to
> concern
> > > > one
> > > > > > > > file but the whole pull request, there is a review checkbox,
> but it
> > > > > > > > seems to be personal, i checked the first o
t; >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 26/01/23 07:48, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In "Files changed" tab*, when you select a file, the "Review
> changes" button allows you to comment, approve or request changes on this
> file.
> > > > > > I guess "approve" is what you are looking for?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/517/files
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le 26/01/2023 à 17:26, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > > > > > > Does anyone know of a way in a GitHub PR that a reviewer can
> mark an
> > > > > > > individual file as reviewed-and-passed so that other reviewers
> can skip
> > > > > > > that file?
>
--
Daniel Watford
>>>>>> (no plugins yet) Codenarc, and that the build is successful under
> java
> >>>>>> 17.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/517#issuecomment-1398487745
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I tried to isolate rule fixes in separated commits, there are a lot
> (133
> >>>>>> commits), with some redundancy. But rebasing is not easy since
> files are
> >>>>>> modified by several rule fixing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Integration and unit test are ok. I did some manual testing when I
> got
> >>>>>> some doubt, but it could be nice to have some more eyes on the
> subject.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After reviewing process, and if everything is fine, should we commit
> >>>>>> that as a big squash ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WDYT
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Gil
>
--
Daniel Watford
/54c39963-3980-4ba9-be6e-0c016cdb3...@getmailspring.com/0?redirect=mailto%3Adouglas.melo98%40hotmail.com=ZGV2QG9mYml6LmFwYWNoZS5vcmc%3D
> )
> +55 28 99955-2528 (tel:+55%2028%2099955-2528)
>
>
--
Daniel Watford
nt me to an example in the existing code base that I can use
> as a reference model.
>
> thanks in advance
>
> Ernest
>
--
Daniel Watford
ground/history to why a particular approach, workaround or
compromise might have been implemented would be really helpful.
Thanks,
Dan.
--
Daniel Watford
ted.
--
Daniel Watford
+ '--add-exports=java.base/sun.util.calendar=ALL-UNNAMED', // OFBIZ-12721
> > +'--add-opens=java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED' // OFBIZ-12726
> > +]
> >
> > To release w/o the workarounds it is enough to remove the 2
> "ALL-UNNAMED" lines.
> >
> > It also would be great to freeze a 23.01 branch and use it as next demos
> while replacing the 18.12 by 22.01 as stable.
> >
> > Looking forward for opinions...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jacques
>
--
Daniel Watford
m 20.12.22 um 07:53 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
> >>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After Eugen suggested so, for few weeks now I'm using 7.6 and JDK
> 17 without any problems.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For that, we have OF
; Not yet, but it should be "soon" (ie in few weeks), hopefully using JDK 17
> and Gradle 7.6...
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 16/12/2022 à 10:12, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > The ofbiz project recently announced there would be no further releases
> for
> >
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
