On 2016-11-09 13:47, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El onsdag 9. november 2016 13.36.11 CET Craig Wallace escribió:
Is it just for streets? Or can you add photos of footpaths, cyclepaths,
railways, rivers etc. Or any other feature you can travel along.
Why not have a name with less focus on streets?
--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:10:53 +0100
> From: Michał Brzozowski
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change
> Message-ID:
> <
>
El onsdag 9. november 2016 13.36.11 CET Craig Wallace escribió:
> Is it just for streets? Or can you add photos of footpaths, cyclepaths,
> railways, rivers etc. Or any other feature you can travel along.
> Why not have a name with less focus on streets?
For the same reason OpenStreetMap has footp
On 2016-11-08 15:34, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open
street level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and
iOS. Since then, we not only have collected almost 30 kilometers of
coverage, but also received a
On 16-11-08 19:13:34, Joseph Reeves, wrote 3.9K characters saying:
How about just StreetScape?
I would argue against this.
To me, "OpenStreetView" sounds okay in non-english languages (Spanish,
French, German), contrary to "StreetScape" which I imagine would be really
strange for me to say t
Streetscape is totally fine, if you just want to have the same problems
again.
Rough step by step guide to finding a workable product name:
- don't do it in public
- don't use anything descriptive
- google for the name
- do an exhaustive trademark search (or rather let your fav IP counsel
do i
How about StreetOpenView? ;)
Streetscape sounds fine to me, too.
08.11.2016 16:37 "Martijn van Exel" napisał(a):
> Hi all,
>
> A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open street
> level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and iOS.
> Since then, we not
Am 08.11.2016 um 19:51 schrieb Glenn Plas:
> ..
> View is quite a common word. Imagine apple claiming the rights on
> anything that starts with I- : I-crap, I-whatever, I-rail, I-eat (there
> are thousands of those). They wouldn't exist either without Apple.
Apple is naturally the text book exampl
LibreView ?
Pierre
De : Martin Koppenhoefer
À : Glenn Plas
Cc : talk@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : mardi 8 novembre 2016 15h52
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 08 nov 2016, alle ore 19:51, Glenn Plas ha
> scritto:
&
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 08 nov 2016, alle ore 19:51, Glenn Plas ha
> scritto:
>
> in our EU law system you cannot claim ownership over common words like
> that. It's not because you're big and bold that you can get away with
> bullying.
>
well, a German telco has successfully claime
Sigh
Trademarks are not patents, there is no concept similar to prior art
(there is in the US some thing which comes quite close, but that is just
1 (one) country). If you are a trademark owner you need to monitor
applications that are close to your mark and if the examiners don't
throw them
On 08/11/16 18:54, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> FWIW, I like the "-scape" suffix, e.g. OpenStreetscape:
Get's my vote Capital 'S' though OpenStreetScape
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http:/
How about just StreetScape?
I think the open- prefix is unnecessary unless OpenStreetView is officially
part of the OSM project? We should be expecting all good projects to be
open by default, so branding as Open may be unnecessary. In addition,
projects should be aiming to compete on features and
Andy Mabbett wrote:
> This is hardly surprising, and not unreasonable (there's no
> "Ford Beetle" or "Volkswagen Mini", nor a "BurgerKing
> Happy Meal". for example).
Though there is Ordnance Survey Street View, which pre-dates Google Street
View by several years. (It's soon to be replaced by OS
On 08-11-16 19:16, Hakuch wrote:
> On 08.11.2016 18:34, Glenn Plas wrote:
>> I think it's definitely totally unreasonable by Giegle.
>
> To be honest, no one would have chosen "View" if there not has been that
> other tool, do you?
View is quite a common word. Imagine apple claiming the rights on
I'm guessing they are claiming trademark rights on the term "Street
View" which is not entirely unreasonable. (IANAL, etc)
Toby
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Glenn Plas wrote:
> Does well-know-bully-company own the word 'view' ? I don't understand
> why you consider yielding on this. They c
OpenStreetPic
OpenStreetPics
--> OSP
On 08.11.2016 18:05, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> OpenStreets
>
> OpenVista
guess, another big player will complain then ;)
> OpenPanorama
>
0x2E165BB0.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
talk mailing list
talk@op
On 08.11.2016 18:34, Glenn Plas wrote:
> I think it's definitely totally unreasonable by Giegle.
To be honest, no one would have chosen "View" if there not has been that
other tool, do you?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.open
Knock yourselves out by not being able to choose:
http://www.namemesh.com/domain-name-search/open%20street%20photo?show=1
But I still think it's bullshit to claim this as it's clearly a part of
the openstreet-brand if you just put the word 'view' behind it.
I think it's definitely totally unreas
Since all-evil-you-know-who have lawyers that can sue the ass off everything,
let us look at what strictly mean the same but sounds completely different, my
idea is FSLI, the Free Street Level Images.
Aun Johnsen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstr
'Photos for openstreetmap" abbreviated as photosm like with hotosm?
Op 8 nov. 2016 6:08 p.m. schreef "Andy Mabbett" :
> On 8 November 2016 at 15:34, Martijn van Exel wrote:#
>
> > a friendly (for now) request by a well-known company with a
> similarly-named
> > product :) to not use the OpenStre
On 8 November 2016 at 15:34, Martijn van Exel wrote:#
> a friendly (for now) request by a well-known company with a similarly-named
> product :) to not use the OpenStreetView name.
This is hardly surprising, and not unreasonable (there's no "Ford
Beetle" or "Volkswagen Mini", nor a "BurgerKing H
Libre Via Picturae (Open Street View in Latin... as best I can tell
usingahem... Google translate)
Mike
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Hans De Kryger
wrote:
> Guessing that company's name rimes with frugal
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Nov 8, 2016 8:35 AM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote:
>
>> Hi
Guessing that company's name rimes with frugal
Regards,
Hans
On Nov 8, 2016 8:35 AM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open street
> level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and iOS.
> Since then, we not o
Does well-know-bully-company own the word 'view' ? I don't understand
why you consider yielding on this. They can ask all they want right ?
Glenn
On 08-11-16 16:34, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open
> street level imager
Hi all,
A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open street
level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and iOS.
Since then, we not only have collected almost 30 kilometers of
coverage, but also received a lot of attention from both you and the press.
T
On 25 Sep 2009, at 13:58, malenki wrote:
You are right (except that I have uploaded ~2k pictures. Meanwhile 376
seem to exist for the counter :) )
I wonder how I cam to "Moderating" loggin in before, since there is no
hint how to get there now. After all, I took the URL from the history
of th
John McKerrell wrote:
>On 23 Sep 2009, at 20:16, malenki wrote:
>
>> John McKerrell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 Sep 2009, at 17:44, malenki wrote:
>>>
| There was an error saving your changes
>>> Odd, I'll take a look, can you paste the URL to the thumbnail to
>>> help me identify it?
>>
>> Imp
On 23 Sep 2009, at 21:27, Richard Bullock wrote:
>>
>> [still not enough :)]
>>
>> For moderating: right now I moderated several photos until I cam
>> onto a
>> visible license plate. This I masked and added the tag licenceplate,
>> left the masking area, clicked "mark as safe" and "save" - and
On 23 Sep 2009, at 20:16, malenki wrote:
John McKerrell wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009, at 17:44, malenki wrote:
| There was an error saving your changes
Odd, I'll take a look, can you paste the URL to the thumbnail to help
me identify it?
Impossible at the moment, OSV looks like this both in o
On 24 Sep 2009, at 18:25, malenki wrote:
> Jeremy Adams wrote:
>
>> You'll find most of the documentation on the wiki at
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
>>
>> This mailing list you've posted to is the primary source of
>> discussion.
>> There are other lists as well for more specific topics (
On 24 Sep 2009, at 15:51, malenki wrote:
> Richard Bullock wrote:
>
>> Also, I've mistakenly uploaded an image without geolocation in the
>> exif (I haven't pushed it towards moderation yet). Any chance we
>> could
>> have the option to remove an image?
>
> My suggestion: be able to delete the
John McKerrell wrote:
>
>On 22 Sep 2009, at 17:44, malenki wrote:
>> It would be nice to have p...@openstreetmap.org on gmane.
>I'm not actually sure what you mean by this, is it something I need
>to set up for the pho...@openstreetmap.org mailing list?
This is the place where you can subscribe t
Jeremy Adams wrote:
>You'll find most of the documentation on the wiki at
>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
>
>This mailing list you've posted to is the primary source of discussion.
>There are other lists as well for more specific topics (newbies,
>legal, etc) as well as for specific countries.
Th
Richard Bullock wrote:
>Also, I've mistakenly uploaded an image without geolocation in the
>exif (I haven't pushed it towards moderation yet). Any chance we could
>have the option to remove an image?
My suggestion: be able to delete the picture if it is you own or if 2
or three have marked it as
You'll find most of the documentation on the wiki at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
This mailing list you've posted to is the primary source of discussion.
There are other lists as well for more specific topics (newbies, legal, etc)
as well as for specific countries.
-Jeremy
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009
I've signed up at the OpenStreetView site, but it does not appear that there is
significant documentation available, nor a method for discussion. Could
someone say something to this? Perhaps this is coming in the future - it would
be helpful to known this. --openstreetmap login = ceyockey
___
>
> [still not enough :)]
>
> For moderating: right now I moderated several photos until I cam onto a
> visible license plate. This I masked and added the tag licenceplate,
> left the masking area, clicked "mark as safe" and "save" - and then an
> error showed up:
> | There was an error saving your
John McKerrell wrote:
>
>On 22 Sep 2009, at 17:44, malenki wrote:
>
>> | There was an error saving your changes
>>
>Odd, I'll take a look, can you paste the URL to the thumbnail to help
>me identify it?
Impossible at the moment, OSV looks like this both in opera and firefox:
http://omploader.or
On 22 Sep 2009, at 17:44, malenki wrote:
| There was an error saving your changes
Odd, I'll take a look, can you paste the URL to the thumbnail to help
me identify it?
Besides there seems to be no way (atm) to edit several pictures in a
row. MArking some and clicking "mask sections" showe
malenki wrote:
[still not enough :)]
For moderating: right now I moderated several photos until I cam onto a
visible license plate. This I masked and added the tag licenceplate,
left the masking area, clicked "mark as safe" and "save" - and then an
error showed up:
| There was an error saving you
malenki wrote:
[not enough :)]
It would be nice to have p...@openstreetmap.org on gmane.
For moderating photos:
1) It would be handy to be able to see the pictures in full resolution
since its a difference if a car with licence plate is photographed with
a 320x240 cam of a mobile phone or with
John McKerrell wrote:
[a lot about OSV]
Questions: Housenumbers would not be a privacy problem I hope?
Because of privacy, selecting the relevant pictures and rotating them I
anyway review all the pictures before I upload them.
I quite often make photographs of the ground when the highways surf
On 22 Sep 2009, at 08:55, Claudius wrote:
> Am 21.09.2009 23:45, John McKerrell:
>>> To try it out, head over to http://openstreetview.org/
>>>
>>> You'll need to sign up for an account, verify your email address and
>>> then log in.
>
> The most important question for me: Why don't you use OSM's
Am 21.09.2009 23:45, John McKerrell:
>> To try it out, head over to http://openstreetview.org/
>>
>> You'll need to sign up for an account, verify your email address and
>> then log in.
The most important question for me: Why don't you use OSM's own OAuth
infrastructure [1]? I don't feel comforta
Because I'm convinced it needs a level of moderation that would end up
requiring that we host the photos anyway. Also flickr (for instance)
costs money above 200 (I think) photos. I would hope that someone
(possibly me) would write something to let you suck images in from
flickr when the OS
This is a great idea, but why not just use Flickr or some similar photo site
that offers an API for geotagged photos?
The only unique thing we'd need to add is a method of recording the
orientation (X degrees from magnetic north, Y degrees inclination, Z degrees
field of view) of the photo at a gi
So, after talking about my ideas for an OpenStreetView project at SOTM
way back in July I've finally got things together enough to launch a
site. I announced it on pho...@openstreetmap.org a few days ago to get
some initial opininos but I think it's time to get a few more people
looking at
We, the Romanian OSM team (as Norc is a Romanian based service), are in
contact with the people from Norc since the launch of the project. They have
given us permission to derive from their panoramas, and also they donated
their GPS logs. We are waiting in the next few days to get a new set of
trac
On 13 May 2009, at 16:04, Joseph Reeves wrote:
> How does the service provided by norc.ro compare with people's
> desires?
>
> http://www.norc.ro/
norc.ro looks similar to Google, which is nice, but I guess the
question is what license is the imagery available under? Also could I
submit my
How does the service provided by norc.ro compare with people's desires?
http://www.norc.ro/
Cheers, Joseph
2009/5/13 Ian Dees :
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:25 AM, John McKerrell wrote:
>>
>> On 13 May 2009, at 15:00, Rory McCann wrote:
>>>
>>> StreetView data would be awesome to have, since i
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:25 AM, John McKerrell wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2009, at 15:00, Rory McCann wrote:
>
>>
>> StreetView data would be awesome to have, since it would massivly
>> increase the amount of information we could add. Footpaths, speedlimits,
>> number of lanes, etc etc, Theses are thi
On 13 May 2009, at 15:00, Rory McCann wrote:
>
> StreetView data would be awesome to have, since it would massivly
> increase the amount of information we could add. Footpaths,
> speedlimits,
> number of lanes, etc etc, Theses are things you can't get from aerial
> imagery.
I imagine that even
On 13/05/09 14:47, Ian Dees wrote:
> This is different, though, as Google owns the StreetView data. They
> license all other geographic data (street maps and aerial/satellite
> images).
Yes that's what I thought. As far as I know Yahoo licenced map data and
bought the 'you can relicence it' option
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Joseph Reeves wrote:
> For the same reason that they don't release any of their data?
>
This is different, though, as Google owns the StreetView data. They license
all other geographic data (street maps and aerial/satellite images).
There is significant interest
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Rory McCann wrote:
> Any idea why Google don't do this yet?
>
>
I (and some others in the OSM community) have been working with some Google
engineers on this for quite some time (1.5 yrs). There is significant
interest in opening the data, but they are having prob
For the same reason that they don't release any of their data?
2009/5/13 Rory McCann :
> On 01/05/09 15:05, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>> Google Street View got me thinking that it might be a good idea to explore
>> the possibility of an open source street view database, which could be
>> linked in w
On 01/05/09 15:05, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> Google Street View got me thinking that it might be a good idea to explore
> the possibility of an open source street view database, which could be
> linked in with OSM.
Course what would be awesome is if Google released all there timestamped
photos an
Would be nice if we could upload video+GPS to some site for processing
into openstreetview (yeah I know it's 2GB/hour) but it saves having to
stop and take photos. You could always assume that the camera is a
fixed angle from the track/heading.
For anyone looking at video cameras for bikes, I jus
2009/5/1 John McKerrell :
> Quite odd, I was mulling over submitting talks on OpenStreetView to SOTM and
> AGI conference today. I just noticed your website and thought I'd see if you
> had mentioned it on the OSM mailing list, to find that you had just over an
> hour ago. I have the openstreetview
also: http://openviewproject.org/
From: Ian Dees
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 10:15:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Nick Whitelegg > wrote:
I have put together an extremely simple facility to allow users to
uplo
ntervals.
Cheers,
Adam
> From: Ian Dees
> To: Nick Whitelegg
> Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 10:15:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Nick Whitelegg
> wrote:
>>
>> I have put together an
See also: http://openviewproject.org/
From: Ian Dees
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 10:15:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Nick Whitelegg
wrote:
I have put together an
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Nick Whitelegg
wrote:
> I have put together an extremely simple facility to allow users to upload
> panoramas and view their location on a slippy map at
> http://www.openstreetview.org.uk/. (Sorry about .uk but .org, .com, .net
> appear to be already taken). There's
Hello everyone,
Google Street View got me thinking that it might be a good idea to explore
the possibility of an open source street view database, which could be
linked in with OSM. The idea would be that people could take panorama
photos of streets in their area and upload them, and so potenti
65 matches
Mail list logo
