be a broadcast nightmare - but if you want to try it
-Tim
Everything is working fine, with load balance between the links, redundancy
etc... the issue is only with the IP to test if the gateway is up or not
You have to have a SEPARATE IP for each monitor address...
If you are going out through the same gateway, than traceroute out on the net
About a year ago, I switched to running the full pfSense 2.0 (beta something
at the time) on a Kingston SS100S2/8G embedded SSD.
I installed the 30G version in 12 systems, all of which failed within 6 months.
I moved to Intel 320s and/or WD Greens (depending on budget of the site) so
we'll
/diag_backup.php;
Replace your password and hostname of your box, and it'll download your config
to a datestamped XML file.
***CAVEAT*** I'm using this against a handful of pfSense boxes running 1.2.2
and 1.2.3. This may not work with the 2.x series. It is untested there...
***CAVEAT***
--Tim
.
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Has anyone experience this or how can i have a fix to the problem.
Unable to reach that file from here either... Looks like the packages 7.2
folder was removed from the FTP server.
See here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/
-Tim
the install (which works
great)
You will want to setup the Virtual IPs first, then power cycle the router.
It will then arp out when it boots and get the IPs routed correctly.
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr
' package installed.
--Tim
No 2.0 as Xmas present this year?
---
I don't see this happening really, a RC could be possible, but that's unlikely
too.
Per Scott on Twitter (@sullrich)
Now is the time to speak up if you know of any issues in pfSense. Final push
to RC1 begins today. Speak up now or forever hold your...
Is there a way in PF to have dhcp assign a custom gateway in the static dhcp
setup.
Why don't you whitelist the IPs you want to pass in the captive portal
configuration.
They would all go through the captive portal, but those IPs assigned to bypass
wouldn't be blocked.
-Tim
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Greetings all-
I'm trying to nail down some issues I'm experiencing with idle states
being disconnected. Can anyone tell me or point me to documentation
that gives the timeout values for each of the state table optimization
options?
Normal
of
increased memory usage and CPU utilization.
Also, for UDP traffic, is it advisable to change the state type in the rule to
'none'? Will this prevent the state table from killing states that should be
left alone?
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
Does pfsense have a package which would allow me to send a link to a
big file sitting on my network that someone can either ftp or scp safely?
Take a look at http://openupload.sf.net/
Not a package, but a nice web utility
-
exactly
is the problem, what ports/protocols do your application use, etc.
Googling 'pyramid server' brings nothing entirely definitive except maybe a
game of some sort?
--Tim
://nw-ds.com/shop/firewalls.html They sell rackmount unit with pfSense
preinstalled but the NICs are in the back.
shamelessplug
LinuxAppliance.net also has pfSense firewall options, shipping from the U.S.
/shamelessplug
--Tim
Contacting you off the board, as I have questions about the other firewall
software you carry. What do you think of Vyatta and Untangled? I came from
using m0n0wall so naturally recommend pfSense to my clients, but wanted to
know if you think either of the others are better.
I use both
://www.travla.com/product_d.php?id=16
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
=172.16.30.0/255.255.255.0
externrefresh=120
rtp.conf:
rtpstart=1
rtpend=2
but, what more I must do in my asterisk server?.
Set nat=yes for peer 320.
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr
I don't know the IP addresses of the SSH servers on the Internet.
Then only allow to the SSH servers you know/want? You can go either way...
block all and allow only certain IPs
Or allow all, and block certain IPs
On 2.0 you can block by OS type too...
I disagree with this statement. What makes you believe this?
Windows has had built-in, default firewalling for quite some time, as has
almost every desktop distribution of linux. SOHO firewalls that don't
firewall IPv6 don't do so because they're generally not IPv6 capable (see
PFSense for
that is accessible is more fuel used to attach the host.
You can fight either way, but the truth is , the more information you can keep
secret - the better, this whole thread can be summed up with that...
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
- Paul Mansfield it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
On 04/08/10 18:31, Tim Nelson wrote:
There is no option for legacy mode in the BIOS. :-(
presumably there's no PS2 keyboard port?
or if there is, your keyboard isn't the type which
/ukbd0: Device busy
I've tried multiple keyboards, with and without using a KVM, and the result is
the same.
I've also tried booting without a keyboard altogether but then the error
message is 'No such file or directory' instead of 'Device busy'.
Any thoughts?
--Tim
and 'settle' prior to the kernel attempting a mount
and failing.
Thoughts?
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available
- Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
On 8/4/2010 1:24 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
Greetings (again) fellow pfSense'rs-
I'm also having issues with booting a system with a USB keyboard.
The keyboard works perfectly fine, but when pfSense attempts to
initialize all devices
- Paul Mansfield it-admin-pfse...@taptu.com wrote:
On 04/08/10 18:31, Tim Nelson wrote:
There is no option for legacy mode in the BIOS. :-(
presumably there's no PS2 keyboard port?
or if there is, your keyboard isn't the type which can turn into a
ps2
keyboard using the oversized
- Jeppe Øland jol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com
wrote:
While booting a system from a USB--SATA attached hard drive, the
boot process fails when
trying to mount root since the drive has not been fully initialized.
The system
- David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com
wrote:
Yes, I'm testing with the latest 2.0 BETA3.
The latest is BETA4.
Silly typos. Who thought it would be a good idea to put the '3' next to the '4'
on the keyboard
harder to do than adding a simple delay.
I guess I'll be checking this out over the weekend!
If it works, maybe we can request it to be added to the default
configuration.
VERY interesting! I'll try this shortly and report back.
--Tim
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
- Jeppe Øland jol...@gmail.com wrote:
Googling found a recent workaround:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?s=d7af7671c4a56cb50af4c13e2fb7877fp=91961postcount=8
Since few month ago it is possible to workaround the issue on
8
, these resources will have what you're looking for:
1. pfSense wiki: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Main_Page
2. pfSense book:
http://www.amazon.com/pfSense-Definitive-Christopher-M-Buechler/dp/0979034280
--Tim
that would stop working after 20 minutes. :-/
Just my $0.02.
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https
Just installed pfsense on linux locked myself out.
pfSense runs on FreeBSD - how'd you manage that!? ;)
If you have an SSH session there is a prompt to reset the webmin password -
just hit that.
If you are on linux with a VM (maybe that's what you are talking about) - then
use the VM console
' will only work from *INSIDE* the running pfSense system, not
on your Linux system used to flash the pfSense image.
Can you clarify what steps you took exactly to get where you are now? Maybe
send us the output of 'uname' and 'dmesg' from your system so we can see your
environment?
--Tim
It is posible to make load balancing whit 2 acounts of 30mbps from the same
ISP?
For the current release you have to put another device in front of one of the
WANs so that it has a separate gateway.
-tim
-
To unsubscribe
=captiveportal-header.png
Just make sure you keep the total file size under the limit.
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support
We used openDNS at all our schools but we just finished putting all
our schools behind a single firewall so that didn't fly. We had to go
to a commercial filter product unfortunately. We did consider throwing
up DNS servers all over the place but it would have become ugly to
manage.
On Fri, Jun
that DNS
server. It really is pretty slick. However, the more savvy users will just find
some proxy out there to use. 'Proxy' has become a new buzzword for the social
networking crowd as of late it seems...
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e
... Any idea as to 1.x and not plugging a cable into WAN while bridging 2 OPTs?
Setup WAN to a VLAN - just to get it out of the way...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
How would I go about not doing what I suggest above but instead setting WAN
to a VLAN as you suggest?
When setting up your NICS - choose YES to add VLANS.
Just add some extra VLANS even if you aren't using them.
OR you can set it up in the GUI after, by adding VLANS then assigning to the
://doc.pfsense.org/
[2] http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Tutorials
[3]
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0979034280?ie=UTF8tag=pfsense-20linkCode=as2camp=1789creative=9325creativeASIN=0979034280
[4] http://forum.pfsense.org/
--Tim
be just that simple. You
can even enable things like NAP after that (we have essentially 2 subnets,
one less trusted and one trusted, and you get dumped into the individual
subnet based upon your health). If you need specifics on multiple subnets
let me know.
Cheers,
Tim
in advance for your feedback...
Tim
Because OpenDNS does their filtering based on the source IP address, you
would have to have eat LAN have its own outgoing IP(s) using Outbound NAT
rules.
I've never actually done outbound NAT. So lets say I've got multiple IP
addresses bound as virtual IP's onto the physical WAN interface. I
Doesn't this create a ton of DNS traffic traversing the firewall?
Why does it create any more DNS traffic than doing it any other way?
I've actually got a decent sized block of public IP's to play with, so I
will get started on this later in the week. The reason I am concerned about
still just waiting for it to crash/reboot again to further
diagnose the problem.
Thanks for all of the help
Charles
You won't seen the padlock item in your BIOS. It is simply built into the CPU.
Post your 'dmesg' output to the list and we can tell if you have padlock or
not...
--Tim
- innocent mayunga innocent.mayu...@pccb.go.tz wrote:
Hi Tim,
I have been running several tests with large downloads using DAP for
the
past few weeks.
As you can see from the attached RRD Graphs generated by Pfsense i
have
never gone past 600 bits/s
I am not only worried that i might
the next sample period hits and your graph will not show that you hit 1mbit.
The best way to test this is to download a large file like a Linux ISO and let
the download go for 10 minutes or so. THEN, check your graphs.
--Tim
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Paul Mansfield
it-admin-pfse...@taptu.comwrote:
On 02/04/10 20:12, Tim Dressel wrote:
super stable. But with the ntop package things goes south quickly. I've
I've found ntop to be hit and miss in terms of stability, when it works
it works well but for certain
available to check, but you
might even be able to specify the timeout value manually in later versions.
HTH.
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
any help on how could i connect to the client PC's on my pfsense LAN
interface as current i set my LAN interface to DHCP pool address.
Take a look here:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/OpenVPN_Bridging
I'm assuming that's what you are asking...
Hi There,
I've built a couple of pfSense 1.2.3-Release boxes lately, they are super
stable. But with the ntop package things goes south quickly. I've got three
interfaces (all Intel GT class giganics) and ntop is listening to LAN and
OPT1. Once ntop starts, its good for about 5 minutes, then I
➢ if you are saying PPTP not being the most secure means of VPN which VPN i
sthe most secure to use ???
I’ll take this off list – as it’s been covered before – I’ll email you
directly, Joseph.
-tim
server)
I have to say - it is by far the most convenient especially for your use.
I'd say go for it - just wanted to make sure you were fully informed.
Let me know if you have any more questions.
-Tim
From: Joseph Rotan [mailto:joseph.ro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 8:59 PM
Errr After all that - forgot to change the TO: ... sorry list!
could not access by pfsense box.
Joseph.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Tim Dickson tdick...@aubergeresorts.com
wrote:
-- any hint on how to apply https over the INTERNET to my PFSENSE box ???
Enable HTTPS (443) on the WAN interface in your ruleset.
-- and how could i access my LAN
well strange because i can access my box with the following http://IP
address:443 how is it possible as you you've said it should be https://IP
address:443
If you setup HTTP as port 443 I this would work - kind of goes against web
standards - but it's your box :) - you probably just didn't
-- any hint on how to apply https over the INTERNET to my PFSENSE box ???
Enable HTTPS (443) on the WAN interface in your ruleset.
-- and how could i access my LAN (clients PC)
You were correct with VPN being the best way. You could put port forwards in
as well, and you could also enable SSH
Tim A. wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Hey this is great, thank you!
Can you please do a diff -rub and then email the patch as an
attachment to coret...@pfsense.org and I will get it promptly
committed.
Done.
I've also attached a patch for spamd_db.php that makes the GUI more
accurate
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Bob Gustafson bob...@rcn.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:16 -0800, Tim Dressel wrote:
Hi folks,
I have been interconnecting several schools into one big network via a
MAN over fiber, but in the end I'm going to have a couple of schools
that I can't afford
subnet.
Would appreciate any assistance!
Thanks...
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https
If you're unhappy with pfSense, simply request a refund. /sarcasm
Before you start throwing around complaints, you may wish to check the status
of IPv6 development. Try here:
http://redmine.pfsense.org/search/index/pfsense?q=ipv6
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
on my
kind words. :)
Take care,
Tim
P.S. Please no MS bashing here,,, I know that PNRP is about as safe as
UPnP, but any good tech knows how to put in mitigating factors.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
,
Step 2 go to interfaces tab, enable the interface, and set the IP/Subnet
Step 3 Configure VLANS on the switch port that is connected to the NIC.
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional
255.255.255.0; push route 172.24.66.0 255.255.255.0;
push route 172.16.66.0 255.255.255.0; push route 192.168.24.0 255.255.255.0;
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
- Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
When you restart pfSense does RIP work? What MBUF usage shows? Does
it
continuously grow?
Evgeny.
RIP works for a little while upon reboot, then after about 30 minutes
or so, stops
- Evgeny Yurchenko evg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:
Has MBUF been growing since you switched to RIPv1?
Evgeny.
MBUF usage has been exactly the same as when I was using RIPv2.
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Greetings all-
I've got a system running 1.2-RELEASE embedded in my home lab
(haven't
upgraded to 1.2.3 because I don't have a larger CF available
yet...).
It's been working fine for quite
- Gerald A geraldabli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Tim,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Something else I didn't notice before... my MBUF Usage: 5337 /5505
Does that make a difference?
While my MBUF usage isn't 100
management network...
I've been using RIPv2 but for 'gits and shiggles' I'll try RIPv1 and see if
that makes any difference. I'm rather stumped on this one...
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
not available?
Thanks for any pointers you can lend!
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Greetings all-
I've got a system running 1.2-RELEASE embedded in my home lab (haven't
upgraded to 1.2.3 because I don't have a larger CF available yet...).
It's been working fine for quite some time but recently I enabled RIP
on it. The route
and in the WAN2 interface,I set Type to static,IP address to
192.168.1.254/32,Gateway to 192.168.1.1.
I believe you want it to be 192.168.1.254/24
Right now the gateway and static IP are in two different subnets.
-tim
sketchy
and eventually stop again. Something like a simple ping from LAN to WAN
would fail 20% of the time,,, but ping of the interfaces was always fine.
I moved to the GT giganics and all my pfsense boxen are bullet proof.
Cheers,
Tim
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Tom Müller-Kortkamp
tmu
Hi folks,
In a former like I replaced an overworked Firebox with an IPCop
installation (this was before I knew about pfSense, all my firewalls
are now pfSense now.
Anyways... the only thing I miss about that Firebox was this cool
little graphical traffic graph that updated in real time. On one
-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:millenia2...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 9:18 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Old Firebox question
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:18:13 -0800
From:
about removing the
secondary Router and programming pfsense for all the subnets?
-tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available
How is that for open source support!
You guys rock.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Scott Ullrich sullr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@typo3usa.com wrote:
Grace and Peace Friends:
In Snort we are seeing the following:
Fatal error: Allowed memory
I've run on a few x3400 and x3500's if you are all about IBM. They run
well, but you will have more stability by throwing in some GT class
intel giganics even if you are running low traffic.
I've got one machine on a simple network, 1 WAN, 2 LAN, 1 Wireless
with captive portal, various visibility
PRO 100's have serious problems in BSD7.
I know the PRO 1000 GT's work flawlessly.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
Hi list,
We're currently running
This is the exact issue I had with the PRO100's. I never tried
disabling TSO or applying the patch.
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-09:03.fxp.asc
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Tim Dressel tjdres
- Seth Mos seth@xs4all.nl wrote:
Tim Nelson schreef:
Greetings all-
I apologize if this problem has been fixed in a later version and
I've not seen it yet...
I have a box running pfSense 1.2.2 (Full version) and whenever a
DHCP leases is handed out, there is a 50/50 chance
the Status--System Logs--DHCP log, the
proper information is shown (DHCPREQUEST,DHCPACK,DHCPINFORM,etc..).
Is this a bug? Has it been fixed in later versions? Maybe it works fine for
everyone else but not me for some reason?
Thanks!
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332
many of the issues I face with SIP or other 'noisy' protocols behind pfSense.
It may work for you as well.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
)
If anyone else finds a permanent solution - shout it out - because I've yet
to find one.
(My only permanent solution so far - was to upgrade to the RTM of win7)
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
-Original Message-
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:curtislamast...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5:50 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 192.0.2.112
I'm not sure how the dynamic dns daemon works on pf, however I could
possibly understand this issue if
access the
internet.
Looks like you have the LAN IP the same as your ISP Gateway...
Change that IP to something other than 192.168.1.1
-Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail
on the connection. My thought was to
write a script that would automagically check for the public IP, and if it is
changed, then update the firewall rule using curl to submit the form and then
reload the rules. Is there a better way to do this or any unforseen caveats to
doing it the way I described?
Tim
- Curtis LaMasters curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Tim Nelsontnel...@rockbochs.com
wrote:
Greetings all-
I have a situation where I need to have firewall rules for a
particular host that has a dynamic IP address(PPPoE ADSL).
Unfortunately, getting
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
Tim Nelson wrote:
- Curtis LaMasters curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Greetings all-
I
- Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
Tim Nelson wrote:
- Curtis LaMasters curtislamast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Tim
to dynamically update the firewall rule directly. :-/
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Cheyenne Dealcheye...@hsrvr.us wrote:
I have a small problem, I am trying to get some Zynx ZX414's and some ZX424's
working in pfSense 1.2.2 and it refuses to give a linkup. I know that the the
cards are good when using windows install on them but refuses to
for reliability and
performance. Plus, there are no odd firewall limitations.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Lennyfive2one.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Tim Dressel tjdres...@gmail.com wrote:
Install on both sides, not on pfsense.
i.e. install on a machine on the WAN side, and on the LAN site. Or if
you are testing between LAN and an OPT
Install on both sides, not on pfsense.
i.e. install on a machine on the WAN side, and on the LAN site. Or if
you are testing between LAN and an OPT interface, put a machine on
both subnets and test that way.
iPerf on pfsense will not give you a throughput of the firewall (at
least nothing that
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Rainer Duffnerrai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Paul Mansfield schrieb:
boot a live linux disk like ubuntu
try a speed test website.
for network testing...
set up the interfaces
create a 1G test file, e.g. dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/random bs=1024
/image068.png
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
.jpg
The hilarity and simultaneous irritation this thread has caused is just
fantastic.
--Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support
been unsuccessful in finding full systems that
would work. Typically we buy used hardware from ITXchange, so I'm sort
of limited to IBM servers. Can anyone recommend an x3550 type server
that works out of the box? Then I can go put my quad intel nics in it
from the HCL.
Thanks!
Tim
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo
