Re: PIX and Trunk [7:62383]
Paulo Current releases of the PIX OS do not support vlan trunking. I believe I saw something on this list a short while back regarding the 6.3 Beta version which does support trunking, but you will have to verify that. Regards Peter --On 03 February 2003 21:27 + Paulo Roque wrote: > Hi all, > > Does PIX support VLAN trunk? > > Paulo > > > -- > Eng. Paulo Roque > Network Engineer > Cisco Certified Network Associate > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62427&t=62383 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: specific MIBs on Cat 6509 [7:62370]
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > You'll find what's supported at . > Walk around in ../oid and ../v2 to get a look at the schemas and the oids. Uh, guess the URL got lost somewhere after sending the mail. ;-) Try ftp.cisco.com, the path is /pub/mibs. // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62429&t=62370 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the last couple years, > which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the routing protocol > came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion on EIGRP vs. > OSPF, which one is refered? What's the weakness and advantage? Thanks! - OSPF is pretty much supported by all vendors nowadays. - OSPF calculates a tree from the point of origin using Dijkstra's algorithm (SPF) - OSPF is a link-state protocol, you get really fast convergence by tuning the timers - All area 0 (ie. backbone) routers have a complete overview of the network - Easy to deploy - By default link-cost is calculated from the bandwidth of the link - Only for IP - Filtering on ABR/ASBR only, between areas preferably - EIGRP, although the spec is available, only you usually find it on only brand Ci$co routers. - EIGRP calculates it's view of the world using DUAL (Diffusing update algorithm) - Router stores its neighbors routing tables and queries its neighbors if no specific route is found - It's pretty much a distance-vector protocol with some features borrowed from link-state ones. - Pretty easy to deploy - Is bugwards compatible with IGRP - Works with IP and IPX - Easy to filter and aggregate, on any interface (ie you can do "areas" quite easily) - Takes into account path reliability, loading, MTU, lowest bandwidth between destinations, total delay when calculating the best way of getting to the destination. - Enterprise people tend to prefer EIGRP over others because it's easy to do ISDN backup with it Most people would nowadays choose OSPF because their CIOs might want to keep a second vendor option on the table. Service providers would probably choose IS-IS (my favorite) or OSPF. // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62430&t=62419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Book for CSPFA & MCNS [7:62431]
Hi, Can someone tell me the name of book through which I can study for CSPFA & MCNS. Good web links are also appriciated... TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62431&t=62431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best practice to add modem to 2503 [7:62432]
I have a 2503 router to which I want to attach a modem. At rear panel I have the choice of 2 serial ports (Synchronous) using DB60 connectors - or using the Auxilary port via an RJ45 connection. Because the 2 serial ports are Synchronous (Not Asychronous) should I use the AUX port for attaching my modem ? (I am basically wanting to play with reverse telnet and some remote access stuff). I think the AUX port is nomally used for remote out of band dial up - any comments appreciated - thanks! Pete Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62432&t=62432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]
EIGRP easy to configure & optimised for Cisco kit. Use OSPF if mixed vendor environment and if network is large scale. Requires good configurqtion knowledge as much less plug and play than EIGRP. Also OSPF is true link state so faster convergence and better scalability. EIGRP is enhanced distance vector. Both carry subnet data and allow complex subnetting, route summarisation but OSPF harder to configure. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62433&t=62419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
preparation tips for ccie lab [7:62434]
Hi all, Passed the written and am prepraring to crack the hardest part. I appreciate any tips and recommendation on where to start(equipment is not my concern at this point) and what is the best study strategy in terms of time allocation, focusing areas, good study materials, etc. Thanks in advance Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62434&t=62434 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]
OSPF no hop limit link state have 2 know how to configure it bandwith is the metric supportes areas therefore scalls well supports area and net summarization supportes cidr, vlsm fast to converge supports demand cicuits standard based djikstra is the algo used in large environments EIGRP advanced distance vector ( the way messages are sent, have only some similarity to link state protos) default hop limit 100 can be up to 255 supports IPX and Appletalk by default is faster to converge than OSPF, RIP1and2 and IGRP supports unequall path load balancing redistribute routes from IGRP with the same AS#. redistribute routes from RTMP redistribute routes from RIP IPX dual is the algo used mostely in cisco environments supports CIDR VLSM uses a reliable transport mechaanism very easy to configure but u have to know the default behavior ""Peter P"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > EIGRP easy to configure & optimised for Cisco kit. Use OSPF if mixed vendor > environment and if network is large scale. Requires good configurqtion > knowledge as much less plug and play than EIGRP. Also OSPF is true link > state so faster convergence and better scalability. EIGRP is enhanced > distance vector. Both carry subnet data and allow complex subnetting, route > summarisation but OSPF harder to configure. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62435&t=62419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay...Serial Int Flapping [7:62411]
look at the carrier transitions do a debug frame-relay lmi ""Dain Deutschman"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > I have a Frame Relay circuit to an adtran ts120 and then v.35 to a > cisco1721. My serial interface keeps flapping > > 01:11:40: Serial0: attempting to restart > 01:11:40: PowerQUICC(0/0): DCD is up. > > Line protocol changes to up...then down...and stays down. But debug output > shows the above. > > Any ideas? > > interface Serial0 > bandwidth 512 > ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x 114 IETF > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > -- > Dain Deutschman > CCNP, CSS-1, CCNA, MCP, CNA > Data Communications Manager > New Star Sales and Service, Inc. > 800.261.0475 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62436&t=62411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396]
You really should read all the BluePrint. I would recommend the books Practical Studies, by Solie, and All-in-One Cisco(r) CCIE(tm) Lab Study Guide, by Stephen Hutnik, Michael Satterlee. I specially appreciate the correction of Satterlee labs. "Panella Todd" @groupstudy.com em 03/02/2003 20:02:43 Favor responder a "Panella Todd" Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto:Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396] Has anyone taken the new format of the written test? I just got my head handed to me. Needed a 58 to pass and got a 47. I definitely studied the wrong material. I thought the test would emphasize OSPF, BGP, WAN and the basic Routing Protocol interaction. Boy was I wrong. 75% of the test was Multicast, IPX, Token Ring and QoS. I studied QoS pretty well, but slacked a bit on Multicast and totally wrote off Token Ring or IPX. Ooops$300 down the drain. Anyone else have a similiar experience? As far as what I used, I thought the "official CCIE R&S Exam Cert. Guide" would be enough. Uhh, that's a big NO! Bruno and clan don't even cover half of what was on this test. Anyone else recommend something different for next time? Should I just say No to all books and print out all the links on the Exam blueprint page? I think that's what I'm going to do this time, oh, that and concentrate on useless protocols. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62437&t=62396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Documentation CD..... [7:62438]
Team, I am working like a dog every day (around 5 hours) to pack down all different angles of all materials to be cover on the famous LAB (Folks there are not shortcuts, I keep asking the Lord Jesus for giving me strength to continues this journey, Wow...What a Ride). Well now to my question. Any tips or ideas of how to search for any topic on the Documentation CD, I want to be able to find very quickly any configuration examples for any topic without wasting time (This is another one that is driving me crazy, Time is Money, well here Time is more than Money)... I know that you can do things like "OSPF Tips" or "HRSP Tips" but at the same time I saw in a previous mail that "Tips" was not available BTW, the way I see it, if you need to search the Documentation for how do a particular task your changes of passing a very low, it is only 8 hours to put together a network out of Space (Jokingnot complaining) Again, all I want to is to make sure I am covering as much as I can. Thanks, and as always your comments are appreciated... Juan Blanco Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62438&t=62438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN Dialer Watch on 4500 [7:62423]
And you have a dynamic routing protocol watching the routes and it is able to see when the one you specify disappears? Could you post your config? -Original Message- From: Nelson Herron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN Dialer Watch on 4500 [7:62423] Are there any special tricks to getting a dialer watch to work on a 4500 NP-4B? I have tried the configurations from the web site and from Solie's book on a 4500 w/4B connecting to a 4000M/4B via a Teltone Demonstrator. I cannot get the ISDN to show any dialer event activity when I unplug the serial cable. Packet debug shows the dialer conditions appropriately (primary, secondary down) but no attempt appears to be made to dial out. I'm using IOS 12's. I've tried clearing the int bri's, shut/no shut the bri on each end, turning off the demonstrator, reloading the router. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62439&t=62423 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Book for CSPFA & MCNS [7:62431]
Hi Gunjan, I've read the Managing Cisco Network Security: ISBN:1578701031 published by www.ciscopress.com. It's a good book. Although, lenthy and currently outdated. Also, I'm currently reading Cisco Secure PIX Firewalls: ISBN:1587050358. I think it will be comprehensive. Until new books are written for the new exams these will do. I'm more interested in some updated practice exams for these two certs. JoeT MCSE, CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62440&t=62431 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NLI Lab [7:62441]
Has anyone used the CCIE Lab subscription from NLI? If so, was it useful to you in studying for the CCIE? Please give me your thoughts on the product. Naomi James Computer Services and Information Technology Savannah State University 912-356-2509 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Mabelt.gif] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Mabelb.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62441&t=62441 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Self-Employment [7:62442]
Along the same lines, how does one find such clients? Any services you use, techniques for finding potential clients? Hal - Original Message - From: "Mike Schlenger" To: "'Sam Munzani'" ; "steve r" ; "Jay Greenberg" ; ; Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:42 PM Subject: RE: CCIE Self-Employment > Really? WHERE DO I SIGN?? :) > > Mike > Chicagoland CCIE #7079 > > -Original Message- > From: Sam Munzani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:12 PM > To: steve r; Jay Greenberg; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE Self-Employment > > > Rate depends on who is paying and how much do they have? :-) > > In chicago area $125/Hr is considered normal with 1 way travel time. If you > got a fortune 500 client, you can easily bump it up to $175/Hr. and they > will not argue about it. > > Sam > > > > CCIE self employed, > > well if you find another CCIE to partner with you can get silver partner > > status, (and some other requirements too) > > > > If you are in the biz you should know...pix...vpn and some other stuff the > > hourly work is great but it depends on the clients locations...and the > > billing rate.. > > Good luck in this market it may be better then being out of work like my > > friend is (and he is a CCIE too) > > Bill at what you can get $100 to $200 an hour or more > > or less if its cash.. > > > > Stephen > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jay Greenberg" > > To: ; > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:14 PM > > Subject: CCIE Self-Employment > > > > > > > Any CCIEs on the list in business for themselves? What's the money > > > like, what sort of companies do you work for? Do you do short-term or > > > long term contracts? Hourly work? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Jason Greenberg, CCIE #11021 > > > > > > . > > . > . > . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62442&t=62442 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content Switch Module and Server Load Balancing [7:62443]
Does anybody could share any real example of using Server Load Balancing in 6000 switches? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62443&t=62443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T1 CSU Service-module command help required [7:62445]
Hi all,
while configuring the T1 CSU DSU card we use service-module commands.
Here when I have the following command
service-module t1 remote-loopback {full | payload} [alternate | v54]
The default option is Full and payload loopbacks with standard-loopup codes.
and its mentioned in documentation also that by entering the service-module
t1 remote-loopback command without specifying any keywords, you enable the
standard-loopup codes, which use a 1-in-5 pattern for loopup and a 1-in-3
pattern for loopdown.
The calrifications needed are that
1) If I select the full option from the cli then want to switch back to the
default option, do the above command without parameters will do that function
example
service-module t1 remote-loopback full alternate
then if i want to switch to default option will this work
service-module t1 remote-loopback
But I tried this command doesnot work(incomplete command)
so how to enable both payload and alternate with standard loopup codes.
Just by negating the earlier command
is their some command for this
2) For what this default option used for
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62445&t=62445
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Self-Employment [7:62367]
I'm not sure I agree about losing tax breaks -- with the exception of having to pay the "employers share" of FICA. There was a time over the past 28 years where -- when I wasn't a professor -- I ran a small law practice. I had 1099s -- and simply expensed everyting on a Schedule C. I believe that you can do the same -- without difficulty -- as long as you keep adequate records. You do not need to have an employer, or headhunter -- unless they are going to underwrite your expenses etc. Lastly, DO NOT consider this as legal advice! I'm not practicing law anymore -- and if I was you would be getting my bill for $300/hr -- regardless of a 1099!! Greg Macaulay Oldest Human Being preparing for the CCIE Lab Lifetime AARP member Retired Attorney/Law Professor > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Sam Sneed > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCIE Self-Employment [7:62367] > > > The 1099 is an easy way to go but you lose out on a lot of tax > breaks. I'm a > 1099 now and am kicking myself in the ass for not setting up as small > business. > I'm working in NYC now. $6 just to take the bridge into NYC from > jersey and > $25 day parking. Never mind 40 minutes each way traffic to > commute 10 miles. > If you're set up as a small business you have more flexiblity in > writing off > expenses like these. > > ""Chuck Church"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Yes. Money will depend on your skill level with both Cisco and other > > products as well, such as Unix, NW, MS, etc. It could be > $30/hour, could > be > > $100. Location is probably almost as important. NYC pays pretty well, > but > > it cost's $50 to park a car for 4 hours! The thing about > consulting like > > this is you need be a salesperson at times. Personally, I hate > salespeople, > > and therefore don't make a good one myself. There's also more > > responsibility, as far as finding your own insurance, paying taxes, etc. > If > > you can find a headhunter who will place you as a 1099 employee, that's > > usually pretty good, but I haven't heard from my headhunter in months > > :(I was on an indefinite project for a year, but that ended > when they > > outsourced. Since then it's all been small projects, mostly complicated > > installs involving layer 3 switching. It's a tough market, and > getting a > > name for yourself can be difficult. Personally, I'm looking for a full > time > > position now. > > > > Chuck Church > > CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jay Greenberg" > > To: ; > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:14 PM > > Subject: CCIE Self-Employment > > > > > > > Any CCIEs on the list in business for themselves? What's the money > > > like, what sort of companies do you work for? Do you do short-term or > > > long term contracts? Hourly work? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Jason Greenberg, CCIE #11021 > > > > > > . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62444&t=62367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Documentation CD..... [7:62438]
the search engine on the doc CD is crap. Your only hope is to spend just a little time learning where to find things using the menus. for example, great information on regular expressions is found where? in the dial services section under IOS. where do you find info on setting up a router as a tftp server? a web server? etc. in other words, you probably should spend some time drilling through the menus and checking out the kinds of things in each section. HTH -- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" ""Juan Blanco"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Team, > I am working like a dog every day (around 5 hours) to pack down all > different angles of all materials to be cover on the famous LAB (Folks there > are not shortcuts, I keep asking the Lord Jesus for giving me strength to > continues this journey, Wow...What a Ride). Well now to my question. > Any tips or ideas of how to search for any topic on the Documentation CD, I > want to be able to find very quickly any configuration examples for any > topic without wasting time (This is another one that is driving me crazy, > Time is Money, well here Time is more than Money)... I know that you can > do things like "OSPF Tips" or "HRSP Tips" but at the same time I saw in a > previous mail that "Tips" was not available BTW, the way I see it, if > you need to search the Documentation for how do a particular task your > changes of passing a very low, it is only 8 hours to put together a network > out of Space (Jokingnot complaining) Again, all I want to is to make > sure I am covering as much as I can. > > Thanks, and as always your comments are appreciated... > > > Juan Blanco Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62446&t=62438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wireless sniffing [7:62448]
I've tried numerous times to continue participation in the wireless discussion. My messages have all been filtered, as far as I can tell. I hope the moderators don't post them now, if this one gets through. I did learn a lot from the answers. Thanks. Here's one thing that I'm just now understanding. Association isn't necessary for wireless sniffing. It would be necessary for receiving frames. Bottom line, as someone said, use PEAP or LEAP. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62448&t=62448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but IMPORTANT. please help [7:62449]
Hi everyone, could someone please point me to the admin of this mailing list? thanks a lot, avinash Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62449&t=62449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: myth about ccna salary??? [7:5925]
As an employee of one of those training centers, I would like to warn anyone considering one of them to beware of schools that list salaries in their advertisments. The last I checked Institutions that are accredited by the US Department of Education are not permitted to make promises with regard to future salary. They are not even allowed to allude to it. So if you are thinking about enrolling in a school which advertises "That if you take our xxx course, you can earn $" you should be suspect. Also beware of schools that offer Placement guarntees, as it is impossible to guarantee that you will get a job unless the school has an internship program which they consider a placement. J ""Craig Columbus"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > For those who came into the IT industry during the mid to late 1990s, these > last few years have been eye opening. > Let's face it...if you could spell MCSE in 1997, you could easily land a > job earning $70k or more per year. This amazing earning power was an > anomaly that burst with the dotcom bubble. Historically, jobs that paid > significantly more than average (engineering, medicine, law, etc.) required > a great deal of study and knowledge in the chosen field. When it got to > the point that just about anyone with a heartbeat could pass certain > certification tests by rote memorization of braindumps, two things happened: > 1) Certified people became a commodity and supply exceeded demand. As > anyone who took even an intro economics course can tell you, excess supply > leads to falling prices. In this case, the price (salary) required to > obtain the commodity (certified persons) took a nose dive. > 2) Companies realized that certifications were no predictor of ability or > performance. Rather, they are at best a baseline indicator that the person > has been exposed to certain ideas and concepts. > > Today, we're dealing with a slow economy and an excess of qualified IT > labor. Those who get jobs in today's market are those with the better > qualifications (experience, education, and certifications), those who are > willing to work for a salary greatly reduced from what they could expect to > earn even two years ago, and those who are lucky. The only places touting > the ability of new CCNAs to earn $60k per year are those training centers > that base their very existence on luring people to very expensive classes > with the illusory promise of graduating with a high-paying job in hand. > > The bottom line is that there's no substitution for education and hard work > when trying to get a job in today's IT world. Are certifications still > important? Yes. If for no other reason that many companies use them as a > basic screening tool to decide whose resume gets read and whose gets > passed. Are certifications enough to guarantee a good job? Absolutely > not. Many people don't like to hear this, but the time is approaching when > IT workers are going to be held to the same standards as other career > fields. You're going to need an education along with the certification if > you're going to get your foot in the door in the future. > > Finally, you want to know how to earn a six figure salary in IT. The way > you do this is to love your work. You're dealing with a highly dynamic > field where today's hot skill can be tomorrow's ticket to the unemployment > line (ask the COBOL programmers). This means that the learning NEVER > stops. If you're not studying the latest technology every day, you're > going to find yourself useless very quickly. The work can be frustrating > and the hours can be very long. Have you ever noticed how the IT guys are > often the first in and the last to leave? And when the CEO's car is at the > golf course on Saturday, the IT guy's car is at the office working on an > upgrade? If you don't love technology, and the challenges that come with > it, you're going to have a very hard time staying in the field long enough > to reach the six figure mark. On the other hand, if you love technology, > and you love your work, you'll find that over the years, your skills and > knowledge will increase, and the salary will come. > > > > At 04:39 AM 2/2/2003 +, you wrote: > >Hello, I'm recently taking a ccna course in new york. What I want to know is > >that I've read in salary reports which state that ccna salary's start at 60k > >but in message boards such as this one, I'm finding out that a ccna > >certification alone will get you nothing. Can someone please elaborate on > >this and if possible tell me which combination of it certifications are > >necessary for the 6- figure salary range. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62369&t=5925 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396]
I had a similar experience (with a 44) and also under-estimated the exam. I found, however, that I did use the correct study material, just not enough time spent on learning worthless information, which you need to do. I am not very good with memory learning and prefer something where logic is involved... Unfortunately I found that most of the CCIE written questions require at least some memory work, which is where I got stuck. I did not see too much TR, but lots of MPLS, BGP, Bridging, Multicasting and lots of questions from the web links. Good luck with your second try. I don't think that many of us are getting through on the first try Or are we just stupid??? I used: Doyle 1 & 2 Caslow MPLS and VPN architectures Halabi - Internet routing architectures Boson tests 1 and 3 Cisco web I also referred to a few of my CCNP books, but not in great detail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2003 00:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396] Has anyone taken the new format of the written test? I just got my head handed to me. Needed a 58 to pass and got a 47. I definitely studied the wrong material. I thought the test would emphasize OSPF, BGP, WAN and the basic Routing Protocol interaction. Boy was I wrong. 75% of the test was Multicast, IPX, Token Ring and QoS. I studied QoS pretty well, but slacked a bit on Multicast and totally wrote off Token Ring or IPX. Ooops$300 down the drain. Anyone else have a similiar experience? As far as what I used, I thought the "official CCIE R&S Exam Cert. Guide" would be enough. Uhh, that's a big NO! Bruno and clan don't even cover half of what was on this test. Anyone else recommend something different for next time? Should I just say No to all books and print out all the links on the Exam blueprint page? I think that's what I'm going to do this time, oh, that and concentrate on useless protocols. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62428&t=62396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]
Good answers. Here are a few additional comments. OSPF is an IETF standard, which has the following advantages: You have access to the RFCs that describe it, which can help when troubleshooting and designing network changes, even though the RFCs aren't very readable. Engineers from around the world can enhance OSPF, using standard IETF procedures and taking advantage of IETF work on advanced routing protocol features. EIGRP is not an IETF standard. You said below that the spec if available, but that's not true. Cisco has lots of documentaton on EIGRP but they have not released a specification for it. The fact that EIGRP is not a standard means that it probably won't be able to take advantage of new IETF work, or at least not as easily, and not with so much input from engineers around the world. By the way, EIGRP converges very quickly too. And it doesn't use load and reliability in its metric by default. Also it passes MTU info around, but MTU isn't part of the metric. In fact, figuring out exactly how a router running EIGRP uses MTU is one of those things that you can't find a specification on. Good discussion! Priscilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) wrote: > > In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > > > I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the > last couple years, > > which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the > routing protocol > > came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion > on EIGRP vs. > > OSPF, which one is refered? What's the weakness and > advantage? Thanks! > > - OSPF is pretty much supported by all vendors nowadays. > - OSPF calculates a tree from the point of origin using > Dijkstra's > algorithm (SPF) > - OSPF is a link-state protocol, you get really fast > convergence by tuning > the timers > - All area 0 (ie. backbone) routers have a complete overview of > the > network > - Easy to deploy > - By default link-cost is calculated from the bandwidth of the > link > - Only for IP > - Filtering on ABR/ASBR only, between areas preferably > > - EIGRP, although the spec is available, only you usually find > it on only > brand Ci$co routers. > - EIGRP calculates it's view of the world using DUAL (Diffusing > update > algorithm) > - Router stores its neighbors routing tables and queries its > neighbors if > no specific route is found > - It's pretty much a distance-vector protocol with some > features borrowed > from link-state ones. > - Pretty easy to deploy > - Is bugwards compatible with IGRP > - Works with IP and IPX > - Easy to filter and aggregate, on any interface (ie you can do > "areas" > quite easily) > - Takes into account path reliability, loading, MTU, lowest > bandwidth > between destinations, total delay when calculating the best > way of > getting to the destination. > - Enterprise people tend to prefer EIGRP over others because > it's easy to > do ISDN backup with it > > > Most people would nowadays choose OSPF because their CIOs might > want to > keep a second vendor option on the table. Service providers > would probably > choose IS-IS (my favorite) or OSPF. > > > > // kaj > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62450&t=62419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396]
The Bruno book is just a place to start. It will at least give you an introduction to each of the topics... I would recommend reading both of Doyle's Routing TCP/IP books, Sam Halabi's Internet Routing Architectures, Caslow's Cisco Certification, as well as a good MPLS book. I'm the author of one of the Boson exams for this test (which means I have a bit of an agenda), so I think those are useful too... I also put together a fairly basic study guide for this exam that you can download from www.cramsession.com (but you have to really look around to find the free version)... Lastly, I put together a bunch of free material at www.laganiere.net I hope that helps give you a place to start getting ready for a second attempt. As hard as the qualifying exam is, trust me, the lab is much worse... --- Dennis - Original Message - From: "Panella Todd" To: Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:02 PM Subject: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396] > Has anyone taken the new format of the written test? I just got my head > handed to me. Needed a 58 to pass and got a 47. I definitely studied the > wrong material. I thought the test would emphasize OSPF, BGP, WAN and the > basic Routing Protocol interaction. Boy was I wrong. 75% of the test was > Multicast, IPX, Token Ring and QoS. I studied QoS pretty well, but slacked > a bit on Multicast and totally wrote off Token Ring or IPX. Ooops$300 > down the drain. Anyone else have a similiar experience? As far as what I > used, I thought the "official CCIE R&S Exam Cert. Guide" would be enough. > Uhh, that's a big NO! Bruno and clan don't even cover half of what was on > this test. Anyone else recommend something different for next time? Should > I just say No to all books and print out all the links on the Exam blueprint > page? I think that's what I'm going to do this time, oh, that and > concentrate on useless protocols. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62416&t=62396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fast Ethernet on 4700 [7:62350]
Earlier I asked if anyone had new boot rom's for a 4700M series router. Perhaps I should have been more specific with the problem I've encountered. I purchased a used 4700M off ebay the other day. Got it here, powered it up, upgraded the IOS and all was fine. I also purchased an NP-1FE from Ebay. When I installed the module in the router, it had a bus error that mentioned something about needing what I think mentioned a newer boot rom, 11.1(2) or better. Over the last several says I have searched up and down CCO for any mention of needing newer boot roms for the FE to work in a 4700 and found nothing. What I did see mentioned is that an FE requires more shared memory, at least 1.5 MB per interface if you use this module. The 4700 I have has the standard 4 MB shared. Have anyone experienced this problem in the past? Do I only need to boost the amount of shared memory of the router? Richard Burdette Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62350&t=62350 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: myth about ccna salary??? [7:5925]
Craig, Very well put... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: "Craig Columbus" To: Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:40 PM Subject: Re: myth about ccna salary??? [7:5925] > For those who came into the IT industry during the mid to late 1990s, these > last few years have been eye opening. > Let's face it...if you could spell MCSE in 1997, you could easily land a > job earning $70k or more per year. This amazing earning power was an > anomaly that burst with the dotcom bubble. Historically, jobs that paid > significantly more than average (engineering, medicine, law, etc.) required > a great deal of study and knowledge in the chosen field. When it got to > the point that just about anyone with a heartbeat could pass certain > certification tests by rote memorization of braindumps, two things happened: > 1) Certified people became a commodity and supply exceeded demand. As > anyone who took even an intro economics course can tell you, excess supply > leads to falling prices. In this case, the price (salary) required to > obtain the commodity (certified persons) took a nose dive. > 2) Companies realized that certifications were no predictor of ability or > performance. Rather, they are at best a baseline indicator that the person > has been exposed to certain ideas and concepts. > > Today, we're dealing with a slow economy and an excess of qualified IT > labor. Those who get jobs in today's market are those with the better > qualifications (experience, education, and certifications), those who are > willing to work for a salary greatly reduced from what they could expect to > earn even two years ago, and those who are lucky. The only places touting > the ability of new CCNAs to earn $60k per year are those training centers > that base their very existence on luring people to very expensive classes > with the illusory promise of graduating with a high-paying job in hand. > > The bottom line is that there's no substitution for education and hard work > when trying to get a job in today's IT world. Are certifications still > important? Yes. If for no other reason that many companies use them as a > basic screening tool to decide whose resume gets read and whose gets > passed. Are certifications enough to guarantee a good job? Absolutely > not. Many people don't like to hear this, but the time is approaching when > IT workers are going to be held to the same standards as other career > fields. You're going to need an education along with the certification if > you're going to get your foot in the door in the future. > > Finally, you want to know how to earn a six figure salary in IT. The way > you do this is to love your work. You're dealing with a highly dynamic > field where today's hot skill can be tomorrow's ticket to the unemployment > line (ask the COBOL programmers). This means that the learning NEVER > stops. If you're not studying the latest technology every day, you're > going to find yourself useless very quickly. The work can be frustrating > and the hours can be very long. Have you ever noticed how the IT guys are > often the first in and the last to leave? And when the CEO's car is at the > golf course on Saturday, the IT guy's car is at the office working on an > upgrade? If you don't love technology, and the challenges that come with > it, you're going to have a very hard time staying in the field long enough > to reach the six figure mark. On the other hand, if you love technology, > and you love your work, you'll find that over the years, your skills and > knowledge will increase, and the salary will come. > > > > At 04:39 AM 2/2/2003 +, you wrote: > >Hello, I'm recently taking a ccna course in new york. What I want to know is > >that I've read in salary reports which state that ccna salary's start at 60k > >but in message boards such as this one, I'm finding out that a ccna > >certification alone will get you nothing. Can someone please elaborate on > >this and if possible tell me which combination of it certifications are > >necessary for the 6- figure salary range. Thank you. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62339&t=5925 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Self-Employment [7:62442]
I think I've posted along these lines before, but it's important to reiterate: 1) Working for yourself is a great idea. It provides flexibility that no employer can offer. You set the hours, you decide which clients to work with, you decide which projects to accept, you decide how much to charge, and you decide how much to pay yourself. 2) It's NOT EASY. I can't stress this enough. Between filing regulatory paperwork, keeping up with accounting, doing all marketing, going to sales meetings, etc., you'll find yourself working some very long hours...especially if you've got enough clients to stay busy. 3) Don't expect that you're going to work 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year. My experience is that 25 hours of billable is a FULL work week when coupled with all the other tasks of keeping a small business afloat. Certain long-term projects will be the exception to this rule. 4) Make sure you've got enough cash to cover receivable cycles. Some clients will pay on time...others will take 60-90 days. Don't underestimate expenses...they'll come back to bite you when it's least convenient. There's been more than once when I've had a AmEx payment due of many thousands of dollars and a big customer check was late arriving. Trust me...it'll make you sweat if you don't have the cash on hand to cover. 5) Don't ever stop marketing, networking, and selling. Since sales cycles can typically take 60-90 days, the time to find your next gig is while you're working on your current one. 6) Treat your customers well. If they trust and respect you, they'll come to you first when they need assistance. This repeat business is vital to staying afloat financially. 7) Refer to number 2. It's NOT EASY. When you work for yourself, the buck stops with you. When there's a problem, you have to deal with it. When there's a decision to be made, you have to deal with it. When a customer complains, you have to deal with it. If you're not prepared to deal with all aspects of running a business, you're not ready to go out on your own. 8) If you've read all of the above and you still have the entrepreneurial bug, I recommend that you go for it. Working for yourself can be a huge hassle, but it's also tremendously rewarding. Good luck! Craig At 03:29 PM 2/4/2003 +, you wrote: >Along the same lines, how does one find such clients? Any services you use, >techniques for finding potential clients? > >Hal >- Original Message - >From: "Mike Schlenger" >To: "'Sam Munzani'" ; "steve r" ; >"Jay Greenberg" ; ; > >Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:42 PM >Subject: RE: CCIE Self-Employment > > > > Really? WHERE DO I SIGN?? :) > > > > Mike > > Chicagoland CCIE #7079 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sam Munzani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:12 PM > > To: steve r; Jay Greenberg; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCIE Self-Employment > > > > > > Rate depends on who is paying and how much do they have? :-) > > > > In chicago area $125/Hr is considered normal with 1 way travel time. If >you > > got a fortune 500 client, you can easily bump it up to $175/Hr. and they > > will not argue about it. > > > > Sam > > > > > > > CCIE self employed, > > > well if you find another CCIE to partner with you can get silver partner > > > status, (and some other requirements too) > > > > > > If you are in the biz you should know...pix...vpn and some other stuff >the > > > hourly work is great but it depends on the clients locations...and the > > > billing rate.. > > > Good luck in this market it may be better then being out of work like my > > > friend is (and he is a CCIE too) > > > Bill at what you can get $100 to $200 an hour or more > > > or less if its cash.. > > > > > > Stephen > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jay Greenberg" > > > To: ; > > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:14 PM > > > Subject: CCIE Self-Employment > > > > > > > > > > Any CCIEs on the list in business for themselves? What's the money > > > > like, what sort of companies do you work for? Do you do short-term or > > > > long term contracts? Hourly work? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jason Greenberg, CCIE #11021 > > > > > > > > . > > > . > > . > > . Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62451&t=62442 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
passed ccie written [7:62395]
Hi all, Just passed the written and feel like i need to say something. Really want to say thanks for all the helps I gained from this study group. Test is 3 hours, 150 questions, single or multiple choices. If mulitple, will give indication how many answers. Can go backward and forward to check the questions. Passing score 58. Highly recommend 1. Boson #1 and #3. You should make sure you either remember or understand every answer. Don't even give up hard ones. Only give up something you really think it is going to be nonesense if you have to waste your brain resource memorizing the answers. 2. Need to understand these topics in depth: VoIP, MPLS(mpls-vpn, mpls-te), QoS. Those are my failing points where i only read superficially, but not in depth. 3. Try to read the online CCO website as much as you can, here is my another failing point. 4. The rest are the usual stuffs that every one talks a lot: books to read: Doyle's routing, lan switching, cisco press QoS, cisco press mpls, Caslow. Now it is time to crack the most difficult part: Lab. Cheers, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62395&t=62395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T1 CSU Service-module command help required [7:62445]
Hi all,
while configuring the T1 CSU DSU card we use service-module commands.
Here when I have the following command
service-module t1 remote-loopback {full | payload} [alternate | v54]
The default option is Full and payload loopbacks with standard-loopup codes.
and its mentioned in documentation also that by entering the service-module
t1 remote-loopback command without specifying any keywords, you enable the
standard-loopup codes, which use a 1-in-5 pattern for loopup and a 1-in-3
pattern for loopdown.
The calrifications needed are that
1) If I select the full option from the cli then want to switch back to the
default option, do the above command without parameters will do that function
example
service-module t1 remote-loopback full alternate
then if i want to switch to default option will this work
service-module t1 remote-loopback
But I tried this command doesnot work(incomplete command)
so how to enable both payload and alternate with standard loopup codes.
Just by negating the earlier command
is their some command for this
2) For what this default option used for
any help will be appreciated
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62452&t=62445
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About Unity Engineer Exam [7:62389]
Hello, anyone has take the Unity Engineer Exam? This exam is hard? Boson tests are the best simulates for this exam? Thanks. Jefferson CCNA / CCNP / BISCI Technician / MCSE (2/7) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62389&t=62389 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE:( T1 CSU some More doubts added)Modified [7:62445]
I have 1 Port T1 CSU/DSU WAN Interface Card,
some more problems I am facing are
1) when I am trying to give
service-module t1 remote-loopback payload command with out any optional
parameter it does not work and gives that incomplete command error.where as
the V54 is optional parameter
2) this combination of command also does not work and gives format error.
service-module t1 remote-loopback full alternate
this both v54 and alternate are optional parameters as mentioned in the
documentation.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800874e6.html#1019309
Please refer this link that these are optional parameters(v54 and alternate).
In my knowledge there could be 4 possible combinations but only two work
full
full with alternate(doesnot work)
payload(doesnot work)
payload with v54
Can anybody explain these also in additional to the previous doubts
mentioned below
---
Simmi Singh wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> while configuring the T1 CSU DSU card we use service-module
> commands.
> Here when I have the following command
> service-module t1 remote-loopback {full | payload} [alternate |
> v54]
> The default option is Full and payload loopbacks with
> standard-loopup codes. and its mentioned in documentation also
> that by entering the service-module t1 remote-loopback command
> without specifying any keywords, you enable the standard-loopup
> codes, which use a 1-in-5 pattern for loopup and a 1-in-3
> pattern for loopdown.
>
>
> The calrifications needed are that
> 1) If I select the full option from the cli then want to switch
> back to the default option, do the above command without
> parameters will do that function
> example
> service-module t1 remote-loopback full alternate
>
>
> then if i want to switch to default option will this work
>
> service-module t1 remote-loopback
>
> But I tried this command doesnot work(incomplete command)
> so how to enable both payload and alternate with standard
> loopup codes.
> Just by negating the earlier command
> is their some command for this
>
> 2) For what this default option used for
>
> any help will be appreciated
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62453&t=62445
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > EIGRP is not an IETF standard. You said below that the spec if available, > but that's not true. Cisco has lots of documentaton on EIGRP but they have > not released a specification for it. AFAIK there used to be another company who manufactured routers with an EIGRP functionality (!) years ago. A detailed spec isn't available but the packet format is available as are descriptions of the TLVs and the FSM. > The fact that EIGRP is not a standard means that it probably won't be able > to take advantage of new IETF work, or at least not as easily, and not with > so much input from engineers around the world. Yup. It's always been Cisco's very own special little friend. ;-) > By the way, EIGRP converges very quickly too. And it doesn't use load and > reliability in its metric by default. Also it passes MTU info around, but > MTU isn't part of the metric. In fact, figuring out exactly how a router > running EIGRP uses MTU is one of those things that you can't find a > specification on. Uh, true. Minimum path MTU obtained from the link is not used for calculation of the link metric. Some people (that I've seen) set K5 as MTU. // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62456&t=62419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto notify if router config changes? also sof [7:61704]
Prescilla, I wanted to let you know that your suggestion to use a personal firewall to control unwanted port usage on the LAN lead me to a very nice solution. I found a program called portslock that basically gives you control regardless of if its on a frame relay or local area network. Thank you! JD -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 6:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: auto notify if router config changes? also sof [7:61704] dre wrote: > > > Also I was wondering if there is any kind of port management > tool that can > > deny or block usage of certain game ports on the LAN ? For > instance if a > > corp office is having problems with people using unwanted > programs such as > > messenger or counter strike (port 27015 by default) can it be > done with a > > software program or packet sender to "jam" that port on a > specific > > computer? > > it's probably best to just let people run the applications that > they want to > run. > if you want to improve productivity at work, pick up a book or > go get an MBA > or something. i recommend this month's issue of the harvard > business > review. Hear, hear. I love the way you get to the crux of the matter, dre. :-) On a technical note, if you were to not take dre's advice, I don't know of any way to jam a port on a specific computer from some other device, at least not some way that wouldn't do more harm than good. Of course, you could put an access list on the router so the traffic doesn't get out. If your company has a very authoritative, controlling culture, then you could put personal firewalls on the users' machines that block the ports. Then you could lock down the firewall so they couldn't change its config. However, the meaner you get, the more creative users will get to go around your authority. When you tell someone they can't do something, at least here in the US, they often take it as a challenge, not a hard-coded rule, especially if you're dealing with testosterone infused LAN game players. :-) Priscilla > > -dre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62457&t=61704 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]
Interesting! I learned OSPF on BSCN book but never deploy it. EIGRP has been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2. It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths? Thanks All for the input! Thomas ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Good answers. Here are a few additional comments. > > OSPF is an IETF standard, which has the following advantages: > > You have access to the RFCs that describe it, which can help when > troubleshooting and designing network changes, even though the RFCs aren't > very readable. > > Engineers from around the world can enhance OSPF, using standard IETF > procedures and taking advantage of IETF work on advanced routing protocol > features. > > > EIGRP is not an IETF standard. You said below that the spec if available, > but that's not true. Cisco has lots of documentaton on EIGRP but they have > not released a specification for it. > > The fact that EIGRP is not a standard means that it probably won't be able > to take advantage of new IETF work, or at least not as easily, and not with > so much input from engineers around the world. > > > By the way, EIGRP converges very quickly too. And it doesn't use load and > reliability in its metric by default. Also it passes MTU info around, but > MTU isn't part of the metric. In fact, figuring out exactly how a router > running EIGRP uses MTU is one of those things that you can't find a > specification on. > > > Good discussion! > > Priscilla > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) wrote: > > > > In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > > > > > I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the > > last couple years, > > > which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the > > routing protocol > > > came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion > > on EIGRP vs. > > > OSPF, which one is refered? What's the weakness and > > advantage? Thanks! > > > > - OSPF is pretty much supported by all vendors nowadays. > > - OSPF calculates a tree from the point of origin using > > Dijkstra's > > algorithm (SPF) > > - OSPF is a link-state protocol, you get really fast > > convergence by tuning > > the timers > > - All area 0 (ie. backbone) routers have a complete overview of > > the > > network > > - Easy to deploy > > - By default link-cost is calculated from the bandwidth of the > > link > > - Only for IP > > - Filtering on ABR/ASBR only, between areas preferably > > > > - EIGRP, although the spec is available, only you usually find > > it on only > > brand Ci$co routers. > > - EIGRP calculates it's view of the world using DUAL (Diffusing > > update > > algorithm) > > - Router stores its neighbors routing tables and queries its > > neighbors if > > no specific route is found > > - It's pretty much a distance-vector protocol with some > > features borrowed > > from link-state ones. > > - Pretty easy to deploy > > - Is bugwards compatible with IGRP > > - Works with IP and IPX > > - Easy to filter and aggregate, on any interface (ie you can do > > "areas" > > quite easily) > > - Takes into account path reliability, loading, MTU, lowest > > bandwidth > > between destinations, total delay when calculating the best > > way of > > getting to the destination. > > - Enterprise people tend to prefer EIGRP over others because > > it's easy to > > do ISDN backup with it > > > > > > Most people would nowadays choose OSPF because their CIOs might > > want to > > keep a second vendor option on the table. Service providers > > would probably > > choose IS-IS (my favorite) or OSPF. > > > > > > > > // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62459&t=62419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List of ip protocols [7:62460]
Hi all, Does anyone know of a reference list of ip protocols and their numbers For example gre = 47, tcp = 6? Etc Cheers, Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62460&t=62460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT-Netscreen 5xp VPN very slow [7:62461]
Hi, Group Can somebody help with this problem with a netscreen 5xp firewall running VPN (3des)? It's behind a cable modem. If I connect my pc directly to the modem, I can surf the internet fine. As soon as I put my pc behind the firewall and try to access intranet web page through vpn, it's very very slow-- takes 3 minutes to load a single page. Thanks. Xueyan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62461&t=62461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX logging [7:62462]
Hi guys, I am studying the PIX, and have successfully set it up, and am logging to kiwi syslog daemon on my windows XP box. I have done this before, not at home, and the info I saw in the syslog screen was reasonably detailed, ie it had the source and destination ports in the text, for warnings. I am now only getting protocol numbers (hence my other question) as seen below: 02-04-2003 20:46:29Local4.Warning 172.16.1.1 Feb 04 2003 20:46:16: %PIX-4-106019: IP packet from 192.168.100.20 to 172.16.1.100, protocol 6 received from interface "DMZ" deny by access-group "dmz2int" 02-04-2003 20:46:29Local4.Warning 172.16.1.1 Feb 04 2003 20:46:16: %PIX-4-106019: IP packet from 192.168.100.20 to 172.16.1.100, protocol 6 received from interface "DMZ" deny by access-group "dmz2int" 02-04-2003 20:46:26Local4.Warning 172.16.1.1 Feb 04 2003 20:46:12: %PIX-4-106019: IP packet from 172.16.2.100 to 172.16.1.100, protocol 17 received from interface "DMZ" deny by access-group "dmz2int" This doesn't tell me much. I have been mucking around with debugging levels and facility numbers, but not getting anywhere. Anyone know how to force it to show port numbers? Cheers, Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62462&t=62462 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specifying networks in OSPF - How? [7:62463]
Hello, Is there a rule of thumb on specifying the network commands in an Ospf FR topology? Ex. for netw. 10.10.10.1/24, would one specify under ospf: #router ospf 1 #netw 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 OR #router ospf 1 #netw 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 Which one?? Is the network specified or the host address itself. Does it depend if it's a frame-relay full-mesh (ip ospf network broadcast/non-broadcast) or partial-mesh (ip ospf network point-to-multipoint) ? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62463&t=62463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: List of ip protocols [7:62460]
Hi Symon, Try this URL:http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers. JoeT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62464&t=62460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of ip protocols [7:62460]
A search on Google using the terms "ip protocol numbers" turned up the following link: http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers :-) Regards, John >>> "Symon Thurlow" 2/4/03 1:44:32 PM >>> Hi all, Does anyone know of a reference list of ip protocols and their numbers For example gre = 47, tcp = 6? Etc Cheers, Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62465&t=62460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: List of ip protocols [7:62460]
Ah yes, unfortunately I am still not fluent in "google"..., or ,my brain is asleep, or both. My searches for: listing of IP protocols And IP Protocol listing Gave me a load of un-realted information... I even got out "TCP/IP Illustrated V1" and Doyle Routing TCP/IP and couldn't find it. Thanks John! Symon -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2003 21:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Symon Thurlow Subject: Re: List of ip protocols [7:62460] A search on Google using the terms "ip protocol numbers" turned up the following link: http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers :-) Regards, John >>> "Symon Thurlow" 2/4/03 1:44:32 PM >>> Hi all, Does anyone know of a reference list of ip protocols and their numbers For example gre = 47, tcp = 6? Etc Cheers, Symon = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62466&t=62460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX logging [7:62467]
Further to this, I searched Google (I do get it right occasionally) and found that this happens when you use access lists instead of conduits with 5.1. I am using 5.1(5), the other PIX I had detailed info on was using 6.22. Still looking for a workaround (other than changing my access lists to conduits). Cheers, Symon -Original Message- From: Symon Thurlow Sent: 04 February 2003 20:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX logging Hi guys, I am studying the PIX, and have successfully set it up, and am logging to kiwi syslog daemon on my windows XP box. I have done this before, not at home, and the info I saw in the syslog screen was reasonably detailed, ie it had the source and destination ports in the text, for warnings. I am now only getting protocol numbers (hence my other question) as seen below: 02-04-2003 20:46:29Local4.Warning 172.16.1.1 Feb 04 2003 20:46:16: %PIX-4-106019: IP packet from 192.168.100.20 to 172.16.1.100, protocol 6 received from interface "DMZ" deny by access-group "dmz2int" 02-04-2003 20:46:29Local4.Warning 172.16.1.1 Feb 04 2003 20:46:16: %PIX-4-106019: IP packet from 192.168.100.20 to 172.16.1.100, protocol 6 received from interface "DMZ" deny by access-group "dmz2int" 02-04-2003 20:46:26Local4.Warning 172.16.1.1 Feb 04 2003 20:46:12: %PIX-4-106019: IP packet from 172.16.2.100 to 172.16.1.100, protocol 17 received from interface "DMZ" deny by access-group "dmz2int" This doesn't tell me much. I have been mucking around with debugging levels and facility numbers, but not getting anywhere. Anyone know how to force it to show port numbers? Cheers, Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62467&t=62467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of ip protocols [7:62460]
more /etc/protocols has some: ip 0 IP # internet protocol, pseudo protocol number icmp1 ICMP# internet control message protocol ggp 3 GGP # gateway-gateway protocol tcp 6 TCP # transmission control protocol egp 8 EGP # exterior gateway protocol pup 12 PUP # PARC universal packet protocol udp 17 UDP # user datagram protocol hmp 20 HMP # host monitoring protocol xns-idp 22 XNS-IDP # Xerox NS IDP rdp 27 RDP # "reliable datagram" protocol # # Internet (IPv6) extension headers # ipv641 IPv6# IPv6 in IP encapsulation ipv6-route 43 IPv6-Route # Routing header for IPv6 ipv6-frag 44 IPv6-Frag # Fragment header for IPv6 esp 50 ESP # Encap Security Payload for IPv6 ah 51 AH # Authentication Header for IPv6 ipv6-icmp 58 IPv6-ICMP # IPv6 internet control message protocol ipv6-nonxt 59 IPv6-NoNxt # No next header extension header for IP v6 ipv6-opts 60 IPv6-Opts # Destination Options for IPv6 ""Symon Thurlow"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Does anyone know of a reference list of ip protocols and their numbers > > For example gre = 47, tcp = 6? Etc > > Cheers, > > Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62468&t=62460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T1 loopback settings [7:62470]
Hi All I am having the T1 CSU/DSU card. While configuring the remote loopback settings, i am facing some problems like, whatever has been given in cco is not happening. The following the excerpt from the cco doc. The service-module t1 remote-loopback command specifies whether the T1 CSU/DSU goes into loopback when it receives a loopback code on the line. The [full | payload] parameter specifies whether the T1 CSU/DSU accepts full loopbacks (CSU loopback) or payload loopbacks (DSU loopback). The [v54 | alternate] parameter selects the loopback code that the T1 CSU/DSU recognizes or generates with the loopback remote command. The "standard" pattern (specified by ommitting the [v54 | alternate]) is used in the United States and consists of a repeating bit pattern "1". The alternate pattern is used in Canada, and is the inverse of the "standard" code: "0". To disable remote loopbacks, use no service-module t1 remote-loopback. The T1 module will not generate loopback codes via the loopback remote command if configured for no service-module t1 remote-loopback. But when i am configuring on the router, if i give the command service-module t1 remote-loopback full lternate, this gives the format error. Also if i give only service-module t1 remote-loopback payload and hit the enter key, it gives the incomplete command msg. I want to know what are the sequence of commands used in real time networks The standard pattern what the doc says, will not be taken in CLI. only for full it is available but for payload we need to give v54. but v54 is given as optional. I am getting much confused. Thanks in advance Regards Deepak Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62470&t=62470 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Specifying networks in OSPF - How? [7:62463]
In OSPF, the network statement specifies which interfaces will participate in OSPF routing. Use whichever syntax you prefer. Your first example would cause all interfaces in the 10.10.10.0/24 range to participate. Your second example activates only the interface with the IP address 10.10.10.1. It really depends on what you're trying to accomplish. As a guideline, though, many including myself would suggest that you always be as specific as possible, using one network statement with a mask of 0.0.0.0 for each interface. This is a little more work but it reduces errors and aids in troubleshooting. Regards, John >>> "Cisco Nuts" 2/4/03 1:52:53 PM >>> Hello, Is there a rule of thumb on specifying the network commands in an Ospf FR topology? Ex. for netw. 10.10.10.1/24, would one specify under ospf: #router ospf 1 #netw 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 OR #router ospf 1 #netw 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 Which one?? Is the network specified or the host address itself. Does it depend if it's a frame-relay full-mesh (ip ospf network broadcast/non-broadcast) or partial-mesh (ip ospf network point-to-multipoint) ? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62469&t=62463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pix Enable Password recovery [7:62401]
John, this should help you out. I suggest you bookmark the site. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/index.shtml John On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:05:11AM +, John Brandis wrote: > Just purchased a pix 515, however the muppet how sold it to me cant remember > the enable password. Can any one remember the steps to recover ??? > > Thanks all. > > > > > ** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > ** > > The Solution 6 Head Office and NSW Branch has moved premises. > Please make sure you have updated your records with our new details. > > Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000. > > General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666 > > General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555 > > ** > > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > * -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62471&t=62401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed ccie written [7:62395]
Congrats. I've been seeing complaints about too much questions on old tech such as Token Ring, IPX. Did you have the same feeling? Thanks, Leon paul dong so wrote: >Hi all, > >Just passed the written and feel like i need to say something. Really >want to say thanks for all the helps I gained from this study group. > >Test is 3 hours, 150 questions, single or multiple choices. If mulitple, >will give indication how many answers. Can go backward and forward to >check the questions. Passing score 58. > >Highly recommend >1. Boson #1 and #3. You should make sure you either remember or >understand every answer. Don't even give up hard ones. Only give up >something you really think it is going to be nonesense if you have to >waste your brain resource memorizing the answers. >2. Need to understand these topics in depth: VoIP, MPLS(mpls-vpn, >mpls-te), QoS. Those are my failing points where i only read >superficially, but not in depth. >3. Try to read the online CCO website as much as you can, here is my >another failing point. >4. The rest are the usual stuffs that every one talks a lot: books to >read: Doyle's routing, lan switching, cisco press QoS, cisco press mpls, >Caslow. > >Now it is time to crack the most difficult part: Lab. > >Cheers, > >Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62458&t=62395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396]
Todd, here's something that may help a little... Bill Parkhurst's take on the IE Written at Networkers last year was something to the tune of, "The purpose of the written exam is to test things that we simply can't test on the lab." Just think of the written as a box that you have to check before you can take the lab. Studying for the written is NOT the same as studying for the lab... the two are totally different animals. Incidentally, I noticed Dennis Laganiere also replied to this thread. I downloaded the Boson test he wrote the day of my lab, and it was a great help. Assuming that it's been updated for the new test, I highly recommend that you use it to test yourself maybe a day or two before your next attempt. Good luck, Hal Logan Network Specialist Computing & Engineering Technology Manatee Community College > -Original Message- > From: Panella Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 6:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Blown Away By The New CCIE Written [7:62396] > > > Has anyone taken the new format of the written test? I just > got my head > handed to me. Needed a 58 to pass and got a 47. I > definitely studied the > wrong material. I thought the test would emphasize OSPF, > BGP, WAN and the > basic Routing Protocol interaction. Boy was I wrong. 75% of > the test was > Multicast, IPX, Token Ring and QoS. I studied QoS pretty > well, but slacked > a bit on Multicast and totally wrote off Token Ring or IPX. > Ooops$300 > down the drain. Anyone else have a similiar experience? As > far as what I > used, I thought the "official CCIE R&S Exam Cert. Guide" > would be enough. > Uhh, that's a big NO! Bruno and clan don't even cover half > of what was on > this test. Anyone else recommend something different for > next time? Should > I just say No to all books and print out all the links on the > Exam blueprint > page? I think that's what I'm going to do this time, oh, that and > concentrate on useless protocols. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62455&t=62396 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: About Unity Engineer Exam [7:62389]
It's a difficult exam in that you need to know all the hardware specs for the various servers etc. Other than that, its not too bad. Will Gragido CISSP CCNP CIPTSS CCDA MCP 9450 W. Bryn Mawr Ave. Suite 325 Rosemont, Il 60018 www.ins.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jefferson Orsi Siratuti Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: About Unity Engineer Exam [7:62389] Hello, anyone has take the Unity Engineer Exam? This exam is hard? Boson tests are the best simulates for this exam? Thanks. Jefferson CCNA / CCNP / BISCI Technician / MCSE (2/7) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62454&t=62389 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SQLNET/TNS Firewall Rule [7:62472]
I have a PIX firewall between a oracle server and a client. The client always start a connection on port 1521 on the server. The server always send a port redirect to the client informing the client to start a new connection on second port. This second port is always random, what makes me create a rule that permits the client to connect to any port on the server. This situation is bad. Is it possible to create a rule that restrict the client access to the server and still permit the oracle connection to occur? -- Eng. Paulo Roque Network Engineer Cisco Certified Network Associate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62472&t=62472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2. Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-) > It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if > OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths? Only equal cost paths are taken into consideration when using OSPF. The default is four of them. You can change it with maximum-paths under "router ospf." // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62473&t=62419 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6509 23" Rack Mount Kit? [7:62474]
Does anyone know if the 6509 has a 23" telco rack mount kit? I can't seem to find one. Thanks. Guy H. Lupi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62474&t=62474 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Specifying networks in OSPF - How? [7:62463]
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: > Is there a rule of thumb on specifying the network commands in an Ospf FR > topology? AFAIK adding the network should be the same regardless of technology used. I've always treated a FR/ATM PVC the same as a STM-16 SRP cct. > Ex. for netw. 10.10.10.1/24, would one specify under ospf: > #router ospf 1 > #netw 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 You're adding 10.10.10.0/24 now, example: int fa0/0/0 ip add 10.10.10.254 255.255.255.0 router ospf asn network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 On some images (at least 12.0S, 12.2, IPv6 EFT) entering router ospf asn network 10.10.10.254 0.0.0.255 area 0 will work the same and actually get translated to the first example above. I don't know how long this has been around but older software seemed to barf on entering the second example above :) > #router ospf 1 > #netw 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 You're adding 10.10.10.1/32. Usually people do this if 10.10.10.1 would be assigned to a /32 loopback interface: int lo0 ip add 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.255 router ospf asn network 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 > Is the network specified or the host address itself. Does it depend if it's > a frame-relay full-mesh (ip ospf network broadcast/non-broadcast) or > partial-mesh (ip ospf network point-to-multipoint) ? It really depends on what your prefix is. Recent versions let you specify "network 10.10.10.126 0.0.0.127 area 0" converting it to "network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.127 area 0" (ie. the wildcard mask calculates the network address into the config so you just cut-paste the gateway address from "ip address" or somewhere.) If you're buying PtP PVCs between two locations treat it as a /30 or /31 PtP subinterface. If you're buying a mesh, you can always use frame-relay/atm maps on a interface and specify your neighbors explicitly in your ospf configuration. This enables you to assign different costs for each neighbor (for example.) I guess there's at least another way of achieving the above. // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62475&t=62463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 6509 23" Rack Mount Kit? [7:62474]
You might want to look to rack manufacturers. Chatsworth makes different sized 23-19" adapters. > -Original Message- > From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 6509 23" Rack Mount Kit? [7:62474] > > > Does anyone know if the 6509 has a 23" telco rack mount kit? > I can't seem > to find one. Thanks. > > Guy H. Lupi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62477&t=62474 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Difference between SNMP notifications and traps [7:62478]
What is the difference between an SNMP notification and an SNMP trap? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62478&t=62478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modem Config [7:62479]
I am trying to setup a modem dialup for Cisco AUX or Console port. The modem connects fine, but then hangsand never goes to to the router prompt. Is there any special configs for setting up 33.6 usroobotics modem. Here is what I am doing: GLOBAL MODE:modemcap entry usrobotics:MSC=&F1&D3S0=1 LINE MODE:line aux 0 modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usrobotics transport input all speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware line con 0 modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usrobotics transport input all speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware PIN 1, 3 AND 8 DOWN AND THE REST OF THEM UP. Any idea? Thanks, Teza ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62479&t=62479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Modem Config [7:62479]
Make sure the dip switch settings are as follows: 1 UP Data terminal ready normal 2 UP Verbal result codes 3 DownDisplay result codes 4 UP Echo offline commands 5 UP Auto Answer first ring 6 UP Carrier detect normal 7 UP Load NVRAM defaults 8 DownSmart Mode You need to reverse telnet into the modem to configure. When you reverse telnet enter the command string. Here is a good link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/471/mod-aux-exec.html Good luck, Scott Terminiello President Scott Enterprises 5 Whitney Drive Marlboro, NJ 07746-1241 Office: (732)972-2698 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Azhar Teza Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Modem Config [7:62479] I am trying to setup a modem dialup for Cisco AUX or Console port. The modem connects fine, but then hangsand never goes to to the router prompt. Is there any special configs for setting up 33.6 usroobotics modem. Here is what I am doing: GLOBAL MODE:modemcap entry usrobotics:MSC=&F1&D3S0=1 LINE MODE:line aux 0 modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usrobotics transport input all speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware line con 0 modem InOut modem autoconfigure type usrobotics transport input all speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware PIN 1, 3 AND 8 DOWN AND THE REST OF THEM UP. Any idea? Thanks, Teza ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62480&t=62479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: List of ip protocols [7:62460]
Symon Thurlow wrote: > > Ah yes, unfortunately I am still not fluent in "google"..., or > ,my brain > is asleep, or both. > > My searches for: > > listing of IP protocols > > And > > IP Protocol listing > > Gave me a load of un-realted information... > > I even got out "TCP/IP Illustrated V1" and Doyle Routing TCP/IP > and > couldn't find it. It's in "Troubleshooting Campus Networks." :-) The IP protocols are pretty straightforward. The IANA list for application-layer protocols and their UDP/TCP port numbers isn't so great because it doesn't say which is usually used, UDP or TCP. For example, it says this for FTP: ftp-data 20/tcpFile Transfer [Default Data] ftp-data 20/udpFile Transfer [Default Data] ftp 21/tcpFile Transfer [Control] ftp 21/udpFile Transfer [Control] But nobody runs FTP on UDP. That's why a book is sometimes better than the IANA documents. The book also gives you the "truth" about "registered port numbers." But that's port numbers. For IP Protocol numbers, the IANA doc is fine. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com > > Thanks John! > > Symon > > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 February 2003 21:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Symon Thurlow > Subject: Re: List of ip protocols [7:62460] > > > A search on Google using the terms "ip protocol numbers" turned > up the > following link: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers > > :-) > > Regards, > John > > >>> "Symon Thurlow" 2/4/03 1:44:32 PM >>> > Hi all, > > Does anyone know of a reference list of ip protocols and their > numbers > > For example gre = 47, tcp = 6? Etc > > Cheers, > > Symon > = > > This email has been content filtered and > subject to spam filtering. If you consider > this email is unsolicited please forward > the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > request that the sender's domain be > blocked from sending any further emails. > > = > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62481&t=62460 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN Dialer Watch on 4500 [7:62423]
In response to your question: I hope I haven't violated any restriction about size of posting but here is the configuration on each end. I thought about editing it down, but then I thought maybe I'd delete something that was significant that I hadn't previously noticed. This is a test bed so I am only watching a loopback (Lo0) on the other end. I am running EIGRP, the route shows up as connected through S1 when it is connected, and when I pull the S1 line on the r4500b the dialer watch points out that the primary is down but it never seems to make an effort to dial the other end. If I attempt to ping the watch address nothing happens, but if I ping the other end of the ISDN line, it comes up, but it doesn't seem very healthy. I included the debug dialer output from that session at the very end of the page. The watchdog client r4500b#Sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname r4500b ! no logging buffered enable secret 5 $1$dmkQ$LhX8ezIO8y81ypOR34wvt. ! username r4000m password 0 wienerdog ip subnet-zero isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 172.255.255.240 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Loopback1 ip address 172.18.200.9 255.255.255.248 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Loopback2 ip address 172.18.200.17 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Loopback3 ip address 172.18.200.33 255.255.255.224 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast media-type 10BaseT ! interface Ethernet1 ip address 172.18.15.254 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast media-type 10BaseT ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.18.196.2 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial1 bandwidth 250 ip address 172.18.200.2 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface BRI0 ip address 192.254.254.1 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 30 dialer watch-disable 15 dialer map ip 172.255.255.245 name r4000m broadcast 8358662 dialer map ip 192.254.254.2 broadcast 8358662 dialer load-threshold 5 outbound dialer watch-group 10 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0835866101 isdn spid2 0835866301 ppp authentication chap ppp multilink ! interface BRI1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-ni ! interface BRI2 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-ni ! interface BRI3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-ni ! router eigrp 666 network 172.18.0.0 network 172.255.0.0 network 192.254.254.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ! access-list 101 deny eigrp any any access-list 101 permit ip any any dialer watch-list 10 ip 172.255.255.245 255.255.255.255 dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 101 ! line con 0 session-timeout 2880 exec-timeout 2880 0 logging synchronous transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 session-timeout 2880 exec-timeout 2880 0 password wiener login ! end r4500b#sh isdn active ISDN ACTIVE CALLS History table has a maximum of 100 entries. History table data is retained for a maximum of 15 Minutes. CallCalling Called Remote Seconds Seconds Seconds Charges TypeNumber Number NameUsedLeftIdle Units/Currency r4500b# r3662#1 The dial-in server [Resuming connection 1 to r4000m ... ] r4000m#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2238 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname r4000m ! no logging buffered enable secret 5 $1$51sJ$.h3NUdXcZI/hNuQefakc60 ! username r4500b password 0 wienerdog ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip finger ! ! ! ! source-bridge ring-group 100 source-bridge remote-peer 100 tcp 172.19.21.1 source-bridge remote-peer 100 tcp 172.19.21.5 source-bridge remote-peer 100 tcp 172.19.21.9 ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 172.255.255.245 255.255.255.255 ! interface Loopback1 ip address 172.19.21.1 255.255.255.252 ! interface Loopback2 ip address 172.18.196.9 255.255.255.248 ! interface Loopback3 ip address 172.18.196.17 255.255.255.240 ! interface Loopback4 ip address 172.18.196.33 255.255.255.224 ! interface Loopback5 ip address 172.18.196.65 255.255.255.192 ! interface Loopback6 ip address 172.18.196.129 255.255.255.128 ! interface Serial0 bandwidth 250 ip address 172.18.200.1 255.255.2
RE: Difference between SNMP notifications and traps [7:62478]
I guess it depends on the context, but when configuring a Network Mgmt Server, like Ciscoworks, insight manager, etc. a SNMP notification refers to a SMTP email, or pager notification, etc. of a warning, or critical situation that has occurred, with the NMS learning about it through various methods, like SNMP polling, or SNMP trap receiving (the end node sends a trap about an event that has occurred, like a link down, power supply failure, etc) Polling is done on a different UDP port, and is done by the NMS actively, where a "trap" is generated by the end node to the NMS (Network mgmt server) Hope that helps... Brett Spunt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tafasi Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Difference between SNMP notifications and traps [7:62478] What is the difference between an SNMP notification and an SNMP trap? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62483&t=62478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed ccie written [7:62395]
Token Ring, IPX are listed in Blueprint, I will not skip those topics. As for questions, they are really the questions you should know the answers. cheers, Paul Leon Zhao wrote: > Congrats. I've been seeing complaints about too much questions on old > tech such as Token Ring, IPX. Did you have the same feeling? > > Thanks, > Leon > > paul dong so wrote: > > >>Hi all, >> >>Just passed the written and feel like i need to say something. Really >>want to say thanks for all the helps I gained from this study group. >> >>Test is 3 hours, 150 questions, single or multiple choices. If mulitple, >>will give indication how many answers. Can go backward and forward to >>check the questions. Passing score 58. >> >>Highly recommend >>1. Boson #1 and #3. You should make sure you either remember or >>understand every answer. Don't even give up hard ones. Only give up >>something you really think it is going to be nonesense if you have to >>waste your brain resource memorizing the answers. >>2. Need to understand these topics in depth: VoIP, MPLS(mpls-vpn, >>mpls-te), QoS. Those are my failing points where i only read >>superficially, but not in depth. >>3. Try to read the online CCO website as much as you can, here is my >>another failing point. >>4. The rest are the usual stuffs that every one talks a lot: books to >>read: Doyle's routing, lan switching, cisco press QoS, cisco press mpls, >>Caslow. >> >>Now it is time to crack the most difficult part: Lab. >> >>Cheers, >> >>Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62476&t=62395 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed ccie written [7:62484]
Hi, I think my PC has problem, my emails don't seem to be shown, but they are actully there. If I have sent a few of them, please forgive me. :) I was asked a few questions, here are the answers: 1. token ring and ipx are the topics you need to know as they are listed in the blueprint 2. there are exhibition questions, quite a few, you can prepare yourself via boson exam 3. reading CCO website to expand the topics on the books. Normally they are more uptodate. But it is up to your time allocation scheme as online materials are vast. If you don't have time, you can choose the topics you are not that good at or you find the books can't answer your questions. HTH Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62484&t=62484 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BayTech RPC-2 [7:62331]
Hmm, we use a lot of those, but they are always hooked to a Baytech port rather than direct to a Cisco port. As I recall its a 9600 81N port. If you have not already found it, http://www.baytech.net/ftp_series.shtml might be some help. ""John Tafasi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Group, I am using baytech rpc-2 in my home lab but I could not get it to work with a cisoc 2511 terminal server. I am using the correct cable from baytech. Could some one with a similar experience show me how to configure the 2511 to work with baytech? Thanks in advance John Tafasi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62485&t=62331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Difference between SNMP notifications and traps [7:62478]
An SNMP notification is a trap. Its that simple. I looked at some Cisco SNMP feature web pages and that is how they used the term. ""John Tafasi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What is the difference between an SNMP notification and an SNMP trap? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62486&t=62478 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-Netscreen 5xp VPN very slow [7:62461]
Hi, Did you check the NS-5XP log? Also, if you place your PC behind the NS and access internet, what's the path of your traffic? Simply PC-> FW-> cable modem-> Internet OR PC-> FW( VPN gateway ) -> cable modem -> VPN gateway -> Internet? BUT you mentioned 3DES, if NS is just using as a Firewall, encryption (3DES and VPN) should not cause your problem. rgds, ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62487&t=62461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
