any router that supports VLAN trunking (802.1q or ISL). The 2600 does if
equipped with a fastethernet interface.
see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml (I it got using a search
for intervlan routing)
which indicates the minimun router is the 2620
- Original Message -
From:
If your critical servers are in there own subnet/VLAN, this is a natural
barrier to even a misconfigured static. A client pc can't speak to a router
not on its own subnet, therefore is forced to maintain any topology you
devise. (i.e. the answer is strict addressing rules, and hierarchical
George,
I'd recommend a couple of 2600s with NM-1Vs and FX-S cards. That's what I
used for my lab. I used a 2610 and a 2620 each with NM-1Vs and VIC-2FXS
cards. I then also used the 2620 for ISL trunking. I'd recommend a couple
of 2610s with 64D/16F (so you want have to worry about
Wojtek,
Hi! IF you're putting together a CCIE lab, I would recommend starting with
some 2500 series routers. The 16xx and 17xx are alright, but they dont run
Enterprise IOS code. A good way to start your home lab would be with a
couple of 2501s and another 25xx with at least 4 serial ports
Make sure that your Frame-switch has:
encap frame
frame intf-type dce
clockrate 64000 (if it has the dce end of cable)
If you manually set the frame lmi-type on both routers, make sure they are
the same. You do not have to set them manually. After getting the links up
you will need the Frame
Hello Everyone
Just wonder if anyone is aware of a way to restrict traffic entering a Cisco
761 router form the Internet to only ftp control and data traffic. From my
searching, I have found that it will probably need to be done with the set
ip filter command, however have not seen an
Hi Jon,
Congrats on clearing the LAB if u have any pointer to us then
please let us know.
by the way i am interested in ur 2502 router please send me a show version
and a pic if u got we can have a deal i am in MD
-Mamoor
Jon Mendoza wrote in message
[EMAIL
There were issues with the 5000 series and a beta versions - don't ask me
which one - of Windows XP. This issue has allegedly been addressed.
http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO59523,00.html
Please can someone explain the role of the designated bridge with regards to
STP
Thanks
Mike
__
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official
business of Standard Bank Investment
The earliest dates are in May 2002
Ged
Kolesnikov Paul wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello all,
Cisco change format of CCIE Lab Exam (single extended day) and Cisco say
that ... new format will result in additional lab seat opening so
candidates will then
Hi Guys..
Come with some New Queston..
For eg,
our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
I have a question:
I don't know if Cisco3600 and Cisco2600 series routers support MultiLinkPPP
as
an access server or no?
I apperciate your answers.
Regards,
-- Ali Amiri
Network Admin.
Safineh Co.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.safineh.net/
Message Posted at:
For clarity since VLANs are a pet peeve of mine, can we ask which router
will route between trunked interfaces? One does not route between VLANs,
one routes between IP subnets with IP routers.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 2:40 AM EA Louie wrote:
any router that
Every LAN segment in the network has a designated bridge. The designated
bridge is the bridge on that LAN segment which advertises the lowest
path cost to the root bridge. Only the deginated bridge is allowed to
forward non-BPDU frames to other LAN segments.
Hawthorne, Mike MM 08/21/01
To prevent loops, only one switch/bridge on each LAN/VLAN segment is elected
to be the designated bridge/switch, and it usually has the best route to the
root bridge/switch.
More detailed information can be found here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/5.html
Hth,
Ole
Yes,they would support it.
Regards,
Dragi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16641t=16636
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure
Is there a question here that I'm missing?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 7:06 AM Cisco Lover wrote:
Hi Guys..
Come with some New Queston..
For eg,
our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub
Spoke
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Hi Sam!
I think this is what you might need:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/750/700cr44/700crip.htm#8954
Regards,
Dragi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16643t=16629
--
FAQ, list
Hi,
Apologies for a very trivial question. I am trying to find out whether the
HSSI interface (PA-H) for the 7200 contains the IOS sub-command clock rate
'bps'. In other words does it cater for standard serial variable clock rate.
I am aware that for standard serial interfaces the command is
definitely !!
-Original Message-
From: Peter Van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 14:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]
Is there a question here that I'm missing?
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 7:06 AM
For those of you studying for the CCIE written (including myself) the Exam
Cram book states on page 68 that A 1 bit indicates the RIF is read left to
right, and a 0 is read right to left. In the Rossi Paper it states 0 means
the RIF is read left to right, 1 means the RIF is read right to left.
What are the differences for Interfaces ATM and ATM-DXI.. Can I cross
connect an ATM interface with another ATM-DXI interface?.. I will work?.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16646t=16646
--
FAQ, list archives,
I believe any router will route between VLANS, if you want to use the same
interface I believe it has to be FE.
- Original Message -
From: Circusnuts
To:
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:23 PM
Subject: What Router for Routing Between VLANS [7:16609]
I have lent out my CCNP books
Oopss
Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it
here again.
Thanks for the kind replies..
For eg,
our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub Spoke
environment.In that case there must be some unused DLCI's on spoke routers
which
You don't have unused dlci's because you are in a hub and spoke...
You see those dlci's because the phone company you are going through employs
goobers that love to mis map pvc's :)
And unless you can figure out a way to filter at the dlci level, they stay
until you call the phone company
The Exam Cram is wrong and they have a correction on the publisher's
website, IIRC. 0 is left to right, 1 is right to left. Be very careful
when reading the Exam Cram book, it has quite a few errors. You should
check the errata on that one before your put any trust into it.
HTH,
John
Patrick..
The Scenerio I told u , Is not related to any phone company but its of my
own company i.e my personal LAb :),created by myself.
Because one of my friend told me that there is some way to disable those
Unused DLCIS by playing with some commands,, and Im in search of that
way..
Just go to google, type in your desired search words and add
site:cisco.com ...
Thanks!
TJ
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Rapid spanning-tree 802.1w
this is one of several blatant errors in the exam cram book. take care when
reading it, and be sure to check other sources if you have doubts.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Wright, Jeremy
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:44 AM
Tony I sit my written tomorrow at 3pm and if I pass I can't wait to get on
that boring list
- Original Message -
From: Tony Medeiros
To:
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Associate and Professional Email Lists [7:16217]
Let's keep the list the same, I my
for CCNA now its 849.
Dwayne Saunders wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
has the passing score for the ccna changed
when I sat it in December last year the pass mark was 822
just wondering
D'Wayne Saunders
Network Admin
Ph:08 89507742
Fax:08 89521112
get rid of them? why? why not use them? after all, you are paying for them!
or you can call the telco and have them delete the dlci's you aren't using.
but as long as the dlci's are configured on the frame switch, LMI will
report their existence to you. this is a Good Thing, by the way.
Chuck
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Circusnuts wrote:
I have lent out my CCNP books do not remember all the router models that
can
route between VLAN's. I currently have a 4700M doing the job, but wanted
to
know if a 2600 would route them.
Sure, a 2620 or better can do this.
Thanks
Phil
I'm
Very strange I have a fast Ethernet module in a 2610 and it works and I am
only using the ip feature set
so I don't know what the story is there
D'Wayne Saunders
Network Admin
Ph:08 89507742
Fax:08 89521112
Mobile:
www.lasseters.com.au
World's First Government Licensed and Regulated
You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes and then clear
the cache. That should prevent the spokes from seeing the unused dlci's,
but will require a static map of dlci to ip for each dlci you want to use.
Cisco Lover wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Hmm, how interesting.
Is that something you see often, or only in few cases?
Will it have ANY effect on the router at all, or will it just be
empty/unused information?
I would think that if they map a DLCI to your router that is live with
someone elses router, you could end up receiving
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote:
Oopss
Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I have write it
here again.
Thanks for the kind replies..
For eg,
our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub
Spoke
environment.In that case there must
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote:
Hi Guys..
Come with some New Queston..
hmm, ok, so your looking for some challenging questions? Ok, I will post
one, its got FR in it. First I'll post the problem, followed by the
config:
THE PROBLEM
===
Users on DLCI's 200, 224, 201, 225
I think that at this point, it would help if you could tell us little bit
about your setup.
1) How many routers do you have, and how are they connected to each other?
2) Include the show conf of the router acting like a Frame Relay Switch.
3) Include the show conf of the hub router.
4) Include
Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]
You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes
You might be right, I would have to test in it a lab. Can anybody give
confirmation on this?
-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635]
Doesn't
How do you set up a sw as a full mesh and a network as a HUB and Spoke. I
dont understand.
- Original Message -
From: Cisco Lover
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:08 AM
Subject: Fwd: For FR Grus [7:16635]
Oopss
Sorry guys...I donto know where it lost in b/w..Any way..I
As a result of an off-list conversation, I came across the following
networking term:
iBGP split horizon
my first reaction was a sarcastic remark about never having come across the
term in the RFC's. but then I got to thinking about it, and I now see this
as a descriptive and quite useful term.
I have been using Cisco Press CCNP library as my primary source.
I had about 12 questions on both BGP and OSPF.
Regards,
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I passed the routing exam today, only just. Not very proud of the
score, 770.
I
just scraped through my last exam (CIT) today to complete CCNP
it was by far the hardest exam, didn't finish in time and didn't understand
some of the questions (it would be easy to blame the wording and the grammar
but I guess that's part of the test ?) but just did enough.
Good luck to any
it used to be that you could do a clear frame-relay-inarp to accomplish
this. however, since the advent of 12.x, I believe the only sure way is to
reload.
BTW, watch out for the mapping of 0.0.0.0 to your DLCI's! ;-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
This really confuses me because according to the Cisco products
reference guide, there is no FastEthernet module available for the 2600
series. It says that if you need fastethernet on a 2600 you need to get
a 2620 or better. A 2610 has a single 10baseT port.
Are you doing ISL or 802.1q with
Are you connecting one VLAN to your Ethernet interface and the other VLAN to
your Fast Ethernet module interface, or do you have them both connected to
the Fast Ethernet module interface setup with VLAN trunking?
Ole
~~~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
let me save you the trouble. ;-
1)it is a violation to disclose whether or not ISIS is on the LAB, but you
probably should study it anyway, if only because
2) those /32's in the routing table are supposed to be there when you have
an OSPF network over a frame relay cloud. no, they can't be
Could you elaborate on the mapping of 0.0.0.0 to a DLCI? How does it come
about?
Thanks,
Scott
Chuck Larrieu wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
it used to be that you could do a clear frame-relay-inarp to accomplish
this. however, since the advent of 12.x, I
If dont want to use the DLCs and you are using a physical interface for
frame-relay just disable frame-relay inverse arp. If you dont want to do
that use point - to - point subinterfaces and define the DLCI you want to
use on the subinterface.
Raul
- Original Message -
From: Donald B
I don't believe so, at least on the newer 12.0 stuff, you can disable
frame-relay inverse-arp and then clear frame and your ok. I think
it may have behaved differently in the past though.
Brian
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Scott Hoover wrote:
You might be right, I would have to test in it a lab.
E-mail me if you are working on CCIE, and would like to form CCIE study
group in North Jersy.
Eric
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16674t=16674
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Donald B Johnson jr wrote:
How do you set up a sw as a full mesh and a network as a HUB and Spoke. I
dont understand.
Because you only use some of the DLCI's, not all of them.
- Original Message -
From: Cisco Lover
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:08 AM
Chuck, I think there's a difference here. Split Horizon as you say, does not
advertise a route back out the interface that it received it on, but the
iBGP does not only not propagate a route learned from other iBGP out the
receiving interface, but it does not propagate it out any interfaces
Yes,
Rossi is correct.
Phil.
--- Wright, Jeremy wrote:
For those of you studying for the CCIE written
(including myself) the Exam
Cram book states on page 68 that A 1 bit indicates
the RIF is read left to
right, and a 0 is read right to left. In the Rossi
Paper it states 0 means
the
Interesting,
But traditional split-horizon seems to be concerned with the interface
the routes came in and went out on, whereas with iBGP the routes are not
passed even if they come in one interface, but are being sent out another,
Its more of a peer level than an interface level.
Brian
On
Is that the same principle as one does not route between LANs ?
or bridge where you can, route where you must ?
- Original Message -
From: Peter Van Oene
To: EA Louie ;
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:51 AM
Subject: Re: What Router for Routing Between VLANS [7:16609]
For clarity
I don't think bridge will work on this network because of split horizon.
- Original Message -
From: Brian
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16659]
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote:
Hi Guys..
Hi all .
Me and my friend have the lab date for 3rd october and 11th october.We want
to switch in 1st week of december of course 2001.
Please reply
Almazi M. Rashid
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Get your FREE
Ultimate Hacking
New York, NY 08/28/01 08/31/01 $3995
San Jose, CA 09/11/01 09/14/01 $3995
Boston, MA 09/18/01 09/21/01 $3995
Irvine, CA 10/08/01 10/11/01 $3995
NT/2000 Security
New York, NY 09/25/01 09/27/01 $2500
Irvine, CA 12/11/01 12/13/01 $2500
Managing Cisco Network Security
I've actually heard that term used before, and I think it *may* have
been in one of Howard's books or CertificationZone papers. Maybe not,
I'm sure he'll correct me. I do know that I've heard the term split
horizon in this context before.
I agree that we should probably use it more often. A
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Donald B Johnson jr wrote:
I don't think bridge will work on this network because of split horizon.
Can you be more clear about your answer?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Brian
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:51 AM
Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM
Any one located in NY-NJ area like to do CCNA-CCNP or require any help .
I have alot of Cisco Study+exam resources.
I am available to help you (On site Visit/Phone/E-mail)
contact me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16685t=16685
I just got the advertisement from Global Knowledge, sounds like a good
time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Chang
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Training [7:16684]
Ultimate Hacking
New
you can correct me here if I am wrong but split horizon is only used in
distance vector protocols NO???
The problem here without giving the answer is that a router is expected to
pass a packet out of an interface which is on its own subnet !! Doesn't
compute! What is the routing protocol
Hello All,
Can anyone recommend good books to read when one wants to configure
access-lists on Cisco devices?
Thanks
James
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16693t=16693
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
yeah but he is using irb with a bvi and igrp it is probably a split h issue
it creating a loopa
- Original Message -
From: McCallum, Robert
To: 'Donald B Johnson jr' ;
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16681]
I have a five year old that could probably teach that ultimate hacking.
Cause he is my number one flea.
- Original Message -
From: John Chang
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:17 AM
Subject: Training [7:16684]
Ultimate Hacking
New York, NY 08/28/01 08/31/01 $3995
San
I wish that Networking 101 was required in schools. Then even the
Management by Business Week types would know about the 7 layers and that
the operating system, which generally deals with local file management and
I/O, should not matter when considering traffic going through routers and
First of all, I believe you have a typo:
router igrp 1
network 192.1.0.0
network 192.2.0.0
network 193.3.0.0
should have been
router igrp 1
network 192.168.1.0
network 192.168.2.0
network 193.168.3.0
I have not an answer to your question yet.
Ole
Glad you are still around, Chuck... :)
The bug being referred to has to deal with the Catalyst 5500 switches, and
early EARL versions...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cat5k-8021x-vuln-pub.shtml
Basically, if you are going to roll out XP, you should be using the resource
kit, and
To me this looks very similar to bridging with DSL. Since you cannot
receive the ARP the router must proxy this.
At 09:52 AM 8/21/2001, McCallum, Robert wrote:
you can correct me here if I am wrong but split horizon is only used in
distance vector protocols NO???
The problem here without
From CCO:
clear frame-relay-inarp
To clear dynamically created Frame Relay maps, which are created by the use
of Inverse ARP, use the clear frame-relay-inarp EXEC command.
clear frame-relay-inarp
Syntax Description
This command has no arguments or keywords.
Command Mode
EXEC
Example
The
yeah you got irb and bvi and igrp on same interface you are creating loops
because SH is disabled
- Original Message -
From: Brian
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus [7:16635]) [7:16687]
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Donald B
Last week while searching for an answer to a question I had, I ran across
this study group. I was very pleased to run across a group that I felt had
the same love for network engineering as I. From the sound of some of the
emails, Real world work related network questions are inappropriate for
Hai,
I am tryig to analyse a problem that is existing in my network. I have a
link with PPP on WAN, Till four days back everything working fine. The
problem started four days back, the problem is I am able to traceroute the
IPs, but unable to ping to that network. I didn't restricted ICMP on
end
Putting static routes on the remote routers pointing back to the hub router
would work. Assuming the hub router has routes in it's routing table to all
the remote routers.
Darrin Gibson
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Wenthin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001
Could be worse...
I had a boss that turned off the UPS because:
All that beeping was bothering me. Can't you make it stop???
Of course the fact that it was beeping because of a power failure was lost
on him
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL
No one has gotten this problem yet. Remeber, making it so the clients are
on differnt layer 3 networks works, but when they are on the same it
doesn't. What mechanics are involved in how the packet will be treated
different if on the same network vs. different networks.
I'll still leave the
yes that was a typo, but had nothing to do with the problem, good catch
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Ole Drews Jensen wrote:
First of all, I believe you have a typo:
router igrp 1
network 192.1.0.0
network 192.2.0.0
network 193.3.0.0
should have been
router igrp 1
network
no thats not the problem
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Donald B Johnson jr wrote:
yeah you got irb and bvi and igrp on same interface you are creating loops
because SH is disabled
- Original Message -
From: Brian
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: CHALLENGE
O'Reilly's book on Cisco access lists is pretty good...
newbie newbie wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello All,
Can anyone recommend good books to read when one wants to configure
access-lists on Cisco devices?
Thanks
James
Message Posted at:
Unfortunately, none of the suggestions to find 802.1W at Cisco's site
worked. Perhaps they just don't support it yet, although a normal Google
search did discover that they are working on it. It would make sense since
they have been so concerned with improving the spanning tree algorithm for
That about covers it Chuck,
Dont' forget How do I fix the full/half duplex thing
Tony
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: Associate and Professional Email Lists [7:16217]
let me save you the trouble. ;-
1)it is a
I have the following config for auth on the pix 500 series
aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius
aaa-server RADIUS (inside) host 192.168.1.1 cisco timeout 15
aaa authentication http console RADIUS
aaa authentication http outbound 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 RADIUS
This should be all I need to
I just checked the 2600 product catalog. It doesn't list a FE for the
2600... but it does list an NM-4E (4 10 Mbps Ethernet interfaces) which
would enable you to route between four... er... um... oh heck. Between 4
VLANs. Sorry Peter, I couldn't think of another way to explain it on short
I can think of two reason why it wouldn't work.
1. Because you're using bridging on the frame relay links, it must adhere
to the spanning tree rules. This means that you cannot send traffic out
the same interface you receive it on. In this configuration it would mean
that information received
Yes, that is the fact according to mine too, however, if you look here, it
should be possible.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/hw_in
st/nm_inst/nm-doc/connteth.htm#34411
Watch for word wrap.
Hth,
Ole
~~~
Ole Drews Jensen
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Sasha wrote:
He is doing transparent bridging between pvc's, hence
routing issues are irrelevant.
The problem here is that a packet that comes into a physical
interface is not transmitted back through the same physical
interface (although on another pvc), and bridging
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can think of two reason why it wouldn't work.
1. Because you're using bridging on the frame relay links, it must adhere
to the spanning tree rules. This means that you cannot send traffic out
the same interface you receive it on. In this
It's really the principal that one does not use layer three protocols to
govern layer two activities.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/21/2001 at 11:55 AM EA Louie wrote:
Is that the same principle as one does not route between LANs ?
or bridge where you can, route where you
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Gibson, Darrin wrote:
Putting static routes on the remote routers pointing back to the hub router
would work. Assuming the hub router has routes in it's routing table to all
the remote routers.
that would not work. There is something fundementally wrong with the
below
If the clients are on different layer 3 network,
then that should be configured as point to point
network. If they are on same network then they can use
point to multipoint.
I think in the given senerio, it should be configured
as point to point network.
Arun
--- Brian wrote:
No one has
Thanks for the input Dennis, I will check it out.
James
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16721t=16693
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Anyone know of any good introductory books on PIX firewalls? Something nice
and simple that has a beginning, middle, and an ending.(Most authors of tech
books miss this concept). I'd rather not have to jump around in CCO land
getting snippets of different functionalities that I probably would
How about get rid of igrp and configure ospf in nbma mode? :)
-Patrick
Brian 08/21/01 02:10PM
No one has gotten this problem yet. Remeber, making it so the clients are
on differnt layer 3 networks works, but when they are on the same it
doesn't. What mechanics are involved in how the
I'm playing around with this and I've been concentrating my focus on EasyIP.
It would appear that only dialer interfaces are able to obtain an address
via DHCP. I want my Ethernet interface to get an IP address dynamically.
Has anyone done this? Can anyone give me some guidance if it is
Dear Friends,
We will be holding the Cisco Professional Association - DC August
meeting and picnic on Saturday August 25, 2001.
Because the ceiling in my living room is finally getting fixed,
this being 7 years after the tornado damaged our roof, we are NOT holding
this
I don't know of any books but all of the manuals can be found here:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/
Allen
- Original Message -
From: sam sneed
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:09 PM
Subject: books on PIX? [7:16720]
Anyone know of any good introductory
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
