REPOS A3 DMS (NOLIST MARGIN 63'
'SET LANG (ADD DMS USER'
'ERASE DMSUME TEXT'
end
if ren_rc = 0 then 'RENAME RDYMSG REPOS A DMSUME REPOS A'
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 12/17/2010
10:42:15 AM:
Greetings
to an interface on the stack issuing the
message, then somebody else on your network is using that IP address...no
matter what your telecom guy says :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 12/15/2010
10:40:53 AM:
Hello Alan,
I
to the VSWITCH.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 11/02/2010
10:45:33 AM:
Ok, they may be defined but try having a z/Linux guest connect to
them before DTCVSW* is up!
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS
If FTPGEST0 is a z/VM FTP server and your user ID is in the TCP/IP server's
OBEY list, you could issue:
SMSG FTPGEST0 CLOSECON
to close the console.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 02/04/2010
09:21:25 AM:
The IBM z/VM
determines the optimal MTU
Is it that important...?
It definitely improves overall performance in some environments. If you're
in such an environment, then yes.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
Dave,
Use 'TYPE E' and 'MODE B' rather than 'bin' and 'quote site fix 80'
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 11/04/2009
10:51:13 AM:
Hi all,
I have a little knowledge problem here. I'm trying to FTP in binary
a fixed
that :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 08/23/2009
05:01:55 AM:
Hi,
I tried to use IFCONFIG to remove a link. According to the help file
the interface must be inactive first. I assumed that an interface which
is
DOWN can
IFCONFIG doesn't display information about VSWITCHes or their
controllers...so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Could you clarify?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
Dean, David (I/S) david_d...@bcbst.com
Yep, and if you have two controllers for failover to two OSA’s
Mike,
TCP/IP can be configured to dispatch device driver work on non-base CPUs
by coding the CPU num option on the DEVICE statement in PROFILE TCPIP.
Other than that it won't do anything with multiple processors.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
|
| From
was
causing the connection to close would require some tracing either on the
client side or on the TCP/IP stack (MORETRACE TCP would probably be the
most enlightening from the stack point of view).
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Steve,
According to the doc, the default is 10,000 bytes.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
Adam,
What does NETSTAT DEV say?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
NETSTAT HOME shows the right information (ETH1 is the L2 LAN; ETH0 a
Layer 3 QDIO LAN, HSI0 is L3 Hypersockets, and CTC0 is a point-to-
point CTC TCPIP link):
netstat home
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 540 TCP/IP
Adam,
Transport Type: IP
This says your NIC is defined as Layer 3.
14:55:58 DTCOSD355E OSD device ETH1: Possible LAN transport
misconfiguration detected during OSD device initialization.
This says you tried to attach a Layer 3 NIC to a Layer 2 LAN (or
vice-versa)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z
part. I've
forwarded your note off to the dirmaint developer for verification, but it
doesn't look like it's possible at this point.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
*Sigh*...yeah it's Friday...you tell the TCP/IP stack that this is a Layer
2 device by specifying the ETHERNET option on the LINK statement in PROFILE
TCPIP
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 05/15/2009
01:33:27 PM:
Adam
OK, so, look, surely I'm not the first person to want to do this.
With the ETHERNET option on the QDIOETHERNET LINK statement (in case you
missed my other note)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
?
Which one is the better and simple way if lots of Linux guests run on it?
The GRANT command needs to go in SYSTEM CONFIG.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
. That looks like a bug. Feel free to open a PMR.
FWIW, this was fixed in z/VM 5.4.0
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
Alan,
The links in the RSU Content column, take you to a list of all APARs on
the releases' RSUs, along with the RSU they were included on.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 04/02/2009
09:32:28 AM:
I just went
Tom,
See APAR PK49558
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 03/27/2009
10:05:14 AM:
Hi all,
I am getting this error when I am attempting to receive a file that
was sent via SENDFILE (UFTASYNC
I can send files from
connect OK.
What client(s) are you using?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
NETSTAT GATE is what's going to show the stack's routing table. If you
have a DEFAULTNET route specified on your GATEWAY statement and you don't
see a default route in the NETSTAT output, check the TCP/IP server's
console for error messages.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
The IBM z
addresses assigned to the
OSA, IP addresses which the OSA has assumed responsibility for due to an
outage (IP Takeover), and VIPA addresses.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
Mike,
Could you open a PMR for this? It seems our FTP server is misbehaving
here. We should not be sending back the 503 in this case.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 11/19/2008
10:42:25 AM:
Well DRAT!
Here
Steve,
This is controlled by the MAXRESTART statement in PROFILE TCPIP. The
default is 5.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 11/20/2008
10:40:51 AM:
In PROFILE.TCPIP, I have a TCPIP server (we’ll call it server_a
,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 11/19/2008
10:24:42 AM:
snip
I know this code is executing because I see my FTPEXIT: RetMsg on the
console, but the FTP Server is ignoring my RETSTRING (NOOP) and still
attempting to execute PROT
Do you have the PTF for PK69986 applied?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 10/09/2008
06:20:19 AM:
Can anyone give me a hint whats wrong ?
Packet fragmentation is done in the TCP/IP stack. The stack will chunk the
packet up into smaller packets before sending it over the HiperSockets
device.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 08/20/2008
12:40:47 PM
If you wanted to get nitpicky, it would actually need 3 fragments to
account for the extra IP header(s). :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 08/20/2008
01:38:48 PM:
Yes and no. :-)
It won't be truncated
Mike,
Smurf attacks are malformed ICMP echo packets. They aren't directed to a
particular port. You've got all the information there is :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 07/31/2008
07:40:23 AM:
[image removed
I believe this means PERFSVM doesn't have permission to bind to whatever
port it's trying to use. Make sure you have an entry in the PORT statement
of the TCP/IP server's configuration file.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
IFCONFIG linkname UP
or
NETSTAT OBEY START devicename
Issue either command from a user ID in the TCP/IP server's OBEY list
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 07/10/2008
11:23:26 AM:
Hi
I found out
to be
significantly more straightforward than OBEYFILE. See TCP/IP Planning and
Customization or HELP TCPIP IFCONFIG for command options.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 07/10/2008
12:25:03 PM:
For instance I can issue one
,
9300-9302,
EA00-EA02,
EB00-EB02
Continue as needed :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 07/10/2008
03:56:01 PM:
[image removed]
Re
How about:
'PIPE',
'| STEM x',
'| APPEND FILE NAME A',
'| OUT FILE A'
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 04/15/2008
12:43:51 PM:
I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
1. copy records from a stem
.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 02/05/2008
01:20:06 PM:
I have SineNomine's SSLSERV installed on my z/VM 5.3 system and I can
establish secure telnet sessions. I tried to configure FTP to take
advantage of SSL
In order to use self-signed certificates, you must specify the CERTNOCHECK
as well
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 02/05/2008
02:05:36 PM:
On Feb 5, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Miguel Delapaz wrote:
The control port has
.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 11/20/2007
02:12:31 PM:
On Tuesday, 11/20/2007 at 02:40 EST, Dave Keeton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you, Alan. Using ifconfig, I see that the interface is listed as
DOWN
of the other pools) dynamically. The values specified in the PROFILE TCPIP
are initial allocations only. If the TCP/IP server runs low on a
particular control block, it will dynamically allocate more automatically
(and send a note to the INFORM list).
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The DTCPARMS file is discussed in TCP/IP Planning and Customization Chapter
5. General TCP/IP Server Configuration
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 09/20/2007
12:31:42 PM:
Alan,
thanks for spotting that.
I
Berry,
This issue was addressed in APAR PK42210
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
Now I noticed the default was presented as a default gateway (flags UGS)
in the old VM and the new one is a host (flags UGHS). Other than that I
think the netstat gate output is the same in both
(Securing FTP with TLS). Configuration
of the FTP server to support TLS is discussed in TCP/IP Planning and
Customization, Chapter 8. Configuring the FTP Server (specifically Step 6:
Configure Secure FTP Connections).
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System
The CMS FTP client was also updated to support TLS. Configuration and
usage is discussed in the TCP/IP User's Guide, Chapter 2. Transferring
Files Using FTP under the heading Transferring Files Using Secure FTP
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM
I think Atlantic Standard Time would make more sense...but still...why
bother to log in? :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 07/10/2007
07:06:19 AM:
On Monday, 07/09/2007 at 10:30 AST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED
Jim,
The timeout values are configured in the FTP DATA file. There are a few
knobs in there that you may need to twist depending on what's causing the
timeout - CCONNTIME, DATACTTIME, DCONNTIME, INACTTIME MYOPENTIME
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating
Berry,
No, there's no logic in the TCP/IP stack to reduce the size of the buffers
once they've been expanded. It would be nice though...
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 06/22/2007
03:40:44 PM:
Hello Alan
I think it brings up too many thoughts of Final Destination to use as a
movie title...'cause those movies definitely were not blockbusters and were
very far from cool :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 06/25/2007
02
blamed for stuff that's not
his fault? :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
8100Fax: 123 123 1234
Record expires on 08-Sep-2009
Record created on 20-Feb-2007
Database last updated on 20-Feb-2007
I'm gonna go with no
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
03/14/2007 10:00
,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
03/09/2007 02:33:33 AM:
Why is the home address for the ESC1 link placed in the
OSA for device DEVGEF11 that is connected to another network
: No Layer 2
Portname: OSADXVM2 RDEV: FD12 Controller: NONE Error: No Layer 2
Ready;
The No Layer 2 in the Error: field means the devices you're trying to
use do not support layer 2 mode.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
is *not* the tool's problem. However, it does become our problem
when the shot is taken, they call us and their overall user experience is
less than favorable. I think having the tool unload the gun is
preferable.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
. If you read further in the description of the first
operand the doc says: Alternatively, ipv4_dest can be specified as the IP
address, in dotted-decimal form, of any host that is on the destination
network. Which is really what applies in this case.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP
to be correct
Yes
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
You don't *have* to have the HOST entry if you have the subnet route. It
doesn't hurt, and will make some things more clear. For example, the
P-t-P address on the IFCONFIG output is taken from the HOST routing entry.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating
would explain why you cannot PING 205.235.227.41, 205.235.227.74 and
192.168.3.21. As to why you can't PING 192.168.194.1, I'm not sure, is
that host up? Is that host actually attached to the same network as
QDIO1?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
this message are I not, by definition, taking any action
based on it?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
11/22/2006 12:01:17 PM:
Anyway, am I correct in that the IPWIZARD doesn't handle a supernet?
Tom,
It seems you're correct. This is a bug. Please contact the support
center to have them open an APAR.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM
more information about how the indexes into TABLE relate to the data
or display would be helpful.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
wrote on 11/08/2006 09:16:27 AM:
Hi Plummers,
I have a little PIPE question.
I have
says
to start reading the data at 10001 and go up to TABLE.0 (12480) */
'| LOCATE',
/* Get rid of any values that haven't been set (still
null)
*/
'| CONS'
You may have to doctor it a bit to suit
your needs. Hope this helps.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM
HX (Halt eXecution)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
wrote on 11/07/2006 08:55:06 AM:
How do I make a runaway exec quit? It is spewing out error messsages
in a
loop. I've been pressing [CLEAR] for hours now. Isn't
Specify SUPPRESSNOTIFICATION in your
SMTP CONFIG file I believe that support was added in z/VM 4.4.0
If you're on z/VM 5.1.0 or later, you
can specify RECEIVED, DELIVERED, or ALL after SUPPRESSNOTIFICATION to have
a bit more control over which messages you suppress
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM
OSPF_INTERFACE.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
. The port that is used for this
connection on the client's TCP/IP stack (which may or may not be the same
as the server's), will generally be an ephemeral port (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port).
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
*/
This should also be a bit more tolerant
than your initial solution when it comes to intervening records (e.g. throw
an 0AAAFULL02
after the second header, and your pipes will give you a lot of extra junk).
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
Hmmm...nevermind my whole Building
off Jim's solution thing...the first time I tried yours it didn't
give me what I was expecting...But, I tried it again and it produces just
what was asked for. Plus it's cleaner :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating
was executed, the value would be something else (Success,
Failed etc.).
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
the packet data from
the firewall is probably the easiest way to know *what* the packets are
(and where the originated).
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
be *too* painful.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
a requirement that simply
says: The SMTP server should be compliant with RFCs 2821 and 2822.
That being said, are there aspects of
those RFCs that you need supported that our current implementation does
not support?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/475/), it's very powerful.
/digression
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
Marcy,
Here is the response from our SMTP developer.
Also, posting to the listserv for anyone else who is/was interested.
If you have any more questions/concerns
please let us know!
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
- Forwarded by Miguel
Delapaz/Endicott/IBM on 10/17/2006
Some Wikipedia articles relevant to
this conversation:
SI Prefixes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix
Non-SI Prefixes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-SI_unit_prefix
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
Well, right depends on your
perspective. I was speaking of right in terms of the
general SI prefix standards. 1024^n was/is used to simplify our lives
because we (computers) deal with powers of 2.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM
Systemz9). See:
http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/fcgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=cainfotype=anappname=iSourcesupplier=897letternum=ENUS206-084
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
David,
FYI...Works fine for me on Windows with
firefox. I tried it with IE and I get the error everyone else is
seeing.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
wrote on 08/04/2006 12:57:55 PM:
Huh. Looks fine on Linux.
I
OSPF_INTERFACE
statements. By forcing the links to have different costs, MPRoute
will only use the path with the lowest total cost, and will no longer round-robin
the packets. In the event of adapter failure, MPRoute would fail-over
to using the higher cost path.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
Adam,
Interesting. That little example
is wrong (and it's still wrong in the 5.2.0 doc).
See the information on the SRVRFTP CONFIG
file in the chapter on configuring the FTP server. The PORT specification
goes in there.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating
Tom,
NETSTAT OBEY was added in z/VM 4.3
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
wrote on 07/27/2006 11:08:01 AM:
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Tom
It isn't a matter of grammar.
It's a quote from the Highlander (http://imdb.com/title/tt0091203/)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
There can only be one.
(sigh) There can be only one.
Alan
Now that reminds me of Mr Gilmore's postings on the Assembler list
In z/VM TCP/IP Planning and Customization,
the chapter on Configuring the Local Host Files states the hostname in
a HOSTS LOCAL file can be a maximum of 24 characters
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
wrote on 07/13/2006 07
I should also mention that if you are
on z/VM 5.1.0 or later you should consider using ETC HOSTS rather than
HOSTS LOCAL (it's documented in the same chapter). The hostname limit
in ETC HOSTS is 128 characters.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
- Forwarded by Miguel
Delapaz
Apparently, you're not alone :-)
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/06/23/immature_hum.html?category=humanguid=20060623110030
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
wrote on 06/27/2006 01:48:11 PM:
Good company, indeed.
I
It was posted on Slashdot a couple of
days ago; and about 2 or 3 minutes :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
wrote on 06/27/2006 02:32:22 PM:
One must wonder WHY you knew about that site, and how much time you
spent
87 matches
Mail list logo
