Edit Definition" in the expression's contextual menu. After
> that, all that was needed was for me to position the item exactly where I
> wanted it and, (most importantly, I think) make sure the multi-measure rest
> was wide enough on its staff system that the number didn'
H. That may account for everything. I'll go back in and test that
this afternoon. However, my situation is that I have an 8-bar section
between double pars. The "To Coda" happens at the end of the 7th bar.
I want it to show a 7-bar mm rest with the "To Coda" carefully placed at
the righ
I have a problem I just can't figure out. I am using F2014, but it
might be the same in earlier releases.
My problem is my score has Sign ... To Coda ... D.S. al coda ... Coda.
As far as I can tell, all 4 of those marks have exactly the same
settings (Show on top staff only). The only differe
I have not seen that particular bug, so I cannot say for certain if it
is fixed. I haven't scanned enough different music to say for certain
that I should have stumbled on that
I just scanned a 5 page etude that has LOTS of notes (flute + grand
staff for piano). The only "pitch" problems happ
I have spent a lot of time the past 10 days assessing the progress of
the music scanning software. I last used these products about 7 years
ago and lost interest because they were just too limited. I couldn't
find any cases where it was faster to scan than to just enter from
scratch. After d
Clif,
Thanks for sharing. That's a different approach than I had considered.
I may give that a try this weekend.
I am struck by the observation that part of your process involves things
that are absolutely inexcusable for today's software to not already deal
with. Specifically, straightenin
I don't expect perfection, but I think it is reasonable to expect that I
shouldn't have to make edits to every single measure where the scanning
software has missed something important (ties, repeats, slurs,
articulations, got the rhythms wrong, etc.)
On 1/23/2014 5:14 PM, Vosbein, Terry wrote
That does seem to be the experience of the majority. However, the
vendors claim great success and apparently some people are finding it
good enough to use, at least occasionally. If there are
hardware/software/parameter combinations that improve the results, I'd
like to discover that because
When you say it scans "pretty well", do you mean that most of the time
it accurately recognizes these things:
* Key sigs
* Meter marks
* Dotted notes and ties
* Slurs
* Repeats and endings
* Common dynamics and hairpins
* Multi-measure repeats
and doesn't add a bunch of extraneous notes you have
I used a variety of scan formats and they all produced identical
results. One was a 600 BPI TIFF grey scale.
It is hard to believe that the scanner model would make such a
difference because the image at 600 BPI is extremely crisp on my scanner
(which happens to be a Brother.
I did some tests
I know this is an old topic that has been batted around many times. I
have owned several of the scanning products (Smartscore, Photoscore, and
SharpEye). The last time I used any of them was about 7 years ago. Of
the 3, I could sometimes get marginal results with SharpEye, but usually
there w
Has anybody experienced this? Working in scroll most at zoom level 2
(Ctrl-2) on a Windows 7 system, I kept getting into a case where I
couldn't apply articulations. It seemed to happen if I was working on
notes toward the left of the screen. I clicked on the notes with a hot
key down and go
Yes, the chime patch seems to be very good on the MalletKat, regardless
of the sound engine. Chimes have such a distinctive harmonic series
that it is relatively ease to get that to sound authentic. Same for oboe.
If the Kat is a model that has the Kurzweil sound engine, there will be
lots of
Regarding notation, if the controller is segmented for several different
tonal voices with the idea that the player would alternate from one
voice to another, then I would put each voice on its own treble clef
staff, and set the octave to put the notes mostly on the staff for ease
of reading.
If I could insert my own reverb on a track by track basis ...
If I could insert my own compressors ...
If I could use a transient shaper VST ...
It could sound a lot more like what people are accustomed to hearing.
Hopefully in some Finale release soon.
On 12/3/2013 2:37 PM, Williams, Jim w
I agree 100% with what Chuck said. Without tweaking, it is pretty lame.
I struggle with the volume levels. I really have to work to get
anything heard in the mix. Spreading out the stereo field helps a lot.
Adjusting the way Finale interprets articulations, especially the
marcato mark, helps
On 11/20/2013 4:36 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> Steinberg is developing their own notation program, Avid has Sibelius
> to go along with ProTools, Presonus bought up Notion, so the only
> independent notation program is Finale.
I had missed the news about Presonus and Notion. That is very
inte
On 11/20/2013 9:07 PM, terry cano wrote:
> This is my opinion only guys.
> I can happily do my projects in F2008 and you can also. Yes, there are some
> additions that would be nice but the fact is we are dealing with a system,
> music notation, that was created many years ago and hasn't change
On 11/20/2013 4:36 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> My first thought when reading about the reorganization at MakeMusic is
> that the new owners, being venture capitalists and not software
> developers, are looking to reshape the Finale team so they can make it
> more marketable to another company s
On 11/20/2013 3:19 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> The likelihood that the Steinberg product will both A) meet its
> (unoffiicial mind you) release date target ...
>
> If they are saying now 18 months, then if it is one of the extremely few
> planned software projects lucky enough to actually see the
Dannewitz wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/2013 11:15 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>>> I think both finale and Sibelius are pretty much the top of what you can do
>>> with notation. I don't really know what people expect ot
On 11/20/2013 11:15 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> I think both finale and Sibelius are pretty much the top of what you can do
> with notation. I don't really know what people expect other than little
> refinements to the programs in each version.
Everything about the process of notation can be made
On 11/20/2013 10:40 AM, Richard Yates wrote:
> That's a good possibility. Just be sure I was not missing something I looked
> up "double down." I think they liked the connotations of the word being
> something like "bold and decisive" but looked no further (like in a
> dictionary). The closest defi
Obviously they want to keep their dirty laundry inside the company,
which is understandable.
It is also understandable that after investing so much to fund that 2.5
year hiatus between products, the owners really couldn't chance shaking
things up before the product launch. The fact that they d
I have a 4/4 measure that consists of three 8th note triplets and a
quarter note, and the first 8th note (in the first triplet) is actually
an 8th rest. When I drag this to another staff or do a cut/paste
everything goes haywire.
Finale is interpreting the first elements as a SIXTEENTH NOTE tr
er
>
>
>
>
> On Thu Nov 14, at ThursdayNov 14 4:17 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> If you have articulations in a measure where you apply a staff style
>> (e.g. slash notation), the articulations bleed through. This is a new
>> bug with 2014. never happened o
.
On 11/14/2013 10:54 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>>
>> Why would you want to show an accent when the note doesn't show?
> Slash notation drum part might need accents on some
Why would you want to show an accent when the note doesn't show? An
accent just sitting there by itself doesn't have any context. Accent WHAT?
All I know is it never did this at 2012 and I didn't change anything in
my staff style definition.
On 11/14/2013 5:37 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
>
>
he articulations?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 4:17 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>>
>> If you have articulations in a measure where you apply a staff style
>> (e.g. slash notation), the articulations bleed through. This is a new
&g
If you have articulations in a measure where you apply a staff style
(e.g. slash notation), the articulations bleed through. This is a new
bug with 2014. never happened on prior releases.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/
Yes, this is exactly what happens to me. I find myself sight-reading
live performances a more often than I would like. I guess I am good
enough at it that people are willing to call me in an emergency. Every
time I trip up on one of these redundant accidentals non-parenthesized,
I cuss the m
On 11/10/2013 11:10 AM, David Froom wrote:
> After entering a few challenging measures (accidental-wise), I ran the finale
> cautionary accidental plugin. Though it created parentheses when I
> specifically told it not to, after taking them out, I saw that the
> accidentals do, indeed, stick. SU
Probably not a great answer, but assuming you have 2012 still installed,
you could save as MusicXML, and open in 2014 that way. Once open in
2014, you could probably save it is 2012 format successfully if you
wanted to do that. Of course you will lose some formatting through the
MusicXML proc
Kudos for the improvements on Export to Audio. In the past I couldn't
complete the export at all for VST instruments in most cases. Now it
seems to be completely reliable and quite fast.
However, I would have hoped there would be an option to create separate
WAV files for each staff line, so
That is really a miserable ad. It doesn't mention any benefits at all,
only a handful of obscure features -- not to mention spelling errors
(pallet). Generally speaking, the Finale folks do a pretty good job of
describing the benefits of the new releases at announcement time. I do
not believ
On 9/17/2013 2:33 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
> Translation of audio files into notation is a more sophisticated problem, one
> that requires the kind of "jumping of levels" that computers are less good
> at. I can think of a number of conditions in which notation decisions reside
> in areas where
On 9/17/2013 9:50 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> But I am but surprised at the dismissive implications of calling Fin and
> Sib "20-year-old products". Finale 2012 is 2 years old. It would be
> laughable to compare it with version from 20 years ago, which I believe was
> still (Mac) 2.6.x. For a lau
On 9/17/2013 8:09 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> The version of MuseScore that I tried out 2 years ago was nowhere near
> Fin/Sib, but it has been and continues to be moving faster than any of
> them. And I disagree that it is not innovative. It's just that the
> innovations that are added seem to b
Regardless of whether we all can come together on the meaning of
"vaporware", wouldn't it be cool if the notation industry had a degree
of standardization and openness such that we could use a mixture of
tools, as the need fit? In the process of recording, I might use
dedicated hardware at the
On 9/17/2013 2:18 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:
> I think Steinberg notation software is, at this point, the poster boy for
> "100%
> vaporware." They put out a video with demos made on a totally different
> product, for goodness' sake!
>
> I wish them only the best, and hope the ultimate product doe
Just for the record, I also want most of the things you listed. And I
think you identified the nub of the problem. As Finale (or any other
notation product) exists today, it is in fact a zero sum game because it
is a closed system where only MakeMusic (and a few plug-in developers)
can delive
On 9/17/2013 8:19 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> On 2013-09-17 07:05, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> 1) In 2013 I shouldn't still have to fiddle with layouts on my parts.
>> How many Finale releases have we seen that bragged about great new
>> algorithms that avoid collis
On 9/17/2013 7:30 AM, Steve Parker wrote:
> Maybe I'm alone in not wanting every program to do everything..
Again I would look at the parallel in the DAW universe. DAWs, per se,
don't do that much. They are essentially "frameworks" that provide a
basic set of capabilities needed by anybody invo
On 9/16/2013 1:36 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Honestly though, what sort of "breakthroughs" are you wanting? I'd
> rather see refinements of stuff that is already in there but doesn't
> work well. Like audio to pitch, the whole parts thing in Finale,
> making play back for scores better, maybe e
On 9/16/2013 6:07 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> But I expect that if it can weather the current financial woes, Avid
> will continue to develop Sibelius. Certainly if one can say that
> Sibelius is a mature cash cow that doesn't need any more development,
> the same can be said for Finale, yet we
Just looking for opinions and thoughtful speculation.
Finale had to go private to get an infusion of capital. But they seem
to be nearing a new product release that has the potential to put them
on a more solid footing.
Avid acquired Sibelius, and that company seems to be in a real mess at
th
I did some additional testing this evening with the System Monitor
turned on. There is no memory problem. It never pages at all, and
there is always more than 3GB available. It is the CPU that goes
through the roof.
I tried a moderately complicated score under several conditions. This
score
I'm pretty sure it is about the new release. The text description is
just copied from the prior version, which has been on the market a long
time. It would make no sense to write a Finale 2012 book at this stage.
Also note that the book cover clearly indicates "Finale 2014".
Here is the 2012 ve
What you describe is certainly within the realm of possibility. I spent
a bit of time earlier in my career modeling the behavior of large-scale
mainframes, and this involved a branch of science called "queuing
theory". There very definitely can be "knee of the curve" phenomena
where everything
Finale 2014: A Trailblazer Guide
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/finale-2014-mark-johnson/1116075876?ean=9780981473178
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
I don't think the speed of my machine is an issue. It is a dual core
AMD running Win7 64-bit, with 6GB of physical RAM. There are certainly
faster machines around, but this one is feast enough. The first 75% of
the file is generated very quickly, then it grinds to a halt. I had
this same pr
My symptoms are exactly like yours, except a lot more extreme. That is
to say, the display usually freezes somewhere around the 70% point. If
I watch the actual file size, it grows rapidly (at an expected rate) up
to the point when the display freezes. But from that point onward, the
file gr
Does this feature actually work for other people? I can only use this
for very small files -- say 100 measures or less. Anything larger and
the program gets stuck. It generates the first minute or two of music
very fast and then grinds to a halt. I suppose if I left it running for
a couple
trary release schedule?
>
> Sent from my iSomething
> --
> Eric Dannewitz
> Musician/Polymath/Evil Genius
> http://www.ericdannewitz.com
>
>> On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>>
>> Well, "some schedule" is over 2 years now. There co
On 9/5/2013 3:02 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> On 9/5/2013 1:38 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>> Well, "some schedule" is over 2 years now. There comes a point where a
>> company ceases to be in business if they aren't shipping a product.
>>
> Remember what th
work better than adhere to some release schedule
>
> NOT Sent from my Hackintosh
> --
> Eric Dannewitz
> Musician/Polymath/Evil Genius
> http://www.ericdannewitz.com
>
> On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:47 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> Makemusic said they would have
Makemusic said they would have a new release in 2013.
The normal pattern would be to announce new releases in May or June so
as to get into the pipeline for the new school year. That did not happen.
Another normal pattern is to not announce anything during August because
much of the world is o
It seems to me that Speedy entry remains in the data entry mode WITHOUT
FORMATTING as long as it thinks you are still entering notes. You have
to click on a whole different region of the score to get it out of that
mode, and then it will proportion everything.
I assume this was for efficiency
Bravura seems like a nice font, but that is hardly a breakthrough. The
SMuFL idea seems like something the industry should get behind, as an
annex to MusicXML -- making MusicXML files that much more
transportable. Again, a nice development, but not really a huge
breakthrough.
At this stage,
Does anybody have any insights -- or even educated guesses -- where
Garritan stands regarding continued development? They were acquired by
Makemusic, so that raises questions, at least about how this might
affect product cycles.
I note that PGMusic (Band In A Box) has been on a product cycle o
I have the Garritan J&BB library, and of course the basic library that
comes with Finale 2012.
I am getting better at making the playback sound halfway authentic for
big bands. So yesterday I decided to work on a trombone quartet piece.
For this, I used the bundled sounds: the three solo teno
I know this isn't what you are asking for (i.e. not a solution internal
to Finale), but it is really quick and easy to generate all your parts
as PDF, using the PDF Creator free software. That is a good thing to do
without respect to the desire for colors.
But once your parts are in PDFs, you
Wow. The few sound clips that appear on the interview sound very
interesting. The description "21st century big band" might sound a bit
highfalutin, but what I hear adds up to that description.
It seems that the trend in big bands in the last 30 years was mostly
about playing louder, faster,
On 4/24/2013 9:09 AM, Williams, Jim wrote:
> 5.it is imperative to avoid simultaneous attacks. HP does that to some
> extent, but I haven't taken the time to determine how much.
How do you do that? Is that the setting in HP preferences - Tempo
variations called "Don't randomize (exact timing)"?
the pan to put a voice ENTIRELY to one
side or another.
So from what I can surmise, you use the Aria player to assign
instruments and to set up the reverb sends, but nothing else (unless you
are tweaking the sound of a particular sample (EQ, etc.).
Is that how others do it?
On 5/3/2013 6:31
I posted this on another thread, but maybe it deserves its own thread.
I am looking for practical advice on how Aria (i.e. the Garritan sounds)
relates to the normal Finale mixer window.
It appears to me that if I use the faders on either one, they have an
effect, but they are not linked. So i
As I am digging deeper into trying to get a realistic playback, I am
struggling with the Aria mixer. I expected the fader levels to be
static, like an un-motorized control surface. I want the dynamics to
adjust up and down with the dynamic expressions I have entered in the score.
But what I a
Thanks for the suggestion. But I can't get out of the starting gate.
Where is this "articulation definition" window? Is that in document
options, somewhere in HP settings or somewhere else? I can't find any
reference to it in the documentation.
On 5/3/2013 11:18 AM, Christopher Smith wrote
Hey, come to think of it, there are no cimbasso sounds on the Garritan
libraries. How could they have missed that? :)
I'm not doing many of the things you mentioned. I am using a little
reverb, but I got frustrated when I couldn't control that from Aria.
The Aria player has a tab for effects
I have JABB V3 (the current version. I think the saxes and various
basses are pretty good. Trumpets are horrendous -- sound more like a
reed organ than a trumpet.. I have worked mostly with the individual
trumpet sounds of the "notation - keyswitch" category. so maybe some of
the other trump
Just write a simple piano part and hide the notation.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> - DJA
>> -
>> WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
>>
>> On May 2, 2013, at 1:19 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>>
>>> OK, this is probably a bug that has no fix, and maybe I'm
OK, this is probably a bug that has no fix, and maybe I'm the only
person in the world who thinks this is important.
When writing for jazz piano, I usually just put in enough notes to
suggest a style and let the piano player use his own comping skills,
which are almost always better than anythi
I believe that turns off chord playback for ALL instruments. I want
chord playback on my piano track because most of that track is just
slash notation with chord names.
The ScoreManager thing works to a degree. If you mute an instrument
from the mixer window and then unmute it, that unmutes t
mist that some of these bugs will be cleaned up in the 2014
version. But if it is really an extensive rewrite ... well, I don't
even want to think about the implications.
On 5/1/2013 1:41 PM, Michael Mathew wrote:
> Dear Craig Parmerlee,
>
> In the score manager each instrument h
mist that some of these bugs will be cleaned up in the 2014
version. But if it is really an extensive rewrite ... well, I don't
even want to think about the implications.
On 5/1/2013 1:41 PM, Michael Mathew wrote:
> Dear Craig Parmerlee,
>
> In the score manager each instrument h
I have a big band chart where the solo sections have the chords in
numerous parts that optionally could solo. I don't want these chords to
play back. I only want the chords to play back on the piano staff.
I can't find any way to turn this off in a mass edit or global sort of
way. I realize
dent.
On 4/24/2013 12:42 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
> I bought JABB a few years back. I haven't had it installed for the last
> several Finale releases because the supplied GPO voices were
> sufficient. But I'm working on a project where I really need the
> keyswitch voice
I bought JABB a few years back. I haven't had it installed for the last
several Finale releases because the supplied GPO voices were
sufficient. But I'm working on a project where I really need the
keyswitch voices (muted trumpets). So I installed this software on my
Windows 7 Finale 2012 sy
I think you are right that they might be burnishing the story a little.
I suppose there is an argument that when they come out with a new
release annually, some people might place an order before the June
quarter ends, particularly if the company said "order now and you will
get a free upgrade
See
http://www.virtual-strategy.com/2012/08/07/makemusic-reports-second-quarter-2012-results
It includes the comment "Development efforts are well underway towards a
mid-2013 launch of a modernized Finale product that takes advantage of
current technology and workflows."
My interpretation is t
iscuss the word processor -- only the subject
matter of the article.
MakeMusic does not understand collaboration, period.
On 8/9/2012 10:29 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> On 2012-08-09 15:26, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> With MusicXML, you lose everything but the notes, basically.
> You ha
on is
inherent with LibreOffice.
On 8/7/2012 11:39 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> On 2012-08-07 16:22, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> This loosely relates to the Dark Ages concept of file compatibility that
>> the Finale folks have followed. It is never a good business model, when
&g
Like others, I wasn't even aware the product was still alive. About
once a month somebody sends me a WPD , which of course I can't open.
One of those guys is still using Windows 95.
This loosely relates to the Dark Ages concept of file compatibility that
the Finale folks have followed. It is
Are you doing playback with Garritan or MIDI? MIDI ought to cover a
very wide range. The Garritan files do seem to stop before the outer
reaches of some instruments. I've noticed that on tuba and bass trombone
for example.
On 8/6/2012 9:35 PM, Neal Gittleman wrote:
> Greetings…
>
> Using F
mes I have to copy the entire
> file contents to a new document to clean it out.
>
> Christopher
>
> On Wed Aug 1, at WednesdayAug 1 11:32 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> No, I could not find any way to flip the tie. I ended up just removing
>> it because it was
No, I could not find any way to flip the tie. I ended up just removing
it because it was worst than having no end-tie at all.
The last note before the endings was second space with the stem up as
normal. I didn't override anything. The tie to the right of the last
measure before the endings
On 8/1/2012 5:22 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
> WordPerfect is very far from the people who originated it (several
> iterations of ownership, actually) yet it remains a robust word
> processing environment
David, I was with you -- right up to that instant.
I'm thinking if Finale follows the path
gt;
> There have been times (perhaps with older updated files) where that doesn't
> work, and I have to use a hand slur adjusted to resemble the ties.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>
>> This is something that has always bugged me.
Absolutely. I love the feature, although I am generally familiar with
instrument ranges. It is a very nice assist, but it would be even
better if I could make a few adjustments to the instrument ranges.
On 7/30/2012 12:30 PM, John Howell wrote:
> Of course! But it is somewhat useful when I'v
This is something that has always bugged me. There are many cases where
the last note before an ending ties, and the tie goes into the first
note of BOTH the first and second ending. In fact, that is the normal
case of a tie. In my view, it is invalid to right a tie going into the
first endi
thing like that.
I cannot see myself ever producing a finished audio product within
Finale, so I'd rather see them put that effort into fixing the many bugs
and annoyances in the basic product.
On 7/24/2012 3:04 PM, Raymond Horton wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Craig P
On 7/20/2012 3:07 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:
>
> I know that when I taught a music theory class at a middle school a few
> years ago I had the students download and use MuseScore. That was 10
> sales Finale didn't get.
>
> But because of the ease of use right out of the box, actually, many such
>
I wonder if anybody has any information or informed opinion abut the
impact of MuseScore on the commercial products (Finale and Sibelius
particularly). I cannot see MuseScore being a significant factor for
professional composers, arrangers and copyists., but that is surely a
small percentage o
d to an outboard digital recorder, or to Audacity
> on another computer.
>
> Raymond Horton
> Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra
> Minister of Music, Edwardsville (IN) UMC
> Composer, Arranger
> VISIT US AT rayhortonmusic.com
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Cra
"all other layers" check the "Notes" box.
That seems to work, but maybe somebody has a more straightforward approach.
On 7/17/2012 1:07 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
> There is a style of drum set notation that has slash notation in the
> measures, but the punches are wri
I get what I need by modifying the definition for slash notation
to show notes in all other layers, which is similar to your suggestion.
Thanks.
On 7/17/2012 1:24 AM, dershem wrote:
> On 7/16/2012 10:07 PM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
>> There is a style of drum set notation that has sla
If I have my instruments set to MIDI, I can render to WAV quickly. But
if my instruments are set to VST, there seems to be a problem where the
software bogs down slower and slower. If my score is only 75 measures,
I can render, but if it is 120 measures, it gets so slow that I think it
will p
There is a style of drum set notation that has slash notation in the
measures, but the punches are written as regular notes above the
percussion staff. I can't figure out how to make this happen in
Finale. I trued using a second voice for the punches, but if the
measure is set to slash notati
eginner/Intermediate/Advanced".
>
> -Lee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [mailto:finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of
> Craig Parmerlee
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:43 PM
> To: Finale News List
> Subject: [Finale] 1012B: Controlli
The 2012B release has a nice feature that automatically highlights notes
that Finale thinks are out of range. Previously there was a plug-in to
do this. In the plug-in you could select beginner-intermediate-advanced
to fine-tune the range. I have looked around and I cannot find any way
to co
201 - 300 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
