EIGRP Summary address funny [7:33837]
Hi all, I tried this yesterday and got some funny results. A client of ours uses another private company to do long haul connections to overseas sites. They (the private company) are redistributing their OSPF routes into my EIGRP process. They have recently had some instability on some of their numerous routes, so I tried using summary addressing on the router that connects to my clients network. The summary was correct and actually showed correctly in the routing table on the upstream router. Problem: Even though the summarised route is in the table, the 100's of host routes are also there, all pointing to the same place. Now the users in the UK could not connect. I removed the summary addresses and all ok again - just the summarised route gone from the routing tables. This particular router is using ver 11.1 ( really old!!) Now this summarisation works on all the other routers correctly. Any idea's Andrew Larkins BCom, CCNP, CCDA Bytes Technology Networks A Division of the Bytes Technology Group A Member of the Altron Group www.btgroup.co.za visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes Tel : +27 11 800 9336 Fax : +27 11 800 9496 Mobile : +27 83 656 7214 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message may contain information which is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message." > > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33837&t=33837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please confirm (conf#ae1fd8f45b2bed8613ddb184751dc1a9) [7:33838]
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please confirm (conf#ae1fd8f45b2bed8613ddb184751dc1a9) Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! --ORIGINAL MESSAGE- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 02:59:30 2002 Received: from ubdccomjhbex.usko.com (ubdccomjhbex.usko.com [196.41.203.13]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA19697 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 02:59:28 -0500 Received: by UBDCCOMJHBEX with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:03:07 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andrew Larkins To: Cisco Mail List Subject: EIGRP Summary address funny Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:02:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all, I tried this yesterday and got some funny results. A client of ours uses another private company to do long haul connections to overseas sites. They (the private company) are redistributing their OSPF routes into my EIGRP process. They have recently had some instability on some of their numerous routes, so I tried using summary addressing on the router that connects to my clients network. The summary was correct and actually showed correctly in the routing table on the upstream router. Problem: Even though the summarised route is in the table, the 100's of host routes are also there, all pointing to the same place. Now the users in the UK could not connect. I removed the summary addresses and all ok again - just the summarised route gone from the routing tables. This particular router is using ver 11.1 ( really old!!) Now this summarisation works on all the other routers correctly. Any idea's Andrew Larkins BCom, CCNP, CCDA Bytes Technology Networks A Division of the Bytes Technology Group A Member of the Altron Group www.btgroup.co.za visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes Tel : +27 11 800 9336 Fax : +27 11 800 9496 Mobile : +27 83 656 7214 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message may contain information which is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message." > > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33838&t=33838 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPX host static name possible? [7:33839]
> Hi all! > > Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host > name to an IPX address. > Like we do for IP addresses > This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. > > Thanks for any reply, > > Paulo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33839&t=33839 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug in IOS for 3660 ver 12.2.6a IP plus [7:33840]
Hi all, Just to let you know, if you did not already, that there is a bug in the IOS with regards to upgraded the code. With this code, when you enter "copy tftp flash", it does not prompt you if you want to erase the flash before the copy. Work around: Boot the router as normal, then erase the flash and then do the tftp copy HTH Andrew Larkins BCom, CCNP, CCDA Bytes Technology Networks A Division of the Bytes Technology Group A Member of the Altron Group www.btgroup.co.za visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes Tel : +27 11 800 9336 Fax : +27 11 800 9496 Mobile : +27 83 656 7214 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message may contain information which is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message." > > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33840&t=33840 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN simulator [7:33841]
just wondering anybody knows which isdn simulator is best for home lab in terms of functionalities and pricing? hope this is not violating nda, but very interest to see whether real ccie lab use isdn simulator or isdn lines?? if it's a simulator, which brand? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33841&t=33841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco IDS [7:33842]
Dear All, I want to employ an IDS solution in our network, I'm looking to purchase Cisco IDS, please advise me about this product like performance, efficiency, managment, easy of deploy and what other solution rather than cisco is better if any ? Regards, --- Mohannad N. Khuffash Network Administrator Information Technology Dept. Palestine Telecommunication Company Tel: 970-09-2930509 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33842&t=33842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#f86dd838d0d29bec9453ce397510a440) [7:33843]
>Hi, > >You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because >the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required >to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a >spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending >Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). > >By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: > >1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. > >2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. > >3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com > >4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. > >5. The message is NOT inflammatory. > >6. The message is NOT a test message. > >To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once >confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. > > >Welcome to GroupStudy.com! > > >--ORIGINAL MESSAGE- > >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 21:53:29 2002 >Received: from dfw-smtpout2.email.verio.net >(dfw-smtpout2.email.verio.net [129.250.36.42]) > by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA05947 > GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:53:29 -0500 >Received: from [129.250.38.62] (helo=dfw-mmp2.email.verio.net) > by dfw-smtpout2.email.verio.net with esmtp > id 16W7Mx-00042K-00 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 02:54:35 + >Received: from [68.49.184.209] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) > by dfw-mmp2.email.verio.net with esmtp > id 16W7O7-0007QD-00 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 02:55:47 + >Mime-Version: 1.0 >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Message-Id: >Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:54:32 -0500 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" >Subject: Re: Default-informatin originate always [7:33729] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" > >>Regarding this command... >>"Default-information originate [always]" >>this is documented as saying... >>this generates the default route into OSPF even if the path to the default >>route goes down... >>and... >>even when the router has no default route, with the magic keyword "always" it >>will create a "default route"...pointing to where?? >>Q: What's the point of advertising a route if it is indeed DOWN? Isn't this >>like saying i know that Exit5 is closed but I'm gona keep directing all >>motorists to go to Exit 5 anyway? >> >>Please clarify this for me. >> >>Elmer > >Imagine you have a fairly large OSPF area. If the default route goes >down, all the topological databases have to be updated and >propagated. While if JUST the default route were involved, the >Dijkstra computation will not have to be run, there still will be >bandwidth and processor utilization. > >If there is only one router generating default, and it goes down, the >traffic is going to fail anyway. To take your traffic analogy, >default-information always is indeed like directing the traffic >LEAVING THE AREA to Exit 5, but not otherwise disturbing those cars >that don't care about Exit 5. > >If there's more than one default router, you definitely don't want >the always keyword. > >Now--as far as where it points: "it depends". All it points to is >the router generating default. That router may or may not have a >default route of its own -- it might be a default-free BGP router as >well as an ASBR. It could have a default route of its own that points >somewhere outside the AS or area. > >AFAIK, if the router was default-free, you couldn't use >default-information originate without always, because the router >would never have a local default to meet the ALWAYS condition. In >that case, you'd have to have BGP or a static route specify it, and >redistribute that route into OSPF. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33843&t=33843 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing CID [7:33784]
How would you compare the CSS1 tests to the CCNP tests? I am thinking about going after my CSS1 after I pass the Checkpoint CCSA and CCSE tests. -dlb ""Godswill HO"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Priscilla, > > Questions like "which answer doesnt not belong " means what??? Is Cisco > implying that the double negative means positive as we were taught years ago > in algebra class or it should be ignored and taken for one negative. > > Am currently taking my CSS1 track, I wrote Cisco Secure VPN yesterday which > happens to be the third exam in the series. I came accross a lot questions > which made no sense at all. Looking at the question, it was not a question > at all. it was not asking any particular thing, it had no meaning, no > bearing, no sense in it, they are just like saying blablablablablablablabla. > The more I read them the more I get confused and lost at what Cisco was > tring to ask. Have you come accross questions that made you think 'What must > be in the mind of the examiner when he was asking this question, which > aspect of Network or Security implementation was he thinking of? What I > normally do is to completely ignore the questions and eliminate the odd > options in the answer, at the end of the day in many questions like these, I > come out with NOT THE BEST ANSWER as they use to tell one, but rather a > choice that made a different SENSE and MEANING than the other three or four. > > I sometimes ask whether the current Cisco questions were not originally > written in English but were translated from another language and as such the > transators did not do a good job or is it a deliberate action on the part of > Cisco? If it were the former it is long time they take a closer look at it > and if it is the later, what must have informed their actions? > > Regards. > Godswill Oletu CCNP, CCDP. > > - Original Message - > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > To: > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:57 PM > Subject: Re: Passing CID [7:33784] > > > > At 07:19 PM 1/30/02, brian hall wrote: > > >Passing this test #640-025 was the hardest yet. It took a couple of > times. > > >Now its on to CCIE and then the lab were the truth comes out. > > >Some tell me that passing this brings you close to being prepared to take > > >the CCIE written. I'll find out soon enough. > > > > > >To any one who cares using boson CCDP #1 & #3 helped . > > > > > >I started using the latest version of the CID exam prep from cisco press > but > > > > Exam prep guides are written with the goal of summarizing what you need to > > know. They are not the course materials, but go beyond in some ways, and > > may also skip some basic stuff. They can be great for review, but don't > > work for everyone as the primary source. > > > > >found the earlier version of the book written by birkner a better source. > > > > This wasn't an earlier version of the same book. It's a different book. > > This was the course materials ported to book format. The author should be > > Cisco (course developers) although in this case Birkner didn't exactly > > follow the script and added his own material and left some out. > > > > In general, Cisco Press develops at least two types of books: > > > > Certification guides: not written by Cisco, but still often very helpful > > Course book: training written by Cisco, ported to book format by an editor > > paid by Cisco Press, usually an excellent resource as the tests are taken > > from the course. > > > > A question came up about the different types of Cisco Press books in a > > different thread, so I responded here. (My other response never made it?) > > > > Anyway, congratulations on passing CID! It's a hard test. Good luck with > > CCIE. > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > >The answers are very close to each other and need to be read carefully, > they > > >can be tricky. Watch out for the " which answer doesnt not belong " > > >questions those can be the most difficult. > > > > > >Good luck, > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33844&t=33784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPX host static name possible? [7:33839]
NO! STOP ASKING! Seriously, if you didn't get an answer the first time, then that's it. Asking the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th time will not make the IOS change commands. Call Cisco and request the feature. Or use IP. ""Paulo Baptista"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi all! > > > > Could anyone please, clarify me if there is any chance of mapping a Host > > name to an IPX address. > > Like we do for IP addresses > > This is for Cisco routers 2621 and 3640. > > > > Thanks for any reply, > > > > Paulo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33846&t=33839 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with frame-relay pvc status [7:33793]
It can occur if your provider has told you to configure your Frame Relay DLCI as for example 16, but have configured it as DLCI 20 themselves. Verify that you have the correct DLCI in your config. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Stephane Wantou Siantou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 7:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with frame-relay pvc status [7:33793] Hi everybody, Can anyboody tell me what frame-relay status "deleted" means on a pvc and how to change it "active"? Thanks a lot, Stephane Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33847&t=33793 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing CID [7:33784]
The "Which answer doesn't not belong?" is that a very trick question that should actually be read "Which answer does belong?", or did you do a typo? If that's the case, you could spend long time understanding questions like "What do you not think would be false to give as an incorrect answer?" Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: brian hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passing CID [7:33784] Passing this test #640-025 was the hardest yet. It took a couple of times. Now its on to CCIE and then the lab were the truth comes out. Some tell me that passing this brings you close to being prepared to take the CCIE written. I'll find out soon enough. To any one who cares using boson CCDP #1 & #3 helped . I started using the latest version of the CID exam prep from cisco press but found the earlier version of the book written by birkner a better source. The answers are very close to each other and need to be read carefully, they can be tricky. Watch out for the " which answer doesnt not belong " questions those can be the most difficult. Good luck, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33848&t=33784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705]
I've installed a dozen NBX systems, and worked as the Guru at a 3com reseller. The original NBX is by default a Voice-over-Ethernet device, under the original version it broadcasted for Music on hold, paging, and device discovery. Under 2.0+ it uses a Multicast MAC address. You can acquire from 3com (For about 1500 iirc) a license to make it do Voice-over-IP. The License key is a hash of the Backplane chassis number, so you can't use the same code over and over. The originals were 10BaseT only, but the 100BaseT phones should be out by now. According to 3com, the original plan was to integrate al of the functions of the NBX into a card for the Corebuilder 7000, but I think that plan has been scrapped. http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?tab=features&pathtype=purchase &sku=WEBBNGNBX100COMSYS is 3com's site, but you'll have to paste it back together to make it work. www.nbx100.com is the site for one of the larger resellers. -Original Message- From: Mark Odette II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705] a couple of weeks back, someone posted a question about inexpensive PBXs and PBAXs and where to get them. when I mentioned the NBX option, someone else commented that the NBX is by default Voice over Ethernet, but that you could purchase a VoIP license to activate VoIP software running on it. I don't know how much of this is accurate, or what the real details on it are... but I've been told that if I wanted to take a NBX phone set home, and provision the office network correctly, that I could get it to log in across the Internet directly into the NBX... and recieve calls as if it were at the office. Anybody got any validity they can add to this?? Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Pearch Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705] One thing that Cisco reps mention when the NBX comes up is that 3Com's solution is voice over ethernet, rather than a VOIP solution. Then they admit that Cisco doesn't play well in the small implementation market (less than 50 phones) unless there are some unusual requirements that are tailored for VOIP. TTFN, Bill -Original Message- From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705] My company is a Cisco Voice partner and a 3Com Voice Partner. The office I work out of uses the 3Com NBX for about 20 phones. It works, no real complaints. Some of the earlier versions of code were pretty bad. Downsides, NBX has 1 hard drive, if it goes we are down. No way to backup. 3Com may be providing a new solution, I'm not sure??? Here is our position when selling to a customers. If they are a small office (0-30 phones), with no need for VoIP connecting different offices, 3Com is probably the best choice. Cost is a lot less than Cisco solution for same customer and customer wants basic features (voice-mail, auto-attendant, call-park, call-transfer, speaker phone). For customers with larger offices (40+ phones), the potential for VoIP with branch offices we go Cisco. We end up selling Cisco to 95% of our customers. In-line powered phones is a big advantage. Power outlets at the desk are usually filled, it's nice to avoid power strips at every desk. I see 3Com has a price advantage and Cisco has a Technology advantage. Support from Cisco is excellent. Lots of time the problem people have with the Cisco solution is the complexity. Cisco VoIP can work in many different environments, 3Com is more positioned for the standard/simple small office. Don't forget data integration with IP phone system. XML applications to the phone are a very good thing. Some applications on the phones our customers like are phone directories, time-clock sign-in/sign-out (for hourly staff). You have to look at the survivability of the company. 3Com has problems turning a profit. Networkers hate 3Com NICs, 3Com has exited the core switching market. They now sell NICs (most professionals hate them), modems (commodity), low end switches (commodity), home broadband routers (Cable/DSL commodity), and a low end phone system. How long will this model work Will they dump the NBX in the next 12 months??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stull, Cory Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Cisco AVVID vs. 3Com [7:33705] Does anyone have any working experience or good opinions on Cisco's IP Telephony solution compared to 3Com? I'm trying to make a buying decision and right now am very up in the air. 3Com has a nice and more cost effective solution that even would allow me to (coming soon) be able to use my existing legacy Lucent/Nortel phones with t
RE: NAT [7:33769]
Phil, Thanks for your help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33850&t=33769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM issue [7:33802]
You need to enable OAM. Simply under the PVC add on both end "oam enable" Dave "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > How can I detect an ATM link went down? > > Due to business reason, we are in a process to replace old Frame Relay > connections with ATM connections. But when Carrier's ATM network had problem > and one of the ATM link went down, the router interface attached to it still > shows up up. For that reason the ISDN backup interface on the same router > wouldn't automatically dial the remote end, and we couldn't meet 7x24 > requirement. > > There was no such problem before switching to ATM. It works perfectly with > FR connections and ISDN DDR Backup. If there was a problem in one of the FR > links, the interface attached to it will go down and the ISDN interface will > automatically dial the remote end. > > Is there any way to get around this problem? > > Thanks in advance. > > Tony > -- > > __ > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. > Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! > http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > http://webmail.netscape.com/ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33854&t=33802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing CID [7:33784]
Hi David, The CSS1 track looks easier to me than the CCNP track. Among others, the major reason reason is that, they are a lot of overlapping areas in all four exams, If you write MCNS, start preparing for the PIX exam, you will discover that, you are familar with almost 75% of the material, same for the VPN exam, all you just have to do is to note the specific applications within the current context. Very unlike the CCNP each four exams deals with a complete different world of knowledge. For you to see clearly what am saying: I wrote all four of my CCNP exams within six(6) weeks, but I have written three of the CSS1 exams in just one(1) week ! (MCNS=22/1/1, PIX=25/1/1 and VPN=29/1/1), left with IDS. However you need to know your stuff, but it is not really a terrior of an exam. Please tell me more about the Checkpoint exam, my next target is either checkpoint or CISSP, though am more likely to give CISSP a look first, however Checkpoint will follow vey soon. Regards. Oletu. - Original Message - From: David L. Blair To: Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:26 AM Subject: Re: Passing CID [7:33784] > How would you compare the CSS1 tests to the CCNP tests? I am thinking about > going after my CSS1 after I pass the Checkpoint CCSA and CCSE tests. > > -dlb > > ""Godswill HO"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Priscilla, > > > > Questions like "which answer doesnt not belong " means what??? Is Cisco > > implying that the double negative means positive as we were taught years > ago > > in algebra class or it should be ignored and taken for one negative. > > > > Am currently taking my CSS1 track, I wrote Cisco Secure VPN yesterday > which > > happens to be the third exam in the series. I came accross a lot questions > > which made no sense at all. Looking at the question, it was not a question > > at all. it was not asking any particular thing, it had no meaning, no > > bearing, no sense in it, they are just like saying > blablablablablablablabla. > > The more I read them the more I get confused and lost at what Cisco was > > tring to ask. Have you come accross questions that made you think 'What > must > > be in the mind of the examiner when he was asking this question, which > > aspect of Network or Security implementation was he thinking of? What I > > normally do is to completely ignore the questions and eliminate the odd > > options in the answer, at the end of the day in many questions like these, > I > > come out with NOT THE BEST ANSWER as they use to tell one, but rather a > > choice that made a different SENSE and MEANING than the other three or > four. > > > > I sometimes ask whether the current Cisco questions were not originally > > written in English but were translated from another language and as such > the > > transators did not do a good job or is it a deliberate action on the part > of > > Cisco? If it were the former it is long time they take a closer look at it > > and if it is the later, what must have informed their actions? > > > > Regards. > > Godswill Oletu CCNP, CCDP. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:57 PM > > Subject: Re: Passing CID [7:33784] > > > > > > > At 07:19 PM 1/30/02, brian hall wrote: > > > >Passing this test #640-025 was the hardest yet. It took a couple of > > times. > > > >Now its on to CCIE and then the lab were the truth comes out. > > > >Some tell me that passing this brings you close to being prepared to > take > > > >the CCIE written. I'll find out soon enough. > > > > > > > >To any one who cares using boson CCDP #1 & #3 helped . > > > > > > > >I started using the latest version of the CID exam prep from cisco > press > > but > > > > > > Exam prep guides are written with the goal of summarizing what you need > to > > > know. They are not the course materials, but go beyond in some ways, and > > > may also skip some basic stuff. They can be great for review, but don't > > > work for everyone as the primary source. > > > > > > >found the earlier version of the book written by birkner a better > source. > > > > > > This wasn't an earlier version of the same book. It's a different book. > > > This was the course materials ported to book format. The author should > be > > > Cisco (course developers) although in this case Birkner didn't exactly > > > follow the script and added his own material and left some out. > > > > > > In general, Cisco Press develops at least two types of books: > > > > > > Certification guides: not written by Cisco, but still often very helpful > > > Course book: training written by Cisco, ported to book format by an > editor > > > paid by Cisco Press, usually an excellent resource as the tests are > taken > > > from the course. > > > > > > A question came up about the different types of Cisco Press books in a > > > different thread, so I responded here. (My other response never made > it?) > > > > > > Anyway, con
Re: Help with frame-relay pvc status [7:33792]
Or your provider screwed up the switch config deactivating your DLCI. Dave s vermill wrote: > > Deleted usually means that it is referenced in your config somewhere but > there is nothing coming from the switch in LMI to indicate that it is > active/even exists. > > Stephane Wantou Siantou wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > Can anyboody tell me what frame-relay status "deleted" > > means on a pvc and how to change it "active"? > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Stephane -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33853&t=33792 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast over Frame Relay [7:33852]
I am trying to do multicast over frame-relay with hub and star topology. > R2 (Spoke1)-R1(Hub)---R3(Spoke2) > I am using PIM sparse mode , with IP PIM NBMA-MODE command. I made Hub as RP. I tried by using IP PIM RP-ADD and auto-rp option. I can see RP mapping on both spokes. I made R3 member of a multicast group and tried to ping it from R1 and R2. I am able to ping it from R1 (HUB), but not from R2 (Spoke1). I tried making R3 as RP , but even then I am not able to ping from Sopke1. > > Have any body tried it. Is there any trick to it ?? > > Thanks > > M > > > > > > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33852&t=33852 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM issue [7:33802]
ILMI is used in the SVC world for setting up and addressing. See OAM. Dave Circusnuts_1999 wrote: > > Is your carrier not allowing ILMI ??? > > Phil > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ATM issue [7:33802] > > How can I detect an ATM link went down? > > Due to business reason, we are in a process to replace old Frame Relay > connections with ATM connections. But when Carrier's ATM network had > problem > and one of the ATM link went down, the router interface attached to it > still > shows up up. For that reason the ISDN backup interface on the same > router > wouldn't automatically dial the remote end, and we couldn't meet 7x24 > requirement. > > There was no such problem before switching to ATM. It works perfectly > with > FR connections and ISDN DDR Backup. If there was a problem in one of the > FR > links, the interface attached to it will go down and the ISDN interface > will > automatically dial the remote end. > > Is there any way to get around this problem? > > Thanks in advance. > > Tony > -- > > __ > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. > Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! > http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > http://webmail.netscape.com/ > _ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33855&t=33802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
I don't really have an answer, this is more of a "me too" email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John >>> "Cisco Nuts" 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM >>> Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33856&t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Startup questions [7:33711]
Another resource for this would be RFC2178. ""Cebuano"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks all for the different insights. Being in a teaching environment, > these are just what i need to be able to explain the behavior/process in > easier-to-digest terms. > > Elmer > > - Original Message - > From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:33 PM > Subject: Re: OSPF Startup questions [7:33711] > > > > At 12:41 PM 1/30/02, Cebuano wrote: > > >i would think that regardless if there's a new > > >router with a higher RID that comes on line, the DR/BDR > > >should be the default MASTER to initiate the exchange > > >since he's got all the topology/links info in the area, except > > >of course for scenarios where there is no DR/BDR. > > > > Both neighbors have information to send. The master/slave business is just > > a temporary relationship to allow the neighbors to exchange their > > information in a reliable fashion. There's no real reason for one router > > instead of the other to become the master. Remember that protocol design > is > > modular. You should keep the database synchronization process separate > from > > the DR/BDR election. > > > > The synchronization process is the first step in the adjacency-building > > process. Each router describes its database by sending a sequence of > > database description packets to its neighbor. > > > > Each database description packet has a sequence number. Database > > description packets sent by the master (polls) are acknowledged by the > > slave through echoing of the sequence number. Both polls and their > > responses contain summaries of link-state data. The master is the only one > > allowed to retransmit database description packets. > > > > The OSPF protocol developers could have chosen some other method to ensure > > reliability, such as opening a TCP session or inventing a client/server > > protocol with the DR acting as the server on networks that have a DR. > > Instead they invented a master/slave protocol. It's just how they decided > > to implement it. If you think about it, you can see that their method has > > some advantages. If you were in a computer science protocol development > > class, you could write an essay on why their method is best. As a CCIE > > candidate, however, I'm tempted to say, "why ask why?" ;-) > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > >Elmer > > >- Original Message - > > >From: "Rogell, Dennis" > > >To: "'Cebuano'" > > >Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:19 PM > > >Subject: RE: OSPF Startup questions [7:33711] > > > > > > > > > > You can make the Dr the higher rid , and the answer to 3 is it looks > at > > > > sequence numbers not timestamps.If the information it receives is the > > same > > > > but the sequence number is greater that will be entered into ls > database. > > > > > > > > hth > > > > > > > > Dennis Rogell CNE, CCNP > > > > nextiraone > > > > Formally Milgo Solutions > > > > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Phone: (954) 846-5128 > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Cebuano [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 08:38 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: OSPF Startup questions [7:33711] > > > > > > > > > > Hi, group. > > > > > I have a few questions to iron out regarding OSPF startup. > > > > > > > > > > 1. EXSTART - master/slave is created between each router and its > > >adjacent > > > > > DR/BDR. > > > > > Q: But this "election" on who the master will be is mute because > > the > > > > > router with the higher RID (thus) the DR/BDR acts as the master, > right? > > >If > > > > > not, shouldn't the DR act as the master anyway since he ( or she) is > > the > > > > > central distribution point for the area's topology? > > > > > > > > > > 2. LOADING - slave router sends an LS request if the master's DBD > has a > > > > > more > > > > > up-to-date link-state entry. > > > > > Q: "up-to-date" meaning timestamps?? But...what if there's no > NTP > > > > > server > > > > > to synchronize them? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > Elmer > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33857&t=33711 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM issue [7:33802]
I'm asking because I don't know the real world answer, and don't have a lot of real world experience with ATM. My reading is that OAM will shut down interfaces when the end to end ATM PVC fails. Can you explain this in a bit more detail. Is this something you really want to happen in real world? Wouldn't this complicate things when the link comes back up? Chuck ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You need to enable OAM. Simply under the PVC add on both end "oam > enable" > > Dave > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > > How can I detect an ATM link went down? > > > > Due to business reason, we are in a process to replace old Frame Relay > > connections with ATM connections. But when Carrier's ATM network had > problem > > and one of the ATM link went down, the router interface attached to it > still > > shows up up. For that reason the ISDN backup interface on the same router > > wouldn't automatically dial the remote end, and we couldn't meet 7x24 > > requirement. > > > > There was no such problem before switching to ATM. It works perfectly with > > FR connections and ISDN DDR Backup. If there was a problem in one of the FR > > links, the interface attached to it will go down and the ISDN interface > will > > automatically dial the remote end. > > > > Is there any way to get around this problem? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Tony > > -- > > > > __ > > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. > > Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! > > http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > > http://webmail.netscape.com/ > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33859&t=33802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP Summary address funny [7:33837]
On IOS versions of that age, EIGRP summarization does not work properly. A while back I researched this and found the Cisco bug report. I don't have the information off hand, but it can be found on CCO. You should upgrade to a more recent IOS if possible.. Chuck ""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I tried this yesterday and got some funny results. > A client of ours uses another private company to do long haul connections > to overseas sites. They (the private company) are redistributing their OSPF > routes into my EIGRP process. They have recently had some instability on > some of their numerous routes, so I tried using summary addressing on the > router that connects to my clients network. The summary was correct and > actually showed correctly in the routing table on the upstream router. > > Problem: > > Even though the summarised route is in the table, the 100's of host routes > are also there, all pointing to the same place. Now the users in the UK > could not connect. I removed the summary addresses and all ok again - just > the summarised route gone from the routing tables. This particular router is > using ver 11.1 ( really old!!) > > Now this summarisation works on all the other routers correctly. Any idea's > > Andrew Larkins > BCom, CCNP, CCDA > Bytes Technology Networks > A Division of the Bytes Technology Group > A Member of the Altron Group > www.btgroup.co.za > visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes > > Tel : +27 11 800 9336 > Fax : +27 11 800 9496 > Mobile : +27 83 656 7214 > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > OR [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > "This message may contain information which is confidential and subject to > legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, > use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received > this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, > facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33858&t=33837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM issue [7:33802]
Use dialer watch and have the backup kick in when the route disappears. Marc Russell Network Learning, Inc. 1677 W. Hamlin Rochester Hills, MI 48309 Ph# 248-299-8114 www.ccbootcamp.com http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > How can I detect an ATM link went down? > > Due to business reason, we are in a process to replace old Frame Relay > connections with ATM connections. But when Carrier's ATM network had problem > and one of the ATM link went down, the router interface attached to it still > shows up up. For that reason the ISDN backup interface on the same router > wouldn't automatically dial the remote end, and we couldn't meet 7x24 > requirement. > > There was no such problem before switching to ATM. It works perfectly with > FR connections and ISDN DDR Backup. If there was a problem in one of the FR > links, the interface attached to it will go down and the ISDN interface will > automatically dial the remote end. > > Is there any way to get around this problem? > > Thanks in advance. > > Tony > -- > > > > > __ > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. > Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! > http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > http://webmail.netscape.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33825&t=33802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Man on the moon [7:33860]
I'm sick for 2 days and miss an entire conversation!
> Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33860&t=33860
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Limit access to serial link to four users [7:33306]
Interesting problem. I think that I would look at QoS options or an application layer solution. Perhaps CAR configured for a maximum rate that would force the application to not have sufficient B/W on the path? --- Darrell Newcomb wrote: > I try not to use the below logic on my networks, but > have also never had > it fail to deliver service when there was no other > choice. > > The common streaming of windows media and real have > such large client > side buffers that you'll find you can seemingly > overload the link > without having any user observable qualitative > difference. Some factors > which contribute even more to the success of > overloading are the bit > rate varies as the encoders don't always output the > maximum data rate. > The fact that most streams on the public internet > are short lived, the > standard buffers can cover the end of the stream the > user is still > viewing leaving capacity for other streams to go > through their peak > startup period. The traditional stat muxing factors > come into play > where depending upon the application there is some > downcycle in > streaming usage in the workflow. You only need a > 2.5:1 to get 300kbps > streams through uncongested. > > Lastly I think you are approaching the wrong > problem. Non streaming > uses for the same 2Mbps link will be the big enemy > of predictably good > streaming performance. Your application may even be > one of those by > downloading other supporting data... > > To more directly approach the problem space you > posed: > -There is xauth in pixOS and I believe IOS NAT > -Couple that with a creative authentication server, > or script to control > it > -The above should get you the max number of sessions > through. > -Can't recall the reflexive access lists with CAR > ball of wax off the > top of my head. But there is some per-session rate > limiting in cisco. > > There are various rate limiting equipment out there. > Riverstone has > good affordable routers for this, Netscreen claims > to do it(haven't used > them yet), and Packeteer also does this type of > thing. There is more > but I believe them to be the notables. > > There are proxy and/or cache products which would > address the max number > of sessions issue and maybe address the usage > pattern you have. > > Not that I'd recommend this, but if your application > and rest of the > network path can adequately support forcing the > streams over a tcp > session you'll probably find it much easier to deal > with the rate > limiting. But really try to handle it without > forcing tcp as any > backoffs will hurt the qualitative performance if > there are other > signficant numbers of tcps over any congested > link.(read: IME(nee > opinion) tcp will backoff quicker than a given > streaming protocol) > > Good Luck, > Darrell (always looking for contract work) Newcomb > > Gaz wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm after some ideas if you'd be so kind :-) > > > > A 2Mb link being used mainly for streaming media > has about 15 potential > > users. The task is to limit the number of users at > any one time to four, so > > they have half a Mb each (ish). > > > > My initial idea, which I must admit, I dont think > is such a good one is to > > set up a NAT pool of four addresses, and drag the > translation timeout down > > to about a minute (yet to be tested), so that the > first four users to pass > > traffic will be translated and allowed through, > but after that, they'll > have > > to wait. > > > > I'm off to look at something like TACACS to see if > I can control network > > authorization by number of users (shot in the > dark). > > > > No equipment in place yet, so we have a clean > drawing board. > > > > Anybody have any neat ideas please!! > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Robert Padjen __ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33818&t=33306 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE On-line lab prep [7:33566]
If you already offer a CCIE bootcamp the last day or two could be a mock lab exam, then a detailed "lessons learned" session the next day or half day. My $0.02 worth. "Through Complexity there is Simplicity, Through Simplicity there is Complexity" David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, A+, 3Wizard ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Treece, > > We were thinking of coming up with something like this, I just wasnt sure of > the interest level. Maybe there's more people out there that would like a > mock 1-day lab exam that is proctored by a CCIE? If anyone else is > interested, feel free to drop me a line. > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net > CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html > > ""EFIRD, TREECE (CONTRACTOR)"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > It seems like sometime back in the Fall, someone on the list reviewed a > > remote lab test/training option. This particular lab was timed and had two > > portions: the practice lab, and the simulated final lab. You could take > the > > practice lab as many times as you wanted, but you could only take the > > simulated (and timed) final lab once. I also think the cost of this was > > around $500. > > > > I looked through the archives and the only thing close to this that I > found > > was Chuck's review of the now defunct Mentor Tech vLab. That didn't seem > > quite right, but I could be mistaken. > > > > Does anyone recall this review, or know of a similar situation? > > > > Thanks, > > Treece Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33845&t=33566 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM issue [7:33802]
I mean "oam-pvc manage" interface ATM1/0.32 point-to-point ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 pvc madman 1/32 oam-pvc manage encapsulation aal5snap Dave MADMAN wrote: > > You need to enable OAM. Simply under the PVC add on both end "oam > enable" > > Dave > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > > How can I detect an ATM link went down? > > > > Due to business reason, we are in a process to replace old Frame Relay > > connections with ATM connections. But when Carrier's ATM network had > problem > > and one of the ATM link went down, the router interface attached to it > still > > shows up up. For that reason the ISDN backup interface on the same router > > wouldn't automatically dial the remote end, and we couldn't meet 7x24 > > requirement. > > > > There was no such problem before switching to ATM. It works perfectly with > > FR connections and ISDN DDR Backup. If there was a problem in one of the FR > > links, the interface attached to it will go down and the ISDN interface > will > > automatically dial the remote end. > > > > Is there any way to get around this problem? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Tony > > -- > > > > __ > > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. > > Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! > > http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > > http://webmail.netscape.com/ > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33862&t=33802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a variance of 2 worked perfectly. Dave John Neiberger wrote: > > I don't really have an answer, this is more of a "me too" email. I've > only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to > make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high > number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes > into the routing table. > > At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working > but I've been avoiding it. > > John > > >>> "Cisco Nuts" 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM >>> > Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does > not > seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide > by > CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA > connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and > RTC > are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected > to > TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE > running > rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR > have > the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on > Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is > correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, > Serial0 > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 > The > metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 > [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > After > doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is > greater > than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see > 2 > routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru > RTC.Is > there a reason why?Thank you. : > > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33863&t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM issue [7:33802]
This is definitely something that we have a need for here. We have multiple locations with DSL backup links that terminate back here on an ATM DS1. Since these are backup links, without OAM I have no way of knowing when there is a problem with one. Qwest DSL support certainly isn't going to call me and let me know! So, I've enabled OAM and now get a nice syslog message when the link goes down. This allows me to get a quicker start on my one-hour phone call with clueless tech support. ;-) John >>> "Chuck Larrieu" 1/31/02 8:55:17 AM >>> I'm asking because I don't know the real world answer, and don't have a lot of real world experience with ATM. My reading is that OAM will shut down interfaces when the end to end ATM PVC fails. Can you explain this in a bit more detail. Is this something you really want to happen in real world? Wouldn't this complicate things when the link comes back up? Chuck ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > You need to enable OAM. Simply under the PVC add on both end "oam > enable" > > Dave > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > > How can I detect an ATM link went down? > > > > Due to business reason, we are in a process to replace old Frame Relay > > connections with ATM connections. But when Carrier's ATM network had > problem > > and one of the ATM link went down, the router interface attached to it > still > > shows up up. For that reason the ISDN backup interface on the same router > > wouldn't automatically dial the remote end, and we couldn't meet 7x24 > > requirement. > > > > There was no such problem before switching to ATM. It works perfectly with > > FR connections and ISDN DDR Backup. If there was a problem in one of the FR > > links, the interface attached to it will go down and the ISDN interface > will > > automatically dial the remote end. > > > > Is there any way to get around this problem? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Tony > > -- > > > > __ > > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. > > Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! > > http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > > http://webmail.netscape.com/ > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33864&t=33802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
Even with the variance command a neighbor might not be considered a feasible successor. Remember a feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance. This is a loop prevention method in EIGRP. Read the section, "Deciding if a Path is Loop-Free" in the document at the link below http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp1.html#6 I guarantee a light bulb will come on above your head after you read this. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] I don't really have an answer, this is more of a "me too" email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John >>> "Cisco Nuts" 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM >>> Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33861&t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Topic repeat [7:33865]
First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this message, but not exactly match my question. Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault tolerance purpose. We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is working fine. Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load balance and fault tolerance. How to do that? 1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. 2. Static or default route: (1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in case of one line is down, is it right? (2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if T1 line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach their local network through DSL line? Thanks Shawn _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33865&t=33865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#d22216f5b24622b2d135b956c50be7ca) [7:33866]
> >Hi, > >You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. >Because >the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be >required >to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a >spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending >Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). > >By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: > >1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. > >2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. > >3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com > >4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. > >5. The message is NOT inflammatory. > >6. The message is NOT a test message. > >To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once >confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. > > >Welcome to GroupStudy.com! > > >--ORIGINAL MESSAGE- > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 11:17:08 2002 >Received: from hotmail.com (f219.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.219]) > by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03142 > GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:17:07 -0500 >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; >Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:18:22 -0800 >Received: from 66.59.140.7 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; > Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:18:22 GMT >X-Originating-IP: [66.59.140.7] >From: "Shawn Xu" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Topic repeat >Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:18:22 -0500 >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >Message-ID: >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jan 2002 16:18:22.0917 (UTC) >FILETIME=[E7734750:01C1AA72] > >Topic: connecting to two ISPs for load balance and fault tolerance. > >First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this >message, but not exactly match my question. > >Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said >you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault >tolerance purpose. > >We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an >ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their >local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is >working >fine. > >Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load >balance and fault tolerance. > >How to do that? > >1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. >2. Static or default route: >(1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in >case of one line is down, is it right? >(2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if >T1 >line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route >0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach >their local network through DSL line? > >Thanks > >Shawn > > > > > > > > > > >_ >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33866&t=33866 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Topic repeat [7:33868]
First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this message, but not exactly match my question. Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault tolerance purpose. We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is working fine. Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load balance and fault tolerance. How to do that? 1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. 2. Static or default route: (1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in case of one line is down, is it right? (2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if T1 line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach their local network through DSL line? Thanks Shawn _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33868&t=33868 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN simulator [7:33841]
Ronald, If you want the lowest price simulator available, you should go with the simline2. It has S/T interfaces so it goes nicely with 2503s, 2504s, etc. Paul B. (the owner of groupstudy) also bought one of these for his home lab. I believe he posted about it somewhere. Check the archives: www.groupstudy.com If you want more detailed information on the simline2 you can visit www.cheapisdn.com thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc ""Ronald James"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > just wondering anybody knows which isdn simulator is best for home lab in > terms of functionalities and pricing? hope this is not violating nda, > but very interest to see whether real ccie lab use isdn simulator or isdn > lines?? if it's a simulator, which brand? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33867&t=33841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Topic repeat [7:33865]
2. Is your choice. If you use HSRP, remember that only one link will be used at one time. It sounds like a good choice for you as long as you realize one link is primary and one is back-up. You can do the 0.0.0.0 routes with one floating above the other. As for the rerouted traffic, it's a little more complicated. You could create secondary MX records for the e-mail, would need to have the primary ISP who gave you the /24 have a back-up route to the other router if it became unreachable or do off site web hosting. I'm sure there are other options, but these are the first that come to my mind. HTH, Steve ""Shawn Xu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this > message, but not exactly match my question. > > Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said > you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault > tolerance purpose. > > We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an > ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their > local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is working > fine. > > Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load > balance and fault tolerance. > > How to do that? > > 1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. > 2. Static or default route: > (1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in > case of one line is down, is it right? > (2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if T1 > line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach > their local network through DSL line? > > Thanks > > Shawn > > > > > > > > > > > _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33869&t=33865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Topic repeat [7:33870]
First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this message, but not exactly match my question. Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault tolerance purpose. We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is working fine. Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load balance and fault tolerance. How to do that? 1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. 2. Static or default route: (1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in case of one line is down, is it right? (2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if T1 line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach their local network through DSL line? Thanks Shawn _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33870&t=33870 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE benefits [7:33871]
Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does a CCIE receive Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33871&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: CCIE benefits [7:33872]
- Original Message - From: Joe Carr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:26 AM Subject: CCIE benefits Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does a CCIE receive Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33872&t=33872 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM issue [7:33802]
The primary reason I have used OAM is when a customer has a backup circuit and lets say you use a floating static route. If the remote sight has a problem your ATM interface will stay up thereby negating the usefulness of the floating static route. In ATM as in frame, up an up is only to the repective switch, not the remote device. With OAM enabled the end devices, i.e. routers, communicate with each other as to their status. If they loose a configurable number of OAM cells the interface will declare itself down. This is also nice for customers that are monitoring their ATM network via SNMP. I'm not quite sure what your concern is when you say it may complicate things, it just allows for the real status of the link to be known. Hope that helps some Dave Chuck Larrieu wrote: > > I'm asking because I don't know the real world answer, and don't have a lot > of real world experience with ATM. > > My reading is that OAM will shut down interfaces when the end to end ATM PVC > fails. Can you explain this in a bit more detail. Is this something you > really want to happen in real world? Wouldn't this complicate things when > the link comes back up? > > Chuck > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > You need to enable OAM. Simply under the PVC add on both end "oam > > enable" > > > > Dave > > > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > > > > > How can I detect an ATM link went down? > > > > > > Due to business reason, we are in a process to replace old Frame Relay > > > connections with ATM connections. But when Carrier's ATM network had > > problem > > > and one of the ATM link went down, the router interface attached to it > > still > > > shows up up. For that reason the ISDN backup interface on the same > router > > > wouldn't automatically dial the remote end, and we couldn't meet 7x24 > > > requirement. > > > > > > There was no such problem before switching to ATM. It works perfectly > with > > > FR connections and ISDN DDR Backup. If there was a problem in one of the > FR > > > links, the interface attached to it will go down and the ISDN interface > > will > > > automatically dial the remote end. > > > > > > Is there any way to get around this problem? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Tony > > > -- > > > > > > __ > > > Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. > > > Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! > > > http://shopnow.netscape.com/ > > > > > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at > > > http://webmail.netscape.com/ > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33873&t=33802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE benefits [7:33874]
Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does a CCIE receive? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33874&t=33874 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
OT, I placed an order for ccna with cheet-sheets and those guys never return my emails. Does anybody know if they are up and still working. -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a variance of 2 worked perfectly. Dave John Neiberger wrote: > > I don't really have an answer, this is more of a "me too" email. I've > only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to > make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high > number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes > into the routing table. > > At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working > but I've been avoiding it. > > John > > >>> "Cisco Nuts" 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM >>> > Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does > not > seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide > by > CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA > connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and > RTC > are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected > to > TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE > running > rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR > have > the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on > Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is > correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, > Serial0 > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 > The > metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 > [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > After > doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is > greater > than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see > 2 > routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru > RTC.Is > there a reason why?Thank you. : > > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33876&t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN simulator [7:33841]
Hi, there is also a lot of simulator stuff at: http://www.teltone.com/telecom_solutions/test_tools/test_home.html Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33877&t=33841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boson Tests didnt help for BCRAN [7:33879]
I recently took the BCRAN Test and used Boson Tests 1 and 2 to help me prepare along with the Cisco Book. I didnt pass, I missed by one question. I was taken aback; the Boson tests didnt really prepare me for the Exam. Does anyone have any suggestions for the BCRAN Exam preparation process. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33879&t=33879 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCRAN Exam Preparation [7:33878]
I recently took the BCRAN Test and used Boson Tests 1 and 2 to help me prepare along with the Cisco Book. I didnt pass, I missed by one question. I was taken aback; the Boson tests didnt really prepare me for the Exam. Does anyone have any suggestions for the BCRAN Exam preparation process. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33878&t=33878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
You can also get these nice kind of hard-to-troubleshoot issues if your cables are not wired properly; i.e. 'crossed or mismatched pairs' on some cable-testers. Specifically - if the pinout is such that the wrong wires are being twisted around each other ... would normally work just fine for really short runs, but get into 20' or longer and you get the problems listed below. Also - just for the record - we had absolute fits with our RS6k's as well until hard-coding each side at the same speed and duplex; 100/FULL. In our case . Thanks! TJ >""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like >port > > speed/duplex mismatch. > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on >a > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > > some > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there >were > > > the > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > > any > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Patrick * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33881&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN PRI to BRI [7:33882]
Hello All, when i order and get a ISDN PRI will i get 23/24 SPID ?? I know when i order ISDN BRI i will get two SPID for the two B channels and trying to understand how it would be for ISDN PRI , let's say if i want to provide ISDN dial backup from abt 15 spokes ( BRI) to central site ( ISDN PRI) , i would go abt and order 15 ISDN BRI for individual spokes , what would i get in terms of identification if i order a ISDN PRI ?? Is it just one SPID ? Appreciate your assitance, Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33882&t=33882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco IDS [7:33842]
Hi Mohannad, I work for a financial company, and I have the Cat6000 IDS Module installed in a Cat6509. As far as I can say, it is not much of a problem to install it. For management of the module, you will need either the Cisco Secure Policy Manager (CSPM) v2.2 and higher, or Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection Director. What kind of company are you working for ? It all depends on what level of security you require. Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33875&t=33842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Topic repeat [7:33865]
You can use BGP if you simply receive partial routes from say the SDSL provider and point default at the other with floating default for SDSL provider. This way you can dynamically announce your network, get some load balancing and redundancy. Dave Shawn Xu wrote: > > First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this > message, but not exactly match my question. > > Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said > you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault > tolerance purpose. > > We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an > ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their > local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is working > fine. > > Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load > balance and fault tolerance. > > How to do that? > > 1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. > 2. Static or default route: > (1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in > case of one line is down, is it right? > (2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if T1 > line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach > their local network through DSL line? > > Thanks > > Shawn > > _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33883&t=33865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF and DDR w/area authentication [7:33884]
Hi all. I was working on a lab with an ISDN link between two of my OSPF routers. The link would come up if the Frame cloud went away. Normal stuff link would be initiated as usual. However, since area 0 had authentication turned on broadcasts from 224.0.0.5 kept the isdn link up all the time. If I filtered out the 224.0.0.5 from being interesting the ospf neighbors would get terminated at the dead interval. When I turn off authen. from area 0 all worked as normal. Is this a normal occurrance? When area authentication is turned on do the key exchanges still happen even over a demand-circuit? Thanks... Richard Newman Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33884&t=33884 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
I would change out the cat 5 cable and also move the cable to a different port/card on the switch. If you are still experiencing problems then I would replace the NIC on the server. Just my 2 cents. -Original Message- From: Evans, TJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ethernet errors explained [7:33687] You can also get these nice kind of hard-to-troubleshoot issues if your cables are not wired properly; i.e. 'crossed or mismatched pairs' on some cable-testers. Specifically - if the pinout is such that the wrong wires are being twisted around each other ... would normally work just fine for really short runs, but get into 20' or longer and you get the problems listed below. Also - just for the record - we had absolute fits with our RS6k's as well until hard-coding each side at the same speed and duplex; 100/FULL. In our case . Thanks! TJ >""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like >port > > speed/duplex mismatch. > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on >a > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > > some > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there >were > > > the > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > > any > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Patrick * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33885&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE benefits [7:33872]
If the device in question has Smartnet, a CCIE can automatically go to Level 2 live handoff. They assume you have done the basic trouble shooting and CCO research. Not sure if CCIE gets free TAC support if there is no smartnet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Carr Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fw: CCIE benefits [7:33872] - Original Message - From: Joe Carr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:26 AM Subject: CCIE benefits Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does a CCIE receive Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33886&t=33872 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing CID [7:33784]
Its just a typo. I meant, "which answer does not belong" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33887&t=33784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson Tests didnt help for BCRAN [7:33879]
Yes, first of all the Boson Tests are not ment for preparation of the material (in my opinion), but should be used when you know the material to prepare you for the Cisco Way of asking questions, and to give you an idea what you can expect. I always wait until I have read the book(s) and think I am ready, and if I cannot score about 80% on the first time I take the Boson test(s), I know that I need to go back to my book(s). If you keep taking the Boson test(s), you will eventually score a 100%, but that doesn't mean that you know your material - only that you have a good memory. As one of the only exams I have ever taken, I only used one book for the BCRAN exam, and you can read more about that if you follow my Router Chief link below. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: rtc9 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson Tests didnt help for BCRAN [7:33879] I recently took the BCRAN Test and used Boson Tests 1 and 2 to help me prepare along with the Cisco Book. I didnt pass, I missed by one question. I was taken aback; the Boson tests didnt really prepare me for the Exam. Does anyone have any suggestions for the BCRAN Exam preparation process. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33888&t=33879 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOS IP [7:33889]
Hello All , Does the IOS Ip supports NAT or i have to get Ent Plus IOS for NAT support ?? Thanks, Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33889&t=33889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE benefits [7:33871]
No free TAC. However your cases are marked CCIE and usually handled by something other than 1st level support At 11:36 AM 1/31/2002 -0500, Joe Carr wrote: >Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does >a CCIE receive Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33890&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Boson Tests didnt help for BCRAN [7:33879]
I just read the CCNP exam certification guide for Remote Access. It was pretty straight-forward and that book covered it all. ""rtc9"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I recently took the BCRAN Test and used Boson Tests 1 and 2 to help me > prepare along with the Cisco Book. I didnt pass, I missed by one question. I > was taken aback; the Boson tests didnt really prepare me for the Exam. Does > anyone have any suggestions for the BCRAN Exam preparation process. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33891&t=33879 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
I think this was the exact issue that I was running into. Given this information, it seems that this decreases the usefulness of the variance command greatly. I'll try to draw the my scenario in text: [A] / \ / \ [B] [C] \ / \ / [D] | | [E] Let's start out with a metric of 10 on each link. At Router A, it sees two paths to network E, each with a metric of 30. Now let's make set the C-D metric to 20. Router A will now pick the path through B because of the lower metric (30). Since the advertised distance from C is also 30--not greater than the FD--then it becomes a feasible successor. In this case, addind the variance command would have an effect. Now, make the C-D metric 30. Router A will install the route through B with a metric of 30. However, since the advertised distance from C (40) is now greater than the FD, router C will not be entered into the EIGRP topology table as a feasible successor. In this situation, variance would have no relevance because we only have a single feasible successor in the table. Is that basically it? Thanks! John >>> Jim Brown 1/31/02 8:24:00 AM >>> Even with the variance command a neighbor might not be considered a feasible successor. Remember a feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance. This is a loop prevention method in EIGRP. Read the section, "Deciding if a Path is Loop-Free" in the document at the link below http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp1.html#6 I guarantee a light bulb will come on above your head after you read this. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] I don't really have an answer, this is more of a "me too" email. I've only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes into the routing table. At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working but I've been avoiding it. John >>> "Cisco Nuts" 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM >>> Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does not seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide by CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and RTC are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected to TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE running rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR have the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 The metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 After doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is greater than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see 2 routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru RTC.Is there a reason why?Thank you. : Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33892&t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS IP [7:33889]
IOS supports Nat I believe after 11.3 and PAT in 12.0. ""Muthuraja Ayyanar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello All , > > Does the IOS Ip supports NAT or i have to get Ent Plus IOS for NAT support > ?? > > Thanks, > > Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33893&t=33889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing CID [7:33784]
Okay, thanks - that makes more sense :-) And congratulations btw - good going! Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: brian hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passing CID [7:33784] Its just a typo. I meant, "which answer does not belong" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33894&t=33784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE benefits [7:33871]
Hell no! Benefits, I still have a job :) Dave Joe Carr wrote: > > Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does > a CCIE receive -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33896&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Topic repeat [7:33865]
get real.. what SDSL Provider is going to do BGP with you ? Joseph Brunner ASN 21572 MortgageIT MITLending New York, NY 10038 (212) 651 - 7695 Voice (212) 651 - 7795 Fax -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Topic repeat [7:33865] You can use BGP if you simply receive partial routes from say the SDSL provider and point default at the other with floating default for SDSL provider. This way you can dynamically announce your network, get some load balancing and redundancy. Dave Shawn Xu wrote: > > First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this > message, but not exactly match my question. > > Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said > you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault > tolerance purpose. > > We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an > ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their > local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is working > fine. > > Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load > balance and fault tolerance. > > How to do that? > > 1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. > 2. Static or default route: > (1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in > case of one line is down, is it right? > (2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if T1 > line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach > their local network through DSL line? > > Thanks > > Shawn > > _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33895&t=33865 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE benefits [7:33871]
Most CCIE's dont bother the TAC, they figure out the problem themselves! :) Im not sure if CCIE's get free support, but if you have a service contract, and you are registered in CCO, they seem to respond a little faster to the CCIE's (myself and a couple others have noticed that). Personally, I try not to open a case unless I think I have found an IOS bug or have a hardware issue. Granted, I have openned up my fair share of "stupid-cases" in the past. (The best one occuring pretty recently...I had a grey CPA 3640 router and I was asking for the cookie file...needless to say, there is no such thing as a cookie for the CPA 3640, all I had to do was load a new IOS image onto it) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.ccbootcamp.com/quicklinks.html ""Joe Carr"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does > a CCIE receive Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33880&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN PRI to BRI [7:33882]
You get A telephone number. All the remote sites dial the same number and the teleco switch does it's magic. For a price you can get individual numbers if you really want. Dave Muthuraja Ayyanar wrote: > > Hello All, > > when i order and get a ISDN PRI will i get 23/24 SPID ?? I know when i order > ISDN BRI i will get two SPID for the two B channels and trying to understand > how it would be for ISDN PRI , let's say if i want to provide ISDN dial > backup from abt 15 spokes ( BRI) to central site ( ISDN PRI) , i would go > abt and order 15 ISDN BRI for individual spokes , what would i get in terms > of identification if i order a ISDN PRI ?? Is it just one SPID ? > > Appreciate your assitance, > > Muthu -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33897&t=33882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIP2 ATM issue [7:33898]
I have a cat5000 with sup III and RSM w/VIP2 card. in the VIP card I have a songle port OC3 multimode fiber card installed. When I session into the RSM I cannot access the atm interface and it does not show up in a show int or a show run. I can see the VIP2 on the sup III as an expansion module. Can you help me? Thanks, Joe Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33898&t=33898 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33899&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
zilch ""Joe Carr"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33901&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
hopefully nothing. ""Joe Carr"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33902&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing CID [7:33784]
That might be the likely case. But what stops them from correcting these mistakes each time they review their questions? Why do we have such frequent typo errors in other exams like microsoft, checkpoint, etc?...just thinking aloud. Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: brian hall To: Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:45 AM Subject: RE: Passing CID [7:33784] > Its just a typo. I meant, "which answer does not belong" _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33903&t=33784 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ethernet errors explained [7:33687]
If it is feasible, you might want to move the workstation to work your switch is and connect with a CAT 5 patch cord. If you don't get the errors, then your problem is in the cabling between the switch and the workstation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bolton, Travis Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ethernet errors explained [7:33687] I would change out the cat 5 cable and also move the cable to a different port/card on the switch. If you are still experiencing problems then I would replace the NIC on the server. Just my 2 cents. -Original Message- From: Evans, TJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ethernet errors explained [7:33687] You can also get these nice kind of hard-to-troubleshoot issues if your cables are not wired properly; i.e. 'crossed or mismatched pairs' on some cable-testers. Specifically - if the pinout is such that the wrong wires are being twisted around each other ... would normally work just fine for really short runs, but get into 20' or longer and you get the problems listed below. Also - just for the record - we had absolute fits with our RS6k's as well until hard-coding each side at the same speed and duplex; 100/FULL. In our case . Thanks! TJ >""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Are you sure switch and NIC are the same speed and duplex? Looks like >port > > speed/duplex mismatch. > > ""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Everyone > > > > > > I trying to find some information on some Ethernet errors that I see on >a > > > port, see the text below. The machine is an RS6000 and was experiencing > > > some > > > performance problems, the NIC was set to auto negotiation and there >were > > > the > > > usual errors. The port and NIC are now both fixed and the errors are > > > increasing steadily, I've had a good search on the CCO but I can't find > > any > > > explanation of what causes the errors, any advice will be appreciated > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Patrick * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33904&t=33687 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stub area and Default Cost [7:33905]
The BSCN book mentions... if the area stub default cost is not configured, the router advertises 0.0.0.0 with a default cost metric of 1 plus any internal costs. Q: Isn't the default metric a Type 2? Or is a stub area an exception? R3# int e0 ip add 192.168.14.1 255.255.255.0 int s0 ip add 192.168.15.1 255.255.255.252 router ospf 100 net 192.169.14.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 net 192.168.15.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 area 2 stub R4# int s0 ip add 192.168.15.2 255.255.255.252 router ospf 15 net 192.168.15.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 area 2 stub (page 193) Thanks for the help. Elmer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33905&t=33905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
I'd be surprised if you could find a CCIE with no work experience. Even if you could, they wouldn't be worth that much, IMHO. Assuming I pass in April, I'll have just over three years experience and a CCIE certification. What does that mean? Well, it means that if I leave my current job to look for work elsewhere, I'll be going up against CCIEs with 5-7+ years experience plus degrees. Someone with only three years experience still isn't going to be the most marketable person around. If you somehow managed to get CCIE and have no work experience at all, I wouldn't expect a starting salary higher than a CCNA. John >>> "Joe Carr" 1/31/02 11:26:39 AM >>> what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33906&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN PRI to BRI [7:33882]
When you order a PRI, you don't get individual SPIDs for each channel. You get a single phone number, and inbound connections are handled round-robin. Each of your satellite locations will be configured to dial to the same point. The first inbound call is routed to Channel 1, the second to Channel 2, etc. Alan - Original Message - From: "Muthuraja Ayyanar" To: Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: ISDN PRI to BRI [7:33882] > Hello All, > > when i order and get a ISDN PRI will i get 23/24 SPID ?? I know when i order > ISDN BRI i will get two SPID for the two B channels and trying to understand > how it would be for ISDN PRI , let's say if i want to provide ISDN dial > backup from abt 15 spokes ( BRI) to central site ( ISDN PRI) , i would go > abt and order 15 ISDN BRI for individual spokes , what would i get in terms > of identification if i order a ISDN PRI ?? Is it just one SPID ? > > Appreciate your assitance, > > Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33907&t=33882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS IP [7:33889]
according to the cisco ios feature navigator... http://www.cisco.com/go/fn/ the regular ip load supports NAT -Eric ""Muthuraja Ayyanar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello All , > > Does the IOS Ip supports NAT or i have to get Ent Plus IOS for NAT support > ?? > > Thanks, > > Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33908&t=33889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please confirm (conf#d22216f5b24622b2d135b956c50be7ca) [7:33909]
The 2503 can run bgp if the ISP's agree. This is the only way to properly implemet redundancy. Bgp (Default-only) will not significantly increase the memory or cpu utilization of the 2503. ---Isp -bgp- 2503 - ebgp multihop - 1605 Isp--- The 1605 doesn't even know about bgp, It just passes traffic... Alternately, you could ---ISP -bgp- 2503 -ibgp- 1605 -bgp- Isp--- and use hsrp on the 1605 and 2503 to provide access-layer redundancy as well. If you want to configure this, let me know, my current company is expiring and I need a gig. Ejay Hire CCNA, CCNP, CCIE Candidate 434-591-4564 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Shawn Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please confirm (conf#d22216f5b24622b2d135b956c50be7ca) [7:33866] > >Hi, > >You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. >Because >the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be >required >to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a >spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending >Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). > >By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: > >1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. > >2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. > >3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com > >4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. > >5. The message is NOT inflammatory. > >6. The message is NOT a test message. > >To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once >confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. > > >Welcome to GroupStudy.com! > > >--ORIGINAL MESSAGE- > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 11:17:08 2002 >Received: from hotmail.com (f219.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.219]) > by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03142 > GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:17:07 -0500 >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; >Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:18:22 -0800 >Received: from 66.59.140.7 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; > Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:18:22 GMT >X-Originating-IP: [66.59.140.7] >From: "Shawn Xu" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Topic repeat >Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:18:22 -0500 >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >Message-ID: >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jan 2002 16:18:22.0917 (UTC) >FILETIME=[E7734750:01C1AA72] > >Topic: connecting to two ISPs for load balance and fault tolerance. > >First of all, I should announce I have searched Archives before I post this >message, but not exactly match my question. > >Some people said for this topic you have to use BGP, and some people said >you can use default route if you are only for load balance and fault >tolerance purpose. > >We have one client, who currently uses T1 line (Cisco 2503 router) to an >ISP, and has a whole class C ip address (/24) from the ISP. And on their >local network, they have web server, mail server, etc. everything is >working >fine. > >Now they want to connect to us using SDSL line (Cisco 1605 router) for load >balance and fault tolerance. > >How to do that? > >1. Cannot use BGP, because nobody wants to buy a BGP router. >2. Static or default route: >(1) HSRP groups implement load sharing, and automatically switching over in >case of one line is down, is it right? >(2) Because they are using T1 line ISP's IP address for local network, if >T1 >line is down, how can we route their traffic through DSL line, ip route >0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 DSL_ISP will work? and from outside how people can reach >their local network through DSL line? > >Thanks > >Shawn > > > > > > > > > > >_ >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33909&t=33909 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
I would hate to see a CCIE with no work experience, but the last guy who announced his passing the CCIE lab in this group a few weeks ago, not only had no experience in the real world with routers or Cisco stuff, he claimed that he got his CCNA to CCIE in 9 months!!! I was shocked, and unless he's lying, there's at least one out there who has his CCIE, and never saw a router in production. Not only that, he didn't have to troubleshoot in his lab ( no longer a requirement), so who knows if he ever troubleshot a router/network issue, WAN. LAN, etc, (which is huge part of job), who knows if he ever provisioned a network, or even knows the product line! I agree that I wouldn't expect a salary of over $40-50K. I'm not sure if I'd even hire one with no experience. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'd be surprised if you could find a CCIE with no work experience. Even > if you could, they wouldn't be worth that much, IMHO. Assuming I pass > in April, I'll have just over three years experience and a CCIE > certification. What does that mean? > > Well, it means that if I leave my current job to look for work > elsewhere, I'll be going up against CCIEs with 5-7+ years experience > plus degrees. Someone with only three years experience still isn't > going to be the most marketable person around. > > If you somehow managed to get CCIE and have no work experience at all, > I wouldn't expect a starting salary higher than a CCNA. > > John > > >>> "Joe Carr" 1/31/02 11:26:39 AM >>> > what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work > experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33910&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE benefits [7:33871]
Peter van Oene wrote: > > No free TAC. However your cases are marked CCIE and usually handled by > something other than 1st level support In theory Dave > > At 11:36 AM 1/31/2002 -0500, Joe Carr wrote: > >Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits > does > >a CCIE receive -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33911&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IOS IP [7:33889]
Actually NAT was first supported in 11.0 but you needed the plus version and PAT was supported in 11.0 also though quite buggy. I think in 12.0 much NAT functionality was available in all IOS but may need plus version for things like static translations. Thats off my head but can be confirmed on CCO. Dave "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > IOS supports Nat I believe after 11.3 and PAT in 12.0. > ""Muthuraja Ayyanar"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hello All , > > > > Does the IOS Ip supports NAT or i have to get Ent Plus IOS for NAT support > > ?? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Muthu -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33913&t=33889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
LOL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Carr Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE starting pay [7:33899] what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33914&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE starting pay [7:33912]
haha very funny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33912&t=33912 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN PRI to BRI [7:33882]
Thanks a lot to all , Muthu -Original Message- From: W. Alan Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISDN PRI to BRI [7:33882] When you order a PRI, you don't get individual SPIDs for each channel. You get a single phone number, and inbound connections are handled round-robin. Each of your satellite locations will be configured to dial to the same point. The first inbound call is routed to Channel 1, the second to Channel 2, etc. Alan - Original Message - From: "Muthuraja Ayyanar" To: Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: ISDN PRI to BRI [7:33882] > Hello All, > > when i order and get a ISDN PRI will i get 23/24 SPID ?? I know when i order > ISDN BRI i will get two SPID for the two B channels and trying to understand > how it would be for ISDN PRI , let's say if i want to provide ISDN dial > backup from abt 15 spokes ( BRI) to central site ( ISDN PRI) , i would go > abt and order 15 ISDN BRI for individual spokes , what would i get in terms > of identification if i order a ISDN PRI ?? Is it just one SPID ? > > Appreciate your assitance, > > Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33915&t=33882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE benefits [7:33871]
What about that nice pretty plaque? -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE benefits [7:33871] Hell no! Benefits, I still have a job :) Dave Joe Carr wrote: > > Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does > a CCIE receive -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33917&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
Man that's an insult. A CCIE with no experience. I guess I will go back to building race cars. -Original Message- From: Joe Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE starting pay [7:33899] what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33918&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
So based on your experience, if I set the bandwidth on one route to 45mb and leave the other as the default, variance of 2 will work, right? I'll try that and let you know. Thanks! >From: "MADMAN" >Reply-To: "MADMAN" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] >Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:14:46 -0500 > >I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I >needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a >variance of 2 worked perfectly. > > Dave > >John Neiberger wrote: > > > > I don't really have an answer, this is more of a "me too" email. I've > > only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to > > make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high > > number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes > > into the routing table. > > > > At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working > > but I've been avoiding it. > > > > John > > > > >>> "Cisco Nuts" 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM >>> > > Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does > > not > > seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide > > by > > CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA > > connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and > > RTC > > are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected > > to > > TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE > > running > > rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR > > have > > the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on > > Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is > > correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, > > Serial0 > > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 > > The > > metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 > > [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > > After > > doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is > > greater > > than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see > > 2 > > routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru > > RTC.Is > > there a reason why?Thank you. : > > > > > > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here >-- >David Madland >Sr. Network Engineer >CCIE# 2016 >Qwest Communications Int. Inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >612-664-3367 > >"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33919&t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson Tests didnt help for BCRAN [7:33879]
I am in the same boat as you were, but with the BCSN test. My suggestion is that where it is fine to use testing software, but make sure you understand why the answer is right, and not just what the answer is. Since I missed the BCSN test by 1 or 2 questions, I may being doing overkill with my studying. But studying too much is not a bad thing, because it will help in the long run. Really knowing the subject will help you if the person writing the test tries to "bait" you to selecting an answer because you recognized it from some commonly used software. I think they are being more creative with the questions since the price increase of the exams. It is not the cookie cutter questions anymore. I have my CCNA now, and no one has every stopped me from working on a router or firewall asking me for my CCNP papers. I think the program is a great guideline, but having experience is more important. I am making slow progress with the CCNP, because I am studying for other cisco exams as well that don't fit in that category. My suggestion to you for the BCRAN exam is to read a few different books, maybe 3. That's what im doing right now to make sure I know all the material. I might read the concept in 1 book, and think I understand it, then read it in another book, and they emphasize on something else. This is really helping me understand concepts from more then 1 point of view. Even if the book has errors, you will notice that your other books said something different. The networks I work on are not worldwide, so I don't have everyday exposure to BGP, and hooking up to several ISPs etc, so I have to make sure what I am reading is correct. In my humble opinion, some of the questions on boson test are a bit obscure. Just concentrate on what is on the Cisco outline, and try not to deviate too far from that. Being that you almost passed, I think with a bit more reading, or maybe reading a book from another point of view, that you will definitely pass next time. I am sure there were some things you saw on the exam, or the format of the exam, that you can use to study certain areas. -Original Message- From: rtc9 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson Tests didnt help for BCRAN [7:33879] I recently took the BCRAN Test and used Boson Tests 1 and 2 to help me prepare along with the Cisco Book. I didnt pass, I missed by one question. I was taken aback; the Boson tests didnt really prepare me for the Exam. Does anyone have any suggestions for the BCRAN Exam preparation process. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33923&t=33879 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IOS IP [7:33889]
Thank you al, Muthu -Original Message- From: Eric Waguespack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IOS IP [7:33889] according to the cisco ios feature navigator... http://www.cisco.com/go/fn/ the regular ip load supports NAT -Eric ""Muthuraja Ayyanar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello All , > > Does the IOS Ip supports NAT or i have to get Ent Plus IOS for NAT support > ?? > > Thanks, > > Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33924&t=33889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco web product catalog [7:33926]
Hi All , In the Cisco web site product catalog there are two identical entry for each and every part # / description, namely the first one without = sign and the second one with = sign.What exactly id the differnence between those two ?? For instance for 3620 IOS IP has the following two entries ?? Cisco 3620 Series IOS IP S362C-12104 Cisco 3620 Series IOS IP S362C-12104= Thanks, Muthu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33926&t=33926 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
Am I not the only one that is insulted by this question?? ""Joe Carr"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33927&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rommon ? flash upgrade [7:33928]
I just bought 16MB Flash for a 2600 router and I install it and power the router on, but it never boots. I tried it in another router and get the same thing. Do I need to upgrade the Boot ROM or bootstrap? ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33928&t=33928 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VIP2 ATM issue [7:33898]
What version of IOS are you running. Some require the vip feature, i.e. enterprise/wVIP Dave Joe Carr wrote: > > I have a cat5000 with sup III and RSM w/VIP2 card. in the VIP card I have a > songle port OC3 multimode fiber card installed. > When I session into the RSM I cannot access the atm interface and it does not > show up in a show int or a show run. I can see the VIP2 on the sup III as an > expansion module. Can you help me? > > Thanks, > Joe -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33929&t=33898 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
I would offer them a CCIE engraved toilet bowl because they would be full of...i wont finish that sentence Paul :) just joking -Original Message- From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE starting pay [7:33899] Man that's an insult. A CCIE with no experience. I guess I will go back to building race cars. -Original Message- From: Joe Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE starting pay [7:33899] what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33930&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE benefits [7:33871]
No, but they get privileged access to TAC with a valid support agreement. See (watch for wordwrap): http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/faqs.html Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Joe Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE benefits [7:33871] Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other benefits does a CCIE receive Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33932&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
Is there such a thing? The only reason I was able to pass the test was lots of work experience. Dave Joe Carr wrote: > > what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33931&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX question [7:33933]
The recommended design for PIX to have your Webserver in a private network segment hanging off at the dmz port, and then statically map private IP address to public IP address. In this design before customer decided to have PIX for security they were running their webserver with atleast 25 virtual IP addresses (All Public) spanning two different network segments. Obviously PIX could only respond to an IP address assigned to the PIX's dmz port from one of the two network segments. Customer decided to add one more NIC card into a webserver and then attach it to another dmz port for the second network segment. I believe, I will have to disable NAT into a PIX because webserver will still be using public IP addresses, and there will be no natting. The other approach I could take to use static mapping and conduit with the same IP address. For example, If one of the web addresses is mapped to public IP address 63.83.198.21, I could statically map to the same address. static (dmz, outside) 63.83.198.21 63.83.198.21 255.255.255.255 conduit permit tcp host 63.83.198.21 eq www any. Will both approach work? Which one will be better because I am talking about atleast 25 addresses. Another question, Customer purchased one more public block with 6 IP addresses for their media server. 208.21.233.48/29. The want to use 2 out of 6 IP addresses for the media server which will be on another dmz port, and again they will actually assign public ip addresses to the boxes itself, so again there will be no natting, or I could use the same technique which I mentioned above which is statically map with the same IP addresses. The question is that the customer wants to use the last 4 addresses for the internal users to browse the network. So, I will have to create a global pool and PAT (if necessary). Will PIX be able to differentiate among 6 addresses 2 coming out from dmz and the rest of them will be used for the users coming out from the internal network. Logically, it will work, but I need input from the forum experts. Regards, AA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33933&t=33933 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE benefits [7:33871]
Oh ya I do have a pretty medallion, how could I forget;) dave Steve Smith wrote: > > What about that nice pretty plaque? > > -Original Message- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE benefits [7:33871] > > Hell no! Benefits, I still have a job :) > > Dave > > Joe Carr wrote: > > > > Does anyone know if a CCIE gets free TAC support? OR what other > benefits > does > > a CCIE receive > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33934&t=33871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835]
hmm, I'll be interested to see what happens. In case your wondering why in the world, it was a channelized T3 so the link was really another parallel T1 but to EIGRP the interface was 45M. Dave Cisco Nuts wrote: > > So based on your experience, if I set the bandwidth on one route to 45mb and > leave the other as the default, variance of 2 will work, right? I'll try > that and let you know. > Thanks! > > >From: "MADMAN" > >Reply-To: "MADMAN" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Variance for Eigrp...does it actually work?? [7:33835] > >Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:14:46 -0500 > > > >I'm not going to attempt to explain the mathmatics but the last time I > >needed to use variance, get EIGRP to loadshare over a T1 and T3 a > >variance of 2 worked perfectly. > > > > Dave > > > >John Neiberger wrote: > > > > > > I don't really have an answer, this is more of a "me too" email. I've > > > only bothered with variance once in a practice lab and I was not able to > > > make it work even after setting the variance to a ridiculously high > > > number. No matter what I did, I was not able to get both EIGRP routes > > > into the routing table. > > > > > > At some point I need to go back and figure out why it wasn't working > > > but I've been avoiding it. > > > > > > John > > > > > > >>> "Cisco Nuts" 1/31/02 12:05:03 AM >>> > > > Hello,I am testing out the variance command under eigrp and it does > > > not > > > seem to be working the way it is explained in the CCNP routing guide > > > by > > > CiscoPress. Any ideas ? Sorry, Long post but need help.I have RTA > > > connected to RTB and RTC via FR physical intf. running eigrp 1RTB and > > > RTC > > > are connected to BBR via serials also running eigrp 1BBR is connected > > > to > > > TS via serial running eigrp 1 and igrp 1TS is connected to REMOTE > > > running > > > rip.RTA to RTB to BBR have bandwidth = 64 configed.RTA to RTC to BBR > > > have > > > the default bw = 1.544On RTA, the route to Rip netw. 12. and 13. on > > > Remote show up via the RTC to BBR to TS to Remote routewhich is > > > correct.D EX 12.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:12:37, > > > Serial0 > > > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/3245056] via 192.168.10.243, 00:13:42, Serial0 > > > The > > > metric via RTB to BBR to TS to Remote is 41538560 as inD EX 12.0.0.0/8 > > > [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > > > D EX 13.0.0.0/8 [170/41538560] via 192.168.10.242, 00:00:17, Serial0 > > > After > > > doing the math,( multiplied 3245056 x 13 to get 42185728 which is > > > greater > > > than 41538560), I configed a variance of 13 on RTA and expected to see > > > 2 > > > routes to networks 12. and 13. but only 1 route shows up, that thru > > > RTC.Is > > > there a reason why?Thank you. : > > > > > > > > > > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here > >-- > >David Madland > >Sr. Network Engineer > >CCIE# 2016 > >Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >612-664-3367 > > > >"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > _ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33935&t=33835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP Labs [7:33940]
I'm looking for CCNP labs that will help me pass the tests and get some experience. I dont care if its PDF's or a book or whatever. I have a couple CCIE lab books because that is all I can find, but they're not that good or require a lot of routers. Does anyone know where I can get some labs that start with basic technologies (ie RIP) and then build on top of that and then on to harder and harder labs? I have six routers so my lab is decent, but finding quality labs is pretty difficult. I've started writing my own, but I'm getting tired of that and theres also a good chance I'm missing stuff that I should be learning. Any ideas/suggestions are appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33940&t=33940 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
I would say $50-60K. I am currently studying for the CCIE written and I have no "on the job" experience. The only experience I have is in the classroom, but I passed my tests on the first try. I would expect someone to hire a CCIE with no experience, but at a reduced salary compared to others with experience. WES Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33939&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Labs [7:33940]
Have you tried reading the BSCN book cover to cover and doing each lab at the end of the chapters? I found them to be useful as a starting point. You will invariably think of things you want to do on your own as you go through the motions. Break things - physically and logically - and capture that debug. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33941&t=33940 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE starting pay [7:33899]
A CCIE With no work experience I think most employers would shy away from that! A CCNP, or CCNA possible, but CCIE... Im not sure. That would be like a Brain surgeon with no work experience... WHat would you pay him to operate on your brain Makes you think eh??? I think your best bet is to get a job as a CCNP or CCNA, get a year or two experience (Minimum) then worry about CCIE. Maybe work some other certs in there too, like Unix or maybe Microsoft or something to round you out a bit more and make some opportunities in the market for yourself... Or firewalls, and or something like tripwire etc... My point is, If you have a CCNA, CCNP, CCIE, and 50 other certifications behind your name, and no work experience, poeple are going to know you are a good test taker, but you will still be starting off at the bottom. With a salary range of maybe 30-50k But that CCIE is not going to make it 100k no matter what your cousins brother or whatever told you. All the certifications are for is to take someone who has the experience, and skills, and gives them something they can use as proof of their expertise. It is not for an entry level person to get so they can get a higher start pay... All that does is cheapen the cert. Look at the MCSE. Back when I took my MCSE, that cert gave me credibility. I walked out of every interview with an offer. I could make my own choices. I took my MCSE after several years of workwith Net systems including Novell, IBM OS/2, and Microsoft. It was more of a proof of my skill set. Not a proof I can read Brain Dumps, and hope I will do ok if someone gives me the chance... Now days you mention MCSE, and what goes through your mind??? Thats right Worthless. Now why is that? Its because people with no skills heard of someone who became an MCSE, and started making 70k or whatever... Then that person decided, Hey, I can do that And found Transcenders etc... Became an M CSE, but cant even copy files to a floppy This happened on a large scale, and soon employers were hiring worthless MCSEs, and were getting frustrated... Now, in the IT industry, it has become a low level Cert... TO me that ticks me off. Ive been an MCSE since 96, and mine is prrof of the pudding not a piece of paper... Now, Cisco is becoming the same way. Look at how many people are becoming CCNP...CCNA...etc... How many of those people could configure a medium level network lab without the directions How many could trouble shoot their way out of a paper bag If people dont try to really learn the systems, all certifications will be no better than a 3rd grade diploma! sorry for my soap box, just really feel people take these things the wrong way If people dont wake up, then all of this is for nothing... I would not be happy spending a couple thousand dollars to get a 3rd grade diploma - Original Message - From: "Joe Carr" To: Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:26 PM Subject: CCIE starting pay [7:33899] > what would be the average starting pay for CCIE with no work experience. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33922&t=33899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCRAN Exam Preparation [7:33878]
I used CCXXPRODUCTIONS and managed 85%. But you have to at least study for two-three weeks. I prepared though for the whole winter semester at the Cisco Network Academy. On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:10:29 -0500 "rtc9" writes: > I recently took the BCRAN Test and used Boson Tests 1 and 2 to help > me > prepare along with the Cisco Book. I didnt pass, I missed by one > question. I > was taken aback; the Boson tests didnt really prepare me for the > Exam. Does > anyone have any suggestions for the BCRAN Exam preparation process. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33916&t=33878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
