How config changes logged? [7:20968]

2001-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Configuration changes are logged, but not what commands were changed.  The
configuration change log messages are severity 5 (notification), so if your
logging only shows warnings and higher, you won't see the notifications.
Example of a notification...

.Sep 24 10:25:39 EST: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by vty0
(1.2.99.2)

As you can see, it doesn't show what was changed or who changed it (beyond
an IP address - I think with tacacs implemented you will see the user), but
at least it shows the time.

JMcL
- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 26/09/2001 03:43 pm -
   
 
   
Cisco
Breaker  To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How config changes logged?
[7:20968]
Sent
by:
   
nobody@groupst
   
udy.com
   
 
   
 
   
25/09/2001
06:00
pm
Please
respond
to
Cisco
   
Breaker
   
 
   
 




Hi everyone?

Does anybody know how to view the last time the config changed or how to
view which commands added at what time to a router? I tried show log I only
see updowns etc..

Best regards,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21106t=20968
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Is following CCIE written book list enough? [7:21107]

2001-09-26 Thread Frank Shen

I'm on way to ccie written. Now I am using the clark, jeff, halabi to
prepare. Is caslow needed?
I also know ATM is part of the exam, which is my weakness. Is it very
difficult?
Thanks for all rely my question!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21107t=21107
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DLSW Confusion:Canonical/noncanonical [7:21109]

2001-09-26 Thread Cisco Lover

Hi guys,

Having a very simple confusion about when and where we need to convert
canonical/noncanonical addresses ,when dealing with DLSW+??

Like for eg, if the Question ask to use ICANREACH macaddress command on 
tokenring router to show that this router can reach an ethernet 
macaddress DO we have to change ethernet address to noncanonical at this 
stage before specifying with ICANREACh command or ant thing else??

Please solve the confusion.

Thanks.
Cisco lover

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21109t=21109
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



re: PIX agent for oracle configuration [7:21110]

2001-09-26 Thread Rod Rodericks

Hi Gents,

I need some assistance in configuring the Cisco PIX  agent for oracle to
allow  SQL*NET request from external network thru the PIX to access internal
Oracle database?
the pix works fine but the only problem is the oracle side which port does
it use.?

Thanks Guys

Rod




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21110t=21110
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Sniffing Packet From the router. [7:21111]

2001-09-26 Thread Ken

Hi,

Does anyone know how I can sniff packet from a router. Or can the router
redirect the packet to another Ethernet interface. Like Span port on the
switch. I need to capture the packet that is going across the WAN interface.

Thanks.

Ken




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2t=2
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



content service switch 11500? [7:21112]

2001-09-26 Thread steven

i want to use 2 web switches 11500 to load-balance 2 pixs ,
how could i design it ?


Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21112t=21112
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Voice over IP specific [7:21031]

2001-09-26 Thread Patrick Donlon

Looking at what your doing you should be able to dial only once and reach
the client on the other side. From my experience you would never have to
dial an access code at each stage. I've got some sample config's with pots
ports and lots of isdn configs, if you have any more specific questions let
me know,

regards

Cisco Breaker  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi All,

 We have a customer that wants a implementation of voice over ip. Their
dial
 plan will be like this.

 A-clients --pbx--router--voip--router--pbx--Bclients
|
|
   router
   |
PBX
   |
   Cclients

 Normally if an A client want to reach a client from B, they dial 66 and
from
 PBX or FXS they get a line and dial 76 and reach the corresponding route
 rfrom voip and dial 86 to reach PBX and the last step they dial the
Bclients
 expansion number 801. My question is this, Is it possible to only dial
once
 and reach the corresponding Bclient from A without PLar (cause A client
will
 Cclients too)? I want to appoint   ony one number and make it dial all
 66,76,86,801 with  commas ofcourse cause there is a waiting time over
PBXs.

 Best regards,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21113t=21031
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: EIGRP network design [7:21019]

2001-09-26 Thread Patrick Donlon

Yes the firewalls are all PIX. For the PIX can I set up the PIX to receive
RIP routes redistributed from the EIGRP routers? If so this will save a lot
of admin work, but will this be a security risk, ie. someone being able to
inject routes into the PIX?

regards

Carroll Kong  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 What kind of firewalls?  Pix?  If so, try RIP v2 with redistribution into
 your routers.  As for discontiguous networks, there are many ways around
 that, with a different cost associated of course.

 At 12:52 PM 9/25/01 -0400, Patrick Donlon wrote:
 Hi everyone
 
 I've got a project where I have to design and implement EIGRP in a small
to
 medium sized network of about 50 to 70 routers. One of my main problems
is
 what to do with routing updates at the firewalls at each site, should
they
 be allowed to pass through the firewall or should statics be used either
 side of the firewalls. Another problem I can see is the routes on the
 firewalls, is there a way to avoid having to type all those route entries
in
 them, the network has many discontiguous networks. And one last point is
the
 redistribution to the BGP routers at the edge of the network I'm after
some
 tips, experiences and URLs so I can read around the subject myself
 
 Regards Pat
 -Carroll Kong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21114t=21019
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Other Groups [7:21115]

2001-09-26 Thread MJ

Dear All,

This newsgroup has been really helpful and great. Do anyone of you know more
groups on Cisco like this ?


Mukul




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21115t=21115
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ISDN support in Tacacs+ ? [7:21118]

2001-09-26 Thread Arshad Mughal

Hi,

I am trying to configure the Tacacs+ for the ISDN callin  Callback, but
did'nt find much AV pairs and information regarding this issue.

Is anybody knows or has any information regarding this issue? Please
share this information with me.

Thanks a lot,

Arshad




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21118t=21118
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MPLS Beta Exam + Multicast/QOS Beta Exam [7:21116]

2001-09-26 Thread Kenneth Yeung

Did any who has attended the beta exam for MPLS or QOS Beta Exam.?
I would like to know which material can be used to prepare for the exam? 
Which books should I read?  Is the books enough for the exam?
Appreciate any recommendation.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21116t=21116
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Voice over IP specific [7:21031]

2001-09-26 Thread Cisco Breaker

I have made the config with num-exp command and it worked.

Thanks for the answers.

Cisco Breaker  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi All,

 We have a customer that wants a implementation of voice over ip. Their
dial
 plan will be like this.

 A-clients --pbx--router--voip--router--pbx--Bclients
|
|
   router
   |
PBX
   |
   Cclients

 Normally if an A client want to reach a client from B, they dial 66 and
from
 PBX or FXS they get a line and dial 76 and reach the corresponding route
 rfrom voip and dial 86 to reach PBX and the last step they dial the
Bclients
 expansion number 801. My question is this, Is it possible to only dial
once
 and reach the corresponding Bclient from A without PLar (cause A client
will
 Cclients too)? I want to appoint   ony one number and make it dial all
 66,76,86,801 with  commas ofcourse cause there is a waiting time over
PBXs.

 Best regards,




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21119t=21031
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Passed switching [7:20868]

2001-09-26 Thread TP

you are not allowed to take anything in the exam room and this should go for
all exams!
It is not correct...I was allowed to take coca-cola in the exam room :)

Ciao,
Teresa



 From: Baker, Jason
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:01 AM
  Subject: RE: Passed switching [7:20868]


  hmmm you are asking what you are allowed to bring in.. sounds to me you
have
  been doing your exams at dodgy exam centre
  as well.

  you are not allowed to take anything in the exam room and this should go
for
  all exams!

  Jason
   -Original Message-
   From: Juan Blanco [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 7:43 am
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: Passed switching [7:20868]
  
   The passing score is 699
  
   -Original Message-
   From: John McCartney
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 9/25/2001 2:57 PM
   Subject: RE: Passed switching [7:20868]
  
   What is the passing score for the BCMSN? I'm taking mine in about 3
   weeks.
   Also, what did they let you bring in? Congrats on passing, keep going!!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21117t=20868
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



VPN [7:21120]

2001-09-26 Thread Ramesh c

Hey Guys,

My setup as follows 

Internet -- Router  PIX -- Internal network

We are using a 192.168.x.x network and using NAT to change to valid ip
address.So when I need to setup VPN should I use the 192.168.x.x or the
Valid Ip address?

My internet router config

interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.y.x 255.255.255.252
 ip nat inside

interface Serial0/0
  ip address 192.168.x.x 255.255.255.240

More which is advisable..
1)VPN to router or VPN to PIX ?

Pls explain in detail...



Make a difference, help support the relief efforts in the U.S.
http://clubs.lycos.com/live/events/september11.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21120t=21120
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: content service switch 11500? [7:21112]

2001-09-26 Thread Wilson, Bradley

This would be possible, but the only catch is that you'd have to be running
RIP, OSPF, or using static routing (since those are the only routing options
with the CSS platform).

BJ



-Original Message-
From: steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: content service switch 11500? [7:21112]


i want to use 2 web switches 11500 to load-balance 2 pixs ,
how could i design it ?


Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21122t=21112
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Just Passes CCIE Written [7:21121]

2001-09-26 Thread Phantom

Hi

Just want to say thanks to every one in this forum, I just came back from
writing my CCIE Written.

If I have to single out one book it is probably Caslow's Book (v1)

It contained all the information I needed to pass the exam.

Phantoms Method
--
First I did CCNP, Took me 4 Months.

After CIT I downloaded Cisco Blueprint and checked what was extra above the
CCNP.

I then got the exam cram from brainbuzz and went through that. (A few errors
in there but well worth the read)

I then downloaded all the exam crams for CCNP end went through them as a
refresher of what I already new from doing my CCNP.

I then worked through Caslows books end referenced my CCNP books every now
and then to clarify certain things.

I also used the tokenring paper from CCPREP, (a MUST Have)
http://www.ccprep.com/resources/news/archives/Token_Ring2.pdf

I probably got atleast one question out of each section on the blueprint.
Don't know how its going to change at the end of the month though.


Now its on to the lab.

Phantom




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21121t=21121
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



re: PIX agent for oracle configuration [7:21110]

2001-09-26 Thread Sean Young

It uses tcp port between 1521 and 1571; however, 1521 and 1526 is most
commonly used because usually Oracle listener is running on either of
these port.  Do a netstat -an | grep 1521 or 1526 to check of Oracle
listener is running on the box.

From: Rod Rodericks Reply-To: Rod Rodericks To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: re: PIX agent for oracle configuration
[7:21110] Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 03:29:14 -0400  Hi Gents,  I need
some assistance in configuring the Cisco PIX agent for oracle to allow
SQL*NET request from external network thru the PIX to access internal
Oracle database? the pix works fine but the only problem is the oracle
side which port does it use.?  Thanks Guys  Rod Message
Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21110t=21110
-- FAQ, list archives,
and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report
misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21123t=21110
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 3Com Switch [7:20980]

2001-09-26 Thread Elaluf, Sylvia,

Dear Mark,

Our switch hasnt got a reset button in the back but Bob's advice was great
as we solved the problem
Thanks anyway
Silvia


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Odette II [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:59 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: 3Com Switch [7:20980]
 
 Another way to recover the password Cisco fashion, is to hook up a null
 modem cable to the console port, and break out your favorite terminal app.
 Power off the switch, wait 30 seconds, and while powering it back up,
 depress the little reset button on the back for 5-10 seconds.  This will
 return the device to its factory defaults, as per 3Com Tech Support
 and
 that way, you don't have to RMA the device.
 
 They, of course, don't post this tidbit on the website you only learn
 of
 it when you call in for a support call with a registered piece of
 equipment.
 
 Mark
 - Original Message -
 From: Bob Timmons 
 To: 
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:35 AM
 Subject: Re: 3Com Switch [7:20980]
 
 
  Found this on 3com's site:
 
  -
  SolutionID:
  2.0.76269083.3278305
  Title: SuperStack II Switch 3300 - How to recover lost password on a
  1100/3300 switch?
 
  Goal  How to recover lost password on a 1100/3300 switch?
 
  Fact  3C16980
  Fact  3C16980A
  Fact  SuperStack II Switch 3300
  Fact  SuperStack II Switch 3300
  Fact  SuperStack II Switch 1100
  Fact  default password
 
  Symptom  lost password
 
  Cause  The password was changed and now the switch cannot be accessed.
 
  Fix  The default password for the admin account is no password (just
 press
  enter when prompted for the password).
  If you can not access the switch try the security account using
 security
  as login and security as password. As soon as you gain access to the
  switch modify the admin account and re-login as administrator. You
 should
  avoid to access as security for administrative tasks.
 
  If you still have no access to the switch, please, contact 3Com to RMA
 the
  unit.
 
  -
 
   Hi
  
   I have a 3Com Switch 3300 - 24 Port Superstack II that unfortunately I
  dont
   know the password.
  
   Maybe somebody can give advice in how to do a password recovery /hack
 the
   device?
  
   I have not been able to find in the 3Com site documentation for this
   purpose.
  
   Thanks
  
   Sil




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21125t=20980
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Aux port - Dialer setup question [7:21088]

2001-09-26 Thread Ouellette, Tim

Robert,

having done this exact same setup in my CCIE lab using a teltone POTS
simulator I can verify that this can be done.

You were right on in asking about the async port.  That will be the physical
interface to your dialer1. Your basical config may look something like this
interface async1
ip unnumbered ethernet0
no ip directed-broadcast
encap ppp
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
async mode dedicated
fair-queue 64 16 0
no cdp enable
ppp authentication chap

Check out this link as it provides a lot of information for DDR.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12supdoc/dsq
cg3/qcddr.htm#xtocid60145

Watch the wrap.

Tim

 -Original Message-
 From: Robert  Fowler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:51 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Aux port - Dialer setup question [7:21088]
 
 While studying for my BCRAN test, I decided to test some of what I learned
 however I think I may have hit a bump. I think the problem is you can't
 put
 an aux port into a dialer pool because it doesn't have a physical
 interface.
 However for the purpose of this exercise I let you in on what I have
 attempted.
 
 I have 2 routers, I have a modem connected to each aux port. The 2 routers
 have a link between them, if that link goes down I want 1 router to call
 the
 2nd and establish a connection using the aux ports.
 
 Do I have to have an asynch port in order to accomplish this?
 
 
 Thank You,
 Robert Fowler




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21124t=21088
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco Equipment [7:21127]

2001-09-26 Thread Derek Gaff

Hello all

I have being reading the posts that have being posted in this list for the
last few weeks. If anybody can help me, I am trying to purchase some
secondhand Cisco Equipment in Ireland to prepare for the CCIE Written and
Lab. At this time I cannot find anywere that resells secondhand equipment.
Does anybody from this part of the world have any ideas.

Cheers
Derek



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21127t=21127
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Purchase Routers in Ireland [7:21109]

2001-09-26 Thread Derek Gaff

Hello all

I have being reading the posts that have being posted in this list for the
last few weeks. If anybody can help me, I am trying to purchase some
secondhand Cisco Equipment in Ireland to prepare for the CCIE Written and
Lab. At this time I cannot find anywere that resells secondhand equipment.
Does anybody from this part of the world have any ideas.

Cheers
Derek



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21126t=21109
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Passed switching [7:20868]

2001-09-26 Thread Robert Fowler

I heard that if you read a Coca-cola can backwards it has all the answers to
the foundation exam! :)

-Original Message-
From: TP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Passed switching [7:20868]


you are not allowed to take anything in the exam room and this should go
for
all exams!
It is not correct...I was allowed to take coca-cola in the exam room :)

Ciao,
Teresa




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21128t=20868
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



End to end Voip not working [7:21129]

2001-09-26 Thread Amit Gupta

Hello All,

I am facing some problems in making an end to end VoIP
call over an IPLC.We are using 4 wire em, type 5
signalling
The local loopback/ hairpinning is working fine at one
of the ends but it fails  sometimes  at the remote
end.The IPLC link is stable and has no errors.

Can someone suggest any debugging areas.
Could it be some kind of signalling problem. Please
suggest.


Regards

Amit 




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21129t=21129
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread khramov

Hello,
 ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So would you
agree
 that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
broadcast, ip
 helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If I
enable ip
 dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 66 and
67)?

 Thanks a lot,
 Alex

MADMAN wrote:

 Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's and
 an MSFC2,
 they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.   So I
 figured they
 must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and
 wallah, there it
 is!!!

 C7507MIX#conf t
 Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
 C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
 C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
 C7507MIX(config)#^Z
 C7507MIX#wr t
 Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
 ip classless
 no ip forward-protocol udp bootps

   Dave

 khramov wrote:

  I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file.  I
  mean (ip
  forward-protocol udp 67).
  Is that the way it is suppose to be?
 
  MADMAN wrote:
 
   Check ip foward protocol
  
 Dave
  
   khramov wrote:
   
Hello
 How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
 helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
 services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I guess
 to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on
 ports 67 and 68 only?
   
 And another question that I have what exactly ip
 directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's web
 site but I never came across a clear defenition?
   
 Thanks,
 Alex
   
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had
a
  name
of khramov.vcf]
   --
   David Madland
   Sr. Network Engineer
   CCIE# 2016
   Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   612-664-3367
  
   Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
 
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
  of khramov.vcf]
 --
 David Madland
 CCIE# 2016
 Senior Network Engineer
 Qwest Communications
 612-664-3367

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of khramov.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21133t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Paul Jin

Do you have WINS server setting configured correctly for
the client workstations.

Unless u have a domain controller, clients will not know how
to contact the domain controller... WINS helps you on that.

Paul


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21134t=21130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]

2001-09-26 Thread michael

Dear all,

could somone help me with my following question how to configure
ISDN PRI to BRI ?

I would like to configure the following szenario:

1 central site :  1x PRI
13 remote site:   1x BRI

If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would like to
activate  ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote side
and the other way arround.
But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2
timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30
timeslots) on the central side.

Please help me

best regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21136t=21136
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Need Help on pix [7:21135]

2001-09-26 Thread Rajeev Karamchand

Hi all

I am facing the a strange problem.

All the site were working fine till yesterday. 

Now I can just ping from outside both with Ip and
name. But cannot bring the site from outside with IP
number and site name. DNS is working fine.

When I move one site out the firewall the site is up
and running. Is it the problem of the pix.

Any ideas




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21135t=21135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Santosh Koshy

All,
we have a situation where the users and the nt servers are on different
subnets divided by a L3 router that switches / routes information between
them. Everything seems to work perfectly fine. The user gets an IP address
via DHCP, he can ping and trace everywhere, as well as browse the web.
Although all this is happenning, the user cannot logon to the NT server
(v4).

All workstations, servers and routers are running only IP. Netbios is
encapsulated within IP.

Thanks,
Santosh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21130t=21130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I think if you configure the router for 'ip dhcp-server' you are configuring
the router as a dhcp server.  If you want to do that you need to configure a
address pool as well.

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


Hello,
 ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So would you
agree
 that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
broadcast, ip
 helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If I
enable ip
 dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 66 and
67)?

 Thanks a lot,
 Alex

MADMAN wrote:

 Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's
and
 an MSFC2,
 they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.   So I
 figured they
 must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and
 wallah, there it
 is!!!

 C7507MIX#conf t
 Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
 C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
 C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
 C7507MIX(config)#^Z
 C7507MIX#wr t
 Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
 ip classless
 no ip forward-protocol udp bootps

   Dave

 khramov wrote:

  I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file.  I
  mean (ip
  forward-protocol udp 67).
  Is that the way it is suppose to be?
 
  MADMAN wrote:
 
   Check ip foward protocol
  
 Dave
  
   khramov wrote:
   
Hello
 How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
 helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
 services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I guess
 to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on
 ports 67 and 68 only?
   
 And another question that I have what exactly ip
 directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's web
 site but I never came across a clear defenition?
   
 Thanks,
 Alex
   
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had
a
  name
of khramov.vcf]
   --
   David Madland
   Sr. Network Engineer
   CCIE# 2016
   Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   612-664-3367
  
   Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
 
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
  of khramov.vcf]
 --
 David Madland
 CCIE# 2016
 Senior Network Engineer
 Qwest Communications
 612-664-3367

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of khramov.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21137t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Telnet listening port [7:21138]

2001-09-26 Thread FC

Sorry in advance for the monkey question...I'd like to Pat the 23 port of my
Dialer interface (ip negotiated) to the inside lan. I am able to do this,
but obviosly I lost the connection with the router from outside. There's a
command to change the listening telnet port on the vty lines? I have a 827
with 12.0(3).




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21138t=21138
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Quick TFTP question [7:21139]

2001-09-26 Thread suleman ibrahim aboo

I would like to know about the tftp server for back ups- how does the router
know the location on the machine used for the storages of images. I know you
give the address- ie domain name or IP address but what about the directory?

Thanks in advance

suleman




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21139t=21139
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: which layer do the ospf bgp rip work on [7:20953]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

Ya that may be been since when has ANSI been the authoritative source
for correct spelling, I trust Merriam-Webster more...

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary

  fibre is a variant of fiber

  Dave

Dr Rita Puzmanova wrote:
 
 Keeping myself - hopefully - unbiased in this spelling discussion (not
 being native English speaker) I would like to point out - FYI - that
 FIBRE CHANNEL is the ANSI standard?!
 
 Rita
 
 MADMAN wrote:
 
  Ah yes I should have known it was a British spelling, like centre,
  fibre, behaviour etc...  When they gonna learn some good English ;)

David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21141t=20953
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE-Security Written [7:21140]

2001-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Group,

Is there anyone out there who is preparing to write CCIE-Security?

Steve




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21140t=21140
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DLSW Confusion:Canonical/noncanonical [7:21109]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

I have done many DLSW configs including what used to be refered to as
translational bridging and had never had to worry about canonical,
non-canonical.  Now ring numbers in hex vs. dec is another story...

  Dave

Cisco Lover wrote:
 
 Hi guys,
 
 Having a very simple confusion about when and where we need to convert
 canonical/noncanonical addresses ,when dealing with DLSW+??
 
 Like for eg, if the Question ask to use ICANREACH macaddress command on
 tokenring router to show that this router can reach an ethernet
 macaddress DO we have to change ethernet address to noncanonical at
this
 stage before specifying with ICANREACh command or ant thing else??
 
 Please solve the confusion.
 
 Thanks.
 Cisco lover
 
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21143t=21109
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21142]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

You can use ppp multilink but as I have said in the past, why bother
with the extra configs and overhead when you can simply enable CEF and
load share per packet or destination, your choice...

  Dave

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hello all
 I have  128 KBPS leased line  between 2 routers and I want to enhance the
 performance of the same using one more leased line . Can anyboby suggest me
 whether  is there any command which will  make these 2 lines to work as 1
 logical line as is the case with etherchannel ?
 Thanks in advance.
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21142t=21142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 6509 L 3 module [7:20997]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner

i9f i get what you ask correctly ...

the L3 module is a MSFC/RSM this is either a daughterboard on the supervisor 
cards or a seperate card..

basically they are a 2600 router on a card

here are some links to cisco configs

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/23.html

http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/35.html


From: chris 
Reply-To: chris 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 6509 L 3 module [7:20997]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:41:56 -0400

Where can I find well documented configuration information about the 6509
with Layer 3 module?  E.g. like routing between 2 6509 with layer L3
modules.  I believe it is a little different than connecting two 3600 back
to back because they are switched ports first.  Any info will help.  Thanks
Chris
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21145t=20997
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sniffing Packet From the router. [7:21111]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

You can easily hedge your bets against crashing the router by using an
extended access-list with ip packet debuging.

  Dave

Dennis wrote:
 
 debug ip packet... use with extreme care, you could crash the router if you
 have lots of traffic...
 
 Ken  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Hi,
 
  Does anyone know how I can sniff packet from a router. Or can the router
  redirect the packet to another Ethernet interface. Like Span port on the
  switch. I need to capture the packet that is going across the WAN
 interface.
 
  Thanks.
 
  Ken
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21144t=2
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Tim Booth

Alex,

Ip dhcp-server should be sufficient for your needs. Nothing else should need
to be enabled. Try it out.

Tim Booth

- Original Message -
From: khramov 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


 Hello,
  ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So would
you
 agree
  that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
 broadcast, ip
  helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If I
 enable ip
  dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 66
and
 67)?

  Thanks a lot,
  Alex

 MADMAN wrote:

  Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's
and
  an MSFC2,
  they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.   So
I
  figured they
  must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and
  wallah, there it
  is!!!
 
  C7507MIX#conf t
  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
  C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
  C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
  C7507MIX(config)#^Z
  C7507MIX#wr t
  Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
  ip classless
  no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
 
Dave
 
  khramov wrote:
 
   I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file.
I
   mean (ip
   forward-protocol udp 67).
   Is that the way it is suppose to be?
  
   MADMAN wrote:
  
Check ip foward protocol
   
  Dave
   
khramov wrote:

 Hello
  How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
  helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
  services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I guess
  to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on
  ports 67 and 68 only?

  And another question that I have what exactly ip
  directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's web
  site but I never came across a clear defenition?

  Thanks,
  Alex

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
had
 a
   name
 of khramov.vcf]
--
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367
   
Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
  
   [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
 name
   of khramov.vcf]
  --
  David Madland
  CCIE# 2016
  Senior Network Engineer
  Qwest Communications
  612-664-3367

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
 of khramov.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21146t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21147]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner

not as far as i am aware

What you COULD do ..is set them up as seperate lines ...and then run 
eigrp/ospf betweeen them ...this will load balance the lines..

you could just upgrade your one line to 256k...also

but there is no serial etherchannel varient..

you can do it with isdn using dialer channel`s


HTH steve

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21105]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 02:26:48 -0400

Hello all
I have  128 KBPS leased line  between 2 routers and I want to enhance the
performance of the same using one more leased line . Can anyboby suggest me
whether  is there any command which will  make these 2 lines to work as 1
logical line as is the case with etherchannel ?
Thanks in advance.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21147t=21147
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



3524 - Gigabit Etherchannel [7:21149]

2001-09-26 Thread Provost, Robert

Is Gigabit Etherchannel available on the 3524 and/or 4006?  I have some
documentation and it only mentions the Catalyst 5000 line. 

TIA




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21149t=21149
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]

2001-09-26 Thread Tim Booth

Michael,

  You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one to many
channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of lines that
will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups.

Hope this helps,
Tim Booth
- Original Message -
From: michael 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


 Dear all,

 could somone help me with my following question how to configure
 ISDN PRI to BRI ?

 I would like to configure the following szenario:

 1 central site :  1x PRI
 13 remote site:   1x BRI

 If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would like
to
 activate  ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote side
 and the other way arround.
 But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2
 timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30
 timeslots) on the central side.

 Please help me

 best regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21150t=21136
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21105]

2001-09-26 Thread dragi radovanovic

If you change the encap to ppp, you can build a multilink bundle, and have a
pipe going between you routers.
Do search on configuring virtual template on cisco.com

Dragi


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21151t=21105
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



AW: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]

2001-09-26 Thread Michael Dungl

thanks tim,
but how it is possible to assign channel-groups ?

best regards


-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2001 16:17
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


Michael,

  You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one to
many
channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of lines
that
will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups.

Hope this helps,
Tim Booth
- Original Message -
From: michael 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


 Dear all,

 could somone help me with my following question how to configure
 ISDN PRI to BRI ?

 I would like to configure the following szenario:

 1 central site :  1x PRI
 13 remote site:   1x BRI

 If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would
like
to
 activate  ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote
side
 and the other way arround.
 But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2
 timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30
 timeslots) on the central side.

 Please help me

 best regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21153t=21136
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21154]

2001-09-26 Thread Sam Deckert

Could he set the encapsulation of each serial int to be ppp, and use ppp
multilink on them??

- Original Message -
From: Stephen Skinner 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21147]


 not as far as i am aware

 What you COULD do ..is set them up as seperate lines ...and then run
 eigrp/ospf betweeen them ...this will load balance the lines..

 you could just upgrade your one line to 256k...also

 but there is no serial etherchannel varient..

 you can do it with isdn using dialer channel`s


 HTH steve

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ? [7:21105]
 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 02:26:48 -0400
 
 Hello all
 I have  128 KBPS leased line  between 2 routers and I want to enhance the
 performance of the same using one more leased line . Can anyboby suggest
me
 whether  is there any command which will  make these 2 lines to work as 1
 logical line as is the case with etherchannel ?
 Thanks in advance.
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21154t=21154
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: which layer do the ospf bgp rip work on [7:20953]

2001-09-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

You may trust Merriam-Webster, but if you want to find things in 
standards documents, I suggest you follow their rules.

Ya that may be been since when has ANSI been the authoritative source
for correct spelling, I trust Merriam-Webster more...

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary

   fibre is a variant of fiber

   Dave

Dr Rita Puzmanova wrote:

  Keeping myself - hopefully - unbiased in this spelling discussion (not
  being native English speaker) I would like to point out - FYI - that
  FIBRE CHANNEL is the ANSI standard?!

  Rita

  MADMAN wrote:
  
   Ah yes I should have known it was a British spelling, like centre,
   fibre, behaviour etc...  When they gonna learn some good English ;)

David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21156t=20953
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]

2001-09-26 Thread Tim Booth

Michael,

  Per-PRI interface...(controller T1 or maybe E1 command) then set up the
framing and linecode, then set up channel-groups with the channel-group
command.

Tim Booth
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dungl 
To: Tim Booth ; 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:44 AM
Subject: AW: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


thanks tim,
but how it is possible to assign channel-groups ?

best regards


-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2001 16:17
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


Michael,

  You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one to
many
channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of lines
that
will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups.

Hope this helps,
Tim Booth
- Original Message -
From: michael 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


 Dear all,

 could somone help me with my following question how to configure
 ISDN PRI to BRI ?

 I would like to configure the following szenario:

 1 central site :  1x PRI
 13 remote site:   1x BRI

 If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would
like
to
 activate  ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote
side
 and the other way arround.
 But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2
 timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30
 timeslots) on the central side.

 Please help me

 best regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21155t=21136
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Quick TFTP question [7:21139]

2001-09-26 Thread Robert Perez

It sends it to wherever you created the default TFTP directory on that
server.

-Original Message-
From: suleman ibrahim aboo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Quick TFTP question [7:21139]


I would like to know about the tftp server for back ups- how does the router
know the location on the machine used for the storages of images. I know you
give the address- ie domain name or IP address but what about the directory?

Thanks in advance

suleman




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21157t=21139
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: content service switch 11500? [7:21112]

2001-09-26 Thread Kelly Hair

A couple of solutions off the head include using Stonebeat to cluster the 
firewalls or reviewing some docs at Cisco's site..

Refer to 
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/webscale/css/advcfggd/firewa
ll.htm

or

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/117/cdn_top_issues/issue_loadbal.html 

HTH
Kelly

 This would be possible, but the only catch is that you'd have to be
 running RIP, OSPF, or using static routing (since those are the only
 routing options with the CSS platform).
 
 BJ
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:45 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: content service switch 11500? [7:21112]
 
 
 i want to use 2 web switches 11500 to load-balance 2 pixs ,
 how could i design it ?
 
 
 Thanks
 Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21158t=21112
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCNP Support 640-506 exam difficulty [7:21060]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner

the support exam is as hard as your support knowledge is week...( a crsap 
answer i know)..

i spent most of my time supporting networks and i found it quite easy..

you will get lots of question about reading sniffer`s ,,basic fault 
finding..and so  on

the lamme series is OK...but i like the support exam cram(it`s all i used to 
pass and ofcourse  the mighty boson)

HTH steve

From: Tim Booth 
Reply-To: Tim Booth 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCNP Support 640-506 exam difficulty [7:21060]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:07:02 -0400

Hello,

   I have taken Routing, Switching, and Remote Access. I am wondering about
the
difficulty level of the Support exam as compared to the others. I feel as
though I know most of the material when reading through the Support book
(Lammle series).

   Also, I'd like to know if the CCIE book (Lammle series) is sufficient to
pass the CCIE *written* exam.

Thanks,
Tim Booth
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21160t=21060
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]

2001-09-26 Thread Charlie Hartwell

An alternative method...

If you configure the PRI using a dialer profile for every remote site
and make each Dialer interface the backup route (using floating
statics) or backup-interface for the remote sites you can instruct
the interface to use a maximum of 2 channels.

I'm not going to go into dialer profile config here - it's easy to
find on cisco.com but the command you need in the Dialer Interface
config is dialer max-calls 2. Alternatively you can configure
dialer pool-member # max-link 2 on the physical interface. they do
the same job but there are reasons why you may need to use one rather
than the other.

Have a go at it and let us know if you still have problems.

regards

Charlie

 --- Tim Booth  wrote:  Michael,
 
   You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one
 to many
 channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of
 lines that
 will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups.
 
 Hope this helps,
 Tim Booth
 - Original Message -
 From: michael 
 To: 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM
 Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]
 
 
  Dear all,
 
  could somone help me with my following question how to configure
  ISDN PRI to BRI ?
 
  I would like to configure the following szenario:
 
  1 central site :  1x PRI
  13 remote site:   1x BRI
 
  If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i
 would like
 to
  activate  ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the
 remote side
  and the other way arround.
  But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb
 (2
  timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels
 (30
  timeslots) on the central side.
 
  Please help me
 
  best regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21159t=21136
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: policy route [7:21044]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner

i have to diasgreeevery 3 secs a pulse is sent from the active to 
standby.even if you have a route connected to your standbywhen 
thestandby gets any routed packets HSRP (which is layer 1/2) will send 
it to the active master..this wil then route the packets accordingly...

i`m told ther is a way around this but you will have to search the 
archives...it was only a couple of weeks ago

Cheers

steve

From: Jim Bond 
Reply-To: Jim Bond 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: policy route [7:21044]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:15:07 -0400

I have to disagree. The standby router has static
route point to the other side. Once traffic gets to
standby, it should route...

Jim

--- Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI
  wrote:
  Standby is stanby, it doesn't do any routing until
  the active router goes
  down.
 
  Regards,
 
  Mark,
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:52 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: policy route [7:21044]
 
 
  Hello,
 
  I have 2 routers running HSRP in a small office. I
  want SMTP traffic go through standby router so I
  configured policy route on active router that all
  SMTP
  traffic, send to standby router. But it doesn't
  work.
  I'm wondering if policy route will work this way?
 
  At active router:
  interface e0
   ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
   ip policy route-map SMTP
   standby ip 10.1.1.1
   ...
  route-map SMTP permit 10
   match ip address 102
   set ip next-hop 10.1.1.3 !standby router ethernet
  ...
  access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 25
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Jim
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
  messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
  http://im.yahoo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! 
Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21161t=21044
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 3524 - Gigabit Etherchannel [7:21149]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

4006 yes, 3500, i doubt it.

  Dave


Provost, Robert wrote:
 
 Is Gigabit Etherchannel available on the 3524 and/or 4006?  I have some
 documentation and it only mentions the Catalyst 5000 line.
 
 TIA
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21163t=21149
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Purchase Routers in Ireland [7:21109]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner

www.network-sol.com


From: Derek Gaff 
Reply-To: Derek Gaff 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Purchase Routers in Ireland [7:21109]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:39:35 -0400

Hello all

I have being reading the posts that have being posted in this list for the
last few weeks. If anybody can help me, I am trying to purchase some
secondhand Cisco Equipment in Ireland to prepare for the CCIE Written and
Lab. At this time I cannot find anywere that resells secondhand equipment.
Does anybody from this part of the world have any ideas.

Cheers
Derek
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21167t=21109
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Quick TFTP question [7:21139]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner

if you have downloaded the cisco tftp server you have the choice to select a 
local/network drive and folder...#

the cisco box just sends itits upto the tftp server to put the file in a 
directory

hth

steve


From: suleman ibrahim aboo 
Reply-To: suleman ibrahim aboo 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Quick TFTP question [7:21139]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:15:25 -0400

I would like to know about the tftp server for back ups- how does the 
router
know the location on the machine used for the storages of images. I know 
you
give the address- ie domain name or IP address but what about the 
directory?

Thanks in advance

suleman
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21164t=21139
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

Actually it's much simpler than that.  You set up your T1 controller,
D channel and pool and usernames and passwords for authentication.  The
remotes simply dial the PRI number when they, preferbly, loose a route. 
Of coarse there are other more convoluted ways but I like to KISS it. 
(Keep It Simple Stupid:)

 username remoteA password letmein
 !
controller T1 0
 framing esf
 clock source line primary
 linecode b8zs
 pri-group timeslots 1-24


interface Serial0:23
 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation ppp
 no keepalive
 autodetect encapsulation ppp v120
 isdn switch-type primary-5ess
 isdn incoming-voice modem
 peer default ip address pool DIALIN
 no fair-queue
 compress stac
 ppp authentication chap pap callin
 ppp multilink
 !
 ip local pool DIALIN 172.16.200.150 172.16.200.254




Tim Booth wrote:
 
 Michael,
 
   You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one to many
 channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of lines
that
 will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups.
 
 Hope this helps,
 Tim Booth
 - Original Message -
 From: michael
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM
 Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]
 
  Dear all,
 
  could somone help me with my following question how to configure
  ISDN PRI to BRI ?
 
  I would like to configure the following szenario:
 
  1 central site :  1x PRI
  13 remote site:   1x BRI
 
  If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would like
 to
  activate  ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote
side
  and the other way arround.
  But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2
  timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30
  timeslots) on the central side.
 
  Please help me
 
  best regards
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21166t=21136
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



AW: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]

2001-09-26 Thread Michael Dungl

thanks a lot!
Seems to be working. And now i have to configure on each timeslot 
the neccessary dialer map.  i am right  or ?

many thanks for you help
Michael



channel-group 1  timeslots 1-2
!
interface serial 4/1:0
  encapsulation ppp
   dialer map
   multilink ppp
!
Serial0/0:1 is reset, line protocol is down 
  Hardware is DSX1
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 128 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, 
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  LCP Closed, multilink Closed
  Closed: CDPCP
  Last input never, output never, output hang never
  Last clearing of show interface counters 00:12:59
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 12
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue :0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
 Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
 0 carrier transitions
  Timeslot(s) Used:1-2, Transmitter delay is 0 flags



-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2001 16:38
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


Michael,

  Per-PRI interface...(controller T1 or maybe E1 command) then set up
the
framing and linecode, then set up channel-groups with the channel-group
command.

Tim Booth
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dungl 
To: Tim Booth ; 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:44 AM
Subject: AW: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


thanks tim,
but how it is possible to assign channel-groups ?

best regards


-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tim Booth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2001 16:17
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


Michael,

  You need to configure your PRI interface and I believe create one to
many
channel-groups on that interface as needed; One for every pair of lines
that
will run to your remote sites, so say 13 channel-groups.

Hope this helps,
Tim Booth
- Original Message -
From: michael 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: PRI to BRI BACKUP [7:21136]


 Dear all,

 could somone help me with my following question how to configure
 ISDN PRI to BRI ?

 I would like to configure the following szenario:

 1 central site :  1x PRI
 13 remote site:   1x BRI

 If our frame goes down or one of the PVC to the remote site i would
like
to
 activate  ISDN Backup with 128kb from the centrale site to the remote
side
 and the other way arround.
 But how it is possible to configure the central site using 128kb (2
 timeslots) for calling the remote site ? I have got 30B Channels (30
 timeslots) on the central side.

 Please help me

 best regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21165t=21136
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: which layer do the ospf bgp rip work on [7:20953]

2001-09-26 Thread Stephen Skinner

HorrayTally-ho.Chin-chin and all that ..us brits are first at 
something

Marvelous...

From: MADMAN 
Reply-To: MADMAN 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: which layer do the ospf bgp rip work on [7:20953]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:17:16 -0400

Ya that may be been since when has ANSI been the authoritative source
for correct spelling, I trust Merriam-Webster more...

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary

   fibre is a variant of fiber

   Dave

Dr Rita Puzmanova wrote:
 
  Keeping myself - hopefully - unbiased in this spelling discussion (not
  being native English speaker) I would like to point out - FYI - that
  FIBRE CHANNEL is the ANSI standard?!
 
  Rita
 
  MADMAN wrote:
  
   Ah yes I should have known it was a British spelling, like centre,
   fibre, behaviour etc...  When they gonna learn some good English ;)

David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21169t=20953
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Mac address [7:21170]

2001-09-26 Thread chris

Is there any way to config you switch/router to prompt you when a certain
Mac address is plugged in or online.  Rather than setting the cam table
aging  to 3 days.

-Original Message-
From: dragi radovanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ?
[7:21105]


If you change the encap to ppp, you can build a multilink bundle, and have a
pipe going between you routers.
Do search on configuring virtual template on cisco.com

Dragi




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21170t=21170
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 3524 - Gigabit Etherchannel [7:21149]

2001-09-26 Thread Ole Drews Jensen

The 3500 does support Gigabit Etherchannel.

Follow this link:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/tech/c3500_wp.htm

(watch for word wrap).

It's about 4/5 through the document.

Hth,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3524 - Gigabit Etherchannel [7:21149]


4006 yes, 3500, i doubt it.

  Dave


Provost, Robert wrote:
 
 Is Gigabit Etherchannel available on the 3524 and/or 4006?  I have some
 documentation and it only mentions the Catalyst 5000 line.
 
 TIA
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21171t=21149
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Two more to GO...... [7:21172]

2001-09-26 Thread Juan Blanco

Team,
I just passed the Switching testnow to start working on the Remote
Access I want to thank first GOD, second every one in this group and
third to OLE DREWS JENSEN for a well develop free software(CATALYST 5000
SET-BASED COMMAND TRAINER)...his web site is www.routerchief.com 

Now for the remote access test which book is recommended(it should help me
to learn properly the material and at the same time to prepare me for the
CCIE(one day).

Which test from Bosson.


GOD BLESS AMERICA...STRONGER THAN EVER.

JB




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21172t=21172
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732]

2001-09-26 Thread George Aslanishvili

I believe Cisco is switching their 2 day lab test to one day starting
October 1st. Maybe that's why your confirmation is delayed. 

Good Luck

Cheers

-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732]


Hi,How long does it take for one to schedule the Lab after having passed the
Written? I passed it more than 2 weeks back and till today I have not
received any email from Prometric or Cisco regarding scheduling the lab. I
was told 3 days!!Any ideas?Thank you.



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21173t=20732
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: which layer do the ospf bgp rip work on [7:20953]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

Yes of coarse but I was refering to spelling of fiber/fibre etc. not
the standards  describing there use and it was light hearted, I'm not
going to worry about it much...

  Dave

Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
 
 You may trust Merriam-Webster, but if you want to find things in
 standards documents, I suggest you follow their rules.
 
 Ya that may be been since when has ANSI been the authoritative source
 for correct spelling, I trust Merriam-Webster more...
 
 http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
 
fibre is a variant of fiber
 
Dave
 
 Dr Rita Puzmanova wrote:
 
   Keeping myself - hopefully - unbiased in this spelling discussion (not
   being native English speaker) I would like to point out - FYI - that
   FIBRE CHANNEL is the ANSI standard?!
 
   Rita
 
   MADMAN wrote:
   
Ah yes I should have known it was a British spelling, like centre,
fibre, behaviour etc...  When they gonna learn some good English ;)
 
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367
 
 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21174t=20953
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 3524 - Gigabit Etherchannel [7:21149]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

Thanks Ole for the clarification, I doubt no more :^)

  Dave

Ole Drews Jensen wrote:
 
 The 3500 does support Gigabit Etherchannel.
 
 Follow this link:
 
 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/tech/c3500_wp.htm
 
 (watch for word wrap).
 
 It's about 4/5 through the document.
 
 Hth,
 
 Ole
 
 ~~~
  Ole Drews Jensen
  Systems Network Manager
  CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ~~~
  http://www.RouterChief.com
 ~~~
  NEED A JOB ???
  http://www.oledrews.com/job
 ~~~
 
 -Original Message-
 From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:21 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: 3524 - Gigabit Etherchannel [7:21149]
 
 4006 yes, 3500, i doubt it.
 
   Dave
 
 Provost, Robert wrote:
 
  Is Gigabit Etherchannel available on the 3524 and/or 4006?  I have some
  documentation and it only mentions the Catalyst 5000 line.
 
  TIA
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367
 
 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21175t=21149
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Other Groups [7:21115]

2001-09-26 Thread EA Louie

there are a few others...Brainbuzz actually has quite a few- here are 2
examples
Cisco CCNA/CCIE/NP/DA/DP Discussion Board
http://boards.brainbuzz.com/boards/vbt.asp?b=78
Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert Board
http://boards.brainbuzz.com/boards/vbt.asp?b=716

2 newsgroups (check your newsreader)
news:comp.sys.dcom.cisco
news:alt.certification.cisco

and there is also a CCNA discussion list on www.groupstudy.com

-e-

- Original Message -
From: MJ 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:53 AM
Subject: Other Groups [7:21115]


 Dear All,

 This newsgroup has been really helpful and great. Do anyone of you know
more
 groups on Cisco like this ?


 Mukul
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21162t=21115
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Mac address [7:21170]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

On a switch you can configure port level security:



  Dave

chris wrote:
 
 Is there any way to config you switch/router to prompt you when a certain
 Mac address is plugged in or online.  Rather than setting the cam table
 aging  to 3 days.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: dragi radovanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:45 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Can I configure 2 leased line for single channel ?
 [7:21105]
 
 If you change the encap to ppp, you can build a multilink bundle, and have
a
 pipe going between you routers.
 Do search on configuring virtual template on cisco.com
 
 Dragi
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21176t=21170
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fastethernet failover [7:21177]

2001-09-26 Thread Steve Smith

Hey gang this may sound strange but it was just a thought. I have a 3640
that has two separate Ethernet interfaces. I have one that runs into one
of our cats running HSRP. Is there a way to run the second one to the
other cat as a fail over path? Can this be done with weights or anything
like that?

Thanks in advance!

Steve




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21177t=21177
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Telnet listening port [7:21138]

2001-09-26 Thread TP

Fabio,
If you want to telnet the router you have  to know the dialer ip address
(after negotiation).

In the following expample you are opening a telnet session to 1660 port:

ip nat inside source list # inferface dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp (eth0 ip address) 23 (dialer0 ip address)
1600
extendable

This is the configuration I set for Balassone, for troubleshooting purposes,
maybe we are talking about the same customer: isn't it?
Ciao,
Teresa
P.S.
keep in mind: dialer interface will negotiate a different IP address to the
next connection


  - Original Message -
  From: FC
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:13 PM
  Subject: Telnet listening port [7:21138]


  Sorry in advance for the monkey question...I'd like to Pat the 23 port of
my
  Dialer interface (ip negotiated) to the inside lan. I am able to do this,
  but obviosly I lost the connection with the router from outside. There's a
  command to change the listening telnet port on the vty lines? I have a 827
  with 12.0(3).




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21178t=21138
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: EIGRP network design [7:21019]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

RIPv1 sends to 255.255.255.255. RIPv2 sends to 224.0.0.9. They both use UDP 
port 520. Both the source and dest ports are 520.

Are you sure static routes wouldn't be the best bet, though? I haven't 
followed the entire discussion, so if that's off the wall, just ignore it.

Priscilla


At 09:09 AM 9/26/01, Carroll Kong wrote:
Hm.  If you are that worried about internal security, you should probably
make an ACL that allows only the redistributing router's ip, deny all other
udp port 520 reqs (for ripv1, or multicast 224.0.0.5?  re-check what it
uses).  Also, you might need to write some no nat rules to avoid nat.  That
might be more work than statics.

Yes, IPs are spoofable, and so are MAC addresses.  If your internal
security helps avoid this (easy to do), then an ACL for Rip updates should
be fairly secure.

At 04:41 AM 9/26/01 -0400, Patrick Donlon wrote:
 Yes the firewalls are all PIX. For the PIX can I set up the PIX to receive
 RIP routes redistributed from the EIGRP routers? If so this will save a
lot
 of admin work, but will this be a security risk, ie. someone being able to
 inject routes into the PIX?
 
 regards
 
 Carroll Kong  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   What kind of firewalls?  Pix?  If so, try RIP v2 with redistribution
into
   your routers.  As for discontiguous networks, there are many ways
around
   that, with a different cost associated of course.
  
   At 12:52 PM 9/25/01 -0400, Patrick Donlon wrote:
   Hi everyone
   
   I've got a project where I have to design and implement EIGRP in a
small
 to
   medium sized network of about 50 to 70 routers. One of my main
problems
 is
   what to do with routing updates at the firewalls at each site, should
 they
   be allowed to pass through the firewall or should statics be used
either
   side of the firewalls. Another problem I can see is the routes on the
   firewalls, is there a way to avoid having to type all those route
entries
 in
   them, the network has many discontiguous networks. And one last point
is
 the
   redistribution to the BGP routers at the edge of the network I'm after
 some
   tips, experiences and URLs so I can read around the subject myself
   
   Regards Pat
   -Carroll Kong
-Carroll Kong


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21180t=21019
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you 
already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and

ip forward-protocol udp 67
no ip forward-protocol 137
no ip forward-protocol 138

The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast 
forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a helper 
address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to configure 
it to be more discerning.

Priscilla

At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
Hello,
  ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So would
you
agree
  that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
broadcast, ip
  helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If I
enable ip
  dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 66 and
67)?

  Thanks a lot,
  Alex

MADMAN wrote:

  Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with RSP8's
and
  an MSFC2,
  they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.   So
I
  figured they
  must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67 and
  wallah, there it
  is!!!
 
  C7507MIX#conf t
  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
  C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
  C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
  C7507MIX(config)#^Z
  C7507MIX#wr t
  Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
  ip classless
  no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
 
Dave
 
  khramov wrote:
 
   I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config file. 
I
   mean (ip
   forward-protocol udp 67).
   Is that the way it is suppose to be?
  
   MADMAN wrote:
  
Check ip foward protocol
   
  Dave
   
khramov wrote:

 Hello
  How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
  helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
  services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I guess
  to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast on
  ports 67 and 68 only?

  And another question that I have what exactly ip
  directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's web
  site but I never came across a clear defenition?

  Thanks,
  Alex

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
had
a
   name
 of khramov.vcf]
--
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367
   
Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
  
   [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
   of khramov.vcf]
  --
  David Madland
  CCIE# 2016
  Senior Network Engineer
  Qwest Communications
  612-664-3367

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of khramov.vcf]


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21181t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: can you block code red [7:21073]

2001-09-26 Thread Michael Vaughan

George,

The below URL's might help...

How to Filter Code Red on Cisco Cache and Content Engines
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/117/cache_engine/code_red_cache_engine.
html
 

Using Network-Based Application Recognition and Access Control Lists for
Blocking the Code Red Worm at Network Ingress Points
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nbar_acl_codered.shtml

How to protect from the Nimda Virus
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nimda.shtml

Cisco Code Red Technical Tips
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/codered_index.shtml

SAFE Code-Red Attack Mitigation
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/cuso/epso/sqfr/scdam_wp.htm

I am sure there are other ways, do a little research at cert.org, and
Cisco.com.  :)

Cheers,
Michael Vaughan
Senior Network Engineer
Predator-Hunter.com Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena,
whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly;
who errs and comes short again and again, who knows the great
enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause;
who at best, knows the triumph of high achievement; and who, at the
worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his
place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither
victory nor defeat. 
-Theodore Roosevelt, Citizen in a Republic, April 23, 1910

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21179t=21073
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Lab Info [7:21067] (and more CCIE information) [7:21168]

2001-09-26 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm

As a follow up to my previous comments about CCIE lab equipment... Cisco
says that yes they will be replacing the Cat 5000's some time in the future
and will post a notice beforehand.  When that's to occur, I don't think even
they know but it's definitely not October 1st.

They've also indicated that there will be no PIX on the routing and
switching exam.  On the security exam -- yes, and that makes sense.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Leigh Anne Chisholm
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:32 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Cisco Lab Info [7:21067] (and more CCIE information)
 [7:21078]


 Interesting.

 19.  Will I need to prepare any differently for the new format exams?
 No. Only the format of the exam itself has changed. The knowledge
 and skills
 required to pass are the same in the old and new formats.

 There's no reference to the fact that the equipment list is being
 revised as
 was reported earlier by Brad Ellis
 (http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/cisco/200108/msg03300.html) so I
 wouldn't necessarily think that you should run out and buy a PIX
 and try and
 get some hands-on on a 6509.  I've got an email into Cisco asking if the
 equipment is changing as was rumored.

 There has been another question circulating around this
 list--specifically,
 what happens if you lose your CCIE certification--does your number get
 released back into the pool or do you get to keep that number if
 you end up
 recertifying again.  The answer according to the people I've emailed at
 Cisco is that the number is yours.  If you recertify, you get it back.

 The other question I asked Cisco was about whether you could call
 yourself a
 CCIE if you have a status of suspended (your two years has elapsed and
 you're in the 1 year grace period to complete the recertification exam) or
 inactive (you've failed to successfully complete the recertification
 exam).  Again, the answer I received was that once you're a CCIE, you're
 always a CCIE.  You must however clarify your status so that you don't
 mislead anyone.  If you're inactive, you must clarify that fact.
 If you're
 suspended, likewise.

 Hope that helps answer all of those CCIE mysteries...

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Wright, Jeremy
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:43 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Cisco Lab Info [7:21067]
 
 
  Team, thought you might be interested in some of this info if
 you weren't
  already aware...
 
  http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/new_format.html




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21168t=21168
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732]

2001-09-26 Thread Kim Edward B

I passed Written last Wednesday and I was able to register this Monday.
Perhaps you should check with Cisco.
I got a confirm e-mail from this e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Hope it helps.

Ed

-Original Message-
From: George Aslanishvili [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732]

I believe Cisco is switching their 2 day lab test to one day starting
October 1st. Maybe that's why your confirmation is delayed. 

Good Luck

Cheers

-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Schedule for Lab?? [7:20732]


Hi,How long does it take for one to schedule the Lab after having passed the
Written? I passed it more than 2 weeks back and till today I have not
received any email from Prometric or Cisco regarding scheduling the lab. I
was told 3 days!!Any ideas?Thank you.



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
*
DISCLAIMER:   The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential
and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee.  Access, copying
or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other
person is not authorized.  If you are not the intended recipient please
notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21182t=20732
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Question and also some information too - VoIP [7:21183]

2001-09-26 Thread Ouellette, Tim

What is the default interval between pings from a 6509 w/msfc?

The reason I ask is that I just got an email from a cisco tac dude.  We're
having issues at one of our sites where we can only ping a Cisco 7960 IP
phone 60% of the time.  This is true when pings are performed from the core
6509 switch/router.  When I goto the access layer device which is just a
6509 with no msfc, the pings are 100% successful. When I ping from the
callmanager, 100% replies.

The cisco tac guy said that the IP phones will not respond to more than one
ping per 10ms for security reasons?.  The weird part about this is that the
phones that are not working are running a new version of code ( load
=P003D310) and the phones that are working are running P003Q301.

Therefor,  new code = 60% ping, old load = 100% ping.  Ping from MSFC = 60%,
ping from anywhere else including access switch the phone is connected to or
ping from any other pc and it works 100%

Can anyone shed some light please?

Tim




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21183t=21183
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: policy route [7:21044]

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Hundley

Stephen,

Your statement is incorrect.  Enabling HSRP on a router does not cause the
standby router to send all packets to the primary.  The only things that
enabling HSRP does is:

1) Enable the primary router to answer arp replies and accept/return packets
for the virtual IP address (it does this by creating a virtual MAC to match
the virtual IP)
2) Enable a hearbeat signal so that secondaries can takeover for the primary
in the event of failure

Neither of these things has any effect on the backup HSRP routers ability to
forward IP packets as it normally would.  You can still use the secondary
HSRP router as you normally would by sending packets to its real IP.  The
secondary routers will forward packets sent to them based on the contents of
their routing table, they will not simply send all traffic over to the
primary router.

I've tested this in real world scenarios before and just re-confirmed it in
my lab.

-Kent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Stephen Skinner
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: policy route [7:21044]


i have to diasgreeevery 3 secs a pulse is sent from the active to
standby.even if you have a route connected to your standbywhen
thestandby gets any routed packets HSRP (which is layer 1/2) will send
it to the active master..this wil then route the packets accordingly...

i`m told ther is a way around this but you will have to search the
archives...it was only a couple of weeks ago

Cheers

steve

From: Jim Bond
Reply-To: Jim Bond
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: policy route [7:21044]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:15:07 -0400

I have to disagree. The standby router has static
route point to the other side. Once traffic gets to
standby, it should route...

Jim

--- Liang Mark J Civ AFRL/PROI
  wrote:
  Standby is stanby, it doesn't do any routing until
  the active router goes
  down.
 
  Regards,
 
  Mark,
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:52 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: policy route [7:21044]
 
 
  Hello,
 
  I have 2 routers running HSRP in a small office. I
  want SMTP traffic go through standby router so I
  configured policy route on active router that all
  SMTP
  traffic, send to standby router. But it doesn't
  work.
  I'm wondering if policy route will work this way?
 
  At active router:
  interface e0
   ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
   ip policy route-map SMTP
   standby ip 10.1.1.1
   ...
  route-map SMTP permit 10
   match ip address 102
   set ip next-hop 10.1.1.3 !standby router ethernet
  ...
  access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq 25
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Jim
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
  messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
  http://im.yahoo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21184t=21044
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Tim Booth

Priscilla and others:

Ip dhcp-server does not turn your router into a dhcp server. It tells your
router where your dhcp server is.

Tim Booth

- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


 Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
 already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and

 ip forward-protocol udp 67
 no ip forward-protocol 137
 no ip forward-protocol 138

 The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
 forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a helper
 address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to configure
 it to be more discerning.

 Priscilla

 At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
 Hello,
   ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So would
 you
 agree
   that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
 broadcast, ip
   helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If
I
 enable ip
   dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 66
and
 67)?
 
   Thanks a lot,
   Alex
 
 MADMAN wrote:
 
   Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with
RSP8's
 and
   an MSFC2,
   they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.
So
 I
   figured they
   must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
and
   wallah, there it
   is!!!
  
   C7507MIX#conf t
   Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
   C7507MIX(config)#^Z
   C7507MIX#wr t
   Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
   ip classless
   no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
  
 Dave
  
   khramov wrote:
  
I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config
file.
 I
mean (ip
forward-protocol udp 67).
Is that the way it is suppose to be?
   
MADMAN wrote:
   
 Check ip foward protocol

   Dave

 khramov wrote:
 
  Hello
   How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
   helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
   services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
guess
   to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast
on
   ports 67 and 68 only?
 
   And another question that I have what exactly ip
   directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's web
   site but I never came across a clear defenition?
 
   Thanks,
   Alex
 
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
 had
 a
name
  of khramov.vcf]
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367

 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
   
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had
a
 name
of khramov.vcf]
   --
   David Madland
   CCIE# 2016
   Senior Network Engineer
   Qwest Communications
   612-664-3367
 
 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
 of khramov.vcf]
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21185t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Need Help on pix [7:21135]

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Hundley

If your saying you can't connect to outside networks from the inside of the
PIX, check your 'nat' and 'global' commands.  If those look correct, make
sure there is no access-list applied on the inside interface and/or check
for 'outbound' and 'apply' statements that may be blocking traffic.

If you still cannot figure it out, post your sanitized config.

HTH,
Kent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rajeev Karamchand
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need Help on pix [7:21135]


Hi all

I am facing the a strange problem.

All the site were working fine till yesterday.

Now I can just ping from outside both with Ip and
name. But cannot bring the site from outside with IP
number and site name. DNS is working fine.

When I move one site out the firewall the site is up
and running. Is it the problem of the pix.

Any ideas




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21187t=21135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VPN [7:21120]

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Hundley

The addresses assigned to the VPN client will typically come from a pool of
addresses from the inside network.  It's also typical to terminate VPN
clients on your firewall, so in this case you would terminate them on the
PIX.  There are examples on Cisco's web site for configuring client to PIX
VPN.  Just do a search on PIX technical tips and you should find all the
info you need.

HTH,
Kent


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ramesh c
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN [7:21120]


Hey Guys,

My setup as follows

Internet -- Router  PIX -- Internal network

We are using a 192.168.x.x network and using NAT to change to valid ip
address.So when I need to setup VPN should I use the 192.168.x.x or the
Valid Ip address?

My internet router config

interface FastEthernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.y.x 255.255.255.252
 ip nat inside

interface Serial0/0
  ip address 192.168.x.x 255.255.255.240

More which is advisable..
1)VPN to router or VPN to PIX ?

Pls explain in detail...



Make a difference, help support the relief efforts in the U.S.
http://clubs.lycos.com/live/events/september11.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21186t=21120
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Kent Hundley

Sounds like a name resolution issue. (Netbios name resolution, not DNS)  Do
you have a WINS server?  You typically will need a WINS server for Netbios
name resolution across subnets. (and hence logon capability)

HTH,
Kent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Santosh Koshy
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


All,
we have a situation where the users and the nt servers are on different
subnets divided by a L3 router that switches / routes information between
them. Everything seems to work perfectly fine. The user gets an IP address
via DHCP, he can ping and trace everywhere, as well as browse the web.
Although all this is happenning, the user cannot logon to the NT server
(v4).

All workstations, servers and routers are running only IP. Netbios is
encapsulated within IP.

Thanks,
Santosh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21188t=21130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread MADMAN

Bravo,  This makes the router a DHCP server:

ip dhcp pool dave
   network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
   dns-server 172.28.2.217 172.28.2.10
   default-router 10.0.0.1

  Dave

Tim Booth wrote:
 
 Priscilla and others:
 
 Ip dhcp-server does not turn your router into a dhcp server. It tells your
 router where your dhcp server is.
 
 Tim Booth
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:12 PM
 Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]
 
  Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
  already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and
 
  ip forward-protocol udp 67
  no ip forward-protocol 137
  no ip forward-protocol 138
 
  The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
  forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a
helper
  address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to
configure
  it to be more discerning.
 
  Priscilla
 
  At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
  Hello,
ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So
would
  you
  agree
that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
  broadcast, ip
helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If
 I
  enable ip
dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 66
 and
  67)?
  
Thanks a lot,
Alex
  
  MADMAN wrote:
  
Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with
 RSP8's
  and
an MSFC2,
they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.
 So
  I
figured they
must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
 and
wallah, there it
is!!!
   
C7507MIX#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
C7507MIX(config)#^Z
C7507MIX#wr t
Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
ip classless
no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
   
  Dave
   
khramov wrote:
   
 I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config
 file.
  I
 mean (ip
 forward-protocol udp 67).
 Is that the way it is suppose to be?

 MADMAN wrote:

  Check ip foward protocol
 
Dave
 
  khramov wrote:
  
   Hello
How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
 guess
to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast
 on
ports 67 and 68 only?
  
And another question that I have what exactly ip
directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's
web
site but I never came across a clear defenition?
  
Thanks,
Alex
  
   [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard
which
  had
  a
 name
   of khramov.vcf]
  --
  David Madland
  Sr. Network Engineer
  CCIE# 2016
  Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  612-664-3367
 
  Emotion should reflect reason not guide it

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
had
 a
  name
 of khramov.vcf]
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Senior Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
  
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
 name
  of khramov.vcf]
  
 
  Priscilla Oppenheimer
  http://www.priscilla.com
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21189t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Ole Drews Jensen

Try this:

1) Can you ping server on subnet A by it's name from a workstation on subnet
B?

Example: ping acct_svr_1

2) Do you have any access lists on the router?

If you do, try to disable them

3) Can you from the workstation click Start - Find and find the server by
its IP address?


Let me know,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: Santosh Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


All,
we have a situation where the users and the nt servers are on different
subnets divided by a L3 router that switches / routes information between
them. Everything seems to work perfectly fine. The user gets an IP address
via DHCP, he can ping and trace everywhere, as well as browse the web.
Although all this is happenning, the user cannot logon to the NT server
(v4).

All workstations, servers and routers are running only IP. Netbios is
encapsulated within IP.

Thanks,
Santosh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21190t=21130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

At 01:06 PM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
 From my understanding ip dhcp-server command will enable upd broadcast 
 on  ports 66 and 67.  Is that true?

It causes your router to BE a DHCP server and to accept and process 
broadcasts to UDP port 67 and to send responses from port 66. It does not 
cause the router to forward UDP broadcasts to port 67.

If you turn your router into a DHCP server, you would also have to identify 
an external File Transport Protocol (FTP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol 
(TFTP), or remote copy protocol (rcp) server that you will use to store the 
DHCP bindings database. The router will access that database. Here's more 
info on turning your router into a DHCP server, which is often not a good 
idea, in my opinion (because it detracts from the router's real jobs):

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr_c/ipcprt1/1cfdhcp.htm

Priscilla


Alex


Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and

ip forward-protocol udp 67
no ip forward-protocol 137
no ip forward-protocol 138

The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a helper
address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to configure
it to be more discerning.

Priscilla

At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
 Hello,
   ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So 
 would you
 agree
   that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
 broadcast, ip
   helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If
I
 enable ip
   dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 
 66 and
 67)?
 
   Thanks a lot,
   Alex
 
 MADMAN wrote:
 
   Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with 
 RSP8's and
   an MSFC2,
   they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the 
 config.   So I
   figured they
   must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
and
   wallah, there it
   is!!!
  
   C7507MIX#conf t
   Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
   C7507MIX(config)#^Z
   C7507MIX#wr t
   Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
   ip classless
   no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
  
 Dave
  
   khramov wrote:
  
I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config 
 file.  I
mean (ip
forward-protocol udp 67).
Is that the way it is suppose to be?
   
MADMAN wrote:
   
 Check ip foward protocol

   Dave

 khramov wrote:
 
  Hello
   How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
   helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
   services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
guess
   to be more specific what can I do to forward udp 
 broadcast on
   ports 67 and 68 only?
 
   And another question that I have what exactly ip
   directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's web
   site but I never came across a clear defenition?
 
   Thanks,
   Alex
 
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard 
 which had
 a
name
  of khramov.vcf]
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367

 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
   
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which 
 had a
 name
of khramov.vcf]
   --
   David Madland
   CCIE# 2016
   Senior Network Engineer
   Qwest Communications
   612-664-3367
 
 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a 
 name
 of khramov.vcf]
 groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21133t=21051
 --
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/lis 
 t/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21191t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Ole Drews Jensen

More...

If you can ping a server by its IP address but not its name, try to add it
in the workstations hosts file.

The hosts file is in C:\windows on 95 an 98 computers, but I can't remember
where it is on NT/2000 computers. It might not even be there, so search for
hosts.sam which is a sample file.

If you in the same folder can see hosts (without any extension) edit it,
else create it.

Add the following line to it and save it:

192.168.1.19  Acct_Svr_1  #pre   #dom:JoesShoeShop

where
192.168.1.19is the IP
Acct_Svr_1  is the server name
JoesShoeShopis the domain name

See if it works now.

If that helps, you are not getting any name resolution from neither WINS nor
DNS.

Let me know,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: Santosh Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


All,
we have a situation where the users and the nt servers are on different
subnets divided by a L3 router that switches / routes information between
them. Everything seems to work perfectly fine. The user gets an IP address
via DHCP, he can ping and trace everywhere, as well as browse the web.
Although all this is happenning, the user cannot logon to the NT server
(v4).

All workstations, servers and routers are running only IP. Netbios is
encapsulated within IP.

Thanks,
Santosh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21192t=21130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Equipment [7:21127]

2001-09-26 Thread Brad Ellis

Derek,

Hi!  We ship second hand hardware worldwide.  Is there something in
particular you are looking for?  If so, please email me offline.  We've
helped quite a few groupstudy students get great hardware at great prices!
:)

thanks,
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796
Network Learning Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
used Cisco:  www.optsys.net

Derek Gaff  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hello all

 I have being reading the posts that have being posted in this list for the
 last few weeks. If anybody can help me, I am trying to purchase some
 secondhand Cisco Equipment in Ireland to prepare for the CCIE Written and
 Lab. At this time I cannot find anywere that resells secondhand equipment.
 Does anybody from this part of the world have any ideas.

 Cheers
 Derek




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21193t=21127
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



whats the difference [7:21195]

2001-09-26 Thread george gittins

im  currently studying for the ccie written and dont know which one will
help me  along
with the books i have already purchased. there are several and was wondering
which one have
people used before
CCIE Qualification Exam Workbook




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21195t=21195
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Steve Smith

Right on Dave!

And on top of that don't forget your global config:

dhcp exclude-address 2.2.2.1 2.2.2.15 (if you need some static
addresses).



-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


Bravo,  This makes the router a DHCP server:

ip dhcp pool dave
   network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
   dns-server 172.28.2.217 172.28.2.10
   default-router 10.0.0.1

  Dave

Tim Booth wrote:
 
 Priscilla and others:
 
 Ip dhcp-server does not turn your router into a dhcp server. It tells
your
 router where your dhcp server is.
 
 Tim Booth
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:12 PM
 Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]
 
  Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought
you
  already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and
 
  ip forward-protocol udp 67
  no ip forward-protocol 137
  no ip forward-protocol 138
 
  The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
  forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a
helper
  address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to
configure
  it to be more discerning.
 
  Priscilla
 
  At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
  Hello,
ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So
would
  you
  agree
that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
  broadcast, ip
helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global
config?  If
 I
  enable ip
dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp
(ports 66
 and
  67)?
  
Thanks a lot,
Alex
  
  MADMAN wrote:
  
Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with
 RSP8's
  and
an MSFC2,
they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the
config.
 So
  I
figured they
must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp
67
 and
wallah, there it
is!!!
   
C7507MIX#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
C7507MIX(config)#^Z
C7507MIX#wr t
Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
ip classless
no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
   
  Dave
   
khramov wrote:
   
 I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in
config
 file.
  I
 mean (ip
 forward-protocol udp 67).
 Is that the way it is suppose to be?

 MADMAN wrote:

  Check ip foward protocol
 
Dave
 
  khramov wrote:
  
   Hello
How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know
that ip
helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of
netbios
services causes some problems for win nt server.  So
I
 guess
to be more specific what can I do to forward udp
broadcast
 on
ports 67 and 68 only?
  
And another question that I have what exactly ip
directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched
Cisco's
web
site but I never came across a clear defenition?
  
Thanks,
Alex
  
   [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard
which
  had
  a
 name
   of khramov.vcf]
  --
  David Madland
  Sr. Network Engineer
  CCIE# 2016
  Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  612-664-3367
 
  Emotion should reflect reason not guide it

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard
which
had
 a
  name
 of khramov.vcf]
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Senior Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
  
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
had a
 name
  of khramov.vcf]
  
 
  Priscilla Oppenheimer
  http://www.priscilla.com
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21194t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hey Dave, forgot 1 line:

ip dhcp excluded-address 10.0.0.1

Thanks Buddy! ;^)

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


Bravo,  This makes the router a DHCP server:

ip dhcp pool dave
   network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
   dns-server 172.28.2.217 172.28.2.10
   default-router 10.0.0.1

  Dave

Tim Booth wrote:
 
 Priscilla and others:
 
 Ip dhcp-server does not turn your router into a dhcp server. It tells your
 router where your dhcp server is.
 
 Tim Booth
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:12 PM
 Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]
 
  Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
  already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and
 
  ip forward-protocol udp 67
  no ip forward-protocol 137
  no ip forward-protocol 138
 
  The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
  forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a
helper
  address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to
configure
  it to be more discerning.
 
  Priscilla
 
  At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
  Hello,
ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So
would
  you
  agree
that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
  broadcast, ip
helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?
If
 I
  enable ip
dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports
66
 and
  67)?
  
Thanks a lot,
Alex
  
  MADMAN wrote:
  
Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with
 RSP8's
  and
an MSFC2,
they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.
 So
  I
figured they
must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
 and
wallah, there it
is!!!
   
C7507MIX#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
C7507MIX(config)#^Z
C7507MIX#wr t
Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
ip classless
no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
   
  Dave
   
khramov wrote:
   
 I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config
 file.
  I
 mean (ip
 forward-protocol udp 67).
 Is that the way it is suppose to be?

 MADMAN wrote:

  Check ip foward protocol
 
Dave
 
  khramov wrote:
  
   Hello
How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that
ip
helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
 guess
to be more specific what can I do to forward udp
broadcast
 on
ports 67 and 68 only?
  
And another question that I have what exactly ip
directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's
web
site but I never came across a clear defenition?
  
Thanks,
Alex
  
   [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard
which
  had
  a
 name
   of khramov.vcf]
  --
  David Madland
  Sr. Network Engineer
  CCIE# 2016
  Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  612-664-3367
 
  Emotion should reflect reason not guide it

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
had
 a
  name
 of khramov.vcf]
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Senior Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
  
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
 name
  of khramov.vcf]
  
 
  Priscilla Oppenheimer
  http://www.priscilla.com
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21197t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Hennen, David

this syntax is for the lmhosts file, instead of the hosts file.  the hosts
file is just like in unix, a local static mapping of hostnames to ip
addresses so the domain info doesn't apply.  lmhosts is what you want to
give a windows machine a local mapping of computernames for domain
controllers, domains etc...

on my w2k system it's located in c:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc

dave h

-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


More...

If you can ping a server by its IP address but not its name, try to add it
in the workstations hosts file.

The hosts file is in C:\windows on 95 an 98 computers, but I can't remember
where it is on NT/2000 computers. It might not even be there, so search for
hosts.sam which is a sample file.

If you in the same folder can see hosts (without any extension) edit it,
else create it.

Add the following line to it and save it:

192.168.1.19  Acct_Svr_1  #pre   #dom:JoesShoeShop

where
192.168.1.19is the IP
Acct_Svr_1  is the server name
JoesShoeShopis the domain name

See if it works now.

If that helps, you are not getting any name resolution from neither WINS nor
DNS.

Let me know,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: Santosh Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


All,
we have a situation where the users and the nt servers are on different
subnets divided by a L3 router that switches / routes information between
them. Everything seems to work perfectly fine. The user gets an IP address
via DHCP, he can ping and trace everywhere, as well as browse the web.
Although all this is happenning, the user cannot logon to the NT server
(v4).

All workstations, servers and routers are running only IP. Netbios is
encapsulated within IP.

Thanks,
Santosh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21196t=21130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

OK, I'm starting to see where the confusion is coming from. The ip 
dhcp-server command can be used on dial-up PPP links. It specifies the IP 
address of a DHCP server for the PPP client to use. It was almost 
impossible to find in the documentation. Most of the ip dhcp commands 
relate to telling your router to be a DHCP server, which is a completely 
different solution, of course.

Are you using PPP, Khramov?

The general-purpose way to tell your router the address of your DHCP server 
is the ip helper-address command.

Priscilla

At 01:54 PM 9/26/01, Tim Booth wrote:
Priscilla and others:

Ip dhcp-server does not turn your router into a dhcp server. It tells your
router where your dhcp server is.

Tim Booth

- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


  Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
  already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and
 
  ip forward-protocol udp 67
  no ip forward-protocol 137
  no ip forward-protocol 138
 
  The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
  forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a
helper
  address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to
configure
  it to be more discerning.
 
  Priscilla
 
  At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
  Hello,
ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So
would
  you
  agree
that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
  broadcast, ip
helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If
I
  enable ip
dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 66
and
  67)?
  
Thanks a lot,
Alex
  
  MADMAN wrote:
  
Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with
RSP8's
  and
an MSFC2,
they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the config.
So
  I
figured they
must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
and
wallah, there it
is!!!
   
C7507MIX#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
C7507MIX(config)#^Z
C7507MIX#wr t
Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
ip classless
no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
   
  Dave
   
khramov wrote:
   
 I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config
file.
  I
 mean (ip
 forward-protocol udp 67).
 Is that the way it is suppose to be?

 MADMAN wrote:

  Check ip foward protocol
 
Dave
 
  khramov wrote:
  
   Hello
How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
guess
to be more specific what can I do to forward udp broadcast
on
ports 67 and 68 only?
  
And another question that I have what exactly ip
directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's
web
site but I never came across a clear defenition?
  
Thanks,
Alex
  
   [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard
which
  had
  a
 name
   of khramov.vcf]
  --
  David Madland
  Sr. Network Engineer
  CCIE# 2016
  Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  612-664-3367
 
  Emotion should reflect reason not guide it

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
had
a
  name
 of khramov.vcf]
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Senior Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
  
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
  of khramov.vcf]
  
 
  Priscilla Oppenheimer
  http://www.priscilla.com


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21199t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Need Help on pix [7:21135]

2001-09-26 Thread Jeff Smith

You said everything was working fine.  What changed?


From: Rajeev Karamchand 
Reply-To: Rajeev Karamchand 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need Help on pix [7:21135]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 09:53:49 -0400

Hi all

I am facing the a strange problem.

All the site were working fine till yesterday.

Now I can just ping from outside both with Ip and
name. But cannot bring the site from outside with IP
number and site name. DNS is working fine.

When I move one site out the firewall the site is up
and running. Is it the problem of the pix.

Any ideas




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! 
Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21198t=21135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CID 3.0 Exam [7:21200]

2001-09-26 Thread Zahid Hassan

Hi All,

I would appreciate any suggestions/tips on CID 3.0 exam.
I will be taking the exam  next week and am using
mainly the CCO for preparation.
Any input would be highly appreciated.

Regards,

Zahid




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21200t=21200
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: whats the difference [7:21195]

2001-09-26 Thread Jack Williams

My recommendation for a primary study source for CCIE written would be the
Caslow book.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21201t=21195
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Their must be more than one way to foreword DHCP requests.



Tom got me looking into this earlier.

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


At 01:06 PM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
 From my understanding ip dhcp-server command will enable upd broadcast 
 on  ports 66 and 67.  Is that true?

It causes your router to BE a DHCP server and to accept and process 
broadcasts to UDP port 67 and to send responses from port 66. It does not 
cause the router to forward UDP broadcasts to port 67.

If you turn your router into a DHCP server, you would also have to identify 
an external File Transport Protocol (FTP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol 
(TFTP), or remote copy protocol (rcp) server that you will use to store the 
DHCP bindings database. The router will access that database. Here's more 
info on turning your router into a DHCP server, which is often not a good 
idea, in my opinion (because it detracts from the router's real jobs):

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr
_c/ipcprt1/1cfdhcp.htm

Priscilla


Alex


Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and

ip forward-protocol udp 67
no ip forward-protocol 137
no ip forward-protocol 138

The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a helper
address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to configure
it to be more discerning.

Priscilla

At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
 Hello,
   ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So 
 would you
 agree
   that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
 broadcast, ip
   helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If
I
 enable ip
   dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 
 66 and
 67)?
 
   Thanks a lot,
   Alex
 
 MADMAN wrote:
 
   Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with 
 RSP8's and
   an MSFC2,
   they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the 
 config.   So I
   figured they
   must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
and
   wallah, there it
   is!!!
  
   C7507MIX#conf t
   Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
   C7507MIX(config)#^Z
   C7507MIX#wr t
   Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
   ip classless
   no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
  
 Dave
  
   khramov wrote:
  
I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config 
 file.  I
mean (ip
forward-protocol udp 67).
Is that the way it is suppose to be?
   
MADMAN wrote:
   
 Check ip foward protocol

   Dave

 khramov wrote:
 
  Hello
   How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
   helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
   services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
guess
   to be more specific what can I do to forward udp 
 broadcast on
   ports 67 and 68 only?
 
   And another question that I have what exactly ip
   directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's
web
   site but I never came across a clear defenition?
 
   Thanks,
   Alex
 
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard 
 which had
 a
name
  of khramov.vcf]
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367

 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
   
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which 
 had a
 name
of khramov.vcf]
   --
   David Madland
   CCIE# 2016
   Senior Network Engineer
   Qwest Communications
   612-664-3367
 
 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a 
 name
 of khramov.vcf]
 groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21133t=21051
 --
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/lis 
 t/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21202t=21051
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]

2001-09-26 Thread Rico Ortiz

We {USCG} use the 350s to provide connectivities to the Boats in the NY
harbor. Its a great solution if your standing still but watch out if you
rock..



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Allen May
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]


rofl...my badI thought it said Arrowpoint...not Aironet.  *slap self*

- Original Message -
From: Murphy, Brian J SITI-ISET-31
To: 'Allen May' ;
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]


 Iassumes he means driver support...

 This is the list from linux 2.4.10

  [*] Wireless LAN (non-hamradio)   x x
  STRIP (Metricom starmode radio IP) (NEW)x x
  ATT WaveLAN  DEC RoamAbout DS support (NEW)   x x
  Aironet Arlan 655  IC2200 DS support (NEW) x x
  Aironet 4500/4800 series adapters (NEW) x x
  Cisco/Aironet 34X/35X/4500/4800 ISA and PCI cards (NEW)

 -Original Message-
 From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:43 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]

 It works via IP addresses...so yes.

 - Original Message -
 From: Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)
 To:
 Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:03 AM
 Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]


  Is both work with Linux OS?
 
  Steiven
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: netman
  To:
  Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:21 PM
  Subject: Re: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
 
 
   I don't know about the Lucent stuff, but I installed some Cisco
Aironet
  340
   series equipment last summer (99), and I have not had one trouble call
 at
   all. These are used constantly for classes and haven't had one probem.
 In
   fact I almost forgot we had them installed. You can't beat that :-)
  
   Donman
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)
   To:
   Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:25 PM
   Subject: Cisco Aironet vs Lucent ORiNOCO [7:20954]
  
  
Hello Folks,
   
Any one got idea about above comparison?
   
   
Rgds,
Steiven




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21204t=20954
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Yes, I finally found that also, but only in reference to dial-up networks 
where the router is acting as an access sever for SLIP/PPP clients. Does it 
work elsewhere? It would be good if it did.

Priscilla

At 02:24 PM 9/26/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Their must be more than one way to foreword DHCP requests.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial_r/drdreip.htm#xtocid1564817
 


Tom got me looking into this earlier.

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]

At 01:06 PM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
  From my understanding ip dhcp-server command will enable upd broadcast
  on  ports 66 and 67.  Is that true?

It causes your router to BE a DHCP server and to accept and process
broadcasts to UDP port 67 and to send responses from port 66. It does not
cause the router to forward UDP broadcasts to port 67.

If you turn your router into a DHCP server, you would also have to identify
an external File Transport Protocol (FTP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol
(TFTP), or remote copy protocol (rcp) server that you will use to store the
DHCP bindings database. The router will access that database. Here's more
info on turning your router into a DHCP server, which is often not a good
idea, in my opinion (because it detracts from the router's real jobs):

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr_c/ipcprt1/1cfdhcp.htm
 


Priscilla

 Alex
 
 
 Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
 Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
 already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and
 
 ip forward-protocol udp 67
 no ip forward-protocol 137
 no ip forward-protocol 138
 
 The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
 forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a
helper
 address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to
configure
 it to be more discerning.
 
 Priscilla
 
 At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
  Hello,
ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So
  would you
  agree
that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
  broadcast, ip
helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config? 
If
I
  enable ip
dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports
  66 and
  67)?
  
Thanks a lot,
Alex
  
  MADMAN wrote:
  
Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with
  RSP8's and
an MSFC2,
they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the
  config.   So I
figured they
must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
and
wallah, there it
is!!!
   
C7507MIX#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
C7507MIX(config)#^Z
C7507MIX#wr t
Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
ip classless
no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
   
  Dave
   
khramov wrote:
   
 I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config
  file.  I
 mean (ip
 forward-protocol udp 67).
 Is that the way it is suppose to be?

 MADMAN wrote:

  Check ip foward protocol
 
Dave
 
  khramov wrote:
  
   Hello
How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that
ip
helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
guess
to be more specific what can I do to forward udp
  broadcast on
ports 67 and 68 only?
  
And another question that I have what exactly ip
directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's 
 web
site but I never came across a clear defenition?
  
Thanks,
Alex
  
   [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard
  which had
  a
 name
   of khramov.vcf]
  --
  David Madland
  Sr. Network Engineer
  CCIE# 2016
  Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  612-664-3367
 
  Emotion should reflect reason not guide it

 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
  had a
  name
 of khramov.vcf]
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Senior Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
  
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
  name
  of khramov.vcf]
  groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21133t=21051
  --
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/lis
  t/cisco.html
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

RE: Aironet 350 authenication using RADIUS [7:20974]

2001-09-26 Thread Rico Ortiz

we are using the cisco radius server its extremely simple to setup.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
dovelet
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Aironet 350 authenication using RADIUS [7:20974]


Hi all,

Our company just wants to implement wireless LAN and we will go for Cisco
Aironet 350. In authenication, the Cisco guy told us that we need to use
their ACS RADIUS server. My question is: can I use another RADIUS server for
it? What is the requirement? Can anyone suggest a RADIUS server to me?

Thanks a lot.
Dovelet




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21205t=20974
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NAT pool timeout [7:21206]

2001-09-26 Thread Quadri, Habeeb

Hi,

I am running out of addresses in nat pool. I understand that after certain
time period of inactivity addresses are timed out and return to the pool. I
would like to know, what is the default timeout for inactive addresses in
pool and how to reduce/manage timeout after a certain period of inactivity.
I researched CCO but things are not clear!!.  Any comments are appreciated.

Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21206t=21206
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread khramov

Priscilla,
 I think that you are right about the ip dhcp-server command.  I looked it
up on Cisco's web site.  It seems
that it can be used only with dial up to tell the client where dhcp server
is.

Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:

 Yes, I finally found that also, but only in reference to dial-up networks
 where the router is acting as an access sever for SLIP/PPP clients. Does it
 work elsewhere? It would be good if it did.

 Priscilla

 At 02:24 PM 9/26/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Their must be more than one way to foreword DHCP requests.
 

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial_r/drdreip.htm#xtocid1564817
 
 
 Tom got me looking into this earlier.
 
 -Eric
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]
 
 At 01:06 PM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
   From my understanding ip dhcp-server command will enable upd broadcast
   on  ports 66 and 67.  Is that true?
 
 It causes your router to BE a DHCP server and to accept and process
 broadcasts to UDP port 67 and to send responses from port 66. It does not
 cause the router to forward UDP broadcasts to port 67.
 
 If you turn your router into a DHCP server, you would also have to
identify
 an external File Transport Protocol (FTP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol
 (TFTP), or remote copy protocol (rcp) server that you will use to store
the
 DHCP bindings database. The router will access that database. Here's more
 info on turning your router into a DHCP server, which is often not a good
 idea, in my opinion (because it detracts from the router's real jobs):
 

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr_c/ipcprt1/1cfdhcp.htm
 
 
 Priscilla
 
  Alex
  
  
  Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
  Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
  already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and
  
  ip forward-protocol udp 67
  no ip forward-protocol 137
  no ip forward-protocol 138
  
  The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
  forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a
 helper
  address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to
 configure
  it to be more discerning.
  
  Priscilla
  
  At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
   Hello,
 ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So
   would you
   agree
 that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
   broadcast, ip
 helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?
 If
 I
   enable ip
 dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports
   66 and
   67)?
   
 Thanks a lot,
 Alex
   
   MADMAN wrote:
   
 Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with
   RSP8's and
 an MSFC2,
 they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the
   config.   So I
 figured they
 must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp
67
 and
 wallah, there it
 is!!!

 C7507MIX#conf t
 Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
 C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
 C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
 C7507MIX(config)#^Z
 C7507MIX#wr t
 Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
 ip classless
 no ip forward-protocol udp bootps

   Dave

 khramov wrote:

  I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config
   file.  I
  mean (ip
  forward-protocol udp 67).
  Is that the way it is suppose to be?
 
  MADMAN wrote:
 
   Check ip foward protocol
  
 Dave
  
   khramov wrote:
   
Hello
 How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that
 ip
 helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
 services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
 guess
 to be more specific what can I do to forward udp
   broadcast on
 ports 67 and 68 only?
   
 And another question that I have what exactly ip
 directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's
  web
 site but I never came across a clear defenition?
   
 Thanks,
 Alex
   
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard
   which had
   a
  name
of khramov.vcf]
   --
   David Madland
   Sr. Network Engineer
   CCIE# 2016
   Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   612-664-3367
  
   Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
 
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which
   had a
   name
  of khramov.vcf]
 --
 David Madland
 CCIE# 2016
 Senior Network Engineer
 Qwest Communications
 

RE: DHCP [7:21051]

2001-09-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Try this again.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial
_r/drdreip.htm#xtocid1564817

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DHCP [7:21051]


Their must be more than one way to foreword DHCP requests.



Tom got me looking into this earlier.

-Eric

-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP [7:21051]


At 01:06 PM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
 From my understanding ip dhcp-server command will enable upd broadcast 
 on  ports 66 and 67.  Is that true?

It causes your router to BE a DHCP server and to accept and process 
broadcasts to UDP port 67 and to send responses from port 66. It does not 
cause the router to forward UDP broadcasts to port 67.

If you turn your router into a DHCP server, you would also have to identify 
an external File Transport Protocol (FTP), Trivial File Transfer Protocol 
(TFTP), or remote copy protocol (rcp) server that you will use to store the 
DHCP bindings database. The router will access that database. Here's more 
info on turning your router into a DHCP server, which is often not a good 
idea, in my opinion (because it detracts from the router's real jobs):

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr
_c/ipcprt1/1cfdhcp.htm

Priscilla


Alex


Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Why do you want to turn your router into a DHCP server? I thought you
already had a DHCP server. You just need a helper address and

ip forward-protocol udp 67
no ip forward-protocol 137
no ip forward-protocol 138

The last two commands are because you said that NetBIOS broadcast
forwarding was causing problems for your NT server. When you have a helper
address, the router forwards a bunch of UDP packets. You have to configure
it to be more discerning.

Priscilla

At 09:24 AM 9/26/01, khramov wrote:
 Hello,
   ip dhcp-server works,  I didn't specify it with a hyphen.  So 
 would you
 agree
   that the best solution for me would be to disable ip directed
 broadcast, ip
   helper address and enable ip dhcp-server at the global config?  If
I
 enable ip
   dhcp-server do I need to enable ip forward-protocol udp  (ports 
 66 and
 67)?
 
   Thanks a lot,
   Alex
 
 MADMAN wrote:
 
   Hmm..  I haven't done it in a while so I tried it on a 7507 with 
 RSP8's and
   an MSFC2,
   they both accepted the command just fine but are not in the 
 config.   So I
   figured they
   must be enabled by default so I did a no ip forward protocol udp 67
and
   wallah, there it
   is!!!
  
   C7507MIX#conf t
   Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip for
   C7507MIX(config)#no ip forward-protocol udp 67
   C7507MIX(config)#^Z
   C7507MIX#wr t
   Building configuration...ip kerberos source-interface any
   ip classless
   no ip forward-protocol udp bootps
  
 Dave
  
   khramov wrote:
  
I did that, but when I do sh run it is not showing up in config 
 file.  I
mean (ip
forward-protocol udp 67).
Is that the way it is suppose to be?
   
MADMAN wrote:
   
 Check ip foward protocol

   Dave

 khramov wrote:
 
  Hello
   How do I enable broadcast for DHCP server?  I know that ip
   helper enables UDP broadcast, but broadcast of netbios
   services causes some problems for win nt server.  So I
guess
   to be more specific what can I do to forward udp 
 broadcast on
   ports 67 and 68 only?
 
   And another question that I have what exactly ip
   directed-broadcast command does?  I've searched Cisco's
web
   site but I never came across a clear defenition?
 
   Thanks,
   Alex
 
  [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard 
 which had
 a
name
  of khramov.vcf]
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367

 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
   
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which 
 had a
 name
of khramov.vcf]
   --
   David Madland
   CCIE# 2016
   Senior Network Engineer
   Qwest Communications
   612-664-3367
 
 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a 
 name
 of khramov.vcf]
 groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21133t=21051
 --
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
 http://www.groupstudy.com/lis 
 t/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:

RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]

2001-09-26 Thread Ole Drews Jensen

You can put it in your hosts file too - try it if you do not believe me.

It also depends on what mode it's setup to use.

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: Hennen, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


this syntax is for the lmhosts file, instead of the hosts file.  the hosts
file is just like in unix, a local static mapping of hostnames to ip
addresses so the domain info doesn't apply.  lmhosts is what you want to
give a windows machine a local mapping of computernames for domain
controllers, domains etc...

on my w2k system it's located in c:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc

dave h

-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


More...

If you can ping a server by its IP address but not its name, try to add it
in the workstations hosts file.

The hosts file is in C:\windows on 95 an 98 computers, but I can't remember
where it is on NT/2000 computers. It might not even be there, so search for
hosts.sam which is a sample file.

If you in the same folder can see hosts (without any extension) edit it,
else create it.

Add the following line to it and save it:

192.168.1.19  Acct_Svr_1  #pre   #dom:JoesShoeShop

where
192.168.1.19is the IP
Acct_Svr_1  is the server name
JoesShoeShopis the domain name

See if it works now.

If that helps, you are not getting any name resolution from neither WINS nor
DNS.

Let me know,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: Santosh Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT Users cannot logon [7:21130]


All,
we have a situation where the users and the nt servers are on different
subnets divided by a L3 router that switches / routes information between
them. Everything seems to work perfectly fine. The user gets an IP address
via DHCP, he can ping and trace everywhere, as well as browse the web.
Although all this is happenning, the user cannot logon to the NT server
(v4).

All workstations, servers and routers are running only IP. Netbios is
encapsulated within IP.

Thanks,
Santosh




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21209t=21130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Way OT but pretty funny.... [7:21210]

2001-09-26 Thread John Neiberger

Sorry, this really struck me as funny and I didn't have anyone else to
share it with.I'm hoping that this--while not hilarious--will
give someone a few laughs.  The humor should be apparent.

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.asp?Sku=97580customer_id=19spagenum=5page=dellitems.aspicompatid=108891docid=6158


Long link, sorry

Regards,
John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21210t=21210
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >