Thank you Andre. I will take a look!
Regards
Patrick
On 11/03/14 00:21, Andre Laforest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My first look would point to NX (or Neat x) for the server part.
> The client outside the network could use any NX client. For my part Remina
> is doing great.
>
> Regards,
>
> André
>
>> --
Hi,
My first look would point to NX (or Neat x) for the server part.
The client outside the network could use any NX client. For my part Remina is
doing great.
Regards,
André
> - Original Message -
> From: Patrick Reynolds
> Sent: 03/06/14 08:00 AM
> To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge
Le mercredi 9 juin 2010 17:48:45, Steve Cayford a écrit :
> On 06/09/2010 02:16 AM, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> > You can also let the thin-client decide on which server it will boot. A
> > server with a lot of load will answer later than the one with less
> >
> > Another possibility: at ldm login, u
On 06/09/2010 02:16 AM, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> You can also let the thin-client decide on which server it will boot. A server
> with a lot of load will answer later than the one with less
>
> Another possibility: at ldm login, users can be presented a list of servers.
> Then they choose on which
Le mardi 8 juin 2010 22:04:18, Steve Cayford a écrit :
> I'm looking at expanding my LTSP installation with another server (I
> already have /home, LDAP authentication, and CUPS offloaded onto another
> server). It appears that the primary options at the moment are load
> balancing across a pair of
Thank you Asmo and Klaus.
I'll try your suggestions.
Sean
--
Sean Carte
esAL Library Systems Manager
+27 72 898 8775
+27 31 373 2490
fax: 0866741254
http://esal.dut.ac.za/
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
T
Sean Carte kirjoitti:
> Or is there a better way: how easy is it to configure Windows server
> to redirect a client to the LTSP server? Presumably this would mean
> that I wouldn't need the DHCP server on the LTSP server?
You can do that in two ways. I use Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, so here we go. I do
us
Torsdag 16. juli 2009 10:58, skrev Sean Carte:
> I hope someone has done this before and can tell me how to do it: I
> need to run an LTSP server in an environment where DHCP leases are
> handed out by a Windows 2003 DHCP server. I know that it is possible
> on Novel to specify a list of clients to
Hi,
I was with Lars when we were troubleshooting this.
We tried downgrading dhcp3-server to the same version that the Hardy server
was running.
But that didn't help at all.
I dont know what else on the server could make the DHCP server act this way.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Gavin McCulla
Hi,
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009, Lars Andersson wrote:
> If this is for any help for you we found a work around. After hours of
> wiresharking and reconfiguring of dhcpd we decided to try another dhcp
> server. We put a Hardy Heron server with dhcp3-server beside our Intrepid
> Ibex server and after that
> I have a show stopper problem with my LTSP installation. I run Ubuntu
> 8.10 with Edubuntu Add on. Sometimes my clients doesn't seem to get an
> ip address from the server. Usually I can boot about 4 to 5 clients
> with no problems at all but when I turn on some more clients they hang
> when
Hi,
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009, Lars Andersson wrote:
> I have a show stopper problem with my LTSP installation. I run Ubuntu
> 8.10 with Edubuntu Add on. Sometimes my clients doesn't seem to get an ip
> address from the server. Usually I can boot about 4 to 5 clients with no
> problems at all but when
HI,
Ok then check out dhcp sample configuration file.
Vishu
On 08/04/2008, jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:04 -0700,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> #next-server 192.168.5.254;
> > >> next-server 192.168.5.120;
> > >
>
> > > Yo
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:04 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> #next-server 192.168.5.254;
> >> next-server 192.168.5.120;
> >
> > You are missing:
> > option root-path "192.168.5.120:/opt/ltsp/i386";
>
> This is only relevant if the client asks for
Hi,
Use k12-ltsp project..it's working fine... if face any problems, then send
me mail on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bye
Vishu
On 07/04/2008, jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> frustration is the obvious not working ...
>
> I'm trying to use DHCP on my system server (.254) to run LTSP5 on my
> ltsp
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Sudev Barar wrote:
>> #next-server 192.168.5.254;
>> next-server 192.168.5.120;
>
> You are missing:
> option root-path "192.168.5.120:/opt/ltsp/i386";
This is only relevant if the client asks for the kernel *from .120* ... if
it d
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, jam wrote:
> but my via epia TC gets the DHCP info from .254 as it should and then
> tries to tftp the files from .254 not from .120.
> Is this a defect on via's pxe or me being ultra stupid ?
I had similar problem with pxe boot of an ibm lenovo (see earlier
posts)... You can
On 07/04/2008, jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> frustration is the obvious not working ...
>
> I'm trying to use DHCP on my system server (.254) to run LTSP5 on my
> ltsp server (.120)
>
> I see the next-server correctly set in the DHCP offer (.120)
> I can get the files from .120 by tf
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 20:46:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hallo, I'm testing ltsp on ubuntu, I need some help for the dhcp, we have
> two networks, 192.168.2.0 is the main network and 192.168.0.0 is the lts
> network. I want to distribute fixed ip based on mac address for the main
> network
Perseu schrieb:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:51:26 +0200
>> From: Rolf-Werner Eilert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP fails on Suse 10.2/LTSP 4.2
>> To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-88
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:51:26 +0200
> From: Rolf-Werner Eilert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP fails on Suse 10.2/LTSP 4.2
> To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
>
Verner Kjærsgaard schrieb:
> Mandag 16 juli 2007 08:51 skrev Rolf-Werner Eilert:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've got a new server here to be equipped with LTSP. There is a Suse
>> 10.2 running on this machine. I can log in via X from my terminal to the
>> old server like from a big client.
>>
>> After s
Mandag 16 juli 2007 08:51 skrev Rolf-Werner Eilert:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've got a new server here to be equipped with LTSP. There is a Suse
> 10.2 running on this machine. I can log in via X from my terminal to the
> old server like from a big client.
>
> After setting up LTSP 4.2 and copying (from
Steve Cayford wrote:
> [...]
> I followed the recommendations in this discussion,
> http://www.mail-archive.com/edubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com/msg00175.html ,
> however the "ipconfig -p 1068 ${DEVICE}" line in /scripts/nfs doesn't seem to
> help. I verified that it is changed in the new initrd tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You must allow the interfaces in /etc/sysconfig/dhcpd
> # Examples: DHCPD_INTERFACE="eth0"
> # DHCPD_INTERFACE="eth0 eth1 eth2 tr0 wlan0"
> # DHCPD_INTERFACE="internal0 internal1"
> # DHCPD_INTERFACE="id-00:50:fc:e4:f2:65 id-00:a0:24:cb:cc:5c
On Friday 12 January 2007 00:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I had a working LTSP setup running on Suse 9.3. I am trying to upgrade
> to openSuse 10.2. The dhcp config file has been slightly modified
> (changed the kernel version number entries).
>
> Also, I have tried adding the "next-server xxx.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hallo, I'm using LTSP on K12LTSP, now I have a problem
> configuring the dhcp, I have only one dhcp, but I want to use
> it for serving two different networks. Some mac address
> must receive a random 192.168.99.xxx address
> (ltsp network), some mac address must recei
Hmm... Have you ever tried rising your lease-time and max-lease-time values?
--
Eduardo Costa Lisboa
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to sh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eduardo
Costa Lisboa
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 7:39 AM
To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP and Thin Clients
Hi, Chris. First of all, it is important to say that the thin clients
Hi, Chris. First of all, it is important to say that the thin clients
do DHCP requests at least two times: one during the boot, before
getting the bootstrap file and the kernel via TFTP and other, during
the boot process, when starting the network(ing) script.
What happens is that physically, you
On 19/09/06, Chris Northstrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now when the thin clients boot up, they get to the login screen for ltsp and
> everything, only problem is they seem to be getting an address from another
> dhcp server I use for everything but ltsp.
> a line from my dhcpd.conf file. Th
Dear All:
Interesting discussion! Thanks for the food for thought. My $0.02 worth is
inserted below...
Yours Truly!
Krishna
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Cristi Mitrana wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Fred Clewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi, I'm a LTSP and DHCP noob, and need to understand how I shoul
Cristi Mitrana wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Fred Clewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi, I'm a LTSP and DHCP noob, and need to understand how I should work with
>> a LTSP DHCP server in a large company with it's own DHCP servers.
>>
>> So when the LTSP workstation starts, it broadcasts for a DHCP se
On 9/7/06, Fred Clewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi, I'm a LTSP and DHCP noob, and need to understand how I should work with
> a LTSP DHCP server in a large company with it's own DHCP servers.
>
> So when the LTSP workstation starts, it broadcasts for a DHCP server to
> meet it's needs. M
lists.sourceforge.net,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [Ltsp-
I will try producing a 2.6.16 kernel package to solve the Rhine problems.
The problem is I just moved into a new office, and i'm still sorting out
all my networking, and I won't have my development server back online
until at least saturday.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've compiled kernels before, but I don't think it would be a wise use
> of my time to download the source to 2.6.16 and attempt to re-create
> the already created kernel packages and modules provided by LTSP. If
> the kernel itself isn't available, I'd be willing to put forth the
> effort if a
If you use "get-lease-hostnames" instead of "use-host-decl" in your
dhcpd.conf, the hostnames passed to the thin client will come
from /etc/hosts (or DNS). So, you can use that trick in the generic
section, and then just have hostname entries in /etc/hosts for each IP
in the "range".
NOTE:
Be su
Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2006, 16:22 +0200 schrieb Richard Bos:
> This piece of magic looks very interesting as it may prevent a lot of system
> administration work:
> subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range 192.168.0.100 192.168.0.199;
> if substring (option vendor-class-iden
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 07:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> p.s. unfortunately IRC is blocked so I cannot use IRC while at the school
> to troubleshoot this issue
Can you do ssh? if so ssh port forwarding is magic eg
>From (even a dynamic ip) home to school:
ssh -R 1200:localhost:194 [EMAIL PROT
Anselm-
It looks like I can use a single DHCP3 server to do both dynamically-
assigned addresses to non-MAC-identified PCs as well as the ones we have
to have MAC-based entries for and assign statically. It's just a matter of
leaving the "get-lease-hostnames true;" statement out so it
Am Montag, den 17.07.2006, 10:54 -0400 schrieb Krishna Murphy:
> Hey-
>
> It appears that I need to have two DHCP servers running on one sub-net.
> Apparently this causes a conflict with one in particular (inside a router
> provided by an ISP) and the DHCP3 server under Debian that I'm using to
Jim-
You're right, there was a "range" statement left over in my dhcp.conf from
the past when I was (unwisely) doing DHCP with both a pool of addresses
and specific MAC addresses. I had picked up on the need to comment out the
"get-lease-hostnames true;" line when using
"use-host-dec
Ben Green wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:30:20 +0100, toman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>> Does anyone know if the next-server command works in the version of
>> dhcpd that Ubuntu (dapper) uses ?
>> Let me ask it this way: what is it supposed to do, and does it actually
>> do that? I
On Saturday 17 June 2006 03:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> FYI, my router will do that if the DHCP server on the server doesn't give
> it an address first. But I'm pretty sure my setup is similar to Joey's and
> I have seen addresses assigned that were not specified in the dhcpd.conf.
Guys, there
FYI, my router will do that if the DHCP server on the server doesn't give
it an address first. But I'm pretty sure my setup is similar to Joey's and
I have seen addresses assigned that were not specified in the dhcpd.conf.
-Krishna
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Joey,
There's nothi
Joey,
There's nothing in your dhcpd.conf file that would cause it to give out IP
addresses to other clients.
So, i'm not sure how it could possibly be doing that.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, June 15, 2006 11:41 pm, Joey S. Eisma wrote:
> hi!
>
> my dhcp (ltsp) server responds, giv
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:30:20 +0100, toman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone know if the next-server command works in the version of
> dhcpd that Ubuntu (dapper) uses ?
> Let me ask it this way: what is it supposed to do, and does it actually
> do that? I was trying to split off LTSP
That's it!
Thank you all, very, very much!
I really appreciate it a lot.
From: Anselm Martin Hoffmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dormition Skete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] DHCP OFFER never gets to workstation
Am Freitag, den 24.03.2006, 00:48 -0700 schrieb Dormition Skete:
> I have a very perplexing problem with dhcp. I had to rebuild my server due
> to a hard disk failure, and I decided to try SuSE 10.0 for a change. I have
> installed LTSP several times on Redhat and Slackware without any signific
Jim McQuillan a écrit :
Sudev Barar wrote:
8-(
Scratching my head.
Jim says ltsp will work if /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf if set for dhcpd
service. And Denis gets LTSP working by copying dhcpd.conf there.
I did LTSP install on Ubuntu 5.04 & 5.10 in last three days four time
but everytime ltspadm
Sudev Barar wrote:
On 12/12/05, DenisG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim McQuillan a écrit :
Denis,
Look and see if you have a /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf file.
That is used by Ubuntu's implementation of LTSP.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you were right, once again Jim!
I co
On 12/12/05, DenisG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim McQuillan a écrit :
> > Denis,
> >
> > Look and see if you have a /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf file.
> >
> > That is used by Ubuntu's implementation of LTSP.
> >
> > Jim McQuillan
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Yes, you were right, once again Jim!
>
> I copie
Jim McQuillan a écrit :
Denis,
Look and see if you have a /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf file.
That is used by Ubuntu's implementation of LTSP.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you were right, once again Jim!
I copied my dhcpd.conf to /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf and it worked.
I didn't find anything abo
Phil Davey a écrit :
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, DenisG wrote:
subnet 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
use-host-decl-names on;
option log-servers 172.16.122.10;
}
host cdi5 {
hardware ethernet 00:C0:4F:A9:89:E3;
fixed-address 172.16.122.6;
filename "/tftpboot/lts/vmlinuz-2.4.26-ltsp-3"
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, DenisG wrote:
subnet 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
use-host-decl-names on;
option log-servers 172.16.122.10;
}
host cdi5 {
hardware ethernet 00:C0:4F:A9:89:E3;
fixed-address 172.16.122.6;
filename "/tftpboot/lts/vmlinuz-2.4.26-ltsp-3";
}
This looks wrong
DenisG wrote:
Jim McQuillan a écrit :
Denis,
Look and see if you have a /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf file.
That is used by Ubuntu's implementation of LTSP.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
I can't see that until monday (I don't carry the server with me when
back home!) but I'll tell you.
On 12/10/05, DenisG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim McQuillan a écrit :
> > Denis,
> >
> > Look and see if you have a /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf file.
> >
> > That is used by Ubuntu's implementation of LTSP.
> >
> > Jim McQuillan
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks
> I can't see that until monday (I don't
Jim McQuillan a écrit :
Denis,
Look and see if you have a /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf file.
That is used by Ubuntu's implementation of LTSP.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
I can't see that until monday (I don't carry the server with me when
back home!) but I'll tell you.
Why put a /etc/l
Denis,
Look and see if you have a /etc/ltsp/dhcpd.conf file.
That is used by Ubuntu's implementation of LTSP.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DenisG wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to configure a LTSP server (Ubuntu 5.10) on a 172.16.XX.YY
network, but dhcpd refuses to start. Here's my config, I
Denis,
I don't use Ubuntu but (since it is Debian-based) in Debian the
setting is in a file under /etc/defaults - file name is something like
dhcp or dhcp3.
You can also look in the /etc/init.d/dhcp* start up script.
Pete Billson
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Service, Inc.
Web Des
Denis,
Ah, now we have enough information to really help you.
On Ubuntu, with dhcp3, you need to edit the /etc/default/dhcp3-server
file, and set:
INTERFACES="eth1"
Then, restart dhcp3-server
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, DenisG wrote:
> Peter Billson a écrit :
> >
Peter Billson a écrit :
Denis,
Did you change your DHCP server settings to listen on eth1?
Pete Billson
Thanks for your reply (and thanks to Todd too)
That's exactly what I want to do, but I don't find where to do this!
I use dhcp3-server on Ubuntu. There's nothing about it in dhcpd.conf.
D
YEEES !!
Thanks Jim, that was the information I was looking for, and it worked. I
thought everything was in dhcpd.conf. I learnt something today again ;)
Thanks to Todd and Peter too.
DenisG
Jim McQuillan a écrit :
Denis,
Ah, now we have enough information to really help you.
On Ubuntu, with
Denis,
Did you change your DHCP server settings to listen on eth1?
Pete Billson
Thanks for your reply (and thanks to Todd too)
That's exactly what I want to do, but I don't find where to do this!
I use dhcp3-server on Ubuntu. There's nothing about it in dhcpd.conf.
Not sure where Ubuntu
Denis,
It depends on the distro. For Redhat, it's in /etc/sysconfig/dhcp
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, DenisG wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I changed the network card on my LTSP server, and since that the client can't
> get an IP at boot, displaying
> Searching for server (DHCP).
Denis,
Did you change your DHCP server settings to listen on eth1?
Pete Billson
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Service, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
DenisG wrote:
Hi list
I changed the network card on my LTSP server, and since that the client
can't get an IP
Dennis,
You should be able to shut off the on-board NIC in the
BIOS setup on the server. That should cause the
system to recognize the new PCI card as eth0.
Otherwise you can use something like webmin to
configure the DHCP server to use eth1.
Todd
--- DenisG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
other reasons lead me to change distro from Ubuntu to Gentoo... and I
must say now the lab really rocks. Everything is up and running
without a pain. The dhcp requests came on the eth0, I've successfully
setup an eth0.1 for the vlan linked to the gateway and we're going to
live happily ever aft
> Couldn't you use alias ip addresses instead of using vlans?
I'll check but I think I can't cause they are using vlan lans on the
school network.
And the proxy is on vlan1 so I must be on vlan1 to ping it, it's not
enought to use the same network mask.
--
"The only thing necessary for the trium
Couldn't you use alias ip addresses instead of using vlans?
This way you would assign the secondary ip address using:
ifconfig eth0:0 ip mask up
and remove it using:
ifconfig eth0:0 ip mask up
This should keep you away from complicated stuff like vlan (unless you
need vlans for other purposes)
> INTERFACES="eth0"
at the beginning it was so, but after restarting dhcp it complained
about that... I'm not a DHCP expert but I assume it complain the ip of
eth0 (0.0.0.0) was different from the dhcpd.conf subnets and ips ...
> How did you setup the VLANs? Are they really VLANs or just alias ip
Encico,
Is there any chance you've upgraded your dhcp server along the way, to
3.0.3? In which case, you'd be getting bit by this issue:
http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/DhcpdSiaddr
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Enrico Teotti wrote:
> hi,
> I've finally fi
try:
INTERFACES="eth0"
How did you setup the VLANs? Are they really VLANs or just alias ip adrresses?
Regards,
Umberto
On 9/15/05, Enrico Teotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> I've finally figured out how to configure the vlan network with my
> LTSP lab... right now the server using eth0
Adam,
What version of dhcpd are you using? If it's 3.0.3, there's a problem.
Fortunately, the fix is easy.
Take a look at this article:
http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/DHCP
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> Thanks Jim,
>
> I have copied
Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2005, 20:39 +1200 schrieb Adam Bogacki:
> Thanks Jim,
>
> I have copied output from tcpdump and netstat below - at least
> the cable and connections are working, together with the
> original error message.
>
> (1) tcpdump
>
> Tux:/var/log# tcpdump -i eth1 port 67
> tcpdump
Thanks Jim,
I have copied output from tcpdump and netstat below - at least
the cable and connections are working, together with the
original error message.
(1) tcpdump
Tux:/var/log# tcpdump -i eth1 port 67
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
decode
listening on et
phabs,
do you have a 'filename' entry in your dhcpd.conf file?
etherboot will ignore offers that don't include a filename to
download.
Also, what version of dhcpd are you using? We've just recently been
seeing problems with the new ISC dhcpd version 3.0.3. It doesn't set
the boot-server IP add
Adam,
I've missed the initial conversation of what's going on.
If your client is saying 'Seeking server (DHCPD)' (btw, I think you
need to reread what it says on the screen, because although I've seen
something similar, I don't think that's exactly what it says).
Anyway, if it says something li
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:03:41PM +0200 or thereabouts, Dave Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 21:01 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:47:23AM +0200 or thereabouts, Dave Cotton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:40 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems I
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 21:01 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:47:23AM +0200 or thereabouts, Dave Cotton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:40 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> >
> > > It seems I have the same problem but having looked at
> > > 'ltspcfg' I can find no 'next-server
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:47:23AM +0200 or thereabouts, Dave Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:40 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
>
> > It seems I have the same problem but having looked at
> > 'ltspcfg' I can find no 'next-server' entry.
> >
> > Could you be more specific where it may be foun
>To: Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Dhcp problems.
>
>On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Dave Cotton wrote:
>> I've used LTSP for around 6 years and every problem that has occured
>> I've been able
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Dave Cotton wrote:
I've used LTSP for around 6 years and every problem that has occured
I've been able to fix from the docs, but this one's got me.
Version 3.0.3 of DHCP does not allow my terminals past the looking for a
DHCP server stage, reverting to 3.0.2 and all's fine.
Am Donnerstag, den 01.09.2005, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Dave Cotton:
> I've used LTSP for around 6 years and every problem that has occured
> I've been able to fix from the docs, but this one's got me.
>
> Version 3.0.3 of DHCP does not allow my terminals past the looking for a
> DHCP server stage, rev
Bill Arlofski wrote:
Joe Auerbach wrote:
Bill Arlofski wrote:
Hi Joe... That will work, but only on RedHat or RedHat-based distros.
[snip]
Hope this helps and I hope it as received in the spirit in which it
was written.
Huh. I guess I never had t
Joe Auerbach wrote:
>> Bill Arlofski wrote:
>> Hi Joe... That will work, but only on RedHat or RedHat-based distros.
>> [snip]
>> Hope this helps and I hope it as received in the spirit in which it
>> was written.
> Huh. I guess I never had to worry about it on my ubuntu system, but I
> just assu
Bill Arlofski wrote:
Hi Joe... That will work, but only on RedHat or RedHat-based distros.
A more generic manipulation of the firewall rules that would work on any
Linux distro would be:
iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
iptables -F
This will first
Joe Auerbach wrote:
> In case anyone's vague on how to do this:
>
> to turn off iptables temporarily (for testing): "service iptables stop"
>
> to permanantly disable iptables (if the above works): "service iptables
> stop", "chkconfig iptables off"
>
> Jim McQuillan wrote:
>
>> Try turning off
- gpg control packet
Check the server logs on 192.168.0.254 (is your GATEWAY really also a
*NIX/TFTP server?)
If yes, then the logs will tell you what is happening here.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i`ve done that
> but the kernel still doens`t load
> the screen:
> loading 192.168.0.254:lts/vmlin
In case anyone's vague on how to do this:
to turn off iptables temporarily (for testing): "service iptables stop"
to permanantly disable iptables (if the above works): "service iptables
stop", "chkconfig iptables off"
Jim McQuillan wrote:
Try turning off iptables. It is probably blocking t
Try turning off iptables. It is probably blocking tftp traffic. And if
so, then it will also be blocking your NFS and XDMCP traffic.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i`ve done that
> but the kernel still doens`t load
> the screen:
> loading 192.168
i`ve done that
but the kernel still doens`t load
the screen:
loading 192.168.0.254:lts/vmlinuz-2.4.26-ltsp-3
stays up forever
Quoting Bill Arlofski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> > when I boot my clients (usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everyone
> when I boot my clients (using a floppy) I get:
> searching for server (dhcp)...
> Me? 192.168.0.1, dhcp 192.168.2.151, tftp 192.168.2.151 gateway 192.168.0.254
> loading 192.168.2.151:/lts/vmlinuz-2.6.9-ltsp-3
>
Am Freitag, den 29.07.2005, 02:36 +0800 schrieb Ricarte Lapuz:
> some who can help about this
>
> tulip0: MII transceiver #1 config 3100 status 7809 advertising 01e1.
> eth0: Davicom DM9102/DM9102A rev 49 at 0xd000, 00:80:AD:78:22:05 IRQ 11.
> Running dhcpd om port 67
> eth0 :Setting full-duplex b
Also, if you have a linksys wrt54g (and some other routers as well), you
can install alternative firmware (since linksys wrt54g{,s}'s run linux)
that will enable bridging.
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 09:57 -0500, Patrick Rea wrote:
> Most SOHO routers (D-Link, NetGear, Linksys) have an option to turn o
Most SOHO routers (D-Link, NetGear, Linksys) have an option to turn off the
DHCP function. Check the manual or on-line helpto see how to do it.
On January 29, 2005 02:38, Atul Naik wrote:
> Hi
> what do i do if i have internet router acting as a
> gateway. which is having dhcp built in.
> I want
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Atul Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> what do i do if i have internet router acting as a
> gateway. which is having dhcp built in.
> I want to keep internet gateway & terminal server
> sepatate
>
> can anybody help me out
Atul,
Do you control the r
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 13:08, Atul Naik wrote:
> Hi
> what do i do if i have internet router acting as a
> gateway. which is having dhcp built in.
> I want to keep internet gateway & terminal server
> sepatate
>
> can anybody help me out
You tow NIC setup. One NIC controls the LTSP network while t
Am Samstag, 29. Januar 2005 08:38 schrieb Atul Naik:
> Hi
> what do i do if i have internet router acting as a
> gateway. which is having dhcp built in.
> I want to keep internet gateway & terminal server
> sepatate
>
> can anybody help me out
If that internet router DHCP does not hand out "filena
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
