rob wrote:
>
> cdblocks=` mkisofs -print-size -quiet ... `
> mkisofs ... | cdrecord ... tsize=${cdblocks}s -
>
> Make sure you have the "s" at the end of tsize=, otherwise cdrecord
> interprets it as something other than CD blocks. I had this problem for
> a while...
Rob,
That worked. Thanks
cdblocks=` mkisofs -print-size -quiet ... `
mkisofs ... | cdrecord ... tsize=${cdblocks}s -
Make sure you have the "s" at the end of tsize=, otherwise cdrecord
interprets it as something other than CD blocks. I had this problem for
a while...
Karl Bellve wrote:
I am not even sure why are yo
I am not even sure why are you even on this list if everything is
answered in the man pages or readmes.
Remember, not all questions are directed at you. I don't remember
emailing you, but emailing the mailing list. There are many other people
on the list who might answer a question even though t
e following paragraph is not easily understandable:
>IMPORTANT NOTICE:
>***
>The current versions do not work for DVD recording
>if you specify the -dao option. They write in DAO
> only without the -dao option.
>
>From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >I can write an iso with mkisofs, then use cdrecord-ProDVD without
>> >problems.
>>
>> >Inside a script, I have the following:
>>
>> >mkisofs -J -r -T "$@" | burndvd fs=1
OTICE:
***
The current versions do not work for DVD recording
if you specify the -dao option. They write in DAO
only without the -dao option.
Cdrecord-ProDVD-1.11a35 and later fix this bug and
allow to spedify -da
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:48:58PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >From: Karl Bellve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I am having trouble piping from mkisofs to cdrecord-ProDVD
>
> >I can write an iso with mkisofs, then use cdrecord-ProDVD without
> >problem
c. Give us something to work with.
>
> Len Sorensen
I suppose that would help!
Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 1.11a35 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C)
1995-2002 Jörg Schilling
Unlocked features: ProDVD Clone
Limited features: speed
This copy of cdrecord is licensed for:
private/research/education
>From: Karl Bellve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I am having trouble piping from mkisofs to cdrecord-ProDVD
>I can write an iso with mkisofs, then use cdrecord-ProDVD without
>problems.
>Inside a script, I have the following:
>mkisofs -J -r -T "$@" | burndvd fs=16m -v
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:32:16PM -0400, Karl Bellve wrote:
>
> I am having trouble piping from mkisofs to cdrecord-ProDVD
>
> I can write an iso with mkisofs, then use cdrecord-ProDVD without
> problems.
>
> Inside a script, I have the following:
>
> mkisofs -J -r
I am having trouble piping from mkisofs to cdrecord-ProDVD
I can write an iso with mkisofs, then use cdrecord-ProDVD without
problems.
Inside a script, I have the following:
mkisofs -J -r -T "$@" | burndvd fs=16m -v speed=2 dev=0,0,0 -
burndvd is another wrapper script with the
I just put out a new cdrecord-ProDVD binary out.
amongst a lot of other new features, the speed= parameter
may now be used with DVD media too.
ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/
Jörg
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> You missinterpret what happens. The reallity is:
>
> All contributed code is freely available under GPL.
>
> What I am doing is simply a second legal type of use. I am the original Author
> and have the right to make a second publication under
>From: Karl Bellve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I am testing CDRecord-ProDVD and it is performing well.
>I have a few questions:
>1) Does CDRecord-ProDVD use /etc/default/cdrecord as its configuration
>file or some other file?
>2) Any get kreatecd to use CDRecord-ProDVD t
I am testing CDRecord-ProDVD and it is performing well.
I have a few questions:
1) Does CDRecord-ProDVD use /etc/default/cdrecord as its configuration
file or some other file?
2) Any get kreatecd to use CDRecord-ProDVD to burn a DVD-RW or DVD-R
disk?
I prefer to use kreatecd since it is
It's amusing these discussions on this list here. The only reason for me to
stay on it, as cdrtools work without problemce
> >If you can give only the slightest idea on how to prove this
> completely
> >wrong assumption, go on and do it!
>
> This is a result from discussions with several progra
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I'm wondering, why do you support Linux at all? If it's such a badly=20
>coded and proprietary system, then why don't you just drop support=20
>for it? That should save a lot of work since you can close most=20
>bugreports with a simple "sorry, Linux is un
>From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Don, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Please be more polite to other people!
>That was a joke and sarcastic, sorry, next time I put in a smiley so
>that everybody will understand!
>> The main problem with most (maybe all???) Linux developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 June 2002 12:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> Please be more polite to other people!
>
> Why did you choose to introduce these harsh words? I never used
> them!
>
>
> The main problem with most (maybe all???) Linux developers is
> that th
On Don, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Please be more polite to other people!
That was a joke and sarcastic, sorry, next time I put in a smiley so
that everybody will understand!
> The main problem with most (maybe all???) Linux developers is that they usually
> lack background knowledge
>From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Don, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> >- I've contributed small fixes to countless projects, including
>> > the Linux kernel, netkit, ncftp, GNU fileutils, .
>>
>> I stopped trying to help with those projects at it turned out that the
>
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Okay, I've been reading this entire discussion for the past couple=20
>of days, and I am wondering why there isn't a fork (or even a=20
>completely alternative implementation) of cdrtools yet.
I believe that it is easy to find an answer to this question:
On Don, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >- I've contributed small fixes to countless projects, including
> > the Linux kernel, netkit, ncftp, GNU fileutils, .
>
> I stopped trying to help with those projects at it turned out that the
> maintainers are not really interested in help fro
>From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>So, why not stop wasting time trying to convince each other, and=20
>instead simply write two different programs/libraries/whatever?=20
>This discussion is not going anywhere. More choice is good for=20
>everyone, so a second implementation won't hurt, whi
>From: Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >" As I am not sure if people will follow my licensing rules, so these
>> >keys are time limited and will expire on June 17th."
>> > ^
>> >Maybe it's *you* who should check before posting...
>>
>From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> The project in question does not contain a single line of contributions
>> from him.
>Actually I remember sending you a patch to get it to build with glibc 2
>when it was new, and I think it got in. I don't mind that you forgot, I
>don't kee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 June 2002 01:20, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 22:27:50 2002
>
> >Maybe there's a communication gap because english isn't your
> > primary language. Your arguments are not making any sense to
> > me...
>
> I
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 22:16:58 2002
> >ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
> >"As I am not sure if people will follow my licensing rules, so these
> > keys are time limited
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 13 01:24:15 2002
>> ??? Why then didn't you contribute to improve the code?
>So if people submit patches to add dvd writing support to cdrecord, you
>will accept them (even if it means opensource cdrecord will compete with
>closed source
rove the code?
So if people submit patches to add dvd writing support to cdrecord, you
will accept them (even if it means opensource cdrecord will compete with
closed source cdrecord-prodvd)?
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 22:42:56 2002
>ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
>" As I am not sure if people will follow my licensing rules, so these
> keys are time limited and will ex
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 22:27:50 2002
>Maybe there's a communication gap because english isn't your primary
>language. Your arguments are not making any sense to me...
If you don't understand my english, you should ask, instead it seems that you
make unrelated claims..
Jörg
EMai
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 22:16:58 2002
>ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
>" As I am not sure if people will follow my licensing rules, so these
> keys are time limited and will ex
).
Well I did expect that you start such a commnication because it sweems that
you like to know something about the cdrecord-ProDVD status.
You definitely did not...
>> For this reason I am the original Author of cdrecord and _do_ have the right to
>> publish it with any Licence I lik
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >Bernhard doesn't limit work to one single project, but he does contribute
> >code to lots of different ones. So I don't think "the RH Germany guy" is
> >much different...
>
> ???
>
> The project in question does not contain a single line of contr
- just check before posting!
ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/README
" As I am not sure if people will follow my licensing rules, so these
keys are time limited and will expire on June 17th."
^
> >
oesn't have any license
>keys, it doesn't have any timebombs (June 17).
Again: he did not contribute a single line of own code and the key expires
on Jan 12th 2003 - just check before posting!
>You stated one reason to keep cdrecord-prodvd secret is to prevent
>companies to steal the
hostview is closed source and old versions are distributed under something
> smilar to GPL.
So it's justification to keep cdrecord-prodvd closed source?
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 20:53:02 2002
>Give me your credit card number and I will set it up for you :-) :-)
>> The main difference between me and the RH Germany guy seems to be that
>> I am really busy with writing Free Software and don't have the time
>> to look for things like payp
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 20:26:55 2002
> >On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >> What is your problem with cdrecord-ProDVD?
> >It's closed source binary-only with a license key and timebomb (Jun
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 20:26:55 2002
>On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> What is your problem with cdrecord-ProDVD?
>It's closed source binary-only with a license key and timebomb (June 17).
It makes sense to check assumptions before posting
it
ruary 1998) I keep the sources secret.
If you don't use other people's code, that's your choice of course.
It's my choice to dislike this sort of thing enough to do something about
it.
> Cdrecord-ProDVD is a legal DVDD writing program what is your problem?
1. I believed it&#x
sons and your only motivation was to have a private copy of
> cdrecord running for your A03. This way we never will get good and powerfull
> free software.
He released his source code to the public. It doesn't have any license
keys, it doesn't have any timebombs (June 17).
You stated
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 11:19:36 2002
> >And for the record joerg, if you had a paypal "donate" button for the open
> >source cdrecord, I would donate for that too.
> If somebofy helps me to set up an account why not.
Give me your credit c
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> What is your problem with cdrecord-ProDVD?
It's closed source binary-only with a license key and timebomb (June 17).
Is it any wonder people might prefer the open source one?
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 11:19:36 2002
>And for the record joerg, if you had a paypal "donate" button for the open
>source cdrecord, I would donate for that too.
If somebofy helps me to set up an account why not.
The main difference between me and the RH Germany guy seems to be that
iting CDs. It's just too bad there are no plans to add
>DVD support in a legal version thereof, so it's time for someone else to
>do it.
Cdrecord-ProDVD is a legal DVDD writing program what is your problem?
In addition: Why do _you_ claim this and never tried to contact me befor
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Plamen Neykov)
>Hi Guys,
>I know it is a stupid question, but ...
>Do I still have to use cdrecord-prodvd to record DVD-R's or it is possible just to
>use the "normal" version of cdrecord?
As the GPL does not prvent DW thiefs fr
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > Look at the web page and judge yourself. The first thing that comes into
> > mind is the 'pay' button.
> Actually the sole reason I placed it there is to show people you can ask
> users to contribute without violating the GPL.
> If people fin
Finally a well said answer without flaming, completely opposed to Jörg
unfriendly comments. Congratulations.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Norbert Preining Technische Universität Wien
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14D
y
because I'm busy with other work, and because the current version works
perfectly for me.
I will release a newer version once I either have some spare time, or once
I find a serious problem in the current version.
> that uses an add on which
> most likely has been created by reverse enginee
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>From: Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>>On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Plamen Neykov wrote:
>>
>>>I know it is a stupid question, but ...
>>>Do I still have to use cdrecord-prodvd to record DVD-R's or it is possible just
>From: Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Plamen Neykov wrote:
>> I know it is a stupid question, but ...
>> Do I still have to use cdrecord-prodvd to record DVD-R's or it is possible just to
>use the "normal" version of c
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Plamen Neykov wrote:
> I know it is a stupid question, but ...
> Do I still have to use cdrecord-prodvd to record DVD-R's or it is possible just to
>use the "normal" version of cdrecord?
If you have pioneer DVDRW (A103,A104,103,104), you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Guys,
I know it is a stupid question, but ...
Do I still have to use cdrecord-prodvd to record DVD-R's or it is possible just to use
the "normal" version of cdrecord?
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Thanks - that gets things going nicely.
Lachlan.
>>With the binary version of cdrecord-prodvd - I am having problems
>>getting it to recognise the key with Redhat 7.3 (Key as given on the
>>cdrecord ftp area). (this is for academic not-for-profit use)
>
>>Does anyo
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>With the binary version of cdrecord-prodvd - I am having problems
>getting it to recognise the key with Redhat 7.3 (Key as given on the
>cdrecord ftp area). (this is for academic not-for-profit use)
>Does anyone have an example of their .bashrc
Hi,
With the binary version of cdrecord-prodvd - I am having problems
getting it to recognise the key with Redhat 7.3 (Key as given on the
cdrecord ftp area). (this is for academic not-for-profit use)
Does anyone have an example of their .bashrc file of the Key
where cdrecord-prodvd is
Besides the support for all available DVD-R/DVD-RW drives (including Panasonic)
the new version supports to use cdrecord -atip.
It now prints senseful messages in this case.
Jörg
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you do
The new cdrecord-ProDVD-1.11b19 also supports writing to the
Device type: Removable CD-ROM
Version: 0
Response Format: 2
Capabilities :
Vendor_info: 'MATSHITA'
Identifikation : 'DVD-RAM LF-D310 '
Revision : 'A116'
Device seems to b
>From: csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 13:05:25 +0100 (CET)
>Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Some people may already noticed that since January 1st 2002,
>> cdrecord-ProDVD is free for Educational and Research purposes,
>>
On 9 Mar, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Some people may already noticed that since January 1st 2002,
> cdrecord-ProDVD is free for Educational and Research purposes,
> starting from now, it is also free for private non-commercial use.
>
>
Although you are definitely not a fan of
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 13:05:25 +0100 (CET)
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some people may already noticed that since January 1st 2002,
> cdrecord-ProDVD is free for Educational and Research purposes,
> starting from now, it is also free for private non-commerci
>From: Bill Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Congratulations J=F6rg and all the authors of cdrtools. You've made these=20
>software programs into the most flexible and powerful CD/DVD recording=20
>tools for computer users on any operating system. CDRTools is simply the=20
>best there is.
Thank you, u
esearch institutes but will soon become part of everybodies
>life.
>
>
>Some people may already noticed that since January 1st 2002,
>cdrecord-ProDVD is free for Educational and Research purposes,
>starting from now, it is also free for private non-commercial use.
--
To UNS
es but will soon become part of everybodies
life.
Some people may already noticed that since January 1st 2002,
cdrecord-ProDVD is free for Educational and Research purposes,
starting from now, it is also free for private non-commercial use.
This is now part of the README in ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.
I've got problems using the latest cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 1.11a11
glibc 2.2 binary on SuSE Linux 7.3 for clone writing. The main
process suddenly exits before writing:
- --- snip ---
foo# cdrecord-prodvd dev=0,4,0 -raw96r -clone -v cdimage
Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 1.11a11 (i586-pc-linu
; I am looking at getting a Pioneer DVD-R A03 to supplement our CD-R
> drive. It will be used on a Linux storage, serving other computers. I
> have had very good success with cdrecord/mkiosfs on a Linux system and a
> Yamaha SCSI cd-r drive.
>
> I can't find any information about why I
I am looking at getting a Pioneer DVD-R A03 to supplement our CD-R
drive. It will be used on a Linux storage, serving other computers. I
have had very good success with cdrecord/mkiosfs on a Linux system and a
Yamaha SCSI cd-r drive.
I can't find any information about why I should get CDR
can we send you a disk with hpux10.20 to build from?
-david jentz
>From: Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: cdrecord prodvd for hpux
>Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 22:48:08 +0100 (MET)
>
> >From: "david jentz" <[EMAIL PROTE
i would like to get cdrecord pro-dvd for hpux 10.26, but i have not found it
built for this kernel. I have seen some posts saying it costs $100 usd to
get the DVD enabled version - or at least Joerg Schilling's version.
Where can I get more information?
-David Jentz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ps. I th
On 1 Nov, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>On 19 Oct, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> And ethical consideration should tell you that as long as I cannot prvent
>>> companies like Ahead to steal my tecnology, the best idea is not
>>> to give away the real omportant parts in
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On 19 Oct, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> And ethical consideration should tell you that as long as I cannot prvent
>> companies like Ahead to steal my tecnology, the best idea is not
>> to give away the real omportant parts in source.
>Are you implying that Ahead did steal
uets of=20
>your time and update your web site with real information about=20
>cdrecord-dvdpro... I've been trying for more then 2 mths to be able to=20
>burn DVD's in linux... and do not mind paying for it...=20
send me a 100 US $ cheque and get the trial version from:
ftp://ft
;>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 10/19/01, 1:33:17 AM, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: Cdrecord--ProDVD test versions:
> >From: Nicolae Miha
On 19 Oct, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> And ethical consideration should tell you that as long as I cannot prvent
> companies like Ahead to steal my tecnology, the best idea is not
> to give away the real omportant parts in source.
Are you implying that Ahead did steal your technology, or that
So sprach »Joerg Schilling« am 2001-10-19 um 12:41:11 +0200 :
> A typical Linux user buys a SuSE distribution more than once a year.
> A typical Solaris user loads the CD binaries over the internet.
> You cannot load the SuSE CD's over the internet.
Well, a typical Linux user uses Mandrake and lo
achine. It never really makes it
past about 70MB before the FIFO hits empty. I guess a P2 450 with a 9G
IBM SCSI drive just isn't fast enough to keep up.
Also what is the license on the full version of cdrecord-ProDVD. I have
seen mentions in the few places I have managed to find a reference t
On Friday 19 October 2001 13:32, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 19 12:53:25 2001
>
> >> A typical Linux user buys a SuSE distribution more than once a
> >> year. A typical Solaris user loads the CD binaries over the
> >> internet. You cannot load the SuSE CD's over the int
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 19 11:53:33 2001
>> As you see from other postsings today, DVD writing is currently only used
>> for commercial purposes. Why shouldn't I try to get some money for my
>> hard work? Or the other way round: wy should I give things away for
>> free that usually are n
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 19 12:53:25 2001
>> A typical Linux user buys a SuSE distribution more than once a year.
>> A typical Solaris user loads the CD binaries over the internet.
>> You cannot load the SuSE CD's over the internet.
>>
>Ooops. Before coming to work in Belgium, the only pl
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 19 12:00:03 2001
>
> >> >> Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
> >> >> asked for it.
> >>
> >> >Hmmm. Please show me a single web page whe
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 19 12:00:03 2001
>> >> Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
>> >> asked for it.
>>
>> >Hmmm. Please show me a single web page where prodvd is mentioned.
>>
>> Google gives 665
ed to write my own free driver for cdrecord.
> >>
> >> This reads really funny!
> >>
> >> Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
> >> asked for it.
>
> >Cdrecord-ProDVD is not free.
>
> As you see from other postsings today
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 19 11:07:31 2001
>
> >This is why I decided that my company should not buy the prodvd from
> >you but to write a driver.
>
> So you will cause you company much more costs by going this way.
>
Not so much because I do it on my own time.
own free driver for cdrecord.
> >>
> >> This reads really funny!
> >>
> >> Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
> >> asked for it.
>
> >Hmmm. Please show me a single web page where prodvd is mentioned.
>
> Goo
ecided to write my own free driver for cdrecord.
>>>
>>> This reads really funny!
>>>
>>> Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
>>> asked for it.
>
>>Cdrecord-ProDVD is not free.
>
> As you see from other po
>From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Fre, 19 Okt 2001, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
>> asked for it.
>>
>> In general I can say that the was little or no interest at all
>> for DVD w
>From: Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>From: Nicolae Mihalache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>>After a lot of search and frustation about writing DVD
>>>on Linux, I decided to write my own free driver for cdrecord.
>>
>> This read
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>From: Nicolae Mihalache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>>After a lot of search and frustation about writing DVD
>>on Linux, I decided to write my own free driver for cdrecord.
>
> This reads really funny!
>
On Fre, 19 Okt 2001, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
> asked for it.
>
> In general I can say that the was little or no interest at all
> for DVD writing in the last 3 and a half year. This changed
> a bit during th
>From: Nicolae Mihalache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>After a lot of search and frustation about writing DVD
>on Linux, I decided to write my own free driver for cdrecord.
This reads really funny!
Cdrecord-ProDVD is available since February 1998 and you never
asked for it.
In general
Nicolae Mihalache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello!
>
> After a lot of search and frustation about writing DVD
> on Linux, I decided to write my own free driver for cdrecord.
> The big problem is documentation that I don't have and I can only
> base my driver on last MMC3 draft from t10.org.
>From: Nicolae Mihalache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
>> I just put test versions of cdrecord-ProDVD on
>>
>> ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/
>>
>> These binaries support DVD-R and DVD-RW.
>>
>>
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> I just put test versions of cdrecord-ProDVD on
>
> ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/
>
> These binaries support DVD-R and DVD-RW.
>
> You may either write a full (4.7 GB) Media in -dummy mode or
> up to 1 GB in real mod
Hello!
After a lot of search and frustation about writing DVD
on Linux, I decided to write my own free driver for cdrecord.
The big problem is documentation that I don't have and I can only
base my driver on last MMC3 draft from t10.org.
The driver should be almost ready, but I did not test it in
Why not 4.7 GB in real mode?
/Mattias
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Joerg Schilling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 19. October 2001 0:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cdrecord--ProDVD test versions
>
>
> I just put test versions of cdr
I just put test versions of cdrecord-ProDVD on
ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix/cdrecord/ProDVD/
These binaries support DVD-R and DVD-RW.
You may either write a full (4.7 GB) Media in -dummy mode or
up to 1 GB in real mode.
Jörg
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
Mitchell Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to Joerg Schilling:
> Please put a clear link on your webpage about Cdrecord-ProDVD with price
> and ordering information...
>
> An e-mail address that dose not block prospective customers(our smtp
> server refuses e-mai
ll another os on there system to be able to burn
DVD disks.
I'm one of those people. A few things to help the people questing to
write DVD's that come after me...
to Joerg Schilling:
Please put a clear link on your webpage about Cdrecord-ProDVD with price
and ordering information..
201 - 300 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
