RSM,MLS, MLS-RP,etc [7:5220]
Hi Cisco Comrades, Anybody can lead me to the resouces for the above that I can get for better understanding ? rgds. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5220&t=5220 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
Hi Can anybody tell me where I can find some sample configs for VoIP and a good and complete document for it. Thanks Hamid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5221&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RSM,MLS, MLS-RP,etc [7:5220]
Hi, www.mplsrc.com http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t5/vpn.htm http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/switch_c/xcprt4/xcdtagc.htm hope this helps steve >From: "Arumugam Sundarum" >Reply-To: "Arumugam Sundarum" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RSM,MLS, MLS-RP,etc [7:5220] >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 03:55:01 -0400 > >Hi Cisco Comrades, >Anybody can lead me to the resouces for the above that I can get for better >understanding ? > >rgds. >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5222&t=5220 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
share ethernet [7:5223]
hi all, i got 2 routers sharing the same ethernet...both ether should active at the same time(so i think hsrp not meaningful) with each ether have different ip address with same subnet. Server on LAN should point to one particular ip(can it be two..?)...how do i achieve that...?? pls help tq rgds nazri Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5223&t=5223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
single or mutlimode? [7:5224]
Hi, May I know what is the command to check where the ATM interface card is multi-mode or single-mode? Thanks, Andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5224&t=5224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ccie written [7:5225]
Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. Thanks to the group and to boson test. Let's go for the lab Stefano Andrello CCIE written, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5225&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccie written [7:5225]
Hi Stefano Congratulations on your CCIE written. Can you tell us which books you have used and which Boson Test you practiced Thanks Mohd. > -Original Message- > From: Stefano Andrello [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mon, May 21, 2001 12:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ccie written [7:5225] > > Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > Let's go for the lab > > Stefano Andrello > CCIE written, CCNA > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5226&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QOS/Policy routing [7:5227]
Hi folks, I like to setup a policy so that any traffic destined to 1.1.1.0/24 will take precedence over the rest. My outbound link is a single T1. Please throw me a short sample config. Thanks for helping. -Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5227&t=5227 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
passed CIT [7:5228]
A traditional Thank All message Just passed CIT, and completed CCNP. Priscillas flash cards are great. But the exam itself sucks. Routing was by far the best one in CCNP track. Now have to start thinking about CCIE writen. Regards George Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5228&t=5228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: passed CIT [7:5228]
I agree 100% with George...!!! Vivek CNE, MCSE, Compaq ASE, CLP Admin, CLP Dev., CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, SCSA -Original Message- From: George Kadeishvili [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: passed CIT [7:5228] A traditional Thank All message Just passed CIT, and completed CCNP. Priscillas flash cards are great. But the exam itself sucks. Routing was by far the best one in CCNP track. Now have to start thinking about CCIE writen. Regards George FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5229&t=5228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT 2B+D Basic Rate ISDN Emulator [7:5231]
Hi Guys, I am thinking of buying this unit for my lab. 2B+D Basic Rate ISDN Simulation with the 2B+D Emulator. Pls. share experiences? (Good or Bad). Thanks, Rashid Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5231&t=5231 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QOS/Policy routing [7:5227]
How about this?: access-list 100 permit ip any 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 100 Then on the interface do a priority-group 1 At 03:32 AM 5/21/01, you wrote: >Hi folks, >I like to setup a policy so that any traffic destined to 1.1.1.0/24 will >take precedence over the rest. My outbound link is a single T1. Please >throw me a short sample config. Thanks for helping. > >-Frank >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5232&t=5227 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccie written [7:5225]
> Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > Let's go for the lab > > Stefano Andrello > CCIE written, CCNA Wow ! what a score ... Can you share with us what tips and book you use to prepare for CCIE written ? Regards, Ronny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5233&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AS-PATH Regular Expression [7:5234]
Hi all, I am suppose to accept the following routes from my peer AS123, which has peering with another AS (AS456). I was told to accept the following routes from them, but I don't really understand the regular expression. Can anyone please help to explain to me the following? And what does the "+" and the parenthese means in this AS-PATH. (_123)+(_456)+ I am confused with the parenthese and the "+" sign. Please advise. Thank you. Regards, Cheeyong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5234&t=5234 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sybex virtual lab e-trainer [7:5235]
Has anyone used Sybex Virtual Lab E-Trainer for ccna studying? Eric James Network Admin 2 Franklin County Data Center Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5235&t=5235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: certificate [7:5200]
I am not so sure that this " flame " was appropriate, it was a simple question, if you do not think this subject is for the Cisco groupstudy list why not just move on to the next mail and forget it. Anyway I didn't see you flaming the Juniper questions, what do they have to do with the Cisco Groupstudy list. In fact you are part of the Juniper discussions. Doug -Original Message- From: Drew Simonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 11:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: certificate [7:5200] Jim Bond wrote: > > Hello, > > My client wants to use certificate server to > authenticate PCs on the network. Is there a way to do > it? I thought certificate has to be used with browser. > How do you give PC a certificate? 1. What the hell does this have to do with Cisco, with Cisco certifications or with study for Cisco certifications? Why on God's green earth would you think that this is the sort of place for your question? I'm really curious. 2. Of course you can authenticate users (who log into a PC on a network) using certificates. How do you give a PC a certificate? You copy the file on to it. Viola. Check the web, use a search engine, and learn the answers. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5236&t=5200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sybex virtual lab e-trainer [7:5235]
--- "James, Eric L." wrote: > Has anyone used Sybex Virtual Lab E-Trainer for ccna > studying? > > > > Eric James > Network Admin 2 > Franklin County Data Center > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Please send replys to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5237&t=5235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed CIT [7:5228]
How do you find "Priscillas flash cards" --- George Kadeishvili wrote: > A traditional Thank All message > Just passed CIT, and completed CCNP. > Priscillas flash cards are great. But the exam > itself sucks. Routing was > by far the best one in CCNP track. > Now have to start thinking about CCIE writen. > Regards > George > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Please send replys to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5238&t=5228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AS-PATH Regular Expression [7:5234]
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Tay Chee Yong wrote: > Hi all, > > I am suppose to accept the following routes from my peer AS123, which has > peering with another AS (AS456). I was told to accept the following routes > from them, but I don't really understand the regular expression. Can anyone > please help to explain to me the following? And what does the "+" and the > parenthese means in this AS-PATH. > > (_123)+(_456)+ > > I am confused with the parenthese and the "+" sign. Please advise. Thank you. *browsebrowsebrowse* http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/ np1_r/1rbgp.htm#xtocid2382618 [...] as-regular-expression Autonomous system in the access list using a regular expression. See the "Regular Expressions" appendix in the Dial Solutions Command Reference for information about forming regular expressions. -- "Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5239&t=5234 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Examine: Doyle's protocol analyser [7:5241]
Hi, all. Does anybody know the name of the company that wrote the "Examine" protocol analyser featured in Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP Vol.1? Thanks. Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5241&t=5241 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sybex virtual lab e-trainer [7:5235]
I used it. Personally, I didn't think it was worth the $100 price tag. Boson has one that's only $30 I think. Kris. -Original Message- From: RCL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 8:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sybex virtual lab e-trainer [7:5235] --- "James, Eric L." wrote: > Has anyone used Sybex Virtual Lab E-Trainer for ccna > studying? > > > > Eric James > Network Admin 2 > Franklin County Data Center > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Please send replys to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5240&t=5235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF - Do Not Age LSA [7:5242]
Hi All, In the following situation, where sholud I see the "DoNotAge LSA" a- only in router R2 b- only in router R1 c- in R2 and R3 d- in all router. Please, explain your answer Router R2 is configured with "ip ospf demand-circuit" area 0 x--- | x-- | R1 | ABR area 6 x-- | | [PTSN] | | x- -x-- | R2 || R3| x- -x-- || x---x area 25 -- Eng. Paulo Roque Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5242&t=5242 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1605 56k csu dsu to 1602 CSU DSU [7:5091]
You can also use a single jack as a loop to bring the interface up. You just need two copper wires and a jack. Make sure wire 1 goes from pin1 to pin 8 in the jack and wire two goes from pin 2 to pin 7 in the jack. Plug the jack in and you should get an up up status. This is good for lab if you want to add another network and then advertise it say over the ethernet interface for any routing protocol. Just remove the plug and the interface goes down, hence the network goes down, get for debug and troubleshooting. Don - Original Message - From: "Brian Dennis" To: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 11:43 PM Subject: RE: 1605 56k csu dsu to 1602 CSU DSU [7:5091] > www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/75.html > > > Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 > 5G Networks, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (925) 260-2724 > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Randy Espiritu > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: 1605 56k csu dsu to 1602 CSU DSU [7:5091] > > > > > > Hi All > > > > Anyone know how to configure 2 1600 series router connecting both > > WIC-1DSU-56K from each router using cross over cable > > > > thanks all in advance > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5243&t=5091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written [7:5188]
...also add Boson prep tests in your shopping list (they are "must have") CM > -Original Message- > From: EA Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 May 2001 05:17 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE Written [7:5188] > > > Gary - in a word, Tons. > > Start with the Blueprint > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/rsblu > eprint.html > and assess yourself with the subjects (I have a > self-assessment spreadsheet > that you're welcome to have on request) > > Then, look at their Recommended Reading list > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routi ng.html#34 Towards the bottom of the list, there are LOTS of links to Cisco-generated documents that you can have for free (well, for the cost of bits on a disk, or sheets of 8-1/2 x 11 paper) Finally, when you feel you have the subject matter pretty well handled, there's a great book that my one of my study partners has loaned me CCIE Prep Kit CCIE 350-001 Routing and Switching, published by Que ISBN 0-7897-2359-x which will ice the cake for you. If you have lots of experience, your reading will probably be more on the theoretical side. If you have little or no experience, you'll need some of the background information that's provided in the Cisco docs. hth... -e- - Original Message - From: "Gary Hughes" To: Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 11:28 AM Subject: CCIE Written [7:5188] > Any good books or study material recommended for the CCIE Written test? > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5244&t=5188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my head hurts! (Terminal server) [7:5245]
Can someone explain how the following excerpt from a menu on a 2511 being used as a terminal server works! I know that traffic is being passed through e0 using the specified port, but i need to know how the hell it manages to get to the specified switches. menu CONNECT text 1 Cisco 2912 LAN Switch #3 menu CONNECT command 1 telnet 10.1.1.12 2001 menu CONNECT text 2 Cisco 2912 LAN Switch #4 menu CONNECT command 2 telnet 10.1.1.12 2002 interface Ethernet0 ip address 10.1.1.12 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects no ip directed-broadcast no ip proxy-arp no cdp enable Thanks in advance from one of the ignorant masses!! = George Dodds CCNA, MCP __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5245&t=5245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cable Multiservice Operators [7:5246]
Hi group, I need to speak with a networker who has cable operator experience. My company (ISP) will become a partner with a CATV operator and will begin to give data services over CATV network. But I have some questions to discuss with group members who are experienced about this type of network. please reply if you have something to say about Cable Multiservice Operations. Cheers, Alec __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5246&t=5246 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX question... [7:5248]
Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your help... -Rizzo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5248&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QOS/Policy routing [7:5227]
Hi; Policy Routing sample interface serial 0 ip address x.w.y.z /netmask ip policy route-map frank ! access-list 101 permit ip any 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.25 ! route-map frank permt 10 match ip address 101 set ip precedence critical ! Prority Queue is another option. HTH Vincent Chong ""Frank Kim"" Hi folks, > I like to setup a policy so that any traffic destined to 1.1.1.0/24 will > take precedence over the rest. My outbound link is a single T1. Please > throw me a short sample config. Thanks for helping. > > -Frank > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5250&t=5227 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IEEE 802 Standards for free [7:5249]
-- quote No Charge to View IEEE 802 Standards The IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) has announced a pilot program that grants public access to view and download individual electronic (PDF) IEEE Local and Metropolitan Area Network (802) standards at no charge. New IEEE 802 standards will be added to the "Get IEEE 802" program, in PDF format, six months after publication. For more information, please visit http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/getieee802.html -- quote Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5249&t=5249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AS-PATH Regular Expression [7:5234]
On Mon, 21 May 2001, ElephantChild wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2001, Tay Chee Yong wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am suppose to accept the following routes from my peer AS123, which has > > peering with another AS (AS456). I was told to accept the following routes > > from them, but I don't really understand the regular expression. Can anyone > > please help to explain to me the following? And what does the "+" and the > > parenthese means in this AS-PATH. > > > > (_123)+(_456)+ > > > > I am confused with the parenthese and the "+" sign. Please advise. Thank you. > > *browsebrowsebrowse* > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/ > np1_r/1rbgp.htm#xtocid2382618 (rest snipped) Sorry, folks, incomplete answer. I meant to add the URL for the actual syntax description, then decided as I read it that it was a bit obscure as an introduction to regular expressions. Anyway, here's my FMTYWTK answer: _ matches any character that separates individual ASNs in an AS path, including the start or end of the AS path. So _123 ensures that the 123 in the regular expression won't match say, AS 4123. It could, however, match AS 1234 if used by itself, but the rest of the expression will take care of that. + matches at least one occurence, and perhaps more than one, of the preceding character or sub-expression between (). So if your peer indulges in AS path prepending, (_123)+ will take care of that by matching 123 123 or 123 123 123 12345 as well as a single 123 or 1234. The rest of the regular expression, and specifically the _ that starts (_456)+, takes care of that, since it doesn't match the 4 in 1234 or 12345, but only the separator after the 3 of the final 123. Now that I dissected your regular expression, I will say that IMHO, it's more complex than what you need, and may still not do what you want in some cases. Depending on what you want, you may use one of the following: - To match any AS path that contains ASNs 123 and 456 in that order, and may contain any other ASN either before or after, but not between, use _123_456_ (Note that this would still match 123 789 456 123 456, but that path has a loop in it, and if your peer will feed you that kind of paths, you have more serious trouble than just an unwanted 789.) - To match any AS path that starts with one or more occurences of ASN 123, followed with one (at least) occurence of 456, possibly followed by other ASNs, use ^(123_)+456_ - To match any AS path that starts with one or more occurences of ASN 123, possibly followed by one or more occurences of ASN 456, but contains no other ASN, use ^(123_)+(456_)*$ -- "Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5251&t=5234 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stop the Flaming [7:5252]
I know I am going to get flamed by the negative people on this list. When I joined on this list it was for the study of certification. Whenever anyone asks a question related to certification, they get flamed. There is nothing wrong with asking a question, there are no stupid questions.What is wrong with helping someone starting out? Nothing (People should check the archives first.) When a company hires someone it is more for how they get along than there certs. If you don't like what someone says either delete the message or mind you own business. Dan Evensen CCNAWS CNS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5252&t=5252 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX question... [7:5248]
Scary, use VPN >>> "Rizzo Damian" 05/21 10:15 AM >>> Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your help... -Rizzo FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5254&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: b**** tests [7:5194]
On Sun, 20 May 2001, John Andrews wrote: > First of all: > > I worded the subject space that way because I was unsure if the word B > is > banned here or not, so that was to be on the safe side so this would go > through to the group. > > My question: > > Are the above tests for switching close to the exam type questions that > appear > on the prometric. I have both switching exams and have been using them for > practice examinations. If the name you're thinking of is the same as that of the class of elementary pbrticles that follow the Bose-Einstein statistics, as opposed to say, a female representative of species Canis domesticus or (according to some) Homo sapiens, you can use it here. Boson. Boson. Boson boson bosonbosonboson. See? :-) And it's been abundantly discussed on this here fine list, so hitting the archives is probably your best bet. -- "Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5253&t=5194 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed BCMSN [7:4546]
John, Kevin and Group, I know most on this list agree.. What difference does it make if we start from books & go to experience, or start with experience and go to books? The main point is we know where we want to go, and either way we'll get there. Does anyone on list know the story of blue crabs in a bucket? No matter how many crabs try to escape, they always get pulled back down by a crab below them. No crab ever gets away, and no lid is ever used. So if somebody finds fault with your path, your way, remember those blue crabs. They're really yummy. live well, smile lots, - susan lab scheduled for Jan. 10/11, 2002 RTC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5255&t=4546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: b**** tests [7:5194]
On Sun, 20 May 2001, John Andrews wrote: > First of all: > > I worded the subject space that way because I was unsure if the word B > is > banned here or not, so that was to be on the safe side so this would go > through to the group. > > My question: > > Are the above tests for switching close to the exam type questions that > appear > on the prometric. I have both switching exams and have been using them for > practice examinations. If the name you're thinking of is the same as that of the class of elementary pbrticles that follow the Bose-Einstein statistics, as opposed to say, a female representative of species Canis domesticus or (according to some) Homo sapiens, you can use it here. Boson. Boson. Boson boson bosonbosonboson. See? :-) And it's been abundantly discussed on this here fine list, so hitting the archives is probably your best bet. -- "Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5256&t=5194 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: share ethernet [7:5223]
Use a routing protocol or static routes. The default router for the server will send an ICMP redirect to the server for any networks reachable by the other router. Or, set the servers defualt gateway to it's self and let proxy arp do the router selection. Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From: md. nazri To: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:53 AM Subject: share ethernet [7:5223] > hi all, > i got 2 routers sharing the same ethernet...both ether should active at the > same time(so i think hsrp not meaningful) with each ether have different ip > address with same subnet. Server on LAN should point to one particular > ip(can it be two..?)...how do i achieve that...?? pls help > > tq > > rgds > nazri > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5257&t=5223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stop the Flaming [7:5252]
>I know I am going to get flamed by the negative people on this list. When I >joined on this list it was for the study of certification. Whenever anyone >asks a question related to certification, they get flamed. Dan, I take your post in a positive sense. Nevertheless, there are certain things I do regard as inappropriate, although I generally don't join in the flame war, or occasionally try to deflect it with a bit of humor. When it comes to flaming, I've rarely if ever done it here. When I was writing one of my books and made a comment about lawyers, the editor quibbled that it might be insulting to lawyers. My response was that if it wasn't clear that it was insulting, I'd make every effort to make the insult unambiguous. Let me talk about _my personal_ reaction to certain kinds of questions. 1. "How many questions" and the like -- not really harmful, but I'm puzzled what anyone can do with the information. Especially if the test format is such that you can't go back (and that _is_ valuable information), what can you do other than keep answering questions until you run out of time? 2. Questions directly posted from some review source, with NO discussion of what the poster thinks might be the right answer, or why, perhaps, all the possible answers are incorrect. I'm glad to help people work out the nuances of specific answers, but I expect to see that they've tried first. Otherwise, I get a sense that they are just trying to memorize without understanding. There also may be copyright issues in directly posting questions. As something of a personal note, which I suspect would be echoed by most firms that write review materials, if there's a problem with one of our questions, it's often more productive to send a query to customer service than just posting the question to the list. Believe me, at CertZone, such queries are taken seriously, and usually go to the actual author of the question. I know that there have been times when I received such a query on one of my questions, looked at it, and realized I made a typo or logic error. We promptly let people know about the correction. The question author is in the best position to know what he or she meant. That isn't to say that the review sites should be in the business of explaining more detail about a question that is verified correct. On a commercial basis, that would be tutoring. I know I will suggest, on occasion, that the person asking direct the discussion to the list. 3. Closely related to the commercially questionable explanation are the posts beginning "my client wants to..." My immediate reaction is that I am usually paid to answer commercial questions. Of course, my greatest annoyance is when I get this in private mail from someone I don't know. That isn't to say that a real-world problem can't be discussed on the list as a way of gaining insight. You'll probably notice that I respond to quite a few BGP routing policy situations. I do this for several reasons. One, it fits in with my general IETF/NANOG/etc. teaching role and role in avoiding Internet problems, and second, these often wind up in case studies in my books. 4. Another problem area is apparent buggy behavior in a Cisco product, to which my immediate reaction is "what does the TAC say?" If the TAC has been consulted but didn't give a good answer, the problem should be escalated in Cisco -- indeed, how to do so is part of the CIT exam. I can understand asking for bug support for a personal lab, but frankly, I would say that anyone without a massive internal support infrastructure is crazy not to have at least basic SmartNet. >There is nothing >wrong with asking a question, there are no stupid questions.What is wrong >with helping someone starting out? Nothing (People should check the archives >first.) And yes, checking the archives and CCO should be a given. >When a company hires someone it is more for how they get along than >there certs. >If you don't like what someone says either delete the message or mind you >own business. > >Dan Evensen CCNAWS CNS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5258&t=5252 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird trace results [7:5259]
All, When performing a trace on an IP address (for "testing purposes we'll use 10.1.2.3) this is the result I get: router#trace 10.1.2.3 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.1.2.3 1 192.1.2.2 4 msec 192.1.2.10 4 msec 192.1.2.2 4 msec 2 10.1.2.3 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec 3 * * * 4 * * * 5 * * * 6 * * * This to me shows that I am still trying to find a path to the IP address...but if the IP Address is returned at the 2nd hop, why is the trace still continuing? I thought that it would stop when the trace has the "path". Also note that when a "ping" is performed it returns the infamous "." This has really got me perplexed, and any help would be greatly appreciated. Maybe I am just not understanding something about the trace command/ICMP. Rick Watson Network Engineer Advanced Systems Development, Inc. OUSD(Comptroller) 703.697.5710 office 800.309.7782 pager ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5259&t=5259 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX question... [7:5248]
Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet connection to reach your LAN. Craig At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your help... > > > -Rizzo >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5260&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird trace results [7:5259]
I suggest that you check your routing table, that's what come out my mind. HTH Vincent Chong ""Watson, Rick, CTR, OUSDC"" All, > > When performing a trace on an IP address (for "testing purposes we'll use > 10.1.2.3) this is the result I get: > > router#trace 10.1.2.3 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Tracing the route to 10.1.2.3 > > 1 192.1.2.2 4 msec > 192.1.2.10 4 msec > 192.1.2.2 4 msec > 2 10.1.2.3 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec > 3 * * * > 4 * * * > 5 * * * > 6 * * * > > This to me shows that I am still trying to find a path to the IP > address...but if the IP Address is returned at the 2nd hop, why is the trace > still continuing? I thought that it would stop when the trace has the > "path". Also note that when a "ping" is performed it returns the infamous > "." > > This has really got me perplexed, and any help would be greatly appreciated. > Maybe I am just not understanding something about the trace command/ICMP. > > Rick Watson > Network Engineer > Advanced Systems Development, Inc. > OUSD(Comptroller) > 703.697.5710 office > 800.309.7782 pager ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5261&t=5259 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed BCMSN [7:4546]
>John, Kevin and Group, > I know most on this list agree.. > What difference does it make if we start from books & go to >experience, or start with experience and go to books? The main point is we >know where we want to go, and either way we'll get there. Valid observation. It's a constant circle. Part of my job involves designing routers and protocol implementation, so I can't have had experience on something that doesn't yet exist. A deep knowledge of real theory -- in the computer science sense, not just message formats and the like -- is what I have to fall back on. But experience is a factor. When I started working with the Stratacom/Cisco switches, I wasn't dependent only on the courseware -- I knew what the things were supposed to do, so I started looking for features and commands I knew had to be there. > Does anyone on list know the story of blue crabs in a bucket? No >matter how many crabs try to escape, they always get pulled back down by a >crab below them. No crab ever gets away, and no lid is ever used. So if >somebody finds fault with your path, your way, remember those blue crabs. >They're really yummy. I have to share one vaguely on-topic story from my days teaching with Geotrain. Training partners have lots of work to do shipping around the portable labs, and they often have a couple of freight specialists on staff. It's especially bad if the equipment has traveled internationally. We had our freight person go to Baltimore-Washington Airport, in the Delta air freight area, to help get our equipment out of Customs during a Customs crackdown. Apparently, there was one shipment ahead of ours in the inspector's queue: a shipment of live crabs. They were in what essentially was a cage -- a series of pans with chicken wire around them. Not satisfied with poking through the wire, the inspector insisted on having a cage opened. For whatever reason, loosening a particular wire caused an entire stack of cages to fall apart. The standard crab protocol of pulling back escapers doesn't apply when all of the crabs are on the floor. Crabs to the left of them. Crabs to the right of them. Crabs running away. Crabs running at the inspectors, the air freight staff, our freight specialist, etc. Customs inspector losing it completely and screaming "STOP THEM! THEY MIGHT BE CARRYING DRUGS!" The warehouse smelled of crabs for several weeks, and it did take a while to air out that particular portable lab...its aroma led to some strange student reviews. > >live well, smile lots, >- susan >lab scheduled for Jan. 10/11, 2002 RTC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5262&t=4546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: b**** tests [7:5194]
>On Sun, 20 May 2001, John Andrews wrote: > >> First of all: >> >> I worded the subject space that way because I was unsure if the word B >> is >> banned here or not, so that was to be on the safe side so this would go >> through to the group. >> >> My question: >> >> Are the above tests for switching close to the exam type questions that >> appear >> on the prometric. I have both switching exams and have been using them for >> practice examinations. > >If the name you're thinking of is the same as that of the class of >elementary pbrticles that follow the Bose-Einstein statistics, as >opposed to say, a female representative of species Canis domesticus or >(according to some) Homo sapiens, you can use it here. Boson. Boson. >Boson boson bosonbosonboson. See? :-) And it's been abundantly discussed >on this here fine list, so hitting the archives is probably your best >bet. > Somehow, you remind me that the answer to the CID beta delay may be that the test designer is Schrodinger's Cat. Test takers were in a state of either having passed or not passed, but the state could not be known without opening the box. (Reminding my cat that this is only theoretical and that he should not worry.) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5263&t=5194 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New CCNP [7:5264]
Just a big thank you all... passed CIT today with an 890. Be careful who you believe, I thought this exam was the hardest out of the four ?!!! Guess it just comes down to how lucky you are with the question database. I had very little ISDN and lots and lots of VTP/ISL questions On to Checkpoint and CCIE Written now.. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5264&t=5264 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX question... [7:5248]
We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term goal. However, for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to NAT from an outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. Thank you! -Rizzo -Original Message- From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM To: Rizzo Damian Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet connection to reach your LAN. Craig At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your help... > > > -Rizzo >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5265&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: single or mutlimode? [7:5224]
The closest is "show atm int atm x/0" - where x is the slot number. If you're referring to the CX-AIP card there is no command that shows. You have to physically inspect the card. A single mode card has ST connectors and a laser warning label. A multimode has SC connectors. The part numbers get interesting. A single mode is a CX-AIP-SS and a multimode is a CX-AIP-SM. The first "S" stands for SONET. So far, so good. However the singlemode card has UNI-155SM printed on its front. I don't have a multimode handy to view. Hopefully it says UNI-155MM. > -Original Message- > From: Andy Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: single or mutlimode? [7:5224] > > > Hi, > > May I know what is the command to check where the ATM > interface card is > multi-mode or single-mode? > > Thanks, > > Andy > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5266&t=5224 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird trace results [7:5259]
I've seen this before in networks using HSRP and no route caching. Is it causing a problem or just interesting? Darren At 11:59 AM 05/21/2001 -0400, Vincent Chong wrote: >I suggest that you check your routing table, that's what come out my mind. > >HTH >Vincent Chong > >""Watson, Rick, CTR, OUSDC"" All, >> >> When performing a trace on an IP address (for "testing purposes we'll use >> 10.1.2.3) this is the result I get: >> >> router#trace 10.1.2.3 >> >> Type escape sequence to abort. >> Tracing the route to 10.1.2.3 >> >> 1 192.1.2.2 4 msec >> 192.1.2.10 4 msec >> 192.1.2.2 4 msec >> 2 10.1.2.3 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec >> 3 * * * >> 4 * * * >> 5 * * * >> 6 * * * >> >> This to me shows that I am still trying to find a path to the IP >> address...but if the IP Address is returned at the 2nd hop, why is the >trace >> still continuing? I thought that it would stop when the trace has the >> "path". Also note that when a "ping" is performed it returns the infamous >> "." >> >> This has really got me perplexed, and any help would be greatly >appreciated. >> Maybe I am just not understanding something about the trace command/ICMP. >> >> Rick Watson >> Network Engineer >> Advanced Systems Development, Inc. >> OUSD(Comptroller) >> 703.697.5710 office >> 800.309.7782 pager ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Darren S. Crawford Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written "Providing the Power Operable Networks." *** "Ham and Eggs - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a pig." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5267&t=5259 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX question... [7:5248]
Yeah. It's called static NAT. And then you create an access-list to open services to that host. ""Rizzo Damian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term goal. However, > for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to NAT from an > outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. > > Thank you! > > -Rizzo > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM > To: Rizzo Damian > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] > > Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. > Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether > you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing > this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A > properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet > connection to reach your LAN. > > Craig > > At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to > >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact > >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have > >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They > >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way > >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP > >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your > help... > > > > > > -Rizzo > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5268&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IEEE 802 Standards for free [7:5249]
Awesome Already on my hard-disk. Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: "Oleg Mazurov" To: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 7:27 AM Subject: IEEE 802 Standards for free [7:5249] > -- quote > > No Charge to View IEEE 802 Standards > > The IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) has announced a pilot program > that > grants public access to view and download individual electronic (PDF) > IEEE > Local and Metropolitan Area Network (802) standards at no charge. New > IEEE > 802 standards will be added to the "Get IEEE 802" program, in PDF > format, > six months after publication. For more information, please visit > http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/getieee802.html > > -- quote > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5269&t=5249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe cisco [7:5270]
unsubscribe cisco Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5270&t=5270 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"network logon problems" [7:5271]
HELP!! I have an issue where it appears that multiple users cannot login. I receive the error "you will be logged on using a cached account" and once logged on, all network devices are available. I have ensured that on the catalyst 3548XL, all ports have Port fast enabled and I have also enabled STP to try and overcome the problem with no success. I have also moved the users to switches that have no issues and I still have the same problem. I also did a ipconfig /release renew and replaced the nic card and did a cold boot and warm boot on the machines with no success. All other user are fine and it is only affecting like 3 people. I even set them to auto, auto and the switch to auto,auto and this did not work either. I then tried 100 full and half and that did not work either. I also do not have port security enabled. It appears to be a network issue with the catalystr switches, but I am unsure as to the root of the problem.Don't know if this would do anything, but I did a NBTSTAT -RR from the command line as well. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5271&t=5271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help its very very urgent ..isl trunking [7:5272]
Hi I am facing problem in setting the isl trunk between 29900xL series switch and 7100 series router .The configuration is like i am using fast ethernet port 0/16 of switch for trunk . i configure it using commands as below for the switch i do.. conf t int vlan 1 ip adress 192.168.3.215 255.255.255.0 ip default-gateway 192.168.3.210 conf ter int fast eth0/16 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk encapsulation isl(right ) swicthport trunk allowed vlan all conf ter int fast0/15 switchport access vlan 2 spannig portfast exit also i did like vlan database vtp server vlan 2 now for the router conf t int fast0/0 no shutdown exit int fast0/0.1 encap isl 1 ip add 192.168 .3.210 255.255.255.0 exit int fast0/0.2 encap isl 2 ip add 192.168 .4.210 255.255.255.0 exit now the problem is i am not able to ping from router to interface 192.168.3.210 ..am i doing something wrong ..also after this if i do show cdp neigh the router see the switch but if i do it on switch it doesn't see the router ..please help . where i am doing wrong ..Please help Thanx in advance Regards Arun Sharma Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5272&t=5272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL using 11.2????? [7:5273]
Yes i think u need to upgrade to 11.8 ""Jeff"" wrote in message 9aricg$6i0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9aricg$6i0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am using a 4500 with a Fast Ethernet interface and would like to be able > to route between VLANs that are setup on my 2900. I don't have the option to > use encapsulation ISL using Ver 11.2 on the 4500. Do I have to upgrade to > 11.3 or something higher to be able to use ISL? > > Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5273&t=5273 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX question... [7:5248]
I'm not clear on what you're asking. Are you asking if the PIX can take a public IP and make it appear as a private IP on the internal network? The answer is yes, although you certainly want to be careful with this and I can't say that this is a recommended config. You'll need a config similar to the one below: nat (outside) 1 0 0 static (inside,outside) netmask 255.255.255.255 access-list permit ip any host For more info, reference http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v52/config/examples.htm#xtocid274896 Thanks, Craig At 12:14 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term goal. However, >for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to NAT from an >outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. > > Thank you! > > -Rizzo > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM >To: Rizzo Damian >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] > >Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. >Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether >you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing >this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A >properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet >connection to reach your LAN. > >Craig > >At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to > >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact > >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have > >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They > >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way > >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP > >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your >help... > > > > > > -Rizzo > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5274&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP question [7:4973]
Greetings All I think the context of some of the conversation is missing. BGP can handle any class of address, and in fact the BGP being run on the net at present (BGP4) is classless. The whole reason for CIDR was that it was intended to shrink the size of the BGP routing tables. SO them saying BGP will only work with class C is totally bogus! BUT Any ISP running BGP will implement a BGP policy, a hopefully uniform way in which they do BGP routing and handle BGP peering with their customers. There may be rules they have set up regarding how they do BGP, and you may be asking for something outside of the capabilities of their Policy. That doesn't mean BGP can't do it, it means they do not do that. As for your having a class A address. Who do you work for? There are only 127 class A addresses, mopst belonging to ISPs or the Government, or Reserved. I can think of one compnay who has a Class A, HP, they have the 15.0.0.0 network. However if you have a RFC1918 Class A that you're using that's a whole different story. What is your address range, and which ISP told you they couldn't handle class A addresses? Inquiring minds want to know Tom > >Rizzo Damian wrote: >> >> Hey folks, I have a quick question regarding BGP. We are looking for an >> alternative ISP for our Internet. One company we spoke with that offers a >> 100MB connection, said that in order to use their services we need to >> implement BGP on our Internet router. We currently utilize a class A >address >> on our Internet router, and they said BGP will only work with Class C >> addresses. I don't know enough about BGP yet to argue this fact, so I turn >> to you to ask if you agree or disagree with this comment? Thanks a lot! >> >> >> -Rizzo >> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Tom Pruneau Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 3 Van de Graff Drive Burlington Ma. 01803 24 Hr. Network Operations Center 800-436-8489 If you need to get a hold of me my hours are 8AM-4PM ET Mon-Fri --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- "Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5275&t=4973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird trace results [7:5259]
Like the other reply sez, a routing table check may be in order, you have multiple routes out of equal preference? Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 21 May 2001, Watson, Rick, CTR, OUSDC wrote: > All, > > When performing a trace on an IP address (for "testing purposes we'll use > 10.1.2.3) this is the result I get: > > router#trace 10.1.2.3 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Tracing the route to 10.1.2.3 > > 1 192.1.2.2 4 msec > 192.1.2.10 4 msec > 192.1.2.2 4 msec > 2 10.1.2.3 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec > 3 * * * > 4 * * * > 5 * * * > 6 * * * > > This to me shows that I am still trying to find a path to the IP > address...but if the IP Address is returned at the 2nd hop, why is the trace > still continuing? I thought that it would stop when the trace has the > "path". Also note that when a "ping" is performed it returns the infamous > "." > > This has really got me perplexed, and any help would be greatly appreciated. > Maybe I am just not understanding something about the trace command/ICMP. > > Rick Watson > Network Engineer > Advanced Systems Development, Inc. > OUSD(Comptroller) > 703.697.5710 office > 800.309.7782 pager ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5276&t=5259 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "network logon problems" [7:5271]
Has this ever worked? Did the problem just recently occur? If the user logs in with the cached credentials, verifies that he is able to access the correct network resources, logs off, logs back in, and still can't connect to the domain, then you can rule out spanning-tree calculations as the problem. Is the domain in which the user accounts reside available and properly configured on each of the problem workstations? I can only think of a few things that would cause this problem: 1) The correct domain is not available, or does not (or is unable to) respond within the time-out for some reason. 2) The correct domain is not configured properly in Windows. 3) The switch port is blocking for some reason. Craig At 01:01 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >HELP!! >I have an issue where it appears that multiple users cannot login. I >receive the error "you will be logged on using a cached account" and once >logged on, all network devices are available. I have ensured that on the >catalyst 3548XL, all ports have Port fast enabled and I have also enabled >STP to try and overcome the problem with no success. I have also moved the >users to switches that have no issues and I still have the same problem. I >also did a ipconfig /release renew and replaced the nic card and did a cold >boot and warm boot on the machines with no success. All other user are fine >and it is only affecting like 3 people. I even set them to auto, auto and >the switch to auto,auto and this did not work either. I then tried 100 full >and half and that did not work either. I also do not have port security >enabled. It appears to be a network issue with the catalystr switches, but >I am unsure as to the root of the problem.Don't know if this would do >anything, but I did a NBTSTAT -RR from the command line as well. Any help >would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5277&t=5271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "network logon problems" [7:5271]
Can you ping domain controllers by name on said boxes? Richard Tufaro, CCNA, MCSE, GSEC Network Engineer Anda Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "Robert Perez" 05/21 1:01 PM >>> HELP!! I have an issue where it appears that multiple users cannot login. I receive the error "you will be logged on using a cached account" and once logged on, all network devices are available. I have ensured that on the catalyst 3548XL, all ports have Port fast enabled and I have also enabled STP to try and overcome the problem with no success. I have also moved the users to switches that have no issues and I still have the same problem. I also did a ipconfig /release renew and replaced the nic card and did a cold boot and warm boot on the machines with no success. All other user are fine and it is only affecting like 3 people. I even set them to auto, auto and the switch to auto,auto and this did not work either. I then tried 100 full and half and that did not work either. I also do not have port security enabled. It appears to be a network issue with the catalystr switches, but I am unsure as to the root of the problem.Don't know if this would do anything, but I did a NBTSTAT -RR from the command line as well. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5278&t=5271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX question... [7:5248]
Actually it seems as if you understand exactly what I'm asking. Your idea is very similar to mine. However it didn't work unfortunately. Let me ask this another way, if you don't mind...You have an internet router which is directly connected to the external (un-trusted) interface of your PIX firewall. Basically I want to be able to access my internal LAN with private IP addresses from the Internet router with Public IP addresses. So I should be able to telnet onto my internet router and ping my privately held LAN. Forget about Security, I just want to know if it can be done. The static mapping doesn't seem to work. Probably because it require a one-to-one mapping no? Thanks for any help in advance! -Rizzo -Original Message- From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX question... [7:5248] I'm not clear on what you're asking. Are you asking if the PIX can take a public IP and make it appear as a private IP on the internal network? The answer is yes, although you certainly want to be careful with this and I can't say that this is a recommended config. You'll need a config similar to the one below: nat (outside) 1 0 0 static (inside,outside) netmask 255.255.255.255 access-list permit ip any host For more info, reference http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v52/config/exa mples.htm#xtocid274896 Thanks, Craig At 12:14 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term goal. However, >for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to NAT from an >outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. > > Thank you! > > -Rizzo > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM >To: Rizzo Damian >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] > >Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. >Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether >you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing >this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A >properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet >connection to reach your LAN. > >Craig > >At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to > >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact > >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have > >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They > >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way > >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP > >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your >help... > > > > > > -Rizzo > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5279&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R 2523 [7:5280]
Gang - Is USD.590 for above router without flash is worth buying? Thanks for your feedback. RamG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5280&t=5280 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "network logon problems" [7:5271]
Set up a ping once you can authenticate and let it run for a few hours (ping the DC or another client resource). If you see that you have packet loss that occurs on all the machines at the same time, you may begin to suspect STP buggering up. Do you have any loops that could be causing STP to prune certain connections ? ""Robert Perez"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > HELP!! > I have an issue where it appears that multiple users cannot login. I > receive the error "you will be logged on using a cached account" and once > logged on, all network devices are available. I have ensured that on the > catalyst 3548XL, all ports have Port fast enabled and I have also enabled > STP to try and overcome the problem with no success. I have also moved the > users to switches that have no issues and I still have the same problem. I > also did a ipconfig /release renew and replaced the nic card and did a cold > boot and warm boot on the machines with no success. All other user are fine > and it is only affecting like 3 people. I even set them to auto, auto and > the switch to auto,auto and this did not work either. I then tried 100 full > and half and that did not work either. I also do not have port security > enabled. It appears to be a network issue with the catalystr switches, but > I am unsure as to the root of the problem.Don't know if this would do > anything, but I did a NBTSTAT -RR from the command line as well. Any help > would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5281&t=5271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
This is a good link : ""Hamid"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > Can anybody tell me where I can find some sample configs for VoIP and a good > and complete document for it. > > Thanks > > Hamid > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5282&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISL using 11.2????? [7:5273]
Minimum Requiremnet, 11.3(1) T ""Arun"" Yes i think u need to upgrade to 11.8 > > ""Jeff"" wrote in message > 9aricg$6i0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9aricg$6i0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am using a 4500 with a Fast Ethernet interface and would like to be able > > to route between VLANs that are setup on my 2900. I don't have the option > to > > use encapsulation ISL using Ver 11.2 on the 4500. Do I have to upgrade to > > 11.3 or something higher to be able to use ISL? > > > > Thanks! > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5284&t=5273 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice over IP Documents and sample configs [7:5221]
Link included this time :) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/voice _c/index.htm Cisco has some very good resources on their site. I recommend searching CCO. ""Hamid"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > Can anybody tell me where I can find some sample configs for VoIP and a good > and complete document for it. > > Thanks > > Hamid > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5283&t=5221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: video conference [7:5217]
Kevin, At what speeds to the three locations access the Internet. ""kevin A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We have three location. All location have internet > access. We would like to have video conference setup > for all location. What are some good product out > there. Need to be easy to use and very good tech > support. How does this solution compare to Isdn > solution. Where can we buy these products. Thank you. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5285&t=5217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help its very very urgent ..isl trunking [7:5272]
What do you find in show vtp comand set ? Check your trunking mode in the catalyst. HTH Vincent Chong ""Arun"" Hi > I am facing problem in setting the isl trunk between 29900xL series switch > and 7100 series router .The configuration is like i am using fast ethernet > port 0/16 of switch for trunk . > i configure it using commands as below for the switch i do.. > > conf t > int vlan 1 > ip adress 192.168.3.215 255.255.255.0 > ip default-gateway 192.168.3.210 > > conf ter > int fast eth0/16 > switchport mode trunk > switchport trunk encapsulation isl(right ) > swicthport trunk allowed vlan all > conf ter > int fast0/15 > switchport access vlan 2 > spannig portfast > exit > also i did like > vlan database > vtp server > vlan 2 > > now for the router > conf t > int fast0/0 > no shutdown > exit > int fast0/0.1 > encap isl 1 > ip add 192.168 .3.210 255.255.255.0 > exit > int fast0/0.2 > encap isl 2 > ip add 192.168 .4.210 255.255.255.0 > exit > > > now the problem is i am not able to ping from router to interface > 192.168.3.210 ..am i doing something wrong ..also after this if i do > show cdp neigh the router see the switch but if i do it on switch it doesn't > see the router ..please help . > where i am doing wrong ..Please help > Thanx in advance > > > Regards > Arun Sharma > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5286&t=5272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT Looking for tech presentation tips [7:5111]
Ask your manager to send you to a class on doing presentations. You shouldn't be expected to do this without training any more than the junior engineers can do their jobs without training. In a training class, you will get a chance to practice in a safe environment. You will also learn how to handle questions. A helpful tip is to keep in mind that you are the expert. The students signed up for the class because they want to learn from you. If they get disruptive, the best approach is to stand right beside the disruptive person so all eyes in the classroom are drawn to him. To avoid the jitters, stick to decaf! ;-) Good luck! Priscilla At 06:37 AM 5/19/01, Rashid Lohiya wrote: >Hey Guys, > >I am a CCNP with 15 yrs of network experience, I am well travelled in the >course of my work. > >I think I generally know what I am doing, but have great difficulty >explaining myself to more junior staff. > >I can design/configure/troubleshoot networks and create accurate >diagrams/documents/reports etc. > >As I am the Senior in my department, my boss is expecting me to help train >the 6 x new trainees/graduates that are in the Network department. I once >had to give a presentation and I was shaking and stuttering and I must have >seemed insecure and unconfident. I was lost for words and really stressed. I >was sweating and confused, I knew the answers to their questions, but I just >could not explain to them. > >Any tips on how to overcome this? > >Rashid Lohiya >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >020 8509 2990 >07785 362626 >www.pioneer-computers.com >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5288&t=5111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccie written [7:5225]
I could see in your signature that you have CCNA and CCIE written. Don't you have to have CCNP before applying to CCIE tests? cya Daniel Lafraia ""Stefano Andrello"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > Let's go for the lab > > Stefano Andrello > CCIE written, CCNA > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5289&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX question... [7:5248]
I just realized that the config I sent through to the list didn't come through as I typed it. Probably because the filter is set to take out certain characters. Rizzo, hopefully you got the correct config in the message I sent you directly. Using the static command should work, provided that it's coupled with the appropriate NAT command (to tell the router where to NAT and in what direction) and the correct access-list command (needed to tell the router to pass traffic from the particular public IP identified in the static config). In your particular case, you'll need to setup a static command and access-list for each IP address in your modem pool. Refer again to the URL I sent in the previous message. It has specific configuration commands to do exactly what you're trying to do. Thanks, Craig At 01:32 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Actually it seems as if you understand exactly what I'm asking. Your idea is >very similar to mine. However it didn't work unfortunately. Let me ask this >another way, if you don't mind...You have an internet router which is >directly connected to the external (un-trusted) interface of your PIX >firewall. Basically I want to be able to access my internal LAN with private >IP addresses from the Internet router with Public IP addresses. So I should >be able to telnet onto my internet router and ping my privately held LAN. >Forget about Security, I just want to know if it can be done. The static >mapping doesn't seem to work. Probably because it require a one-to-one >mapping no? Thanks for any help in advance! > > > > -Rizzo > > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:12 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: PIX question... [7:5248] > >I'm not clear on what you're asking. Are you asking if the PIX can take a >public IP and make it appear as a private IP on the internal network? The >answer is yes, although you certainly want to be careful with this and I >can't say that this is a recommended config. You'll need a config similar >to the one below: > >nat (outside) 1 0 0 >static (inside,outside) > netmask 255.255.255.255 >access-list permit ip any host > >For more info, reference >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v52/config/exa >mples.htm#xtocid274896 > >Thanks, >Craig > >At 12:14 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term goal. However, > >for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to NAT from an > >outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. > > > > Thank you! > > > > -Rizzo > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM > >To: Rizzo Damian > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] > > > >Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. > >Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether > >you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing > >this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A > >properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet > >connection to reach your LAN. > > > >Craig > > > >At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > > >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to > > >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact > > >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have > > >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. >They > > >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a >way > > >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP > > >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your > >help... > > > > > > > > > -Rizzo > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5290&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help its very very urgent ..isl trunking [7:5272]
Hi I have checked the trunking mode on the port it shows it as encaps isl and i found this with show int fast0/16 switchport command Regards ""Vincent Chong"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What do you find in show vtp comand set ? > > Check your trunking mode in the catalyst. > > HTH > Vincent Chong > > ""Arun"" Hi > > I am facing problem in setting the isl trunk between 29900xL series switch > > and 7100 series router .The configuration is like i am using fast ethernet > > port 0/16 of switch for trunk . > > i configure it using commands as below for the switch i do.. > > > > conf t > > int vlan 1 > > ip adress 192.168.3.215 255.255.255.0 > > ip default-gateway 192.168.3.210 > > > > conf ter > > int fast eth0/16 > > switchport mode trunk > > switchport trunk encapsulation isl(right ) > > swicthport trunk allowed vlan all > > conf ter > > int fast0/15 > > switchport access vlan 2 > > spannig portfast > > exit > > also i did like > > vlan database > > vtp server > > vlan 2 > > > > now for the router > > conf t > > int fast0/0 > > no shutdown > > exit > > int fast0/0.1 > > encap isl 1 > > ip add 192.168 .3.210 255.255.255.0 > > exit > > int fast0/0.2 > > encap isl 2 > > ip add 192.168 .4.210 255.255.255.0 > > exit > > > > > > now the problem is i am not able to ping from router to interface > > 192.168.3.210 ..am i doing something wrong ..also after this if i do > > show cdp neigh the router see the switch but if i do it on switch it > doesn't > > see the router ..please help . > > where i am doing wrong ..Please help > > Thanx in advance > > > > > > Regards > > Arun Sharma > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5291&t=5272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "network logon problems" [7:5271]
Yes, but really what I was referring to was that the port will not pass traffic when it's trying to figure out the spanning-tree. Since you're set to portfast, the port should immediately go to forwarding. Since this is affecting only a few users on the network, I really can't see that STP is the issue. My instincts say that this is probably not a network issue; that it's more likely a Windows issue. However, there are some tests you can do to determine the point of failure: 1) Hookup a sniffer to the switch in question, mirror the problem port(s), fire up the workstations, and watch the traffic. Do you see the workstation trying to authenticate? Do you see responses from the DC? 2) If the DC is trying to respond, but the workstation isn't receiving the messages, look for errors on the switch ports. 3) If all traffic looks normal and you're not seeing any errors, start looking at your Windows configuration and/or logins. Make sure the users aren't selecting a domain that is no longer available on your network or something like that. Thanks, Craig At 01:43 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Yes and it just started last week, so according to what you have said, >spanning tree is ruled out. Now when you say the port is blocking, are you >referring to the port that station is connected to? > >-Original Message- >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:18 PM >To: Robert Perez >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: "network logon problems" [7:5271] > > >Has this ever worked? Did the problem just recently occur? >If the user logs in with the cached credentials, verifies that he is able >to access the correct network resources, logs off, logs back in, and still >can't connect to the domain, then you can rule out spanning-tree >calculations as the problem. >Is the domain in which the user accounts reside available and properly >configured on each of the problem workstations? >I can only think of a few things that would cause this problem: >1) The correct domain is not available, or does not (or is unable to) >respond within the time-out for some reason. >2) The correct domain is not configured properly in Windows. >3) The switch port is blocking for some reason. > >Craig > >At 01:01 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >HELP!! > >I have an issue where it appears that multiple users cannot login. I > >receive the error "you will be logged on using a cached account" and once > >logged on, all network devices are available. I have ensured that on the > >catalyst 3548XL, all ports have Port fast enabled and I have also enabled > >STP to try and overcome the problem with no success. I have also moved the > >users to switches that have no issues and I still have the same problem. I > >also did a ipconfig /release renew and replaced the nic card and did a cold > >boot and warm boot on the machines with no success. All other user are >fine > >and it is only affecting like 3 people. I even set them to auto, auto and > >the switch to auto,auto and this did not work either. I then tried 100 >full > >and half and that did not work either. I also do not have port security > >enabled. It appears to be a network issue with the catalystr switches, but > >I am unsure as to the root of the problem.Don't know if this would do > >anything, but I did a NBTSTAT -RR from the command line as well. Any help > >would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5293&t=5271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird trace results [7:5259]
I'd say there was an access-list or firewall blocking ICMP-echo replies, but not TTL expired messages. This is a guess. This is only a guess. In the event of a real answer, the statements just typed would have been followed by supporting documentation. Ejay Hire -Original Message- From: Watson, Rick, CTR, OUSDC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Weird trace results [7:5259] All, When performing a trace on an IP address (for "testing purposes we'll use 10.1.2.3) this is the result I get: router#trace 10.1.2.3 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.1.2.3 1 192.1.2.2 4 msec 192.1.2.10 4 msec 192.1.2.2 4 msec 2 10.1.2.3 0 msec 4 msec 4 msec 3 * * * 4 * * * 5 * * * 6 * * * This to me shows that I am still trying to find a path to the IP address...but if the IP Address is returned at the 2nd hop, why is the trace still continuing? I thought that it would stop when the trace has the "path". Also note that when a "ping" is performed it returns the infamous "." This has really got me perplexed, and any help would be greatly appreciated. Maybe I am just not understanding something about the trace command/ICMP. Rick Watson Network Engineer Advanced Systems Development, Inc. OUSD(Comptroller) 703.697.5710 office 800.309.7782 pager ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5292&t=5259 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIT Exam Cram Book [7:5294]
Does anyone out there have a copy of the CIT Exam Cram book ? Does anyone know where to obtain a copy. I can't seem to find a copy in print anywhere...[borders/barnes/etc.] thanks in advance Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5294&t=5294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN [7:5295]
Please help, I can't ping the remote side of this ISDN connection. Here is the config AND the log with debug ppp negotiation showing a PROTREJ(toward the end of output). Does that mean PPP is not working or setup right? When I ping the remote, the call is made to the customer but I don't get a reply. Also, if I show ip route after I ping(while the line is still up) I see a route like this 192.168.2.58/32 what does the /32 mean-I know it's subnet bits but how is it 32? Before the dialer makes the call if I show ip route I see it as 192.168.2.56/29(I'm 192.168.2.57 and customer is 192.168.2.58) The rest of the output show what happens when I ping the other side with debug ppp negotiation on. Thanks for any help. isdn switch-type basic-ni1 ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 192.168.2.57 255.255.255.248 encapsulation ppp isdn spid1 9258255950 isdn spid2 9258255957 dialer idle-timeout 57 dialer map ip 192.168.2.58 name customer 1904296 dialer-group 1 ppp chap hostname service ppp chap password xxx ping 192.168.2.58 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.58, timeout is 2 seconds: FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX question... [7:5248]
Correct- It can be done, but it does require a static mapping. One question to verify what you are asking: You want to ping from the internet to you lan like so: Ping from x.x.x.x to y.y.y.y, where x.x.x.x is an internet routable address, and y.y.y.y is a static translation of your private addresses, and not the private address themselves? andras -Original Message- From: Rizzo Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX question... [7:5248] Actually it seems as if you understand exactly what I'm asking. Your idea is very similar to mine. However it didn't work unfortunately. Let me ask this another way, if you don't mind...You have an internet router which is directly connected to the external (un-trusted) interface of your PIX firewall. Basically I want to be able to access my internal LAN with private IP addresses from the Internet router with Public IP addresses. So I should be able to telnet onto my internet router and ping my privately held LAN. Forget about Security, I just want to know if it can be done. The static mapping doesn't seem to work. Probably because it require a one-to-one mapping no? Thanks for any help in advance! -Rizzo -Original Message- From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX question... [7:5248] I'm not clear on what you're asking. Are you asking if the PIX can take a public IP and make it appear as a private IP on the internal network? The answer is yes, although you certainly want to be careful with this and I can't say that this is a recommended config. You'll need a config similar to the one below: nat (outside) 1 0 0 static (inside,outside) netmask 255.255.255.255 access-list permit ip any host For more info, reference http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v52/config/exa mples.htm#xtocid274896 Thanks, Craig At 12:14 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term goal. However, >for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to NAT from an >outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. > > Thank you! > > -Rizzo > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM >To: Rizzo Damian >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] > >Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. >Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether >you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing >this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A >properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet >connection to reach your LAN. > >Craig > >At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to > >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact > >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have > >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. They > >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a way > >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP > >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your >help... > > > > > > -Rizzo > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5296&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help its very very urgent ..isl trunking [7:5272]
First, trunk mode is desirable, non-neigotate, auto, none, something like that. Second, isl is an encapsulation method, it is not a trunk mode. I am pretty sure you have layer 2 problem, cdp command is layer 2 troubleshooting tool. HTH Vincent Chong ""Arun"" Hi > I have checked the trunking mode on the port it shows it as encaps isl > and i found this with show int fast0/16 switchport command > Regards > ""Vincent Chong"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > What do you find in show vtp comand set ? > > > > Check your trunking mode in the catalyst. > > > > HTH > > Vincent Chong > > > > ""Arun"" Hi > > > I am facing problem in setting the isl trunk between 29900xL series > switch > > > and 7100 series router .The configuration is like i am using fast > ethernet > > > port 0/16 of switch for trunk . > > > i configure it using commands as below for the switch i do.. > > > > > > conf t > > > int vlan 1 > > > ip adress 192.168.3.215 255.255.255.0 > > > ip default-gateway 192.168.3.210 > > > > > > conf ter > > > int fast eth0/16 > > > switchport mode trunk > > > switchport trunk encapsulation isl(right ) > > > swicthport trunk allowed vlan all > > > conf ter > > > int fast0/15 > > > switchport access vlan 2 > > > spannig portfast > > > exit > > > also i did like > > > vlan database > > > vtp server > > > vlan 2 > > > > > > now for the router > > > conf t > > > int fast0/0 > > > no shutdown > > > exit > > > int fast0/0.1 > > > encap isl 1 > > > ip add 192.168 .3.210 255.255.255.0 > > > exit > > > int fast0/0.2 > > > encap isl 2 > > > ip add 192.168 .4.210 255.255.255.0 > > > exit > > > > > > > > > now the problem is i am not able to ping from router to interface > > > 192.168.3.210 ..am i doing something wrong ..also after this if i do > > > show cdp neigh the router see the switch but if i do it on switch it > > doesn't > > > see the router ..please help . > > > where i am doing wrong ..Please help > > > Thanx in advance > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > Arun Sharma > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5298&t=5272 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sybex virtual lab e-trainer [7:5235]
Eric, I used it and it was pretty good for reinforcing knowlegde in the basic areas. It has about 8 module labs and you can complete them pretty quickly. I would rate it as more of a beginning stage resource for folks who have not had much experience. If you have experience in the basic areas already like configuring static and default routes, vlans etc, you may want to check into something else like RouterSIM Good Luck... "James, Eric L." wrote: > Has anyone used Sybex Virtual Lab E-Trainer for ccna studying? > > Eric James > Network Admin 2 > Franklin County Data Center > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5297&t=5235 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccie written [7:5225]
No, you do not need the Professional level certs before taking the CCIE written. You don't even need the CCNA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Lafraia Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ccie written [7:5225] I could see in your signature that you have CCNA and CCIE written. Don't you have to have CCNP before applying to CCIE tests? cya Daniel Lafraia ""Stefano Andrello"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > Let's go for the lab > > Stefano Andrello > CCIE written, CCNA > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5299&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: video conference [7:5217]
One big thing to consider is the potential for drops and jitter going over the Internet. We use Polycom FX units (Polyspan FX in Europe) to do this over our WAN (frame and MPLS). We have good quality most of the time, but do get some drops on occasion. Most of the time our VP's love it, but one or two start to complain if we drop even two or three packets during a call. The sound and video quality are great with the units above. Some questions: 1. Are all your sites connected by the same backbone ISP? 2. Do you use a VPN to connect the sites? 3. As the last question asked, what are the internet connection speeds? 4. How many hops between sites (or better, what is the response time?). andras -Original Message- From: Wojtek Zlobicki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: video conference [7:5217] Kevin, At what speeds to the three locations access the Internet. ""kevin A."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We have three location. All location have internet > access. We would like to have video conference setup > for all location. What are some good product out > there. Need to be easy to use and very good tech > support. How does this solution compare to Isdn > solution. Where can we buy these products. Thank you. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5300&t=5217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: "network logon problems" [7:5271]
Robert, Since you can see network devices then it's probably access to the domain controller SAMs database that is hosing your PCs. Especially if ipconfig/release renew found the DHCP server & received new IP info then TCP/IP is working fine, so timing issues are a low probability. It's winders. Check DHCP config, compare with config of working PCs for: Duplicate computer names (both current on net at same time) Incorrect domain name received from DHCP. NT box with name from old replaced PC. (old PC no longer on network - delete from Server Manager & wait 20 minutes then try to re-add computer as member of domain with admin account) Also check http://support.microsoft.com for this error message. - susan >>> "Robert Perez" 05/21 1:01 PM >>> HELP!! I have an issue where it appears that multiple users cannot login. I receive the error "you will be logged on using a cached account" and once logged on, all network devices are available. I have ensured that on the catalyst 3548XL, all ports have Port fast enabled and I have also enabled STP to try and overcome the problem with no success. I have also moved the users to switches that have no issues and I still have the same problem. I also did a ipconfig /release renew and replaced the nic card and did a cold boot and warm boot on the machines with no success. All other user are fine and it is only affecting like 3 people. I even set them to auto, auto and the switch to auto,auto and this did not work either. I then tried 100 full and half and that did not work either. I also do not have port security enabled. It appears to be a network issue with the catalystr switches, but I am unsure as to the root of the problem.Don't know if this would do anything, but I did a NBTSTAT -RR from the command line as well. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5302&t=5271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccie written [7:5225]
No, anyone can take the CCIE written, no prior tests or certs required. andras -Original Message- From: Daniel Lafraia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ccie written [7:5225] I could see in your signature that you have CCNA and CCIE written. Don't you have to have CCNP before applying to CCIE tests? cya Daniel Lafraia ""Stefano Andrello"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > Let's go for the lab > > Stefano Andrello > CCIE written, CCNA > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5301&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed CIT [7:5228]
You find them here: http://www.priscilla.com Of course! ;-) Priscilla At 08:45 AM 5/21/01, RCL wrote: >How do you find "Priscillas flash cards" > > >--- George Kadeishvili wrote: > > A traditional Thank All message > > Just passed CIT, and completed CCNP. > > Priscillas flash cards are great. But the exam > > itself sucks. Routing was > > by far the best one in CCNP track. > > Now have to start thinking about CCIE writen. > > Regards > > George > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >= >= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = >Please send replys to: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices >http://auctions.yahoo.com/ >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5303&t=5228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX question... [7:5248]
How about conduit statements allowing the outside addresses access to the inside addresses. (Or access lists for the newer OS versions.) You could run it wide open or be specific to addresses and ports. > -Original Message- > From: Rizzo Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: PIX question... [7:5248] > > > Actually it seems as if you understand exactly what I'm > asking. Your idea is > very similar to mine. However it didn't work unfortunately. > Let me ask this > another way, if you don't mind...You have an internet router which is > directly connected to the external (un-trusted) interface of your PIX > firewall. Basically I want to be able to access my internal > LAN with private > IP addresses from the Internet router with Public IP > addresses. So I should > be able to telnet onto my internet router and ping my > privately held LAN. > Forget about Security, I just want to know if it can be done. > The static > mapping doesn't seem to work. Probably because it require a one-to-one > mapping no? Thanks for any help in advance! > > > > -Rizzo > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: PIX question... [7:5248] > > I'm not clear on what you're asking. Are you asking if the > PIX can take a > public IP and make it appear as a private IP on the internal > network? The > answer is yes, although you certainly want to be careful with > this and I > can't say that this is a recommended config. You'll need a > config similar > to the one below: > > nat (outside) 1 0 0 > static (inside,outside) > netmask 255.255.255.255 > access-list permit ip any host > > For more info, reference > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_ > v52/config/exa > mples.htm#xtocid274896 > > Thanks, > Craig > > At 12:14 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > >We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term > goal. However, > >for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to > NAT from an > >outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. > > > > Thank you! > > > > -Rizzo > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM > >To: Rizzo Damian > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] > > > >Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. > >Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to > consider whether > >you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet > router. Reducing > >this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN > solution. A > >properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any > dial-up Internet > >connection to reach your LAN. > > > >Craig > > > >At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > > >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses > (outside) to > > >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically > the exact > > >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are > going to have > > >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public > IP address. > They > > >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our > LAN. Is there a > way > > >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a > private IP > > >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank > you for your > >help... > > > > > > > > > -Rizzo > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5304&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccie written [7:5225]
No. Their are no pre-requisites to the CCIE Certification. Ejay Hire -Original Message- From: Daniel Lafraia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ccie written [7:5225] I could see in your signature that you have CCNA and CCIE written. Don't you have to have CCNP before applying to CCIE tests? cya Daniel Lafraia ""Stefano Andrello"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > Let's go for the lab > > Stefano Andrello > CCIE written, CCNA > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5305&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ccie written [7:5225]
There is no prerequisite to taking the CCIE. While doing CCNP first might be good preparation, it is not required. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Lafraia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ccie written [7:5225] > > > I could see in your signature that you have CCNA and CCIE > written. Don't you > have to have CCNP before applying to CCIE tests? > > cya > Daniel Lafraia > > > ""Stefano Andrello"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > > Let's go for the lab > > > > Stefano Andrello > > CCIE written, CCNA > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5307&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccie written [7:5225]
sigh. ""Daniel Lafraia"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I could see in your signature that you have CCNA and CCIE written. Don't you > have to have CCNP before applying to CCIE tests? > > cya > Daniel Lafraia > > > ""Stefano Andrello"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Today I passed my CCIE written, score 95%. > > Thanks to the group and to boson test. > > Let's go for the lab > > > > Stefano Andrello > > CCIE written, CCNA > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5306&t=5225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: R 2523 [7:5280]
Depends on how much you will have to pay for replacement Flash. Also where will you obtain an IOS image? 2523's are going on eBay for $800-900 with 16 MB Flash and 8-16 MB DRAM. A recent auction on eBay sold compatible 8 MB Flash for the 2500s at $60 each. > -Original Message- > From: RamG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: R 2523 [7:5280] > > > Gang - Is USD.590 for above router without flash is worth buying? > > Thanks for your feedback. > > RamG > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5308&t=5280 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newbie question [7:5309]
My ISP just placed a new router outside of our PIX 515, and now, every 4 hours, the PIX loses connectivity and needs to be rebooted. Is this an ARP problem (is it looking for the mac of the old server)? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5309&t=5309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 Server Architechture/ Data Organization [7:5310]
Hi Everyone, I am in the process of reorginizing this my network, Prior to me everything was just put everywhere and I need to come up with a full proof plan. My questions are: -For a 60 user enviorment how many servers do I need to run Active Directory on, Should AD be on a dedicated box? -How should I organize data, (users / corp data/ Fin Data) What restrictions should I put on these shares? -DNS, Wins, DHCP, Exchange, SQL, IIS5, Inoculate, Backup Exec, Print Services, What should be on dedicated boxes what shouldnt? TIA, Kevin _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5310&t=5310 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vlans 1-1000 are automatically transported [7:5311]
Comrades, I have one quick question that I have not been able understand so far... can someone please help with an answer or a direction pointer. I appreciate your help. (1) CAT5509 as a reference (2) Cisco "Building Cisco Multilayer Switched Networks," book by Karen Webb, page 106. The Cisco book states ~"vlans 1-1000 are automatically transported... even if a range was specified... one must use the "clear" command to remove the unnecessary vlans". When two test vlans are added to the 5509 and then the "show vlan" command is used, I do not see where "unnecessary' vlans have been added. Note that example: 1 default active 3 3/1-12 5/1-2 7/1-3 2 jr_vlan2 active 146 5/9-16 3 jr_vlan3 active 146 5/17-25 ... John L. Reel Intel-Gigabit Lab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5311&t=5311 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN [7:5295]
Michelle, Check this ISDN debug ppp site. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/112/chapter17.htm#ISDNOUT , ISDN Outbound Calling section. Your log was not attached to the message so we don't know what happened. Also, try adding ppp authentication chap to your config under your BRI0/0 interface and see if it makes any difference. Both sides need the same encap usernames/passwords, compression, authentication method. good luck! - susan -Original Message- From: Michelle Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN [7:5295] Please help, I can't ping the remote side of this ISDN connection. Here is the config AND the log with debug ppp negotiation showing a PROTREJ(toward the end of output). Does that mean PPP is not working or setup right? When I ping the remote, the call is made to the customer but I don't get a reply. Also, if I show ip route after I ping(while the line is still up) I see a route like this 192.168.2.58/32 what does the /32 mean-I know it's subnet bits but how is it 32? Before the dialer makes the call if I show ip route I see it as 192.168.2.56/29(I'm 192.168.2.57 and customer is 192.168.2.58) The rest of the output show what happens when I ping the other side with debug ppp negotiation on. Thanks for any help. isdn switch-type basic-ni1 ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 192.168.2.57 255.255.255.248 encapsulation ppp isdn spid1 9258255950 isdn spid2 9258255957 dialer idle-timeout 57 dialer map ip 192.168.2.58 name customer 1904296 dialer-group 1 ppp chap hostname service ppp chap password xxx ping 192.168.2.58 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.58, timeout is 2 seconds: FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5312&t=5295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIT Exam Cram Book [7:5294]
e=Book&prodID=51773969 http://shop.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=0JY02VDQIQ&m scssid=T2QP66PW0SM18LRP0JSELXN3QLCS2T6D&isbn=1576106810 http://www1.fatbrain.com/asp/bookinfo/bookinfo.asp?theisbn=1576106810&vm= http://www.elgrande.com/elgrande/book_product.asp?sku=856814&session=C8HAJTN2 9ESR2PCG00A4005R0K115PJ0&searchstr=exam+cram+ccnp&smethod=contain&criteria=ti tle (watch the word wrap) Adam Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Before you criticize someone, make sure to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you do criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. - Original Message - From: ; "Michael (CAP, AFS, Contractor)" To: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:32 AM Subject: CIT Exam Cram Book [7:5294] > Does anyone out there have a copy of the CIT Exam Cram book ? Does anyone > know where to obtain a copy. I can't seem to find a copy in print > anywhere...[borders/barnes/etc.] > > thanks in advance > > Mike > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5313&t=5294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vlans 1-1000 are automatically transported [7:5311]
Try using "sh trunk" to see what you're looking for. Darren At 03:11 PM 05/21/2001 -0400, Reel, JohnX wrote: >Comrades, > >I have one quick question that I have not been able understand so far... can >someone please help with an answer or a direction pointer. I appreciate your >help. > >(1) CAT5509 as a reference >(2) Cisco "Building Cisco Multilayer Switched Networks," book by Karen Webb, >page 106. > > >The Cisco book states ~"vlans 1-1000 are automatically transported... even >if a range was specified... one must use the "clear" command to remove the >unnecessary vlans". > >When two test vlans are added to the 5509 and then the "show vlan" command >is used, I do not see where "unnecessary' vlans have been added. Note that >example: > >1 default active 3 3/1-12 > 5/1-2 > 7/1-3 >2 jr_vlan2 active 146 5/9-16 >3 jr_vlan3 active 146 5/17-25 >... > >John L. Reel >Intel-Gigabit Lab >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Darren S. Crawford Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written "Providing the Power Operable Networks." *** "Ham and Eggs - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a pig." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5316&t=5311 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
startup config issue [7:5314]
If I reload router it doesn't bring up the startup config. What should I check or change to fix this. Thanks everyone. Justin Lofton Account Executive/CCNA Tredent Data Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (818) 222-3770 http://www.tredent.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5314&t=5314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Newbie question [7:5309]
Yes it's an ARP issue. I bet your PIX has the following line: arp timeout 14400 (equal 4 hours in seconds) The other parameters for timeout settings are something like the following: timeout xlate 1:00:00 conn 1:00:00 udp 0:02:00 timeout rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute Darren At 03:08 PM 05/21/2001 -0400, Roger wrote: >My ISP just placed a new router outside of our PIX 515, and now, every 4 >hours, the PIX loses connectivity and needs to be rebooted. Is this an ARP >problem (is it looking for the mac of the old server)? Any info would be >appreciated. Thanks. >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Darren S. Crawford Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written "Providing the Power Operable Networks." *** "Ham and Eggs - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a pig." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5315&t=5309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: startup config issue [7:5314]
Hi! press break while booting up, and check the config register... -- cU, Laszlo Csosza ""Justin Lofton"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If I reload router it doesn't bring up the startup config. What should I > check or change to fix this. > > Thanks everyone. > > Justin Lofton > Account Executive/CCNA > Tredent Data Systems > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (818) 222-3770 > http://www.tredent.com/ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5317&t=5314 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: "network logon problems" [7:5271]
I don't believe that it is a catalyst problem, I think it is a MS problem. Try logging in with a different account on same station, then try logging in with same account on different station. Users are just logging in using a cached account. Try this also, create a new account then log in at the station using this account and see if you can authenticate to the domain. Obviously that account won't be cached at the station. It has been sooolong since I worked an NT domain but I beleive there is a check box having to do with a slow network connection that will use the cached account somewhere. Thank You, Don Johnson Engineering Adelphia Communications Corp. P# 814-260-3259 office P# 814-274-9391 lab F# 814-260-3227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- - Original Message - From: "Robert Perez" To: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:01 AM Subject: "network logon problems" [7:5271] > HELP!! > I have an issue where it appears that multiple users cannot login. I > receive the error "you will be logged on using a cached account" and once > logged on, all network devices are available. I have ensured that on the > catalyst 3548XL, all ports have Port fast enabled and I have also enabled > STP to try and overcome the problem with no success. I have also moved the > users to switches that have no issues and I still have the same problem. I > also did a ipconfig /release renew and replaced the nic card and did a cold > boot and warm boot on the machines with no success. All other user are fine > and it is only affecting like 3 people. I even set them to auto, auto and > the switch to auto,auto and this did not work either. I then tried 100 full > and half and that did not work either. I also do not have port security > enabled. It appears to be a network issue with the catalystr switches, but > I am unsure as to the root of the problem.Don't know if this would do > anything, but I did a NBTSTAT -RR from the command line as well. Any help > would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5318&t=5271 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM in Lab [7:5319]
Ive never worked with ATM before and would like to start playing with it in my home lab. Do I need to buy an LS1010 (or LS100) or can I do all the configuration stuff that is necessary with an MC3810? I havent really been able to differentiate between the two products all that much yet (of course I dont have any ATM xp either). Ben __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5319&t=5319 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: my head hurts! (Terminal server) [7:5245]
George, Sorry if this hits twice. When someone on that router types in CONNECT a menu will be displayed. The 'text' is what's displayed in the menu so they would see... 1 Cisco 2912 LAN Switch #3 2 Cisco 2912 LAN Switch #4 If they type in a 1 it will execute the command associated with 1 (ie. telnet 10.1.1.12 2001) This doesn't telnet 'out' e0, it telnet's to 10.1.1.12 port 2001. Port 2001 just happens to be the first async port on a 2511. Look in the doc's for more information on this. Basically if someone chooses 1 then they will be connected to whatever's physically connected to that first async cable (probably the console on Lan Switch 3). Good luck! --Alan George Dodds wrote: > > Can someone explain how the following excerpt from a > menu on a 2511 being used as a terminal server works! > > I know that traffic is being passed through e0 using > the specified port, but i need to know how the hell it > manages to get to the specified switches. > > menu CONNECT text 1 Cisco 2912 LAN Switch #3 > menu CONNECT command 1 telnet 10.1.1.12 2001 > menu CONNECT text 2 Cisco 2912 LAN Switch #4 > menu CONNECT command 2 telnet 10.1.1.12 2002 > > > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 10.1.1.12 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > no ip directed-broadcast > no ip proxy-arp > no cdp enable > > Thanks in advance from one of the ignorant masses!! > > > > = > George Dodds > > CCNA, MCP > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5321&t=5245 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX question... [7:5248]
OK kids. Allowing packets from a lower security level interface to a higher security level interface requires a conduit or access list. So yes, it can be done. I wouldn't forget about security though. ;^) D. At 01:50 PM 05/21/2001 -0400, Rizzo Damian wrote: >Actually it seems as if you understand exactly what I'm asking. Your idea is >very similar to mine. However it didn't work unfortunately. Let me ask this >another way, if you don't mind...You have an internet router which is >directly connected to the external (un-trusted) interface of your PIX >firewall. Basically I want to be able to access my internal LAN with private >IP addresses from the Internet router with Public IP addresses. So I should >be able to telnet onto my internet router and ping my privately held LAN. >Forget about Security, I just want to know if it can be done. The static >mapping doesn't seem to work. Probably because it require a one-to-one >mapping no? Thanks for any help in advance! > > > > -Rizzo > > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:12 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: PIX question... [7:5248] > >I'm not clear on what you're asking. Are you asking if the PIX can take a >public IP and make it appear as a private IP on the internal network? The >answer is yes, although you certainly want to be careful with this and I >can't say that this is a recommended config. You'll need a config similar >to the one below: > >nat (outside) 1 0 0 >static (inside,outside) > netmask 255.255.255.255 >access-list permit ip any host > >For more info, reference >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v52/config/exa >mples.htm#xtocid274896 > >Thanks, >Craig > >At 12:14 PM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >>We are aware of the VPN solution and that is our long term goal. However, >>for the moment, all I need to know is if it is possible to NAT from an >>outside (not trusted) interface to an inside (trusted) interface. >> >> Thank you! >> >> -Rizzo >> >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Craig Columbus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM >>To: Rizzo Damian >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: PIX question... [7:5248] >> >>Sounds like a VPN is your best bet. >>Should you decide to implement the VPN, you may want to consider whether >>you still need to maintain the modem pool on the Internet router. Reducing >>this cost could help justify the cost of implementing a VPN solution. A >>properly authenticated VPN user should be able to use any dial-up Internet >>connection to reach your LAN. >> >>Craig >> >>At 10:15 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: >> >Hey all, is it possible to translate public IP addresses (outside) to >> >private IP addresses (inside) on a PIX firewall. Basically the exact >> >opposite of what's usually performed on a firewall. We are going to have >> >users dial in to our internet router and receive a Public IP address. >They >> >have to get through our firewall to gain access to our LAN. Is there a >way >> >to translate the Public IP address they will obtain into a private IP >> >address used by our LAN so they can access it? I thank you for your >>help... >> > >> > >> > -Rizzo >> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Darren S. Crawford Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant - CCNA, CCIE Written "Providing the Power Operable Networks." *** "Ham and Eggs - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a pig." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5322&t=5248 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed BCMSN [7:4546]
Please don't get me wrong, I am not advocating memory work without any hands on experience. I just wanted to correct the person who mentioned that one requires practical experience to pass the BCMSN exam. If I had a choice, I would have loved to build a multilayer swithching lab to practice on, but the truth of the matter is that I did not have the resources. If I had put that obstacle in my path , I would have never gotten my CCNP.I pursued my CCNP for the purpose of gaining sound fundamentals in networking issues and to see the broader picture. I strongly believe that if want to pursue a certification to prove your salt in "hands on" work, go take the CCIE. I really wonder why employers don't set up a lab tests to select job canidates. Kevin Schwantz ""John Andrews"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I guess I will be first. I am also memorizing and studying in hopes of > passing my switching exam with no experience. I currently work for a very > small company with ten 95 computers and 15 or so unix machines on a unix > server. My main job is to unsnag people who lock their computers up and to > print reports. But, I am studying for my tests. Hopefully one day, when I > finish I can gain some real networking experience. In the meantime, I am > learning the unix language and have learned great self restraint of the > defined art of self control when wanting to strangle users. You just keep > plugging away, but, noone I don't think would ever say that practical > networking experience is not a valuable asset to have..it's just that some > of > us don't have a choice. But you don't quit trying. > > And that's my two cents: > John Andrews > > >= Original Message From "Sudarshan Narasimhachari" > = > >Kevin et all Brain dump people out there, > > > >I have no comments on your ability to memorise a whole book. What we > >are talking here about is real achievements. I hope people in this > >group will agree with me in the difference between real experience and > >knowledge and just brain dumps. > > > >I know there are going to be fumes on this now. Let them come:-) > > > >- Sudarshan > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Kevin Schwantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:06 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Passed BCMSN [7:4546] > > > > > >I passed BCMS with only a book. Never configured a switch before. You > >just > >have to memorise it all. > > > > > >Kevin > > > > > >__ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices > >http://auctions.yahoo.com/ > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Have a great day! > John A > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5247&t=4546 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
