akarta)
>> due to a lack of contributors / resources to ramp up updated versions
>> in Geronimo.
>>
>> I have no strong opinion about switching the project umbrella as it
>> wouldn't change anything regarding contributions, I guess.
>>
>> Gruß
>> Richa
Hi,
Did you try handling LITERAL+ capability (1)? I don't think we do as of
today.
(1)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7888#:~:text=LITERAL%2B%20allows%20the%20alternate%20form%20of%20literals%20(called%20%22non%2D,are%204096%20bytes%20or%20less
.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <ht
If not crazy can be great to avoid to need to rereleasz just for that else
ok for me.
Le mer. 6 avr. 2022 à 21:48, Jean-Louis Monteiro
a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> while working on the TomEE TCK, I realized BVal was not supporting XML
> configuration because of the way we handle XML Namespaces.
>
> We
it is what it means
concretely.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/
ave to go that way at some point anyway, ideas welcomed.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://w
Let say it enables more control whereas this kind of toggle system
properties can be random when apps don't need the same (once again it is
functional and not about perf there).
Feel free to take back my PR, was just sharing the idea with code to try to
fix it together faster.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Send a PR with the "SPI" option which enables to have this toggle *at will*
and drop it when not desired anymore without any config.
Hope it illustrates better than words one toggle option which
wouldnt depend on the env.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannib
createPointerFactory(mapWithToggle) so it is a
global flag which means it breaks some deployments anyway - at least at
tomee level - when > 1 app is deployed (or >= 1 app + 1 extension).
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi JL,
> &
r everyone for literally 0 gain IMHO.
Hope it makes sense.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
Link
Hi Ivan
You can set it with a cxf interceptor or even jaxrs filter but looks like a
bug, at least the default. Default should be true only if there is no
custom mapper, not if there is any registered mapper matching and this is
known at deploy time. Guess you should open a ticket.
Le mer. 25
issues to version Health_1.0.3
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO/fixforversion/12346154>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:00 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
>
Hi JL
AFAIK the missing impl are mainly fault tolerance 2 (which adds
completionstage support we already have), opentracing 1.3 (which is sadly
just minor fixes compared to others and no opentracing upgrade IIRC), and
metrics 2 (which mainly split counters in 2 entities). Other specs are
ready I
TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or
> do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead?
>
> thoughts?
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wro
As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it sounds ok
for me.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://git
We cant, only impl+api are certified so no issue ;)
Le mer. 4 sept. 2019 à 17:01, Jean-Louis Monteiro
a écrit :
> I'd like to certify some of them if possible of course.
>
> Le mer. 4 sept. 2019 à 15:33, Romain Manni-Bucau
> a écrit :
>
>> Not sure I'm following Mar
Not sure I'm following Mark, EPL is fine for us (
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html) and G spec jars are not
officially certified so don't change of license anytime.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>
@Mark: didn't change with jakarta donation? can you open a ticket on
jakartee tracker please?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
if system
props/SPI enable to switch it since it enables to make fatjars smooths
without configs and to ensure we load the right default but it is really a
single string so can be discussed.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.met
No I guess it was right, "that are" ;) = fork @G only when we need to
change some impl/default provider.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>
go ahead
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
MP license is ok (Apache2) but Jakarta is EPLs so keeps the ambiguity for
us.
That said it is good to reuse the same GAV for end users so we might ask
jakarta to double license its api jars?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
gt; depends what their license is. EPL is (weak) copyleft. Thus I would like
>> to avoid exposing it downstream as api.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> > Am 03.09.2019 um 16:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>
If we still can't reuse jakata artifacts (their license is ok and there is
no impl reference inside so we should just use them, right?) it sounds
natural
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
was planned, we were waiting Mark green light IIRC
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn &
Hi JL,
Not sure if you need it - which can make us reconsider it - but long story
short it is superseeded by capabilities on modern OSGi containers so all
done in the pom.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>
Hi everybody
Last m3 depends on a phantom bval release breaking dependency management
it seems.
Was it identified/communicated?
wasn't able to make it work.
>
> I will have a look at it again this week, if I have improvement I will let
> you know.
>
> If you have any other tips let me know.
>
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:25 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
&g
Hi Ivan
Did you debug ZipkinHttp?
Depending your server/app config you can need some config like providers
etc. This class is a good start to check what is happening.
A good config start is
https://github.com/jeanouii/microprofile-samples/blob/master/docker-compose.yaml
- you can need to inline
Cxf rest cdi extension leaks beans, think i opened n issue last week or the
week before about it. Dropping the static from the extension fixes that.
Guess it was done as a workaround for ears but probably better to use
another mecanism like the one of deltaspike or just not do it.
Le mar. 12
gth": 2147483647,
> "minLength": 0,
> "nullable": false,
> "readOnly": false,
> "type": "string",
> "uniqueItems": false,
>
.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<htt
Yes Ivan, array mapping is in progress. In the meantime you can define your
schema to ensure you control it and the implicit representation does not
depends on the way the impl parses it - which can not match your underlying
mapper.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
Hi Ivan,
Did you test on the snapshot? we got some enhancements about it.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
Hey, just recalled we had a flag about it,
you can skip it setting openejb.cxf-rs.cache-application=false
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &
.
Enhancing TomEE to no do it anymore or not use a wrapper when not needed
can be a first step fixing that.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &
for instance) and
forcing geronimo.opentracing.filter.active to false for the webapp (not
globally). Setting the system property you should get the same behavior but
it will be global so some app will not get tracing.
In other word it is the core work tomee must do: integration :).
Romain Manni-Bucau
If Roberto agrees +1
Le ven. 11 janv. 2019 20:29, Gurkan Erdogdu a écrit :
> Hi folks
> Regarding TomEE, we need to add Java EE Security, JSR-375 spec to
> geronimo-specs and needs a release. I have committer access to
> geronimo-specs and added to code (implemented by Roberto Cortez in
>
that yaml is supposed to be the default then we are in a grey
enough area to make you happy ;). Worse case we would revert it but it is
not a prod usage for sure so no big deal for now.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.met
Hello
If it helps there are twi things to consider:
1. When we supported ee7 we made most of these descriptors at lowest cost
which means we mainly let them pass and sometimes ignore some model part
not used at runtime and let the actual runtime lib read it (typically jsf)
2. All the current
If it helps I have an antora setup ([1]) to generate another doc site with
most of these features - think only the day/night thing is missing, it uses
tags to manage versions - overridable by branches.
Side note: when we did the new site we decided to not merge with the old
one cause too much
ill open about this issue that can
> update or not later the fix in the TCK.
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-open-api/issues/228
> [2] https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-open-api/issues/302
>
>
> El vie., 30 nov. 2018 a las 10:49, Romain Manni-Bu
current impl not compliant?
>
> Like I said yaml is not default and that diverges from the spec. Adding
> yaml as default if we add jackson yaml won't make it default as well, it
> will be still an alternative.
>
Ok, then this is this assumption which is wrong and where this thread
beca
Ok, will repeat a third time hoping it is a mail crossing issue: why is
current impl not compliant?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
for
"other$" reasons.
Also note that, as I mentionned, the implementation is now compliant to the
spec, so not really sure the follow up to give to that topic.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.me
to be compatible, this is what has been done in TomEE since
years and it works well making users happy rather than spec leads.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g
If jackson yaml is present it will add a (jackson) writer for yaml, if not
it stays on json.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g
'm
in this last partbeing said at the end you can't rely on the history
whatever effort you put in the writing of it). I have a colleague who is
quite interesting on that, he says "I squash 'fix typo' commits only".
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitte
I'll add */* for yaml endpoint to complement text/plain, this will solve
the ambiguity
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm
mo/microprofile/openapi/jaxrs/OpenAPIFilter.java#L57
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 3:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
>> Response is fine (thanks jaxrs), request is up to jaxrs runtime so
>> depends where you deploy it (i dont think implementing a custom writer for
>> that is
Response is fine (thanks jaxrs), request is up to jaxrs runtime so depends
where you deploy it (i dont think implementing a custom writer for that is
right for users, it has too much pitfalls once integrated to anything else
than this very specific spec).
Le jeu. 29 nov. 2018 21:39, Jonathan
Nov 29, 2018 at 11:03 AM Ivan Junckes Filho >
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Romain, take a look on:
> >
> >
> >
> https://download.eclipse.org/microprofile/microprofile-open-api-1.0/microprofile-openapi-spec.html#_content_format
> >
> > It is clear for me there,
ver be) so no reason to import a
lib (which can be heavy and potentially with vulnerabilities + work for the
users to maintain it) for that.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordp
it on your side, did you set the system
property geronimo.metrics.jaxrs.activated=true
?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm
Hello Bruno,
I put some suggestions on the PR, hope it helps.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn &
@Bruno: note that this is not what we are doing, I'm just mentionning that
TomEE does not need that and that there is no need to put any pressure
either on TomEE or Geronimo in such situation since everything is good on
both side in current state.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <ht
+0 (this is only for error cases as far as i saw and a few concatenations
so you don't see the diff in practise + the compiler is able to optimize it
and even replace string builder when relevant these days)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
ers.
>
> Bruno Baptista
> https://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
>
> On 23/11/18 15:41, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Le ven. 23 nov. 2018 à 16:34, Bruno Baptista a
> écrit :
> >
> >> Hi Romain,
> >>
> >> About "The point is not the cdi bean but t
Hi Ferdi,
surefire got some "hiccup" in last versions, maybe try 3.0.0-M1 or or
2.22.1 which should work, if not the output dump can help sometimes to
identify if it is a memory issue or (more likely) another one.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
/community/index.adoc).
And yes we never used develop branch, only master.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc
Hello
Quick recommandation for such a very valuable feedback is to make it a
contribution doing a PR on http://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator
and let tomee community promote it live asap. Also it encourages it to be
part of the community work quickly and avoid it to be lost.
This way you
Hi Ivan
TCK are in geronimo and they use arquillian, tomee just reapplies them to
check the packaging does not break anything and its classloading is fine as
well so you can write tests the same.
Le ven. 23 nov. 2018 19:51, Ivan Junckes Filho a
écrit :
> Hello guys, I did a change on
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/4c7fd4af95983a92bef89dc598873310dd13dd2e/server/openejb-cxf-rs/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/johnzon/JsonbJaxrsProviderTest.java
was supposed to cover that
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
the default executor as being lazy
3. we assume safeguard will not impact an app not using it
==> you must ensure that 3 didnt trigger an executor creation, it is fine
to rely on 1+2 (which means so "main" code)
>
> Cheers
>
> Bruno Baptista
> https://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
cify he wants safeguard to use the executor
"'mysafeguardexecutor".
This is why the config is important and I mentionned it early even if it is
not the most sexy part to do, I agree.
>
> Cheers
>
> Bruno Baptista
> https://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
>
> On 23/1
hich is quite
ridiculous when you think about it for something about failt tolerance.
This is why it should be in before next release. Now if you do the PR next
week it is fine, was not to do it today but to ensure it is not merged and
the enthusiasm makes it forgotten.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmann
Hi César
Not sure the snapshot was deployed, maybe build it locally
JL's fix does not change that error which is an outdated api in the server.
Le ven. 23 nov. 2018 03:58, César Hernández Mendoza
a écrit :
> Hi,
> I updated my PR [1], the previous exception is no longer appearing since
> I'm
eated the PR but the
>>> microprofile metrics TCK seems to be broken on TomEE, so I am not sure if
>>> the PR is reliable.
>>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/2
>>>
>>> I will try to check what is going on with the TCK on TomEE,
modify the classloader by default at
the beginning of the review and just reuse the system classpath. The
intention was to make this custom loader behave the same as the child first
one but guess it was never aligned.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
Hi Ivan
It is a bug in tomee scanning I think
Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 21:35, Ivan Junckes Filho a
écrit :
> Hey guys, I was writing an example of metrics gauge (WIP).
>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/213
>
> And I found a bug when trying access a gauge with "Accept:
> application/json".
dency free since the spec does nothing much compared to
the jvm itself.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
Lin
Ok so MP decided to be bloated as the old ee so we will get a light impl
@geronimo - likely next year. Anyone wants to lead it since you asked?
Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 13:44, Romain Manni-Bucau a
écrit :
> Hi Otavio,
>
> none yet and the existing ones are either bloated or don't integ
been fixed for microprofile metrics 2.x
> release [1] [2] as we are speaking.
>
> [1] https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-metrics/pull/309
> [2] https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-metrics/issues/290
>
>
> El lun., 19 nov. 2018 a las 23:52, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> r
..@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> >
> >> > > I'm following this thread with some interest. What would be some
> good
> >> > tests
> >> > > to make sure these cases are covered off? Some suggestions in
> >> addition to
> >> > > the existing test:
> >
What about a bot polling tweets in a github repo - with a scheduled date
for instance? Then PR would be welcomed ;). Just needs a server (or even a
free heroku pby or openshift).
Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 18:57, David Blevins a
écrit :
> I would trust Mark Struberg with access to the twitter account
Hi Otavio,
none yet and the existing ones are either bloated or don't integrate well
in any existing stack :(
FYI the reason it is not @geronimo:
https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile/issues/57
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
Probably worth a read:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-next-tomee-version-targetting-EE-7-td4674650.html
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Java-EE-version-Alignment-Troubles-td4674796.html
And related if you still feel motivated by reading after these pages ;)
Le mar. 20
Hi César,
Did you test passing accept header or just in the browser which sends json
and text as acceptable value so resolution can be not that deterministic
using it - but this is the request so all fine ;).
The last side note is prometheus does not support monotonic=false (small
glitch in the
tomee/commit/23f44b17e6ab504561f32aa4ae92f2521e07261e
> However, the problem is before that... The test with the interceptor,
> somehow fails to load the alternative, which has me very puzzled.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Bruno Baptista
> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
>
> On 19/11/18 16:45, Romain Man
n as the injection mystery
> is solved. Any feedback on the injection of the alternative bean will be
> appreciated because I'm kind of stuck now.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Bruno Baptista
> > http://twitter.com/brunobat_
> >
> >
> > On 19/11/18 15
ode this bean themselves to control it I think.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://w
() {
@Override // hardcoded impl for testing purposes
public Object execute(final InvocationContext invocationContext) {
return "replaced";
}
};
}
}
Side note: did you want to use @Resource for the executor injection?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibu
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<htt
Hi Bruno,
it is a palin bean so @Specializes works, did you put it on the method?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm
The full tomee build does not rely on modules even ran with java11 so it
does not surprises me much.
Try to create a new project and require openejb-core module for instance.
Will be enough to check
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
Hey JL, did you check these names are valid? Think the - can be an issue
(jdk.internal.module.Checks#requireModuleName)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g
Hi JL,
did you mean 2.3.0.1? 2.3.1 does not exist under these coordinates
also take care it is built with java 9 so maybe not what we want to deliver
in tomee
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
I'm running cxf under java 11 since some time now so it can be important in
that work to split the statements between "it runs on java11" and "it uses
java11 natively" - which is not done by any lib today AFAIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rman
Side note: tomee already supports it - or any fancy pool - through resource
definition
Le lun. 12 nov. 2018 22:29, Jonathan Gallimore
a écrit :
> Yeah, I saw that a while back and thought it was interesting. I'd be
> interested in adding support for it in TomEE.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018
- if needed).
Overall point was to not lock an ecosystem for features not used in half of
it. Commons-[pool|dbcp] is not required dependency of openjpa so shouldnt
block its release and if it does we must work to fix that issue IMHO.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
f OpenJPA hacking.
> One of the tasks is to also support xbean-asm7.
> That should go into openjpa-3.0.1.
>
> What is the timeframe we want to target?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 09.11.2018 um 14:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >:
> >
> > I don't h
I don't have the list handy but tomee will need at least some --add-opens
etc to run on java11 (you can add it in setenv.sh) - likely for unsafe and
the agent.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
Hi JL
Openjpa needs xbean upgrade but should be quick. Cxf stack needs some jaxb
upgrades from memory. After the stack "supports" java11 as "run it" but
think no spec in EE is java >= 9 compatible (modules, spi etc).
Should be enough for tomee that said.
Le jeu. 8 nov. 2018 20:27, Jean-Louis
The built-in apps should have a MP config entry with the
value geronimo.opentracing.filter.active=false, you can workaround it
adding in the exploded webapp a
WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/microprofile-config.properties with this value
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibu
s efforts, but this has probably contributed to some confusion. I
> would suggest we continue this over on the Geronimo and OWB lists to avoid
> further confusion.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:46 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Yes t
erBasedProducer class, and
> that looks like a security issue.
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:56 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > yes and no, idea is to be fast and for all producers it works except the
> > principal which i
It is mainly about ensuring it is ok then merge yes
The jfx tests are not executed if not configured as such, the flag does it
If I got it right
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol
merge this in with confidence, and without the tests I
> don't
> > see how we can do that.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:35 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> &
PR and potentially do the javafx
setup it would be awesome.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedI
/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/TckSecurityService.java
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.
Did you try a semaphore waiting all tasks are done? It likely also needs a
boolean to prevent new submissions before starting waiting for completion.
Side note: @Schedule sounds not bad for your use case ;)
Le lun. 29 oct. 2018 20:55, ChrisOwens a écrit :
> This is with TomEE plus 7.0.5
>
>
1 - 100 of 1698 matches
Mail list logo
