is not working so i went directly to the Jenkins instance and in the
> Struts folder[3] explored the tasks but i could not find any stored artifacts.
>
> Are Nightly Builds not longer supported?
>
> [1] https://struts.apache.org/builds.html
> [2]
> https://builds.apache.or
asks but i could not find any stored artifacts.
Are Nightly Builds not longer supported?
[1] https://struts.apache.org/builds.html
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2-JDK6/lastStableBuild/org.apache.struts$struts2-assembly/
[3] https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Str
; I'm old and forgetful :)
In any event, there something to be said for lettting Bamboo build our
JARs on every checkin, and so forth.
My suggestion would be to ask Mark to set this up, link to it, and if
goes well, we can turn the S2 nightly builds off again.
-Ted.
On 8/14/07, James Mitchell
half-way down the source code page. We're careful to
bury the link since these JARs are not authorized distributions of the
Apache Struts PMC.
There have been discussions on other lists that suggest nightly builds
have been overused in the past by some projects, and at times, builds
have been used
++1
On Tue Aug 14 8:43 , 'Ted Husted' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
On 8/14/07, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, there's nothing wrong with what we have now.
Besides, you'd have to have an account on the ASF box in order to
drop the jars out there and I am -1 on keeping my
) with a Solaris Zone
[0] that we happen to use to do the automated nightly builds with.
Any committer has a right to ask for an account on this box.
[0] http://www.apache.org/dev/solaris-zones.html
If you guys still feel that you do not need the process that I have
in place. Please let me
restart! :)
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [s2] nightly builds
No, actually, we haven't done this on our own machines in quite a
while.
For a long time we were doing this on our
Awesome. We should place a link on the downloads page of the site...
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 6:16 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [s2] nightly builds
Ok, looks like things are rolling again. The one
discussions on other lists that suggest nightly builds
have been overused in the past by some projects, and at times, builds
have been used as an alternative to creating an actual release.
Substituting builds for releases may undermine the legal protection
provided to PMC members by the foundation
We need to get a process setup for generating nightly builds for Struts 2. I'm
not familiar with all of the infrastructure involved with getting this going,
but am
willing to help get this in place.
I have spoken briefly to James Mitchell about this and I understand that he was
doing
Between Bamboo and Maven, I wonder if nightly builds are still worth
the trouble. Bamboo alerts us if we do anything that breaks the build,
and if someone wants the latest bits, maven install is not so much
to ask.
-Ted.
On 8/12/07, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to get a process
not and I'm sure there are others in
the same boat as
me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Husted
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 11:49 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [s2] nightly builds
Between Bamboo and Maven, I wonder if nightly
On 8/12/07, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to get a process setup for generating nightly builds for Struts 2.
I'm not familiar with all of the infrastructure involved with getting this
going, but am
willing to help get this in place.
I have spoken briefly to James Mitchell
to. Let me know.
--
James Mitchell
On Aug 12, 2007, at 11:15 AM, James Holmes wrote:
We need to get a process setup for generating nightly builds for
Struts 2. I'm not familiar with all of the infrastructure involved
with getting this going, but am
willing to help get this in place.
I have
Yes, please restart! :)
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [s2] nightly builds
No, actually, we haven't done this on our own machines in quite a while.
For a long time we were
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [s2] nightly builds
No, actually, we haven't done this on our own machines in quite a
while.
For a long time we were doing this on our zone account, which is ASF
hardware. I stopped this process a few
We might get around this by enabling wild-carded configPaths. Then
scan for struts-plugin-*.xml in addition to what we already do.
What do you think?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Dec 7, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Don Brown wrote:
The only way we could do it is if we had a custom maven 2
Yeah, we could adapt the classloader scanning tool we use for the
zeroconf stuff to look for xml files at the root. Still, this would
involve custom maven 2 work, and even then, the jar wouldn't work in a
predictable manner. The problem is that a plugin can tell struts 2 it
wants to override
Is there a way we could just post post the lib.zip distribution as
our nightly build, since that contains all the plugins and the various
dependencies?
If someone isn't building the framework from a source code checkout,
but wants to follow the dev discussions, then the lib binaries is all
he or
On 11/28/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, should we even have a struts-all JAR then?
I haven't worked much with plugins, but I don't see how an -all jar
can work given that each plugin has a struts-plugin.xml file in the
root of the jar.
Don?
--
Wendy
The only way we could do it is if we had a custom maven 2 plugin that
combined all the xml, and even then, we'd have to build in conflict
resolution capability. No, I think we should get rid of struts-all.
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/28/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, should
So, should we even have a struts-all JAR then?
On 11/27/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only real disadvantage of defaulting to the struts2-all.jar is that
you lose the self-configuration aspect of the plugins. For example, by
including the Spring plugin jar, it is able to tell
Right now, we're posting the api and core JARs for Struts 2
Would it be difficult to switch that to the all JAR, which includes
the plugins?
(And, now that I say it, I realize that maybe the all JAR is the one
we should J4.)
Is there a non-technical reason why we are just posting the JARs, and
The only real disadvantage of defaulting to the struts2-all.jar is that
you lose the self-configuration aspect of the plugins. For example, by
including the Spring plugin jar, it is able to tell Struts 2 to use its
ObjectFactory automatically. However, if you included both the Spring
and
Sorry, I've been a little slow with keeping up on list traffic these
last few weeks, but why are we using this location for anything other
than nightly builds? The nightly cron job will clear out anything
older than 7 days starting at /www/cvs.apache.org/builds/struts.
Should I turn
Until we have nightly builds again, it's my intent to run these at
least every week.
Does the cron job clear out everything under 2.0.x, or just the
nightly subdirectory?
(Has the cron job been updated to use 2.0.x instead of 2.x?)
In any event, next time I can just open a 2.0.0 for the weekly
On 7/25/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I've been a little slow with keeping up on list traffic these
last few weeks, but why are we using this location for anything other
than nightly builds? The nightly cron job will clear out anything
older than 7 days starting at /www
On 7/25/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted, can you put the 1.3.5 distributions back in
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.5/ ?
Done.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
up discussion on this thread.
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:04 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
Until we have nightly builds again, it's my intent to run these at
least every week.
Does the cron job clear out everything under 2.0.x, or just the
nightly subdirectory?
(Has the cron job been
Note that I renamed 2.x on people.apache.org/builds/struts to 2.0.x so
as to match our conventions for 1.x.
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does not exist! expected
Build failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # mvn
/usr/local/maven-2.0.4/bin/mvn: test: argument expected wtf?
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 18, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
So, what is it that we are doing about nightly builds?
I though we had
Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
expected
Build failed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # mvn
/usr/local/maven-2.0.4/bin/mvn: test: argument expected wtf?
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 18, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
So, what is it that we are doing about nightly
So, what is it that we are doing about nightly builds?
I though we had them running, but I don't see them now.
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Ok, so I finally got around to fixing the nightly build for 1.3.x
Since crontab is not running on the zone, (and I don't feel like
asking why on infr@) I'll be kicking these off from my personal box.
This will also allow me to keep a close eye on it.
Next stop -- 2.0.x
--
James Mitchell
I've got the script ready to publish the nightlies, but I want to
know what everyone wants published (along with any special commands
needed to produce it).
When I execute mvn package, I see the following that I can publish:
./api/target/struts2-api-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
On 7/2/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got the script ready to publish the nightlies, but I want to
know what everyone wants published (along with any special commands
needed to produce it).
When I execute mvn package, I see the following that I can publish:
...
Is this all
On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/2/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got the script ready to publish the nightlies, but I want to
know what everyone wants published (along with any special commands
needed to produce it).
When I execute mvn package, I see
://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.x/
Sorry, that wasn't directly related to your question about nightly builds.
By having the example apps as part of the default build, 'mvn deploy'
publishes the .war files as artifacts in the snapshot repo, which I
don't want to happen.
Nevermind... it will get sorted
AFIAC, you're doing the work, and you can make the decision. :)
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 20, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/20/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig and I were discussing a few offline items and one thing that
came up was how we currently publish the nightlies. We agree that
this is best discussed in public, so here I am :)
Craig and I were discussing a few offline items and one thing that
came up was how we currently publish the nightlies. We agree that
this is best discussed in public, so here I am :)
Currently the nightly build can be found (or will be) on minotaur
(people.apache.org) under
On 6/19/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My questions would have been about the POM
changes that Sean eluded to during our mini hackathon. I could be
wrong, but I thought he said there would be an issue with something
we needed and it not being published yet and that may or may not
On 6/20/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig and I were discussing a few offline items and one thing that
came up was how we currently publish the nightlies. We agree that
this is best discussed in public, so here I am :)
Currently the nightly build can be found (or will be) on
MrStruts do full nightly builds using a similar
nightly script to the one I was using for many months with the Maven
1 built nightlies. I'm in the process (as I type this) of creating
the necessary build scripts to produce nightly artifacts of Struts
Action 1 (1.2.x and 1.3.x), Struts Action 2
On 6/19/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig, I've already zapped the 'maven' directory, can we:
1. remove the extra directory 'maven2' and just have p.a.o/builds/
struts/shale (requires you to change your scp script)?
Related: I'm using
That brings up another interesting problem. Generated docs. I know
we try to keep the latest and greatest docs online (main site) but
for branched versions (Action 1.2.x), we would need to provide the
docs as well. So it might look like...
to, except [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I plan to have MrStruts do full nightly builds using a similar
nightly script to the one I was using for many months with the Maven
1 built nightlies. I'm in the process (as I type this) of creating
the necessary build scripts to produce nightly artifacts of Struts
Action 1
Ok, with my latest change, we now have the 1.2.x nightlies back online.
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/action1/1.2.x/
The only hickup was the log file, but that's already resolved and I'm
firing off another build in 2 minutes.
--
James Mitchell
On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:05 AM, James
) wrote:
Setup Nightly Builds of SAF2
Key: WW-1348
URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1348
Project: Struts Action 2
Type: Task
Components: Misc
Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Ted Husted
Priority: Critical
, 1.3.x, 2.0.x, Shale, and Tiles)
Sean and I are meeting today for our mini hackathon and it might be a
good idea to keep all of these together.
--
James Mitchell
On Jun 14, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Ted Husted (JIRA) wrote:
Setup Nightly Builds of SAF2
Key
be a
good idea to keep all of these together.
--
James Mitchell
On Jun 14, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Ted Husted (JIRA) wrote:
Setup Nightly Builds of SAF2
Key: WW-1348
URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1348
Project: Struts Action 2
:
Setup Nightly Builds of SAF2
Key: WW-1348
URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1348
Project: Struts Action 2
Type: Task
Components: Misc
Versions: 2.0.0
Reporter: Ted Husted
Priority: Critical
For those of you following Shale, you've probably noticed that there have
not been any nightly builds available for the past few weeks. This was due
to a combination of circumstances, but the primary reason is we've been
focusing on migrating the build environment from Ant-based scripts to use
not been any nightly builds available for the past few weeks. This was due
to a combination of circumstances, but the primary reason is we've been
focusing on migrating the build environment from Ant-based scripts to use
Maven2 instead. When completed, it will be *much* easier to build Shale
On 6/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For maximum user benefit, it's nice to ship sample apps ready to run, with
all their dependent jars included. But with four apps already, that would
mean lots of jar files duplicated -- which would really bloat an all-in-one
download. For
That would be awesome! But I wouldn't bother setting up the Ant based
builds, though; the focus should be on getting the Maven based things to
work. A wrinkle is you might have to be a bit adaptable on the assembly
stuff, as we're not quite done creating that. And, that actually raises a
On 6/12/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For maximum user benefit, it's nice to ship sample apps ready to run,
with
all their dependent jars included. But with four apps already, that
would
mean lots of jar files duplicated --
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-1287?page=all ]
Don Brown reopened STR-1287:
Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List)
validator needs internet connection (rc1 and latest nightly builds
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-1287?page=all ]
Don Brown closed STR-1287:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
validator needs internet connection (rc1 and latest nightly builds
On 1/30/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe I've fixed the problem and I am manually running the nightly. If
you don't hear anything from me then things are running smoothly.
Is there an update? If you ran them yesterday, it didn't work-- only
the files from the 24th are
On 1/31/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe I've fixed the problem and I am manually running the nightly. If
you don't hear anything from me then things are running smoothly.
Is there an update? If you ran them yesterday,
: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Nightly builds experiencing some weirdness
On 1/31/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe I've fixed the problem and I am manually running the nightly.
If
you don't hear anything
678.910.8017
- Original Message -
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.devel
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: Nightly builds experiencing some weirdness
Right, it's failing in between the builds 1.2 and 1.3. I'm running it
again
The nightly builds for Struts Action and friends have gone missing.
The last ones are from the 24th. I assume these are (were!) running
on the zone. Can someone please check it?
Thanks,
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Just an FYI -- the nightly builds (performed via a cron job on our zone)
suddenly stopped working after 1/24/06. I could be wrong, but this seems to
coincide with the recent zone 'down time' or 'maintenance' announcement
around that time.
The logs [0] indicate that Maven can no longer find
: gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.devel
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:45 PM
Subject: Speaking of nightly builds...
The nightly builds for Struts Action and friends have gone missing.
The last ones are from the 24th. I assume these are (were!) running
on the zone. Can someone please check it?
Thanks,
--
Wendy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10294.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17812.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
for tonight. Are we confident enough in
the zone
builds to run nightlies from there instead? If so, I'll just
comment it out
of my crontab. Also, have you had a chance to mess with the nightly
builds
for the commons packages also, or is that a separate kettle of fish?
--
James
, have you had a chance to mess with the nightly
builds
for the commons packages also, or is that a separate kettle of
fish?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
Craig
On Nov 3, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/3/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, sorry, the build
process to
the
zone builds?
I fixed it on my desktop for tonight. Are we confident enough in
the zone
builds to run nightlies from there instead? If so, I'll just
comment it out
of my crontab. Also, have you had a chance to mess with the nightly
builds
for the commons packages
in
the zone
builds to run nightlies from there instead? If so, I'll just
comment it out
of my crontab. Also, have you had a chance to mess with the nightly
builds
for the commons packages also, or is that a separate kettle of
fish?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
desktop for tonight. Are we confident enough in
the zone
builds to run nightlies from there instead? If so, I'll just
comment it out
of my crontab. Also, have you had a chance to mess with the nightly
builds
for the commons packages also, or is that a separate kettle of fish?
--
James Mitchell
of my crontab. Also, have you had a chance to mess with the nightly
builds
for the commons packages also, or is that a separate kettle of fish?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
Craig
On Nov 3, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/3/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL
I was hoping to get the latest build of shale, to get the latest clay
changes, and I noticed that the latest nightly build is from 10/28. Is there
a reason why there is no 11/3 build?
Thanks,
Ryan
I have Craig's nightly script and I am running it as I type this.
Look for some nightlies in a few minutes.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Nov 3, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Ryan Wynn wrote:
I was hoping to get the latest build of shale, to get the latest clay
changes, and I noticed that the
Um, sorry, the build failed (which I half expected anyway, not having
run it on the particular machine yet) so I'll rework a few things and
kick it off again. I'll ping the list when they are available.
Thanks.
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Nov 3, 2005, at 12:49 PM, James Mitchell
On 11/3/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, sorry, the build failed (which I half expected anyway, not having
run it on the particular machine yet) so I'll rework a few things and
kick it off again. I'll ping the list when they are available.
Thanks.
Thanks James. I was also
So, does that mean you do not want me to add the ant process to the
zone builds?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Nov 3, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/3/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, sorry, the build failed (which I half expected anyway, not having
crontab. Also, have you had a chance to mess with the nightly builds
for the commons packages also, or is that a separate kettle of fish?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
Craig
On Nov 3, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/3/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, sorry
/ Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Have the nightly builds moved? The most
: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Oct 30, 2005, at 3:53 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Have the nightly builds moved? The most recent one for any of the
sub-projects is dated 20051026. http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/
maven/trunk/nightly/
Thanks,
Wendy
Have the nightly builds moved? The most recent one for any of the
sub-projects is dated 20051026.
http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/
Thanks,
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
James, can you please check the nightly builds for BSF and Flow?
'maven clean dist' works here. Try deleting the 'build' directory under
both of them and updating again.
Thanks,
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The nightlies are actually built from a clean checkout of http://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/current/.
So, doing a 'clean' doesn't really apply here.
What specifically is the issue? Are we missing nightlies?
Yes.
Please take a look at this:
http://people.apache.org/~jmitchell/docs/
Unless someone says otherwise, I am planning to add to the nightly
build a process that zips up the documentation generated by 'maven
multiproject:site' in current/site (which are generated to current/
site/target/docs)
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am planning to put our documentation under the following:
(left nav pane from the main site)
Apache Struts Project
Welcome
Who We Are
Announcements
Struts 1.2.x-- documentation from STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH
Struts 1.2.7-- documentation as was
Ok, I've been monitoring the nightlies for a few days now and it
looks to be completely hands off and it all happens on Apache
hardware. I also made sure that all configuration for doing the
nightlies are included either as files (nightly.sh) or as
configuration (cron job config), so in a
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am planning to deploy the generated site over cvs.apache.org:/www/
struts.apache.org/ which means our existing web site will never be more
than 24 hours old.
I don't see a link to the 1.2.7 docs in site/xdocs/navigation.xml. I
remember some
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think now would be a good time to discuss the Struts website. I know
Wendy and Ted have been making a lot of changes and I honestly haven't
been keeping up with it all.
I think we've already decided to do everything you mentioned-- go back to
Yes, that's possible, but not likely to be needed, since it is just
extra overhead to generate something that will never change.
BTW -- Can you tell me (wiki, mail-archive, etc) where to get the
latest instructions to build the web site and documentation and how
we want it laid out? I'm
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW -- Can you tell me (wiki, mail-archive, etc) where to get the latest
instructions to build the web site and documentation and how we want it
laid out? I'm getting ready to add that task to the nightly build and I
don't want to do it wrong.
I
Ok, that's what I needed. I'll see if I can pull it all together.
Thanks
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) and
thanks to
Martin and Google, I'm now able to fully build the nightly (by
hand)
of the entire Struts project.
Woohoo! :-)
For those who haven't been watching, the nightly builds that were
happening on my machine began failing during the 'svn up'
portion of
the script
-zones.html) and
thanks to
Martin and Google, I'm now able to fully build the nightly (by
hand)
of the entire Struts project.
Woohoo! :-)
For those who haven't been watching, the nightly builds that were
happening on my machine began failing during the 'svn up'
portion of
the script
://www.apache.org/dev/solaris-zones.html) and
thanks to Martin and Google, I'm now able to fully build the
nightly (by hand) of the entire Struts project.
For those who haven't been watching, the nightly builds that were
happening on my machine began failing during the 'svn up' portion
of the script
.
Woohoo! :-)
For those who haven't been watching, the nightly builds that were
happening on my machine began failing during the 'svn up' portion of
the script. This basically caused Maven do say oh cool, nothings
changed, let's not build any artifacts, and the rest of the shell
script just
! :-)
For those who haven't been watching, the nightly builds that were
happening on my machine began failing during the 'svn up' portion of
the script. This basically caused Maven do say oh cool, nothings
changed, let's not build any artifacts, and the rest of the shell
script just happily uploads the same
! :-)
For those who haven't been watching, the nightly builds that were
happening on my machine began failing during the 'svn up' portion of
the script. This basically caused Maven do say oh cool, nothings
changed, let's not build any artifacts, and the rest of the shell
script just
I have finally gotten around to finishing the setup of my account on
our zone (http://www.apache.org/dev/solaris-zones.html) and thanks to
Martin and Google, I'm now able to fully build the nightly (by hand)
of the entire Struts project.
For those who haven't been watching, the nightly
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
