Re: how to add a relationship whit other key different to the PK
Sorry for not noticing your reply until now. In that case you might get away with simply telling the relationship that the foreign key is software_id. On Apr 28, 4:02 pm, Manolet Gmail mano...@gmail.com wrote: the problem is that i need to user the value of software_id for the query. for example, the HasMany query should be: SELECT `Mirror`.`id`, FROM `mirrors` AS `Mirror` WHERE `Mirror`.`software_id` = (6) But how i can put in the query, or in the conditions value add the id of software_id?? Thanks in advance On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.comwrote: You can set foreign_key to false and instead use the condition of the relationship. This is usually used for things like User.active = true and simple things like that but I think it can be used for your purpose. COme to think of it, I may be wrong. I vaguely recall an RC for Cake1.2 causing problems when the condition is not an array... and I think you might need a string contition. On Apr 28, 12:54 am, Manolet Gmail mano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, i have this tables: Software Reviews Mirror Requirements Published Now, this is the relations: Software Has Many Reviews Software Has Many Mirrors Software HABTM Requirements Works fine. The problem is that i need to resume the tables to get a better response from mysql, the reviews tables have text fields and are classified by language, so, for the public site i do a Published table for each language, i mean: language_en language_es language_fr and load the data automatically into that tables... The Published table is a merge of the Software and Review Table. The PK of Published table is 'id', and is the same number of the reviews table. I want to establish this relationship: Published.software_id (not the PK) Has Many Mirrors.software_id The key has a Unique index, the problem is that aparently i can use the foreign_key attribute when declaring the relationship to set the Mirror model field, but i cant set the field that i want to use on the Published model, it uses the PK by default. Is there a way to force it to use other key different to the PK for the queries? Currently im using afterFind function and works okey, but dont allows me to use contain or fields. Hope you can understand me and help me thanks for you time, Manolo Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organdhelp others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comcake-php%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.c omFor more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comcake-php%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.c omFor more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Limitations to plugins for app modularity - are there any left in cake 1.3?
My experience tells me that almost all of your limitations did not exist even before 1.3 - plugins couldn't access or extend app's models They could. I did it regularly. - code in the app couldn't access a plugin's models They could. But I would not recommend doing it. (IMHO an app should not break when a plugin is missing) - plugin did not have callback capabilities in their appController like app did (eg. beforeFilter, etc.). They did. - plugin's views had no way of integrating with cake's theme'ing I don't know about themes at all so no comment. - plugin controllers couldn't be managed by Auth/ACL Auth: they could. ACL: no idea. The main gotcha I can think of is the dot notation for targeting plugins. Pizza.PizzaModel or Pizza.PizzaComponent and similar. I have an app that is made up almost entirely of plugins. Only login/ logout and statistics and reporting are the visible features residing in the core. The one hack I made to the 1.2 core was to let urls get a bit shorter by not requiring the namespacing part of controllers in plugins. / pizza/pizza_orders is messier than /pizza/orders But this was purely cosmetic to get prettier urls. On May 11, 7:57 am, keymaster ad...@optionosophy.com wrote: In the past (cake 1.1, and to an extent cake 1.2) there were limitations to plugins which prevented their use as a means of modularizing your app's code. For example, - plugins couldn't access or extend app's models - code in the app couldn't access a plugin's models - plugin did not have callback capabilities in their appController like app did (eg. beforeFilter, etc.). - plugin's views had no way of integrating with cake's theme'ing - plugin controllers couldn't be managed by Auth/ACL - etc. The main reason is that plugins were not originally designed as a tool for application modularity, but rather were for sharing functionality across apps. So, there was originally no intent to have them integrate fully into any app. As a result, many people avoided the use of plugins as a means of modularizing their apps, and instead defined additional paths to all the cake pieces using the variables for that purpose in config/ bootstrap. This way, you could have full modularity without any of the limitations of plugins. With all the good new development in plugins since cake 1.2 and 1.3, in particular the ability to have js/css located inside the plugin they apply to, I am musing over the possibility of converting all my additional paths folders over to plugins. However, I am scared that I will trip over some unknown plugin limitation which will become a showstopper. So the question is: in cake 1.3, are there still limitations to plugins which native app code doesn't have, or are plugins for all intents, fully considered as additional controllers/models/views to the main app, and can integrate freely as any other app code can? Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Shared SSL and .htaccess
Classic problem. being inside a aliased folder, like ~myuser you need to edit your .htaccess file adding a rewrite base. Search and find tons of threads discussing it in detail. (searching is easy once you know the right keywords) Once you got that done Cake should work fine. On May 10, 6:31 am, lavin carloslavi...@gmail.com wrote: I've been trying to make my site work with the free shared SSL provided by my hosting (bluehost), which is enabled by accessing the URLhttps://secure.bluehost.com/~myuser/subdomainfolder/ I can see that it is working if i remove the .htaccess files used for cakephp (the subdomain folder contains a typical cakephp installation, app folder, cake folder, etc)... However i just cant get the htaccess to work ok with it Has anyone ran into this same problem? Got any ideas for the .htaccess? Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Cookie::delete() spits error on one server but not the other
I have been scratching my head a bit here and can't find the problem.
$this-Cookie-delete('Auth.User');
...is called on login and logout.
When sometimes the Auth key does not exist in the cookie __values I
get a notice from PHP... but only on my production server. php.ini is
a likely candidate, I just can't find the php.ini setting causing it.
All looks ok to me.
Any ideas?
(Cake 1.3, PHP5.3)
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Limitations to plugins for app modularity - are there any left in cake 1.3?
I think you are reading two posts as one. I only mentioned using plugins for all visible features except a very few... nothing about paths. And to clarify about the app I refer to: The app is made up of many plugins.. not one common plugin. There is a lot of common functionality in the main app... just not exposed as visible features. The app is plugin-based to enable quick development of new features and variations of similar features without changing the central application. The main menu simply lists activated plugins + user management and reporting. Each client may have an infinite variation of plugins activated based on their contract and needs. The central app does a ton of model stuff and other validation and also a fair bit of component things that plugins can make use of. It is all really very straight-forward... but a bit complicated to explain. I tried on my website and the bakery a while back: http://www.eimermusic.com/articles/designing-a-modular-application-using-cakephp-plugins/ http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/designing-a-modular-application-using-cakephp-plugins On May 11, 2:29 pm, AD7six andydawso...@gmail.com wrote: On May 11, 2:25 pm, AD7six andydawso...@gmail.com wrote: On May 11, 2:12 pm, keymaster ad...@optionosophy.com wrote: Actually, believe it or not, many of these issues did exist, but admittedly it was a very long time ago. For example, it wasn't until late 2007 (Oct./Nov. timeframe if I remember correctly), that the ability for app code to access plugin models was introduced into the 1.2 branch through the use of the Plugin dot notation. Prior to that it was impossible. Not by oversight, but by intention. Plugins were intended to remain optional, decoupled code from the main app, and were not meant to be a means of organizing similiar functionality together. As an example of the feeling towards app organization/modularity back then, I actually dug up this comment by Gwoo (former Project Manager of cake) from late 2007: Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems some are using plugins to organize parts of a larger application. To me, you are on a slippery slope here to basically negating the whole benefit of a plugin and just making it more work on yourself. Using the config/bootstrap.php to organize your MVC requires a lot less code and should yield the same benefits. That thread is here:http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/8526219c... So, you can see it was originally intended that plugins were not for organizing application code, only for sharing amongst developers. As a result there were several limitations to how apps could use, or more specifically could not use, plugins. While it's true that some plugins are optional and the app should not depend on them, other plugins might neeed to be an integral part of the app, containing code which was just separated off for the purpose of grouping closely knitted functionality together, within the larger app. In that sense, models in one plugin might need to have associations with models in another plugin. (eg. Order belongs to Account, or Order HABTM Warehouse, where accounts, orders, and warehouses are all in different plugins). The limitations back then (I believed based on discussions in this group, though I never tried it) prevented the use of plugins for grouping together functionality within the app. So, I and many other developers used the additional paths to group things together. At some point in cake v.1.2 a number of these limitations were removed, and in 1.3 yet more were removed. So, I'm wondering now that 1.3 is out, is there still a reason to organize apps using the additional paths in config/bootstrap? I think it's safe to say that a quote from 2007 isn't fair justification for not just trying it. I've used plugins almost as long as they've existed and can't remember having any problems at all worthy of 'holding back'. AD PS additional app paths and plugins don't solve the same problem, I'm kind of scared what you've been up to if for you they are interchangable. For me additional app paths is for using exactly the same app with different css a different db whilst maintaining one code base. even so the app contained only auth and user logic and a contact form - the rest was in a common plugin. Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their
Re: Datasource CouchDB
This is not an answer as such, only an idea if there is no datasource already. If you feel a bit adventurous you might be able to sneak a peek at the MongoDB datasource and make a similar one for CouchDB. The two databases are not identical but I think significant parts of the datasource would be similar. http://github.com/ichikaway/mongoDB-Datasource On Apr 27, 9:41 pm, Maury maurymmarq...@gmail.com wrote: Someone has a datasource for CouchDB cakePHP that works like this?http://book.cakephp.org/view/1077/An-Example Thanks Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: how to add a relationship whit other key different to the PK
You can set foreign_key to false and instead use the condition of the relationship. This is usually used for things like User.active = true and simple things like that but I think it can be used for your purpose. COme to think of it, I may be wrong. I vaguely recall an RC for Cake1.2 causing problems when the condition is not an array... and I think you might need a string contition. On Apr 28, 12:54 am, Manolet Gmail mano...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, i have this tables: Software Reviews Mirror Requirements Published Now, this is the relations: Software Has Many Reviews Software Has Many Mirrors Software HABTM Requirements Works fine. The problem is that i need to resume the tables to get a better response from mysql, the reviews tables have text fields and are classified by language, so, for the public site i do a Published table for each language, i mean: language_en language_es language_fr and load the data automatically into that tables... The Published table is a merge of the Software and Review Table. The PK of Published table is 'id', and is the same number of the reviews table. I want to establish this relationship: Published.software_id (not the PK) Has Many Mirrors.software_id The key has a Unique index, the problem is that aparently i can use the foreign_key attribute when declaring the relationship to set the Mirror model field, but i cant set the field that i want to use on the Published model, it uses the PK by default. Is there a way to force it to use other key different to the PK for the queries? Currently im using afterFind function and works okey, but dont allows me to use contain or fields. Hope you can understand me and help me thanks for you time, Manolo Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Bakery...arrogance or plain lack of attention
I have a few articles published in the Bakery. This does not make me an authority on the subject but Since my first one was back in 2007 (I think), before it was even called the Bakery, I do have some experience of it over a pretty long time. My personal set of guidelines for writing articles are: - Write and edit, preview and check... a lot. - Only publish once. Don't ever edit a published post unless you are at gunpoint. - Instead post additions or edits as author comments. - Keep the rss feed of comments to each of your articles in your feed reader. - Respond to real comments and delete spam comments. (I only delete spam I am certain of) I have developed some of this due to the sometimes very slow moderation process. A spell-correction once lingered for many weeks. This is of-course frustrating. But, if everyone took great care to check their articles before publishing their content I believe the process would be significantly quicker. Other points in my list are there to improve the quality of the article and to take on a small part of the burden of comment moderation. By keeping track of comments and responding to them you improve the quality of your article and the Bakery as a whole. Even if it is just a tiny improvement, it is something everyone can do. No forking required. ;) I believe that the main problems that need to be addressed in the software are related to spam. It if not perfect in most other respects, few things are, but the spam comments are the most urgent problem. They also take up a lot of time, I imagine. (There is also the thing where an author can't delete his/her own articles.) The other frustrations I have experience from time to time are probably more due to human resources, or a shortage thereof. It is important to point out that the people involved are NOT the problem... the rest of us, not involved, are so to speak. I am sure that with more insight one could see ways of improving the software that would streamline the work of moderators. /Martin On Apr 26, 3:10 am, Graham Weldon gra...@grahamweldon.com wrote: Most definitely. We're keeping pretty busy with work on the core at the moment, with releases for 1.2.7 and 1.3.0 out recently, we have a fair load of work ahead to push through on CakePHP 2.0. If anyone has an interest in developing and working on the bakery, we would very much welcome it. Cheers, Graham Weldon (aka. Predominant) On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM, jacmoe jac...@mail.dk wrote: I think you misunderstand: When you make a fork of a project on Github, you can make merge requests back. Which means that if you're unsatisfied with the Bakery (as software), just fork it, fix it, and make a merge request. Even for small fixes, doesn't matter. I am sure Graham and Mark and the rest of the CakePHP team would appreciate that. :) That's what I mean by forking. Cheers Jacob On Apr 26, 2:04 am, calvin cal...@rottenrecords.com wrote: I haven't published anything on the Bakery except for comments, so I can't comment on the process. However, I will note that the software is pretty screwed up. All my article reply notifications are blank e- mails--not even a link to the comment/article. I personally hate it when people send me e-mails or make forum posts where they don't write anything in the message body and just use the subject-line as the message. And I think this, along with dead links in the Cookbook, both make Cake look very unprofessional. But I don't think just forking the Bakery is a solution. Cake needs a centralized/official article/plugins repository. There are just a few things that need to be fixed is all. Even if someone were to fork the Bakery, it would not be as successful/useful. The Bakery is only so useful today because lots of people know about and use it--it's linked to right from the CakePHP homepage. So this if you don't like it, just fork it attitude is not appropriate. It's similar to the attitude that, if you find Cake's documentation lacking, you should write it yourself. FOSS is about cooperation and free exchange of ideas and information. It's not an excuse to deflect all criticism or pin all responsibilities on the user/critic. And a person does not need to have contributed to Cake's source code to level a valid criticism. On Apr 25, 2:46 pm, jacmoe jac...@mail.dk wrote: That doesn't give you carte blanche to be arrogant, does it? What have you done for CakePHP if I may ask? :) A couple of weeks ago I posted this topic: http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/e3a1f469... With the title 'Let's get rid of The Bakery'. I volunteered as a moderator, but there's still lots of things to do. And the software itself needs some fixing. Feel free to fork it. I would probably delete the article as well, if there haven't been any response in three months - I don't know
1.3rc4 and saveAll, strange return values
I wanted to get some input on the return I get from Model::saveAll().
(I am on 1.3 RC4)
When trying to save multiple records of the same model things did not
save at all at first due to the new validation default. I needed
individual validation so that correct records would save but invalid
ones would be tossed.
So I have added validate true like so:
$this-Modename-saveAll($this-
data['Modename'],array('validate'=true));
Problem is I now expected an array of return values, one for each
record as hinted at (somewhere, can't find it now) but I all I get is
false. Even though 3 out of 4 records are saved. I was under the
impression that saveAll would return an array for these partial
successes. Perhaps not?
With validate set to first I do get an array back... but only an empty
one.
Is this a bug and should have a ticket or is there just some confusion
in the way I have read the docs?
thanks
Martin
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: mac users, which ide are you using to develop cakephp?
No ide, just Textmate for me. On Apr 19, 6:14 am, Bryan Lim ytbr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, mac users, which ide are you using to develop cakephp? to compile and to debug? I search the group here and realised this discussion is dated back to 2009. So, I want to know if there's any changes? thanks, Bryan Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: composite keys to identify a record
In conclusion @Renan: Composite keys are a very normal part of database design but not in any way supported or very compatible with CakePHP. Either you have to access that data via your own queris (no find and save), not use the core Schema Shell to dump the schema ,and a bunch of other things you loose. Or, as suggested, you complicate your schema a tiny bit by adding an extra id field and get to use all the cake stuff. Just my 2¢ I have only once found it preferable to stick to a multi-key (or zero- key in that case) table. That table is a WORM table for reporting data containing only a single data field and about 10 foreign keys. Since the object is to pull stats you will never ever find a single record. You will group on the various keys in different combinations to get graph data. Cake can be forgiven for not supporting that kind of table. Personally I think the classic HABTM joining table would haven been more worthy of support, seeing as there are so many of them in any given app. But I feel the topic has been discussed to death before. I don't want to start another discussion about database-religion. /Martin On Apr 18, 12:07 pm, Jeremy Burns jeremybu...@me.com wrote: And Cake will just 'deal with it', without you having to do any work. Jeremy Burns jeremybu...@me.com On 18 Apr 2010, at 11:04, j0n4s.h4rtm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hello, for instance you could have Post, Tag, PostTag, Post HABTM Tag / Post HasMany PostTag, Tag HasMany PostTag. why this example? because it shows the most common place where you would - outside of Active Record - use a combined primary key - PostTag would have PrimaryKey(post_id, tag_id) - but as Jeremy Burns pointed out: besides the very tiny data overhead, what is the issue with one additional field as a primary and setting Unique(post_id, tag_id)? On Apr 17, 12:50 am, Jeremy Burns jeremybu...@me.com wrote: I absolutely endorse a single, incremental, non-intelligent primary key, enriched with multi-field unique indexes and the adoption of convention. Why make life any more difficult than it is already? Jeremy Burns jeremybu...@me.com On 16 Apr 2010, at 21:29, Renan Augusto wrote: Dear, Someone must have encountered a situation where a table had with composite key. what did you do? Since CakePHP recognizes only one field to primaryKey! In my opinion I see two possibilities: 1 - not create tables with composite keys. When you need to use composite keys to identify a record, create one more field with the name ID and put it as primary key. 2 - forget standardization. Choose one of the fields to put in $ primaryKey attribute of the model and when you need to make a relationship (or hasMany belongsTo), use to specify the conditions other fields that make up the key of the table. That's my opinion, please tell her! Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organdhelp others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organdhelp others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Tip: MongoDB-Datasource undocumented feature
I did not know the datasource could do this and almost didn't try it
as a result. Don't make the same mistake.
Yasushi Ichikaway has developed a very nice datasource for MongoDB.
http://github.com/ichikaway/mongoDB-Datasource/
Mars Story wrote a very nice intro post about it.
http://mark-story.com/posts/view/using-mongodb-with-cakephp
After looking at the github page and reading Mark's post I was
convinced that only ordinary scalar values were supported by the
MongoDB datasource. The source lists only strings, integers and stuff
as datatypes... not objects, arrays or hierarchies in any form.
The good news is that deep nested arrays of data are supported. THis
is a big deal and I don't want anyone else to give this plugin a pass
just because they draw the same conclusions I did.
From my experience, any field defined in the schema can be an array
and contain any hierarchical data. I have given these fields the
datatype array without an error just to indicate to myself that they
are hierarchies.
I have not been able to just add a new root level field but anything
inside a defined field can have any data structure added to it.
Example:
var $mongoSchema = array(
'some_string' = array('type'='string'),
'data'=array('type'='array'), // just a reminder for me
'created'=array('type'='datetime'),
'modified'=array('type'='datetime'),
);
For this model I can save anything inside data. Like:
$this-data['Modelname']['data']['hello']['world'] = 'cool';
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: the plugins dont work at all
Hi, Plugins do work. I have whole apps build with a limited core and numerous plugins (22 of them in one case). I can think of a few details to double-check. I don't think you should have plugins named in camelCase. Try naming the folder and the urls you try pizza_order instead. (The plugin in the manual is simply named pizza btw) app/plugin/poll/ the plugins folder should be named plugins (with an s). You write it in singular form without the s in one place. Plugins must have the equivalent of pizza_app_controller.php and possible pizza_app_model.php too. Without them the plugin will not be found. At least that was the case when I started using plugins, it may have changed but I still have them in each plugin. The final detail I can think of is some rewrite detail messing with you. Unlikely but since I never run apps as anything but their own vhost I can't be 100% how plugins react to being in a subfolder. (as in localhost/apname/) Those are all long-shots but they are all I can think of that might be the cause. Good luck. /Martin On Apr 16, 5:28 pm, islam4hak islamco...@gmail.com wrote: hi why i cant accses any plugin i create ? i make the manual tutorial to create the pizzOrder plugin but i cant access to it /pluginname/controllername/action so i bake another plugin but i cant access it to app/plugin/poll/ i tryhttp://localhost/appname/poll/ it dont work Error: PollController could not be found. Error: Create the class PollController below in file: appname \controllers\poll_controller.php so i download a ready to user plugin and i cant access it to ? the plugin is AJAX star rating plugin for CakePHP 1.2 i tryhttp://localhost/appname/rating/ so what i'm doing wrong ? Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Timezone management advice
Hi, I have found myself in a position where I need to support correct times across timezones. I'd love any advice and gotchas from those experienced in timezone management of a Cake app. I have gotten a bit bewildered by the complexity by something that looks to simple on the face of it. I need to support time-conversions correctly and I don't really see full support for it in either Cake or PHP. The Basics: The server may be in a different timezone from the user and users may be in different timezones. Times in incoming data (posts, uploads...) need to be converted to Server Time. Times for display need to be converted to Client Time. Some complexities: You can't sniff the client timezone from the server-side without (reportedly unreliable) ip-geolocation lookups from the non-free providers (reportedly less unreliable). So, I need javascript or I need to ask the user to choose. I'd like to avoid asking the user. Some timezones use DST. Some do not. Dates when DST are in effect vary from location to location... and (big sigh) year to year. That is basically the broad view of my knowledge of the problems involved in time-conversions. Am I making things needlessly complicated for myself? I really need the timestamps to be correct for the type of app I am developing. Serious things can happen if they get screwed up by only an hour. The kind of things that cause multi- million dollar lawsuits and put companies out of business. I don't want that. :) Please fire away with your advice and experience on this topic. /Martin Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.
Re: How can Schema Shell create new tables?
Also, I can't get the reverse to work either. I.e. update does not notice that a table should be dropped. I'd love some help on that also. On Mar 30, 7:51 am, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, cake schema run update -f always creates an ALTER TABLE statement. So how about when a new table is in the schema? I see the code really in DboMysqlBase::alterSchema() for my dbo but the same logic was found in the Postgres class. Since I am quite sure the Schema Shell would not have been released without the ability to handle new tables I assume there is something I don't get. So, put me out of my misery, please. I really don't see it. I can only see that I would have to manually force a create command and supply the table name. This can't be the right way since it would not work at all in a deployment situation. Can it? thanks for any info you can provide. /Martin Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
How can Schema Shell create new tables?
Hi, cake schema run update -f always creates an ALTER TABLE statement. So how about when a new table is in the schema? I see the code really in DboMysqlBase::alterSchema() for my dbo but the same logic was found in the Postgres class. Since I am quite sure the Schema Shell would not have been released without the ability to handle new tables I assume there is something I don't get. So, put me out of my misery, please. I really don't see it. I can only see that I would have to manually force a create command and supply the table name. This can't be the right way since it would not work at all in a deployment situation. Can it? thanks for any info you can provide. /Martin Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
Re: cake schema run update gone crazy
I'll update the thread with some findings after rooting through the code a bit. Looking at the source I found out that -f does not force 'generate' to create a new schema.. It is used To force generation of all tables into the schema... but not only that. It can also be used to force update to ignore the Model classes in the same way as generate and therefore update a schema generated using the option. So, Schema Shell appear to do all the important stuff I need... more testing will confirm. On Mar 25, 4:59 pm, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: Ah. Thanks for the hint. I have models for all tables... BUT the schema generator does not find them all since some are in plugins and some are in sub-foldes of app/ models. I guess tables matching these models are the cause of the problem. So in reality, schema shell is only fully usable in apps that do not have plugins, multiple dbs or sub-folders inside models. Oh, and all table must follow Cake's conventions to the letter. E.g. can't have a table without a pk for example. I kind of liked the idea of the schema shell. Being abel to keep just one schema file and letting Git do the versioning feel just right next to the rails-type schema files. So I guess I will have to start plowing the source to see if I can make it behave with my schema after a reasonable amount of work. /Martin On Mar 25, 2:07 pm, Ian M. Jones imijs...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Martin, Have you got models defined for all the tables in your schema file? If not, running cake schema run update will try to add all the columns for any tables missing model files, so I discovered myself today. Regards, Ian IMiJ Ltdhttp://www.imij.co.ukhttp://www.ianmjones.comhttp://twitter.com/ianmj... On 25 Mar 2010, at 13:02, Martin Westin wrote: I thought I'd give schema migrations a try. But something small must be horribly wrong with how I am trying to use the schema shell. I run cake schema run update on the database that just generated the schema and the shell wants to add all the columns to the tables again. That can't be right? What's wrong with my schema that the shell thinks all tables are without columns? I am on Cake 1.2.6 and Apache2, php5.3, MySQL 5... on a Mac with Snow Leopard. I tried creating an empty db. I ran a create and it created all tables... then I ran update and it again wanted to add all (existing) columns to the tables. Any ideas? Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organdhelp others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject. Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
non-interactive Schema Shell for deployment?
I am almost there with the Schema Shell. Now just one thing remains. Being able to do run update -f without answering y or n to the questions. Is there a non-interactive mode for the Schema Shell? I can't see any option to do it. /Martin Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
Re: non-interactive Schema Shell for deployment?
Found a shell-based way to automatically answer the question. http://www.unix.com/shell-programming-scripting/30246-how-give-variable-command-shell-script.html On Mar 26, 3:41 pm, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: I am almost there with the Schema Shell. Now just one thing remains. Being able to do run update -f without answering y or n to the questions. Is there a non-interactive mode for the Schema Shell? I can't see any option to do it. /Martin Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
cake schema run update gone crazy
I thought I'd give schema migrations a try. But something small must be horribly wrong with how I am trying to use the schema shell. I run cake schema run update on the database that just generated the schema and the shell wants to add all the columns to the tables again. That can't be right? What's wrong with my schema that the shell thinks all tables are without columns? I am on Cake 1.2.6 and Apache2, php5.3, MySQL 5... on a Mac with Snow Leopard. I tried creating an empty db. I ran a create and it created all tables... then I ran update and it again wanted to add all (existing) columns to the tables. Any ideas? Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
Re: cake schema run update gone crazy
Ah. Thanks for the hint. I have models for all tables... BUT the schema generator does not find them all since some are in plugins and some are in sub-foldes of app/ models. I guess tables matching these models are the cause of the problem. So in reality, schema shell is only fully usable in apps that do not have plugins, multiple dbs or sub-folders inside models. Oh, and all table must follow Cake's conventions to the letter. E.g. can't have a table without a pk for example. I kind of liked the idea of the schema shell. Being abel to keep just one schema file and letting Git do the versioning feel just right next to the rails-type schema files. So I guess I will have to start plowing the source to see if I can make it behave with my schema after a reasonable amount of work. /Martin On Mar 25, 2:07 pm, Ian M. Jones imijs...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Martin, Have you got models defined for all the tables in your schema file? If not, running cake schema run update will try to add all the columns for any tables missing model files, so I discovered myself today. Regards, Ian IMiJ Ltdhttp://www.imij.co.ukhttp://www.ianmjones.comhttp://twitter.com/ianmjones On 25 Mar 2010, at 13:02, Martin Westin wrote: I thought I'd give schema migrations a try. But something small must be horribly wrong with how I am trying to use the schema shell. I run cake schema run update on the database that just generated the schema and the shell wants to add all the columns to the tables again. That can't be right? What's wrong with my schema that the shell thinks all tables are without columns? I am on Cake 1.2.6 and Apache2, php5.3, MySQL 5... on a Mac with Snow Leopard. I tried creating an empty db. I ran a create and it created all tables... then I ran update and it again wanted to add all (existing) columns to the tables. Any ideas? Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject. Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
Re: After the Cake is baked...
Avoid getting sued? Stop being an american work like a charm. ;) (sorry, I could not resist) On Feb 22, 8:39 am, Johnny Cupcake sparklew...@hotmail.com wrote: OK, so after we have successfully built our modern, interactive CakePHP website...where can we learn how to actually /run/ the website? Can you recommend any books or forums that provide a good introduction to all the legal, administrative and technical issues? For instance, best practices for data backups, how to avoid getting sued into oblivion, et cetera. The post title is in fun, of course--we all know these issues should be dealt with _before_ any coding takes place...right? ;) Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: 1.2.6 strtotime error
That should not be a Cake 1.2.6 problem but a php 5.3 problem. (or even possibly 5.2.10 or something) I had this error notice way before 1.2.6... and the fix is exactly what you paste... to set the default timezone so that php is happy. One small problem is that the PHP manual lists a lot of timezones you can set that PHP doesn't actually support :) /Martin On Feb 17, 8:56 pm, Selino seli...@gmail.com wrote: :PHP Warning: strtotime(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'America/Los_Angeles' for '-8.0/no DST' instead in C:\xampp\htdocs\cake_1_2\cake\libs \cache.php on line 429: I only get this when I try to use bake in a new cakephp 1.2.6 app. If I run bake in the default app folder (the one that comes with the cake build) it does this. If I run bake from my old 1.2.5 project (cake_1_2/ myapp) it works fine. Is anyone else having this issue with CakePHP 1.2.6 projects? It's not a PHP problem because then it would be consistent with any time functions I tried. Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: About CakePHP and DB2
Can you be more specific. Do you have a problem with CakePHPs db2
driver? What specifically is not working?
I haven't used many drivers (MySQL and Sqlite) but I would expect them
all to work just by choosing to use them.
From the manual
var $default = array('driver' = 'db2',
'persistent' = false,
'host'= 'localhost',
'login' = 'cakephpuser',
'password'= 'c4k3roxx!',
'database'= 'my_cakephp_project',
'prefix' = '');
On Feb 10, 12:18 am, Hector Mansilla Arias hector.mansi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there!
I need some information about how to use CakePHP with DB2... Anybody
has exprience with that?
I need to use:
- Debian.
- Apache.
- CakePHP.
- DB2.
If anybody did a project link this, please help me with a how-to or
any idea about the implementation...
Thanks a lot!
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: inflector - class methods - slug ????
Cake only supports conversion of a specified list of characters to
their root a or o.
You need to patch the Inflector class (and post it back to the
tracker).
line 496 of inflector.php is where the action starts. It is quite
obvious where to add your additional characters. Actually I added
those three to this version if you want the quick fix:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1955811171
I will let you post the ticket though.
On Feb 10, 2:02 pm, PaulMan pho...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
echo Inflector::slug(' ã õ ï ö ä ë ö ü á í é ó ú à è ì ò ù â ê î ô û
ç );
what i want is to have the next result
a_o_i_oe_ae_e_oe_ue_a_i_e_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_c
but the result is
_õ_ _oe_ae_e_oe_ue_a_i_e_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_c
ã should be = a
õ should be = o
On 10 Fev, 12:41, anler anle...@gmail.com wrote:
You want to keep the url with your letters as they are? if that is the
case, google by IDNA (International Domain Names ... or something, or
the package Net_IDNA in pear.php.net)
On Feb 10, 1:35 pm, PaulMan pho...@gmail.com wrote:
echo Inflector::slug(' ã õ ï ö ä ë ö ü á í é ó ú à è ì ò ù â ê î ô û ç
');
results:
_õ_ _oe_ae_e_oe_ue_a_i_e_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_c
the first three chars do not work, the first and second are used many
times in Portuguese language...
is this a bug? does anybody have a solution?
best regards,
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: inflector - class methods - slug ????
Just my personal opinion:
Making changes to the core has really not been a problem for me since
I put Cake into a Git repo. I just have a branch with my changes in it
and Git takes care of the merging.
On Feb 10, 11:20 pm, jodator joda...@gmail.com wrote:
Psst, don't do that ;-) I think I saw a ticket about it and id would
not be fixed in 1.2 branch, but in 1.3 there should be an option to
add custom chars mapping.
Don't hack your core either, because it could cause problems when
upgrading, doing new stuff from fresh cake, etc. Make your own class,
or make new function in your app_model/app_controller/app_helper and
use it $this-mySlug();
I had the same issue with polish letters and I make copypaste from
core as one of my models' function.
On Feb 10, 5:17 pm, PaulMan pho...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you both!!!
I used the patch you gave, and used mb_* functions to set string to
lowercase ( i was having problems with chars like Ó and Á )
Martin what do you mean by:
I will let you post the ticket though.
Sorry im not a expert on CAKEPHP , yet
On 10 Fev, 14:37, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote:
Cake only supports conversion of a specified list of characters to
their root a or o.
You need to patch the Inflector class (and post it back to the
tracker).
line 496 of inflector.php is where the action starts. It is quite
obvious where to add your additional characters. Actually I added
those three to this version if you want the quick fix:
http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1955811171
I will let you post the ticket though.
On Feb 10, 2:02 pm, PaulMan pho...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
echo Inflector::slug(' ã õ ï ö ä ë ö ü á í é ó ú à è ì ò ù â ê î ô û
ç );
what i want is to have the next result
a_o_i_oe_ae_e_oe_ue_a_i_e_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_c
but the result is
_õ_ _oe_ae_e_oe_ue_a_i_e_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_c
ã should be = a
õ should be = o
On 10 Fev, 12:41, anler anle...@gmail.com wrote:
You want to keep the url with your letters as they are? if that is the
case, google by IDNA (International Domain Names ... or something, or
the package Net_IDNA in pear.php.net)
On Feb 10, 1:35 pm, PaulMan pho...@gmail.com wrote:
echo Inflector::slug(' ã õ ï ö ä ë ö ü á í é ó ú à è ì ò ù â ê î ô
û ç
');
results:
_õ_ _oe_ae_e_oe_ue_a_i_e_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_a_e_i_o_u_c
the first three chars do not work, the first and second are used
many
times in Portuguese language...
is this a bug? does anybody have a solution?
best regards,
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Access Global Function in CakePHP
I can not imagine why you would use a localized variable variable.
Anyway...
$temp_var = __('String',true);
echo {${$temp_var}};
On Feb 11, 8:14 am, Mukhamad Ikhsan ikhsan.o...@gmail.com wrote:
global function like __() is break the OOP concept, in some cases i need the
function bind to an object
case:
echo {${$someobject-__('String')}} // This will work
echo {${__('String')}} // this will not work because curly syntax after ${
is looking the variable object not a function, even in php manual this
should work but i have tried and it's not worked
but because __() is a global function, i don't know how to bind that
function into a variable/object
--
Mukhamad Ikhsan
Y!id:ikhsan_only
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Mongo without a schema?
Hi, I thought I'd see if any user or contributor to the MongoDB datasource can answer this question. The datasource is this one by ichikaway: http://github.com/ichikaway/mongoDB-Datasource The datasource strangely requires each model to define $_schema in the class definition. I say strangely since being schema-less is one of the main benefits of Mongo, Couch et.al. It would be interesting to get some insight into what make this a requirement to gauge wether it would be fruitful to try to find a way past it. I can see that a lot of the Model class referencing $_schema to for various reasons but I haven't looked into it in depth yet. I ask before I spend countless hours trying to do something that might almost end up as a rewrite of Model itself. thankful for any insight you may have Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Release: CakePHP 1.2.6
I want to add my thanks to everyone contributing. @Mark Did you forget to make this topic a sticky? On the first page in the google group the 1.2.5 announcement is still pinned at the top but this one is not. Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
My Cake app presented at CES keynote
I have been working on the same Cake app for the past two years. A lot of it has been a bit hush hush but last week we were truly outed by Qualcomm. Check out our 3 min segment from the Keynote: http://www.greatconnection.se/en/ces The system transmits medical images from echo machines (ultrasound), CTs, MRs or any similar digital x-ray type device, to any mobile phone, any email inbox and a few social networking apps. There is a lot of high-tech stuff going on behind the scenes and CakePHP is at the core of it all. Not just for the web-interfaces but actually to drive the whole thing. Roughly 85% of the code and all the main logic is CakePHP. The rest is C and Java for certain things that benefit greatly from being optimized and run as compiled code. For a Cake app it is kind of an oddball I imagine. I thought it might be interesting to hear of a Cake app that is not a CMS or a Twitter mash-up or some other more common type of application. I also thought this would come to my defence and help explain some of the more strange questions I have been asking and problems I have been having. I may not be all crazy... I hope. Now... how am I going to work up the courage to attempt to migrate this monster to 1.3? :) Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: My Cake app presented at CES keynote
@John Thanks. @Chad I can't tell what it is exactly Boy, do I know that phrase! It is so nice to have it out so I don't have to mask my code and questions as much. Let me know when you can tell me more. Your app sounds intriguing. Martin On Jan 18, 2:07 pm, Chad Smith chadsmith...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Martin, Nice job! I too have a rather large app that we are working on with cakePHP driving the whole thing. I can't tell what it is exactly but it will be using a C/C# application to do some of the work as the program that assists the program is not written in PHP or Java. Good times though, and it's exciting to be working on it. Sadly it's a side project for our company so we haven't had a lot of time to dedicate to it yet. So I might be asking YOU questions about how to interface the two systems together sometime soon! haha. Take care and that's really wonderful! Well done. Chad On Jan 18, 4:23 am, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: I have been working on the same Cake app for the past two years. A lot of it has been a bit hush hush but last week we were truly outed by Qualcomm. Check out our 3 min segment from the Keynote:http://www.greatconnection.se/en/ces The system transmits medical images from echo machines (ultrasound), CTs, MRs or any similar digital x-ray type device, to any mobile phone, any email inbox and a few social networking apps. There is a lot of high-tech stuff going on behind the scenes and CakePHP is at the core of it all. Not just for the web-interfaces but actually to drive the whole thing. Roughly 85% of the code and all the main logic is CakePHP. The rest is C and Java for certain things that benefit greatly from being optimized and run as compiled code. For a Cake app it is kind of an oddball I imagine. I thought it might be interesting to hear of a Cake app that is not a CMS or a Twitter mash-up or some other more common type of application. I also thought this would come to my defence and help explain some of the more strange questions I have been asking and problems I have been having. I may not be all crazy... I hope. Now... how am I going to work up the courage to attempt to migrate this monster to 1.3? :) Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: adding/updating additional fields in HABTM's join table
Of-course there is :) The trick to getting some control over the join table is the with key. http://book.cakephp.org/view/83/hasAndBelongsToMany-HABTM This tells Cake to use your class file for the join model and any methods and settings in it. Mariano also has a good write-up of how to get the join table working as a real model. http://marianoiglesias.com.ar/cakephp/modelizing-habtm-join-tables-in-cakephp-1-2-with-and-auto-with-models/ And finally Teknoid has aa very short and clear post about how to actually save the extra data. http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/saving-extra-fields-in-the-join-table-for-habtm-models/ On Jan 18, 9:36 am, Ernesto e.fanz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. as the title says is there any way to add/update additional fields in HABTM's join table? Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: coding practices with models
I feel the same way sometimes. It is tempting to use model methods as
$record-method() in a way similar to an object-based ORM (e.g. Rails,
where class methods are used for finding and instance methods are used
for record manipulation).
But the way Cake works it is a bit dangerous and I would recommend
following John's advice.
/Martin
On Dec 28, 1:39 pm, John Andersen j.andersen...@gmail.com wrote:
I use the model class as the maintainer of the individual record and
the provider of a collection of records.
So in your banana example, my model would know what to do when a
controller stated that peeling the banana was required :)
Whether or not to read the banana into the model depends on the
situation you are in - is the banana currently being viewed, then the
model already has the banana - but if the banana was just one of many
selected by the user for peeling, then the model would need to be
provided with the id of the banana to peel, read it from the database
and then peel it :)
I would not let the controller know whether to read the banana in the
model, that is the models responsibility, to ensure that the correct
banana is being peeled :) - so the controller would just provide the
id to the model through the peel method and the model compares whether
the current banana is the requested one!
I usually separate the model methods into those that works with an
individual record and those that work with a collection of records.
On Dec 28, 4:14 am, Christian cdamiani...@gmail.com wrote:
When i come across situations that I feel needs to be coded inside the
model I'm not sure whether (form the perspective of the controller or
a different model) to treat a model as an object, or just as a
collection of class methods.
For example:
If I want to peel a banana..
Is it correct to instantiate the Banana
$this-Banana-read(null,$id);
and then call the method
$this-Banana-peel();
and in banana.php:
function peel() {
//since this method was called on a specific instance
//it should have access to it's private variables (tuple from the
database)
}
OR do i just call the method on the id and sort that out in the model
$this-Banana-peel($id);
then...
function peel($id) {
//need to instantiate the banana first before we can operate on it
$this-Banana-read(null,$id);
}
I'm curious about the practices of some of you regular cakers.
thanks
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Containable query
Well,
Containable will not do what you want in this case.
Containable will not limit your primary result-set by conditions on
some associated model.
Logically it might be said to flow like this:
Your query will find all Users since you have no condition to limit
the users.
Each User will also contain it's Student if it has one.
Each such related Student will contain it's Submissions if it has any
and student_id is null.
What you want is a join. One that returns only if there is no record
to join to in the submissions table.
You can do joins a bit Cake-like. Pass 'joins' and an array of
parameters to find. It is not well documented in the manual but Nate
wrote a great article for the bakery about it:
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/quick-tip-doing-ad-hoc-joins-in-model-find
You don't have to build anything like what he suggests but at least it
contains some examples of using the joins key.
A quick googling gave me this page detailing some variations of joins
that might help you figure out which type of join you need.
http://www.wellho.net/solutions/mysql-mysql-joins-using-left-join-and-right-join-to-find-orphan-rows.html
/Martin
On Dec 3, 1:53 am, Bryan Paddock bryanpadd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm... nobody have any ideas?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Bryan Paddock bryanpadd...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey all,
I have this relationship in question:
User - hasOne Student - hasMany Submission
I'm a bit stumped on how I can fetch all the users who do not have any
submissions linked to their name.
I've tried:
$list = $this-User-find('all', array(
'contain' = array(
'Student' = array(
'Submission' = array(
'conditions' = array(
'Submission.student_id' = null
)
),
)
)
));
I have the actAs in the model so the containable behaviour is functioning -
there is just a problem with my specific query.
Any ideas?
thanks!
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: HABTM questions
About the pagination:
http://book.cakephp.org/view/83/hasAndBelongsToMany-HABTM
Look at the bottom. The last examples abut binding can be used to let
paginator deal with your habtm.
When it comes to finding related data find is better than read. But
probably find('first') in this case since it does more or less the
same as read. Use Containable to specify what and how deep you want
your data returned. That should do it...
On Dec 3, 4:02 am, Alan Asher a...@asteriskpound.com wrote:
I've been scouring the web for a while trying to figure this out. My brain
is fried, so I need some help.
I have a model called Containers, a model called Assets and HABTM table
called AssetsContainer.
So a container can have many assets.
The first question I have is when I'm doing this operation
$this-Container-read(null,$id);
How do I paginate the assets. right now I am only testing so there's only 2
assets linked to the container. Am I assuming right that there would be an
endless number of assets? If not, still, how do I paginate this data?
Next question is, each asset can be one of three different tables, Photos,
Profiles, Blogs. Each of these models has a hasOne relationship of asset_id
in each model. How do I get the read() function to retrieve this data
automatically? My first instinct is to put a nominal field for each
potential table of photo_id, profile_id and blog_id and update the model for
Asset with the hasOne of each.. This way it will grab the data right?
Also, is this an instance where instead of read, I use find('all') instead?
Many thanks,
Alan
Example of my Container-read below
Array
(
[Container] = Array
(
[id] = 1
[user_id] = 1
[title] = Default
[total_items] =
[mime_type] = image
[photo_id] = 1
[created] = 2009-12-02 11:53:21
[modified] = 2009-12-02 11:53:21
[is_fan_club] = 0
[fan_club_requirements] =
[nsfw] = 0
[ordering] =
[active] =
[deleted] =
)
[User] = Array
(
[id] = 1
[user_type_id] = 2
[user_group_id] = 3
[username] = user
[email] =
[name] =
[gender_id] = 1
[password] =
[salt] =
[birthday] = 1991-11-23
[created] = 2009-11-23 21:41:24
[modified] = 2009-11-24 15:24:59
)
[Photo] = Array
(
[id] = 1
[user_id] = 1
[asset_id] = 15
[created] = 1259625133
[modified] = 1259625133
[title] =
[deleted] =
[file_name] = c0a80aa6-5aab-f111.jpg
[rel_path] = users/1/2009/11
[caption] =
[server_id] = 1
[is_featured] =
)
[Asset] = Array
(
[0] = Array
(
[id] = 1
[asset_type_id] =
[user_id] =
[created] = 2009-11-30 16:12:05
[modified] = 2009-11-30 16:12:05
[ordering] = 0
[allow_comments] = 1
[allow_rates] = 1
[nsfw] = 0
[total_views] = 0
[total_rates] = 0
[total_rating] = 0
[total_comments] = 0
[AssetsContainer] = Array
(
[id] = 1
[asset_id] = 1
[container_id] = 1
[ordering] = 1
[created] =
[modified] =
)
)
[1] = Array
(
[id] = 2
[asset_type_id] =
[user_id] =
[created] = 2009-11-30 16:13:47
[modified] = 2009-11-30 16:13:47
[ordering] = 0
[allow_comments] = 1
[allow_rates] = 1
[nsfw] = 0
[total_views] = 0
[total_rates] = 0
[total_rating] = 0
[total_comments] = 0
[AssetsContainer] = Array
(
[id] = 2
[asset_id] = 2
[container_id] = 1
[ordering] = 2
[created] =
[modified] =
)
)
)
)
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related
Re: download API documentation and book
These will not be the great answers you were hoping for. It is just my DIY way of dealing with the problem you describe. On the start page of The Book (left sidebar, at the bottom) there is a link to all in one page. I go there. Get a cup of coffee while it renders and then save it as a pdf. Then I have a searchable offline version. Unfortunately you can't really do the same with the api... but then again you have the source code. The API is generated from that directly. I often open the cake core as a project and search for various things. I use Textmate which means I also get a quick index of the methods in a class just by opening the source file. I imagine other editors have similar features. /Martin On Dec 3, 11:42 am, Lorenzo Bettini bett...@dsi.unifi.it wrote: Hi is there a version of APIs and book documentation to be downloaded for offline browsing? thanks in advance Lorenzo -- Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino HOME:http://www.lorenzobettini.itMUSIC:http://www.purplesucker.com BLOGS:http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Delete confirm
Really interesting thread guys. I often resort to just disabling SecurityComponent (I know) when I run into the black hole of death a few times and can't figure out why. Is there a good way to debug SecurityComponent problems so that dealing with specific issues on some forms can be less hit and miss? For example, I'd like a log or output or something telling me exactly why my post was denied. Was it because jQuery did the submission? Because a field doesn't have a corresponding Model? Because... things like that. I don't intend to hijack the thread but since you both (ionas and AD) seem to have done a fair bit of work on these things I imagine you have some technique you might be willing to share. /Martin On Dec 3, 1:40 pm, AD7six andydawso...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 dic, 17:27, j0n4s.h4rtm...@googlemail.com j0n4s.h4rtm...@googlemail.com wrote: A mostly working solution[1][2], that you can see here:http://github.com/ionas/sna/blob/master/www/app/app_controller.php#L1... It is based on Teknoids great information at his blog[3][4], combined with a helper that triggers a javascript::confirm(), doubleposts are essentially not possible due to SecurityComponent. If you really require an js-free confirmation, why not add a checkbox to that helper that you have to check before clicking (check if it was clicked in the helper and before that onSubmit via javascript) [1]http://code.cakephp.org/tickets/view/377 [2]http://code.cakephp.org/tickets/view/354 [3]http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/make-your-cakephp-forms-a-lot... [4]http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/clearing-up-some-confusion-re... That's ... a lot of code. You also have to remember/know in the view if you should or should not use your helper. FWIW I prefer for things to be a lot more transparent that that. Here's an example:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1027790/csrf-protect-confirm.png That's using ajax - but it doesn't have to be (it's not a requirment or inherant to the technique/solution). The 'magic' is here:http://code.assembla.com/mi/subversion/nodes/branches/mi_plugin/views... There's no 'magic' here:http://code.assembla.com/mi/subversion/nodes/branches/blog/views/entr... Anyway, good for the topic to be discussed. AD Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Views/layouts/js folder
I believe it is supposed to contain layout files for any action you have that outputs javascript (using parseExtensions). You can return pure javascript from ajax calls and have that code executed in the browser. I have only ever used rss, xml, and a few of my own like xls and mms... never js, though. /Martin On Dec 1, 1:40 pm, Dave davidcr...@gmail.com wrote: I believe that is there so when you are coding your layouts, if you link to js/whatever.js it will redirect to the proper app/webroot/js folder On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:01 AM, thomaus tho...@saimiris.com wrote: Hi, Just a simple question. I can't figure out why is there a default Views/layouts/js/ folder in Cake. I thought that all the Javascripts should go into webroot/js/ Does anybody know? Thanks in advance. Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comcake-php%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.c omFor more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: CakePHP performance 1.2 - is future any better?
I can only agree with all these suggestions and add a little beauty i
was introduced to recently. X-Sendfile is a great for performance if
you do any file output from php. It offloads all the actual output of
the file to the webserver (nginx, Apache, lighttpd...).
For me, implementing sendfile for all file output was a 10-minute job
and I improved download speed by about 25% when testing to my home-
computer... and the cpu load showed that receiving an email was more
CPU-intenceive than sending a few dvd-image-sized files with nginx. I
believe that is what they like to call low hanging fruit in
corporate bullshit (that is a real language you know).
(I did also spend a few minutes finding out that nginx wants paths
relative to a configured folder while the other two main players take
a full system path)
/Martin
On Nov 24, 8:12 am, Crazy crazy...@gmail.com wrote:
Judging by your setup I believe you should start using a profiler, and
optimize your code a bit or take a better look at why your machines
perform poorly.
I run a site that has around 250k hits/day and it's on one box
(Core2Quad 8800 8GB RAM) with the db on the same machine + .
It runs on average 75% idle. Only thing that puts it under heavy load
is the cronjobs that are running.
Don't know how far you've optimized everything, like ppl say, use an
opcode cacher(APC in my experience is the most stable) and do other
things like gzip, fix your keepalives, use cdn, etags,
In cake, also don't do any find('all'), always specify the fields you
need, don't use recursion if you don't have to, cache large sets of
unchangeable data in memcache.
Use a profiler(I use XDebug), every ms you can optimize will lower the
load.
From your description it sounds like an inefficient setup or code.
I agree that cakephp isn't the fastest framework around, but it isn't
that slow!
On Nov 24, 7:37 am, j0n4s.h4rtm...@googlemail.com
j0n4s.h4rtm...@googlemail.com wrote:
- Clone all of your application files/code (anything besides /app/
webroot but including /app/webroot/index.php) to a ram based file
system on your *nix host.
- Try lazyloader:http://github.com/mcurry/lazy_loader
- Never use recursive -1, make sure containable does not do multiple
queries, if it does use complex find queries and joins
- Use elements that are being cached, if you use requestAction make
sure those are cached too
On Nov 23, 10:08 pm, Pablo Viojo pvi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, APC and Memcache is a must if you want good performance.
Regards,
Pablo Viojo
pvi...@gmail.comhttp://pviojo.net
¿Que necesitas?http://needish.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Miles J mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
Haha funny you ask. The mozilla addons site actually runs CakePHP 1.1
and they recently announced they are switching to Django.
All I can say is use APC for opcode caching and memcache for user
caching.
On Nov 23, 11:02 am, Balrog kraus.it...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
We are running quite growing social network in Poland for students at
CakePHP, now 70k users and 0.5M hits a day.
We have 3 app servers for it with CakePHP 1.2.5 installed on each.
Servers are Quad Core i7 920 + 8G RAM, so rather good machines.
DB on separate box + nginx frontend for static content on other box.
Load on each machine is now 5+, i see addons.mozilla using CakePHP
with far greater traffic than ours
Have they released info if they have made any significant changes to
the Cake core ? It is rather publicly known that Cake seems to be
rather poorly comparing to RoR or Django in performance.
Any good pieces of advice on how to optimize your app (the cake
itself, cause app is prettily good written, db also optimized) ?
Is upcoming 1.3 or 2.0 anyhow faster or less-cpu-using?
Regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comcake-php%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.c
om
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Re: About multilingual websites
Hi, For 1: If Cake has trouble figuring out where your app is (for some reason). The simple workaround is to specify it with the full path: /Users/thomaus/Sites/MyApp/cake/consol/cake -app /Users/thomaus/Sites/ MyApp/app i18n extract That is the foolproof and disgustingly verbose way of making sure you target the right app (= how to call the console from cron). For part of 2: Plural forms are explained sort-of correctly in that post. The problem is that they depend greatly on the language you translate into. First is the header in the .po file which specifies how this language treats plurals. Second is the actual messages that will then need to add plural forms to match the header. But not all messages need plural forms!! Only single words that are translated in a plural-senitive way need them. Normal singular translation will likely be 99% of what you do: msgid this is just a string, no plurals needed! msgstr det här är bara en sträng, inga plurala variationer behövs! Then there will be things like date and time formatters, translated paging labels and things of that sort: msgid second msgid_plural seconds msgstr[0] sekund msgstr[1] sekunder My advice is to stay away from too many single words and plurals in your translations. My reason for this is that synonyms rarely match that well and generally the quality of the translated copy will suffer. It is a lot simpler for a translator to read entire sentences and to re-work them for the new language. Remember that you can put variables into the translation strings and that if you have more than one you should make sure their order is changeable. /Martin On Nov 24, 2:48 pm, thomaus tho...@saimiris.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for your answer. 1) I tried to do ../cake/consol/cake i18n extract from my /MyApp/ app/ path and it says: Welcome to CakePHP v1.2.4.8284 Console --- App : app Path: /Users/thomas/Sites/MyApp/app --- What is the full path you would like to extract? Example: /Users/thomaus/Sites/MyApp/myapp [Q]uit [/Users/thomaus/Sites/MyApp/app] I don't get why it does so. 2) Is there a clear and updated tutorial or blog to do multilingual applications with CakePHP? I found this onehttp://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/p28n-the-top-to-bottom-persis... but it's completely out-of-date... About the plural form, is this blog correct?http://nik.chankov.net/2008/11/20/translating-plural-and-singular-for... Thanks in advance, On Nov 23, 4:55 pm, Larry E. Masters aka PhpNut php...@gmail.com wrote: Ignore this section in the manual it in incorrect: Remember that po files are useful for short messages, if you find you want to translate long paragraphs, or even whole pages - you should consider implementing a different solution. e.g.: http://cakedc.com/usesentire paragraphs. http://cakeqs.org/isanother example, the cakeqs.pot for it is located here:http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/filesyoucan open that file in an editor and around line 1735 see a msgid for an entire paragraph. the cakeqs-*.po files are the actual files we use in the app. One of the most important settings in the .po file is Plural-Forms:, if it is incorrect, your plural translations will not look right. Let me know if you need help with this, I am working to get the old translations.cakephp.org domain setup again and it will list all the different plural form expressions: Example (There are 16 forms of plurals, 2 listed below): #English, French, etc nplurals=2; plural=n1; #Japanese etc nplurals=1; plural=0; You can also dig through the test case app in the core that has all the plural forms in cake/tests/test_app/local/* Another piece of advice you may already know. Using the console you can extract these string with the following command. cake i18n extract This will create the pot file that you would use to create the .po files using a tool likewww.poedit.net /** * @author Larry E. Masters * @var string $userName * @param string $realName * @returns string aka PhpNut * @access public */ On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:35 AM, thomaus thomas.ausse...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, One month ago, I did a multilanguage website using CakePHP but putting all the multilangual content in my dB. From what I read today, this was the right way to display short messages in various languages with CakePHP : http://book.cakephp.org/view/162/Internationalizing-Your-Application From what I read too, po files are useful for short messages, if you find you want to translate long paragraphs, or even whole pages - you should consider implementing a different solution. Then my question is : is there a standard way to translate dynamically long paragraphs? Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Re: File upload size (copy by value)
You are looking at the problem form the wrong angle. Don't store 42MB files in the database, that's all. Files are best stored in the filesystem. Then you store the filename (and path) in your database. You will never even need to have the file in php-memory at all. /Martin On Nov 24, 7:37 am, Наргиза Саркулова snt.joc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I recently implemented a file upload feature in one of my cakephp project following the guidelines in: http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2006/04/15/file-upload-with-cakephp/ The upload feature is working nice but the only problem is that it requires a huge amount of memory because cakephp save function and DB function pass their argument by copy so for a 42 megabyte file, for example, I get: 5 0.6854 9126724 ApplicantdataController-attachment( ) ../object.php: 118 6 0.6855 9126724 ApplicantdataController-saveAttachments( ) ../ applicantdata_controller.php:195 7 0.7750 49591836 Model-save( ) ../applicantdata_controller.php:398 8 0.7761 49602268 DboSource-create( ) ../model.php:1253 9 0.7767 49602220 DboMysql-value( ) ../dbo_source.php:571 requiring a 120mega PHP request. I was wondering if it makes sense to create my own version of the save function passing by reference or maybe there is a better way to implement the file upload feature. Passing by reference should allow me to not have the 49mega copied twice. Thanks for your help, Nargiza -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Re: CakePHP performance 1.2 - is future any better?
Maybe someone should answer the original question: Will future versions improve performance? 1.3 - most likely not too much. 2.0 - this will likely see some more significant improvements since php4 is dropped. Any advancements after 2.0 are also likely to offer improvements as more and more code is php5 optimized. On Nov 24, 3:38 pm, Javier javier.cor...@gmail.com wrote: CakePHP performance is really poor. To improve it you must use APC and/ or memcached On 23 nov, 16:02, Balrog kraus.it...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! We are running quite growing social network in Poland for students at CakePHP, now 70k users and 0.5M hits a day. We have 3 app servers for it with CakePHP 1.2.5 installed on each. Servers are Quad Core i7 920 + 8G RAM, so rather good machines. DB on separate box + nginx frontend for static content on other box. Load on each machine is now 5+, i see addons.mozilla using CakePHP with far greater traffic than ours Have they released info if they have made any significant changes to the Cake core ? It is rather publicly known that Cake seems to be rather poorly comparing to RoR or Django in performance. Any good pieces of advice on how to optimize your app (the cake itself, cause app is prettily good written, db also optimized) ? Is upcoming 1.3 or 2.0 anyhow faster or less-cpu-using? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en.
Re: CakePHP performance 1.2 - is future any better?
Straight from the source. Thanks Larry, I was mostly guessing that 2.0 would see the bigger improvements. :) On Nov 24, 4:17 pm, Larry E. Masters aka PhpNut php...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.comwrote: Maybe someone should answer the original question: Will future versions improve performance? Yes 1.3 - most likely not too much. Yes 1.3 already has improvements and more are being found and implemented. 2.0 - this will likely see some more significant improvements since php4 is dropped. There are other improvements that are not related specifically to dropping php 4, these changes will be back ported to 1.x series of the code to help improve performance. Any advancements after 2.0 are also likely to offer improvements as more and more code is php5 optimized. Yes -- /** * @author Larry E. Masters * @var string $userName * @param string $realName * @returns string aka PhpNut * @access public */ Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: addons.mozilla.org soon will leave CakePHP..
A lot of their reasoning is solid but part of it sound like classic 1.1 issues. They note some of it in their google spreadsheet. Reading partly between the lines it sounds like they don't like Simpletest, the cake shell and php4 limitations (=ORM with array- data). With that one has to understand that they compare Cake's roadmap with other frameworks and feel that they will be better served by a framework with, for example, object-based ORM today and not at some point in the future. @jburns, @Okto I have been building stuff with CakePHP for almost 4 years (on and off) and I can still recognize the worry you guys express. Will Cake survive?, Is everyone abandoning the sinking ship? and thoughts like that can easily crop up when you hear things like this. Back in 2006 the question was wether a rails ripoff could survive at all... Cake is still here among numerous competitors more or less inspired by Rails. Just remember... The Mozilla team are not (afaik) the driving force behind CakePHP. They have been big users and probably quite big contributors. They have provided a real-world showcase and test-case for big deployments that have probably helped find optimization bottlenecks and things like that. Also, in relation to the whole li3 thing, the last time CakePHP had a big crisis (core members disagreeing in public in early 2008 I believe) it ended up kickstarting the final push towards 1.2 stable. Mark really started to make himself known as THE driving force behind a lot of the work and improvements and bug fixes sped up. CakePHP is like any open project... some people leave as others join and the fate of the framework is up to you guys, me and anyone who cares to make any contributions they can to it. You can and certainly should consider other frameworks, that is just good sense. But you hopefully chose Cake for a reason and I hope that reason was not that Mozilla used it :) Also, a lot of what you learn now will translate quite well to other frameworks. /Martin On Nov 18, 5:07 am, Okto Silaban o...@silaban.net wrote: Maybe some of you haven't heard about this.. Just FYI, AMO (addons.mozilla.org) now still using cakephp 1.1. But they've planned to migrate to Django. Link :http://micropipes.com/blog/2009/11/17/amo-development-changes-in-2010/ labanux,http://okto.silaban.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=.
Re: Timeout in Internet Explorer but no other browsers
I'll say from the start: I don't have the answer to your question. I reply simply to clarify some points and ask for a few more details. IE spends 12sec loading before displaying the error on one page. At the same time IE spends 3min loading on another page before displaying the same error. Is that correct? If so, it does not sound at all like a timeout. If other browsers take similar amounts of time but successfully display the page, then a php memory problem is unlikely. More likely is a (small) problem in your output or headers that make IE go nuts. You get no error, warning or notice from php during the execution? (I assume you are at debug 1 and have not in some other way suppressed php's error output) You are outputting html? Not xml, xls, csv or any other type of generated file, right? My best advice for you is to not fix this problem but instead fix your report-gathering so that it does not take 3min to process the page. I suggest you look into aggregating and caching your data so that the pages do not have to do the calculations each time. Data from 3 months ago is not going to change is it? So, if you can process the raw data via a cron job or something and store the aggregated data ready for viewing then your page should load in a fraction of a second, server cpu, ram sql... all will see significantly less load. Everyone will be happy. I prefer the star schema type of reports gathering. This is a theoretical method of re-arranging your data so that it is suitable for reports and in and you will be able to pull vastly different reports from that same data a lot quicker than straight from your normal data. On top of this you may want to further aggregate certain data for specific reports. I have written a few base-classes and methods to enable star-schema generation in Cake. You will find my code and explanations in the bakery. http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/starschema-olap-setup-for-reporting /Martin On Nov 10, 11:18 am, Adrian gond...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having the same issue as the following post: http://old.nabble.com/Timeout-on-IE-but-not-on-other-browsers-td18082... I have a controller for generating (sometimes large) reports and Internet Explorer times out whenever I try to run a report. Firefox, Chrome and Safari are fine but Internet Explorer (tested on IE7 and IE8) displays the following error: Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage The strange thing is the browser will take longer to load for a large report than it would for a smaller then show the error when it should render the page. As an example I generated a report with results from the last month for all clients and it took about 12 seconds then showed the error message. I then tried a report for all clients for the last year and it took about 3 minutes before showing the error message. Other browsers take around the same amount of time to load but show the page when finished. This issue is definitely not caused by Javascript as I have disabled this and it made no difference. I tried putting a line above my big query that outputs a space like suggested in the previous post: echo ' '; // Force IE to actually load the page This works, but only on my local machine. I uploaded the exact same change to the live (FreeBSD based) server and had the same problem as before. This only affects IE and I am out of ideas... If anyone could help it would be appreciated :). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=.
Re: Mod rewrite skip
Am I right when I say that you want /app/webroot/manager/existing_file -- should be accessible /app/webroot/manager/nonexistent_file -- should not be rewritten to a missing controller page It that is what you want, the lazy answer is that you don't have to worry. When you are live... at debug 0... Cake will render a 404 page for the missing file. It might just look a little different from the default one Apache renders. The less lazy answer was found on stackoverflow: RewriteRule ^manager - [L,NC] put that before the existing Cake rules and it should do the trick... if app/webroot is in fact the web root. The thread contains a few other variations if the above doesn't work. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/163302/how-do-i-ignore-a-directory-in-modrewrite On Nov 10, 9:47 am, Walther waltherl...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure exactly what you are wanting to do, but CakePHP automatically allows you to access files in webroot. So if you have a app/webroot/manager and you visit domain.com/manager you will automatically access whatever files are in app/webroot/ manager. This allows you to have 3rd party scripts (like forums, etc.) On Nov 9, 9:19 am, kangur91 kangu...@gmail.com wrote: I've got problem. Is a possibility to skip folder in modrewrite? For example I have folder in /app/webroot/manager/ -- I want to skip rewrite on manager folder. PS: this folder is on manager.domain.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=.
Re: Date Calculation Problem
I do a lot of this kind of thing:
date('Y-m-d H i s', strtotime('+1 hour',strtotime($start_datetime)));
You can use handy things like +2 monday to get to monday two weeks
from now and a number of cool things that I prioritize.
/Martin
On Oct 30, 8:08 am, Jiru jiransl...@gmail.com wrote:
hii,
In my project there is issue date and due date in dropdown list.
My problem is,
if the issue date is October 10 2009 i want to display the due date
as October 20 2009 automatically. How i can add/calculate the date.
regards,
jiru
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 404 Status
debug = 1 and you are expected to be in development and any missing file is likely to be a missing controller or action. debug = 0 and you are expected to be deployed... Cake now returns 404 for missing items. On Oct 30, 7:01 am, #2Will willjbar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, My installation of cake returns a 200 status for missing items, eg controller not found, action not found etc etc. Am i right in thinking this is a bit of a no-no seo wise? I thought google likes to see a 404 code for 404 pages. Also, it makes it hard to look in firebug and see what files are missing (am i incuding jquery correctly etc) because everything is 200 ok, not 404 and red. If i open in anouther tab, i get the helpfull cake page prompting me to create a controller. Is this normal cake behaviour? how can i change it? Should cake not do this? Thanks Will --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Odd code in sanitize core lib?
I am just guessing here but couldn't it be replacing looks like an
exclamation but is really far out into outfer space with a normal
exclamation?
Using a bad font and the code look different.
On Oct 29, 7:32 am, Miles J mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought you were lying so I checked, and haha it is there. Im
curious on this as well.
On Oct 28, 8:51 pm, George H acher...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I've been debugging my controller that is using Sanitize and I had a
peek inside the CakePHP Sanitize core lib file, where I found
something odd.
Is it possible if someone could explain to me (I'm just genuinely
curious) the reasoning behind line 223 in /cake/libs/sanitize.php
(version 1.2.5)?
$data = str_replace(', ', str_replace(!, !, $data));
From what I can tell, this line is replacing ! chars with !, and then
replacing ' chars with '. I've done some checks and the search and
replace strings are exactly the same.
As I mentioned, I am genuinely curious (probably more curious if I am
lost my marbles or not and maybe I'm seeing things), so any core devs
out there please do not see this as a personal attack on you, or your
intelligence, or ability to cut good code, etc etc.
Cheers,
-- George
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Simple question from a newbie seeking help from the gods
No, you still need a controller action... but that action does not
need to do more than call the model in this case... well, and format
response data for the view and things like that. The point was that
you mentioned calling one controller from another... that was the main
reason behind pushing this simple functionality down into the model.
On Oct 18, 10:42 am, Will Poillion lorew...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Martin!
So i can put the method in the model class, but how would I call it
within a view?
This is the link I have that calls the ingredients function to remove
it from the group. If I put the method in the model, I can't call it
directly like I'm doing below can I?
Right now this works, but I'm open to a better way:
?php echo $html-link(__('Remove', true),
array('controller'='ingredients',
'action'='removeFromGroup',
$ingredient['id'],
$ingredientGroup
['IngredientGroup']['id']),
null, sprintf(__('Are you sure you want to
remove \'%s\' from this group?', true), $ingredient['name'])); ?
Can I just put
$this-IngredientGroup-Ingredient-removeFromGroup( $ingredient
['id'], $ingredientGroup['IngredientGroup']['id'])
directly in the view somehow? That seems to go away from the MVC
methodology.
Thanks again!
Will
On Oct 17, 10:27 am, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote:
First the quickfix... hopefully.
This will try to save a PHP-null value.
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = null;
Instead try to save an SQL-null value.
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = 'null';
Or even just a zero if the above doesn't work.
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = '0';
Now for a suggestion. For saving a single field Cake models have a
special function... called saveField no less :)
$this-Ingredient-id = $id; // this line if very very important
$successful = $this-Ingredient-saveField
('ingredient_group_id','null'); // or 0
And finally another suggestion. You don't have to call a method in one
controller from another for this... Better to put the whole
removeFromGroup() method into the Model and call it from wherever.
You know you can call a model like: $this-IngredientGroup-Ingredient
right?
... and by answering I am not implying I am a God of any kind ;)
/Martin
On Oct 17, 7:56 am, Will Poillion lorew...@gmail.com wrote:
Just trying to update a single field within a function called from its
associated model:
I'm calling 'removeFromGroup' in Ingredients controller from my
IngredientGroups controller.
I basically want to remove the ingredient from the group, so set the
ingredient_group_id to null.
function removeFromGroup($id = null, $group_id = null) {
if (!$id) {
$this-Session-setFlash(__('Invalid id for
Ingredient', true));
$this-redirect(array('controller'=
'IngredientGroups',
'action'='view', $group_id));
}
$this-data = $this-Ingredient-read(null, $id);
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = null;
$this-Ingredient-save($this-data);
$this-redirect(array('controller'= 'IngredientGroups',
'action'='view', $group_id));
}
There's my function. It just won't save the ingredient_group_id to
null. Not sure what I'm doing wrong. Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Simple question from a newbie seeking help from the gods
First the quickfix... hopefully.
This will try to save a PHP-null value.
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = null;
Instead try to save an SQL-null value.
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = 'null';
Or even just a zero if the above doesn't work.
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = '0';
Now for a suggestion. For saving a single field Cake models have a
special function... called saveField no less :)
$this-Ingredient-id = $id; // this line if very very important
$successful = $this-Ingredient-saveField
('ingredient_group_id','null'); // or 0
And finally another suggestion. You don't have to call a method in one
controller from another for this... Better to put the whole
removeFromGroup() method into the Model and call it from wherever.
You know you can call a model like: $this-IngredientGroup-Ingredient
right?
... and by answering I am not implying I am a God of any kind ;)
/Martin
On Oct 17, 7:56 am, Will Poillion lorew...@gmail.com wrote:
Just trying to update a single field within a function called from its
associated model:
I'm calling 'removeFromGroup' in Ingredients controller from my
IngredientGroups controller.
I basically want to remove the ingredient from the group, so set the
ingredient_group_id to null.
function removeFromGroup($id = null, $group_id = null) {
if (!$id) {
$this-Session-setFlash(__('Invalid id for
Ingredient', true));
$this-redirect(array('controller'=
'IngredientGroups',
'action'='view', $group_id));
}
$this-data = $this-Ingredient-read(null, $id);
$this-data['ingredient_group_id'] = null;
$this-Ingredient-save($this-data);
$this-redirect(array('controller'= 'IngredientGroups',
'action'='view', $group_id));
}
There's my function. It just won't save the ingredient_group_id to
null. Not sure what I'm doing wrong. Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
What kind of Model-methods do you write?
Dumb question? I hope not. I wanted to see which is the most popular
way of writing methods in models. And by which way and what kind I
am referring to if the methods assume and require a loaded row from
the database or not.
Better use an example. Drawing from the ever present blog tutorial,
assume you want to change a post from draft to published. That is: a
simple method that operated on the model data. Would you write:
function publish() {
$this-saveField('published', 1);
}
or
function publish($id) {
$this-id = $id;
$this-saveField('published', 1);
}
Note: both very condensed and without any returns or error-checking
just to keep things short.
The important bit is wether you prefer to write methods that assume
$this = the table or $this = a row. Variations of save and find will
always be table-level methods but a lot of other methods could be
written either way. Row-level methods would be more natural in
something like rails since results are objects.
From the controller the first method above would be called like this:
$this-Post-read($id); // or find('first',..)
$this-Post-publish();
and the second:
$this-Post-publish($id);
Possibly the example is a poor one but I hope you can discern what I
am driving at.
I have tried writing both ways. I like writing row-level methods but
they can be problematic because of Cake's data handling.
/Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: gwoo Leaving CakePHP??
Best of luck to Garret in his future endeavors. I am confident that Larry, Nate, Mark, Joel, Andy and everyone else active in developing CakePHP will continue to do a beautiful job. I also hope I can continue, if not increase, my miniscule contributions. /Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to implement multiple pagination with SAME model on a single view?
The support for multiple pagination on the same page is not complete. The source and API reveals that work did start on this feature but it was not finished for 1.2. I am not sure if it is suppsed to be in 1.3 or if you have to wait for 2.0. On Oct 14, 1:30 pm, doze doze...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Is there a way to do multiple pagination with same model on a single view? I know about the $options['model'] in pagination to do multiple paginations in single view with different models, but what about multiple paginations with same model. The model contains a datetime column and I'm trying to do two different paginated lists in the view, past events and future events. I cannot find a way to tell the paginator how to separate the two different lists. Please help! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: how to deal with empty data in index-views (example inside...)
I just check for empty data and switch out part of the view. Much like the code sample Ceryl supplied. For more advanced use you can go all the way to using a status field in your database. An example, still from my file manager, User hbtm File can be used to figure out if a user has seen a file before or if it is new. Each time a file is displayed to a user an association is created indicating the file has been seen by this user. Each load of a list of files does a check and formats data for the view so it can know which files to indicate as new. The trick here is to do this kind of thing without slowing your application down to a crawl. I had to do a lot of trickery to be able to handle a few thousand files in a folder without slowing down or even running out of memory (using recursive = out of memory). For your situation you might use a field (fields) in the User model to determine if it is the first time a user has activated a feature. Most of the time the smart thing is to write the copy cleverly so it works for both first-time and I just erased everything situations. On Oct 12, 6:28 pm, DigitalDude e.blumsten...@googlemail.com wrote: @Ceryl: yeah I did a little test-view and I think you're right, when you have a lot of different pages where empty data can occur, there would be many elements. So I tried to check the data within the view and displayed a certain div-container when the data-array was empty. It works without any problems. @Martin: This is exactly what I meant. First run information should be given to the user, after the user registers and sees a function or category for the first time. How did you implement that? Do you check if the data is empty within the view? What other ways could we go to achieve the desired behaviour? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Can you recommend quality (virtual) server hosting?
Thanks for the suggestions guys. I'll look into these and see if one strikes a chord. On Oct 13, 6:16 am, 10drill chro...@gmail.com wrote: Linode - better virtual machine and DNS management then Slicehost, higher specs for the price, and offers 32 and 64 bit architecture. On Oct 12, 3:34 pm, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, at my day-job we have plans to expand to the US. For that purpose I wanted to find a reliable hosting provider. Any good/bad experiences you can share would be welcome. I am looking for: • Server hosting / real, virtual or cloud. (we run special system software want to control the OS) • Able to scale. (the app is heavy by nature so scaling is anticipated) • Scaling needs are more likely be disk-space and speed, cpu for image/video conversion more than traditional SQL/webfront needs. • Very reliable. (clients in out field are not going to like downtime one bit) The tech-geek in me would really like to put the system on a cloud since it looks to help scaling and the cost of scaling.. plus it is kewl :) I have looked at Amazon a bit but mostly keep reverting to drooling over Rackspace cloud. Any favorites for deploying critical apps? Please share. Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: how to deal with empty data in index-views (example inside...)
This kind of view is often a good candidate for first-run
information. If you know that empty data will predominately occur for
new users you can use the blank page to display suggestions and
instructions about how to get started.
For example: In my file manager application, an empty folder will
contain a short text suggesting the user uploads some files into it.
/Martin
On Oct 11, 8:04 pm, DigitalDude e.blumsten...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey,
today I was wondering about how I could deal with an index-view where
no data is available. The main point I'm trying to demonstrate here is
the following scenario:
In index-views, commonly we have let's say a table where the data we
grab from our tables is displayed. But when a user just registered for
your app, there won't be any data to display. In this case, there
would be an EMPTY table and that looks really bad in my opinion.
I think in this case it would be better if there would be NO TABLE and
instead, there should be a message like Currently you have no entries
in this category. Add some data by clicking this link...!
So what I mean is, there should be a check if there is any data to
display, and if NOT, a message like the one above should be printed.
But what's the best practice for that? I figured out two
possibilities, but I'm not quite sure if it's really the perfect
way...
1.
We could use two elements; one where the message is displayed, and one
where the data is displayed (for example in a table or so...)
I would do the following check:
if($somedata) {
echo $this-renderElement('DataShowElement');} else {
echo $this-renderElement('EmptyDataMessage');
}
2.
pretty much the same, but without elements so in the view there would
be a check if the data-variable has any elements and the table would
only be shown when the data-array has any entries, otherwise there
would be only the message.
What is the correct way to do this? Are there any other techniques to
deal with this kind of problem?
Regards,
DD
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Can you recommend quality (virtual) server hosting?
Hi, at my day-job we have plans to expand to the US. For that purpose I wanted to find a reliable hosting provider. Any good/bad experiences you can share would be welcome. I am looking for: • Server hosting / real, virtual or cloud. (we run special system software want to control the OS) • Able to scale. (the app is heavy by nature so scaling is anticipated) • Scaling needs are more likely be disk-space and speed, cpu for image/video conversion more than traditional SQL/webfront needs. • Very reliable. (clients in out field are not going to like downtime one bit) The tech-geek in me would really like to put the system on a cloud since it looks to help scaling and the cost of scaling.. plus it is kewl :) I have looked at Amazon a bit but mostly keep reverting to drooling over Rackspace cloud. Any favorites for deploying critical apps? Please share. Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: about https
Find a certificate authority you like (price vs trust). They all have tutorials and detailed information on how to install their certificates. Or google for senf-signed certificates. (and non of it has anything to do with CakePHP...) On Oct 8, 5:45 am, wiky wqsha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi i am working on Solaris 10 with apcahe and php is configured. I have my website placed at /var/apache/htdocs/index.html as document root. and i access it on local apache server. Now i want to shift it on https to secure it from other systems on LAN. what steps i should take to implement. Urgent help is needed. Thanks -Waqas --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Beginners guide to php security
I stumbled across this link today. Very good clear example-driven guide to basic php security. http://phpsec.org/projects/guide/ Deals with sql injection, xss, hijacking globals, validating input. All the basics. It should be said that you get a lot of these things for free with Cake but I will still keep it in my back pocket for the next time I get a question about security. /Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: afterSave causing save to fail
If you are staying on MySQL you can do something like: SET @pos=0; UPDATE busstops SET pos = ( SELECT @pos := @pos +1 ) WHERE route = 1 ORDER BY pos ASC Found that on: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/update.html Roughly half-way down the comments. Search for: Posted by Christian Hansel on July 1 2005 9:13am and you should find the explanations to go with the code. good luck On Oct 6, 10:16 am, WebbedIT p...@webbedit.co.uk wrote: You are right I am trying to achieve the simple task of resetting the ordering each time to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 etc. If there is a more efficient way to do it then I would love to implement it. I must confess I am no MySQL expert, but I have done various searches to find a single SQL query that would do the job and came up short. Strange thing is though, the afterSave works fine if you are not uploading a new image ... and uploading an image should have no baring on resetting the number values of the records. I have created a workaround for this though by creating my own model action which I manually call after a create/edit/delete which in effect is doing exactly the same as the above, just called differently. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: $form-input('') when database-field contains special characters
Strange indeed. I can't remember getting blank strings myself. /Martin On Oct 3, 7:01 pm, Melanie Sommer melanie-som...@mailinator.com wrote: Hello Martin Since the field is empty I suspect you may have Sanitize in place, or some other text cleaner. No (not that I know, just the standard content that cakephp gives you when baking) A simple character set problem should give you garbage but not empty strings. This is also was I thought. But when changing the default settings of my webhoster from latin1 (iso-something) to utf-8 everything worked fine. Strange but impressive. Melanie --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where request comes from?
Looks like a handy Ajax handler Miles. But I can't see where it makes SecurityComponent work with Ajax. All I see is form security being disabled (lines 85-87). Making Ajax work with SecurityComponent would involve actually validating that an ajax post came from the correct form. As with session ids, the problem again is the asynchronous part of Ajax. The only half-secure alternative I find remotely practical is to set a hash as a global javascript variable on each real page load and store that in the session. On Ajax requests you let that hash stick around and you require ajax to pass that hash along each call. This would require the session and the last full page to be hijacked to be able to post data via Ajax. /Martin On Oct 2, 6:02 pm, Miles J mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote: Well you can use my ajax handler, it wraps the security component so it works with AJAX calls. http://www.milesj.me/resources/script/ajax-handler-component On Oct 2, 7:12 am, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: You CAN... but it is painful to say the least. Since you can't have your cake and eat it ;) your best bet is to look inside the Security Component to see what parts you want to use and then put that into your own component, extend the core component or something like that. You can also look at the Security class but it does not offer any turn-key solutions for you. At the risk of being misinterpreted, I am tempted to say that you should not care where requests comes from. Either a request is a public request like /posts/display/123 or a protected action like / posts/delete/123. Where the request comes from has little relevance in the first case. In the second case it really has little relevance too since you will be much more concerned about a valid session identifying an authorized user, right? If your security model needs to include has been posted from exactly my form on my page then ajax should not be used for those requests. IMHO. /Martin On Oct 1, 11:05 pm, Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com d...@widepixels.com wrote: But no good for AJAX. I have AJAX forms in my app so I cant use the security component. Can I? I know it wont work for AJAX submitted forms. I was just curious. Dave -Original Message- From: Martin Westin [mailto:martin.westin...@gmail.com] Sent: October-01-09 5:45 PM To: CakePHP Subject: Re: Where request comes from? The Security Component does this kind of thing for you. For example, it will embed a hash value into the form which is a checksum of the form. If a field is missing or added it will be captured. If a hidden value is modified this will also be captured. Also sessions will be more secure and a lot harder to hijack since the session id is replaced for each request. And a buch more stuff. /Martin On Oct 1, 9:36 pm, Bert Van den Brande cyr...@gmail.com wrote: I believe the FormHelper has some 'secure' stuff available for this ... best to consult the documentation ... On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com d...@widepixels.com wrote: Is there a way to determine / ensure that any requested action comes from the server? I mean more towards the aspect of forms. That when a form is submitted the request is coming from the site and not someone who made a form and trying to submit it to your site. Just curious Thanks, Dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where request comes from?
You CAN... but it is painful to say the least. Since you can't have your cake and eat it ;) your best bet is to look inside the Security Component to see what parts you want to use and then put that into your own component, extend the core component or something like that. You can also look at the Security class but it does not offer any turn-key solutions for you. At the risk of being misinterpreted, I am tempted to say that you should not care where requests comes from. Either a request is a public request like /posts/display/123 or a protected action like / posts/delete/123. Where the request comes from has little relevance in the first case. In the second case it really has little relevance too since you will be much more concerned about a valid session identifying an authorized user, right? If your security model needs to include has been posted from exactly my form on my page then ajax should not be used for those requests. IMHO. /Martin On Oct 1, 11:05 pm, Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com d...@widepixels.com wrote: But no good for AJAX. I have AJAX forms in my app so I cant use the security component. Can I? I know it wont work for AJAX submitted forms. I was just curious. Dave -Original Message- From: Martin Westin [mailto:martin.westin...@gmail.com] Sent: October-01-09 5:45 PM To: CakePHP Subject: Re: Where request comes from? The Security Component does this kind of thing for you. For example, it will embed a hash value into the form which is a checksum of the form. If a field is missing or added it will be captured. If a hidden value is modified this will also be captured. Also sessions will be more secure and a lot harder to hijack since the session id is replaced for each request. And a buch more stuff. /Martin On Oct 1, 9:36 pm, Bert Van den Brande cyr...@gmail.com wrote: I believe the FormHelper has some 'secure' stuff available for this ... best to consult the documentation ... On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com d...@widepixels.com wrote: Is there a way to determine / ensure that any requested action comes from the server? I mean more towards the aspect of forms. That when a form is submitted the request is coming from the site and not someone who made a form and trying to submit it to your site. Just curious Thanks, Dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Where request comes from?
The Security Component does this kind of thing for you. For example, it will embed a hash value into the form which is a checksum of the form. If a field is missing or added it will be captured. If a hidden value is modified this will also be captured. Also sessions will be more secure and a lot harder to hijack since the session id is replaced for each request. And a buch more stuff. /Martin On Oct 1, 9:36 pm, Bert Van den Brande cyr...@gmail.com wrote: I believe the FormHelper has some 'secure' stuff available for this ... best to consult the documentation ... On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Dave Maharaj :: WidePixels.com d...@widepixels.com wrote: Is there a way to determine / ensure that any requested action comes from the server? I mean more towards the aspect of forms. That when a form is submitted the request is coming from the site and not someone who made a form and trying to submit it to your site. Just curious Thanks, Dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: $form-input('') when database-field contains special characters
In reference to the bottom f your post. utf-8 and latin1_swedish_ci do
not mix.
Since the field is empty I suspect you may have Sanitize in place, or
some other text cleaner. A simple character set problem should give
you garbage but not empty strings.
/Martin
On Oct 1, 5:59 pm, Dr. Loboto drlob...@gmail.com wrote:
1. App.encoding must be UTF-8 (core.php)
2. Database encoding must be UTF8 (MySQL)
3. Database connection encoding must be UTF8 (database.php)
4. Layout or server settings must define pages encoding as UTF-8 (app/
layouts/default.ctp and etc or Apache AddDefaultCharset)
5. Files with non-latin symbols must be in UTF-8 ecoding without BOM
On Oct 1, 7:48 pm, Melanie Sommer melanie-som...@mailinator.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have the following problem, I already googled but did not find an
answer although I think it must be a quite common problem:
When adding or editing and inserting a special character in a text
field (for example ä, ö, ü, ², µ, ...) everything seems at first to
work fine. The text is correct in the mysql databse and is displayed
correctly in any view.ctp or index.ctp.
But when trying to edit this entry, that means calling edit.ctp with
$form-input('title'); the text field containing special characters
simply stays completely empty. So I do not have the problem that the
special characters are displayed wrong, the whole content is simply
not displayed at all.
If it is important my settings are:
app/core.php
Configure::write('App.encoding', 'UTF-8');
my mysql database collation is latin1_swedish_ci
Thanks for any advise!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: afterSave causing save to fail
Maybe Cake does not like you calling a saveAll inside a saveAll?
A bit unrelated, but what is that afterSave doing? It looks like a lot
of work for little result. What I see is you finding all images in a
gallery ordered by the order_id. Then you set the order id of each one
to a number in increasing order and then saving them all again. That
is a lot of work just to make sure you don't have any gaps in the
numbering. Or I may be reading the code wrong. Google has an evil line
wrap as I'm sure you know.
I am guessing you allow the user to set the order of the edited image
in the form? Maybe you should look at an ordering solution that is
more suitable to the way the interface work? Or try to optimize the re-
ordering (you may want to give that job to MySQL).
/Martin
On Oct 1, 3:29 pm, WebbedIT p...@webbedit.co.uk wrote:
I am having a problem with the below setup. All works well if editing
a record without uploading new images, but if I upload an image the
final line of my afterSave() function causes the saveAll() in my
action to fail. I know this as commenting out that line allows
everything to work, but my numbering then goes out of sync without it.
Any ideas why uploading an image through this form would stop that
call running, the data that I am fetching and saving within the
afterSave function is identical either way?!?
form:
echo $form-create('Image', array('type'='file', 'url'=$html-url
(array('action'='add'), true)));
echo $form-input('Image.id');
echo $form-input('Image.name');
echo $form-input('Image.gallery', array('options' = array
('portfolio'='portfolio', 'art-prints'='art-prints')));
echo $form-input('Image.full_image', array('type'='file'));
echo $form-input('Image.thumb_image', array('type'='file'));
echo $form-input('Image.html_title');
echo $form-input('Image.meta_description');
echo $form-input('Image.order_no');
echo $form-end('Submit');
action:
if (!empty($this-data)) {
if ($this-data['Image']['full_image']['name']) $files[0] =
'full_image';
if ($this-data['Image']['thumb_image']['name']) $files[1] =
'thumb_image';
if (isset($files)) {
if ($data = $this-Uploader-uploadAll($files, true)) {
if ($this-data['Image']['full_image']['name']) $this-data
['FullImage'] = Set::merge($this-data['FullImage'], $data
['full_image']);
if ($this-data['Image']['thumb_image']['name']) $this-data
['ThumbImage'] = Set::merge($this-data['ThumbImage'], $data
['thumb_image']);
if ($this-Image-saveAll($this-data, array
('validate'='first'))) {
$this-Session-setFlash('pImage updated./p', 'default',
null, 'admin');
$this-redirect(array('action'='index'));
} else {
echo '1';
$this-Session-setFlash('pImage not updated, correct errors
and resubmit./p', 'default', array('class'='error'), 'admin');
}
} else {
$this-Session-setFlash('pImage not updated, correct errors
and resubmit./p', 'default', array('class'='error'), 'admin');
}
} elseif ($this-Image-save($this-data)) {
$this-Session-setFlash('pImage updated./p', 'default', null,
'admin');
$this-redirect(array('action'='index'));
} else {
$this-Session-setFlash('pImage not updated, correct errors and
resubmit./p', 'default', array('class'='error'), 'admin');
}} else {
$this-data = $this-Image-find('first', array('conditions'=array
('Image.id'=$id)));
}
afterSave:
$result = $this-find('all', array(
'fields'=array('Image.id', 'Image.order_no'),
'conditions'=array('Image.gallery'=$this-data['Image']
['gallery']),
'order'='order_no',
'contain'=array()
));
if ($result) {
foreach($result AS $k = $v):
$data['Image'][$k]['id'] = $v['Image']['id'];
$data['Image'][$k]['order_no'] = ($k + 1);
endforeach;}
$this-saveAll($data['Image'], array('validate'=false,
'callbacks'=false));
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: slow static multilingual site made with cakephp
Loads very fast most of the time but it does load very slowly at other times. I get results mostly around 0.06-0.1s but a few were all the way up at 4.5s. To me that suggests either some problem with disk speed. Are you on (an overloaded) shared server or is this site all that is running on the system? Set debug to 0. Anything else and cach will not work at full capacity. At debug 1 Cake will re-write the language cache, database schema cache, paths... every 10s or so. That in combination with an overloaded or for some other reason slow server could account the the intermittent slowness. If the server is under your control in any way I would also check if it is hacked or someone trying to hack it (bombing the ftp or some other service with logins). Check the logs. Is the web access log full of requests to things that do not exist (like windows exploits on a Linux server)? Is the general logs full of failed logins? Is some process taking up a lot of cpu when it shouldn't? And so on... /Martin On Sep 27, 11:41 am, Number 23 qfl...@yahoo.it wrote: Hello, i made a static website with cakephp, using the internazionalization functionality. preview is at http:\\www.sunchaser.it, login/pwd is emo/emo. The initial loading is very slow, and i don't understand why, the page is very light. Any help please? can it depend because cakephp is translating the text? thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Javascript inside a ajax content not work
Some (most?) javascript libraries will strip the response of live
javascript. You should configure the ajax call to evaluate the script
instead. Exactly how you do that depends on the library.
On Sep 28, 10:34 am, marco.rizze...@gmail.com
marco.rizze...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I use ajax helper to load the content of a div inside my page.
In this ajax content I have this:
?php echo $javascript-codeBlock('var value='.$value.';'); ?
But when I try to use the javascript variable value I get the error
that the value doesn't exist.
In my ajax call I have set eval to true.
Can someone tell me what is the best practise to use javascript inside
ajax content?
Many Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: MAMP + CakePHP issues
On 1 I second the opinion that vhosts are the way to go. I have never
ever ever bothered modifying htaccess files just to get a few apps to
run under localhost/one, /two and so on. You are on a Mac and in
perfect position to setup in a way that is 100% identical to a
production deployment. You need two things. vhosts in the apache conf
and fake hostnames for each vhost.
There might be a gui but I just edit the file /etc/hosts adding fake
names pointing to 127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1 one.site
127.0.0.1 two.site
...
That is very convenient.
Managing vhosts were mentioned by Frederick. An alternative is to pay
for MAMP pro which has built-in support for vhosts and advanced
features. Personally I use Apples supplied Apache and PHP and install
MySQL as a pkg so I have no details to offer on vhosts in MAMP.
Speaking of MySQL. Your second problem might be caused by differing
versions of MySQL if the errors apply only to certain queries. If they
are advanced as you say then they might require a more up-to-date
version than MAMP has. Either that or the version of Cake.
And when reading the backtrace, the top line is closest to the error.
Cake is born in webroot and looking at the error MySQL has problems
interpreting __getUsersForUsers as a SQL syntax... which I can
understand. That indicates to me that your version of Cake might be
the problem. It looks like a bug in your code but if you are sure the
same code is executed without problem on another install then it may
be a version problem.
/Martin
On Sep 25, 3:58 pm, FrederickD manzanillo.engl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fahd!
I can advise you on the first question, but not the second. I had been
using MAMP but decided to take it off and go with a stock approach. It
took a little bit, but works solidly now. What makes it very easy is
to use a cheap product called VirtualHostX. You can find it
athttp://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/25689/virtualhostx. The price
recently went up it appears, but it is so worth it to not be
frustrated while developing multiple sites. VirtualHostX is MAMP-
friendly.
I use it to have a sandbox site where I'm testing code and integration
before moving that code over to the development site. Both can be up
at the same time, obviously with different databases, but it could be
the same one. Hmmm...
Anyway, I am also using a product called ModelBaker fromhttp://widgetpress.com
that also is MAMP-friendly and removes the need to use a command line
when baking. All the database design is visual and the configuration
of Cake is a snap. It is a RAP (rapid application prototype) tool that
does a great job at generating 80% of the Cake code so you can focus
on the 20% that is unique to your application. Plus it can generate an
iPhone-aware web application. That's like getting a two-for-one deal!
Very promising product.
I hope some of this helps.
On Sep 24, 3:10 pm, fahd fahd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey fellow Cakers,
I've been developing on CakePHP for a bit and decided to have a
localhost version on MAMP so that I could demo my app to people
without being dependent on an Internet connection.
Ran into a few issues ofcourse and hoping someone can give some
insight:
1) I have several sites under the /Sites/ folder and I pointed MAMP's
Apache document root there. For example /Sites/project1/ is where the
Cake app sites. It finds the /project1/ site fine (after some
htaccess mods) but there are issues with relative links. Any link that
is manually coded and not using $html-link uses /Sites/ instead of /
Sites/project1/ as the base. This is for images and any Ajax calls
from jQuery. (css and js files are fine). The images I can bare, but
the site is unusable without Ajax.
Temp solution: changed the document root to /Sites/project1/. This is
not ideal, but I'd like to know if you guys have a fix so I don't have
to change the document root all the time for previewing different
projects.
2) We have a lot of complex MySQL queries being made, using
$this-query('SELECT...'). We've placed these in the appropriate models
within a function. Hence from the Controller we'll have something like
$this-Users-getMeSomething($variable), that goes to the user.php
model and runs that function. This works fine on our live and dev
sites, but for some reason on MAMP I'm getting the error:
Warning (512): SQL Error: 1064: You have an error in your SQL syntax;
check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the
right syntax to use near '__getUsersForUsers' at line 1 [CORE/cake/
libs/model/datasources/dbo_source.php, line 525]
The context:
==
DboSource::showQuery() - CORE/cake/libs/model/datasources/
dbo_source.php, line 525
DboSource::execute() - CORE/cake/libs/model/datasources/
dbo_source.php, line 201
DboSource::fetchAll() - CORE/cake/libs/model/datasources/
dbo_source.php, line 336
DboSource::query() -
Re: Doubt in cake php
Ever heard of a can of worms :) (The whole -This is MVC. -No, this is MVC thing can turn nasty at times.) Cake allows no direct access to Models from Views. That is how the MVC pattern has been implemented in Cake even though there are other interpretations in other Frameworks. If everyone had the same preference there wouldn't be such an abundance of frameworks doing more or less the same things but is slightly different ways. I have never found cakes strict partitioning to be a problem in any particular situation I can recall. This is likely to be because the web is request based. Every time you will ever see a view rendered that has to have been as the result of a request. And all requests go through a Controller so you will always have access to Model data in every request and the ability to pass that data to the view. Things can be very different in a desktop application or something like a Flash application in which the code runs continuously throughout the session. In these types of applications the MVC works a bit differently. I get the feeling from your question that you may be thinking too strict in another way (as may seem to do). You are not limited to locking the User model to the Users controller and the users views only. I tend to think of the models on the one side and the controller and view as a pair on the other. That is, the controller and view(s) are tightly linked but the models can be utilised a bit more freely. I would never render the Posts/index view from the Users controller for example. But I would, and often do, access the Post model from the Users controller and pass the data to the users views. To finally get to some kind of point: Why would it be a problem to get the list of user clubs in the controller and pass it to the view as you put it? That is the primary purpose of the controller. It is essentially there to interpret the request, access the model(s) and present that data to the view. If you accessed the Models from the Views, the Controller would not do much more than request routing. I hope you are not offended by this accidental lecture on MVC. A topic I am not an expert in by any stretch of the imagination. I was trying to explain my limited knowledge of the reasoning behind the design of CakePHP and to explain that there is more than one way to design an MVC framework. You already mentioned yourself that you knew of a way to access your data. I am afraid the better way you are looking for is not allowed. You could of-course probably set the whole Model instance as a view variable but I have never tried that. On Sep 24, 10:59 am, hunny saurabh85maha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, I am new to cakephp. I am having the following issue: I am displaying list of checkbox containing clubs to a login user. The list of clubs I am passing through the models via controllers in the traditional way. Now the logged in user should see his list of clubs automatically ticked. This list is present in another database. One solution is to get the list of user clubs in the controller itself and pass it to the view. But is there any alternative way, where I can access the user clubs in the view itself without loading in the controller. Basically i am looking for something similar like View Helpers in Zend. We can access the model data in views using view Helpers. Is there something similar in cakephp. P.S: I have asked this question to a few people who knew cake php and their first reaction is that you shouldn't access model data in views as it is against MVC. But let me assure you we can access model data in view as long as it is read only. At least that is what we are used to follow in Zend Framework. :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: i18n table with 180 000+ entrys
One thing I have yet to figure out is how to deal with charset/
collation problems using an i18n table. Because of this I would
probably go for separate tables even though it requires more work to
make id's sync and all that.
The problems I am referring to are queries like
$this-Person-findByFirstName('Pär');
which in Swedish should return users that are called just that but in
English should return any name with any variation of the a character
since ä is not a character in the English alphabet. It is only seen as
an a with some irrelevant bling bling.
I have not seen any supported way of telling the database which
language you want to search in. All I have know of is to try to hack
it into the conditions and order clauses and end up just one step
short of a custom query.
Using separate tables you at least have the option to set them to the
correct collation for the intended language.
Sorry for taking up space with this explanation. It ran a bit long but
it can be unpleasant finding out your searches return the wrong data
when your app is already live. :) I hope someone with good experience
using the translate behaviour can shed some light on how they get make
it work.
On Sep 22, 6:33 pm, chrispie cpiet...@gmail.com wrote:
hei list!
I was wondering if the i18n table is still state of the art for about
30 000 entrys (cities) in a model (=180 000 entrys in i18n).
Or is there a better solution like using a table prefix for different
languages (de_cities, en_cities,)?
thankYouVeryMuch
chris!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Advanced setup
Your problem is likely the cause of one of your .htaccess files not
set correctly. You probably need a rewrite base. If I get your setup
correctly (and I am not at all sure I do) you have the Apache document
root set to var/www and everything else if in sub-folders of that.
I can't really figure out what you are trying to achieve by this
setup.If it is just allowing you and a college to use the same cake
core on different development branches of the app on the same server I
think you are doing this too complicated for yourself. For example:
- Why define APP_DIR with a foldername in an index.php that is in the
app dir already? index in webroot will do that correctly for you.
Renaming it doesn't hurt this.
- The same question for ROOT
All you really should need to set is CAKE_CORE_INCLUDE_PATH since it
is the only folder you have moved. (you still need working rewrite
rules, though.)
I never install in this way myself so I have not examples of rewrite
settings for you. I hope I could at least point you vaguely in the
right direction.
/Martin
On Sep 22, 1:20 am, The Roman mtes...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, this is my first post so please accept my apologies if I break
any conventions. Searches of this site and google at large have not
yeilded any results for me, so here goes.
I have created a cakePHP site which is to be a sub-system within a
larger PHP based intranet. It is hosted on a clients site, to which I
have full access. Now, my fellow developer and I use svn source
control and so I have been going through the process of making the
cake install svn friendly -- splitting of the cake core (cake_1.2.5)
to /var/www, having svn ignore the app/tmp directory etc.
This is how I have split cake: (from app/index.php) --
if (!defined('ROOT')) {
define('ROOT',
DS.'var'.DS.'www'.DS.'programmer1'.DS.'main_system'.DS.'cake_systems');
}
if (!defined('APP_DIR')) {
define('APP_DIR', 'statement_archive');
}
if (!defined('CAKE_CORE_INCLUDE_PATH')) {
define('CAKE_CORE_INCLUDE_PATH', DS . 'var' . DS .
'www' . DS . 'cake_1.2.5');
}
Note that this file is one of those excluded from svn, my coworker
will have the same file but his ROOT will use his initials rather than
'programmer1' so that we each have our own development area.
So from the above you can see (or hopefully you cannot see, and that
is my problem!) that the cake 'app' directory has been renamed to
'statement_archive' and is a sub directory of 'cake_systems'. The
idea is that other modules of the php based system may also be done in
cake, and that these would also be sub directories of 'cake_systems'
and all would share /var/www/cake_1.2.5.
Here is where the problem starts. By setting the route for '/' I can
get a correctly displayed (layout and all) screen via the
urlhttp://xxx.yyy.aaa.bbb/programmer1/main_system/cake_systems/statement
This screen provides other links such as
--http://xxx.yyy.aaa.bbb/programmer1/main_system/cake_systems/statement
Clicking on that link gives a 404 not found -- The requested URL /
programmer1/main_system/cake_systems/statement_archive/statements/
generate/280060 was not found on this server.
Of course, while under development, when the standard 'development
style' cake setup (app directory was called 'app' etc) this all
worked. It is almost like cakePHP is getting its hands on the url to
do its routing, something is beating it to the punch perhaps? To try
and get around this I set some routes manually in statement_archive/
config/routes.php -
Router::connect('/statements/generate/*', array('controller'
= 'statements', 'action' = 'generate'));
Router::connect('/statements/view/*', array('controller' =
'statements', 'action' = 'view'));
Router::connect('/statements/edit/*', array('controller' =
'statements', 'action' = 'edit'));
Router::connect('/statements/delete/*', array('controller' =
'statements', 'action' = 'delete'));
Router::connect('/statements/add/*', array('controller' =
'statements', 'action' = 'add'));
Router::connect('/logos', array('controller' = 'logos',
'action' = 'index'));
Router::connect('/logos/add/*', array('controller' = 'logos',
'action' = 'add'));
Router::connect('/statement_controls', array('controller' =
'statement_controls', 'action' = 'index'));
Router::connect('/', array('controller' = 'statements',
'action' = 'index'));
Any advice as to how and I can links working again?
Many Thanks,
The Roman.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Re: CakePHP and scalability
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/ I hope you have seen this blog? They have had a number of post lately about indexes and always post about optimization in one way or the other (funny enough). If you have added indexes which did not improve much you may be defining them wrong for the query you make. You may also need to modify your queries so that they can make use of the indexes. When adding an index it is good to run an explain on the query before and after to see that the index is being used. 300'000rows for a join-table doesn't sound like too much for one server unless you really need to scan most of that table for a lot of queries... like showing a users friends friends friends... I have that and more in both normal tables and joining tables, though your app probably sees more requests than mine (not a public app). I wanted to get to the point that I used to have huge problems with performance. 9/10 of them needed php related optimizations like Containable or doing 3 queries instead of a for loop or a Set::extract (). Once I needed to cache the returned data from Mysql... when generating reporting data and identical queries could be issued 200 times during the same request. On Sep 21, 11:00 pm, byqsri marco.rizze...@gmail.com wrote: My table is about 30 records with only 5 fields It's a jointable of a HABTM relation. But I use this table in some INNER JOIN in some queries that are very slowly. I use memcache. In these cases what is the best practise to consider? On 21 Set, 20:20, Ma'moon phpir...@gmail.com wrote: i was successfully able to handle tables with more than 200 records yes, above 2 million records! with CakePHP and with a very acceptable performance and speed, the first thing that you should be thinking of is sharding the database into smaller chunks DBs, second thing is enabling memcached to reduce DB access specially reducing the master DB hits, thirdly enable APC or whatever bytecode cacher you might be able to use this will gain your web server a very good performance boost, and finally set the debug level for you cake app to 0 to cache the tables DESC operations. Taking all the above into consideration CakePHP can be a very powerful framework to handle huge databases!. On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Miles J mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote: Well how big is your table? I have tables with over 200,000+ rows and it works just fine. --http://phpirate.net --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Auth redirects ssl back to plain http
I was doing a test to see how my app runs under ssl and found that Auth redirects me out of ssl. All other links and redirects appear to work which is why I ask for help. It is surely some detail I have missed since it can't be a bug in Auth or Router. Does anyone know what I might be doing wrong? Examples: https://example.com/ - Location: http://example.com/login https://example.com/login (post form)- http://example.com/ (logged in) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Configure Cake under Nginx with ssl
If you are running your CakePHP app under Nginx, this might interest you. Cake relies on the php environment variable HTTPS (as in $_SERVER ['HTTPS']) for SSL to be considered by RequestHandler and SecurityComponent. This is a problem for anyone running nginx. HTTPS is not mentioned as a parameter in any php/fastcgi example I have found. Even worse, the ssl module in nginx does not add any variable at all that can be used to set this dynamically. To let php know of the port used you would do fastcgi_param SERVER_PORT $server_port using the provided variable $server_port to set the desires environment variable. No $ssl variable exists and setting true or false based on the port is a bad idea. (I don't know why, that is just what I have read. Performance presumably.) If, like me, you make use of includes a lot there is another stumbling block. Simply adding in the paramater in the server block is not good enough you have to add it on the same structural level as fastcgi_pass and those things. So if you have a vhost file contaning just the barest of info and then you include a cakephp.inc which deals with all the php setups you need do some more work. I went with the cheesy quickfix of copying the cake include and calling it cakephp.ssl.inc... I won't change a lot in those two files so I guess I can remember to make any alterations in both. I hope. (did that make sense without a flowchart?) In short, you need this line among your fcgi params, but only for https requests! just adding it to the list of params will make php think it is always running under ssl. fastcgi_param HTTPS on; /Martin On Sep 22, 10:38 am, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: I was doing a test to see how my app runs under ssl and found that Auth redirects me out of ssl. All other links and redirects appear to work which is why I ask for help. It is surely some detail I have missed since it can't be a bug in Auth or Router. Does anyone know what I might be doing wrong? Examples:https://example.com/- Location:http://example.com/loginhttps://example.com/login(post form)-http://example.com/(logged in) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Encoding problem
Thanks for finding that one. I had not caught that before and I use non-english characters all the time. Guess Iäd better slow my application down by replacing all strtolower with the mb_ version... and possibly if clauses and things to make sure mb is installed. But have a look at php.net... it is possibly quicker to ask mysql to convert to lowercase than php (oh dear). It sounds incredible and I haven't run a test of this myself. http://se2.php.net/manual/en/function.mb-strtolower.php Quick rant: It makes my blood boil every time PHP makes my jaw to drop to the floor like this. Come on! Shouldn't this kind of thing be handled by PHP internally? mb this and mb that. Utf8 is 8bit, single byte, is it not? I don't have a single setting in my installation of php that suggests I prefer 8859. Take a hint why don't you, you silly language! BTW, why is this in the comments on php.net: mb_strtolower($str, mb_detect_encoding($str)); Why is that not built into the function? If PHP can detect the encoding... don't give me the option to screw it up but entering the wrong one! I can not come up with a single situation where I would want to make a string lowercase but do it badly and treat some characters the wrong way. Artistic reasons? I would have liked to see strtolower() do just that. They could have added a artistic_encoding_reinterpretation_strtolower() so that the 99.999% of calls to the function did what that name suggested. end rant. thanks again for posting this... I have some work to do :) On Sep 16, 8:04 am, Roman roman.janowc...@gmail.com wrote: finally I found the solution to my problem. It was not the issue with DB either CakePHP. Problem was in PHP - low function. Never use it if you use encoding different than iso-8859-1. Instead of low use mb_strtolower(string, 'UTF-8). Thanks for help. On 15 Wrz, 14:16, brian bally.z...@gmail.com wrote: Also, use a terminal to verify that the data is as it should be. If all you have to work with is PHPMyAdmin, check that its pages are using UTF-8. It's easy, with MySQL, to import UTF-8 data that gets destroyed. If using an import file, put the following at the top: SET NAMES 'utf8'; And, of course, make sure that database.php has 'encoding' = 'utf8' and that your layout has the proper character set meta tag. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Sergei yatse...@gmail.com wrote: What DB do you use? It is not CakePHP, it 's DBMS problem. If MySql, set encoding to UTF8 and DB collation to utf8_unicode_ci, not utf8_general_ci. On Sep 15, 5:11 am,Romanroman.janowc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have created filter using paginate with extra options taken from input fields. Service and database use UTF-8 (checked). When I try to filter word with polish characters (e.g. ósma) cakephp does not return proper value. Do you have any idea ? Regards, Roman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Question about Reverse Routing
I think you can drop the wildcard and it will work.
Router::connect('/search', array('controller' = 'skateparks',
'action' = 'index'));
/Martin
On Sep 16, 4:38 am, Kyle Decot kdec...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having a little bit of trouble w/ my reverse routing. In my
routes.php file I have:
Router::connect('/search/*', array('controller' = 'skateparks',
'action' = 'index'));
Then in my view I do something like:
$html-link(Search for Something,array
(controller=skateparks,action=index,q=search+terms));
I want to get something like:
http://localhost/search/q:search+terms/
but instead I get:
http://localhost/skateparks/index/q:search+terms/
What is it that I am doing wrong?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Encoding problem
I noted that you need to do some extra work on ucfirst() since it has no direct mb_ equivalent. You have to roll your own or pick one from php.net since mb_convert_case() can only work like ucwords(). On Sep 16, 11:42 am, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for finding that one. I had not caught that before and I use non-english characters all the time. Guess Iäd better slow my application down by replacing all strtolower with the mb_ version... and possibly if clauses and things to make sure mb is installed. But have a look at php.net... it is possibly quicker to ask mysql to convert to lowercase than php (oh dear). It sounds incredible and I haven't run a test of this myself.http://se2.php.net/manual/en/function.mb-strtolower.php Quick rant: It makes my blood boil every time PHP makes my jaw to drop to the floor like this. Come on! Shouldn't this kind of thing be handled by PHP internally? mb this and mb that. Utf8 is 8bit, single byte, is it not? I don't have a single setting in my installation of php that suggests I prefer 8859. Take a hint why don't you, you silly language! BTW, why is this in the comments on php.net: mb_strtolower($str, mb_detect_encoding($str)); Why is that not built into the function? If PHP can detect the encoding... don't give me the option to screw it up but entering the wrong one! I can not come up with a single situation where I would want to make a string lowercase but do it badly and treat some characters the wrong way. Artistic reasons? I would have liked to see strtolower() do just that. They could have added a artistic_encoding_reinterpretation_strtolower() so that the 99.999% of calls to the function did what that name suggested. end rant. thanks again for posting this... I have some work to do :) On Sep 16, 8:04 am, Roman roman.janowc...@gmail.com wrote: finally I found the solution to my problem. It was not the issue with DB either CakePHP. Problem was in PHP - low function. Never use it if you use encoding different than iso-8859-1. Instead of low use mb_strtolower(string, 'UTF-8). Thanks for help. On 15 Wrz, 14:16, brian bally.z...@gmail.com wrote: Also, use a terminal to verify that the data is as it should be. If all you have to work with is PHPMyAdmin, check that its pages are using UTF-8. It's easy, with MySQL, to import UTF-8 data that gets destroyed. If using an import file, put the following at the top: SET NAMES 'utf8'; And, of course, make sure that database.php has 'encoding' = 'utf8' and that your layout has the proper character set meta tag. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Sergei yatse...@gmail.com wrote: What DB do you use? It is not CakePHP, it 's DBMS problem. If MySql, set encoding to UTF8 and DB collation to utf8_unicode_ci, not utf8_general_ci. On Sep 15, 5:11 am,Romanroman.janowc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have created filter using paginate with extra options taken from input fields. Service and database use UTF-8 (checked). When I try to filter word with polish characters (e.g. ósma) cakephp does not return proper value. Do you have any idea ? Regards, Roman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: I want to know now controller or plugin in routes.php
If the names conflict the plugin has precedence. I thinks these are right: /abcs = 1. index on abcs controller in abcs plugin (aka the pluginname controller) 2. index on abcs controller in app /abcs/cba = 1. index on cba controller in abcs plugin 2. cba on abcs controller in abcs plugin (aka the pluginname controller) 3. cba on abcs controller in app and so on. On Sep 16, 12:42 pm, enjoyman i.am.the.king.of.the.h...@gmail.com wrote: I want to do something in routes.php but now I don't know what plugin or what controller for now. If my url is :http://localhost/[cakephp] /[APP] /abc I need to get abc as my now position, how can I do that? another problem is : I dont know if controller name same plugin name , if I access my app by url:http://localhost/[cakephp] /[APP] /abcs and if my controller name is abcs and my plugin is same name,abcs, I want to know the order , what section that cakephp access before and after? Thank you for advance. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Pizza Online Order Notification?
I think Tim is right here. Individual logins work in theory but in a busy restaurant where supposedly a single computer will be logged in all day and used by everyone... passwords would get swapped, written on a post-it and other secure things in a heartbeat. Security = putting the post-it under the keyboard so you have to move it 4in to see the password. :) As for updating the page. Go with ajax. The page loads displaying new orders to fill. javascript is provided with a timestamp of when the page loaded and can poll the server any new orders since ... 17:46:32. The server can simply reply true or false to this request and only when there are new orders do you need to refresh the page. Since this will be lightweight and invisible to the user you can poll every few seconds if you want since the request should be very efficient and not take up a lot of time for the server. (You can also update the list with ajax if you like but it is s bit more work for little benefit.) /Martin On Sep 16, 3:56 pm, Aivaras faifas1...@gmail.com wrote: Create each employee a different user and log which orders did the employee see. Then, after firing a employee you will only have to delete his/her user. Simple as that. Faifas On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 14:48, Tim t...@gurske.com wrote: Thanks for the replies. The IP restriction was since the employees know (or probably find out) the password. They don't want a situation where they fire somebody and they have to worry about that person logging in from home and messing with orders. The IP restriction would be an extra layer of security so they wouldn't have to change the password as often/quickly. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: caching engines
Since you ask, I'd say file. Sorry, that is my least favorite answer to get. All the others require special setups. All the others are better than file under the right circumstances. APC and XCache provide a big performance boost if you need it and like installing php extensions yourself. Memcached is generally the weapon of choose for clustered deployment since it can share it's data between servers. Your circumstances and which fits your setup the best can really only be fully determined by proper testing. You can get a good idea of their general pro's and con's by reading the docs for each and some of the published benchmarks available. Some testing can be done using one of the WAMP, XAMPP, MAMP flavors. I know MAMP is compiled with both APC and XCache and I assume the others are aswell. On Sep 16, 12:54 pm, irshad irsh...@rightwaysolution.com wrote: Hi All, Can anyone let me know which caching engine is best among the four caching engine(APC, XCache, memcache, file) in cakephp 1.2? And how to decide which caching engine should be used? Thanks in advance, Irshad --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Bug?
If you really did set username, email to unique and not username
unique and email unique (see the difference?) all is as it should be.
In the first instance (one index combining the two fields) would have
to have the same username and email combination for MySQLs index to
throw an error.
Is that it, you think?
/Martin
On Sep 15, 12:28 pm, vla...@gmail.com vla...@gmail.com wrote:
Cake PHP 1.2.5, MySQL 5.*
What I have:
model user (all default) and:
var $validate = array(
'username' = 'alphaNumeric',
'password' = 'notEmpty',
'name' = 'notEmpty',
'email' = 'email',
);
In MySQL I set for this table (users) fields: username, email - unique
Also add Security component for security ;-)
Now, I add ticket component for password remainding. And make a
mistake:
/users/remind.ctp:
div class=users form
?php echo $form-create('User');?
?php
echo $form-input('email');
?
?php echo $form-end('Submit');?
/div
As you see form-create - I generate form /users/add
So. I write in one field my email (already present in DB) and got
message User was added
I don't believe it. But in Mysql table I see record with email (which
was present second time!) and other empty fields.
How it possible???
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cache Problem with safari 4
I am sure Safari does cache the page for you. My feeling is that you
can't fix this with a header. My feeling is that Safari has this
feature for some kinds of back-clicking no matter what you do.
Possibly it is to aid javascript-heavy sites.
If I click away now, in the middle of typing this post, I can click
back and still have my text in this ajax-loaded field on the page.
Neither the field nor the text were there when the page loaded. That
is not how FF or any other browser works afaik.
I guess the old rule still applies. Back-buttons are for websites...
not applications. :)
(try clicking back in gmail for example)
/Martin
On Sep 13, 7:33 am, p_tucky p_tu...@whatinthai.com wrote:
Please test on FF3.5, IE7+ , and Safari4
http://perhabs.com/cake_test
user: test
pass: test
please look at display current time under login button.
After login then click back button then see display time Firefox and
IE will show you new time but Safari still display cache time.
That's why I mention Safari still cache.
Thanks
On Sep 11, 2:03 pm, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure that is a cache problem or anything you can fix. Are you
sure
I use Safari 4 all the time and I am under the impression that the
browser sometimes doesn't do any request at all when using the back
button. It simply re-displays what it a few moments ago. I have not
checked if the browser technically does a request or not. It is just a
feeling I get.
/Martin
On Sep 11, 6:13 am, p_tucky p_tu...@whatinthai.com wrote:
Hi, I have cache problem with safari 4.
Any one have problem like me?
I’ve tried with this code but does not work. It take me to the
previous page and have still show the text on form.
function beforeFilter()
{
if($this-action == ‘login’) {
$this-disableCache();
}
Header( “Last-Modified: ” . gmdate( “D, j M Y H:i:s” ) . ” GMT” );
Header( “Expires: ” . gmdate( “D, j M Y H:i:s”, time() ) . ”
GMT” );
Header( “Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate” );
}
FF and IE both don’t have any problem, when click “back button” and no
cache.
Safari 4 it seem still have cache when click “back button”.
Any solution please advise.
Thanks in advance.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: session lost during ajax calls problem
You might want to looks at some of these suggested solutions. http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/redirects-with-ajax Pick the one that works the best for you. /Martin On Sep 11, 6:03 am, learning_cake_php lunaro...@gmail.com wrote: so theres no way on switching to normal redirect from ajax redirect? as what i have understood on your suggestion,correct me if im wrong, is to have a view containing a plain javascript redirect? how about this one: What I have done though is to have that logic in javascript. Cake simply returns success or error on the request and then my javascript knows whether to redirect or not. how can this be done?can you please give me some snippets? thanx --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: isUnique Validation for Multiple Fields
I could easily skip that validation and always let a new vote through. Only when the same user votes again their original vote would be updated. That is totally a matter of taste. I just happen to like being abel to change my mind and update my vote. That doen't work better for rating users, posts or other social stuff that is does for competition entries. For that kind of saves I wish there was a Cake version of INSERT ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE For votes you would likely want to know if the save was an update or not and inform the user, so it is no great loss. /Martin On Sep 14, 2:51 pm, rich...@home richardath...@gmail.com wrote: I wrote one a while back and posted it to this group. can't seem to find it now, but here's a link to it stored elsewhere: http://markmail.org/message/nleqrkgtm2ji6sfe On Sep 14, 11:10 am, Shaun sbef...@gmail.com wrote: I have a table called comment_ratings where users can rate comments up or down. It looks like this: TABLE: comment_ratings id = INT rating_value = TINYINT comment_id = INT user_id = INT created = DATETIME modified = DATETIME Users should only be allowed one vote on each comment, so I have created a unique key on two fields, comment_id and user_id. The name of the key is unique_rating_per_user. This works fine in my database, but how can I add the unique validation to the CommentRating model? As far as I know, isUnique only handles one field. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cache Problem with safari 4
I am not sure that is a cache problem or anything you can fix. Are you
sure
I use Safari 4 all the time and I am under the impression that the
browser sometimes doesn't do any request at all when using the back
button. It simply re-displays what it a few moments ago. I have not
checked if the browser technically does a request or not. It is just a
feeling I get.
/Martin
On Sep 11, 6:13 am, p_tucky p_tu...@whatinthai.com wrote:
Hi, I have cache problem with safari 4.
Any one have problem like me?
I’ve tried with this code but does not work. It take me to the
previous page and have still show the text on form.
function beforeFilter()
{
if($this-action == ‘login’) {
$this-disableCache();
}
Header( “Last-Modified: ” . gmdate( “D, j M Y H:i:s” ) . ” GMT” );
Header( “Expires: ” . gmdate( “D, j M Y H:i:s”, time() ) . ”
GMT” );
Header( “Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate” );
}
FF and IE both don’t have any problem, when click “back button” and no
cache.
Safari 4 it seem still have cache when click “back button”.
Any solution please advise.
Thanks in advance.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Release: CakePHP 1.2.5
Thank you so much for this update. The php 5.3 fixes especially. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: session lost during ajax calls problem
For that one there is no one-click simple trick.
I guess you could return an ajax html snippet containing a javascript
that trigger a redirect... unless it gets captured in some security
check.
What I have done though is to have that logic in javascript. Cake
simply returns success or error on the request and then my javascript
knows whether to redirect or not.
/Martin
On Sep 10, 1:06 pm, learning_cake_php lunaro...@gmail.com wrote:
ah ic..well thanx so much for that information..well i guess i have to
lower my
security level for this matter...one more thing, how can i redirect an
entire page
when im submitting a form using ajax? say for instance
if($this-Model-save(){
$this-redirect('theWholePageToSomeWhereElse');}else{
$this-redirect('toPreviousViewUsingAjax');
}
how can i do that?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: PHP IDEs
On Sep 10, 1:05 pm, jason m ippatsu.ya...@gmail.com wrote: The only downside of textmate is that it doesn't really support any other encodings besides UTF8. Jason Say what? How do you mean Textmate doesn't support any other encoding? It works quite happily in 8859-1 (aka latin1) and Mac roman, and I am Swedish and frequently have documents containing problematic characters like åäö. It does lac the myriad of encodings some editors support (like all the different iso variations) so I guess to some language-specific documents there might be a problem. Textmate is a bit obscure on how to convert encodings. It involves re- opening documents with a new encoding and then save as and setting the new one which is not as flexible as SubEthaEdit for example. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Problem with Security component and form submit
I don't think is affects your problem but in the code you posted the html would be invalid. The form and /form should be at the same hierarchical leven in the html but you have the end inside a div. A 404 is what you would get is SecurityComponent decided to kick you in the behind. It is called blackHole() and is the end of the road for any bad request. You can specify blackHoleCallback on the component (in the beforeFilter of your controller) and name one method in your controller as the callback. This method will then receive the error and giving you the opportunity to debug what is going on. $this-Security-blackHoleCallback = 'some_method_name'; Or you can open the Security Component directly and insert a debug in blackHole... if you prefer that. On Sep 10, 12:39 pm, byqsri marco.rizze...@gmail.com wrote: The url is the same. With FireFox plugin Tamper Data I get status header Not Found - 404 On 10 Set, 12:14, Bert Van den Brande cyr...@gmail.com wrote: What's the url of the page with the form, and what's the url of the white page ? Maybe inspect traffic with the FireFox plugin Tamper Data to detect what's going on ... On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM, byqsri marco.rizze...@gmail.com wrote: I try to set the debug mode to 1 and to 2 but there is no errors On 10 Set, 11:37, Bert Van den Brande cyr...@gmail.com wrote: A clean white page suggests an error that can't be shown because you have set the debug level to 0. Try setting it to 1 or 2 and see if the 'white page' now outputs an error message. On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, byqsri marco.rizze...@gmail.com wrote: On 10 Set, 11:16, WebbedIT p...@webbedit.co.uk wrote: How do you know if this is a security component issue as the form is not being submitted to a Controller/Action to be processed?!? Because if I don't use the Security component the form is correctly submit. What should happen if the form submits to the url /test/? It doesn't anything.Simply it reloads the page. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Flow Control with Ajax
On successful login, Auth Component does a redirect to either: 1. where you were before you were redirected to the login screen (not in your case I guess) 2. whatever default you have set 3. the website index page. (I think that is the correct order) I guess your problem is that your ajax call does not follow the redirect and loads the resulting page. I don't use ajax enough to be sure of that or what can be done about it. What you can do is to turn off the auto redirect for Auth and yourself check if the login was a success and if that success was due to an ajax call. Use the RequestHandler to check for ajax. /Martin On Sep 9, 5:45 am, young.steveo young.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I've posted this elsewhere on the internets, and finally I'm bringing it to you guys. Just started using cake and it's fantastic! Love it. Here's my little problem: I have a form that I am suppressing with jQuery and doing an AJAX call to a controller 'UsersController' with a 'login' action that is working automagically using the built in Auth component. I'm following ProLoser's example from the bakery: http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/serving-up-actions-as-ajax-wi... The only exception is that I'm using the livequery jQuery plugin to support the submit event. My homepage has a copy of the form inside a div, and the the 'users/ login.ctp' view has a copy of the form as well. When the user submits the form, jQuery removes the form from the div. The form is submitted via ajax to the UsersController, and if the user has failed to authenticate, he is served the 'users/login.ctp' view inside the same div using ajax. This all works. If the user DOES authenticate, he is also served the login.ctp inside the div. Instead, I want to change the view to something that says welcome, etc. etc. etc. with no login form. I've bashed my brains into the cookbook, the API, and google to no avail. I feel like this is something super easy to do, but I'm barking up the wrong trees. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: cake cant find model's method!!!
I am not sure about this but I have a vague memory about reading that
for habtm Cake does not look for any real model unless you specify
with in the association. The automagic being that you don't have to
make a real linking model for those simple habtm associations and Cake
does not have to spend time looking for it.
/Martin
On Sep 8, 11:18 am, learning_cake_php lunaro...@gmail.com wrote:
WELL WELL..hehe.. nice trick you had ther..i read the manual aboyt
HABTM's with and kablamm!! it works..
so why is cake behaving things like that?they always used the word
automagically but then dont know how to
automagically interpret the names i used even i followed the
convention..or maybe i did something wrong somewhere..
for now,ill stick with the with key..hard to find the bug there(for
me)...
thank you guys...deadline is fast approaching..still nid to add auth
to my project...acos and aros are still
complicated for me this time..hehe
On Sep 8, 12:02 am, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with the good doctor.
One detail you may not realise is that it matters little if if you
name the model correctly unless you also specify with on the
associations... and that you do it from both sides.
Unless you specify with and specify the Modelname Cake might be
loading AppModel (I believe this happened to me a few months ago even
though it shouldn't).
More definite is that you must specify with from both sides of the
habtm. If you do it only from one side you can be sure the other one
is loaded first and Cake chooses AppModel. From that point on there is
nothing you can do to bring up the real model since the AppModel will
be in the registry.
I noticed this when normal requests worked and shell access was messed
up... because the models were loaded in a different order.
/Martin
On Sep 8, 8:33 am, Dr. Loboto drlob...@gmail.com wrote:
Output get_class($this-EnrolleesOfferedSubject) in your controller.
If it is AppModel cake cannot find your model file.
On Sep 8, 10:32 am, learning_cake_php lunaro...@gmail.com wrote:
i already check my model names and codes...
i have a controller named EnrollmentController and from there
i used the $uses property for me to user the EnrolleesOfferedSubject
model..
why is it that save,create and delete method works just fine..saves
and delete to/from
correct table(enrollees_offered_subjects) but my custom method wont
work..here is the actual code:
//enrollment_controller.php
?
class EnrollmentController extends AppController {
var $name = 'Enrollment';
var $uses = array(
'Enrollment',
'Student',
'EnrollmentPayment',
'Enrollee',
'OfferedSubject',
'EnrolleesOfferedSubject',
'Major',
'Campus',
'College',
'Course',
'Subject',
'Program',
'Scholarship',
'Users'
);
function subjectView(){
$this-setCRUD('subject');
$student=$this-Student-isStudent($this-Session-read
('Student.id'));
if(!$student){
$this-Session-setFlash(__('Student
Not Found.', true));
$this-redirect(array('action'='index'));
}
$this-Session-write('Student.id',
$student['Student']['id']);
$this-Session-write('Student.full_name',
$student['Student']
['last_name']
., .$student['Student']['first_name']
. .$student['Student']['middle_name']
. .$student['Student']['sur_name']
);
$enrollmentPayment=$this-EnrollmentPayment-isPaid($this-Session-
read('Student.id
Re: Two paginations on one page, can't figure it out
Yes I saw defaultModel too after I posted. Both my paginated models were in paginator's params array but using them both seems, as you say, to only affect parst of the helper. For example, numbers pulls the correct values provided by the component and uses them for counting pages but does not use them for constructing model-specific links themselves. I can see why. How often is it a good idea to paginate two models on the same page? My case was a bit of a gui-playground. It was a log view of text and picture messages sent to a certain phone and I thought it would be cool to split the page and have both types of messages paginated right there. Not your typical page. The funny thing was that numbers printed two sets of numbers correctly for the two models but all the links were the same for both. That got me all exited and sure I had just missed some array trickery. :) /Martin On Sep 8, 6:37 pm, Miles J mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote: The paginator class seems a bit incomplete. From your example with options() it looks like the paginator should work with multiple models, but then it also calls $model = $this-defaultModel(); which always defaults to a single model and your additional models aren't added to the params (lines 103-112). However, on your numbers() method it also seems correct, but then again, the model doesnt exist in the params array? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to Call Library Function from a Component
I believe you can call it statically like this: Security::hash(...); /Martin On Sep 9, 8:45 am, Sarah sarah.e.p.jo...@gmail.com wrote: I want to call the hash function from the Core Security Library. In this controller I can simply call $this-hash(...); but in the component I get an error: Fatal error: Call to undefined method obAuthComponent::hash() I tried $this-ControllerName-hash and $this-ModelName-hash and I can't find anything in the manual about it. I would appreciate it if someone could point out how to call a function from the core libraries in a component (or post a link of a resource, I just can't find one!). Many thanks, ~Sarah --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: session lost during ajax calls problem
At security level high CakePHP creates a new session id for each request (often enough anyway). This behaviour might be causing you problems using Ajax. The intermittent aspect of the problem is because ajax will be fine as long as you don't make use of the A too much. Cake will only allow one concurrent request from the same session. if you send a second request to the server without the first having returned (and updated the session id in the browser) you will be sending an old used session id and Cake will think you are a hacker and shut you down. So in practice whenever you use ajax you set the level to medium and live with it. maybe someone has built some kind of queu-system for Prototype or jQuery, I don't know. Initial page load Cake id=1 = Browser id=1 link clicked Browser id=1 = Cake gets 1 and changes to 2 = Browser gets=2 ajax update and link clicked at the same time Browser id=2 = Cake gets 2 and changes to 3 = Browser gets=3 Browser id=2 = Cake gets 2 again, gets upset and flips you off :) Apart from the session timeout time, this is afaik the only difference between high and medium security level. The other thing to beware of in relation to this is the Security component and the way it protects forms. You will almost certainly get locked out is you submit forms using ajax to update something... since each form will contain a hash and can only be sent once. /Martin On Sep 9, 4:35 am, learning_cake_php lunaro...@gmail.com wrote: i dont think im the only one asked this question but i just wanted to be sure that solutions i found in the net is correct and secure.. my problem is when i do an ajax call sometimes my session is lost sometimes its not..say for instance, i have a textbox where every time the value is change the ajax call is triggered. sometimes the session i just set is lost then when i typed again on the textbox, the session is not lost.. some solution says that i have to: Set Configure::write(’Security.level’, ‘medium’); well i havnt tried it though, but they said it will not destroy the session when the browser is being closed, which is not good.. is there any way around this? im using cake 1.2.. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Setting Up CakePHP on MAC with MAMP and Eclipse
I have been developing in folders like project_name for years and I like it. I only need to keep and manage one Cake installation and it keeps my clutter of files to a minimum :) The way I host that locally is with one virtual host for each project. I point the Apache root folder for each one to the equivalent of app/ webroot. That way I host locally in exactly the same way as a production installation. also set fake domain names in my computer's / etc/hosts file. I prefer project_name.site as no real site would be called that. I think you can get away with dumping it all into the same vhost the way you did now. If you create a few apps in named folders they should (hopefully) run if you access them using http://localhost/project_name/. Not sure though. On Sep 7, 5:38 pm, Kludge jvanul...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, that's really helpful. I now have CakePHP using MAMP MySQL and PHP5. Another question... what is the usual workflow. Do I create a copy of the Cake/app folder for my project (project_name)? Do I bake in another directory or directly into my Cake/project_name folder? I notice in the tutorial that it recommends to work directly in the app folder but I will definitely have more than one project... any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you in advance! On Sep 6, 11:32 pm, Martin Westin martin.westin...@gmail.com wrote: A few points for installing Cake to run in Mamp. Simplest way is to drop the whole Cake folder (containing cake,app,vendors...) into Mamp's htdocs folder. Should be: /Applications/MAMP/htdocs That should have Cake running but you probably need / want the database too, right. You need to rename and edit the file app/config/ database.php. That file has to know how to reach Mamp's MySQL. You can see instructions in the Mamp control panel on the port/sockets, username, password and things. Those are really the two common head-scratchers I know of. I can't help you with Eclipse but if you have some specific question about the Mamp-Cake thing let me know. /Martin On Sep 7, 4:59 am, FrederickD manzanillo.engl...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Kludge! Try going towww.widgetpress.comandcheckingout ModelBaker. It is a Mac front-end to CakePHP so that you never have to use the CLI. The product has a graphical representation of the database model you are creating for the project. ModelBaker is not an end-all solution. It is designed to quickly get you up and running with CakePHP code that you then tweak for the unique business logic for your project. It has some limitations as it was just released at MacWorld in January. Overall it promises to be a very strong product for Mac development with CakePHP. There is a demo version available for you to try out. I am not affiliated with WidgetPress at all. I do use ModelBaker because I'm a Mac guy and don't care much for the Terminal and command line interfaces anymore. Been there, did that, haven't done it for 25 years now. Check it out! On Sep 6, 4:14 pm, Kludge jvanul...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any idea on how to do this? I have MAMP and Eclipse installed correctly and have been doing PHP development for a while now and everything works fine. I now want to jump into CakePHP but can't wrap my head around setting it up. Any insight and or steps on getting there would be great. Thank you in advance! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: help::sending data from one controller to another controller
You have had your first bump into the wall of strictly linking views, controller and model. I generally tend to link the views and controller more and keep my models more loose. That is, I don't have a problem with using ModelB in ControllerA. I read that you want one click to save both Contact and related phone numbers. If so, I have a two things to offer (off the top of my head): You can possibly just switch to $this-Contact-saveAll($this-data) if your data is returned correctly from the form. Hint: one single form. You can check the cookbook for the details on how to use saveAll. You can reach the PhoneNumber model like $this-Contact-PhoneNumber and save data that way if you need to. On Sep 7, 8:28 pm, BrAt mrasik...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi , i am new to cakePHP , in order to learn php i am just making my first test application which is a simple telephone directory. in my database there are two entities named contacts and phone_numbers which has One-to-Many relationship. Now i have a form in contacts view add.ctp , i want that single form to add Contact as well as the numbers. so by clicking add button Contact, data should be stored in contacts table and phone number should be stored in phone_numbers. i have added another form for phone number and i m dynamically adding fields for input of phone number using javascript. But when the user clicks add button the data we put in phoneNumber form also goes to ContactsController, Now is there any way to send my PhoneNumber data to PhoneNumbersController to add action ,so that i can save that data in phone_numbers table. or any other way to do this job. i ll be really thankfull. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: cake cant find model's method!!!
I agree with the good doctor.
One detail you may not realise is that it matters little if if you
name the model correctly unless you also specify with on the
associations... and that you do it from both sides.
Unless you specify with and specify the Modelname Cake might be
loading AppModel (I believe this happened to me a few months ago even
though it shouldn't).
More definite is that you must specify with from both sides of the
habtm. If you do it only from one side you can be sure the other one
is loaded first and Cake chooses AppModel. From that point on there is
nothing you can do to bring up the real model since the AppModel will
be in the registry.
I noticed this when normal requests worked and shell access was messed
up... because the models were loaded in a different order.
/Martin
On Sep 8, 8:33 am, Dr. Loboto drlob...@gmail.com wrote:
Output get_class($this-EnrolleesOfferedSubject) in your controller.
If it is AppModel cake cannot find your model file.
On Sep 8, 10:32 am, learning_cake_php lunaro...@gmail.com wrote:
i already check my model names and codes...
i have a controller named EnrollmentController and from there
i used the $uses property for me to user the EnrolleesOfferedSubject
model..
why is it that save,create and delete method works just fine..saves
and delete to/from
correct table(enrollees_offered_subjects) but my custom method wont
work..here is the actual code:
//enrollment_controller.php
?
class EnrollmentController extends AppController {
var $name = 'Enrollment';
var $uses = array(
'Enrollment',
'Student',
'EnrollmentPayment',
'Enrollee',
'OfferedSubject',
'EnrolleesOfferedSubject',
'Major',
'Campus',
'College',
'Course',
'Subject',
'Program',
'Scholarship',
'Users'
);
function subjectView(){
$this-setCRUD('subject');
$student=$this-Student-isStudent($this-Session-read
('Student.id'));
if(!$student){
$this-Session-setFlash(__('Student Not
Found.', true));
$this-redirect(array('action'='index'));
}
$this-Session-write('Student.id',
$student['Student']['id']);
$this-Session-write('Student.full_name',
$student['Student']
['last_name']
., .$student['Student']['first_name']
. .$student['Student']['middle_name']
. .$student['Student']['sur_name']
);
$enrollmentPayment=$this-EnrollmentPayment-isPaid($this-Session-
read('Student.id'));
if(!$enrollmentPayment){
$this-Session-setFlash(__('Not Yet
Paid.', true));
$this-redirect(array('action'='paymentAdd'));
}
$enrollee=$this-Enrollee-isEnrolled($this-Session-read
('Student.id'));
if(!$enrollee){
$this-Session-setFlash(__('Student Not
Yet Enrolled.', true));
$this-redirect(array('action'='enrolleeAdd'));
}
$this-EnrolleesOfferedSubject-recursive = 0;
//$this-EnrolleesOfferedSubject-unbindModel(array
('belongsTo'=array('Enrollee','OfferedSubject')));
$this-EnrolleesOfferedSubject-bindModel(array('belongsTo'=array(
'Enrollee'=array(
'foreignKey'='enrollee_id',
'type'='INNER'
),
'OfferedSubject'=array(
Two paginations on one page, can't figure it out
Hi, I just can't seem to figure this out.
I want to paginate two models on the same page. I can't figure out how
to make the Helper output links correctly.
Example:
$paginator-numbers(array('model'='ModelA'));
$paginator-numbers(array('model'='ModelB'));
I thought that would be it. Those two will output the numbers for each
model (3 pages for A and 5 for B) but the links will both just be
page:2 and so on. No model-specific links. Same for next and prev.
$paginator-options(array(
'ModelA'=$this-passedArgs,
'ModelB'=array('url' = $this-passedArgs)
));
I tried a few variations of this kind of options because I saw in the
source that options looked for model names but that has not yielded
anything good either.
As you can tell I a lost here and I feel like I am missing something
obvious since multiple paginations are supposed to be supported afaik.
any suggestions?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
