Re: [expert] garbage collection ?

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 13:22, Dick Gevers wrote:

> Okay. Is this a poker game?

LOL :) Yeah, you're bringing the pizza, right? :)

> Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] niced at -5

'Nice' sets the schedule priority - ok, what does that mean?  How does
that affect your performance both overall and for the specified program?

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
Windows is the best $189 solitaire game you can buy.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] garbage collection ?

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:36, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:18, Michael Holt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:11, Jack Coates wrote:
> >  
> > > > Curious, I have 512M ram and 256M swap - top shows I'm using 198M of mem
> > > > and none of my swap - I've been running my computer all morning and I've
> > > > got a few apps open.  Why would 80% of 1G of memory be normal?
> > > 
> > > well, it's normal for me :-) I've read that the VMM will allocate as
> > > much RAM as feasible and practical to disk caching.
> > > --
> > > Jack at Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture...
> > 
> > LOL, I didn't mean anything by it, I've heard that too and wondered what
> > the basis was :)
> 
> If I do a cat on /proc/meminfo
> total:used:free:  shared: buffers:  cached:
> Mem:  390709248 371380224 193290240 13205504 181313536
> Swap: 1230839808 48295936 1182543872
> MemTotal:   381552 kB
> MemFree: 18876 kB
> MemShared:   0 kB
> Buffers: 12896 kB
> Cached: 172232 kB
> SwapCached:   4832 kB
> Active: 147668 kB
> Inactive:   190916 kB
> HighTotal:   0 kB
> HighFree:0 kB
> LowTotal:   381552 kB
> LowFree: 18876 kB
> SwapTotal: 1201992 kB
> SwapFree:  1154828 kB
> 
> And the only thing beyond kde open is evolution.
> 
> James

Ok, now I'm seeing what you guys are saying.  I did cat /proc/meminfo
and got similar results.  Then I started vmware+WinXP and this was my
output:

total:used:free:  shared: buffers:  cached:
Mem:  527233024 522104832  5128192045056 423895040
Swap: 263168000   626688 262541312
MemTotal:   514876 kB
MemFree:  5008 kB
MemShared:   0 kB
Buffers:44 kB
Cached: 413416 kB
SwapCached:544 kB
Active: 125232 kB
Inactive:   24 kB
HighTotal:   0 kB
HighFree:0 kB
LowTotal:   514876 kB
LowFree:  5008 kB
SwapTotal:  257000 kB
SwapFree:   256388 kB
Committed_AS:   148076 kB

Then I killed vmware and tried again:

 total:used:free:  shared: buffers:  cached:
Mem:  527233024 477216768 50016256040960 384438272
Swap: 263168000   626688 262541312
MemTotal:   514876 kB
MemFree: 48844 kB
MemShared:   0 kB
Buffers:40 kB
Cached: 374884 kB
SwapCached:544 kB
Active: 120796 kB
Inactive:   254776 kB
HighTotal:   0 kB
HighFree:0 kB
LowTotal:   514876 kB
LowFree: 48844 kB
SwapTotal:  257000 kB
SwapFree:   256388 kB
Committed_AS:   112800 kB

I gained some back, but not as much as I originally had free.  That's
strange, when I looked at it an hour ago, I had barely used any memory
and none of my swap.  So I must have just not had enough opened this
morning?  Now I'm going to have to shut down and see what it looks like
- maybe I'll run root-tail and keep an eye on it.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
Windows is the best $89 solitaire game you can buy.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] java in my path?

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:37, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:16, Michael Holt wrote:
> > Hey,
> > I need to know where to go to add the java binary to my path - who do I
> > modify?
> 
> just you: edit ~/.bash_profile
> JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/j2re1.4.0_01/
> export JAVA_HOME
> PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin
> 
> everyone -- edit /etc/profile and add the same.

Ahh... thank you Sir!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
Windows NT source code now available... download WIN2000.BAS now! 

-- From a Slashdot.org post


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] java in my path?

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Holt
Hey,
I need to know where to go to add the java binary to my path - who do I
modify?
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
92. What software license?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] garbage collection ?

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:11, Jack Coates wrote:
 
> > Curious, I have 512M ram and 256M swap - top shows I'm using 198M of mem
> > and none of my swap - I've been running my computer all morning and I've
> > got a few apps open.  Why would 80% of 1G of memory be normal?
> 
> well, it's normal for me :-) I've read that the VMM will allocate as
> much RAM as feasible and practical to disk caching.
> --
> Jack at Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture...

LOL, I didn't mean anything by it, I've heard that too and wondered what
the basis was :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
50. [looks at workstation] "Say, what version of Dos is this running?"

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] garbage collection ?

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:35, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 01:30, elPunishar wrote:
> > hi everybody,
> > 
> > i noticed that my 1 gig of ram is getting filled up real quick, which may be 
> > okay since i'm running a lot of programs.
> > BUT it doesn't come down again even when i close the programs... memory use 
> > just grows and grows (slow but steady), then beginns to fill up the swap 
> > space...
> 
> memory at 80% full is normal disk caching, and Windows does it too (they
> just don't report it). Growing usage and using swap may not be normal
> though. Try running top and pressing M to sort by memory usage, then
> watch it. You may have an app leaking memory.
> ...
> --
> Jack at Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture...

Curious, I have 512M ram and 256M swap - top shows I'm using 198M of mem
and none of my swap - I've been running my computer all morning and I've
got a few apps open.  Why would 80% of 1G of memory be normal?
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
0. Just add yourself to the password file and make a directory...

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] SOUND! Where is it?

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Adams
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:37:43 -0800
Eric Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > This is maddening.  It is enough, literally, to drive me to
> > uninstall MDK 9.2 and go SuSE 9.0.  I have no sound in 9.2 on my
> > desktop.
> > 
> > Has anyone run into this and found a fix?  I tried installing the
> > 9.1 kernel-src-2.4.21-0.13mdk rpm but it will not build on 9.2. 
> > Errors all over the place.  On 9.2 I started with the default
> > 2.4.22-10mdk kernel, then built and tried 2.4.22-21mdk.  No go. 
> > No sound.  I have now built the 2.4.22-multimedia kernel and...no
> > multimedia!  No sound.  Same problem.  There is something borked
> > in the 2.4.22 kernel series with regards to sound.  
> 
> 
> this is just a guess.  I needed to do it the first time i installed
> 9.1 on my computer, but not the 2nd (same computer, though).
> 
> Anyway, get something soundy running, then in aumix, goto
> mute-->mute all, then toggle it again.  Mine works when mute all is
> selected.  Obviously, the toggle checkmark is backwards...
> 
> eric
> 

Thanks Eric, did it for me. Hope it did it for Praedor too.

BTW what is "Pcm" as this needs to be up as well for Xmms.

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] WTF?? $PATH question

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Holt
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 15:54, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 14:21, Michael Holt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 12:53, Jack Coates wrote:
> > 
> > > > I don't quite understand what the problem is.  Are you saying that '.'
> > > > shouldn't be in your path or that it should be?  
> > > 
> > > should not. It's not that big a deal I suppose, but it's not The Right
> > > Way(TM) for things to be.
> > 
> > :)  You seemed pretty emphatic about it's presence in earlier posts;
> > What effect does it have?  It means you can execute hidden files?  If
> > that's the case, couldn't you do that anyway - if you knew what the
> > filename was?  I suppose just for policy, you would want as few things
> > in a users path as possible - is that just what it's about?  
> 
> the real issue for me is expected versus non-expected behavior. There is
> a security risk, which is fairly arcane unless a large class of boxes
> are going to exhibit this behavior (no matter how arcane and difficult
> the hole, if hundred of boxes will respond in the same way then an
> exploit script will be written).

Hey, makes sense.

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
32. Ummm... Didn't you say you turned it off?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] WTF?? $PATH question

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Holt
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 15:01, Bill Mullen wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Michael Holt wrote:
> 
> > What effect does it have?  It means you can execute hidden files?  If
> > that's the case, couldn't you do that anyway - if you knew what the
> > filename was?  I suppose just for policy, you would want as few things
> > in a users path as possible - is that just what it's about?
> 
> What having ":.:" (or its equivalent, "::") in your $PATH does is allow 
> the current working directory to be included in any search for executable 
> files. This is (wisely, IMHO) considered to be a security risk, as it can 
> lead to the execution of a file other than the one you had intended, if 
> that file has the same name and the ":.:" appears earlier in the PATH than 
> the directory in which the intended file resides.
> 
> Obviously, it is *far* more important that such an entry not be part of 
> root's PATH than a user's, but it's a risk in the latter case as well.

Ahh, that makes sense.  So it's mostly good housekeeping.  Thanks.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
14. dd if=/dev/null of=/vmunix

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] WTF?? $PATH question

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Holt
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 12:53, Jack Coates wrote:

> > I don't quite understand what the problem is.  Are you saying that '.'
> > shouldn't be in your path or that it should be?  
> 
> should not. It's not that big a deal I suppose, but it's not The Right
> Way(TM) for things to be.

:)  You seemed pretty emphatic about it's presence in earlier posts;
What effect does it have?  It means you can execute hidden files?  If
that's the case, couldn't you do that anyway - if you knew what the
filename was?  I suppose just for policy, you would want as few things
in a users path as possible - is that just what it's about?  
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
0. Just add yourself to the password file and make a directory...

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] WTF?? $PATH question

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Holt
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:31, Jack Coates wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] jack]$ echo $PATH
> /usr/local/bin/:/home/jack/bin/:/usr/X11R6/lib/xscreensaver/:/sbin/:/usr/sbin/:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr//bin:/bin:/usr/bin::/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/games:/usr/java/j2re1.4.0_01//bin
> 
> that looks okay... but . is effectively in my path!! I discovered this
> by doing a tab completion line that matched a script in my ~. This is
> with msec level 3
> 
> Maybe related to bash programmable completion? Anyone else seen this
> behavior?

I don't quite understand what the problem is.  Are you saying that '.'
shouldn't be in your path or that it should be?  
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
-6. Ooops, I should really have change directory before doing that
chmod -R bin.bin .

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] maps

2003-11-17 Thread Michael Holt
Anyone know of a good software similar to 'streets and maps'?  I tried
one a while back where you had to compile the maps and it was pretty
rough.  
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
34. What is all this I here about static charges destroying computers?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Clean up old logs (more specific)

2003-11-16 Thread Michael Holt
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 08:34, David E. Fox wrote:
> > My firewall has been up and running for the last 2 years now. While trying =
> > to cleanup the partitions I noticed a wholalotta log files from various stu=
> 
> Please don't post HTML.
> 
> Adrian, isn't logrotate working? Or do you want to clean the stuff up 
> now? At any rate, find would do the job:
> 
> # find . -type f /var/log -mtime 30 | xargs rm
> 
> That gets rid of files modified over 30 days ago.

When I tried doing the line you defined above, I get this output:

find: paths must precede expression
Usage: find [path...] [expression]
rm: too few arguments
Try `rm --help' for more information.

So I did it this way:

find /var/log -type f -mtime 5 | xargs rm

And it works.  The only thing that catches my attention is that in the
'find' man page, '-mtime' says:

 -mtime n
  File's data was last modified n*24 hours ago.

This would seem to me to mean a static multiplyer.  In other words,
'-mtime 30' would be any logs created exactly 30 days ago - not 31, not
29.

How would you state 'anything over 30 days'?  And why did you create the
syntax the way you did above; with the '.' after 'find' and the order of
commands?

Thanks!


-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
81. The drive ate the tape but that's OK, I brought my screwdriver.

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers (update)

2003-11-15 Thread Michael Holt
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 10:01, Bill wrote:
> That is what my understanding was. you wouyld asign like 5 to your primary 
> email server and 10 to the backup. Assigning the same number would just make 
> things a little screwy. 

Ok, that would make sense.  I'm still confused as to why one would let
me in and one wouldn't - I think they need to hire a new engineer :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #316:

Elves on strike. (Why do they call EMAG Elf Magic)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers (update)

2003-11-15 Thread Michael Holt
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 07:22, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 06:57, Michael Holt wrote:
> > ...> 
> > > if we do a mx record lookup for .com we get qxssmtp2.qualxserv.com. that 
> > > server is not answering for port 25 stuff. Interestingly enough they have the 
> > > same number assigned to there email servers which is 10 I thought that was a 
> > > no no. 
> > > 
> > > Man I have been outa the internet systems stuff for two years now and can 
> > > still do this stuff. Im so far out of the loop now seeing how I just got my 
> > > trucking drivers license (class a) with all endorsements to look for work in 
> > > the trucking industry. I gave up on the computer industry. 
> > 
> > Hey I just learned something!  Could you explain the '10' thing to me?
> 
> MX records have a priority option between 1 and 100. Higher priority
> gets first choice of delivery, lower priority is essentially backup.
> 
> > 
> > I drive a tow truck for AAA during my down-time between jobs.  I don't
> > have the cdl stuff, but there seems to be plenty of cars running into
> > each other to stay busy :)

So then having two servers with the same priority level would be either
/ or?  Or would it just hose your servers?
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #341:

HTTPD Error 666 : SysAdmin was here


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers (update)

2003-11-15 Thread Michael Holt
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 22:17, Bill wrote:
> hmmm kinda weird. Here is the results of some nslookup stuff
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] beau]$ nslookup qualxserv.net
> Note:  nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
> Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead.  Run nslookup with
> the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing.
> Server: 66.47.48.51
> Address:66.47.48.51#53
> 
> Non-authoritative answer:
> *** Can't find qualxserv.net: No answer
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] beau]$ nslookup qualxserv.com
> Note:  nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
> Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead.  Run nslookup with
> the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing.
> Server: 66.47.48.51
> Address:66.47.48.51#53
> 
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name:   qualxserv.com
> Address: 65.246.197.37
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] beau]$ nslookup
> Note:  nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
> Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead.  Run nslookup with
> the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing.
> > set type=mx
> > qualxserv.net
> Server: 66.47.48.51
> Address:66.47.48.51#53
> 
> Non-authoritative answer:
> qualxserv.net   mail exchanger = 10 ns1.qualxserv.com.
> qualxserv.net   mail exchanger = 10 qxssmtp3.qualxserv.com.
> 
> Authoritative answers can be found from:
> qualxserv.net   nameserver = ns3.qualxserv.net.
> qualxserv.net   nameserver = ns1.qualxserv.com.
> qualxserv.net   nameserver = ns2.qualxserv.com.
> ns1.qualxserv.com   internet address = 65.246.197.32
> ns2.qualxserv.com   internet address = 65.246.197.33
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] beau]$ telnet ns1.qualxserv.net 25
> Trying 65.246.197.32...
> Connected to ns1.qualxserv.com (65.246.197.32).
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 qxsdns1.qualxserve.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail 
> Service 5.5.2650.21) ready
> 
> 
> There is the answer. Previously they were using qxssmtp2.qualxserv.com. as 
> there mail server for .com now for .net they are using ns1.qualxserv.com and 
> qxssmtp3.qualxserv.com. so its just a forward to there working .com email 
> servers.
> 
> if we do a mx record lookup for .com we get qxssmtp2.qualxserv.com. that 
> server is not answering for port 25 stuff. Interestingly enough they have the 
> same number assigned to there email servers which is 10 I thought that was a 
> no no. 
> 
> Man I have been outa the internet systems stuff for two years now and can 
> still do this stuff. Im so far out of the loop now seeing how I just got my 
> trucking drivers license (class a) with all endorsements to look for work in 
> the trucking industry. I gave up on the computer industry. 

Hey I just learned something!  Could you explain the '10' thing to me?

I drive a tow truck for AAA during my down-time between jobs.  I don't
have the cdl stuff, but there seems to be plenty of cars running into
each other to stay busy :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
49. Oops! (said in a quiet, almost surprised voice)

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers (update)

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Holt
Well, I just wanted to give an update to the postfix prob.
The fix?  I just found out that this company just switched their email
server from '.com' to '.net'.  I don't know what they're doing, cause
they still have the '.com' server up and running.  It must have been
some kind of redirect / relay because I still can't get through if I use
the '.com' address from evolution, but I am able to get through if I
email to the '.net' address.  They definitely have something weird going
on but at least I know I'm not _completely_ incompetent.  Weird...

Anyway, thanks Jack, Bill and Pierre!  
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #235:

The new frame relay network hasn't bedded down the software loop
transmitter yet. 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Evolution auto-signatures

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Holt
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 11:17, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 11:09, Michael Holt wrote:
> ...
> > echo ""
> 
> ba-da-boom. thanks!

LEAST I could do! :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #413:

Cow-tippers tipped a cow onto the server.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Holt
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 06:16, Bill Mullen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Michael Holt wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 18:00, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > > 
> > > Consider coding it simply:
> > > > myhostname = holt-tech.net
> > 
> > Ok, now the question becomes, why am I using my domain name instead of
> > my host name where it asks for my host name?
> 
> >From my previous message in this thread:
> 
> ] Bear in mind that the "myhostname =" setting in main.cf doesn't need to
> ] bear even the slightest resemblance to what your system actually calls
> ] itself; it is the string that is sent whenever Postfix identifies the
> ] system on which it is running to other systems (both clients and 
> ] servers).
> ] As such, the value of this setting *will* have an impact on whether or 
> ] not mail is accepted from you by some servers, as it is sent in the 
> ] HELO/EHLO statement when Postfix initiates a connection as a client.
> 
> It is not "asking for your hostname" - it is asking you to *set* what
> hostname you want it to send to other systems.
> 
> You want to use one that will resolve in at least one direction, which is 
> why "holt-tech.net" is needed here, and why your ISP-given hostname is 
> even more preferable (as the latter resolves in *both* directions).
> 
> There is nothing wrong with using the same value for the $myhostname, 
> $mydomain and $myorigin variables, in case you're wondering.

Ahh, that makes sense now -- thank you for clearing that up.  I really
had no idea that there was so much possible tweaking to make all this
work.  
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #221:

The mainframe needs to rest.  It's getting old, you know.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Evolution auto-signatures

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Holt
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:31, Jack Coates wrote:
> Anyone mess with Evo's script signatures? It's formatting badly, as so:
> 
> -- Jack Coates at Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture... "As
> I went down to Glasgow city, just to see what I might spy, what should I
> see but Nancy Whiskey, a playful twinkle in her eye... I bought her a
> drink I had another, ran out of money so I did steal, she ran me ragged
> lovely Nancy for seven years alone unwell." -- Nancy Whiskey from The
> Snake by Shane McGowan and the Popes
> 
> Basically all the newlines are stripped. Same script's output looks like
> this on the command line:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] jack]$ sig.sh 
> --
> Jack Coates at Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture...
> 
> "You choose your leaders and place your trust, and their lies won't slow
> down and their promises rust, you'll see killing machines and more
> rockets and guns, And the public wants what the public gets but I don't
> get what this society wants, I'm going underground"
> -- Going Underground from Sound Affects by The Jam!
> 
> On another note, I'd doing these quotes in fortune format, so let me
> know if their interest and I'll start posting the dailies on my web
> site.
> 
> -- Jack

This is my evo script sig:

#!/bin/csh -f
=20
echo "-- "
cat /home/michael/.asciisig
/usr/games/fortune

I had done some googling around and found that the " -- " tag
needed to be there even in the ascii message - something with evo.

The actual sig file it calls is the static part and then obviously,
fortune.

I stuck with #! c shell because it seems to work.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #259:

Someone's tie is caught in the printer, and if anything else gets
printed, he'll be in it too.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Hijacking threads

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Adams
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:12:25 -0500
Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



> I think people are supposed to ignore these posts in order to
> encourage the offender to repost properly.  I unfortunately let myself
> be rude instead, for which I apologize.

What is worse, if a person is deleting a thread that doesn't interest
them they may accidentally delete a hijack thread that does interest
them without noticing it.

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 19:05, Bill Mullen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Michael Holt wrote:
> 
> > I added my client machine to /var/spool/postfix/etc/hosts and added the
> > above to main.cf then I sent a message to my boss from the client
> > machine to see what happens.  I'm not sure when I'll hear back, so I'm
> > just going to wait a bit and see.  I want to wait to make any more
> > changes to see if this has any effect.
> 
> You did either restart or reload Postfix after making the changes, right?
> 
> If not, the main.cf change won't take effect until you do.

Si Senor!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
70. Hmm, maybe if I do this...

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 18:57, James Sparenberg wrote:

> 3 people are in a car.  An Electrical Engineer, A Windows programmer,
> and a Mechanical Engineer.  They are trying to get a car to re-start
> after it dies.  The Electrical Engineer is under the hood testing the
> wiring, the Mechanical Engineer is under the car Checking out if the
> measurements are matching the blueprints.  The Programmer is opening and
> closing windows, and a kid who is riding by on his Bike suggests putting
> gas in the tank.
> 
> James

:) I like that

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #10:

hardware stress fractures


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 18:53, Bill Mullen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:41:55 -0800 Michael Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Consider coding it simply:
> > > myhostname = holt-tech.net
> 
> Exactly. Using "earth.holt-tech.net" gives no benefit, because that name 
> does not resolve, while "holt-tech.net" alone *does* (forward, at least).

Ok, too late, I already hit 'send' on my last before reading this one.  
Why would this tag be in the conf file if it wants domain name?
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #22:

monitor resolution too high


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 18:00, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:41:55 -0800 Michael Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> Consider coding it simply:
> > myhostname = holt-tech.net

Ok, now the question becomes, why am I using my domain name instead of
my host name where it asks for my host name?

TIA
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
34. What is all this I here about static charges destroying computers?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 14:22, Jack Coates wrote:

> if the address is in a DHCP pool assigned for home users, more and more
> servers out there will block direct SMTP connections from it; only
> relaying through the ISP's server will work in this case.

This is what I was first thinking; but I'm able to use the webmail from
behind my firewall - that's still a direct connection.  

It seems like rDNS would have to be the culprit.

I guess I'll have to wait a bit and see if I get a message back from my
boss.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
38. OH, CRUD! (as they scrabble at the keyboard for ^c).

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 14:06, Bill Mullen wrote:

> Unless, of course, the only one giving you fits is your boss', which we
> have already established is hosed in some bizarre fashion  ... but
> having Postfix use a more valid hostname may fix that situation, too, even
> though that doesn't fully explain that server's rather eccentric behavior.

Ok, here's my new postconf:

mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain $mydomain,
earth.$mydomain
mydomain = holt-tech.net
myhostname = earth.holt-tech.net
mynetworks = 192.168.0.0/24, 127.0.0.0/24
myorigin = holt-tech.net

I added my client machine to /var/spool/postfix/etc/hosts and added the
above to main.cf then I sent a message to my boss from the client
machine to see what happens.  I'm not sure when I'll hear back, so I'm
just going to wait a bit and see.  I want to wait to make any more
changes to see if this has any effect.

> HTH!

That's great!  Thanks again!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #373:

Suspicious pointer corrupted virtual machine


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 10:23, Jack Coates wrote:

> Yeah, nothing like interviewing job candidates to burst that bubble :-)
> There are some very good people out there, but the dangerous ones are
> the ones that know just enough to do things but don't know enough to
> realize that they shouldn't do that thing.

LOL, no kidding :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #10:

hardware stress fractures


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
130.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:14:06 -0800
Received:   from www.holt-tech.net (unknown
[server.internal.ip.address]) by servername (Postfix) with SMTP id
13833205CFC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:16:15 -0500
(EST)
Received:   from evrtwa1-ar17-4-35-151-34.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net
([4.35.151.34]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user michael) by
server.internal.ip.address with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:16:15 -0800
(PST)

****

Received:   from 4.35.151.34 (EHLO servername) (4.35.151.34) by
mta156.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:00:02 -0800
Received:   from machinename (unknown [host.internal.ip]) by
servername (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0606E205CFC for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:02:11 -0500 (EST)



-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #57:

Groundskeepers stole the root password


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 06:56, Jack Coates wrote:

> I'd stop by the sysadmin's desk on the way to the coffee pot and ask
> her/him, assuming it's the kind of place you can walk around in. 
> 
> Failing that, an off-hand comment about how their email system doesn't
> seem to accept mail from your home address and see if they'll introduce
> you to the sysadmin. Point of contact may not need to know that it's
> widely broken, the sysadmin can help them to that knowledge.

I'm on a remote site :'( but I think I'm just going to email them and
see if I can bug them about it - sometimes innocent ignorance has an
appeal :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #251:

Processes running slowly due to weak power supply


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 06:51, Jack Coates wrote:

> Cisco routers are actually very dumb. If the router or a regular
> firewall is blocking the mail, then the three way TCP handshake will
> never complete. If a proxy-using firewall (Raptor or the so-called
> "security servers" in PIX and Check Point (so-called because the number
> one source of security holes on those firewalls)) is in use, it will
> accept enough headers to make a decision on.
> 
> Dropping the connection right after 220 for servers that aren't on any
> BL is broken behavior.

Ok, in reading the rfc 2821, I come to these relevant lines:

"The SMTP client MUST, if possible, ensure that the domain parameter to
the EHLO command is a valid principal host name (not a CNAME or MX name)
for its host.  If this is not possible (e.g., when the client's address
is dynamically assigned and the client does not have an obvious name),
an address literal SHOULD be substituted for the domain name and
supplemental information provided that will assist in identifying the
client."

In my original post, I included my headers.  They show that the webmail
header came with my verizon dsl id:

Received:   from www.holt-tech.net (unknown
[server.internal.ip.address]) by servername (Postfix) with SMTP id
13833205CFC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:16:15 -0500
(EST)
Received:   from evrtwa1-ar17-4-35-151-34.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net
([4.35.151.34]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user michael) by
server.internal.ip.address with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:16:15 -0800
(PST)

Notice the second "received" line "evrtwa1-blah-blah".  Could that
string be what allows me to connect to their server?  Short of that, I'm
at a loss as to what else could be dropping me.  When I use the client
machines, that line becomes whatever machine name I'm at along with it's
internal ip. 
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #257:

That would be because the software doesn't work.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 06:47, Jack Coates wrote:

> you assume that they know what they're doing... many people in the IT
> world don't.

LOL
I'm working on the 'NMCI' project in Bremerton, WA right now - the
'Naval Marine Corps Intranet'.  I believe that there are a few really
sharp people doing the engineering, but each day my bubble gets a little
more crushed realizing how true your statement is.
I just assumed that the people I went to work with new more than I and
were all professionals...
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #152:

My pony-tail hit the on/off switch on the power strip.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-13 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:56, Bill wrote:
> I dont believe it is a router issue. They could have a acl in place but then 
> you wouldnt see the answer from the server it would just block it alltogther. 
> I dont remember ever seing a Cisco router checking the header files in emails 
> to block a person.  I think they may have a timeout issue like mentioned 
> before. They may be trying to prevent anyone from trying to run a script to 
> get in there box through there email server software. This is the first time 
> I have seen an email server not respond the correct way using telent to port 
> 25.   
> 
> In any case it seems to be there problem. I would contact there sys admin and 
> see whats up with this issue. Please let us know what the answer is if you 
> get one.

p.s. I do have to tread lightly; I contract for this company and the
person I emailed is my point of contact -- I'm not sure how they will
react if I tell them how hard I've been working to 'figure out' their
system *grin*
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #387:

Your computer's union contract is set to expire at midnight.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:56, Bill wrote:
> I dont believe it is a router issue. They could have a acl in place but then 
> you wouldnt see the answer from the server it would just block it alltogther. 
> I dont remember ever seing a Cisco router checking the header files in emails 
> to block a person.  I think they may have a timeout issue like mentioned 
> before. They may be trying to prevent anyone from trying to run a script to 
> get in there box through there email server software. This is the first time 
> I have seen an email server not respond the correct way using telent to port 
> 25.   
> 
> In any case it seems to be there problem. I would contact there sys admin and 
> see whats up with this issue. Please let us know what the answer is if you 
> get one.

Alrightty then, I'll see what I can find out from them.  

Hey thanks again everyone, I'll let you know what I come up with.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #226:

A star wars satellite accidently blew up the WAN.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 19:43, Eric Huff wrote:
> > > On my comcrap, i seem to have a choice: run acpi or run the
> > > paralell port.  i can't do both...
> > > 
> > > eric
> > 
> > Have you tried removing acpi from your lilo?
> 
> Yeah, i have a choice:
> acpi=on and then no parallel port,
> or
> acpi=off, and then the comp doesn't shut down.
> 
> Not sure what acpi=ht means.  I'll hae to check it out
> 
> This is all under 9.1.
> 
> eric

Hmm... I don't pretend to know about kernel stuff, but it seems odd that
that would affect your parallel ports.  All I can say is, try 9.2 - I
don't have any p port stuff, but without acpi in lilo -- off or on --
just removed altogether, my machine shuts down now.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #339:

manager in the cable duct


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 19:27, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 17:10, Bryan Phinney wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 November 2003 07:18 pm, Michael Holt wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm wondering if they have something set on their server to drop any
> > > email that doesn't show an fqdn in the received string.  Maybe to keep
> > > from getting email from a server that's been taken over as a relay?  If
> > > this is the case, how would I set postfix so that emails originating
> > > from other boxes on my lan would appear to be the server sending them?
> > > So that the above headers taken from both webmail and client machines
> > > would look identical?
> > 
> > Michael, is it possible that you are using a different "From:" address when 
> > using Squirrelmail versus when you use Evolution?  They may be whitelisting 
> > based on the From listed as the sender.
> 
> Except they drop connection before he could ever send From.. Maybe
> they've set a ridiculously low timeout or something, but it doesn't act
> like any real world mailserver I've ever seen.

See, that's the thing.  I haven't done any playing with cisco routers,
but I would imagine that the ios is smart enough to drop anything except
an email packet at port 25 and then with all the recent problems with
ddos attacks and virii, etc, I would think that they *would* want to
seriously filter the headers that come in.  But you guys are saying that
the headers on my email - no matter which machine I'm sending from - are
absolutely normal?  Nobody would or could do it differently? 

Well thanks everyone for all the info -- I've definitely learned some
stuff (including that I need to do some studying!:) )
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #321:

Scheduled global CPU outage


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 19:26, Jack Coates wrote:
 
> > Ok, I don't fully understand the term 'whitelisting', but I assume that
> > it means only specified senders get in?  
> right.
> 
> > I'm able to send to any account
> > I've ever tried in the past (hotmail, yahoo, my server when using
> > squirrelmail), how could this be setup?  I've got to be doing something
> > wrong, I just don't know what.
> 
> your setup is probably fine. Theirs is FUBAR'd. No fault of yours.

Well, it seems to be the general opinion that I can't really do anything
about this situation?  It just seems so odd that they would make their
servers *that* inaccessible.

> > p.s. thanks for doing all the footwork of hitting their servers, I don't
> > even really know where to begin :)
> 
> no problem -- this sort of thing is part of what I do for a living these
> days, and I was really bored at work :-)

LOL :)  Cool.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #253:

We've run out of licenses


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 17:10, Bryan Phinney wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2003 07:18 pm, Michael Holt wrote:
> 
> > I'm wondering if they have something set on their server to drop any
> > email that doesn't show an fqdn in the received string.  Maybe to keep
> > from getting email from a server that's been taken over as a relay?  If
> > this is the case, how would I set postfix so that emails originating
> > from other boxes on my lan would appear to be the server sending them?
> > So that the above headers taken from both webmail and client machines
> > would look identical?
> 
> Michael, is it possible that you are using a different "From:" address when 
> using Squirrelmail versus when you use Evolution?  They may be whitelisting 
> based on the From listed as the sender.

No - that stuff is all the same.  
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #371:

Incorrectly configured static routes on the corerouters.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 16:34, Jack Coates wrote:

> Their server won't accept connections from anything that I have access
> too, and I have access to some pretty high traffic (and legit :-) mail
> servers  -- I don't see how they can get mail from any one. They don't
> even give the chance to AUTH. Since that server is the only MX record
> listed in their zone, they're self-blackholed. My guess is they're
> whitelisting, which IMHO is The Beginning Of The End.

Ok, I don't fully understand the term 'whitelisting', but I assume that
it means only specified senders get in?  I'm able to send to any account
I've ever tried in the past (hotmail, yahoo, my server when using
squirrelmail), how could this be setup?  I've got to be doing something
wrong, I just don't know what.

p.s. thanks for doing all the footwork of hitting their servers, I don't
even really know where to begin :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
100. Uh-oh.

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 15:40, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 15:16, Michael Holt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 14:38, Jack Coates wrote:
> > 
> > > Try watching a mail session with ethereal sometime... it's just telnet
> > > to port 25, though a server is faster and has fewer typos than a human.
> > > You can send mails though, -- I posted an example of how to do it
> > > earlier today, with the Dead Kennedies quote, but I think it's still
> > > floating around in Sympa.
> > 
> > Ok, I'll check it out :)  I'm curious though, I'm still unable to get
> > through to that address via evolution, but squirrelmail goes through
> > just fine.  Telnet to that address gets access denied.  I tried
> > telnetting to my own server port 25 and it didn't get denied - so -
> > yeah, I believe you.  I'm still confused about why I can't email through
> > postfix to that specific email address.  I tried it from my wife's
> > laptop using win2k and outlook to my test account and the headers looked
> > almost identical to those of evolution.  It obviously works because I'm
> > writing to you right now using evolution.  Something in their server is
> > rejecting me based on something that is happening differently on
> > evolution -- what the heck would it be?  The only thing that I can see
> > that would be different would be the "received" lines in the headers.  
> > 
> > Any thoughts?
> 
> well, I've only sort of been following this, but if one client gets
> access denied with telnet to 25 and the other doesn't, then the first is
> probably tripping a blacklist rule. Does your wife's laptop connect via
> a VPN (hence via a different network)?

Ok, I think this has gotten confused.  My server is hosting web, email,
etc.  You can logon from anywhere if you have an account, and use
webmail.  When I log on to the web mail server, which is sitting in my
living room - behind the router connected to dsl, I can send email to a
particular person.  Now I can also specify that same server as an email
server and connect to it with client machines, i.e., other boxes; with
client mua's, i.e., outlook, evolution, pine, whatever.  When I connect
with outlook for example, the "received" line of my email header ends up
looking like this:

Received:   from 4.35.151.34 (EHLO servername) (4.35.151.34) by
mta130.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:14:06 -0800
Received:   from www.holt-tech.net (unknown
[server.internal.ip.address]) by servername (Postfix) with SMTP id
13833205CFC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:16:15 -0500
(EST)

When I use squirrelmail (my webmail server) it looks like this:

Received:   from 4.35.151.34 (EHLO servername) (4.35.151.34) by
mta130.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:14:06 -0800
Received:   from www.holt-tech.net (unknown
[server.internal.ip.address]) by servername (Postfix) with SMTP id
13833205CFC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:16:15 -0500
(EST)
Received:   from evrtwa1-ar17-4-35-151-34.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net
([4.35.151.34]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user michael) by
server.internal.ip.address with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:16:15 -0800
(PST)

Now, I've changed the ip's and machine name's but you get the idea. 
This is sent to a test account just to see what the headers end up
like.  The problem is that when I email my boss (I'm a contractor and my
point of contact works for this specific company) I get refused and my
email is bounced with this:

connect to
qxssmtp2.qualxserv.com[65.246.197.34]: server refused mail service

Received: from myclientmachine (unknown [192.168.0.4])
by myemailserver (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E918200099

This is just a snippet but the rest is just email information.  I'm not
able to telnet to this person's email server at all, from anywhere.

I'm wondering if they have something set on their server to drop any
email that doesn't show an fqdn in the received string.  Maybe to keep
from getting email from a server that's been taken over as a relay?  If
this is the case, how would I set postfix so that emails originating
from other boxes on my lan would appear to be the server sending them? 
So that the above headers taken from both webmail and client machines
would look identical?

 
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #173:

Recursive traversal of loopback mount points


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 14:38, Jack Coates wrote:

> Try watching a mail session with ethereal sometime... it's just telnet
> to port 25, though a server is faster and has fewer typos than a human.
> You can send mails though, -- I posted an example of how to do it
> earlier today, with the Dead Kennedies quote, but I think it's still
> floating around in Sympa.

Ok, I'll check it out :)  I'm curious though, I'm still unable to get
through to that address via evolution, but squirrelmail goes through
just fine.  Telnet to that address gets access denied.  I tried
telnetting to my own server port 25 and it didn't get denied - so -
yeah, I believe you.  I'm still confused about why I can't email through
postfix to that specific email address.  I tried it from my wife's
laptop using win2k and outlook to my test account and the headers looked
almost identical to those of evolution.  It obviously works because I'm
writing to you right now using evolution.  Something in their server is
rejecting me based on something that is happening differently on
evolution -- what the heck would it be?  The only thing that I can see
that would be different would be the "received" lines in the headers.  

Any thoughts?
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #309:

firewall needs cooling


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 13:37, Jason Williams wrote:

> $ telnet 65.246.197.34 25
> Trying 65.246.197.34...
> Connected to 65.246.197.34.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 521 qxssmtp2.qualxserv.com access denied
> Connection closed by foreign host.

Ok, question -- why would a server let you telnet into port 25?  I would
think that a connection like that would get dropped for sure.

> You may want to consider upgrading to a new version of Postfix. There have 
> been quite a few enhancements as well as security features that have 
> changed since this release. A quick note: If you do upgrade, note that the 
> way rules are applied (UCE specifically) into Postifx 2.x are slightly 
> different than 1.x.

I think I'm going to hold off upgrading pf for just now; time
constraints and all.  I'm planning on migrating the server to mdk9.2
here soon - just waiting to make sure enough release bugs are squashed
:)

> Hope that helps. Let me know if you have any other questions.
> 
> Jason 

Thanks so much for your help!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #266:

All of the packets are empty.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 13:10, Jason Williams wrote:

> I dont see anything in your headers that would warrant them being malicious 
> or spam.
> The only real thing I can see is that when you logged in remotely, its 
> showing the verizon connection that was initiated.

Is this a bad thing?  This is just saying where I logged in from, no? 
My router does NAT loopback, so I just log onto my webpage using my
domain name and then hit the webmail page and log in.  I assumed that
this is what is being added here.

> There are no other messages regarding why it was blocked? No bounce backs?

connect to
qxssmtp2.qualxserv.com[65.246.197.34]: server refused mail service

I didn't save any others.  It's only been a few, but since I just tried
using a different system, everything is suspect.

> What version of postfix are you running?

postfix-1.1.11-4mdk / Mandrake 9.0

> Jason 

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #194:

We only support a 1200 bps connection.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] postfix headers

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
Hey all, 
Sorry for the long post, but I'm confused here.  I've been using
squirrelmail for several months now, but I wanted to switch to a local
mail client.  Squirrelmail really is local because my postfix email
server is behind the firewall along with my host machines.  I want to
use the webmail when I'm outside the firewall and
Evolution/Pine/Outlook/whatever when I'm inside.  Anyway, I've gotten a
couple of returned emails since I've started using evolution saying that
the destination server refused the email.  I don't have any way of
testing their systems to see why it's being rejected so I just tried
sending a couple messages to an external test account on yahoo and then
comparing the headers.  The following are two sets of headers; the first
is from squirrelmail where I was logged on remotely to webmail but from
the same side of the firewall.  The second is from evolution, also on
the same side of the firewall.

**

X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via 66.218.93.72; Wed, 12
Nov 2003 12:14:06 -0800
X-YahooFilteredBulk:4.35.151.34
Return-Path:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received:   from 4.35.151.34 (EHLO servername) (4.35.151.34) by
mta130.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:14:06 -0800
Received:   from www.holt-tech.net (unknown
[server.internal.ip.address]) by servername (Postfix) with SMTP id
13833205CFC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:16:15 -0500
(EST)
Received:   from evrtwa1-ar17-4-35-151-34.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net
([4.35.151.34]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user michael) by
server.internal.ip.address with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:16:15 -0800
(PST)
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Subject:another test
From:   "Michael Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Add to Address Book
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0
MIME-Version:   1.0
Content-Type:   text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Content-Length: 4

***

X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via 66.218.93.80; Wed, 12
Nov 2003 12:00:02 -0800
X-YahooFilteredBulk:4.35.151.34
Return-Path:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received:   from 4.35.151.34 (EHLO servername) (4.35.151.34) by
mta156.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:00:02 -0800
Received:   from machinename (unknown [host.internal.ip]) by
servername (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0606E205CFC for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:02:11 -0500 (EST)
Subject:test
From:   "Michael Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Add to Address Book
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:   text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version:   1.0
X-Mailer:   Ximian Evolution 1.4.4-8mdk
Date:   Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:01:59 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
Content-Length: 314



Both messages were written in ascii (html turned off) but I've noticed
that they don't have the same type of tags at the bottom.  The
"received" lines for both also seem to be quite different.  What I need
to know is, are these differences enough to keep my email from getting
through on some systems?  Could someone be considering my email to be
potentially dangerous or spam or something of that nature because of
these headers?

Thanks in advance,
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
97. Go get your backup tape. (You _do_ have a backup tape?)

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:12, James Sparenberg wrote:

> Eric,  Don't haunt Newbie so to me it's just proof that great minds run
> on the same wavelength. *grin*
> 
> James

Alright, let's not get carried away now ;)
> 
> ______

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
18. where did you say those backup tapes were kept?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:29, Artemio wrote:
> Michael Holt wrote:
> > I don't have any parallel devices to connect to my machine, so that's a
> > moot point for me.  Have you tried removing acpi from your lilo?
> 
> Well, yes - but in mdk 9.1 - and it didn't change anything for me. 

How about on 9.2?  Like I said, I've been living with this for quite a
while now; if it hadn't been for noting that it worked briefly during an
upgrade, I probably would have just continued to use it as-is.
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
SysAdmin excuse #128:

Power Company having EMP problems with their reactor


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 00:43, Peter Watson wrote:

> PS. I missed the most important difference. Kino allows unlimited DV 
> capture, M$ moviemaker appears to allow the same, but the resultant files 
> are somehow crippled so that they appear to other applications to be only 
> 7008 frames long. This severely limits your ability to do any post 
> processing, such as conversion to MPEG 1/2 in order to master a VCD or 
> DVD, I don't know how or why this is done but it is typical of M$ to build 
> in restrictions to otherwise functional software, look at XP Home 
> networking abilities. The overall result is that moviemaker is really only 
> a toy and cannot be cosidered for any attempt to produce serious video 
> output.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Pete

Cool!  Thanks for the very detailed response!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
94. Hey!! The suns don't do this.

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


RE: [expert] Q: Failure to boot installed Linux PPC 9.1 on G3

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 05:58, Stew Benedict wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Morten S. Mortensen wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi Stew B. & all,
> > 
> > Move to "cooker-ppc"? Because the "cooker"-version tries to repair this or what?
> > There is not much "cooker" over the 9.1 version, is there?
> > 
> 
> "ccoker-ppc" is a bit of a misnomer.  It's a general purpose "Mandrake on 
> PowerPC" list, both for the development and released versions.  I just 
> suggested moving so we don't annoy the "x86" folks with Apple noise :)

I'm not annoyed, if that counts :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
37. The sprinkler system isn't supposed to leak is it?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 20:50, Eric Huff wrote:
> > I just upgraded to 9.2 though, and noticed that when I
> > shutdown the machine, it actually powered all the way off; instead
> > of just stopping at the end and waiting for me to turn it off. 
> 
> Do you have a printer hooked up to the paralell port?  If so check
> and see if it works.
> 
> On my comcrap, i seem to have a choice: run acpi or run the paralell
> port.  i can't do both...
> 
> eric

Hmmm...
I just removed the acpi=ht line from lilo.conf and now all is well.
I'm not sure if that disables acpi - I would think so.  Anyway, the
machine shuts off now.  
I don't have any parallel devices to connect to my machine, so that's a
moot point for me.  Have you tried removing acpi from your lilo?
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
40. The backup procedure works fine, but the restore is tricky!

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] manually start / stop gpilotd

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:11, Bill Mullen wrote:

> Also worth knowing is that "view" is equivalent to "vi -R" (and quite a 
> bit easier to remember) ... "gview" is the same as "gvim -R", also ...

That's not nearly as fun though!  Want a rush?  Logon as root and start
randomly opening files with vi :)

Seriously though, thanks for the 'view' command.  I'll switch to that I
think, it seems easier to remember - especially if I can still override
with :w!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
-2. `We are shutting xxx down from 8.30 to 10.30 on Thursday to install
a
new tape drive.'
The machine was up at about 2pm sans-tape drive

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] firebird / evolution new session

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 08:03, Jack Coates wrote:

> use this attached script as your default browser instead -- it opens new
> tabs if there's already a browser open, or opens a new browser if
> necessary. Set up for Mozilla now, but making it work with Firebird or
> whatever would be fairly simple from the examples. Thanks to Ciff Wells,
> who wrote it.

Hey Jack,
Just an update; script works great!  Since I don't use mozilla (I use
firebird) I just linked 'mozilla' in my path to MozFbird so I didn't
have to mess with the script at all. 
Thanks again!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
18. where did you say those backup tapes were kept?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] firebird / evolution new session

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 08:03, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 07:36, Michael Holt wrote:
> > Hey,
> > I just started using evolution and I've found that when I click on a
> > link from my email, it tries to start a new session of mozilla.  When
> > this happens, mozilla complains about having a session already open. 
> > How do I make it look to see if an instance is already open?  I imagine
> > that this is probably more to do with how mozilla gets called to begin
> > with, so; I used gnome control center to change the default handler to
> > mozillafirebird %s -- I thought the %s was what was supposed to take
> > care of my problem?
> > 
> > tia
> 
> use this attached script as your default browser instead -- it opens new
> tabs if there's already a browser open, or opens a new browser if
> necessary. Set up for Mozilla now, but making it work with Firebird or
> whatever would be fairly simple from the examples. Thanks to Ciff Wells,
> who wrote it.

:
thanks!!!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
-8. Ignore the errors.  It complains too much.

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] firebird / evolution new session

2003-11-12 Thread Michael Holt
Hey,
I just started using evolution and I've found that when I click on a
link from my email, it tries to start a new session of mozilla.  When
this happens, mozilla complains about having a session already open. 
How do I make it look to see if an instance is already open?  I imagine
that this is probably more to do with how mozilla gets called to begin
with, so; I used gnome control center to change the default handler to
mozillafirebird %s -- I thought the %s was what was supposed to take
care of my problem?

tia
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
36. It is only a minor upgrade, the system should be back up in
a few hours.  ( This is said on a monday afternoon.)

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mirroring contents of old drive onto new drive

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Noble
Use rsync:

rsync -az /old /new

Mike

Tom McLaughlin wrote:
Hi all, I have an 80 gig xfs formatted drive that I use for data
storage.  The drive is almost full so I have ordered a new 200 gig drive
to replace it.  Now I need to figure out how to mirror the contents of
the old drive onto the new one.  I had thought about mirroring the
drives using `dd` but I don't think that's the right way to go since the
drives are not the same size.  From reading the xfsdump man page it
looks like the following should take care of my needs:
# xfsdump -J - /old | xfsrestore -J - /new

Are there any other arguments that I should add to xfsdump or xfsrestore
such as blocksize?  Are there any caveats to doing this considering the
amount of data to be transfered or to be aware of when using this
method?  Am I going in the complete wrong direction and should instead
be using something else?  All help is greatly appreciated.  If you can't
tell, I'm super paranoid about screwing this up.  Thanks!
Tom




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Noble
If you have not setup a filter in procmail, here is what mine looks
like:
## File all spam mail
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
SPAM
This is catching 98% of all spam received.  I would not suggest sending
spam to /dev/null, by sending it to a folder you have the ability to
make sure spammassassin does not think some is spam when it really is
not.  I also have my mailreader to show all attachements as attachements
and not displayed inline this way I do not have to actually see the junk
mail.
Mike

Schwartz Avi wrote:
On Nov 10, 2003, at 13:27, Praedor Atrebates wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, this really irritates me.  I have the latest spamassassin.  It is 
running
in daemon mode.  I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that is
identified as spam.  I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to
identify certain messages as spam...BUT THEY KEEP GETTING THROUGH!

I don't know how you set spamassasin, but in my installation all it does 
is tag the message as spam in the headers and I still had to create a 
rule (in my case using sieve) to move all this garbage to a spam folder.

Avi




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 16:26, Peter Watson wrote:

> No it can do more things IMO:-
> 
> Create titles - do fewer but better effects - export video in more
 ^ ^^
>  
> formats(like divx) - show frame numbers (as well as times)when editing 
> -more flexible editing tools.
> 
> Regards
> Pete

Ok, that's what I'm looking for.  I want to be able to do some of those
"better" effects.  So, how would I approach that?  Moviemaker can take
still jpegs and turn them into transitions like a page flip for
example.  How would I accomplish that on linux?  Is that where the gimp
would come in?  I guess I'm looking for any plugins or whatever that
could go into kino.

I'm going to play more with kino and cinelerra and see how it works out.

Thanks!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
If Microsoft built cars, you could only have one person in the car at a
time, unless you bought "Car95" or "CarNT". But, then you would have to
buy
more seats.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] manually start / stop gpilotd

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 16:33, Jack Coates wrote:

> yeah, if file says it's a script, then you vi -R the script and see what
> it does (-R means read-only :-)

Yeah, pulled that one before ... ouch
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_  www.mandrakelinux.com
===<


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 16:42, Peter Watson wrote:

> Kino will allow you to do some simple video editing and includes effects 
> like fades and barn doors also you can create titles etc from gifs or 
> jpegs (hint use gimp to create them), it is not as comprehensive as 
> premier but miles better than M$ moviemaker.  I have not usef cinelerra 
> but from what I hear it is very good, probably equal or better than 
> premier
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Pete

So are you saying 'miles better' because it's m$?
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrakelinux.com 
==<
19. hey, what does mkfs do?

--Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:50, James Sparenberg wrote:

 
> > APCI Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
> errr  APIC sorry.

> > James

APIC AIPC ACIP AICP APCI ACPI 

I CNA'T TKAE IT AYNMROE!!!

:P
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_  www.mandrakelinux.com
===<


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:34, James Sparenberg wrote:

> ACPI is part of Linear Algebra and beyond my ken. *grin*
> 
> James

Yeah, thanks.  I wasn't screwed up enough with just two definitions :)
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_  www.mandrakelinux.com
===<


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 15:26, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 08:05, Michael Holt wrote:
> > James Sparenberg mused:
> > 
> > > There was/is one that was by many considered to be studio quality
> > > called
> > > broadcast 2000 You can find the files here
> > >
> > > http://www.tux.org/pub/packages/orphaned/broadcast2000/
> > >
> > > in source form and If you go to rpmfind or rpm.pbone.net you might
> > > find
> > > a src rpm as well.
> > >
> > > James
> > 
> > Thanks James,
> > I d/l'd it and am going to start playing with it now.  I'm curious
> > though; cinelerra is supposed to be the replacement for bcast2k
> > and I googled around for bcast; do you know why they stopped
> > supporting bcast?
> 
> Some of what they where doing was patented after the fact and they felt
> that the chances of running into expensive lawsuits wasn't worth the
> risk.
> 
> James
Ahh, I see.  Thanks James
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_  www.mandrakelinux.com
===<


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] manually start / stop gpilotd

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 14:13, Jack Coates wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] html]# urpmf gpilotd
> libgnome-pilot2:/usr/lib/libgpilotd.so.2
> libgnome-pilot2:/usr/lib/libgpilotd.so.2.1.0
> libgnome-pilot2:/usr/lib/libgpilotdcm.so.2
> libgnome-pilot2:/usr/lib/libgpilotdcm.so.2.0.2
> libgnome-pilot2:/usr/lib/libgpilotdconduit.so.2
> libgnome-pilot2:/usr/lib/libgpilotdconduit.so.2.0.3
> gnome-pilot:/usr/bin/gpilotd-control-applet
> gnome-pilot:/usr/bin/gpilotd-session-wrapper
> gnome-pilot:/usr/lib/gpilotd
> ...
> 
> ah hah. There's your gpilotd... that session-wrapper thing might be
> useful... try using file on it, and if it's a script then it might tell
> you something useful.

You da man!!  :)

Ok, I ran /usr/lib/gpilotd and all is well.  Now, what did 'file' tell
me beside the fact that this was an executable file?  I noticed that you
said "if it's a *script* then it might tell you something useful."  
I tried running file on some scripts; it seems to describe what type of
scripts you're looking at.  Is that what you were getting at?

Thanks Jack!
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA   (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_  www.mandrakelinux.com
===<


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 11:13, Artemio wrote:
> > Hey, awesome!
> > I had "acpi=ht"; I removed that line altogether and added "noapic"
> > for kicks.
> 
> So - did it work?

Yeah, and I removed the noapic line because evidently, I don't need it!
:)

> The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing
> 
> ACPI = Advanced Configuration and Power Interface
> 
> APIC = Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
> 
> 
> ...dictd at localhost port 2628
> 
> 
> :-P

Yes and thank you for that too!  I'm getting rug-burn on my nose now :)

I'm off to see if I can find some other stupid question to ask now!

Thanks again :)
-- 
Michael Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] manually start / stop gpilotd

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 11:57, Jack Coates wrote:

> no it isn't, that's the control panel applet, which happens to start
> gpilotd for you if it isn't already running. Just run gpilotd from a
> startup script.

Ok, if I do 'which gpilotd' it's nowhere to be found.  If I do 'gpilotd'
from the command, I get --bash command not found.  In fact, if you do
'gpil' you get:

gpilotd-control-applet   gpilotd-session-wrapper  gpilot-install-file

The actual 'gpilotd' seems to be buried somewhere.  I tried doing 'vi
gpilotd-control-applet' just to see if I could see what is happening,
but it wasn't very helpful for me.


> you're lucky that it works at all, gnome-pilot is one finicky pile of
> junk -- er, fine piece of software. :-)

:)




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
Tim Sawchuck mused:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:48:46 -0800 (PST)
> "Michael Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed on electronic
> parchment:
>
>> Artemio mused:
>> > I may not be right, but this can be something connected with
>> ACPI.
>> >
>> > If in /etc/lilo.conf for main "linux" image you have
>> "acpi=off" in
>> > "append"
>> > string - try to change it to "acpi=on" and say "lilo" to
>> > re-install the
>> > loader. Or, if you have "acpi=on" try to set it to "off".
>>
>> Hey, awesome!
>> I had "acpi=ht"; I removed that line altogether and added
>> "noapic"
>> for kicks.
>>
>> By the way, which is it?  ACPI or APCI?  Or are they two
>> different
>
> Two *very* different things!  Thanks to Google:
>
> ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface)  www.acpi.info/
>
> The 82093AA I/O Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller
> (IOAPIC) provides multi-processor interrupt management
>
> www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/290566.htm
>
> Tim

hehe, I thought that was just a type-o!  :)

thanks

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] manually start / stop gpilotd

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
Jack Coates mused:
> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 09:42, Michael Holt wrote:
>> Jack Coates mused:
>> > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 07:58, Michael Holt wrote:
>> >> How can I start / stop the gpilotd manually?
>> >> I want it to get started when the machine boots but I'd like
>> to
>> >> be
>> >> able to shut it off manually.
>> >
>> > In a terminal, type
>> >
>> > pkill gpilotd
>> >
>>
>> AAA!!!  DUH!!  I'm sorry I'm very distracted this morning :/
>>
>> Ok, killing the thing isn't really a problem - starting it when
>> the machine boots would be nice. :)
>> I got a little frustrated trying to find the actual 'gpilotd'
>> on/off button.  I'd like to be able to run the gpilotd as an
>> init
>> script, but I don't know where it lives.  I did some googling
>> around but had no luck.
>>
>> Anyway, thanks Jack!
>
> NP :-)
>
> if you've got a sessions-capable window manager, your configger
> will
> have some sort of a "start these programs" tool. Otherwise, put an
> executable script into ~/Desktop/Autostart/ and call it from
> there. If
> you go that route, look our for how you edit the script --
> Anything in
> the folder will be executed, including ~ backup files.

It's not so much that I can't start the program; the start program
is 'gpilotd-control-applet'.  The thing is, I just want to put my
visor in it's cradle and hit the sync button - I've been using
jpilot, but you have to hit the button on the cradle then click
the sync button on jpilot and sometimes that doesn't work and if
you don't hurry, it times out and you have to start over on the
series of clicks and button pushes.  Gnome-pilot is supposed to
have the gpilotd (daemon) which runs in the background.  Now once
you've started it via the applet / dialog (which also brings up a
dialog box asking you to confirm the device and settings), you can
hit the cradle button to sync and it works great.  The problem is
that I don't leave this machine on, so I don't want to have to
manually start that applet each time and even if it does start
automatically, I still need to hit the 'ok' button each time.  I
just want it to start silently in the background.  I can't seem to
find any documentation that covers what I want it to do.

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
Artemio mused:
> I may not be right, but this can be something connected with ACPI.
>
> If in /etc/lilo.conf for main "linux" image you have "acpi=off" in
> "append"
> string - try to change it to "acpi=on" and say "lilo" to
> re-install the
> loader. Or, if you have "acpi=on" try to set it to "off".

Hey, awesome!
I had "acpi=ht"; I removed that line altogether and added "noapic"
for kicks.

By the way, which is it?  ACPI or APCI?  Or are they two different
things?

Thanks though, it works now!


-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] manually start / stop gpilotd

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
Jack Coates mused:
> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 07:58, Michael Holt wrote:
>> How can I start / stop the gpilotd manually?
>> I want it to get started when the machine boots but I'd like to
>> be
>> able to shut it off manually.
>
> In a terminal, type
>
> pkill gpilotd
>

AAA!!!  DUH!!  I'm sorry I'm very distracted this morning :/

Ok, killing the thing isn't really a problem - starting it when
the machine boots would be nice. :)
I got a little frustrated trying to find the actual 'gpilotd'
on/off button.  I'd like to be able to run the gpilotd as an init
script, but I don't know where it lives.  I did some googling
around but had no luck.

Anyway, thanks Jack!

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
James Sparenberg mused:

> There was/is one that was by many considered to be studio quality
> called
> broadcast 2000 You can find the files here
>
> http://www.tux.org/pub/packages/orphaned/broadcast2000/
>
> in source form and If you go to rpmfind or rpm.pbone.net you might
> find
> a src rpm as well.
>
> James

Thanks James,
I d/l'd it and am going to start playing with it now.  I'm curious
though; cinelerra is supposed to be the replacement for bcast2k
and I googled around for bcast; do you know why they stopped
supporting bcast?

Thanks again

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] manually start / stop gpilotd

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
How can I start / stop the gpilotd manually?
I want it to get started when the machine boots but I'd like to be
able to shut it off manually.

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] pc doesn't shutdown

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Holt
I haven't had my pc shutdown all the way for quite some time.  I
was using mdk9 then 9.1 and now 9.2 and I've just gotten used to
it.  I just upgraded to 9.2 though, and noticed that when I
shutdown the machine, it actually powered all the way off; instead
of just stopping at the end and waiting for me to turn it off. 
That was on an upgrade type install from 9.1 to 9.2.  For other
reasons, I did a reinstall of 9.2, wiping the old partitions to
start out fresh.  Now I'm back to having to hit the power button
to turn the machine off.  I know this is vague, but any ideas
where to look?  Now it's going to bug me.
The machine is an Asus a7m266-d dual athlon board.  I haven't done
any of the bios updates because they don't offer any improvements
that I could tell.

Thanks, Mike

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-10 Thread Michael Holt
Hey all,
M$ has a somewhat new program called 'moviemaker' which you can
download for free for winxp.  I would like to know if there is
something comparible for linux.  I was asked if I could help with
some video production at my church and they want to use Adobe
Premier.  As always, I would like to introduce as much opensource
as possible.  I haven't done much video editing, and what I have
done was on Windows, several years ago.  I would like something
that could handle both jpeg compilation like moviemaker and also
something that could do video transitions with effects similar to
premier.  Being able to make photos 'shatter' into the next photo
or have like a 'page-flip' effect.  Same with the video; maybe
being able to 'twist' the video and merge into other footage.

Any suggestions?

Things I've looked at already are:

cinelerra
kino
mjpeg
filmgimp

As I've said, I don't have much video editing experience; if one
of the programs I've already mentioned does what I've asked, feel
free to point that out :)

Thanks!

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Michael Noble
It has been a while since I last dd a disk drive (it is best to make
them the same type and size).  Assuming that the old disk is /dev/hda
and the new disk is /dev/hdb the following command should work:
dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb

Then make the new disk /dev/hda and the system should boot.  As I said
it has been a while and may have the basic command a little off.  But
the original (noisy) drive will still be in working order.
If you have it, I have also heard that the latest Norton Ghost will also
work.
Mike

Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 09 Nov 2003 5:06 pm, Michael Noble wrote:

Anne,

Usually when a drive starts to make noise, it is caused by the
bearings. I have had drives last for years while making noise.  But
if this is a new drive (less than a year) you will probably be able
to get it replaced.  But since you will have to deal with the
manufacturer of the drive (which will mean down time) it would
probably do best to go out and purchase another drive replace the
noisy drive and then get it replaced.  Once replaced, you will have
a spare drive for future use.
The odd thing is, it's for short periods, just a few times a day.

Thanks to all for comments/suggestions.  This is really bad timing for 
me, as I have so many commitments over the next few days, but I don't 
think I should ignore this.  I'll fit it all in as best I can.


For the copy, I would suggest dd rather than cp.

OK - I'll RTFMP 

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Michael Noble
Anne,

Usually when a drive starts to make noise, it is caused by the bearings.
I have had drives last for years while making noise.  But if this is
a new drive (less than a year) you will probably be able to get it
replaced.  But since you will have to deal with the manufacturer of the
drive (which will mean down time) it would probably do best to go out
and purchase another drive replace the noisy drive and then get it
replaced.  Once replaced, you will have a spare drive for future use.
For the copy, I would suggest dd rather than cp.

Mike

Anne Wilson wrote:
Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.  It 
is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have unmounted 
all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still happening, so I 
have to assume that it is the new drive.

We have had workmen in the house for over 2 weeks, and there has been 
an incredible amount of dust.  I cleaned out the inside of the box as 
well as I could after the main part of the work was complete, but it 
was only at about time that the noise started.  I think it is when 
writing to swap.

I suspect that dust has got in where I cannot follow.  How likely is 
that?

I wonder if I should be buying another drive of the same size, then 
doing an overnight cp -a to the new drive, then attempting to use 
rsync to keep them mirrored, just in case.  What do you think?

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] fetchmail not working on 9.2

2003-11-09 Thread Michael Noble
I installed 9.2 all the patches and fetchmail does not work.  I
can go back to 9.0 and fetchmail works.
Has anybody gotten fetchmail to work on 9.2, if so what is the trick?
Mike


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Autofs and hiding mount points

2003-11-05 Thread Michael Noble
By default Autofs hides indirect mounts till it is used.  Is there
any way to prevent this behavior.  I realize that this is actually
a nice security by obscurity feature, but my users do not always
know the directories inside the indirect path and being able to see
the directory name would really be a benefit.
Mike


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: Redhat discontinued? was: Re: [expert] Mandrake Clubs

2003-11-04 Thread Michael Adams
On 04 Nov 2003 09:35:17 -0500
Brian V Bonini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 22:59, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 17:02, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > > On Monday 03 November 2003 07:01 pm, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> > > > Carroll Grigsby wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday 02 November 2003 09:03 am, Brian V Bonini wrote:
> > > > >>Not exactly a tech questions but:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Where can I find a list of differences between the different
> > > > >club>membership levels, assuming there are differences?
> > > > >
> > > > > Brian:
> > > > > The Club FAQ gives some help, although IMHO it could be more
> > > > > complete:
> > > > > http://www.mandrakeclub.com/article.php?sid=1294&mode=nocomments
> > > > > -- cmg
> > > >
> > > > I agree they need to be more clear. They explain "Standard vs
> > > > Silver and above". But not Silver vs Gold, or Gold vs Platinum.
> > > >
> > > > It would be nice to get some special stuff as a Gold or Platinum
> > > > user, like real ftp of iso's instead of bittorrent... :)
> > > 
> > > Brian:
> > > Gold and Platinum memberships are targeted at corporate sponsors
> > > -- as in folks with big bucks to spend. I don't think that they
> > > get any special benefits beyond those of a Silver member.
> > > -- cmg
> > > 
> > 
> > And it works like an umbrella membership for all employee systems.  
> > 
> > James
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the info, just looking to support it in some way so we
> don't end up like RedHat. I must be slow on getting news this week but
> I just learned of this:
> http://www.redhat.com/solutions/migration/rhl/rhn
> Probably a good time for mdk to have their ducks in a row, I'm
> guessing there will be RH users looking to move elsewhere since RH is
> bailing on them.
> 

Redhat are not bailing. They have forked. They have there commercial
side and then there is Fedora.

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Got hands on RAID-1 or RAID-5?

2003-10-31 Thread Michael Adams
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:52:29 -0500
Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Friday 31 October 2003 03:33 am, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > I'm planning to try RAID-1 or RAID-5. Does anyone have any
> > experience on this? Can you pls tell me about it or give me an url?
> > Thanks guys.
> 
> I use  RAID 1 here on a small samba server.  Very easy to set up and
> get going.
> 
> There are a couple of really good HOWTO's on this topic over at
> tldp.org-- 
> /g
> 
> "Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
> a dog it's too dark to read" -Groucho Marx
> 
> 

RAID 5 is the best, no arguement. It requires three disks though. It
allows for one disk to be removed on failure, a new disk to be
installed, and the data to be rebuilt from the other two disks.
Excellent for mission critical stuff. The data effectively gets written
1.5 times across the three disks.

No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was always better
anyway:)

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] more msec questions

2003-10-30 Thread Michael Holt
Michael Holt mused:
> Hi ... me again :/
> I'm at msec 4, which defaults to 6 days on password aging.  I've
> used drakconf to set password aging to several different numbers
> and I've tried setting my changes in level.local - no good, still
> stays at 6 days.  I've also tried restarting all services and even
> reboot the machine - still not happening.  Thanks for any
> suggestions...

I'll answer my own post...
I did chage -M on the individual users and it seems to have stuck;
why wouldn't that work through my previous methods?  thanks


-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
"So in Christ we who are many form one body, and each member
belongs to all the others."  Romans 12:5

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] more msec questions

2003-10-30 Thread Michael Holt
Hi ... me again :/
I'm at msec 4, which defaults to 6 days on password aging.  I've
used drakconf to set password aging to several different numbers
and I've tried setting my changes in level.local - no good, still
stays at 6 days.  I've also tried restarting all services and even
reboot the machine - still not happening.  Thanks for any
suggestions...

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
"So in Christ we who are many form one body, and each member
belongs to all the others."  Romans 12:5

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] updates to 9.2

2003-10-29 Thread Michael Noble
I just reloaded my 9.2 and installed updates.  Now I not only do not
have any screen savers but the menus are almost completely empty.  Some
of the Start option menus are completely gone.  I can not even get a
terminal started.
I have been fond of Mandrake but this is really a disappointment when
it goes form bad to worse.  If this is the state of Mandrake then new
users will be turned away and never come back.
I am not trying to put down Mandrake, but I am really starting to get
feed up with the problems.
Can somebody tell me what is going on?

Thanks
Mike

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Packet writing to CDRW

2003-10-29 Thread Michael Adams
On 29 Oct 2003 18:32:05 +1100
Mark Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Well since the announcement of the packet drivers and Mandrake, does
> anyone know how the packet writing works in Mandrake 9.2, I mean it
> would be really cool just to use a CDRW device as a removable drive
> which can be written to on the fly.
> 
> Cheers
> Mark 
> 

Saved this link which someone used to good effect.
http://hints.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/cdrw-hint.txt

Are you ex Ericson NZ, Mark? I seem to recognise the name.

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] OT Verizon dsl

2003-10-27 Thread Michael Holt
Daniel Anderson mused:
> Hi,
>   This may be a bit off topic but it does involve Linux. I,m
> considering
> getting Verizon dsl, since it is now available in my area, and my
> wireless connection is not reliable. I had a Verizon dialup
> account once
> for about three years, with no problems, until one day I could no
> longer
> connect to the mail servers unless I used windows. Are any of you
> using
> Verizon dsl, and if so are there any problems with using Linux?
> Thanks,
> Dan

Not a problem here.  I've been using Verizon for like 3-4 years
without any problems to speak of.  I use a hardware router and run
a server, etc.

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
"So in Christ we who are many form one body, and each member
belongs to all the others."  Romans 12:5

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] msec level 4

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Holt
Bryan Phinney mused:

> I would guess that something is either not configured correctly,
> you have
> installed some software that has changed the default settings, or
> you are
> hitting a different machine than you think you are hitting.  I
> have tried
> this on my web server which is also set to msec level 4 and it
> does NOT work.
> Telnet connections are refused, just like SSH was initially until
> I opened
> that up using hosts.allow.
>
> It is possible that you have altered your hosts.deny file and the
> cron job
> that is supposed to change it back simply hasn't run yet, but it
> should get
> around to it.  However, default at msec level 4 is to create a
> hosts.deny
> file that denies all.  Until you explicitly allow connections in
> hosts.allow
> or remove hosts.deny, it should be refusing all connections.
> --
> Bryan Phinney
> Software Test Engineer

Hmm...
I´m going to have to do some more playing around.  I´ll let you
know what I broke ;)

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨For we are God´s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good
works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.¨  Eph. 2:10

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] msec level 4

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Holt
Bill Mullen mused:

> I don't run telnet (naturally ), but I'd guess that access to
> it is
> probably controlled by xinetd, rather than by /etc/hosts.allow. If
> that's
> the case, you'll have an /etc/xinetd.d/telnet[d] file where this
> sort of
> thing can be configured. After you've made any changes to that
> file, the
> xinetd service would need to be restarted, for those changes to
> "take".

Actually, I was just playing with my linux box earlier and found
that I can indeed ssh into the server.  When I had the trouble, I
had been running Windows 2000 from the same box.

Some background...

I have several small hdd´s that a friend gave me (4G) which I use
to configure different systems on so that I can get familiar with
them.  I loaded win2k on such a drive and put it in a pull out bay
and booted the system.  I just used the same static ip that the
regular system uses ´cause I didn´t want to add another host to my
server.  This was fine except that the machine name was different.
 I added that to the hosts file on the server.  Anyway, I assume
that my original problem must have been that I didn´t identify the
Windows box the same as the linux box (ip, machine name, fqdn).

As far as the telnet-server - done ;)  I actually hadn´t realized
that I had the server part installed -- doh!

> Be sure to "urpme telnet-server" sometime soon, though! ;)
>
> HTH!

Yes!  It does!  Thanks

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨For we are God´s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good
works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.¨  Eph. 2:10

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] msec level 4

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Holt
Good morning,
I´ve got another msec question.  I was working on a different
computer  on my lan and hadn´t put it´s id in my hosts file on my
server yet.  I was lazy and didn´t feel like getting on a system
which had access (for ssh that is) so I was trying different toys
to see which had access.  I couldn´t get on user accounts using
ftp, or ssh, etc, but then I tried telnet and got right in.  I
though, ´hmm, that´s odd...´
I´m also able to get in using my domain name - which I´m not able
to do using ssh.  I´m confused; why can I telnet get right in but
ssh is blocked?  I know the obvious answer - remove telnet from
the server - but I would like more information about this before
removing the symptom.

Thanks

--
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨For we are God´s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good
works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.¨  Eph. 2:10

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] where are urpmi commands for 9.2?

2003-10-25 Thread Michael Adams
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:04:59 -0500
Praedor Atrebates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Never mind.  I found what I wanted (updates, plf, texstar), however, I
> am presently running 9.1 and plan to wait for my 9.2 CDs before I
> upgrade.  Is there a way to use urpmi to download rpms without
> installing them?  I can save them with the --noclean option, of
> course, but I do not necessarily want to install anything right now
> because of dependency issues best solved by installing 9.2.
> 
> praedor
> 

Just find a mirror and FTP the updates to a directory of your choice.
Easy URPMI should locate a mirror for updates for you.
ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandrake/updates/9.2/
as an example. Suck everything in the directory except /SRPMS/ unless
yuo plan to roll your own (all up, about 250MB and rising).

gFTP is a reasonable GUI tool.

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mandrake releases bug fixes for MDK 9.2

2003-10-25 Thread Michael Adams
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:20:29 -0400
Glenn Burkhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 17:20, James Conner wrote:
> > For those on the MDK security mailing list you will already know. 
> > For those that aren't, check the archives(it's too large to repost
> > here).  These updates fix quite a few of the bugs that have been
> > troubling people lately.  Glad to see that Mandrake is on top of
> > this to release patches.  Granted, it would have been nice to have
> > flawless, bug-free release. :)
> > 
> > Jim
> 
> I've just looked at the update page, and I'm shocked to see how many
> packages are affected by MDKA-2003:020 (about 60!!).  That's got to be
> a new record for a new release.  For this many packages, and the
> severity of some of the bugs, Mandrake would be wise to include these
> new packages in their boxed sets, if they want folks to buy 9.3, or
> whatever the next release is.  It's bad enough that over 300mb of
> fixes were posted against 9.1.
> 
> This looks like a QA breakdown.
> 
> 

It won't happen on the boxed sets, they have already been sent to press.

I am hoping however that the download edition, when release to the rest
of the world on mirors will include updated RPM's. This possibility has
only come about because of the policy of releasing it on Mandrake Club
first. It means that the faithfull that know how to update already, can
update, and those that are new to Mandrake will get the "shinier"
product.

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mandrake releases bug fixes for MDK 9.2

2003-10-22 Thread Michael Adams
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:20:17 +
James Conner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> For those on the MDK security mailing list you will already know.  For
> those that aren't, check the archives(it's too large to repost here). 
> These updates fix quite a few of the bugs that have been troubling
> people lately.  Glad to see that Mandrake is on top of this to release
> patches.  Granted, it would have been nice to have flawless, bug-free
> release. :)
> 
> Jim
> -- 
>  

I'm wondering if the ISO's will be redone before the public release?

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] msec???

2003-10-20 Thread Michael Holt
Wow!  Thanks for all the help Bryan!  I´m going to go through the
list and see what I can start implementing.  Yeah, I do have a
hardware router with port forwarding setup.  I´m going to start
playing with those other tools you mentioned.

Thanks again
-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
There are 10 kinds of people in the world;
those who understand binary, and those who don´t...

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] msec???

2003-10-20 Thread Michael Holt
Bryan Phinney mused:

> Msec level 4 denies everything by default.  Therefore, you must
> explicitly
> allow the things that you want to allow in the hosts.allow file.
> This will
> override the hosts.deny file so that anything that is not allowed
> is denied.
>
> I had the same problem with my web server, once you understand
> that the
> default behavior is to deny, it makes perfect sense.

Yeah, that makes sense.  I was reading different posts on HOW to
allow things though, and trying to find which way would stick
which was confusing.  I put ´All: All´ in my allow file just so I
can make it work and I found a sample allow file on the web that
I´m going to play with when I get home from work today.  Since
you´re running a web server, would you mind posting a copy of
yours?  (/etc/hosts.allow file, that is).
I´ve got kind of an ´all-in-one´ type of server - I don´t really
have the resources to split things up.  I´m running apache,
webmail (postfix, squirrelmail, etc), samba, ftp, ssh, blah; just
pretty much everything - on the same box.  It would be nice to
setup a firewall (other than port fowarding on my router), get
msec all hardened up, and make everything all secure - but I think
I have too many things going to do that.  Anyway, all suggestions
excepted :)

Thanks

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
There are 10 kinds of people in the world;
those who understand binary, and those who don´t...

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] msec???

2003-10-19 Thread Michael Holt
Jack Coates mused:

> Start by read the /usr/share/msec/perm.* files, then apply changes
> to
> /etc/security/perm.local.
>
> Next, did you know that all the msec stuff is in script? Read it,
> quite
> enlightening. /usr/sbin/msec is the wrapper that figures out what
> to do,
> then calls python and bash scripts that live in /usr/share/msec.
> msec.py
> is the really powerful one. Look out for password aging, for
> instance
> :-) The bad news is that IIRC some of this stuff is dependent on
> kernel
> patches like GRSecurity, and so msec is toggling kernel flags that
> can
> only be touched during bootup.

Cool, Thanks Jack

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
There are 10 kinds of people in the world;
those who understand binary, and those who don´t...

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] msec???

2003-10-19 Thread Michael Holt
Ok, I´ve read all the posts I could find and it looks like no one
has had any luck with msec?  I´ve been doing fine forever at
´high´ security; now a friend from work is dogging me about making
things more secure.  Since he´s an m$ guy, I want to prove how
much better *nix can do things and so I am off and ready to make
that server of mine so secure that you can´t get ANYTHING done! 
Well, I´ve succeeded!  I can´t get anything done!

Ok, sorry ´bout that; now here´s my problem:
When I go to msec level 4 - I can´t login to squirrelmail, use
ssh, use ftp - I´m just about completely locked out.  I´ve tried
commenting out the line msec put in /etc/hosts.deny denying all,
but it gets overwritten.  I read a post about using chattr +i, but
I´m using xfs so that´s no good.  I tried adding
´authorize_services (all)´, but that didn´t help.  I would really
like to have secure level 4 or maybe even 5, but I need to be able
to use my computer and I don´t know how to manually set the same
environments without using msec.  What can I do to fix this mess? 
I want the wheel group, etc.

Thanks in advance!

--
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
There are 10 kinds of people in the world;
those who understand binary, and those who don´t...

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Why not use the default directories?

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Adams
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:42:37 -0700
Rolf Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Turgut Kalfaoglu wrote:
> > A general comment: Why doesn't Mandrake, when it's building a new
> > version, does not use the default installation directories of each
> > package? Because otherwise, when we reinstall it, we have a chance
> > of ending up with two versions of the same files!  -turgut
> > 
> > -
> > Turgut Kalfaoglu:  http://www.kalfaoglu.com
> > EgeNet Internet Services: http://www.egenet.com.tr
> > 
> 
> Mandrake strives to conform to the Linux Standards Base and has been
> LSB certified: 
> http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/community/mandrakesoftnews/news?n=/mandrakesoft/products/2381
> 
> 
> The LSB specifies the Filesystem Hiearchy Standard as the authority
> for where files go: 
> http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.3.0/gLSB/gLSB/execenvfhs.html
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/index.html#TOC
> 
> The standards allow for some options and are somewhat open to 
> interpretation.  Different software authors might have different 
> interpretations, implement options differently, or lack compliance
> with these standards.
> 
> Rolf

In other words, it's up to the package authors to come up to speed with
the Linux Standard Base. Mandrake does a good job of squeezing any RPM's
files into the right directories and where necessary makes links
(/etc/rc3.d/ -> /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/).

Any 3rd party package that does comply with LSB installs well in
Mandrake (refer OO.o thread).

-- 
Michael

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] DOS bootdisk??

2003-10-14 Thread Michael Holt
Rob Blomquist mused:
> Is there an image of a DOS boot disk that can be made under Linux
> so that I
> can flash my bios? Now of course, I could find a winders confuser
> to do the
> job, but hey, can it be done on a Linux box?
>
> I was just poking around and found www.bootdisk.com, now which
> image should I
> use to flash it?
>
> Rob
> --
Hey Rob,
I didn't hear back from you whether you wanted that file or not? 
I'll be home around 6:30 - 7:00 tonight - let me know, k?


-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨Now Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of
things not seen¨ Heb. 11:1

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] DOS bootdisk??

2003-10-13 Thread Michael Holt
Rob Blomquist mused:
> Is there an image of a DOS boot disk that can be made under Linux
> so that I
> can flash my bios? Now of course, I could find a winders confuser
> to do the
> job, but hey, can it be done on a Linux box?
>
> I was just poking around and found www.bootdisk.com, now which
> image should I
> use to flash it?
>
> Rob
> --

I´ve got a boot image for you if you like

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨There are 10 kinds of people in the world -
those that understand binary, and those that don´t¨

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Veritas Netbackup

2003-10-12 Thread Michael Noble
I have Veritas Netbackup (master is a SUN Box) and am trying to
get it to backup a Mandrake 9.0 client.  Does anybody have any
experience with this?  The master (SUN) tries to install the
client software on the Mandrake box, but get permission denied.
I have tried adding the master server to /.rhosts /root/.rhosts
and /etc/hosts.equiv and it still does not allow it.
Mike


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] thinkpad buttons; how to enable them?

2003-10-11 Thread Michael Holt
Kwan Lowe mused:

> It depends a lot on your particular window manager, but here is a
> start:
> Run xev in a terminal window to determine what the keycode
> settings are
> for the extra keys.
>
> Use these to populate your local .Xmodmap file to look like:
> keycode 146 = XF86Mail
> keycode 147 = XF86Search

What about those usb keypads that you can attach to a laptop?  Has
anyone tried one under linux?

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨There are 10 kinds of people in the world -
those that understand binary, and those that don´t¨

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Michael Holt
Jack Coates mused:

[snip]

> look at how little the growth is for XP, .NET extensions, all that
> hype.
> Win98 is being abandoned, but for Linux and Win2000. And look at
> the
> huge increase in Mozilla on Windows.

That´s pretty cool!  Maybe a trend?  It´s amazing how many people
I run into nowadays who´ve at least tried linux compared to a
couple of years ago when no one knew what it was.

Just about 5 years ago I was an m$ advocate and balked at mozilla
- times sure change :)

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨There are 10 kinds of people in the world -
those that understand binary, and those that don´t¨

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How to Block IE from a Website

2003-10-10 Thread Michael Holt
HaywireMac mused:
>
> How would one configure Apache so that anyone using IE would be
> met with
> a "nice friendly message" that they are not welcome?

This is REALLY easy.  Here´s a link to read all about:

http://www.devin.com/ieblock_howto.shtml

Server side includes are probably the easiest way to do it; no
need to even mess with apache (other than setting up the ability
to use ssi´s.  It´s been a common practice ever since the browser
plugin wars.  You write one page for the rest of the world and
then a specific page for ie.  You have to save your pages as
.shtml and then make apache aware that you´re using shtml.

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com
<
¨There are 10 kinds of people in the world -
those that understand binary, and those that don´t¨

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >