Re: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
I can almost guarantee they aren't real questions. On question 4, he has a blank spot of where a chart or graphic should have been. They were cut and pasted from somewhere into his message. I wouldn't about the NDA in this case. ""Ali, Abbas"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry guys, > > I just got carried away. I always respected Cisco's NDA. I just didn't > think that were the real questions since they were so long. In my previous > groups I always raised the issue of NDA when some people tried to violate. > > IT WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN. > > Regards, > > Abbas > > -Original Message- > From: james mensah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:32 AM > To: Ali, Abbas; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862] > > > Abbas are you new to this group and do you have some respect for Cisco NDA > and for that matter ethics? Watch out Cisco is about to get you. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali, > Abbas > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862] > > Sorry to hear that. Here is what I think the answers would be. > > Q1) B > Q2) B > Q3) Definetly A, could also include B if multiple choice. > Q4) AB > Q5) Don't know. > Q6) BC > Q7) > Q8) > Q9) D > Q10) > Q11)B > > -Original Message- > From: Yang Jun (Ike Yang) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CCIE written questions [7:28862] > > > Dear CCIEs, > > I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here > but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct > answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! > > 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token > release? > > > A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given > time, but only one data frame is allowed. > > B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any > given time, but only one token is allowed. > > C. More than one data frame and more than one token can > circulate the ring at any given time. > > D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame > from the ring > > E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token > to be released from its neighbor. > > > > 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? > > > > A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from > the OSPF area. > > B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the > bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite > cost. > > C. The specific network is not sent out again on the > interface it was received on. > > The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a > metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. > > > > 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple > answer) > > > A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. > > B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver > to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. > > C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more > than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. > > D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. > > > > 4.Examine the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? > (multiple answer) > > > > A. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > > > B. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 2 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > C. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > D. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network > design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router > configurations? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A. No changes are necessary. > > B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and > area 0. > > C. A serial line or other physical connections could be > installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. > > D. Router B could be configured as an Area Borde
Re: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
I usually don't waste my time on these kind of questions, but couldn't resist this one. It's appears that you have a very good memory but are completely wasting it. Even if you manage to pass the written, you have virtually no chance of passing the lab with an attitude like this. In order to pass the lab you must be diligent in working thru issues, thinking of ways to make something work that appears impossible. Only then do you consider asking for help. You seem to remember some of the stuff that you may have seen, but make no attempt to figure it out on your own. No to mention appearing to break the NDA that you agreed to. Sorry if this sounds harsh, but in my mind, you are asking for it. ""Yang Jun (Ike Yang)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear CCIEs, > > I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here > but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct > answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! > > 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token > release? > > > A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given > time, but only one data frame is allowed. > > B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any > given time, but only one token is allowed. > > C. More than one data frame and more than one token can > circulate the ring at any given time. > > D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame > from the ring > > E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token > to be released from its neighbor. > > > > 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? > > > > A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from > the OSPF area. > > B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the > bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite > cost. > > C. The specific network is not sent out again on the > interface it was received on. > > The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a > metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. > > > > 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple > answer) > > > A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. > > B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver > to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. > > C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more > than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. > > D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. > > > > 4.Examine the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? > (multiple answer) > > > > A. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > > > B. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 2 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > C. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > D. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network > design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router > configurations? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A. No changes are necessary. > > B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and > area 0. > > C. A serial line or other physical connections could be > installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. > > D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router > between Area 60 and Area 6. > > E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it > work. > > > > 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) > statements is correct? > > > A. CGMP manages multicast traffic Catalyst 5000 series > switches by allowing directed switching of IP multicast traffic. > > B. CGMP will switch IP multicast packets to all ports in one > specific VLAN. > > C. CGMP filtering requires a network connection from the > Catalyst 5000 series to a router running CGMP. > > D. CGMP handles ARP, SAP, UDP, SSAP and DSAP. > > > > 7.Which statement about RADIUS is true? > > > A. The RADIUS server must you use TCP for its connection the > NAS. > > B.
Re: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
Posting questions from the test that you took is a violation of Cisco's NDA! - Original Message - From: "Yang Jun (Ike Yang)" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:49 Subject: CCIE written questions [7:28862] > Dear CCIEs, > > I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here > but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct > answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! > > 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token > release? > > > A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given > time, but only one data frame is allowed. > > B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any > given time, but only one token is allowed. > > C. More than one data frame and more than one token can > circulate the ring at any given time. > > D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame > from the ring > > E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token > to be released from its neighbor. > > > > 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? > > > > A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from > the OSPF area. > > B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the > bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite > cost. > > C. The specific network is not sent out again on the > interface it was received on. > > The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a > metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. > > > > 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple > answer) > > > A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. > > B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver > to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. > > C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more > than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. > > D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. > > > > 4.Examine the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? > (multiple answer) > > > > A. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > > > B. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 2 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > C. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > D. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network > design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router > configurations? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A. No changes are necessary. > > B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and > area 0. > > C. A serial line or other physical connections could be > installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. > > D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router > between Area 60 and Area 6. > > E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it > work. > > > > 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) > statements is correct? > > > A. CGMP manages multicast traffic Catalyst 5000 series > switches by allowing directed switching of IP multicast traffic. > > B. CGMP will switch IP multicast packets to all ports in one > specific VLAN. > > C. CGMP filtering requires a network connection from the > Catalyst 5000 series to a router running CGMP. > > D. CGMP handles ARP, SAP, UDP, SSAP and DSAP. > > > > 7.Which statement about RADIUS is true? > > > A. The RADIUS server must you use TCP for its connection the > NAS. > > B. AAA can be configured to direct RADIUS > authentication/authorization to one server and RADIUS accounting to a > different server. > > C. RADIUS supports bi-directional CHAP authentication. > > D. RADIUS is a proprietary protocol that is necessarily > vendor specific. > > E. RADIUS supports command authorization. > > > > 8.Which statements about TACACS+ are true? (multiple answer) > > > A. If more than one TACACS+ server is configured and the > first one does not respond within a given
RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
Abbas are you new to this group and do you have some respect for Cisco NDA and for that matter ethics? Watch out Cisco is about to get you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali, Abbas Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Sorry to hear that. Here is what I think the answers would be. Q1) B Q2) B Q3) Definetly A, could also include B if multiple choice. Q4) AB Q5) Don't know. Q6) BC Q7) Q8) Q9) D Q10) Q11)B -Original Message- From: Yang Jun (Ike Yang) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Dear CCIEs, I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token release? A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one data frame is allowed. B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one token is allowed. C. More than one data frame and more than one token can circulate the ring at any given time. D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame from the ring E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token to be released from its neighbor. 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from the OSPF area. B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite cost. C. The specific network is not sent out again on the interface it was received on. The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple answer) A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. 4.Examine the following: Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? (multiple answer) A. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 B. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 2 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 C. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 D. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router configurations? A. No changes are necessary. B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and area 0. C. A serial line or other physical connections could be installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router between Area 60 and Area 6. E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it work. 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) statements is correct? A. CGMP manages multicast traffic Catalyst 5000 series switches by allowing directed switching of IP multicast traffic. B. CGMP will switch IP multicast packets to all ports in one specific VLAN. C. CGMP filtering requires a network connection from the Catalyst 5000 series to a router running CGMP. D. CGMP handles ARP, SAP, UDP, SSAP and DSAP. 7.Which statement about RADIUS is true? A. The RADIUS server must you use TCP for its connection the NAS. B. AAA can be configured to direct RADIUS authentication/authorization to one server and RADIUS accounting to a different server. C. RADIUS supports bi-directional CHAP authentication. D. RADIUS is a proprietary protocol that is necessarily vendor specific. E. RADIUS supports command authorization. 8.
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address [7:28864]
Perhaps you should take this discussion off line as it is no longer relevant to the list. Cheers, Symon --- > >>until you have done some real research > -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) > Does that count?? > - > Priscilla > Just in case you were wondering, that was a rhetorical question. Which > means I do *not expect* a reply from your ego-centric highness. > Suggest you look up "rhetorical" when you grow up. It is rather a long word. > Thanks > -Anil > > -Original Message- > From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:54 PM > To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > >>What's your point? > This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. > >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > > That is my point. > - > >>until you have done some real research > -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) > Does that count?? > > > -Original Message- > From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM > To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > >Please stop sending messages about this topic > >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. > I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. > My sincere apologies > > -Anil > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Priscilla Oppenheimer > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: > >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. > >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > > > >It must be out of date :-) > > Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. > What's your point? > > Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have > you checked some RFCs? > > Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its > messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems > were its creators trying to solve? > > Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until > you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of > a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care > less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people > studying for advanced Cisco certifications. > > Priscilla > > >-Anil > > > > > >5. Session Layer > >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host > >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard > >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a > >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then > >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File > >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps > >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is > >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote > >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > >That's 40% right. > > > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > > > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > > > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can > >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol > >behavior is concerned. > > > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard > >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > > > >Priscilla > > > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > > >Yes, I checked it out.. > > >Session layer protocols include: > > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > > >Someone please correct me. > > >-Anil >
CCIE Written Exam [7:28870]
I took my CCIE Written yesterday and passed it. I got 78%. The good thing that it allowed me to review the questions, but the bad thing was that in multiple choice questions, the only hint you will get "CHECK MULTIPLE ANSWERS". Some questions were really confusing. If anyone is preparing make sure to learn everything about Token Ring (RSRB, SRB,SRT, SR/TLB, DSLW+). Lot of people get frustrated with Token Ring. But in my case it actually helped me passed the exam since I did little bad in other sections. Token ring questions are more like math's equations if you do it right you know that you are right compare to couple of other sections where memorization is required and the wording game by Ciso will kill you. The test is not interactive, so don't worry too much about command lines. Regards, Abbas Ali, AVVID, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE Network Engineer II > Tel: 714.428.3367 Pager: 714.748.4817 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28870&t=28870 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT:duplicate mails [7:28878]
i am receiving duplicate mails since a couple of weeks. can the list owner help me ? /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) |oOOO--(_)--OOOo--|-|- | Ndabarasa Michel... | | CCNA,CCAI.. | | National University of Rwanda.. | | Computing Centre... | | voice.. | | office (+250)530666 | | cell (+250)08510951..| | .oooO | | ( )Oooo. | |---\ (--- ( )---|-| \_) ) /|-| (_/ -- FREE! The Best in Rwanda Email Address @mail.rw Reserve your name right now at http://mail.rw Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28878&t=28878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
How can you attack someone for bringing this URL to your attention? There is even a feedback address. You would have been better off sending your attacks to the people who print the mistakes. Not the person who brings them to your attention. Strongly suggest you apologise. -Anil At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28857&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Priscilla Oppenheimer > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > ... > This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. ^^ Could have fooled me ... by the knowledge level of some of the enquires on this list ... I have no Cisco certifications but I'll be damned if I don't know a lot more than a lot of you "certified" ones ... remember people, the paper means nothing if the knowledge isn't there to back it up ... Hugo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28869&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does 1720 Support Voice? [7:4]
Looking at the features supported by the image c1700-sy-mz.12.2-6 (IP PLUS) in the Feature Navigator (I will not paste the URL because apparently it will be removed), we can see that the image supports the "Voice over Frame Relay (FRF.11)" feature. Strange, because the "Cisco IOS Planner" tool tell us that the IP PLUS image is not supported in the 1750, only in the 1720. Can anybody tell me if the images c1700-sy-mz.12.?-?.? (IP PLUS) run in a 1750-2V /4V box? And the voice hardware will be recognized (DSP and analog interfaces) and enabled? Thanks, Hugo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4&t=4 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3rd party Flash memory [7:28823]
I upgraded a 2600 and a couple of 2500's some time ago. The 2600 worked just fine and so did the flash memories to the 2500's. The 2500 DRAM's however... To make a long story short, it turned out that since there is a large number of revisions of the 2500 not all memories worked in all boxes. In the end I got a new shippment which had chips from a different vendor on it (Nania instead of Samsung). These modules worked just fine and still runs without a problem. The lesson I learned from this is that it's probably no problem to get 3rd party memories for newer boxes, but for older ones you really have to have a good relationship with your supplier. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28865&t=28823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318]
Shah, What about the other Cisco career certificaton exams (CC-N/D-A/P)? -Original Message- From: Shah Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: terca-feira, 11 de dezembro de 2001 00:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] CCIE Written (350-001) costs 585$ in Australia. (thats about 300US$). Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28879&t=28318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788]
Hello, I have a 2514 and a 2523 that I am selling for $1300.00 + S&H. The 2514 has 2 serials and 2 ethernets and the 2523 comes with 8 serials along with a TR and ISDN port. Along with the router, you get 2 Cisco console cables, 2 AUI transceivers and 2 Cisco original V.35 DTE/DCE cables along with CAT5 cables. Let me know if you are interested. Sincerely, >From: "Carroll Kong" >Reply-To: "Carroll Kong" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788] >Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:23:06 -0500 > >Seems to be a lot on Ebay. (2514 that is). (2523) is a bit more rare. > >At 09:49 AM 12/9/01 -0500, John Green wrote: > >ok tell me this guys. > >the 2523 and 2514 are not available in like > >used_hardware / online / acution sites. > >seems these two are pretty popular ones. why ? > >i have been trying to get hold of 2514 (has 2 ethernet > >interfaces) but have been unsuccessful yet. > > > > > > > >--- Circusnuts wrote: > > > All you need is @ least version 10.0 IOS and Serial > > > interfaces. This > > > explains why the AGS and MGS (and ear muffs) are > > > still found in a lot of > > > CCIE labs today. > > > > > > All the best !!! > > > Phil > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "EA Louie" > > > To: > > > Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 2:53 PM > > > Subject: Re: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788] > > > > > > > > > > yes it is. I have one and it works fine as a > > > frame switch AND router with > > > > isdn, serial, and token ring. A great > > > multi-purpose device, and usually > > > > cheaper than a 2522. > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Ham web" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:39 AM > > > > Subject: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788] > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > Joust wanted to know if the 2523 was a good buy > > > to act > > > > > as a frame relay/x.25 switch in a home lab > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks > > > > > > > > > > Ham > > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site > > > hosting, just $8.95/month. > > > > > http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 > > > > > > > > >_ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >__ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > >http://greetings.yahoo.com >-Carroll Kong _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6&t=27788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Exam [7:28870]
Congratulations!! Is this the new format. How many questions and how long were you allowed? Do I need to remember all Cisco commands? How heavy on specific Cisco as opposed to general protocol knowledge? What is percentage on Token Ring stuff? BGP? Cisco router/switches configuration? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28881&t=28870 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Priscilla I have a lot to learn from you (and others), and I mean that in all honesty. Thank you for being so patient and understanding. It's good to see the "real" you again. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 09:11 AM 12/11/01, anil wrote: > >Please stop sending messages about this topic > >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I'm sorry I was so hard on you. You're right that I don't have a right to tell you what to send. You irritated me because you kept sending links to wrong info and I misunderstood your motive for doing that. I gave more thought to NFS and the issue of wrong info everywhere. I stick to my guns that you have to dig deeper sometimes and investigate the messages that the protocol sends, the services it offers, the services below it that it uses, what problem the creators of the protocol were trying to solve, etc. Knowing (or investigating) some history helps. Sun developed NFS as part of their Open Network Computing platform in the late 1980s. The OSI model was already being used for what it's good for. NFS was designed to be an application-layer protocol that ran above a session-layer protocol and uses XDR at the presentation layer. This is not a good one to turn into an arguable issue. It's straight forward. Because it's a Sun protocol, I wasn't really sure if there was an RFC, but there does seem to be one, RFC 1094. I found it by searching on "NFS RFC" in Google. It was the first hit. Regarding the existence of session-layer protocols, there really are very few in the IP world. RPC is one. NetBIOS is one. AppleTalk has the AppleTalk Session Protocol (ASP), but when Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) runs above TCP, the session layer disappears. There is something called Data Stream Identifier (DSI) between AFP and TCP, but it doesn't do much. OSI did a good job of defining the session layer. Believe it or not, Cisco Network Academy materials describe it reasonably well and cover two-way alternating and two-way simultaneous relationships, etc. But then they categorized the wrong protocols as being session-layer protocols. OSI's definitions for the session layer are just academic these days. Even the protocols I mentioned, such as NetBIOS, etc. don't behave the way OSI said would!? ;-) Priscilla >I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. >My sincere apologies > >-Anil > Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
Let's be realistic here: If this guy had a memory good enough to remember all these questions, he would not have failed the exam. He obviously cheated and wrote the questions down during the test. ...or maybe he had a spy camera in his lapel? The sad thing is that he is tempting a lot of hard-working people on this list who are earnestly trying to LEARN the material for the exam. Brent Gardner - -Original Message- From: Yang Jun (Ike Yang) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12&t=28862 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: passed CCIE written (longish) [7:28614]
just a quick question, im studying for the ccie written what the QUe, is it a webs site? where can i get this ccie prep kit -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Albert Pak Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: passed CCIE written (longish) [7:28614] Congratulation!!! I passed this exam as well, at the first attempt with a 75% 2 days ago. I used: 1) Lou Rossi's Token Ring Paper 2) Network Learning CCIE Written Prep Guide 3) CCIE Prep Kit from QUE I agreed with Nick this is not an easy exam. I would also suggest everyone who has done with CCNP, should take this exam within a short period of time. Thanks everyone on this group. On to the Lab exam!!! Albert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: passed CCIE written (longish) [7:28614] I just passed my qualification test with an 83. It was not an easy test, considering the topics covered. However, I must admit that nothing on the test was beyond the blue print (from CCO). I must admit that being a CCNP is definitely an advantage when one goes for this test, the coverage is different, since more concentration is on theoritical topics, desktop protocols & of course token ring & SRB/DLSW/RSRB/etc. bridging, rather than the actual routing protocols. I would attempt to suggest a path that one may take (books etc.) while preparing for this test. This will apply mostly to CCNP/DP's & one with experience (NP/DP level). Read : 1. Internetworking TEch. overview (CCO) this is an absolute must, however not many who have passed the test seem to refer to this. It certainly has no commands kinda info, but packet types, frame types, layers etc. are plentiful, and these are tested. 2. Caslow : I have mixed responses about caslow, no doubt it is a very good book, no doubt I couldnt have studied some of the topics without it, no doubt that it has a wealth of concentrated info, however one can "bypass it". It is replaceable. 3. Read chapter on ATM & LANE from LAN switching book by Kennedy Clark (Cisco Press). Its the best explanation one can get. 4. If a CCNP, read all the 4 books, read DLSW + RSRB + SRB papers from CCO. 5. Know the boot sequence & the boot register in & out. 6. Lou Rossi's Token Ring Paper 7. Dennis Laganiere's RIF examples (good examples) 8. CCO Blue print(probably the most imp. ), I used to go back and forth forming my own Q's about a particular topic. One can replace Caslow (for written, its an absolute must for LAB) by referring to all the above mentioned material. I would recommend taking Written almost immediately after CCNP, while the material is still fresh. And lastly, the most important is BOSON tests, especially 2 & 3, test 3 has now about 400Q's and that really tests most of the stuff. Experience with actual hardware is important, however I would think that Cisco doesnt rely on actual experience with hardware for this test atleast (NP/DP tests albeit do rely on experience) I would like to thank everyone on this group. now enroute to LAB, and also being part of the exclusive LAB study group (on groupstudy, where else :) Nick Shah Network Engr. Connect Internet Solutions Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9&t=28614 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Switching - Mapping MAC address to IP Multicast [7:10]
Hi all. This is my first message here. Greetings from Spain ;) Now, i have a question for you. I'm preparing my CCNP Switching exam, and now im reading about IP Multicast. The book says that IANA reserved some MAC address for using with IP Multicast. The book also says that MAC addresses must be mapped to IP Multicast address, and it explains how to map them. But i cant understand it. I dont understand how to map MAC address to IP Multicast addresses. Can u help me? Thanks in advice. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10&t=10 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1601 with "-mz." Images [7:7]
What does a 1601 need to support compressed images? PCMCIA flash cards cost more than the 1601 box. It should be very intresting to use an image like "c1600-sy-mz.12.1-1" that needs 4MB flash, that's usually the amount of flash that the 1601 already have. The DRAM requirements are not higher if an -mz. image will be used? The Feature Navigator tool has a "N. A" in the DRAM requirements... Please help, Hugo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7&t=7 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Exam [7:28870]
Nick, Thanks. Where do I get Rossi's paper? Ric Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5&t=28870 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written Exam [7:28870]
Good work Ali. Ric, the new format has 100 Q's to be answered in 2 hrs(120 mins). You can mark a Q, and go back, or you can go back and change anyway. Multiple selections dont tell you to select 2 or 3, but just "multiple answers" so we have to think and select the correct ones. The test stresses heavily on theoritical aspects, and so Token/SRB/RSRB/DLSW appear a lot. Try reading Lou Rossi's paper and that contains all that you need to know. The rest of the stuff is found in Internetworking TEch. Overview (on CCO) & Caslow. If you stick to these 2 sources + Boson + Rossi's paper you should be fine. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3&t=28870 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
At 09:11 AM 12/11/01, anil wrote: > >Please stop sending messages about this topic > >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I'm sorry I was so hard on you. You're right that I don't have a right to tell you what to send. You irritated me because you kept sending links to wrong info and I misunderstood your motive for doing that. I gave more thought to NFS and the issue of wrong info everywhere. I stick to my guns that you have to dig deeper sometimes and investigate the messages that the protocol sends, the services it offers, the services below it that it uses, what problem the creators of the protocol were trying to solve, etc. Knowing (or investigating) some history helps. Sun developed NFS as part of their Open Network Computing platform in the late 1980s. The OSI model was already being used for what it's good for. NFS was designed to be an application-layer protocol that ran above a session-layer protocol and uses XDR at the presentation layer. This is not a good one to turn into an arguable issue. It's straight forward. Because it's a Sun protocol, I wasn't really sure if there was an RFC, but there does seem to be one, RFC 1094. I found it by searching on "NFS RFC" in Google. It was the first hit. Regarding the existence of session-layer protocols, there really are very few in the IP world. RPC is one. NetBIOS is one. AppleTalk has the AppleTalk Session Protocol (ASP), but when Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) runs above TCP, the session layer disappears. There is something called Data Stream Identifier (DSI) between AFP and TCP, but it doesn't do much. OSI did a good job of defining the session layer. Believe it or not, Cisco Network Academy materials describe it reasonably well and cover two-way alternating and two-way simultaneous relationships, etc. But then they categorized the wrong protocols as being session-layer protocols. OSI's definitions for the session layer are just academic these days. Even the protocols I mentioned, such as NetBIOS, etc. don't behave the way OSI said would!? ;-) Priscilla >I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. >My sincere apologies > >-Anil > Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28891&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
Sorry guys, I just got carried away. I always respected Cisco's NDA. I just didn't think that were the real questions since they were so long. In my previous groups I always raised the issue of NDA when some people tried to violate. IT WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN. Regards, Abbas -Original Message- From: james mensah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:32 AM To: Ali, Abbas; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Abbas are you new to this group and do you have some respect for Cisco NDA and for that matter ethics? Watch out Cisco is about to get you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali, Abbas Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Sorry to hear that. Here is what I think the answers would be. Q1) B Q2) B Q3) Definetly A, could also include B if multiple choice. Q4) AB Q5) Don't know. Q6) BC Q7) Q8) Q9) D Q10) Q11)B -Original Message- From: Yang Jun (Ike Yang) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Dear CCIEs, I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token release? A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one data frame is allowed. B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one token is allowed. C. More than one data frame and more than one token can circulate the ring at any given time. D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame from the ring E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token to be released from its neighbor. 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from the OSPF area. B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite cost. C. The specific network is not sent out again on the interface it was received on. The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple answer) A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. 4.Examine the following: Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? (multiple answer) A. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 B. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 2 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 C. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 D. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router configurations? A. No changes are necessary. B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and area 0. C. A serial line or other physical connections could be installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router between Area 60 and Area 6. E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it work. 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) statements is correct? A. CGMP manages multicast traffic Catalyst 5000 series switches by allowing directed switching of IP multicast traffic. B. CGMP will switch IP multicast packets to all ports in one specific VLAN. C. CGMP filtering requires a network connection from the Catalyst 5000 series to a router running CGMP. D. CGMP handles ARP, SAP, UDP, SSAP and DSAP. 7.Which statement
Re: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
> Dear CCIEs, > > I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here > but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct > answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! > Wow, that is a lot of questions, and it clearly indicates that you were not ready for the CCIE Written exam. Where did you LOOK for the correct answer? May I politely suggest that you study the information on Cisco more carefully, then provide your own answers to these questions? Those of us who have passed had to learn the answers by reading and then remembering the information. Almost all of the answers that you are requestion can be found at www.cisco.com so please do your studying. Other members have informed you by asking these questions, you are breaking the Cisco Non-Disclosure Agreement that you signed before you took the exam (non-disclosure means, don't tell anyone what the questions or answers are on the exam). You should be concerned that if you are caught violating this non-disclosure agreement, you will be barred from taking the Written Exam. Are the answers to these questions really worth the suspension? Also, CCIE's are usually very independent and know how to do research on a subject before asking questions for help. You should start your training in that manner - do the research FIRST, and then when you can't find the answer, ask us here on the list. PS Many of us know the answers to these questions, and the answers are easily found in the Cisco documentation and in the books that are suggested reading material for the CCIE Written exam. > 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token > release? > > > A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given > time, but only one data frame is allowed. > > B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any > given time, but only one token is allowed. > > C. More than one data frame and more than one token can > circulate the ring at any given time. > > D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame > from the ring > > E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token > to be released from its neighbor. > > > > 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? > > > > A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from > the OSPF area. > > B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the > bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite > cost. > > C. The specific network is not sent out again on the > interface it was received on. > > The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a > metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. > > > > 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple > answer) > > > A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. > > B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver > to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. > > C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more > than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. > > D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. > > > > 4.Examine the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? > (multiple answer) > > > > A. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > > > B. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 2 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > C. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > > > D. router A > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > > router B > > router OSPF 1 > > network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 > > 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network > design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router > configurations? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A. No changes are necessary. > > B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and > area 0. > > C. A serial line or other physical connections could be > installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. > > D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router > between Area 60 and Area 6. > > E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it > work. > > > > 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) > statements is cor
ethernet keepalive [7:28888]
what does an ethernet keepalive packet look like? Who does a router send one to (especially if connected to a switch). Is it looking for voltage or something else? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2&t=2 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Group Study LAB Board Question [7:28863]
Thanks Jim. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't breaking any rule. I've taken the lab once (failed and written expired). I am familiar with how dates become open within a couple of weeks of when someone is ready for the test. Key is to be ready then start looking for swaps. Looks like a lot of folks are trying for March tho. Thanks again. ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Join the board and use whatever date you feel comfortable with. As far as > the date is concerned, if you can leave on a weeks notice, there will be a > seat available. > > Dates are always opening up. Just study with a March date in mind and you > should be able to grab one within two weeks of the test. I'm pretty certain > about this. > > Look at the scheduler and you probably will see Jan dates open. If I > remember correctly Cisco testing is closed for testing from around the 20th > till the new year. This might affect the availability of Jan dates in > regards to my earlier statement. > > Just keep an eye open study your buns off and you should be able to grab the > desired date as it approaches. > > > -Original Message- > From: Gregg Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT:Group Study LAB Board Question [7:28863] > > > I recently passed my CCIE written. I am hoping for a Mid March lab date. > Currently, cisco is showing only earliest available dates in June. I'd like > to join the lab discussion group, but I have not yet schdeluded the lab > since I don't want to wait until June to take it. Would it be an error in > protocol to join the group saying that I have a mid March date? I'm am > going to try very hard to get a mid March date (hopefully a swap). > > Thank you, Gregg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28887&t=28863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
Can't the moderator block these kinds of posting? It really makes me sick, let me get back to my lab before l get distracted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yang Jun (Ike Yang) Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Dear CCIEs, I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token release? A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one data frame is allowed. B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one token is allowed. C. More than one data frame and more than one token can circulate the ring at any given time. D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame from the ring E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token to be released from its neighbor. 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from the OSPF area. B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite cost. C. The specific network is not sent out again on the interface it was received on. The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple answer) A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. 4.Examine the following: Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? (multiple answer) A. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 B. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 2 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 C. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 D. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router configurations? A. No changes are necessary. B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and area 0. C. A serial line or other physical connections could be installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router between Area 60 and Area 6. E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it work. 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) statements is correct? A. CGMP manages multicast traffic Catalyst 5000 series switches by allowing directed switching of IP multicast traffic. B. CGMP will switch IP multicast packets to all ports in one specific VLAN. C. CGMP filtering requires a network connection from the Catalyst 5000 series to a router running CGMP. D. CGMP handles ARP, SAP, UDP, SSAP and DSAP. 7.Which statement about RADIUS is true? A. The RADIUS server must you use TCP for its connection the NAS. B. AAA can be configured to direct RADIUS authentication/authorization to one server and RADIUS accounting to a different server. C. RADIUS supports bi-directional CHAP authentication. D. RADIUS is a proprietary protocol that is necessarily vendor specific. E. RADIUS supports command authorization. 8.Which statements about TACACS+ are true? (multiple answer) A. If more than one TACACS+ server is configured and the first one does not respond within a given timeout period, the next TACACS+ server in the list will be contacted. B. The TACACS+ server!/s connection to the NAS encrypts the entire packet. C. The TACACS+ server must u
RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
If you can remember the questions then you should be able to find you own answers. You are violating the Cisco's policy. Please be careful. Regards, Ali, Abbas -Original Message- From: Yang Jun (Ike Yang) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE written questions [7:28862] Dear CCIEs, I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token release? A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one data frame is allowed. B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one token is allowed. C. More than one data frame and more than one token can circulate the ring at any given time. D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame from the ring E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token to be released from its neighbor. 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from the OSPF area. B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite cost. C. The specific network is not sent out again on the interface it was received on. The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple answer) A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. 4.Examine the following: Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? (multiple answer) A. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 B. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 2 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 C. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 D. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router configurations? A. No changes are necessary. B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and area 0. C. A serial line or other physical connections could be installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router between Area 60 and Area 6. E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it work. 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) statements is correct? A. CGMP manages multicast traffic Catalyst 5000 series switches by allowing directed switching of IP multicast traffic. B. CGMP will switch IP multicast packets to all ports in one specific VLAN. C. CGMP filtering requires a network connection from the Catalyst 5000 series to a router running CGMP. D. CGMP handles ARP, SAP, UDP, SSAP and DSAP. 7.Which statement about RADIUS is true? A. The RADIUS server must you use TCP for its connection the NAS. B. AAA can be configured to direct RADIUS authentication/authorization to one server and RADIUS accounting to a different server. C. RADIUS supports bi-directional CHAP authentication. D. RADIUS is a proprietary protocol that is necessarily vendor specific. E. RADIUS supports command authorization. 8.Which statements about TACACS+ are true? (multiple answer) A. If more than one TACACS+ server is configured and the first one does not respond within a given timeout period, the next TACACS+ server in the list will be contacted. B. The TACACS+ server!/s connection to the NAS encrypts the entire packet. C. The TACACS+ serv
Re: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
I'm not going to sit a flame you, there is enough of that as of late, but I know I signed some Nondisclosure and though it's been several years I think you signed one when taking the CCIE written. IOW what your asking is violating the NDA. If you can remember these questions and answers me thinks you can find and remember the correct answers. Dave "Yang Jun (Ike Yang)" wrote: > > Dear CCIEs, > > I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here > but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct > answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28880&t=28862 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written questions [7:28862]
Hello Ike, >From your email address I know you are based in China. Perhaps you are not very aware of Cisco's lawyer's fearsome powers due to geographical distance. I mean no ill will and this is simply a friendly reminder, but please refrain from posting actual test questions. You signed the Non - disclosure agreement when you took the test, and they can, and have, revoked people's certs because of leakage. Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28877&t=28862 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP and memory allocation errros [7:28819]
Sounds like you may have dCEF enabled, and not enough RAM on a linecard... I had the same problem... Patrick Donlon wrote: >Hi All > >I have a problem with a router running BGP. I have two 7204vxr's running BGP >connecting to two different service providers, I upgraded the IOS of one the >routers with version 12.1(5)T10 (IP PLUS IPSEC 3DES) and the boot image, it >ran for a week with no problems. I upgraded the other router with the same >images and as got memory allocation errors when it established adjacency >with the BGP neighbours, see the output below. I'm no BGP expert and I >believe there is enough memory in the router, so any suggestions will be >appreciated > >Regards > >Pat > >*Nov 25 15:55:29: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up >*Nov 25 15:55:31: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up >*Nov 25 15:55:41: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up >*Nov 25 15:56:07: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 65496 bytes failed >from > >0x606BE0F4, pool Processor, alignment 0 >-Process= "BGP Router", ipl= 0, pid= 118 >-Traceback= 606C1450 606C38B0 606BE0FC 606BE8F0 6082D330 6082D578 6082EA84 > >609FA5EC 609FB2B8 61476248 609FB35C 609D61F0 606B7DA4 606B7D90 >*Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory >*Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory >*Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.*Down No memory >*Nov 25 15:56:11: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor *.*.*.* 3/1 (update > >malformed) 0 bytes >*Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up >*Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up >*Nov 25 15:56:51: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28876&t=28819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Schedule job in CiscoWorks2000 [7:28852]
Yes. Login to CW2000 as admin (or a user with admin priveleges) and go to RME--> Administration --> Inventory --> Change Device Attributes. This is where you set the passwords and SNMP community strings that CW2K will use to access your devices. This is maintained separately from the SNMP settings used by the ANI Server. HTH, John >>> "Hans Stout" 12/11/01 10:03:00 AM >>> Hello colleagues, I am trying to schedule a job to get the enable and telnet passwords changed on all my switches and routers using the job scheduler in Resource Manager Essentials. I understand how to schedule the job, but the execution fails every time because the logon to the switches and routers fails. How is the job scheduler supposed to now how to logon to a system ? Where are the passwords stored ? Is there an option in CiscoWorks2000 where you can fill in the default passwords, similar to the default SNMP community strings ? Thanks for your help in advance. Regards, Hans _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28875&t=28852 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Group Study LAB Board Question [7:28863]
Join the board and use whatever date you feel comfortable with. As far as the date is concerned, if you can leave on a weeks notice, there will be a seat available. Dates are always opening up. Just study with a March date in mind and you should be able to grab one within two weeks of the test. I'm pretty certain about this. Look at the scheduler and you probably will see Jan dates open. If I remember correctly Cisco testing is closed for testing from around the 20th till the new year. This might affect the availability of Jan dates in regards to my earlier statement. Just keep an eye open study your buns off and you should be able to grab the desired date as it approaches. -Original Message- From: Gregg Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT:Group Study LAB Board Question [7:28863] I recently passed my CCIE written. I am hoping for a Mid March lab date. Currently, cisco is showing only earliest available dates in June. I'd like to join the lab discussion group, but I have not yet schdeluded the lab since I don't want to wait until June to take it. Would it be an error in protocol to join the group saying that I have a mid March date? I'm am going to try very hard to get a mid March date (hopefully a swap). Thank you, Gregg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28873&t=28863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 [7:28859]
YEEHAW!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 [7:28859] >Nice... Nothing like taking cheap shots on someone that is sending to a >forum thats supposed to help you learn. > >I'll bet you can remember a time back when you didn't know everything >there is to know about BGP. > >Try adjusting the timers, soft neighbor reconfiguration. > "fwells12" 12/10/01 06:22PM >>> >Dude, your a senior network engineer? > >Doing a clear ip bgp * forces the neigbors to renegotiate their >relationship >and resend ALL the routes. > >I think they are probably talking about using the neighbor >soft-reconfiguration command. > > >- Original Message - >From: "Phillip Estrada (EUS)" >To: "Antonio Marfil" ; > >Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:51 PM >Subject: RE: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 > > >> Dude, you're a senior network engineer? >> > > Clear ip bgp * Dude, Isn't as simple as it looks. Just as a start of knowing about some of the mechanisms being introduced, an excerpt from my upcoming book, Building Service Provider Networks, is below. I haven't read this specific scenario. I will make the point, however, that fast BGP reconvergence isn't necessarily a good thing, when weighed against Internet stability. Reconverging quickly to a failed net is futile. Enterprises and ISPs will have different perspectives on this. So the scenario may be artificial rather than real-world. BGP convergence itself is not that well-defined, and I'm actively involved in an IETF effort to formalize the definitions: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-00.txt -- The next implementer approach was to have the router store the entire Adj-RIB-In, rather than only those routes in it that passed filtering criteria and went to the Loc-RIB. If the acceptance policy then changed, the information already was there to refilter. While this improvement avoided needing to do a full reconvergence, it was both memory and processor intensive. The next step was to negotiate a soft refresh between pairs of BGP speakers. When both routers advertise the route refresh capability, a speaker whose policies change can send a ROUTE REFRESH message to the neighbor. On receipt of that message, the neighbor will readvertise the appropriate Adj-RIB-Out, which the local speaker will refilter and send the surviving routes to its Loc-RIB. Figure 12: Route Refresh Even though soft refresh improved the situation, there was still the The Adj-RIB-In conceptually contains all BGP routes received on an interface. When the speaker at the other end is sending all, or a substantial part, of the global routing table, per-interface memory requirements can become quite large. A fairly straightforward workaround was to keep the Adj-RIB-In conceptual. As routes were received, acceptance policy rules were applied to them, and only those that "survived" the input policy were sent to the Loc-RIB. This seems a reasonable workaround -- until you change an acceptance policy rule. At that point, how do you know that one of the "rejected" routes would not pass the new policy, and belongs in the RIB? The first operational solution was to "bounce" the BGP session up and down, resulting in the neighbor resending its entire Adj-RIB-Out. Especially on slower links, this could take significant bandwidth and introduce a noticeable delay. If BGP rules were followed, all routes whose next hop was to the neighboring router were now invalid, and would have to be readvertised to all other neighbors, causing a cascading bandwidth and processing requirement on other routers, potentially across the entire Internet. real-world problem that the sender of the Adj-RIB-Out might very well send routes that would be filtered by the receiver, wasting bandwidth and receiver processing time. Outbound Route Filtering was a new way to deal with this problem. Outbound Route Filtering I have long maintained that BGP doesn't transmit policies, but sends the information on which policy decisions are made based on information configured into the router by element management. Outbound Route Filtering (ORF) has forced me to modify that position, giving a final (if qualified) victory to a long-running debate between me and Sue Hares, co-chair of the IDR working group that develops BGP. At the next IETF we attend, I owe her a drink. The idea of ORF is that it can be of mutual benefit to a pair of routers to exchange their acceptance policies, so a router about to send its Adj-RIB-Out can prefilter it, thus requiring only the bandwidth for the updates the receiver really will use. Figure 13: Outbound Route Refresh Several independent proposals have been made for the policies that can be exchanged, and there is an attempt in
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Good to see that poor behavior is visited with goodness and wholesome encouragment. My name is Joshua and I am new to this board. Looking to learn all that can be taught! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of anil Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] Miss Priscilla >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much Yes, well the level of research that went into your statement matches the intelligence of a newt, doesn't it? If you had a brain cell it would die of loneliness. -Anil PS fun isn't it, attacking someone's intelligence in public. Strongly suggest you apologise to protect yourself against further remiss. -- >I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28871&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco OSPF ABR Implementations [7:28868]
Hi, all I believe you have already read this RFC draft. But for those who have missed this important material, I'd like to share this with you. It will clarify somewhat tricky Cisco ABR behavior. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-abr-alt-04.txt Hope this helps. Regards Jaeheon Yoo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28868&t=28868 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frf.12 [7:28840]
>From what I can understand, FRF.11 is just a standard to packetize voice and encap it in a frame-relay header. FRF.12 is a way to break up large packets in a queue, encap them in frame relay headers and interleave small voice packets among the larger packets. FRF.11 has nothing to do with interleaving and fragmenting, and I don't think FRF.11 gets fragmented (although after a certain level of IOS, there was a way to specify the encap size, but this is not fragmentation in my book). I haven't done any VoFR in a while and it was on a 3810. ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you tell me some of the difference between FRF11 and FRF12 as far as > fragmentation goes? Does 12 offer some improvements (in theory) over 11? I > remember MPPP and FRF11/12 being discussed as ways to fragment packets so > that voice didn't get trounced on a low bandwidth ( > Just curious. > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28867&t=28840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frf.12 [7:28840]
>From what I can understand, FRF.11 is just a standard to packetize voice and encap it in a frame-relay header. FRF.12 is a way to break up large packets in a queue, encap them in frame relay headers and interleave small voice packets among the larger packets. FRF.11 has nothing to do with interleaving and fragmenting, and I don't think FRF.11 gets fragmented (although after a certain level of IOS, there was a way to specify the encap size, but this is not fragmentation in my book). I haven't done any VoFR in a while and it was on a 3810. ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can you tell me some of the difference between FRF11 and FRF12 as far as > fragmentation goes? Does 12 offer some improvements (in theory) over 11? I > remember MPPP and FRF11/12 being discussed as ways to fragment packets so > that voice didn't get trounced on a low bandwidth ( > Just curious. > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28866&t=28840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT:Group Study LAB Board Question [7:28863]
I recently passed my CCIE written. I am hoping for a Mid March lab date. Currently, cisco is showing only earliest available dates in June. I'd like to join the lab discussion group, but I have not yet schdeluded the lab since I don't want to wait until June to take it. Would it be an error in protocol to join the group saying that I have a mid March date? I'm am going to try very hard to get a mid March date (hopefully a swap). Thank you, Gregg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28863&t=28863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE written questions [7:28862]
Dear CCIEs, I failed in the CCIE written exam today and, I recall some questions here but can't find the correct answer. Do please help me figure out the correct answer and give me your explain. Great thanks! 1.. In a token ring environment, what is allowed regarding early token release? A. More than one token can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one data frame is allowed. B. More than one data frame can circulate the ring at any given time, but only one token is allowed. C. More than one data frame and more than one token can circulate the ring at any given time. D. A station releases a free token after stripping the frame from the ring E. A station can transmit early without waiting for a token to be released from its neighbor. 2.What is the best description of poison reverse? A. It is a procedure used by OSPF to remove a network from the OSPF area. B. Once a connection disappears, the router advertising the bad network will send an update from this network indicating an infinite cost. C. The specific network is not sent out again on the interface it was received on. The network is sent back out on the interface it was received on, but with a metric of one more than the metric in the receive update. 3.In FDD, the characteristics of !04B/5B Encoding!1 include: (multiple answer) A. Sending 4 bits of informations using a 5 bit symbol. B. Increasing the clock rate of the transmitter and receiver to 125Mhz, which establishes an effective data rate of 100Mbps. C. Increasing the distance between two FDDI stations to more than 2km, when using multi-mode fiber. D. Providing a workaround for the optical Bypass Relay. 4.Examine the following: Based on the information above, which OSPF configurations listed are valid? (multiple answer) A. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 B. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 2 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 C. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 D. router A router OSPF 1 network 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 router B router OSPF 1 network 14.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 5.In reorganization, OSPF areas are realigned. Is this a valid network design? If not, what changes could be made to the network and/or router configurations? A. No changes are necessary. B. A virtual link could be configured between Area 60 and area 0. C. A serial line or other physical connections could be installed between devices in Area 60 and Area 0. D. Router B could be configured as an Area Border Router between Area 60 and Area 6. E. This is not valid design, and no changes can make it work. 6.Which of the following CGMP (Cisco group management protocol) statements is correct? A. CGMP manages multicast traffic Catalyst 5000 series switches by allowing directed switching of IP multicast traffic. B. CGMP will switch IP multicast packets to all ports in one specific VLAN. C. CGMP filtering requires a network connection from the Catalyst 5000 series to a router running CGMP. D. CGMP handles ARP, SAP, UDP, SSAP and DSAP. 7.Which statement about RADIUS is true? A. The RADIUS server must you use TCP for its connection the NAS. B. AAA can be configured to direct RADIUS authentication/authorization to one server and RADIUS accounting to a different server. C. RADIUS supports bi-directional CHAP authentication. D. RADIUS is a proprietary protocol that is necessarily vendor specific. E. RADIUS supports command authorization. 8.Which statements about TACACS+ are true? (multiple answer) A. If more than one TACACS+ server is configured and the first one does not respond within a given timeout period, the next TACACS+ server in the list will be contacted. B. The TACACS+ server!/s connection to the NAS encrypts the entire packet. C. The TACACS+ server must use TCP for its connection to the NAS. D. The TACACS+ server must use UDP for its connection to the NAS. E. The TACACS+ server may be configured to use TCP or UDP for its connection to the NAS. 9.CGMP (Cisco Group Management Protocol) is: A. A serial protocol for communications betwe
RE: Clear counters command [7:28850]
yes clear counters [Enter] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Perez Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Clear counters command [7:28850] Does anyone know if you can use a clear counters command from the CLI on a Cat 3548XL to clear multiple int's at one shot? EX: clear counters fa0/1:48 ?? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28861&t=28850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pin outs [7:28741]
Thank you Jim ""Jim Keny"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can any one point me to a web site where I can find information on how to > connect terminal server (2509) to a console port of a cat5505. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28860&t=28741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 [7:28859]
>Nice... Nothing like taking cheap shots on someone that is sending to a >forum thats supposed to help you learn. > >I'll bet you can remember a time back when you didn't know everything >there is to know about BGP. > >Try adjusting the timers, soft neighbor reconfiguration. > "fwells12" 12/10/01 06:22PM >>> >Dude, your a senior network engineer? > >Doing a clear ip bgp * forces the neigbors to renegotiate their >relationship >and resend ALL the routes. > >I think they are probably talking about using the neighbor >soft-reconfiguration command. > > >- Original Message - >From: "Phillip Estrada (EUS)" >To: "Antonio Marfil" ; > >Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:51 PM >Subject: RE: Speeding up BGP convergance in Bootcamp lab 18 > > >> Dude, you're a senior network engineer? >> > > Clear ip bgp * Dude, Isn't as simple as it looks. Just as a start of knowing about some of the mechanisms being introduced, an excerpt from my upcoming book, Building Service Provider Networks, is below. I haven't read this specific scenario. I will make the point, however, that fast BGP reconvergence isn't necessarily a good thing, when weighed against Internet stability. Reconverging quickly to a failed net is futile. Enterprises and ISPs will have different perspectives on this. So the scenario may be artificial rather than real-world. BGP convergence itself is not that well-defined, and I'm actively involved in an IETF effort to formalize the definitions: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-conterm-00.txt -- The next implementer approach was to have the router store the entire Adj-RIB-In, rather than only those routes in it that passed filtering criteria and went to the Loc-RIB. If the acceptance policy then changed, the information already was there to refilter. While this improvement avoided needing to do a full reconvergence, it was both memory and processor intensive. The next step was to negotiate a soft refresh between pairs of BGP speakers. When both routers advertise the route refresh capability, a speaker whose policies change can send a ROUTE REFRESH message to the neighbor. On receipt of that message, the neighbor will readvertise the appropriate Adj-RIB-Out, which the local speaker will refilter and send the surviving routes to its Loc-RIB. Figure 12: Route Refresh Even though soft refresh improved the situation, there was still the The Adj-RIB-In conceptually contains all BGP routes received on an interface. When the speaker at the other end is sending all, or a substantial part, of the global routing table, per-interface memory requirements can become quite large. A fairly straightforward workaround was to keep the Adj-RIB-In conceptual. As routes were received, acceptance policy rules were applied to them, and only those that "survived" the input policy were sent to the Loc-RIB. This seems a reasonable workaround -- until you change an acceptance policy rule. At that point, how do you know that one of the "rejected" routes would not pass the new policy, and belongs in the RIB? The first operational solution was to "bounce" the BGP session up and down, resulting in the neighbor resending its entire Adj-RIB-Out. Especially on slower links, this could take significant bandwidth and introduce a noticeable delay. If BGP rules were followed, all routes whose next hop was to the neighboring router were now invalid, and would have to be readvertised to all other neighbors, causing a cascading bandwidth and processing requirement on other routers, potentially across the entire Internet. real-world problem that the sender of the Adj-RIB-Out might very well send routes that would be filtered by the receiver, wasting bandwidth and receiver processing time. Outbound Route Filtering was a new way to deal with this problem. Outbound Route Filtering I have long maintained that BGP doesn't transmit policies, but sends the information on which policy decisions are made based on information configured into the router by element management. Outbound Route Filtering (ORF) has forced me to modify that position, giving a final (if qualified) victory to a long-running debate between me and Sue Hares, co-chair of the IDR working group that develops BGP. At the next IETF we attend, I owe her a drink. The idea of ORF is that it can be of mutual benefit to a pair of routers to exchange their acceptance policies, so a router about to send its Adj-RIB-Out can prefilter it, thus requiring only the bandwidth for the updates the receiver really will use. Figure 13: Outbound Route Refresh Several independent proposals have been made for the policies that can be exchanged, and there is an attempt in the IDR committee to come up with a unified proposal that contains the three filtering criteria suggested: o Prefix expression for NLRI o AS path expression o Community These are a subset of the policy options available on commercial rou
RE: IOS 12.0(4) Bugs ? [7:28845]
Hi Phil, Here is a link to 12.0 caveats. I did not see anything relating to your issue. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120cavs/120mcavs.htm Jim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28858&t=28845 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>>The session layer is an elusive beast The only elusive beast around here is a public apology. Looking forward to it. -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:12 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? - Priscilla Just in case you were wondering, that was a rhetorical question. Which means I do *not expect* a reply from your ego-centric highness. Suggest you look up "rhetorical" when you grow up. It is rather a long word. Thanks -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:54 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >>What's your point? This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much That is my point. - >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > >Someone please correct me. > >-Anil > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PRO
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Miss Priscilla >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much Yes, well the level of research that went into your statement matches the intelligence of a newt, doesn't it? If you had a brain cell it would die of loneliness. -Anil PS fun isn't it, attacking someone's intelligence in public. Strongly suggest you apologise to protect yourself against further remiss. -- >I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28855&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frf.12 [7:28840]
Can you tell me some of the difference between FRF11 and FRF12 as far as fragmentation goes? Does 12 offer some improvements (in theory) over 11? I remember MPPP and FRF11/12 being discussed as ways to fragment packets so that voice didn't get trounced on a low bandwidth (<768Kbps) line Just curious. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28854&t=28840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? - Priscilla Just in case you were wondering, that was a rhetorical question. Which means I do *not expect* a reply from your ego-centric highness. Suggest you look up "rhetorical" when you grow up. It is rather a long word. Thanks -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:54 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >>What's your point? This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much That is my point. - >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > >Someone please correct me. > >-Anil > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > >At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: > > >Hi, there, > > > > > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: >
Schedule job in CiscoWorks2000 [7:28852]
Hello colleagues, I am trying to schedule a job to get the enable and telnet passwords changed on all my switches and routers using the job scheduler in Resource Manager Essentials. I understand how to schedule the job, but the execution fails every time because the logon to the switches and routers fails. How is the job scheduler supposed to now how to logon to a system ? Where are the passwords stored ? Is there an option in CiscoWorks2000 where you can fill in the default passwords, similar to the default SNMP community strings ? Thanks for your help in advance. Regards, Hans _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28852&t=28852 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
traffic-shape basics for IP [7:28851]
traffic-shape 16000 8000 48000 1000 What does it mean? 8000 is per interval, right? Intervat is 128ms by defaiult,right? So, 8000 x 8 = 64000 bps burst, right? Every second ??? So, 16kbps+64kbps = 80kbps, from which 32kbps guaranteed and the rest best effort ? What difference is between: traffic-shape 16000 8000 48000 1000 and traffic-shape 32000 6000 48000 1000 where I have 32kbps + 6kb x 8 intervals/sec = 80 kbps ??? Apreciate any HELP. Chris just CCNA Vrei sa pleci la munte??? Cum? Simplu! Inscrie-te acum la http://www.romance.ro si CASTIGA un weekend la munte pentru tine si perechea ta! E gratis, si in plus te poti distra de milioane! --- http://www.click.ro - unul dintre cele mai mari portaluri romanesti, mail gratuit. http://www.webmania.ro - FREE hosting. http://www.funmanaia.ro - bancuri, poze si filme haioase. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28851&t=28851 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
This group sure is a great way to make friends, aint it. Tend to get intimate real quick. Caps off, coats off and gloves off...here we go :-) Just my type... -Anil -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:38 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28849&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clear counters command [7:28850]
Does anyone know if you can use a clear counters command from the CLI on a Cat 3548XL to clear multiple int's at one shot? EX: clear counters fa0/1:48 ?? Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28850&t=28850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>I don't agree that the other guy did any real research The "other guy" is called "Anil" You could not even be bothered to do the resrarch to check the name.. Getting sloppy in your old age miss (must be a girl). Suggest you kindly *drop dead* before making personal attacks on my credentials/ability to do research. Thanks -Anil PS Ever heard the saying "Don't shoot the messenger." ?? Hurts when people attack you doesn't it..suggest you stop. An apology would be a small miracle. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28848&t=28378 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP and memory allocation errros [7:28819]
Madman is right. In the absence of more memory this should help. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Donlon Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP and memory allocation errros [7:28819] Hi All I have a problem with a router running BGP. I have two 7204vxr's running BGP connecting to two different service providers, I upgraded the IOS of one the routers with version 12.1(5)T10 (IP PLUS IPSEC 3DES) and the boot image, it ran for a week with no problems. I upgraded the other router with the same images and as got memory allocation errors when it established adjacency with the BGP neighbours, see the output below. I'm no BGP expert and I believe there is enough memory in the router, so any suggestions will be appreciated Regards Pat *Nov 25 15:55:29: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:55:31: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:55:41: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:56:07: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 65496 bytes failed from 0x606BE0F4, pool Processor, alignment 0 -Process= "BGP Router", ipl= 0, pid= 118 -Traceback= 606C1450 606C38B0 606BE0FC 606BE8F0 6082D330 6082D578 6082EA84 609FA5EC 609FB2B8 61476248 609FB35C 609D61F0 606B7DA4 606B7D90 *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.*Down No memory *Nov 25 15:56:11: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor *.*.*.* 3/1 (update malformed) 0 bytes *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:56:51: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28846&t=28819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frf.12 [7:28840]
I had the same issue with FRF.12. Sounds good in theory and on papaer, but in the real world, it never works. FRF 11 Annex C is OK (VoFR) and PPP multilinking is OK, but FRF.12 is no good. Remind me to thank Cisco for drinking the FRF.12 kool-aid. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm not certain as to why, but *every* time we've tried it, the voice > call quality has gotten worse. I have no explanation because it doesn't > really make sense, but it's happened every time we've tried it. > > Sorry I couldn't be of more help... > > John > > >>> "VoIP Guy" 12/11/01 8:49:34 AM >>> > Has anyone have a clue as to when frame-relay fragmentation could > actually > make a voice call worse? > > Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28847&t=28840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOS 12.0(4) Bugs ? [7:28845]
Has anyone got a cisco link for bugs in the above IOS ? I'm having difficulty locating on cisco.com. specifically relating to 'sh sessions' and 'telnet to vty 0 4. I can telnet the routers without a password or login. Regards, Phil. __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28845&t=28845 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: frf.12 [7:28840]
I'm not certain as to why, but *every* time we've tried it, the voice call quality has gotten worse. I have no explanation because it doesn't really make sense, but it's happened every time we've tried it. Sorry I couldn't be of more help... John >>> "VoIP Guy" 12/11/01 8:49:34 AM >>> Has anyone have a clue as to when frame-relay fragmentation could actually make a voice call worse? Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28844&t=28840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
Anil, First, let me say I _am_ one of Paul's moderators. Moderation, on this list, works on an exception basis -- certain key phrases and names put things into a queue for moderator review before they post. People that don't play nicely with others have been known to join those filters. A friendly reminder. I'm not saying don't post, but use some discretion. Now, speaking for myself rather than Paul, let me respond a bit to your concern. As a PhD, you presumably know the differences between primary and secondary research sources. Primary sources were directly involved in the development or experiment in question, while secondary sources are paraphrasing and commenting on primary sources. I believe I have some reasonable credentials as a primary source on OSI, and, for that matter, current IETF work. In the OSI context, I was involved, through the US Federal Telecommunications Standards Committee, with the ANSI Distributed Systems (DISY) project, which was a significant starting point for the CCITT/ISO work (1976-1979). After that, I was the network management architect for GTE Telenet (1980-81) and still worked with standards groups. Subsequently, I was the first member of the technical staff for the Corporation for Open Systems (1986-1991), an international consortium for OSI/ISDN conformance testing and general development.My duties included staff liaison to the Architecture Committee (including all major vendors), test system development manager for FTAM (which does include the OSI session protocol and service), CMIP, and X.25, programmed protocol code on a number of other protocol test systems, and one of the primary external representatives for COS (including lecturing on OSI testing in Tokyo). I was also involved with harmonizing architecture between the ISO and IEEE 802 efforts. Without getting into irrelevant detail, I've been participating in IETF meetings since 1994, am the author or coauthor of three RFCs, and a coauthor of five active Internet Drafts. With respect to TCP/IP interoperability, and the TCP/IP interoperability workshops that became Interop, been there, got the T-shirt, although it doesn't fit all that well anymore...I prefer to think I've gained more knowledge than weight since the 2nd such conference. In other words, I think I can say legitimately that I have primary experience with the Internet protocol development process and the role of the OSI (and other) models in it. I've worked with Priscilla for eight years or so, during part of which time she was a Cisco employee and course developer, and I was a Cisco contractor with involvement in course development. I think we can also claim a fair bit of direct experience with how Cisco does things. Without trying to get into the middle of either you or Priscilla are phrasing your comments, I will make the observation that more than one person on the list has some pretty direct experience with the technologies and their primary specifications. Arguing they are wrong because a secondary source written for beginners says something different is, to put it gently, perhaps ill-advised. > >>What's your point? >This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. >>>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >That is my point. >- >>>until you have done some real research >-Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) >Does that count?? > > >-Original Message- >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >>Please stop sending messages about this topic >>(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. >I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. >My sincere apologies > >-Anil > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >>This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > > >>It must be out of date :-) > >Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. >What's your point? > >Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have >you checked some RFCs? > >Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its >messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems >were its creators trying to solve? > >Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until >you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of >a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care >less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book
Re: RSRB [7:28835]
If you have access to an image that supports APPN, you can configure your routers as APPN nodes. If the nodes are able to connect, then your RSRB/DLSw+ configs are working. Here is the link to a post in the archives: http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/cisco/200106/msg01186.html You can also test your configs using IP even though DLSw was not intended to transport IP. It gets a little trickier but you can do it. If you try that method, remember to add the following command to one of the routers in the chain: bridge xyz bitswap-layer3-addresses If you don't add that, ARP requests and replies won't function correctly. good luck! John >>> "Lupi, Guy" 12/11/01 7:55:59 AM >>> I have set up RSRB in the lab, and I have verified the configurations several times with various sources. The issue that I am seeing is that when I specify the remote neighbor in the configuration, the state transitions from dead to closed, but never to open. My question is, what causes the connection to go from closed to open, do I have to have traffic such as SNA or netbios to force the neighbors to come up? Is there a way to simulate this traffic if I only have 3 token ring routers? Any help is appreciated. R4#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname R4 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! source-bridge ring-group 12 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.5.4 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.1.1 ! ! interface Serial0 ip address 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 130.13.5.4 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 ring-speed 16 multiring ip source-bridge 2 1 12 source-bridge spanning ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router ospf 100 network 4.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 130.13.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! ip classless ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end R4# R4#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 130.13.1.1 Repeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: y Source address or interface: 130.13.5.4 Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: Validate reply data? [no]: Data pattern [0xABCD]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 130.13.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms R4# R4#sh source Local Interfaces: receive transmit srn bn trn r p s n max hops cnt cnt drops To0 2 2 12 * b 7 7 7 0 0 0 Global RSRB Parameters: TCP Queue Length maximum: 100 Ring Group 12: This TCP peer: 130.13.5.4 Maximum output TCP queue length, per peer: 100 Peers: state bg lv pkts_rx pkts_tx expl_gn drops TCP TCP 130.13.5.4 - 3 0 0 0 0 0 TCP 130.13.1.1 closed 3 0 0 0 0 0 Rings: bn: 2 rn: 2 local ma: 4008.de5c.a38a TokenRing0 fwd: 0 Explorers: --- input --- --- output --- spanning all-rings total spanning all-rings total To0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Explorer fastswitching enabled Local switched: 0 flushed 0 max Bps 38400 rings inputs bursts throttles output drops To0 0 0 0 0 R4# R3#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname R3 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! source-bridge ring-group 12 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.1.1 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.5.4 ! ! interface Serial0 ip address 4.4.4.5 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue clockrate 130 ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 130.13.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 ring-speed 16 multiring ip source-bridge 1 1 12 source-bridge spanning ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router ospf 100 network 4.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 130.13.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! ip classless ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end R3# R3#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 130.13.5.4 Repeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: y Source address or interface: 130.13.1.1 Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: Validate reply data? [no]: Data pattern [0xABCD]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 130.13.5.4, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/9/28 ms R3# R3#sh sour Local Interfaces: receive transmit srn bn trn r p s n max hops cnt cnt drops
Re: Archive Search [7:28788]
Occasionally this happens. I will fix the problem. It will take about three hours to rebuild. Thanks! Paul - Original Message - From: "Dan Lockwood" To: Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:19 PM Subject: Archive Search [7:28788] > The archive search feature seems to be non-functional. Can anyone > confirm this? > > http://www.groupstudy.com/cgi-bin/wilma/cisco#search > > Dan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28841&t=28788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frf.12 [7:28840]
Has anyone have a clue as to when frame-relay fragmentation could actually make a voice call worse? Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28840&t=28840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM circuit [7:28774]
pris , i am going to answer to the statement itself... i am not going to say weather it is possible (becuase i don`t know) but the passage reads to me like this an ATM VC can run over any medium becuase it`s a VC..it may leave your HQ on ATM but int the Service provider`s backbone it could run on anything...DS3 t3 MPLS etc.etc.) this is the message he seems to be trying to get across...and prehaps a re-wording is in order???. my SP (BT)has said that they DONT run atm over ethernet either steve "not meaning to offend ,just trying to help" skinner >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" >Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: ATM circuit [7:28774] >Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:46:28 -0500 > >My co-author added this statement to the book I'm working on: > >" an ATM virtual circuit may begin on an OC-3 fiber link, cross over to >a T3 line, pass across a Gigabit Ethernet fiber backbone, and end up going >out through an OC-12 fiber link. This may be an implementation of a single >ATM circuit, however." > >Could an ATM virtual circuit really span an Ethernet backbone?? > >Thanks! I don't want to be one of those authors that propagates >misinformation. ;-) Seriously, some mistakes are unavoidable, but this one >seems avoidable (if it is a mistake) > >Priscilla > > > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >http://www.priscilla.com _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28839&t=28774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP and memory allocation errros [7:28819]
Well, if you don't have 128MB of memory you're on severe trouble. Full-BGP-routing as it stands right now (all 105000 routes of it), takes around 80MB memory on your router (you can check this thru "sh proc mem" and checking the process BGP Router). And that is for a single peer giving you Full-Routing. With two, the memory allocation doesn't double, but may rise to around 100MB. So, if you want to have all that fancied'up IOS version (IP PLUS IPSEC 3DES), have Full-BGP-Routing and still be on the safe side, upgrade RAM to 256MB. Hugo > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > MADMAN > Sent: terga-feira, 11 de Dezembro de 2001 14:35 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: BGP and memory allocation errros [7:28819] > > > You don't give the more important output, a sh ver!! If you don't > have 128M then you have memory problems or lack thereof. > > dave > > Patrick Donlon wrote: > > > > Hi All > > > > I have a problem with a router running BGP. I have two > 7204vxr's running > BGP > > connecting to two different service providers, I upgraded > the IOS of one > the > > routers with version 12.1(5)T10 (IP PLUS IPSEC 3DES) and > the boot image, it > > ran for a week with no problems. I upgraded the other > router with the same > > images and as got memory allocation errors when it > established adjacency > > with the BGP neighbours, see the output below. I'm no BGP > expert and I > > believe there is enough memory in the router, so any > suggestions will be > > appreciated > > > > Regards > > > > Pat > > > > *Nov 25 15:55:29: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > > *Nov 25 15:55:31: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > > *Nov 25 15:55:41: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > > *Nov 25 15:56:07: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of > 65496 bytes > failed > > from > > > > 0x606BE0F4, pool Processor, alignment 0 > > -Process= "BGP Router", ipl= 0, pid= 118 > > -Traceback= 606C1450 606C38B0 606BE0FC 606BE8F0 6082D330 > 6082D578 6082EA84 > > > > 609FA5EC 609FB2B8 61476248 609FB35C 609D61F0 606B7DA4 606B7D90 > > *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory > > *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory > > *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.*Down No memory > > *Nov 25 15:56:11: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor > *.*.*.* 3/1 (update > > > > malformed) 0 bytes > > *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > > *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > > *Nov 25 15:56:51: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28838&t=28819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RSRB [7:28835]
I think a RIF will do. dave "Lupi, Guy" wrote: > > I have set up RSRB in the lab, and I have verified the configurations > several times with various sources. The issue that I am seeing is that when > I specify the remote neighbor in the configuration, the state transitions > from dead to closed, but never to open. My question is, what causes the > connection to go from closed to open, do I have to have traffic such as SNA > or netbios to force the neighbors to come up? Is there a way to simulate > this traffic if I only have 3 token ring routers? Any help is appreciated. > > R4#sh run > Building configuration... > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname R4 > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > ! > source-bridge ring-group 12 > source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.5.4 > source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.1.1 > ! > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip ospf interface-retry 0 > no ip mroute-cache > no fair-queue > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > interface TokenRing0 > ip address 130.13.5.4 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip ospf interface-retry 0 > ring-speed 16 > multiring ip > source-bridge 2 1 12 > source-bridge spanning > ! > interface BRI0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > router ospf 100 > network 4.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > network 130.13.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > ! > ip classless > ! > ! > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > R4# > R4#ping > Protocol [ip]: > Target IP address: 130.13.1.1 > Repeat count [5]: > Datagram size [100]: > Timeout in seconds [2]: > Extended commands [n]: y > Source address or interface: 130.13.5.4 > Type of service [0]: > Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: > Validate reply data? [no]: > Data pattern [0xABCD]: > Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: > Sweep range of sizes [n]: > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 130.13.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > ! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms > R4# > > R4#sh source > Local Interfaces: receive transmit > srn bn trn r p s n max hops cnt cnt drops > To0 2 2 12 * b 7 7 7 0 0 0 > Global RSRB Parameters: > TCP Queue Length maximum: 100 > Ring Group 12: > This TCP peer: 130.13.5.4 > Maximum output TCP queue length, per peer: 100 > Peers: state bg lv pkts_rx pkts_tx expl_gn drops TCP > TCP 130.13.5.4 - 3 0 0 0 0 0 > TCP 130.13.1.1 closed 3 0 0 0 0 0 > Rings: > bn: 2 rn: 2 local ma: 4008.de5c.a38a TokenRing0 fwd: 0 > Explorers: --- input --- --- output --- > spanning all-rings total spanning all-rings total > To0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Explorer fastswitching enabled > Local switched: 0 flushed 0 max Bps 38400 > rings inputs bursts throttles output drops > To0 0 0 0 0 > R4# > > R3#sh run > Building configuration... > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname R3 > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > ! > source-bridge ring-group 12 > source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.1.1 > source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.5.4 > ! > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 4.4.4.5 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip ospf interface-retry 0 > no ip mroute-cache > no fair-queue > clockrate 130 > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > interface TokenRing0 > ip address 130.13.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip ospf interface-retry 0 > ring-speed 16 > multiring ip > source-bridge 1 1 12 > source-bridge spanning > ! > interface BRI0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > ! > router ospf 100 > network 4.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > network 130.13.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > ! > ip classless > ! > ! > ! > line con 0 > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > R3# > R3#ping > Protocol [ip]: > Target IP address: 130.13.5.4 > Repeat count [5]: > Datagram size [100]: > Timeout in seconds [2]: > Extended commands [n]: y > Source address or interface: 130.13.1.1 > Type of service [0]: > Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: > Validate reply data? [no]: > Data pattern [0xABCD]: > Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: > Sweep range of sizes [n]: > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 130.13.5.4, timeout is 2 seconds: > ! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/9/28 ms > R3# > R3#sh sour > Local Interfaces: receive transmit > srn bn trn r p s n max hops cnt cnt drops > To0 1 1 12 * f 7 7 7 0 0 0 > Global RSRB Parameters: > TCP Queue Length maximum: 100 > Ring Group 12: > This TCP peer: 130.13.1.1 > Maximum output TCP queue length, per peer: 100 > Peers: state bg lv pkts_rx pkts_tx expl_gn drops TCP > TC
Multiple Virtual-Templates?!?!?! [7:28836]
My question is about being able to use multiple Virtual-Templates for PPP Multilink applications. Picture this: A router (3640) configured to handle analog and ISDN dial-up via ISDN PRI and Mica modems that also has 2 point-to-point T1s attached to it's serial ports for WAN connectivity. Currently, the 2 point-to-point T1s are configured for multilink, and I have multilink setup to use Virtual-Template1. The way I understand it by giving the command "multilink virtual-template 1", any interface configured to use multilink will attempt to use the virtual-template1 and join the virtual-access1 multilink bundle (and perhaps upon attempting this, it realizes the endpoints aren't the same and it creates another virtual-access interface for the "new" bundle, but that's another issue =). However, I would like to enable ppp multilink on the ISDN lines so that people dialing in with ISDN (BRI) can bond both channels. Is there a way to specify for the Dialer interface (or whateve) to use ppp multilink but to use, say, Virtual-Template 2 (so that I could configure Virtual-Template2 specifically for ISDN dial-up). I've been digging around Cisco's site, and the main article I found on configuring Virtual-Templates/Profiles says one limitation is: "Although a system can have as many as 25 virtual template interfaces, one template for each virtual access application is a more realistic limit. " This seems to imply that I could setup a template the for WAN multilink "application" and another for the ISDN "application". Am I reading this wrong? This question comes more out of curiousity than anything else. We have other routers setup with T1 multilinks to a few sites, and they all use the same Virtual-Template, and that's not a big deal But I was curious to know if it were possible to have multilink somehow specify which Virtual-Template to use depending on the interface type or application... TIA, Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28836&t=28836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RSRB [7:28835]
I have set up RSRB in the lab, and I have verified the configurations several times with various sources. The issue that I am seeing is that when I specify the remote neighbor in the configuration, the state transitions from dead to closed, but never to open. My question is, what causes the connection to go from closed to open, do I have to have traffic such as SNA or netbios to force the neighbors to come up? Is there a way to simulate this traffic if I only have 3 token ring routers? Any help is appreciated. R4#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname R4 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! source-bridge ring-group 12 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.5.4 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.1.1 ! ! interface Serial0 ip address 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 130.13.5.4 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 ring-speed 16 multiring ip source-bridge 2 1 12 source-bridge spanning ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router ospf 100 network 4.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 130.13.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! ip classless ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end R4# R4#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 130.13.1.1 Repeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: y Source address or interface: 130.13.5.4 Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: Validate reply data? [no]: Data pattern [0xABCD]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 130.13.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms R4# R4#sh source Local Interfaces: receive transmit srn bn trn r p s n max hops cnt cnt drops To0 2 2 12 * b 7 7 7 0 0 0 Global RSRB Parameters: TCP Queue Length maximum: 100 Ring Group 12: This TCP peer: 130.13.5.4 Maximum output TCP queue length, per peer: 100 Peers: state bg lv pkts_rx pkts_tx expl_gn drops TCP TCP 130.13.5.4 - 3 0 0 0 0 0 TCP 130.13.1.1 closed 3 0 0 0 0 0 Rings: bn: 2 rn: 2 local ma: 4008.de5c.a38a TokenRing0 fwd: 0 Explorers: --- input --- --- output --- spanning all-rings total spanning all-rings total To0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Explorer fastswitching enabled Local switched: 0 flushed 0 max Bps 38400 rings inputs bursts throttles output drops To0 0 0 0 0 R4# R3#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname R3 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! source-bridge ring-group 12 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.1.1 source-bridge remote-peer 12 tcp 130.13.5.4 ! ! interface Serial0 ip address 4.4.4.5 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue clockrate 130 ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 ip address 130.13.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 ring-speed 16 multiring ip source-bridge 1 1 12 source-bridge spanning ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router ospf 100 network 4.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 130.13.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! ip classless ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end R3# R3#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: 130.13.5.4 Repeat count [5]: Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: y Source address or interface: 130.13.1.1 Type of service [0]: Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: Validate reply data? [no]: Data pattern [0xABCD]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 130.13.5.4, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/9/28 ms R3# R3#sh sour Local Interfaces: receive transmit srn bn trn r p s n max hops cnt cnt drops To0 1 1 12 * f 7 7 7 0 0 0 Global RSRB Parameters: TCP Queue Length maximum: 100 Ring Group 12: This TCP peer: 130.13.1.1 Maximum output TCP queue length, per peer: 100 Peers: state bg lv pkts_rx pkts_tx expl_gn drops TCP TCP 130.13.1.1 - 3 0 0 0 0 0 TCP 130.13.5.4 closed 3 0 0 0 0 0 Rings: bn: 1 rn: 1 local ma: 4008.de6c.6382 TokenRing0 fwd: 0 Explorers: --- input --- --- output --- spanning all-rings total spanning all-rings total To0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Explorer fastswitching enabled Local switched: 0 flushed 0 max Bps 38400 rings inputs bursts throttles output drops To0 0 0 0 0 R3# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28835&t=28835
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>>What's your point? This is total crap coming from a self proclaimed moderator. >>The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much That is my point. - >>until you have done some real research -Anil (PhD [Comp-Sci Tokyo Inst of Technology]- Sister School of MIT) Does that count?? -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:14 PM To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] >Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > >Someone please correct me. > >-Anil > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > >At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: > > >Hi, there, > > > > > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: >"Remember > > >that none of the upper > > >layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am >wondering > > >if the session layer doesn't > > >use network address, how can it establish a dialogue with other session > > >layer in other host? > > > >I would probably disagree with Todd's statement, although it's taken out of > >context and you haven't given us enough information to say that the > >statement is definitely "wrong." > > > >However, try to picture the numerous OSI pictures you have seen. Most of > >them show horizontal lines between a layer on one host talking
Re: PayPal Scam [7:28519]
And how many times were you ripped off? -- -=Repy to group only... no personal=- ""Donald"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Actually I have bought and paid for everything with paypal. Oh that is my > ccie lab I'm talking about, so I think it is relevant. > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Jonathan Hays" > To: > Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 8:59 AM > Subject: Re: PayPal Scam [7:28519] > > > > Jason wrote: > > > > > > Found this on one of the newsgroup... Might be good to forward this to > your > > > friends. I encounter the same problem and thought I was the only one > until > > I > > > saw the following Do a search on Google, etc about Paypal scam and > you > > > will see a few other similar sites !! Be WARNED. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > BREAKING NEWS ABOUT PAYPAL SCAM! IF YOU HAVE AN ACCOUNT WITH PAYPAL YOU > MAY > > > WANT TO READ THIS BREAKING NEWS FROM.ZDNET, CNN AND THE NEWYORK > TIMES. > > > > > > CLICK ON THE LINK > > > http://www.paypalwarning.com/Default.htm > > I disagree with your need to post this. > > This is a Cisco study newsgroup and frankly I personally > > would prefer not to see any way off-topic messages posted. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28803&t=28519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP and memory allocation errros [7:28819]
You don't give the more important output, a sh ver!! If you don't have 128M then you have memory problems or lack thereof. dave Patrick Donlon wrote: > > Hi All > > I have a problem with a router running BGP. I have two 7204vxr's running BGP > connecting to two different service providers, I upgraded the IOS of one the > routers with version 12.1(5)T10 (IP PLUS IPSEC 3DES) and the boot image, it > ran for a week with no problems. I upgraded the other router with the same > images and as got memory allocation errors when it established adjacency > with the BGP neighbours, see the output below. I'm no BGP expert and I > believe there is enough memory in the router, so any suggestions will be > appreciated > > Regards > > Pat > > *Nov 25 15:55:29: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > *Nov 25 15:55:31: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > *Nov 25 15:55:41: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > *Nov 25 15:56:07: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 65496 bytes failed > from > > 0x606BE0F4, pool Processor, alignment 0 > -Process= "BGP Router", ipl= 0, pid= 118 > -Traceback= 606C1450 606C38B0 606BE0FC 606BE8F0 6082D330 6082D578 6082EA84 > > 609FA5EC 609FB2B8 61476248 609FB35C 609D61F0 606B7DA4 606B7D90 > *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory > *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory > *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.*Down No memory > *Nov 25 15:56:11: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor *.*.*.* 3/1 (update > > malformed) 0 bytes > *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up > *Nov 25 15:56:51: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28833&t=28819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM circuit [7:28774]
We provide a similiar service, labled LSS, LAN switching service. Customer gets either a 10 or 100M connection which we carry over DS3 or OC3 ATM. At the customer prem the router is actually a bridge or if you will, transparent LAN. Dave Gregg Malcolm wrote: > > Priscilla, > > I have to agree with you on this. I know of no method to carry ATM over an > Ethernet. The opposite of course, is true. If the author would have said > that ATM can run over chicken wire, I would find that much more > believeable. ATM can run over nearly any phyiscal media. > > BTW - Do you encounter service providers at all? A Tranparent LAN (TLAN) is > quite a popular term with them. Just a bridged 1483 PVC. Until I worked > with that sector, never heard of it. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28831&t=28774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CCIE Written [7:28772]
Well, think about it this way. You have a test with 26 questions. You get a === Section 1: 100% Section 2: 33% Section 3: 33% Final Score: 85% === It doesn't make much since until you consider what they don't tell you. Section 1: 20 questions Section 2: 3 questions Section 3: 3 questions so, (1*20) + (0.33*3) + (0.33*3) = 22 22/26 = 84.6% -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Passed CCIE Written [7:28772] For a long time now I had ignored the Cisco scoring pattern, the bottom line is that you passed. When I was writing my CCNP/CCDP series, I discover that in 2 of the papers I got on each 2 100%, a few 30-something % and an embarasing 0% but the final score read 80-something %, close to 90%. From that time I start ignoring their scoring system, Cisco need to re-write their scoring algorithm. Congrats, on to the big moster. Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Derek Gaff To: Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:32 PM Subject: Passed CCIE Written [7:28772] > Passed CCIE Written today, Was not a bit impressed with my score, got 71% > with > a pass score of 70%. Just scraped the bucket with this one. Although I can't > understand there scoring method. I got 100% in 3 items, 80% in 2 and between > 50 and 70% in the rest. :-) > > Anyway, a pass is a pass no matter what the score is. Thanks for all the > information and thoughts. > > Cheers Derek _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28832&t=28772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716]
Actually this NM does not work in the 26xx series. I believe the logic is that the processor in the 26xx cannot handle the additional FE cards, however that's just my guess (I mean a 2621 would have two right?). You will find that any NM-FExxx will not work in a 26xx router. Sorry 'bout the bad news, ccie1ab -Original Message- From: Feargal Ledwidge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] Theres a good croos-referencing tool at: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/Support/HWSWmatrix/hwswmatrix.cgi It lets you search by chassis model and module model and shows the IOS version supported. Feargal Feargal Ledwidge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager of Network & Systems Administration TeraGlobal Communications -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] The blurb actually states it is not compatible with the 2600. Check the NM table towards the bottom of the link. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] Here is a marketing blurb that appears to say it is supported on the 2600 platform but me thinks it lies ;) http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/2636m_ds.htm Dave Johan Hjalmarsson wrote: > > Does a NM-1FE1R2W= work in a Cisco 2620 router? > > I thought all NM's worked in both the C26xx and C36xx series, but I > can't get this configuration to work. When I look in the HW/SW > compability matrix only SW for the C36xx is shown for this module. > > Any suggestions? -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28830&t=28716 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM circuit [7:28774]
Not ours Dave Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > My co-author added this statement to the book I'm working on: > > " an ATM virtual circuit may begin on an OC-3 fiber link, cross over to > a T3 line, pass across a Gigabit Ethernet fiber backbone, and end up going > out through an OC-12 fiber link. This may be an implementation of a single > ATM circuit, however." > > Could an ATM virtual circuit really span an Ethernet backbone?? > > Thanks! I don't want to be one of those authors that propagates > misinformation. ;-) Seriously, some mistakes are unavoidable, but this one > seems avoidable (if it is a mistake) > > Priscilla > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28829&t=28774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378]
>Please stop sending messages about this topic >(or any other topic) until you have done some real research. I had no idea you were the moderator of this group. My sincere apologies -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 7:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] At 06:18 PM 12/8/01, anil wrote: >This is from Cisco Oct 2001 Packet.. >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/784/packet/oct01/p76-training.html > >It must be out of date :-) Not "out of date." Just wrong. You can keep coming up with wrong material. What's your point? Have you looked at NFS with a Sniffer? Have you read a Unix man page? Have you checked some RFCs? Have you considered what NFS does? What are its functions? What do its messages look like? What protocols below it does it rely on? What problems were its creators trying to solve? Please stop sending messages about this topic (or any other topic) until you have done some real research. In your last message you quoted page 9 of a CCNA book. Sorry to burst your bubble, but nobody on this list could care less what it says on page 9 of a CCNA book. This list is for people studying for advanced Cisco certifications. Priscilla >-Anil > > >5. Session Layer >The session layer provides services in the application to manage inter-host >communication. Think of this function as the old-time telephone switchboard >operator: first, watching for a light on the switchboard indicating a >connection was needed, next connecting and monitoring the call, and then >finally disconnecting it by pulling the plug. For example, Network File >System (NFS) is like an extended feature Telnet program for UNIX that keeps >a connection (session) alive and available until the terminate command is >given. Other examples include Structured Query Language (SQL), Remote >Procedure Call (RPC), and X-Windows. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 3:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > >That's 40% right. > >SQL, NFS, and XWindows are application-layer protocols. > >RPC and NetBIOS are session-layer protocols. > >We often have discussions about which books are best. Todd Lammle books can >teach you basic router configuration. They are often wrong where protocol >behavior is concerned. > >A better reference for learning about OSI is the OSI paper by Howard >Berkowitz at http://www.certificationzone.com. > >Priscilla > >At 11:32 PM 12/7/01, anil wrote: > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Yes, I checked it out.. > >Session layer protocols include: > >SQL, NFS, RPC, NetBios, Xwindows are examples of session layer protocols. > >Page 9 of CCNA 2nd Edition study guide Todd Lammle > > > >-Anil > > > > > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:17 PM > >To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much > >Wait a sec, I thought SQL, NFS and netbios were session layer protocols? > >Someone please correct me. > >-Anil > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Priscilla Oppenheimer > >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:55 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Does session layer protocol use IP address ? [7:28378] > > > > > >At 02:59 AM 12/7/01, mlh wrote: > > >Hi, there, > > > > > >I read Todd Lammle's CCNA2.0 study guide and found this sentence: >"Remember > > >that none of the upper > > >layers know anything about networking or network addresses." I am >wondering > > >if the session layer doesn't > > >use network address, how can it establish a dialogue with other session > > >layer in other host? > > > >I would probably disagree with Todd's statement, although it's taken out of > >context and you haven't given us enough information to say that the > >statement is definitely "wrong." > > > >However, try to picture the numerous OSI pictures you have seen. Most of > >them show horizontal lines between a layer on one host talking to the same > >layer on another host. So the session layer talks to the session layer on > >the other host. That's probably what Todd was getting at. > > > >However, the pictures also show vertical lines. A layer calls on a layer > >below to provide services. Each layer offers services to layers above it. > > > >The session layer is an elusive beast that is not implemented much. But one > >example might help. NetBIOS is a session layer. On a Windows client, when > >you access a Server Message Block (SMB) server, NetBIOS
Re: visual snmp client [7:28825]
Castlerock SNMPc -- -=Repy to group only... no personal=- ""ndabarasa michel"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hello, > i want to be able to monitor interfaces on my snmp_enabled > devices. > > i wantto know what snmp client i can use(if possible a > visual and easy one). > links to documentations highly appreciated. > > > /'^ ^'\ > ((o)-(o)) > |oOOO--(_)--OOOo--|-|- > | Ndabarasa Michel... | > | CCNA,CCAI.. | > | National University of Rwanda.. | > | Computing Centre... | > | voice.. | > | office (+250)530666 | > | cell (+250)08510951..| > | .oooO | > | ( )Oooo. | > |---\ (--- ( )---|-| > \_) ) /|-| >(_/ > > > > -- > FREE! The Best in Rwanda Email Address @mail.rw > Reserve your name right now at http://mail.rw Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28827&t=28825 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP Help [7:28826]
Can someone help me figure out the MIB's to get information from the show interface commands? I am specifically looking for. -input/output -crc -carrier transitions -overruns Thanks -Russ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28826&t=28826 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
visual snmp client [7:28825]
hello, i want to be able to monitor interfaces on my snmp_enabled devices. i wantto know what snmp client i can use(if possible a visual and easy one). links to documentations highly appreciated. /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) |oOOO--(_)--OOOo--|-|- | Ndabarasa Michel... | | CCNA,CCAI.. | | National University of Rwanda.. | | Computing Centre... | | voice.. | | office (+250)530666 | | cell (+250)08510951..| | .oooO | | ( )Oooo. | |---\ (--- ( )---|-| \_) ) /|-| (_/ -- FREE! The Best in Rwanda Email Address @mail.rw Reserve your name right now at http://mail.rw Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28825&t=28825 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIXL: no client connectivity [7:28685]
Hi It seems to me that you have missed access group command For example, use the following command statement to ping from the inside interface to the outside interface: access-group acl_ping in interface outside. Once you define an access list you have to specify the access group command for each interface thru which you want the icmp packets to pass. hope this helps fahim ccna. ccda, css1 ""Gibb, Jake"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Isn't there an implicit deny at the end of your access list? > > access-list acl_ping permit icmp any any > > Should you add the following to permit http traffic at least. You will > probably need dns resolution as well. > > access-list acl_ping permit tcp 80 any any > > -Original Message- > From: Pierre-Alex J. Guanel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PIXL: no client connectivity [7:28685] > > > From a client (inside) I can ping the inside interface of the PIX . > > From a client (outside) I can ping the outside interface of the PIX. > > However no (inside) client manages to ping or do any sort of traffic > with hosts outside the PIX. > > I have the feeling that I have a Global or PAT issue. > > Do you spot where my problem is? > > Thank you!!! > > BTECHPIX# sh config > : Saved > : > PIX Version 5.1(2) > nameif ethernet0 outside security0 > nameif ethernet1 inside security100 > enable password encrypted > passwd encrypted > hostname BTECHPIX > fixup protocol ftp 21 > fixup protocol http 80 > fixup protocol h323 1720 > fixup protocol rsh 514 > fixup protocol smtp 25 > fixup protocol sqlnet 1521 > names > access-list acl_ping permit icmp any any > pager lines 24 > logging on > no logging timestamp > no logging standby > no logging console > no logging monitor > no logging buffered > no logging trap > no logging history > logging facility 20 > logging queue 512 > interface ethernet0 auto > interface ethernet1 auto > mtu outside 1500 > mtu inside 1500 > ip address outside 209.152.115.123 255.255.255.0 > ip address inside 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 > no failover > failover timeout 0:00:00 > failover ip address outside 0.0.0.0 > failover ip address inside 0.0.0.0 > arp timeout 14400 > global (outside) 1 209.152.115.125 > nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 > route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.152.115.1 1 > timeout xlate 3:00:00 conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 > timeout rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute > aaa-server TACACS+ protocol tacacs+ aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius no > snmp-server location no snmp-server contact snmp-server community public > no snmp-server enable traps floodguard enable isakmp identity hostname > . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28811&t=28685 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3rd party Flash memory [7:28823]
Hi Patrick , I am using third party DRAM and Flash on my 2600 series routers , and they have been working fine for the last 3 months , and they cost fraction of the price as compared to the original Cisco Price list , I have upgraded my Flash and DRAM on 4 of my routers so far and I have bought them all from anthonypanda.com . Navin Parwal "Patrick Donlon" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everyone > > I am looking at purchasing flash memory cards for Cat6Ks from Kingston, I'd > just like to hear from anyone who has done the same and whether the flash > cards worked OK > > cheers Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28824&t=28823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3rd party Flash memory [7:28823]
Hi everyone I am looking at purchasing flash memory cards for Cat6Ks from Kingston, I'd just like to hear from anyone who has done the same and whether the flash cards worked OK cheers Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28823&t=28823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cannot boot from bootstrap eventhout configured wi [7:28821]
if there is the case, wat is the purpose to be served to have the bootstrap ios if can not be boot up for those router series ? - Original Message - From: "Shah Nick" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:13 PM Subject: RE: Cannot boot from bootstrap eventhout configured wi [7:28808] > I think I found an answer, basically only a few of the routers are having > the RXBOOT image on them. yes, 2500, 3000, 4000 (i know for sure that 5400 > has it) and others... but nowhere in the list did i find 17xx or 36xx etc. > So its safe to assume that they dont have the rxboot image. > > Check this url.. > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_c /fcprt1/fccfgtoo.htm > > Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28821&t=28821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: x21 workable cable length at 2Mb [7:28752]
Thanks Jenny, This table was the American equivalent of the UK table I saw with E1 at approx 8 metres. Everything I found suggested the same. I've had a bit of an argument with a company who swore blind that the 20 metres was well within limits and insisted that the install go ahead. Now I'm having to move the router and run twisted pair. Your confirmation is good enough for me - I'm off for an argument :-) Thanks, Gaz wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > There is a table that seems to be reproduced in many parts of CCO, in the > installation guides... > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7505/portadpt/serial /pa_4t/2660over.htm#19815 > Table 1-1. > > This claims that the maximum distance for X.21 at T1 speed is 15 metres. > Being US-centric, it doesn't bother mentioning a maximum distance for those > of us who use 2 Mbps ;-) but basically the distance gets shorter as the > speed gets higher. > All versions of the table that I have spotted give distances for lower > speeds (2400 bps, 4800 bps, etc up to 56 kbps) and then jump to 1544 kbps, > so it's a bit difficult to extrapolate, but I'd guess that an 8 metre limit > for 2 Mbps may be being cautious and a 20 metre limit may be being > optimistic. > I'm afraid I can't give any practical examples - I've only used standard > short Cisco cables for speeds above 64 kbps. > > JMcL > > - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 11/12/2001 11:32 am - > > > "Gaz" > > cc: > Sent by: Subject: x21 workable cable > length at 2Mb > nobody@groups > [7:28752] > > tudy.com > > > > 11/12/2001 > 09:04 > am > > Please > respond > to > > "Gaz" > > > > > > > Hi all, > > Could I have a concensus of opinion please for maximum workable cable > length > for a CABX21 - MT running at 2Mb. > Seen various web pages which suggest differing lengths, and I suppose, > depending how old the web page is, it may differ. > I have a 20m cable working fine at 512k, but having problems at 2Mb over > the > same cable. Pretty sure it is the distance problem and we're changing to > G703 to get round it, but would like to know where the cut off is for 2Mb. > > I believed it to be about 25 feet (8m) prior to this install, but was > assured that 20m would be OK. > > > Thanks, > > Gaz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28822&t=28752 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - Good 3920 simulator [7:28802]
Chuck, It's cheaper to use some cardboards and do screen shots of the 3920 and you get the same effect as using the 3920 simulator... cause that's what it does !! ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > NLI ( AKA the Boot**Camp Company ) is now marketing the 3920 token ring > simulator developed by Dmitri at vConsole. This according to Brad Ellis, in > some marketing materials. > > For those who can't invest in the real thing, this simulator is an excellent > way to learn the menus. Used in conjunction with the materials freely > available on CCO, it can be a good way to spend some time while preparing > for the CCIE Lab. ( yes the 3920 is on the advertised equipment list on > CCO ) > > downside - can't hook up to any equipment to test workability > > upside - looks and feels just like the real thing. great way to gain comfort > with the interface. > > best wishes > > Chuck > ( no I don't get anything for saying nice things about this product ) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28820&t=28802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP and memory allocation errros [7:28819]
Hi All I have a problem with a router running BGP. I have two 7204vxr's running BGP connecting to two different service providers, I upgraded the IOS of one the routers with version 12.1(5)T10 (IP PLUS IPSEC 3DES) and the boot image, it ran for a week with no problems. I upgraded the other router with the same images and as got memory allocation errors when it established adjacency with the BGP neighbours, see the output below. I'm no BGP expert and I believe there is enough memory in the router, so any suggestions will be appreciated Regards Pat *Nov 25 15:55:29: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:55:31: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:55:41: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:56:07: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 65496 bytes failed from 0x606BE0F4, pool Processor, alignment 0 -Process= "BGP Router", ipl= 0, pid= 118 -Traceback= 606C1450 606C38B0 606BE0FC 606BE8F0 6082D330 6082D578 6082EA84 609FA5EC 609FB2B8 61476248 609FB35C 609D61F0 606B7DA4 606B7D90 *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Down No memory *Nov 25 15:56:08: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.*Down No memory *Nov 25 15:56:11: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor *.*.*.* 3/1 (update malformed) 0 bytes *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:56:37: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up *Nov 25 15:56:51: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor *.*.*.* Up Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28819&t=28819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Lab for Sale [7:28818]
Hi, I have the following equipment for sale: 2503 8/8 2504 8/8 w/ mau 2513 8/8 25118/8 w/ Octal 4000M 16/8 1 eth, 1 tok, and 4 port ser. 2522 16\8 Cat 2926 runs same IOS as Cat 5 ISDN Simulator, Emutel Solo. I will include serial crossover cables, console cables, power cables, transceivers, Token ring hubs, some additional DRAM and 8MB flash I believe. Lots of choices for IOS. I would like to sell everything together but will consider selling items seprately. I would like $9,000.00 for everything listed above. The lab is located in southern California area. Thanks for looking! Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28818&t=28818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Good 3920 simulator [7:28802]
gz joe wrote: > > where to download it?thanks Costs 80$. go here : http://www.ccbootcamp.com/shoponline.htm Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28817&t=28802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot boot from bootstrap eventhout configured wi [7:28808]
I think I found an answer, basically only a few of the routers are having the RXBOOT image on them. yes, 2500, 3000, 4000 (i know for sure that 5400 has it) and others... but nowhere in the list did i find 17xx or 36xx etc. So its safe to assume that they dont have the rxboot image. Check this url.. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_c/fcprt1/fccfgtoo.htm Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28816&t=28808 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot boot from bootstrap eventhout configured wi [7:28808]
Yes, I have seen this on 1720, I agree with you that you cant make it boot the bootstrap ios by using register value as 0x101 or 0x2101, however I didnt pursue it further, since it wasnt crucial for me. I guess it must be somewhere on CCO. Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28815&t=28808 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
