Hi, I signed Oracle Contributor Agreement about a month ago, but have not got a
response. I reported a bug, but I can not contribute my patch. So, could anyone
please tell me how long will it take before I am informed? Thanks, sincerely
Hi
when will be the exam "Oracle Certified Professional, MySQL 5.6 Database
Administrator" for MySQL 5.7?
Lukas
Hi
is the book "Oracle Database 11g and MySQL 5.6 Developer Handbook from
Michael McLaughlin" a good preparation for new dev exam 1Z0-882?
Will I pass when understand and know everything in this book?
Lukas
Older MySQL Exams to Retire
https://blogs.oracle.com/certification/entry/0875_01
regards,
m
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
Hello Lukas,
On 7/22/2013 8:16 AM, Lukas Lehner wrote:
Hi
I am now responsible for LAMP applications. I worked previously with Oracle
11g.
It seems that those exams are an "easy win" for me. I guess my preparation
effort is about 60 hours.
1Z0-871 MySQL 5 Developer Certified Profess
Hi
I am now responsible for LAMP applications. I worked previously with Oracle
11g.
It seems that those exams are an "easy win" for me. I guess my preparation
effort is about 60 hours.
1Z0-871 MySQL 5 Developer Certified Professional Exam, Part I
1Z0-872 MySQL 5 Developer Certified Pr
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Jim McNeely wrote:
> Shawn Green works for Oracle and has been very helpful, and I am happy to
> eat a little bit of shoe leather!
>
> Thanks Shawn!
>
> Jim
>
Check the archives for Shawn's posts. IMNSHO, they are unparalleled in
clarit
Shawn Green works for Oracle and has been very helpful, and I am happy to eat a
little bit of shoe leather!
Thanks Shawn!
Jim
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Jim McNeely wrote:
> Wow! We paid for MySQL enterprise plus enterprise support back in the good
> old days before ORACLE bought My
Wow! We paid for MySQL enterprise plus enterprise support back in the good old
days before ORACLE bought MySQL. I just sacrificed the sacred chicken and
sprinkled the blood around my computer and went to sign up for support at
support.oracle.com. After wading through the crappy Flash interface
I need to migrate about a dozen tables from ORACLE 10g to MySQL 5. I
have manually migrated the schema to MySQL. I am able to write SQL*PLUS
queries to extract ORACLE data into insert statements (including date
conversions to MySQL format etc) that I can run against the MySQL
database. The CLOB
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Sydney Puente wrot
> a mysqldump might do that job too, but the output from mysqldump
> --compatible
> was rejected by oracle.
>
Hmm. Interesting, you might want to file an issue about that - now that
MySQL is oracle-owned, you'd expect at l
rejected by oracle.
-Syd
- Original Message
From: Kevin (Gmail)
To: Johan De Meersman ; Shawn Green (MySQL)
Cc: Sydney Puente ; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Sent: Wed, 17 November, 2010 18:17:38
Subject: Re: export db to oracle
Hello,
It should be possible to connect Oracle to the MySQL
You can try using Oracle SQL Developer Tool which got the data import
function from MySql.
On 11/17/2010 4:14 AM, Sydney Puente wrote:
Hello,
How can I export a mysql 5.0.45 db to Oracle? mysql is going to stau but I need
to pass the data to oracle, just so the data can be transfered.
I have
Hello,
It should be possible to connect Oracle to the MySQL (or other) database
using a DBlink (using a MySQL ODBC driver)
the tables could then be copied using PLSQL.
Maybe you could link directly to Oracle and copy the code using MySQL
procedures or scripts (I have more experienc of Oracle
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:26 PM, who.cat wrote:
> Maybe you can dump as a csv format,then create table all tables in oracle
> .After that you can write a script program format the csv to oracle which
> can be recognized.
>
MySQL's select into outfile may well be good enough to
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Shawn Green (MySQL) <
shawn.l.gr...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 15:14, Sydney Puente wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> How can I export a mysql 5.0.45 db to Oracle? mysql is going to stau but I
>> need
>> to pass t
On 11/16/2010 15:14, Sydney Puente wrote:
Hello,
How can I export a mysql 5.0.45 db to Oracle? mysql is going to stau but I need
to pass the data to oracle, just so the data can be transfered.
I have carried out a mysql dump. This seems fine.create table etc. about 20 MB
in total.
Any ideas
Hello,
How can I export a mysql 5.0.45 db to Oracle? mysql is going to stau but I need
to pass the data to oracle, just so the data can be transfered.
I have carried out a mysql dump. This seems fine.create table etc. about 20 MB
in total.
Any ideas? It is on Redhat if that makes a difference
Hi Machiel,
I'm not sure if you like the method I use for Export from Oracle to MySQL
databases:
You need an ODBC DSN for each, source and destination DB. Then you create an
empty Access Database with a link to the Oracle Source table.
If the destination MySQL table doesn't yet e
My quick suggestion for such a process would be to use SQL*NET formatting
commands to create a well-formed CSV file, which you then import into MySQL
using LOAD DATA INFILE.
I'm not aware of any Oracle-specific import tools in MySQL. If anything,
after the merger I would rather expect some
clients are currently running MySQL for their web based
systems, however all other systems are running oracle.
There is a current "data load" process from oracle that generates a
dump file of specific data, goes through a convertion process, gets
imported into a mysql runnign on VM to t
Hi guys,
Is the information is true.
No, it was blocked by the EU.
http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokuteks-acquisitions-blocked-by-eu/
http://planet.mysql.com/
http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
short of exxon there is no other entity that comes close to acquiring Oracle
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger
.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:39 AM
>To: MySQL
>Subject: Tokutek Acquires Oracle
>
>Hi guys,
>
>Is the information is true.
>
>http://planet.mysql.com/
>
>http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/
>
>Regards,
>Krishna
--
MySQL General M
Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
Hi guys,
Is the information is true.
http://planet.mysql.com/
http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/
Might want to check the date.
Gary
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http
April's fools not a tradition where you are ? :-)
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Krishna Chandra Prajapati <
prajapat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is the information is true.
>
> http://planet.mysql.com/
>
> http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquire
Hi guys,
Is the information is true.
http://planet.mysql.com/
http://tokutek.com/2010/04/tokutek-acquires-oracle/
Regards,
Krishna
> Oracle will sell it if they can convince the customer.
Any one who has had the pleasure of using Oracle Application Server
can attest to that.
--
- michael dykman
- mdyk...@gmail.com
May the Source be with you.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.
re that the application is
a lot simpler, faster and easier to maintain.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Download Database Workbench for Oracle, MS SQL Server, Sybase SQL
Anywhere, MySQL, InterBase, NexusDB and Firebird!
Database questions? Check the fo
Martijn Tonies wrote:
Martijn Tonies wrote:
database. I would also bet that 80% of the people who are actually
writing queries with that many joins don't have a solid grasp of the
fundamental principles of relational database design.
Why not? Normalizing gets you -more- tables, not less.
A
Tom,
I noticed the article didn't say how much money you'll save by not paying
through the nose for Oracle per server licensing, the cost of upgrading
your hardware to get some speed out of Oracle, or the cost of having to
hire one or more Oracle administrators to manage and tweak th
d- and software
for their application are simply forgetting that they were supposed to
produce a working application and not the most normalized database with
all the fancy views and other stuff.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Download Database Wor
make more
commission on the AS/400 so that's the one I am selling.'
Oracle is very similar. They are managed to make money. I suspect we will
see licensing fees and required support contracts because they can now
charge them. And, an Oracle consultant to write a join with 100-200
On 1/29/10 5:03 PM, "mos" wrote:
> I noticed the article didn't say how much money you'll save by not paying
> through the nose for Oracle per server licensing, the cost of upgrading
> your hardware to get some speed out of Oracle, or the cost of having
On 01/29/2010 07:24 PM, Shawn Green wrote:
> Rudy Lippan wrote:
>> On 01/29/2010 02:57 PM, Chris W wrote:
>>
>>> Hardcore stupid if you ask me. I suppose it is "possible" to have a
>>> valid reason (can't imagine what it might be) for using more than 61
>>
>> How about complex data requirements?
Rudy Lippan wrote:
How about complex data requirements? Depending on the resolution of
your data set, I could see a "simple" person-type object that contained
name, address, SSN, mother, and birth_info starting to approach the limit.
Cities change, address changes, names change, and even mother
Martijn Tonies wrote:
database. I would also bet that 80% of the people who are actually
writing queries with that many joins don't have a solid grasp of the
fundamental principles of relational database design.
Why not? Normalizing gets you -more- tables, not less.
And normalizing is a goa
Rudy Lippan wrote:
On 01/29/2010 02:57 PM, Chris W wrote:
Hardcore stupid if you ask me. I suppose it is "possible" to have a
valid reason (can't imagine what it might be) for using more than 61
How about complex data requirements? Depending on the resolution of
your data set, I could see a
On 01/29/2010 02:57 PM, Chris W wrote:
> Hardcore stupid if you ask me. I suppose it is "possible" to have a
> valid reason (can't imagine what it might be) for using more than 61
How about complex data requirements? Depending on the resolution of
your data set, I could see a "simple" person-ty
... or 50 ways to leave your Oracle...
... or 50 ways to save your money...
Choose mysql! :)
--
Jørn Dahl-Stamnes
homepage: http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/dahls/
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub
as a relatively unsophisticated dbms user (just dynamic web site back
end),
i thought it was very interesting to see the kinds of things oracle users
do
that i'd never have imagined.
more than 61 joins in a query?! man, those guys are hardcore.
Hardcore stupid if you ask me. I suppo
At 01:57 PM 1/29/2010, Chris W wrote:
fsb wrote:
as a relatively unsophisticated dbms user (just dynamic web site back end),
i thought it was very interesting to see the kinds of things oracle users do
that i'd never have imagined.
more than 61 joins in a query?! man, those guys are har
fsb wrote:
as a relatively unsophisticated dbms user (just dynamic web site back end),
i thought it was very interesting to see the kinds of things oracle users do
that i'd never have imagined.
more than 61 joins in a query?! man, those guys are hardcore.
Hardcore stupid if you ask m
gn.
Sequences are way easier to use in multi-table inserts.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Download Database Workbench for Oracle, MS SQL Server, Sybase SQL
Anywhere, MySQL, InterBase, NexusDB and Firebird!
Database questions? Check the forum:
Hmmm... I find it suspicious that there are *exactly* 50 things you need to
know before migrating from oracle to mysql. Not 49. Not 51. Exactly 50.
Well, he did repeat that clustering is not what you think it is so I guess
it technically is 49. But I wonder what would happen if he thunk up a
On 1/28/10 5:21 AM, "changuno" wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Read a blog which states 50 things to know before migrating from Oracle to
> MySQL. Any comments on this?
as a relatively unsophisticated dbms user (just dynamic web site back end),
i thought it was very interesti
Doesn't Google run MySQL ?
Hmmm
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Carl wrote:
> A quick Google turned up
>
>
> http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/03/13/50-things-to-know-before-migrating-oracle-to-mysql/
>
> Man, I love Google.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
>
A quick Google turned up
http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2009/03/13/50-things-to-know-before-migrating-oracle-to-mysql/
Man, I love Google.
Thanks,
Carl
- Original Message -
From: "Daevid Vincent"
To:
Cc: "'changuno '"
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:4
> -Original Message-
> From: John Meyer [mailto:johnme...@pueblocomputing.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:16 PM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
>
> On 1/28/2010 3:21 AM, changuno wrote:
> > Read a blog which states 50 things to know before migrating
>
On 1/28/2010 3:21 AM, changuno wrote:
Hi folks,
Read a blog which states 50 things to know before migrating from Oracle to
MySQL. Any comments on this?
would it have been too much to just link to it?
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To
Shawn Green wrote:
> 23. There are fewer and less sophisticated tools for administration.
>
> MySQL doesn't need them. That alone should tell you something about
> our reliability.
>
This speaks to simplicity-- both in terms of easy to use and in terms of
more limited features. It says nothing
changuno wrote:
Hi folks,
Read a blog which states 50 things to know before migrating from Oracle to
MySQL. Any comments on this?
... list snipped ...
MySQL was never designed to be a clone of Oracle (the database). We
have distinct differences in design and implementation that make us a
anguno wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Read a blog which states 50 things to know before migrating from Oracle to
> MySQL. Any comments on this?
>
> 1. Subqueries are poorly optimized.
> 2. Complex queries are a weak point.
> 3. The query executioner (aka query optimize
Hi folks,
Read a blog which states 50 things to know before migrating from Oracle to
MySQL. Any comments on this?
1. Subqueries are poorly optimized.
2. Complex queries are a weak point.
3. The query executioner (aka query optimizer / planner) is less
sophisticated.
4. Performance
To ensure delivery directly to your inbox please add
repl...@oracle-mail.com to your address book today.
Oracle Corporation
<http://www.oracle.com/dm/global_images/oracle_white2.gif>
<http://www.oracle.com/dm/10h2corp/o_sun_redbox_clr.gif>
We are pleased to a
entering
>the country name then pressing enter and then entering the next, etc
>
>. When exporting the data to a file (even when enclosing each field
>within quotes) it still writes the control characters causing each item to
>be read as a different line and thus the import in
) it still writes the control characters causing each item to
be read as a different line and thus the import into Oracle fails.
Any idea on how we can resolve this as the process needs to be cronned to
run on a weekly basis and thus we need to get this process resolved.
You haven't describ
Good day guys
I previously requested information regarding the exporting
of data which needs to be imported into oracle.
We are however still struggling with the data though and
maybe someone can give me some ideas...
It seems that one of
Thank you for the link but seeing that I am still new with MySQL , this does
not mean anything to me.
From: prabhat kumar [mailto:aim.prab...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 January 2010 4:22 PM
To: machiel.richards
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: FW: MySQL export and import into Oracle
http
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/control-flow-functions.html#function_if
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:52 PM, machiel.richards wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> Can you please assist me in rewriting this query in order to run this
> against a mysql database?
>
>
>
> It seems that the decode function do
Hi guys,
Can you please assist me in rewriting this query in order to run this
against a mysql database?
It seems that the decode function does not exist in mysql.
select
decode(nvl(receive_email, 'No'), 'Yes', 'Yes', 'No') email_corr,
count(*) tot
from profiles
where email i
Martin,
> What does monty say?
Monty made a submission to EU regulators. I can't find the URL just now.
One-line summary: "Letting Oracle have MySQL is worse than putting the
fox in charge of the henhouse..." (Florian Mueller,
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10379870-38.h
> On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, John Daisley wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
>>> European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
>>> database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball.
>>> M
On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, John Daisley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 23:50 -0600, Peter Brawley wrote:
>> European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
>> database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
>> Sun revenue fe
I believe MySQL will still have great influence in Open Source area.
The better is that MySQL will be a separate Company which has no relation to
Sun and Oracle.
Maybe Oracle can sell MySQL to a 3rd company.
2009/11/11 John Daisley
> What I am more concerned about at the moment is how much
future development would
go and a fear that when the deal goes through Oracle may slowly raise
support and training costs to the sort of levels applicable to Oracle
database products. These kind of arguments seem impossible to counter
for as long as the uncertainty continues and I for one wish they
European regulators agree with Monty that the Oracle-Sun deal threatens
database competition. Apparently Oracle means to play hardball. Meanwhile
Sun revenue fell 25% in 3rd quarter 2009; who else but an anti-competitive
giant would take a chance on buying Sun now? Story here:
http
Peter Brawley <
> peter.braw...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> I think you'd need to use Prepare, eg replace the query with ...
>>
>> set @sql = concat( "select
>> user_id as iamsId
>> ,division_name as divisionNa
facing a problem in porting an application written for oracle to run on
mysql.
The application uses a sqlmap (ibatis) at the heart of which is basically a
file that defines all sql's used in the application. It is very well
organized this way. The application uses Oracle as the database. The prob
Hi All,
I am facing a problem in porting an application written for oracle to run on
mysql.
The application uses a sqlmap (ibatis) at the heart of which is basically a
file that defines all sql's used in the application. It is very well
organized this way. The application uses Oracle a
Hi.
Here is the introduction.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/05-sep/o55security.html
I want to know whether MySQL has the same function as Oracle's?
Any reply is appreciated.
--
David Yeung,
MySQL Senior Support Engineer,
Sun Gold Partner.
My Blog:http://yueliangda
In case anyone is interested, here is Monty's views on the Oracle buyout.
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/04/to-be-free-or-not-to-be-free.html
Mike
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:58 +0100, Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
> > The real question is whether they will let MySQL
> > wither
> > and die by not providing updates for it?
>
> Well, MySQL is open source, right? And the source is available? I'm
> sure
> a team of devs will come to the rescue. As for
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:58 +0100, Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
>> > The real question is whether they will let MySQL
>> > wither
>> > and die by not providing updates for it?
>>
>> Well, MySQL is open source, right? And the source is available? I'm
>> sure
>> a team of devs will come to the rescue.
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 17:58 +0100, Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
> > The real question is whether they will let MySQL
> > wither
> > and die by not providing updates for it?
>
> Well, MySQL is open source, right? And the source is available? I'm
> sure
> a team of devs will come to the rescue. As for M
t; > worried about the future and he's posted a few ideas of how you can
> > prepare.
> No he didn't. He posted doom and gloom:
>
Boy you really just can't handle someone not agreeing with you can you?
> "It will be a supported but second class citizen from
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 18:15 +, Glyn Astill wrote:
>
> > Begone Postgres troll!
> >
>
> Oh the hostility of a scorned mysql user. Joshua has posted no more FUD than
> you mysql chaps have done yourselvs over the past few days. You were worried
> about the future and he's posted a few ideas
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:42 -0700, David Sparks wrote:
>
> > --
> > PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org
>
> Your FUD would be better posted on a Postres list with all the onging
> discussions on how Mysql doesn't support foreign keys, transactions, etc.
There is no FUD here. The que
--- On Fri, 24/4/09, David Sparks wrote:
> Mysql is getting better at a pace that is making the other
> open source DB
> servers irrelevant.
>
lol. Is that a typo? Surely you wanted to say "Mysql's bug fix list is
gathering pace..."
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http:/
repare.
No he didn't. He posted doom and gloom:
"It will be a supported but second class citizen from Oracle."
"Oracle is not interested in the 1000/yr business. For the most
part that is where MySQL revenue is."
"maintain it long enough to allow MySQL to kill
--- On Fri, 24/4/09, David Sparks wrote:
> From: David Sparks
> Subject: Re: Oracle , what else ?
> To: "j...@commandprompt.com"
> Cc: "mysql@lists.mysql.com"
> Date: Friday, 24 April, 2009, 6:42 PM
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I would expect
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I would expect that MySQL in two years likely won't exist except on the
> most tertiary level. Most new projects will be developed in either
> PostgreSQL, Interbase or one of the forks (MariaDB, Drizzle).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr
Interesting question. I think MySQL will live on in various incarnations
but I do think its glory days are over. It will be a supported but
second class citizen from Oracle.
I was at Innotech yesterday speaking on the open source panel
(http://vimeo.com/4307197) and one of the participants state
, like the Firebird community who took up the development of the
Interbase fork. There is a huge interest in MySQL and no matter what
happens, it will be around for some time to come. If Oracle was smart, they
should put a lot of effort into supporting it.
Open source, yes, but "free", no w
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 08:44 +0200, Martijn Tonies wrote:
> >Well, MySQL is open source, right? And the source is available? I'm sure
> >a team of devs will come to the rescue.
>
> Really? What would make a group of developers wanting to develop
> a -database engine- for free? Some party needs to
ijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Download Database Workbench for Oracle, MS SQL Server, Sybase SQL
Anywhere, MySQL, InterBase, NexusDB and Firebird!
Database questions? Check the forum:
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://l
> -Original Message-
> >After MySQL bought by the java maker,
> > and now Sun bought by Oracle,
> >
How did I miss this!?
>
> It seems like the little fish are getting eaten by the bigger fish.
>
> I understand Microsoft is now going to buy Or
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 08:25 +, Glyn Astill wrote:
> --- On Wed, 22/4/09, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > >what are we gonna run as RDBMS ?
> >
> > How about PostgreSQL?
> >
>
> I second that. You should all have a play with the 8.4 beta
>
I actually think a lot of primarily MySQL people are
On 21.04.2009 18:40 CE(S)T, mos wrote:
> At 08:06 AM 4/21/2009, Gilles MISSONNIER wrote:
>> what are we gonna run as RDBMS ?
>
> It seems like the little fish are getting eaten by the bigger fish.
>
> I understand Microsoft is now going to buy Oracle. :-)
> (Sorry, just
--- On Wed, 22/4/09, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> From: Joshua D. Drake
> Subject: Re: Oracle , what else ?
> To: "Martijn Tonies"
> Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Date: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009, 10:45 PM
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 15:19 +0200, Martijn
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 15:19 +0200, Martijn Tonies wrote:
> Hey Gilles,
>
>
> >After MySQL bought by the java maker,
> > and now Sun bought by Oracle,
> >
> >what are we gonna run as RDBMS ?
How about PostgreSQL?
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - X
XE store up to 4GB of user data, use up to 1GB of memory, and use one CPU on
the host machine.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Thomas Pundt wrote:
> José I. Merino schrieb:
>
>> The main question is:
>>
>> Will Oracle permits a cheaper DB in his portfolio with almost
The revenue that MySQL has accrued to date comes (obviously) from the
support contracts. Oracle has no interest in derailing this revenue stream.
It may well slow down the version cycle, which may be a good thing, but that
aside, I cannot see Oracle killing the MySQL stream. There's no arg
José I. Merino schrieb:
The main question is:
Will Oracle permits a cheaper DB in his portfolio with almost the same
reliability than his main and expensive DB?
It already has, it's called "Oracle Express Edition".
Ciao,
Thomas
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list
The main question is:
Will Oracle permits a cheaper DB in his portfolio with almost the same
reliability than his main and expensive DB?
Ok. MySQL is the main database in a wide 'open source' community. That
people never will bought Oracle to build a phpBB forum or to install Joomla
t;> It will great if the MYSQL guys were to buy mysql from Oracle for half the
>> price that Sun paid.
>>
>
> Yeah, I'm sure Widenous is writing a check as we speak. He is busy
> working on Maria, a stripped down branch of MySQL.
> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/0
It will great if the MYSQL guys were to buy mysql from Oracle for half the
price that Sun paid.
Yeah, I'm sure Widenous is writing a check as we speak. He is busy
working on Maria, a stripped down branch of MySQL.
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/01/maria-engine-is-released.html
At 07:13 PM 4/21/2009, you wrote:
It will great if the MYSQL guys were to buy mysql from Oracle for half the
price that Sun paid.
Yeah, I'm sure Widenous is writing a check as we speak. He is busy
working on Maria, a stripped down branch of MySQL.
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/20
It will great if the MYSQL guys were to buy mysql from Oracle for half the
price that Sun paid.
They would come out making lots of money and back controlling their own
destiny.
:-)
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Arthur Fuller wrote:
> I hereby bet the farm that this shall not occur. I h
Sparc base + Java, etc.). MySQL, as much as we love it, is a tiny
teensy part of this acquisition, and my guess is that Scott and Larry are
much more focussed on the other parts (e.g. end-to-end solutions extending
from the hardware to the middleware to the Oracle apps, etc.) and in this
ballpark MySQL
1 - 100 of 741 matches
Mail list logo
