-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VSAM Surprise
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:38:52 -0800, GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 7:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why isn't OMVS command integrated with ISPF?
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:15:35 +0100, Lindy Mayfield wrote
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pat Mihalec
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Question on Out Sourcing
I have a question on Out Sourcing. When you sign a contract does that
mean you no lo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin Packer
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Javascript disabled in Firefox. Was "Re: redirect.www.ibm.com
(IBMLink)"
Remind me why you'd run Firefox wi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pat Mihalec
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on Out Sourcing
I know this but I needed it from someone else to show the current
director. He
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Price of CPU seconds
Hi
If someone can tell me the price of a CPU second in a larger z/OS system
(we d
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Price of CPU seconds
Hi
For me this more or less clear.
I have here a number of collegues from
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cal McCracken
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM contact for documentation servers?
IBM recently (a couple of weeks ago) implemented a slightly new
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Price of CPU seconds
One of the other examples uses $0.22/second which results in nearly
$7,000,000 per
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Price of CPU seconds
> That example stated that $800 per CPU/hr was the cost for a machine
> (undefined
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 12:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Price of CPU seconds
>If all other things are equal, the cost per CPU second for a machine
with two pr
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Replacement for CA - TPX - Session Manager?
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:30:44 -0600 Todd Blandford <[EMA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 8:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zIIP API for ISV's
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilma
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SDSF User Manual
On 4 Mar 2008 12:03:30 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Schwarz, Barry
A) wrote:
>I've never se
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 6:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is PSATOLD always zero when in SRB mode?
The answer is "yes".
But you might want to ask the converse ques
Anyone see this or run into such issues?
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&;
articleId=9067863&source=NLT_PM&nlid=8
(watch wrap)
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-- All opinions expressed by me are my own and may not necessarily
reflect those of my employer. --
--
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Legal Issues with WEB
I'm not familiar with the specific patents in question, but it should be
obvious by now
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 6:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Disclaimers
>Ted, I like you, but you're guilty of starting this thread. ;-)
Yes, I am.
If it offends you,
I was going through all the files associated with one of my TSO IDs and
I found a number of ISPF Backup datasets that have been archived.
How or why would these get orphaned (if they have been archived, I
consider them orphaned)? The format of the names is:
userid.ISRn.BACKUP which matches the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Backup Files
I believe that the way you described the backup datasets is the way it
works. If your
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kirk Talman
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Backup Files
Thanks for APAR info.
And that goes for me, as well as for the link to the customizatio
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Convert EBCDIC to ASCII in batch?
I cannot think of an easy way to do this, so I thought that I'd ask. I
want
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Grimes
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Changing the MF IP Address
Hello,
I'm going to a meeting next week where I will advocate moving our MF
behind
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 12:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Stupid? MS patent
This does not sound very innovative. CA' CAS9 does something similar.
IFAPRDnn member of PAR
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Backup Files
Also look at prior discussion on this list for "ispf edit recovery" from
May 2007:
Fo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 3:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SVCDUMP processing question
I need remedial training in MVS disagnostic techniques. :-(
I seem to have c
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 4:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SVCDUMP processing question
Thompson, Steve wrote:
> QUIESCE is a new one on me, and I can
Is there an equivalent list server for the AS/400 systems as we have
here with IBM-Main?
I have this ugly feeling I'm going to need it.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-- All opinions expressed by me are my own and may not necessarily
reflect those of my employer. --
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 7:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Link for I-Series?
Try this:
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/
Very good people there! They were
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 2:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another one bites the dust.
Martin,
I'm sorry to hear you shut your MP3000 down for good. We had the sam
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Software cost savings from a zIIP
This has been cross posted to the MXG-Listserv.
=20
We will be moving from
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Using IPCS (full screen) in a UNIX shell?
While this is going on, I cannot use my TSO session for anything e
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 converter via /*JOBPARM SYSAFF=
In a JES2 MAS (Multi Access SPOOL) environ with two different levels
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 converter via /*JOBPARM SYSAFF=
But the suggestion to use /*XMIT would work, so that JES2 con
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Each CPU usage
Since the conclusion was that they didn't even require a 4-way after the
problem was "so
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual Storage implementation
Very true. Although we act as if we invented it. IIRC, the first virtual
So far, I've timed out once, and am still waiting for a response in
login into IBMLink (web).
So before I do the 800 number thing... Anyone else not able to get in?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
---
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM-Link Down 31AUG07?
Except for one anomalous occurrence, I use a 62x160 screensize without
problems. I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM-Link Down 31AUG07?
Seems the problem is sporadic. Not everyone has it happening.
Good thing the VM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 5:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual Storage implementation
This was a problem when I worked with VM/SP and MVS guests 20 years ago,
and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Britz, Anton - CO 7th
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 1401 simulator for OS/360
Hi,
I am still not sure why anybody would want to run an IBM opera
Ok, I confess, I'm suffering from old age.
I know that there is a way to concatenate n PDSes together, and then
extract a member from this to a sequential file.
Why am I needing this? Well, I have several levels of source libraries
(PROD, TEST, Private) and I need to pull a member from the lowest
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 4:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDS to Sequential Question
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:36:28 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
>Ok, I conf
Does anyone know of a channel attached TCP device that supports 1-8MB
Window size? [The amount of data that can be sent from stack to stack
before having to wait for response.]
Does anyone know how or if this can be changed on a z9's internal
adapters for z/OS?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
--
--
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 8:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is TCBECB supposed to be zero at end of task?
I don't feel a whole lot of need to answer this, as TCBE
I don't know the manual title, but it sure looks like an OPS/MVS-II
message to me.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Dranes
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 5:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
We just recently installed z/OS 1.8 using ServerPac. We then ap
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
The data set space allocations are not the result of a logic
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
Without the APAR numbers, it's a bit hard to say (smile), b
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
Oddly enough I'd looked already. I wrote the SMS support spe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 7:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PLPA and COMMON PAGESPACE Size
We do this so that we don't have to worry about sizing the PLPA page
d
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Deaver
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: FICON tape drive?
Anybody ever seen a stand alone FICON attached 3490 capable tape drive?
Yes, I know
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FICON tape drive?
Well, I got the wrong info. Something bothered me about what I was told
and
It looks like data wrap. Verify that the source basically lines up in CC
1, 10, & 16.
If the data starts look
ing like th
is then you have a dat
a wrap problem.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA142E Operation code not complete on first record
This is the code:
DAIR9900 DS0H
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA142E Operation code not complete on first record
It's 80:
TECH.DITTO.SRCLIB(DITTDAIR) - 01.0
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Walker
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tech Notes - Any body know about them or where they are
hidden?
>If the communications server people ha
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Green
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: JAVA un z/OS
Does anyone have any tuning/performance references/links for Java under
z/OS?
Some tentative f
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Mason
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JAVA un z/OS
Steve
Careful! You'll be giving the defenders of the true USS a reputation for
being diffic
I must remember to place markers...
--
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ib
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alfred Gaiani
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 1:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: QWS3270
I am using QWS3270 sofware under Windows XP to connect to our IBM
mainframe.
The dialup works fin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rohit Bhandari
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 2:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 or JES3, Which one is older?
First of all there is no specific date issued by IBM , but this wh
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anton Britz
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 or JES3, Which one is older?
Hi,
Come on all ya x'perts. this is not good enough for the "new
I have attempted to logon to the web interface only to get a 500 error
message.
Second attempt has also gotten:
-
500 Server Error
The following error occurred: [code=RESOURCE_RECLAIMED] Internal error.
Try again.
Could not open error file
-
Regards,
Steve Thompson
Mr. Palmisano's office is probably tired of hearing from me.
So why don't you and the rest who have a legitimate gripe, email Mr.
Palmisano's office. The more the wheel squeaks, the more attention paid
to it...
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rankin, Bob
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9
Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My
management wants to purchase
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anton Britz
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ADABAS vs IMS vs DB2 Who is faster?
Hi,
Summarized :
a) So you never worked with ADABAS in your life
b)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SLIP sliding away
I really don't see that there is a serious problem here. (Or am I still
missing the poin
Enough said... and this is my last posting, for those that had enough
of this serious talk in a bar.
Anton Britz
One can only hope.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anton Britz
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RES: ADABAS vs IMS vs DB2 Who is faster?
Hi,
Jon wants us all to "play nicely" and I would try and show
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ADABAS vs. IMS vs. DB2 Who is faster?
Van Dalsen, Herbie wrote:
[...]
> The reason why both(DB2/Adabas) are still
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Barbara Nitz
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are there tasks that don't play by WLM's rules
>Has anyone else experienced this with Direct-Connect or an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 1:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: "System z"? "System z9"? "eServer zSeries"? which?
"System z" for current z9BC and z9EC machines (replaced
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: "System z"? "System z9"? "eServer zSeries"? which?
Arts and Crafts at the Psych ward, Steve? :-)
Bob Rich
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to read source from a PDS member
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:43:51 -0400, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you
w
https://www-304.ibm.com/jct03004c/ibmlink/link2/servicelink/servicelinkP
age.jsp?lc=en&cc=US ibmlink
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/ Pubs for
z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Norgauer
Sent
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carroll, William
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: tso racf
is there anyway to block or ignore or stop somebody from entering a
command on the command promp
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 5:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: tso racf
>That way you know the user was safely tucked into ISPF.
Why do we care?
What problem are we sol
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VARY too many devices offline
On Oct 23, 2007, at 3:17 AM, Zaromil Tisler wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:54
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Santosh Kandi
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: About dispatching process
Since "DISABLED" applies to only I/O and External interrupts, if you
dont w
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Santosh Kandi
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: About dispatching process
"Repressible or Exigent?
Do you have VM or Flex-Es?
Otherwise, it will b
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VARY too many devices offline
Eric:
What would you do with dishonest consultants?
A clue was given whe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 Features summary
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:05:02 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
But SDB came too
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 Features summary
Thompson, Steve wrote:
> Linkedit had a limit built into it that was ne
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Postpischil
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 Features summary
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>> The word Engineer is in my title as well.
>
>
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PL/S ??
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLink down again second time today SEV1 Ticket# 33639291
IBMLink is down for the second time today and n
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Berg
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
..just for my obscene curiosity:
What IDIOT designed the COBOL COPY RE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAI
Is IBM Main down?
This is a test message. If this had been a real message, then various of
the members could argue as to whether or not this message contained any
intelligence.
Alas, this is only a test message, similar to a sharp stick, with which
to poke the IBM Main server to see if it will re
about 15
minutes after contacting the BAMA EDU help desk.
Darren's retirement ripples being felt?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:06 AM
To
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 11/08/2007
06:23:58 PM:
Actually, no. We a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
Thompson, Steve wrote:
> You did say dedicated. And it certainly app
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 11/08/2007
12:24:52 PM:
No, there is no su
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Bruce Black passed away
For at least 10 years before that, Bruce was easily the most active
poster
in th
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Peplinski
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SV: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:20:36 +0100, Thomas Berg <[EMAIL PROTECT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Bolan
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLink's unavailability
Ok. Just a thought. I am not responsible in any way for IBMLINK. I
don't even
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: latest ibmlink news (still not working, shock and surprise)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM M
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of willie bunter
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHSM - URGENT HELP
Good Day,
A files which was migrated by DFHSM (MIGRAT2)was uncataloged in error
(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 4:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
As Ralph Johnson noted in his post to the FLEX-ES listserv,
"Inte
401 - 500 of 984 matches
Mail list logo
