-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 27 February 2005 07:46, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:51, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas
wrote:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 22:29, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 01:24 am, Derek Jennings
On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:51, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 22:29, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 01:24 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 16:06, David Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I am following Derek
On Sunday 27 February 2005 06:50 am, Rob Blomquist wrote:
Spamc is just a wrapper for spamd, so spamd has to be up and running.
But if you want real email filtering you really need to be running
spamassassin with more than just the basic rules. That caused me to
Derek,
Sunday, February 27, 2005, 1:24:13 AM, you wrote:
The service is called 'spamd' I'll correct the document.
derek
But I don't have a spamd service there either. On searching the system
for spamd I only find a perl program called spamd, and not the
c-wrappered spamd you mention in a
Fajar,
Sunday, February 27, 2005, 2:00:22 AM, you wrote:
Did you successfully install Spamassassin?
If so, you should be able to run it by:
service spamassassin start
There was nothing to say that the installation had not been
successfull.
Using service spamassassin gives:
[EMAIL
On February 27, 2005 09:19, David Anderson wrote:
But I don't have a spamd service there either. On searching the system
for spamd I only find a perl program called spamd, and not the
c-wrappered spamd you mention in a later posting.
You may need to install additional packages:
Saul,
Sunday, February 27, 2005, 3:18:49 PM, you wrote:
You may need to install additional packages:
spamassassin-spamc-3.0.2-0.1010.1mdk
spamassassin-spamd-3.0.2-0.1010.1mdk
Thanks very much - that did the trick!
--
Best regards,
Davidmailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
I am following Derek Jennings' excellent Postfix mail server
configuration document, and have got stuck in the SpamAssassin part.
The doc says that you need to install the RPM, and then start the
spamassassin service in Mandrake Control CentreSystemServices.
Unfortunately there is no entry
On Saturday 26 February 2005 16:06, David Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I am following Derek Jennings' excellent Postfix mail server
configuration document, and have got stuck in the SpamAssassin part.
The doc says that you need to install the RPM, and then start the
spamassassin service in Mandrake
On Saturday 26 February 2005 11:06 pm, David Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I am following Derek Jennings' excellent Postfix mail server
configuration document, and have got stuck in the SpamAssassin part.
The doc says that you need to install the RPM, and then start the
spamassassin service in
On Sunday 27 February 2005 01:24 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 16:06, David Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I am following Derek Jennings' excellent Postfix mail server
configuration document, and have got stuck in the SpamAssassin part.
The doc says that you need to
On Saturday 26 February 2005 5:29 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
Hmm, I'm still running v9.2 here so some things may be different, and if
they are, I apologise for wasting the bandwith but...
here...if I use spamd it takes a lot longer to d/l my e-mail. If I use
spamc on the other hand, all is
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:50:44 -0800
Rob Blomquist wrote:
The checking of each email with this setup is about 1 to 2 seconds
each with my XP-2100, so the hit on Kmail would be serious.
I have nothing against spamassassin But if when you look at the CPU
usage required and the time for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 26 February 2005 22:29, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 27 February 2005 01:24 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Saturday 26 February 2005 16:06, David Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I am following Derek Jennings' excellent Postfix mail server
Hi,
I've installed Spamassassin (SA) from Mandrakce Control Center (MCC) package handler. I also use Webmin. When I try to administer SA, it tells me that [it] isn't set up in Procmails (PM) config. What do I needPM for? Doesn't SA work without PM? I would like to run Postfix (with MLs pop3),
Hi:
I am using Spamassassin version 2.63 (spamd and spamc invoked by
procmail) installed from 10CE cd and it is only catching around 20% of
spams, which in my case means that is missing between 60-70 spams a day.
Since missing that large percent of spams is something that is only
happening to me,
When I request kmail to check in messages it may run a while or hang
almost instantly. I traced the problem to spamassassin using 94.7 % of
the cpu using top. When I kill the PID assigned to spamassassin with
signal 15 things work well until done with spamassassin using from 0.3
to 25.7 % of
While looking through my syslog I found the following entry:
Mar 7 04:20:47 dhcppc0 spamd[24012]: bayes: lock: 24012 cannot create tmp
lockfile /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes.lock.dhcppc0.24012 for
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes.lock: Permission denied
I'm assuming from the line below, I have
On Sunday 07 Mar 2004 17:58, Chris wrote:
While looking through my syslog I found the following entry:
Mar 7 04:20:47 dhcppc0 spamd[24012]: bayes: lock: 24012 cannot create tmp
lockfile /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes.lock.dhcppc0.24012 for
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes.lock: Permission denied
On Sunday 07 March 2004 02:53 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
The solution is to either put the line
bayes_path /path/to/file
in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file where the path points to
a directory with 666 permissions, or else create a
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file in
On Sunday 07 Mar 2004 21:13, Chris wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2004 02:53 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
The solution is to either put the line
bayes_path /path/to/file
in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file where the path points to
a directory with 666 permissions, or else
On Sunday 07 March 2004 04:27 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Sunday 07 Mar 2004 21:13, Chris wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2004 02:53 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
That would not help because msec would come along and change the perms
back to 660. You could always use drakperm to override msec, but
On Sunday 07 Mar 2004 22:42, Chris wrote:
That would not help because msec would come along and change the perms
back to 660. You could always use drakperm to override msec, but my
experience with msec is that its best not to try to fight it. Just set
the path
to /home/chris/something
On Sunday 07 March 2004 04:52 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Sunday 07 Mar 2004 22:42, Chris wrote:
Ok Derek, does this look any better? If not I guess maybe I'd just
better go bury my head somewhere.
bayes_path /home/chris/.spamassassin
bayes_file_mode 0666
I installed spamassassin 2.63 a few weeks ago via CPAN leaving the old 2.41
intact. Looking at the CPAN install log I can't seem to decipher where the
newer version has been installed. Any help would be appreciated.
Chris
--
Regards
Chris
A 100% Microsoft free computer
Registered
On Saturday 06 March 2004 12:04 pm, Chris wrote:
I installed spamassassin 2.63 a few weeks ago via CPAN leaving the old 2.41
intact. Looking at the CPAN install log I can't seem to decipher where the
newer version has been installed. Any help would be appreciated.
I am pretty sure that
On Saturday 06 March 2004 12:32 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2004 12:04 pm, Chris wrote:
I installed spamassassin 2.63 a few weeks ago via CPAN leaving the old
2.41 intact. Looking at the CPAN install log I can't seem to decipher
where the newer version has been installed.
On Monday 01 Mar 2004 05:23, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
On Sunday 29 February 2004 16:55, Derek Jennings wrote:
Tks, Derek! but ONE more question!
(see below, pls)
On Sunday 29 Feb 2004 19:40, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
Hi!
I've been using
Hi!
I've been using spamassassin for a while, but I must have missed some
detail on the config process!
It's configured system wide. And as I use procmail and kmail, the spamassassin
insist on putting the lock file at ~/Mail/ (kmail directory).
How can I change this? I have set two
On Sunday 29 Feb 2004 19:40, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
Hi!
I've been using spamassassin for a while, but I must have missed some
detail on the config process!
It's configured system wide. And as I use procmail and kmail, the
spamassassin insist on putting the lock file
On Sunday 29 February 2004 16:55, Derek Jennings wrote:
Tks, Derek! but ONE more question!
(see below, pls)
On Sunday 29 Feb 2004 19:40, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
Hi!
I've been using spamassassin for a while, but I must have missed some
detail on the config process!
Hello,
Spamassassin is installed in the central server where I receive mail. I
have not installed it locally. Almost no spam are caught anymore; all
spams seems to have understand the trick and to hide somehow the
significant word (writing v.ia.gr@ for example). Has anyone experienced
this
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 16:45, Olivier Esser wrote:
Hello,
Spamassassin is installed in the central server where I receive
mail. I have not installed it locally. Almost no spam are caught
anymore; all spams seems to have understand the trick and to hide
somehow the significant word
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 11:45 am, Olivier Esser wrote:
Hello,
Spamassassin is installed in the central server where I receive mail. I
have not installed it locally. Almost no spam are caught anymore; all
spams seems to have understand the trick and to hide somehow the
significant word
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:45:46 +
Olivier Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Spamassassin is installed in the central server where I receive mail.
I have not installed it locally. Almost no spam are caught anymore;
all spams seems to have understand the trick and to hide somehow the
I use annoyance filter and it works great too, it's another bayesian filter
and you can find a complete howto on making it work on
http://www.newsforge.com/software/03/10/24/2046238.shtml?tid=74
and
http://www.newsforge.com/software/03/10/27/1533240.shtml?tid=74tid=82
have fun :)
Beppe
--
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 08:45 am, Olivier Esser wrote:
Hello,
Spamassassin is installed in the central server where I receive mail. I
have not installed it locally. Almost no spam are caught anymore; all
spams seems to have understand the trick and to hide somehow the
significant word
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 07:43 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
In case anyone is using SpamAssassin and wants to increase their use of
the available DNS Blacklists, I have a configuration file that I can make
available that includes connections to some of the blacklists that I find
to be more
On Friday 16 January 2004 09:29 pm, Chris wrote:
Brian, question on running spamassassin. There are two files to run spamc
and spamd. Should they both be running together? I have spamc set to
start at boot and its running, spamd I find has to be started from a root
terminal. I figured I'd
I've been running SA for several months now, and it has been extremely
successful. My wife get's dozens of spams a day, and the filtering has
gotten better as more spams get added to the database.
Now I want to move her account to a different machine, but I don't want to
start the sa-learn
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 09:58:33 -0800
E. Hines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been running SA for several months now, and it has been extremely
successful. My wife get's dozens of spams a day, and the filtering has
gotten better as more spams get added to the database.
Now I want to move
On Thursday 13 Nov 2003 1:43 am, Bryan Phinney wrote:
In case anyone is using SpamAssassin and wants to increase their use of the
available DNS Blacklists, I have a configuration file that I can make
available that includes connections to some of the blacklists that I find
to be more valuable.
On Thursday 13 November 2003 09:04 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
Later:-
I tried out your rules and get these errors when I run spamd -D
debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: tflags
RCVD_IN_EASY
Possible that additional CR/LF have been introduced by my posting. I
On Thursday 13 Nov 2003 2:42 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2003 09:04 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
Later:-
I tried out your rules and get these errors when I run spamd -D
debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
tflags RCVD_IN_EASY
Possible
On Thursday 13 November 2003 10:23 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
No still the same. Reading 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' it looks as if
the tflags statement should always assign a test type to a test. I made
them all test type 'net' and now the config files parse OK.
Now to see if they will
On Thursday 13 Nov 2003 3:42 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2003 10:23 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
No still the same. Reading 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' it looks as if
the tflags statement should always assign a test type to a test. I made
them all test type 'net' and
On Thursday 13 November 2003 01:03 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
OK I have adjusted some of the scores and it is all working nicely, but I
have a question?
What is the difference between RCVD_IN_SORBS and the specific Sorbs tests
like X_SORBS_SOCKS ?
RCVD_IN_SORBS is triggered when any one of
In case anyone is using SpamAssassin and wants to increase their use of the
available DNS Blacklists, I have a configuration file that I can make
available that includes connections to some of the blacklists that I find to
be more valuable. These include SPEWS, SORBS, Easynet, Blackholes.us,
On Monday 20 Oct 2003 4:46 am, Dennis Myers wrote:
On Sunday 19 October 2003 07:56 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
Don't know if anyone else is running this, but I just upgraded to the 2.6
version of SpamAssassin. My message processing time has dropped from an
avg of about 30 seconds to an avg of
On Sunday 19 October 2003 08:42 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
On Sunday 19 October 2003 08:56 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
Don't know if anyone else is running this, but I just upgraded to the 2.6
version of SpamAssassin.
In my opinion, the jump from 2.55 to 2.6 is worlds better and very much
worth
Don't know if anyone else is running this, but I just upgraded to the 2.6
version of SpamAssassin. My message processing time has dropped from an avg
of about 30 seconds to an avg of 5 seconds with the new version. Also, my
spam trigger score is set to about 8 and I used to get about 1 or 2
On Sunday 19 October 2003 08:56 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
Don't know if anyone else is running this, but I just upgraded to the 2.6
version of SpamAssassin.
In my opinion, the jump from 2.55 to 2.6 is worlds better and very much
worth doing the upgrade. Just figured I would mention it for
On Sunday 19 October 2003 07:56 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
Don't know if anyone else is running this, but I just upgraded to the 2.6
version of SpamAssassin. My message processing time has dropped from an
avg of about 30 seconds to an avg of 5 seconds with the new version. Also,
my spam
On Sunday 19 October 2003 07:56 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
In my opinion, the jump from 2.55 to 2.6 is worlds better and very much
worth doing the upgrade. Just figured I would mention it for anyone else
on the list that runs SA.
On Sunday 19 October 2003 11:46 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
I
Anyone have some tips on this?
It appears that this /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
will do the trick, but I may be missing something to make this Mandrake
specific (the how-to's seem to be written for other distros that place the
configuration files in /home/~/.spamassassin, which I don't
On Friday 10 Oct 2003 6:04 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
Anyone have some tips on this?
It appears that this /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
will do the trick, but I may be missing something to make this Mandrake
specific (the how-to's seem to be written for other distros that place the
On Friday 10 October 2003 01:04 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
Anyone have some tips on this?
It appears that this /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
will do the trick, but I may be missing something to make this Mandrake
specific (the how-to's seem to be written for other distros that place the
On Friday 10 October 2003 05:35 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Friday 10 October 2003 01:04 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
It appears that this /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
will do the trick, but I may be missing something to make this Mandrake
specific (the how-to's seem to be written for other
On Sunday 09 Feb 2003 5:12 am, Dennis Myers wrote:
I want spamassassin to log or put mail that it thinks is spam in a folder
in my kmail setup. I have given the command spamassassin
--log-to-mbox=Spam in a console but it doesn't seem to be doing the job.
Should I have used the -l switch first
On Sunday 09 February 2003 05:39 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Sunday 09 Feb 2003 5:12 am, Dennis Myers wrote:
I want spamassassin to log or put mail that it thinks is spam in a folder
in my kmail setup. I have given the command spamassassin
--log-to-mbox=Spam in a console but it doesn't
On Sunday 09 February 2003 10:58 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Sunday 09 Feb 2003 3:59 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
On Sunday 09 February 2003 05:39 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Sunday 09 Feb 2003 5:12 am, Dennis Myers wrote:
I want spamassassin to log or put mail that it thinks is spam in a
SNIP
Thanks Derek, that was exactly what I needed. Who knew that . was a
regular expression? I don't seem to get much spam from any source, maybe
once a month, but I know that sooner or later it will come. Your help is
appreciated. So much to learn, so little time. : )
1 a month! I get
I want spamassassin to log or put mail that it thinks is spam in a folder in
my kmail setup. I have given the command spamassassin --log-to-mbox=Spam in
a console but it doesn't seem to be doing the job. Should I have used the -l
switch first or just how does one get it to filter and send to a
63 matches
Mail list logo
