preface - I'm still running Bering v1.2
I ran accross a program which I'd like to build, or have built, for use
with my Bering router. I tried to setup the userspace build
environment, but was unsuccessful. I know I need to upgrade to Bering
uclibc, so maybe this is something that pushes me
Wow, thats interesting. I would check the /etc/cron.d/daily ...
I would also check out /etc/crontab ... but I would be really surprised
that its a job that is firing off, it certainly isn't standard. Someone
may have added it, but who knows.
Good luck Sayang!
joey
Sayang Oin wrote:
Hi
I just noticed on Slashdot.org that the WCG has released a linux client,
basic information is available here:
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=4224
So I figured since my router LEAF box is just sitting here, basically doing
nothing, I thought I'd give it whirl.
I'm using Vonage with Bering. I setup the ToS under the shorewall
configuration. The ports are well documented on the Vonage website. Also,
you do need to DNAT certain ports to your internal ATA address.
I setup my ATA as a dedicated (although still DHCP) IP address. Never had a
problem so
Not to sound like a smart ass, but Ghost, from Symantec will do this, quite
nicely. It'll either just recognize the card as a drive, which you can
create an image from (and restore from) or allow you to perform a Ghost
mirror of the drive to another CF on the fly.
Alternateively, you can use
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joey Officer
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 7:07 AM
To: Stefaan Van Dooren; leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] RATL
The only relevant link I could fine was here:
http://www.ec11
The only relevant link I could fine was here:
http://www.ec11.dial.pipex.com/port-num2.shtml#2400
Which describes port 2499 as RATL unisys.com ... so I'll assume that the
RATL service has something to do with a Unisys device. We run Unisys system
at our office, and we have two onsite techs from
I don't have an answer to your specific question, but would it be possible
to routinel down the aDSL line, and bring it back up. I'll assume for a
second that the aDSL line dropped due to an unknown event, and possibly due
to a cycle at the ISP end, so its possible that a routine downing and
Yes, because the system is performing NAT, then (even at the most basic
level) a firewall is in place. What you will need to do is find the
configuration to disable, and make the netgear a passthrough device, so that
it doesn't perform any inspection at all, and treats the eth1 connection
Of Michael
McClure
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:04 AM
To: Joey Officer
Cc: Charles Steinkuehler; Charles Steinkuehler; Leaf Mailing List
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Help! Problems getting Raid5 to work. Banging
my head against the wall!
This doesn't seem available. I don't see an fd type
Sorry to intrude on this thread, but I noticed a few things.
The first being that the drive partitions are not set correctly. If I
recall correctly, the partition types need to be set to fd Linux raid
auto
chernobyl# fdisk /dev/sda
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 9104 MB, 9104953344
I'm looking at using the Bering-uClibc environment to drop in a relatively
quick linux box, with a harddrive as real storage (booting from a CD or
other device). At anyrate, I'm looking at building the wuftpd (or another
FTP server) and quite possibly Samba support. I've built kernel modules
NAME=DEV2_GRID_INTERVAL VALUE=10
The DEV2 portion may be different in your environment, please adjust to the
next available number in sequence.
Now just reload the webpage, and you should see 'live' cpu stats.
I hope this helps someone, if you gues have any questions, please let me
know.
Joey
by the Exchange server for the various
services. What I believe you will need to do is open the specific ports so
that your workstation can access the Exchange server.
Hope this is useful information.
Joey Officer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Does there exist, or is there a need to build a virtual environment similar
to that of the Bering virtual environment? I read through the documentation
of the Bering-uClibc environment, and it seems to work OK, but my intent was
to compile a module. I ended up modifying the Makefile of the
-user] Routing Question
At 10:23 AM 05/01/04, Ray Olszewski wrote:
At 07:46 AM 5/1/2004 -0500, Joey Officer wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but I have what seems to be a very simple question.
I
have a wireless card that I'm still attempting to setup, and while I
think I
have the link issues
Alas, you may be faced with compiling it yourself. Not a terrible thing to
have to do, but you'll need the development environment. If you have the
source to the driver, I'd be happy to compile it for you, although I
currently only have the standard bering development inplace.
I'd be willing
Forgive my ignorance, but I have what seems to be a very simple question. I
have a wireless card that I'm still attempting to setup, and while I think I
have the link issues corrected, I do have some questions about the routing
itself.
My configuration is as follows:
eth0 : internet/dhcp
eth1 :
previous post.
Joey
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 6:38 AM
To: Joey Officer
Cc: Dave Hunt; 'Leaf-User'
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] SNMPd using Dachstien netsnmpd.lrp
Joey Officer wrote:
Dave,
Thanks for this tip, I see
file from.
Thanks again.
I'll post if I find any more problems, but I think this was the big step
that I kept fumbling with.
Joey
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 6:00 PM
To: Joey Officer
Cc: 'Leaf-User'
Subject: Re: [leaf
installed correctly.
Thanks,
Joey
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 9:05 AM
To: Joey Officer
Cc: Leaf-User
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] SNMPd using Dachstien netsnmpd.lrp
Joey Officer wrote:
I followed the threads from
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:56 AM
To: 'Joey Officer'; 'Leaf-User'
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] SNMPd using Dachstien netsnmpd.lrp
Try:
snmpwalk -v 1 -c public firewall
Cheers,
Dave.
www.me2000.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I followed the threads from an archive, which ultimately died without giving
a conclusion email (perhaps I missed it) however I am looking to get the
SNMPd package working. The thread that I found before referenced someone
using the netsnmpd.lrp file from the Dachstien CD, which I've grabbed, as
I have to agree here. While the idea of using an embedded device that is
intended to do a specific job, and do it well, is really nice, I think its
also intended for a larger environment.
I can see this card being used for a rack of systems that could treat all of
these card as a single device,
To add to the discussion, I currently am a Vonage customer, using a mostly
vanilla Bering setup. Currently (although could change later) I have my ATA
on the same network as my other PCs. It hasn't caused any problems that
I've found, and Bering has done an excellent job. One thing I did do
Has anyone configured the Bering system to acknowledge when a UPS has become
active, and wether or not to initiate a shutdown properly, or to cancel a
shutdown?
I recently purchased a Belkin UPS (holiday special) that I've got plugged
in, and it was nice enough to come with a serial cable, for us
Very late to this thread, probably not a concern, but I wanted to add.
I too on occasion have this problem. In my case, the eth0 or eth1 would
die, and if I downed the box, and brought it back up, no harm no foul.
After a few more instances, I decided to just down the eth0 or eth1 device
and
While I personally have not been very active, I can say that the list is
definately alive.
My wife and I are trying to square some things away before I get involved
again, but expect me back in full force in the near future.
Joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
of something fowled up in the distro
that I got.
joey
-Original Message-
From: S Mohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:28 AM
To: 'Joey Officer'
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] QOS setup under Bering 1.2
You would get this error if tc does not support htb. I know
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:32 AM
To: Joey Officer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] QOS setup under Bering 1.2
Joey
for your reference, this is how the wondershaper installs the root qdisc
# install root HTB, point default traffic to 1:20:
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root
I normally don't advertise for anyone, but I just read this on Marketwatch
about a company comming out with a card in January, with native support for
Linux (currently Redhat Timesys). For any of those specializing in this
type of configuration, enjoy.
am willing to continue to
test this, if others are willing to work with me.
Joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joey Officer
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:31 PM
To: Leaf User List
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] QOS setup under Bering 1.2
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 1:46 AM
To: Joey Officer; Leaf User List
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] QOS setup under Bering 1.2
Joey
I am using tc only (not qos-htb) with the wondershaper as documented on the
shorewall site.
To start with, it failed too with IIRC similar problems
-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Joey Officer
Enviado el: Martes, 16 de Diciembre de 2003 04:28
Para: Leaf User List
Asunto: RE: [leaf-user] QOS setup under Bering 1.2
Been doing some reading, and I found a couple of interesting bits.
What appears to be a somewhat
I'm currently experiencing the same problem. I think this has to do with
the Ash/Bash problems. Earlier on, there was a thread that I believe
resolved this. I am going backwards now to find it. I'll update you as I
make progress.
Cheers
joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: S Mohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 3:37 AM
To: 'Joey Officer'
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] QOS setup under Bering 1.2
I think the package is broken. Can Juan/Jacques let us know which the
right package is? Apart from
Is there a specific reason you can remember for attempting to comment out
the shorewall entry?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Craig
Caughlin
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:34 AM
To: LEAF (LEAF)
Subject: [leaf-user] Necessary to comment
This is in reference to the mrtg program file, the line references line
1485. There may be a syntax error.
another way to get what you want as a test is to perform an snmpget on your
selected target.
joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Without trying to sound rude, have you read the LEAF/Bering documentation on
PPPoE setup? It can be found here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bupppoe.html
Additionally, can you define some specific problem? You have not given us
much to go on, you could start by telling us which Distro
). This is just my 2cents, but I'd bet
the PPPoE for Linux mailling list would have some great examples. I'll be
sure to read up on it as well!
Joey
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Inacio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Joey Officer
Subject: Re
I am setting up a wireless card under Bering and I wanted to provide limited
access to it. But because I know that eventually the WEP will be cracked
and someone will get an IP address from the DHCPd server, I want to know if
I can redirect all traffic from (example) 192.168.2.0 except
At face value, and without (intending to) sounding like a moron, Shorewall
can block anything you tell it not to explicitly allow. Isn't that the
default way its currently being used?
respectfully,
joey
- Original Message -
From: Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shorewall Users [EMAIL
In reference to the recent communications regarding the hack of the Debian
website and the general release of the information regarding the exploit
that exists in kernels prior to 2.4.23, is anyone working on, or has anyone
already addressed this issue going forward with either the Bering or
Thanks Tom for the input. It was nothing of major importance, just
something that would have been nice.
Regards,
joey
- Original Message -
From: Tom Eastep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joey Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Leaf User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:43 PM
Sorry for the late reply, but I hope the information will be useful
none-the-less. Once I modified the HTML to include netmon and the Java
applet, I added the TCP port (Martin Hejl mentioned this as well) to the
shorewall rules file, and restarted shorewall, I assume the same would work
for you.
Is there a way to replace the 'src=ip.add.re.ss with a host name?
For example, in the current connection window:
tcp src=192.168.1.203 1031 dst=216.136.173.180 5050 --431958 sec.ESTABLISHED
Is there a way to say
tcp src=computer1 dst=whateverdomain.com
It would be slightly more informative
I've read over the docs for the Bering user guide, and have been stuck at a
single spot:
firewall: -root-
# tc qdisc add dev eth0 root
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
I have noticed that when I go into LRCFG, that the qos-htb package is not
listed. Is there anyway to confirm that the
for port
ranges (like the 1 - 2)?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Schurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joey Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] QOS setup under Bering 1.2
Joey,
You might try this qos-htb.lrp
I got it from
While I might be offering a very simple view, and forgive me if I am, but I
have a question.
If you disconnect the two connections, and run with a single connection
only, do you receive better ping times individually? For example, if eth0 =
wired and eth1 = wireless, if you leave eth0 down and
He's right, typically they have to be configured with 3comcfg or some tool,
free from 3com, but it used to specific to the ISA cards, i don't think you
needed them for the pci cards... I could be wrong
www.scyld.com is a greate place to start though!
joey
btw.. I'm back!
- Original Message
are you sure the 8139too driver isn't there?
I would think that it was...
- Original Message -
From: Phil Moors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: leaf-user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:24 PM
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering 1.2 Driver Module Compile
I'm going to compile the
is
there...
joey
- Original Message -
From: Phil Moors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: leaf-user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bering 1.2 Driver Module Compile
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Joey Officer wrote:
are you sure the 8139too driver isn't
spoofed IPs?
At 09:51 29/01/03 -0600, Joey Officer wrote:
Jan 29 11:23:47 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
10.51.192.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=350 S=0x00 I=25217 F=0x T=255 (#8)
What you have there is just static from your ISP, that you can safely put
in silent deny.
Your
I quickly scanned the logs and didn't find anything that resembled what I'm
doing here, so I'll try to explain it best as possible.
I've got my LEAF w/ SSH on port 22, an internal SSH server on port 24, and
vnc running on the internal server. I want to get to the vnc server running
on the
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lynn Avants
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] VNC, SSH, port forward
On Monday 27 January 2003 02:40 am, Joey Officer wrote:
I've got my LEAF w/ SSH on port 22, an internal SSH server on port 24
: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:20 AM
To: Joey Officer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] VNC, SSH, port forward
I'm doing this.
I have leaf port forward port 22 to a Red Hat box running ssh. Then I use
plink to create the tunnel from the internet.
plink.exe -ssh jay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Re: [leaf-devel] VNC, SSH, port forward
Joey Officer wrote
Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] VNC, SSH, port forward
Joey Officer wrote:
I quickly scanned the logs and didn't find anything that resembled what
I'm
doing here, so I'll try
/ pci slots, but not enough to
do the job - so I'm pretty certain it's EISA. But I didn't think about that
until I had already sent the e-mail...
I'll look at the 3c515 card.
Thanks again for the info.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Joey Officer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
thanks for the info on the EISA bus. I didn't recall the throuhgput of that
channel.
speaking nostalgia, I had an old 486 mb with ISA/EISA that board was
awesome. I used it for a while as a desktop (hand me down style) and worked
flawlessly. The best part was that I went from that old 486 to a
Enjoyable article. I think this article really shows the leg that Linux
stands on. Performance at low cost.
thanks for the submission
joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Nosko
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:30 PM
To: leaf
I was reading an article today and ultimately came accross this nifty tool
for monitoring network traffic based on type of traffic. Nice for realling
finding out what is going accross (ie napster, nntp, smtp, etc..)
http://www.caida.org/tools/utilities/flowscan/
It reads like it is intended for
well, the 3c515 cards are isa 100mbit, and you will get some speed increase
from them, but they can be a little tricky to get working, there used to be
a problem with the plug and play, but i believe that is working these days.
My home router is using these cards. Two 3c515 running dachstein
you should first verify that you have loaded and installed the IPSec module.
edit modules.conf (from the menu) and remove the hash mark # from the line
that has the ipsec module. this is for pass through vpn/ipsec
configurations.
that should fix the problem
Joey
-Original Message-
when you update a kernel for the release like this, does the UML need to be
updated as well? Or can we continue to work under the debian wood UML?
I still need to read the section on creating .lrp files, but I'm getting a
little closer to being finished with a 'hylafax.lrp' Hope to start testing
the cron part would actually need to call a script. I believe what you
would do is setup a cron on both sides, tar the files, into one, file have
sftp (or even ssh copy) grab the file and decompress on the archiving
machine.
as for cron itself, man cron is extremely informative, and I'm not
although i have no expierence setting up qmail, its possible it could be a
couple of different problems, check the load order, you said in your email
that you load qmail manually, if this is the case, make sure the qmail
package is the last one loaded, just in case.
if that doesn't work, load it
my mail server was down and I've not received the better part of todays
list, could you direct me to his email address and how you paid, i am in the
need of building one for home in the next month or so and would like one i
think
joey
- Original Message -
From: Brad Fritz [EMAIL
-
From: Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joey Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:29 AM
Subject: Re: ipsec.o missing in ipsec.lrp
Hi Joey, I moved this over to leaf-user
Thanks for the info. I was just wondering why KLIPS (aparently the ipsec
I assume you mean how can you save the file after you reboot the machine?
You'll need to back the etc.lrp package. I believe.
Joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:leaf-user-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Roberto Pereyra
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002
You could write a script that was called by cron to email the files, or move
to a separate directory, then create new files for logs, say run every night
at midnight, or something like that, I would use the date as part of the
filename when moving.
Joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
If you are questioning can IPSec be setup with DCD sure, you can use a
floppy, and with my limited experience, it looks like there is enough
information here to setup your ipsec.conf file, but I don't see a key...and
the destination network should be the private range I assume?
Joey
Just so that I understand, eth0 is connected to the internet? If so, what
you are seeing isn't so unusual. It looks like the ip address that is being
assigned to you is a private address from your provider. While this sucks,
it may be their policy. Do you have multiple internet connections to
I noticed that you said your setup is approximately 60mb, I'm curious to a
couple of things.
1 What is the purpose of running such a system from CD? I understand the
need for quick booting, but would this make a static system, you can only
modify so much, I assume that you are still using a
I'm not familiar with PPTP at all, but if its at all similar to ipsec
(sounds like it) then you might need to add the module to allow trafic
through the firewall. I am really speaking out of my ass on this one
though.
try adding the pptp module (ip_masq_pptp.o) to the modules conf, I'll bet
Make sure you have modified the hosts.allow file to allow the box from where
you are coming from. I believe there are two specific places where you will
need to modify the files. The first is the hosts.allow file, the second is
the network.conf file (atleast under dachstein). You will need
David, I posted a similar reply just a few minutes ago on the mailing list,
please check the threads for some suggestions.
Also, I have little success getting mrtg to work pulling information from a
dachstein based snmpd setup. If you get anywhere, please let me know, I'm
very interested in
Are you talking about setting up Telnet for the gateway box, or for an
internal telnet server?
Internal telnet server is very similar, except that you would just use the
port numbers, something similar to the following
INTERN_SERVERS=tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_telnet_192.168.1.1_telnet
you can use
the network while using it
from my one computer on the network.
And by the way I'm using WindowsXP pro, just a home
user on 3-computer network.
---
--- Joey Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you talking about setting up Telnet for the
gateway box, or for an
internal telnet server?
Internal telnet
Another way to do this is with an IPSec gateway. This would bridge the two
networks and make it very similar to sending an email from within your
network at work. However this becomes a little more detailed, esp. if you
don't have access to the servers at work.
Joey
-Original Message-
device, but I have since moved on. Although it worked,
it was more of a project than a need. I no longer have it setup for
that.
Good luck
joey officer
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 17:14, Alex Ryabtsev wrote:
Hello leaf-user@lists,
Finally I've got LPT Link cable and now I trying to connect trough
will work...
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ArisB
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] FTP server behind dachstein
I've got a FTP server running on my
print to a windows box and spool everything there.
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Schalit
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Jeff Newmiller
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf
, and it
works fine. Let me know if you need some specific help.
BTW, I'm running Dachstein-CD Based installs with IPSec 1.91. Took me a few
days to fully understand what it was I was doing, but I've got it down now.
Atleast that part.
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From
be able to keep up with even
a cable modem w/o any lagging. 3com 509 is a 10mbit (cable), while the
intel pro/100 is 100mbit (LAN) ... just some other thoughts
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kyle
processors
I got the whole loot for about $350(US). I figured it was a good deal,
hopefully it was...
That's all the information that I have on the hardware until I pick it up,
hopefully on Friday (27th). At any rate, any help would be greatly
appreciated...
Joey Officer
Sales Operations
Martin
requesting an IP
address, and dhcpd tried to assign an IP, but the client would not keep the
IP address.
Any thoughts?
Joey Officer
Sales Operations
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
800-784-6806 x11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email
, as well as ping IPs that are connected via IPSec. I intend to
play with it more tonight. I'll post some more questions later tonight I'm
sure...
Thanks for the support everyone...
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Newmiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
that my cable was good. Since then, the serial console has worked
flawlessly. Thanks again for the support then...
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I did not find any links on Charles' website that mentions the scripting you
did. Furthermore, I did not find any reference to PPPd on charles' website
either
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August
the
correct kernel (stock kernel from Dachstein-CD). Any suggestions, as I have
not found a great deal of documentation for pppd on LEAF systems...
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of guitarlynn
Sent
I found it.. I'm not thinking very well this afternoon... I checked the
dependencies and found the problem.. will continue to work and see where it
leads me...
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
I read the links below, and found a little information. One thing of
importance that I read was the authentication. Part of the documentation
says that it is not required, however judging by the error I receive, it
seems that authentication is required... please review :
--snip
# pppd -detach
. And to
take it a step further, how difficult would it be to setup a modem to accept
a connect within a Dachstein/LEAF enviroment.
Just something I was thinking of this weekend...
Joey Officer
Sales Operations
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
800-784-6806 x11
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Forgive my ignorance, but what is Mobile IP?
Joey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chad Carr
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Mobile IP for LEAF
I'm gonna take a
Judging from what it sounds I could click on the link and automagically do a
search on that hit. I like it. But I'm very familiar with writing any kind
of html lines. Are the lines you posted below ready for input into a
Dachstein weblet config. And specifically which files would I modify...
as an exercise ;)
http://www.ripe.net/perl/whois/
http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/whois2.pl
etc.
--- Joey Officer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judging from what it sounds I could click on the link and automagically do
a
search on that hit. I like it. But I'm very familiar with writing any
kind
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joey Officer
Sent: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:11 AM
To: guitarlynn; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] allowing internal connections w/o IPSec
Lynn, I read you write up on port forwarding on the FAQ
on the UDP line lets the connection work,
but remote.ip.add.ress/32 does not.
As I said, only a guess, since I am unfamiliar with the actual service.
At 08:31 AM 8/16/02 -0500, Joey Officer wrote:
While I didn't get this detailed, I have been able to accomplish (atleast
in
testing) what
I've use the LNE100 cards, I got 4 of them from a package deal that cost me
about $10, including 2 5port network hubs. The tulip driver works fine and
there is really nothing to do. I've also got 2 boxes running the d-link
530tx+, which uses the rtl8139 driver, but I think that it also requires
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
