Right now I design away from Ethernet within machine because with my computer
and switches and it does not work perfect. Whatever the reason is I simply
can't do anything about it.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 10:32:27 -0700
Chris Albertson wrote:
> Modern Ethernet does not
Modern Ethernet does not have a collision problem. It uses a switched
topology. All of the cables are point to point. One end is on your device
the other is on a switch. The switch has enough performance and bandwidth
to drive all cables at full wire speed.
The switch adds very little
Yes openPowerlink might be a really good choice. I implemented CANopen over UDP
for configuration a few weeks ago and openPowerlink is adapted from CANopen.
The SDO communication from CANopen work really well for configuration and I
guess it should also work well for between machine
nothing missed ... only not know the STMBL project it seems quite
simple obtain a calculated angle of joint for send the data to my program
for 18 point delta calibration, so I find these project real interesting. Apart
from that, I'm investigating the possibility of having open industrial
> If Ethernet is "complex" then PowerLink is "very complex" as it is a few
> layers over top of Ethernet.
>
> Is there a list of requirements some place? What are the end points,
> processes that run on a CPU of some kind.
>
> I've been doing this kind of work for ages but you can't select
If Ethernet is "complex" then PowerLink is "very complex" as it is a few
layers over top of Ethernet.
Is there a list of requirements some place? What are the end points,
processes that run on a CPU of some kind.
I've been doing this kind of work for ages but you can't select anything
without
> > But the goal is to find the best industrial bus for communication
> > between devices and open source ... openpowerlink seems quite open,
> > master and slave side
> > (ethercat for example in
>
>
> I must have missed some of the requirements. But from the above Ethernet
> seem like an
> But the goal is to find the best industrial bus for communication
> between devices and open source ... openpowerlink seems quite open,
> master and slave side
> (ethercat for example in
I must have missed some of the requirements. But from the above Ethernet
seem like an obvious solution.
So I cheked ... is it broke ...SO SORRY AT ALL FOR MY FIRST POST
SUBJECT. IS WRONG. OPENPOWERLINK INSTEAD OPENPROFIBUS
...any how thanks a lot for link about "justinbiber.hal"
...(note: i prefer Nirvana, Sonic Youth, Pearl Jam, Stone temple
Pilots ..etc etc ;) ) a good project. Perfect for build
@ andy ... I'm new to use gmail ... if change subject on post ... the list
is breack?
bkt
2017-05-31 1:58 GMT+02:00 andy pugh :
> On 30 May 2017 at 16:59, theman whosoldtheworld
> wrote:
> > I discover that CC-Link is tipycal "open project" but for
REALLY NICE ... good jog "justinbiber" (but I prefer nirvana, stone temple
pilot, soundgarden, sonic Youth etc etc ... ;))
and these is an good solution for 18 point calibration for delta robot
. and ideal for "multiple mesa-card-robot-line" ... very thanks for
these link.
In any case with
On 30 May 2017 at 16:59, theman whosoldtheworld wrote:
> I discover that CC-Link is tipycal "open project" but for people who pay
> ... so i search for other industrial bus
Well
At least one other project (STMBL) is using the Mesa Smart-Serial
protocol. (in addition to
I discover that CC-Link is tipycal "open project" but for people who pay
... so i search for other industrial bus ... open-powerlink .. rt-space
works on kernel 4.4 (first step of test) ... now more difficult test ...
isol cpu on emc2 and isol cpu on powerlink ...
If any one have other experience
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, Steve from Tube Gauge wrote:
> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 20:59:58 -0500
> From: "[utf-8] Steve from Tube Gauge" <st...@tgifinc.com>
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> To: emc-us
On 7 December 2016 at 01:59, Steve from Tube Gauge wrote:
> Hi, I posted the other day about using EMC2 with existing Fanuc servo and
> servo amps. The conclusion appears to be an adapter board, however, at the
> servo motor. Shouldn't the "conversion" be needed at the
Hi, I posted the other day about using EMC2 with existing Fanuc servo and servo
amps. The conclusion appears to be an adapter board, however, at the servo
motor. Shouldn't the "conversion" be needed at the output of EMC2 into the
servo amp?
Also how do I get rid of the pesky "?" that show
Hi
In linuxCNCconfigs hm2-servo5i20.ini
file each axis has
MIN_FERROR=0.002
i replace 0,002 with 0,008 - made some trade off and as a result machine
works very good now.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:11 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 May 2014 21:58, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
On 31 May 2014 21:30, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
file each axis has
MIN_FERROR=0.002
i replace 0,002 with 0,008 - made some trade off and as a result machine
works very good now.
That is actually very strange.
That value only controls what positional error triggers an error. As
far
in same directory
linuxCNCconfigs hm2-servo
i found only one folder that indicate hal
hm2-servo.hal
and there i could not find anything like MIN_FERROR
i have emc2 ---2.5---
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 2:49 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 May 2014 21:30, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
On 05/31/2014 05:43 PM, a k wrote:
in same directory
linuxCNCconfigs hm2-servo
i found only one folder that indicate hal
hm2-servo.hal
and there i could not find anything like MIN_FERROR
i have emc2 ---2.5---
MIN_FERROR is a parameter in the .ini file, there should be one
for each axis.
i did increase min error from 0.002 to 0.008 and now no noise machine
sounds really good.
how much i lost geometric accuracy by increasing --min error --?
i want to compare theoretical lost of accuracy with real measurement.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 May 2014 21:58, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
i did increase min error from 0.002 to 0.008 and now no noise machine
sounds really good.
min error means nothing to me at all.
Was this an INI file entry? _exactly_ what was it called, and what is
it connected to in the HAL file.
--
hi
i noticed in ini file
on y axis
---#the y axis servo's encoder has an index channel, so we use it to
improve the home accuracy---
and for x and z
-- #the x (z) axis servo's encoder does not have an index channel, so we
have to to home without index---
///
On Tue, 27 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:18:01 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:18:01 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i did tune 2 motors which are from
On 28 May 2014 17:59, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
which file ? any instruction?
http://www.mesanet.com/pdf/motion/7i33man.pdf
Page 2
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
Yes i did check that and they are in set up for differential mode.
/
Next will be --4. Make sure that the filter bits of the HostMot2 encoder
counters are set true
How i can check this one?
in which file ?
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:28 AM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 May
Hi
in ini file i think that as default setting for this parameters
Ferror=1
min error=0.002
and FF1=1
am i right or no?
i am not sure about tune up only with P FF1 and FF2.
http://gnipsel.com/linuxcnc/tuning/servo.html
it did not work out in my case
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:08 PM, a k
, 23 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:45:06 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i did run emc2.2 live cd and put ini file back
it work for 2 min and start give join following error0.
what is difference between joint following error 0 from joint following
error
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
scale factor must be 163840 because it is simple arithmetic
8192x4x5= 163840
is this right?
Yes
On Sun, 25 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 11:25:59 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:45:06 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i did run emc2.2 live cd and put
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i did run emc2.2 live cd and put ini file back
it work for 2 min and start give join following error0.
what is difference between joint following error 0 from joint following
error 1 and joint following error 2
thanks
aram
Most
Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i did run emc2.2 live cd and put ini file back
it work for 2 min and start give join following error0.
what is difference
On 25 May 2014 00:24, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
i want to be sure that my ac servo motor (with 8192 pulse) tune able at all
with emc2 -2.5 ?
There shouldn't be any problems with any high enough encoder
resolution, and 8192 is fairly high resolution.
My guess is that the problem might
Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i did run emc2.2 live cd and put ini file back
it work for 2 min and start give join following error0.
what is difference between
dac-scale previously?
in calibration window i try input_scale 8192x4x5=163840
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 5:23 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 May 2014 00:24, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
i want to be sure that my ac servo motor (with 8192 pulse) tune able at
all
with
On 25 May 2014 01:26, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
so with emc2 one can not use motor with encoder 8192 pulse
is this right?
No, that is completely incorrect. You can use absolutely any encoder
count you wish.
One thing I can guarantee is that anything that could be done with 2.2
can
On 25 May 2014 01:33, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
dac-scale previously?
in calibration window i try input_scale 8192x4x5=163840
That's the input scale, I am talking about the output scale. As in,
the scaling between PID output and volts at the drive.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you
output-scale=1.0
and
max out put =1.0
i did not change it in 2.2 and now in 2.5
do i need change output scale to === ?
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 5:37 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 May 2014 01:33, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
dac-scale previously?
in calibration window
On 25 May 2014 01:46, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
output-scale=1.0
and
max out put =1.0
i did not change it in 2.2 and now in 2.5
do i need change output scale to === ?
I have no idea. I would feel more like trying to help if you answered
the question I asked rather than providing
On Sat, 24 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 16:24:04 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
, I am talking about the output scale. As in,
the scaling between PID output and volts at the drive.
that is in ini file?
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 6:05 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 May 2014 01:46, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
output-scale=1.0
and
max out put =1.0
On Sat, 24 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 18:55:57 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
, I am talking about the output scale. As in,
the scaling between PID output and volts at the drive
May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 18:55:57 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
, I
On Sat, 24 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 19:38:08 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
:38:08 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
scale factor must be 163840 because it is simple
...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
scale factor must be 163840 because it is simple arithmetic
8192x4x5= 163840
11:32:08 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i think i know
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:29
On 23 May 2014 12:16, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
i think that the situation where i am now - controller that does not work-
is good answer to question why i avoid to update to new releases of emc2.
Nobody told you to upgrade to 2.5. I just informed you that what you
wanted to do wasn't
Aram,
I am sure the 5i20s are not garbage.
You are correct about updating causing problems. Everytime you do it you
will have some problems but sometimes it is necessary to do.
No one in this group will do anything to cause anyone any problems.
1. Relax.
2. Ask your questions.
3. Read the
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i think i know
On Thu, May 22, 2014
On Fri, 23 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 04:16:59 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
hi
i think that the situation where i am now - controller that does not
work-
is good answer to question why i avoid to update to new releases of emc2.
why data for 5i20 was change during evaluation from 2.25 to 2.5
Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
hi
i think that the situation where i am now - controller that does not
work-
is good answer to question why i avoid to update to new releases of
emc2.
why data for 5i20 was change during evaluation from
On Fri, 23 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 14:45:06 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
hi
about
Your existing config used the hal_m5i20 driver, which no longer exists.
i did reinstall Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx and LinuxCNC (current release)
i did check m5i20 than software created new file.
when i try to start emc2 it show error
ubuntu is working -no problem
linuxcnc is not working.
hi
this is error that i got when i start in terminals
To run a command as administrator (user root), use sudo command.
See man sudo_root for details.
aram@aram-desktop:~$ linuxcnc
LINUXCNC - 2.5.0
Machine configuration directory is '/home/aram/linuxcnc/configs/hm2-servo'
Machine
Here is more print about error
Print file information:
RUN_IN_PLACE=no
LINUXCNC_DIR=
LINUXCNC_BIN_DIR=/usr/bin
LINUXCNC_TCL_DIR=/usr/lib/tcltk/linuxcnc
LINUXCNC_SCRIPT_DIR=
LINUXCNC_RTLIB_DIR=/usr/realtime-2.6.32-122-rtai/modules/linuxcnc
LINUXCNC_CONFIG_DIR=
2014-05-22 21:06 GMT+03:00 a k pccncmach...@gmail.com:
[11380.125103] hm2_5i20.0: firmware: requesting hm2/5i20/SVST8_4.BIT
[11380.127460] hm2_5i20.0: FPGA did not reset: /INIT = 1, DONE = 1
[11380.127470] hm2/hm2_5i20.0: failed to reset fpga, aborting hm2_register
There is something
On 22 May 2014 19:06, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
[11380.125103] hm2_5i20.0: firmware: requesting hm2/5i20/SVST8_4.BIT
[11380.127460] hm2_5i20.0: FPGA did not reset: /INIT = 1, DONE = 1
OK, so you seem to have a config updated for the new driver, which is
a good start.
I think we might
Something more
when power for driver is off, than EMC2 start and it looks ok
when i turn power to drivers - to ran machine- than joint following error
and it is all
i did change 5i20 INI file for tune up motor and it did not help.
just saying what i have
thank you
aram
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at
who is PCW?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:18 AM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 May 2014 19:06, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
[11380.125103] hm2_5i20.0: firmware: requesting hm2/5i20/SVST8_4.BIT
[11380.127460] hm2_5i20.0: FPGA did not reset: /INIT = 1, DONE = 1
OK, so you
i think i know
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:29 AM, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
who is PCW?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:18 AM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 May 2014 19:06, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
[11380.125103] hm2_5i20.0: firmware: requesting
2014-05-22 21:29 GMT+03:00 a k pccncmach...@gmail.com:
who is PCW?
Purple crystal wizard :))
Viesturs
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across
The module is not loading into the kernel. Permission issue?
Without the module loaded into the kernel, I don't think the system can
talk to the FPGA.
I don't know this first hand, just reading the listings above.
Ray
--J. Ray Mitchell Jr.
jrmitche...@gmail.com
(818)324-7573
The things we
On Thu, 22 May 2014, a k wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:32:08 -0700
From: a k pccncmach...@gmail.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] emc2--2.5
i think i know
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:29 AM, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
who is PCW?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:18 AM, andy pugh
Hi
i download, burn cd and install
Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx and LinuxCNC (current release)
and it is not working
it shows
print file information
debug information
kernel messages
where do i need to look for problem?
thank you
aram
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 16:42:04 a k did opine
And Gene did reply:
Hi
i download, burn cd and install
Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx and LinuxCNC (current release)
and it is not working
it shows
print file information
debug information
kernel messages
where do i need to look for problem?
On 21 May 2014 21:42, a k pccncmach...@gmail.com wrote:
where do i need to look for problem?
Your existing config used the hal_m5i20 driver, which no longer exists.
You should make a backup copy of your existing config, and create a
new config using pncconf. This will use the new hm2_pci
Am 11.02.2014 um 22:18 schrieb Charles Buckley rijrun...@gmail.com:
I am guessing that this is slated for a 3.x release? It is a rather
significant architecture change.
It is a significant change.
The replacement stack for NML is pretty much feature-complete. It supports both
a C++/Python
I am guessing that this is slated for a 3.x release? It is a rather
significant architecture change.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.atwrote:
Am 10.02.2014 um 22:22 schrieb Charles Buckley rijrun...@gmail.com:
This leads into a more fundamental question
I am interested in using EMC2 to control a 3D printer. I have searched
the archives and gone thru the wiki and couldn't find any EMC2
conversions dedicated to driving a 3D printer. I saw the rep-strap
versions but the printers appear to be modified versions of a CNC mill
or small router. I
On 02/10/2014 06:54 AM, Steve wrote:
I am interested in using EMC2 to control a 3D printer.
You really want to talk to Charles Steinkuehler, he is in the
forefront of doing this. He is concentrating mostly on
using the Beagle Bone black computer instead of a PC,
but knows all the ins and outs of
There is work going on to modify AXIS
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/gui/axis.html to better suit
glue gun printers as well as SLA/DLP/SLS 3D printers. Axis was designed
around cutting tools about 10 years ago and needs a few changes to
better fit additive manufacturing.
EMC2
On 2/10/2014 6:54 AM, Steve wrote:
I am interested in using EMC2 to control a 3D printer. I have searched
the archives and gone thru the wiki and couldn't find any EMC2
conversions dedicated to driving a 3D printer. I saw the rep-strap
versions but the printers appear to be modified
Hallo Charles,
for use with PC, I could try to adaped gmoccapy surface to suit your
needs. You just need to tell me what you need. Marius did that resulting
in the plasma screen of gmoccapy.
Unfortunately I am not come so far, to reduce the CPU load very much,
but I am working on that part.
This leads into a more fundamental question down the road.
Will the GUI be split from the Controller engine in the future? So, we
would be able to connect in any environment with any skin to run the
engine, which would be on its own dedicated motherboard?
Charles Buckley
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014
Am 10.02.2014 um 22:22 schrieb Charles Buckley rijrun...@gmail.com:
This leads into a more fundamental question down the road.
Will the GUI be split from the Controller engine in the future?
yes, I am working on exactly that.
So, we
would be able to connect in any environment with any
--- On Thu, 11/8/12, Rondal Nannie rl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
From: Rondal Nannie rl...@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ideal Tool Table
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, November 8, 2012, 9:59 PM
Gene
This is a different
like jay-leno-people-on-the-street-survey-well-understood, right? excuse me
sir, would you like to take a shot at describing a 'multivibrator'?
--- On Thu, 3/8/12, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
From: Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates
informative. thanks.
--- On Thu, 3/8/12, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates - safe to install?
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, March 8
On 03/07/2012 01:35 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Mark Wendt wrote:
I've found it's easier to put ALL: ALL in /etc/hosts.deny, then
selectively put the hosts I want allowed in /etc/hosts.allow. You
can even get more granular by specifying what you want the hosts to
be able to access. Tcpd is a
On 03/07/2012 01:35 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Mark Wendt wrote:
I've found it's easier to put ALL: ALL in /etc/hosts.deny, then
selectively put the hosts I want allowed in /etc/hosts.allow. You can
even get more granular by specifying what you want the hosts to be able
to access. Tcpd is a
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates - safe
to install?
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2012, 7:17 AM
On 03/07/2012 10:11 AM, charles green
wrote:
turbo cnc? interesting. ..nice - $60 to
register
the shareware
On 03/08/2012 07:17 AM, charles green wrote:
the overcapacity problem is a problem of going to unnecessary lengths to
accomplish a defined task, a problem of applying the most extreme measures in
straigtforward cases.
Who said anything about going to unnecessary lengths? The capacity
2012/3/8 charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com:
the disposal liabilty pcs of a decade vintage have plenty of capacity to
function as machine controllers, so why not repurpose them to that task
rather than a dumpsite?
Ok, I totally agree with the point on nature-responsible (hopefully I
spelled
viesturs.la...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates - safe to install?
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2012, 8:34 AM
2012/3/7 charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com:
hmm. has anyone else tried turbo cnc?
I guess
On 03/08/2012 08:24 AM, charles green wrote:
that was my question. is such claim true? it is a bit like speaking english
and wondering if any other language is as effective for a particular purpose.
of course the answer is that english is the best language.
It's true if all you want
of the pc realm -
it is goverened by fashion and fleeting lust for market fads.
who knows, maybe cartesian coordinates will eventually go out of style.
--- On Thu, 3/8/12, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2
.
--- On Thu, 3/8/12, Mark Wendt mark.we...@nrl.navy.mil wrote:
From: Mark Wendt mark.we...@nrl.navy.mil
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates - safe to install?
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2012, 5:36 AM
On 03/08/2012 08:24 AM, charles green
wrote:
that was my
On 03/08/2012 08:55 AM, charles green wrote:
It's true if all you want is a machine controller and
nothing else.
so, again, strictly in the capacity of a machine controller, turbo cnc vs
linuxcnc, the comparison and contrast results are what? have you a basis for
comparison? do not
2012/3/8 charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com:
the machines i work with only have tape drives and serial ports, so all cam
files are sent over serial lines as text (ascii i think). failed controller
component replacement is a problem because the hardware platform does not
have long term
2012/3/8 charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com:
It's true if all you want is a machine controller and
nothing else.
so, again, strictly in the capacity of a machine controller, turbo cnc vs
linuxcnc, the comparison and contrast results are what? have you a basis for
comparison? do not limit
...@nrl.navy.mil
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates - safe to install?
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2012, 4:46 AM
On 03/08/2012 07:17 AM, charles green
wrote:
the overcapacity problem is a problem of going to
unnecessary lengths to accomplish a defined task
On 03/08/2012 09:26 AM, charles green wrote:
the comp i'm on right now, i dont think i could find if i went shopping for
used. it's still pluggin along. not hefty enough for penguin ubuntu 6 tho -
that was my first try, and 667MHz + 256Mbyte ram couldn't do it. admittedly,
i never spent
Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC2/Ubuntu updates - safe to install?
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2012, 6:06 AM
2012/3/8 charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com:
It's true if all you want is a machine controller
1 - 100 of 707 matches
Mail list logo