On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:41:50 +, Steely.Mark wrote:
>I would like to check each member of a PDS and if it is empty (0 Lines) - I
>would like to add a line with the text of *NONE*.
>
What requirement does this satisfy?
After you do this, how will you know whether a member containing the
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 23:31:10 +, Schmitt, Michael
wrote:
>3. LMMLIST LIST STATS(YES) to create a list of the members, with statistics
> While LMMLIST rc = 0
> If ZLCNORC = 0
> LMPUT to write your NONE line
Of course, that assumes that there *are* already statistics. If the
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:41:50 +, Steely.Mark wrote:
> ISPSTART CMD(%EDITREXX XX.TSS.CTM.DATA(PADM3) EMPTREXX)
> ISPSTART CMD(%EDITREXX XX.TSS.CTM.DATA(PPCT3) EMPTREXX)
You don't want to start and stop ISPF for each member (ISPSTART). There are far
better methods to process specific
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2024 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EDIT MACRO REQUEST
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:41:50 +, Steely.Mark wrote:
>I would like to check each member of a PDS and if it is empty (0 Li
I have the EDITREXX part. That works. Only need help with the EMPTREXX issue.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2024 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EDIT MACRO REQUEST
CAUTION! EXTERNAL
;EDITREXX" part, see "EDMACALL" on my web site / CBT file 434. URL
of my web site below. The source code has a simple example of an
edit macro.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 an
I would like to check each member of a PDS and if it is empty (0 Lines) - I
would like to add a line with the text of *NONE*.
I would like to do this in batch using this format:
//TSOBTCH1 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSLIST DD SYSOUT=*
//ISPLOGDD DSN=,
//
lf
> Of
> Bob Bridges
> Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2023 11:39 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ISPF: How to remove highlighting of a FIND/SEEK result in an
> EDIT MACRO
>
> I don't think I've ever run across this. The Edit Macro manual says this
> about RES
IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bob Bridges
Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2023 11:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF: How to remove highlighting of a FIND/SEEK result in an
EDIT MACRO
I don't think I've ever run across this. The Edit Macro manual says this
about RESET FIND:
&
On Sun, 1 Jan 2023 00:49:52 +0200, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>I have an EDIT MACRO that is doing a SEEK (but the same results with FIND).
>There does not seem to be an obvious way to reset the high-lit result.
>
Why is highlighting undesirable? Terminal sensitivity?
BTW, I'm suddenl
I don't think I've ever run across this. The Edit Macro manual says this
about RESET FIND:
"Turns off highlighting of FIND strings until the next FIND, RFIND, CHANGE,
or RCHANGE command. However, SEEK and EXCLUDE do not return the highlighting
of FIND strings in this manner.
&
I have an EDIT MACRO that is doing a SEEK (but the same results with FIND).
There does not seem to be an obvious way to reset the high-lit result.
I tried RESET FIND and RESET with no luck.
What obvious command am I missing?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen
ldwide – Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Clist question - edit macro
EXTERNAL EMA
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:04:37 +, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
>
> So I need to change an edit macro to add a function, and most I have figured
> reading the RTFM, except for this one, if its possible.
>
>If this was REXX, and not in a MACRO, I have done this 100 t
Hi,
So I need to change an edit macro to add a function, and most I have figured
reading the RTFM, except for this one, if its possible.
If this was REXX, and not in a MACRO, I have done this 100 times,
however.
So I am doing this to find the string, which it does, add I do adds
, 2021 4:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
I remembered that
(:) prefix command line (primary command) can execute line command
Command ===> :hx
Command ===> :i
Command ===> :r
etc ...
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=co
I remembered that
(:) prefix command line (primary command) can execute line command
Command ===> :hx
Command ===> :i
Command ===> :r
etc ...
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=commands-line
You can enter edit line commands as primary commands on the command line by
prefixing them with
Sloppy coding then but it answers the original
"is there is a way to execute "HX" line command from edit macro ? "
Pick a different label name and add smarts for determining the line number.
Hank
--
Fo
Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Hank Oerlemans [03c4d8bf55f3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 12:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
/* Rexx */
Address isredit
"macro"
"
/* Rexx */
Address isredit
"macro"
"label 4 = .HX"
"FLIP .HX"
flips line 4.
Hank
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I, D, C, CC, RR and DD are not ISREDIT commands or assignment statements. The
issue is whether there is a way to issue line commands from an EDIT macro, not
whether you can issuethem from a keyboard.
There is an ISREDIT INSERT command that has the same effect as an I line
command
Actually they are:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.2.0?topic=macros-performing-line-command-functions
Here's the HEX command edit macro:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.2.0?topic=statements-hexset-query-hexadecimal-mode
Joe
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:02 PM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> well
Answering myself, IBM doc at 2.1 and I'm pretty sure 2.4 see's these
commands as edit line commands
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=reference-edit-line-commands
<https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=reference-edit-line-commands>
HX being one edit and edit macr
Subject: Re: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
I'll have to believe you didn't find it, but I've used edit line
commands in macros, like insert, repeat,copy, delete, and assign a label
to a line, range(s)
if I made an assumption HX is valid then that was a bad assumption
Carmen
On 9/9/202
] on behalf of
Carmen Vitullo [cvitu...@hughes.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 1:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
I'll have to believe you didn't find it, but I've used edit line
commands in macros, like insert, repeat,copy, delete,
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
long before edit CUT and PASTE were readily available in ISPF I picked
up a rexx exec from some toolbox online, I don't recall where, but cut
and paste were a good example of using edit line commands in a macr
my explanation was lost in the post, but before CUT and PASTE were
available in ISPF I picked up that rexx from some MVS toolkit, it has
some examples of using edit line commands in an edit macro, from that
example I have used the line command in other macros when needed.
Carmen
On 9/9/2021
/* REXX ***/
/*** */
/*** ISPF/PDF edit macro to write lines from a file to the user */
/*** PROFILE pool for later inclusion by the PASTE macro
assignment statements" and "Chapter 11. Edit macro commands and
assignment statements" in z/OS 2.4 ISPF Edit and Edit Macros, SC19-3621-40, and couldn't
find any way for an edit macro to issue a line command. What did you do with the variable CMD
to treat its value as
I checked Edit assignment statements" and "Chapter 11. Edit macro commands and
assignment statements" in z/OS 2.4 ISPF Edit and Edit Macros, SC19-3621-40,
and couldn't find any way for an edit macro to issue a line command. What did
you do with the variable CMD to treat its
, September 7, 2021 10:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
Like I said I never used this line command, my syntax was not correct
but a quick check;
ISREDIT (CMD) = 'HX' should work -I've not tested
you need to have the cursor positioned to wher
men Vitullo [cvitu...@hughes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 10:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
Like I said I never used this line command, my syntax was not correct
but a quick check;
ISREDIT (CMD) = 'HX' should work -I've not tes
My understanding of the OP's initial request was the ability to display a line
in hex from within an edit macro, which is probably doing a lot more than just
the hex display as it is very easy to do the HX on the line while in edit/view.
Unfortunately there are a very limited number of line
for the misunderstanding
I did not know the option
"quote original message"
and It's tapping me to comment
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:55:00 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
I do not understand your response, you asked;
there is a way to execute "HX" line command
>from e
ng me to comment
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:55:00 -0500, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
>I do not understand your response, you asked;
>
>there is a way to execute "HX" line command
>from edit macro ?
>ISREDIT HX .ZCSR
>
>- is a line command
>
>now you are askin
I do not understand your response, you asked;
there is a way to execute "HX" line command
from edit macro ?
ISREDIT HX .ZCSR
- is a line command
now you are asking command line ?
so
ISREDIT (CMD) - 'HEX'
Carmen
On 9/2/2021 10:14 AM, Weizman arbel wrote:
ISREDIT HX .ZCSR s
, 2021 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
hi,
there is a way to execute "HX" line command
from edit macro ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acces
ISREDIT HX .ZCSR should work
this is command line
and there is Does not exist HX in command line (the command is hex on / hex off)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
So I understand it's impossible
execute "HX" line command from
edit macro
I know the way to do it myself in the code
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@lists
, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
You can turn HEX ON or OFF in an Edit macro but you can't do it for a specific
record. You can do it yourself in your edit macro and insert the hex info as a
note or message line below the real record.
I cobbled this together - it is a quick/dirty example of an edit
You can turn HEX ON or OFF in an Edit macro but you can't do it for a specific
record. You can do it yourself in your edit macro and insert the hex info as a
note or message line below the real record.
I cobbled this together - it is a quick/dirty example of an edit command that
will add
2, 2021 7:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ispf edit macro "HX" line command
hi,
there is a way to execute "HX" line command from edit macro ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acces
,
there is a way to execute "HX" line command
from edit macro ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
/I am not bo
hi,
there is a way to execute "HX" line command
from edit macro ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2021 1:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:15:17 -0700, Charles Mills wr
On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:15:17 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>That's why we get the big bucks.
>
Ah! EBCDIC belongs top the Full Employment Program for coders!
On Sun, 30 May 2021 15:48:01 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> That's not cheating;
>
>Of course it is cheating; it's not a faithful
816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 11:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
On Sun, 30 May 2021 01:03:04 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> I hate EBCDIC issue, it's a multiple code page set issue!. Pop quiz: when
>&g
t's why we get the big bucks.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 6:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
I hate EBCDIC i
Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 6:03 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
>
> > I hate EBCDIC issue, it's a multiple
That's why we get the big bucks.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 6:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
> I hate EBC
On Sun, 30 May 2021 01:03:04 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> I hate EBCDIC issue, it's a multiple code page set issue!. Pop quiz: when
>> using REXX on a PC, is � 'AA'X or 'AC'X? And, yes, you can cheat and use \
>
That's not cheating; it's USASCII. Porrtable.
>... so you don't have to care
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom
Brennan [t...@tombrennansoftware.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 1:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
Hi Greg,
That's probably what I'm
Friday, May 28, 2021 7:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
(This thread would better go on ISPF-L.)
On Fri, 28 May 2021 13:27:23 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>I'm trying to write a Rexx ISPF Edit Macro which contains a FIND Regular
>Expression
Nice! I like the SYMSET character map too. For me, hex is no problem -
I still have a couple of Casio CM-100 calculators from the 1980's, which
are far above any others I used in ease of use.
http://edspi31415.blogspot.com/2017/02/retro-review-casio-cm-100-computer-math.html
On 5/29/2021
On 5/28/2021 10:10 PM, Tom Brennan wrote:
I see my current code page 1047 showing up as 0417 hex - highlighted at
the bottom of this image:
http://www.mildredbrennan.com/mvs/termtest.png
Right...
Well done to spot it there!
SYMSET0 should break that out (still in hex sorry to say) on the
Hi Greg,
That's probably what I'm thinking of, or maybe in the back of my mind it
was something under ISPF written by Doug Nadel. I forgot!
But I just tried your program and I see my current code page 1047
showing up as 0417 hex - highlighted at the bottom of this image:
On 29/05/2021 7:30 am, Tom Brennan wrote:
But years ago I remember a bit of free code that displayed many more
terminal characteristics. I'm not talking ISPF terminal types (I'd
recommend using type 3 with PCOMM, some others tell ISPF to sends
graphic characters to the screen). I'm talking
(This thread would better go on ISPF-L.)
On Fri, 28 May 2021 13:27:23 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>I'm trying to write a Rexx ISPF Edit Macro which contains a FIND Regular
>Expression.
>...
>I turned HEX ON so that my square brackets can be displayed. (I used
>x'AD' and x'
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 5:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
There is a variable. I found this old panel of mine:
** * Top of Data
[IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 2:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH,
I am using PCOMM.
How do I display the Code Page?
ISPF Option 0:
Log
: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH,
I am using PCOMM.
How do I display the Code Page?
ISPF Option 0:
Log/List Function keys Colors Environ Workstation Identifier Help
s
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 2:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH,
I am using PCOMM.
How do I di
LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
Hi,
I'm trying to write a Rexx ISPF Edit Macro which contains a FIND Regular
Expression.
I'm getting a ISRE997 on this line
cussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
Hi,
I'm trying to write a Rexx ISPF Edit Macro which contains a FIND Regular
Expression.
I'm getting
id Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression
Hi,
I'm trying to write a Rexx ISPF Edit Macro which contains a FIND Regular
Expression.
I'm getting a ISRE997 on this line:
&qu
Hi,
I'm trying to write a Rexx ISPF Edit Macro which contains a FIND Regular
Expression.
I'm getting a ISRE997 on this line:
"ISREDIT FIND R'ÝABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ@#$¨'" 3
7CEDCCCE4CCDC4D7ACD775B774F444
F92954930695409DD12345678912345678923456789CBBD
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 22:38
>
It was mentioned and addressed:
--- On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 20:51:42 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote:
>No one else has mentioned it, so I may be all wet, but don't you have to
>have an ISPF environment to run an ISPF E
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, at 23:40, Steely.Mark wrote:
> //SYSTSIN DD *
> PROFILE PREFIX(xx)
> ISPSTART CMD(%EDITREX1 XXX0111.DATA(DATAXX) - EICUPDT PARM(1))
So the command being issued once ispf is up is
%EDITREX1 XXX0111.DATA(DATAXX) - EICUPDT PARM(1)
> Here is EDITREX1:
> PARSE ARG
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 20:51:42 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote:
>No one else has mentioned it, so I may be all wet, but don't you have to
>have an ISPF environment to run an ISPF Edit macro? IKJEFT01 won't do
>itI thought.
>
It was mentioned and addressed:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22
You are correct; you have to call an EDIT macro from within EDIT. However, you
can write a macro that tests how it was invoked and behaves accordingly.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
No one else has mentioned it, so I may be all wet, but don't you have to
have an ISPF environment to run an ISPF Edit macro? IKJEFT01 won't do
itI thought.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Never dare your little brother to paint the family car. -from "
>>
>> I did add that - but the process is not executing the macro.
>>
>> So that is not the problem.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
>> Of Joe Monk
>&g
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Edit Macro
>
> ATTENTION: This e-mail came from an external source. Do not open
> attachments or click on links from unknown or unexpected emails.
>
>
> Well...
>
> The first thing youve got to do is fix your edit macro
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Edit Macro
ATTENTION: This e-mail came from an external source. Do not open attachments or
click on links from unknown or unexpected emails.
Well...
The first thing youve got to do is fix your edit macro. When you run an edit
macro in batch, it has to end with "ISREDIT END&
Well...
The first thing youve got to do is fix your edit macro. When you run an
edit macro in batch, it has to end with "ISREDIT END".
So, you might have two different versions, one for batch and one for online.
Second, when you run ISREDIT in batch, you have to use a macro to supply
Send again hope it keeps the formatting.
I have this edit macro EICUPDT:
* Top of Data
ISREDIT MACRO (NUM1)
ISREDIT COPY EICLIST 20 20 BEFORE 1
ISREDIT COPY EICLIST BEFORE 1
EXIT: +
EXIT CODE(0)
Bottom of Data **
When I am
I have this edit macro EICUPDT:
* Top of Data
ISREDIT MACRO (NUM1)
ISREDIT COPY EICLIST 20 20 BEFORE 1
ISREDIT COPY EICLIST BEFORE 1
EXIT: +
EXIT CODE(0)
Bottom of Data **
When I am in a edit member session and I enter
ast new keyword was
> added on 2018-07-31) keywords from 1)
>
> 3) A "master" exec/edit macro that reads 1), and updates the keyword tables
> inside the "handful of others"
>
> > Why don't you leave the execs alone and make them read their data from
> &
process its contents.
The "master" exec/edit macro (it's both) just extracts all the relevant data,
and passes it on to the various per-exec/edit macro subroutines. It has no clue
whether the data to be processed by any of these other exec/edit macros has
changed.
That's confusing. Earlie
he input file for the affected execs does change, but the changes may not
> affect all of the REXX execs/edit macros that are used to process its
> contents.
> The "master" exec/edit macro (it's both) just extracts all the relevant data,
> and passes it on to the various per-ex
s change-log entries ... then you
won't have the 'compare' problem?
The input file for the affected execs does change, but the changes may not
affect all of the REXX execs/edit macros that are used to process its contents.
The "master" exec/edit macro (it's both) just extracts all
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, at 11:44, Robert Prins wrote:
> It also updates the change-logs in each of the affected execs, and as
> we keep a few generations of older versions around, it's irritating
> that compares show that the change-log has been updated, but
> that there are no other changes.
So
On 2020-02-03 21:52, Bob Bridges wrote:
I've never used the COMPARE command. (Never used MACRO_MSG, either.) What
message were you expecting from COMPARE?
"Files are the same"
or of course the message that tells me they're not. It would allow me to cancel
the update that in fact isn't an
I've never used the COMPARE command. (Never used MACRO_MSG, either.) What
message were you expecting from COMPARE?
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* By 2005 or so, it will be clear that the Internet's impact on the economy
has been no greater than the fax
I've been using this for ages, and in case you've never heard of it:
MACRO_MSG Set or Query the Macro Message switch
The MACRO_MSG assignment statement sets or retrieves the value of the
macro_msg switch, which controls whether macro processing delivers ISPF
messages to the macro.
Syntax
ata for the "get first/next" record request from EDIF.
>
>I have just executed the following simple REXX EDIT macro in SDSF SJ and SE in
>2.2 and 2.3 and the results were as expected:
>
>address ISREDIT "MACRO"
>address ISREDIT "(CU
Dana
I would double-check your REXX exec code - perhaps paste to the forum?
"SE" and "SJ" use ISPF "EDIF" services - pretty much all SDSF does is supply
the data for the "get first/next" record request from EDIF.
I have just executed the following
I have an edit macro that I've used in one form or another for many years,
it's my version of the point and shoot edit. Place the cursor on a dataset
name in a jcl member for instance, hit the PFK set to ';CA' and you are
taken to edit of that dataset. It discerns the dataset name
On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 22:16:16 +, Steely.Mark wrote:
>I have a JCL Check product that uses an EDIT Macro to check the JCL. This EDIT
>Macro has been copied under different member names through the years. The
>customers uses whatever process was provided when hired.
>
W
I really don't want to do that but may be the only option.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 5:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EDIT Macro
A more
t; To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: EDIT Macro
>
> I have a JCL Check product that uses an EDIT Macro to check the JCL. This
> EDIT Macro has been copied under different member names through the years.
> The customers uses whatever process was provided when hired.
>
> The quest
I have a JCL Check product that uses an EDIT Macro to check the JCL. This EDIT
Macro has been copied under different member names through the years. The
customers uses whatever process was provided when hired.
The question is can I call another edit macro within another edit macro.
Ex. JJ1
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dan D
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: :Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
Hi Skip,
Have you checked the ISPF command table for your command?
=3.9 then change the table
Hi Skip,
Have you checked the ISPF command table for your command?
=3.9 then change the table to ISP.
We have quite a few CLISTs there ...
WHOAMI3 SELECT CMD(%WHOAMI)
Then a WHOAMI CLIST that checks for ISPF and pops up a window with user info.
If it's not within ISPF it just WRITES
gt; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of CM Poncelet
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 6:04 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):Re: :Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
>
> FWIW
>
> The oddity is that
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of CM Poncelet
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 6:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: :Re: Message IRX0006I running an edit macro CLIST
FWIW
The oddity is that there are *no* edit macro statements after "ISREDIT MACRO
(PARMSTR)". So why is an
;preceding "ISREDIT MACRO" statement.
>
But you might risk a "NOT AN EDIT MACRO" error in its absence.
>BTW I use "ADDRESS" only for "ADDRESS IPCS", to avoid having to juggle
>between "ADDRESS TSO/MVS/ISREDIT/ISPEXEC/whatever-else".
>
D
*Any* commands that can be issued in a Clist or REXX proc (e.g. "ISPEXEC
SELECT PGM(J00YCKAL) PARM(JLRCL)" etc.)can also be issued in an edit
macro. But *only edit* statements (e.g. "EXCLUDE ALL P'¬'" then "CHANGE
ALL P'.' ' ' NX" etc.) can be issued in edit
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 02:04:25 +0100, CM Poncelet wrote:
>FWIW
>
>The oddity is that there are *no* edit macro statements after "ISREDIT
>MACRO (PARMSTR)". So why is an edit macro declared in the Clist?
>
>E.g. "ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(J00YCKAL) PARM(JLRCL)" etc.
FWIW
The oddity is that there are *no* edit macro statements after "ISREDIT
MACRO (PARMSTR)". So why is an edit macro declared in the Clist?
E.g. "ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(J00YCKAL) PARM(JLRCL)" etc.can be issued
directly from the Clist proc and does not need an edit macro to d
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
