Vagrant.
Thanks for the reply. In due course, I might get the updated Ubuntu
package. For the moment, I hacked up the scripts in
/opt/ltsp5/i386/usr/share/ltsp/screen.d/
to get the desired result. At least telnet and startx suffer from
the same problem. Arguments not passed properly.
This
On 2015-02-12, Tim Johnston wrote:
ltsp-server-standalone 5.5.1-1ubuntu2
...
I have /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp5/i386/lts.conf as:
[default]
SERVER=192.168.10.1
SCREEN_01=shell
SCREEN_02=telnet
SCREEN_03=kiosk
...
TELNET_HOST=192.168.10.1
...
screen_02 says
On 2015-02-12, Tim Johnston wrote:
On recently upgraded Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty).
I've installed
ltsp-server-standalone 5.5.1-1ubuntu2
and done the ltsp-build client.
I have /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp5/i386/lts.conf as:
[default]
SERVER=192.168.10.1
SCREEN_01=shell
vagrant
Thanks for the reply.
ltsp-server-standalone 5.5.1-1ubuntu2
and done the ltsp-build client.
I have /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp5/i386/lts.conf as:
[default]
SERVER=192.168.10.1
SCREEN_01=shell
SCREEN_02=telnet
SCREEN_03=kiosk
...
On recently upgraded Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty).
I've installed
ltsp-server-standalone 5.5.1-1ubuntu2
and done the ltsp-build client.
I have /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp5/i386/lts.conf as:
[default]
SERVER=192.168.10.1
SCREEN_01=shell
SCREEN_02=telnet
SCREEN_03=kiosk
Loose notes of mine. It's been a while since I set these up. Once done
you forget because it just works. I go to slap for LDAP though, so it
may be a bit different to a Domain Controller.
Make sure
/etc/nsswitch.conf has:
passwd: compat ldap
group: compat ldap
shadow:
Hallo Edgar,
Edgar Kogler schrieb am 10.12.2012 23:49:
I managed to activate ldap-authentication on the terminals from our domain
controller. I want our users to have access to their local media on the
terminals. What I found in the docs is that with LTSP5 the user logging in
on the terminal
I'm running LTSP5 on Debian squeeze in a school-network.
As terminals I use some old Compaq Evo Computers, and they work fine.
I managed to activate ldap-authentication on the terminals from our domain
controller.
I want our users to have access to their local media on the terminals. What I
Sir,
anyone having working Ltsp 5 server on Fedora 12 on single network card.
If anyone have please guide how to install Ltsp 5 on Fedora 12.
Rajeev.
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage,
Am 2010-01-26 12:20, schrieb Michael George:
I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
necessary files, but the terminal hits a kernel panic when it tries to
mount / over NFS. It says that
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:07:19PM -0500, Eric Thibodeau wrote:
For the most part, LTSP does a very good job of detecting what hardware???s
on
your thin client. However, it???s possible that you may want to manually
specify
a kernel module to load after boot.
_after boot_
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote:
Am 2010-01-26 12:20, schrieb Michael George:
I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
necessary files, but the terminal
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 12:19:16, Michael George a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:07:19PM -0500, Eric Thibodeau wrote:
For the most part, LTSP does a very good job of detecting what
hardware???s on your thin client. However, it???s possible that you may
want to manually specify a
Am 2010-01-28 14:57, schrieb Michael George:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Jakob Unterwurzacher wrote:
Am 2010-01-26 12:20, schrieb Michael George:
I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:20:38AM -0500, Michael George wrote:
I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
necessary files, but the terminal hits a kernel panic when it tries to
mount / over NFS.
Le mercredi 27 janvier 2010 18:44:40, Michael George a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:20:38AM -0500, Michael George wrote:
I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
necessary files, but
For the most part, LTSP does a very good job of detecting what hardware’s on
your thin client. However, it’s possible that you may want to manually
specify
a kernel module to load after boot.
_after boot_ ...which implies you got past the NFSroot mounting...which he
can't since he
I'm trying to move to LTSP 5 on my Gentoo system. I have the client
system built, the TFTP (tftp-hpa) and DHCP (dhcp) working to provide the
necessary files, but the terminal hits a kernel panic when it tries to
mount / over NFS. It says that there's no network available.
I know the connection
Dear LTSP users,
lately we experienced some performance problems and lags during input
e.g. with matlab and other programs. Once the font server was rebooted
and suddenly all sessions on thin clients froze and continued working
when the font server was up again. This indicates that the current
Jeff Siddall wrote:
Lars Madsen wrote:
(2) RHEL 5.3 uses Gnome 2.16, it will automatically detect the two
floppy mounts, place them on the desktop and in the Places menu, but
USB and CDROM are not picked up. Any idea on how to fix this?
I've seen a patch for ltspfsmounter that will add the
Lars Madsen wrote:
does your USB sticks appear under /media/user ?
Yes
floppy and Data CDs appear on the desktop and in Places just fine. It is
only USB sticks that causes problems.
Like I said I have no way to test floppies and CDs so they _might_ work
in KDE also. Maybe someone else can
Lars Madsen wrote:
(2) RHEL 5.3 uses Gnome 2.16, it will automatically detect the two
floppy mounts, place them on the desktop and in the Places menu, but
USB and CDROM are not picked up. Any idea on how to fix this?
I've seen a patch for ltspfsmounter that will add the icons for USB ad
(2) RHEL 5.3 uses Gnome 2.16, it will automatically detect the two
floppy mounts, place them on the desktop and in the Places menu, but
USB and CDROM are not picked up. Any idea on how to fix this?
I've seen a patch for ltspfsmounter that will add the icons for USB ad
CDROM, but it IS
Hi,
I've finally managed to get LTSP 5 working with RHEL 5, by using an
Ubuntu based client, and some extensive script modifications.
I still have a few problems though, that I hope you could help me fix.
(1) the mounted local devices appear twice on the server, once under
/media/user/device
Lars Madsen wrote:
Lars Madsen wrote:
Hi,
I've finally managed to get LTSP 5 working with RHEL 5, by using an
Ubuntu based client, and some extensive script modifications.
I still have a few problems though, that I hope you could help me fix.
(1) the mounted local devices appear twice on
I should have begun there: here is my network config
- - 2 ethernet devices eth0 an eth1: eth0 is the internet interface,
associated to an ADSL connection, and eth1 is plugged to a switch
providing a private network for computers and thin client (which used to
connect the server with ltsp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 12/03/2009 14:50, David Hopkins a écrit :
I should have begun there: here is my network config
- - 2 ethernet devices eth0 an eth1: eth0 is the internet interface,
associated to an ADSL connection, and eth1 is plugged to a switch
providing a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 10/03/2009 18:44, David Hopkins a écrit :
I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
I followed instructions there:
https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
But failed
Make sure you follow them
I am wondering if there is not an IP issue because the boot server has
default IP 172.31.100.254 and ldm seems to answer on 192.168.1.1 which
is the eth1 IP on which my lan is connected.
In the instructions on https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
there are no information on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/03/2009 19:41, David Hopkins a écrit :
I am wondering if there is not an IP issue because the boot server has
default IP 172.31.100.254 and ldm seems to answer on 192.168.1.1 which
is the eth1 IP on which my lan is connected.
In the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
I followed instructions there:
https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
But failed
Either I use ltsp-vmclient and the boot process hangs after:
writing
Bonjour,
I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
I followed instructions there:
https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
But failed
Make sure you follow them exactly up to the point that you have to
enable the network for real thin clients (Step
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Hopkins a écrit :
Bonjour,
I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
I followed instructions there:
https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
But failed
Make sure you follow them exactly up to
I try to install an ltsp-server to boot thin clients on my f10 box.
I followed instructions there:
https://fedorahosted.org/k12linux/wiki/InstallGuide
But failed
Make sure you follow them exactly up to the point that you have to
enable the network for real thin clients (Step 11).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Rob you are right. that depends mainly on the distribution. In lenny you
find it in the [chroot]/etc.
but that was not the question.
The other configurations at my site work fine (using multiple autologins
and so on). Also rebooting the thin
I'd just like to point out that LTSP 5 on Debian puts lts.conf in
/opt/ltsp/i386/etc. I think the location is related to whether NFS
or NBD is used for the root image. If NBD is used, then lts.conf must not be
in /opt/ltsp/i386, so it gets put in
/var/lib/tftpboot/i386.
Somebody correct me if
Hi Helmut,
LTSP 5 uses lts.conf in /var/lib/tftpboot/i386, as stated by Keith. The
file in /opt/ltsp/i386/etc is just a dummy file, and there's a lot of
problems you have if you try using it.
PS: Antonio, evite postar em português na lista internacional, nem sempre
você vai ter sorte de
Em qual diretório deve ser definido o lts.conf ? Ao que li não deve mais
ser definido em /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/.
Antonio
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the
At least switching to nfs booted for me except that i am having issues
with gdm not starting properly.
SB
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi Vagrant
Please help me with this. I am trying out a normal debian Ltsp-5.
Loading, please wait...
IP-Config: eth0 hardware address xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
On Thursday 25 December 2008 02:09:02 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPWithoutNFS
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:59:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
you should just ensure that boot=nfs is in
Hi
It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
Nataraj S Narayan
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@freegeek.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:42:43AM -0800, Nataraj
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 09:29:11 Nataraj S Narayan, vous avez écrit :
It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPWithoutNFS
look for Reverting to
Linux termial server client for windows caveat emptor
http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxts/
--
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:42:43AM -0800, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Please help me with this. I am trying out a normal debian Ltsp-5.
..snip...
rootserver: 192.168.0.254 rootpath: /opt/ltsp/i386
filename : /ltsp/i386/nbi.img
Error: Connect: Connection refused
mount:
Hi
This is some where in the middle of my Ltsp server on XP experiment.
I finally managed to get vmlinuz -2.6.26-1-486,
initrd.img-2.6.26-1-486 and a i386.img (file system). For this I used
Debian Lenny and installed ltsp-server package, and then
ltsp-build-client --create-ext2-image.
I wish
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:13:42PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
This is some where in the middle of my Ltsp server on XP experiment.
that doesn't sound very fun... :)
I finally managed to get vmlinuz -2.6.26-1-486,
initrd.img-2.6.26-1-486 and a i386.img (file system). For this I used
Hi
I need to use Ltsp linux clients, but they tftp
server, dhcp server and nfs server are hosted on a Windows XP machine.
Can I have the pxelinux.0 ,ltsp kernel and file system Image on an XP
machine? I read that LTSP-5 uses the kernel of the host linux machine.
For some reason this does not sound like LTSP. Might be just me.?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@freegeek.orgwrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:13:42PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
This is some where in the middle of my Ltsp server on XP experiment.
that
Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 12:41:11 Nataraj S Narayan, vous avez écrit :
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
to help him.
Hi
I need to use Ltsp linux clients, but they tftp server, dhcp server
and nfs server are hosted on a Windows XP machine. Can I have the
pxelinux.0 ,ltsp kernel and file system Image on an XP machine? I read
that LTSP-5 uses the kernel of the host linux machine. ITC, I will I
be able to use
On Thursday 18 Dec 2008, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
I need to use Ltsp linux clients, but they tftp server, dhcp server
and nfs server are hosted on a Windows XP machine. Can I have the
pxelinux.0 ,ltsp kernel and file system Image on an XP machine?
I struggle to understand, perhaps this makes
Hi
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
to help him.
The plan is to boot Linux over network and use RDP client in Linux to
Yes you can have something of this sort. But you have to enable
Terminal server on XP. There was some workaround for that. You can
have DHCP,TFTP running on XP. there is one free utility available for
it. I am forgetting this name as I have done this 3-4 years back. Once
you make your
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
to help him.
Nonsense. A real friend won't ask you to help
Well, I think the guy needs RDP as just one of the Apps, while he can
use all other Linux apps.
Come on, at least we give credit for an M$ guy is trying out Linux.
He might switch over fully soon enough.
regards
Nataraj
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Maybe these links will be of interest:
http://www.ncomputing.com/
http://www.xpunlimited.com/
Sounds like what you really want to do is run a regular LTSP server and
RDP to a Windows Terminal Server and/or Windows XP machine.
I suggest you use LTSP 5, and forget about putting tftp, etc on the
On Thursday 18 Dec 2008, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions. This
person is a client of a personal friend of mine, so I am being forced
to help him.
Licence restrictions
Chris Roberts wrote:
I would say so, but it makes my head hurt - it's probably the most convuluted
method of connecting to a Windows machine imaginable, and does nothing to
avoid the licensing costs.
I guess running an LTSP server inside a virtual machine inside of
Windows would probably be
Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) kirjoitti:
I guess running an LTSP server inside a virtual machine inside of
Windows would probably be a bit better.
Something like this ;-)
Ubuntu 7.10 Desktop (Virtualbox XP (Ubuntu 7.10 Server KVM (Fedora 10
(Fedora 10 Thin Client
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
Ubuntu 7.10 Desktop (Virtualbox XP (Ubuntu 7.10 Server KVM (Fedora 10
(Fedora 10 Thin Client
http://www.arkki.info/howto/Fedora10/KVM_Virtualbox_01.png
Krhm...
Ubuntu 8.10 Desktop (Virtualbox XP (Ubuntu 8.10 Server KVM (Fedora 10
Fedora 10 Thin Client
I believe the answer to your woes lies here:
http://www.thinstation.net/
Keep it simple dude. ;-) Hope I haven't over-simplified your need.
SB
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:11:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions.
Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he won't have to buy the
client side of
Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:11:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions.
Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he won't have
Scott Balneaves skrev:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 05:11:11PM +0530, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi
The situation is like this. A guy who was a techie at Microsoft wants
to have RDP from thin clients without the license restrictions.
Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he won't have
On Thursday 18 Dec 2008, Scott Balneaves wrote:
Although, by using LTSP thin clients for access, he won't have to buy the
client side of the license, he'll still be liable for the server side
of the license which, last time I checked (4+ years ago) was the expensive
bit.
Could someone else
On Thursday 18 December 2008 23:20:51 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
I need to use Ltsp linux clients, but they tftp server, dhcp server
and nfs server are hosted on a Windows XP machine. Can I have the
pxelinux.0 ,ltsp kernel and file system Image on an XP machine? I read
You might want to take a look there:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPQuickInstall
Marc
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Varun Pabrai [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hello,
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
I have never done ltsp on Ubuntu.
I have
Varun,
See the Ubuntu LTSP documentation -
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP
Cheers,
Jordan/Lns
Varun Pabrai wrote:
Hello,
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
I have never done ltsp on Ubuntu.
I have never done ltsp-5.
apt-get showed me the
On Thursday 13 November 2008 07:20:41 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
apt-get showed me the following packages :
ltsp-client
ltsp-client - core
ltspfs
ltspfsd
ltsp - manager
ltsp - server
ltsp - server -
Hello,
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
I have never done ltsp on Ubuntu.
I have never done ltsp-5.
apt-get showed me the following packages :
ltsp-client
ltsp-client - core
ltspfs
ltspfsd
ltsp - manager
ltsp - server
ltsp - server - standalone
Please
2008/11/12 Varun Pabrai [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
apt-get showed me the following packages :
ltsp-client
ltsp-client - core
ltspfs
ltspfsd
ltsp - manager
ltsp - server
ltsp - server - standalone
Please explain me the individual
Hi Varun
i have installed Ubuntu 8.04 with LTSP5 for a School Project
i cannot explain all the packages but i can say to you which package i
have used!
ltsp-server-standalone -- this package is the hole ltsp environment
(standalone means that you use the ltsp server as dhcp server too)
Varun Pabrai kirjoitti:
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
Please explain me the individual packages and
Which of the following packages I need to install.
Please, please - Use Ubuntu 8.04.1 Alternate (i386), it has everything
you need out-of-box.
The installer
Hi Asmo
yes sure this is the easiest way to install ltsp on a ubuntu... but the
learn effect is very poor
regards
Ivan
Asmo Koskinen wrote:
Varun Pabrai kirjoitti:
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
Please explain me the individual packages and
Hi Varun
Varun Pabrai wrote:
I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
I want to setup ltsp-server.
From a command line, do a sudo apt-get install ltsp-server. If you
want to run a DHCP server from the same machine, do a sudo apt-get
install ltsp-server-standalone.
If your server IP is not on a
Ivan Torretti - Sun Microsystems Schweiz AG kirjoitti:
yes sure this is the easiest way to install ltsp on a ubuntu... but the
learn effect is very poor
Ok. You can read these pages about theory first and then install the way
you like most.
hi,
Am Montag, den 03.11.2008, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Gideon Romm:
acpid is not installed in a default chroot.
it definately is in ubuntu, not sure what chroot you look at though, but
ltsp-client depends on it since hardy (i'm not sure, but i think it was
like that even in gutsy)
ciao
oli
Il giorno 01/nov/08, alle ore 12:00, SZABO Zsolt ha scritto:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
If user logout then client log in again, no way to tell the
client to
poweroff.
Is there any solution to this task?
The power(off) button on the box of the client? ;-)
Great,
acpid is not installed in a default chroot.
If you want to force Instant Off capabilities, you can either:
1. Go into the thin client BIOS and *disable* ACPI and set the Power
button from 4 secs to Instant Off (on most BIOSes); or
2. install acpid into your chroot and reroll the image
-Gadi
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
If user logout then client log in again, no way to tell the client to
poweroff.
Is there any solution to this task?
The power(off) button on the box of the client? ;-)
Great, but only pushing it doesn't work... it should be there some
script
Il giorno 31/ott/08, alle ore 21:00, SZABO Zsolt ha scritto:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
I set up some LTSP clients with autologin but I need to even to
poweroff
clients when users finish working but with this configuration it
seems to be
not possible at all.
If
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Francesco D'Offizi wrote:
I set up some LTSP clients with autologin but I need to even to poweroff
clients when users finish working but with this configuration it seems to be
not possible at all.
If user logout then client log in again, no way to tell the client to
On Saturday 01 November 2008 07:55:29 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I set up some LTSP clients with autologin but I need to even to
poweroff clients when users finish working but with this configuration
it seems to be not possible at all.
If user logout then client log in again,
Helo.
LTSP 5 Ubuntu no up.
Endereço IP: 201.92.222.166
DNS primário: 200.204.0.10
DNS secundário: 200.204.0.138
***
Conectividade com o Gateway (200.204.210.219)
Conectividade com o Servidor DNS 1 (200.204.0.10)
Conectividade
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Timothy Legge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Just a couple of notes on my recent implementation of Ubuntu with LTSP
5. The progress on sound, local devices etc is amazing compared to my
first FC1 based install. Most things just work in initial testing but
I
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Timothy Legge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Just a couple of notes on my recent implementation of Ubuntu with LTSP
5. The progress on sound, local devices etc is amazing compared to my
first FC1 based install. Most things just work in initial testing but
I
jam wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 05:01:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
As I've pointed out, ltsp is an alternate use of ssh, and as Rob
pointed out, ltsp requires that ssh be configured in a way that is
simply unacceptable for traditional use, i.e., remote (open) access.
[snip]
jam wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 01:47:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Personally I don't see the benefit to have an additional SSH server
by default running... if your network isn't firewalled, you've got a
lot more to worry about than an open SSH port. It's common network
administration
Scott Balneaves wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:51:45PM -0600, David Burgess wrote:
I'm not criticising the ltsp team. I love what they provide. And I'm
not asking anybody--I hope--to change the way your ssh server or ltsp
server operates. I simply think it would be a boon to the project
On Friday 17 October 2008 21:10:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No it simply means YOU don't know how to do it. Making LTSP more
complicated to solve THAT problem is silly.
My previous mail shows 2 ways to achieve bog-standard-ltsp AND
administrator access without passwd access from the
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Rob Owens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for bringing some sanity to this discussion. That's all the
original poster was looking for -- a way to share his learning
experience with others.
Exactly. My original post listed a couple of the issues I ran into
Frank Bergmann wrote:
Timothy Legge schrieb:
Hi
Just a couple of notes on my recent implementation of Ubuntu with LTSP
5. The progress on sound, local devices etc is amazing compared to my
first FC1 based install. Most things just work in initial testing but
I am sure the users will find
jam wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2008 07:19:04 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I don't see the benefit to have an additional SSH server by
default running... if your network isn't firewalled, you've got a lot
more to worry about than an open SSH port. It's common network
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, jam wrote:
Security through complexity is dumb and ends up biting you:
Security by obscurity will probably work against brute force ssh worms, but
is less likely to work where there is a determined attack.
My server is on a 192.168. From the WORLD it is only
Le Thursday 16 October 2008 11:58:33 Gavin McCullagh, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, jam wrote:
Security through complexity is dumb and ends up biting you:
Security by obscurity will probably work against brute force ssh worms, but
is less likely to work where there is a determined
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 10:58 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, jam wrote:
Security through complexity is dumb and ends up biting you:
Security by obscurity will probably work against brute force ssh worms, but
is less likely to work where there is a determined
Xavier Brochard wrote:
Le Thursday 16 October 2008 11:58:33 Gavin McCullagh, vous avez écrit :
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, jam wrote:
Security through complexity is dumb and ends up biting you:
Security by obscurity will probably work against brute force ssh worms, but
is less
Glad to hear it. The documentation, however, seems to be written the
other way:
The solution is to create 2 instances ssh, one serving the internal ip on
port 22 and one serving the wan interface on port .
David Van Assche wrote:
If you read the script, that's the what its doing, it
Seriously, this conversation is getting kind of silly. I seriously see
no need to launch a completely separate sshd just for administrators on
a different port. There are plenty of network-layer utils available to
secure a port from the outside world. There is no need to make
LTSP/Edubuntu
1 - 100 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
