Re: [OSM-talk-be] Du côté de la France...

everal times to notice "le relief français". All the best, André. Best regards, Lionel Le dim. 3 janv. 2021 à 22:53, André Pirard <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> a écrit : On 03/01/2021 15.27, François Piette wrote: Interesting ! Do yo

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Du côté de la France...

On 03/01/2021 15.27, François Piette wrote: Interesting ! Do you know if there is (or will be) a tile server? -- francois.pie...@overbyte.be The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How owing to FlightRadar24 to follow the Tour de France on a less straight route

On 12/07/2019 18.55, André Pirard wrote: Comment avec FlightRadar24 suivre les avions plutôt que les vélos du Tour de France. <https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/how-the-tour-de-france-goes-from-cycle-to-screen/?utm_campaign=website_source=sendgrid.com_medium=email> How

Re: [OSM-talk-be] arlon - osm - training courses: JOSM and PICC

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:40 PM Pierre Parmentier wrote: Hello, The two planned training sessions

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Quick Building tracing question... -> Area Selector JOSM plugin

On 2019-01-10 03:42, John Willis wrote: I am tracing and repairing existing traces of warehouses in an industrial district. On a slightly different but similar subject. To do serious fast building tracing, one should use JOSM with Area Selector Plugin and

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] identifier in ref:xOperatorx=y0yyyy to url=http://mijnlijn.be/y0yyyy

On 2018-11-18 19:05, Kevin Kenny wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:16 AM André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: Jakka's

Re: [OSM-talk-be] identifier in ref:xOperatorx=y0yyyy to url=http://mijnlijn.be/y0yyyy

On 2018-11-18 13:47, Jo wrote: Frank, url wasn't used yet on the bus stops, so no conflict there. Jakka's point is not that "url" is used but that it could be wanted and that this usage would prevent it. To prevent the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] cadastral plan now open data

On 2018-09-21 23:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 21. Sep 2018, at 21:32, André Pirard <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote: The whole cadastral map is offset by that 7m. ... *Picture 3:* So, I dragged his parcel right onto the wall. And now it's correctl

Re: [OSM-talk-be] cadastral plan now open data

On 2018-09-21 13:33, Lionel Giard wrote: I'm not supporting the addition of this WMS neither, as it is more imprecise than others sources for most of the data. So the question about the license is not really important in that

Re: [OSM-talk-be] cadastral plan now open data

On 2018-09-21 12:46, joost schouppe wrote: Op vr 24 aug. 2018 om 13:58 schreef joost schouppe mailto:joost.schou...@gmail.com>>: Hi, The cadastral plan is now open data for the entire country! That's pretty big because: - for Wallonia, it's the first open vector data with

Re: [OSM-talk-be] N30 relation fixed (was: National Road relation: does order matter?)

On 2018-09-03 21:59, Nathan Monfils wrote: Op ma 3 sep. 2018 om 20:03 schreef André Pirard : Op zo 2 sep. 2018 om 22:54 schreef Nathan Monfils Hello! I was doing some editing on the N30 near Liège, when I noticed that its relation was completely unordered, with ways near the city center being

Re: [OSM-talk-be] National Road relation: does order matter?

On 2018-09-03 00:24, Jo wrote: for route=road relations order doesn't matter much. It's impossible to sort them according to any meaningful criterion. A meaningful criterion to sort a route is so that two adjacent ways of it share one same end node. In other words, that the route is ordered the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Ourthe = path?

On 2018-04-12 09:12, Stijn Rombauts wrote: >> On ‎Thursday‎, ‎April‎ ‎12‎, ‎2018‎ ‎01‎:‎06‎:‎49‎ ‎AM, Gerard >> Vanderveken wrote: >> >> Goedendag, >> >> Hier heeft er eentje bij derivier Ourthe >> >> een

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] area=yes on object without kind + using PICC & JOSM

On 2018-01-12 14:52, Jo wrote: > You are right in that we shouldn't base any of our mapping on what is > visible on Google Streetview. Which is why I was suggesting that > somebody go check it out locally. I've been looking at Belgian aerial > imagery we are allowed to use, taken over several

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] how to map a fr:talus?

it man made=embankment <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dembankment>, according to your repeated consent, but only as a single way at the top of the slope I suppose. But I'll name it an old canal's bank. Thanks to all, Cheers, André. > Sent from Mail <https://go.mic

Re: [OSM-talk-be] how to map a fr:talus?

On 2017-11-23 17:26, joost schouppe wrote: > 2017-11-23 16:48 GMT+01:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>>: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for how to map what is called in French a talus > <http://www.cnrtl.fr/def

[OSM-talk-be] how to map a fr:talus?

Hi, I'm looking for how to map what is called in French a talus (Google's translation). I would call this a 1.8m simple step running for some reason for several 100s meters across meadows. Steep slope. There are "top of slope" and "bottom of slope" lines.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Belgium Phone Format OSM Tool

On 2017-11-21 00:08, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > Le 20. 11. 17 à 23:49, Ubipo . a écrit : > >> I don't know of any library that does all that :( > https://github.com/googlei18n/libphonenumber/ > I never use it but it look like fine. > > Regards, > Marc That's what the JOSM suggestion

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Belgium Phone Format OSM Tool

On 2017-11-18 13:49, Ubipo . wrote: Hey all, I wanted to let you know about a tool I made called 'BPF' - Belgium Phone Formatter. When provided with OSM login credentials and a list of OSM ID's to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

On 2017-09-29 22:46, eMerzh wrote: > just another example a little more cycleway... > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=GnblTsSKolUsjQ6URC0zyg=photo=50.86767032=4.3280441=17=0.510308202857=0.4999=0 > > but still for me the delimitations are not really clear ... and > calling that

[OSM-talk-be] RFC: Defaults are paramount, abandoning Proposed_features/ is a HUGE mistake

Hi, Examples: either each road is tagged with *maxspeed*=* speed limit and *driving_side*=* or there are defaults. I'm reviving this remark because the examples are numerous: * The Belgian

Re: [OSM-talk-be] AreaSelector source (JOSM pour tracer les bâtiments)

On 2017-05-04 11:13, Verhoeven Fr wrote: > Le 03/05/17 à 21:00, André Pirard a écrit : >> On 2017-05-03 11:42, Sus Verhoeven wrote: >>> Bonjour, >>> >>> Me référant au message qui suit je m'adresse à vous pour de l'aide >>> vu ma faible connaissance de

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How to map an amenity that spans several buildings?

On 2017-07-09 13:53, Yves bxl-forever wrote: > Hi, > > Philippe raised an interesting point about the following note. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/722850 > > There are several occurrences where a shop or an amenity spans over several > buildings. > Buildings have their own id based on

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Potlatch crasht keer op keer

Hi Karel, Beside running JOSM, which is highly recommended, you might try an alternative Flash player found here . Cheers André. On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Karel Adams wrote: > Already for a couple of weeks, Potlatch crashes when I

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Tagging of schools/college

On 2017-05-31 15:10, Guy Vanvuchelen wrote: > Volgens mij is 'school'voor België de beste oplossing. In één school kunnen > immers meerdere afdelingen zijn: beroepsonderwijs, maar ook ASO. Als je > Wikipedia zou volgen is 'college' een klassikale les krijgen aan een > universiteit. Als je

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Authorization request for use of SPW data (PICC, orthophotos and others) and OSM representative

On 2017-05-30 18:43, Thomas Bertels wrote: > Hi, > > After different emails to > * helpdesk.carto AT spw.wallonie.be (no official answer) > * carlo.diantonio AT gov.wallonie.be > * rene.collin AT gov.wallonie.be > * jeanclaude.jasselette AT spw.wallonie.be What is the need to contact all those

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Dixit JOSM: missing tag - street with odd number of lanes, but without lanes:forward and lanes:backward or oneway

ding, doesn't it? Moreover, as "|" is the OR symbol and ";" is the multiple values separator, "left;through|right" would have been the intuitive, logical choice in the same simple mind. Oh well, I silently tiptoed backward away from that. Cheers André. > On Thu

[OSM-talk-be] Dixit JOSM: missing tag - street with odd number of lanes, but without lanes:forward and lanes:backward or oneway

Hi, Just like Osmose does, JOSM accused me of those errors with tags I never wrote: here and here . It appears that the mapper used turn:lanes:… and that JOSM wants lanes:… I'll leave it to the specialists

Re: [OSM-talk-be] YES, we can trace the PICC

On 2017-05-10 11:58, joost schouppe wrote: > > I guess Glenn’s point is that the license issue cannot be > circumvented, even if the king itself says something different > than its contents. > > André, could you elaborate the statement that tracing = consulting? I > don't really

Re: [OSM-talk-be] YES, we can trace the PICC

their mates who would trace it. >> >> While helping someone with routing problems I mentioned the Michelin map. >> I had just imagined that an OSM route could be compared to Michelin's. >> Someone came down on me, suspecting me to trace Michelin. >> I had just come ac

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] Missing oneway:bicycle=no / Wiki editing

ow the concept of sarcasm : > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm > > ** Certainly this will also leave some (border) cases which are > disputable, > but at least there would be SOME agreed guideline. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct > > Am 10.05.2017 um 15:10 schrie

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

Hi, In this thread, I said, in agreement with others, that oneway:bicycle =no (click to open that page) is the tag to be used *to tell routing software**(GPS)* that *oneway*=yes does not apply

Re: [OSM-talk-be] YES, we can trace the PICC (was: Using SPW PICC layer in josm)

ichelin. > On 01-03-16 21:48, Erik B wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I understand that there is no clear agreement to use PICC for OSM but it >> is said and written by different persons from the government that there >> is nothing against the use of those data for OSM and th

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

On 2017-03-26 18:10, André Pirard wrote: > On 2017-03-25 17:49, Marc Gemis wrote: >> the problem with a subtag is that you cannot use it in combination >> with oneway. Now you can map it as oneway:moped_A/B/P = yes > Yes we can, as: :moped:A=yes I meant oneway:moped:A=yes of co

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New traffic sign for bicycle

On 2017-03-25 17:49, Marc Gemis wrote: > the problem with a subtag is that you cannot use it in combination > with oneway. Now you can map it as oneway:moped_A/B/P = yes Yes we can, as: :moped:A=yes When using namespace , ":A" means a qualifier of what

[OSM-talk-be] Missing oneway:bicycle=no

I once read that routes of cyclists using OSM were laughed at by the others... oneway=yes is a routing tag (used by GSM) indicating that only one way of the highway can be used. That page says that the exception for bicycles to run contraflow is

[OSM-talk-be] OSM updates by cyclists

Hi, I'm presently helping cyclists to draw an overpass map used to request their Administration Communale to add "oneway:bicycle=no" signs. Doing that, the discovery is (pardon me Julien Fastré) that oneway=yes tags are horribly missing. And hence, if cyclists care so much about oneway, we could

Re: [OSM-talk-be] JOSM pour tracer les bâtiments

On 2016-10-24 17:26, Sus Verhoeven wrote: 2016-10-24 0:55 GMT+02:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>: On 2016-10-23 20:54, Guy Vanvuchelen

Re: [OSM-talk-be] [Tagging] mapping default values?

On 2016-10-05 11:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2016-10-05 3:35 GMT+02:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>>: > > On 2016-09-27 11:43, Marc Gemis wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> op 1/1/2017 daalt de s

Re: [OSM-talk-be] mapping default values? (was: Maximum snelheid in Vlaanderen, maxspeed in Flanders)

On 2016-09-27 11:43, Marc Gemis wrote: > Hallo, > > op 1/1/2017 daalt de snelheid op Vlaamse gewestwegen van 90 naar 70. > Normaal gezien zullen we die wegen (zonder expliciete borden) dan > moeten taggen met > > maxspeed=70 > source:maxspeed=??:rural > > maar wat komt er op de plaats van de

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Another Nominatim fact

hborhood nodes. > Statistical sectors of course don't always reflect what we would call > neighborhoods (especially in the countryside, or in industrial areas > etc). But in city centers they do tend to reflect what might be used > locally. > (I don't consider this a huge problem myself,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Another Nominatim fact

Hi, That is exactly what I explained several times before (Nominatim's behavior, not that feature). I put it that what that feature does is: if name:ll=* is missing produce an implicit one with the same value as name=*. This means (assuming that name=* always exists), that a browser configured

[OSM-talk-be] using Michelin's road classification (was: Routing in Liège)

in.be/web/Cartes-plans 2016 2016. Kéne afêre à Lîdje and I hope that this work will be useful elsewhere too, Cheers André. (1) As white would not fit for residential, I used grey. I'm surprised indeed that no unclassified roads turn up in blue but that doesn't affect routing. (2) why the heck

[OSM-talk-be] Help starting JOSM on Ubuntu (was; Help! Hoe kan ik deze editeren?)

On 2016-09-13 18:22, Karel Adams wrote: > Allen, > > ... JOSM wil om een of andere duistere reden niet opstarten op mijn > ubuntu-bakske. > Alleen, I can try to help you or anyone start JOSM on Ubuntu if you like. What do you do and what do you see? Cheers André.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing in Liège

On 2016-09-13 18:21, Marc Gemis wrote: > Hallo, > > I was contacted by a mapper from Germany with whom I worked on turn:lanes. > He has to following question, can someone with local knowledge inform > us about the road classifications ? I have the impression a lot of > streets are indeed

Re: [OSM-talk-be] une idée pour mappé les "smart" zone 30? + hazards

On 2016-09-09 08:06, eMerzh wrote: > Hello, > Je suis un peu perdu de savoir comment je mapperai ça :) > > http://www.lalibre.be/regions/bruxelles/bruxelles-les-zones-30-deviennent-intelligentes-57d1d1223570646c923b915d > C'est une bonne chose que de ne plus limiter la vitesse à 30 km/h un 31

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM in French and Dutch [or any monolingual]

On 2016-08-12 10:03, Ruben Maes wrote: > On vrijdag 12 augustus 2016 03:58 André Pirard wrote: >> On 2016-08-11 23:59, Ruben Maes wrote: >>> On donderdag 11 augustus 2016 18:26 André Pirard wrote: >>>> (...) >>>> OSM.org displays the names according to t

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM in French and Dutch [or any monolingual]

On 2016-08-09 11:37, joost schouppe wrote: > Hi, > > Someone asked on Twitter about a rendering of OSM in Dutch and French > to avoid the clutter of bilingual names in the standard rendering. > > https://twitter.com/iciBrussels/status/762743820358418432 > > The French render is easy, OSM France

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM in French and Dutch [or any monolingual]

On 2016-08-09 11:37, joost schouppe wrote: > Hi, > > Someone asked on Twitter about a rendering of OSM in Dutch and French > to avoid the clutter of bilingual names in the standard rendering. > > https://twitter.com/iciBrussels/status/762743820358418432 > > The French render is easy, OSM France

Re: [OSM-talk-be] rendering

On 2016-07-18 21:59, joost schouppe wrote: > Nu het toch suggesties aan het regenen is: QGIS. Met de Openlayers > plugin kan je verschillende stijlen van OSM op de achtergrond > weergeven. De gpx kan je gewoon in het programma slepen. Er zit ook > iets in om prints te maken, maar in de praktijk

Re: [OSM-talk-be] rendering

On 2016-07-18 20:10, Bart Vanherck wrote: Beste mappers, Weet iemand in de groep hier of er ergens een service of een programma bestaat waarmee ik een gpx trace op een openstreetmap layer kan plaatsen. Het doel is om

Re: [OSM-talk-be] WMS layer SPW(Wallonie) PICC disponible dans JOSM est obsolete

On 2016-06-06 02:43, André Pirard wrote: > Please do JOSM>Imagery>Imagery Preferences>Available default > entries>refresh (whirling arrows) and > Activate : BE : SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery > OK > and use the PICC layer as before. Je constate qu'il n'y a pas

Re: [OSM-talk-be] WMS layer SPW(Wallonie) PICC disponible dans JOSM est obsolete

On 2016-06-05 00:51, Erik B wrote: > Les données géographiques SPW PICC disponible comme layer dans JOSM ne > fonctionnent plus. > Message sur Géoportail de la Wallonie : > CETTE DONNÉE EST DÉSACTIVÉE DÉFINITIVEMENT DEPUIS LE 31 MAI 2016 ; > IL N'EST PLUS POSSIBLE

Re: [OSM-talk-be] WMS layer SPW(Wallonie) PICC disponible dans JOSM est obsolete

On 2016-06-05 02:09, André Pirard wrote: On 2016-06-05 00:51, Erik B wrote: Les données géographiques SPW PICC disponible comme layer dans JOSM ne fonctionnent plus. Message sur Géoportail de la

Re: [OSM-talk-be] WMS layer SPW(Wallonie) PICC disponible dans JOSM est obsolete

On 2016-06-05 00:51, Erik B wrote: Les données géographiques SPW PICC disponible comme layer dans JOSM ne fonctionnent plus. Message sur Géoportail de la Wallonie : CETTE DONNÉE  EST DÉSACTIVÉE DÉFINITIVEMENT DEPUIS LE 31 MAI 2016 ;

[OSM-talk-be] Nice OSM POI maps for © lovers

Example . Not all walks are signposted. But who cares, with a GPS and a map? Also see Leaflet. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Using SPW PICC layer in josm

On 2016-02-26 15:23, Thib wrote: > Hi, > > SPW PICC tiles layer is available in JOSM for mapping Belgian Southern > area but I can't find enough information about the license terms. > > Is it allowed to : > - copy (doing"calc") buildings and other objects boundaries (as we do > with bing tiles) >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Changes to Belgian-Dutch Border

On 2016-01-04 20:41, Marc Gemis wrote: > Found an article on De Redactie (Dutch): > http://deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/binnenland/1.1773332 For better French than La Belgique se correctif zéro Pays-Bas

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Erreur dans la base de donnée

On 2016-01-03 21:34, lionel bulpa wrote: > Bonjour, > > Alors là je comprends plus rien, effectivement tout est là, pourtant > j'ai regardé 4-5 fois aujourd’hui et les données ne se sont jamais > affichées. Je n'y comprends plus rien. Enfin bref, le principal est > que les informations soient là.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Strange nice map

ew how to boost a site up in Google's order. > I like the colours and general appearance, but streetnames are not > optimal. > > Regards, > Gerard > > André Pirard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have been very surprised to find this >> <http://fast_food.cart

[OSM-talk-be] Strange nice map

Hi, I have been very surprised to find this

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IGN/NGI/NGI/NGI too now using OpenStreetMap

015-11-11 18:25 GMT+01:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>>: On 2015-09-06 23:54, Nicolas Pettiaux wrote : Dear In March, I have met the directeur général adjoint of IGN during a meeting about GIS in Belgium where I represente

Re: [OSM-talk-be] WMTS and JOSM

On 2015-12-07 00:34, Jo wrote : > Thank you André. I hadn't been able to get WMTS configured yet, > probably because of that reason. The fix should be in the latest snapshot already for any eagerness to know. > > Cheers, > > Jo > > 2015-12-06 23:17 GMT+01:00 André Pirard &

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rise of the voetwegen

On 2015-12-02 21:35, Jo wrote : > It seems like a way to prove that Google Translate is not quite up to > spec... It is indeed one reason that you should know: Google does not help understanding such messages, possibly because of turns of phrases. When I was an OSM newbie, although I fairly know

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rise of the voetwegen

On 2015-12-04 08:13, joost schouppe wrote : > > I don't think it's realistic to ask everyone to translate into the > three languages. It is too much work, but also: I'm not sure anyone > would understand my French :) > > There is no perfect solution as some of us are monolingual. But I > think

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rise of the voetwegen

On 2015-12-02 14:43, Glenn Plas wrote : > Hi, > > Effe korte peer check: Ik zie veel voetwegen verschijnen in de buurt, > op zich super natuurlijk maar ik begin een wildgroei aan tags te zien > voor dezelfde voetweg per segment. Het is een zootje aan het worden met > footways die overgaan naar

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New UrbIS presets for Bruno and everybody

On 2015-11-26 10:07, Sander Deryckere wrote : > Do we really need these old URBIS urls? What use are they for regular > mappers (in contrast to people interested in recent history of a > region)? IMO they would clutter the list. Old versions of aerial photos are often very interesting when

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New UrbIS presets for Bruno and everybody

Hi, For a test, I'd like a few streets of Urbis where the houses are still to map (with number). I may erase tags, do my test and not save the result, of course. But I prefer to be useful as well. Does that exist? Cheers André. ___ Talk-be mailing

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New UrbIS presets for Bruno and everybody

On 2015-11-24 12:37, Bruno Veyckemans wrote : > Hi all, > > I became an enthusiastic OSM mapper following Julien Fastré's > presentation at Foss4G BE last month, and now have big projects to map > all I can in Brussels. > > I focus on using Overpass / PHP to create listings and see what's >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] New UrbIS presets for Bruno and everybody

es in and around Brussels. It's nice for > double checking from a different perspective. > > Cheers, > > Polyglot > > 2015-11-25 23:48 GMT+01:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>>: > > On 2015-11-24 12:37, Br

Re: [OSM-talk-be] UrbIS aerial pictures for Brussels on OSM - Vues aériennes UrbIS 2015 sur OSM

On 2015-11-24 22:11, Julien Fastré wrote : ... Add the URL [1] in the required field, and click on "get the layers". You will see all the layer available ! Choose your layer and give him a name. On 2015-11-24 22:19, Julien Fastré wrote :

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Packaging Urbis ortho by default in JOSM

On 2015-11-24 22:19, Julien Fastré wrote : > Hi, > > I have read a message from Polyglot some months ago about adding some > WMS services by default in JOSM. You may also have read that, when the reprojection SPW bug was solved, I added their servers (photos and PICC). Since then, everything that

Re: [OSM-talk-be] UrbIS aerial pictures for Brussels on OSM - Vues aériennes UrbIS 2015 sur OSM

On 2015-11-25 00:12, André Pirard wrote : > On 2015-11-24 22:11, Julien Fastré wrote : >> ... >> >> Add the URL [1] in the required field, and click on "get the layers". >> You will see all the layer available ! >> >> Choose your layer and give h

[OSM-talk-be] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

Hi, OpenstreetMap often extends friendliness by humanitarian tagging. In this case of desolation, there is little to tag. Little... Wikipedia have been extremely fast in all languages !!! After some mourning period, the note below may

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Friendliness with attacked mapped places in Paris

our own cause, which > too many people are already doing. I don't feel like that at all. There is no boasting. Would you suppress humanitarian tagging about which there is much boasting? Cheers André. > Regards > Ruben > > > Saturday 14 November 2015 17:14:57, André Pir

[OSM-talk-be] Does Google lack data?

Hi, I've been surprised when Searching Google for Щорса Кричев to find the result Остановка - Щорса - Кричев - WikiRoutes.info which is a map containing

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IGN/NGI/NGI/NGI too now using OpenStreetMap

the PICC bug that I have asked 5 years ago (and that was being laughed at), we can now redo with JOSM with a 20cm precision much of the work that was made over 5 years with a 2 to 5 m error and more with other editors. Cheers André. > > Best regards, > > Nicolas > > Le dim 6 sep 20

Re: [OSM-talk-be] IGN/NGI/NGI/NGI too now using OpenStreetMap

with a 250m shift in Banneux. The IGN/NGI is a most important source of information indeed. Thanks. Keep us informed. Cheers André. > > Best regards, > > Nicolas > > Le dim 6 sep 2015 à 21:45, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> a > écrit : >> Hi, >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] What is "The Smart Box" ?

On 26-09-15 11:41, Marc Gemis wrote: > thanks > > since it is a "personal" device there is no need to map it imho. No more than "personal" houses and their surrounding ;-) In fact, it is a a kind of private letterbox. BTW, it must be fun to use a 40×40 red letterbox (without a horn) as one's own

[OSM-talk-be] For Jo

For Jo . André. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk-be] For Jo

For Jo. André. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] IGN/NGI/NGI/NGI too now using OpenStreetMap

Hi, In their now official Cartesius project , IGN/NGI/NGI/NGI et al. too are now using OpenStreetMap (click Basemap). It would have been surprising that NGI did not display the OSM © notice ;-)

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Relaties aanpassen

On 2015-08-26 22:02, Tom Lauwereins wrote : Hoi Ik zou enkele relaties moeten aanpassen (wijzigingen in fietsknoopuntennetwerk en fietsroutes) Kan iemand me zeggen wat de makelijkste manier is om dit te doen. Waar vind ik ergens een handleiding. Ik heb een beetje schrik dat ik de hele

Re: [OSM-talk-be] missing affiliation on BIPT website

On 2015-08-27 07:26, Nicolas Pettiaux wrote : Thanks Olivier for letting us know I know personnally a member of the board of IPBT (Charles Cuvelliez, see http://www.bipt.be/fr/operateurs/ibpt/le-conseil) whom I can contact on behalf of the OSM-be community to say something like We appreciate

Re: [OSM-talk-be] POIs

to try and use the servers with a fallback system. If one doesn't answer, try another. Jo 2015-07-27 18:47 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: On 2015-07-25 22:01, Marc Zoutendijk wrote : Recently OSMF asked for money to support

Re: [OSM-talk-be] POIs

On 2015-07-25 22:01, Marc Zoutendijk wrote : Recently OSMF asked for money to support their servers and within short time they collected that money from the community.[1] Don't you think that if a service (like overpass) is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] POIs

Hi, My point was that, in this civilization, people are perfectly happy with many bad links in Wikipedia or elsewhere. (I, personally, would run a program to check them) Now, if you want to digress... On 2015-07-24 21:32, Ruben Maes wrote : Op vrijdag 24 juli 2015 heeft André Pirard a.pirard.pa

Re: [OSM-talk-be] POIs

On 2015-07-25 22:01, Marc Zoutendijk wrote : I am the developper of openpoimap, And I congratulate you deeply. Myself and on behalf of all the non-OSM computer geeks that I let know OPM. All replied that they are amazed and in

Re: [OSM-talk-be] POIs

On 2015-07-24 10:08, Marc Gemis wrote : On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:58 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote: May I recall another approach that I presented as a way for OSM.be to make money. For each customer or usage, a POI list is built

Re: [OSM-talk-be] POIs

On 2015-07-24 08:55, Marc Zoutendijk wrote : Op 24 jul. 2015, om 07:16 heeft Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: Joost Schouppe heeft eventjes een vergelijking gemaakt voor Antwerpen: slechts 37 van de 294 bakkers zouden gemapped zijn. Dus als POIs je ding zijn, dan

Re: [OSM-talk-be] POIs

On 2015-07-24 12:04, Marc Gemis wrote : Are you On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:47 AM, André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com wrote: The URLs are not stable either, so you can't

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Someone a idea when the cycling map is renderd

On 2015-07-12 09:49, Jakka wrote : Hi, Someone a idea when the cycling map is renderd, had to change/move two "knooppunten" 91 79 wrong places and adapt there relations? Do not want to lose contact with person who show the mistake.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Josm: aerial images as layer

On 2015-06-21 10:32, Jakka wrote : Are these links/image layers automatic update? I suppose you speak of new map versions on the servers. ... Wallonie part Geoservices Wallonie aerial imagery

Re: [OSM-talk-be] SPW PICC 2000 map on JOSM (not 2000)

) are free for copying to OSM? PICC is about the same as the Flemish AGIV GRB map but the building shapes on that map may not be copied. Regards, Erik Op 23-05-15 om 18:14 schreef André Pirard: On 2015-05-15 15:13, Nicolas Pettiaux wrote : Dear all, I want to learn how to use JOSM

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Wallonie picarde à vélo / ODBL compatible ?

On 2015-05-26 23:13, Matthieu Gaillet wrote : I'm currently busy mapping a huge cycling network in Wallonie Picarde http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4128428. ... — Ma question est la suivante : J’ai immédiatement demandé et obtenu l’autorisation d’intégrer les données du réseau sous

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Wallonie picarde à vélo / ODBL compatible ?

On 2015-05-29 15:50, Marc Gemis wrote : 2015-05-29 11:53 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: BTW, using registered letters makes me laugh. One may claim that the envelope was empty. totally of topic, Not off topic. It was part

[OSM-talk-be] For OSM copyright enforcers: strangest map yet

Hi, I stumbled on this map http://www.balnam.be/boninne/sentier/21. They've got the Google Pegman, markers, zoom bar and logo. They've got a Google Terms of Use https://www.google.com/intl/en_US/help/terms_maps.html. But, gulp, the map is OSM (what I've just mapped, looked like an echo ;-) ) In

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Osmand en JOSM

the GPX file? What does JOSM when you load the file? Maybe the shortest path is to send me privately a GPX file that doesn't load. I'll try to load it and try the figure the difference with what you do. Cheers André. Guy Vanvuchelen *Van:*André Pirard [mailto:a.pirard.pa

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Osmand en JOSM

Vanvuchelen *Van:*André Pirard [mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com] *Verzonden:* vrijdag 15 mei 2015 12:29 *Aan:* OpenStreetMap Belgium *CC:* Guy Vanvuchelen *Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-be] Osmand en JOSM On 2015-05-15 08:21, Guy Vanvuchelen wrote : I am using: Smartphone Sony

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Osmand en JOSM

On 2015-05-14 17:28, Guy Vanvuchelen wrote : Sinds enkele dagen kan ik een GPX bestand dat gemaakt werd met Osmand niet meer rechtstreeks inladen in JOSM. Vroeger lukte dat wel. Als ik op de website http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/convert_input het GPX bestand inlees en terug bewaar als GPX

  1   2   3   >