Re: Graphing link status (off the topic) [7:9759]
Art, Given the nature of the data, you could graph it as a gauge integer(Options: gauge) but the graph really wouldn't give you any practical data (boring to look at and easy to miss the blips). Besides, it wouldn't give you uptime - just the average of the values gathered. In broad terms, you're asking MRTG to graph binary data. Yes, I know there are 3 values, but the principle is the same. Also there's the matter of timeliness. With MRTG, the info would only be graphed at whatever interval you set MRTG to use (default = 5 min) and if there's no response, the value is automatically zero. SNMP traps are more timely. It sounds like what you need is to set up a monitoring program or syslog server to gather traps and set up the router to send them when any of these conditions occur. There are any number of programs out there that handle this (including some freeware). If what you're looking for is some way to monitor/record uptime... well, you have options. You could write a script to parse the syslog info and do up the information for you in a nice presentable format, you could parse the information by hand, or you can use a network monitoring program like ipMonitor, WhatsUp Gold, SNMPc, etc... Personally, I prefer scripts. More flexible and lets you post the info to an internal web page automatically in whatever format you like. ...I'm a big fan of automated administrivia. Saves time and makes you look like you can walk on water. :-) HTH, Karen *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 6/25/2001 at 8:04 AM art news wrote: >Hello all, > >I need assistance in graphing the status of my frame relay subinterfaces (up >and down status of link). There is frcircuitstate which corresponds to >1.3.6.1.2.1.10.32.2.1.3.2.x where x=dlci > >When the subinterface is up it gives a value of 2 >When the subinterface is down it gives a value of 3 >and when the serial is down it gives a value of 1 > >How can I use this info. to graph in MRTG. > >Thanks in advance. >Art >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9936&t=9759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any one want talk about alteon?? [7:9720]
webos 8.0.54 ""Gil Shulman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What version? > > -Original Message- > From: amanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 5:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9935&t=9720 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Got A Side Job and am baffled by one client...... [7:9612]
Shot in the dark: I read something in a M$ publication today that a WinModem not on the HCL can cause serious networking problems. I have yet to validate this, but your problem is goofy. I would have guessed NAT overloading as well. There's always the "proper" way to repair M$ problems... Format and Reinstall! Good Luck. Post a resolution when you get one. Nate ""George Murphy CCNP"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > =0D > Hey Folks... I just wanted to get your opinions on this:=0D > =0D > I snagged a side job (pays great) and am wondering about a situation. Ok.= > =2E. here goes. One PC out of about 15 that work great can see Server res= > ources but cannot browse the web or ping outside. They are using an NT 2k= > Server, 2900XL switch and CELLPipe router to the web via ADSL. I have t= > ried sitching drives, copycatting configs from other clients, reinstallin= > g stack and client (no domain just a workgroup) and even a different NIC,= > still no web for this node. I have checked th router and switch and ther= > are no filters and no access lists yada yada yada... The only clue i= > s the last group they had in did not resolve the server backup issues and= > left things unresolvd so they let them go this makes me think there = > may be some trickery in her since these folks left the router exposed to = > the web with no password (which I have fixed) and were able to access unt= > il yesterday. I guess my question in retrospect is there some way to bloc= > k the bosses PC from TCP/IP via MAC address that I am rusty or unknowledg= > able of? What arer your thoughts The client is DHCP and the serve= > r is no domain but providing DHCP and workgroup..? > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type Image/jpeg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9934&t=9612 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to clear counters on a specific port. [7:9896]
Hi You can issue the clear counters command for a specific port e.g clear counters fastEthernet 0/1 cheers -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] UUnet Africa http://www.uunet.co.ke Washington Rico wrote: > Anyone know how to clear counters for a specific port. I need to clear > counters on a specific port instead of clear all the counters on the > switch. How do you do that. Switch is Cat 6500. > > Regards, > Rico > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] UUnet Africa http://www.uunet.co.ke Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9933&t=9896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help in hooking up the console port to a computer on a [7:9932]
Don't feel insulted by this, cuz I did it for about an hour once... Is your Palm HotSync Manager running and tying up the serial port? Also, if you are using SerialB, do you have it set in the BIOS for Infrared (thereby disabling the physical port)? Nate ""Ajay Pandey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am using a roll-over cable.. > > > ""Ajay Pandey"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > I just bought a used Cisco 2520 router and as per instructions, I connect > > the console port using the RJ-45 cable to a DB9 (I also tried connecting > it > > to a DB25) and connected it into my computer running Win Me. I setup the > > hyperterminal according to the setting, Baud rate etc., given on the > online > > documentation and it said it is connected. > > But there was no CLI of the router, also it remained connected even if I > > powered off the router. > > > > Please help me in troubleshooting this as I am new to Cisco hardware. > > > > Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9932&t=9932 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: access-list /TCP & UDP ! [7:9638]
Here's the "Official" ports list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers Nate ""Ron Goff Jr"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > First I'll give you links to port assignments and documents that will > help, then I'll give you my understanding of the workings of TCP and UDP (if > you don't mind doing a little reading). The first link is to a listing of > UDP/TCP ports: > http://www.networkice.com/advice/Exploits/Ports/ > Additionally, I would advise you to go to the Cisco Web site www.cisco.com, > and investigate the details concerning TCP/IP. I'm sure you've already > checked there, and I don't mean to offend you by indicating this, however > the issue concerning ports and transport protocols is vague and needs to be > investigated at length in order for someone to gain a clear understanding. > That being said, here is what I personally know (once again, this is not > gospel, this is one persons understanding). > We first have to agree that TCP/IP does not directly correlate to the OSI > Reference Model. If we can agree on that, then we can discuss how an > application or service talks to the TCP/IP protocol, and how TCP and UDP > relate to port assignments. If you looked at the first link I indicated, > you will see that there are no specific listings for TCP or UDP ports, only > listings for services that operate over certain ports. There are two kinds > of port assignments: those that are well known and used to provide specific > services using the TCP/IP suite as an application level service, and those > ports that are negotiated for a particular application that exists outside > of TCP/IP. An analogy would be: If you choose to Telnet into another > computer, you are using an application which is part of the TCP/IP suite. > The innerworkings of Telnet are included in the TCP/IP specification. If, > however, you are going to connect to a server to play Quake III or something > of that nature, you are using TCP/IP only as a transport. Quake III is an > application, but is not an application that is contained in the TCP/IP > suite. To that end, you are not using TCP/IP on the Application, > Presentation, or Session layers of the OSI, but rather the Quake III > application uses TCP or UDP as a transport for communication. In the case > of Quake III, it provides it's own application, presentation, and session > layer information, and then communicates with the TCP/IP protocol, telling > it whether it needs connection-oriented or connectionless transmission. And > now the discussion turns to which ports are TCP (connection-oriented) ports > and which ports are UDP (connectionless) ports. > Regarding the issue of which ports are UDP and which are TCP; I've never > seen a document which explains this to my satisfaction. This is where my > logic (and or the failure there of) comes into play. My understanding is > that TCP and UDP do not have port assignments. If you are using an > application that is outside of the services of the TCP/IP protocol suite, > the application must request either a connection-oriented (TCP), or > connectionless (UDP) transport. If this train of thought is correct, then > it doesn't matter what port an application requests, it will be able to > request either TCP or UDP based on whether the application needs a > connection-oriented or connectionless transport. There are (by RFC > specification I believe) 1024 well known ports. The first 1024 have been > reserved (so to speak)for the TCP/IP protocol. This logic might indicate > that these ports (for the purposes of security and convenience) have been > designated as either UDP or TCP, however I'm not sure this is the case. I > will give you an example, however, to clarify this point. FTP is known as a > TCP/IP suite protocol known to be a File Transfer Protocol. It is also > known to use the Transport Control Protocol (TCP) as its transport (end to > end connection)and actually uses two ports: 20 and 21. If you look at those > ports, one controls data flow and the other actually transmits data. This > is important in that when we use FTP we are declaring that the information > being sent is critical and we need confirmation that it is being received > correctly. Conversly, TFTP uses port 69. The Trivial File Transport > Protocol uses UDP, a connectionless protocol, which assumes that the data is > not critical. In the case of UDP, we're saying that we'd like to send > information, but It's not neccessary to acknowledge it. Both these > protocols are part of the TCP/IP suite, and both use a different transport > method. My question would be in regards to the 1024 well known ports and > whether there are assignments specifically designated to the TCP/IP suite, > or is rather just a matter that applications developed using these ports use > this standard for the sake of continuity? > If you wish to extend this discussion, we could consider why anyone would > consider
cisco [7:9930]
when i start ncc broker is down error comes what does it mean plz tell kaushalenders Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9930&t=9930 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Administrative Distance [7:9921]
Thank you very much Kevin!!! Let's say I assign a administrative distance of 180 to a static route (backup route). It should not show up and be used in "show ip route", given that the default route is active. If I redistribute this static route (assigned with admin distance of 180) to the EIGRP, will it still be in passive mode and won't overide the default route on the EIGRP Autonomous System??? Again, Thanks alot!!! "Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Yes, > > This is normally called a "floating static" > > Configure the static with a higher admin distance. While the default route > is valid, the static will not show up in "sh ip route". > > Once the default fails, the floating static route will be installed into the > routing table and it will be visible in "sh ip route". > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: "Thomas" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, 26 June, 2001 00:21 > Subject: Administrative Distance [7:9921] > > > > Hi All, > > > > Is it possible to assign the "Administrative Distance" to a static route > > (default = 1)? In my network, the default route on a router is learned > > through EIGRP (D*EX 0.0.0.0/24) with Administrative Distance of 170. I > > would like to add a static route on this router for backup; however, this > > static route will be chosen over the default route learned through EIGRP, > > since the Administrative Distance for static route is 1. I wonder if it > is > > possible to raise the Administrative Distance of the static route to be > > greater than 170 so that It will only be chosen as a secondary route, in > > case the default route is down Thanks All!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9929&t=9921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Administrative Distance [7:9921]
yes, entirely possible, in fact, practiced quite often. those kinds of static routes are called 'floating statics' the syntax of the static route statement is ip route i.i.i.i s.s.s.s n.n.n.n ad where i.i.i.i is the IP network you wish to connect to s.s.s.s is the subnet mask of that network n.n.n.n is the address that you want the route to point to, or the interface that you want to use ad is the administrative distance. for example, ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0 220 would create a floating default route out serial 0 with an administrative distance of 220. Thus, it would only take effect if your routing protocol that advertised 0.0.0.0 lost its route. -e- - Original Message - From: Thomas To: Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:21 PM Subject: Administrative Distance [7:9921] > Hi All, > > Is it possible to assign the "Administrative Distance" to a static route > (default = 1)? In my network, the default route on a router is learned > through EIGRP (D*EX 0.0.0.0/24) with Administrative Distance of 170. I > would like to add a static route on this router for backup; however, this > static route will be chosen over the default route learned through EIGRP, > since the Administrative Distance for static route is 1. I wonder if it is > possible to raise the Administrative Distance of the static route to be > greater than 170 so that It will only be chosen as a secondary route, in > case the default route is down Thanks All!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9928&t=9921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Administrative Distance [7:9921]
ip route a.b.c.d w.x.y.z dentination.address distance ( higher than the distance of the routing protocol in question ) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r /iprprt2/1rdindep.htm#xtocid279708 definitely watch the word wrap make sense? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Administrative Distance [7:9921] Hi All, Is it possible to assign the "Administrative Distance" to a static route (default = 1)? In my network, the default route on a router is learned through EIGRP (D*EX 0.0.0.0/24) with Administrative Distance of 170. I would like to add a static route on this router for backup; however, this static route will be chosen over the default route learned through EIGRP, since the Administrative Distance for static route is 1. I wonder if it is possible to raise the Administrative Distance of the static route to be greater than 170 so that It will only be chosen as a secondary route, in case the default route is down Thanks All!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9927&t=9921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake? [7:9926]
Thanks to everyone for their feedback. After Michael's post, I guess I'm stuck with my 70... oh well. Time to study for the Lab. Also Michael: Can you post a URL to CCSI cert info? I can't find it on Cisco's website. Also, if you care to, can you elaborate on your own personal quest to teach this stuff? Nate ""Michael Bambic"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well this should take a load off your mind, Cisco doesn't allow retakes > for better scores and now the Vue testing software puts that rule into > effect. We just got an Email from Vue at my place which is a Vue testing > center concerning that very thing. Everybody thought I caused it because > I took the CCNA again to get a better score to qualify for CCSI. I had > never seen a no retake policy from Cisco but there it was from Vue. > Luckily it was a Vue spam to every testing center and it wasn't me who > caused the problem... > :) > At least I got a 978 on the retake, got a 914 first time around in 6 > minutes... > > Mike Bambic > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Peter Slow > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake? > [7:9789] > > > My honest reccomendation would be to study for it like you were going to > take it again, and then not. > > study till you know you would ace it. > (of course if you went and took it then, youd prolly only get a 90, but > thats okay.) ...and then don't take it 'cause it costs 300 to take, and > you've already passed it. > > Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist > Network Engineer > Planetary Networks > 535 West 34th. Street > New York, New York > 10001 > > Cell: +1(516) 782.1535 > Desk: +1(646) 792.2395 > Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake? > [7:9743] > > > you have 18 months now to take yer first whiff at it, is that not enuff > time?? > > Bri > > - Original Message - > From: "Nate Vanderschaaf" > To: > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:48 PM > Subject: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake? [7:9733] > > > > Since I realized I would never feel ready for the CCIE, I figured the > > best way to prepare for the CCIE written was to take it once, try to > > get a feel for the subject material, topics and format, then go home, > > study anything that was a total surprise, and take it again. ($300 > > for the test, instead of $3000 for a class). Trouble is, I passed the > > > test-- barely. I got a > 70%, > > the absolute minimum passing score. > > > > I realize the lab is challenging, and since it's at least 6 months out > > > for me (full schedule in NC and CA), I'm trying to figure out if > > there's a > good > > reason to retake the written. I did notice that you need to submit > > your score when logging in to the Lab scheduling system. > > > > > > BTW, I thought the CCIE written was too easy and too difficult at the > > same time. I really don't see the need to have memorized tons of > > TokenRing bridging techniques in today's Ethernet world, but > > concurrently, I would have liked to be more challenged with OSPF and > > BGP questions, things that are critical to today's Internet world. I > > wonder how many people on this newsgroup realize that ARIN has allowed > > > backbone carriers to only > advertise > > /20 bits to BGP peers and how this threatens the integrity of the > > 'net? (Also hats off to uu.net for continuing on with /24! Damn you > > sprint!) > > > > > > Congratulations to anyone who has worked hard to learn > > internetworking. Certified or not. > > > > Nate Vanderschaaf Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9926&t=9926 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routers for Sale!!-Sorry guys!! [7:9922]
are you giving up - Original Message - From: "cisco guru" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:29 AM Subject: OT: Routers for Sale!!-Sorry guys!! [7:9922] > Hi, > I have a bunch of routers that I need to get rid of before Ebay gets them > and before I post it in the Buy/Sell area of groupstudy. Anyone with a > reasonable offer can have them( or best offer!). S/H is extra-depends on the > dest. Sorry if this email is annyoing to other Group members. > Here they are: > 1. 1 4500 - 4 Serial, 2 TR + 4 V.35 DTE/DCE Cisco original Cables > 2. 1 2514 - 2 Serial, 2 Eth. + 2 V.35 DTE/DCE Cisco original Cables > 3. 1 2511 - 2 Serial, 16-Async + 1 Async Octal Cable > 4. 1 2502 - 2 Serial, 1 TR + 2 V.35 DTE/DCe Cisco original cables > 5. 2 1602's - Brand new still shrink-wrapped in it's original Cisco box. > > Thank you. > CG > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9924&t=9922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Administrative Distance [7:9921]
Yes, This is normally called a "floating static" Configure the static with a higher admin distance. While the default route is valid, the static will not show up in "sh ip route". Once the default fails, the floating static route will be installed into the routing table and it will be visible in "sh ip route". Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Thomas" To: Sent: Tuesday, 26 June, 2001 00:21 Subject: Administrative Distance [7:9921] > Hi All, > > Is it possible to assign the "Administrative Distance" to a static route > (default = 1)? In my network, the default route on a router is learned > through EIGRP (D*EX 0.0.0.0/24) with Administrative Distance of 170. I > would like to add a static route on this router for backup; however, this > static route will be chosen over the default route learned through EIGRP, > since the Administrative Distance for static route is 1. I wonder if it is > possible to raise the Administrative Distance of the static route to be > greater than 170 so that It will only be chosen as a secondary route, in > case the default route is down Thanks All!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9925&t=9921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
I guess you weren't around for a thread that escalated beyond reason on this very question. CCNA was required "in the beginning" - but probably as late as a year ago (or more) that was changed. I got my CCDA on 13 Apr 1999 and I'm sure CCNA was required then. (I wrote the CCNA on 9 April 1999). CCNA is required for CCDP (and of course CCNP) so people won't escape it, they just get to use the CCDA initials sooner than before... Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Michael L. Williams" To: Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2001 23:58 Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > Good call... When did this happen? Or was it a myth that CCNA was ever > required for CCDA? > > Mike W. > > "Kevin Wigle" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > h boy, don't get me started on this thread again! > > > > CCNA as a pre-req for CCDA was a long time ago. > > > > It is no longer the case. CCNA is "highly recommended" > > > > check out this url: > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccda.h > > tml > > > > watch any wrap > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michael L. Williams" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2001 21:11 > > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > > > > Also, CCNA is a prerequisite for CCDA (just incase someone wanted to get > > > CCDA without trying the CCNA first) > > > > > > Mike W. > > > > > > "Brian" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > As another list member pointed out, ccda is a prereq to ccdp, thought > > that > > > > was obvious, but incase you didn't know.. > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > > check out the tests for ccdp, you'll see that the 3 Bs from ccnp are > > > there > > > > > also. So you only need complete 1 more exam to get ccdp. How bout > > that > > > > > for smile inducement?? > > > > > All you need to complete the ccdp cert is 640-025, a design exam. > See > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.h > > > tml > > > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Danner wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their > > CCNP > > > > > > counterparts? Or is it just the same information? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > From: "Brian" > > > > > > To: > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding > > at > > > > that, > > > > > > > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen > skills > > > and > > > > get > > > > > > > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like > this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > > > > > > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > > > > > > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > > > > > > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. > Which > > > next > > > > > > Design > > > > > > > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9923&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Routers for Sale!!-Sorry guys!! [7:9922]
Hi, I have a bunch of routers that I need to get rid of before Ebay gets them and before I post it in the Buy/Sell area of groupstudy. Anyone with a reasonable offer can have them( or best offer!). S/H is extra-depends on the dest. Sorry if this email is annyoing to other Group members. Here they are: 1. 1 4500 - 4 Serial, 2 TR + 4 V.35 DTE/DCE Cisco original Cables 2. 1 2514 - 2 Serial, 2 Eth. + 2 V.35 DTE/DCE Cisco original Cables 3. 1 2511 - 2 Serial, 16-Async + 1 Async Octal Cable 4. 1 2502 - 2 Serial, 1 TR + 2 V.35 DTE/DCe Cisco original cables 5. 2 1602's - Brand new still shrink-wrapped in it's original Cisco box. Thank you. CG _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9922&t=9922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Distance [7:9921]
Hi All, Is it possible to assign the "Administrative Distance" to a static route (default = 1)? In my network, the default route on a router is learned through EIGRP (D*EX 0.0.0.0/24) with Administrative Distance of 170. I would like to add a static route on this router for backup; however, this static route will be chosen over the default route learned through EIGRP, since the Administrative Distance for static route is 1. I wonder if it is possible to raise the Administrative Distance of the static route to be greater than 170 so that It will only be chosen as a secondary route, in case the default route is down Thanks All!!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9921&t=9921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recommendation for IPSEC & ATM [7:9920]
Depending on your level of understanding with ATM a decent review of the documentation CD should be enough to get you by. Just remember it behaves like any other NBMA technology. There's a decent IPsec section in the TAC area on CCO. Kris, On 26 Jun 2001, Faisal Athar wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Any recommendation to cover CCIE Lab objectives for IPSEC & ATM. > > Thanks a lot for reply. > > Faisal. > > Faisal Athar > On the Way to CCIE.. > > > > > > #The oNLY People who never succeded are# > ### Only those who never Try > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9920&t=9920 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MyGirlFriend Dogs [7:9891]
It should be fairly obvious that someone succumbed to the temptation of opening an e-mail attachment from an untrusted source - one of those VBS worms - and is the source of al this mail. http://www.trusecure.com/html/news/press/2001/050901homepageworm.shtml watch the wrap these things can get into a Windoze mail systems such as Outlook or Outlook Express, and start sending replications to everyone in the address book of the compromised user. It is the groupstudy server that is stripping the attached files. This is a policy Paul has had in place for quite a while. Coincidentally, it is serving to keep the list from becoming a carrier of these kinds of virus / worms. HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Murphy CCNP Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 8:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MyGirlFriend Dogs [7:9891] I believe these are the effects of a virus he has. It appears in some of them that the email server has protectively (is that a word)? stripped the attachment ---Original Message--- From: Sangram Mohapatra Date: Monday, June 25, 2001 09:47:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MyGirlFriend Dogs [7:9891] why is this cad sending e-mail attachments like this on this site. Please leave us alone com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9919&t=9891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP Sequence. [7:9918]
Hi all, I guess I'm repeating this question again. But hopefully someone could point how do I go about this. Initial Syn, host A send out this number. Size=512, Seq = 1234 ACK=333 and B reply Size=1024, Seq=5435 ACK=444. What would A reply/see? I guess the Seq and ACK should be incrementing by 1, but what about the window size? Since startup is 512 and B reply 1024, would A reply as 1024? Regards, Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9918&t=9918 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay acceptable DE packets [7:9746]
Kent. I have some questions they're inline "Kent Hundley" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Symon, > > Unfortunately, its not as simple as looking at the DE packets. Simply > looking at DE packets alone doesn't tell you anything really. The reason is > that if the FR cloud doesn't experience congestion, those DE packets will > get there just as well as the non-DE packets. Some carriers encourage their > customers to use 0K CIR because "we don't oversubscribe our network", so > _all_ packets are marked DE. (Sprint used to do this, don't know if they > still do or not) This is good.. I often heard that people would suggest 0 CIR so that they could oversubscribe the #*&$ out of their network =) Then when people's traffic didn't go through they could go "well we agreed to carry 0" > If you see the FECN's spike without a corresponding spike in the DE, that > means your provider is experiencing congestion, but its on a backbone link > and not your link. This means the provider's links are over-subscribed and > your packets are likely getting dropped without being marked DE. If this happens, and you sniff both sides and show that you're sending more than you're receiving (i.e. you prove that you have packets being lost without being marked DE), isn't that a violation of your CIR agreement (assuming it's > 0)? Since nothing should get marked DE except for packets over CIR, I can see how the logic makes sense, but does this happen often? Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9916&t=9746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
Good call... When did this happen? Or was it a myth that CCNA was ever required for CCDA? Mike W. "Kevin Wigle" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > h boy, don't get me started on this thread again! > > CCNA as a pre-req for CCDA was a long time ago. > > It is no longer the case. CCNA is "highly recommended" > > check out this url: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccda.h > tml > > watch any wrap > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: "Michael L. Williams" > To: > Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2001 21:11 > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > Also, CCNA is a prerequisite for CCDA (just incase someone wanted to get > > CCDA without trying the CCNA first) > > > > Mike W. > > > > "Brian" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > As another list member pointed out, ccda is a prereq to ccdp, thought > that > > > was obvious, but incase you didn't know.. > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian wrote: > > > > > > > check out the tests for ccdp, you'll see that the 3 Bs from ccnp are > > there > > > > also. So you only need complete 1 more exam to get ccdp. How bout > that > > > > for smile inducement?? > > > > All you need to complete the ccdp cert is 640-025, a design exam. See > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.h > > tml > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Danner wrote: > > > > > > > > > Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their > CCNP > > > > > counterparts? Or is it just the same information? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > From: "Brian" > > > > > To: > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding > at > > > that, > > > > > > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills > > and > > > get > > > > > > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > > > > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > > > > > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > > > > > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > > > > > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which > > next > > > > > Design > > > > > > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9917&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recommendation for IPSEC & ATM [7:9914]
my recommendation is to study them :) really, if you buy the clasic books and do some of the fatkid labs you will be exposed to ipsec and atm. Also check out the doc CD and also CCO. Also Caslow books as well. - Original Message - From: "Faisal Athar" To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:51 AM Subject: Recommendation for IPSEC & ATM > Hi Guys, > > Any recommendation to cover CCIE Lab objectives for IPSEC & ATM. > > Thanks a lot for reply. > > Faisal. > > Faisal Athar > On the Way to CCIE.. > > > > > > #The oNLY People who never succeded are# > ### Only those who never Try > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9914&t=9914 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help in hooking up the console port to a [7:9910]
Try using a rollover cable instead of a straight through cable to the db9 D'Wayne Saunders Network Admin Ph:08 89507742 Fax:08 89521112 Mobile: www.lasseters.com.au World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... *** This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. *** -Original Message- From: Ajay Pandey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Need help in hooking up the console port to a computer on a [7:9901] Hi, I just bought a used Cisco 2520 router and as per instructions, I connect the console port using the RJ-45 cable to a DB9 (I also tried connecting it to a DB25) and connected it into my computer running Win Me. I setup the hyperterminal according to the setting, Baud rate etc., given on the online documentation and it said it is connected. But there was no CLI of the router, also it remained connected even if I powered off the router. Please help me in troubleshooting this as I am new to Cisco hardware. Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9910&t=9910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help in hooking up the console port to a computer on a [7:9915]
I am using a roll-over cable.. ""Ajay Pandey"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > I just bought a used Cisco 2520 router and as per instructions, I connect > the console port using the RJ-45 cable to a DB9 (I also tried connecting it > to a DB25) and connected it into my computer running Win Me. I setup the > hyperterminal according to the setting, Baud rate etc., given on the online > documentation and it said it is connected. > But there was no CLI of the router, also it remained connected even if I > powered off the router. > > Please help me in troubleshooting this as I am new to Cisco hardware. > > Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9915&t=9915 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: supervisor engine [7:9902]
Ummm...this is describing etherchannel, but you can do that also. Rik -Original Message- From: jackxu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: supervisor engine [7:9902] certainly u can,cisco 6509's supervisor engine provide two gigabit ethernet port in this module, so two 6509 can be combined together by thrunking through the GE port. "Joe Morabito" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know if you can use the ports of a supervisor engine (which ever > model) for trunking? > > Or do you always need to use a port from the chasis...Assuming you have no > rsm. > > Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9913&t=9902 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MyGirlFriend Dogs [7:9891]
I believe these are the effects of a virus he has. It appears in some of them that the email server has protectively (is that a word)? stripped the attachment ---Original Message--- From: Sangram Mohapatra Date: Monday, June 25, 2001 09:47:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MyGirlFriend Dogs [7:9891] why is this cad sending e-mail attachments like this on this site. Please leave us alone com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9912&t=9891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
LOL That made my day =) Mike W. "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >Hey, hey, "go to the basics list with those typos":))) > > > After I gave a Cisco University VPN seminar and discovered I had > described "pubic key cryptography" on the whiteboard, I am more > tolerant of typos. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9911&t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: supervisor engine [7:9902]
The ports on a sup engine are like any other comparable port - they can be trunked. Rik -Original Message- From: Joe Morabito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: supervisor engine [7:9902] Does anyone know if you can use the ports of a supervisor engine (which ever model) for trunking? Or do you always need to use a port from the chasis...Assuming you have no rsm. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9909&t=9902 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: supervisor engine [7:9902]
certainly u can,cisco 6509's supervisor engine provide two gigabit ethernet port in this module, so two 6509 can be combined together by thrunking through the GE port. "Joe Morabito" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know if you can use the ports of a supervisor engine (which ever > model) for trunking? > > Or do you always need to use a port from the chasis...Assuming you have no > rsm. > > Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9908&t=9902 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recommendation for IPSEC & ATM [7:9907]
Hi Guys, Any recommendation to cover CCIE Lab objectives for IPSEC & ATM. Thanks a lot for reply. Faisal. Faisal Athar On the Way to CCIE.. #The oNLY People who never succeded are# ### Only those who never Try Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9907&t=9907 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help in hooking up the console port to a computer on a [7:9906]
can't use an ethernet patch cord. need a rollover cable - pins 1 and 8 reversed. look here: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/distrdir/dd2501/pin.ht m watch the wrap for the Cisco cable pinouts ( note there is a type on the pinout chart ) HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ajay Pandey Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Need help in hooking up the console port to a computer on a [7:9901] Hi, I just bought a used Cisco 2520 router and as per instructions, I connect the console port using the RJ-45 cable to a DB9 (I also tried connecting it to a DB25) and connected it into my computer running Win Me. I setup the hyperterminal according to the setting, Baud rate etc., given on the online documentation and it said it is connected. But there was no CLI of the router, also it remained connected even if I powered off the router. Please help me in troubleshooting this as I am new to Cisco hardware. Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9906&t=9906 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MyGirlFriend Dogs [7:9891]
why is this cad sending e-mail attachments like this on this site. Please leave us alone Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9904&t=9891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need help in hooking up the console port to a computer on a [7:9901]
Hi, I just bought a used Cisco 2520 router and as per instructions, I connect the console port using the RJ-45 cable to a DB9 (I also tried connecting it to a DB25) and connected it into my computer running Win Me. I setup the hyperterminal according to the setting, Baud rate etc., given on the online documentation and it said it is connected. But there was no CLI of the router, also it remained connected even if I powered off the router. Please help me in troubleshooting this as I am new to Cisco hardware. Thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9901&t=9901 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #1392 [7:9903]
Mail not delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quota exceeded. Try sending later. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9903&t=9903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
supervisor engine [7:9902]
Does anyone know if you can use the ports of a supervisor engine (which ever model) for trunking? Or do you always need to use a port from the chasis...Assuming you have no rsm. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9902&t=9902 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheap 2500 & 3000 Series RAM [7:9842]
I just received a shipment from this fellow & everything works perfect in the 2500's & 3000 routers. http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1247757355 Just passing on a little good Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9842&t=9842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay acceptable DE packets [7:9746]
Symon, Unfortunately, its not as simple as looking at the DE packets. Simply looking at DE packets alone doesn't tell you anything really. The reason is that if the FR cloud doesn't experience congestion, those DE packets will get there just as well as the non-DE packets. Some carriers encourage their customers to use 0K CIR because "we don't oversubscribe our network", so _all_ packets are marked DE. (Sprint used to do this, don't know if they still do or not) In order to make any sense of the DE packets, you also need to look at the ECN bits in the direction of the traffic flows. In your case, the Forward direction (FECN's). Looking at your info, only .4% of the inbound packets had the FECN bit set. This is very low obviously, but without knowing _when_ those FECN's occured and the rate, you still don't know much. You really need to do some qualatative analysis here during the periods when users are complaining and look at total line utilization and packets marked FECN and DE. If there is spike in the packets marked FECN and DE, chances are good that significant amount of packets are getting dropped in the FR cloud. You could run sniffers on each side of the link to verify this. If you see the FECN's spike without a corresponding spike in the DE, that means your provider is experiencing congestion, but its on a backbone link and not your link. This means the provider's links are over-subscribed and your packets are likely getting dropped without being marked DE. If there are no FECN spikes when the users complain, you will need to start looking at other things like TCP seq. and ack. numbers for site to site traffic flows. Bottom line, there's not really any number for DE, not even a rule of thumb. If your provider is not over-subscribed, 100% DE is not bad, if they are very over-subscribed, 10% DE could be bad if all 10% get dropped due to switch congestion. All the DE tells you is that _you_ are over-subscribing your CIR, to know what is happening in the FR cloud you need to look at the FECN's and BECN's. (depending on the traffic flow direction) HTH, Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay acceptable DE packets [7:9746] Hi All, I have a PVC with a large amount of packets recieved with the DE bit set, and in the mornings the users complain of slow access. This is logical, as they are frequently over their CIR, and I guess the Frame cloud must be congested in the mornings. What I was looking for was some sort of guideline as to what is an acceptable percentage of packets to recieve with the DE bit set. I understand that this depends on the type of traffic that you are sending over the PVC, my use is just typical NT based remote office, being log in, email and and some file access. Below is snipped from a sh frame pvc input pkts 42007721output pkts 33246300 in bytes 4262623522out bytes 1153916597 dropped pkts 53 in FECN pkts 182632in BECN pkts 0 out FECN pkts 0out BECN pkts 0 in DE pkts 10348052out DE pkts 0 out bcast pkts 1385303 out bcast bytes 110678462 As you can see, the percentage of input packets with DE set is about 25%. This seems high, but probably ok? PVC is 512k, CIR is 256. Any words of wisdom/experience greatly appreciated. Cheers, Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9800&t=9746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame type question [7:9900]
On the Frame type, what's the difference between Ethernet 802.3 nad 802.2? and the network number, 1 from 0? Thanks again. Regards, Hunt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9900&t=9900 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
Just FYI but from http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccda.h tml CCDA Prerequisites Knowledge and skills to install, configure, and operate small networks. CCNA certification is highly recommended. I should know, I took my CCDA first thinking it was easier than the CCNA :-P. Of course after that I took the CCNP first then completed the remaining CCDP requirement afterwards. I found the design and network exams very different. For me personally I thought the CCNA/NP was alot easier than either of the two design exams, but at the same even though it was more difficult, I really liked studying for the design exams and found the material MUCH more interesting. :-) But that's just me, I'm sure alot of people will say the opposite too Regards, Owen Edwards MCSE+I / CCNP / CCDP - Original Message - From: "Michael L. Williams" To: Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:11 PM Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > Also, CCNA is a prerequisite for CCDA (just incase someone wanted to get > CCDA without trying the CCNA first) > > Mike W. > > "Brian" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > As another list member pointed out, ccda is a prereq to ccdp, thought that > > was obvious, but incase you didn't know.. > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian wrote: > > > > > check out the tests for ccdp, you'll see that the 3 Bs from ccnp are > there > > > also. So you only need complete 1 more exam to get ccdp. How bout that > > > for smile inducement?? > > > All you need to complete the ccdp cert is 640-025, a design exam. See > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.h > tml > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Danner wrote: > > > > > > > Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their CCNP > > > > counterparts? Or is it just the same information? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Brian" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM > > > > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding at > > that, > > > > > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills > and > > get > > > > > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > > > > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > > > > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > > > > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > > > > > > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which > next > > > > Design > > > > > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9898&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fail over to 2 ISDN Provider. [7:9899]
Hi, Out of curiousity, one of my respective pre-sales ask me this set of question and it triggers my mind whether this is feasible to implement. Assuming there is only 1 router with 1 ISDN card (regardless what IOS/Model it is), where 2 Dialer profile is configured for 2 separate ISP. The scenario is if the first dialer profile fail to authenticate/connect due to some other reason, how could I tell the second dialer profile for activation? Each and every IP is dynamically obtain so there is no way of using metric or static route to do it. But what abou backup interface? I'm sure this might squeeze our mind a bit, while I'm still wondering around cisco website. Regards, Ryan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9899&t=9899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP relocation [7:9897]
Out ISP is relocating their POP and that is causing us to probably move to another ISP; however, they are offering us only several minutes of downtime. Is that possible? They said it is only a circuit move. Nothing more. However, they are running BGP and they said they might have to renumber our network. What would we have to do? Would we have to reregister our AS number?We have two /24 networks with them. Also, we have another T1 line coming in with /28. Could we ask them to advertise our networks that we got from the previous ISP? Is that possible? Can one ISP take care of the static routing to our network even if we have addresses that they did not assign? What other changes would we have to make to our routers to have this "circuit move" go thorugh? Thanks, nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9897&t=9897 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to clear counters on a specific port. [7:9896]
Anyone know how to clear counters for a specific port. I need to clear counters on a specific port instead of clear all the counters on the switch. How do you do that. Switch is Cat 6500. Regards, Rico _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9896&t=9896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Password Tools [7:9894]
Run a search on yahoo and you'll find a lot of tools you can use. e.g. boson.com has a free tool you can download. Richard ""Swart Douwe"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Is anyone aware of any password decoding tools. > > I have a copy of the show run of a working router, which contains the > password to access the vty port on a router. > > I need to get into the router to troubleshoot some issues, but I cannot log > onto the vty port as the user has forgotten the password. > > I know that I can use the console port, but I am not on site. > > The password key encryption starts with a 7. > > Any tools would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks > > Douwe > > Visit our Website : http://www.traveland.com.au > > Disclaimer - This message and any attachments are confidential and may > contain privileged information intended only for the use of the addressee > named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are > hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of > this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error > please notify Traveland Pty Ltd immediately by return email. Any views > expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not > necessarily reflect the views of Traveland Pty Ltd.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9895&t=9894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Password Tools [7:9894]
Is anyone aware of any password decoding tools. I have a copy of the show run of a working router, which contains the password to access the vty port on a router. I need to get into the router to troubleshoot some issues, but I cannot log onto the vty port as the user has forgotten the password. I know that I can use the console port, but I am not on site. The password key encryption starts with a 7. Any tools would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Douwe Visit our Website : http://www.traveland.com.au Disclaimer - This message and any attachments are confidential and may contain privileged information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Traveland Pty Ltd immediately by return email. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Traveland Pty Ltd.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9894&t=9894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
h boy, don't get me started on this thread again! CCNA as a pre-req for CCDA was a long time ago. It is no longer the case. CCNA is "highly recommended" check out this url: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccda.h tml watch any wrap Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Michael L. Williams" To: Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2001 21:11 Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > Also, CCNA is a prerequisite for CCDA (just incase someone wanted to get > CCDA without trying the CCNA first) > > Mike W. > > "Brian" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > As another list member pointed out, ccda is a prereq to ccdp, thought that > > was obvious, but incase you didn't know.. > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian wrote: > > > > > check out the tests for ccdp, you'll see that the 3 Bs from ccnp are > there > > > also. So you only need complete 1 more exam to get ccdp. How bout that > > > for smile inducement?? > > > All you need to complete the ccdp cert is 640-025, a design exam. See > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.h > tml > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Danner wrote: > > > > > > > Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their CCNP > > > > counterparts? Or is it just the same information? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Brian" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM > > > > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding at > > that, > > > > > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills > and > > get > > > > > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > > > > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > > > > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > > > > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > > > > > > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which > next > > > > Design > > > > > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9893&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network security issue [7:9556]
> --- Jim Bond wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My client is a Cisco shop and they have many offices > > all over the world. They want to make sure that only > > authorized person can connect to their network. > > Their > > concern is that someone may just walk into one of > > their offices and plug in a laptop and then is on > > their network. How can we prevent this? > > > > The only thing I can think of is create a MAC > > database > > and implement security on the 6509 switches. But to > > create and manage tens of thousands of MAC addresses > > is a pain. Is there any other way? > > Perhaps you should look into the User Registration Tool http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/wrurto.htm When a user logs in to an NT domain, their VLAN is changed to the proper one. Users who cannot login are stuck on the default VLAN which has no access to anything. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9892&t=9556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MyGirlFriend Dogs [7:9891]
Nice dog... [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-msdownload which had a name of BullBull.exe] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9891&t=9891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
routing update on IGRP [7:9889]
Hi All, I wonder how IGRP updating its routing table? Is it using broadcast or multicast? I am trying to compare the difference between IGRP and EIGRP... Thanks all in advance! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9889&t=9889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redundancy with 4908 [7:9757]
You can use HSRP for Layer 3 redundancy. But, spanning tree is still going to be an issue since one of the links will be put into blocking mode. By using uplinkfast you will get 3 second convergence for a change. By doing half of the vlans on each 4908 only half of your network will feel this and even then, most users won't notice. David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com - Original Message - From: "Andri Herkenrath" To: Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:31 AM Subject: Re: Redundancy with 4908 [7:9757] > I think you misunderstood me . > I don4t want to use a spanning tree. > Isn4t there a more sophisticated way to build a redundancy ? > > Thanks > A.Herkenrath Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9888&t=9757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
At 08:46 PM 6/25/01, Michael L. Williams wrote: >Doesn't IPX do more than just addressing, etc? Everything I've always read >tells me that IPX can actually act as it's own connectionless transport >protocol. Here are some things I've read that imply this. Tell me if this >stuff is misleading or if I'm just reading it wrong: It's all essentially correct. It is simply describing a very normal layer-3 connectionless protocol that provides transport of datagrams. You could replace every instance of IPX with IP and it would also be correct. Change a few words here and there, like SPX -> TCP, and this could be right out of TCP/IP Illustrated. >"SPX extends IPX connectionless datagram service by providing a facility for >reliable connection oriented deliverly". > >"IPX (Internetwork Packet Exchange) is a peer-to-peer protocol. It was >derived from the XNS Internet Datagram protocol. IPX is a connectionless >protocol. It's only concern is internetwork addressing and intranode >addressing (sockets). IPX completely relies on the network hardware for the >actual node addressing. " (i.e. it uses the MAC address to complete an >address) > >"IPX is a datagram-based, connectionless protocol. Datagram-based, >connectionless protocols do not require an acknowledgment for each packet >sent. Packet acknowledgment, or connection control, must be provided by >protocols above IPX" > >"IPX accomplishes these and other Network-layer tasks with the help of RIP, >SAP, and NLSP" > >Wouldn't all of these statements imply that IPX can be it's own transport, >and therefore be considered Layer 4 as well? IPX is its own transport. That doesn't make it layer 4. IP is its own transport. It's not layer 4. There are cases of protocols that run directly over IP, without TCP or UDP, (ICMP, IGMP, OSPF, IGRP, etc.), just like there are cases of protocols that run directly over IPX without SPX (NCP, RIP, SAP). > > IPX RIP does path determination. > >Doesn't IPX RIP simply act as a routing protocol like IP RIP? Yes. > Aside from >allowing routing to share routes, IPX RIP doesn't actually perform the path >determination does it? (i.e. the router still looks in the routing table at >routes for path determination whether they're static, redistributed, or >learned via IPX RIP) When forwarding frames, the router looks in the routing table for the next hop. The routing protocol does path determination, at least the way Cisco uses the term "path determination." The routing protocol learns how to reach remote networks. But we're just mincing words now. The bottom line is that Novell protocols aren't anything special. If you know IP, you can learn IPX. I would say the only weird things are the sockets in the IPX header (but DDP has sockets too, so that's not unique) and that the common file-sharing protocol (NCP) runs right on top of IPX. It does not use SPX. NCP does its own sequencing, acknowledgements, flow control (with burst mode) even though it is supposedly an application-layer protocol. Priscilla >"By default, the Cisco IOS software redistributes IPX RIP routes into >Enhanced IGRP, and vice versa." > >Please clarify, because I don't know tons about IPX/SPX and how they divy up >the functions of path determination, etc. that well.. > > > > IPX does HAVE > > >to use SPX for transport. > > > > Not sure if that was a typo, but IPX does NOT have to use SPX for > > transport. Most packets in an IPX network do not have an SPX header. > >You're right, it was a typo =) However, from my (again, limited) >understanding, most everyday communications over IPX/SPX would need reliable >transport (communications for login to servers, getting files and running >applications from servers, etc..) and would need the SPX for reliability, >correct? > >Thanks! >Mike W. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9890&t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
>Hey, hey, "go to the basics list with those typos":))) After I gave a Cisco University VPN seminar and discovered I had described "pubic key cryptography" on the whiteboard, I am more tolerant of typos. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9887&t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wan technology [7:9475]
What exactly do want to know about the stratacoms??? What stratacom boxes are you using? IGx, BPX, MGX8220,8230, 8250, 8850, 8240, 8260??? Each of the above mention boxes has different functions and capabilities. Let me know what your implementation is and what the design is and I can help you better. If you do not have a design...pls tell me what you are planning to do and I can come up with the optimal design. M --- shella kevin wrote: > Tell us more about the StrataCom plz ! > > > >From: "M" > >Reply-To: "M" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Wan technology [7:9475] > >Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:28:32 -0400 > > > >Cisco ofcourse. > > > >StrataCom and the MGX range of switches ROCK. > > > >M > > > > > >--- Rico Ortiz wrote: > > > diversity is key. know them all and don't pigeon > > > hole your self. > > > > > > Rico > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Ronnie Poon > > > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:33 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Wan technology [7:9475] > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > Which vendor's WAN technology is more valuable > in > > > the market. > > > Nortel passport , juniper or Cisco. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Ronnie Poon > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >__ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9886&t=9475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Router Access [7:9885]
I have a Cisco 4500 and 2502 Routers online that I will give access to for a day for $5 Anyone Interested??? More equiptment to come soon ... ;-) -Russ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9885&t=9885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network security issue [7:9556]
Implement soft security tokens. They work like the hard SecurID tokens, but you have to install them on all the machines and have an AAA server to authenticate them. Michael Le, CCIE #6811 --- Jim Bond wrote: > Hello, > > My client is a Cisco shop and they have many offices > all over the world. They want to make sure that only > authorized person can connect to their network. > Their > concern is that someone may just walk into one of > their offices and plug in a laptop and then is on > their network. How can we prevent this? > > The only thing I can think of is create a MAC > database > and implement security on the 6509 switches. But to > create and manage tens of thousands of MAC addresses > is a pain. Is there any other way? > > Thanks in advance. > > Jim > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9884&t=9556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? [7:9864]
Could be anywhere from 2 seconds up. If designed properly, it shouldn't take long at all for convergence. Having feasible successors really gives EIGRP an edge in converging faster Mike W. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9883&t=9864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
Also, CCNA is a prerequisite for CCDA (just incase someone wanted to get CCDA without trying the CCNA first) Mike W. "Brian" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > As another list member pointed out, ccda is a prereq to ccdp, thought that > was obvious, but incase you didn't know.. > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian wrote: > > > check out the tests for ccdp, you'll see that the 3 Bs from ccnp are there > > also. So you only need complete 1 more exam to get ccdp. How bout that > > for smile inducement?? > > All you need to complete the ccdp cert is 640-025, a design exam. See > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.h tml > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Danner wrote: > > > > > Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their CCNP > > > counterparts? Or is it just the same information? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > John > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Brian" > > > To: > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM > > > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > > > > > > > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding at > that, > > > > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills and > get > > > > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > > > > > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > > > > > > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > > > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > > > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > > > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > > > > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which next > > > Design > > > > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > > > > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9882&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting up Sub-interfaces on serial interface for Frame [7:9881]
Problem has been resolved. I found the problem after taking Symon's suggestion of checking that I did no accidently trying to apply a network or broadcasxt address to the interface. I found that one of the addresses I was trying to use was the network address of another interface. Thanks, for all the responds everyone. ""Rik Guyler"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, since you say you have everything else accounted for, have you tried > rebooting the router? Subinterfaces and loopbacks tend to be rather > troublesome once setup. Deleting and changing these virtual interfaces > typically requires a reboot for the changes to take effect completely. > > You might also check that "ip subnet-zero" is turned on. If not, you will > get that very message if you try to use the zero subnet. > > Rik > > -Original Message- > From: tazman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 5:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Setting up Sub-interfaces on serial interface for Frame Relay > [7:9697] > > > I am having a problem when attempting to configure sub-interfaces for a > Frame Relay connection and was wondering if anyone has ever seen this > problem before. I configured two routers for a point-to-point Frame Relay > circuit with sub-interfaces and performed a test and turn-up with AT&T which > worked fine. The problem I am having is I realized after I configured the > interfaces on both routers that I had used the wrong IP addresses. I setup > both ends of the circuit with a subnet address of 255.255.255.252 but when I > attempted to change the address I get a bad subnet mask error. I have both > routers configured as IP Classless and was able to assign a /30 address to > both earlier. I removed the IP address from the interfaces and tried to add > a new address and I get the same thing. Is there something special with > sub-interfaces or Frame Relay which is causing this problem? Any suggestions > would be greatly appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9881&t=9881 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TCP Slow Start ? [7:9795]
Well put, Sam. Below is a link to RFC 2001 that defines Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmit and Fast Recovery. Slow Start is indeed as described by Sam. However, it's important to note that, although Slow Start and Congestion Avoidance are separate algorithms with separate tasks, they work hand-in-hand. Congestion Avoidance kicks in when Slow Start has reached it's max speed and hits congestion. Once max speed is reached, the rate drops down, then (from the RFC) "Slow start continues until TCP is halfway to where it was when congestion occurred (since it recorded half of the window size that caused the problem ... then congestion avoidance takes over" It's an interesting read... http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2001.txt?number=2001 Enjoy! Mike W. "Sam Sneed" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > TCP slow start is mandarory of all TCP implementations. It operates by > observing the rate which acknowledgemenst are returned and injecting new > packets into the network accordingly. It uses a congestion window on the > senders side.It initializes this window to one segment when a new connection > is made. Each time an ack is received it increments the window by 1 segment. > As the window is incremented by n segments the sender can send n+1 segments. > The through of put data will increase until the window hit its maximum size > or and intermediate router discards packets. > > More details on the specifics how TCP is implemeted can be found in TCP/IP > Ilustrated Vol 1 by Richard Stevens. > > > > wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > What is TCP Slow Start? Is it only applicable to SNA? Is it inherit to > TCP? > > When do you use this? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9880&t=9795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
>At 05:57 PM 6/25/01, Michael L. Williams wrote: >>It seems interested to note that no one has mentioned that IPX not only >>performs addressing and path determination (layer 3) but can also act as >>it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP.. I suspect that Novell applications that are appropriate for connectionless transport tend to use the NetBIOS datagram service rather than raw IPX. > >The IPX layer identifies a source and destination socket in addition to >source and destination layer-3 addresses, but it is still a layer-3 >protocol in my opinion. AppleTalk DDP also identifies sockets, but it's >layer 3 also. IPX and DDP have the same job as IP. IP identifies the next >layer up also. It has its protocol type field. And the equivalent of socket ID, of course, is in TCP or UDP, which are identified by the IP protocol type field. Other values of IP protocol type include ICMP, OSPF, EIGRP, etc. > >IPX RIP does path determination. As does NLSP. > >> IPX does HAVE >>to use SPX for transport. > >Not sure if that was a typo, but IPX does NOT have to use SPX for >transport. Most packets in an IPX network do not have an SPX header. > >>so IPX is really a Layer3 & 4 protocol > >Perhaps what you are getting at is the extra glue between NetWare Core >Protocol and IPX that does things like sequencing and acknowledging. >Protocol analyzers, such as Sniffer and EtherPeek, decode this as part of >NCP. Novell documentation does not put it with IPX. (I have the IPX >functional specification but not any formal NCP documentation). Perhaps >some books put it with IPX. It's my understanding that NCP runs on top of a NCP-specific reliable transport called Packet Exchange Protocol (PEP), which runs over IPX. PEP is part of the largely confidential NCP specification. The way I look at Novell is that there are three APIs: Application layer: NCP Session layer: NetBIOS Transport layer:SPX Resource location is defined for NCP with SAP/GNS, with the NetBIOS name service for NetBIOS, and is undefined for SPX. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9878&t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still Remember You [7:9879]
She is MY sexy Linong [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-msdownload which had a name of MyLinong.Exe] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9879&t=9879 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCBOOTCAMP LABs [7:9877]
Does anyone know the minimum Home lab requirements to complete CCBoot Camp Labs 1-7? Jermaine Reid, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9877&t=9877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fast Switching on Cisco Routers [7:9753]
You are correct sir. What's interesting is that the CIT book doesn't mention that detail. It just says "Optimum is the default" (I guess it is talking about 7500's tho). When studying this, I went to Cisco's site and read up on this to be sure.. It seems now (on units that support it) CEF is the default as of IOS 12.0. Here's the article I read.. good info http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/tuning.html Mike W. "John Neiberger" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Optimum switching is the default only on platforms that can use it. > Lower-end routers like the 2500/2600/3600 can't do optimum. In those > cases, fast switching is the default. > > >>> "Michael L. Williams" 6/25/01 5:12:13 PM >>> > Mohamed, > > 1) Fast switching is the default for everything except IP. Optimum > switching is the default for IP.] > > 2) Process switching is the most CPU intensive because the router has > to > processes every packet, no caching of anything. Some debug commands > can > actually overload a somewhat busy router and shouldn't be used if CPU > utilization over 50% > > 3) All of these are just different switching methods, the details of > which > I cannot provide. However, I do know that Cisco Express Forwarding is > not > the same as any of these methods you mention. Check out: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/switc > > h_c/xcprt2/xccef.htm > > (careful of wrap in the URL) for more info on CEF. > > Can't help on the white papers for Dist. Switching. > > Mike W. > > "Mohamed El Komy" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'd like to know "which is the default switching in Cisco Routers > for > TCP/IP > > traffic?" Is it Process or Fast Switching?" > > Also there're some questions I need an answer to: > > > > 1- When issuning debug commands,do I need to turn off Fast Switching > ? > > 2- Which leads to more CPU and Memory utilization: Process or Fast > Swithing? > > 3- What's the differnece between Fast,Autonomous,Silicon and Optimum > > Switching? > > > > I also need some technical papers about Distributed Switching using > VIP > > cards on Cisco 7500 series and its Architecture. > > > > Thanks, > > komy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9876&t=9753 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay acceptable DE packets [7:9746]
That's a smokin' suggestion.. taking advantage of all of your tools. nice going... Aside from his suggestion, the high DE percentage would indicate exactly what you believe it does. there's a high amount of traffic coming into you that is over CIR. Not that it is a bad thing.. it just means you're over CIR on the sending end. If anything, be thankful that that much traffic is making it through the cloud over CIR ;-). The problem arises (as you pointed out) when the provider's cloud gets congested and starts dropping your packets. You may want to configure basic traffic shaping so that when there is congestion, the interfaces will at least slow down their traffic rate and obey the CIR. Other than that, about the only thing to do is knock up the CIR =) Mike W. "Mark Odette II" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm not sure what to say for the DE packet performance, but another way to > address the slow login issue is to build really inexpensive servers (we're > talking not even PII) with NT Server on them, and have them operate in the > role of BDC's. Configure the registry on these units to perform their > Directory and WINS replication in the off-peak times of the day of WAN > usage, and you'll definitely see a performance increase. > > This is what I did for a client that had 4 offices connected via FR with > 256k PVCs/128k CIR's (it first started out as 128k PVC's/64k CIR's, but then > threw VoIP into the mix) with NT 4, WINS, Printing across the frame (special > purpose situation for batch order print-outs) and of course the 128k > connection to the Internet that all the employees immediately went crazy > over. > > I too would be interested in the DE possibilities. > > - Original Message - > From: > To: > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:40 AM > Subject: Frame Relay acceptable DE packets [7:9746] > > > > Hi All, > > > > I have a PVC with a large amount of packets recieved with the DE bit > > set, and in the mornings the users complain of slow access. > > > > This is logical, as they are frequently over their CIR, and I guess > > the Frame cloud must be congested in the mornings. > > > > What I was looking for was some sort of guideline as to what is an > > acceptable percentage of packets to recieve with the DE bit set. I > > understand that this depends on the type of traffic that you are > > sending over the PVC, my use is just typical NT based remote office, > > being log in, email and and some file access. > > > > Below is snipped from a sh frame pvc > > > > input pkts 42007721output pkts 33246300 > > in bytes 4262623522out bytes 1153916597 > > dropped pkts 53 > > > > in FECN pkts 182632in BECN pkts 0 > > out FECN pkts 0out BECN pkts 0 > > in DE pkts 10348052out DE pkts 0 > > out bcast pkts 1385303 out bcast bytes 110678462 > > > > > > As you can see, the percentage of input packets with DE set is about > > 25%. This seems high, but probably ok? PVC is 512k, CIR is 256. > > > > Any words of wisdom/experience greatly appreciated. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9875&t=9746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 05:57 PM 6/25/01, Michael L. Williams wrote: > >It seems interested to note that no one has mentioned that IPX not only > >performs addressing and path determination (layer 3) but can also act as > >it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP.. > > The IPX layer identifies a source and destination socket in addition to > source and destination layer-3 addresses, but it is still a layer-3 > protocol in my opinion. AppleTalk DDP also identifies sockets, but it's > layer 3 also. IPX and DDP have the same job as IP. IP identifies the next > layer up also. It has its protocol type field. Doesn't IPX do more than just addressing, etc? Everything I've always read tells me that IPX can actually act as it's own connectionless transport protocol. Here are some things I've read that imply this. Tell me if this stuff is misleading or if I'm just reading it wrong: "SPX extends IPX connectionless datagram service by providing a facility for reliable connection oriented deliverly". "IPX (Internetwork Packet Exchange) is a peer-to-peer protocol. It was derived from the XNS Internet Datagram protocol. IPX is a connectionless protocol. It's only concern is internetwork addressing and intranode addressing (sockets). IPX completely relies on the network hardware for the actual node addressing. " (i.e. it uses the MAC address to complete an address) "IPX is a datagram-based, connectionless protocol. Datagram-based, connectionless protocols do not require an acknowledgment for each packet sent. Packet acknowledgment, or connection control, must be provided by protocols above IPX" "IPX accomplishes these and other Network-layer tasks with the help of RIP, SAP, and NLSP" Wouldn't all of these statements imply that IPX can be it's own transport, and therefore be considered Layer 4 as well? > IPX RIP does path determination. Doesn't IPX RIP simply act as a routing protocol like IP RIP? Aside from allowing routing to share routes, IPX RIP doesn't actually perform the path determination does it? (i.e. the router still looks in the routing table at routes for path determination whether they're static, redistributed, or learned via IPX RIP) "By default, the Cisco IOS software redistributes IPX RIP routes into Enhanced IGRP, and vice versa." Please clarify, because I don't know tons about IPX/SPX and how they divy up the functions of path determination, etc. that well.. > > IPX does HAVE > >to use SPX for transport. > > Not sure if that was a typo, but IPX does NOT have to use SPX for > transport. Most packets in an IPX network do not have an SPX header. You're right, it was a typo =) However, from my (again, limited) understanding, most everyday communications over IPX/SPX would need reliable transport (communications for login to servers, getting files and running applications from servers, etc..) and would need the SPX for reliability, correct? Thanks! Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9874&t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
As another list member pointed out, ccda is a prereq to ccdp, thought that was obvious, but incase you didn't know.. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Brian wrote: > check out the tests for ccdp, you'll see that the 3 Bs from ccnp are there > also. So you only need complete 1 more exam to get ccdp. How bout that > for smile inducement?? > All you need to complete the ccdp cert is 640-025, a design exam. See > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.html > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Danner wrote: > > > Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their CCNP > > counterparts? Or is it just the same information? > > > > Thanks, > > John > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Brian" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM > > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > > > > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding at that, > > > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills and get > > > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > > > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > > > > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which next > > Design > > > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > > > > > Regards. > > > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9873&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? [7:9864]
>On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? It depends on what caused the problem. If a local serial link fails, a router can start the convergence process immediately if it notices the Carrier Detect (CD) signal drop. On an Ethernet network, if the router's own transceiver fails, it can start the convergence process immediately. Otherwise, the router starts the convergence process after three x the 5-second hello timer (15 seconds). When an EIGRP router detects that a link has failed or that a neighbor router isn't sending hellos any more, if a feasible successor has an alternate route, the router switches to the alternate route immediately, without causing any network traffic. If there is no successor, the router sends a query to neighbors. The query propagates across the network until a new route is found. That could take a few seconds that may have to be added to the 15 seconds already mentioned. Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9872&t=9864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? [7:9864]
isn't this just slightly a function of network complexity?? Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9871&t=9864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
Hey, hey, "go to the basics list with those typos":))) -Original Message- From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] Excuse me.. I meant to say "IPX does NOT have to use SPX for transport..." Sorry for the "non-type" Mike W. "Michael L. Williams" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > It seems interested to note that no one has mentioned that IPX not only > performs addressing and path determination (layer 3) but can also act as > it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP.. IPX does HAVE > to use SPX for transport. so IPX is really a Layer3 & 4 protocol > > Mike W. > > "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 12:11 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > > > >Thank you veery much for clarifying that. > > > > > >Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the > > >ODI "wrap" and IPX "share" the layer 2 functions? > > > > No. IPX does layer-3 functions. > > > > ODI is just an Ethernet driver. It allows a NIC to be used to carry data > > for different protocols. For example, ODI allows a computer with a single > > NIC to be simultaneously connected to both an IPX and an IP network. So, > > IPX interfaces to ODI. It's a layered architecture. > > > > >Also, what is the NWLINK equivalent of ARP? > > > > NWLINK is NetBIOS running on top of IPX/SPX. It's just generic IPX. It has > > nothing to do with ARP which is an IP function to map IP addresses to MAC > > addresses. > > > > These basic questions belong on the CCNA study list, not this one. Also, > > find yourself a good protocol chart. Every so often someone sends around a > > link to one. > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:51 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > >IPX runs at layer 3. There's no question of that. > > > > > >Perhaps the confusing thing is that IPX layer-3 addresses consist of > > >network.MAC. The node part of the address is the same as the layer-2 NIC > > >address, also known as MAC or hardware address. > > > > > >This means that IPX doesn't need an ARP. If you know the Layer-3 address, > > >you know the Layer-2 address also. > > > > > >Above IPX, the most common Novell protocol is NetWare Core Protocol (NCP) > > >used by file servers. Print servers use SPX. It's a myth that NCP uses > SPX. > > >It doesn't. > > > > > >Priscilla > > > > > >At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > > >I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack. > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Charles Manafa > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > > > > >IPX is layer 3 > > > >Switches operate at layer 2 > > > > > > > >CM > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: 20/06/01 08:14 > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > >Thanks! I found the setting in the printer to disable the IPX. > However > > > >Can > > > >we filter the IPX traffic on our 2900 IOS switches, and set based 5500 > > > >switches. IF yes.. what is the command to disable transmission of IPX > > > >traffic in the switches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Jim Dixon > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:40 PM > > > >To: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > > > > >It may be an HP JetDirect card. > > > > > > > >Get rid of it by assigning your JetDirect and or Printer an IP Address > > > >(whichever you need to do) > > > >Turn IPX off on the JetDirect Print Server. > > > > > > > >OR > > > > > > > >Filter IPX at your router and see if you can still print. > > > >Then > > > >RE_check for your IPX.. Is it still there? Did printer stop working? > > > >If so > > > >then you may want to keep IPX till you can switch to IP. > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:12 AM > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi. > > > > > > > >I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our > > > >network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But > > > >we > > > >have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? > > > > > > > >In the ethereal output I saw
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
check out the tests for ccdp, you'll see that the 3 Bs from ccnp are there also. So you only need complete 1 more exam to get ccdp. How bout that for smile inducement?? All you need to complete the ccdp cert is 640-025, a design exam. See http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan2/programs/ccdp.html Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Danner wrote: > Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their CCNP > counterparts? Or is it just the same information? > > Thanks, > John > > - Original Message - > From: "Brian" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM > Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > > > > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding at that, > > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills and get > > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which next > Design > > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > > > Regards. > > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9869&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
At 05:57 PM 6/25/01, Michael L. Williams wrote: >It seems interested to note that no one has mentioned that IPX not only >performs addressing and path determination (layer 3) but can also act as >it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP.. The IPX layer identifies a source and destination socket in addition to source and destination layer-3 addresses, but it is still a layer-3 protocol in my opinion. AppleTalk DDP also identifies sockets, but it's layer 3 also. IPX and DDP have the same job as IP. IP identifies the next layer up also. It has its protocol type field. IPX RIP does path determination. > IPX does HAVE >to use SPX for transport. Not sure if that was a typo, but IPX does NOT have to use SPX for transport. Most packets in an IPX network do not have an SPX header. >so IPX is really a Layer3 & 4 protocol Perhaps what you are getting at is the extra glue between NetWare Core Protocol and IPX that does things like sequencing and acknowledging. Protocol analyzers, such as Sniffer and EtherPeek, decode this as part of NCP. Novell documentation does not put it with IPX. (I have the IPX functional specification but not any formal NCP documentation). Perhaps some books put it with IPX. Here's an EtherPeek packet to help you understand my point: 802.3 Header Destination: 00:80:5F:05:77:29 Source: 00:01:83:A0:28:CD Length: 40 IPX - NetWare Protocol Checksum: 0x Length: 39 Transport Control: Reserved: % Hop Count: % Packet Type: 17 NCP - Netware Core Protocol Destination Network: 0x00094301 Destination Node: 00:00:00:00:00:01 Destination Socket: 0x0451 NetWare Core Protocol Source Network: 0x0001 Source Node: 00:01:83:A0:28:CD Source Socket:0x4003 IPX Ephemeral NCP - Netware Core Protocol Request Type: 0x Request Sequence number: 203 Connection number low:123 Task number: 20 Connection number high: 0 Function Code:62 Alt Dir Search Parameters Alt Dir Search Parameters Request Directory handle: 45 File Name: Extra bytes (Padding): v.v 76 0C 14 00 18 00 76 Frame Check Sequence: 0x04004A00 Priscilla >Mike W. > >"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 12:11 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > > > >Thank you veery much for clarifying that. > > > > > >Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the > > >ODI "wrap" and IPX "share" the layer 2 functions? > > > > No. IPX does layer-3 functions. > > > > ODI is just an Ethernet driver. It allows a NIC to be used to carry data > > for different protocols. For example, ODI allows a computer with a single > > NIC to be simultaneously connected to both an IPX and an IP network. So, > > IPX interfaces to ODI. It's a layered architecture. > > > > >Also, what is the NWLINK equivalent of ARP? > > > > NWLINK is NetBIOS running on top of IPX/SPX. It's just generic IPX. It has > > nothing to do with ARP which is an IP function to map IP addresses to MAC > > addresses. > > > > These basic questions belong on the CCNA study list, not this one. Also, > > find yourself a good protocol chart. Every so often someone sends around a > > link to one. > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:51 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > >IPX runs at layer 3. There's no question of that. > > > > > >Perhaps the confusing thing is that IPX layer-3 addresses consist of > > >network.MAC. The node part of the address is the same as the layer-2 NIC > > >address, also known as MAC or hardware address. > > > > > >This means that IPX doesn't need an ARP. If you know the Layer-3 address, > > >you know the Layer-2 address also. > > > > > >Above IPX, the most common Novell protocol is NetWare Core Protocol (NCP) > > >used by file servers. Print servers use SPX. It's a myth that NCP uses >SPX. > > >It doesn't. > > > > > >Priscilla > > > > > >At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > > >I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack. > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Charles Manafa > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > > > > >IPX is layer 3 > > > >Switches operate at layer 2 > > > > > > > >CM > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: 20/06/01 08:14 > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > >Thanks! I found the sett
Re: Fast Switching on Cisco Routers [7:9753]
Optimum switching is the default only on platforms that can use it. Lower-end routers like the 2500/2600/3600 can't do optimum. In those cases, fast switching is the default. >>> "Michael L. Williams" 6/25/01 5:12:13 PM >>> Mohamed, 1) Fast switching is the default for everything except IP. Optimum switching is the default for IP.] 2) Process switching is the most CPU intensive because the router has to processes every packet, no caching of anything. Some debug commands can actually overload a somewhat busy router and shouldn't be used if CPU utilization over 50% 3) All of these are just different switching methods, the details of which I cannot provide. However, I do know that Cisco Express Forwarding is not the same as any of these methods you mention. Check out: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/switc h_c/xcprt2/xccef.htm (careful of wrap in the URL) for more info on CEF. Can't help on the white papers for Dist. Switching. Mike W. "Mohamed El Komy" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'd like to know "which is the default switching in Cisco Routers for TCP/IP > traffic?" Is it Process or Fast Switching?" > Also there're some questions I need an answer to: > > 1- When issuning debug commands,do I need to turn off Fast Switching ? > 2- Which leads to more CPU and Memory utilization: Process or Fast Swithing? > 3- What's the differnece between Fast,Autonomous,Silicon and Optimum > Switching? > > I also need some technical papers about Distributed Switching using VIP > cards on Cisco 7500 series and its Architecture. > > Thanks, > komy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9867&t=9753 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6509 Console into MSM [7:9858]
it has a physical console port on it. you can't use 'switch con' to get on it like you can with msfc, you must use the physical console. -dre ""Telemachus Luu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How does one console into the MSM on a Cat 6509? I can console into the > switch and session into the msm, but would like to know the console method. > > Thanks, > Telemachus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9866&t=9858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fast Switching on Cisco Routers [7:9753]
Mohamed, 1) Fast switching is the default for everything except IP. Optimum switching is the default for IP.] 2) Process switching is the most CPU intensive because the router has to processes every packet, no caching of anything. Some debug commands can actually overload a somewhat busy router and shouldn't be used if CPU utilization over 50% 3) All of these are just different switching methods, the details of which I cannot provide. However, I do know that Cisco Express Forwarding is not the same as any of these methods you mention. Check out: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/switc h_c/xcprt2/xccef.htm (careful of wrap in the URL) for more info on CEF. Can't help on the white papers for Dist. Switching. Mike W. "Mohamed El Komy" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'd like to know "which is the default switching in Cisco Routers for TCP/IP > traffic?" Is it Process or Fast Switching?" > Also there're some questions I need an answer to: > > 1- When issuning debug commands,do I need to turn off Fast Switching ? > 2- Which leads to more CPU and Memory utilization: Process or Fast Swithing? > 3- What's the differnece between Fast,Autonomous,Silicon and Optimum > Switching? > > I also need some technical papers about Distributed Switching using VIP > cards on Cisco 7500 series and its Architecture. > > Thanks, > komy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9865&t=9753 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router show commands [7:9747]
Check out the Cisco Press CIT book. It covers this topic in detail. Mike W. "Mohamed El Komy" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'd like to know the effect of "show buffers" command on router and why do i > need buffer pools on the router although each interface has its own buffers > to process incoming packets. > Plz send me any papers talking simply about Router Architecture. > > thanks, > komy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9863&t=9747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? [7:9864]
What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9864&t=9864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
Do you not have to take the 3 CCDP tests if you have passed their CCNP counterparts? Or is it just the same information? Thanks, John - Original Message - From: "Brian" To: Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:32 PM Subject: Re: CCNP At last!! [7:9853] > I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding at that, > use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills and get > your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > > > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which next Design > > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > > > Please write to advice me. > > > > Regards. > > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9862&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
Excuse me.. I meant to say "IPX does NOT have to use SPX for transport..." Sorry for the "non-type" Mike W. "Michael L. Williams" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > It seems interested to note that no one has mentioned that IPX not only > performs addressing and path determination (layer 3) but can also act as > it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP.. IPX does HAVE > to use SPX for transport. so IPX is really a Layer3 & 4 protocol > > Mike W. > > "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 12:11 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > > > >Thank you veery much for clarifying that. > > > > > >Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the > > >ODI "wrap" and IPX "share" the layer 2 functions? > > > > No. IPX does layer-3 functions. > > > > ODI is just an Ethernet driver. It allows a NIC to be used to carry data > > for different protocols. For example, ODI allows a computer with a single > > NIC to be simultaneously connected to both an IPX and an IP network. So, > > IPX interfaces to ODI. It's a layered architecture. > > > > >Also, what is the NWLINK equivalent of ARP? > > > > NWLINK is NetBIOS running on top of IPX/SPX. It's just generic IPX. It has > > nothing to do with ARP which is an IP function to map IP addresses to MAC > > addresses. > > > > These basic questions belong on the CCNA study list, not this one. Also, > > find yourself a good protocol chart. Every so often someone sends around a > > link to one. > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:51 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > >IPX runs at layer 3. There's no question of that. > > > > > >Perhaps the confusing thing is that IPX layer-3 addresses consist of > > >network.MAC. The node part of the address is the same as the layer-2 NIC > > >address, also known as MAC or hardware address. > > > > > >This means that IPX doesn't need an ARP. If you know the Layer-3 address, > > >you know the Layer-2 address also. > > > > > >Above IPX, the most common Novell protocol is NetWare Core Protocol (NCP) > > >used by file servers. Print servers use SPX. It's a myth that NCP uses > SPX. > > >It doesn't. > > > > > >Priscilla > > > > > >At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > > >I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack. > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Charles Manafa > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > > > > >IPX is layer 3 > > > >Switches operate at layer 2 > > > > > > > >CM > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: 20/06/01 08:14 > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > >Thanks! I found the setting in the printer to disable the IPX. > However > > > >Can > > > >we filter the IPX traffic on our 2900 IOS switches, and set based 5500 > > > >switches. IF yes.. what is the command to disable transmission of IPX > > > >traffic in the switches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Jim Dixon > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:40 PM > > > >To: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > > > > >It may be an HP JetDirect card. > > > > > > > >Get rid of it by assigning your JetDirect and or Printer an IP Address > > > >(whichever you need to do) > > > >Turn IPX off on the JetDirect Print Server. > > > > > > > >OR > > > > > > > >Filter IPX at your router and see if you can still print. > > > >Then > > > >RE_check for your IPX.. Is it still there? Did printer stop working? > > > >If so > > > >then you may want to keep IPX till you can switch to IP. > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:12 AM > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi. > > > > > > > >I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our > > > >network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But > > > >we > > > >have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? > > > > > > > >In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like > > > >source destination Protocol Info > > > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query > > > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query > > > >0.0008c7280106 0.ff
Re: Firewall & Proxy [7:9785]
Wow, you should really double check that information there. ""Allen May"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > PIX does NAT and PAT. NAT is when you have a range of IP addresses and > users "borrow" one each time they access the web. PAT is when you have only > one outside address and users can access the web by using different ports on > the same IP address. Proxy is very similar to PAT but it's usually software > based sharing of a single IP address. > > My personal preference is NAT when possible... > > I was a little vague on the descriptions but I hope that gives you an > overview of what you're looking for. > > Allen > > - Original Message - > From: "Jatin" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:38 AM > Subject: Firewall & Proxy [7:9785] > > > > HI , > > > > What is the difference between firewall and proxy server ? > > > > Which is better ? > > > > Does PIX support both ( Proxy and Firewall ) > > > > Please help > > > > Thanks In Advance. > > > > Jatin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9860&t=9785 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6509 Console into MSM [7:9858]
How does one console into the MSM on a Cat 6509? I can console into the switch and session into the msm, but would like to know the console method. Thanks, Telemachus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9858&t=9858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dirty e-mails [7:9787]
Hi, I had fun with this (I think) the one I had uses a thing called HKK32.exe this thens send of to others on the mail list. In the case I had it sent it to the recipent on his secondary mail server this sent it back to him and he sent it back to himself on the secondary mail server that sent it back to him. 50,000 mail messages later he had little to no service. Nasty little trick. Teunis On Monday, June 25, 2001 at 01:18:24 PM, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > Seems to be generated by a trojan. > > -Original Message- > From: Robert (BOB) Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: dirty e-mails [7:9787] > > > Anyone keep getting mail from ***@sexyfun.net ? > I noticed that they sent [EMAIL PROTECTED] > an e-mail the other day and now they are being directed to my inbox? > > > Bob Perez > EPX Network Support > 302-326-0700 x4242 > Cell 302-420-6883 -- www.tasmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9859&t=9787 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813]
Since books really are a commodity, I'll resuggest using www.mysimon.com to find the best price. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Nabil Fares wrote: > Heads up, it's out of stock. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] > > > Bookpool has the same book for $7 less, for those of you who are interested. > > http://www.bookpool.com/.x/a649x57h50/ss/1?qs=0072123354&Go.x=22&Go.y=3 > > Stephen Hoover > DCI Corporation > > - Original Message - > From: "CiscoG" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:49 PM > Subject: RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] > > > > Actually I have configuring these once or twice. Save your money on the > book > > below Phil and buy this one; > > > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072123354/o/qid=993493780/sr=2-3/ref > > =aps_sr_b_1_3/104-1980751-0486302. By far the best and only book you'll > ever > > need in regards to ANY access-lists and even traffic policing and queuing. > > Simply fantastic! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9856&t=9813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
I would reg now for the written, then after hopefully succeeding at that, use the several months it takes to get a lab to strengthen skills and get your ccdp. 3/4 of the ccnp tests are good for the ccdp. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. wrote: > It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: > > Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 > Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 > Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 > Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 > > I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which next Design > track or Security track or CCIE written?? > > Please write to advice me. > > Regards. > Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9857&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Catalyst 2900XL [7:9843]
According to the realeas notes Quality of service (QoS) based on IEEE 802.1p class of service (CoS) values on Release 12.0(5)XP. You can check it here: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/29_35wc/rn/1061504.htm >From: "Jacek Malinowski" >Reply-To: "Jacek Malinowski" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Catalyst 2900XL [7:9843] >Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:22:38 -0400 > >Is there possible configure QoS on switch 2924 XL ? >What software number I need ? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9855&t=9843 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813]
Book Comparison Sites: http://www.addall.com/ http://www.bestwebbuys.com/books/index.html http://www1.ecompare-corp.com/cgi-bin/books/booksearch.cgi?input=1587200236&; type=ISBN watch out for the word wr- ap. I am sure there are others. -Original Message- From: Stephen Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] Bookpool has the same book for $7 less, for those of you who are interested. http://www.bookpool.com/.x/a649x57h50/ss/1?qs=0072123354&Go.x=22&Go.y=3 Stephen Hoover DCI Corporation - Original Message - From: "CiscoG" To: Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:49 PM Subject: RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] > Actually I have configuring these once or twice. Save your money on the book > below Phil and buy this one; > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072123354/o/qid=993493780/sr=2-3/ref > =aps_sr_b_1_3/104-1980751-0486302. By far the best and only book you'll ever > need in regards to ANY access-lists and even traffic policing and queuing. > Simply fantastic! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9854&t=9813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP At last!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:9853]
It was not easy but it is over, I wrote my four exams like this: Routing 2.0 ==20/4/2001 Switching 2.0 ==04/6/2001 Support 2.0 ==12/6/2001 Remote Access2.0 ==23/6/2001 I almost went to sleep after Routing 2.0, but it is easy. Which next Design track or Security track or CCIE written?? Please write to advice me. Regards. Oletu H. G. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9853&t=9853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCRAN and Boson [7:9378]
Congrats Mike W. "Lopez, Robert" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I took the BCRAN this morning and scored 832. Thanks to the list for all > the great info. I used the official BCRAN coursebook, CCNP certification > guide and some hands on at work. Three down and one to go for CCNP... > > Robert > -Original Message- > From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 9:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: BCRAN and Boson [7:9378] > > > I used both exam 1 and 2 for all of my CCNP exams. For some reason, #2 > was always more difficult, but that's a good thing. If you've got the extra > $30, get 1 and 2. if not, just get #2.. > > Mike W. > > "Robert (BOB) Perez" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I read an e-mail yesterday about Boson BCRAN test and someone wanted to > know > > which ones were good. I only saw one reply referencing test 2 as ok. I > am > > taking my test next week and would like to purchase one. Any other > feedback > > on which one out of the three would be the best?? > > > > Bob Perez > > EPX Network Support > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9852&t=9378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Test..pls ignore [7:9850]
__ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9850&t=9850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet traffic in a VLAN environment [7:9318]
If you have multiple VLANS, then all of their traffic has to pass through a router to talk between them anyway. Can't you just use that same router to either route to the internet or connect to a router that connects to the internet?There's really no need to segregate the internet traffic to it's own VLAN, is only traffic to/from the internet would get intermingled into the VLAN traffic anyway. Mike W. "Vijay Ramcharan" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks but not quite. I was just wondering about the actual placement > of the Internet router. Is it in it's own VLAN or is it part of another > VLAN with hosts, servers etc. In terms of security, wouldn't best > practice dictate that a router that is directly connected to the > Internet, be segregated in its own VLAN? Am I right or wrong? I know > how to make it work either way, but I'd just like to get an idea of what > the better ways are of separating Internet bound traffic from LAN based > traffic? > > Vijay Ramcharan > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Karen E Young > Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 2:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Internet traffic in a VLAN environment [7:9318] > > > Vijay, > > All you need is a default gateway on the router that points to the > internet. > > When an Internet destined packet from a workstation on a VLAN hits the > switch it gets dumped off on the router or MSFC since it doesn't have a > destination MAC address of a device on that VLAN. The router takes a > look at the IP and sees if it has a route. If it doesn't recognize the > destination network then it dumps it out the default gateway. Any return > traffic will have a destination IP and MAC address that the router and > switch will recognize. > > Hope this helps. > Karen > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > On 6/21/2001 at 10:27 AM Vijay Ramcharan wrote: > > >Could someone enlighten me on some of the best practices for directing > >traffic destined for the Internet from a VLAN based environment? I > >mean, is it best to create a separate VLAN and direct all unknown > >traffic out through that VLAN and then out to the Internet? OR > >Do you just choose one preexisting VLAN and have that one connected to > >your Internet router? > > > >I'm a bit confused. (lot confused?) > > > >Vijay Ramcharan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9851&t=9318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
It seems interested to note that no one has mentioned that IPX not only performs addressing and path determination (layer 3) but can also act as it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP.. IPX does HAVE to use SPX for transport. so IPX is really a Layer3 & 4 protocol Mike W. "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 12:11 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > >Thank you veery much for clarifying that. > > > >Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the > >ODI "wrap" and IPX "share" the layer 2 functions? > > No. IPX does layer-3 functions. > > ODI is just an Ethernet driver. It allows a NIC to be used to carry data > for different protocols. For example, ODI allows a computer with a single > NIC to be simultaneously connected to both an IPX and an IP network. So, > IPX interfaces to ODI. It's a layered architecture. > > >Also, what is the NWLINK equivalent of ARP? > > NWLINK is NetBIOS running on top of IPX/SPX. It's just generic IPX. It has > nothing to do with ARP which is an IP function to map IP addresses to MAC > addresses. > > These basic questions belong on the CCNA study list, not this one. Also, > find yourself a good protocol chart. Every so often someone sends around a > link to one. > > Priscilla > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:51 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > >IPX runs at layer 3. There's no question of that. > > > >Perhaps the confusing thing is that IPX layer-3 addresses consist of > >network.MAC. The node part of the address is the same as the layer-2 NIC > >address, also known as MAC or hardware address. > > > >This means that IPX doesn't need an ARP. If you know the Layer-3 address, > >you know the Layer-2 address also. > > > >Above IPX, the most common Novell protocol is NetWare Core Protocol (NCP) > >used by file servers. Print servers use SPX. It's a myth that NCP uses SPX. > >It doesn't. > > > >Priscilla > > > >At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > > >I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack. > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Charles Manafa > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > >IPX is layer 3 > > >Switches operate at layer 2 > > > > > >CM > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: 20/06/01 08:14 > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > >Thanks! I found the setting in the printer to disable the IPX. However > > >Can > > >we filter the IPX traffic on our 2900 IOS switches, and set based 5500 > > >switches. IF yes.. what is the command to disable transmission of IPX > > >traffic in the switches. > > > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Jim Dixon > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:40 PM > > >To: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > >It may be an HP JetDirect card. > > > > > >Get rid of it by assigning your JetDirect and or Printer an IP Address > > >(whichever you need to do) > > >Turn IPX off on the JetDirect Print Server. > > > > > >OR > > > > > >Filter IPX at your router and see if you can still print. > > >Then > > >RE_check for your IPX.. Is it still there? Did printer stop working? > > >If so > > >then you may want to keep IPX till you can switch to IP. > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:12 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > > > > >Hi. > > > > > >I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our > > >network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But > > >we > > >have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? > > > > > >In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like > > >source destination Protocol Info > > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query > > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query > > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Response > > >0.0008c7280106 0.NBIPXFind name "our > > >domain > > >name" > > >0.0008c7280106 0.BROWSER Host Announcement > > >"workstation name" workstation, server, print queue server, NT > > >workstation, > > >NT server, Potential browser. > > > > > >In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer > > >server? > > >Why printer got something to do wit
RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
My friend, Thank you for your assistance. I was not aware that there was a ""basics CCNA list." I will, however, not refrain from being "basic" on this list, if you permit it, of course. Thank you, -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] At 12:11 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: >Thank you veery much for clarifying that. > >Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the >ODI "wrap" and IPX "share" the layer 2 functions? No. IPX does layer-3 functions. ODI is just an Ethernet driver. It allows a NIC to be used to carry data for different protocols. For example, ODI allows a computer with a single NIC to be simultaneously connected to both an IPX and an IP network. So, IPX interfaces to ODI. It's a layered architecture. >Also, what is the NWLINK equivalent of ARP? NWLINK is NetBIOS running on top of IPX/SPX. It's just generic IPX. It has nothing to do with ARP which is an IP function to map IP addresses to MAC addresses. These basic questions belong on the CCNA study list, not this one. Also, find yourself a good protocol chart. Every so often someone sends around a link to one. Priscilla >-Original Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:51 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > >IPX runs at layer 3. There's no question of that. > >Perhaps the confusing thing is that IPX layer-3 addresses consist of >network.MAC. The node part of the address is the same as the layer-2 NIC >address, also known as MAC or hardware address. > >This means that IPX doesn't need an ARP. If you know the Layer-3 address, >you know the Layer-2 address also. > >Above IPX, the most common Novell protocol is NetWare Core Protocol (NCP) >used by file servers. Print servers use SPX. It's a myth that NCP uses SPX. >It doesn't. > >Priscilla > >At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: > >I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack. > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Charles Manafa > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > >IPX is layer 3 > >Switches operate at layer 2 > > > >CM > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: 20/06/01 08:14 > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > >Thanks! I found the setting in the printer to disable the IPX. However > >Can > >we filter the IPX traffic on our 2900 IOS switches, and set based 5500 > >switches. IF yes.. what is the command to disable transmission of IPX > >traffic in the switches. > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Jim Dixon > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:40 PM > >To: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > >It may be an HP JetDirect card. > > > >Get rid of it by assigning your JetDirect and or Printer an IP Address > >(whichever you need to do) > >Turn IPX off on the JetDirect Print Server. > > > >OR > > > >Filter IPX at your router and see if you can still print. > >Then > >RE_check for your IPX.. Is it still there? Did printer stop working? > >If so > >then you may want to keep IPX till you can switch to IP. > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:12 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > > > > >Hi. > > > >I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our > >network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But > >we > >have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? > > > >In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like > >source destination Protocol Info > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query > >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Response > >0.0008c7280106 0.NBIPXFind name "our > >domain > >name" > >0.0008c7280106 0.BROWSER Host Announcement > >"workstation name" workstation, server, print queue server, NT > >workstation, > >NT server, Potential browser. > > > >In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer > >server? > >Why printer got something to do with IPX . > > > >How to get rid of this? > > > >Please advice > >Thanks > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: jason douglas > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:38 PM > >To: [EM
Re: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813]
which doesn't help if its out of stock try this link: http://www.bestwebbuys.com/books/index.html It searches dozens of stores and brings back price and availability. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Stephen Hoover" To: Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2001 16:39 Subject: Re: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] > Bookpool has the same book for $7 less, for those of you who are interested. > > http://www.bookpool.com/.x/a649x57h50/ss/1?qs=0072123354&Go.x=22&Go.y=3 > > Stephen Hoover > DCI Corporation > > - Original Message - > From: "CiscoG" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:49 PM > Subject: RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] > > > > Actually I have configuring these once or twice. Save your money on the > book > > below Phil and buy this one; > > > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072123354/o/qid=993493780/sr=2-3/ref > > =aps_sr_b_1_3/104-1980751-0486302. By far the best and only book you'll > ever > > need in regards to ANY access-lists and even traffic policing and queuing. > > Simply fantastic! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9848&t=9813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813]
Heads up, it's out of stock. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] Bookpool has the same book for $7 less, for those of you who are interested. http://www.bookpool.com/.x/a649x57h50/ss/1?qs=0072123354&Go.x=22&Go.y=3 Stephen Hoover DCI Corporation - Original Message - From: "CiscoG" To: Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:49 PM Subject: RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] > Actually I have configuring these once or twice. Save your money on the book > below Phil and buy this one; > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072123354/o/qid=993493780/sr=2-3/ref > =aps_sr_b_1_3/104-1980751-0486302. By far the best and only book you'll ever > need in regards to ANY access-lists and even traffic policing and queuing. > Simply fantastic! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9846&t=9813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #1391 [7:9845]
Mail not delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quota exceeded. Try sending later. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9845&t=9845 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813]
Bookpool has the same book for $7 less, for those of you who are interested. http://www.bookpool.com/.x/a649x57h50/ss/1?qs=0072123354&Go.x=22&Go.y=3 Stephen Hoover DCI Corporation - Original Message - From: "CiscoG" To: Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 1:49 PM Subject: RE: CBAC and Firewall IOS on 1720 ADSL Internet Router [7:9813] > Actually I have configuring these once or twice. Save your money on the book > below Phil and buy this one; > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072123354/o/qid=993493780/sr=2-3/ref > =aps_sr_b_1_3/104-1980751-0486302. By far the best and only book you'll ever > need in regards to ANY access-lists and even traffic policing and queuing. > Simply fantastic! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9844&t=9813 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst 2900XL [7:9843]
Is there possible configure QoS on switch 2924 XL ? What software number I need ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9843&t=9843 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT Issue [7:9840]
Im trying to pass snmp traffic to my internal LAN (10.0.0.0) We connect to our WAN through a interface with a public address. When our snmp enabled devices try to access the Network Managment Station they get denied, I think it has something to do with private vs. public addresses. See Diagram *** * NMS * 10.0.0.101 * * 10.0.0.100 F0/0 & Sec. Public address * *2621* **Public add S0/0 (I want to NAT here) | | | Public Address S1/0.x GSR * *SNMP *172.16.x.x Public Add e0 *Device * * * *** Any help would be great Erich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9840&t=9840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: router respond to network address [7:9793]
Brian, If it is enabled in every IOS as a standard, I guess I learned something new. THANKS! It has always been rather obscure to me because it doesn't appear in a lot of the Cisco docs that I've looked thru in the past. As I said, the list is always a good learning experience! Thanks again RH Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9838&t=9793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Books for BCMSN ???? [7:9841]
Hi all, Can anyone tell me what is the best book to study BCMSN examI am planning to take it in about 15 days. thanx a lot in advance. Imran CCNA = Imran Moin Network Engineer CCNA __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9841&t=9841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
Thank you veery much for clarifying that. Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the ODI "wrap" and IPX "share" the layer 2 functions? Also, what is the NWLINK equivalent of ARP? -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] IPX runs at layer 3. There's no question of that. Perhaps the confusing thing is that IPX layer-3 addresses consist of network.MAC. The node part of the address is the same as the layer-2 NIC address, also known as MAC or hardware address. This means that IPX doesn't need an ARP. If you know the Layer-3 address, you know the Layer-2 address also. Above IPX, the most common Novell protocol is NetWare Core Protocol (NCP) used by file servers. Print servers use SPX. It's a myth that NCP uses SPX. It doesn't. Priscilla At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote: >I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack. > >-Original Message- >From: Charles Manafa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > >IPX is layer 3 >Switches operate at layer 2 > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 20/06/01 08:14 >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > >Thanks! I found the setting in the printer to disable the IPX. However >Can >we filter the IPX traffic on our 2900 IOS switches, and set based 5500 >switches. IF yes.. what is the command to disable transmission of IPX >traffic in the switches. > > > >-Original Message- >From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:40 PM >To: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) >Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > >It may be an HP JetDirect card. > >Get rid of it by assigning your JetDirect and or Printer an IP Address >(whichever you need to do) >Turn IPX off on the JetDirect Print Server. > >OR > >Filter IPX at your router and see if you can still print. >Then >RE_check for your IPX.. Is it still there? Did printer stop working? >If so >then you may want to keep IPX till you can switch to IP. > >-Original Message- >From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:12 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] > > >Hi. > >I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our >network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But >we >have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? > >In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like >source destination Protocol Info >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query >0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Response >0.0008c7280106 0.NBIPXFind name "our >domain >name" >0.0008c7280106 0.BROWSER Host Announcement >"workstation name" workstation, server, print queue server, NT >workstation, >NT server, Potential browser. > >In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer >server? >Why printer got something to do with IPX . > >How to get rid of this? > >Please advice >Thanks > > > >-Original Message- >From: jason douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:38 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco [7: >9041] > > >I thought it was similar. > >frank wrote: > > > > compared with 350-001,easier or much the same? > > > > Thanks, > > > > frank >-- >Jason Douglas >Lucent World Wide Services >Pager 888-451-0755 >== >De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en >is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht >onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en >de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. >== >The information contained in this message may be confidential >and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you >receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents >herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. > > >== >== >De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en >is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht >onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en >de afzender direct te info
RE: ATM Home Lab [7:9834]
the mods you want are nm-4t1-ima configuring atm on a ds-3, on oc-3, and an ima t1-group are all the same, minus configuring the linecoding and framing and whatnot. Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th. Street New York, New York 10001 Cell: +1(516) 782.1535 Desk: +1(646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ATM Home Lab [7:9834] If I have several Cisco 2600 routers, is it possible to create a home lab that runs ATM (for practicing) if I buy the ATM modules. If yes, what modules should I buy. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9836&t=9834 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
