Re: John McCreesh

I also heard about it and it's very sad to hear this. John was indeed a huge enrichment for the community ans he was a very pleasant person. I met him several times and worked with him in the community council in the former pre Apache era of OepnOffice. Juergen On 18/01/16 15:58, Simon Phipps wr

Re: Possible Mac problem 4.1.2

On 06/11/15 18:34, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > The same symptoms Juergen reports are also attributable to the absence of a > Java Runtime Environment (JRE) that AOO can use. That is, one can create a > new empty database .odb, but cannot open it, etc. > > That there are crashes without any repo

Re: Possible Mac problem 4.1.2

On 03/11/15 10:02, FR web forum wrote: >> Possible cross problem with mailmerge function. > Issue reported: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126623 > Maybe Mac users could be confirm or not? > I can confirm that there is a problem, an existing DB file can be opened but the existing table

Re: Remembering Ian Lynch in 4.1.2 announcement

On 28/10/15 09:41, JZA wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt > wrote: > >> On 27/10/15 23:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> I was wondering whether we should remember Ian Lynch at the end of the >>> 4.1.2 Release announcement, with a sent

Re: Remembering Ian Lynch in 4.1.2 announcement

On 27/10/15 23:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I was wondering whether we should remember Ian Lynch at the end of the > 4.1.2 Release announcement, with a sentence like > > "The OpenOffice community dedicates version 4.1.2 to the memory of Ian > Lynch, a member of the OpenOffice Project Management Co

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

On 27/10/15 17:45, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> >> checked the build in the morning and en-US built was successful. Besides >> the fact that we have some issues on newer Linux distros (we ever had) >> the src package is fin

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

On 26/10/15 15:05, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 26/10/15 12:17, Regina Henschel wrote: >> Hi Jürgen, >> >> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >>> On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote: >>>> [x] 0 Abstain >>>> >>>> It is still not clear,

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

On 26/10/15 12:17, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi Jürgen, > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> [x] 0 Abstain >>> >>> It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the >>> delivered source on

Re: Extra files in 4.1.2-RC3 source package

On 25/10/15 11:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Damjan reported an interesting finding a few hours ago: the source > package of OpenOffice 4.1.2-RC3 contains two extra files (which are not > in SVN) in "main/": MacOSXX64Env.Set and MacOSXX64Env.Set.sh. > > I've done a quick check and: > - The issue al

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

On 23/10/15 13:50, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > We have been in the Release Candidate stage for three weeks and it is > now time to start a VOTE for releasing OpenOffice 4.1.2. > > Source and binary packages for RC3 are available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/ > and the refere

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2

On 26/10/15 09:31, Regina Henschel wrote: > [x] 0 Abstain > > It is still not clear, whether the fact, that I cannot build the > delivered source on Windows 7 is a problem in my build environment or a > bug in the source. Regina I don't know why it doesn't build on your machine but I successfully

Re: [QUESTION] How Many Pre-Built Binaries are Enough?

On 21/10/15 09:55, Marcus wrote: > Am 10/21/2015 02:25 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >> I recently started a download of all of the AOO 4.1.2 rc2 candidates, >> then see how long it was going to take and let it run overnight. In >> the morning, the download had failed to get them all. >> >> What

Re: Incompatible change of oslFileError?

On 28/09/15 11:07, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> $ svn diff -c1705196 sal/inc/osl/file.h >> Index: sal/inc/osl/file.h >> === >> --- sal/inc/osl/file.h(revision 1705195) >> +++ sal/inc/osl/file.h(revision 1705196) >> @@ -132,6 +132

Re: [VOTE] Dennis Hamilton as new AOO Chair.

[X] +1, Dennis Hamilton as new Chair On 16/08/15 08:57, jan i wrote: > This is a call for a formal vote among the 1 candidate for the AOO Chair > role. > > Due to the fact that there are only 1 candidate we could use lazy > consensus, but since > some persons might be against that, we will use m

Re: [NOTICE] Windows build machine setted up

On 07/08/15 09:50, Michal Hriň wrote: > Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version > is > made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make > a > release candidate or started voting on a release candidate. > > Is this coordinated with the release ma

Re: STATE OF AOO: Overall Bugzilla Activity through July 2015

On 06/08/15 08:17, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > Thanks Dennis for doing that, great job. I agree we should look deeper into > what happened in 2015 only. > > Roberto > > 2015-08-06 4:56 GMT+02:00 Dennis E. Hamilton : > >> In looking for visible indicators of project activity, I created an >> overv

Re: [SOURCE]: build errors on MacOS

On 29/07/15 02:06, Jose R R wrote: > Niltze, Jürgen- > > > Building on Debian AMD66, after resolving multiple issues, build --all > *always* halts "at recompile with -fPIC" > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 27/07/15 17:40, Jü

Re: [SOURCE]: build errors on MacOS

On 27/07/15 17:40, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I thought it can be useful to do a build on MacOS to ensure that it sill > works on this platform ... > > The latest fixes for FreeBSD in coinmp break the build ... When I have > more time I will try to fix it. I would re

Re: [RELEASE] Availability of machines for binary builds

On 24/07/15 18:36, jan i wrote: > On Friday, July 24, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 18/07/2015 Davide Dozza wrote: >> >>> I have a vm with visual studio express 2008 I use to build AOO for >>> win7. It is accessible from Internet. I can support the building >>> process. >>> >> >> I expecte

[SOURCE]: build errors on MacOS

Hi, I thought it can be useful to do a build on MacOS to ensure that it sill works on this platform ... The latest fixes for FreeBSD in coinmp break the build ... When I have more time I will try to fix it. I would recommend to be careful with fixes for not release relevant platforms. Juergen -

Re: [RAT REPORT] - 30 files with an unknown or no License Header

On 11/06/15 18:23, jan i wrote: > On 8 June 2015 at 16:58, Regina Henschel wrote: > >> Hi Jürgen, >> >> is it OK to commit the patch? >> > if it not ok to commit the patch, then I wonder how the files was committed > in the first place. > > If it is not ok, then the files should be deleted. We c

interesting white paper from MS shared on the dev-de list

Hi, Joerg Schmidt shared an interesting whitepaper from Microsoft "White Paper: OpenOffice / LibreOffice Evaluation Criteria" on the dev-de list. I found it interesting and thought it can be of interest for others here as well. Juergen http://www.whymicrosoft.com/see-why/openoffice-evaluation-

Re: [RAT REPORT] - 30 files with an unknown or no License Header

On 06/05/15 14:45, jan i wrote: > On 6 May 2015 at 14:14, Gavin McDonald wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html >> >> shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers adding. >> >> A quick look shows to me that we should probably inse

Re: CVE-2015-1774: OpenOffice HWP Filter Remote Execution and DoS Vulnerability

On 29/04/15 21:53, Marcus wrote: > Am 04/29/2015 05:39 PM, schrieb jan i: >> On 29 April 2015 at 15:07, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti >>> wrote: >>> Simon Phipps wrote: > Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 8 and AOO

On 18/03/15 04:19, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 17 Mar 2015, at 20:41, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> >> The problems I've seen reported are apparently all on MacOS. Something >> about needing a legacy Java 6 to work and there is no way for the user to >> accomplish that, apparently. >> >>

Re: PMC FAQ update

On 05/03/15 15:04, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 05-03-2015, at 06:49, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:03 AM, jan i wrote: >> >>> On 5 March 2015 at 11:42, Simon Phipps wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Dave Barton wrote: > >> >>> On Mon, Feb

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On 19/02/15 20:57, Rob Weir wrote: > The page in question is here: > > http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html > > Voting choices are: [ ] Leave the page as it is. [X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken. [ ]

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On 19/02/15 22:38, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> Thread for discussion > > Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this > conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this: > > http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje > > [Andrea] The page provi

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

On 16/02/15 19:01, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > I'm just curious about these statements. Have potential new developers > remarked on this to you? > Since most IDEs support a variety of version control mechanisms, I'm > wondering how the suggestion to switch to git might have emerged. But, > again, I

Re: Looking for C++ APIs or Source code

On 05/02/15 04:19, BS, Nayana wrote: > HI, > > I am very new to AOO. > I want to develop a project to generate Excel report file. > I am planning to use NI-Labwindows platform to develop my project. if it > doesn't support then i will prefer to do with Visual Studio (VC++). > Can you please send

Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 30/01/15 19:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Who of the two candidates do you prefer to replace Andrea Pescetti as > the OpenOffice project PMC Chair? > [ ] Dennis E. Hamilton (orcmid) [X] Jan Iversen (jani) (binding) Juergen -

Re: [DISCUSS] Inappropriate "Compliance Costs"

On 29/01/15 19:19, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I didn't even know about this page, > , until I saw an update on > the Apache ooo-site SVN yesterday. I glanced at it and didn't think much > about it. > > Today, Simon Phipps has pointed out how

Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 15/01/15 01:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 31 December 2014 I wrote to this list that I would be available to > resign from the Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair position as soon as a > successor could be elected. We had nominations and long discussions and > in the end we have one candidate availabl

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 20/01/15 00:29, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:32, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> I am probably seeming very disagreeable here. > Nope. You'll have to try harder :-) > > More seriously, you point to a flaw that was not evident on an abstract level > but was in practice. I had

Re: Nominations for a new PMC Chair

then > reporting becomes a team work and can be much better than what we have > done so far. > > The 6 nominees so far are, in alphabetical order: > - janiJan Iversen > - jsc Jürgen Schmidt > - kschenk Kay Schenk > - louis Louis Suarez-Potts > - marcus M

Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On 16/12/14 16:02, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I have built the release on private machines. Means a local windows build >> machine, local Linux CentOS build VMs and of course my Mac prepared with >> the proper baseline. > > And you are volun

Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On 14/12/14 10:10, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote: >> On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Very honestly, I would like that we don't depend on individuals for >>> project resources, but maybe it is easier for a developer to share an >>> existing virtual mac

Re: Java 32

On 10/12/14 08:22, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 + > Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> >> >> On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: > Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:

Re: Signing AOO 4.1.1 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter)

On 09/12/14 09:17, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> We had a signing mechanism in place for a long time and the reason why >> we have currently no digital signing is the lack of a certificate where >> we as project (PMC) or as representative the releas

Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On 08/12/14 20:15, jan i wrote: > On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100 >> Marcus wrote: >> >>> Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800 Kay Schenk wrote: > And, I didn't review the

Re: Signing AOO 4.1.1 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter)

On 09/12/14 03:29, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I don't know if this is helpful or not. I'm not in a position to check. > > Thinking out loud: > > There are two cases of signatures. > > 1. Digital signing of installable components, such as DLLs and such. This > is also important but a second-

Re: opengrok.

On 08/12/14 12:42, jan i wrote: > On 8 December 2014 at 11:24, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 06/12/14 00:49, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/05/2014 04:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote: >>>>> H

Re: opengrok.

On 06/12/14 00:49, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 12/05/2014 04:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of >>> opengrok. >>&

Re: opengrok.

On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote: > Hi all. > > I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of > opengrok. > > Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? sure, I have it running on a private internal server. What exactly do you need to know. As far as I remember i

Re: Another Basic Function that doesn't Work!!

On 01/12/14 22:33, Darren Myers wrote: > Thank you that worked! > > Very frustrated why Can't that be set as a default... its such a common task > to find and replace.?? as far as I know regular expression search is not on by default. And if I search January 2014 and try to replace it with Dece

Re: I would like to give the Mac Buildbot a try

On 21/11/14 11:16, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi at all > > I would like to give the Mac Buildbot a try. Therefor I ask here for what do you mean? We are waiting on some feedback from Andrew Rist who planned to work on the setup of our build env. I offered my help and be in standby mode ... Once t

Re: Problem with pootle

On 19/11/14 18:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 18/11/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I simply forgot it and have this step not on my list. Maybe we can add >> it on https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_for_developers to be >> aware of this step in the future. > &

Re: Problem with pootle

On 18/11/14 15:02, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 18/11/14 11:36, jan i wrote: >> On 17 November 2014 23:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> Vladislav Stevanovic wrote: >>> >>>> I can not open some a page with untranslated words on Pootle (

Re: Problem with pootle

On 18/11/14 11:36, jan i wrote: > On 17 November 2014 23:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> Vladislav Stevanovic wrote: >> >>> I can not open some a page with untranslated words on Pootle (for >>> Serbian). >>> Is there some problem? >>> >> >> Assuming you mean this page >> https://translate.apach

Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

On 13/11/14 17:23, Malte Timmermann wrote: > Hi Louis, > > On 28.10.2014 21:12, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> Hi Malte, >> >>> And you are right wrt many early developers working for Open-Xchange >>> now :) >> >> Yes, and perhaps one day we’ll even see something (I joke; there is >> already so

Re: AOO mailing list subscription totals, and other tidbits

On 12/11/14 20:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > jan i wrote: >> On 12 November 2014 15:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> It's sometimes very interesting and there are some more numbers > > Mailing list numbers are very good. The announce list, if I recall > correctly, us

Re: AOO mailing list subscription totals, and other tidbits

On 12/11/14 14:55, jan i wrote: > On 12 November 2014 00:30, Dave Barton wrote: > >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> Here's the current total subscribers for the AOO mailing lists I >> moderate: >>> >>> announce 11,318 >>> users 584 >>> dev 499 >>> qa 277 >>> l10n 233 >>> marketing 173 >>> api 149 >>> >>> (I

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 07/11/14 23:27, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 31/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125810 >> too late, now where I was aware of this request I did it already > > Good, tha

Re: [Pootle] Lost in translation

On 05/11/14 12:08, FR web forum wrote: > Hello dev team, > On Pootle, in sd/source/ui/accessibility.po > We find some strange strings like: > accessibility.src#SID_SD_A11Y_P_NOTES_D.string.text / PresentationNotesShape > accessibility.src#SID_SD_A11Y_P_UNKNOWN_N.string.text / > UnknownAccessiblePr

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 28/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Concrete example: http://markmail.org/message/usn5khq3imrdibzq Sinhala >>> (si) was requested two weeks ago and >>> http://svn.apach

Re: Latest survey data on OpenOffice user

On 29/10/14 13:40, Rob Weir wrote: > New post on my personal blog which may be of interest to the AOO community: > > http://www.robweir.com/blog/2014/10/the-power-of-brand-and-the-power-of-product-redux.html > > This gives updated survey results (the 5th time I've done this survey) > looking at O

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 28/10/14 18:07, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 10/28/2014 01:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or >>>> inter

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or >> interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages >> where nobody is working on? I don't get it. > > T

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

On 24/10/14 20:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote: >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release > > I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release > and actually the two can work together really well. > > I would like to streamline our processes and remove bot

Re: Good news! We now have a Mac OSX buildbot!

On 26/10/14 09:34, Marcus wrote: > Am 10/24/2014 10:19 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902 > > Hurray, long-term goal fulfilled. :-) Andrew Rist is as far as I know working on it ... the news is 2 weeks old or so but promising that we will have a build bot

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote: > On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have. >> >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: >> >> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of >> course dictionary upd

Re: the question about installing OO‘ sdk

On 24/10/14 07:22, soyol aron wrote: > Hi all, > I have some question about installing OO‘ sdk. I know that this topic is > might not be appropriate for discussing at here. But I can't subscribe to > the a...@openoffice.apache.org, It always return me the message like below > at the step I confirm

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > >> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de] > >> Being a customer, I do see things differently. >> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF. > > theoretically correct, but practically? > >> One day in future LO will save ODF as a secon

Re: Improved OOXML support?

On 23/10/14 07:02, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:13 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Improved OOXML support? >> >> With regard to the quotation from me, yes, it is possible to >> find

Re: Concerns about the AOO community

On 21/10/14 18:00, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote: > For instance, here: > >> In other words, for some reason, development of OpenOffice has all but > stalled, while LibreOffice remains an active project. > > Much of OpenOffice's recent decline may be due to IBM's withdrawal from the > project. OpenOffice

Re: Improved OOXML support?

On 21/10/14 08:34, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone know when the integration of the extended OOXML filter > functionality will be completed in AOO? > > I mean the enhancements that have been created within a project of the OSBA: > http://www.osb-alliance.de/en/working-groups/wg-of

Re: Recommend to extend the AOO 4.1.1 release notes based on tests on Windows 2012

On 20/10/14 14:24, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I will add >> a note to the release notes of AOO 4.1.1 that we have verified the >> support of Windows 2012 server on the same level as for AOO 3.4.1. > > Thanks, and please update > http://www.

Re: Recommend to extend the AOO 4.1.1 release notes based on tests on Windows 2012

On 17/10/14 13:24, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 17/10/14 11:13, Yuzhen Fan wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> During AOO 4.1.1 full regression test, I did basic tests on Windows 2012 >> and get them passed. In order to get sufficient tests to extend the release >> notes for

Re: Recommend to extend the AOO 4.1.1 release notes based on tests on Windows 2012

On 17/10/14 11:13, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > Hi All, > > During AOO 4.1.1 full regression test, I did basic tests on Windows 2012 > and get them passed. In order to get sufficient tests to extend the release > notes for 4.1.1, Juergen Meyer has executed further expended tests. The > result is positive a

Re: Build System Improvements

On 17/10/14 09:32, Andre Fischer wrote: > As you may know, in the past years I have made a couple of experiments > regarding the > build system of AOO. With the resulting experience I > would now like to start to work on improving the build system. I have > in mind a > "soft conversion" that grad

Re: Hunspell improvement idea for italic (foreign) words

On 10/10/14 04:42, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: > Hi! > > Microsoft Office 2010 suggests words to be changed to italic if they are > foreign, at least for Portuguese. > > For example: "e-mail" in Portuguese would be written in italic: "/e-mail/". > > I was wondering if this could be implemented into H

Re: October Board report (draft)

On 08/10/14 14:18, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > The report for July, August and September is available in draft at > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2014+Oct > > Feel free to complete and make corrections. It is due soon. it looks good to me and I have nothing to add Juergen

Re: release manager for the next release

On 07/10/14 08:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 07/10/14 00:54, Andrew Rist wrote: >> >> On 10/4/2014 1:57 AM, jan i wrote: >>> Thanks jürgen for the work you have done. >>> >>> making a mac bot a priority seems to be easier said than done. We have had &g

Re: release manager for the next release

On 07/10/14 00:54, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 10/4/2014 1:57 AM, jan i wrote: >> Thanks jürgen for the work you have done. >> >> making a mac bot a priority seems to be easier said than done. We have had >> a ticket open with infra for more than 2 years, and despite many pokes from >> arist and mys

Re: release manager for the next release

On 05/10/14 19:06, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 2:21 AM, jan i wrote: > >> On 4 October 2014 22:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> On 04/10/2014 jan i wrote: >>> Thanks jürgen for the work you have done. >>> >>> Sure, thanks Juergen for being a great, reliable and patient

Re: release manager for the next release

On 02/10/14 14:33, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after a longer vacation and some silence in the past weeks I would like >> to discuss the release manager role. >> >> I think it's time that s

Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

On 01/10/14 12:19, Carl Marcum wrote: > > On 10/01/2014 02:25 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 01/10/14 02:19, Carl Marcum wrote: >>> Amenel, >>> >>> I am cross posting to dev since the original message didn't get copied: >>> >>> On 09

Re: Concerns about the AOO community

On 02/10/14 01:44, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> On G+ I have hold a conversation with Bruce Byfield and Jos from KDE >> about the continuation of the Apache OpenOffice community and how the >> way that the community has enter lately into a dormant

Re: create instance of XTextTable service c++

On 02/10/14 10:21, Semen Gubarev wrote: > Hello, > I trying to create simple executable application for connect to OpenOffice > 4.1.1 and create table in writer. > I successfully create connection with OpenOffice and do some work (like > insert texts), but I can't create a table. > I have a problem

release manager for the next release

Hi, after a longer vacation and some silence in the past weeks I would like to discuss the release manager role. I think it's time that somebody else takes over this role and drives active the next release. I did it since the beginning of OpenOffice at Apache but I think it is a good opportunity

Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

On 01/10/14 02:19, Carl Marcum wrote: > Amenel, > > I am cross posting to dev since the original message didn't get copied: > > On 09/30/2014 09:39 AM, Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote: >> Hi Carl, >> I don't know whether it was intended behavior or not. I have ran into >> this problem in an extension that

Re: API for sidebar

On 28/08/14 18:40, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > I have been asked by a user of the en-Forum if I knew of a section of the API > which dealt with the Sidebar. I found bits and pieces, but rather expected > that there might be a draft addition to the API documentation? Is there such? > > I should say

[INFO] Your project is a "Project of the Week" on SourceForge!

Hi, I am a project owner of the AOO project at SourceForge that is mainly used to handle the binary artifacts for our releases. You know I do the upload of the binaries etc. I was informed that AOO was one of the projects of the week. And I thought it is worth to share it with you. ###

Re: We need some BZ changes now that 4.1.1. is out

On 26/08/14 00:22, Kay Schenk wrote: > Someone needs to add 4.1.1 to the version field for BZ. > > Apparently, I don't have the karma for this. :/ > I have added 4.1.1 to hopefully all relevant projects Juergen - To unsubscrib

Re: Packages from Unofficial Apache OO Debian repository updated to version 4.1.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 25/08/14 17:05, Marcelo Santana wrote: > Hi all, > > The unofficial Apache OO Debian repository was updated and from now > it provides the version 4.1.1 of Apache Openoffice with all > available languages. > > All information needed for new ins

Re: Setting buildbot back to trunk

On 25/08/14 14:23, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > version 4.1.1 is out. Can someone please set a Windows buildbot back to > trunk? aoo-win7 fails currently anyway. I believe Herbert has already done it but not 100% sure, he is on vacation this week. Will try to check ... I am still not very fam

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 21/08/14 13:46, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.08.2014 13:31, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 21/08/2014 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >>> Can someone take care of the "head line" which is currently "New: Apache >>> OpenOffice 4.1.0 released!" after Jürgen has announced 4.1.1? >> >>

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 21/08/14 13:29, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 21/08/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I plan the following email for 2:00pm today on announce@openoffice + >> announce@apache > > I agree with the other proposed changes too, but I'm replying to this > message for eas

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 21/08/14 11:28, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > sounds good from my point of view. > > Please see below for one suggestion and one correction > > > Best regards, Oliver. > > On 21.08.2014 11:18, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >>

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 21/08/14 11:34, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:18:13 +0200 > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I plan the following email for 2:00pm today on announce@openoffice + >> announce@apache >> >> ### >> The Apache

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

Hi, I plan the following email for 2:00pm today on announce@openoffice + announce@apache ### The Apache OpenOffice project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of OpenOffice 4.1.1. You can download it from our website [1]. Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 is a micro update with many useful

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 21/08/14 09:24, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.08.2014 01:06, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >> wrote: >> >>> On 20/08/14 17:07, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >&

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 20/08/14 17:07, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 20.08.2014 14:34, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 20/08/14 01:24, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> 3. updating the OpenOffice portal page (www.openoffice.org) and >>

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 20/08/14 01:24, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 08/19/2014 07:10 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >> On 08/19/2014 05:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the vote for our upcoming AOO 4.1.1 release ended today successfully. >>> Tha

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 20/08/14 09:42, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 19/08/14 20:43, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 19/08/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>>> Things to do: >> >> No Release Notes? Not even a short text like > > sure and we have already a page for it. I had it in

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 19/08/14 20:43, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 19/08/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> Things to do: > > No Release Notes? Not even a short text like sure and we have already a page for it. I had it in mind but forget to list it. It should be finalized. > > https://

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 19/08/14 14:14, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 19/08/14 14:00, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the vote for our upcoming AOO 4.1.1 release ended today successfully. >> That means we can continue with the final preparation and can plan to >> release on Thurs

Re: [RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

On 19/08/14 14:00, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > the vote for our upcoming AOO 4.1.1 release ended today successfully. > That means we can continue with the final preparation and can plan to > release on Thursday August 21th. Or does anything prevent us from this date? > &

[RELEASE]: final preparation for AOO 4.1.1

Hi, the vote for our upcoming AOO 4.1.1 release ended today successfully. That means we can continue with the final preparation and can plan to release on Thursday August 21th. Or does anything prevent us from this date? Things to do: 1. upload the release bits to dist and to the SourceForge mirr

[RESULT][VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 (RC3)

Peli Olega +1 Nitya On 15/08/14 09:15, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 > > The vote starts now and will be open until: > >Tuesday, 19 August: 2014-08-19 12:00am UTC+2. > > We invite all people to vote (non

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >