ent based on the nature of the handbook.
*About the Authors*
* *
*Frank Booty is former editor of Facilities Management and a contributor
to, and editor of, other market-leading titles, books and web sites in the
fields of business, IT and networking. *
Hopefully it helps.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois
t;
> 151 East 25th Street, 5th Floor
>
> New York, NY 10010
>
> Phone: (646) 312-1687
>
> Email: michael.borr...@mail.cuny.edu
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA]
Also, some books could be a "combination" of relevant content rather than
an original creation and writing. For your reference :)
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Joan Wang wrote:
> From the information about Frank Booty*. *He is used to be an editor :)
> Yes. I made an ass
I should say the intellectual content of a work :-)
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Joan Wang wrote:
> I think that we can expand the relationships to projects embodied in a
> work, such as a legal case, a thesis, and a government policy.
>
> Thanks,
> Joan Wang
> Illinois
I think that we can expand the relationships to projects embodied in a
work, such as a legal case, a thesis, and a government policy.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:23 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> I've forgotten whether it was on Autocat
examples. But then, the
> same if true of the whole RDA. The rewrite is still far short of
> Michael Gorman's clarity in AACR2.
>
>
>__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
> ___}
00-711 or 800-811, or in a name/title linking field tagged
MARC 76x-78x*”. How can I understand the guideline 12? Is it applicable to
the two 700 fields?
Thank you very much for your time.
Regards,
Joan Wang
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library
I feel that "cxciv, 47, 47, 48-148 pages" looks better. "cxciv, 47, 47, 148
pages" could be interpreted as various pagings. But it is not the truth.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:46 PM, John Hostage wrote:
> What about "c
play an important role in searching. They help more for understanding (at
the semantic level or data element level). I think that that is the reason
for the omission or addition of punctuations.Punctuations should be used as
a technique :-)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Fri
It does not make many sense if we transcribe it as "S-h-e". Who cares about
that? users or catalogers? If we consider dash separating letters in the
word a punctuation, I would suggest an omission of punctuations that
disturb a word to be complete. Just my opinion :-)
Thanks,
Joan Wan
a title page. Should we consider dash as a
punctuation and keep them?
Have fun :-)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Adam L. Schiff wrote:
> Transcribe square brackets found on the source of information used.
>
> 2.3.1.4 Transcribe
to construct terms if we need.
Or, it is a common sense?
Any more advice?
Many thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:47 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Thank you Thomas for letting me know that 380 may be used in
> bibliographic records. (One catalogue
t is requested to advise the
> sender and delete this email immediately.
>
> Although this email has been scanned for viruses, this email is not
> guaranteed to be free of viruses and should be vetted by your own security
> mechanisms. The Parliament of Western Australia accepts no
Thanks. Thomas.
I have not gone through your responses. But I notice that you mentioned 380
form of work. It is possible to give some instructions about the use of 380
field in bibliographic records? I mean in what situations we should use 380
fields.
Many thanks for that in advance.
Joan Wang
Thanks for sharing. I read the article. I can image the situation of the
implementation of RDA in China :-)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Li Kai wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I wrote a new blog post about RDA's developments i
Sorry. should be allowed to use (not us). Thanks.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> Bernadette
>
> Thanks for your explanation. I know what you mean. My question actually is
> these two terms are quite close. It would be hard for us to choose if they
> both ar
Bernadette
Thanks for your explanation. I know what you mean. My question actually is
these two terms are quite close. It would be hard for us to choose if they
both are allowed to us.
Thanks again,
Joan Wang
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Bernadette Mary O'Reilly <
bernade
ly
> Catalogue Support Librarian
>
> Bodleian Libraries,
> Osney One Building
> Osney Mead
> Oxford OX2 0EW.
>
> bernadette.orei...@bodleian.ox.ac.uk
> 01865 2-77134
>
> ***
>
> ** **
>
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
Sorry. Should be option 2.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Joan Wang wrote:
> I feel that the answer should be option 1. A similar case is for copyright
> date. A copyright date is only required if neither date of publication nor
> date of distribution is identified. So far I only
x27;t
gotten a chance to see records with three dates: a probable publication
date, a probable distribution date, and a copyright date. So I assume there
is no such requirement.
Is that right?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Joan Wang wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I have a question about manufac
feel that I may have to take option 1. Isn't it too
much work?
Many thanks for your help in advance.
Joan Wang
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
indicator 4), the only
thing you need is sub-field c for the copyright date. As you did, put a
symbol before the date.
Hopefully it helps.
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Basma Chebani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have one a case with the
u
>
> Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not
> represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information
> or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that
> of the original sender and does not represent the vi
This is the rule: Precede the date by the copyright symbol (©) or the
phonogram copyright symbol (℗). If the appropriate symbol cannot be
reproduced, precede the date by copyright or phonogram copyright.
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Crum, Cathy
t;Published to commemorate XYZ"--Unnumbered page 2.
>
> Hate it. Silliest page reference since "Page 4 of cover" for
> back cover.
>
>
>__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.
Walter F. Nickeson, Catalog &
>
> Metadata Management Librarian
>
> Rush Rhees Library
>
> University of Rochester
>
> Rochester, NY 14627-0055****
>
> wnicke...@library.rochester.edu
>
> (585) 273-2326 fax: (585)
"page ii" seems to make more sense :-)
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Joan Wang wrote:
> OK! Now I know what you are saying. Put a word to indicate that? like
> "unnumbered page 2"?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Nickeson, Walter <
> wnicke..
***
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Joan Wang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:20 PM
> *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> *
r F. Nickeson, Catalog &
> Metadata Management Librarian
> Rush Rhees Library
> University of Rochester
> Rochester, NY 14627-0055
> wnicke...@library.rochester.edu
> (585) 273-2326 fax: (585) 273-1032
> *
>
--
Z
carriers. So if a carrier type includes a pagination, record it.
Apparently RDA attempts to use pagination instead of volume to record
extent of volumes mainly with text. But it forgets that not only text could
be carried by a volume. I feel that is why it causes a trouble :-)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Congress
Policy encourages you to supply a probable publication date. The policy
includes a guideline for supplying a probable publication date.
Does that make sense?
Thank you.
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Amy Mercer wrote:
> I have seen m
I feel that the modification in your case more likes a revision.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> "Adaptation" in RDA seems to mean the modification would result in another
> literary form.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Aaron Smith wr
gt;
>> 330-672-1703
>>
>> lmccu...@kent.edu
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
>> Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Joan Wang
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10
level. Does "excerpts" means
an abbreviated version? Or mean a "rewriting"? If it means a "rewriting",
the relationship will be at the work level.
See if anybody else can help more. I am also learning :-)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:09 AM, MCCUTC
I am not sue if the custom edition in your email means a different edition
or a different physical form. If it is a different edition, I would use
775. If it is a different physical form, I would use 776.
Hopefully it helps :-)
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013
l situation.
>
> Web searches are a great help. I find one can almost always find
> something.
>
> To record where you found data use field 588, e.g.:
>
> 588 $aPublication information based on author's website viewed ...
>
>
> __ __ J. McRee (Mac) El
ay KNOW that something was
> published between 2000 and 2004, or you may assume that it was PROBABLY >
published between 2000 and 2004; those are two different things.
Yes, Kevin. You are right. I just read RDA 1.9.2.4 and 1.9.2.5 and found
the difference. Thanks.
Also thanks to Adam :-)
gt;
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks so much -- Shahrzad
>
> * *
>
> * *
>
> * ***
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Joan Wang
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 15
Forgot to say, a probable country would like this: [United States?]
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> It is possible to supply a probable county, like United States? Also,Place
> (upper-cased) not place
>
> :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:21 AM,
> Adam Schiff
> University of Washington Libraries
>
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Joan Wang wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:05:22 -0500
> > From: Joan Wang
> > Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
> Access
> >
> >
/lc-dev.searchtechnologies.com/saved/Mabibl_264> #1 $a … $b …
$c [between 1993 and 1999]
008/06 Type of date
q
008/07-10
1993
008/11-14
1999
Thank you very much for your time.
Regards,
Joan
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> Adam
>
> Thanks a lot for
Adam
Thanks a lot for letting me know :-)
Joan
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Adam L. Schiff
wrote:
> Joan,
>
> The between dates should have a question mark at the end according to RDA.
>
> Adam Schiff
> University of Washington Libraries
>
> On Thu, 15 A
ither an earliest or latest possible year. I would
> say that based on the condition of the piece, I am able to assume a
> century.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Gary Oliver
> Abilene Christian University
>
> ** **
>
> --
> -
> Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A.
> Stuttgart Media University
> Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
> www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
>
> ** **
>
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
e is a necessity for "chiefly
illustrations". In such a case, the artist (if there is one) would be in
100 field. Is that right?
Any more clarification is appreciated.
Thanks
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller <
wies
- Reproductions (LC Core)
Related items
- Reproductions (LC Core)
- Special relationships for rare materials as warranted (LC Core)
- “Bound with” (LC Core)
Serial relationships (LC Core)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Arakawa, Steven wrote:
> *I beli
ized
> ones), changing the 650 for Large type books has not been a priority,
> especially as we get records from multiple sources, many of which continue
> to use 650 (including LC).
>
> It would be about a 15-minute batch job to change just under 5000 large
> print bibliographic records.
>
> There does seem to be a need for greater co-ordination between
> genre/form/audience 650/655 terms and bibliographic elements (variable and
> controlled).
>
> Thomas Brenndorfer
> Guelph Public Library
>
>
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
ataire visé, vous
> n’avez aucun droit d’utiliser cette information, de la copier, de la
> distribuer ou de la diffuser. Si cette communication vous a été transmise
> par erreur, veuillez la détruire et nous en aviser immédiatement par
> courriel.
>
> ** **
>
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
d Manuscripts
>
> 1080 Chapel Street, PO Box 208280, New Haven, CT 06520
>
> 203.432.9672francis.la...@yale.edu
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Acces
isher's name. I do not mind the removal
of "other
than solely publishing" in instruction at 2.8.4.4. But it seems to be a big
difference :) At least the relevant instructions in the three statements
are not consistent.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Deborah Fritz w
d be changed like this:
2.9.4.4 Record words or phrases indicating the function (other than solely
distributing) performed by a person, family, or corporate body as they
appear on the source of information.
My opinion!
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at
f Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a
> courtesy for information only.
>
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
Cataloging and Interim Coordinator
> of Collection Development
>
> Harvey A. Andruss Library
>
> Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
>
> 400 E. 2nd St.
>
> Bloomsburg PA 17815****
>
> 570-389-4226
>
> mhinc...@bloomu.edu
>
> *
I think that you are right. Kevin.
For me, I would not put anything. I think that the second indicator 2 is
enough -:)
Thanks again.
Joan Wang
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Kevin M Randall wrote:
> I think if you use "Contains (expression)" that should be sufficient.
> If
So better to put two identical headings, and respectively $i Contains
(work) and Contains (expression) -:)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> No. It is possible if we use the same heading to represent a work and its
> expression (for a compilation). Is that right?
>
&
No. It is possible if we use the same heading to represent a work and its
expression (for a compilation). Is that right?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> I do think that I am right. It should mean that it contains an expression,
> although the heading would not have an e
I do think that I am right. It should mean that it contains an expression,
although the heading would not have an element for the original language.
Sorry about that :)
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> Does that mean it contains both a work and an expression?
>
>
&
* **
>
> Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Joan Wang
> *Sent:* Friday, August 02, 2013 9:21 AM
> *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
&g
sing relationship designators.
Anyway, more work is always good :)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Adam L. Schiff wrote:
> 700 1_ $i Contains (work): $a Estes, David. $t Anna's story.
> should be
> 700 12 $i Contains (work): $a Estes,
at 10:04 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> The question about 505 content notes reminds me a question about
> compilations. According to FRBR, the primary relationships are between
> work, expression, and manifestation, and item of Group 1 entities. These
> relationships are actually at a gene
the same
manifestation? I know that Library of Congress Policy puts compilations
under Related Works. I am trying to understand that :)
Any insights or comments? Thank you very much in advance :)
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
resource itself”. As Deborah mentioned, it meets the principle of
differentiation.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Watters, Tim (MDE)
wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 J. McRee Elrod posted:
>
> ** **
>
> >>“We do
lly have an item. The "request" process includes inter-library
loan and online access to digital resources. So far, I think that the
process for searching and making use of bibliographic records is
fulfilled.
The above is my (maybe limited) understanding of user tasks defined in FRBR
:)
applies to the predominant part of the resource (if there is a predominant
part), or b) that apply to the most substantial parts of the resource
(including the predominant part, if there is one).
Hopefully that my understanding is correct :)
Thank you!
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
Let's help our users. This is the reason we discuss issues here and assist
with proposals to improve RDA :)
Happy Monday!
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:53 AM, JSC Chair wrote:
> RDA is about describing bibliographic resources and their relat
e front and
> back panels and the spine to which they are joined."
>
>
> Kathie Coblentz, Rare Materials Cataloger
> Collections Strategy/Special Formats Processing
> The New York Public Library, Stephen A. Schwa
*
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Mitchell, Michael <
michael.mitch...@brazosport.edu> wrote:
> Would it make sense to consider the illustrations to be representative of
> the content of the work (rather than the expression o
combine them.
So the only difference you will see is no abbreviation. I was also told to
record "chiefly illustrations" in 500 notes. For spelling, RDA provides two
options: color or colour.
That is all I know. I hope that somebody else can give you more information
:)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
O
Is it "45 pages : color illustrations"?
Thank you.
Joan Wang
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Darlene Taylor wrote:
> hi. The examples you are showing are mostly from the old cataloging
> rules,AACR2. They should be:
>
> 45 pages : illustrations (colour)
> 45 pa
There would be many misleading mappings using your criterion. I am not a
person who is able to answer the question. But I believe that many people
would be happy with taking advantage of the convenience :)
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:34 PM
I check the mapping of RDA instruction rules with MARC fields in RDA
Toolkit. 3.13 Font size is mapped to $a of 300 fields, $n of 340 fields,
and 500 fields. So I assume that we can record "Large print" in either of
the three fields depending on cases and needs.
Thanks,
Joan Wan
__ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
> ___} |__ \__
>
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
How can I understand a photocopy of a thesis? I guess that many theses
could be photocopies. Do we still consider theses as manuscripts under RDA?
If look at the definition in RDA Toolkit, they are not. But if look at OCLC
special cataloging guidelines, they are.
Happy fourth!
Joan Wang
Illinois
Sorry, should be for authorized access points (headings).
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Joan Wang wrote:
> Use the abbreviations in table
> B.1<http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdaappb&target=rdab-399#rdab-399>for
> the names of certain countries and for
gt; Behalf Of *Saunders, Mary
> *Sent:* 03 July 2013 01:45 PM
> *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] 264 question
>
>
>
>Thanks to all who responded. I have decided to make a single 264 1
> [Charleston, SC?] : $b Author’s name, $c [2013]
>
>
>
Sorry. Should be $e of 300 fields :)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> A similar case is for accompanying materials. I consider it a whole-part
> relationship. But they are encoded in $c of 300 fields. I was told that it
> is a structured description. So
&
A similar case is for accompanying materials. I consider it a whole-part
relationship. But they are encoded in $c of 300 fields. I was told that it
is a structured description. So
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller <
wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de>
many things beyond rules and
sentences he/she is seeing and capturing. But it is really not something
new for cataloging. Is that right :)
I am learning from the discussion.
Thanks to everyone,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Robert Maxwell
Heidrun,
I look at MARC to RDA mapping. It shows that the corresponding RDA
instruction number is "N/A". So I have to say that I do not know :)
Have a great weekend,
Joan Wang
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller <
wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de>
Hi, Heidrun
I am not sure if I understand your issue correctly. Does it go
relationships between expressions? So we can use structured or unstructured
descriptions, or relationship designators in authorized access points.
If I am not right, please feel free to correct me.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On
ate.
I hope that my understanding is correct. Any correction would be
appreciated.
Thanks to everyone.
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Deborah Fritz
wrote:
> My thanks to the folks who sent in feedback on how they would handle my
> two da
I agree with Deborah. I would verify the illustrator from other sources,
and bracket the statement.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Deborah Fritz wrote:
> The data entry instruction for the SOR element is:
> 2.4.2.3 "Record statements of responsibility relati
A tiny question is about the capitalization. Is it upper-case like [Place
of publication not identified] and [Publisher not identified], or
lower-case?
Thanks for your help.
Joan Wang
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Paradis Daniel
wrote:
> According to LC's training material, a date
for
Library of Congress.
Hopefully it helps.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Julie Moore wrote:
> (My apologies for the cross-posting)
>
> Dear All,
>
> In trying to move beyond the inexplicable inconsistent "period" issue ...
>
> Now we have wi
I recall my message. I sent it to a wrong email address. Sorry about that.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> I have a question about MARC encoding of multiple languages in a single
> expression. RDA instructs us to record language of expression as a separate
> el
, Russian, or encoded in separate fields?
Many thanks for your help in advance.
Joan Wang
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
Yes. Daniel.
You are right. Translations are one of them. Here, types of materials are
more from the expression perspecive instead of specific media type.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Paradis Daniel wrote:
> **
>
> Actually, the LC-PCC PS limits the addit
Thanks, Adam
RDA 6.27.3 does refer to 6.11 for constructing authorized access point
representing an expression. But Library of Congress Policy limits an
addition of an expression attribute to four types of materials, which does
not include motion pictures.
Thanks again,
Joan Wang
On Thu, Jun 6
Herskovitz ; produced by Edward Zwick, Pieter Jan Brugge ;
director of photography, Eduardo Serra ; screenplay by Clayton Frohman &
Edward Zwick ; directed by Edward Zwick. *A motion picture with some
dialogue in English, some dialogue in German, and some dialogue in Russian.*
Thanks again,
Joan
. If following RDA 6.11.1.4, we would
encode each of them in separate fields. So we would see, for example,
multiple 730 fields (each has $l). Hope somebody else would like to confirm
it.
Thanks for your time.
Joan Wang
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Trina Pundurs <
tp
multiple expressions are not under the big umbrella of
RDA 6.11.1.4. Is it under 6.11.1.3?
Hope somebody would like to help :-)
Thanks for your time.
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office
Adam,
Yes, you are right. A composer should be a creator for a performed music. I
actually thought about all of the sound from the film. But I could not find
an appropriate term (maybe use more than one?) in RDA 6.9.1.3.
Many thanks,
Joan Wang
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Adam Schiff wrote
> 130 0#$aGone with the wind (Motion picture).$hSound recording.
I think that for this, should use Performed music in $h?
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Joan Wang wrote:
> (Forgot to put subject in the earlier email I sent. Sorry about that)
>
> Hi, All
>
> I hope that s
help in advance.
Regards,
Joan Wang
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax
wind (Motion picture).$hSound recording.
700
1#$aE., Sheila$q(Escovedo),$d1959- $tDawn, the beginning.$hSound recording.
Under RDA, subfield h Sound recording would be changed to Spoken word, is
that right?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Regards,
Joan Wang
--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D
Robert,
Thanks. That is what I thought. I do not think that it would work in MARC.
But it raises a totally different idea (right?).
Thanks again,
Joan Wang
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Robert Maxwell wrote:
> The RDA alternative implies that all the names would be in one field in
>
ement? And Library
of Congress policy says Do not apply ???
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Tony Fang wrote:
> Joan,
>
> If it is truly a collaborative work by the three named authors, then, it
> will look like this:
>
> 100 1_ Gumbley, Warren, 1962– $e aut
archaeological sites in New Zealand
Resource described: Management of wetland archaeological sites in New
Zealand / Warren Gumbley, Dilys Johns, and Garry Law
My question is: how it works in MARC encoding?
Any clarification would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
Thanks, Jean.
I was not aware with that.
Joan Wang
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Harden, Jean wrote:
> I’m not Kevin, but yes, definitely it is fine to use the same name in
> 100 and 700 (or 110 and 710). As Kevin said, the 1xx field has no necessary
> relation to any title o
help.
Joan Wang
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Kevin M Randall wrote:
> The 1XX field relates only to the title in the 240 or 245. Fields 730
> and 740 should be used for titles that do not have a personal, family, or
> corporate body name as part of the authorized access point. Th
For separate works of one person/family/corporate body, I think that we use
730/740 fields.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Harden, Jean wrote:
> Recording each separate work’s title is something we do all the time in
> music cataloging. In MARC, you use the field
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
