are
there, the defines shouldn't be forced.
Mike, thanks for doing this, it has been a pain in my shoe since 2008
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/2008/11/who-wants-to-support-largefile. I'm
looking forward to the protests that 64-bit inodes don't exist, though.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https
On 31 May 2015 at 14:33, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
Do users with 64-bit systems have to pay attention to this ?
Only as far as multilib is concerned. The 64-bit ABIs are (AFAIR) all LFS
with no opt-out. x86-64 is definitely LFS.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https
On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Of course, one thing that could make the process faster would be if C++
based packages were marked some way.
revdep-rebuild --soname 'libstdc\+\+.so.*'
should do the trick. Stuff that does not link the library (statically
linked
than
just crashing, especially as *most* of the functions will likely work
either way, as long as the same set of allocators/users/deallocators are
used…
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
*all* the packages built with one
or the other when switching, or (if the SONAME were the same) they
would be built against a different ABI that they are built against,
which can be possibly causing security issues as data structure size
(and thus meaning of the content) changes.
Diego Elio Pettenò
://blog.flameeyes.eu/2014/07/libressl-and-the-bundled-libs-hurdle
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
with and does not solve the transitive
dependencies problem.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
for it which is still valid...
Uh? They don't do it for free, but they do revoke certificate if you pay for it.
xine-project.org has a revoked cert from last year due to heartbleed.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 14 March 2015 at 23:30, Manuel Rüger mr...@gentoo.org wrote:
iirc most deb and rpm based distributions use main for their central
repository, so +1 for gentoo-main.
Add me for gentoo-main too.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
before but never properly
implemented.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 27 February 2015 at 03:07, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:00:04 -0800 (PST) Alex Alexander wrote:
Our bug queue has 89 bugs!
If you have some spare time
On 23 February 2015 at 22:11, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have streamlined those into ebuilds and a dedicated overlay
Thanks!
So whoever needs to render Blender files from 2003 again at some point
should find working ebuilds to do that. Feel free to join keeping them
in
But they don't. See my two blog posts on the matter. ABI compatibility is
explicitly not. What they care about.
On 23 Jan 2015 05:56, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2015-01-23, o godz. 01:51:24
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Regarding the last libav discussion I think
Yes, yes, yes, please fix this eight years old wish entry for me ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-02/msg00314.html
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 18 January 2015 at 21:50, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi everyone, I'd like to make a commit
On 26 Nov 2014 11:07, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/26/2014 01:43 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
Standart - cross-compilation and prefix. If you do not care about the
latter(not having keywords for your package) - it's ok.
Cross-compilation, or compilation into another root is
Hi, did you end up running the script only for RESO/NEEDINFO or for all of them?
If you have a chance to run it for every bug I will just turn down the
S3 account afterwards.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 20 November 2014 at 16:04, Ian
% of the cost of one month of bare server hosting.
For myself, this is just closure. I was tired already of the situation
and I just want to get over it now.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Trying to dump first the packages I no longer use/I'm no longer interested in:
app-crypt/sgeps
app-emacs/actionscript-mode
dev-java/jcommander
dev-perl/CHI
dev-perl/Data-Uniqid
dev-perl/Digest-JHash
dev-perl/Filesys-SmbClient
dev-perl/google-api-adwords-perl
dev-perl/Hash-MoreUtils
again, this is disproportioned to ONE person refusing to accept a
setup.
So really, I'm tired to be insulted, and this was the last drop. Goodbye.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 21 November 2014 07:51, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org
On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
So who wants to pick up the pieces now? Because I'm almost pissed off
enough to turn down the tinderbox and give a big FU to Gentoo already.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527608
More! https://bugs.gentoo.org
://blog.flameeyes.eu/tag/foraparallelworld has some
posts on the topic, otherwise
https://blog.flameeyes.eu/tag/parallelmake (there is some duplication
as lots of the former posts are tagged for the latter too).
Have fun.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Also feel free to pick up the package, I no longer have a license or a
reason to buy one :(
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 12 November 2014 23:00, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
You have just done a full version bump, so the ebuild file
.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
this proposal worth our time any more, shall we?
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 8 Nov 2014 01:35, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 November 2014 13:59, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Okay, sure. I'll save it for the day when someone finds a valid reason
to install binaries with broken soname deps (not likely).
Another candidate for a possible
Beside being off-topic. And beside SCIM being a well-known opensource
projector for IME.
If you're inventing a new license, that's simply wrong.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 3 November 2014 13:24, Andrés Martinelli andma...@gmail.com wrote
Excuse the top posting.
You don't need to strip the HTML. Change the extension to whatever.log and
it's already there in unmangled text.
On 2 Nov 2014 01:10, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/11/14 03:53 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El
How do you strip the html code? I was unsure about to do that :/
You should have asked. There is no need to strip. I upload both HTML and
text alike.
was
paying between $.12 and $.20 for storing EBS snapshots from long ago
that I never ended up removing. It's not even a rounding error at this
point.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 1 November 2014 10:47, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
But let's reason a moment on the no-linked-logs policy: as Rich
pointed out already, the policy is there for a reason and that reason
is that we don't want people to submit bugs with pastebins or home
server logs
to turn down the tinderbox and give a big FU to Gentoo already.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527608
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
, huge thanks to Rich and Jer for their help here, it does
feel good to know that at least some of the colleagues do have my
back.)
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
were not attached.)
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 18 October 2014 08:51, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/13/14 1:38 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
have you considered to stabilize gcc:4.9 instead possibly 4.9.2 ?
I'm
to volunteer my time to run the tinderbox and file the
bugs. But I won't do so if all I'm going to get back is bitching. It seems
a fair proposal to me.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 18 October 2014 12:59, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El
of my time.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 18 October 2014 17:55, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 18-10-2014 a las 14:15 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
If you write the code for that, be my guest. But the code is in Ruby
) is not something I feel.
Especially in comparison to the $600/month the tinderbox *hardware* costs
me to host.
If there is the interest, I'll start prop it up for gcc-4.9 testing even
tonight. It'll take a couple of weeks to go all through it.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu
And if faad is *required* for aac it should not use faad as USE flag, but
aac.
Because in the case of mplayer it's selecting faad *over libavcodec*. In
other cases faad is depended upon with aac because it is required to play
back aac files.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu
that's intended. repoman warns for missing *needed* dependencies, but won't
bother for unknown blockers exactly for cases like this.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 15 October 2014 01:25, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/13/2014
(d)
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 13 October 2014 17:58, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
I've got two obsolete packages masked currently: app-text/unix2dos and
app-doc/djbdns-man. Both of them block other stable packages,
app
What Lars said.
Although I have to admit that the fact that one full day later I'm looking
at it myself after work and before getting ready for travel saddens me.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 6 October 2014 05:34, Lars Wendler polynomia
nowhere.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 5 October 2014 11:18, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua
Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't
Thanks for looking it up Matthias. Sounds like me or someone else will get
to it asap (not on my laptop right now to commit).
On Oct 5, 2014 4:45 PM, Matthias Maier tamiko+gen...@kyomu.43-1.org
wrote:
Am 05. Oct 2014, 15:20 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu
:
Simple
Any -Werror=* flag will make random autoconf checks fail for no good
reason, don't use them on profiles, it's silly.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 20 July 2014 20:28, Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to enable
I'm pretty sure we have an eclass function to get the name of the 0 group.
On 12 Apr 2014 17:41, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
na...@gentoo.org:
fcaps.eclass is using group name 'root' which is not available on BSD
system. Instead you can use 0, or $(id -g -n 0) if you'd prefer group
There's a sandbox.d configuration directory on purpose; imagemagick[opencl]
should probably install its own exception.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 27 March 2014 07:29, Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
Currently
If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick
maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care about
them as much.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 11 January 2014 11:01, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it
wrong
wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by.
I'm not saying it makes a difference, sorry I didn't make it clear.
Diego Elio Pettenò
a single
person, and when said single person asked for the rest of the users
of/providers for PAM to accentrate on a single package, they ignored/worked
around problems instead of reporting/discussing them.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
I stopped caring about pambase when people decided to break it.
I'm still officially pam herd as maintainer of Linux-PAM, pam_ssh I don't
use and care very little about.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho
and create a bigger one at runtime.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
mind), you can make it
so that `-p` is an optional parameter, and if not passed no pidfile is
created. And voilà, you can make an unconditional patch and even send it
upstream for other init systems that do rely on pidfiles that are not
OpenRC.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Conditionally patching openntpd in the ebuild if a system is using
openrc is certainly the way to go.
You mean unconditionally here, right? Because pid files should be there,
full stop.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee
Quick note: I forgot my key from this laptop does not let me commit. I had
some fixes done, but I'll have to wait to get back to Ireland to commit
again, as the key is physically there.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1
, but it
was
always up to the discretion of the maintainer back then.
Last riting predates treecleaners by quite a bit.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Seems like I forgot to select reply all earlier.
I'm going to look into that next week. I failed to resetup my monitoring
after I left my previous customer and I've reinstalled icinga just this
week.
I don't understand people's insistence with a single product herd given we
don't have enough
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu
wrote:
I don't understand people's insistence with a single product herd given
we don't have enough manpower yet and I don't want to have
to not depend on v8.
If made not to depend means bundle, is the bundled version any safer
than the ebuild there? If the answer is no, you're now increasing the
security issue.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.orgwrote:
Perfect.
Seriously? Perfect because one person agrees with you?
Sigh.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
As Michał said.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-20, o godz. 19:58:51
Justin (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
what is your opinion to set
FEATURES
are basically trash characters that get in the way.
You do know that many eclasses (including the Ruby ones) have a setting
that enables/disable color output? I keep it enabled on my system but I've
always been disabling it for tinderboxes..
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org wrote:
good point, will go for ADAPTEC then instead
Please don't.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Unlikely you screwed up, -O0 makes bigger code than -O2 almost in every
case; then -g annotates it. I'm expecting -ggdb to take some few GBs more.
It'll be the same if not worse with almost all software, -g3 would make it
even worse.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http
clearing at any other -O level).
But if you're trying to step through an algorithm, an optimized version of
the code will most likely reorder the code that you read from the sources.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
Because it would require us to change a whole load more than just the
targets variable.
Plus we actually were the first coming up with the solution...
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Brian Dolbec dol
Does this still allow me to use libav? If not I'd like to veto it.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.orgwrote:
Currently USE=system-ffmpeg is masked for stable www-client
If you can start it I can try to get the stable tinderbox running over the
weekend.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Tomáš Chvátal tomas.chva...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/7/26 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee
to remove
it. Otherwise it will pop up in the tree sooner or later again.
Which is a perfect reason to keep it p.maske din tree so that nobody can
re-introduce it as they felt it missing.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 21/07/2013 10:10, Pacho Ramos wrote:
media-gfx/iscan-data
media-gfx/iscan
I'll pick up these two (soon as my laptop gets back working)..
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
as Duncan pointed out. Maybe
even more than half.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
not support software with such low QA
does not apply
It applies perfectly. It's a p.mask for a reason, and can convey reasons.
It's your package, do what you want, but stop just trying to force your
views into suggestions, just because you already reached your
conclusion, please.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò
differently depending on where you launch them.
And non-deterministic tests are stupid, useless, broken tests.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
in where you have problems (concurrency
problems)... :-)
Not during packaging. Those are developer tests. Yes there are difference
between the two. But as Ian said, we're off-topic now ;)
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
I would object... 10 games are wa too few for a new category and
especially pkg moves..
And? Two wrongs don't make a right.
And I've said the same for any other proposed category like that.
there. Not sure if we have rainslick
still in tree but it would fit as well.
Maybe consider adding a few more, and if we reach the 20 games I
wouldn't object.
But 10 are way too few, and a roguelike would *not* fit in the genre to
begin with.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http
on adventure/exploration.
So either Matt is right or you should really refrain to posting without
having a clue about what is being discussed.
**We have a frigging games-roguelike category!**
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
meetings, you can cannot multitask, say making your dinner
while discussing this or that feature.
A VC is a full commitment, and its attractiveness is often much higher
_before_ you use it..
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
with VCing or
just thought that it looks cool?
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Pavlos Ratis daster...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On Mon
?
I think we already got a number of packages where that holds true. It was
one of the reasons why I did my best to make sure people understand that
debug symbols and nostrip should *not* be conflated with USE=debug.
If I'm not mistaken, app-editors/nano[debug] is hardly usable.
Diego Elio
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.orgwrote:
It depends how you run it. We have teams having a video thing
open during the day with there geographically-diverse other team
members and it works well for them. For those teams, it also
improves cohesion.
writing and understanding written English, let alone spoken.
Honestly, I couldn't get over reading a couple of paragraph here, because
the premise itself is too much to bear for me, sorry.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013
should have been involved in the process.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.orgwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
It is unfortunate to observe constant
On 17/06/2013 06:55, Mike Frysinger wrote:
tar -xJf ./$i
why doesn't the bzip2 detect as bzip2 ?
Capital J is XZ not bzip2.. still, it makes me think it needs a newer
version of file to recognize it.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee
lzma
xJ with _current_ tar will extract both XZ and lzma
zJ with _past_ tar will only extract lzma
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 16/06/2013 11:03, Pacho Ramos wrote:
media-gfx/iscan-plugin-gt-f720
I'll clean it up so that it behaves like the other iscan-plugins but if
somebody has hardware that would be nice to co-maintain (including users)
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http
access.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
got CVS access, it's not a
threat or a grandstanding, it's a simple boolean logic statement.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
time on it again, so don't expect
further mail from me on the topic.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
and something that no sane
people would accept.
Nobody pays me to waste my time in explaining *again* why VCS ebuilds
should be a corner case and not something to spend time making easier to
create (because that's what it boils down to).
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu
to death.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 15/06/2013 14:34, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
restrict+http: (as suggested by the OP) is probably not enough
because it doesn't distinguish between fetch and mirror restriction.
nofetch+http and nomirror+http ?
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 15/06/2013 14:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Or the other way around: {fetch,mirror}+http. I'd rather have RESTRICT
apply to all of SRC_URI (as it is now) and use the new syntax to
specify any exceptions from the restriction.
WFM
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http
On 15/06/2013 17:06, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Are there any objections to removing this warning from the devmanual?
Please, go for it.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 15/06/2013 17:19, hasufell wrote:
How does that make any sense?
It does not, but I don't remember anybody trying to assert that PMS
makes sense in quite a long time.
(Yes I still think that the PMS is 90% a waste of time)
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http
is a nice idea will ruin it. It's not like I depend on
Gentoo for my work anymore.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 15/06/2013 22:17, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
You know what? I really should just leave and see how people who think
that a live ebild is a nice idea will ruin it. It's not like I depend on
Gentoo for my work anymore.
Oh wait, I already know how that's going to happen.. bug #443448 is a
nice
.
Maybe you should think twice about what _you_ have been doing, rather
than worrying about my social skills.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Err, i do not want to say that wiki is not suite for this purpose, but
what's wrong with current situation? Is there something wrong with gorg?
Yes, there is something wrong with it... it's called 'gorg'.
Or to put it
On 12/05/2013 14:27, Peter Stuge wrote:
I feel strongly against github.
Making something like github the primary point of contact
communicates many negative things for Gentoo IMO.
Oh heavens, for once I agree with Peter.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http
, so please don't effing go around
blaming people without even having a clue about what's going on, you
just piss me off.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
It's happening that we seem to have a bunch of crybabies in Gentoo
that don't get along together and instead of figuring out their
differences are going to screw up users even more.
Bunch of chipmunks in our ranks as well I suppose.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http
1 - 100 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
