Re: [Vo]:Panacea's f E machines

Esa Ruoho wrote: > i know ashtweth and the australian panacea lot are working on > extracting resonance from a RotoVerter, and that they are > > btw, you might be interested in this stanley meyer compilation: > http://merlib.org/node/5247 I looked at the above URL, I saw a bunch of recycled Stan

Re: [Vo]:Re: Electron fugacity, deuteron fugacity, and applied fields

Michel Jullian wrote: Thanks Horace for the explanations, it seems to me "higher electron density = higher probability of electron screening" is what they boil down to, which makes sense, let me I've got to hand it to you Michel, you're a brilliant theorist. The question is can you produce any

[Vo]:Panacea's f E machines

Vortexians; Recently I posted a letter from Patrick, the webmaster of Panacea University. I challenged him to produce a working F E machine. He responded my mentioning several. Have any of you heard of any of these machines? --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usf

Re: [Vo]:Meyers' Technology

Esa Ruoho wrote: > you mean these? > http://panaceauniversity.org/D6.pdf > http://panaceauniversity.org/D14.pdf The D14 file. Patrick also sent me a letter with a list of alledged F E machines. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---

[Vo]:Meyers' Technology

Vortexians; Patrick Kelly, of Panacea University sent me a .pdf file on Stan Meyers' technology. AFAIK, it looks like the same old Stan Meyers shtick. The man on the water fuel discussion group, says that it works however. Otto Schmitt opined that there was,"no reason why it should work." But

[Vo]:Meyers technology

I subscribed to Patrick's waterfuel list and received his paper. He claims to have replicated Stan Meyer's electrolyzer. If any of you are interested, I will forward you the .pdf file. It looks like standard Meyer shtick to me. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.us

Re: [Vo]:Pantone may be subjected to forced medication

Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 27, 2007, at 5:08 PM, William Beaty wrote: Didn't Pantone simply discover the old idea that water injection improves MPG? I don't know what all Pantone invented. I don't think water injection was in his patent though. It certainly should have been reje

Re: [VO]: Ancient vortex

R.C.Macaulay wrote: Howdy Vorts, Surprised me when I saw this on MSNBC. They describe the pic taken from space as a "depression" natural formed but... do I see a counterclockwise spiral lurking. http://www.msnbc.com/modules/interactive.aspx?type=ss&launch=19810770,2&pg=11

[Vo]:The latest shtick on The Newman Energy Machine:

JNPCo. wrote: *The 7500-lb energy machine will now try* *to reach the SPEED OF LIGHT!* * * Wow, reach the speed of light, Joseph had me going there for a minute. Then I noticed the word try. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! -

Re: [Vo]:The Ho Motor

Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 25, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Jones Beene wrote: Lost amidst the Steorn recriminations: http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Magnetic_Motor.pdf From China, with love - or more self-delusion? It is more confusion than delusion. Their mistake is right out in plain sigh

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

Zachary Jones wrote: On Jul 23, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 23, 2007, at 8:46 AM, thomas malloy wrote: IMHO, it's not proper to substitute the word research for speculation, which AFAIK, is what "the local vacuum dynamics" is. I'm wond

Re: [Vo]:Bearden weighs in on STEORN

OrionWorks wrote: I guess it was inevitable. Tom Bearden has weighed in on the recent STEORN incident. Tom Bearden, weighing in, there's a great double entendre. According to Bearden it would appear that the STEORN device may have suffered the fate of having been "...moved to the 'new' sit

Re: [Vo]:Re: centripetal force question

Harry Veeder wrote: Interesting thread. The reason I started it was because I'd like to know, suppose the earth started spinning faster, say 10 times it's present rotational speed, how much weight would I loose? --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/ds

[Vo]:technology extends human capacity

Vortexians; The exchange with Michel Jullian's being a French speaker brought this link to mind, http://www.jacquesvallee.net/blog/blog.html . I'm a big fan of Dr. Vallee's, having read two of his books on UFO's. His observations on the behavior of the "aliens" comport with my understanding o

Re: [Vo]:Maxwell's Demon, naw!

Stiffler Scientific wrote: Maxwell's Demon, How to know he is working? Ambient Ta ~ 23.5 'C (input air temp) Air pump @ 4 PSIG, adds ~ 0.5 'C to air temp., giving working air temp of Tq = 24 'C Outlet (1) T1 = 24 'C Outlet (2) T2 = 24.6 'C (Demon door installed) How are you powering the d

Re: [Vo]:What if radiation doesn't cause cancer?

William Beaty wrote: Maybe J. Frank Parnell was right after all. Risk of Radiation-Induced Cancer Increased in Some Individuals radiation disease? Irradiate everyone with low power x-rays, but only certain families aren't immune? I take it that the study proves that certain families ar

Re: [Vo]:Lithium titanate battery (was Re: Cheap solar a couple years away?)

Michel Jullian wrote: More on these miracle batteries: Quote: "Power comes from 900 pounds of Altair NanoSafe lithium titanate batteries. Vehicle integration and testing are by Boshart Engineering. I this the same thing as a Li ion battery? --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo

Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn

Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: > I think you missed my point. If you don't want something public then > don't make it so yourself. Actually it appears you did miss something. If you are so concerned and you want your addr

Re: [Vo]:Re: Isomers, LENR, reprocessed D2O

Jones Beene wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: IF - when all is said and done - (big IF) it then becomes apparent that a high ratio of 18O to 16O is in fact the most Interesting observation. I think that when identifing isotopes such as O 18 or O16 a better convention might be O (18) or O (16).

Re: [Vo]:Gravimagnetics

Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 15, 2007, at 9:25 PM, thomas malloy wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 9:55 PM, thomas malloy wrote: Last night I visited the Chukanov Energy site. I noticed that there is an animation on gravity, the solar system, and the Pioneer craft

Re: [Vo]:Gravimagnetics

Horace Heffner wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 9:55 PM, thomas malloy wrote: Last night I visited the Chukanov Energy site. I noticed that there is an animation on gravity, the solar system, and the Pioneer craft. Do you have the URL of the animatiom? www.chukanovenergy.com , page about 1

[Vo]:centripital force question

I'm subject to weight loss produced by the centripital force produced by the earth's rotation, I'm wondering if centripetal force is a function of revolutions per time unit, or total distance traveled as the planet travels? --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfami

Re: [Vo]:Gravimagnetics

Horace Heffner wrote: The pioneer anomaly stuff is now removed to a separate paper: Last night I visited the Chukanov Energy site. I noticed that there is an animation on gravity, the solar system, and the Pioneer craft. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfam

Re: [Vo]:The Twilight Experience

Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote: At 01:04 PM 7/14/2007 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote: William Beaty wrote: And whatever did happen with the CETI/Patterson-cell investors, staff, management, etc.? I head different things about the Patterson cell. Gene Mallove told me that it did, in fact, STOP WOR

Re: [Vo]:The name vortex-l

R.C.Macaulay wrote: David Jonsson wrote.. This list was created to address vortex motion. This was probably a misnomer. There is a Vortex themes remain a component of this list. Some of us have ongoing applied research projects relating to water vortex phenomena. Jones Beene offers a regula

[Vo]:Steorn conclusions

In his conclusion to Steorn, Dr. Mike wrote; My conclusion after going through all this is that Steorn is neither hoax nor scam. It is delusion. The reason it seems surreal is because it is surreal - we are the real part of someone elses imagination. I thank Steorn for this truely awesome oppo

Re: [Vo]:How are they doing this

Jones Beene wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: However, there will still be losses due to core and magnet heating, even if no power is drawn from the coils. Further, as soon as the coils draw power, the motion of shield is retarded because the energy from opening the flux hole is less. The so

Re: [Vo]:The pattern of Historical Accounts

Jed Rothwell wrote: thomas malloy wrote: I have been told that of all the researchers who attempted to develop flight, the Wrights alone built a wind tunnel. They were among the first. Albert Zahm, at Catholic University in Washington, DC built one at about the same time they did. Langley

Re: [Vo]:The Preendev and Bedeni motors

Paul Lowrance wrote: thomas malloy wrote: R.C.Macaulay wrote: Paul wrote,, It sounds like it could be accelerated-- not sure. I'd be surprised if just anyone could build such a machine using any type of PM and expect "free energy." After glancing at some Perendev motor

[Vo]:The Preendev and Bedeni motors

R.C.Macaulay wrote: Paul wrote,, It sounds like it could be accelerated-- not sure. I'd be surprised if just anyone could build such a machine using any type of PM and expect "free energy." After glancing at some Perendev motor designs seemed clear it used the same "It sounds like"... I l

Re: [Vo]:The pattern of Historical Accounts

Nick Palmer wrote: "/Of all the men who attacked the flying problem in the 19th century, Otto Lilienthal was easily the most important. ... It is true that attempts at gliding had been made hundreds of years before him, and that in the nineteenth century, Cayley, Spencer, Wenham, Mouillard, a

Re: [Vo]:How are they doing this

Harry Veeder wrote: After viewing the link provided by Gibson, I take that Harry, Harry. If the Chinese have a good magnetic shield that will do this, where work in (the short distance of turning the knob with less than 44lbs of applied Has anyone heard of the Jines P M Motor patent? They

Re: [Vo]:New ENERGY TIMES (tm) July 10, 2007 -- Issue #23

Jed Rothwell wrote: Jones Beene wrote: OK yes - it does get worse over time but that is not material to the comment of a low starting level, i.e. a low impurity level As far as I know, all heavy water is made from ordinary tap water, not ocean water. Nearly all of it is made with a chemica

Re: [VO]: Mid year new energy forecasts

R.C.Macaulay wrote: Howdy Vorts, Lets have your brief forecasts on the potential for advances of new energy technology for the next 5 years running. I'm a big fan of my version of the Brown Nuclear Battery, which is now public property. My version would utilize spent reactor waste. Havin

[Vo]:energy source

*/Vortexians; I heard from Bruce at Zephyr technologies. IMHO, and that of the Correas, the orgone may be an energy source. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ /www.zephyrtechnology.com/ ** Sunday July 8, 2007 Dear Thomas: Thank you for your thoughtful contact! To measure Orgone Energy directly, I suggest t

Re: [Vo]:The Energy Fringe

Stifler Scientific wrote: What is the Energy Fringe? People who think that they can come up with a viable, cost effective, nonconventional energy source. Now that being said, lets look at what I consider to be a logical view of what so many are in search of and why they have not found it.

Re: [Vo]:Re: Quark mass

oked like Anubis, the dog headed god of Egyptian mythology, smoking a cigarette. When it realized that they were watching him, the creature disappeared, leaving the smoldering cigarette behind. Now those stories are weird by Thomas Malloy standards. I've been considering these reports, parti

Re: [Vo]:*****THE NEWMAN ENERGY MACHINE NOW USES ONLY SOLAR PANELS!!!

Jed Rothwell wrote: Michel Jullian wrote: > It is a proof-of-principle device. If it actually produces > 120 W of anomalous excess power, it does not matter how big the thing is. Nothing anomalous about the 120W, it's his input power (from the solar panels). Yes, I should have noted tha

[Vo]:physics of 2012

Vortexians; In reading the article on one galaxy eating another, I came across this link, which I found interesting. Particularly the word barycenter, I've never considered what a fluxiating barycenter of a plasma ball might result in. http://viewzone.com/endtime.html --- http://USFamily.N

Re: [Vo]:National Review admits global warming is real

Jed Rothwell wrote: thomas malloy wrote: Most importantly don't over look what you can do about anthropogenic climate change if it is happening, A: not a damn thing! Oh give us a break, Tom! At least you can say: "I don't want to pay to fix the problem." Or: "I d

[Vo]:Benfield Brown demonstration

Vortexians; While researching Orgone accumulators I happened upon Zephyr Technology's website. They are offering this gadget for sale, http://www.zephyrtechnology.com/UFO_Technology/ufo_technology.html It looses some weight, the man I talked to said that it's operation is based on Benfield B

Re: [Vo]:National Review admits global warming is real

R.C.Macaulay wrote: Nick Psalmer wrote.. >I have to point out that these groups you mention must be American and are therefore unlikely to be part of the internationally >recognised and credible environmental groups such as Friends of the Earth International (at least 50 countries) and Gree

Re: [Vo]:National Review admits global warming is real

coast to coast AM radio saying similar things (that Thomas Malloy keeps bringing to our attention). Your apparent belief in the The C to C producers put on both sides of the controversy. IMHO the increased solar irradiance is one of two great factors, the other being increased sub sea v

Re: [Vo]:free ambient energy

Paul Lowrance wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: On Jun 19, 2007, at 2:00 AM, Nick Palmer wrote: By the way, the ridiculous debate about the radiation from "both sides" has mutated slightly - Paul originally said it radiates X watts PER SQUARE METRE from both sides. He is now leaving out th

Re: [VO]: Future energy predictions

Horace Heffner wrote: On Jun 15, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: And your point regarding occupation is? I only asked what it meant, I didn't say you were wrong. I don't disagree with you that it would have that result. I do however disagree with the ethics, the legality,

[Vo]:Dude, where's the hardware?

Paul Lowrance wrote: Some recent articles by Tom Bearden on the suppression of overunity systems --> http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/index.htm I visited the website, IMHO Dr. Bearden is one of the people most deserving of the title a Prince of Vaporware . It was the same old shtic

Re: [Vo]:question about the Space Station

leaking pen wrote: On 6/12/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I regards to the Spacestation's gyros, I posted, and leaking pen replied: > what do you mean by stops? they are mounted on arms The gyros can only rotate so far before the bump against a stop. >

Re: [Vo]:question about the Space Station

OrionWorks wrote: From Thomas Malloy IMHO, if I set out to design the worst possible vehicle, I'd end up with the shuttle. The space shuttle suffered the fate of dwindling budgetary constraints during the design phase. I believe one of the original shuttle designs placed the reu

Re: [Vo]:question about the Space Station

I regards to the Spacestation's gyros, I posted, and leaking pen replied: what do you mean by stops? they are mounted on arms, was my understanding. and try standing on a free spinning platform. spin a bike tire while holding it so it orients vertically, grab it by the center, and turn it 90

[Vo]:question about the Space Station

Vortexians; I'm listening to Richard C Hoagland being interviewed on C to C AM. He said that the space station has four gyros in it. They are multi thousand pound units, these gyros. He said that they had rotated against the stops. If the gyros break the stops, the station becomes uncontrolla

Re: [Vo]:Fw: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday June1, 2007

Jed Rothwell wrote: thomas malloy wrote: Hitler could have done the same thing with the Atlantic Wall, but he was outfoxed by Allied intelligence. If he had moved the Panzers in the first hours of D-Day, the attack would have probably failed. The German generals were afraid to wake him up

Re: [Vo]:Infamous SHOE FOOT X-RAY Machine

Michael Foster wrote: William Beaty wrote: Antique Simplex Shoe Fitting X-Ray Machine 1930's-40's It's just a guess, but I would estimate that my friends and I had several hours each total exposure to the x-rays emitted from these beasts. To my knowledge, none of us has developed any sym

Re: [Vo]:the Firestorm Plug

Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to thomas malloy's message of Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:52:04 -0500: Hi Thomas, [snip] Vortexians; My friend has been working with Robert Krupa, the inventor of the Firestorm spark plug. He showed me a paper written by the inventor. It Any idea where

Re: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted

Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Jeff Fink's message of Sat, 9 Jun 2007 07:00:25 -0400: Hi, [snip] So, why can’t people living within a few hundred feet of high voltage transmission lines tap useful “free” power with a 60 Hz receiver circuit? [snip] Are you sure they can't? I hea

Re: [Vo]:Fw: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday June1, 2007

Jed Rothwell wrote: Robert Park wrote: 3. MEXICO: "SOMETHING THERE IS THAT DOESN'T LOVE A WALL." The bipartisan immigration reform bill failed in the Senate in the early morning hours today. Other "Great" walls have not worked well. That is incorrect. Park probably made that up. Why does h

[Vo]:the Firestorm Plug

Vortexians; My friend has been working with Robert Krupa, the inventor of the Firestorm spark plug. He showed me a paper written by the inventor. It contains some pictures (drawings.) I was unable to find a digitized version of the paper. Given the claims of a 30+% increase in fuel efficiency

[Vo]:Chukanov update

Vortexians; In a recent correspondence Kiril Chukanov www.chukanovenergy.com informed me that he tested his latest F E machine. the Anlotron 1. It's performance exceeded his expectations, It consumed 120 K W and it's output was 5 M W. Unfortunately, because of the back current, a part of it'

[Vo]:FPGA Computing

Some one posted the Star Bridge website. What is FPGA computing? --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---

Re: [Vo]:D2 direct to Fe ?

cycle. Ditto for solar irradiance. - Original Message - From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:11 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:D2 direct to Fe ? Horace Heffner wrote: This is also evidence for the notion that sunspots are caused by astero

Re: [Vo]:Filament ion jets

Horace Heffner wrote: On Jun 4, 2007, at 6:16 PM, thomas malloy wrote: Horace's post motivated me to visit Kiril's website. H says that he's restricting information, so he must be making progress. Who is H? Regards, Horace Heffner Oops, I ment to type

Re: [Vo]:D2 direct to Fe ?

Horace Heffner wrote: This is also evidence for the notion that sunspots are caused by asteroids or comets hitting the sun. Some will have a high iron content. Few people understand the consequences of the enormous energy gained by bodies approaching the sun. Interesting post Horace.

Re: [Vo]:Filament ion jets

Horace Heffner wrote: Wild speculation: by magnetically putting corkscrew kinks in the jet, before throwing the switch, using a nearly longitudinally directed B, and using a really big C1, it might even be possible to generate ball lightning. I have previously posted about the research

[Vo]:low carbon footprint buildings

Some one posted a link to a rubber band machine gun, which was fun. Then I noticed a link to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yy8YH13qZs&feature=dir which was an architect talking about cleaver buildings whose design was inspired by nature. The subject of growing food in green houses is a frequen

Re: [Vo]:Should Congress support cold fusion? I vote no!

Jed Rothwell wrote: Michel Jullian wrote: This makes a lot of sense, but how will the public vote between CF and Joe Newman's machine or any other fringe research in practice? Via some reality television program? (why not) And who/what will guide their choice? The public will have to educ

Re: [Vo]:Should Congress support cold fusion? I vote no!

Jed Rothwell wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: Second, this would put the Energy Fund beyond the reach of the taxpayers, where no publicly funded organization should They answer to no one, and they waste billions of dollars mainly on lunatic environmental destruction: megaprojects that dump co

Re: [Vo]:Should Congress support cold fusion? I vote no!

Jed Rothwell wrote: Michel Jullian wrote: One of their contributors is Mark Mills who is possibly the stupidest individual I have ever come across. He vies for that title with the anti-cold fusion flack Nate Hoffman. Gary Taubes is several tacos short of a platter, but he is cunning and ruth

[Vo]:Li cell question

Vortexians; I was in stupid mode when I failed to realize that 3 Li -> would produce 1 O18. I'm wondering if this is the reaction Jones was talking about? If this is the case, what kind of energy relase are we talking about? I assume that O18 a rare isotope, so an isotopic analysis of gas comi

Re: [Vo]:Exciting predictions from 1958

Horace Heffner wrote: On May 27, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Horace Heffner wrote: Yep. Looks like there is still 5 years to go: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-04/dnl-rpb042507.php On May 27, 2007, at 10:51 PM, thomas malloy wrote: I thought is was 50 years My nephew, the power

Re: [Vo]:Exciting predictions from 1958

Horace Heffner wrote: On May 26, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Out of "Time" Quote: "No one wants to predict definitely how long it will take. "It couldn't possibly be less than ten years," says Sir John Cockcroft. "It might be as long as 50. Twenty plus is about the most reasona

Re: [Vo]:More on Gravimagnetism and the Pioneer Anomaly

Horace Heffner wrote: As usual, I have made and corrected a computational error at: Interesting paper Horace, you mentioned a device called a wiggler. I'm wondering if you could address the subject of it's construction, and what such a device would do. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.htm

Re: [Vo]:radio frequency generator used to heat metals - and burn saltwater.

Esa Ruoho wrote: > > hmm? > > > > Video: Water into fuel? > > > Salt water eh? I ass

Re: [Vo]:New Hydrogen Storage Medium

Jones Beene wrote: ... but whatever is causing these problems is NOT in the book! At least not in the non-pathological-science books. Hum, so perhaps an energy anomaly associated with Li batteries might be in unknown territory? Suppose that someone had produced such an anomaly associated

Re: [Vo]:New Hydrogen Storage Medium

OrionWorks wrote: From Nick Palmer, ... It would be ironic if they "rediscover" CF as an annoying side effect that hinders their project! It is occasionally a good idea to step outside of the confines of one's highly trained skill set (and stated objectives), to view the bigger picture.

Re: [Vo]:Star Flashers

Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 24 May 2007 09:58:18 -0700: There may be a simpler explanation:- O16 + D -> F18 + 7.5 MeV F18 decays to O18. This would require circumstances which favor the rapid formation of D. (Rapid compression of lots of Hy?).

[Vo]:Electric Ranger

A Minnesota inventor is working on a battery powered Ford Ranger. The heart of the system is a new transmission said to double the vehicle's range. http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2007/05/16/electricranger/ --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.n

Re: [Vo]:Oh yes, it's heavy O

Jones Beene wrote: "Heavy O" is not a new oat cereal. And we're not talking That corresponding isotopic ratio of O in space (16O/18O), and in stars, and in rocks of various ages, is such that it might appear (to this casual observer at least) from the available data that 18O is somehow being

Re: [Vo]:Hot factoidz

Jones Beene wrote: There is lots of disagreement on the actual price of nuclear fuel. To be honest, it must be admitted that the Sierra Club is still a 'net positive influence' on American Society and politics. Just as most of us no longer hold the inheritors of the Roman Catholic historical

Re: [Vo]:*******VIDEO LINK TO THE NEW ENERGY MACHINE DEMONSTRATION

Jed Rothwell wrote: Michel Jullian wrote: In all this time wouldn't you expect him to have found out by himself, or at least to have been told by someone, how siphons work? This exchange reminds me of some characters I've come across in my quest for the illusive free energy machine. Several

[Vo]:Paul Brown update

Vortexians; I just had a conversation with an old friend, Al. He mentioned the late Paul Brown. Al is stockholder in Nucsol. Several years ago, some short sellers targeted the company, the value of it's stock has yet to recover. The culprits have a court date soon. Paul had some plasma paten

Re: [Vo]:*******VIDEO LINK TO THE NEW ENERGY MACHINE DEMONSTRATION

Your absolutely right, and totally within your duties as the administrator William. However, Joseph has been asked repeatedly over the past twenty plus years to conclusively demonstrate that his machine produces any usable energy, and AFAIK, he has yet to do so William Beaty wrote: On Thu, 1

[Vo]:NASA Prize

Voratexians; I happened upon this URL. I doubt that space flight will ever be the providence of governments. http://www.space.com/news/050323_centennial_challenge.html --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---

Re: [Vo]:Scum -TNBT

Jones Beene wrote: the next big thing? imagine these all over the parched-prairies of the southwest... http://tinyurl.com/2rskd2 Interesting URL Jones. Thanks for posting it. I think that learning how to set up and manage those plants is a big growth area. --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.h

Re: [Vo]:oilgae

R.C.Macaulay wrote: Thomas wrote.. I've decided to research the oilgae matter. Howdy Thomas, . Shell has an ongoing work in studies to reduce or modify an excess of sulphur during the process of refining crude oil. You seem to be talking about biologically modifying crude oil, my inte

[Vo]:oilgae

Vortexians; I've decided to research the oilgae matter. Someone posted that yields of 5 - 10,000 gallons of oil per acre were possible. This beats growing corn, or any other crop for that matter. Apparently the people who organized the three companies mentioned in the oilgae news blog http://

Re: [Vo]:New Steorn debates on internet Video (youtube.com)

Paul Lowrance wrote: Some Steorn news. The recent Steorn debate made it on youtube.com video. Sean reminds everyone that threats of physical violence were made by scientists towards Steorn. Hum, my experience with scientists is that their weapon of choice is a knife in the back. What's th

Re: [Vo]:OT: 70 Years Ago (with commentary)

Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 08 May 2007 [snip] To the south, between Gettysburg and Washington, there are no good places the land is flat, thanks to a meteor strike millions of years ago. So I take that oil is found under these plains? I read

Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Viscosity

Terry Blanton wrote: Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today: http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=57711&page=1#Item_17 http://snipurl.com/1jgm1 about how his technology works. Isn't this the same as hysteresis? Yah, or an answer to the burning question, does Steoran

Re: [Vo]:They Obviously Believe in UCaps

Wesley Bruce wrote: thomas malloy wrote: Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 2 May 2007 20:29:15 -0400: http://www.zenncars.com/home/EEStor%20equity%20investment%20April%2030%202007%20FINAL%202.pdf [snip] Inc. The negotiated investment terms

Re: [Vo]:Russ George in New York Times

Jones Beene wrote: By George, laddies, it doesn' make much sense to force an algae bloom and not harvest it. Obviously that is too ambitious a plan to pull-off from day one - but looking ahead a few years ... (here is another idea for Russ to "borrow") Call me crazy (or call me Ishmael) but

Re: [Vo]:They Obviously Believe in UCaps

Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 2 May 2007 20:29:15 -0400: http://www.zenncars.com/home/EEStor%20equity%20investment%20April%2030%202007%20FINAL%202.pdf [snip] Inc. The negotiated investment terms also grant ZENN an additional investment option of up

Re: [Vo]:to John Berry regarding GW

Paul Lowrance wrote: thomas malloy wrote: Paul Lowrance wrote: thomas malloy wrote: > John Berry wrote: I think what you meant to say is that volcanoes have in the past erupted to produce more CO2 than humanity ***for a given duration***. Oddly enough you're missing a hug

Re: [Vo]:to John Berry regarding GW

Paul Lowrance wrote: thomas malloy wrote: > John Berry wrote: I think what you meant to say is that volcanoes have in the past erupted to produce more CO2 than humanity ***for a given duration***. Oddly enough you're missing a huge factor, "Duration." IOW, humanity conti

Re: [Vo]:to John Berry regarding GW

John Berry wrote: Balls. The argument that us 'puny humans' can't effect the environment isn't based on science, it's just a philosophy if Did you watch the video John? Volcanoes pump out 10 times as much CO2 as all human activity. The big volcano you mentioned blocked out the sunlight whi

Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity is NOW 'Unequivocal'

Paul Lowrance wrote: "Evidence For Human-caused Global Warming Is Now 'Unequivocal'" February 2, 2007 I agree, what we are discussing is the cause. I contend that we are seeing the convergence of several factors, solar irradiance, volcanic activity, and possibly a change in the aether, all o

Re: [Vo]:Global Warning

PHILIP WINESTONE wrote: Not only that, but Jeff didn't deny that global warming wasn't happening (although that in itself is questionable - if we're "allowed" to question the sacred GW Scriptures); he was simply saying that the evidence (evidence, mind you) is that global warming has happened

Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.

Jones Beene wrote: One warped comment to add into the bogosity mix: People are not destroying the planet.. maybe themselves individually and in collective groups.. but not the planet.. I agree with this part of Richard's summation, but he may be viewing the situation in the context of a n

Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.

Paul Lowrance wrote: thomas malloy wrote: Paul Lowrance wrote: There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU No doubt, but Dr. Brenda said nearly all climate scientists now agree with the recent overwhelming data that clearly indicates

Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.

Paul Lowrance wrote: thomas malloy wrote: > One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused Well, it is difficult to ignore Dr. Brenda, PhD's credentials, and the fact that she is and has worked in the field of climate science. Furthermore Dr. Brenda said

Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.

Michel Jullian wrote: It seems to me that whatever the causes of GW, if we want a remedy we will have to take care of it. Jed mentioned orbiting parasols once, I then understood he was talking about Earth orbits so I You could use either the Cook Drive or the E M Drive to hold the parasol i

Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.

Paul Lowrance wrote: I'm surprised nobody at Vo picked up on climate scientist Brenda Ekwurzel, PhD. guest on Coast To Coast AM show last Saturday -- One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused warming to talk about anything else. She ignored the issue of the Sun

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >