[google-appengine] Re: Question about dispatch & backends

Hello Joshua, I understand that your program uses APIs that need more than 60 seconds to complete but even though you are using B8 instances in App Engine, your program times out past the 60 seconds. I’m assuming you are using App Engine Standard. To find supporting documentation for you, can

[google-appengine] Re: Question on Flex restriction

*Hi Jerry,No, App Engine Flex doesn't support the use of App Engine standard libraries. so you need to change a few places in your code to adapt your app for App Engine Flex. Please, refer to this full guide of migration[1][1]https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/flexible/java/migrating*

[google-appengine] Re: Question about standard app engine with Python runtime migration from 2.7 to 3.7?

In the app.yaml configuration file of a Python 3 application, "threadsafe" field is deprecated. All applications are presumed to be threadsafe. You may find related details in the "Updating app.yaml" sub-chapter

[google-appengine] Re: Question on LeaseOptions

Thank you, I just wanted to check that my undestanding was correct. Cheers Tony On Sunday, 19 May 2019 20:12:03 UTC+1, tonycavanagh1929 wrote: > > I am looking at tasks, I am trying to understand what is the purpose > of LeaseOptions > > In the docs it says so > > Once tasks are in a pull

[google-appengine] Re: Question on LeaseOptions

Hello Tony, You are right, the shortest formulation for lease in this context is the one you wrote: get a task and then run it. There are still some other important elements to this: leasing a task makes it unavailable for processing by another worker, and it remains unavailable until the

[google-appengine] Re: Question related to MultiRegion Datastore Behavior

Hi Suman, A request from an App Engine application, either from the same project or from other projects, will be routed to the best suited backend service by the frontend . When a request comes from the App Engine, it will be redirected

[google-appengine] Re: Question: app engine search index & namespaces

Search operations use the namespace associated with a context passed to them when they are called. To perform an operation in a namespace, wrap a context with appengine.Namespace, and use that context when calling methods on an index. You may see an example in the "Using namespaces with

[google-appengine] Re: Question re seeing code after deploy

You're not missing anything, other than perhaps the expectation that this feature exists when using the Eclipse plugin only to deploy a Java application. The source browser is a feature of Cloud Source Repositories , so it requires that you set

[google-appengine] Re: Question regarding deleting entities from datastore

Try flushing memcache and see if the issue persists. ( You're probably getting the entity by key via ndb / objectify /etc that will query memcache / in-context cache first whether an entity exists only then query the datastore. Since you removed the entity directly from the datastore and not

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Datastore quotas

Yes, ndb cache only Key operations. See on Operations on Multiple Keys or Entities: https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/python/ndb/entities Regards, Renzo Nuccitelli On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:09:51 AM UTC-2, John Louis Del Rosario wrote: Thanks. That clarifies things. I'm using

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Datastore quotas

1,000,000, as you are reading 1,000,000 entities. If you do not cache the entities (Session Cache or Memcache), and load the page again, that is another 1,000,000 read operations. On Friday, November 21, 2014 6:17:25 AM UTC-6, John Louis Del Rosario wrote: I'm a bit confused about what the

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Datastore quotas

Thanks. That clarifies things. I'm using NDB, which I believe automatically caches entities. Does NDB's caching only work for Key operations (e.g. .get(), .get_multi())? And queries need to be cached manually? On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:12:17 AM UTC+8, Chad Vincent wrote: 1,000,000, as

[google-appengine] Re: question on performance and storing non-indexed data in the datastore

You didn't say which language you're using, but if you're on Java, I strongly suggest Objectify. It defaults all columns/fields to unindexed unless you decorate the field with an @Index annotation. On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 2:55:12 AM UTC-6, Mattan Furst wrote: I have a question regarding

[google-appengine] Re: Question using datastore to achieve this

This is correct. I think Jimin maybe doesn't realize that the parent key is *appended* to the child's, so it is a 1:N relationship, not a 1:1 relationship? Jimin, what language are you using? If you're using Java, then Objectify can make this much simpler, as you just decorate a [Customer]

[google-appengine] Re: Question using datastore to achieve this

Hi! (Since nobody wrote back, I thought I'd give it a shot even though I am also beginner) It seems like you are on the right track. It might be simpler than you think. I would also make Purchases a child of the Customer, so you can do a simple search by simply querying where

[google-appengine] Re: Question about SSL for custom domains

Just to make sure I understand correctly: 1. I must pay for GAE hosting if it exceeds the minimum limits. 2. I must pay $9/month for Google Apps, even though I don't need or use Google Apps... Google just requires me to manage GAE through Google Apps now, and apparently it's an easy way for them

[google-appengine] Re: Question about SSL for custom domains

Yes, you need to pay for your certificate (e.g., RapidSSL) and for Google to host your certificate. On the Google side, you can choose from SNI ($9/month) or VIP ($39/month). SNI works with most modern browsers, but not (I think) Windows XP nor older Android installs. You may also run into

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

Hi Arthur, I'm not the original poster, but I deployed a simple communications app recently and I used a new company called Firebase. Firebase is still in beta, but it basically handles the entire communications backend for you, and all you need is some javascript on your side. Here's a quick

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

I ended up writing my own solution, which is essentially a replacement for the channel APIs. The solution involves a node.js service that multiplexes to the clients. I used websocket-node (https://github.com/Worlize/WebSocket-Node) on the node.js end, and SocketRocket

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

Thanks for the inputs. I might just try firebase instead of trying to build my own solution. Either that or use XMPP which I have working right now using a resource for each client connection. I did start down the NodeJS path as well just like Kris is doing except I used socket.io with NodeJS

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

Hey Christoph, may I ask what you ended up doing? I thought about registering one gtalk account and use it within the game client (register each client with a unique ressource, or maybe with a ressource per game). So basically the GAE app would send messages to my_customapp [at] gmail [dot]

[google-appengine] Re: Question on how to modularize handlers

Two things: 1. You need an __init__.py file in the handlers directory 2. Your script line should read 'handlers.test.application' On Saturday, 10 November 2012 10:52:35 UTC+11, Kyle Finley wrote: Shan, if you are using the python27 runtime it should be: # app.yaml runtime: python27 - url:

[google-appengine] Re: Question on how to modularize handlers

Shan, if you are using the python27 runtime it should be: # app.yaml runtime: python27 - url: /test script: handlers/test.application https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/appconfig#Script_Handlers -- Kyle On Friday, November 9, 2012 9:18:35 AM UTC-6, Shan Sikdar

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question on key design: Datastore errors and tablets

I know this is an old thread, but relevant to a recent topic of interest. My question is: If the sustained QPS is indeed high, is there any advantage to doing batch put operations (as it relates to the 'hot tablet' issue with sequential index values)? In other words, if I am trying to write

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Data Store Read operations

Hi Robert, I got it! I have not considered that query offset also causes small operation. thank you very much Robert for your input. On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Andrew, So you need to remember that running a query will result in many

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Data Store Read operations

Hi Robert, Thanks for you being interested to help me. Let me tell my long sad story: I have Java appengine app. The app has only one page. This page performs search with various parameters, fetches 11 entities and displays search result. My app has 3400 page views per day and each day it

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Data Store Read operations

Hey Andrew, So you need to remember that running a query will result in many reads (the number of results, plus a scan iirc) -- not just one. That could well be the source of your problem. As for why memcache isn't being effective, that's harder to say; that could be a coding issue or a

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Data Store Read operations

Hi Robert, no, session disabling is the first thing I did to reduce datastore access count. See http://code.google.com/p/rent-map/source/browse/trunk/trunk/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/appengine-web.xml Second thing I did was memcache introducing. So I used all standard datastore friendly technics.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Data Store Read operations

Hey Andrew, What symptoms are you seeing exactly? Robert On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 05:48, Andrew Osipenko dev7...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Robert, no, session disabling is the first thing I did to reduce datastore access count. See

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Data Store Read operations

Hi Frank, Have you solved it? I have nearly the same problem. I think that appstats do not count some datastore read operations. I thought my application accessed datastore during intialization before appstat filter is being invoked. But I can't find anything bad during my app

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Data Store Read operations

Are you using sessions? On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 05:37, Andrew Osipenko dev7...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Frank, Have you solved it? I have nearly the same problem. I think that appstats do not count some datastore read operations. I thought my application accessed datastore during

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

The latency is mind blowingly low in my experience. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Ya9qA6-3cdMJ. To post to this group, send email

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

thank you for mentioning and sharing your experiences with pubnub, althought it seams a bit expensive for my purpose (at least the pay as you go system, haven't calculated the prepaid options yet). It looks interesting for applications with somehow moderate update rates / pushes, since you get

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

for. Comparing EC2 and GAE isn't really fair because EC2 is IaaS and GAE is PaaS. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christoph Grossegger Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:46 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

Hello Christoph, Welcome to GAE (group)! I'd like to share my PubNub experience: I have been using PubNub for updating thousands of iPhones at the same time. Once you have a (java) instance running which as already connected to pubnub in the past, it publishes fast. I don't know the latency

[google-appengine] Re: Question about pushing messages to native apps

Hi, I know that a few people have mentioned using PubNub http://www.pubnub.comfor broadcasting events to multiple users, although I've no idea what the latency is like for it. Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group.

[google-appengine] Re: Question about indexing of properties

It wasn't a problem of revealing secrets, I just thought at this situation (while playing with different data models on my entities), so that is why I generalized. So, to use your example: i could model my entity like this: - name=SimpleEntity - type=animal - properties=[cat,big] (which is a list)

[google-appengine] Re: Question about indexing of properties

Well let's say I have an Entity with the following fields: - String name - String type - ListString properties The purpose is to search these entities (for example: the user inputs the search words to be matched against properties field and the name and type are matched according to some other

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Question about indexing of properties

AM To: Google App Engine Subject: [google-appengine] Re: Question about indexing of properties Well let's say I have an Entity with the following fields: - String name - String type - ListString properties The purpose is to search these entities (for example: the user inputs the search words

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about indexing of properties

Note: I wrote the first part of this email before I understood what you were doing, but since I think it is useful information, I am leaving it in. Original email --- Basically, there are a few rules to remember when considering tradeoffs: - get by key is always best. It's the most cost

[google-appengine] Re: Question about GAE authentication options

My bad! type=com.google does return google app accounts. I had a gmail.com filter, which I totally forgot about. Google App accounts can authenticate with GAE just as well as regular Gmail accounts - just as the documentation says. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Rishi Arora

[google-appengine] Re: Question about M/S - HR Migration

Hey, did you check the logs? I think it needs datastore to be enabled before it can complete. Cheers Rob On Jul 6, 8:52 pm, Joshua Smith joshuaesm...@charter.net wrote: As a dry run, I'm trying the migration process with one of my apps that nobody uses, which only has a tiny amount of data.  

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about M/S - HR Migration

Indeed there were errors in the logs saying writes were disabled. I re-enabled them, and the task still isn't finishing. There is nothing in the logs indicating why. On Jul 6, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Bert wrote: Hey, did you check the logs? I think it needs datastore to be enabled before it can

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Task's Fork Bomb

You are supposed to design tasks with some level of idempotency, there are cases where tasks are executed more than once, which will also lead to a fork bomb if not coded properly. You are supposed to use task names to prevent forks, as task names are unique, so a task can't be inserted twice

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Task's Fork Bomb

Note that task naming only works for non-transactional tasks. For transactional tasks you have to come up with some kind of Datastore based run-once primitive. There is not a standard workaround for transactional task insertion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[google-appengine] Re: Question about dynamic backends

Thanks for the clarification. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[google-appengine] Re: Question about dynamic backends

Good question. Here's how this works. For the moment, let's only consider resident backends: 1) Backends are charged for uptime by the minute. 2) Whenever a backend instance goes down, the system will continue to bill for an extra 15 minutes. 3) If a backend comes back up within the 15 minute

[google-appengine] Re: question on multiple entity groups comments google io 2008

yup. i did take a look , but didn't mentioned about multiple entity groups comments like in the talk. anyone else has any useful reference articles? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to

[google-appengine] Re: question on high-throughput data pipelines googleio 2010 talk Options

@robert thank you -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about cron and versions

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Tim Hoffman zutes...@gmail.com wrote: Cron only runs against your default version. Nice, thanks Tim. Rgds T On Oct 28, 8:12 am, Rafael Sierra rafaeljs...@gmail.com wrote: Does cron run for every version? Let's say I have versions 1-0 1-1 and 1-2, all

[google-appengine] Re: Question about GAE future

Cool :) On 1 oct, 15:56, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: Google is committed to supporting Java. We'll continue to support both Java and Python for App engine. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com

[google-appengine] Re: Question about sort order on id on entities of the same kind but having different parents

On Sep 10, 1:09 pm, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you, Nick. What about applying a filter in these cases? Will key ordering be ignored if I also try to apply a filter on a 'real' property? Thanks. Jeff Jeff, If you apply an inequality filter, the results must be

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about sort order on id on entities of the same kind but having different parents

That's what I thought and thanks. I don't think the google datastore documents detail these issues in enough detail. If they do they are spread out over multiple documents. I wish they were codified and in one place. Anyway, I had the problem that I originally posted about, ordering descending on

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Stored Data and Quota of 41 Gigs vs. 1 Gig

me pueden enviar los mensajes en espanol no los entiendo en ingles Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:19:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Stored Data and Quota of 41 Gigs vs. 1 Gig From: robert.kl...@gmail.com To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Probably indexes

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Stored Data and Quota of 41 Gigs vs. 1 Gig

Hi Eli, Thanks. After looking at it more, I understand and agree with you. The Quota Details page is a little confusing since it does not mention that 1 Gig is the free quota and 40 is the paid quota. I looked at the Datastore Statistics for this application and it says: Size of all entities

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Stored Data and Quota of 41 Gigs vs. 1 Gig

Sorry. I meant 1.15 Gigs. On Aug 27, 4:59 pm, fedex1 fed...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Eli, Thanks. After looking at it more, I understand and agree with you. The Quota Details page is a little confusing since it does not mention that 1 Gig is the free quota and 40 is the paid quota. I looked at

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about Stored Data and Quota of 41 Gigs vs. 1 Gig

Probably indexes. Star this issue: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2740 Robert On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 17:06, fedex1 fed...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry.  I meant 1.15 Gigs. On Aug 27, 4:59 pm, fedex1 fed...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Eli, Thanks. After looking at it

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Stored Data and Quota of 41 Gigs vs. 1 Gig

Wow, thanks. And yes, I've starred it. On Aug 27, 5:19 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Probably indexes. Star this issue:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2740 Robert On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 17:06, fedex1 fed...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry.  I

[google-appengine] Re: Question about processing power within a persistent game of life application.

Indeed, but I'm trying to get a general idea Of how much I can expect with a reasonably optimized application. Could it process hundreds,thousands,tens of thousands each minute ? On Aug 8, 1:17 pm, Matt H matt2...@gmail.com wrote: From what I've seen, AppEngine is designed for applications

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about processing power within a persistent game of life application.

AppEngine places quite severe restrictions on the amount of time it allows for each request. You should read the docs to get an understanding of this constraint and how it and other constraints effects everything you will do on the platform. With that said, AppEngine is built to scale out and if

[google-appengine] Re: Question about processing power within a persistent game of life application.

From what I've seen, AppEngine is designed for applications driven by huge databases, rather than ones which need huge amounts of computation. On Aug 7, 9:00 pm, PT pechetru...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all,  I've started designing an application based on the appengine but I'd appreciate a couple

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about your ToS

Then you shouldn't worry about it. The great thing about the pornography rule (they know it if they see it) is that 99.99% of the time you know it too. It's pretty obvious to everyone when you're trying to cheat the system. When you're not trying to cheat the system - that's obvious too. Jeff

[google-appengine] Re: Question about your ToS

Ok. Thanks. =) On Jul 27, 8:36 am, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote: Then you shouldn't worry about it.  The great thing about the pornography rule (they know it if they see it) is that 99.99% of the time you know it too.  It's pretty obvious to everyone when you're trying to cheat

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question for Google Team regarding Receive Email address count limit?

Hi Vivek, On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Vivek Ramachandran vivek.securitywiz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Nick. But I need someone from Google App Engine team to confirm what the system quotas are for incoming email. As I understand: 1. There are no limits on the number of emails of

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question for Google Team regarding Receive Email address count limit?

Thanks Nick! Just what I hoped for. I will get in touch in case we need more fire power using the request forms on the app engine site. Regards, VR On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Vivek, On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Vivek

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question about your ToS

That should be fine. As long as you don't use them to circumvent quota. They are legitimately different applications: a blogging application, a forum app, etc. If you're using different apps for different purposes, it's fine and we won't shut you down. This clause of the ToS is very confusing to

[google-appengine] Re: Question about your ToS

I definitely won't use them to circumvent quota, but what if the traffic onto the site does get to a point where each app is serving up resources in excess of what the free quota would be if it were a single app? On Jul 26, 9:08 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: That should be fine.

[google-appengine] Re: Question about your ToS

I'm not sure. But I think you can Enable Billing. Money is King ;) I am interested in Dedicated IP or move my app to another server after Enable Billing. Because very many apps request to Twitter API and make GAE server slow :( Before, my app received a deluge of complaints about 500 status. But,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question for Google Team regarding Receive Email address count limit?

2nd Try Is there someone from App Engine Team monitoring this list? :) I want to create a commercial application which will surely pay Google a couple of hundred $$ a month :) , so please answer my questions below. I have till next Tuesday to get back to management with the platform choice.

[google-appengine] Re: Question for Google Team regarding Receive Email address count limit?

As far as I remember : 1) No limit 2) No limit except api and cpu limits applicable. A limit of 2000 outgoing emails (no billing enabled). Happy coding :-) Nick Milon On Jul 21, 6:23 pm, Vivek Ramachandran vivek.securitywiz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My mail is regarding the option for

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question for Google Team regarding Receive Email address count limit?

Thanks Nick. But I need someone from Google App Engine team to confirm what the system quotas are for incoming email. As I understand: 1. There are no limits on the number of emails of the form x...@appid.appspotmail.com 2. There are system limits on the number of incoming emails per day. What

[google-appengine] Re: Question on CPU intensive app

On Mar 17, 3:48 am, sdillard spencer.dill...@gmail.com wrote: My app is VERY computationally intensive.  We're talking simulation, genetic algorithms, monte carlo analysis, etc. I have read that you can't create threads, so are there any alternatives...

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question on key design: Datastore errors and tablets

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:28 AM, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote: What about keynames like: counter_standard_dbf counter_standard_clo or would something like dbfo01la_counter_standard clo091b_counter_standard work better? I'm thinking of cases where you may use keynames that can

[google-appengine] Re: Question on key design: Datastore errors and tablets

Thanks Nick, I understand now. So I guess the easiest thing to do is to have a random component in your keynames...at least for apps I'm considering I don't think I'd have any other way to reasonably ensure the range of keynames in a given (batch) update were well distributed. On Feb 19, 11:58 

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question on key design: Datastore errors and tablets

Hi Peter, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:04 PM, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Nick, I understand now. So I guess the easiest thing to do is to have a random component in your keynames...at least for apps I'm considering I don't think I'd have any other way to reasonably ensure the

[google-appengine] Re: Question on key design: Datastore errors and tablets

Say I did a batch update of 500 entities all of the same model...could this breach the '100s of qps' requirement that could lead to tablets getting too hot? I've seen benches (http://blog.dantup.com/pi/ bm_put_perf.png) that show 500 entities being batch put in ~4s which suggests an average put

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Question on key design: Datastore errors and tablets

Hi peterk, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:02 PM, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote: Say I did a batch update of 500 entities all of the same model...could this breach the '100s of qps' requirement that could lead to tablets getting too hot? I've seen benches (http://blog.dantup.com/pi/

[google-appengine] Re: Question on key design: Datastore errors and tablets

What about keynames like: counter_standard_dbf counter_standard_clo or would something like dbfo01la_counter_standard clo091b_counter_standard work better? I'm thinking of cases where you may use keynames that can in some way be constructed/predicted for fast access later.

[google-appengine] Re: question about memcache time

I would be wary of using any cache for program control. You have no guarantees that because you asked for something to be cached for 5 minutes that it will actually be cached for 5 minutes, it may actually fall out of the cache immediately and therefore you cannot rely on it for any sort of

[google-appengine] Re: question is regarding billable resources:

These other quotas are not billable and can not be increased by paying for more. I believe you may be able to get more quota if you app is close to these limits by contacting Google. On Jan 13, 3:39 am, Dmitri srey...@gmail.com wrote: HI All, My question is regarding billable resources: As

Re: [google-appengine] Re: question is regarding billable resources:

Hi Wooble, how about the number of custom indexes? as far as i know, it's not a billable option yet, and an billing-enabled app should have a higher quota for this (but yet we can't pay to increase such quota) when our apps is getting more complicated and covering more aspects, I can see the

[google-appengine] Re: Question on using TextProperty()

Thanks guys. That seemed to work! On Dec 3, 5:49 pm, OvermindDL1 overmind...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: Just a guess here, but try wrapping the contents in a pre tag.  Probably they newlines are not getting displayed by the

[google-appengine] Re: Question on Free Stored Data Quota

No, it is 1GB total. On Nov 22, 6:55 am, yccheok yancheng.ch...@gmail.com wrote: I have a question on the Stored Data Quota. Google is offering us free 1GB quota for stored data. Currently, my total data base size is 0.9 GB. (0.1 GB) left. So, during next month, will my quota limit be

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Program Policies and Prohibited Content

I liked this conversation. But the fact is while history transforms, Rules and laws, and Policies will be transformed by the makers. If We design our applications in a way that they attract massive people base, which means the people who use them are in sync with our application and not aware (

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Program Policies and Prohibited Content

Hi David, Just to clarify, there are several definitions of 'profane': 1. Marked by contempt or irreverence for what is sacred. 2. Nonreligious in subject matter, form, or use; secular: *sacred and profane music.* 3. Not admitted into a body of secret knowledge or ritual; uninitiated. 4. Vulgar;

[google-appengine] Re: Question about Program Policies and Prohibited Content

Profane is generally interpreted as anti-religion as opposed to simply being devoid of religion or secular. You have nothing to worry about. If you need further explanation then you should consult your own lawyer. I doubt anybody from Google on this list is authorised to make any comment on the

[google-appengine] Re: question about db.allocate_ids

Hi Takashi, On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Takashi Matsuo matsuo.taka...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I noticed db.allocate_ids method is very useful when bulkloading. I have a question about the spec of this function. Q1. Isn't it possible to allocate ids for children entities of particular

[google-appengine] Re: question about db.allocate_ids

Hi Nick, Thanks for your clarification! It helps me a lot. On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Takashi, On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Takashi Matsuo matsuo.taka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I noticed db.allocate_ids method is very

[google-appengine] Re: Question

http://code.google.com/appengine/ On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:43 PM, AbduLrehman designer.reh...@gmail.comwrote: what is Google App Engine ? -- Marcellus de Castro Tavares --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[google-appengine] Re: question regarding session tokens and users

Does anyone have feedback on this? It seems I can't be the only one trying to do something like this. Thanks! Dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send

[google-appengine] Re: Question on increasing performance..

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Devel63 danstic...@gmail.com wrote: If you only want the 3rd object, do you think it's faster -- Just do a normal fetch(3) -- Do a keys_only fetch(3), then a get of the 3rd key? Neither - use fetch(1, offset=2). -Nick Johnson On Aug 23, 4:41 pm,

[google-appengine] Re: Question on increasing performance..

Makes sense, but in this case I may need to wrap past the end of the collection, so I need to know how many entities satisfied the request before the end of the collection, so I know how many to skip over from the beginning. So, I still have the original question... On Aug 25, 5:32 am, Nick

[google-appengine] Re: Question on increasing performance..

If you only want the 3rd object, do you think it's faster -- Just do a normal fetch(3) -- Do a keys_only fetch(3), then a get of the 3rd key? On Aug 23, 4:41 pm, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: Your query will probably fetch more then 25 Action objects. Fetching all those Keys is fast.

[google-appengine] Re: Question on increasing performance..

If it is about response time I think the normal-fetch(3) is faster. Only one call to the datastore, objects are fetched and converted to python-objects in parallel. If you also want to optimize the CPU-ms it depends on the size of the objects. Writing a test is the only way to know for your type

[google-appengine] Re: Question on increasing performance..

Your query will probably fetch more then 25 Action objects. Fetching all those Keys is fast. Fetching all the complete objects is slow, you fetch a lot more then you need. If you iterate over the GQL query, no fetch, that requests full Action objects (SELECT * FROM ACTION...), the objects

[google-appengine] Re: Question on increasing performance..

Every a.project statement results in a db.get() operation. Try to batch get() the project_key cache misses, and then set_multi() these in memcache. Put/Copy the project.active and project.deleted booleans in the Action object. Then you can use them in the query and just fetch 25 Action objects

[google-appengine] Re: question about GAE server

On Jun 29, 11:28 pm, except...@gmail.com except...@gmail.com wrote:    I was a GAE beginer.Today I started GAE server using the eclipse GAE plugin.I accessed my app using such URL http://myIpAddress:8080/ appName  but couldn't connect to the GAE server.When I replace myIpAddress with

[google-appengine] Re: Question about google.appengine.runtime.apiproxy_errors.CapabilityDisabledError

See http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/fbe433cb1cbec6da/98fad6cd3870828d#98fad6cd3870828d - and star http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1116 Cheers! Greg. On Jun 9, 2:31 pm, bowman.jos...@gmail.com bowman.jos...@gmail.com wrote: Does

[google-appengine] Re: Question about exploding index sizes

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Morten Bek Ditlevsen morten@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nick, Just to make sure I understand this right (well, rather - I don't think I get it 100%): By the inverted index entity you mean a new entity kind where I store word lists and then reference

[google-appengine] Re: Question about exploding index sizes

Hi Morten, On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Morten Bek Ditlevsen morten@gmail.com wrote: I have an application with an entity containing a list of geoboxes for geographic querying. I currently generate 28 geobox entries in this list. Since the list property is being queried along with

  1   2   >