Of what value are such progress bars other than proving useless
animation can also be provided in TSO sessions? Those development
resources would better be working on real enhancements.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For
I will be out of the office starting 12/03/2007 and will not return until
12/10/2007.
If you need immediate assistance, please contact Jim Cudworth
(1-630-371-4911 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Sheila Bratton
(1-317-443-2142, [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Radoslaw,
Have you tried loading the data in reverse key order? (10, 9, 8, 7, etc)
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: KSDS CA split, no CI
I am aware of the NTP support within STP. But if you are not running sysplex
and STP is not installed, how can I sync. Time between network and Z/OS?
Thanks for your ideas.
Itschak Mugzach, Director
SecuriTeam Software ltd.
Tel: +972 (522) 986404
Skype: Securiteam-Software
Email: [EMAIL
Kees, can you give more details ? Manual, product name, etc. Is this a uss
daemon?
Itschak
Itschak Mugzach, Director
SecuriTeam Software ltd.
Tel: +972 (522) 986404
Skype: Securiteam-Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for large mails
-Original Message-
From:
Itschak Mugzach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am aware of the NTP support within STP. But if you are not running
sysplex
and STP is not installed, how can I sync. Time between network and
Z/OS?
Thanks for your ideas.
You can run an NTP server on z/OS and
Michael Poil wrote:
RS,
Just remembered a VSAM gottcha. After initial load yit is better to
ALTER the dataset to use FSPC(0 0) if you are using Sequential Insert
Strategy so as to reduce the potential for CA splits.
Mike,
Bingo!
I did the following:
DEF CL ...FSPC(15 15)
REPRO (2
Kees,
Did you mean SNTP?
Itschak Mugzach, Director
SecuriTeam Software ltd.
Tel: +972 (522) 986404
Skype: Securiteam-Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for large mails
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
At 12/3/2007 05:04 PM, Dave Kopischke wrote:
With all due respect, I don't believe IBM has an obligation to you
or any of us to act responsibly nor fairly in this matter. This is
IBM's property and they are entitled to sell it or allow access to
it or give it away in any way they see fit. And
See the formatted version here:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~oscarptyltd/Money_Just_Doesnt_Work_Any_More.html
http://members.ozemail.com.au/%7Eoscarptyltd/Money_Just_Doesnt_Work_Any_More.html
Clement Clarke
--
For IBM-MAIN
* Money Just Doesn’t Work Any More.*
*
IF WE DON'T HAVE A PLANET WITH TREES TO LIVE ON THERE WILL BE NO
ECONOMY, NO FOOD AND SOME PRETTY TERRIBLE OUTCOMES.* Lisa P, Melbourne.
Does money buy us freedom, or houses or health or anything, as the
Politicians would have us believe? Why do we
Hi,
When we IPL or z/OS 1.9 system we get this message:
AXR0401I DYNALLOC FOR SYS1.SAXREXEC FAILED. RC=0004, RSN=17080002
We get this message because we've renamed SYS1.SAXREXEC.
This library is part of the System REXX component.
Is there a parameter that will tell the system the new
It is another OS/2 debacle, isn't it? Best OS at the time, and we had
to put up with a decade of Windows 98 etc before they got a relatively
stable OS with Win 2k etc.
All because of money... see next email.
Clement Clarke
David Cole wrote:
At 12/3/2007 05:04 PM, Dave Kopischke wrote:
No big laugh
I actually sent that out to all our Pollies a few weeks BEFORE the election.
It created a bif of discussion, to say the least.
But - think about it. Does money help, or hinder?
Clem
PS: The Government thrown out was a right wing government.
I am not sure what we put in it's
Hi, Matthew.
Yes, I want to create a Coupling Facility inside a single machine.
Previously I have had GRS in ring mode, but there were problems of enqueue
in the CICS regions on one of the LPar.
So now, I'll look the ICP CHPID definitions too.
Thanks so match.
Saludos.
Álvaro.
We get this message because we've renamed SYS1.SAXREXEC.
As far as I know, the library name is hard-coded and can't be changed. System
Rexx obviously needs some work in this area. The ability to concatenate
libraries would be greatly appreciated.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 21:33 +0900, Clement Clarke wrote:
See the formatted version here:
You moonlighting for the ABC Clem ??? ...
See http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/04/2108688.htm
For those unaware, Australia has just tossed out it's (latest) Prime
Minister and his attendant
Clem,
Move to Cuba, you'll be a happier individual.
--Dave Day
- Original Message -
From: Clement Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 6:33 AM
Subject: Money Just Doesn’t Work Any More
See the
Hrrrm. Let's end this thread.
_
Thomas Berg Specialist IT Utveckling Swedbank AB (Publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För David Day
Skickat: den 4 december
Ed Gould writes:
Please lets us know that the DS6000 is capable of remote mirroring
and that it can indeed be done.
It is, and it can, yes. It does support Metro Mirror/PPRC and Global
Mirror/XRC. You need two (or more) of them for mirroring of course.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:04:52 -0600, Dave Kopischke wrote:
I don't believe IBM has an obligation to you or any of us to act responsibly
nor fairly in this matter. This is IBM's property and they are entitled to sell
it or allow access to it or give it away in any way they see fit.
Dave, that may
As the topic of crypto on System z has come up, and someone specifically
mentioned PCI (Payment Card Industry), I figured I should mention that our
System z security web page has a focus on PCI right now, with a couple of
white papers, an announcement about a PCI and System z webcast we're hosting
This library is indeed hard coded and cannot be changed
currently.
Meir Zohar
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
- Original Message -
From: Itschak Mugzach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 6:26 AM
Subject: Native NTP support on Z/OS
I am aware of the NTP support within STP. But if you are not running
sysplex
and STP is not installed, how can I
Yes, that is what we have running.
See:
z/OSCommunications Server
IP Configuration Guide
Version 1 Release 6
Document Number SC31-8775-06
2.14 Chapter 22. SNTPD daemon
Kees.
Itschak Mugzach [EMAIL
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roger Bowler) writes:
IBM worked long and hard over many years to successfully establish
S/360 and its successors as *the* standard computer
Yes, that is what we have running.
See:
z/OSCommunications Server
IP Configuration Guide
Version 1 Release 6
Document Number SC31-8775-06
2.14 Chapter 22. SNTPD daemon
Kees.
Itschak Mugzach [EMAIL
So. How Oracle, UDB and other products deal with that time changing back
on other platforms?
Itschak Mugzach, Director
SecuriTeam Software ltd.
Tel: +972 (522) 986404
Skype: Securiteam-Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for large mails
-Original Message-
From:
And you don't suffer from symptoms like those mentioned by Pinnacle?
Itschak Mugzach, Director
SecuriTeam Software ltd.
Tel: +972 (522) 986404
Skype: Securiteam-Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for large mails
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:51:43 -0500, Bob Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And I have long wondered: SYS1.SAMPLIB(CSFTEST) exists on some of our
systems, but not others. This seems to be random, not correlated with OS
release (although it's available on our 1.9 system).
In our shop it's available
hi listers,
try to locate tool/user exit of MVS console message filter for the event
triggered automatically. I know Ttivoli SA/390 , and control-o. If the
automation event is simple . Is there any cheaper solution ? Does anybody
know that before ?
Thanks !
Sincerely,
Laurence
MPF Exits - look for IEAVMXIT documentation and at MPFLSTxx in PARMLIB.
-Original Message-
hi listers,
try to locate tool/user exit of MVS console message filter for the event
triggered automatically. I know Ttivoli SA/390 , and control-o. If the
automation event is simple . Is there
Of course not: here z/OS is the server and others synch their time to
the z/OS time.
Kees.
Itschak Mugzach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
And you don't suffer from symptoms like those mentioned by Pinnacle?
Itschak Mugzach, Director
SecuriTeam Software ltd.
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
So. How Oracle, UDB and other products deal with that time changing back
on other platforms?
Definition of communism: a system which is fighting to solve the problem
which are never occured elsewhere. g
Ragrding to original question: in order to have z/OS as a
Hi there,
we have an 8-way sysplex with a unique master catalog for these 8 systems.
Our customer wants to separate this master catalog in 5 master catalogs
where each master catalog is shared by 2 systems.
Does anybody have a similar situation? how can we mantain the same
contained in these 5
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:16:10 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Is there some cross reference between CPU types and machine instructions
supported? Perhaps in manual form?
Binyamin,
This document might help:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tsai Laurence
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 9:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Is there any tool or userexit of MVS console message filter ?
hi listers,
try to locate
I am not sure what you are asking. Perhaps you can provide more details.
The whole point of a SYSPLEX is to SHARE (almost) EVERYTHING. I would be
attempting to exceed the customer's requirement go to one master
catalog.
snip
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Divide the master catalog
Hi
On 4 Dec 2007 04:40:33 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clement
Clarke) wrote:
So, what happened? We have been told over and over and over again
that having money is a good thing.
Who is telling us over and over again that having money is a good
thing? Some things we figure out for ourselves,
-Original Message-
From: Ernest Nachtigall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 4:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is CPACF enough to successfully run sample ICSF COBOL program
?
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:19:28 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353
[EMAIL
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
some recent topic drift in thread that wandered into
run-up/justification for 360
You have a locked catalog - you did check the messages and codes manuals for
IDC3009I, right?
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of esmie moo
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CATALOG ERROR
Good Day Gentle Readers,
I am trying to define a user catalog and I am
Good Day Gentle Readers,
I am trying to define a user catalog and I am unsuccessful. The error
message (please see below) points to a Security problem. I checked with
Security and they say that it is not a Security issue. Could anybody tell me
where I can look?
DEFINE
RETURN CODE 186
Explanation: Error attempting to lock a catalog or access a locked
catalog.
2 Explanation: Access was denied for
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:32:04 -0600, Raquel Calvo Olmos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
we have an 8-way sysplex with a unique master catalog for these 8 systems.
Our customer wants to separate this master catalog in 5 master catalogs
where each master catalog is shared by 2 systems.
Does
On Dec 4, 2007 3:03 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of what value are such progress bars other than proving useless
animation can also be provided in TSO sessions? Those development
resources would better be working on real enhancements.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT
GRS star is vastly superior in performance to ring mode. We saw a huge
improvement in converting even what amounted to a one-member sysplex. Some
points to consider.
-- While GRS ring can be configured to cover almost any (sub)set of systems
in a shared complex, the scope of GRS star is *exactly*
Adding to what Mark said, being a University, we do create a lot of TSO
ID's and therefore aliases. We have a pretty simple ISPF / Rexx panel
that randomly assigns a user catalog (from a pool of 4 or 5) for a new
alias and then creates that alias in all master catalogs. It's pretty
simple to
Thanks to all. I removed the LOCK and it worked. The reason I used the LOCK
to prevent updates to this CATALOG because it is shared.
Larry Crilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RETURN CODE 186
Explanation: Error attempting to lock a catalog or access a locked
catalog.
2 Explanation: Access
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:53:15 +0100, R.S. wrote:
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
So. How Oracle, UDB and other products deal with that time changing back
on other platforms?
Definition of communism: a system which is fighting to solve the problem
which are never occured elsewhere. g
Over a decade ago,
/snip
perfectly synchronized. But, all told, the prices I've heard would
seem driven more by customer need and lack of an alternative than by
supplier costs.
-- gil
In my opinion prices in most area's, from software via internet accounts
to TV's, are determined by what the market is
I'm a little confused: I think you meant to say 'shared master', not
'unique master'.
One way to propagate master updates is to have each of the masters
defined as user catalogs to all the other masters. To do an update (such
as adding a new alias), execute the command five times, once for each
The reason I used the LOCK to prevent updates to this CATALOG because it is
shared.
That's not the purpose of LOCK.
It's for recovery/operational purposes, IIRC.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:33:29 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I understand that the CPACF instructions are just that - single
instructions. But so are AR, MVCL, and CFC - quite a range.
(I'm guessing that CFC takes a long time to execute. It's
description takes a long time to
I hate to say it, but I hope IBM loses this legal fight.
Why?
Come one, be serious. How many of us here would LOVE to have our own
mainframe sitting on a spare laptop, just for bragging rights alone? Well, I
just finished up this work on my mainframe, and... is an ego boost equivalent
to
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:48:17 -0600, Rugen, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding to what Mark said, being a University, we do create a lot of TSO
ID's and therefore aliases. We have a pretty simple ISPF / Rexx panel
that randomly assigns a user catalog (from a pool of 4 or 5) for a new
alias and
Clark Morris wrote:
You might even make a stink about the lack of
improvements in the language that is supposedly the
one of the future.
Personally, given IBM and other vendor actions,
I believe it is a cash cow on a long term death bed.
At the Tampa Share, I think, Tom Ross announced that he
Must be nice to be untouched by this :-)
This is not sudden: many of us have been dancing with this bear for a
year or two now. We have mandates to increase security to reduce
identity theft and fraud.
The bar gets higher and higher on each iteration.
-Original Message-
From:
I was thinking (dreaming) today about what if when I giving training for
MVS stuff and each student had their own mainframe instead of connecting
to a central one. We could do so much more.
Here is what I wonder. Does IBM want to be a software company, a
hardware company, or a service provider?
Must be nice to be untouched by this
I was affect as far back as 1990, working for a bank.
We used 4753's, which were PC/AT's with a channel to channel connection.
And, you could only do 50 security calls per second.
I think one chip on a z/990 can do almost 12,000.
-
Too busy driving to stop
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:06:21 -0600, Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must be nice to be untouched by this :-)
This is not sudden: many of us have been dancing with this bear for a
year or two now. We have mandates to increase security to reduce
identity theft and fraud.
The bar gets higher
Wow! Is it the Fourth of Joulukuuta already? Seems like only yesterday
that it was the 38th day of Kunagonda...
While IBM is one of the few companies to handle multiple functions (it's a
floor wax *and* a dessert topping), I sometimes think that they're believing
their own hype that the
Not untouched... been running ICSF since z900 years ago.
We went from 4753's, to 9672-Rn6, to z/900, at the Bank I worked at.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
David Cole wrote:
I no longer believe that IBM is acting in the long term interest of
the z/OS industry.
Well here is my $0.05 worth...
How long did Amdahl last ? Os shall I say How far were they prepared to
support the people that trusted them enough to buy a mainframe off
them...
I firmly
Lindy,
I agree with all the points you made below, but...
Surely the copy of windows that you are running is fully licensed?
Why expect IBM to give it away for free. Dell gives discounts on
desktops to employees of companies that buy enough Dell servers from
them, but they do not give it away
In response to listserv questions and offline comments about
the LVCs and the snow, plus a question for you about LVC topics.
The LVC's are listed on the VM events calendar.
http://www.vm.ibm.com
I don't think there's an email subscriber list for LVC's,
but if you like to be subscribed to
How long did Amdahl last?
Until 64-bit, like HDS.
Even though IBM was just open (as required) with the z/Arch, both companies
couldn't afford the RD.
But, Amdahl really went down the tubes, while HDS still (at least) sells disk
for the mainframe.
I remember the last time I talked to an Amdahl
Who said free? I'd happily pay a C-note for software like this (that's $100
American for our readers in Rio Linda). That gives IBM a clear $20 profit on
the deal!
As to licensing, I'm CERTAIN that the bright bulbs deep within the Armonk
Giant's underground volcano laboratory in the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Van Dalsen, Herbie
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
Lindy,
I agree with all the points you
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lindy Mayfield) writes:
I was thinking (dreaming) today about what if when I giving training for
MVS stuff and each student had their own
John wrote:
Not really accurate, but sounds like Borland's explanation. I can read
upside down (slowly). So it is possible for two people to legally read
a
single book simultaneously
The only time I have seen someone prepared to wait for the slow reader,
was couples that are in love, and only in
I'm trying to get RMM to list all the scratch tapes it knows about which
start with the letter 'V'. Here is the command I'm using...
RMM SV OWNER(*) VOLUME(V*) STATUS(SCRATCH) LIMIT(*)
But it will only list the scratch volumes to V0.I have volumes
defined out to V4.
Anyone have any
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:12:40 -0600, Doc Farmer wrote:
Come on, IBM! Make that software available to IBM-MAIN'ers, RACF-L'ers,
etc., for $100 a pop, and you'll be able to make at least $20 profit on each
One PMR on such a system would put IBM in the red. Who would pay for
software support? How
Angel,
What message appear in SYSLOG when the NOTIFY is issued and you're not
logged on ?
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax: 55 11
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 06:56:23 -0500, David Cole wrote:
WADR (BTW, I hate that phrase...)
I just didn't want to start a flame war. We probably agree more than we
disagree...
And I probably read more into your post than you intended, so I apologize for
that.
But we are all in the same boat. We
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:12:40 -0600, Doc Farmer
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:46:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:12:40 -0600, Doc Farmer wrote:
Come on, IBM! Make that software available to IBM-MAIN'ers, RACF-L'ers,
etc., for $100 a pop, and you'll be able to make at least $20 profit on each
One PMR on such a system would put
Who pays for software support now? WE do. Besides, wouldn't you have to
have a software contract that would *provide* said support? IBM could
always draft the agreement for the PC-based z/OS to have limited coverage
(an RTFM clause would probably work). Besides, IBM requires users to
provide
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Van Dalsen, Herbie
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 11:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
SNIP
Well here is my $0.05 worth...
How long did
Good points. Here are my opinions.
First, you cannot really seriously run z/OS and call it a mainframe
without comparable hardware. So in essence the use of the software is
for training, development and other similar purposes. A copy of Windows
on the other hand is the real thing.
Second IBM
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:46:55 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:12:40 -0600, Doc Farmer wrote:
Come on, IBM! Make that software available to IBM-MAIN'ers, RACF-L'ers,
etc., for $100 a pop, and you'll be able to make at least $20 profit on each
One PMR on such a system would put
Based upon a fairly recent discussion here on IBM-Main, I've changed my code to
now use CSVINFO(as opposed to using LPDE's) to identify modules in the PLPA.
The macro is coded CSVINFO FUNC=LPA,ENV=MVS. My MIPR routine is getting called
with a MODI data for both alias and real load modules,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
[ snip ]
Such software could be distributed with no support. But
then, people would want access to PTFs and the like. If
nothing else, that would cost IBM (or somebody) for Intenet
bandwidth.
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Deaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 1:40 PM
Subject: RMM Scratch list short
I'm trying to get RMM to list all the scratch tapes it knows about which
start with the letter 'V'. Here is the
David Day wrote:
Based upon a fairly recent discussion here on IBM-Main, I've changed my code to
now use CSVINFO(as opposed to using LPDE's) to identify modules in the PLPA.
The macro is coded CSVINFO FUNC=LPA,ENV=MVS. My MIPR routine is getting called
with a MODI data for both alias and
It doesn't on my system. Bit is not set in the MODI data area returned.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: Using CSVINFO
David Day wrote:
Based
Thanks a lot for your responses.
The answer for the last three questions:
1.- Did you then check for the IKJEESnn or IKJVSNXn system exits: We are not
using those exits.
2.- Are there any messages in the SYSLOG at the point in time where a batch
job would normally execute the NOTIFY?: At the end
Did something change in PARMLIB member IKJTSO00? Are you using the same
PARMLIB on 1.8 as 1.7?
Here is the SEND section from ours:
SEND /* SEND COMMAND DEFAULTS */ +
OPERSEND(ON) /* */ +
USERSEND(ON)
There is no differences between SEND section in z/OS 1.7 and SEND section in
z/OS 1.8 but it is different than the yours:
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE PARMLIB OPTIONS FOR SEND:
OPERSEND(ON)
USERSEND(ON)
SAVE(ON)
CHKBROD(OFF)
LOGNAME(*)
USEBROD(ON)
MSGPROTECT(OFF)
SYSPLEXSHR(OFF)
David Day wrote:
It doesn't on my system. Bit is not set in the MODI data area returned.
- Original Message - From: Robert Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: Using CSVINFO
See
CSVQUERY doesn't return any info for AMODE64. Alternate function/macro?
Regards Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
IBM already do give software away You can get the WAS Community
Edition as well as the DB2 Express Community edition.
You can develop applications using DB2 Express-c and sell it for profit.
Microsoft actively tries to get Mainframe shops to convert to the MS
Data Center product or at leats
See also
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0711L=ibm-
mainP=R28085D=1H=0I=1O=DT=0
AFAIR the requirement for this is already accepted by IBM in 2004.
Roland
Clark Morris wrote:
You might even make a stink about the lack of
improvements in the language that is supposedly the
one of the
TMMODI_ATTR2,MODI_MINOR IS THIS A MINOR ENTRY POINT
BZGTLP0550NO
ICM R4,15,MODI_5_PTRGET PTR TO MODI_5 DSECT
BZGTLP0550NO MINOR ENTRY
USING MODI_5,R4
MVC APLPMJNM,MODI_8_BYTE_MAJOR_NAME
In the above code, MODI_ATTR2 is at offset x'18' into the MODI_1
Its great that IBM informally supports IBM-MAIN, but most of the support
comes from users.
Doesn't IBM benefit from IBM-MAIN as well?
I agree with many others on this thread - an open z architecture platform
benefits not only users, but IBM.
IMO -
- The architecture *interfaces* (POP) should be
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:25:09 -0600 Roland Schiradin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:CSVQUERY doesn't return any info for AMODE64. Alternate function/macro?
Is the last bit of OUTEPA(64) set?
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill -
CSVQUERY doesn't return any info for AMODE64. Alternate function/macro?
Regards Roland
===
What return code did you get? According to Assembler Services it
accepts _any_ AMODE caller.
Also, there are a series of keywords that
IEF196I IGD103I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME SYS00110
ICH408I JOB(AXR04 ) STEP(AXR04 ) CL(PROCESS )
OMVS SEGMENT NOT DEFINED
Anyone got this to work?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 4, 2007, at 12:53 PM, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
On
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
