Re: mozilla-releases-security-updates

2020-12-22 Thread Yamo'
Hi, Dirk Fieldhouse a tapoté le 21/12/2020 23:55: > Besides which, some or all of these issues may be in neophile code > (Gecko 60+) that has yet to infect the SM codebase. It is not only gecko60 code, there is an effort to backport the code : Quoting

Re: mozilla-releases-security-updates

2020-12-21 Thread Dirk Fieldhouse
On 20/12/2020 00:16, Daniel wrote: meagain wrote on 20/12/20 05:01: https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2020/12/16/mozilla-releases-security-updates-firefox-firefox-esr-and How to integrate these updates into SeaMonkey? I would stand-by, meagain, as I'm sure our trusty SM

Re: mozilla-releases-security-updates

2020-12-19 Thread Daniel
meagain wrote on 20/12/20 05:01: https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2020/12/16/mozilla-releases-security-updates-firefox-firefox-esr-and How to integrate these updates into SeaMonkey? I would stand-by, meagain, as I'm sure our trusty SM Devs are working their holiday

mozilla-releases-security-updates

2020-12-19 Thread meagain
https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2020/12/16/mozilla-releases-security-updates-firefox-firefox-esr-and How to integrate these updates into SeaMonkey? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-10 Thread Daniel
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 10/12/20 20:54: Daniel wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 09/12/20 07:26: Ant wrote: On 12/8/2020 9:42 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bug

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-10 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Daniel wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 09/12/20 07:26: Ant wrote: On 12/8/2020 9:42 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bugs or ask for official support. A bit misle

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-10 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Ant wrote: On 12/8/2020 12:26 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/8/2020 9:42 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bugs or ask for official support. A bit mis

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-10 Thread Daniel
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 09/12/20 07:26: Ant wrote: On 12/8/2020 9:42 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bugs or ask for official support. A bit misleading. Goes for ot

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-09 Thread Ant
On 12/8/2020 12:26 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Ant wrote: On 12/8/2020 9:42 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bugs or ask for official support. A bit misleading. Goes f

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-09 Thread Gunther Nikl
Edmund Wong wrote: > It is also not likely that we'd set the update system to use > SSLv3 or TLSv1 (thanks to Heartbleed, Poodle, and whatever > else) and set to a lower cypher set. Despite the attacks listed I believe supporting TLSv1 with a very limited cypher set should be possible. Even SM 1.1

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-08 Thread Daniel
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 9/12/2020 4:33 am: Daniel wrote: Edmund Wong wrote on 08/12/20 10:48: Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5. There are no updates to this version.  There are updates to 2.49.4. Just none to 2.49.5.  Users hoping to update

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-08 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
sions was that the Mozilla server they were hard-coded to check for updates ceased to exist (or at least stopped hosting SeaMonkey updates). So you were having to set up a new server to host updates, but even then older versions wouldn't know about it so wouldn't pick up any updates.

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-08 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Ant wrote: On 12/8/2020 9:42 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bugs or ask for official support. A bit misleading. Goes for other OS too but mentioned 7 because 2.53.1 re

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-08 Thread Ant
On 12/8/2020 9:42 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bugs or ask for official support. A bit misleading. Goes for other OS too but mentioned 7 because 2.53.1 removed pre Wi

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-08 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If anyone wants to stay on 2.49.5 or prior running Windows 7 and up be my guest but don't file any bugs or ask for official support. A bit misleading. Goes for other OS too but mentioned 7 because 2.53.1 removed pre Windows 7 support. FRG _

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-08 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Daniel wrote: Edmund Wong wrote on 08/12/20 10:48: Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5. There are no updates to this version.  There are updates to 2.49.4. Just none to 2.49.5.  Users hoping to update to this version will need to update manually

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-07 Thread Daniel
Edmund Wong wrote on 08/12/20 10:48: Edmund Wong wrote: Hi All, This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5. There are no updates to this version. There are updates to 2.49.4. Just none to 2.49.5. Users hoping to update to this version will need to update manually. Further to my

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Daniel
gt;= 27] This is only considering versions as they are; Not the underlying operating system support. That's my update on the updates. [Probably going to be an update to this update that updates on the update...etc... ad nauseum]   We're nearly there.  I just need to make sure that the upd

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Steve Wendt via support-seamonkey
On 12/7/2020 4:05 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: What I do know is that there was never an automatic upgrade path from < 2.0 to 2.0. It was always manual. I think the best way is to backup the profile, and upgrade SeaMonkey manually from < 2.0 to 2.0, then 2.0 to 2.1..etc up until 2.24 (while backing

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Edmund Wong
pdate 2.0 to the latest and greatest. >> >> Here's a list of versions and their supported status: >> >> Versions >> >>    o Mozilla Suite, 1.x, 2.0x, <= 2.23  :  Not supported. >> [Related gecko versions: 1.8, 1.8.1, 1.9.1, <= 26 >> >

Re: Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-07 Thread Edmund Wong
Edmund Wong wrote: > Hi All, > > This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5. > > There are no updates to this version. There are updates to 2.49.4. > Just none to 2.49.5. Users hoping to update to this > version will need to update manually. Further to my post,

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread WaltS48
run a simple command and the whole o/s (and all apps) offer their updates. The issue for Edmund is trying to ensure that, when SeaMonkey is built by a distro and installed via their package manager, SeaMonkey's built-in updater doesn't interfere with that.  The system package keeps tr

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
their updates. The issue for Edmund is trying to ensure that, when SeaMonkey is built by a distro and installed via their package manager, SeaMonkey's built-in updater doesn't interfere with that. The system package keeps track of files it installs, so that they can be removed as nece

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Gerry Hickman via support-seamonkey
WaltS48 wrote: What is EPEL? Ubuntu doesn't provide SeaMonkey in its main repo anymore. I have to download and install each new version over the old. An internal app update mechanism would be greatly appreciated. EPEL is "Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux", you can add it as a repositor

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread WaltS48
r all. The way it works on Linux distros is really much better than I remember on Windows where individual apps had their own updaters with their own schedules, installers, and admin rights. On Linux distros, you run a simple command and the whole o/s (and all apps) offer their updates. SeaMonk

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Gerry Hickman via support-seamonkey
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: Just one question to that: I have an ancient profile which I found on an unused machine and where I'd like to at least have access to the emails there. Would a modern Seamonkey be able to understand them I'd say it's important that you upgrade (and test) any ol

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Gerry Hickman via support-seamonkey
os is really much better than I remember on Windows where individual apps had their own updaters with their own schedules, installers, and admin rights. On Linux distros, you run a simple command and the whole o/s (and all apps) offer their updates. SeaMonkey is already in EPEL for example, so it&#x

Re: Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son
f versions and their supported status: Versions o Mozilla Suite, 1.x, 2.0x, <= 2.23 : Not supported. [Related gecko versions: 1.8, 1.8.1, 1.9.1, <= 26 o versions >= 2.24: Supported [related gecko versions: >= 27] This is only considering versions as they ar

Updates: re: 2.49.5

2020-12-07 Thread Edmund Wong
Hi All, This is a quick specific mention for version 2.49.5. There are no updates to this version. There are updates to 2.49.4. Just none to 2.49.5. Users hoping to update to this version will need to update manually. Why? Because 2.49.5 was a difficult version (at least for me) to release

Updates: General

2020-12-07 Thread Edmund Wong
r supported status: Versions o Mozilla Suite, 1.x, 2.0x, <= 2.23 : Not supported. [Related gecko versions: 1.8, 1.8.1, 1.9.1, <= 26 o versions >= 2.24: Supported [related gecko versions: >= 27] This is only considering versions as they are; Not the underlying operating s

Re: updates

2020-09-30 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son
Doug Hughes wrote: Good Morning I have and use Sea Monkey on two PC's On this particular PC,2.53.1 Seamonkey says it is up to date and there are no available updates. On my other PC, 2.53.3  Seamonkey and says an update to 2.53.4 is available, yet windows wont let me install because publ

Re: updates

2020-09-29 Thread Lemuel Johnson via support-seamonkey
On 9/25/2020 8:12 AM, Doug Hughes wrote: Good Morning I have and use Sea Monkey on two PC's On this particular PC,2.53.1 Seamonkey says it is up to date and there are no available updates. On my other PC, 2.53.3  Seamonkey and says an update to 2.53.4 is available, yet windows wont l

Re: updates

2020-09-29 Thread Nuno Silva
On 2020-09-25, Doug Hughes wrote: > Good Morning > > I have and use Sea Monkey on two PC's > On this particular PC,2.53.1 Seamonkey says it is up to date and there > are no available updates. > On my other PC, 2.53.3  Seamonkey and says an update to 2.53.4 is > availabl

updates

2020-09-26 Thread Doug Hughes
Good Morning I have and use Sea Monkey on two PC's On this particular PC,2.53.1 Seamonkey says it is up to date and there are no available updates. On my other PC, 2.53.3  Seamonkey and says an update to 2.53.4 is available, yet windows wont let me install because publisher is unknown. O

Re: updates

2020-08-17 Thread Ray Davison
Ken Rudolph wrote: After all these years (since Netscape 1.0) I've always been scared in the past when I had to manually do a SeaMonkey version update. Since Netscape 1.0 I have never "updated" any of the related apps. I get the profiles to a neutral location - preferably a different partition

Re: updates

2020-08-16 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son
Edward wrote: Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: The first (Windows) Seamonkey which offered a 64-bit version officially was 2.49.5.  You have 2.49.1, so unless you downloaded an unofficial build from a different site - and I'm assuming you'd remember doing that - you have a 32-bit version. That

Re: updates

2020-08-16 Thread Edward
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote: The first (Windows) Seamonkey which offered a 64-bit version officially was 2.49.5.  You have 2.49.1, so unless you downloaded an unofficial build from a different site - and I'm assuming you'd remember doing that - you have a 32-bit version. That User Agent is a

Re: updates

2020-08-16 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son
dows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Does that x64 mean 64 bit version even if it is SM 2.49.1? I've never worried about that in previous updates to SM.  But now you have me thinking that I better know whether to uninstall my current version (someth

Re: updates

2020-08-15 Thread Ken Rudolph
64; x64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Does that x64 mean 64 bit version even if it is SM 2.49.1? I've never worried about that in previous updates to SM. But now you have me thinking that I better know whether to uninstall my current version (something that worrie

updates

2020-08-14 Thread Ken Rudolph
After all these years (since Netscape 1.0) I've basically given up on the SeaMonkey browser, replacing it with Firefox. However, out of habit and utility, I still use SeaMonkey 2.49.1 for e-mail and Composer for updating my web site (I have separate links to open only those portions of the sui

Re: UA String Updates - User Agent Switcher

2019-12-06 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
On 03.12.2019 21:53, Edward wrote: Unfortunately, all of the User Agent switcher Hallo, did you already try "User Agent Switcher" from https://seamonkeyde.wordpress.com/2019/01/09/classic-add-ons-archive/ after having it converted https://wp.me/p7kLBG-dI it for your SM version? CU Rainer __

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-05 Thread Daniel
Ray_Net wrote on 6/12/2019 9:36 AM: NFN Smith wrote on 04-12-19 23:14: Ray_Net wrote: NFN Smith wrote on 04-12-19 00:31: It's definitely Google's problem.  Showing a stock Firefox UA gets around the problem. For some reason, Google doesn't like Seamonkey. My U.A.String is: User agent: Mozi

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-05 Thread Ray_Net
NFN Smith wrote on 04-12-19 23:14: Ray_Net wrote: NFN Smith wrote on 04-12-19 00:31: It's definitely Google's problem.  Showing a stock Firefox UA gets around the problem. For some reason, Google doesn't like Seamonkey. My U.A.String is: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64;

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-04 Thread NFN Smith
Ray_Net wrote: NFN Smith wrote on 04-12-19 00:31: It's definitely Google's problem.  Showing a stock Firefox UA gets around the problem. For some reason, Google doesn't like Seamonkey. My U.A.String is: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-04 Thread Ray_Net
NFN Smith wrote on 04-12-19 00:31: Edward wrote: NFN Smith wrote: There's only a couple of sites that I regularly see that don't like the UA string for Seamonkey 2.49.5, especially Google's home page.  Thus, rather than doing global spoofing, I went to prefs:js and set general.useragent.over

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-03 Thread NFN Smith
Edward wrote: NFN Smith wrote: There's only a couple of sites that I regularly see that don't like the UA string for Seamonkey 2.49.5, especially Google's home page. Thus, rather than doing global spoofing, I went to prefs:js and set general.useragent.override.google.com to show a standard F

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-03 Thread Ray_Net
Thomas Pamin wrote on 03-12-19 13:50: My UA String is Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0. Should the NT 6.1 be changed to NT 10.0 for Windows 10? Anything else I should update? Mine is: User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/201

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-03 Thread Edward
NFN Smith wrote: There's only a couple of sites that I regularly see that don't like the UA string for Seamonkey 2.49.5, especially Google's home page.  Thus, rather than doing global spoofing, I went to prefs:js and set general.useragent.override.google.com to show a standard Firefox 68.0 UA

Re: UA String Updates

2019-12-03 Thread NFN Smith
Thomas Pamin wrote: My UA String is Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0. It's certainly workable, although a stock Firefox 68 ESR on Win 7 will have "(Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:68.0)" in it. For compatibility purposes, it shouldn't make any differenc

UA String Updates

2019-12-03 Thread Thomas Pamin
My UA String is Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0. Should the NT 6.1 be changed to NT 10.0 for Windows 10? Anything else I should update? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org ht

Re: Updates

2019-05-18 Thread WaltS48
On 5/18/19 12:06 PM, Luis wrote: Almost one year without updating. Thanks for the update. ;) For up to date news see Might be time for a new blog post, but ewong is probably very busy getting the new infrastructure in shape.

Updates

2019-05-18 Thread Luis via support-seamonkey
Almost one year without updating. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Is it me or are installed extensions not getting updates anymore?

2018-05-01 Thread NFN Smith
) * PrefBar 7.1.1 (http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/) * uBlock Origin 1.13.8 (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock) Is it because developers moved onto the new Gecko engine? :( Thank you in advnace. :) I have not seen any updates in themes or extensions for over a year. The ones I have still work, however

Re: Is it me or are installed extensions not getting updates anymore?

2018-04-26 Thread Ant via support-seamonkey
On 4/25/2018 11:54 PM, Mason83 wrote: On 26/04/2018 04:18, Ant wrote: I have these currently installed in my SeaMonkey v2.49.2 web browsers: * ColorfulTabs 31.1.9 (http://www.addongenie.com/colorfultabs) * DOM Inspector 2.0.16.1-signed (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/) * Open With 6.8

Re: Is it me or are installed extensions not getting updates anymore?

2018-04-26 Thread EE
7.1.1 (http://prefbar.tuxfamily.org/) * uBlock Origin 1.13.8 (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock) Is it because developers moved onto the new Gecko engine? :( Thank you in advnace. :) I have not seen any updates in themes or extensions for over a year. The ones I have still work, however (I did

Re: Is it me or are installed extensions not getting updates anymore?

2018-04-26 Thread Mason83
On 26/04/2018 04:18, Ant wrote: > I have these currently installed in my SeaMonkey v2.49.2 web browsers: > * ColorfulTabs 31.1.9 (http://www.addongenie.com/colorfultabs) > * DOM Inspector 2.0.16.1-signed (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/) > * Open With 6.8.6 (https://github.com/darktrojan

Is it me or are installed extensions not getting updates anymore?

2018-04-25 Thread Ant via support-seamonkey
I have these currently installed in my SeaMonkey v2.49.2 web browsers: * ColorfulTabs 31.1.9 (http://www.addongenie.com/colorfultabs) * DOM Inspector 2.0.16.1-signed (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/) * Open With 6.8.6 (https://github.com/darktrojan/openwith) * PrefBar 7.1.1 (http://pref

Issue With Automatic updates and Avast Antivirus

2018-01-09 Thread Ken Kellaher
windows firewall. I contacted Avast and they had me try a few things with Avast... that appeared to work for a few days. The problem appears to be with their Webshield, because when I shut it down I have no problems looking for updates on Seamonkey. When I contacted Avast again, they suggested

Re: Download installer from downloads section, re. updates

2018-01-04 Thread Mort Linder
Hi Walt, Thanks a lot for your reassuring reply. Happy New Year, Mort WaltS48 wrote: On 1/4/18 11:07 AM, Mort Linder wrote: Hi, I keep getting an announcement in red letters that I will not get SeaMonkey updates,and that I must download the full installer from the downloads section. I

Re: Download installer from downloads section, re. updates

2018-01-04 Thread WaltS48
On 1/4/18 11:07 AM, Mort Linder wrote: Hi, I keep getting an announcement in red letters that I will not get SeaMonkey updates,and that I must download the full installer from the downloads section. I tried every which way, and keep getting that red announcement. I am running Windows 7 Prof

Download installer from downloads section, re. updates

2018-01-04 Thread Mort Linder
Hi, I keep getting an announcement in red letters that I will not get SeaMonkey updates,and that I must download the full installer from the downloads section. I tried every which way, and keep getting that red announcement. I am running Windows 7 Prof. 64 bit. How may I get the proper

Re: Ref Seamonkey Updates

2017-04-19 Thread Lee
Thanks for your replies, I did know it was up to date but I kept getting that warning I showed below.I just wondered if it needed correcting and if yes how to do it. Thanks again! > Up date XML File malformed (200) Lee wrote: I get the following when I check for updates, any info would

Re: Ref Seamonkey Updates

2017-04-19 Thread Danny Kile
Lee wrote: I get the following when I check for updates, any info would be appreciated. Software updates There were problems checking or, downloading, or installling this update SeaMonkey could not be upgraded because Up date XML File malformed (200) Can I correct this?, is there someplace

Re: Ref Seamonkey Updates

2017-04-19 Thread WaltS48
On 4/19/17 10:41 AM, Lee wrote: I get the following when I check for updates, any info would be appreciated. Software updates There were problems checking or, downloading, or installling this update SeaMonkey could not be upgraded because Up date XML File malformed (200) Can I correct this

Ref Seamonkey Updates

2017-04-19 Thread Lee
I get the following when I check for updates, any info would be appreciated. Software updates There were problems checking or, downloading, or installling this update SeaMonkey could not be upgraded because Up date XML File malformed (200) Can I correct this?, is there someplace to get the

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2017-01-16 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
EE wrote: Disable automatic updating. In Preferences > Advanced > Software Installation, under "SeaMonkey" uncheck "Automatically check for updates". Not the same thing. Checking for updates and notifying the user doesn't install anything. If you want to disa

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2017-01-16 Thread EE
Maybe this is a Mac quirk... Disable automatic updating. In Preferences > Advanced > Software Installation, under "SeaMonkey" uncheck "Automatically check for updates". ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.moz

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread cyberzen
Le 31/12/2016 à 18:44, WaltS48 a écrit : Some of us clear browsing history on shutdown. I do -- cyberzen ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread Jonathan N. Little
accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: > This thread has gone in the wrong direction, as it is focusing on whether or > not I have backed up my profile data. > No you seem to be missing the point. You did not need to create a new profile and "lose" your data just by uninstalling SeaMonkey and reinstalling

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread accordiongirl
This thread has gone in the wrong direction, as it is focusing on whether or not I have backed up my profile data. The original (and more important) question is -- is "shouldn't SeaMonkey check System Requirements before automatically updating?" ___ s

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread Jonathan N. Little
accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: > The profile was crippled by SeaMonkey. Here is a description of this issue > from the 2.46 Release Notes. > > "Data loss warning: If you use a profile with this or any later version and > then try to go back to SeaMonkey 2.40 or earlier, SeaMonkey will rename yo

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread WaltS48
On 12/31/2016 12:32 PM, accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: The profile was crippled by SeaMonkey. Here is a description of this issue from the 2.46 Release Notes. "Data loss warning: If you use a profile with this or any later version and then try to go back to SeaMonkey 2.40 or earlier, SeaMonke

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread accordiongirl
The profile was crippled by SeaMonkey. Here is a description of this issue from the 2.46 Release Notes. "Data loss warning: If you use a profile with this or any later version and then try to go back to SeaMonkey 2.40 or earlier, SeaMonkey will rename your history file to places.sqlite.corrupt

Re: 2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread Jonathan N. Little
accordiong...@gmail.com wrote: > SeaMonkey 2.46 has automatically updated itself on my computer running Mac OS > 10.6.8. > > This update is not compatible (it requires Mac OS 10.9), and therefore does > not run. > > It also cripples my profile. > > And so now I must re-install 2.40, and start

2.46 Automatically Updates, Breaks Mac OS 10.6.8

2016-12-31 Thread accordiongirl
SeaMonkey 2.46 has automatically updated itself on my computer running Mac OS 10.6.8. This update is not compatible (it requires Mac OS 10.9), and therefore does not run. It also cripples my profile. And so now I must re-install 2.40, and start over with a new profile. Shouldn't SeaMonkey che

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-22 Thread pthf1nd3r
On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 9:52:07 AM UTC-7, Chris Ilias wrote: > On 2016-11-17 2:16 AM, pth@gmail.com wrote: > > > My impression is that the microsoft November update rollup makes seamonkey > > 2.46 for windows 7 x32 crash. > > Does the Mozilla Crash Reporter come up? If not, it coul

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-22 Thread pthf1nd3r
On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 10:15:05 AM UTC-7, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > ... > What I meant with crashing the browser is the Windows telemetry which > came standard with Windows 10 and is now rolled out by Microsoft for 7 > and 8.1 users. It can not be disabled but you can uninstall

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-22 Thread pthf1nd3r
On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 10:15:05 AM UTC-7, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > > > What I meant with crashing the browser is the Windows telemetry which > came standard with Windows 10 and is now rolled out by Microsoft for 7 > and 8.1 users. It can not be disabled but you can uninstall it.

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-19 Thread Chris Ilias
On 2016-11-17 2:16 AM, pthf1n...@gmail.com wrote: My impression is that the microsoft November update rollup makes seamonkey 2.46 for windows 7 x32 crash. Does the Mozilla Crash Reporter come up? If not, it could be because you're not using an official release. If it does, 1. Open SeaMonkey

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-19 Thread Ed Mullen
On 11/19/2016 at 3:26 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl's prodigious digits fired off: Yes but the Windows update catalog is different. If you want to actually get a kb from it you need to use an MS browser. And KB3197867 for Windows 7 or KB3197873 for 8.1 are only available there. FRG Ed Mullen wrote:

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-19 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
You can't do a thing about it in Windows 10. Spying is build so deeply into it it can not be removed. Using the privacy options will not fully disable it. And it gets worse with every release. You can hack it but with the Anniversary edition I gave up and just wiped the vm. When my other older T

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-19 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Yes but the Windows update catalog is different. If you want to actually get a kb from it you need to use an MS browser. And KB3197867 for Windows 7 or KB3197873 for 8.1 are only available there. FRG Ed Mullen wrote: You do NOT need to use IE or Edge to view Knowledge Base atricles. Just Go

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-18 Thread Ray_Net
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 18-11-16 18:14: Submitting telemetry data is disabled by default in SeaMonkey. Telemetry itself is so woven into the gecko engine that you will see fragments of it even when disabled. But no data is transmitted. What I meant with crashing the browser is the Windows

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-18 Thread Ed Mullen
On 11/18/2016 at 12:35 PM, Larry S.'s prodigious digits fired off: So how do I get KB3197867? In Windows Update Catalog I get a brief flash of the content, then "There is a problem with this site" (or equivalent). No way to get at the download. Advice greatly appreciated. Larry S. Just Google

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-18 Thread Ed Mullen
On 11/18/2016 at 12:43 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl's prodigious digits fired off: You need to use IE. Also close all other browsers. AS siad they make it hard to get rid of this... FRG Larry S. wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Submitting telemetry data is disabled by default in SeaMonkey. Telemetr

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-18 Thread EE
Ray_Net wrote: EE wrote on 17-11-16 19:56: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Works fine fro me in x86 and x64 with 2.46 and 2.47. The latest Windows 7 update includes telemetry by default and I have seen at least one report were this crashed the browser. Monst/any problems you will have with SeaMonkey

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-18 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
You need to use IE. Also close all other browsers. AS siad they make it hard to get rid of this... FRG Larry S. wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Submitting telemetry data is disabled by default in SeaMonkey. Telemetry itself is so woven into the gecko engine that you will see fragments of it

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-18 Thread Larry S.
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Submitting telemetry data is disabled by default in SeaMonkey. Telemetry itself is so woven into the gecko engine that you will see fragments of it even when disabled. But no data is transmitted. What I meant with crashing the browser is the Windows telemetry which came

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-18 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
Submitting telemetry data is disabled by default in SeaMonkey. Telemetry itself is so woven into the gecko engine that you will see fragments of it even when disabled. But no data is transmitted. What I meant with crashing the browser is the Windows telemetry which came standard with Windows 1

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-17 Thread pthf1nd3r
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 1:27:07 AM UTC-7, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > > could anyone explain in plain english, what is happening with Seamonkey for > > windows 7 ? Please? > > > We are having build problesmw which delayed the next release for a few > weeks now. They are in the process o

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-17 Thread Ray_Net
EE wrote on 17-11-16 19:56: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Works fine fro me in x86 and x64 with 2.46 and 2.47. The latest Windows 7 update includes telemetry by default and I have seen at least one report were this crashed the browser. Monst/any problems you will have with SeaMonkey you will likely

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-17 Thread Pat Connors
Curious, will version also work on Windows 10 in x64? For Windows x86 pick 2.46 from here: https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/ My impression is that the microsoft November update rollup makes seamonkey 2.46 for windows 7 x32

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-17 Thread EE
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Works fine fro me in x86 and x64 with 2.46 and 2.47. The latest Windows 7 update includes telemetry by default and I have seen at least one report were this crashed the browser. Monst/any problems you will have with SeaMonkey you will likely also have with Firefox. Same

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-17 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl
could anyone explain in plain english, what is happening with Seamonkey for windows 7 ? Please? We are having build problesmw which delayed the next release for a few weeks now. They are in the process of being fixed but it takes time and the devs are all volunters which have a life. For Windo

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-16 Thread Gérard
0 the final version, or will there be future updates? I really don't want to switch to another browser, but it definitely appears obvious that Seamonkey doesn't get updated much at all anymore. Any word on this? thank you. long time Mozilla/Seamonkey user, K. could anyone explain i

Re: Is "SeaMonkey 2.40" the last version, or will there be further updates?

2016-11-16 Thread pthf1nd3r
or will there be future updates? > > I really don't want to switch to another browser, but it definitely appears > obvious that Seamonkey doesn't get updated much at all anymore. > > Any word on this? > thank you. > > long time Mozilla/Seamonkey user, K. coul

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

2016-10-30 Thread Rainer Ullrich
W64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161016181837 app.update.url is set to "https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/update/3/%PRODUCT%/%CHANNEL%/%BUILD_TARGET%/%LOCALE%/update.xml"; Check for Updates-result: No Updates Fo

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

2016-10-20 Thread Adrian Kalla
W dniu 10/20/2016 o 11:19 AM, Rainer Ullrich pisze: > The confusing point is: > On a windows 64bit, if you have installed such a *32bit* preview 2.46 > SeaMonkey, > and you click on "Help->Check for update", you will be offered a 2.46 > update! > > If you accept this update, your 32bit SeaMonkey w

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

2016-10-20 Thread Rainer Ullrich
On 20.10.2016 09:13, Daniel wrote: Yeap!! I'll believe you, NoOp, but on my Win 7 WOW64, when I click Help->Check for update, I'm still being told my SM 2.40 is the latest version available!! :-( 2.40 is the latest official version. 2.46 is not finished today and not released! There exists a

Re: [Resolved] Re: 2.46 updates?

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel
On 20/10/2016 6:29 AM, NoOp wrote: On 10/19/2016 01:22 AM, Daniel wrote: On 19/10/2016 1:00 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 10/18/2016 09:23 AM, Daniel wrote: ... I just went to my SM browser, clicked Help->Check for updates and was told there were no updates for my WIN7 WOW64 SM!! What vers

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >