Re: OFF is zero

2002-10-21 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Stephen: I think I missed the beginning of this thread, so please forgive me if I rehash old ground. The 'vertical line' and 'circle' you refer to, are actually a 1 (One) and 0 (Zero); as in digital logic on/off respectively. My original posting on this subject

Re: OFF is zero

2002-10-21 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Serge: O = Out of Circuit I = In Circuit Note: while many people believe the symbols are O 1, they are in fact O I IEC 60417 Symbols 5007 and 5008 are neither: the numbers 1 and 0, nor the letters I and O. They are the symbols depicted in the 60417

Re: OFF is zero

2002-10-21 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Neil: The origin may be true, but IEC60417 is quite clear. ON is a vertical line (symbol 5007) and OFF is a circle (symbol 5008). Agreed. And thank you for the clarification. Best regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC

OFF is zero

2002-10-18 Thread Rich Nute
A week or so ago, I asked about the origin of the 0 and 1 symbols for off and on. I mentioned that it was my recollection that the the symbols came from early safety standards where the off and on functions were by means of a rotary switch where the 0/zero position was off. I found some

Origin of power symbols 0 and 1?

2002-10-08 Thread Rich Nute
I am looking for the origin of the power symbols 0 (off) and 1 (on). The earliest standards that I have are CEE 10 and similar where the standard specifies something like: Where a rotary switch is used for power, the 0 position shall be off and the 1 and higher position shall be

Re: Creepage

2002-10-07 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Richard: What is a good source that explains the rational for the values for creepage distances? There was a good deal of research done in the late '70s and early '80s on creepage distances and the deterioration due to deposition of foreign materials and the effects of humidity.

Re: Class III ID mark?

2002-09-28 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Tom: With a bit further search, I found: http://w3.hike.te.chiba-u.ac.jp/iec417/html/doc/5180.html This site specifies the use and the referring standard: Application: On any kind of equipment. To identify equipment meeting the safety requirements specified for class

Re: Class III ID mark?

2002-09-28 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Tom: I guess what you think is IEC 60417 No. 5180, which shows III in diamond shaped frame (45 degree rotated square). (http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/terms/iec417-5180.gif) Yes, this is the mark that was mentioned to me. However, I don't know which standard require the

Class III ID mark?

2002-09-27 Thread Rich Nute
A colleague recently showed me a Class III identification mark. However, he had no further information about the mark. (The Class III mark would be used to identify a Class III product similar to the way the Class II mark square-within-a-square is used to identify a double-insulated

EMC-PSTC now functional

2002-09-23 Thread Rich Nute
The EMC-PSTC listserver was down from Friday afternoon until today, Monday, late morning (Pacific Daylight Time). If you attempted to post a message during this time, the message was lost. Please re-send. We apologize for the inconvenience. If you have any questions or comments about

Changing our safety standards (was 0.1 uF discharge)

2002-09-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Gert: I also tried the discharge between two fingers, and found the result to be unpleasant at least. Time to change standards... Now we must ask the question: Is the purpose of the standard to prevent injury or to prevent an unpleasant experience? I presume that

Changing our safety standards (was 0.1 uF discharge)

2002-09-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Gert: I also tried the discharge between two fingers, and found the result to be unpleasant at least. Time to change standards... Now we must ask the question: Is the purpose of the standard to prevent injury or to prevent an unpleasant experience? I presume that

Re: Question: Discharge capacitance 0.1 uF

2002-09-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Tom: So, for voltage up to 450V d.c. (i.e. up to 318V a.c.), capacitor up to 0.1uF will become a Limited Current Circuit, hence the voltage is not Hazardous Voltage (1.2.8.4) - no additional condition would be required for the capacitor connected to the primary circuit.

Re: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Rob: I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual policy to request testing to a listed standard such as UL 60950 for safety in North America. The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory. Is he correct? what compels safety

Re: Question: Discharge capacitance 0.1 uF

2002-09-19 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Tom: So, for voltage up to 450V d.c. (i.e. up to 318V a.c.), capacitor up to 0.1uF will become a Limited Current Circuit, hence the voltage is not Hazardous Voltage (1.2.8.4) - no additional condition would be required for the capacitor connected to the primary circuit.

Re: safety testing in the USA

2002-09-19 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Rob: I am in discussions with a potential supplier of IT equipment, Its our usual policy to request testing to a listed standard such as UL 60950 for safety in North America. The supplier has replied that this is not mandatory. Is he correct? what compels safety

Re: EN60950-1 Sect 2.5 Limited Power sources

2002-09-04 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Tom: Is it permitted to use PTC as an overcurrent protective device for power sources not inherently limited? I don't have EN60950-1 here, but I remember it must be a fuse or other non-autoreset device. I said: The trick is to determine if your test houses can

Re: Green/Yellow Earthing Leads

2002-09-04 Thread Rich Nute
Hello from San Diego: One of our subscriber colleagues has pointed out that my assertion that Europe uses yellow as the color of the earthing wire is incorrect. I recall when the green-yellow was agreed to for power cords and internal equipment wiring. My recall was that both yellow and

Re: electric strength test

2002-09-04 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Greg: Why does True SELV require basic insulation between SELV and earth? What is the hazardous voltage source, and what is the current path through the body if that basic insulation should fail? I believe (and I could be wrong) that it's a

Re: EN60950-1 Sect 2.5 Limited Power sources

2002-09-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Alex: We use a linear (basically a transformer with a PTC thermistor) class II SELV O/P stand alone power supply rated 10Vac, 5A. One of the labs tested the O/P Isc with a direct application of the sc. The other lab tested the O/P Isc by applying a load of 8A. The results were

Re: Green/Yellow Earthing Leads

2002-09-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Peter: What is the percentage of color over a surface area for the insulated green/yellow earthing conductor. Is it better to have more yellow than green or more green than yellow. I know North Americans prefer more green than yellow and Europeans like more yellow than green.

Re: electric strength test

2002-08-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: True SELV . requires double or reinforced insulation from hazardous live parts/parts at hazardous voltages [different expressions used for the same things] and basic insulation from earth. '950 SELV' allows SELV circuits to be earthed (see 2.2.3.3 of IEC60950:1999 or

IT power distribution and Norway (was electric strength test)

2002-08-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: You may come across some distributors in Norway asking for DI or RI between PRI-EARTH, even for Class 1 power supplies. That's because Norway uses the 'IT' power distribution system, where neither mains conductor is earthed directly, but one is earthed through a

Re: electric strength test

2002-08-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: That depends on which variety of SELV you mean. True SELV, as opposed to '950 SELV', requires double or reinforced insulation from earth Why? Best regards, Rich --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety

Re: electric strength test

2002-08-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: Y-caps have enough margin to easily withstand the 4300 V dc without damage. Without immediate failure, no doubt. But such a huge overstress may cause latent damage that later results in failure, and, since IEC 60384 doesn't call for such an over-voltage test,

Re: electric strength test

2002-08-22 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Brian: What I've always wondered about, at least for class 1 construction, is just what is really being tested by the pri/sec hi-pot, when the customer chooses to ground the power supply's return. (These comments presume the secondary is SELV.) When you use a ground for safety

Re: electric strength test

2002-08-22 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Brian: I am attempting to comply with both the letter and spirit of 60950:2000, cl 5.2. Note that 5.2.2 allows for separate testing, according the type of insulation required. When testing a (class 1) power supply, the withstand level for primary to chassis is Basic; and for

minimum distance for PWB inner layers (was creepage)

2002-08-15 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Tom: In 60950, applicable clauses are 2.10.5.3 and 2.10.5.1 (I'm not reading genuine IEC/EN 60950, and I'm sorry if I'm wrong) - the former states that distance through insulation would be applied in such situation, and the latter set minimum thickness of 0.4mm for

Re: Creepage on PCB Internal Layers

2002-08-14 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Chris: To me, it's sort of funny in that it just says that the Creepage and Clearance distances do not apply on inner layers of void free PCBs. That's nice; but I can't find where a distance is specified. I mean, I would think that there should be some minimum distance between

Re: Creepage on PCB Internal Layers

2002-08-14 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Chris: To me, it's sort of funny in that it just says that the Creepage and Clearance distances do not apply on inner layers of void free PCBs. That's nice; but I can't find where a distance is specified. I mean, I would think that there should be some minimum distance between

Re: medical-grade transformers

2002-08-02 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ged: In transformers with REINFORCED INSULATION or DOUBLE INSULATION the insulation between 1ary and 2ary windings shalll consist of - - 1 insulation layer having thickness at least 1mm, or - at least 2 insulation layers with total thickness not less than 0.3mm, or - 3

Re: Marking Languages for Canada

2002-08-01 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Kris: The markings on the power supply are: (also as per UL file) Date code model number electrical ratings Class 2 transformer The additional markings are: CAUTION, Risk of electric shock and Dry location use only and Do not expose to liquid, vapor, or rain

Re: Marking Languages for Canada

2002-08-01 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Kris: A product from manufacturer X is delivered with a (direct plug-in) power supply from mftr Y to customers in Canada. Regarding the power supply, it is UL approved + UL listed and has the UL marking with C and US. The warning marking on the power supply is only in

Re: Compliance Primer

2002-07-31 Thread Rich Nute
It has been some time since I have had to explain or justify product safety activity to a high-level manager-type. As others have said, it is fraught with difficulties. Success depends on first determining the mindset of the person asking the question. I believe I would first ask a

Re: Bonding Impedance

2002-07-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ron: Two years ago, Jim Bacher presented my paper, Equipotentiality and Grounding -- Deriviation of Grounding Resistance for Equipment at the IEEE EMC Symposium Product Safety Workshop. This paper is available for download from the IEEE PSTC Mindcruiser web site:

Admin message: posted advertisement

2002-07-11 Thread Rich Nute
Today, a message was posted that violates IEEE emc-pstc rules against advertising. Here is our rule: - 5. Blatant or overt advertising of goods or services is not permitted. The listserver is provided as a service by the IEEE, whose policies prohibit anything that might be

Product safety job at Hewlett-Packard San Diego

2002-07-11 Thread Rich Nute
Hewlett-Packard Company San Diego site is looking for a high-level product safety engineer. The major job function is that of advising product designers on 1) innovative safeguards for new products, and 2) safety certification requirements for new products. The ideal

Re: TOUCH CURRENT LIMIT

2002-07-09 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Xing Weibing: We can read from table 5A of IEC60950:1999: Touch current limit for accessible parts and circuits not connected to protective earth: 0.25 mA question 1 : How does it (0.25mA) come from and what it is based on? For grounded (Class I) equipment for the home, the UL

10 watts (was IEC 60950 Solar Cells)

2002-06-08 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ted: it seems that the low voltage used in the application is being mistaken for low energy. Your garden variety alkaline manganese cell has such a low internal resistance that it behaves as a little bomb when shorted. Same with lithium battery technology. If the solar cell can

Re: CCFT Backlight Circuits

2002-06-05 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Chris: We use similar circuits. The circuit is an inverter powered from SELV. The inverter output is hazardous voltage. Usually, the output is floating, but not always. The output MAY be hazardous energy ONLY IF the SELV is hazardous energy. If the SELV is hazardous energy, the

Re: UL 60950, Section 6.1.2.1

2002-06-04 Thread Rich Nute
regards, Rich From douglas_beckw...@mitel.com Tue Jun 4 09:35:39 PDT 2002 Subject: Re: UL 60950, Section 6.1.2.1 To: Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com Cc: rgeorger...@carrieraccess.com, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 12:27:52 -0400 Hi Rich, A question. If you

Posting available equipment, was Surplus EMC Test Equipment

2002-05-21 Thread Rich Nute
The policy for emc-pstc postings allows for posting of availability of used or surplus equipment commonly used by subscribers to this listserver. (See the Charter that was sent to you when you subscribed.) However, the policy does not include advertising of any kind. So, how do we decide

Re: UL 60950, Section 6.1.2.1

2002-05-16 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Richard: For those who want to read the UL60950 Section 6.1.2.1, I have written the specific parts of the section that I have questions on. Otherwise, here are my questions and comments: 1) If the bridging components are left in place, do I still have to meet the 10 mA

Off-topic messages.

2002-05-07 Thread Rich Nute
The subject matter for this forum is product safety EMC telecom and related issues. Off-topic postings dilute the value of this forum and are discouraged. I am declaring the subject of guns as off-topic. Further discussion of this topic may result in deletion from the

Re: Anti-static Insulating Tape ???

2002-04-29 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Doug: Thanks for sharing your findings on insulating tape and anti-static tape. All insulators have the property of insulation resistance. Modern insulations have insulation resistances in the gigaohm and teraohm ranges. I would guess that anti-static insulators have a relatively low

Re: EMC and Class 2 equipment

2002-04-29 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: Now we have sub-classes Y1 to Y4. Y capacitors can be used in locations where neither side is grounded, but in the OP's context, grounding is involved. What are the definitions of the various Y capacitors in the most edition of IEC 384? OP? A Y-cap can be used

Re: EMC and Class 2 equipment

2002-04-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: Ground connections is usually nice to have when dealing with EMC. But what about EMC and a class 2 (double insulation) power supply (shall comply with MIL-STD-461E) . I'm thinking on, what to do with the regularly Y-caps, does it really have any meaning with these

Admin message: RE: A very nice game virus.

2002-04-24 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Chris, Bill, and all other subscribers: A message with the subject: A very nice game was sent to the IEEE (emc-pstc) for posting by our listserver. The original message contained a virus known as KLEZ.G. The IEEE computer detected the virus. This virus was stripped from the

Re: EMC and Class 2 equipment

2002-04-24 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Amund: Being a safety guy and not an emc guy... (disclaimer) Ground connections is usually nice to have when dealing with EMC. But what about EMC and a class 2 (double insulation) power supply (shall comply with MIL-STD-461E) . I'm thinking on, what to do with the regularly

Re: Criteria for UL V0 plastic enclosure

2002-04-15 Thread Rich Nute
use any plastic. Best regards, Rich Rich Nute wrote: The choice is yours. If your product is supplied by a Limited Power Source, then you may use any plastic for the enclosure. If your product is not supplied by a Limited Power Source, then you must use V1 or better

Re: Don'r Get Caught Running a Red Traffic Light!

2002-03-08 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Doug: I've only heard shortening the yellow light cycle as an unconfirmed rumor. But I've been watching. grin According to our local newspaper, the San Diego Union- Tribune, not only did the contract photo cops shorten the yellow light, they also moved the sensors. The

Re: ventilation holes

2002-02-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi David: You probably already know this, but don't forget that the product will need to pass temp tests during abnormals i.e., blocked vents. I'm not sure if pass temp tests means compliance with the heating requirements or the abnormal requirements, so I offer this clarification.

Re: UL Material flammability requirements for enclosures less than .3

2002-02-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Paul: Can anyone give me any information on whether a box with less than .33 cubic feet needs to meet UL Flammability ratings? I have been told this is true, but I can not find the location of that information. I believe the requirement you are referring to is Sub-clause

Re: ventilation holes

2002-02-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi George: I have a safety question for the group. I have a small (about 8 x 10 x 2 inch) piece of ITE equipment, SELV, enclosed in a plastic case, powered by an external 12 volt brick from AC mains. The problem is, the device tends to run a little hotter than desired.

Re: double-pole switching and fusing

2002-02-25 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in 200202202227.oaa19...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'double-pole switching and fusing', on Wed, 20 Feb 2002: Tables 2E and 2F are invoked only by the Note 2 to Sub-clause 2.7.4. A Note is informative

double-pole switching and fusing

2002-02-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: I read in !emc-pstc that Crabb, John jo...@exchange.scotland.ncr.com wrote (in B6CD5947CF30D411A1350050DA4B75FF03C2341C@sgbdun200.scotland.n cr.com) about 'South Korean Power System', on Wed, 20 Feb 2002: Typically I would expect IT equipment to be safe if line and

Re: Using PCB traces as transient voltage suppressor

2002-02-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Chris: 1. Can anyone else verify the breakdown voltage of 1Megavolt/meter for air? Seems different than what I can remember; but I don't have a reference handy. It also seems to me that this would be very dependent upon humidity and pollution degree? In a separate message,

Re: Safety of Indicating LEDs

2002-02-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Scott: The scope of EN 60825-1 says LEDs are included whenever the word laser is used, meaning they are to be evaluated the same way lasers are. Does this apply to status indicating LEDs (non-lasing)? If so, are manufacturers expected to test every status-indicating LED on

Re: South Korean Power System

2002-02-20 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ed: With few exceptions, most power distribution systems have one pole of the supply, the neutral, grounded. (Indeed, the definition of neutral for single-phase systems is the grounded conductor.) In the IEC scheme of the world, a power distribution system where the neutral is

Japan mains frequency

2002-02-20 Thread Rich Nute
A good source is http://kropla.com/electric2.htm http://kropla.com/electric2.htm . According to that site: Japan100V50/60 Hz* *Eastern Japan 50 Hz (Tokyo, Kawasaki, Sapporo, Yokohoma, and Sendai) *Western Japan 60 Hz (Osaka, Kyoto, Nagoya, Hiroshima)

Admin message -- format of posted messages should be plain text

2002-02-15 Thread Rich Nute
A request from your list administrators... Except... I (and other classic Compuserve users) won't see these messages at all, unless and until they appear in someone else's REPLY in a form Compuserve can send. It LOOKS great - but please don't send HTML to the list. Cortland is

Re: OEM

2002-02-15 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Richard: We may soon be privately labeling our products for a particular customer, and I have a question concerning the EU Declaration of Conformity. We will be shipping products to our customer's distribution center, and they will be responsible for sales to their customers.

Re: My subscription may have terminated

2002-02-13 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Dan: I have received no emails today. Did my subscription cease? No, your emc-pstc subscription is not terminated. Today is the most unusual day in the history of emc-pstc in that there were no postings to the listserver between 5:30 PM PST Tuesday and 11 AM PST Wednesday. I,

Re: Flammabilty requirement for cloth used on loudspeaker / UL6500

2002-02-13 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Pierre: Unfortunately, Hexamine is temporarely unavailable from IMSPLUS, and, furthermore, this product cannot be sold outside the US. If somebody knows another source, he's welcome ! I did a Google search and found at least one more source:

Re: Flammabilty requirement for cloth used on loudspeaker / UL6500

2002-02-13 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Pierre: Reading the standard, I understand that the cloth used on the front of the loudspeaker (external to fire enclosure) has to be tested according the tablet test (see Table 13). As I recall (from the UL standard), the tablet is hexamine. I have purchased tablets from:

Re: Teslars???

2002-02-08 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Joe: We have a customer that is concerned about how our product, laboratory equipment, will respond to electromagnetic disturbances from a high speed train that runs close to their lab. The customer states that the disturbance will be around 0.7-1.2 m Teslar. I believe you

Re: TUV NRTL

2002-02-07 Thread Rich Nute
Hi George: However, for the U.S. OSHA establishes acceptable NRTLs, and the CFR uses the words NRTL, so I do not see how an electrical inspector could object to what the Federal Government has sanctioned. The inspector must abide by the certifications approved by the local

Re: CE Marking - Prototypes

2002-01-31 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Gregg: My understanding if that: where OSHA is applicable then UL or equivalent is mandatory. True. However, replace UL or equivalent with NRTL. where OSHA is not application then Local Code is mandatory - and LOCAL Code requires NRTL (UL or equivalent) Not

Re: Telecommunications Vs. ITE Product

2002-01-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Gregg: Let me start by asking one simple question - WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION? 1- to meet the legal requirement 2- help market the product 3- do the 'right thing' 4- not to kill anyone 5- make sure that the product is nor recalled Most

Re: Harmonic current emissions

2002-01-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: But whichever method is adopted, the customer pays the bill eventually and I have more confidence in the highly competitive world of electronic products to come up with a cost-effective solution in a timely manner. One of the USA's major objections to

Harmonic current emissions

2002-01-23 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Keith and Ghery: There are a number of effects of harmonic current emission from non-linear loads. 1) When a large number of loads rich in triplen harmonics are supplied from a 3-phase source, the neutral current can be as high as root 3 of the phase current. (This effect

Re: Company close down due to EMC phenomena

2002-01-16 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Amund: I suggest you and your client and the regulatory authority meet to address the situation. Here are the issues as I understand them from your message: 1. In idle mode, the emissions are comfortably below the maximum allowed emissions. 2. In transmit mode, the emissions

Re: TR: 60950 - Insulation between mains and secondary with capacitors

2002-01-11 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Pierre: You did not state whether or not your secondary circuit is intended to be SELV or not. This is critical to your choice of capacitor. However, you did ask whether the circuit is equivalent to reinforced insulation, so I assume that your secondary circuit is SELV. By

Re: Switch Inrush Ratings

2002-01-10 Thread Rich Nute
Taking John Woodgate's usual response to such an inquiry, I did a Google search on inrush. Surprisingly (to me), there is a wealth of reasonably good info on the web under the subject of inrush, including switches rated for inrush current. Best regards, Rich

Re: SMPS Derating reqs for Altitude range of 5000-10000ft

2002-01-04 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Chris, Andrew, Carmen: With regard to safety, both effects of altitude must be considered: 1) effect of air pressure on the electric strength of air (clearance), and 2) effect of lower density air on the temperature of solid insulation. (Creepage is a

Re: EMC-related safety issues

2002-01-04 Thread Rich Nute
No, it's simply that it isn't considered reasonable to have a radio and a CFL in close proximity. If you want a lamp and a radio close together, use an incandescent lamp. That's the bottom line, isn't it? Somebody has decided for me (in terms of what is reasonable) that if I use a

Re: EMC-related safety issues

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: I've replaced the incandescent lamp on my bedside table with a new energy-saving compact flourescent lamp. With the lamp on, I cannot listen to even the strongest AM radio station on my clock radio (on the same bedside table) due to the lamp interference.

Re: EMC-related safety issues

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ken: Trial lawyers and their clients have an obvious interest in portraying consumers as helpless and child-like, and rich corporations as robber-barons preying on the poor and weak. But why does the rest of society jump on that bandwagon? Because profit and wealth, once

Re: EMC-related safety issues

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ken: The Forrestal incident occurred during the Vietnam conflict, July 1967. It was pretty much as you describe except I would not say EMI was not controlled. All DOD services had EMI requirements at his time. In fact, 1967 was the year that MIL-STD-461 was adopted as a

Re: EMC-related safety issues

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi George: The key word in EMC is compatibility. This implies that electrical and electronic equipment are (ideally) designed so that each can operate normally in the presence of another. This requires limiting both the emissions and sensitivity of such devices. EMC?

Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: Is there a value (or range of values) for the resistance of water? The data exists; it depends, of course, on solute nature and concentration. Try a web search. I did a web search before my post. There is lots of data on the use of water resistance and

Re: Electric Shock and Water

2002-01-03 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Jason: Water comprises a 3-dimensional resistor. The value of the resistor depends on: * the purity of the water itself (the resistance is inversely proportional to the purity); * the dimensions of the electrodes (i.e., the conductors in contact with the

Re: Fw: working voltage measurement

2001-12-31 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Cortland: One can also use a pair of probes known to be well balanced and take the difference between the A and B channels, or use a differential input accessory or plugin. There is then no possibility of high-voltage on the instrument chassis. Balance is really

Re: Fw: working voltage measurement

2001-12-31 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Xing Weibing: 2. supply the SMPS from an isolating transformer where both supply conductors are isolated from ground. 3. connect secondary's ground and primary 's ground (neutral and ground are connected together) This is the correct connection for measuring the

Re: Fw: working voltage measurement

2001-12-21 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Xing Weibing: One of the problems of making oscilloscope measurements within switching-mode power supply circuits is that the common side of the oscilloscope *MAY* change the waveform. There are two ways to minimize the effect of the common side of the scope from affecting the waveform:

Re: Mains Cords in the UK and the fuse rating

2001-12-01 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: More significantly, its resistance affects the maximum short-circuit current that can flow. This is a valid consideration with regard to safety. Given a 6-amp maximum, 0.75 sq mm size, and 2 meters length. In North America, 2X rated current is the 1-minute operating time

Re: Mains Cords in the UK and the fuse rating

2001-11-30 Thread Rich Nute
For an IT product there is a restriction in the use of mains cords with a cross sectional area of 0.75mm2 for units up to 6 amps when the cord is greater than 2m in length (EN60950: 2000 section 3.2.5) I am curious as to the hazard that is prevented by this length

Re: [Fwd: clearance and working voltage]

2001-11-29 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Xing Weibing: Here is my answer to the question. Hi group I have a question regarding clearance and working voltage of IEC60950. If I HAVE A AC ADAPTER(AC 100-240V 50/60Hz) ,THE WORKING VOLTAGE MEASURED ARE AS FOLLOWS: Nominal supply voltage: AC240V PRIMARY AND SECONDARY :

Re: Quality Assurance and Product Approvals

2001-11-28 Thread Rich Nute
On the aspect of the where to put Product Safety/Compliance in the organization discussion bears mentioning on the forum. In general I advocate that the Product Safety/Compliance department be separate from Engineering, Sales, and Operations. The Safety/Compliance group should

Re: Production Line Hipot Test for Network Powered Equipment

2001-11-28 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Jerry: Will a production line hipot test be required? As far as I know, the only certification house that requires a production-line hi-pot test of TNV circuits is UL. The test is specified in the gray pages as a separate test from that of the mains hi-pot test. Since you

Re: Quality Assurance and Product Approvals

2001-11-27 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Dan: Dell Computers, as well as a few other major players, take a proactive approach to compliance and actually have a VP position for compliance. With a little investigation into the benefits of having a first rate compliance department with the ability to design for

Re: Quality Assurance and Product Approvals

2001-11-26 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Alan: Two questions, does the group see a time when we have a VP Compliance on level terms with VP Finance, VP Marketing etc, or is this already happening in the US. No. And not likely to happen in companies with ordinary products. As a general rule, compliance is seen as a

Administrative message -- Decorum

2001-11-20 Thread Rich Nute
Over the years, this listserver has never had a problem with decorum. We have had no rules addressing decorum. I and the other administrators do have expectations for decorum in posted messages. Here are our expectations. Decorum: -Propriety and good taste in conduct or appearance.

Re: Tetanization

2001-11-15 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: It seems to me that the actual word 'tetanus' is not used for this in Britain, maybe because of the risk of confusion with the infection. Reilly uses the word tetanus. Guyton uses the word tetanization. Tetanization would seem a better choice of word to describe the

Re: AW: Define Continuous DC Voltage

2001-11-15 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: Also consider that the rectifier will very probably fail due to excessive reverse voltage under the fault condition, thus allowing fault current to flow through the transformer winding. Will the rectifier fail open or short? This SELV grounding scheme certainly doesn't

Re: AW: Define Continuous DC Voltage

2001-11-14 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: I presume that the fault current path for the ungrounded SELV pole must be routed through the SELV source to ground as that path is the lowest impedance path to ground. It seems to me that the fault current would have to pass through the transformer winding. In

Re: AW: Define Continuous DC Voltage

2001-11-14 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: SELV can protect under single fault conditions. BUT, as I tried to explain, under some conditions, it can allow a single fault *to persist undetected*, until eventually a second, unrelated fault occurs which then results in a serious hazard. This is a

Re: AW: Define Continuous DC Voltage

2001-11-14 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Vito: Could either of you clarify why a double insulated SELV circuit can not be grounded? Is it a 60950 based or based on some other performance(?) based requirements? This requires a bit of history. I don't have all of the history, but I can fill in some of the blanks. IEC

Re: [Fwd: User Warning Signal Words]

2001-11-14 Thread Rich Nute
Hi John: My point is that, if attention-demanding words of differing intensity are considered necessary, how can they be chosen, other than the way they are at present? Of course, you may deny that differing intensity is necessary, so that only one word is required, but I

AC, DC definitions and safety

2001-11-14 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Ted: The electrician's rule of thumb when working on domestic wiring was to always check the wire is dead, even though you isolated it, in case of bridging or faulty connection. The technique used was to brush the exposed conductor lightly with the back of the fingers. Any

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >