--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 18:41, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > I'm attempting to fix pageflipping in certain mergedfb modes.
> right
> > now it only works in when crtc2 is right of crtc1. I suspect the
> > problem has t
FWIW, the 2D drivers from the trunk and the code drop from VIA are VERY
different. I'm not sure where you are seeing the conflicts... just an
FYI...
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I was going to merge trunk to the savage-1_0_0-branch, since
> updates to the savage driver in tr
xfree86 and DRI CVS have 2D support for m10 already. 3D is not
possible as no one has sponsored development of an opensource driver
and no one has the databooks for the r300 yet. So, if you want 3D,
you'll have to use the ati binary driver.
Alex
--- Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who
--- Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alex Deucher wrote (on Sat, 4 Oct 2003 at 08:49 -0700):
>
> > xfree86 and DRI CVS have 2D support for m10 already. 3D is not
> > possible as no one has sponsored development of an opensource
> driver
> >
I just commited mergedfb to DRI cvs. Let me know if there are any
problems.
Alex
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
---
This sf.net email is spon
Sorry, I forgot to post a patch of what went in. I committed this
patch:
http://www.botchco.com/alex/radeon/mergedfb/cvs/DRI/final/mergedfb-dri.diff
Alex
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
Yeah. I'll work on that this week unless anyone has any objections.
Alex
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:40:23PM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Log message:
> > Add Merged Framebuffer (MergedFB) support to the radeon dr
/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_cursor.c,v 1.25
2003/08/29 21:07:57 tsi Exp $ */
thanks,
Alex
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:40:23PM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Log message:
> > Add Merged Framebuffer (MergedFB) support
it's be nice if we could merge radeon and r200 into one driver when we
did this as well.
Alex
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:53:29AM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am trying to merge the r200 driver from dri-cvs to mesa-miniglx,
> > final
that's my fault. there's a small bug that I missed that breaks Xv in
non-mergedfb mode. I have the fix. it will be committed ASAP.
Alex
--- Stefan Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> if I try to use Xv (via mplayer, or with xawtv using the v4l-module)
> with current cvs (trunk) the X se
A fix just went into xfree86 CVS earlier today that fixed several
things related to Xv on i8xx hardware. that code hasn't been synced
with DRI CVS yet. I don't have intel hardware so I can't test. The
problem with Xv on radeon was a bug in my mergedfb code, but it's fixed
now.
Alex
--- Linus T
I recently synced up my DRI tree with Hui's latest patch from xfree86
cvs. I need the DVI code for my new 9200. Would anyone object to me
adding this to DRI cvs? I'm using it now with no problems so far.
Thanks,
Alex
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - w
I just got my 9200 up and running but I'm seeing some weird behavior.
3d works fine if I run in single head mode. however, if I run with
mergedfb I get weird corruption in fullscreen apps like screen savers.
for example, if I run the atlantis screen saver, there appears to be
"junk" from previou
Well, I solved the problem...sort of... it happens when I'm using a
merged mode that's 2048 wide. Does anyone know why there would be
corruption at 2048x768 (2 heads of 1024x768)? Has anyone tried a
single head at 2048x1536? Mergedfb works at 2048x768, it just shows
that corruption I described b
Further info on this. Not all GL apps are affected. I've only tried
xscreensavers. of the GL screensavers most show that corruption I
spoke of, but some seem unaffected (many from the rss package:
http://rss-glx.sourceforge.net/).
Those that work:
BusySpheres
Cage
Colorfire
Hufos smoke
hufos tu
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 17:27, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Well, I solved the problem...sort of... it happens when I'm using a
> > merged mode that's 2048 wide. Does anyone know why there would be
> > corruption at
You can have as big a virtual desktop as you want so long as the total
3D contexts are not greater than 2048 in either direction.
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 01:26, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I just committed a major rework of mergedfb to CVS. almost all of the
code is now in radeon_mergedfb.c/h. I also committed Hui's latest code
drop from xfree86 CVS. Let me know if anyone has any problems.
Alex
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with impro
le
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o is unresolved!
> > Symbol RADEONGenerateModeList from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o is unresolved!
> > Symbol RADEONSetCursorPositionMerged from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o is unresol
lution of 1152x864 and seen if that fixes
it.
Send a copy of your log file.
Alex
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just committed a major rework of mergedfb to CVS. almost all of
> the
> > code is now i
hing to do with 2048.
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:13, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > You can have as big a virtual desktop as you want so long as the
> total
> > 3D contexts are not greater than 2048 in either direction.
>
> Wron
x
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 06:13, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > You can have as big a virtual desktop as you want so long as the
> total
> > 3D contexts are not greater than 2048 in either direction.
>
> Wrong. The 2048 limit is
this is a patent issue:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/S3TC
--- Csan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been wondering whether DXTC/S3TC will be implemented in the DRI
> (Radeon)
> drivers. I got an ATI Radeon Mobility M9 Lf (AGP).
> I haven't been able to find any inf
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 16:26, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > perhaps the limit is actually 2047?
>
> No, the RE_WIDTH_HEIGHT register takes 11 bits for the coordinates of
> the rightmost column and bottommost line. Th
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 06:56:32AM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Can you clarify what you tried and what the problem is?
>
> When I restart the 'new' (with MergedFB) XFree86 X server binary with
> the old XF86Co
econd.
Option "noddc" "true"
Option "IgnoreEDID" "true"
Option "MonitorLayout" "CRT, CRT"
You can also try adjusting the DDC mode:
Option "DDCMode"
Alex
--- Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon
drv.o driver to drive your hardware.
somehow validating the mode for crtc2 must be messing up the mode for
crtc1. I rewrote some of that code, so it's possible I messed
something up.
Alex
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:03:38AM -0700,
--- Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> > it seems to crash while validaing the modes on the second head.
>
> Which is odd since, if I turn off mergedfb and just use normal
> xinerama,
> it works fine,
I've uploaded some screenshots as an example:
http://www.botchco.com/alex/2048-error/
the new version of xscreensaver displays a separate instance on each
head of a xinerama desktop. so in this case only the context running up
again the 2048 limit (the right side) shows the error. When I turn off
what's the difference between the two? why does linux have it's own
version? why couldn't the linux version be used with BSD? something to
do with the kernel?
Alex
--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 09:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
--- Roland Scheidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>I just committed a major rework of mergedfb to CVS. almost all of
> the
> >>code is now in radeon_mergedfb.c/h. I also com
As I recall, no. As it is now, only a single instance of Xfree86 can
use the DRI. I think it might be possible by adapting the resume code
to reinitialize state and agp on a VT switch, however, I may be wrong.
Alex
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I am running two copies of Xfree/D
on, 13 Oct 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 09:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > it seems to crash while validaing the modes on the second head.
> I
> > > don't know why it should work on linux but not freebsd. you
> might try
> > &
n the current code. both
work fine on my hardware. testing will prove what works best I
suppose.
Alex
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 21:58, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > The reason mergedfb is enabled by default is to emulate the clone
to more testers to find the bugs :)
if we move to a branch, perhaps we could add it to the snapshots?
Alex
--- Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 21:58, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> >>The reason mergedfb
Sounds good. I may play around with it when I get a chance. Any other
thoughts on what it might be if not clears?
Alex
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 06:44, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > I've uploaded some screenshots as an example:
> &
it turned off. speak up if
you do...
Alex
--- Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
> > That's fine with me. we can revert back to xfree86 CVS for the
> trunk
> > and I can move to a branch. I wouldn't have put it on the trunk if
>
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 22:12, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > perhaps for the time being I can set mergedfb to default to "false"
>
> That's probably a good idea, but then it should default to clone mode
> as
&g
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 22:58, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 22:12, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > perhaps for the time being
there's also this driver:
http://www.instmath.rwth-aachen.de:8000/linux/G450-PCI/
I'm not sure how the G4/550 and G200 differ in regard to PCI vs. AGP...
Alex
--- Ville_Syrjälä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:40:07PM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > Has any one checked the PC
the 3D drvier needs to be updated to mesa 5.x. Not much work has been
done on it and I think there are some issues with the 2D driver.
There's no way it will make it into 4.4.0. the current code is on a
branch in DRI cvs. If you are interested in helping, please do.
Alex
--- Tim Roberts <[EMA
n Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mer, 2003-10-15 at 21:07, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > the 3D drvier needs to be updated to mesa 5.x. Not much work has
> been
> > done on it and I think there are some issues with the 2D driver.
> > There's no way it will make it
Would he be interested in contributing his work back? or maybe
explaining how/if he got it working?
Alex
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ville Syrj?l? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:48:38PM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:36, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > Log message:
> > Clean up of the mode validation code for MergedFB.
>
> Does it behave the same as pre-MergedFB by default now?
I haven't put back
no worries... I was just curious.
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would he be interested in contributing his work back? or maybe
> > explaining how/if he got it working?
>
> Sorry, currently he's forc
Before I go grepping through the tree, where would I find this code (in
the DRM, DRI, or 2D)? Also is it for r100 or r200 or both? is there a
r200_cp_dispatch_clear()?
thanks,
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 06:44, Alex Deucher wrote:
I just noticed this app today:
http://meld.sourceforge.net/index.html
Looks pretty nice.
Alex
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
---
This SF.net
As I recall KDE preloads libGL for some reason. that might have
something to do with it.
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 23:17, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >
> > btw why exactly isn't it possible to hot-swap (when xfree86 is
> running)
> > the dri driv
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 04:41, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > Log message:
> > *Re-wrote MergedFB validate mode function from scratch based on
> crt1 validation
> > rather than the old clone validation code.
&g
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 05:14, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> > Log message:
> > - Converted Linux drivers to initialize DRM instances based on
> PCI IDs, not
> > just a single instance. Moved the PCI ID lists from _drv.c
> in BSD to
> > .h. The PC
you need to change the DRI config settings:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ConfigurationInfrastructure
perhaps we shouldn't make sync to refresh the default.
Alex
--- Paul Zaremba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>I have a Radeon 8500 LE with an LCD attached to the CRT outpu
plus there is a certain machismo element to the number of FPS your card
can render...
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
> > Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I've had several mergedfb users complain about the 2048 DRI limit
put in yesterday:
else if ( pScrn->virtualX > 2048 || pScrn->virtualY > 2048 ) {
info->directRenderingEnabled = FALSE;
xf86DrvMsg(scrnIndex, X_WARNING,
"Dire
Sorry. I documented the MergedDPI option.
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 18:53, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > Log message:
> > Update radeon man page.
>
> Sorry to be pedantic, but this log message is redundant:
>
Is anyone else getting every meesage that is sent to dri-devel twice or
sometimes even 3 or 4 times? It just started happening over the last
couple days.
Alex
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
27, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 17:27, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >
> > >>perhaps we can not disable the DRI if mergedfb is active and the
> viral
> > >>is larger than 2048?
>
> It was only MergedFB wh
The question is, can we start ripping it out now, or will there be a
xfree86 4.5 and 4.6, etc.
Alex
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens Owen wrote:
>
> > We can definitely remove the xf86drmCompat layer for XFree86 5.0.
> I
> > believe it's well understood that major version cha
el Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 23:39, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
...
>
> Why doesn't somebody implement one of the discussed workarounds in
> the
> 3D drivers? :)
>
_
it's hard to say if it's worth pursuing or not since no one that I know
of has the docs for the 3D engine on r300.
Alex
--- Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm curious if anyone has attempted to get an R300 card working with
> the
> r200 driver? :-)
>
> I was fooling around toda
I've talked to quite a few people that have had problems getting
dualhead to work on radeon IGP chips. Specifically, the crt port seems
to go into powersave mode when dualhead is enabled. I talked to Hui Yu
at ATI about the problem and he hasn't seen it on his IGP boards using
the lastest code fro
...without it
>
> works ..
>
>
>
> Alex Deucher schrieb:
>
> >there is a patch for support of the 731 in bugzilla:
> >http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754
> >No other drivers support roation in hardware at the moment, so it's
> up
> >to you to impl
ROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 17:25, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> >>I'll give keith's suggestion a shot, but I don't really understand
> how
> >>it's supposed to work. I'm not really much of an ex
I'll take a look at fixing this in the radeon driver. What needs to be
done to play nice with the DRI?
Alex
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:47:06AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > Well, if someone else has a
I tried to add dualhead support for this chip a while back, but got no
where with docs from S3/VIA. I was able to find out basically how it
worked, but I was never able to get it working (I think I wasn't
setting the second DAC right). I eventually got databooks for the
duoview portion of the vir
sounds good to me.
Alex
--- Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>Does anyone object if I make a new
> savage-2-0-0-branch
> with the (for me) working 2D driver and kernel module?
>
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
Interesting... could these be used in combination? perhaps to get
around the 2048 limit? or if we were to implement the iterative "zone"
approach, process serveral zones at once? I just requested r200
databooks from ati now that I'm a registered developer (got my fingers
crossed).
Alex
--- Mic
you might consider putting your project on freedesktop.org rather than
sourceforge...at least for CVS.
Alex
--- Michael Dreesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you have an ATI card? The ATI proprietary driver has pbuffers
> implemented.
> > pbuffers would let you avoid a lot of the swapping.
that's the weirdest thing! I swear I remember seeing it defined, now I
can't find it anywhere.
Alex
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone give me a clue as to where RADEONWaitForIdleMMIO is
> defined?
> I can't find it via grep, maybe a macro is building it.
>
> =
> Jon Sm
Didn't keith do some agp 8x work a while back?
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 18:32, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > This is set to 4, should it be 8 now?
> >
> > #define RADEON_AGP_MAX_MODE 4
>
> No, it means 'maximum AGP mode supported by the radeon driver'
make sure you add the dri and glx modules under the modules section of
your config file. It doesn't look like anything dri related is loading
in the driver. Did you apply the latest code drop from alan or VIA to
your xfree86 tree? you might want to try the code in the savage-2-0-0
branch of the
I recenly wrote a patch (with some help from Andreas) to a allow for
gamma adjustment of the video overlay. It adds the XV_GAMMA attribute.
The current patch works, but I'm not sure I'm programming the registers
right. Could someone with databooks verify how they should be
programmed? The releva
--- Ville_Syrj�l� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:50:01AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > Ville Syrj�l� wrote:
> >
> > I must say that I am very impressed with how far the MGA driver has
> come
> > since you started working on it. Now the only thing that's missing
I doubt many developers are going to work on it because the rest of the
drivers are closed source and few if any developers have parhelia
hardware. you'd probably be best off trying to port it yourself. you
can look at how the drm modules differ from linux to freebsd for other
drivers (radeon, mg
Currently all my mergedfb work has been in the 2D driver, but I'd like
to start working on some 3d stuff (time permitting). however, I don't
have write access to the mesa tree. It's not real important at this
point I guess, but eventually... Also isn't mesa hosted on
sourceforge? will there be
while it might be possible to add support for freebsd to the apparently
opensource kernel module, adding support for unsupported cards to the
2D/3D drivers is impossible since it is a binary only driver! Ask
matrox to add support. that's your only option right now.
Alex
--- Jan Eidtmann <[EMAIL
A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> >This was an issue with 4.3.0 as I recall. It was fixed in DRI cvs,
> I'm
> >not sure if the fix has made it's way to fedora.
>
> I don't recall hearing about
The attached patch adds alpha blending support to the video overlay on
radeon hardware. It's been tested on my 9200. It adds three new Xv
attributes: XV_ALPHA_MODE, XV_GR_ALPHA, and XV_OV_ALPHA.
XV_ALPHA_MODE - (0 or 1) selects the alpha blending mode. right now it
only supports key and global
Is anyone else having problems posting to the list?
Alex
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/--- Begin Message ---
Your mail to 'Dri-devel' with the subject
Re: [Dri-devel] Latest CVS in non-xinerama or dual screen mo
Are you using mergedfb or not? It's unclear to me. if you are using
mergedfb, what problems are you having exactly? if you enable the
Xinerama extenstion, tht will disable the built in mergedfb xinerama
extension. that might be part of the problem. Also what problems are
you having with Xv? l
m using RightOf for this Layout, this makes
> things backwards. When use Xv
> from time to time it flakes ought and I can't realy tell if it's X,
> the app, or the file i'm
> trying to play.
>
> --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you using mer
daily binary snapshots are available here:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/
--- Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
>
> > > However, it appears that XFree86 is in feature freeze for 4.4.0
> (since
> > > yesterday), whi
The attached patch converts radeon_video.c to use the CP rather than
MMIO if direct rendering is enabled. I wanted to get some feedback
before committing to DRI cvs. I doubt this will affect overall
performance much, but it will reduce the overhead involved in stalling
the CP when switching betwe
I would never commit any thing non-trivial with out some validation
first. that's why I posted it here. Thanks for your comments.
Alex
--- Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 00:31, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > The attached patch converts radeon_v
--- Chris Ison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know you can't give details under NDA, but do the specs for the
> r200
> show any API for PCI, or has the PCI work on the driver been done by
> trial and error.
I'll have to check the docs when I get home. The original PCI GART
work does done for HP
Your best bet, if you can find one, is a fireGL 8800. It's basically
an overclocked 8500. barring that the 8500's and 9100's are the next
fastest.
Alex
--- Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:37, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > I'd sa
the 2048 limitation of the scissor registers can be worked around.
check the dri-devel archives for messages with "2048" in the subject.
basically what we need to do is look at the cliprects in the client
driver and everytime they are a multiple of 2048 divide into a zone.
then when you are rend
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I attached my log and config, just incase.
>
> This is a short list of the things I have found odd with DRI.
> 1. Screen size and DPI, I never understood how this was going to work
> with dual heads.
> 2. A bug that won't let me use 256x240 in MFB, wo
XGI is a joint venture from the trident and sis people. Sis has
released zero documentation in the past. trident is somewhat better.
As far as I know XGI has not released any databooks for these chips.
they may be developing drivers in house. whether they will be
opensource or binary (or devel
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The screen size(in pixels or mm) is now x1 + x2 by (y1 > y2) *
> y1 +
> > > (y1
--- Goyo Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On that note, I am interested in getting involved in DRI development.
> I've been
> trying to read through all the recommended documents for new
> developers from
S3/VIA released a code drop a while back for xfree86 4.2.0. it needs
to be ported to mesa 5.x to work with newer versions of xfree86. that
work is being done on a branch of DRI cvs. for now if you want HW 3D
you will need to use 4.2.0 with s3's code drop.
see these pages for more info:
http://m
turn off HW render accel. both HW render and 3D use the 3D engine and
I don't know if they both keep state properly. that's probably were
your corruption comes from.
Alex
--- Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've had some problems with certain DRI applications occasionall
you should find what you need here:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ATIMach64
I'm not sure anyone has tested it on PPC yet though.
Alex
--- Tomas Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an old G3 iBook with an ATI Rage Mobility, and there
> seems to be no hardware acceler
ta are affected,
> however.
> It is only AA fonts, and across _all_ AA applications when it occurs.
>
> Would installing a debug X server help track the cause of the
> corruption
> down?
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:59:30AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > turn of
hit a brick wall someone else already ran
> into
> with it. ;)
>
> Is there anywhere I can get a G400 databook for reference, or is that
> not publicly available?
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:55:20AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > renderaccel. the reason for the c
there is no support for suspend and resume on matrox hardware. the
only driver with suspend/resume support is radeon. if you want to add
support you can take a look at the radeon driver for reference.
Alex
--- Serge Gavrilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Several days ago I have insta
Felix,
I realize you are focusing on the 3D side, but I noticed that the HW
XvMC stuff isn't in cvs. I would assume that should pretty much just
drop into place once the mesa port is done? No sense in dropping that
if it works.
Alex
--- Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi savage us
--- Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:36:16 -0800 (PST)
> Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Felix,
> >
> > I realize you are focusing on the 3D side, but I noticed that the
> HW
> > XvMC stuff isn&#
in 2.6 there are two agp related kernel modules that need to be loaded.
agpgart and your agp chipset specific module (via, sis, ati, etc.).
Alex
--- Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I decided to give 2.6.0 a shot this morning :-)
>
> My Radeon 8500 (which previous worked with
perhaps some sort of conflict with the local header file? I recall
seeing a version of videodev.h in the 2d driver directory in cvs, but I
haven't really looked into it.
Alex
--- Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm confused ...
>
> I solved my other kernel include file problems and n
701 - 800 of 1232 matches
Mail list logo
