On 10/6/2010 8:02 AM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Boris, the lenses will be two years old next month. If I can get them to
work with a little manual manipulation, which is free, why would I send
them to CRIS to a couple of hundred apiece to have the parts replaced?
Especially so in that I don't use
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "P. J. Alling"
>> On 10/5/2010 7:01 PM, John Francis wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:49:18PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> >>> Well ... not a real car.
> >>>
> >>> I
On 10/6/2010 8:01 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Boris,
I only noticed multiple copies of a couple of your posts, not all of them. So
sending one ping isn't definitive.
I don't want to (bore and) ping PDML to its untimely demise. Also,
you're the only person reported the problem. May be others did n
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> If you receive this message more than once please reply. Otherwise, you don't
> /really/ have to bother.
Boris,
I only noticed multiple copies of a couple of your posts, not all of them. So
sending one ping isn't definiti
On Oct 5, 2010, at 02:04 , Boris Liberman wrote:
On 10/5/2010 9:30 AM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
I think I will let this slide for now, even though it is a crappy
system
that makes these kinds of side-show shenanigans (worked that into a
sentence) with Pentax's top of the line DA optics.
Joe
Walt, here are my few pixels.
Personally, I don't do montages, collages and other digital art forms.
No specific reason except that I'd like to better myself as a
photographer, not as a graphic artist.
I don't have any specific /system/ as to how to decide which image to
save and which to di
Be strong, Ann!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
A, Lucas, the Prince of Darkness
I still like my RED '87 Alfa Romeo Quadrafoglio
http://i896.photobucket.com/albums/ac164/gelewis_2010/Bisbee%20Blues%20Fest%202010/_ORI8154A1.jpg
Jerry
<
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: It ain't like it used to be.
Message-ID: <4cabde0d.1030...@g
From: "P. J. Alling"
On 10/5/2010 7:01 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:49:18PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>> Well ... not a real car.
>>>
>>> I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for transportation.
>> I n
From: Larry Colen
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:10 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Problem number 2 is what's really kept it off the road.
Vandals smashed the windshield and driver's side window and I
can't get the broken glass out of the existing interior. I'm
going to have to strip it out and completely rep
Hello there.
If you receive this message more than once please reply. Otherwise, you
don't /really/ have to bother.
Cheers.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above a
In general I try to only keep those images that don't require an explanation
for the viewer as far as technical deficiencies go. And I don't keep images
that I wouldn't be proud to show others.
Upon download, I make a fast & ruthless selection of keepers and trash the
rest. I'll do that again
On 10/5/2010 8:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames
Just try to add an interesting background to a good foreground shot in
color in a chemical darkroom. It was difficult enough to do in B&W,
Photoshop's a snap.
On 10/5/2010 4:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, P. J.
Good point about storage. I guess I still think of hard drive space
a
I should think that would be one of the best times to take pictures.
Pretty shots of pretty places are easy...
On 10/5/2010 6:27 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
The PAW project came about as a result of the same thing we tend to do here
(talk about equipment rather than taking pictures...but I blam
On 10/5/2010 7:01 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:49:18PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Well ... not a real car.
I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for transportation.
I need to get my MGBGT back on the road too.
So sorry to hear this Ann. I know you had been concerned for her for some
time. But expecting the worst doesn't make coping with the situation all that
much easier.
stan
On Oct 5, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> My oldest (in terms of years known) and one of two of my very dearest
Sad news Ann, my condolences. Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> My oldest (in terms of years known) and one of two of my very dearest
> closest long term friends passed away on Friday ... so I'm off to Chicago to
> her home and family One of the reasons I c
--
From: "Tanya Love"
Subject: RE: Out of curiosity: A question for the pros
I concur. There is no point in keeping stuff just because it is cheap to
do
so. It may only equate to 1TB per year, but it is also a whole lot of
filing, cataloguing e
John Sessoms said:
I just replaced my "cheap Chinese radio-slaves", which come to think were
Interfit Branded with Paul C. Buff Cybersync. Didn't go the CyberCommander
route yet, but the receivers & transmitter I have will work with it if I
ever get that far advanced.
Yeah, I am going to go wi
I concur. There is no point in keeping stuff just because it is cheap to do
so. It may only equate to 1TB per year, but it is also a whole lot of
filing, cataloguing etc that I don't have time to do. There is no point in
me keeping stuff that is average at best. I don't ever want to be an
"aver
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> By this time next year, it'll be about half that. If my time is worth any
>> money at all, it's practically not worth the time to go through the bother
>> of deleting them.
>
> Whenever I can't think of a better reason for keeping a shot t
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> DagT wrote:
>
>> http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
>> K20D, da*16-5...@16mm, 1/90s, f/8, ISO200
>
> Oh YEAH!
Great shot!
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
DagT wrote:
>http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
>K20D, da*16-5...@16mm, 1/90s, f/8, ISO200
Oh YEAH!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and fo
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:10 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Well ... not a real car.
I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for
transportation.
>> I need to get my MGBGT back on the road too. And be
annual
2010/10/5 DagT :
> Thanks Dan and Bob W!
>
> DagT
>
>
> Den 3. okt. 2010 kl. 23.48 skrev Daniel J. Matyola:
>
>> Stunning!
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM, DagT wrote:
>>> http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
>>> K20D, da*16-5...@16mm, 1/90s, f/8, ISO200
>>>
>
Larry Colen wrote:
>
>On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
>>>
>>> I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
>>> for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames every week, the storage spac
click =)
ecke
2010/10/3 :
> Just got word that 4 images of mine have been chosen to be in a group of 25,
> (out of a total of 1200 images submitted) open for voting in a 'Pure
> Michigan' summer photo contest.
>
> check out http://puremichiganphotoclub.com/seasonal-contest/vote/ to view
> the 25
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:32 PM, eckinator wrote:
> nice shot - that's not a fag in his mouth though or is it?
I always find the combination of bicycling and smoking to be a bit of a
cognitive dissonance, as out here in the boonies where bikes aren't very
practical transportation they seem to be mo
total kodachrome moment =)
thanks for sharing
ecke
2010/10/4 Roman Melihhov :
> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20101004134549
> ^^^ Your own photo contributions welcome.
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE f
On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 6 October 2010 11:03, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> That's a bit extreme, in my view (I find a lot of shots that didn't
>> come out as I envisaged prove quite useful later), but I delete a lot.
>> Good photographers have to be ruthless editors of
Rob Studdert wrote:
>On 6 October 2010 11:03, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> That's a bit extreme, in my view (I find a lot of shots that didn't
>> come out as I envisaged prove quite useful later), but I delete a lot.
>> Good photographers have to be ruthless editors of their own work.
>
>Editing does
Clear choice:
Cormorantor 2 - Shagment Day
2010/10/6 Tanya Love :
> I thought my ears were burning!
>
> Mine would be - "Great Cormorantations"
>
> t.x.
>
>
> Tanya Love
> Photographer
>
> www.lovebytes.com.au
> m: 0458 006 740
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [ma
nice shot - that's not a fag in his mouth though or is it?
thanks for sharing
ecke
2010/10/6 frank theriault :
> So in another thread I talked a bit about Alleycat races, messenger
> races through city streets through regular traffic.
>
> Basically you pay a couple of bucks (usually $10) and that
so do I
thanks for sharing
ecke
2010/10/6 frank theriault :
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>> http://dougbrewer.posterous.com/sometimes-shes-still
>>
>> enjoy
>
> I hate you.
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> --
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
>
> --
> PD
On 6 October 2010 11:03, Mark Roberts wrote:
> That's a bit extreme, in my view (I find a lot of shots that didn't
> come out as I envisaged prove quite useful later), but I delete a lot.
> Good photographers have to be ruthless editors of their own work.
Editing does not equal deleting.
--
Ro
It has a certain rugged blue-collar look to it.
The E-5 is bigger than the E-1? [groan]. I've gotten so spoiled by the petite
Pentax K-x with the smallish LE lenses, I'm neglecting the E-1 with zooms.
Jeffery
On Oct 5, 2010, at 7:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Think Tank Photo "Retrospecti
I explain my file system organization and naming in a document
available from my website:
http://www.gdgphoto.com/articles/ see #07.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Shockingly, I have all the bags I need at present too ... although I
have looked at adding the Think Tank Photo "Retrospective 10" when the
new body gets in (the E-5 is bulkier than the E-1 and L1 and doesn't
fit what I have particularly well). I had such a mess of bags I threw
my hands up, saved o
Tanya Love wrote:
>A great photographer who took me under his wing years ago (see
>www.chunglee.com), once said to me "the measure of a great photographer is
>the size of his/her waste paper bin".
Quite right.
>Meaning anything that isn't as
>perfect as you envisaged it should go in the bin
T
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:30 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
>>
>> I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
>> for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames every week, the storage space
>> and time it would take
Take care, Ann, and my sincere condolences.
Ecke
2010/10/5 Ann Sanfedele :
> My oldest (in terms of years known) and one of two of my very dearest
> closest long term friends passed away on Friday ... so I'm off to Chicago to
> her home and family One of the reasons I could talk myself into the e
2010/10/5 Walter Gilbert :
>
> As it happens, I live less than five miles from a uranium enrichment
> plant. I can't believe it never occurred to me to enrich myself via
> uranium. I mean, it's been right there in front of my face the whole time!
> Glowing, even!
hmmm... could it be your mora
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:57:04AM +1000, Tanya Love wrote:
>
> I know this is an opposing view to what most have posted here, but it works
> for me. And when I am shooting 2-3000 frames every week, the storage space
> and time it would take to keep the "average" shots, would be ridiculous.
2000
Yes, those were his first design. I think Larry had one of those go
bad and Buff did a repair on it. Not sure what the cost was. I had
four of the White Lightning 1200 monolights and really liked them, but
they went along with of all my Mamiya MF stuff when my ex sold them
before I could ge
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 06:15:07PM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
> Walter, I keep just about everything i shoot, unless its totally OOF
> then i'll delete it.
I regard deleting digital images much as I would regard shredding negatives;
it's an irreversible step, and one that offers no real benefits
I agree with you as a working professional, Tanya. Work one is doing
for a client, or on spec., is certainly different than the work an
artsy-fartsy photographer does (like me). With few exceptions, if it
doesn't meet the clients expectations or is not special to you for
your own portfolio,
I thought my ears were burning!
Mine would be - "Great Cormorantations"
t.x.
Tanya Love
Photographer
www.lovebytes.com.au
m: 0458 006 740
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob
Sullivan
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2010 4:00 AM
To:
Got the film in the carrier wrong…
:-)
On Oct 5, 2010, at 08:23 , John Sessoms wrote:
From: Jerry in Arizona
Taken at the vineyard of Callaghan Winery in Sonoita, AZ.? Pentax
K20D, Pentax
SMC DA 1:3.5-5.6 18-55mm w/2X telextender.? The plaque recognizes
the area as a
"Backyard Habitat."
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 01:49:18PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> >
> > Well ... not a real car.
> >
> > I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for transportation.
>
> I need to get my MGBGT back on the road too. And being a BGT, it
A great photographer who took me under his wing years ago (see
www.chunglee.com), once said to me "the measure of a great photographer is
the size of his/her waste paper bin". Meaning anything that isn't as
perfect as you envisaged it should go in the bin. It took me a good while
to get my head a
An excellent example, Mark!
I attended college in San Francisco, and had some very respected
luminaries as teachers in the craft of photography.
I was told, and remember this was in the days of film, to not expect
more than one or two good shots per roll of 35 mm.
Do not expect to get mor
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> http://dougbrewer.posterous.com/sometimes-shes-still
>
> enjoy
I hate you.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pd
Thinking of you Ann, friendships like that are few and far between, and a
wonderful reminder of our humanity. I am going to go and have a look at
your gallery now.
Thanks for being so candid and open about it, and I hope that your trip to
Chicago brings you lots of happy tears as you remember the
So in another thread I talked a bit about Alleycat races, messenger
races through city streets through regular traffic.
Basically you pay a couple of bucks (usually $10) and that goes into a
kitty for the winner along with donated prizes from courier-friendly
businesses.
There are a series of che
The PAW project came about as a result of the same thing we tend to do here
(talk about equipment rather than taking pictures...but I blame that on
Photokina). Kyle Cassity on the Leica Users Group came up (half-jokingly) that
the LUG people should use their cameras rather than just talking abou
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
> should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
>
I'm not responsible.
In any way.
Just ask my wife.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:15 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Walter, I keep just about everything i shoot, unless its totally OOF
> then i'll delete it.
>
> I have a lot of photos that i consider "just a bit OOF" but find i can
> use them in the annual fair photo contest as the slight flaw does not
> s
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> I see what you mean.
>
> Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
Don't listen to Frank or Cotty is a good start.
Dave
>
>
> -- Walt
> On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>> that's how you learn to be better.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML P
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> I see what you mean.
>
> Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
Don't listen to
>
>
> -- Walt
> On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>> that's how you learn to be better.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.ne
Walter, I keep just about everything i shoot, unless its totally OOF
then i'll delete it.
I have a lot of photos that i consider "just a bit OOF" but find i can
use them in the annual fair photo contest as the slight flaw does not
show up.
The example you have shown woudld be a forsure keeper in
See that gravel driveway on the right, thats my place.
Dave
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Shot a wedding near Niagara Falls this weekend. Pre-wedding,
> post-raining shot from the patio.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/bUMx1Y-Gqvmre0E6_Y6NSg?feat=directlink
>
From: Larry Colen
On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Well ... not a real car.
I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for
transportation.
I need to get my MGBGT back on the road too. And being a BGT, it
actually makes pretty decent transportation.
Mine's a MGB Toure
I'm not too proud to say that's the greatest thing I've seen in a
long time.
And here I sat thinking that the whole "cormorant" thing was just some
simple, quirky idiosyncrasy of the PDML list. Little did I know!
Thanks for the info and the guffaw (a word which, if I'm not mistaken,
is de
Sweet
Dave
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> http://dougbrewer.posterous.com/sometimes-shes-still
>
> enjoy
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly ab
Free To A Good Home:
Falcon RC print drying rack.
Just add $5 for parcel post mail.
I have 2 and only need one. If that.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
On Oct 5, 2010, at 15:43, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "Bob W"
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at least
>> 100,000
>>> > miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is only when
>>> > keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment
Walter Gilbert wrote:
> what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
>be flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them. For
>instance, a shot that's too poorly focused to rescue with sharpening
>tools and so forth, but does capture a sense of action that is somewhat
On Oct 5, 2010, at 09:06 , Ann Sanfedele wrote:
one of two of my very dearest closest long term friends passed away
on Friday ...
I am sorry to hear of your loss, gladdened for the wonderful
friendship you've enjoyed to oh so many years.
Safe journey. To you both.
The gallery on my web p
On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:39 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Eric Weir
>> On Oct 4, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>>> > Still not clear whether I can move image files into new files . . . .
>> Probably obvious, but that shoulda been "into new folders.
>
> My impression is that Lightroom isn'
From: Paul Sorenson
John -
Did you have the original Buff slaves or the newer ones? They weren't
happy with the original ones and had a recall and an upgrade offer to go
with the newer models. You might check that out with them. The older
models were purchased off the shelf from somewhere i
On 6 October 2010 04:56, Bob W wrote:
> we can always talk about cormorants.
Or maybe we could simply rebrand: the Punsters Discuss Mail List?
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
Yeah, but what about the bags . . .?
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>> Agreed (particularly the LE models). I was thinking more like Sony and
>> Olympus four-thirds.
>
> My FourThirds kit consists of:
>
> 11-22/2.8-
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> Agreed (particularly the LE models). I was thinking more like Sony and
> Olympus four-thirds.
My FourThirds kit consists of:
11-22/2.8-3.5
25/1.4
35/3.5 Macro
50/2 Macro
70/2.8 (50/2 + EC14) Macro
100/4 (50/2 + EC20) Macro
I'd like to get t
can't help you with that - sorry!
>
>I see what you mean.
>
> Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
>
>
> -- Walt
> On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
> > that's how you learn to be better.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailm
Thanks, P. J.
Good point about storage. I guess I still think of hard drive space as
coming at a rather high premium -- and also, there's the fact that I'm
not the most well-organized person in the world. I tend to scatter
copies of images in various forms hither and yon, throughout my dr
Thanks for the input, Jeffery.
I've been curious about the PAW project, having seen references to it in
subject lines on the list in the past. I just assumed it was an
individual effort. Maybe a kind soul will explain it to me sometime.
Now, I've at least put together the fact that PAW s
Thanks, John.
That's just about as close to a verbatim description of my thinking as
it gets. I have gone back over the past couple of days and found some
shots that I wonder why I didn't do something with before. The reason,
of course, is because I didn't have any idea how to make them l
I see what you mean.
Now, how do I learn to be GOOD? :)
-- Walt
On 10/5/2010 1:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
that's how you learn to be better.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link d
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. "Cool new things to buy" is not why I'm
interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
all the equipment I need to do Photograp
. 230,000 so far on the Subaru Legacy
> >> >
> > cars? I can't imagine that I'll ever have a car again.
> >
>
> Yeah, but don't you live somewhere that has decent bus & train service,
not
> to mention being within walking or cycling distance of most everything you
> need?
>
yes
> If I coul
Paul Sorenson wrote:
So sorry to hear that, Ann. Was she the friend you visited in Zion?
Paul, _ yes who you almost met...
thank you for a sweet quote - and there will be many there who are part
of the fabric...
thanks everyone for your kind thoughts
ann
FWIW, I leave you with a qu
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:23 AM, David Parsons wrote:
> You can put the image files anywhere you want. LR does not work well
> when the catalog is stored on a network drive. The catalog wants to
> live on your local computer.
Expanding on this a little, Lightroom is implemented on top of an
SQLl
On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> Well ... not a real car.
>
> I'd get my MG running again, but that's not really for transportation.
I need to get my MGBGT back on the road too. And being a BGT, it actually
makes pretty decent transportation.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.co
From: "Bob W"
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at least
100,000
> miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is only when
> keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment on a new
> car.
> >
>
> Hell, I usually only buy a car AFT
Sorry for you loss, Ann. Thanks for the link to your gallery - very
heartwarming to see a friendship last that long.
--- Scott Catron - z...@yahoo.com ---
http://www.flickr.com/photos/zaui/collections/
- Original Message
From: Ann Sanfedele
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Tue,
From: Walter Gilbert
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So,
please indulge me.
That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be flawed, but still have some redeeming qualiti
So sorry to hear that, Ann. Was she the friend you visited in Zion?
FWIW, I leave you with a quote which has been beneficial to me from time
to time...Don't know the author...
"What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but
what is woven into the lives of others."
-
John -
Did you have the original Buff slaves or the newer ones? They weren't
happy with the original ones and had a recall and an upgrade offer to go
with the newer models. You might check that out with them. The older
models were purchased off the shelf from somewhere in the Far East. Th
Apply some blur, some motion striping and call it art...
Hell, I seldom throw anything out, (unless it's just silly, like 100
pictures of a doorknob), storage is cheap, and you never know when a
great idea for combined images will strike you.
Somewhere on film I have a very nice photograph
Tanya,
If you can get me the same deal, I'll take two!
Thanks for chiming in on this. The U2410 was one of the "top 5"
professional monitors on cnet.com - which was my first stop on the way
down this rabbit hole... It's still in the running... Good to hear
that you like it!
-c
On Tue, Oct 5, 2
On 10/5/2010 1:56 PM, Bob W wrote:
My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
equipment discussions. "Cool new things to buy" is not why I'm
interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
all the equipment I need to do Photography and am only inter
I would post it and say "how do y'all like the bokeh in this shot?" Dealing
with focus and shutter lag when trying to photograph a flying bird (not to
mention my poor reflexes) have convinced me never to even try them with my
current equipment. So, you'll never hear me criticizing another one's
While we can't talk about bodies and lenses, there is always photo bags! And
Godfrey carefully sidestepped the issue of bags. As you are no doubt aware, he
has gone by the name "Bagmelda Marcos" in the past. ;-)
Jeffery
On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>>
My perspective is sim
> As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
> photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So, please
> indulge me.
>
> That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be
> flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them.
> As it happens, I live less than five miles from a uranium enrichment
plant. I
> can't believe it never occurred to me to enrich myself via uranium. I
mean,
> it's been right there in front of my face the whole time! Glowing, even!
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqwS0Ew77WE
--
PDML
On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:58 , Bob W wrote:
I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at
least
100,000
miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is
only when
keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment on
a new
car.
Hell, I usuall
> > I'm getting to be that way as well. I usually drive a car for at least
100,000
> miles before even thinking about getting a new one, and that is only when
> keeping the old car running costs the same as a monthly payment on a new
> car.
> >
>
> Hell, I usually only buy a car AFTER it has 100,0
> >
> >>My perspective is simple: I'm utterly and terminally bored with new
> >>equipment discussions. "Cool new things to buy" is not why I'm
> >>interested in Photography. With one or two small exceptions, I've got
> >>all the equipment I need to do Photography and am only interested in
> >>new t
As I hasten to stipulate at every opportunity, I'm pretty new to
photography, and I have what may seem to be a stupid question. So,
please indulge me.
That said, what do all of you real photographers do with images that may
be flawed, but still have some redeeming qualities to them. For
in
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo