Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Is there any way to do an ADRDSSU RESTORE that changes
the number of qualifiers in data set names?
No.
I hate it too.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydzia Gospo
Heelo Gil,
If you want to change # of qualifiers, you can only do that with explicit
rename dataset pairs, with an additional constraint of 256(?) entries in the
RENUNC list.
I have built a tool some years back that reads the dataset list from a dummy
restore DFDSS sysprint list, and then uses
Dave Kopischke writes:
>We care. Just trying to confirm the situation. Haven't heard
>from our rep yet. What's that cliche' ??? The silence is
>deafening
Actually, Compuware issued a press release. Among other places it's linked
from compuware.com at this instant:
http://www.compuware.com/p
ANTP8802I CQUERY devn(x'10B2') unformat
OPS3092H READY
ANTP0091I CQUERY UNFORMAT LVL 3 908
VOLUME REPORT
10B2,PRIMARY,SUSPEND(3),ACTIVE,
Ah, but then along came Sarbanes-Oxley which changed the rules for a lot of end
users. There is at least one such "compliant" storage device out there that
takes an expiration period in units of seconds -- and the field is 64 bits
wide. Customers are actually looking for retention periods of 5
David had it first but thanks Frank, I always love the things DFSORT can do.
I recently had to do the same thing but used IDCAMS viz:
//* ASSUME OUT1-3 ARE PRE-ALLOCATED OR USE IEFBR14 FIRST
//STEP EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//INDD1 DD DSN=MY.LARGE.INPUT.FILE,DISP=SHR
//OUTDD1 DD
In a message dated 9/4/2007 6:33:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Each night, we suspend the duplex pair, then clip the secondary volume
and vary it online to perform the DFDSS backups from the secondary copy.
After the backup is complete we vary it back offline and
Bill Godfrey wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:21:18 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Miscione
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe FTP
Sensitivity:
Bob R wrote on 09/04/2007 12:59:39 PM:
> I need to split a large physical sequential dataset into two separate
> files. Unfortunately, it's too large to edit using ISPF Edit. I
> thought about using IEBGENER or DFSORT. I thought there was an easy way
> to write the first 100,000 records to a dat
>That might yet be simpler than LM services. But beware of APF entanglements
>calling IEBCOPY from Rexx.
address "TSO" "TSOEXEC CALL 'SYS1.LINKLIB(IEBCOPY)'"
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sign
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:55:58 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>>
>ISPF LM services?
>
>(Well, for n<=3. Onerous restriction. Not necessarilly something I
>like about IBM.)
>
>
>Nuts! Of course I need 5 all told.
>
My apologies; I shot from the hip there. In:
#<<< 2.33.3 "z/OS V1R9.0 ISPF Serv
>>Have you done D GRS,DEV=1301
RESPONSE=SYS1
ISG343I 09.21.26 GRS STATUS 061
DEVICE:1301 VOLUME:PB$B52 NOT RESERVED BY SYSTEM SYS1
NO RESERVE RESOURCE REQUEST EXISTS
>>If you think it is catalog, then I would is
>>
>>Naw, that last one's too dangerous - she'd probably get you hooked on
"As
>>The Stomach Turns" (see also: Death, fate worse than).
>
>I don't have the courage to look; is "The Dumb and the Chestless" still
>in reruns?
I'm afraid it could be worse
Art Celestini wrote:
Indeed, Ed. I was about to point out that the STCKE *format* defines
8 more bits on the left -- enough to cover things through the year
and beyond. Considering that the software was upgraded to support this
"long" clock format, I was disappointed that it wasn't simil
Indeed, Ed. I was about to point out that the STCKE *format* defines
8 more bits on the left -- enough to cover things through the year
and beyond. Considering that the software was upgraded to support this
"long" clock format, I was disappointed that it wasn't similarly updated
to suppor
DFSORT documents the use of SPLIT1R= parameter of OUTFIL statement, as
shown below (no sort performed with this example -- single pass of input data
file):
//STEP1EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN DD *
DATA REC
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:19:27 -0400, Art Celestini wrote:
I don't know about any clock simulators, Ed, but I went and found the code
that was involved and it was the CONVTOD macro that accepted a maximum date
of September 17, 2042. Ed Jaffe pointed out that the hardware
>From Intelligent Enterprise today:
IBM's Computing Breakthrough Promises Chips the Size of Dust
By Thomas Claburn
IBM's new techniques may well lead to the use of atoms for digital
storage,
which could store the entire contents of YouTube--about 1,000 trillion
bits
of data.
http://www.intel
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:35:45 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:19:27 -0400, Art Celestini wrote:
>
>>I don't know about any clock simulators, Ed, but I went and found the code
>>that was involved and it was the CONVTOD macro that accepted a maximum date
>>of Se
So who can accomplish this with the fewest possible commands (JCL not
included) ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 3:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Splitting a large p
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 4:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDS to Sequential Question
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:36:28 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>Ok, I confess,
Robert,
If you have SAS:
Data _null_;
infile indd;
input @;
N+1;
if n<= 10 then do;
file outdd1;
put _infile_;
end;
else do;
file outdd2;
put _infile_;
end;
return;
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:19:27 -0400, Art Celestini wrote:
>I don't know about any clock simulators, Ed, but I went and found the code
>that was involved and it was the CONVTOD macro that accepted a maximum date
>of September 17, 2042. Ed Jaffe pointed out that the hardware does not yet
>support hig
I don't know about any clock simulators, Ed, but I went and found the code
that was involved and it was the CONVTOD macro that accepted a maximum date
of September 17, 2042. Ed Jaffe pointed out that the hardware does not yet
support higher dates, but I might argue that the software (CONVTOD) stil
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:36:28 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>Ok, I confess, I'm suffering from old age.
>
>I know that there is a way to concatenate n PDSes together, and then
>extract a member from this to a sequential file.
>
>
>So anybody got an off the shelf method, standard futility solution?
>
At least as of z/OS 1.4, the short answer is "no". Quote from the
reference manual "You cannot change the number of qualifiers unless you
use fully-qualified names".
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tu
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:21:18 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Miscione
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Mainframe FTP
>> Sensitivity: P
Unfortunally I'm very busy with some other projects so toleration support
for z/OS R9 is still delayed until I have time.
If someone have a urgent need please contact offline and I'll email an early
version if it's ready.
Sorry, but you know I don't get payed for it J
Roland
-
Ed Gould wrote:
You bring up an interesting question (to me). I wonder if anyone did
during the Y2K testing try a date later that 2042.
STCKE/ETOD etc. are architected to allow TOD clock values beyond 2042.
But, the TOD clock itself has not yet been extended on the left. Bit
position 51 is st
In a message dated 9/4/2007 3:31:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tried it. I think it was the TIME macro that returned an error if I asked
for an STCKE value for any year greater than 2042.
??
Do any of the CLOCK simulators do it correctly?
Ok, I confess, I'm suffering from old age.
I know that there is a way to concatenate n PDSes together, and then
extract a member from this to a sequential file.
Why am I needing this? Well, I have several levels of source libraries
(PROD, TEST, Private) and I need to pull a member from the lowest
To go beyond 2042, you'd have to use the ETOD (128 bit) format, but even
with that, it didn't work as of, maybe, z/OS 1.6, which is where I last
tried it. I think it was the TIME macro that returned an error if I asked
for an STCKE value for any year greater than 2042.
--Art
At 03:53 PM 9/4/200
Is there any way to do an ADRDSSU RESTORE that changes
the number of qualifiers in data set names? For example,
I'd like to restore original data set
A.B.C
as
XYZ.A.B.C
?? When I specify:
RENAMEUNCONDITIONAL((A.**,XYZ.A.**))
I get the unexpected and undesired:
XYZ.B.C
44
In a message dated 9/4/2007 3:10:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dataset, using IEBGENER or DFSORT and the right control cards. I got
around the problem without having to write a simple read/write program,
but I'm still curious - is there a simple way to do what I
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 15:59 -0400, Raupach, Robert E (ATS, IT) wrote:
> I thought there was an easy way to write the first 100,000 records to
> a dataset and skip the rest, then skip the first 100,000 records and
> write the remainder to another dataset, using IEBGENER or DFSORT and
> the right con
The following messages are appearing on VM IBMLink. If you don't have
them yet, I suggest now would be a good time to pursue getting your
credentials for 3270 access!
Attention all VM users
The VM Registration Tool will sunset on October 31, 2007. Implications are:
* All users and entitlemen
I need to split a large physical sequential dataset into two separate
files. Unfortunately, it's too large to edit using ISPF Edit. I
thought about using IEBGENER or DFSORT. I thought there was an easy way
to write the first 100,000 records to a dataset and skip the rest, then
skip the first 100
On Sep 4, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:44:55 -0400, Craddock, Chris wrote:
Don't forget that the 8 byte TOD is unsigned, so bit zero is part
of the
value, not the sign. You will need to use the subtract logical
form to
get the right answer without playing
The context of 'port' is being confused, it has nothing to do with which
OSA port is used. It is the TCP port that is negotiated for the data
connection between the FTP client and the FTP server.
Philip Miscione wrote:
To return on the 120 interface instead of the 20 FE/osa card interface
We
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Miscione
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Mainframe FTP
> Sensitivity: Private
>
> I am trying to figure out where or how the port c
To return on the 120 interface instead of the 20 FE/osa card interface
We have two FE/OSA cards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 3:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainfram
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:46:33 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>I have a JES2 exit 20 on z/OS 1.6. What is does is look at the
>submitting user and set a job selection priority for certain jobs, but
>only if submitted by CA7. It does this by chaining from the DCT to the
>ASCB and checking the STC name. Th
Why?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Philip Miscione
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe FTP
Sensitivity: Private
I am trying to figure out where or how the port command gets b
I am trying to figure out where or how the port command gets built in
this FTP job, I want to change it to
PORT 161,221,112,120,8,158
I can't find it anywhere in the JCL or sysin ?
331 Password required for mainframe.
EZA1701I >>> PASS
We just replaced STROBE with Application Performance Analyzer and the
users seem to like APA well enough.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Kopischke
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:22:43 -0400, Bob Shannon wrote:
>No one replied so I guess no one cares. I'm surprised.
>
We care. Just trying to confirm the situation. Haven't heard from our rep yet.
What's that cliche' ??? The silence is deafening
--
I have a JES2 exit 20 on z/OS 1.6. What is does is look at the
submitting user and set a job selection priority for certain jobs, but
only if submitted by CA7. It does this by chaining from the DCT to the
ASCB and checking the STC name. This doesn't work on 1.8 because the DCT
not longer contains a
Doc Farmer wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:29:49 +1000, FRASER, Brian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, just go pull it out of it's berth and see what screams?
Pfft
It would probably be the Ops Manager that screams first, quickly
followed by my manager and finally my Mrs when
> It's been a while since I posted here. While cleaning out my office
> I ran across a 15 inch tape reel. The label says "The Control
> Program of IBM Operating System / 360". It's dated 1964 and it says
> it's 60 minutes long. If anyone would like it I'll be glad to send
> it, if you're willin
Hi all,
It's been a while since I posted here. While cleaning out my office
I ran across a 15 inch tape reel. The label says "The Control
Program of IBM Operating System / 360". It's dated 1964 and it says
it's 60 minutes long. If anyone would like it I'll be glad to send
it, if you're wi
Does anyone know a reason to put the IRLM into the ARM Policy if the Policy
says to not restart it?
I am not sure if there is a performance over head by having ARM monitor a task
that it cannot restart.
Thanks
Lizette
--
For
I didn't expect that it would trigger so much response. I am just beginning
to learn to code using AMODE 64 and the example I had initially presented
doesn't necessarily represent any real program. What I wanted to do was to
call a AMODE31 from AMODE64 and the list did provide too many thoughts /
R.S. wrote:
LPAR numbers will be changed during next IPL. The number of CF LPAR
will change. The system (resides on the same CPC) uses GRS=STAR, so
valid CF policy is required during IPL.
I can prepare new CFRM policy to reflect the change. However default
policy is last used one.
Q: How can
Hi all
Anybody knows the extension for file cfu ???
Best regards
Jorge Arueira Campos
POLITEC LTDA
São Paulo
Brazil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the mes
LPAR numbers will be changed during next IPL. The number of CF LPAR will
change. The system (resides on the same CPC) uses GRS=STAR, so valid CF
policy is required during IPL.
I can prepare new CFRM policy to reflect the change. However default
policy is last used one.
Q: How can I fix the pol
I stand corrected. I mis-typed, it is indeed 2.9 HMC. Ans I know that HMC
supports IOCDS but I FTP'd the IOCP, ie source, from one mainframe to a
new one. And then used that sourece for the stand aloneIOCP/HCD generation.
Of course there is editing to do because the standalone IOCP/HCD is less
rob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Britz, Anton - CO 7th
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 1401 simulator for OS/360
Hi,
I am still not sure why anybody would want to run an IBM opera
Britz, Anton - CO 7th wrote:
So my conclusion with all these simulators/Hercules etc is that it is
because we have a lot of bored and confused MVS/zOs System programmers
that wants to make the whole world speak IBM.
And what's wrong with that?
Note: Did you see the IBM adverts between all t
Hi,
I am still not sure why anybody would want to run an IBM operating
system on a PC.
The only possible reason is "Commercial Software" written for the IBM
operating System , that you want to port to a PC platform but these
days, the same "Commercial Software" on a mainframe, is available for
th
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Don't forget that the 8 byte TOD is unsigned, so bit zero is part of the
value, not the sign. You will need to use the subtract logical form to
get the right answer without playing bit-shifting games, even in a 64
bit register.
Ummm. Remember, the only difference betwe
Hi all,
Maybe off topic but some of you my be interested in this: I have done some
tests with the 1401 simulator for OS/360 by William Wilcox, on Hercules:
http://perso.wanadoo.es/rptv2005/ibm1401/en/sim1401.html
I have never worked with 1401 or OS/360, so comments and corrections are
welcome.
John,
You wrote: What did you do?
Do want to tell me you do not know the answer?
Just joking... I was just to stupid to ask the 'what did you do?'
question...
Regards
Herbie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:44:55 -0400, Craddock, Chris wrote:
>
>Don't forget that the 8 byte TOD is unsigned, so bit zero is part of the
>value, not the sign. You will need to use the subtract logical form to
>get the right answer without playing bit-shifting games, even in a 64
>bit register.
>
o The
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:19:44 -0500, Big Iron wrote:
>IIRC, wipe may not function as expected because, when you rewrite parts
>of an HFS, I think that new pages will be assigned within the HFS and a
>new copy of the data is written. The old pages are not over-written.
>
When the programmer does an u
Had a CE, bending into the back of a 3340 drive butt-bump the emergency
power off for the roomhe didn't notice the coincidence.It took about
10 minutes before smoke started coming out of the main breaker panel - the
button was still pushed so the solenoid was still active - and we finall
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/31/2007
at 09:58 AM, Allen Thennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am trying to execute a Unix Shell Script from the Mainframe via a
>FTP process.
FTP doesn't do that, although you could certainly submit a batch job
to run a shell script. Why not use SSH?
--
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/17/2007
at 12:52 AM, Walter Marguccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I really would like to agree with you, but unfortunately I can't.
Perhaps not, but your response does not indicate why.
>I downloaded both XMITIP an TXT2PDF package, really nice tools which
> simpli
IIRC, wipe may not function as expected because, when you rewrite parts
of an HFS, I think that new pages will be assigned within the HFS and a
new copy of the data is written. The old pages are not over-written.
Bill
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:45:07 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Secure Delete for OMVS files
>
>
> Is there a command or program available to erase the data in
> Bit 51 in the TOD clock is the microsecond bit. Everything to the
> right
> of that is something less than a microsecond. If you have 64 bit
register
> capability, just load one register with a TOD value, then another with
the
> other TOD, and subtract to get the difference. You can then s
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN Anonymous
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:11 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: BPXBATCH utility, how to access to PDS member ?
>
>
> Thank's a lot to all of you,
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 20:49 -0400, Mark Jacobs wrote:
> Is there a command or program available to erase the data in a file that
> resides in an HFS or ZFS filing system prior to its deletion?
I wanted something like this for JES2 spool files awhile ago -- not for
security purposes, but so that th
In a message dated 9/4/2007 2:23:57 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dynamic sparing will look after the rest. Unless you have a lot of read
cache misses to that array group your scream will be more of a whimper! And
definitely no "pfft."
>>
Never got past RAID-5 onl
Did it myself once... just by leaning back too far and lightly touching the
EPO button. At least it proved the button worked!
(...and it's the loudest silence I ever heard...)
John Compton
Phone Cork: +353 (0)21 231 4641;
Phone VOIP: 214-775-3641
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe D
Powering off the entire data centre? Not far fetched for some, we had someone
do that. He thought the power distribution unit was the AC unit and hit the
power off switch. Much to his sha-grin it wasn't.
Matt Dazzo
Technical Services
Publishers Clearing House
516-944-4816
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you done D GRS,DEV=1301
It might have some interesting information.
If you think it is catalog, then I would issue a F CATALOG,LIST or one of
the other catalog commands. If it is a catalog, you can then issue the
CLOSE and UNALLOCATE commands for Catalog.
The other option is to see if
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 14:38 -0500, Kelman, Tom wrote:
> I am trying to run the EDGHSKP program
Did you by any chance neglect to preallocate the MESSAGE, REPORT and
REPTEXT datasets in the housekeeping JCL? You cannot dynamically
allocate those, because they are written to by both housekeeping and
The original post I think asked for procedures so I will share our SOP.
My considerations
1. SAD to DASD is very good and has been since 4.3.0 the simplification
of procedure is easily justification for the DASD on reserve to capture
the SAD
2. Allocate two sets of SAD data sets large enough for t
Chris,
I checked one of our HIS-servers ( 2004 ) and found something called
snaping.exe.
When executed, there is a screen asking for:
- Target MAC
- Network route
- Local SAP
- Time-out
According to the properties, the internal name is dlcping and it's
copyrighted by Microsoft.
Met vriendelijk
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:29:49 +1000, FRASER, Brian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Yeah, just go pull it out of it's berth and see what screams?
>Pfft
>
>
>
>It would probably be the Ops Manager that screams first, quickly
>followed by my manager and finally my Mrs when I tell her that I'm no
>
Just to be clear, that command operates at the file system level, when an
entire HFS or ZFS is being deleted. That doesn't do anything when an
individual file within an HFS or ZFS is being deleted.
Bill
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 09:15:20 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark Jacobs wrote:
>> Is
R.S. wrote:
Mark Jacobs wrote:
Is there a command or program available to erase the data in a file that
resides in an HFS or ZFS filing system prior to its deletion? Our
security officer asked me and I wasn't able to find something on my own.
Yes. It's RACF feature. Simply alter relevant DATAS
Maybe, a couple of years ago we changed from Strobe to Intune for
financial reasons. Now we even terminated that, partly for financial
reasons too. Also here, hardware might be cheaper than manpower plus
tools.
Kees.
"Bob Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>.
It is unfortunate. We are a Strobe customer. We will be watching to
see what happens to this product. Not much we can do otherwise.
Dave Jousma
Mainframe Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mai
No one replied so I guess no one cares. I'm surprised.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Youngren, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: STROBE Layoffs
Compuware is clos
Steve,
I believe that IPLPARM is separate for a reason. Lets get back to what
you are using SETLOAD for. That is to fix a PARMLIB issue. You do not
need a fully specified LOADxx member to do this. All you need is the
necessary PARMLIB statements to fix your problem. As such, I would have
no p
Tom, Using LookAt to find the message, and following the links through the
manuals, brings you to the dynamic allocation return codes. and as has
already been stated, looks like you should raise an ETR if the data sets that
should be pre-allocated, cataloged, DASD data sets are that in fact.
On 9/3/07, Jim McAlpine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use the search facility at -
>
> http://www-306.ibm.com/software/support/
>
> but it is apparently down due to maintenance. It was supposed to be back
> at 07.00 am Sunday. Is there another url I can use to search for existing
>
Hi Chris,
There is (was?) a Microsoft utility called DLCPing. I think it was included
on the CD-ROM in Microsoft's HIS 2000 Resource Kit (long out of print, and
now very difficult to obtain). DLCPing is also occasionally given to
customers by Microsoft PSS, to use in troubleshooting SNA connectivi
Ed,
Actually nothing should scream - just a SIM or two on the console and
dynamic sparing will look after the rest. Unless you have a lot of read
cache misses to that array group your scream will be more of a whimper! And
definitely no "pfft."
Pull two drives perhaps - well that's what RAID-6 is
Mark Jacobs wrote:
Is there a command or program available to erase the data in a file that
resides in an HFS or ZFS filing system prior to its deletion? Our
security officer asked me and I wasn't able to find something on my own.
Yes. It's RACF feature. Simply alter relevant DATASET profile an
Thank's a lot to all of you, it's running now, my member is read
THANK'S
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives a
92 matches
Mail list logo
