[videoblogging] High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
Hi, Anybody have any tips for creating high quality flash for export to blip? I went to the learning place on blip and they said to export in native resolution, but my export resolution from final cut is listed at 720x480 which would be OK, but it's 16:9 footage. I've tried this before

Re: [videoblogging] High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread Roxanne Darling
We use Visual Hub software - it is very fast encoding and does a darn good job. It is for the mac. Rox On Feb 12, 2008 10:00 PM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Anybody have any tips for creating high quality flash for export to blip? I went to the learning place on blip and they

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On Feb 12, 2008 10:44 PM, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your words are golden Bill. Only good content is king, rather than just any content. Just because content is created doesn't mean it's worth watching. On another note though, I am surprised that none of the

[videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
In what way is flash-deluvered video not really video? Surely its one of the few methods that gives advertisers creators the necessary control? If adverts are delivered based on RSS playlists, then someone like me who despises adverts, will have a lot easier time stripping the pollution of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Flash-delivered video (as you call it) is a *video player*. And thus is not video. I.e., Flash-delivered video is similar to the Windows Media Player, the QuickTime Player, VLC. (It's basically a Flash-based video player... similar to a Java-applet based video player.) But it is not video.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
Oh yea, me too! That software ROX! Thanks for the tip Rox. Very nice app there, for sure. Now I have to go back and rethink just about everything. iTunes won't take that FLV file will they? How do I go about putting multiple files out? Got to sleep... marathon... SEO work for the last couple

[videoblogging] Re: High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread Bill Cammack
Me Too. VisualHub. Bill Cammack http://BillCammack.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Roxanne Darling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We use Visual Hub software - it is very fast encoding and does a darn good job. It is for the mac. Rox On Feb 12, 2008 10:00 PM, Ron Watson [EMAIL

[videoblogging] Re: High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = iTunes won't take that FLV file will they? iTunes is all mp4, isn't it? Chris

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread Tim Street
Hey Renat, I wish I could say that everything you talk about was easy to do and that we could just flip a switch and have it all be perfect and work for every independent producer - but that's just not the way it is. There are a few of us that are trying to make several of those things you

[videoblogging] HD quality on YouTube

2008-02-13 Thread Jake Ludington
This link is NSFW, but anybody have any ideas how to get higher bitrate encodes out of YouTube. The video quality is amazing compared to everything else on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/nudisthdtvcom Jake Ludington http://www.jakeludington.com [Non-text portions of this

[videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Well I suppose my point is about what apps the viewers are using to consume the feed. Non-browser video aggregators would need to be specially designed to support feeds with adverts in them, and if its done with open standards, its fairly trivial for people to use non-compliant aggregators

[videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Tim Street
Officials Step Up Net-Neutrality Efforts Here's an update from the Wall Street Journal http://tinyurl.com/3dzjbr Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com [Non-text portions of this message

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread David Meade
that url doesnt work for me. On Feb 13, 2008 11:39 AM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Officials Step Up Net-Neutrality Efforts Here's an update from the Wall Street Journal http://tinyurl.com/3dzjbr Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Tim Street
Sorry about that. Try this one: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120286741569864053.html Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV Subscribe for FREE @ http://frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MyBlog http://1timstreet.com On Feb 13, 2008, at 8:43 AM, David Meade wrote: that url doesnt

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Richard H. Hall
This is great! Go Markey! He's clearly a champion of independent content creators (IMHO) ... Richard On Feb 13, 2008 10:49 AM, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry about that. Try this one: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120286741569864053.html Tim Street Creator/Executive

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Although I haven't tested it myself yet, with iTunes you can already do playlists with SMIL embed inside of QuickTime files. (I.e., with SMILtext.) With Miro... it uses XiphQT. And XiphQT supports XSPF. And XSPF is a playlist format. So both iTunes and Miro already support playlists! As far

Re: [videoblogging] HD quality on YouTube

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
I've heard that you can actually upload a video in flash format and it won't get transcoded. It'll maintain whatever quality in which it was uploaded. On Feb 13, 2008 11:19 AM, Jake Ludington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This link is NSFW, but anybody have any ideas how to get higher bitrate

Re: [videoblogging] Verizon... Old News but frustrating...

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
Sounds like you're well within their terms of use. Could it be your location? I would speak to my neighbors to find out if they're getting more reliable connections from different providers. On Feb 12, 2008 10:33 AM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.wireless-weblog.com/50226711/

Re: [videoblogging] Blip Pro Account

2008-02-13 Thread Charles HOPE
At http://blip.tv/prefs there should be a retry button next to the video in question. And you can get faster responses from us if you e-mail us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! Sheldon Pineo wrote: Ok, I bit the bullet and bought a pro account. Now, how do I re-encode a video. Episode 30

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
Internet traffic has double in the last two years and bandwidth usage has increased by 40% each year. Why allow companies to charge for usage, manage traffic, and invest in new technology when you can kill competition and force the entire internet to slow down because of 5% of users? The creator

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Richard H. Hall
One thing. When I said that some court somewhere ruled that cable/dsl were not subject to common carrier rules, the truth is the FCC made that ruling, not any court. ... richard On Feb 13, 2008 12:54 PM, Richard H. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pat, I believe you're absolutely correct that

[videoblogging] Re: Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Interesting article for sure :) All my mesages on this subject have really been about trying to untangle multiple issues that come under the 'net neutrality' banner. My attitude is probably shaped by the fact that traffic shaping, bandwidth limits, and such like, are not new to the UK. One

[videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread influxxmedia
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL hotspots in the video is also essential for product placement for new tab opening when the end-user clicks on it. What are your thoughts on this? This will be the future of web video for sure. Adobe Media

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
It doesn't make very much sense to me. There's plenty more room in the ground for wire, more space for newfangled telephone poles carrying broadband, and more radio spectrum. Using this seems a lot more fair to me than to have the first company pay for all the infrastructure and then

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles HOPE
Richard H. Hall wrote: About network neutrality and competition. First, of course, if everyone has a fair playing field within the network (like a phone call from me to you, gets the same priority as a phone call from one ATT executive to another), then competition will be increased, sine it

Re: [videoblogging] HD quality on YouTube

2008-02-13 Thread Adam Quirk
That's awesome if it's true. I don't have time to test this right now, but I would love to know if it works. -- *Adam Quirk* / Producer, Wreck Salvage LLC / [EMAIL PROTECTED] /+1 551.208.4644 (m) / imbullemhead (aim) On Feb 13, 2008 12:41 PM, Patrick Delongchamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles HOPE
Jay dedman wrote: this is crazy to me. this is like saying that everyone can make their own power plants nd run lines all over town. (and charge for that power) everyone can make their own water companies and dig up the ground for pipes. (and charge for their use) or everyone can make their

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Internet traffic has double in the last two years and bandwidth usage has increased by 40% each year. Why allow companies to charge for usage, manage traffic, and invest in new technology when you can kill competition and force the entire internet to slow down because of 5% of users? The

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Carriers, like Time Warner, are also content creators. They own HBO, CNN, etc. so its like the old days of Hollywood where studios made the movies, the also owned the movie theaters. It was common for Warner Brother theaters to play just Warner Brothers movies. Called Vertical integration, or

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
Excellent post Richard. I didn't realize some net neutrality bills being pushed allowed for that. Wouldn't it still be better for ISPs to be able to offer preferred service over a 2nd tiered network to those willing to pay for it though? For example, if vonage wanted to make sure they were

[videoblogging] Re: Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Great post, thanks for the clarity :) Here in the UK, we have choice about both the telephone voice provider, and the ISP used for DSL, even though the phone lines, exchanges other infrastructure was built by British Telecom. They were a state-owned monopoly when they built most of it, who

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
I really don't want to see ISP's to be in bed with the Government. well, if we're afraid of our governments then we're all screwed. I know some already think this. But at least we're supposed to be able to affect government policy. you cant affect a private company's policy especially if they

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
I'd have to disagree on bandwidth caps. If you use a lot of bandwidth, you should pay more for it. This will encourage innovation and competition in ISPs because they'll have to (and have money to) build better networks for those paying for it. If your grandmother wants to download movies every

Re: [videoblogging] Sony PMW-EX1 XDCAM EX SxS Pro HD Camcorder

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Has anyone used Sony PMW-EX1 XDCAM EX SxS Pro HD Camcorder. I am thinking of purchasing it and was wondering if anyone had any positive or negative feedback. hmmm...love to hear anyone's experience. here's a link:

Re: [videoblogging] Music in the Public Domain.

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
I have just expanded the site and found a bunch of links to Music in the Public Domain. Not just old stuff, but music that people have created and specifically put in the Public Domain. What is good about Music in the Public Domain? You can use it anyway you want, and there are no

[videoblogging] Re: High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread influxxmedia
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson k9disc@ wrote: = iTunes won't take that FLV file will they? iTunes is all mp4, isn't it? Chris iTunes uses MP3, MP4(H264), MOV or DRMed m4v (video) or m4a (audio)

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
I have no idea why you think this is outrageous. If one utility network can be installed, why not a reasonable number like, say, three or five? There really is no reason why neighbors can't receive service from different networks. You might have a good place to keep your ice cream

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On Feb 13, 2008 11:48 AM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] A solution is to treat broadband companies as common carriers. This recognizes that the internet is a public good which everything depends on...so there should be a level playing field. Broadband companies would

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Wouldn't it still be better for ISPs to be able to offer preferred service over a 2nd tiered network to those willing to pay for it though? For example, if vonage wanted to make sure they were offering high quality phone service, they might be willing to pay more. or if a hospital wanted

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
The common carrier idea you mentions sounds like a great idea it would be great to have more transparency. Even enforced transparency if it makes sense to do so. Does it have anything to do with net neutrality though? Should you be fighting for this instead of net neutrality? It seems like if

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
I'd have to disagree on bandwidth caps. If you use a lot of bandwidth, you should pay more for it. This will encourage innovation and competition in ISPs because they'll have to (and have money to) build better networks for those paying for it. i know you like objective proof, Patrick, so

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
The common carrier idea you mentions sounds like a great idea it would be great to have more transparency. Even enforced transparency if it makes sense to do so. Does it have anything to do with net neutrality though? Should you be fighting for this instead of net neutrality? It seems

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles HOPE
Jay dedman wrote: I have no idea why you think this is outrageous. If one utility network can be installed, why not a reasonable number like, say, three or five? There really is no reason why neighbors can't receive service from different networks. You might have a good place to keep

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On Feb 13, 2008 11:52 AM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea why you think this is outrageous. If one utility network can be installed, why not a reasonable number like, say, three or five? There really is no reason why neighbors can't receive service from

[videoblogging] Re: Viddler's New Video Comment Plug-In

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Ive always been a big fan of video on the net becoming a far more integrated procedure, doable from the browser, easily, by people who dont normally use a video camera. Its ideally suited to video conversations and comments, and if done right it is easy enough to catch on, just so long as

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Delongchamp
Yes, they may be making enormous profits but they're not going to upgrade their system for 5% of users. That just doesn't make any business sense. It makes more sense to place limitations or charge more for special cases. In Canada there are bandwidth gaps but they're really high. I've never

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Milt and the Chicago School are OK but they are the weaker branch of the free-market advocates. If you want the real deal, who lack these inconsistencies you note, look to Von Mises and the Austrian School. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises ill one up you:

[videoblogging] Re: HD quality on YouTube

2008-02-13 Thread influxxmedia
I believe this is true. The nudie video looked very good indeed. YouTube limits uploads to 100MB (does it still work that way, been a while) so they are not limiting DATA RATE. The nudie vids were 10mins long which is quite long, but if you encode down to H264 at a pretty high quality

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
It worked so poorly with the highway system, didn't it? I don't want to see them in bed with the government either which is why I decry the current situation. They are in bed, in private with the government today. I want them in the open and on the streets with the People. I believe that is

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
People who cry free market, just mean they want market regulation that benefits them. Regulation is about benefiting all citizens. A free market has no market regulation (by definition). absolutely correct. I put free market in quotes because all the proponents of this term never

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On Feb 13, 2008 12:08 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] everyone, including companies, pay taxes. Its how we pay for things around us. It's not that way for everything... but for the things it is like that for... it doesn't have to be that way. We tend to get a much

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Indeed they should. But most markets tend to settle down to a small number of companies, although never just one. you got to be joking me. Think the early part of the 20th century before anti-trust laws. The Free Market created near-monopolies in almost every sector. Hollywood, Steel, Oil,

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On Feb 13, 2008 12:33 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People who cry free market, just mean they want market regulation that benefits them. Regulation is about benefiting all citizens. A free market has no market regulation (by definition). absolutely correct.

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles HOPE
Jay dedman wrote: People who cry free market, just mean they want market regulation that benefits them. Regulation is about benefiting all citizens. A free market has no market regulation (by definition). absolutely correct. I put free market in quotes because all the proponents of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Viddler's New Video Comment Plug-In

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
I do wonder if video comments will attract much stronger human concerns about ownership control, than text ones do. If I post a comment somewhere, who owns or controls it? The site I posted it on, me, or the company that provided the technical infrastructure/hosting? text is an open

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Richard H. Hall
On Feb 13, 2008 2:24 PM, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make no mistake, economy is like ecology. It is a naturally occurring phenomenon, whose principles were discovered and researched by scientists. It is not a machine designed by a team of engineers. Make no mistake,

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
Not to mention the cost to the consumer of advertising. Right now, in the unlimited model, advertising is free, meaning we get to see flashy ads on every page. Throttle down the bandwidth consumption with caps and ads become more than an eyesore, they become an expense for the consumer.

[videoblogging] Re: Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
If these free market fantasies were ever allowed to come to true fruition, then the true horros of that 'natural state' would become apparent. But because there never has, nor ever will be a free market of this sort, and this can be blamed upon government, its easy to make that ideology

[videoblogging] Re: High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread influxxmedia
I'll chip in with my 2 cents here as it varies from the populace it seems. To export 16:9 FLV from anamorphic DV (your 720x480) your final video size will need to be 854x480. It sounds like VisualHub may do this for you. I do my encoding in Telestream Episode, as it does batch encoding to a

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
What's the ROI on our interstate highway system? on our local and national parks? on our water supplies? on our public universities? Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://k9disc.com http://discdogradio.com http://pawsitivevybe.com On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On Feb 13, 2008 1:11 PM, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Absolutely not. When steel and oil were monopolies, did people pay $500,000 per ingot or barrel? Companies are always restricted by the marketplace unless they have government protection. Even a monopoly

[videoblogging] Re: Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Your post was very interesting, Im still learning about economics, could you explain this stuff about externalities? Does it have anything to do with, for example, if the finite nature of resources was factored into the price from the start, the masses may never have got to command the

[videoblogging] Re: Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Yes thats because my assertion was wrong. I got confused about what dislike about Game Theory. I probably dont understand it well enough to correct myself, I just dont think social darwinism completely explains behaviour, and I thought that often even when game theory looks at colabborative

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Absolutely not. When steel and oil were monopolies, did people pay $500,000 per ingot or barrel? Companies are always restricted by the marketplace unless they have government protection. Even a monopoly cannot charge infinite prices because there are always alternatives at hand. its not

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread J. Rhett Aultman
Game theory is actually very cold and mathematical and doesn't actually have to focus on people at all. It simply assumes that any agent in the system, given an understanding about what benefits it gets from each action, selects the action that has the chance to create the best benefit. It's a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread J. Rhett Aultman
An externality can be thought of as a side effect. The basic principle of market economics is that the costs of the production and consumption of a good are reflected in the price paid. This is generally called a price signal, and it's why free and frictionless markets are so good at moving to

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
And who gets to decide if something is a benefit to society or not? we the people, and the representatives we elect. I hear you charles. Current governments certainly dont seem to work well. The corrupting influences are enormous. But I fear just tearing it all down, hoping people act for the

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread J. Rhett Aultman
Bell is not an example of an entity in a free market. Bell obtained a government-enforced monopoly through the patent system and government regulations and licensing that (effectively) prevented other companies from entering the market to compete against Bell. In some countries (like in

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
Yes, they may be making enormous profits but they're not going to upgrade their system for 5% of users. That just doesn't make any business sense. this just might be where you and I disagree. I contend (as does most of the industry) that tomorrow's 95% will be today's 5%. Broadband companies

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello, On Feb 13, 2008 2:05 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Absolutely not. When steel and oil were monopolies, did people pay $500,000 per ingot or barrel? Companies are always restricted by the marketplace unless they have government protection. Even a monopoly cannot charge

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread J. Rhett Aultman
I would tend to agree, too. Just look at the history of rural electrification to see the failure of private industry and market forces to electrify rural areas, a critical step in providing the society we now enjoy. -- Rhett. http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Viddler's New Video Comment Plug-In

2008-02-13 Thread Sull
embed code? but you prob are referring to video remixability. On Feb 13, 2008 3:47 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Itd also be cool if video sites didnt lock their videos in the page so it could easily copiable as text. Jay [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re: Interesting video interview about the future of online video advertising

2008-02-13 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Hi Tim, It been over a year downloadablemedia.org has been around. I would like to hear what practical results have been achieved that bring independent producers closer to advertisers. Thanks --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Tim Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Renat, I wish I

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles HOPE
Jay dedman wrote: And who gets to decide if something is a benefit to society or not? we the people, and the representatives we elect. Meanwhile, in terms of education, medicine, and pretty much everything else, public run is a synonym for crappy and busted. I hear you charles. Current

[videoblogging] Classic TV Commercials Video Podcasts Launched BUT....

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone I've launched my classic TV commercials video podcast (In both Flash video iPod formats) HOWEVER due to problems with Blogger, I can't add the RSS feeds at this time (Or any other page element for that matter). Hopefully they'll have a fix for the problem soon. In the meantime,

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Charles HOPE
Jay dedman wrote: All anyone wants is a set of standards and guideliness that we can all depend on. right now, its all arbitrary..and dependent on the whims of the broadband providers. They COULD behave reasonably as you suggest. They COULD behave in their own self-interest as the presiding

Re: [videoblogging] Classic TV Commercials Video Podcasts Launched BUT....

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
The URL you have for the Flash version of your show has an error in it. It should be... http://patsclassictvcommercials-flash.blogspot.com/ But you have it as... http://patsclassictvcommercials-flash/ (You're missing the blogspot.com in that URL.) It's both in the link in the message you

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Jay dedman
The magic of market forces has nothing at all to do with hoping people act for the good of the whole. That is a strawman argument, for over 200 years ago it was explained It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their

Re: [videoblogging] Re: HD quality on YouTube

2008-02-13 Thread sjs Productions
I think you can download a program to upload files larger than 100mb's. However it is only for a PC... MACs are left out. A while ago, I tried to upload a Flash file, and YT still compressed it again. It looked awful. Has YT changed this recently? sjs On Feb 13, 2008 1:51 PM, influxxmedia

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread J. Rhett Aultman
Meanwhile, in terms of education, medicine, and pretty much everything else, public run is a synonym for crappy and busted. You can select an equal number of targets where privatized implies an equal quagmire. The magic of market forces has nothing at all to do with hoping people act for

Re: [videoblogging] Blip Pro Account

2008-02-13 Thread Sheldon Pineo
On Feb 13, 2008 9:58 AM, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At http://blip.tv/prefs there should be a retry button next to the video in question. Thanks Charles. However,there isn't a button next to the item. I'll contact the support address. Shel. -- www.icenrye.com

Re: [videoblogging] Re: High Quality Flash

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
Thanks a boatload! I've uploaded our first high quality offering: http://k9disc.com . It's our new puppy, Prima, and highlights from her first two days at Pawsitive Vybe. Any suggestions, critiques feedback would be appreciated - the site, quality, design, etc. I'm looking to monetize the

Re: [videoblogging] Classic TV Commercials Video Podcasts Launched BUT....

2008-02-13 Thread Patrick Cook
Hi everyone: On Feb 13, 2008 4:40 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The URL you have for the Flash version of your show has an error in it. It should be... http://patsclassictvcommercials-flash.blogspot.com/ But you have it as... http://patsclassictvcommercials-flash/

RE: [videoblogging] Re: HD quality on YouTube

2008-02-13 Thread Jake Ludington
I think you can download a program to upload files larger than 100mb's. However it is only for a PC... MACs are left out. A while ago, I tried to upload a Flash file, and YT still compressed it again. It looked awful. Has YT changed this recently? Apparently you have to do some trickery

Re: [videoblogging] Sony PMW-EX1 XDCAM EX SxS Pro HD Camcorder

2008-02-13 Thread sjs Productions
I got to work with one for an afternoon. I really liked it for my needs. It overcranks and undercranks. Has a histogram you can see on the screen so it is easier to get the right exposure. However I am waiting to see how it looks in slo mo and how it looks on the web. It is a great price

Re: [videoblogging] Net-Neutrality

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
I was listening to NPR today and there was a discussion that was very interesting. It was all about how Hugo Chavez was battling Exxon Mobil in court over a recent move to make the government of Venezuela the majority owner Big Oil projects in country. I'd rather not get into the whole

Re: [videoblogging] Good cheap FLV encoder for Windows...

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Try FFmpeg. It's a command line tool. But there's a number of GUI's for it too. -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. http://ChangeLog.ca/ Motorsport Videos http://TireBiterZ.com/ Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/ On Feb 13, 2008 7:33 PM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[videoblogging] Good cheap FLV encoder for Windows...

2008-02-13 Thread Ron Watson
A friend of mine would like to create higher quality FLVs on his windows machine. Any suggestions? Cheers, Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://k9disc.com http://discdogradio.com http://pawsitivevybe.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [videoblogging] Good cheap FLV encoder for Windows...

2008-02-13 Thread Jake Ludington
A friend of mine would like to create higher quality FLVs on his windows machine. Any suggestions? WinFF - it's not massively bloated and slow like Super. http://www.topdrawerdownloads.com/download/104928 And it still readily exposes all the command line goodness if you need it. Jake

Re: [videoblogging] re: LED lights

2008-02-13 Thread Brook Hinton
Firewire sucks. A client's HV20 just fell victim to a fried port. Unless you have a dedicated firewire BUS (not port) with the ability to turn its power on or off for each device, things will fry. But on the camera/deck end, for DV and HDV, it's all we've got unless you go with a tower and an

[videoblogging] Re: Viddler's New Video Comment Plug-In

2008-02-13 Thread Clintus
I like that option Jay, use the service of choice. Unfortunately right now the only services that I know of that lets you record video from their site is Viddler and YouTube. Blip took theirs down and Vimeo hasn't released their's yet. But this is just the beginning I think. --- In

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Viddler's New Video Comment Plug-In

2008-02-13 Thread schlomo rabinowitz
I agree; there are going to be a lot of them. I think this will be a big year for Instant Gratification video services. Sounds like a pretty crazy plugin to have multiple choices for services in video commenting; like that long string of buttons under blogposts for digg, reddit, etc, etc.. On

Re: [videoblogging] Good cheap FLV encoder for Windows...

2008-02-13 Thread Sheldon Pineo
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A friend of mine would like to create higher quality FLVs on his windows machine. Any suggestions? How about Riva FLV Encoder. The price is right.. http://www.rivavx.com/?encoder -- www.icenrye.com

Re: [videoblogging] Good cheap FLV encoder for Windows...

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Like this one.. http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. http://ChangeLog.ca/ Motorsport Videos http://TireBiterZ.com/ Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/ On Feb 13, 2008 7:38 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try FFmpeg.

Re: [videoblogging] Good cheap FLV encoder for Windows...

2008-02-13 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
WinFF... this is the first time I think I've heard of it. Nice that there's more options in that space. I think this is the main URL for it is... http://biggmatt.com/winff/ -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. http://ChangeLog.ca/ Motorsport Videos http://TireBiterZ.com/ Vlog Razor... Vlogging

[videoblogging] Ninja Girl Debut!

2008-02-13 Thread Yukako Tajima
Hi Ninja Girl, our new show has just been released today! http://ninjagirl.from.tv/ We just did videoblogging event in Tokyo, Japan. It was very exciting! (here is one of the articles) http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nc20080206a1.html We felt like starting something that we can connect

[videoblogging] Re: Ninja Girl Debut!

2008-02-13 Thread Bill Cammack
Fun video, Tajee! :D Bill http://BillCammack.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Yukako Tajima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ninja Girl, our new show has just been released today! http://ninjagirl.from.tv/ We just did videoblogging event in Tokyo, Japan. It was very exciting!

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Ninja Girl Debut!

2008-02-13 Thread Jackson West
Kent and Doug better watch out -- this looks pretty deadly. Tajee's fierce ninja balance skills and adorable kids? Video gold. On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fun video, Tajee! :D Bill http://BillCammack.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com

Re: [videoblogging] re: LED lights

2008-02-13 Thread Brian Gonzalez
I LOVE LEDs. just make sure you get some CTO to compensate for the color temp that tends to be cold, in which case, they're great to balance with daylight. but it's soft and energy saving and usually comes with a dimmer. aside from the on-board panels, DP JoaquĆ­n Baca-Asay (DP of Thumbsucker)