How-do-you-do,
Januk posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
J> Go into the shortcut Properties and add /NOLOGO to the end of the
J> command line. TB loads a little quicker, and it seems to have stopped
J> the freezes on my computer. I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
Althou
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 20:10:24 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 15, 2000, 11:10:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 at 21:15:52 GMT + (which was 1:15 PM
> where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] t
Hi Simon,
On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 at 21:15:52 GMT + (which was 1:15 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> How-do-you-do,
> I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
> I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
Saturday, March 11, 2000, 8:33:05 PM, tracer wrote in response to my
asking:
>> Can Atguard and ZoneAlarm run concurrently?
t> Douglas, the answer is YES, BUT And to avoid reviving a dead
t> horse...ask me off line!!
t> tracer
A dead horse carries no
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:27:26 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, March 12, 2000, 4:27:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Can Atguard and ZoneAlarm run concurrently?
> Douglas
Douglas, the answer is YES, BUT
And to avoid reviving a dead horse.
Hello Simon,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:55:58 + GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, March 11, 2000, 10:55:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
> Marck D. Pearlstone posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
MDP>> Please take this interestin
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 07:17:31 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, March 11, 2000, 8:17:31 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> It didn't go far. There are still url's around for it - I'll see if I
> can find one for you tonight.
I did post the link
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:44:38 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, March 11, 2000, 3:44:38 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> The misunderstanding was related to whether @tGuard can cause problems
> while constantly disabled - no one has run that d
Guys,
I don't want to come across as whining, but I'm having a hard time
determining how this thread is in any way, shape, or form related to
TheBat! Isn't this something that would be better discussed off
topic? Personally, I signed up for this mailing list to discuss the
bat. Not you guys cust
Hello Simon,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 21:18:03 + GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, March 11, 2000, 4:18:03 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
>some of my customers do actually phone me back ;-)
Normally to tell you it still doesnt work (g).
I rarely get a guy calling me he is ha
Hello Dennis & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, March 10, 2000, 12:14:36 PM, Dennis wrote in response what he
thought was my saying something that Simon said:
DWG> Hello Douglas,
DWG> Thursday, March 09, 2000, you wrote:
S>>> I use other stuff now. There is a choice: Lockdown2000, Signal9's
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 03:39:56PM +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Please take this interesting but now wy off-topic and
> getting-very-lengthy discussion off list. The horse died a while back
> (from the TB perspective).
What, a discussion that I was never involved in g
Hallo Douglas,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 06:53:24 -0600 GMT (11.03.2000, 20:53 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH> I didn't install it to have it constantly disabled. I installed it for
DH> those rare times that I need to visit a questionable website. (Some
DH> websites do things other than what you
Hello Douglas,
Saturday, March 11, 2000, 2:17:31 PM, you wrote:
IS>> I agree with tracer that a firewall should not be started/stopped
IS>> continuously.
DH> I didn't catch that. Reason(s)?
Windows leaks. The more applications you start the more times, the
sooner you are forced to reboot.
IS>
How-do-you-do,
Marck D. Pearlstone posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
MDP> Please take this interesting but now wy off-topic and
MDP> getting-very-lengthy discussion off list. The horse died a while back
MDP> (from the TB perspective).
I'm afraid the '
Hi Simon and Tracer,
On 10 March 2000 at 21:18:03 GMT + (which was 21:18 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
t>> I think my number of systems is a bit larger...
S> Well I was actually referring to my home/office Network actually,
S> not my customer base.
[snip]
Hello Woofie & all fellow TBUDL members,
Saturday, March 11, 2000, 5:26:00 AM, Woofie wrote in response to my saying:
DH The only problems I ever get are the "no canvas handle"...
W> I have got that prob with other software, such as Homesite 4.5, when I
W> was running the latest Eudora Pro
Hello István & all fellow TBUDL members,
Saturday, March 11, 2000, 5:35:04 AM, István wrote in response to the
AtGuard issue:
IS> I have tested a number of firewalls (Conseal, ZoneAlarm among them)
IS> and AtGuard beats them all.
IS> It is certainly not for the average user but the control it
Hello Thomas & all fellow TBUDL members,
Saturday, March 11, 2000, 3:10:31 AM, Thomas wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> The misunderstanding was related to whether @tGuard can cause problems
DH>> while constantly disabled - no one has run that down for me.
TF> But it really beats me why you
Chiming in a bit late in the thread, but nevertheless:
I have tested a number of firewalls (Conseal, ZoneAlarm among them)
and AtGuard beats them all.
It is certainly not for the average user but the control it gives over
what to block and what to pass is next to perfect.
Initially I tried star
Hello Douglas,
Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:43:02 AM, you wrote:
DH> Hello Simon & all fellow TBUDL members,
DH> Thursday, March 09, 2000, 3:50:41 PM, Simon wrote in response to my saying:
DH>>> The only problems I ever get are the "no canvas handle"...
Folks,
I have got that prob with other s
Hallo Douglas,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:44:38 -0600 GMT (11.03.2000, 16:44 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH> The misunderstanding was related to whether @tGuard can cause problems
DH> while constantly disabled - no one has run that down for me.
While I don't know AtGuard, I have been following
Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, March 10, 2000, 6:39:25 PM, tracer wrote in response to my saying:
>> Tracer kindly and unselfishly helped me retrieve a good part of my
>> email out of Calypso. Also, since the fools at Calypso blamed my
>> windows and insisted that I install ea
Hello Nick,
Well, I don't wanna get on an off-topic discussion.. other than to
say, I admin well over 200 boxes, all running win2k, office2K, and
I.E. 5.0 and simply don't encounter these problems.. Perhaps it is
other software that is interactingbadly.. with I.E?
Best regards,
Justin D. Pa
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:14:13 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 10:14:13 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Tracer kindly and unselfishly helped me retrieve a good part of my
> email out of Calypso. Also, since the fools at Calyps
How-do-you-do,
tracer posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
t> I think my number of systems is a bit larger...
Well I was actually referring to my home/office Network actually, not my
customer base.
t> I see thousands per year...
un-don extended codpiece.
t> In additi
Hello Simon,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:50:19 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 7:50:19 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
> Tracer, tracer, tracer! What ARE you talking about?
> First, not one IE5 upgrade that I have installed has ever knackered
Hello Allie Martin,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:34:25 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 10:34:25 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:50:19 +, Simon wrote:
> ** snip **
>> I have to say that the problem occurs MORE frequently with
On Friday, March 10, 2000, 10:24:16 AM, Simon wrote:
NA>> use SFC to go DLL by DLL and restore the original versions.
> I take it you are aware of the 'glitch' in System File Checker on Win9x
> systems?
> http://www.bigfix.com/website/maintech.html#SFC has more info
> (problem affects more PC
How-do-you-do,
Nick Andriash posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
NA> use SFC to go DLL by DLL and restore the original versions.
I take it you are aware of the 'glitch' in System File Checker on Win9x
systems?
http://www.bigfix.com/website/maintech.html#SFC has more inf
How-do-you-do,
Dennis W. Greer posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DWG> I use ZoneAlarm. It is good. The only thing I don't like about it
DWG> is that it does not keep an log of what it has done.
I found that a bind also. Steve Gibson's site gives mention of a p
On Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:59:46 AM, Simon wrote:
> If you think what I say stinks or has offended you, you can always email me
> @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] anytime. V
Not at all Simon.
NA>> Opera and haven't touched IE in 6 months.
> The last time I tried Opera it was rather a pain. It was a while
Hello Douglas,
Thursday, March 09, 2000, you wrote:
S>> I use other stuff now. There is a choice: Lockdown2000, Signal9's
S>> PC Firewall, and ZoneAlarm. ZoneAlarm is free from
I use ZoneAlarm. It is good. The only thing I don't like about it
is that it does not keep an log of what it
How-do-you-do,
Now before I start. I'm not in any way trying to cause an argument, or be
antagonistic, or upset anyone :) <- happy to be a TBUDL subscriber. I've
emailed tracer off list just to make certain there is no misunderstanding.
If you think what I say stinks or has offended you, you ca
Hello Allie Martin,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:18:08 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 7:18:08 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:40:21 +0700, tracer wrote:
>> you should never upgrade ie's in windows.
> Hmmm. I've never ha
Hello Justin D. Paine,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 03:23:23 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 6:23:23 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Justin D. Paine wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> You are advising someone to not upgrade? You would prefer to have all
> sorts of security problems, bugs
How-do-you-do,
Allie Martin posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
AM> ... Oh, I forgot to answer these parts. On comparing the contents
AM> ...
AM> [-] Fixed potential vulnerability of 'X-Bat-Files:'.
I checked this out earlier and it is sure enough fixed. Tried ever
On Friday, March 10, 2000, 3:23:23 AM, Justin D. Paine wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> You are advising someone to not upgrade? You would prefer to have all
> sorts of security problems, bugs, etc? I have used win95, win98, nt4,
> win2k, and have NEVER had the I.E. update corrupt my system..
Justin, y
Hello all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:52:52 AM, Allie & Thomas wrote in response
to my saying:
>> On that score, since I'm still using TB! 1.39 and v 1.41 just came
>> out, what's the download url for that, and can I download just the .exe
>> file or are there .dlls that ne
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:14:13 -0600, Douglas Hinds wrote:
** snip **
> On that score, since I'm still using TB! 1.39 and v 1.41 just came
> out, what's the download url for that, and can I download just the .exe
> file or are there .dlls that need changing also, and more importantly,
> is this up
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:50:19 +, Simon wrote:
** snip **
> I have to say that the problem occurs MORE frequently with people that have
> it installed but disabled at startup. I found that the problem was less
> severe when @Guard was run at startup and left running all the time. The
> chances
Hello Simon & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, March 10, 2000, 6:50:19 AM, Simon wrote in response to:
S> And as for yer man Douglas's probs. 1) I'm afraid I was not party
S> to his setup as you seem to be.
I came to TB! in Sept. of last year as a Calypso refugee, which blew
up after a simple
How-do-you-do,
Tracer, tracer, tracer! What ARE you talking about?
First, not one IE5 upgrade that I have installed has ever knackered any of
my Windows installations - any of the 5 PCs on my LAN. Frankly, not
upgrading to fix bugs is not a consideration at all. Bug updates, and
security holes n
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:40:21 +0700, tracer wrote:
> you should never upgrade ie's in windows.
Hmmm. I've never had or seen a problem.
> if you get a corrupted system you cannot uninstall the thing and on
> installing from DOS out of windows you are guaranteed sure to get
> registry corr
Hello tracer,
You are advising someone to not upgrade? You would prefer to have all
sorts of security problems, bugs, etc? I have used win95, win98, nt4,
win2k, and have NEVER had the I.E. update corrupt my system..
Best regards,
Justin D. Paine
Windows NT 5.0 Build:2195
Friday, March 10, 2000
Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, March 10, 2000, 3:44:46 AM, tracer wrote in response to my saying:
DH This happens when resources are low and the screen redraws very
DH slowly. Often shutting down TB! helps postpone my rebooting a
DH bit, if I delete the .tmp before
Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
Friday, March 10, 2000, 2:30:48 AM, tracer wrote in response to my saying:
DH>>> Clue? You mean an anti-virus application?
DH>>> I have at guard installed but it's usually disabled.
t> At guard is not an antivirus...
Simon had mentioned "a certain 's
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 22:35:34 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 11:35:34 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Hello Simon & all fellow TBUDL members,
> Thursday, March 09, 2000, 8:35:17 PM, Simon wrote in response to my saying:
DH>
Hello Simon,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:25:25 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 2:25:25 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
> Justin D. Paine posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
JDP>> Why not run I.E. as a seperate process?
>
Hello Simon,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 02:35:17 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:35:17 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
> Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH>> Clue? You mean an anti-virus application?
DH
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:17:55 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 9:17:55 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
> On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:43:02 -0600GMT (10/03/2000, 09:43 +0800GMT),
> Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH>> Clue? Y
Hello Simon & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, March 09, 2000, 8:35:17 PM, Simon wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> I have at guard installed but it's usually disabled. This happens
DH>> when resources are low and the screen redraws very slowly. Often
DH>> shutting down TB! helps postpone
Hello Thomas & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, March 09, 2000, 8:17:55 PM, Thomas wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> You mean an anti-virus application? I have at guard installed
DH>> but it's usually disabled.
TF> Now that's pretty fatalistic. Just today I got the old Pretty Park
TF> vi
How-do-you-do,
Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH> Clue? You mean an anti-virus application?
DH> I have at guard installed
DH> but it's usually disabled. this happens when resources are low and the
DH> screen redraws very slowly. Often shutting down TB! h
Hi Douglas,
On Thu, 09 Mar 2000 19:43:02 -0600GMT (10/03/2000, 09:43 +0800GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
DH> Clue? You mean an anti-virus application? I have at guard installed
DH> but it's usually disabled.
Now that's pretty fatalistic. Just today I got the old Pretty Park
virus again in an email.
Hello Simon & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, March 09, 2000, 3:50:41 PM, Simon wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> The only problems I ever get are the "no canvas handle"...
S> Funny that. There is a certain 'security' app that I know of causes
S> this very same error in TB! if configure
How-do-you-do,
Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH> The only problems I ever get are the "no canvas handle"...
Funny that. There is a certain 'security' app that I know of causes this very same
error in TB! if configured incorrectly when TB! is running al
How-do-you-do,
Justin D. Paine posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
JDP> Why not run I.E. as a seperate process?
Well this was in fact what I was doing until I last upgraded IE 5 to IE 5.1.
The setting I remember was under the advanced tab of Internet Options, but
to my di
Hello Simon,
Why not run I.E. as a seperate process?
Best regards,
Justin D. Paine
S> How-do-you-do,
S> UN-BE-LIEVable There I was mouthin' on about how I was sooo bleedin'
S> clever earlier, and just as I closed an open browser window, it hung. Used
S> PV2K process killer to kill the pr
How-do-you-do,
UN-BE-LIEVable There I was mouthin' on about how I was sooo bleedin'
clever earlier, and just as I closed an open browser window, it hung. Used
PV2K process killer to kill the process but all open windows were children
of main browser process so killed them all too...and then t
How-do-you-do,
Marck D. Pearlstone posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
>>> Sadly, windoze won't do that reliably :-(((. It needs a reboot at
>>> least three times weekly to remain stable.
Yes, I agree wholeheartedly with your comment 99% of the time.
However, I hav
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
Responding to your article on Thursday, March 09, 2000 at 09:39:09 GMT
+ (which was 09/03/2000 16:39 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
SH>> As far as I can remember, NT under DEC alpha very stable and run
SH>> more faster than on Intel base (especially if RAM 64 MB or
Hi Syafril,
On 09 March 2000 at 09:23:23 GMT +0700 (which was 02:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>>> Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)
AM>> OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to do
AM>> with VMS development
Hello Allie Martin,
Responding to your article on Thursday, March 09, 2000 at 20:55:17 GMT
-0500 (which was 09/03/2000 8:55 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
>> Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)
AM> OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to do with
AM
If I remember correctly. There was once was a guy named Dave Cutler who
was the architect for Digital's OS - VMS (right?) - MS hired him to
architect Windows NT.
Jay
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Allie Martin wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:50:24 +0700, tracer wrote:
> > Now I wonder if someone will ask
Hi Marck,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 12:30:20 +GMT (08/03/2000, 20:30 +0800GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
S>> (which will be possible soon here in UK with latest news of FREE
S>> unmetered access from April 17th...about time n'all)
MDP> I've been noticing stuff about that recently - please can y
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:50:24 +0700, tracer wrote:
> Now I wonder if someone will ask what NT has to do with VMS (g)
OK. The man (I forgot his name) who designed NT had a lot to
do with VMS development as well, and because of this the design of
both OS's share striking similarities? :)
--
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 00:32:45 + GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, March 09, 2000, 7:32:45 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Sadly that does not concur with my experience of NT, which does
> outlast Win9x in the stay-alive stak
Hi John,
On 08 March 2000 at 08:23:37 GMT +0900 (which was 23:23 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>>> Of course, you could always load Windows, then TB! and leave
>>> running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...
>> Sadly, windoze won't do that reliably :-(((. It need
"Marck D. Pearlstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>S> Of course, you could always load Windows, then TB! and leave
>S> running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...
>
>Sadly, windoze won't do that reliably :-(((. It needs a reboot at
>least three times weekly to remain stable.
True of Win9x, but
Hello Simon & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 10:41:16 AM, Simon wrote:
S> Perhaps I should dig out and install an old 486 processor again.
S> That way I wouldn't be able to launch 2 or 3 apps in the space of
S> about 1 sec! That might cure it ;-)
Now that you mention it,
Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 4:24:29 AM, tracer wrote in response to my saying:
>> I just shut down TB! 1.39 and while it reopened, I opened EccoPro
>> with no problems, under an early Win95. Is the version of windows
>> likely to figure in this problem?
How-do-you-do,
Christopher J. Trybowski posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following
comments:
CJT> just remember not to run anything after TB is launched (till at least
CJT> parts of its window appear).
Yeah, that was the bit I was forgetting. I usually leave TB! running, but on
the odd
Hello Simon,
On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 you wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
How do you do!
> I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
> I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
> launches at the same time the connection is opened. I
Hi Simon,
On 08 March 2000 at 12:01:51 GMT + (which was 12:01 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
S> Of course, you could always load Windows, then TB! and leave
S> running 24/7/365, ad infinitum...
Sadly, windoze won't do that reliably :-(((. It need
How-do-you-do,
Marck D. Pearlstone posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
MDP> This is what I do, having a shortcut to "startup.bat" in my startup
MDP> folder.
Yes, this is what I figured. I was using Robert Simpson's 'NetLaunch' to
load and shut down TB! (as well as ever
Hi tracer,
On 08 March 2000 at 17:21:39 GMT +0700 (which was 10:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>>> Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my
>>> system. Sure... Its easy to do as well or to forget it and then
>>> nothing helps excep
Hello Listmembers,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 at 10:11:09 [GMT +] Simon wrote:
> I am running TB! on Windows 98 SE 4.10 A. What about the rest of
> you?
I never had Win98 on one of my systems after I installed it once at
customer's site. Concerning Win NT4 -> W2000 Pro, TB never cause
Hello Simon,
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000 10:11:09 + GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 5:11:09 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
> Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH>> Is the version of windows likely to figure
Hello Douglas Hinds,
On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:40:41 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 1:40:41 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Douglas Hinds wrote:
> Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
> Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 6:32:48 PM, tracer wrote:
t>> Openning another prog
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 19:09:26 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 10:09:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 at 07:32:48 GMT +0700 (which was 4:32 PM
> where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTE
How-do-you-do,
Douglas Hinds posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
DH> Is the version of windows likely to figure in this problem?
May very well be, but there again...
I am running TB! on Windows 98 SE 4.10 A. What about the rest of you?
Slán anois,
Simon sen
Hello tracer & all fellow TBUDL members,
Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 6:32:48 PM, tracer wrote:
t> Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my
t> system. Sure... Its easy to do as well or to forget it and then
t> nothing helps except a restart
I just shut it down TB! 1.39 and wh
Hello tracer,
On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 at 07:32:48 GMT +0700 (which was 4:32 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my system.
> Sure...
> Its easy to do as well or to forget it and then nothing helps except
> a restart
It
How-do-you-do,
tracer posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments:
t> Its easy to do as well or to forget it and then nothing helps except
t> a restart
Yeah, same here; then causes a total lockup. A restart is the only way to
defrost Windows once deep frozen by TB! :-(
Slán a
Hello Simon,
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 21:15:52 + GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 4:15:52 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Simon wrote:
> How-do-you-do,
> I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
> I launch it just as I make a connection to
Hello Simon,
March 07, 2000, 4:15:52 PM, you wrote:
S> How-do-you-do,
S> I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
S> I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
S> launches at the same time the connection is opened. If I wait 3
How-do-you-do,
I have noticed that TB! very occasionally seems to freeze with Windows when
I launch it just as I make a connection to the Net. It is always just as TB!
launches at the same time the connection is opened. If I wait 3 secs (after
ICMP & UDP packets finish broadcasting) I do not seem
88 matches
Mail list logo
