Eric,
Sorry if I came off overly critical. Many people have had problems
trying to use Mason with Apache::Session because of that article. This
is why on the Mason website the link to that article describes it as
outdated and steers people to newer documentation. (It probably should
also
On Saturday, Sep 13, 2003, at 09:22 America/Denver, Perrin Harkins
wrote:
I found a pretty useful article at
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4143 on how to use
Apache::Session with Mason.
I'm afraid that is not a very good article. It's out of date, and
shows
poor erro
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:01:24 -0600
Eric Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Eric,
> I found a pretty useful article at
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4143 on how to use
> Apache::Session with Mason.
I wrote a tutorial on session management with HTML::Ma
te. There you would have found a note that the article you read
is outdated, and a link to the current
docs:http://masonhq.com/user/adpacifico/ApacheSessionMason.html
> PS: Apache::Session::DBI might be ancient, when I did some research for
> this mail I stumbled upon
> http
> I'm afraid that is not a very good article. It's out of date,
...
> Apache::Session::DBI (which is what the article refers to) is ancient
> and should not be used.
I stumbled upon this problem quite a few times. Trying to get the hang
of using cookies for authentication and
> I found a pretty useful article at
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4143 on how to use
> Apache::Session with Mason.
I'm afraid that is not a very good article. It's out of date, and shows
poor error handling. If you want to use sessions with Mason, you
I found a pretty useful article at
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4143 on how to use
Apache::Session with Mason. I followed the article, more or less, and
ended up with this bit of code in my handler.pl to tie() my $session
variable to an Apache::Session class:
eval {
tie
cycle of that particular request
> Apache::Session::Oracle stores the session in the database.
It happens when the session object gets destroyed.
> The problem I am facing is that if the session is stored in pnotes() it
> doesn't end up in the database. When the user comes back that id
&g
you know, somewhere in the request cycle of that particular request
> Apache::Session::Oracle stores the session in the database.
>
> When later that very user comes back to the website with a valid session
> id in the cookie, one reads the session from the database.
>
> The proble
try to reword it.
Let's assume a new user comes to the website. We set up a session for
him and put the session id in a cookie to be sent in the response. As
you know, somewhere in the request cycle of that particular request
Apache::Session::Oracle stores the session in the database.
When later
ssion_id = $cookie->value;
> my %session;
> eval {
> tie %session, 'Apache::Session::Oracle', $session_id,
> {Handle => $class->dbh(), Commit => 1};
> };
Okay, but I was asking how you get it back from pnotes.
> That code works
=
> 'username' which add it to the column a_session.
That's right.
> i know Apache::Session can't do session managerment directly. but i found out that
> when a user
> session timeout, the record also gone automatically.is tied(%session)->delete;
> delete t
> > > $session{'time'} = time();## this updates 'time' record
> >
> > But it doesn't update the time column in the database unless you hacked
> > the Apache::Session code to do that.
> >
>
> now i don't know wh
ng just fine. however, after i
> > added one more
> > field (username) to the sessions table through phpmysql, updating it in the program
> > seems has no effect on the username record. no problem on others.
>
> Do you understand what Apache::Session does? It simply u
phpmysql, updating it in the program
seems has no effect on the username record. no problem on others.
Do you understand what Apache::Session does? It simply use Storable to
turn the whole hash of values into a single binary chunk and stores it
all in the a_session field. It uses the id field to find
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 07:46, you wrote:
(I am sorry I am not replying to the actual email, but to a forwarded
copy from my desktop at home.)
> > It seems, however, that Apache::Session objects stop being stored
> > when I put the session in pnotes() with a code analogous to t
Xavier Noria wrote:
It seems, however, that Apache::Session objects stop being stored when I
put the session in pnotes() with a code analogous to this:
Can you tell us more about the problem is? What do you see when you
take the session hash back out of pnotes?
my $r = Apache::Request
i am experiencing a weird problem with the use of apache::session::mysql
before i had three fields in table sessions : a_session,id,time in the DB.
and updating table etc from the program was working just fine. however, after i added
one more
field (username) to the sessions table through
I am trying to retrieve/create an Apache::Session object for a given
user in the authentication phase, so the following handlers have them
available via pnotes. Sessions are stored in an Oracle database.
It seems, however, that Apache::Session objects stop being stored when I
put the session
All the information that comes from the user-agent can be faked. So the
session id is as insecure as any other identifier you get from the
Browser. The only thing that could be used is the IP address, and as
somebody said earlier, some ISPs and big company LANs may use different
proxies for dif
On Thursday 14 August 2003 8:06 am, Joelle Nebbe wrote:
> What i do is store both the remote IP and the user agent HTTP parameters in
> the session when the session is created. Whenever a new request comes in
> with that session I check that those havent changed.
So, you don't care about AOL users
ff
trolls!
Aleksandr Guidrevitch wrote:
Hi, All
Sorry, this post might be out of scope of this particular list, but
still... don't punch me heavily :) I just think the people here might
have met this problem while deploying big public applications.
I use Apache::Session to identify logged in
Hi
I do a few basic things that improve security - its still not strict security but
What i do is store both the remote IP and the user agent HTTP parameters in the
session when the session is created.
Whenever a new request comes in with that session I check that those havent changed.
If they h
Aleksandr Guidrevitch said:
...
> Is it possible to uniquely identify the user by some attributes ?
> The only thing I consider now is IP, but what about proxies and NATs ?
> User Agent string could also be stolen via javascript. That means I tend
> to make stolen session ids non-reusable.
Went t
Hi, All
Sorry, this post might be out of scope of this particular list, but
still... don't punch me heavily :) I just think the people here might
have met this problem while deploying big public applications.
I use Apache::Session to identify logged in users. However, the users
are allow
Hi, All
What have you used to stip out that stuff ? I've reviewied
HTML::StripScripts, but it seems to be very slow. I've also
considered HTML::Filter to do that but I'm also affraid that
HTML::Parser is not the fastest thing on the earth, even though
it will be invoked once during initial submi
Aleksandr,
we had our own stripping methods. Just get the source for slashcode
http://slashcode.com and look for
Slash/Display/Display.pm: strip_paramattr => \&strip_paramattr,
Slash/Display/Display.pm: strip_urlattr => \&strip_urlattr,
Slash/Display/Display.pm: strip_anchor
Hi
I might be missing the point but if you already are tracking with
Apache::Session why not encrypt the session id before giving it to the user
in the first place. You could store a public 'key' for the encryption in a
cookie on the users machine. That way only that user can gi
Dan McCormick wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a site with Apache, MySQL, Mason, and
Apache::Session::MySQL. I've been sporadically seeing this message in
my error log:
[Wed Jul 9 20:41:42 2003] [error] Magic number checking on storable
string failed at blib/lib/Storable.pm (autosplit into
bli
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:26:54 +0400
"Andrew Alakozow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andrew
>
> BTW, 'clean' method of this model hangs as well.
>
Also Apache::Session::Lock::File (1.54) 'clean' method has a little bug in
checking lockfiles las
PH> On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 07:29, Andrew Alakozow wrote:
>> Apache::Session::Lock::File hangs under Windows if you try to remove
>> session or add data to existing session. This happenes because you
>> cannot "flock($self->{fh}, LOCK_EX)" if you already has
&
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 07:29, Andrew Alakozow wrote:
> Apache::Session::Lock::File hangs under Windows if you try to remove
> session or add data to existing session. This happenes because you cannot
> "flock($self->{fh},
> LOCK_EX)" if you already has "flock($se
Hello,
This may be OT, but may be not though Apache::Session is widely used under
mod_perl.
Apache::Session::Lock::File hangs under Windows if you try to remove
session or add data to existing session. This happenes because you cannot
"flock($self->{fh},
LOCK_EX)" if you already has
ebruary 28, 2003 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [error] Insecure dependency in unlink while running
with-Tswitch at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Store/File.pmline106
> On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 09:10, Martin Moss wrote:
> > I can't use Apache::DBI.
> > I have multiple databa
If you just want to cache data, don't use Apache::Session for that. Use
IPC::MM, Cache::Mmap, Cache::FileCache, or MLDBM::Sync.
- Perrin
ially as I could be operating on 100's of
records.
I was using Apache::Session to generate session IDs and allow me to timeout
users etc...
Marty
- Original Message -
From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:47, Martin Moss wrote:
> Is Apache::Session::DB_type Faster than Apache::Session::File?
It depends on your disk, OS, and filesystem. It stores all the files in
one directory, which is quite slow on some systems and not a problem on
others.
> I already use a lot
Is Apache::Session::DB_type Faster than Apache::Session::File?
I already use a lot of DB connections and I used Apache::Session::File to
reduce this,
Marty
- Original Message -
From: "Cees Hek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Quoting Martin Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
just a minor comment regarding untainting techniques.
If do /(.*)/ to launder tainted vars as you did in:
if ($Directory =~ /^XX_GR_XX(.*)XX_GR_XX$/)
you can as well turn the taint mode off. For more info see:
http://www.gunther.web66.com/FAQS/ta
Quoting Martin Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> All,
> Can Anybody see what I'm doing wrong here?
>
> I have the following error :-
> [error] Insecure dependency in unlink while running with -T switch at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Store/File.pm line 1
All,
Can Anybody see what I'm doing wrong here?
I have the following error :-
[error] Insecure dependency in unlink while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Store/File.pm line 106.
When I run the following subroutine:-
sub delete_session
{
my $self=
md wrote:
--- md <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to have row-level locking (as opposed
to table-level or null locker) with MySQL 4.x and
Apache::Session?
You effectively have that already, since the MySQL locker only locks an
individual session. Check the code.
Looks like I ge
--- md <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to have row-level locking (as opposed
> to table-level or null locker) with MySQL 4.x and
> Apache::Session?
Looks like I get that with InnoDB automatically...
__
Do you Yah
--- Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you look at the actual contents of
> Apache::Session::MySQL, you'll see
> that it's essentially just a config file. There's
> no need to be
> concerned about using Flex, but you could easilly
&
--- Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be. Frankly, there is no value to the kind
> of mutual exclusion
> that the Apache::Session locking provides in a
> typical web application.
> If you use the null locker you will still get
> atomic updates,
md wrote:
Also, we'll soon be adding a substantial number of
users to our system and I wonder if it would be wise
to move away from the table locking that is currently
being used with Apache::Session::MySQL.
It would be. Frankly, there is no value to the kind of mutual exclusion
that the A
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 11:55 AM, md wrote:
We're using Apache::Session::MySQL (Apache::Session
1.54) and occassionaly see long lock times.
I had a similar problem a few months ago with
Apache::Session::Postgres. I occasionally had Apache processes hang,
and a quick ps aux sh
We're using Apache::Session::MySQL (Apache::Session
1.54) and occassionaly see long lock times.
Also, we'll soon be adding a substantial number of
users to our system and I wonder if it would be wise
to move away from the table locking that is currently
being used with Apache::Sess
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 07:09, Grant McLean wrote:
> > I get this error:
> >
> > Can't locate object method "get_lock_manager" via package
> > "Apache::Session::Postgres"
> >
> > And indeed, that method doe
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 07:09, Grant McLean wrote:
> I get this error:
>
> Can't locate object method "get_lock_manager" via package
> "Apache::Session::Postgres"
>
> And indeed, that method does not seem to be defined in any of the modules
> whi
I'm trying to use Apache::Session::Postgres and not having much luck.
When I try to create a new session like this:
use Apache::Session::Postgres;
tie %sess, 'Apache::Session::Postgres', undef, {
Handle => $self->dbh, Commit => 1
};
I get this error:
Ca
ECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:02 PM
>> To: Chris Faust
>> Cc: Modperl
>> Subject: Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and "or die"
>>
>>
>> Chris Faust wrote:
>> > I think it is in the locking as if I let things hang long
>
Chris Faust wrote:
I think it is in the locking as if I let things hang long enough and then
shut down Apache, I get a error of:
Can't call method "disconnect" on an undefined value at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Apache/Session/Lock/MySQL.pm line 89 during
global destruction.
d value at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Apache/Session/Lock/MySQL.pm line 89 during
global destruction.
Which is Apache::Session::Lock:MySQL
I'm still no closer as to figuring out why though.
-Chris
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
&
not calling the right hooks when it traps a die() to trigger the DESTROY
method in Apache::Session which releases all locks. You can find out
exactly what's going on if you run it in the debugger (Apache::DB) or
throw some debug logging into Apache::Session to find out where it gets
stuck
when it traps a die() to trigger the DESTROY
method in Apache::Session which releases all locks. You can find out
exactly what's going on if you run it in the debugger (Apache::DB) or
throw some debug logging into Apache::Session to find out where it gets
stuck. This is the beauty of
I'm having a problem since installing Apache::Session
All works well except when there is any kind of problem in the script where
the condition will die..
For example:
$db->execute() or die...
open yadda or die..
$db->prepare() or die...
etc.
When this happens everything to do with
Axel Huizinga wrote:
The following code hangs after reloading and the try to tie again the
previously created session! WHY?
...
use vars qw(
$id $sID
$lockDir
%session $sessionDir
);
The session variable has to go out of scope for the lock to be released.
I know i
Hi!
The following code hangs after reloading and the try to tie again the
previously created session! WHY?
package Loop;
use strict;
use Apache;
use Apache::Session::File;
use CGI qw(:cgi);
use Devel::Symdump;
use Data::Dumper;
use vars qw(
$id $sID
$lockDir
%session
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Carl Holm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a PPM version of Apache::Session for Perl (v5.8.0
> built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread)
> and Apache/2.0.43. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl Holm
> [EMAIL PROTE
::Session
Hello,
I am looking for a PPM version of Apache::Session for Perl (v5.8.0
built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread)
and Apache/2.0.43. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Carl Holm
Hello,
I am looking for a PPM version of Apache::Session for Perl (v5.8.0
built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread)
and Apache/2.0.43. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Carl Holm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think most people don't use Apache::Session::File in production. It's
> more of a testing thing. In your situation, you would probably get
> great performance from MLDBM::Sync with SDBM_File. I'd suggest trying
> that if you can't determine the cause of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, my question for now is whether anyone has seen corruption like this
with Apache::Session::File in your typical multi-user mod_perl web app
environment?
I think most people don't use Apache::Session::File in production. It's
more of a testing thing
This is going to be a somewhat preliminary "feeler" post because we are not
yet able to fully describe or recreate the bug we're seeing, but I'm hoping
some of you have seen something similar.
We use Apache::Session::File as the storage module for our Apache::Session
sessions
Great, thank you guys!
I am trying to first fix my Apache::Session problem before I open
a whole new bag of candy :o)
Thank you very much for your input, I am grateful!
Richard.
- Original Message -
From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROT
> So by user nobody, you mean in the httpd.conf file in the tags the user and group?
>
> I have it set to user username and group username for each account,
> since all of our boxes use SuExec.
Okay, that may be an issue because SuExec does not work with mod_perl.
Each apache daemon can only run
At 01:25 PM 12/28/2002 -0600, Richard wrote:
>So mod_perl is safe Ok. one other question. If I do upgrade to Mod_Perl,
>can I still run regular Perl scripts, without using Mod_Perl, or do I have
>to use one or the other, only.
Richard,
Yes,you can still run regular cgi, as with MP you have t
So by user nobody, you mean in the httpd.conf file in the I just replied to the PerlMonks reply you did. Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 12:08 PM
Subject: R
should definitely take advantage of the speed increase. Depending on
what you're doing, it can make a really huge difference in performance.
I do recommend that you fix your current Apache::Session problem first,
before thinking about converting to mod_perl.
- Perrin
your reply in a min. Thank you!)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Apache::Session::MySQL
> > Is this the correct list for help with Apache::Session
> Is this the correct list for help with Apache::Session::MySQL?
This is a good list for it if you are using mod_perl. If you're using
CGI, try one of the CGI resources instead, or stick with perlmonks.org. I
just replied to your post there a few minutes ago.
- Perrin
Is this the correct list for help with
Apache::Session::MySQL?
Thanks,
Richard.
Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN) wrote:
I'm not sure how often a user will attempt to complete one form through
multiple browsers. To be honest I'm not sure that he/she should.
There are all kind of forms. An obvious example would be a search.
Users often open up multiple windows when browsing a site and
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> md wrote:
> > My question is with regards to whether I need or
> > should put the submitted data into the session as the
> > user navigates the forms (to create an account). The
> > user will be taken through three forms to create an
> > account. So for
md wrote:
My question is with regards to whether I need or
should put the submitted data into the session as the
user navigates the forms (to create an account). The
user will be taken through three forms to create an
account. So for instance, form one will ask the user
to create a username, passw
ent.
I was reading through the archives and came across
this. Everyone was so helpful the last time I had a
Apache::Session question (thread "what goes in a
session?") so I'm back with another question.
The last project I worked on really had no transient
data, so the only thin
Hi Enrico
After posting, I looked at Apache::AuthCookie for the first time - don't why I hadn't looked at it before - to find that I was, indeed, duplicating a lot of work that has been done before. Didn't I feel foolish!
It looks like Perrin may have to write a "...why not to write your own
On 16 Nov 2002 13:24:13 +0200
Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've written a new module as a wrapper around Apache::Session which
> provides short term (ie session) tracking (which is something that
> Apache::SessionManager and Apache::SessionX provide), but t
I've written a new module as a wrapper around Apache::Session which
provides short term (ie session) tracking (which is something that
Apache::SessionManager and Apache::SessionX provide), but this adds long
term user tracking, and methods to aid login, logout etc.
It is meant to be subcl
Hi Jeffrey,
I've found a little bug in clean method of Apache::Session::Lock::File when
it checks lockfiles last access time.
In effects the result of the expression (file ./Session/Lock/File.pm, line 136)
(stat($dir.'/'.$file))[8] - $now
is always negative and lock di
1)I am using Apache::Session::File to maintain state information (just a
user_id and a few small items).
2)The man page for Apache::Session indicates that the following regexp
should be used to find the session cookie.
$cookie =~ s/SESSION_ID=(\w*)/$1/;
3)This $cookie value is then used in a
ithout
>>the id column being the primary key.
>
>It won't. All of the Apache::Session data is in a blob in the a_session
>column. It has no access to the other columns.
Thats what I was looking for. I ran through the code with ptkdb but since I
wasnt using it ri
Todd W wrote:
> Im looking at Apache::Session and trying to figure out what it does.
It provides shared storage of a hash of data, and gives you a unique ID
that you can tie to a user.
> From what I
> can tell, Apache::Session will only give generic sessions, of which I know
> n
Im looking at Apache::Session and trying to figure out what it does. What I
want
to do is tie sessions to a particular record in a database table. From what
I
can tell, Apache::Session will only give generic sessions, of which I know
nothing about the user untill they give me information
Hi
I am running a RedHat 7.3 server with kernel 2.4.18, Apache 1.3.26,
mod_perl 1.26-5 and Apache::Session and HTML:Mason-1.05 modules. When I
try to start apache i get the error message
Starting httpd: Subroutine status_mason redefined
at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Apache
HiI am running a RedHat 7.3 server with kernel 2.4.18, Apache
1.3-26, mod_perl 1.26-5 and Apache::Session 1.53 and HTML::Mason-1.05
modules. When I try to start apache i get the error message:Starting
httpd: Subroutine status_mason redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux
Greetings.
[...]
>
>
> Rob Bloodgood wrote:
>
> >I tried Apache::Session::File, but after MUCH hair-pulling
> it seems that the
> >Lock mechanism is COMPLETELY hosed (things are either never
> locked or never
> >unlocked, or something...)
> >
Peter J. Schoenster wrote:
> If I'm using Apache::DBI so I have a persistent connection to MySQL,
> would it not be faster to simply use a table in MySQL?
Probably not, if the MySQL server is on a separate machine. If it's on
the same machine, it would be close. Remember, MySQL has more work
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> The performance? I don't remember the exact figure, but it was at
> least several times faster than the BerkeleyDB system. And *much*
> simpler.
In my benchmarks, recent versions of BerkeleyDB, used with the
BerkeleyDB module and allowed to manage their own locking,
Hey James --
> >One way to think about it is this: MySQL stores its data in
> files. There
> >are many layers of code between DBI and those files, each of which add
> >processing time. Going directly to files is far less code, and
> less code is
> >most often faster code.
>
> MySQL also stores
"Jesse Erlbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Peter --
>
>> > The morale of the story: Flat files rock! ;-)
>>
>> If I'm using Apache::DBI so I have a persistent connection to MySQL,
>> would it not be faster to simply use a table in MySQL?
>
>
>Unlikely. Even with cached database connections
Hi Peter --
> > The morale of the story: Flat files rock! ;-)
>
> If I'm using Apache::DBI so I have a persistent connection to MySQL,
> would it not be faster to simply use a table in MySQL?
Unlikely. Even with cached database connections you are probably not going
to beat the performance o
On 21 Aug 2002 at 2:09, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> Now using good old Fcntl to control access to simple "flat files".
> (Data serialized with pack("N*", ...); I don't think anything beats
> "pack" and "unpack" for serializing data).
>
> The expiration went into the data and purging the cache wa
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are investigating using IPC rather then a file based
> structure but its purely investigation at this point.
>
> What are the speed diffs between an IPC cache and a
> Berkely DB cache. My gut instinct always screams 'Stay Off
> The Disk' but my gu
Not in the MS house that I am living in right now :^(
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Ian Struble wrote:
> > And just to throw one more wrench into the works. You could load up only
> > the most popular data at startup and let the rest of the data get loaded
> > on a cache miss.
Jie Gao wrote:
> There are cases in which it is desirable to expire an entry which
> hasn't been used for a certain period of time; authenticated sessions
> data, for example.
Okay, so you're looking for a session module rather than a cache.
Apache::Session doesn't ha
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Jie Gao wrote:
> > I wish some of these modules would be able to "touch" cached data so that
> > it would expire cache entries on "last-accessed" rather than on the time
> > the entries were created.
>
> Why? People used to do that with cached beca
Jie Gao wrote:
> I wish some of these modules would be able to "touch" cached data so that
> it would expire cache entries on "last-accessed" rather than on the time
> the entries were created.
Why? People used to do that with cached because they had limited space
and wanted to purge the cach
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:12:29 -0400
> From: Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Apache::Session - What goes in session?
1 - 100 of 571 matches
Mail list logo
