Re: In defense of Biblical marriage

2004-02-20 Thread tomfodw
Well sure. And you can make exactly the same objection to ANY reason ANYONE puts 
forward for doing ANYTHING. The measure of a measure taken is of course not the 
sincerity of the person taking it, but its effect on others. I'm simply saying that 
Judaism believes in more than mere faith as a guide to living. It's a start, not a 
finish. 

Tom Beck

--
"I always knew I'd see the first man on 
the Moon. I never thought I'd see the 
last." - Dr. Jerry Pournelle
> And who exactly do you trust to decide what is and is not the proper 
> perfection? Who would you trust to make decisions on how the world 
> should be completed, (or if you believe as such), how God intended it 
> to be completed?
> 
> I know of a lot of really bad things that have been done in the name 
> of God. Do you believe that those who did them did not firmly believe 
> that they were doing God's bidding?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: In defense of Biblical marriage

2004-02-20 Thread TomFODW
> Fair enough. One always needs to hope from time to time. But hope is
> perpetually optimistic. And it's been my experience that optimism is in most
> cases, a complete disregard for the truth.
> 

I can't _prove_ faith, and I'm not trying to. I was merely putting forth the 
position (or, rather, _a_ position) that exists within my faith. It's how I 
try to live my life. My choice. Doesn't have to persuade you, or anyone else. 
Just what I think.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: A reasonable view.

2004-02-20 Thread TomFODW
You are correct in the abstract, but perhaps less so in the concrete. So many 
critics of Israel actually ARE motivated by anti-semitism that it is only 
prudent to wonder at first. So many proponents of so-called "states' rights" 
really ARE and WERE motivated by racism that again, one's first thought HAS to be, 
maybe that's what's in play. FIRST thought. Not necessarily second. Being 
aware of the past and how it may inform the present, not being naive, is NOT 
intolerance, but merely prudence. 


" I disagree.

"That automatic questioning, that first assumption is akin to intolerance. 
Many things are not as you say necessarily correct. Reverse implications and 
knee-jerk emotions are places where differences become intolerance and even 
hate."


Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: In defense of Biblical marriage

2004-02-20 Thread TomFODW
> I don't necessarily think that's true. Especially since prayer is the
> action. Besides, if one has to "balance" prayer with something, anything,
> then it kind of defeats the purpose in the first place doesn't it?
> 

Not in Judaism. At least not in Conservative Judaism. 

There's something Napoleon supposedly said to his generals that sums it up 
perfectly: "Pray as if everything depends upon God. But fight as if everything 
depends upon you."

Prayer is NOT enough. God expects us to do His work in His world. Judaism 
teaches us that we are His partners in completing His creation. In Hebrew it's 
called Tikun Olam, "healing the world" or "perfecting the world." That God 
deliberately left the world incomplete so that people could experience the 
fulfillment of accomplishing its completion themselves.

People pray for a lot of reasons. Not just for things but for strength, for 
guidance, for hope, for direction. And after that, we have to go out into the 
world and put our faith into action.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: A reasonable view.

2004-02-19 Thread TomFODW
> None of these examples are correct!
> 

Correction: none of them are NECESSARILY correct. But many of them have at 
least some basis in truth. E.g., criticism of Israel often IS motivated by 
anti-Semitism, proponents of so-called "states' rights" often ARE crypto (or not so 
crypto) segregationists, etc. Not in all cases. But certainly in enough that 
one has to wonder and question if not automatically always assume.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Political Baiting  Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

2004-02-15 Thread TomFODW
> For whatever it is worth, it is a common meme among conservatives that
> liberals consider themselves to be smarter than conservatives.
> 
> 


I don't consider myself necessarily smarter than anyone else. What I would 
say is that liberals are much nicer people in their politics than conservatives 
(not necessarily nicer as people; I know some conservatives who are lovely 
people even though their politics make me sick - when I'm not shrieking in rage). 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

2004-02-15 Thread TomFODW
> This was an honest expression of concern and confusion that is shared by
> many. I suspect and hope that over time people will get used to the idea but 
> for
> now it does not do the cause of gay union any good to sharply casitgate 
> someone
> for honestly expressed feelings.
> 

If you don't confront people and call them on their prejudices, they will get 
the idea that it's okay to feel the way they do. In the long run, that does 
not lead to them abandoning their dislikes. It's easy to walk away when you 
hear someone express feelings of dislike and even hatred based not on knowing a 
particular person but just on the group that person belongs to. How many of us, 
when we hear someone say something negative about "the Jews" or "the blacks" 
or "the Muslims," simply decide to take the easy way out and not cause a 
scene? But how does that advance the cause of increasing rights for all of us? I'm 
not saying jump all over people who express these thoughts, but we also don't 
have to let them think there's nothing wrong with being biased. Because there 
is something very much wrong with it. If we don't object, we are complicit; 
they may even feel we agree with them.

It doesn't have to be vicious or rancorous, but I think we need to let them 
know.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

2004-02-15 Thread TomFODW
> Is there some bizarre meme that's infected the members of this list that 
> dictates that every single person who dislikes something would *automatically* 
> impose his will on others because of it?  Do you all simply have that low of 
> an opinion of everyone else that you assume that no one on the planet can use 
> his brain to realize that just because something's wrong for him, it's not 
> (always) right to make it wrong for others?
> 

Sorry if we misread you. But most people weighing in on the anti-gay marriage 
side of things appear that they very much WOULD impose their views on the 
world. 




Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

2004-02-15 Thread TomFODW
> Well, add me to list of dolts then, Tom.  I find myself in that very boat; 
> I believe gays should have the right to official unions.  Hell, why shouldn't 
> *they* have to have the prospect of giving up half their stuff and arguing 
> over who gets the coffee table if they break up same as straight people?  :)  
> Not to mention my sister is gay, and she and her girlfriend have been 
> together for some seven to eight years, and if that's what she wants, that what I 
> want for her.
> 
> But the idea of calling it "marriage" does make me uncomfortable on some 
> vague level I can't really explain.  Product of my environment, I suppose.  If 
> it makes me a dolt that 36 years of being told that marriage is between a man 
> and a woman isn't easy to just shrug off, so be it.
> 

I can't stop you feeling what you feel, but you need to ask yourself why you 
are so important that your feelings should be permitted to ruin the lives and 
happiness of people you don't even know. As I said, there are still people who 
are "uncomfortable on some vague level" with interracial marriage. Should 
they be permitted to impose their prejudices on the rest of society? Why?



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Thoughts on gay marriage?

2004-02-14 Thread TomFODW

In a message dated 2/15/04 1:56:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> As I understand it, a big concern of opponents is that once MA allows gay
> marriage, other states will be forced to recognize the marriages (IIRC,
> states are required to recognize marriages done in other states), and their
> own states will be vulnerable to lawsuits forcing gay marriage there as
> well.  (In other words, the slippery slope problem).  So they are less
> inclined to write it off as crazy Massachusetts liberals, and more inclined
> to attempt pre-emptive actions to prevent that possibilty.
> 

The US Constitution requires each state to give "full faith and credit" to 
the public acts of each other state. That's why some opponents of gay marriage 
want to amend the Constitution to define marriage as only between a man and a 
woman.

My problem with that is, it enshrines discrimination in the very founding 
document of a country that supposedly believes in and celebrates liberty. Forty 
years ago, some of the very same arguments being made today against gay 
marriage were made then against interracial marriage (which still upsets some very 
conservative people today. When Clarence Thomas was nominated for the US Supreme 
Court, there were some Southern Republicans who were not happy about the fact 
that his wife is white.)

To me, all the arguments opposing gay marriage are based on fear, prejudice, 
and attempts to pander to other people's fear and prejudice. I don't see how 
permitting two adults who love each other to solemnize that love in a legal 
relationship can possibly "threaten" the institution of marriage; if anything, it 
shows just how strong the belief in marriage is. And besides, what's more 
"threatening," anyway: two gay people making a commitment that lasts years, or 
Britney Spears on a whim marrying some dope for a few hours and then ditching 
him? Why is it legal for her, and not for a committed, loving, responsible 
same-sex couple?

Some conservatives seem to want to have it both ways: criticize gays for 
being promiscuous and irresponsible, and then not let them be monogamous and 
responsible. Basically, they want that there shouldn't be gays at all. Well, they 
can't be stopped from believing that, but why should the rest of us let them 
bulldoze and bamboozle the entire country into following their reactionary 
meanspirited hatefulness? 

It's the word "marriage" that appears to have some mystical, totemic meaning 
for some lamebrained lazyminded easily stampeded credulous dolts (i.e., most 
of the American public). They don't mind some kind of legal protection for gay 
couples but just for some reason don't want it to be called "marriage." But 
why should their insensate fear be permitted to cause genuine harm to other 
people? You don't have a right NOT to be offended. There's no right to have your 
every whim and prejudice codified into law. Gay people are subject to all the 
laws of this country. They pay taxes. Why should they not have the right to the 
equal enjoyment of all the other laws that everyone else enjoys? If they 
can't marry, can't serve openly in the military, can't adopt, can't inherit from a 
partner, then maybe they should be exempt from paying taxes, etc. Man, can 
you see the rush of straight tax-avoiders claiming to be gay? Biggest new tax 
shelter in years.

My final thought: Don't want gay marriage? Don't have one. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Voodoo Economics

2004-02-09 Thread TomFODW
> I'm not sure about that.  In many many ways his ideas are both wrong and
> dangerous.  His focusing on classes and the inevitability of class
> struggle, his inability to see the possibility of moderation and compromise
> all are firm foundations for the evil done in his name.
> 
At the time, there was very little moderation and compromise to see.

> My guess is that he will, properly, be taught as a major
> philosopher/political philosopher/sociologist for years to come.  Properly
> taught, he can also be a roll model for the disastrous effects of hubris
> when intellectuals ply their trade.
> 

How did Marx ply his trade? He was never in charge of anything. He wrote and 
argued; others tried to put his ideas into practice (badly and in 
inappropriate places). There was no hubris at play here; in fact, he denounced the 
communist party of Germany shortly before he died for misusing his thoughts (when 
told what their program was, he replied, "If this is what it means to be a 
'Marxist,' then _I_ am not a Marxist!")

You can't take the evil of the 20th century and blame a man who died in 1883 
for what others would do later, even if it was in his name. Especially when he 
never called for it to be done. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Voodoo Economics

2004-02-09 Thread TomFODW
> 1) Why do you assume that if he saw contrary evidence,
> he would have corrected himself?  There was plenty of
> contrary evidence available in 1883, and it didn't
> seem to stop him.
> 
Actually, there wasn't all that much evidence. He did not foresee the rise of 
the labor union movement. He honestly believed that capitalism could NOT 
reform even if it wanted to, that the logic of the market would lead capitalism to 
destroy itself. 

In any case, Marx was beginning to have some doubts right before he died, 
especially about the political movement based on his work. 

> 2) Why _not_ blame him for what has been done in his
> name since he died?  It seems like much of what
> happened in his name is a logical outcome of what he
> said, after all.
> 
Bullshit. Sorry, but that's what it is to blame the horrors of the 20th 
century on a man who died in 1883 and who NEVER countenanced violence (The 
Communist Manifesto was a tract written in the throes of a convulsive year and bears 
about as much relation to his real work as Woody Allen's "Bananas" does to "The 
Battle for Algiers"). He never thought revolution would come to a 
pre-industrial country, he never though it would lead to a single-party dictatorship, 
he 
never thought it would lead to the Gulag. I don't see how you can reasonably 
blame Lenin and Stalin on Marx, who would have been one of the very first to 
castigate the perversions they caused to his theories. It's almost like blaming 
Martin Luther for Hitler (which I've seen done). 

And remember, what Marx was opposed to was not necessarily any better. The 
Industrial Revolution was the cause of massive human suffering (which Marx 
believed was unfortunately necessary to create the wealth that the proletariat 
would later liberate). Just because Lenin was bad does not make Nicholas II good. 
Just because Castro is bad does not make Batista good.   

Marx was not a politician or a political theorist. He thought he was a 
scientific philosopher who had discovered iron laws of history. He was wrong in his 
prescription for the future - capitalism did prove much more adaptable than he 
thought - but his analytical technique is not necessarily inaccurate. 

>   He wasn't Jesus.  You can't argue
> nearly as plausibly that the USSR was a perversion of
> Communism as you could that the Spanish Inquisition
> was a perversion of Christianity.
> 
Of course you can. Marx never expected Russia to be the first country to have 
a communist revolution. He didn't think it was possible - and, in a sense, he 
was right.

> At what point do we get to say that he was full of it
> and move on, really?
> 
His theories turned out to be wrong, but I think he would have realized this 
and adjusted his theories to take notice of such things as trade unionism, 
government-sponsored social security programs, the creation of a larger middle 
class, etc. Obviously we'll never know, but I think it is ahistorical claptrap 
to blame Marx for the Russian Revolution, which happened 34 years after he died 
in a country that he never believed could sustain a workers' revolution (and 
Lenin had to jump through all kinds of theoretical hoops to justify his 
actions). 

I don't think he was any more full of it than the "supply side" morons who 
still won't admit they were pretty much wrong about just about everything.




Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Voodoo Economics

2004-02-09 Thread TomFODW
> Or like Karl Marx, actually.  Enhancing the
> contradictions, isn't that what the Marxists called
> it?  :-)  Been a long time since I read any Marxist
> philosophy, and I will admit I didn't pay that much
> attention when I was supposed to be studying it...
> 

Well, _some_ Marxists seemed to believe in a philosophy that might be called 
"the worse, the better", but most intelligent leftists abandoned that approach 
after the disaster that following it led to in Weimar Germany. 

Remember, it's very difficult to assume what Marx himself would have had to 
say about anything that happened in the 20th century, since he died in 1883. He 
believed he was creating a scientific approach to analyzing history, based on 
the evidence he'd seen. If he saw contrary evidence, he would have corrected 
himself. I don't think it's fair to blame Marx for what has been done in his 
name since he died.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Whatever Happened to Scott Ritter?

2004-02-08 Thread TomFODW
Ask and ye shall learn:

http://truthout.org/docs_04/020804C.shtml



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-06 Thread TomFODW
> I interpreted Tom's post as very clearly judging all Christians.   Perhaps 
> you saw Tom's post differently?
> 

I hope I don't judge all Christians negatively. Most Christians are appalled 
by violence against anyone. Throughout history this has also probably been 
true (if it had been otherwise, I doubt there would be many Jews left by now. Not 
that there ARE all that many of us, alas.)

But - that does not make much difference. The violence that was done, and not 
all that long ago either, was such that Jews still have very good reason to 
be suspicious and nervous and on our guard. It does no good to tell us to 
forgive and forget. We've been through too much, either directly or through knowing 
our history. If we see danger where there is none, that's also a product of 
our experience. And Gibson's actions, and his background, don't give us any 
reason to relax. He's been acting like he's the one at danger here, like he's 
battling mighty, inimical forces. Wanna make a movie about Jesus? It's a free 
country. Gibson is free to make his movie - and we're free to criticize him. But 
there really is a potential danger here, that some people may be stirred up by 
this movie to attack Jews they way they were in the past by viciously 
anti-Jewish Passion plays - does anybody here really want us to risk that? It's not 
Christians whose asses are maybe on the line here. 

Want me not to judge Christians negatively? Stand with us on this. If you're 
talking to someone who saw the movie and they start to say something 
anti-Jewish based on the movie, don't let them get away with it. I don't think this is 
too much to ask. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-06 Thread TomFODW
> So, going on the assumption that the Gospels are the best historical
> account we have of the events we are discussing, is it not ahistorical to
> simply skip over Matthew 27:20-25?  How would you suggest a film-maker
> handle that important portion of the story without making Jews nervous?
> 

Not make the movie. Or not hide it from Jewish audiences once you've made it. 
Or show the script widely to Jewish scholars before starting filming. Not 
show the finished film only to extremly conservative Christian groups. 

Basically, Gibson is acting like he's no clue just why them damn pesky Jews 
are being so uppity about his little movie that poor little ol' defenseless 
powerless little ol' him is fighting such powerful enemies to produce and 
distribute. Either he doesn't understand, in which case where the hell's he been 
since the Holocaust and the Crusades and all the rest, or he understands perfectly 
and actually wants to show how evil us Jews really are. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-05 Thread TomFODW
> I would argue that John Paul II has done precisely that.
> 
To a large extent, yes. Certainly more than any major Christian leader before 
him (well, Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI also did a lot).

Still a long way to go, though.

> But isn't judging all Christians as a class exactly the sort of class-based 
> thinking that Jews of all people should explicitly reject?
> 
I've said that I don't blame all Christians for Christian anti-Semitism, or 
at least that I try not to. Suspicion and resentment are not exactly the same 
as blame. But even if I do, or even if other Jews do, is it so hard to 
understand why? 

I'm trying not to play victim here, since I personally have experienced also 
no anti-Semitism myself. Most of the Christian friends I've had in my lifetime 
have been just that - friends. They accept me for who and what I am, just as 
I accept them for who and what they are. To the extent that I have been 
writing on this issue here recently, it's out of a very strong feeling for what 
other Jews have gone through, and an understanding that that COULD have been me - 
and in different times and places very well MIGHT have been me.

America has been good to the Jews (and vice-versa), and I don't really think 
that this is likely to change much, even if Gibson's movie breaks records. But 
there is always nervousness among Jews, and if we judge Christians harshly, 
that's hardly of the same consequence as Christian anti-Semitism or Nazi 
extermination. Again, my point is, if Christians truly want to demonstrate that they 
understand why Jews are suspicious, if they truly want to prove that they 
pose no threat, it's easy to do so. John-Paul HAS begun to lead the way, and many 
other Christians have done likewise. And you don't have to let Mel Gibson 
speak for you, or leave it to Jews to point out the inherent dangers in basing a 
popular entertainment on an uncritical and ahistorical adaptation of the 
Gospels. 




Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-05 Thread TomFODW
> But, what about God forgiving David?
> 

God can forgive sins against God, not against someone else. Only the person 
sinned against can forgive those (in Jewish teaching, that is).



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-05 Thread TomFODW
> Which makes the words of one famous Jew all the more impressive: "Father 
> forgive them, for they know not what they do."
> 

As I've said, Judaism teaches God can't forgive sins against people - only 
the person sinned against can. 

If I sound bitter against Christians, some of that is in the heat of 
argument. I'm perfectly aware that most Christians today are not likely to perpetrate 
violence against anyone. And any individual Christian today is not responsible 
for what some Christians did in the past.

But it DID happen. Some Christians - too many Christians - DID murder Jews - 
countless thousands of them - for the crime of wanting to be Jewish. We can't 
forget that. We dare not forget it.

I can't forgive the murderers because they didn't hurt me. Only the victims 
can forgive, and then only if the victimizer truly repents and asks for 
forgiveness. Which I don't think happened. 

The thing is, I think Christians should be willing to face up to what was 
done in their name in the past and try to show some understanding for Jewish 
suspicions. We never deserved what happened to us, and yet it happened anyway, and 
you can't simply wish that away or lecture us to be forgiving and forgetful. 
Uh-uh, sorry. Doesn't work that way.

Want forgiveness? Act like you mean it. Help us fight the evil, don't pretend 
it's not there or bore us with nostrums about, oh, that's all in the past, 
can we all get along? From where I'm sitting, from where most Jews sit, we're 
not sure. Sorry if that pisses you off, but that's the way it is.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-04 Thread TomFODW
> So IYO no one can ever make a movie about the life of Jesus -- where for
> Christians the main point of the life of Jesus is His death and
> resurrection and its meaning for us today -- because some people use the
> fact that some Jews who lived at the time were involved in his death to
> justify hatred of and violence against all Jews today?
> 
I never said no one can; people can do anything they want. BUT, if you are 
going to make a movie about the death of Jesus, you need to take care NOT to 
give any ammunition to anti-Semites. Because Jews HAVE been murdered over the 
past two millennia because they were blamed for rejecting and killing Jesus. To 
ignore that is to take on some complicity for the hatred and violence.

I think Christians need to face up to this and not try to argue it away or 
pretend it didn't happen or deny their responsibility for two millennia of 
violence. Because, whatever Christians may think of their religion as being a 
religion of love and peace, to Jews it's a religion of hatred and murder. 

And yes, I know, it's as wrong for Jews to blame all Christians for the 
violence as it is for Christians to blame all Jews for the death of Jesus. But when 
you're a tiny helpless minority being persecuted and hunted down and burned 
alive in synagogues and forced to convert, it's not easy to be fair. To be 
honest, if a Jew distrusts Christians, I'm not sure there's much of a consequence, 
as there simply aren't enough of us to do anything about it. When Christians 
preach hatred of Jews (and I realize that these days most no longer do this, 
but the damage has been done), the consequences are and have been horrific. 
Christians should feel shame and do true penitence about this; is that really so 
much to ask?

>   If that is not what you are saying, what do you think would be an 
> acceptable way of portraying
> the account given in the Gospels while staying true to that account?
> 

Why not make a movie about two millennia of Christians murdering Jews? If a 
Jew did that, wouldn't Christians be stirred up and angry? 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-04 Thread TomFODW
> Does the movie make that claim?  (That ALL Jews are guilty, etc.)  Or is 
> that judgement in the mind of the viewer?
> 

Again, you're completely missing the point. Whether or not the movie blames 
all the Jews for the death of Jesus, over two millennia millions of Christians 
HAVE blamed all Jews and exacted horrible retribution on uncountable tens of 
thousands of innocent Jews. For Gibson to make a movie based on the same 
Gospels that have inflamed these vile and vicious murders and not to explicitly 
renounce the idea of blaming all the Jews is extremely irresponsible. Because I 
guarantee you, there will be anti-Semites who will see this movie and trumpet 
its content as justification for their Jew-hatred.   



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-04 Thread TomFODW
> I sincerely doubt that I
> would have a problem with it if I were born and raised a Nazi. Do you
> understand where I am coming from?
> 
No. There's a moral relativism at work in your statement that I can't fathom. 
It's as if you're saying that you can't choose between anything because 
everything is valid to the person who holds the opinion. Basically, you don't have 
a right to your opinion because it might somehow conflict with someone else's. 




>  I'm looking at things as objectively as I
> can, to find some fundamental truths in this thing we call life. Why?
> Because I have this.integrity if you will, to seek truth, no matter
> harsh that truth may be. I absolutely reject any and all assumption sets,
> and replace them with these truths that hold as much truth as I can find.
> It's how I remain sane.
> 
But you've denied the very existence of truth, since it's all relative to 
you. Where's the 'integrity' in that?




Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Best Superbowl Ever! was>RE: Janet Jackson "s Right Breast Provoke s Outrage

2004-02-04 Thread TomFODW
I don't think it was the best Super Bowl ever, although it was one of the 
best ever. I'd put Giants-Bills as the best (besides the exciting finish, and the 
buildup - during the beginning of what would later be Gulf War I, the game 
was extremely well played - neither team committed a turnover, the only time 
that has happened in a Super Bowl). 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-04 Thread TomFODW
> Sometimes forgeting (and forgiving) IS the choice with wisdom.
> 

A) Judaism teaches that only the wronged party may forgive. I can't forgive 
the Nazis for the Holocaust because I was not a victim. 

B) I believe very strongly that forgetting the Holocaust would be a further 
betrayal of its victims. 

I also don't think that remembering the Holocaust in any way is a negative. A 
remarkably high percentage of Holocaust survivors went on to lead fulfilling 
lives after World War II. They married, had families, built careers and lives. 
Did they have problems adjusting? Did they suffer some guilt, some trauma, 
nightmares? Of course. But they did not let the horror completely ruin their 
triumph at LIVING when Hitler tried to kill them. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-04 Thread TomFODW
> Blasphemy
> against the Jewish God, which they believed Jesus guilty of, while a
> capital offense in the Law of Moses, was not any sort of offense at all
> under Roman law.  So those Jews (note that I am not saying all Jews were
> responsible, just as not all Arabs were responsible for 9/11) had to
> convince the Romans to find Jesus guilty of something which merited the
> death penalty under Roman law in order to have him executed.
> 

Except no death penalty for this had ever been carried out. It was said that 
a Sanhedrin that ordered one execution in 70 years was a bloodthirsty court. 
What _could_ be done under Jewish law and what _was_ done were often quite 
different. 

In any case, this is irrelevant, since what is at stake in the whole issue of 
Gibson's movie is not what the truth was (hard to determine), but what too 
many people have taken the truth to be over the millennia: that ALL Jews are 
guilty of killing Jesus and that therefore ANY Jew can be attacked and even 
murdered in retribution. And, over the millennia, too many Jews to count HAVE been 
attacked and murdered. And Jews feel that we are STILL at risk of being 
attacked and murdered. 

This is not to say that Gibson should not have made his movie. But for him 
not to be aware of Jewish sensitivities in this matter, which I do not find at 
all an overreaction, is remarkably insensitive of him. Given his association 
with his father's extremely right-wing Catholic sect, I think the onus is on him 
to prove that he's not anti-Semitic. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-03 Thread TomFODW
> None of them are perfect. 
> 

That's for sure. Most Jews use one version or another based on the Jewish 
Publication Society's translation, and that has a lot of figurative rather than 
literal translations. The Conservative movement's commentary is always pointing 
out where it thinks the JPS translation has errors. 

I understand that most people cannot read either the Hebrew Tanakh or the 
Greek New Testament. I'm just saying that where I _do_ know that there is a 
mistranslation, I don't feel unjustified in pointing it out.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-03 Thread TomFODW
> Agreed.  I frequently quote from the KJV because a lot of people have heard 
> the familiar passages from that translation, even if they're not very 
> familiar with the Bible.  Many experts will say that more modern translations like 
> the NIV may indeed be more accurate, but there's something about the KJV that 
> sticks in the mind and just sounds more "scriptural" than most of the later 
> translations.
> 

Well, as a Jew who reads biblical Hebrew (a little) I prefer to deal with the 
original (sort of, since we're not exactly sure if what we have now really 
was the original text of the Torah). The KJV has a LOT of mistranslations.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-03 Thread TomFODW
> Thou shalt not kill.
> 

To translate the Hebrew accurately, it says, "Don't murder."



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-03 Thread TomFODW
> Ah yes. You "believe". I for one, believe that views like that, hold back
> any sort of honest discourse. Furthermore, to brand something evil, is to
> show either a narrow-minded approach to things, or a faithful belief in what
> you are spoon-fed. Prove to me however, that evil is a substantial thing and
> I may change my view of evil being a man-made concept.
> 

Forgive me, but what the hell are you talking about? Are you honestly saying 
that the unquestionably anti-Semitic statements issued by these unquestionably 
anti-Semitic organizations in response to Gibson's movie AREN'T evil? Are you 
honestly claiming that labeling these statements evil is somehow more evil 
than the statements themselves? How can you have an "honest discourse" with 
Nazis? All you can do is label them for the filth they are and try to keep others 
from being infected by their evil. And yes, it's clearly evil. And of course 
it's man-made. People do evil things. That's precisely what evil is.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-03 Thread TomFODW
> If a group of Jews make a movie about WWII in the year 3950 will there be 
> Germans complaining that it sheds them in a bad light?
> 

I just hope and pray that there are still Jews around in the year 3950 to 
make a movie about WWII (or to do anything else).



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Reviews for Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"

2004-02-03 Thread TomFODW
> I believe that you are furthering the causes of these broods of vipers
> by republishing their venom.
> 
> I won't even give their words the respect shown by repeating them, even
> to point out the evil they contain.
> 

Far more to the point, will Mel Gibson repudiate their hate-filled verbal 
vomit, or will he pretend he has absolutely no responsibility to acknowledge the 
use these filth are making of his movie? (Or does he secretly agree with 
them?)



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: gud ol Repgnatcan suthrn edukasion

2004-02-03 Thread TomFODW
> And yet, another State without an evolution curriculum is that right-wing 
> hotbed of Illinois.
> 

Illinois has an extreme split between the northeastern corner of Chicago and 
the rest of the state. The southern half of the state is actually basically 
eastern Missouri. Illinois is, alas, by no means a liberal state.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

2004-02-02 Thread TomFODW
> Incidentally, Tom, when do you ever follow that rule?
> Or does it only apply to liberals?  Speaking about
> Republicans when you have no knowledge, that's not
> exactly a problem for you, is it?
> 

Not sure I can recall the last time I accused anyone of any political stripe 
of murder.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: and we thought we had too much snow...

2004-02-02 Thread TomFODW
Looks like business is booming at the snow quarry...if the new Doctor Who has 
an episode set on an ice planet, they can film it there.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

2004-02-02 Thread TomFODW
In a message dated 2/1/04 10:46:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> God knows what really happened.
> 

Exactly. YOU DON'T know. You weren't there. I wasn't there. Stop talking like 
you were.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Elements?

2004-02-01 Thread TomFODW
> element 115 will be designated Ununpentium
> 

Except it might be 114 or 116...



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


War in Iraq "unnecessary"?

2004-01-29 Thread TomFODW
The Army War College thinks the Bush Administration has been ignoring 
Afghanistan in its zeal to go after Iraq.


Army War College essay calls Iraq war 'distraction'
By THOMAS E. RICKS
Washington Post

WASHINGTON -- A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly 
criticizes the Bush administration's handling of the war on terrorism, 
accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an 
"unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that 
pose no serious threat .

The report, by visiting professor Jeffrey Record, who is on the faculty of 
the Air War College at Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala., warns that as a result of 
those mistakes, the Army is "near the breaking point." It recommends, among 
other things, scaling back the scope of the "global war on terrorism" and instead 
focusing on the narrower threat posed by the al-Qaida terrorist network.

"[The] global war on terrorism as currently defined and waged is dangerously 
indiscriminate and ambitious, and accordingly . . . its parameters should be 
readjusted," Record writes. Currently, he adds, the anti-terrorism campaign "is 
strategically unfocused, promises more than it can deliver, and threatens to 
dissipate U.S. military resources in an endless and hopeless search for 
absolute security."

Record, a veteran defense specialist and author of six books on military 
strategy and related issues, was an aide to former Sen. Sam Nunn when the Georgia 
Democrat was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

His essay, published by the Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute, 
carries the standard disclaimer that its views are those of the author and 
don't necessarily represent those of the Army, the Pentagon, or the U.S. 
government.
But retired Army Col. Douglas C. Lovelace Jr., the director of the Army War 
College's Strategic Studies Institute, whose Web site carries Record's 56-page 
monograph, hardly distanced himself from it. "I think that the substance that 
Jeff brings out in the article really, really needs to be considered," he 
said.

Academic freedom
Publication of the essay was approved by the Army War College's commandant, 
Maj. Gen. David H. Huntoon Jr., Lovelace said. He said he and Huntoon expected 
the study to be controversial, but added, "He considers it to be under the 
umbrella of academic freedom."

Larry DiRita, the top Pentagon spokesman, said he had not read the Record 
study. He added: "If the conclusion is that we need to be scaling back in the 
global war on terrorism, it's not likely to be on my reading list anytime soon."

A 'war of choice'
Many of Record's arguments, such as the contention that Saddam Hussein's Iraq 
was deterred and did not present a threat, have been made before by critics 
of the administration. Iraq, he concludes, "was a war-of-choice distraction 
from the war of necessity against" al-Qaida. But it is unusual to have such views 
published by the War College, the Army's premier academic institution.

In addition, the essay goes further than many critics in examining the Bush 
administration's handling of the war on terrorism.

Record's core criticism is that the administration is biting off more than it 
can chew. "A cardinal rule of strategy is to keep your enemies to a 
manageable number," he writes.

He scoffs at the administration's policy of seeking to transform and 
democratize the Middle East."

The essay concludes with several recommendations. Some are fairly 
non-controversial, such as increasing the size of the Army and the Marine Corps. But 
he 
also says the United States should scale back its ambitions and be prepared to 
settle for a "friendly autocracy" rather than a genuine democracy in Iraq.





Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: More good reasons to Distrust Corporations and Drug Companies

2004-01-29 Thread TomFODW

In a message dated 1/29/04 5:20:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> Not "the equation", a method for ~solving~ a family of equations.
> 

But that's still a description of the natural universe - the method is as 
much part of mathematics as the equations themselves. It exists independent of 
the person discovering it. It's like figuring out gravity or finding a subatomic 
particle. You didn't "invent" it - it was always there. That's nothing at all 
like inventing a machine or concocting a process or combining various 
elements into a new pharmaceutical. You can, in my opinion, get _credit_ for figuring 
out a mathematical method, but how in heck can you _patent_ it?



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: More good reasons to Distrust Corporations and Drug Companies

2004-01-29 Thread TomFODW
> Personaly I think that scientific information, discoveries should
> never be secret. I had a physics prof who had a pattent on an
> solution to a class of equations. (don't remember details), So,
> everyone now knows the information, can use the solution in their
> work, but if they use the solution in a way that generates income,
> they owe him for it.
> 

I didn't realize you could patent the truth. I thought patents were for 
inventions and discoveries. To patent an equation would be like patenting a 
syllogism - it strikes me as permitting someone to claim that he invented a truth 
rather than described it.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

2004-01-29 Thread TomFODW
> There were a number of young men in the South who fought for the
> Confederacy not because they were trying to defend slavery, but because
> they felt allegiance to their states before their country.  While the
> simplistic interpretation, and maybe the most correct one, of the Civil
> War was that it was about the slavery issue, a lot of those who fought
> for the Confederacy did not justify their participation for that
> reason.  "Slavery" doesn't get to what was really going on in the hearts
> and minds of many of those who fought.  (And those in the North weren't
> primarily fighting to free the slaves, either, although there were those
> who went to war willingly for that end.)
> 
> Some people might slap the "oil" interpretation over anything the US
> does in the Middle East.  Evidently that is not the motivation for a
> large number of people supporting the current actions.
> 
> Poke at this parallel, scream at me if you like, but this is where *my*
> mind went in the face of the oil/no, not oil argument.  Substitute any
> idea that might be self-serving for Bush himself but not supported by
> supporters of the war for oil, if you like, and I'll throw the same
> Civil War situation back again.
> 

Let's say that you're right, and that many (maybe even most) of the 
Confederate soldiers were not fighting to defend slavery. So what? The motivation of 
their leaders CERTAINLY was primarily if not exclusively to defend slavery. THAT 
was the "state's right" that all the states seceded to protect. The Civil War 
was ALL about slavery; yes, there were other factors, but they all came back 
to slavery. Once the war began, people on each side fought for many reasons; 
but if there had not been any slavery, there would have been no Civil War.

That said, I don't claim that this is a war over oil. And even if it were, 
calling it that would not denigrate the soldiers, who are fighting for their 
country. But there could be - and in the Civil War apparently was - a major 
disconnect between the motivations of the people doing the fighting and that of the 
people who sent them to fight. (Southern soldiers, cynical about the 
plantation owners, called the war 'A rich man's war and a poor man's fight'.)

To understand the origins of a war, it's perhaps less important to understand 
the people who were sent to fight. They rarely know much about the strategy 
and policy that led to the outbreak of the war. Especially when the leadership 
dissembles or conceals or deceives or exaggerates - c.f, Vietnam then and Iraq 
now.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

2004-01-29 Thread TomFODW
> In all seriousness, I still don't get it.  Other than
> such displays of force, what do you think a Qaddafi
> would respond to?  As far as I can tell, _nothing_
> except force is likely to get results from someone
> like him.
> 

There have been stories that he also responded to such things as his growing 
awareness of Libya's backwardness, isolation, and economic stagnation, his own 
approaching mortality, the death of his son, along with fear of what happened 
in Iraq. There are stories that this has been in the works for several years, 
although it may have been accelerated by what happened in Iraq. I distrust 
unitary explanations. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Whale explodes in Taiwanese city

2004-01-28 Thread TomFODW
> No post-explosion pictures.
> 
> No sound.
> 
> Still icky.
> 
> Probably work-safe.
> 

Unless you work at Greenpeace...



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Bone Phone

2004-01-21 Thread TomFODW
> Japanese telecom carriers, pioneers of internet-capable and
> picture-snapping handsets, have now come up with the world's first
> mobile phone that enables users to listen to calls inside their
> heads - by conducting sound through bone.
> 

Thus validating every poor schizophrenic in the world...

Maybe that's how come Joan of Arc heard voices...combine one of those phones 
with an electromagnetic time warp...

"Nine out of the ten voices in my head are telling me NOT to shoot"



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Social Programs (was: Re: Martian Emotion)

2004-01-18 Thread TomFODW
> People who think that social programs are a waste of taxpayer money have
> failed to learn from history.  The poor overthrowing their own nation's
> government due to feeling neglected and oppressed is something that has
> happened repeatedly (The French Revolution, The Russian Revolution, etc.).
> If poor people feel they have no other choice, and their numbers grow large
> enough, they will act.  I, personally, can not believe that the nation
> doesn't see a problem in having a bunch of out-of-work, disgruntled, and
> desperate computer programmers in the country.  If skilled, out-of-work
> programmers formed a rebellion, due to the world-wide dependance on computer
> and network technologies, they could potentially bring the whole
> technological world to its knees without firing a single gun-shot (just
> imagine something like the "I Love You" virus, but written by a huge team of
> programmers, with multiple vectors and exploits, and distributed as a
> coordinated attack, not just a random propagation... a deffinate
> circumstance that would be devistating, and could be easily avoided by
> keeping the citizens employed and contented).
> 

I don't object to what you're saying, but revolutions tend to be led by the 
educated classes, however much they may be fueled by the deprived. The French 
and Russian revolutions were both led almost entirely, especially early on, by 
highly educated but disgruntled and disaffected young men. 

There's a lot of contingency and luck in life, and I especially think we 
should be spending more on education. But I'm not sure how much the government can 
do (less concerned than some of the more conservative people on this list 
about how much it _should_ do). 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: War on AIDS [was: Easterbrook on Bush's NASA plan]

2004-01-18 Thread TomFODW
> Here in Brazil the number of children born with inherited AIDS
> decreased from about 8% to about 3% in the past few years. We
> _may_ have it under control.
> 

Mazal tov, but that has nothing to do with Bush reneging on his promise by 
making a splashy announcement about increasing American contributions to the 
fight against AIDS and then not actually asking Congress for any additional 
money. He always makes these feel-good announcements to get the publicity benefit, 
then, after the press and public have turned their attention elsewhere, 
quietly forgetting all about actually requesting any of the promised money.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Easterbrook on Bush's NASA plan

2004-01-16 Thread TomFODW
> Actually, I'm quite sure that Bush is laughing at you.
> 

Let him. The man's such a worthless buffoon, I take that as a badge of honor. 
At least he's not fooling ME.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Easterbrook on Bush's NASA plan

2004-01-16 Thread TomFODW
> Obviously it is only a start.  The converse of "No bucks = No Buck Rogers"
> is also true.  Open your mind, man.  And your heart.
> 

Open your eyes, man. And your brain. You're taking the wish for the deed. 
Bush is infamous for propsing things that sound nice, so he can some nice 
publicity, and then later, when the cameras are gone, not funding them (remember his 
AIDS initiative? Remember No Child Left Behind?) This is just More Of The 
Same. He's not serious. There's no way we can pay for this, given the budget 
deficits he intentionally engineered SO THAT THERE'D BE NO MONEY TO PAY FOR STUFF 
LIKE THIS.

If you really buy into this, you're being taken. Bush and his people are 
chortling at your credulity. "Man, can you believe they bought this? 
A-hah-hah-hah-hah-hah-hah!"



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Does this pass the smell test?

2004-01-13 Thread TomFODW
Anyone find it more than curious that the Bush Administration, which has been 
doing everything it can to obstruct the inquiry into who leaked Valerie 
Plame's name & undercover CIA status, is leaping to investigate whether or not Paul 
O'Neill leaked secret documents in his book? Smells mighty fishy to me. Where 
are all the Republicans and Conservatives who screamed to investigate every 
single tiny little rumor about malfeasance in the Clinton Administration? Why 
aren't they demanding the White House cooperate fully with the Plame inquiry? 
(Which they could solve in an afternoon if Bush wanted to.) We all know the 
answer, of course - there's no way the Republicans will investigate their own 
president. This stinks.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shrub's Conspiracy to Invade Iraq Revealed by Ex-Admin Official

2004-01-13 Thread TomFODW
My real problem with any attempt to defend the fact that Bush came into 
office determined to get rid of Saddam by saying the reason was to bring about 
regime change, save the people from Iraq, and be nicey was, during the 2000 
campaign, Bush repeatedly derided the very idea of "nation-building" and 
intervention anywhere except for cold calculated national interest. Now, all of a 
sudden, 
he's in office and he's suddenly interested in nation building? Come on.

He wanted to get rid of Saddam because he wanted to do something his father 
couldn't, and he wanted to project US power. But he needed a pretext because he 
knew he never could get American support for a naked, causeless invasion. 
Saddam Hussein is a monster, and I'm glad he's gone, but there are monsters in 
China and Syria and North Korea and Cuba and Libya - why don't we go after them? 
North Korea is far more dangerous to us than Iraq, and Cuba is 90 miles off 
our coast and a chip-shot if we really really wanted to take Castro out.

You cannot convince me that George W. Bush had any reason to go into Iraq 
other than that he simply wanted to. He came into office determined to get 
Saddam, and he was willing to say anything it would take to bring that about. He had 
to wait until he could find a pretext he could present as plausible, and he 
had to sex up the intelligence even to get WMD to work. But this was not a 
humanitarian invasion to save the people of Iraq - otherwise, why did he have to 
wait two years? Why did he completely dismiss the very value of nation building 
in 2000?



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shrub's Conspiracy to Invade Iraq Revealed by Ex-Admin Official

2004-01-11 Thread TomFODW
> At any rate, who cares about this stuff?    About the most damning claim
> O'Neill has is that Bush actually had far more pre-planning for the war in
> Iraq than we have previously none.   So, we are going to pillory Bush for
> planning ahead?
> 

Um...well...considering that he never mentioned any of this at any point, and 
that the reasons he's given for invading Iraq have turned out not to be the 
case (no WMD, no real Al Qaeda connection, no responsibility for 9-11) - 
doesn't it bother you at ALL that this man appears to have come into office planning 
an aggressive war against a country that we now know (and he must have known 
then) did not really pose any threat to us?

I repeat: this is not the Pentagon having contingency plans. After all, I 
doubt seriously that the Bush White House was calling up the plans for war 
against Argentina or Belgium. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Extraordinary Rendition

2004-01-11 Thread TomFODW
> Anyhow, I will now humbly wait for all of the Brin-L's resident liberals to
> point out that interrogtating a foreigner without a lawyer (if indeed that
> this story is true) does not constitute a "high crime and misdemeanor."
> 

Don't ever travel in a foreign country in case you get on the wrong side of 
someone official who decides to treat you like we treated this guy. (Heck, if 
Ashcroft has his way much longer, don't travel in this country.)

It's not the "interrogating a foreigner without a lawyer" that's so 
objectionable (even though many court cases say that foreigners arrested in this 
country have some of the same rights as citizens and lawful residents; and, in any 
case, foreigners arrested in this country are entitled by treaty to speak with 
someone from their embassy or consulate; and we don't normally deport them to 
a third country in order to be tortured - what part of "interrogating" is 
that?). We don't arrest people in this country without probable cause. That 
applies to foreigners, too.

Either there are rights for all, or there aren't really RIGHTS for anyone. To 
let this continue risks them deciding to do it to anyone they want for any 
reason - or none. 

I am completely unable to understand why you dismiss this so cavalierly. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Extraordinary Rendition

2004-01-11 Thread TomFODW
> Perhaps you arrest and tort..., ah,
> thoroughly interrogate 99 basically innocent profilees to snare a single
> operative or active supporter.
> 

We. Don't. Torture. Period. Besides being despicable, it almost never works. 
Most people will say ANYTHING to stop being tortured.

I understand the "ticking timebomb" argument (not that I agree with it), but 
that can hardly apply to a situation where you basically torture anyone you 
can find without any probable cause at all.

To some extent, a war against terror requires some necessary if distasteful 
tradeoffs. I think what is going on at the moment goes WAY far beyond the bare 
minimum necessary. I think Bush and Ashcroft have contempt for civil liberties 
and are overjoyed to have an excuse to do what they want to anyway. 

If distasteful methods sometimes have to be utilized in the field, under the 
exigencies of an ongoing operation or a well reasoned fear that an attack is 
imminent, well, maybe (although it makes it difficult if not impossible to 
complain if and when the other side treats your people the same way). But that 
clearly did not happen in this case. They arrested the guy for almost no reason, 
interrogated him, had absolutely no reason to think he was any kind of 
terrorist - and had him tortured anyway. Practicalities aside, why doesn't that 
infuriate you? How can you defend treating the guy this way?



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Extraordinary Rendition

2004-01-11 Thread TomFODW
> Responding to another list member's ghost post with "hateful, hate filled
> clones": too upset to come up with more adjectives? I'd say you and your
> lot are the ones filled with hate and madness. I'm happy even with pipes in
> my kitchen frozen, the cable being out, my cat being sick and numerous
> (very minor) health problems of my own.
> 

I'm not filled with hate - I'm angry. I think what Bush and his maniacs are 
doing to this country is dangerous and despicable. I think what they did to 
that poor Canadian was outrageous and frightening. How come when right-wingers 
scream, that's okay, but when liberals get angry, that's not?



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Extraordinary Rendition

2004-01-11 Thread TomFODW
> It is time someone asked. What our government did to Maher Arar is worse
> than anything the British did to our Colonial forefathers. It was worse
> than anything J. Edgar Hoover did to alleged Communists, civil rights
> workers and anti-war activists during his long program of dirty tricks.
> 

Wasting your time. There is not a single right-wing fanatic on this list (or 
in dittoland) who will give a damn about what we did to this poor bastard. 
It's far too easy to scream "war against terror" to justify anything they want to 
do or cover up. The fact that Bush and Ashcroft between them are in the 
process of jettisoning much of what makes America WORTH defending in the first 
place is completely lost on Rush and his hateful, hate-filled clones. This is why 
Dubya is the worst president we've ever had, and John Ashcroft is by far the 
worst Attorney-General (by such a far margin that he makes Edwin Meese and John 
Mitchell look almost acceptable by comparison). 

I know this sounds inflammatory and I don't care. I don't see how anyone can 
defend men who can perpetrate such an outrageous injustice. There is nothing 
that justifies this, nothing at all. If we can't defeat our enemies by any 
other means than by becoming them, then we don't deserve to win. This guy did 
nothing and they treated him like he personally guided the planes into the Twin 
Towers by wire. George Bush and John Ashcroft are the worst kind of scum - men 
who hide despicable actions behind airy, lofty motives. They don't even have 
the guts to admit their villainy. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Shrub's Conspiracy to Invade Iraq Revealed by Ex-Admin Official

2004-01-11 Thread TomFODW
> And there are plans for invading N Korea, Cuba, Russia, China, Japan,
> Columbia, New Zealand, Spain, Canada..any country you want. It's what
> the military does.
> 

Plans in the Pentagon are not the same thing as plans in the White House. I 
think the point is not that the Defense Dept. was doing its job but that the 
newly installed Bush administration was thinking about invading Iraq months 
before Sept. 11 gave them what they would use as an ostensible reason. Given that 
Dubya's entire presidency is basically about doing stuff his father couldn't, 
this does not surprise me.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: A List A List!!!!

2004-01-05 Thread TomFODW
> 9. You will never find anybody who can give you a clear and compelling
> reason why we observe daylight savings time.
> 
Not true.

> 14. Your friends love you anyway.
> 
Definitely true, at least in my case.




Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Republicans Attempting to get Bible classified as a 'Textbook' in CA in Constitutional Amendment

2004-01-02 Thread TomFODW
The King James version is nice English but a poor translation, at least of 
the Hebrew books. As literature, it's interesting; teaching it in its historical 
context would have some didactic use, but I'm not sure of any other point. As 
a Jew, I'm naturally suspicious of any right-wing Christian attempt to shove 
their religion down my (or anyone else's) throat. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Victorian Gollum

2004-01-02 Thread TomFODW
> In answer to zMUD question of ever having seen Andy Sirkis, Gollum/Smeagol,
> in anything else, he was in Topsy-Turvy as the chicken walking Choregrapher.
> 

That's an outstanding movie. Highly entertaining. Delightful. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Scouted: "Only those who sacrificed..."

2003-12-31 Thread TomFODW
http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=16205



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Rush Limbaugh is a hypocrite

2003-12-24 Thread TomFODW
> Rather, I am referring to the fact that Roe vs. Wade is the _original_
> "right to privacy case" in the United States.    The US Supreme Court in
> that case,  did not find a right to abortion in that case - how could they?
> - but rather found that 'the penumbra of the Constitution' contains a right
> to privacy.   
> 

I believe the first "right to privacy" case was actually Griswold vs 
Connecticut in the 1960s, which overturned that state's law against the use of 
contraception.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Rush Limbaugh is a hypocrite

2003-12-23 Thread TomFODW
> As opposed, of course, to how well the Left policies it own.
> 

Is that always your answer? "You're another"? Deal with the issue at hand: 
Rush Limbaugh is demanding an accommodation for himself that he has expressly 
insisted, loudly and without compassion or mercy, not be accorded anyone else 
who has done similar things. That's blatant hypocrisy. It doesn't matter who on 
the "Left" (which hardly exists anymore, alas, and which certainly does not 
have the ability to reach as many people as Rush Limbaugh does) may have done 
what. Rush wants to be treated in a way that he has always bleated no one else 
should be treated.

Thing is, when just about ANYONE gets in trouble, they suddenly discover all 
kinds of rights that they may never have thought about or even wanted to deny 
other people. Oliver North was not acquitted, after all; his conviction was 
overturned on a technicality. Funny, I don't recall any "lawnorder" types 
bitching about permissive judges when that happened. It's just human nature. 
Right-wingers like to say, "a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged." They fail 
to mention the converse, "a liberal is a conservative who's been arrested."

Only thing is, Rush is such an obnoxious pig, so loud and so absolutely 
certain of his own genius and infallibility and perfect rectitude, that you can't 
blame people for piling on when he brings all this shit down upon himself, and 
then acts like he did nothing wrong, and it's all someone else's fault, and 
then hides behind his lawyers - exactly the kind of behavior that he has always 
shrieked about when someone he doesn't like does. Why doesn't he practice what 
he's been preaching? Again, it's simple human nature, but he has never been 
so understanding of anyone else's foibles. You'd hope being revealed as flawed 
would teach him a lesson; but I guess you'd be wrong.

You deal with Rush, since he's one of your own (and you can have him). Leave 
the Left to the liberals. 



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: First Mad Cow Case in U.S.

2003-12-23 Thread TomFODW
A) Veneman did not appear to indicate any second thoughts about American 
cattle eating animal byproducts. 

B) Wonder what this will do to the US blood supply. They already exclude 
people from donating blood who've lived for more than a certain amount of time in 
England and other places that have had cases of mad cow disease. If there are 
any significant number of cases here, what will they do?



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SCOUTED:  Becoming a Compassionless Con servative

2003-12-22 Thread TomFODW
> > How is this mother any different than the neglectful wealthy parents of
> such
> > worthless scum as Paris Hilton?
> >
> 
> Thats a rhetorical question, right?!!!
> 
> 

If you mean, that it answers itself (and the answer is, "not in any 
significant way"), then yes.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SCOUTED:  Becoming a Compassionless Conservative

2003-12-22 Thread TomFODW
How is this mother any different than the neglectful wealthy parents of such 
worthless scum as Paris Hilton?



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: A sad, sad, day for the Sci-Fi Channel

2003-12-21 Thread TomFODW
> As if their incredibly bad taste in programming isn't enough, on the
> Friday after Christmas, the Sci-Fi Channel will be doing an all day
> Tremors marathon - every episode in order, and the movies. It's almost
> painful.
> 

I dunno, the first movie is very funny. Never saw any of the other 
iterations, though...



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Fw: Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

2003-12-21 Thread TomFODW
The temp score they're using for the trailer is the Stargate SG-1 theme...



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Edge of the Galaxy

2003-12-19 Thread TomFODW
If we travel through this "extra cosmic arm in the Milky Way that they 
believe wraps around the
outskirts of the vast galaxy like a thick gas border" will we become 
superhuman like Gary Lockwood and Sally Kellerman in "Where No Man Has Gone Before"? 
Kewel!

;)



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: CNN Breaking News

2003-12-14 Thread TomFODW
> Looks like they're doing DNA tests to confirm.  I wonder what that's going 
> to mean to Iraq in both the short and long terms.
> 

It'll probably lead to a more widespread acceptance of the validity of DNA 
testing throughout the Middle East...



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Scouted: Tom DeLay to NYC: Drop Dead!

2003-12-01 Thread TomFODW
http://nytimes.com/2003/12/01/nyregion/01SHIP.html


Tom DeLay, despicable if all-powerful Speaker of the House, wants delegates 
to the Republican convention in NYC next summer to eschew the city's hotels and 
restaurants and instead be his captives, er, sorry, guests on a luxury cruise 
liner a former staffer of his represents that will be moored in the Hudson 
River. So much for his promises to such prominent New York Republicans as 
Governor George Pataki and Mayor Michael Bloomberg (admittedly a Democrat for most 
of his life until realizing he could never get the Democratic nomination to run 
for Mayor of New York) that the convention would bring untold millions to New 
York's economy as well as showcase the Republican Party as the new party of 
all the American people and not just the fat rich white southern conservative 
christian straight men who have been its only concern for the past 30 years. 

Interesting, innit, that even when DeLay *TRIES* to fake everyone out and 
pretend to be anything other than a southern racist bastard, he just can't do it. 
The truth will out.


Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [Listref]  CO redistricting struck down by state Supreme Court

2003-12-01 Thread TomFODW
> See, Texas Isn't The Only State With Gerrymandering Issues Maru   ;)
> 

Sadly, it also isn't the only state with cheating greedy Republican scumbags, 
either...



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Scouted: When Asthma Attacks

2003-11-21 Thread TomFODW
When Asthma Attacks
 A new report from Clean the Air reveals that the ill-conceived energy bill, 
should it be enacted into law, would havehttp://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2003/11/20/news/02energybzbigs.txt";>
 severe public health consequences 
around the country â especially for children. At issue is a little noticed 
provision in the massive legislation that would "http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/20/national/20POWE.html?pagewanted=print&position=";>delay
 for years pollution 
reductions needed to achieve ozone smog clean air standards in the dirtiest areas" by 
allowing "communities with unhealthy air quality...to point the finger at 
pollution sources outside their borders." On three separate occasions federal 
courts have ruled the practice illegal. The study shows that delays in 
implementing the Clean Air Act would lead to 4,900 hospitalizations due to respiratory 
illness, 387,400 asthma attacks and over 573,000 missed school days each year. 
Some areas of the country would behttp://cta.policy.net/reports/na_slippage.pdf?PROACTIVE_ID=cecfcfcbc8cec9c9c6c5cecfcfcfc5cececccdccc9cbc7c9c6c5cf";>
 particularly hard hit. In Pennsylvania 
non-attainment of ozone standards would lead to more than 47,000 missed school 
days, more that 34,000 asthma attacks and more than 440 hospital admissions for 
respiratory illness. Ohio: 29,000 lost school days, 20,000 asthma attacks, 287 
hospital admission. Virginia: 15,000 lost school days, 11,000 asthma attacks, 
129 hospital admissions. (Find out the impact in your statehttp://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/20/national/20POWE.html?pagewanted=print&position=";>
 HERE. Skeptical? 
Review the methodology of the study, conducted by the nation's leading air 
pollution consultants,http://cta.policy.net/reports/ozone_rollback_methodology.pdf?PROACTIVE_ID=cecfcfcbc8cec9c7cec5cecfcfcfc5cececccdccc9cacacbc7c5cf";>
 HERE.)Â



Tom Beck
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I don't think we're in any danger of Johnnie Cochrane defending Michael 
Jackson..."
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Family Guy may return

2003-11-20 Thread TomFODW
I loved the pure surreal nuttiness of Family Guy. The talking dog that 
everyone simply accepts...Stewie's megalomaniacal madness.

But I also loved Futurama, too. Bring 'em both back!

(Anyone but me notice the problem Fox has with shows that start with "F"? 
Family Guy, Futurama, Firefly, Fastlane...)



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Fox News, we distort, you comply.

2003-11-18 Thread TomFODW
> Hmm, interesting perspective.  I wonder if the folks in Burbank feel the
> same way as you do.  Which facility were you working for?
> 

Burbank? They shut us down to save the existing Lockheed facility in 
Sunnyvale. I worked for the Astro Space division in East Windsor, NJ. (They also shut 
down the Astro Space plant in Valley Forge, PA.)

It was originally RCA Astro Space, until GE bought RCA. It became GE Astro 
Space, and they ruined it by replacing experienced astrospace engineers with 
inexperienced engineer managers under the asinine belief that a manager who 
managed a washing machine factory in Memphis could equally well manage a commercial 
communications satellite facility. It didn't work.

GE eventually sold us to Martin Marietta. Then Lockheed came in and bought 
out the Martin Marietta executives and shut us down to save their own factories.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Fox News, we distort, you comply.

2003-11-17 Thread TomFODW
> Martin and Lockheed merged, creating Lockheed Martin
> 

It was a merger in name only, believe me. I lost my job as a result of the 
so-called "merger," which basically ended with Lockheed running the show, 
shutting down Martin facilities and putting Martin employees out of work, and 
Martin's top-level management pocketing big buy-out bonuses.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Fox News, we distort, you comply.

2003-11-16 Thread TomFODW
> do you seriously think that it's easy to become
> the CEO of a major corporation?  These guys are (in
> general) like Major League Baseball players.
> Obviously there are exceptions, but most of the time,
> even the worst one is so much better at what he does
> than the average person that it's barely possible to
> even understand it.  That's true of almost any
> competitive system.  Professional athletes are so much
> more physically capable than you or I that they might
> as well be a different species.One reason GE has so
> convincingly outperformed other companies is its
> tradition of superb management.  Jack Welch and Jeff
> Immelt weren't chosen by accident, and their
> performance echoes it.
> 
> This isn't to say that all CEOs are competent -
> although I bet there isn't one in a Fortune 500
> company who couldn't do a better job than any person
> on this list (myself very much included) by a very
> large margin.  But the performance level involved is
> astonishingly high.
> 

I'm sorry, but this is just not possibly true. There is some skill involved 
in being a CEO along with a lot of experience. And there is no doubt some such 
thing as managerial talent, although I doubt it can be measured by any 
objective standard the way one can measure the speed of a fastball or time a wide 
receiver in a 40 yard dash. But it's just not the same thing Too much about a 
CEO's performance has to be inferred (stock price, etc.), and the fact that so 
much of their compensation is set by committees that are often hand-picked by 
the CEO, and that they often serve on each other's boards - there's just too 
much asskissing in business, that it practically becomes a tautology: how do you 
know he's a good CEO? Because his company is successful. 

GE is a very rare example of a company that is clearly successful because of 
its CEO - although you would not have wanted to work for RCA Astrospace when 
GE bought it, because they damn near ruined the company (remember the Mars 
Observer disaster?) 

Most CEOs get their job because they were successful timeservers who rose 
through the ranks. They may be intelligent, know their business, be good 
managers, etc., but few of them show any real spark of brilliance - because few of 
anyone shows any real spark of brilliance. The difference between, say, Norm 
Augustine (who ruined Martin Marietta Astrospace after Lockheed bought it out) and 
Michael Jordan is, there's really only one Michael Jordan. There's quite a 
few people who could approximate Norm Augustine. True talent is very very rare. 
There are plenty of business leaders who are good at what they do but are not 
truly talented in the sense that Baryshnikov or Stephen King or Mary-Chapin 
Carpenter or Joe Montana is. Let's not confuse the issue. They get overpaid 
because they control to a large extent the system that sets their pay. And they 
vote Republican because they figure that's the best way for them to continue to 
receive and retain their undeserved largesse. They're selfishly voting in 
their own personal interest. If they want to do that, fine, but let's not dignify 
it by calling it some great principle. 



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Abortion: Pro-Lifers Foil Bombing Plot

2003-11-16 Thread TomFODW
> In the pro-lifers don't do enough to oppose violence against abortionists
> department:
> 
> 
>    http://www.lifenews.com/nat209.html
> 
> Investigators revealed more information on Thursday about Stephen John
> Jordi, the man whom FBI agents arrested this week on suspicions of plotting
> to firebomb several abortion facilities in Florida and nationwide.
> 
> Pastors in the small Florida town of Coconut Creek informed police about
> him at least four days before he was apprehended.
> 

Not much to say here except, anyone who really believes in American democracy 
should condemn violence of any stripe. Serious opponents of abortion should 
(and most do) realize that the violent actions of the extremist fringe of their 
movement do nothing to advance their cause. Regardless of the issue, and of 
the sincerity of one's views, for this country to work, we all need to play by 
the same rules, one of which is, you can argue as vehemently as you want for 
your beliefs, and you can engage in peaceful protest and civil disobedience. 
But once you resort to violence, you're breaking the compact. 

If sometimes the "right-to-life" crowd is criticized for not doing enough to 
curb the violence-prone factions of their movement, that's because all too 
often they DON'T do enough. This draws attention precisely BECAUSE it is rare. 
Paul Hill and his sympathizers, and anyone who thinks the sincerity of their 
opposition to abortion justifies their committing murder, should be unequivocably 
reviled by true "pro-lifers", excommunicated, abominated, shunned and in 
every other way made to feel completely unwelcome. But too often that doesn't 
happen. You get the attitude, "Well, what they did wasn't right, but I understand 
their frustration," etc. Which is a tacit condoning of evil. 

This is a good start. Let's see some more.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: christian dreams of murder...

2003-11-14 Thread TomFODW
> Out of curiosity, do you object to Tom Clancy novels?  After all, they
> contain plausible scenarios by which our country and government heads could
> be attacked by all sorts of terrorists, resulting in the deaths of millions.
> 

Oh, come on, it's not even remotely comparable. In Clancy's novels, the 
terrorists are always quite clearly the BAD GUYS. He never muses about how 
something awful could happen and then pretends to be opposed to it. It's always quite 
clear that Clancy really definitely IS opposed to the evil in his books.

On the other hand, this Christian guy's musings, especially with that rather 
pallid introduction, do not really sound too much to me like The Turner 
Diaries. So I think we're paying far too much attention to one little nobody's 
nothings.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Veterens Bushwhacked

2003-11-14 Thread TomFODW
What do you expect from these scumbags in the White House? They announce 
nice-sounding proposals and reap the benefit from people who want to believe that 
their (in this case not really) elected officials are on the side of the 
angels. Then, after getting good press for their announcement - and after the press 
has turned its attention elsehwere - they quietly do nothing (at best; the 
exact opposite of what they announced, at worst). Then, whenever anyone points 
this out, someone who desperately wants to continue to delude himself that the 
Bushitters are not cynical lying scum, bleats that they should still get the 
credit for meaning well. But the list of broken promises is staggering: 
Afghanistan, the environment, veterans, schools, international AIDS funding - all 
impressive sounding initiatives, all left to rot and vanish   - how long can they 
get away with this cynical manipulation?



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Fox News, we distort, you comply.

2003-11-14 Thread TomFODW
> I, for one, don't think Fox is unbiased.  I think it's
> about as biased as CNN or PBS - considerably less than
> NPR, though, to be honest.  It's just in the opposite
> direction.  The hysterical reaction to Fox, it seems
> to me, has more to do with the sudden shock of the
> leftist intelligentisia at finding that it doesn't
> monopolize American information any more.
> 

With all due respect, this is just nonsense. Fox is openly antagonistic to 
the left - openly so. Derisive, disrespectful, jingoistic, etc. They don't make 
even the slightest pretense otherwise. CNN at least makes an attempt to show 
the other side. PBS and NPR are also much more variegated than you give them 
credit for - not to mention reaching a far smaller audience. 

If you like Fox, fine. If you agree with them, that's your right. But don't 
pretend to yourself or to anyone else that they are anything except, 
essentially, the TV arm of the Republican Party.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Scouted: Alabama chickens come home to roost

2003-11-13 Thread TomFODW
ALABAMA CHICKENS COME HOME TO ROOST: This fall, state and national 
conservative groups led the charge to kill Alabama Gov. Bob Riley's tax redistribution 
efforts and now aren't willing to pay the price. The Republican governor warned 
at the time that the cash-strapped state was in dire fiscal straits, as he 
attempted to pull in revenue while easing taxes on the state's poor by shifting 
more of the burden to corporations. Now, with the coffers gone dry, the 
government is having to slice services to the very bone. But http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Date=20031110&Category=APN&ArtNo=311100815&SectionCat";>the
 disconnect over 
paying for services has already set in. While 68% of the state rejected 
increasing taxes for the wealthy corporations, a new poll shows a majority is strongly 
opposing plans to "cut education spending by almost $200 million and to 
eliminate funding for 3,400 teaching positions across the state." And believe it or 
not, one of the men leading the opposition to the tax is now leading the 
complaint about the cuts; Roger McConnell, of Mobile, is complaining that "Riley 
should not be cutting teachers."


Tom Beck
www.mercerjewishsingles.org
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Bishops to punish catholic politicians who disobey Pope

2003-11-13 Thread TomFODW
> Its a good thing Catholics are Jews Fool, or else you might really have
> gotten yourself in trouble at the very least you probably wouldn't be
> allowed to write football columns any more
> 

"Catholics are Jews"? Um...since when...?



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [L3] RE: religious/political question

2003-11-09 Thread TomFODW
> Yet. I wouldn't put it beyond a fanatic to do something unfortunate.
> (Remember a certain chap called Rabin? I do...)
> 

There was also Baruch Goldstein in 1994, I'm ashamed to say.

The difference is, most Jews worldwide were aghast at both. With a few 
despicable exceptions, there was hardly any approval of what either did, and far 
less celebrating. There is certainly no culture wide notion in contemporary 
Judaism (outside a handful of tiny, marginalized groups) that violence against 
civilians is legitimate. 



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Woo-hoo!

2003-11-07 Thread TomFODW
1. EVOLUTION: IT'S A NATURAL LAW, AND IT'S IN TEXAS SCHOOLBOOKS.
By a vote of 11 - 4, the Texas State Board of Education yesterday
rejected efforts of religious groups, the Discovery Institute in
particular, to get science textbooks adopted that conform to the
religious tenets of "intelligent design."  A letter bearing the
names of 550 scientists and teachers who live and work in Texas
was sent to members of the Board a few days before the vote
urging them to support "high standards of science."  The American
Physical Society assisted Texas physicists wishing to be part of
this overwhelming display of support for science. Before the
vote, a Dallas Morning News editorial was troubled by "scientists
in thrall to their own dogmas," but a science reporter exulted in
the outcome, quoting a biology professor who said it, "sent a
strong message that Texas does have high standards in science."



About the Dallas Morning News, however...


Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: republican browncoat's latest attack on democracy

2003-11-07 Thread TomFODW
> "It's saying we're not going to allow the opposition party to ask
> questions about the way we use tax money," said R. Scott Lilly,
> Democratic staff director for the House committee. "As far as I know,
> this is without modern precedent."
> 
> Norman Ornstein, a congressional specialist at the American Enterprise
> Institute, agreed. "I have not heard of anything like that happening
> before," he said. "This is obviously an excuse to avoid providing
> information about some of the things the Democrats are asking for."
> 

Fine. I have just one word for those Republican shits: PRECEDENT. You 
motherfuckers won't be in power forever, despite your tireless efforts to corrupt the 
voting process to ensure that you never actually have to face a fair vote. 
Next time the Democrats are in control, we can and will do exactly to you 
scumbags what you're doing to us now. Think about that, assholes.

(And, of course, being the crybabies they are, the Republicans and their 
lickspittle press cohort will scream and moan and whine about how unfair and mean 
the Democrats are being to them, conveniently ignoring and hoping the rest of 
the country won't remember this incident. Exactly the same way the pretend 
that they didn't try to sabotage Clinton's judicial appointments. If anyone here 
ever wonders why I hate Republicans, now you know.)



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Poll in Iraq

2003-11-07 Thread TomFODW
> I've heard conservative commentators quote "reputable polling companies" as
> indicating that the people of Iraq favor US involvement.  I've read that
> Cheney quoted a Zogby poll as indicating this favorable response.  Yet,
> when I searched for the poll, I got this result.
> 

I read an interview with Zogby in which he repudiated Cheney's interpretation 
of the poll and said he didn't understand how Cheney could interpret it the 
way he did.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Typical Republican hypocrisy

2003-11-07 Thread TomFODW
Justice Brown, if confirmed, would be the 11th Judge on the D.C. Circuit. 
Sens. Charles Grassley, Jon Kyl, and Jeff Sessions voted in favor of her 
nomination yesterday. But in 1997, opposing President Clinton's nominee to the D.C. 
Circuit, citing the D.C. circuits relatively low caseload, Sen. Grassley said "I 
can confidently conclude that the D.C. circuit does not need 12 judges or 
even 11 judges.http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?position=all&page=S2522&dbname=1997_record";>
 Filling either of these two seats would just be a waste of 
taxpayer money -- to the tune of about $1 million per year for each seat." Senator 
Kyl added "...Grassley and Sessions have made sound arguments that thehttp://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?position=all&page=S2522&dbname=1997_record";>
 D.C. 
Circuit does not need to fill the 11th seat. Their arguments are reasonable and 
not based upon partisan considerations. Similarly, my concerns with the Garland 
nomination are basedhttp://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?position=all&page=S2522&dbname=1997_record";>
 strictly on the caseload requirements of the circuit, 
not on partisanship or the qualifications of the nominee." But, since 1997,http://www.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/cmsa2002.pl";> the 
case load of the D.C. Circuit has declined from 1531 appeals filed in 1997 to 
1126 appeals filed in 2002.



Tom Beck
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"Man is the only animal who blushes. Or needs to." - Mark Twain
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Country music evil?

2003-11-05 Thread TomFODW
I don't particularly like "country music" as such. I do like certain artists 
who tend to be considered country performers. My favorite singer period is 
Mary-Chapin Carpenter, but I don't know that I'd call her a country singer, even 
though she has often been listed as one. I also like Kathy Mattea, who is 
closer to country than Mary-Chapin Carpenter, but is still not really a pure 
country singer. Okay, I love Reba McEntire, who is definitely country. I also like 
Garth Brooks, who is sometimes a country singer and sometimes just a pop 
singer. 



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [Scouted] Trick or Treat rage?

2003-11-05 Thread TomFODW
> > > I thought awhile back that if I were ever attacked
> > and managed to knock my
> > > attacker down and unconscious for a bit, I'd use
> > whatever I had at hand to
> > > carve an asterisk in the forehead of the person,
> > then run and call the
> > > police.  The marring of the forehead would make
> > for easier identification
> > > later, and might spur the person to go to the ER,
> > where it might be easier to find that person.
> 
> > I GUARANTEE you, the person would scream bloody
> > murder to the cops and insist
> > that you be arrested too. Then he'd hire a lawyer
> > and sue you from here to Andromeda.
> 
> 
> "  He grabbed me - I just struck out as
> hard as I could...I think I scratched his
> face... fingernails>...  Can I please wash my
> hands now?"
> 

Read carefully: "I thought awhile back that if I were ever attacked and 
managed to knock my attacker down and unconscious for a bit, I'd use whatever I had 
at hand to carve an asterisk in the forehead of the person"

Knocked attacker down. Attacker unconscious. Premeditation to carve asterisk 
in attacker's forehead. Not "I struck out as hard as I could...I think I 
scratched his face".

I'm not defending the attacker, I'm simply saying that if you did this to 
your attacker, your attacker would undoubtedly sue you.



Tom Beck

www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Country music evil?

2003-11-05 Thread TomFODW
> Bluegrass
> 
Love (used to play banjo - poorly)

> Lyle Leavitt
> 
Eh

> the music featured in "Oh Brother Where Art Thou?
> 
Loved

> the music of Bob Wills and the Texas Playboys?
> 
Don't know

> late 19th century country music which is tied to 16th and 17th century
> English music?
> 
Don't know




Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [Scouted] Trick or Treat rage?

2003-11-04 Thread TomFODW
> I thought awhile back that if I were ever attacked and managed to knock my
> attacker down and unconscious for a bit, I'd use whatever I had at hand to
> carve an asterisk in the forehead of the person, then run and call the
> police.  The marring of the forehead would make for easier identification
> later, and might spur the person to go to the ER, where it might be easier
> to find that person.
> 

I GUARANTEE you, the person would scream bloody murder to the cops and insist 
that you be arrested too. Then he'd hire a lawyer and sue you from here to 
Andromeda.

I'm not saying he'd be right to do this, but I absofuckinglutely guarantee it 
would happen. 100% certain.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [L3] RE: religious/political question

2003-11-03 Thread TomFODW
> [He overstates his case here, as most
> Christians consider Jesus 'given for the sake of the
> world' and I think there is a Jewish concept of 'being
> a light unto the world' also.]
> 

There is a core Jewish concept of the people Israel being called upon by God 
to be "or l'goyim" ("a light unto the nations"). We are supposed to be a holy 
nation in obedience to God, which will inspire the rest of the world to 
goodness and unity.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)

2003-11-02 Thread TomFODW
In a message dated 11/2/03 3:22:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:32:28PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
> 
> > I would prefer a monorail system instead.
> 
> Umm, how does it go, is there a danger that the track will bend?
> 

"Not on your life, my Hindu friend!"



Tom Beck
(who is glad he isn't the only one who saw all the Simpsons possibilities in 
the original mention of a monorail)

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)

2003-11-02 Thread TomFODW
> I would prefer a monorail system instead.
> 

 Monorail! Monorail! Monorail! 




Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Barbour campaign shows GOP's white supremacist side

2003-11-02 Thread TomFODW
> I imagine that a number of white people in Texas who own guns would have
> something to say about this
> 

You would hope they would not be thinking selfishly of themselves ("You can't 
move them people into MY neighborhood"), but that the entire idea of 
apartheid for ANYONE is loathesome and despicable. 



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Dogmatism

2003-11-02 Thread TomFODW
> And neither of us would call Marxism a religion. I would call
> Marxism-Leninism/Stalinism the official state (pseudo) religion of the
> former USSR though... and it was evil, EVIL I say!
> 

Please leave Marx out of it. He died in 1883 (34 years before the Russian 
Revolution), he never expected (nor would he have approved) Communism to come 
first to an agrarian, largely pre-industrial country like Russia, and he would 
have been appalled, infuriated, outraged, disgusted, shocked and in every other 
possible way rejected everything Lenin and Stalin and their successors did in 
the Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, and elsewhere.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: religious/political question

2003-11-02 Thread TomFODW
> Women die all the time because of pregnacies and all kinds of related
> problems with pregnacies.
> 
And doctors try to do something about that so the death rate will decline, 
just as they are trying to cure cancer.

>   The that parasite can also last for more 18
> years draining resources, time, energy, money, degradeing the body, etc.
> 
Unless you were a remarkably self-sufficient child, or you were abandoned, 
you yourself (just like everyone else was) were a "parasite" for up to 18 (or 
maybe even more) years. Or did you pay your parents back for all the money (to 
say nothing of time, effort, tears, etc.) they spent on you? Or did you figure 
you didn't ask to be born so you owed them absolutely nothing whatsoever? 
(Talk about parasite!)

For some reason, this reminds me of something Harry Truman is supposed to 
have said (no idea if it's true or not, but it sure _sounds_ like something 
Truman would have said): A reporter asked him, "Is it true you called Richard Nixon 
a son-of-a-bitch?" And Truman is supposed to have answered, "How could I? He 
claims to be a self-made man."




Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)

2003-11-02 Thread TomFODW
> Texas won't stand for such insults Tom!
> 
Texas is SO touchy. For all its size and bluster, it must really be 
nervous and not at all as self-confident as it tries to make itself seem.

> >From this day forward every Mexican I meet will hear about what a 
> wonderful
> place New Jersey is and how much more money they will make if they move
> there.
> 
Except, you won't ever meet any more Mexicans, as they've all already moved 
here.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)

2003-11-01 Thread TomFODW
> It's been my observation that at least part of the problem with improving 
> public transportation is that Americans like their cars too much.  If the 
> state *was* to improve the system, I really don't know how many peope would 
> actually take it.  And of course, there's the question of who would pay for it.
> 
> Even a place like DC that has a great public transportation system in the 
> Metro winds up with loads of traffic.
> 

A) That's true

B) Don't bother arguing with Erik - he's baiting us. There's no point 
responding to his obvious (if lame) attempts at trolling.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)

2003-11-01 Thread TomFODW
> If you want to spend hours commuting to and from work, Jersey's your place 
> then!
> 

You're acting like New Jersey is somehow uniquely bad in this regard. The 
traffic near Boston, DC, Long Island, LA, and Atlanta is at least at bad and 
probably worse. The Long Island Expressway is not nicknamed "The World's Longest 
Parking Lot" for nothing. 

(On the other hand, I will admit that around here, people pray not to have to 
commute through Princeton...)



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)

2003-11-01 Thread TomFODW
> Transportation sucks. Traffic is horrible, and public transit has poor
> coverage unless you just want to go to New York or Philly.
> 

Well, bad traffic and poor public transit are not unique to New Jersey. At 
least New Jersey *has* New York and Philly to go to...not too many states are 
situated so favorably between two such terrific cities.

New Jersey gets bad press...mostly by people who have never actually been 
here or whose personal experience is limited to the area around Newark 
Airport...which would be kind of like judging the entire state of Alaska only by 
looking 
at Prince William Sound immediately after the Exxon Valdez crashed and 
spilled. Or like judging the entire state of Texas by...the entire state of Texas.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


  1   2   3   4   >