I thought VM64798, VM64879, and VM64881 were the only APARs needed for
z196 compatibility for z/VM 5.4.
You are 6.1 so maybe it is different.
But if not, I better find out fast.
Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
11/05/2010
It is usually a good idea to predefine a full range of devices, control
units, etc, to avoid future changes, dynamic or static, to the IOCDS.
Edward M Martin emar...@aultman.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
11/05/2010 03:20 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM
on
the controllers have to match the IODEVICE units.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-363-5050
ext 35050
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 3:27 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: 3592 cart iocp
, VM64799, VM64820, VM64672, VM64747, VM64807 (for
various products and other functionality)
We did not have any problems with the upgrade to date.
Bob
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, November 05
tyvm, MIke.
This is very helpful.
But how did you navigate to this page on the site?
gclo...@br.ibm.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
11/05/2010 04:27 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Check 5VMTCP40 for a 490 link to MAINTSYS 490 which links to Maint 190
I got a similar error putting on maintenance the other week and this was
the problem.
I did not have a 490 link in 5VMTCP40.
As soon as I defined it, everything was fine.
Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com
Sent by: The IBM
Well the list of z196 (alias 2817) compatibility APARs has grown. Here
are all 14 now in alphanumeric order:
PK97799
VM64656
VM64672
VM64747
VM64774
VM64793
VM64798
VM64799
VM64807
VM64818
VM64820
VM64879
VM64881
VM64891
btw: The only way I could find the page in the link Clovis supplied was
Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
Try a different browser.(Lotus Notes? Really?)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
the links on
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?TCVM1, I see it as a
.zip file.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: November 4, 2010 10:01
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
On Thursday, 11/04/2010 at 10:18 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Frank found the problem, Lotus Notes.
Lotus Notes
As a minimum, you can at least issue the ACTIVATE command dynamically
through the HMC.
z/OS is not the only way to issue the CF ACTIVATE command.
It can also be issued on the HMC.
Davis, Larry (National VM/VSE Capability) larry.dav...@hp.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:30 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Dynamic IO Gens on boxes without z/OS?
As a minimum, you can at least issue the ACTIVATE command dynamically
through the HMC.
z/OS is not the only way to issue
Yes, really nice. I like CBDSACT in Step 4 below. It is functionally
equivalent to the z/OS command.
1. Use the HCD ISPF dialog to create a new work IODF based on your current
production IODF as described in the z/OS HCD User's Guide. Continue to use
the HCD dialog to apply your configuration
Curious, how you found this, Marcy. Google, maybe?
Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
11/04/2010 03:53 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Marcy:
The CBDSACT process is definitely the way to go, but if you really want to
know what is going on under the covers, check out the details of CP SET
IOCDS ACTIVE command below and the Lock Step Philosophy writeup from the
Infocenter which follows it below:
2010/11/2 George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Tom:
I think you may have found the problem.
You use ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH.
I do not reset the REXX CMS ENVIRONMENT to the COMMAND ENVIRONMENT with
ADDRESS COMMAND.
Normally that is not a problem for CP commands
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:08 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
Here is what I get when I try to download.
Sorry for the screen shot, but it was the only way I could capture
System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
No, it is a ZIP, not a TAR, created on Windows.
2010/11/3 George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
It's a TAR file, so friendly maybe to LINUX.
Frank M. Ramaekers framaek
, with Windows/XP. Uploaded that to
my VM userid and SENDFILEd that to Endicott. Then it is outside my
hands. But, when I look with Mozilla Seamonkey, I see
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/tcvm1.zip , still a ZIP
extension. Amen.
2010/11/3 George Henke/NYLIC george_he
as corrective (COR) maintenance.
Once again, thank you all, the list is t long, for all your help.
George Henke/NYLIC
09/23/2010 10:30 AM
To
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Applying Maintenance - Best Practice
Would you recommend putting this 5.4
Tom
Would you be so kind as to send me a copy of your AUTOLOG1 EXEC?
If I use it as a model, I should be ok.
Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
11/02/2010 03:52 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
Tom:
I think you may have found the problem.
You use ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH.
I do not reset the REXX CMS ENVIRONMENT to the COMMAND ENVIRONMENT with
ADDRESS COMMAND.
Normally that is not a problem for CP commands, but in this case SET is
also a CMS command and without the ADDRESS
COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG ZLINUX4
..
..
..
ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG VMRMSVM
ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG CMSRUN
ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG WAKEUP
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:56 PM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Tom
Would you be so kind
, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
So I guess what you telling me, Tom, is that . . .
Though the XAUTOLOG's have no CMS synonyms and work in my AUTOLOG1 EXEC
without the ADDRESS COMMAND or even the CP prefix, it is not good form.
But the CP SET VSWITCH, being synonymous
Sergio:
You need to CP SET RUN ON which allows the z/OS guest virtual machine to
run without an interrupt for CP READ.
Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
11/01/2010 09:52 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
system config. 1 for layer 2 and 1 for layer
3. Both work at IPL.
DEFINE VSWITCH VSWTCH1 RDEV 0600 CONTR * ETH
Define VSWITCH VSWTCH3 RDEV 0604 CONTR * IP
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:07 PM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
After IPL we can destroy the VSWITCH:
det vswitch
On Monday, 11/01/2010 at 03:10 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
After IPL we can destroy the VSWITCH:
det vswitch lnxvsw1
Then issue the same commands as in the IPL below and everything
connects.
Why?
Are there some restrictions, considerations
] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 2:43 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
My controllers. DTCVSW1,2 are AUTOLOGed before the GRANTS, but there is
only a 10 sec sleep.
'CP XAUTOLOG GCS'
'CP XAUTOLOG DTCVSW1'
'CP
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 15:43
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
My controllers. DTCVSW1,2 are AUTOLOGed before the GRANTS, but there is
only a 10 sec sleep
/2010 03:58:36 PM---Here is my NSS and DCSS so far,
after Service but before PUT2PROD. It shows GCS has been hit.
From:
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
10/27/2010 03:58 PM
Subject:
Re: Maintenance Warnings
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating
that are
in the sample files and you want to think about applying to any past
samples you started with and are now using in production.
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:15 PM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
I just did PUT2PROD Level 1 and was checking the results
Here is IBM's recommended workaround for the TCPIP problem in PUT2PROD
that bypasses BFS.
Comment out with a '-' in column 1 the BFS load (in tag :TCPBFS) in
5VMTCP40.CATALOG on 5VMTCP40 491 and your TCPIP processing in PUT2PROD
will finish normally.
Evidently the BFS load is done for LDAP.
and get past this hurdle.
much easier to do
munson
From:George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:10/28/2010 12:53 PM
Subject:Re: BFS for Dummies
Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM
Even though everything finished successfully when I applied maintenance
yesterday, I received some warnings which prompt the following 2
questions. I have not PUT2PROD yet.
Question 1: Does the restrictive RMODE cause the RO IFREQ message below
and, if so, do I need to rerun this without the
AM---Even though everything finished
successfully when I applied maintenance yesterday, I received some
From:
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
10/27/2010 10:38 AM
Subject:
Maintenance Warnings
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM
, NLSAMENG, and NLSUCENG DCSS (shared segments). You
need to run the shared segment build steps to rebuild these segments.
Mike Donovan
George Henke---10/27/2010 11:10:57 AM---ty, all. Though not warnings, do
the following messages need some action?
From:
George Henke/NYLIC george_he
It's your self-defining literal =CL.
Make it regular literal, just DS CL and you will be fine.
BAL has never allowed equates for self-defining literals.
Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/26/2010 02:22 PM
Please respond to
' (AVAILABLE ON
0802RSU ON
* LY).
KRSU02HP SLU UMRSU20 * UPDATE CP SERVICE LVL TO '0801' (AVAILABLE ON
0801RSU ON
* LY).
Ray Waters
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 4:18 PM
To: IBMVM
/IP Lev
el 540; RSU 1002 running TCPIP MODULE E2 dated 06/22/10 at 02:40
TCP/IP Module Load Address: 00C1E000
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:26:41
Ray Waters
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:23 AM
Try:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1b490/CONTENTS?SHELF=EZ2ZBK0I.bksDT=20090402193001#16.4.3
Pay particular attention to Section 16.4 (See below):
It is call Telnet Macroinstructrions, but that is just an alias. These
are the old VTAM instructions for coding or
I plan to DDRed my system disks 540RES, 540SPL, 540W01, 540W02, before I
apply maintenance to Level 1 and PUT2PROD, so that I have a *hot* fallback
when I IPL. the maintenance.
How can I be sure the IPL will not pick up these standby disks but WILL
pick them up if I need them for fallback? Is
with the updated
directory (USER2 DIRECT).
2) FLASH2ND process creates unique VolSer (VOLID) and is
IPLable (w/o changes)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Wednesday, October
, it will not run in 3270 mode on
SYSG. :)
-Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 11:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Duplicate VOLSERs at IPL
I plan to DDRed my system disks 540RES
I ordered and was delivered the following RSU from SHOPZ.
I installed it, but the RSU Level did not change, it is still 0802.
Why did RSU level not change when I installed this upgrade.
The Service Guide talks of a PSU (Product Service Upgrade), not an RSU.
Was this a PSU and not an RSU?
Then
?
Hint: XEDIT $VMFSRV $MSGLOG A1
Another hint, XEDIT command: ALL /VMFSRV2195I/
Be sure to QUIT that file, you don't want to change it by accident!
Mike Walter
Aon Hewitt
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Sent
z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/20/2010 04:37 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RSU or PSU?
On Wednesday, 10/20/2010 at 02:06 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote
employer's.
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/20/2010 03:54 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RSU or PSU?
Thank you very
, target is
ST:BUILD7 493 (L)
---snip---
What does your ST:VMFBLD1851I (1 of 1) VMFBDNUC processing CPLOAD show?
Mike Walter
Aon Hewitt
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating
I would like to connect my Level 2 Spool to my Level 1 Spool via RSCS, so
that when I flip the configuration making Level 2, Level 1 and vice versa,
my Level 2 Spool that was Level 1 could then be accessed from Level 1.
I suppose it would begin with defining a VCTC.
But if anyone has done
I thought I saw some detail document for SFB which discussed the creation
and contents of BCHTIMER files.
My current system has been creating automagically and spooling them to
MAINT for several years.
No sure what is triggering the process.
Also any idea of how much disk space is needed for
System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Spool File Backup (SFB) BCHTIMER Files
George, what are BCHTIMER files?
On 10/19/2010 6:50 PM, George Henke/NYLIC wrote:
I thought I saw some detail document for SFB which discussed the
creation and contents of BCHTIMER
I have no extra disk, no tape, but still need a fallback, I am thinking of
implementing the following strategy to put maintenance into production and
would appreciate it, if someone could find something wrong.
My 2d Level is a mirror of 1st Level except for VOLSERs which are unique.
I apply
, DIRMAINT,etc.) and/or an ESM (e.g.
VM:Secure, RACF, etc.) these products will also get out of sync, so find a
way to ensure they stay synchronized between first and 2nd level systems.
-Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
, RACF, etc.) these products will also get out of sync, so find a
way to ensure they stay synchronized between first and 2nd level systems.
-Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 4:53 PM
To: IBMVM
it be that the install CPLEVEL is unchanged so that future PSU's can
be generated for a specific install CPLEVEL rather than BASE?
Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise Thomas Gray
.
George Henke/NYLIC
10/14/2010 07:41 PM
To
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re
You don't need 6.1
Just put VM64798 VM64879 VM64881 on 5.4 and you can run on z10.
5.4 has a longer TTL than 6.1.
6.1 does not have that much more functionality.
Why would anyone go to a higher release that has a shorter expiration and
not much more functionality?
It's suboptimal.
Put on
Also, Frank, it should be noted, 6.1 will not run on a z9. You get a wait
state code. It is not downward compatible, but 5.4 is both downward
and upward compatible.
It would be nice to bring up the software before the hardware comes in the
door, just to shake things down.
It is also not
We've tried it and 6.1 will run as a guest of 5.4 on a z10.
But will 6.1 run on a z9 or less? No, I've tried it.
So for a seamless migration to new hardware, maybe it is not so bad to
change one thing at a time and keep 5.4.
True, there is less risk going from 6.1 to 6.2, than 5.4 to 6.2, but
I ordered RSU 1002 from SHOPZ,IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU or so I thought.
SHOPZ called it RSU5407 when it gave me the download.
Applied 35 PTFs, others were already on, PUT2PROD, and IPLed.
But CPLEVEL still shows 0802:
q cplevel
z/VM Version 5 Release 4.0, service level 0802 (64-bit)
I need to move maintenance from Level 2 to Level 1:
Level 1 is 540RES, 540W01, 540W02, 540SPL, 540SP2, 540PAG, 540PG2
Level 2 is 54XRES, 54XW01, 54XW02 54XSPL, 54XSP2, 54XPAG, 54XPG2
What is the least disruptive way to do this when:
there is no tape,
no additional volumes are available, and
I
Aon Hewitt
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/14/2010 01:56 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM
it.
I will need to examine $VMF... $MSGLOG more carefully, as MIke Walter
suggests, to see what has happened.
PTFs did get applied and I do see the correct SES envelop FNs in $MSGLOG,
so I know I did not just rerun with the old SERVLINK.
George Henke/NYLIC
10/14/2010 06:36 PM
To
The IBM z
RECEIVE_DYNAMIC_SUBNETS=YES
RECEIVE_DYNAMIC_HOSTS=YES
On 2nd level def for the interface just like you did for the first I
think.
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:35
with where
hey need to be issued.
Brian Nielsen
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:15:34 -0400, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
I have defined the OSA2LAN as Dave Jones suggested, though probably not
how:
I defined a SPECIAL in the profile of the Level 2 machine and also in th
e
to Level 2
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:04:29 -0400, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
ty, Brian.
OSA2LAN is defined in the 1st Level Dircectory profile of my 2d Level
machine.
The SPECIALs do not define OSA2LAN, they create the virtual device
addresses and attempt
the level 2 stack to the vswitch. Since you
can't reach the level 1 host, I'd bet on the latter.
On 10/13/10 1:09 PM, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
wrote:
I have NICDEFed to my level 1 switch from my level 2 machine (ZVM54SVM)
and
can display my level 2 switch now with q
Level 2 OSA cannot find a Gateway router:
NETSTAT GATE
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 540 TCP/IP Server Name: TCPIP
Path MTU Discovery Aging Interval: 10 Minutes
Known IPv4 gateways: None
Known IPv6 gateways: None
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 16:35:44
Level 1 has no problem finding the
E080 from STRTLAN for
IPv4
17:43:34 DTCOSD305I Waiting for adapter-initiated Start Lan
- Forwarded by George Henke/NYLIC on 10/12/2010 05:44 PM -
George Henke/NYLIC
10/12/2010 05:17 PM
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Cannot TELNET to Level 2
Level 2 OSA cannot find
.
* The port might have been disabled.
Which one of these might apply to your situation?
DJ
On 10/12/2010 04:47 PM, George Henke/NYLIC wrote:
Also getting the following error on TCPIP startup.
Perhaps it is the problem.
E080 says the OSA has no connectionto the LAN.
17:43:34
connect to anything. And, yes, defining
GRAFs and using DIAL is a standard practice.
George Henke/NYLIC
10/06/2010 10:46 AM
To
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: IPL VM/VM Issues
I IPLed L2 COLD, because I did not have the extra SPOOL volumes yet
they no longer
have tape and cannot use SPXTAPE. Truly . . .
The best things in life ARE free
George Henke/NYLIC
10/07/2010 08:36 PM
To
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Rebuilding NSS and DCSS after DDR
ty, Mike
I do have the same SLOTs in SYSTEM CONFIG
Cool ! ! !
McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/07/2010 12:51 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: IPL VM/VM Issues
Some do remote
FWIW, I do not know if IBM ever fixed it, but TPF (formerly ACP) had no
storage key protection between tasks, workloads, and it was very simple,
even common, for one task to step on another. If that is still the case,
TPF would be the first place I would look for any strangeness.
Colin
. What you're doing is a great learning
experience, and eventually you'll see the value in making your multiple
systems easier to manage.
Brian Nielsen
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:28:01 -0400, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
L2 is a cloned L1 directory except for the volsers
tyvm, Dave.
This is just what I need.
Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/06/2010 12:03 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: IPL VM/VM Issues
that on your 1st level system.
Brian Nielsen
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:52:50 -0400, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
My Level 1l PAGE and SPOOL disks have only the first volume defined in t
he
Directory.
*
USER $PAGE$ NOLOG
MDISK A03 3390 000 END 540PAG R
*
USER $SPOOL$ NOLOG
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: IPL VM/VM Issues
George, have a go at it and let me know what you thinkand please pay
close attention to the restrictions and limitations mentioned in the doc
file.
Have a good one.
On 10/06/2010 11:05 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
VM/VM Issues
George, VMARC files should be uploaded to VM binary mode, recfm F, lrecl
80. To unpack the VMARC file, you'll need the VMARC module. The doc I
mentioned is in the VMARC file, as well.
Let me know if you have any more problems.
On 10/06/2010 02:12 PM, George Henke/NYLIC wrote
My Level 1l PAGE and SPOOL disks have only the first volume defined in the
Directory.
*
USER $PAGE$ NOLOG
MDISK A03 3390 000 END 540PAG R
*
USER $SPOOL$ NOLOG
MDISK B01 3390 000 END 540SPL R
*
Yet, Q ALLOC PAGE and SPOOL recognize a second volume for each:
q alloc page
that on your 1st level system.
Brian Nielsen
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:52:50 -0400, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
My Level 1l PAGE and SPOOL disks have only the first volume defined in t
he
Directory.
*
USER $PAGE$ NOLOG
MDISK A03 3390 000 END 540PAG R
*
USER $SPOOL$ NOLOG
discussing the pitfalls of doing so. You
might want to fix that on your 1st level system.
Brian Nielsen
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:52:50 -0400, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
My Level 1l PAGE and SPOOL disks have only the first volume defined in t
he
Directory.
*
USER $PAGE
There is plenty in the manuals about updating CF Parm disks at the same
level, but any ideas about how to update L2 parm disks from L1?
I have cloned the L1 directory, changed all 540 to 54X disks, and updated
the L2 directory from L1, getting the expected RC=5.
But when I try to link to CF1
L2 is a cloned L1 directory except for the volsers in the Directory and CF
Parm files which have all been made unique, ie 540 becoming 54X.
I plan to ipl as follows:
system reset
term conmode 3270
set mach esa
I 125b clear loadparm 009
START COLD DRAIN
To be safe, I suppose I should also add
Nielsen
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:28:01 -0400, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
L2 is a cloned L1 directory except for the volsers in the Directory and
CF
Parm files which have all been made unique, ie 540 becoming 54X.
I plan to ipl as follows:
system reset
term conmode 3270
Trying to IPL 2d Level but getting the following:
17:34:24 z/VM V5 R4.0 SERVICE LEVEL 0802 (64-BIT)
17:34:24 SYSTEM NUCLEUS CREATED ON 2008-11-28 AT 19:22:25, LOADED
FROM 54XRES
17:34:24
17:34:24
Issues
That’s correct, you do not respond START with startup parms, just enter
the startup parms. In your case reply with COLD DRAIN NOAUTO and you’ll
be fine.
-Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Tuesday
How do you setup a Level 2 Directory before you IPL the Level 2 machine
for the 1st time?
.
Minidisks with the END option specified are not included in a DISKMAP when
the command, DISKMAP USER is entered.
What is the reason for this?
Does this pose a danger when updating the directory directly, no pun
intended? :-)
Ray Waters ray.wat...@opensolutions.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM
A (2NDLEVEL DIRECT being the 2nd level
system directory)
- DET 123
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:05 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
How do you setup a Level 2 Directory before you IPL the Level 2 machine
for the 1st time?
.
at 10:05 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
How do you setup a Level 2 Directory before you IPL the Level 2
machine
for the 1st time?
.
So if my Level 1 Page and Spool have the last cylinder allocated, when I
DDR them, I can probably short the Page pack 1 cylinder, but I do not
think I can short the Spool pack 1 cylinder.
They are multi-disk, so when I short them 1 cylinder, I suppose it is just
on the last disk.
Also,
ty, Rich, for the heads up.
If, perchance, the 1st Level directory gets updated by mistake instead of
the second Level directory, ie you get RC 0, can you just do another
DIRECTXA with the 1st Level directory source to back it out as long as you
don't logoff, or is it too late.
Haven't done
On 9/30/10 5:55 PM, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
wrote:
Unfortunately that was day 1, but its source did not appear until day 4.
David Boyes wrote:
Well, the tech support load for that day 1 thing was pretty heavy. We
took a couple days off after the launch party. 8
Ray,
Please attach a copy of your EXEC in a reply.
I would find it very useful.
Also, would someone please give the pro's and con's of using DIRMAINT as
opposed to just XEDIT directly.
As long as your check DISKMAP for OVER and specify the EDIT option for
DIRECTXA, does DIRMAINT really buy
script. Just ensure you have free space in your DASD pools and your
good.
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:35 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Ray,
Please attach a copy of your EXEC in a reply.
I would find it very useful.
Also, would someone please give
ty for this information, but I do not follow how the last cylinder of any
pack on the IIS being unused allows you to name the real packs anything
you want while still retaining the default names for the 2nd Level system.
Could you explain in a little more detail?
Jeff Gribbin
...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: October 1, 2010 15:51
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice
ty for this information, but I do not follow how the last cylinder of any
pack on the IIS being unused allows you to name the real packs anything
ty, David for this fine explanation.
It's a nice trick of the trade.
David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10/01/2010 04:02 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Sorry for my ignorance and naivete, but I am simply staggered at the
volume of page volumes of whatever size, 100 - 240.
I have just a Dev Test z/VM environment with 2 measly 3390-3's for Paging.
Granted, I am running only 5 z/OS vm's and 3 Linux vm's.
But, what does someone have to run that
page volume sizes
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:39 PM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Sorry for my ignorance and naivete, but I am simply staggered at the
volume of page volumes of whatever size, 100 - 240.
I have just a Dev Test z/VM environment with 2 measly 3390-3's
101 - 200 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
