I've been shooting with Godox lighting gear for about 5 years now.
And petitioning them to give full P-TTL support and HSS to Pentax - and was
over the moon when they did.
The TT350p is an awesome little flash in itself (it's a lovely size
physically) and a perfect cost effective gateway in to
On 4/2/2020 19:08:36, P. J. Alling wrote:
I keep thinking of upgrading my flash capabilities, especially as my older
flashes keep dying...
While doing my research I a flash that's flown completely under my radar.
The Godox TT 350p, also sold by Adorama under the Flashpoint brand.
It looks
I keep thinking of upgrading my flash capabilities, especially as my
older flashes keep dying...
While doing my research I a flash that's flown completely under my radar.
The Godox TT 350p, also sold by Adorama under the Flashpoint brand.
It looks really good for the money, for about half of
On Aug 12, 2010, at 16:27, paul stenquist wrote:
It casts a shadow with most of my lenses, so I haven't experimented with it
much. But the few times I have, I've found it difficult to control in respect
to exposure.
Even with the K7?
I found that the K7, kit lens, and pop-up flash made a
That is indeed a nice image, and a good use of the flash.
Dan
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 16:27, paul stenquist wrote:
It casts a shadow with most of my lenses, so I haven't experimented with it
much. But the few times I
On Aug 13, 2010, at 8:45, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That is indeed a nice image, and a good use of the flash.
(helps to have a good subject)
Dan
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 16:27, paul stenquist wrote:
It casts a
Even better, in this case, to have TWO good subjects. G
Dan
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 8:45, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That is indeed a nice image, and a good use of the flash.
(helps to have a good subject)
--
PDML
On Aug 13, 2010, at 06:39 , Charles Robinson wrote:
Even with the K7?
I found that the K7, kit lens, and pop-up flash made a great party
camera - lightweight, reliable exposure.
Sometimes that direct flash is a real drag in terms of looking like
a flash photo but I never had a single one
On Aug 13, 2010, at 17:14, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 06:39 , Charles Robinson wrote:
Even with the K7?
I found that the K7, kit lens, and pop-up flash made a great party camera
- lightweight, reliable exposure.
Sometimes that direct flash is a real drag in terms of
2010/8/12 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Is it set to anti-red-eye-flash mode?
You mean eyes-inevitably-shut mode?
Even P-TTL gives me lots of closed eyes unless I bounce or diffuse it.
Ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:14, eckinator wrote:
2010/8/12 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Is it set to anti-red-eye-flash mode?
You mean eyes-inevitably-shut mode?
Even P-TTL gives me lots of closed eyes unless I bounce or diffuse it.
My trick is to do trailing-curtain flash with the shutter
On Aug 12, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:14, eckinator wrote:
2010/8/12 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Is it set to anti-red-eye-flash mode?
You mean eyes-inevitably-shut mode?
Even P-TTL gives me lots of closed eyes unless I bounce or diffuse
it.
On Aug 12, 2010, at 9:20, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:14, eckinator wrote:
2010/8/12 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Is it set to anti-red-eye-flash mode?
You mean eyes-inevitably-shut mode?
Even P-TTL gives me
2010/8/12 P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
The best trick is to never, ever use the pop up flash for anything.
I don't. Never. Never ever. It sits too low.
I don't want to have to worry about zooming too far or having
forgotten to remove the hood lest there be a partial circle shadow in
Well, I dunno, Paul. I've used it many times for a bit of fill in backlit
situations.
With the PZ-1 and 1p, the combination of the pop-up and a bounced flash in the
hot shoe did a great job in most rooms. Alas, Pentax moved the hot shoe to the
conventional location in subsequent cameras.
On Aug 12, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Well, I dunno, Paul. I've used it many times for a bit of fill in backlit
situations.
It casts a shadow with most of my lenses, so I haven't experimented with it
much. But the few times I have, I've found it difficult to control in respect
One advantage of being good friends with a band is that you get a lot more
freedom as a photographer. Especially when they love the photos that you take
of them. Last week I was up on stage with them for a while, which allowed me
to actually get some clear shots of the drummer.
Last night
Is it set to anti-red-eye-flash mode?
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Wed, 8/11/10, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: Weird lag with p-ttl flash
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2010, 7:58 PM
One
Larry, what you describe is not how P-TTL works.
You would have to try hard to notice the pre-flash of the P-TTL.
THe interval between the pre-flash and the flash is just at
the border of what a human eye can resolve.
What you describe sounds like a red-eye-reduction mode.
But even for that, -
On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Larry, what you describe is not how P-TTL works.
You would have to try hard to notice the pre-flash of the P-TTL.
That has been my experience.
THe interval between the pre-flash and the flash is just at
the border of what a human eye can
On 3/8/2010 2:58 PM, Miserere wrote:
I don't know about other PDMLers, but I've had that page bookmarked
for a long time; useful stuff. And Matt happens to be a Boston guy, so
he probably says flah-shes.
As for people detesting flashes, I think there are two types of
photographers: Those who
Facebook want's me to login to see the page. I guess not.
On 3/13/2010 8:27 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
Bob W said:
And how did you get started in this business? As I recall it was in exactly
the same way.
Good point Bob, and my ego totally needed to be put back in it's place too
(it
On Mar 13, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
Bob W said:
However, take a look at this:
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=50625id=1022455271ref=nf#!/
album.php
?page=6aid=161316id=547536217
These were shot by a girl I know (in my home town), who is calling
herself a
However, take a look at this:
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=50625id=1022455271ref=
nf#!/album.php
?page=6aid=161316id=547536217
These were shot by a girl I know (in my home town), who is
calling herself a professional and who purchased her FIRST
slr camera less than a year ago!
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I don't have a Facebook account, so I can't see them. Nevertheless, it
doesn't matter. If her target clients don't like them she won't get any
business; if they do, she will. Whether she describes herself as
professional or
On 14 March 2010 09:03, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't watch these TV judge shows, the SO does, but she called me
into the TV room last week for a Joe Brown segment , someone suing a
wedding photographer for blurry and soft photos.
Banter, banter, blah blah etc, then he
My point exactly!
Tan.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Miserere
Sent: Monday, 15 March 2010 5:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Useful resource: Pentax P-TTL flash comparison
On 14 March 2010 09:03, David J Brooks
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Miserere
Sent: Monday, 8 March 2010 10:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Useful resource: Pentax P-TTL flash comparison
snip
As for people detesting flashes, I think there are two types of
photographers: Those who know how to strobe, and those
Brian said:
snip
I haven't checked whether my AF360FGZ behaves in the same way but I'm in the
I hate strobes category and try to avoid using the damn thing.
You know, I use mine CONSTANTLY, and I have no idea if it does or doesn't...
Actually, on second thoughts, I don't think it does cause I
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
I TOTALLY agree! And this is why there are so many pros floating around
places like Facebook who boast the following:
I am an available light photographer, who conveniently comes to you or your
chosen location...
On Mar 13, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com
wrote:
I TOTALLY agree! And this is why there are so many pros floating
around
places like Facebook who boast the following:
I am an available light photographer, who
On Mar 13, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com
wrote:
I TOTALLY agree! And this is why there are so many pros floating
around
places like Facebook who boast the following:
I am an available light photographer, who
I TOTALLY agree! And this is why there are so many pros
floating around places like Facebook who boast the following:
I am an available light photographer, who conveniently comes
to you or your chosen location...
Translated to meaning - I am a mum who bought myself a
camera and can
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
As for people detesting flashes, I think there are two types of
photographers: Those who know how to strobe, and those that
hate strobes.
I'm somewhere in between :-)
I know how to use it AND I hate it. Anyone who thinks
- Original Message -
From: P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: Useful resource: Pentax P-TTL flash comparison
On Mar 13, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:18
Bob W said:
And how did you get started in this business? As I recall it was in exactly
the same way.
Good point Bob, and my ego totally needed to be put back in it's place too
(it gets a bit too big for its boots sometimes!). So, I totally agree!
However, take a look at this:
some people here don't care
about [if not simply detest] flashes), but it was rather useful
to me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across
models
for each feature.
Igor
I don't know about other PDMLers, but I've had
2010/3/9 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
PJ, YOU are an ASSHOLE!
Don't feed him. We just keep him around for show.
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:40, Larry Colen wrote:
I do not, however, like my AF540. It will NOT stay in manual mode.
I agree with this complaint. Any time it is powered up, it defaults to P-TTL, no matter what it was set at before.
It would be nice if it remembered
(or some don't care for it - as I know some people here
don't care
about [if not simply detest] flashes), but it was
rather useful
to me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison
across
models
for each feature.
Igor
I
On 3/9/2010 2:02 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/3/9 John Sessomsjsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
PJ, YOU are an ASSHOLE!
Don't feed him. We just keep him around for show.
I would have though better of you. I know we don't agree on everything
but this was obviously a comment on engineers not
that all other PDMLers know this resource
(or some don't care for it - as I know some people here don't
care
about [if not simply detest] flashes), but it was rather
useful
to me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison
to me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across
models
for each feature.
Igor
I don't know about other PDMLers, but I've had
nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across models
for each feature.
Igor
I don't know about other PDMLers, but I've had that page bookmarked
for a long time; useful stuff. And Matt happens to be a Boston guy, so
he probably says flah-shes.
As for people detesting flashes, I think
to
me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across models
for each feature.
Igor
I don't know about other PDMLers, but I've had that page bookmarked
for a long time; useful stuff. And Matt happens to be a Boston guy, so
he probably says flah
PDMLers know this resource
(or some don't care for it - as I know some people here don't care
about [if not simply detest] flashes), but it was rather useful to me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across models
for each feature.
Igor
I
On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:40, Larry Colen wrote:
I do not, however, like my AF540. It will NOT stay in manual mode.
I agree with this complaint. Any time it is powered up, it defaults to P-TTL,
no matter what it was set at before.
It would be nice if it remembered what mode it was in and
), but it was rather useful to
me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across models
for each feature.
Igor
I don't know about other PDMLers, but I've had that page bookmarked
for a long time; useful stuff. And Matt happens to be a Boston
about [if not simply detest] flashes), but it was rather useful
to me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across
models
for each feature.
Igor
I don't know about other PDMLers, but I've had that page bookmarked
for a long time
Mon Mar 8 11:09:34 CST 2010
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:40, Larry Colen wrote:
I do not, however, like my AF540. It will NOT stay in manual mode.
I agree with this complaint. Any time it is powered up, it defaults to
P-TTL, no matter what it was set at before.
It is possible that all other PDMLers know this resource
(or some don't care for it - as I know some people here don't care
about [if not simply detest] flashes), but it was rather useful to me:
http://pttl.mattdm.org/overview
Very nice summary for each P-TTL flash plus comparison across
.
It always pleased me that the 280 would release the 1/80 shutter for
such shooting.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set
that would work on both.
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras with
TTL flash metering I've used will still control the flash output that
way.
Godfrey
On Mar 3, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Vic Mortelmans
Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to override this.
I can use my Spotmatic or ES combined with the same flash in auto
with the aperture? Most cameras with
TTL flash metering I've used will still control the flash output that
way.
Godfrey
On Mar 3, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to override this.
I can use my Spotmatic or ES combined with the same flash in auto mode
to get slow speeds
- Original Message -
From: Vic Mortelmans
Subject: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras with
TTL flash metering I've used will still
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:09 AM, William Robb wrote:
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras with
TTL flash metering I've used will still control the flash output that
way.
No. Unfortunately
Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to override this.
Isn't this the behavior that Cotty was able to defeat with his
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
On Mar 3, 2008, at 9:09 AM, William Robb wrote:
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras
On Mar 3, 2008, at 10:18 AM, William Robb wrote:
.. They pretty much all worked that way back then. ..
None of my AE capable Nikons of that era (FE2, F3) forced a shutter
speed when I set them on manual exposure control. They metered the
flash TTL for the aperture I chose and ran the
Yes it was, and I'm sure he'll post it again...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Hi,
Using my AF280T on my LX, I notice that there's no way to combine
auto/TTL functions with slow speeds. The camera always switches to the
flash sync speed, and I don't find a way to override
William Robb wrote:
I believe you can disable the forced sync by covering the small pin to the
left of the sync
terminal on the hot shoe.
A nice experiment... will this also disable the TTL capabilities?
My own advice would be to use a good quality non dedicated flash such as a
Vivitar
DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure
time
you want to use manually along with the aperture? Most cameras with
TTL flash metering I've used will still control the flash output
that
way
On Mar 3, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
My own advice would be to use a good quality non dedicated flash
such as a Vivitar 285.
Probably a better advice on the longer term. Non-Pentax side question:
will this type of flash also be of use on a modern Canon DSLR?
I agree with
On 3/3/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
They could have made an easy fix by putting a switch onto the flash to
disable the contact that
forced X-Sync. I believe Cotty may have done such a thing.
I did indeed. A very simple mod, really. Just involved a simple switch
on the right
- Original Message -
From: Vic Mortelmans
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax LX, auto/TTL flash and slow speeds
William Robb wrote:
I believe you can disable the forced sync by covering the small pin to the
left of the sync
terminal on the hot shoe.
A nice
://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 22:38
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
It does take time, but maybe 10-15ms. It's imperceptible.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
So the pre-flash doesn't take
]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 22:38
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
It does take time, but maybe 10-15ms. It's imperceptible.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
So the pre-flash doesn't take time?
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig
Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JB Sendt: 3. april 2006 22:38
JB Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
JB Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
JB It does take time, but maybe 10-15ms. It's imperceptible.
JB -Adam
JB Jens Bladt wrote:
So the pre-flash doesn't take time?
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 22:38
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
It does take time, but maybe 10-15ms. It's imperceptible.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
So the pre-flash doesn't take time?
Regards
Jens
To me, it looks more like one slightly longer flash, rather than a pre
burst and main flash as two separate bursts. However, some people are
prone to blinking and it is quite easy for them to get the eyelids
starting to close while the exposure is being made. I get way more
partially closed
I don't know who said what. I guess Adam said only the cheapest Pentax DSLR
(DS2) supports plain TTL flash. That is not the case. So does the PENTAX
*ist D.
I want the new DSLR to support plain TTL (perhaps as well as other, more
recent systems).
Or I will have to consider taking my business
: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL TTL flash madness
I would have thought that it's something like the red eye reduction pre
flash, which I find very annoying and time consuming (the shot is taken
quite a bit after I have pressed the button). I never use it for the same
reason - and it gives
currently that does plain TTL flash. Pre-Flash is simply
more accurate, and permits technologies like multiple balanced wireless
remotes (As done with i-TTL and E-TTL) and accurate balanced fill-flash.
You have a number of obsolete flashes. Be glad Pentax was kind enough to
not obsolete your flash
No problem and by the way, if control is what you want, computer
controlled flash and manual flash are still there AFAIK.
For me PTTL is important because I just can't how to do these things
myself (like good fill-in, calculate power and so on) so I need (and
i'm very happy) that an automatic
On Apr 4, 2006, at 12:49 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I want a flsh photograph to look something like this. It's hardlyu
notiveable, that a flash was used:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/123353168/
Hmm. Well, to my eye, it's apparent that a flash with bounce
attachment was used as the light
Crippled or not.
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I won't be
buying it.
I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses, one of which is a Metz
60-CT2.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Expect it not to. Pre-flash based TTL and Auto-Thyristor flash are both
more reliable with Digital than plain TTL. It's remarkable that TTL ever
worked with the *ist's (the only other recent DSLR to support TTL flash
was the Fuji S2 Pro, all others use a pre-flash based system like E-TTL,
iTTL
. It's remarkable that TTL ever
worked with the *ist's (the only other recent DSLR to support TTL flash
was the Fuji S2 Pro, all others use a pre-flash based system like E-TTL,
iTTL, D-TTL or whatever KM called theirs).
In other words, TTL is dead.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
Crippled
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Crippled or not.
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I
won't be
buying it.
I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses, one of which is
a Metz
60-CT2.
Why on earth would you expect that the new top-end
Jens Bladt wrote on 03.04.06 8:22:
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I won't be
buying it.
I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses, one of which is a Metz
60-CT2.
Sell all these oldies and buy one solid, modern, P-TTL, HSS and wireless
capable flash
On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:59 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
If the new 10 MP Pentax body doesn't support ordenary TTL flash, I
won't be
buying it. I have too many flashes - I guess 7 or 8 TTL flahses,
one of which is a Metz
60-CT2.
Sell all these oldies and buy one solid, modern, P-TTL, HSS
Who said only?
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 15:49
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Crippled
Jens Bladt wrote:
Who said only?
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 15:49
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Jens Bladt wrote
-- Original message --
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note the only DSLR on the market today which supports plain TTL is the DS2.
And the D. Probably the DS as well, although I have no personal experience with
that camera. However, both of my Ds work fine in
: RE: DL TTL flash madness
Who said only?
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 15:49
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: DL TTL flash madness
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Jens Bladt wrote
this feature in - let's say - 20 years
time ;-)
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 19:00
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL TTL flash madness
BTW, I didn't know that my PENTAX *ist D
not sure if P-TTL
offers this, and if it does, it likely requires a hotshow flash, not the
pop-up.
-Adam
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 19:00
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL TTL flash
Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 19:00
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL TTL flash madness
BTW, I didn't know that my PENTAX *ist D was their very cheapest DSLR?
I knew it was their first one, though.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
You can bounce P-TTL flash just as you would any other flash. The preflash is
barely noticed. It's insignificant.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is E-TTL?
I don't know.
All I know is, that I'm not interested in using ANY
On Apr 3, 2006, at 13:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can bounce P-TTL flash just as you would any other flash. The
preflash is barely noticed. It's insignificant.
Except that it makes my daughter blink every time, so almost every
flash photo I take of her makes it look like she's half
So the pre-flash doesn't take time?
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 20:02
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL TTL flash madness
And P-TTL does not cause shutter lag
-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL TTL flash madness
And P-TTL does not cause shutter lag.
-- Original message --
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is E-TTL?
I don't know.
All I know is, that I'm not interested in using ANY preflash - at all.
It's bad enough
-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. april 2006 20:02
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: DL TTL flash madness
And P-TTL does not cause shutter lag.
-- Original message --
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is E-TTL?
I don't know.
All I
to
believe you should buy a DS2.
You seem to think I'm saying the very opposite of what I'm saying.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: RE: DL TTL flash madness
Date: Mon Apr 3, 2006 12:59 pm
Size: 1K
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
BTW, I didn't know
PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: DL TTL flash madness
Dario Bonazza wrote:
s I own the D (which also doesn't work as well as the DS with TTL).
In what way doesn't the D work well with TTL? Please don't tell my two D
cameras, because they both
In that kind of things but not photo related:
In Belgium we have a couple stores named Exell which are computer stores.
Well, most computer sciences student like to go to these when thay are
bored so they can play with sales people. It's really really much fun.
Of course when you hear what they
are compatible with the least expensive body, intended for newcomers to
the brand? Features are dropped to allow lower pricing on such equipment.
Your point about research is very valid. However, the -DL is the first
Pentax since the Super-A not to feature TTL flash, thus the surprise.
Also, Pentax
1 - 100 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
