Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2004-03-18 Thread Job Evers
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:38:05 -0600
John A. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Also, I'm having problems loading X properly. I couldn't get X to run
 at all under 10.0. And for some reason in 9.2, when I set my monitor 
 resolution as a Flat Panel Display 1024 x 768 the edges of the desktop
 
 extend beyond the montor display. In other words, I can't see the 
 perimeter of the desktop, just the center. Any idea why this would be 
 happening?
 

I've been having similar problems.  I use the 852 chipset, which is supposed to be 
similar to the 855.  Might want to take a look at an earlier thread where I asked 
about this:  
[newbie] Intel 852/855 GM Chipset, 1024x768 Resolution

and also:
[newbie] Zoomed display in GUI

If you're still confused after taking a look at those, come back and we'll see what we 
can do.

-- 
Job Evers

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2004-03-18 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 18:30, Lee Wiggers wrote:
  Simple answer for this: PARTITION MAGIC
  
 Or try even, Partition Surprise: GPLed Partition Magic clone

...who said I *PAID* for my copies of Partition Magic...?

stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
--
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
--
The temperature of the aqueous content of an unremittingly ogled
culinary vessel will not achieve 100 degrees on the Celsius scale.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2004-03-18 Thread John A. Smith
I can't seem to find either thread you mentioned in the list archives. 
But they seem to be current only through 11/03. Is this list archived 
somewhere other than: 
http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/newbie/

-john smith

Job Evers wrote:

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:38:05 -0600
John A. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Also, I'm having problems loading X properly. I couldn't get X to run
at all under 10.0. And for some reason in 9.2, when I set my monitor 
resolution as a Flat Panel Display 1024 x 768 the edges of the desktop

extend beyond the montor display. In other words, I can't see the 
perimeter of the desktop, just the center. Any idea why this would be 
happening?

   

I've been having similar problems.  I use the 852 chipset, which is supposed to be similar to the 855.  Might want to take a look at an earlier thread where I asked about this:  
[newbie] Intel 852/855 GM Chipset, 1024x768 Resolution

and also:
[newbie] Zoomed display in GUI
If you're still confused after taking a look at those, come back and we'll see what we can do.

 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2004-03-18 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 18 March 2004 21:21, John A. Smith wrote:
 I can't seem to find either thread you mentioned in the list
 archives. But they seem to be current only through 11/03. Is this
 list archived somewhere other than:
 http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/newbie/

Yup - it's surprising what you'll find on the TWiki:
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MailingLists

Anne
- -- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAWhz6kFAvMr/nNX8RArAqAJ9fheiH6m5IWySOX3bBVIo6ourITACfRc8/
ngpfH1OL8pVi/BDHJJu2KOs=
=Dgho
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2004-03-18 Thread Job Evers
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:21:24 -0600
John A. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I can't seem to find either thread you mentioned in the list archives.
 
 But they seem to be current only through 11/03. Is this list archived 
 somewhere other than: 
 http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/newbie/
 
 -john smith

A listing of the sites that keep an archive:  
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MailingLists

The twiki is a good source of information, and it seems to improve every time I visit 
it.

 
 Job Evers wrote:
 
 On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:38:05 -0600
 John A. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 
 Also, I'm having problems loading X properly. I couldn't get X to
 runat all under 10.0. And for some reason in 9.2, when I set my
 monitor resolution as a Flat Panel Display 1024 x 768 the edges of
 the desktop
 extend beyond the montor display. In other words, I can't see the 
 perimeter of the desktop, just the center. Any idea why this would
 be happening?
 
 
 
 
 I've been having similar problems.  I use the 852 chipset, which is
 supposed to be similar to the 855.  Might want to take a look at an
 earlier thread where I asked about this:  [newbie] Intel 852/855 GM
 Chipset, 1024x768 Resolution
 
 and also:
 [newbie] Zoomed display in GUI
 
 If you're still confused after taking a look at those, come back and
 we'll see what we can do.
 
   
 
 
 
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 
 Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
   
 
 
 
 
 


-- 
Job Evers

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


[newbie] Install Problems

2004-03-17 Thread John A. Smith
I have an Averatec 5110H laptop - 1.3 GHZ Centrino, Intel 855x graphics 
card, 512MB RAM, 40 GB HD, Intel 2100 integrated wireless - that I have 
been trying to install Mandrake on. During the install process I could 
only get DiskDrake to resize my windows partition down to 34GB. I had 
defragmented thoroughly, turning of hibernate mode and virtual memory, 
and there was only about 8 Gb of data on the drive but it wouldn't let 
me shrink Windows down any smaller. I've tried to reinstall both 9.2 and 
10 with the same results Is there another tool I can use to resize 
Windows without losing the data? Is there something else I need to turn 
off when I defrag?

Also, I'm having problems loading X properly. I couldn't get X to run at 
all under 10.0. And for some reason in 9.2, when I set my monitor 
resolution as a Flat Panel Display 1024 x 768 the edges of the desktop 
extend beyond the montor display. In other words, I can't see the 
perimeter of the desktop, just the center. Any idea why this would be 
happening?

Any input is appreciated.

-john smith


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


[newbie] install problems with Mandrake 9.1 on a Mac 8600 w/G3 upgrade

2003-10-19 Thread Jim
Hi everyone!
I am new tothis list and I hope someone can help me on this problem
I am trying to install Linux mandrake on a Mac 8600 which has a newertech 
maxpowr G3 300Mhz processor 497megs of ram.
It also has a ATI Rage 128 video card installed, 30GB Harddrive w/ mac os 
9.0
The problem is that when I try to boot into Linux Mandrake it comes to a 
point and tells me that it can't find my cdrom?
I am useing bootx 1.2.2
I have tryed to install it several times,I am about ready to give up.
I would be grateful If I got any help on this.
Thanks
Jim
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] !!! Install problems on compaq server!!!

2003-09-23 Thread Terje Heen


Hi there all.
I am a totally newbie folks, and I have tried to install Mandrake 9.1 on a old compac Pentium server (Prosignia 500) with 160 Mb ram. The problem is that Mandrake only detects 16Mb of ram for some reason all thou the system counts 160Mb on POST. The memory consists of 16 Mb onboard (soldered directly to the main board) and 72 pins simm for the rest. I have tried the option by hitting F1 during startup and write linux mem=160M but after some seconds Mandrake replies: Kernel Panic: Unable to mount root fs on 01:03, and there it hangs I hope there are someone who can help me with an advice what to do..

In advance, thanks

Terje..
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-22 Thread FemmeFatale
At 11:07 PM 6/21/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Saturday 21 June 2003 01:44 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:

snip

I'll send the pics to you offlist and everything will become clear as mud. :-)

--

 /\
   DarkLord
 \/


sendy pls to me too! ? :)
-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems, OT Speaking of cable select on HDDs

2003-06-22 Thread FemmeFatale
At 10:17 PM 6/21/2003 -0700, you wrote:
CableSelect is a function of the controller, not the hd.  Very few 
controllers
use the CS function (I've never owned one, nor even seen one, so I can only
take it on face value that they exist).

e
so wtf.. my manual says you can use it..but it didn't work?... i give up. 
Thx E!

-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-22 Thread Ian Trickett
If the master and slave jumpers are set correctly, position on the cable is 
immaterial.  For cable select setting, end connector is master, middle 
connector is slave.  Maxtor drives (and all Dell computers) now come set as 
cable select by default.
Ian

On June 21, 2003 11:19 am, Andy Davidson wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:12:22AM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote:
  Also, it's correct practice to have master on the cable's
  end connector, not the middle one.

 That I didn't know.  Why?

 andy


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-21 Thread C. Tresenriter
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:55:46 -0700
Erylon Hines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 and check that your drive jumpers are in the proper 
 positions (looks like it is the master (hda) on the first ide (ide0).

Oh man I didn't even look at the jumper - thought default was the master position 
- actually it's cable select.

Thanks for the kick start

From my brand spankin' new 9.1 install,
Curt

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-21 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Saturday June 21 2003 04:59 am, C. Tresenriter wrote:
  and check that your drive jumpers are in the proper
  positions (looks like it is the master (hda) on the first ide
  (ide0).

 Oh man I didn't even look at the jumper - thought default was
 the master position - actually it's cable select.

  Yeah CS won't do :)  But also check that you don't have two 
different master positions for the jumper. Some drives have 
different positions depending on if you have a slave on the same 
cable. Also, it's correct practice to have master on the cable's 
end connector, not the middle one.

Actually I'm surprised you got as far as you did with it set to CS
-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-21 Thread Andy Davidson
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:12:22AM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 Also, it's correct practice to have master on the cable's 
 end connector, not the middle one.

That I didn't know.  Why?

andy

-- 
Andy Davidson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems, OT Speaking of cable select on HDDs

2003-06-21 Thread FemmeFatale
At 04:59 AM 6/21/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:55:46 -0700
Erylon Hines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 and check that your drive jumpers are in the proper
 positions (looks like it is the master (hda) on the first ide (ide0).
Oh man I didn't even look at the jumper - thought default was the 
master position - actually it's cable select.

Thanks for the kick start

From my brand spankin' new 9.1 install,
Curt
commence hijack

I understood that newer drives on newer mobos can use cable select with no 
problems.  Well I've had zip luck with this. Ideas?
-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt

Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-21 Thread FemmeFatale
At 08:21 PM 6/20/2003 -0500, you wrote:
I got the new disk form Maxtor today and have just made five attempts at 
installing 9.1 - the last one using rc2 or 3 - the install was smooth but on
 reboot, got this :
EXT3-fs error (device ide0 (3,1)): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable to read 
inode block - inode=259114
Kernel Panic: Attempted to kill init!

The last attempt with the power pack ended with this these 15 lines:

ide0:reset: success
hda: dma_initr: status=0x51 {DriveReady SeekComplete Error}
hda: dma_initr error=0x84 {DriceStatusError Bad CRC} end_request: I/O 
error dev 03:01 (hda) sector 1154352
EXT3-fs error (device ide-0 (3,1)): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable to read 
inode block - inode=719489, block 1441794
repeats last two lines four more times... then
ide0:reset success
Kernel Panic: Attempted to kill init!
6 keyboard: unknown scancode e0 7a

I've had 9.1 installed successfully on this machine several times.
I understand that kernel panic is usually hardware related but that 
doesn't make sense as there's no change in any hardware... except the new 
hard disk.

Do one of you gurus have a clue for me?

Thanks in advance
Your new HDD came with a diskette.  It has utility on it to low level 
format the drive.  I'd do that first.  Fair warning:  If your hard drive is 
over 30gb it will take several hours at best...overnight probably...but 
that will reset the whole thing if there are any weird blocks on the 
platters.  IOW It makes it as if it were blank again at factory 
default.  Thats the first thing i'd do/try.
-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt

Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 01:19, Andy Davidson wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:12:22AM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote:
  Also, it's correct practice to have master on the cable's 
  end connector, not the middle one.
 
 That I didn't know.  Why?
 
 andy

Because by setting a jumpered MASTER/SLAVE you're not leaving yourself
open to  problems with software or BIOS.

-- 
Sun Jun 22 09:20:00 EST 2003
 09:20:00 up 18:30,  5 users,  load average: 3.38, 2.94, 2.54
-
|____  |kuhn media australia|
|   /-oo /| |'-.   |http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  ||
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  |stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
-
 linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1  RH 7.3  
 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586
-
 * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *

Your mother seems really upset.  I better go have a talk with 
her -- during the commercial.

-- Homer Simpson
   Simpsoncalifragilisticexpiala(annoyed grunt)ocious

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems

2003-06-21 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Saturday 21 June 2003 01:44 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:

snip

 I also vaguely remember somethin about cable length and that the
 distances for master and slave are purposely different
 (resistance), and that controllers and the drives firmware take
 this into account. Master expects to be 18 wire length from the
 motherboard connector to approximate a constant resistance factor.

Okay, I've got several I'll go ahead and switch them back, in the interest of 
safety.

I'm not convinced that's because of cable mods, but yeah send me
 the pics.  As long as the case can take in cool air low from the
 rear or side, and exhaust heat at the top front or back, I fail to
 see how cables get involved. If that's an AMD cpu runnin at 35-37C
 under normal load, then you're temps are not being properly
 reported, or your usin water cooling ;) If it's Intel, it's about
 the norm.

Er, sorry - the two are not related! I was just asking about the cables, the 
heat problem was something else entirely! :-)

I'll send the pics to you offlist and everything will become clear as mud. :-)

-- 

 /\
   DarkLord
 \/

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] Install problems, OT Speaking of cable select on HDDs

2003-06-21 Thread Erylon Hines
CableSelect is a function of the controller, not the hd.  Very few controllers 
use the CS function (I've never owned one, nor even seen one, so I can only 
take it on face value that they exist).

e

On Saturday 21 June 2003 02:18 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:

 I understood that newer drives on newer mobos can use cable select with no
 problems.  Well I've had zip luck with this. Ideas?
 -
 FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt

 Good Decisions Your boss Made:
 We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
 character from Peanuts.

 - Source: Dilbert


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] Install problems

2003-06-20 Thread Curt Tresenriter
I got the new disk form Maxtor today and have just made five attempts at installing 
9.1 - the last one using rc2 or 3 - the install was smooth but on 
 reboot, got this :
EXT3-fs error (device ide0 (3,1)): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable to read inode block - 
inode=259114
Kernel Panic: Attempted to kill init!

The last attempt with the power pack ended with this these 15 lines:

ide0:reset: success
hda: dma_initr: status=0x51 {DriveReady SeekComplete Error}
hda: dma_initr error=0x84 {DriceStatusError Bad CRC} end_request: I/O error dev 03:01 
(hda) sector 1154352
EXT3-fs error (device ide-0 (3,1)): ext3_get_inode_loc: unable to read inode block - 
inode=719489, block 1441794
repeats last two lines four more times... then
ide0:reset success
Kernel Panic: Attempted to kill init!
6 keyboard: unknown scancode e0 7a

I've had 9.1 installed successfully on this machine several times.
I understand that kernel panic is usually hardware related but that doesn't make sense 
as there's no change in any hardware... except the new hard disk.

Do one of you gurus have a clue for me?

Thanks in advance

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] install problems of either Rox filer 1.3.3 and 1.3.4 on MD 9.0

2002-10-09 Thread Steve Jeppesen

Hello list,

I made the jump up to 9.0 hoping that I would be able to install rox
with no problems...however that is not the case.  I downloaded both
rox-1.3.3-1mdk.src.rpm and rox-1.3.4-1mdk.src.rpm (1.3.4 being a cooker
package).

First I ran rpm --rebuild rox-1.3.3-1mdk.src.rpm (and also
tried the same for 1.3.4) and then I ran
rpm -ivh /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/rox-1.3.3-1mdk.i586.rpm (same for 1.3.4)
and received this error message from both versions;
error: failed dependencies:
shared-mime-info = 0.8 is needed by rox-1.3.3-1mdk

Sooo, off I went in search of shared-mime-info = 0.8 and found 0.9
and installed that and still am receiving that same error message.

I thought I had seen this solution in an earlier thread having to deal
with Nautilus, but cannot find it.

Was it an rpm -option that I could use?  Or was it I had to download the
rox package from the Mandrakeclub?  I believe I found the rox packages
at rpmfind.net.

My goal is to use Fluxbox as a window manager with Rox as a file manager
so I can create icons on the desktop.

Anybody know of a work-around or something else I could use with Fluxbox
so I can place icons on my desktop?

TIA
Steve



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] install problems of either Rox filer 1.3.3 and 1.3.4 on MD 9.0

2002-10-09 Thread Todd Slater

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:54:08 -0500
Steve Jeppesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello list,
 
 I made the jump up to 9.0 hoping that I would be able to install rox
 with no problems...however that is not the case.  I downloaded both
 rox-1.3.3-1mdk.src.rpm and rox-1.3.4-1mdk.src.rpm (1.3.4 being a cooker
 package).
 
 First I ran rpm --rebuild rox-1.3.3-1mdk.src.rpm (and also
 tried the same for 1.3.4) and then I ran
 rpm -ivh /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/rox-1.3.3-1mdk.i586.rpm (same for 1.3.4)
 and received this error message from both versions;
 error: failed dependencies:
 shared-mime-info = 0.8 is needed by rox-1.3.3-1mdk
 
 Sooo, off I went in search of shared-mime-info = 0.8 and found 0.9
 and installed that and still am receiving that same error message.

I'm using 8.2 and tried to move up to the newest Rox and quit because I
couldn't get gtk+2 installed, and I was in dependency hell for 2 days.
snip
 
 My goal is to use Fluxbox as a window manager with Rox as a file manager
 so I can create icons on the desktop.

I think Fluxbox and Rox don't play nicely together if you want to use the
pinboard feature--you might try just using the panels.
 
 Anybody know of a work-around or something else I could use with Fluxbox
 so I can place icons on my desktop?

Use keys instead of icons ;)

I'm using Rox 1.2.1. You should still be able to find it on the rox
homepage (you might have to dig). I never had any luck with the Mandrake
rpm's, but was able to build from source--it's very easy. You could try
that and see if you can use the panel with Fluxbox. BTW, which version of
Flux are you running?

Todd




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Install Problems Compaq 700T

2002-02-01 Thread Plexishex

Recently, went out and brought 8.1. This is my first jump into linux, so I 
installed next to WinXP. Install goes fine, but after i tell linux to boot in 
LILO the computer just restarts. All options led to the same effect. WinXP 
was unbootable, so I wiped the drive clean, still the same problem. Any help?

Stats.
Compaq Laptop 700T
850 Duron Chip
386MB RAM
18GB HD
Three linux partitions: /root, /usr, /home

thanks



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Install Problems Compaq 700T

2002-02-01 Thread nagaraj.b


to restore winxp for time being

start the comp with windows startup disk
and in command prompt type c:\fdisk /mbr
after restarting it will boot windows ...

then try installing linux with the installation guide
 Recently, went out and brought 8.1. This is my first jump into linux, so I
 installed next to WinXP. Install goes fine, but after i tell linux to boot
in
 LILO the computer just restarts. All options led to the same effect. WinXP
 was unbootable, so I wiped the drive clean, still the same problem. Any
help?

 Stats.
 Compaq Laptop 700T
 850 Duron Chip
 386MB RAM
 18GB HD
 Three linux partitions: /root, /usr, /home

 thanks








 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Install Problems Compaq 700T

2002-02-01 Thread Plexishex

Yup, thats where I am now =D. Though Compaq never did send me just a windows 
cd, I got a 3 cd compaq install, so anything normal window fixes hadn't 
worked. Found and XP bootdisk image on the web, and went from there. Very 
strangely the first 2 times I had done fdisk /mbr, the computer restarted 
displaying only garbage symbols. *The trick was to fall asleep the third 
time, in which I woke up to the awful windows tune, strange but true*

I am not concerned with running windows at the moment. I just want to get 
Mandrake up and running. Also just a note, I tried grub that had no luck.

thanks



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] Install Problems Compaq 700T

2002-02-01 Thread nagaraj.b

booting linux in windows style

http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Loadlin+Win95-98-ME-4.html

4.1 Step One:
Edit (or create) config.sys on the root of Drive C. The contents should be
similar to the following:

---
[menu]
menuitem=Linux, Mandrake Linux 7.2
menuitem=Win98, Windows 98
menucolor=15,1
menudefault=Win98, 10
[linux]
[win98]


If your system already has a config.sys file, put those contents under the
[win98] section. The [linux] section is left blank intentionally.

4.2 Step Two:
Edit (or create) autoexec.bat on the root of Drive C. The contents should be
similar to the following:


goto %config%

:linux
call c:\linux.bat

:win98


As above, if you aready have an autoexec.bat file, put those contents under
the :win98 section.

4.3 Step Three:
Create a file called: linux.bat. Putting it in the root of Drive C is as
good as place as any (but it can go anywhere so long as you reference the
path or location). The contents should be similar to the following:


@echo off
c:\loadlin c:\vmlinuz root=/dev/hda3 ro


The above example assumes that loadlin.exe and vmlinuz are located in the
root of Drive C (or C:\) and that linux is installed on the /dev/hda3
partition. Your configuration may be different.

The important thing here is to make sure that loadlin and your linux kernel
file are properly referenced. Finished!

That should work for you, as that is how I have things set up on my system,
which dual boots with Win98.


 Yup, thats where I am now =D. Though Compaq never did send me just a
windows
 cd, I got a 3 cd compaq install, so anything normal window fixes hadn't
 worked. Found and XP bootdisk image on the web, and went from there. Very
 strangely the first 2 times I had done fdisk /mbr, the computer restarted
 displaying only garbage symbols. *The trick was to fall asleep the third
 time, in which I woke up to the awful windows tune, strange but true*

 I am not concerned with running windows at the moment. I just want to get
 Mandrake up and running. Also just a note, I tried grub that had no luck.

 thanks








 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] NEWBIE: Install problems with LM8.1

2001-11-02 Thread Jaguar

New to this list again..
I am not sure if this has been covered yet, I scanned thru the archives, but didn't 
find anything for my searches.

I have a (well one of 4 systems) Cyrix 233, 5GB, 128 DIMM, 8MB SIS video, supported 
sound/NIC.

I have tried to run setup of L.M. 8.1, and keep getting the SAME error when looking 
for install packages.MISSING BASESYSTEM PACKAGE, this has occured with 3 different 
ISO burns, in both INSTALL, and UPGRADE modes, also on a freshly formated HD.  I know 
the hardware works, since L.M. 7.01 is running on it now.   Please point me to the 
existing email's or give me suggestions that will put LM 8.1 on my machine.

TIA
Jaguar



__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the 
convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] NEWBIE: Install problems with LM8.1

2001-11-02 Thread Paul

In reply to Jaguar's words, written Fri, 02 Nov 2001 14:10:03 -0500

New to this list again..
I am not sure if this has been covered yet, I scanned thru the archives, but
didn't find anything for my searches.

I have a (well one of 4 systems) Cyrix 233, 5GB, 128 DIMM, 8MB SIS video,
supported sound/NIC.

I have tried to run setup of L.M. 8.1, and keep getting the SAME error when
looking for install packages.MISSING BASESYSTEM PACKAGE, this has occured
with 3 different ISO burns, in both INSTALL, and UPGRADE modes, also on a
freshly formated HD.  I know the hardware works, since L.M. 7.01 is running
on it now.   Please point me to the existing email's or give me suggestions
that will put LM 8.1 on my machine.

Have you checked the md5sum on the downloaded packages? If there is a problem
in there, you have to download new ones.
Paul

--
It is better to have loved and lost,
then never to have loved at all
-Lord Alfred Tennyson

http://nlpagan.net - Registered Linux User 174403
Linux Mandrake 8.0 - Sylpheed 0.6.3 claws
Open Source, Open Minds. Linux.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] Install problems

2001-06-22 Thread Joe Finnie

Hi
My previous letter was not so clear, sorry about that.
Anyway I have an old pentium 200, and i have a 10 gig
hard drive but the bios can only see 8 gig. I have
windows 95c on it. I then installed LM 8, suprisingly
it could see the other 2 gig so i installed it to
there. Unfortunately I couldnt boot because when it
was just about to load the OS or lilo or something it
just printed a couple of asc ii chars and then hangs.
Then I tried an expert install. during it I said that
it must change the boot sector or something, it gave
me some warnings but I couldnt start my pc anyway,
into win 95 or linux, so I said ok. That did not help.
I then partitioned the disk 6,2,2. I installed LM8
again but to the second 2 gig partition. This worked
and I can run LM8 with no problem unfortunatly I can
no longer boot to a floppy which is a 98 boot disk. It
seems to just read the disk for a few seconds and then
hang. I disabled my hd in the bios and the disk worked
fine but when i enabled it again the booting was
messed again. So I had to reinstall LM8. Is there any
way to install windows onto that first 6 gig I have
without formatting everything because I still have
quite a bit of info on it which I would like to keep. 
This is a bit lengthy but I hope that it explaines my
situation?
Thanks for any help.
Joe

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




[newbie] Install problems - update

2001-06-21 Thread Gary

Hi all
Just to let you know that I solved the problem (sticking at filesystem
setup - the defrag problem..). It appears that Norton Speed disk was to
'blame'. I had forgotten that the default is to put rarely used files at
the end of the disk. This of course does not show in Windows defrag.
Thanks for all the helpful replies I did get for this problem. I am now
enjoying the Linux experience. Now if I could only get my HP 420 deskjet
to work, i'll be laughing... :-))

Gary
Now Tux powered





[newbie] Install problems with 7.2

2001-02-06 Thread Gene Moreau

I've been trying to do a fresh install on 7.2  and been running into a
problem with DiskDrake, but I'm not sure exactly.

I have a disk with no partitions on it, so I tell diskdrake to do
AutoAllocate.  it seems happy with that.  Says it's writes it to the disk.
Select format all partitions. it comes back with an error "Swap area must
be"  must be what is my question  Some times it gets to a point where is
formats the first two partitions then dies on the swap partition.  I've
played with sizing it differently and that doesn't seem to make any
different.  Strangely enough, if I just keep trying (about 10 time or more
usually) it works and the rest of the install go off with out a hitch.

If you go and look at some of the log screens it tells me "bad magic number"
in some perl script somewhere.  also no partition table on the drive.  What
gives?

What bugs me is that the 7.1 install works no problem.

Help!

Gene Moreau
IT Specialist 
Arrista Technologies - http://www.arrista.com

v: 204.489.3200
f: 204.489.8300
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP pub key:  http://www3.mb.sympatico.ca/~moreaug/pgp.txt






RE: [newbie] Install problems with 7.2

2001-02-06 Thread Bryant Morrison F47743C

What kind of IDE chipset is the mb using?  Is DMA enabled?  Does the kernel
correctly identify the drive controllers?  This sounds like a hardware
related problem.  Has this hard drive been installed successfully with
another OS?  As a last resort, boot up with some Slackware bootdisks,
cfdisk, format the drives, then install Mandrake using the pre-setup
partitions.  Also, using a low-level format utility has corrected disk
errors for me in the past.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gene Moreau
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:45 PM
To: Mandrake Newbie (E-mail)
Subject: [newbie] Install problems with 7.2


I've been trying to do a fresh install on 7.2  and been running into a
problem with DiskDrake, but I'm not sure exactly.

I have a disk with no partitions on it, so I tell diskdrake to do
AutoAllocate.  it seems happy with that.  Says it's writes it to the disk.
Select format all partitions. it comes back with an error "Swap area must
be"  must be what is my question  Some times it gets to a point where is
formats the first two partitions then dies on the swap partition.  I've
played with sizing it differently and that doesn't seem to make any
different.  Strangely enough, if I just keep trying (about 10 time or more
usually) it works and the rest of the install go off with out a hitch.

If you go and look at some of the log screens it tells me "bad magic number"
in some perl script somewhere.  also no partition table on the drive.  What
gives?

What bugs me is that the 7.1 install works no problem.

Help!

Gene Moreau
IT Specialist
Arrista Technologies - http://www.arrista.com

v: 204.489.3200
f: 204.489.8300
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP pub key:  http://www3.mb.sympatico.ca/~moreaug/pgp.txt








RE: [newbie] Install problems with 7.2

2001-02-06 Thread Gene Moreau

Not sure of the IDE chip set off the top of my headhave to go look, but
have had no problems with this drive in the same machine with NT, Mandrake
7.1.  Like I said before if I just keep trying and it eventually works and
lets me finish the install with 7.2.   It then has no problems after that.
just seems like it doesn't actually write the partion table to the drive
when it says it is.

-Original Message-
From: Bryant Morrison F47743C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 6, 2001 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Install problems with 7.2


What kind of IDE chipset is the mb using?  Is DMA enabled?  Does the kernel
correctly identify the drive controllers?  This sounds like a hardware
related problem.  Has this hard drive been installed successfully with
another OS?  As a last resort, boot up with some Slackware bootdisks,
cfdisk, format the drives, then install Mandrake using the pre-setup
partitions.  Also, using a low-level format utility has corrected disk
errors for me in the past.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gene Moreau
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:45 PM
To: Mandrake Newbie (E-mail)
Subject: [newbie] Install problems with 7.2


I've been trying to do a fresh install on 7.2  and been running into a
problem with DiskDrake, but I'm not sure exactly.

I have a disk with no partitions on it, so I tell diskdrake to do
AutoAllocate.  it seems happy with that.  Says it's writes it to the disk.
Select format all partitions. it comes back with an error "Swap area must
be"  must be what is my question  Some times it gets to a point where is
formats the first two partitions then dies on the swap partition.  I've
played with sizing it differently and that doesn't seem to make any
different.  Strangely enough, if I just keep trying (about 10 time or more
usually) it works and the rest of the install go off with out a hitch.

If you go and look at some of the log screens it tells me "bad magic number"
in some perl script somewhere.  also no partition table on the drive.  What
gives?

What bugs me is that the 7.1 install works no problem.

Help!

Gene Moreau
IT Specialist
Arrista Technologies - http://www.arrista.com

v: 204.489.3200
f: 204.489.8300
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP pub key:  http://www3.mb.sympatico.ca/~moreaug/pgp.txt








[newbie] Install Problems with V7.2 and SystemCommander 2000 V5.04

2001-01-22 Thread Stephen L LaBelle

Hello,

I am attempting to multi-boot Windows 98, Windows 2000, and Mandrake 7.2
on an intel platform with System Commander.

I have the Windows 98 and Windows 2000 boots installed and functional 
on the first harddrive HDA. The Windows 98 is there to house System
Commander. Everything on that first drive works.

I run the custom Mandrake install, not the "full expert" but the middle
choice. I choose to install Mandrake directly, so I do not use the
System Commander O/S create utility. I just let System Commander find it
upon the reboot. BTW, this method works for custom installs of Red Hat
or SUSE which I have done several times in the past.

The Mandrake install is onto the 2nd drive fully, HDB, and I get all the 
way thru the install. System Commander finds the new Linux, but when I
try to boot Mandrake I get the following:

"panic unable to mount root filesystem" or something of that
matter.

I took a look at the Linux partitions from the System Commander 2000
disk partioning tool and see that the /boot partition is there and
identified as a Linux EXT2 file system, which is good. However the rest
of the Mandrake install space is not sliced into partitions, it is a 
single big partition that System Commander see as a generic Unix single
partition. That would seem to be the problem, is there something 
special I need to know about Mandrake???

Can someone advise me? As said earlier I have been able to do the same
setup methodology with Red Hat and SUSE and it worked.

Thanks for anyones help

Steve


# Stephen LaBelle  #
# Senior Unix Systems Administrator#
# Metropolitan State College of Denver #
# Denver, Colorado  USA#
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]#






Re: [newbie] Install Problems with V7.2 and SystemCommander 2000 V5.04

2001-01-22 Thread bascule

did you partition the rest into more than one partition i.e. /usr /home etc.?
did you use reiserfs? i installed lm7.2 onto a machine and thoughtlessly 
forgot to deselect the reiserfs package on installation and only realised i 
had done this when using partition magic i noticed that i couldn't resise my 
linux partitions

bascule


   "panic unable to mount root filesystem" or something of that
   matter.
 
 I took a look at the Linux partitions from the System Commander 2000
 disk partioning tool and see that the /boot partition is there and
 identified as a Linux EXT2 file system, which is good. However the rest
 of the Mandrake install space is not sliced into partitions, it is a 
 single big partition that System Commander see as a generic Unix single




RE: [newbie] Install Problems with V7.2 and SystemCommander 2000 V5.04

2001-01-22 Thread Charles A Edwards

The problem most likely stems from the way the partitions were made.
Use the SysCom partitioning tool to delete the extended partition and then
to create it again with however many logical linux partitions you choose
then during the Mandrake installation use DiskDrake only for mounting and
formatting the partitions.

The only time I have used the SysCom OS Wizard was to install BeOS and that
is because the Be bootloader is not installed unless written to the MBR and
the OS Wizards allows SysCom to pick-up the boot record.
All the other installations on that system were done by setting the BIOS to
boot from CD-ROM
and inserting the installation CD. When the install completes all that is
necessary is to toggle the needed partition as bootable and it is added to
SysCom as a boot option.

I have done it a few times. I have a 45GB and a 15GB hd on that system with
all OSes being booted by SysCom2000.
Those include Win98, BeOS, Storm, Caldera, Suse, VA Red Hat, and Mandrake
and I have tried others.


   Charles  (-:


Forever never goes beyond tomorrow.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen L LaBelle
 Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:10 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [newbie] Install Problems with V7.2 and SystemCommander 2000
 V5.04


 Hello,

 I am attempting to multi-boot Windows 98, Windows 2000, and
 Mandrake 7.2
 on an intel platform with System Commander.

 I have the Windows 98 and Windows 2000 boots installed and functional
 on the first harddrive HDA. The Windows 98 is there to house System
 Commander. Everything on that first drive works.

 I run the custom Mandrake install, not the "full expert" but
 the middle
 choice. I choose to install Mandrake directly, so I do not use the
 System Commander O/S create utility. I just let System
 Commander find it
 upon the reboot. BTW, this method works for custom installs of Red Hat
 or SUSE which I have done several times in the past.

 The Mandrake install is onto the 2nd drive fully, HDB, and I
 get all the
 way thru the install. System Commander finds the new Linux, but when I
 try to boot Mandrake I get the following:

   "panic unable to mount root filesystem" or something of that
   matter.

 I took a look at the Linux partitions from the System Commander 2000
 disk partioning tool and see that the /boot partition is there and
 identified as a Linux EXT2 file system, which is good.
 However the rest
 of the Mandrake install space is not sliced into partitions, it is a
 single big partition that System Commander see as a generic
 Unix single
 partition. That would seem to be the problem, is there something
 special I need to know about Mandrake???

 Can someone advise me? As said earlier I have been able to do the same
 setup methodology with Red Hat and SUSE and it worked.

 Thanks for anyones help

   Steve

 
 # Stephen LaBelle  #
 # Senior Unix Systems Administrator#
 # Metropolitan State College of Denver #
 # Denver, Colorado  USA#
 # [EMAIL PROTECTED]#
 








RE: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-23 Thread Kelly, Christopher

I took the hard drive off of the ATA/66 channel and performed a reinstall.
All is well. I guess it just didn't like the ATA???

-Original Message-
From: Rod Baxter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


I dont believe the ATA66 is your problem. Sounds like something to do with
the way your partitions are set up. Is the 2gigs free space or part of a
extended partition.

Rod
- Original Message -
From: "Kelly, Christopher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 9:40 PM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Install problems


 The ATA/66 is on the board, no card. I have an ABIT BX6 II for my MoBo.
Last
 night I got past the SCSI error and found this error at the HD detection
 phase of the install:
 "An error has occured-
 No valid devices were found on which to create new file systems.
 Please check your hardware for the cause of this problem."
 But here's the deal. I have already installed Win98se on this HD and have
 over 2gigs left for Linux. What is this all about?

 -Original Message-
 From: Rod Baxter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 8:02 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


 If your ultra interface is a plug in card some of these look like SCSI
cards
 to the software. I have a promise card which always detects as a SCSI
 controller.

 What is your motherboard and IDE interface etc??

 Rod
 - Original Message -
 From: "Kelly, Christopher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:38 AM
 Subject: RE: [newbie] Install problems


  I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
  Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: John Rye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:45 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
 
 
  "Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
  
   But, I don't have a SCSI card. That's the whole problem. Whether I
press
  yes
   or no, it stalls at that point in the installation.
 
 
  Whoa - hang one here.. You don't have any SCSI cards?
  But - from your original posting you are answering YES to the question
  about SCSI drives Why??
 
  What type(s) of drive do you have?
 
  Give it another burst - this time say NO to the SCSI question..
 
  Cheers
 
 
  --
  ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
  (The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:00 AM
   To: 'Newbie'
   Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
  
   Chris,
  
   It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with
your
   SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
   card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.
  
   --
   Mark
  
   /*  I never worry about the to-jams.
*  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
*  it's already too late...just make sure
*  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
*/
   Registered Linux user #182496
*   Pine 4.21   *
  
   On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:
  
I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK
7.1
 to
   my
computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to
 Winbloze.
   The
second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from
the
 CD
   and
start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It
  gets
   to
a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I
 tell
  it
yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks
yet
   again,
"Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me
  again,
and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So,
I
   tried
running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit
 similar
snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I
have
   done
an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the
 HD
   has
Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
   
Thanks,
Chris Kelly
Registered Linux user 185775
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 










Re: [Re: [newbie] Install problems]

2000-10-20 Thread Michael Scottaline

Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does LM 7.1 fully support ATA66? I seem to remember something about 7.2
 would but can't recall where or when, I'm getting old and crotchetty.
 Somebody know about ATA66?
 -- 
 Dennis M. a registered Linux User #180842
=
Yes it does suport ATA66.  I running it right now.  In fact I was originally
running this box fro ASL at ATA100, but it became a bit unstable and began
giving me boot fits.  So I switched sockets, backing it down to 66 and haven't
had a problem since.  Runs great and very stable.
Mike

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
-Benjamin Frankilin


Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/webmail




Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-20 Thread Mark Weaver

I've got two ATA/66 HDD's hooked to system. Primary master and slave and
they're working fine with Mandrake 7.1. That's all I run as a matter of
fact.

-- 
Mark

/*  I never worry about the to-jams.
 *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
 *  it's already too late...just make sure
 *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
 */ 
Registered Linux user #182496
 *   Pine 4.21   *

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 3:06am ,Dennis Myers spake passionately in a message:

 "Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
  
  I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
  Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)
  
 
 Does LM 7.1 fully support ATA66? I seem to remember something about 7.2
 would but can't recall where or when, I'm getting old and crotchetty.
 Somebody know about ATA66?
 





Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-20 Thread Mark Weaver

please disregard my previous post on this thread...I'm not totally with it
this morning and while I thought I was responding to one thing I was
thinking of something else. Not enough caffine in the blood-stream yet!

-- 
Mark

/*  I never worry about the to-jams.
 *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
 *  it's already too late...just make sure
 *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
 */ 
Registered Linux user #182496
 *   Pine 4.21   *

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 7:34am ,Mark Weaver spake passionately in a message:

 I've got two ATA/66 HDD's hooked to system. Primary master and slave and
 they're working fine with Mandrake 7.1. That's all I run as a matter of
 fact.
 
 





RE: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-20 Thread Kelly, Christopher

The ATA/66 is on the board, no card. I have an ABIT BX6 II for my MoBo. Last
night I got past the SCSI error and found this error at the HD detection
phase of the install: 
"An error has occured-
No valid devices were found on which to create new file systems.
Please check your hardware for the cause of thisproblem."
But here's the deal. I have already installed Win98se on this HD and have
over 2gigs left for Linux. What is this all about?

-Original Message-
From: Rod Baxter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 8:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


If your ultra interface is a plug in card some of these look like SCSI cards
to the software. I have a promise card which always detects as a SCSI
controller.

What is your motherboard and IDE interface etc??

Rod
- Original Message -
From: "Kelly, Christopher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:38 AM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Install problems


 I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
 Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)

 -Original Message-
 From: John Rye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:45 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


 "Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
  But, I don't have a SCSI card. That's the whole problem. Whether I press
 yes
  or no, it stalls at that point in the installation.


 Whoa - hang one here.. You don't have any SCSI cards?
 But - from your original posting you are answering YES to the question
 about SCSI drives Why??

 What type(s) of drive do you have?

 Give it another burst - this time say NO to the SCSI question..

 Cheers


 --
 ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
 (The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)


  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:00 AM
  To: 'Newbie'
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
 
  Chris,
 
  It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with your
  SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
  card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.
 
  --
  Mark
 
  /*  I never worry about the to-jams.
   *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
   *  it's already too late...just make sure
   *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
   */
  Registered Linux user #182496
   *   Pine 4.21   *
 
  On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:
 
   I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1
to
  my
   computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to
Winbloze.
  The
   second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the
CD
  and
   start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It
 gets
  to
   a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I
tell
 it
   yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet
  again,
   "Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me
 again,
   and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I
  tried
   running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit
similar
   snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have
  done
   an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the
HD
  has
   Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
  
   Thanks,
   Chris Kelly
   Registered Linux user 185775
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  









[newbie] Install Problems - MISSING HEADER

2000-10-20 Thread Joel B

Hey Everyone... I purchased Mandrake Linux 7.1 Deluxe which comes with the
following CD's:

Installation CD (x86)
Applications CD (x86)
2nd Applications CD (x86)
Extension CD (x86)
etc...

After telling Mandrake I have all of the above Cd's it starts installing
fine until it gets to the 2nd Application CD half way through when I
encounter the error:

An Error Occured
Package file: missing header

+-+
| OK  |
+-+

Why am I getting this error?  I have sucessfully used these cd's on the same
computer before a hard drive crash (hard drive was replaced) and checked the
cd for scratches etc.

Any ideas?
-Joel B


__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup




Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-20 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 The ATA/66 is on the board, no card. I have an ABIT BX6 II for my
 MoBo. Last night I got past the SCSI error and found this error at
 the HD detection phase of the install:
   "An error has occured-
   No valid devices were found on which to create new file systems.
 Please check your hardware for the cause of this  problem."
 But here's the deal. I have already installed Win98se on this HD
 and have over 2gigs left for Linux. What is this all about?

   It's almost assuredly a hardware/config defienciency.  Try a bios 
setting to change to ata/33, or simply replace the ata/66 IDE cable with 
an ata/33 cable and see if that doesn't solve the problem.  I suspect 
Windoze works with it because it's more tolerant of marginal hardware 
than Linux is.  After/if that change to ata/33 works, then try going back 
to ata/66 (tho it's hardly worth it IMNSHO).

IIRC, there's some problems with Abit and ata/66. To the point that 
Abit even released their own Linux distro (Gentus?) to overcome it.
-- 
Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay




RE: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-20 Thread Dodd Carlton J MSgt 726 ACS/CSG

I haven't even got my install going properly yet, so this may be WAY off
base but:

Is that 2GB you have left set as a partition (eg: using Fdisk), or just left
as unallocated area?  Wouldn't the system miss unallocated space (therefore
the "No valid devices..." error)?

As I said, probably NOT the solution, but the reply might help me learn.

-Carlton




 -Original Message-
From:   Tom Brinkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, October 20, 2000 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:    Re: [newbie] Install problems

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 The ATA/66 is on the board, no card. I have an ABIT BX6 II for my
 MoBo. Last night I got past the SCSI error and found this error at
 the HD detection phase of the install:
   "An error has occured-
   No valid devices were found on which to create new file systems.
 Please check your hardware for the cause of this  problem."
 But here's the deal. I have already installed Win98se on this HD
 and have over 2gigs left for Linux. What is this all about?

   It's almost assuredly a hardware/config defienciency.  Try a bios 
setting to change to ata/33, or simply replace the ata/66 IDE cable with 
an ata/33 cable and see if that doesn't solve the problem.  I suspect 
Windoze works with it because it's more tolerant of marginal hardware 
than Linux is.  After/if that change to ata/33 works, then try going back 
to ata/66 (tho it's hardly worth it IMNSHO).

IIRC, there's some problems with Abit and ata/66. To the point that 
Abit even released their own Linux distro (Gentus?) to overcome it.
-- 
Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay




RE: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-20 Thread Kelly, Christopher

I have actually tried it as both. That is, with and with out a extfs2
partition. I think that I am going to try Tom's suggestion.

-Original Message-
From: Dodd Carlton J MSgt 726 ACS/CSG
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Install problems


I haven't even got my install going properly yet, so this may be WAY off
base but:

Is that 2GB you have left set as a partition (eg: using Fdisk), or just left
as unallocated area?  Wouldn't the system miss unallocated space (therefore
the "No valid devices..." error)?

As I said, probably NOT the solution, but the reply might help me learn.

-Carlton




 -Original Message-
From:   Tom Brinkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Friday, October 20, 2000 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:    Re: [newbie] Install problems

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 The ATA/66 is on the board, no card. I have an ABIT BX6 II for my
 MoBo. Last night I got past the SCSI error and found this error at
 the HD detection phase of the install:
   "An error has occured-
   No valid devices were found on which to create new file systems.
 Please check your hardware for the cause of this  problem."
 But here's the deal. I have already installed Win98se on this HD
 and have over 2gigs left for Linux. What is this all about?

   It's almost assuredly a hardware/config defienciency.  Try a bios 
setting to change to ata/33, or simply replace the ata/66 IDE cable with 
an ata/33 cable and see if that doesn't solve the problem.  I suspect 
Windoze works with it because it's more tolerant of marginal hardware 
than Linux is.  After/if that change to ata/33 works, then try going back 
to ata/66 (tho it's hardly worth it IMNSHO).

IIRC, there's some problems with Abit and ata/66. To the point that 
Abit even released their own Linux distro (Gentus?) to overcome it.
-- 
Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay




Re: [newbie] Install Problems - MISSING HEADER

2000-10-20 Thread Ronald J. Hall

Joel B wrote:
 
 Hey Everyone... I purchased Mandrake Linux 7.1 Deluxe which comes with the
 following CD's:
 
 Installation CD (x86)
 Applications CD (x86)
 2nd Applications CD (x86)
 Extension CD (x86)
 etc...
 
 After telling Mandrake I have all of the above Cd's it starts installing
 fine until it gets to the 2nd Application CD half way through when I
 encounter the error:
 
 An Error Occured
 Package file: missing header
 
 +-+
 | OK  |
 +-+
 
 Why am I getting this error?  I have sucessfully used these cd's on the same
 computer before a hard drive crash (hard drive was replaced) and checked the
 cd for scratches etc.
 
 Any ideas?
 -Joel B

Hi Joel. This is gonna sound really strange, but when I used 7.1, I had the
same problem when I picked (and for the life of me I can't remember which!) one
of the settings:

auto
custom
developer
expert

etc, etc,... Anyways, I finally used developer and expert. This worked fine,
and I didn't get the errors I did before...

Hope this helps!

-- 
 
   /\
   DarkLord
   \/




Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-20 Thread GAPrichard

Dennise,
After LM7.0 was installed I switched my drive up to ATA/66 mode and it 
worked just fine with Mandrake.  I understand that there may be problems when 
installing and using /66 mode, and with Promise controller cards (which 
require a patch if I recall what I read in newbie correctly).  -Gary-

In a message dated 10/19/2000 11:06:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  "Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
  
  I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
  Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)
  
 
 Does LM 7.1 fully support ATA66? I seem to remember something about 7.2
 would but can't recall where or when, I'm getting old and crotchetty.
 Somebody know about ATA66?
 -- 
 Dennis M. a registered Linux User #180842
 
 




Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-19 Thread Mark Weaver

Chris,

It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with your
SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.

-- 
Mark

/*  I never worry about the to-jams.
 *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
 *  it's already too late...just make sure
 *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
 */ 
Registered Linux user #182496
 *   Pine 4.21   *

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:

 I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to my
 computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze. The
 second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD and
 start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It gets to
 a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell it
 yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet again,
 "Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me again,
 and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I tried
 running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
 snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have done
 an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD has
 Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
 
 Thanks,
 Chris Kelly
 Registered Linux user 185775
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





RE: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-19 Thread Kelly, Christopher

But, I don't have a SCSI card. That's the whole problem. Whether I press yes
or no, it stalls at that point in the installation.

-Original Message-
From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:00 AM
To: 'Newbie'
Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


Chris,

It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with your
SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.

-- 
Mark

/*  I never worry about the to-jams.
 *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
 *  it's already too late...just make sure
 *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
 */ 
Registered Linux user #182496
 *   Pine 4.21   *

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:

 I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to
my
 computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze.
The
 second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD
and
 start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It gets
to
 a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell it
 yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet
again,
 "Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me again,
 and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I
tried
 running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
 snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have
done
 an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD
has
 Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
 
 Thanks,
 Chris Kelly
 Registered Linux user 185775
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-19 Thread John Rye

"Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
 But, I don't have a SCSI card. That's the whole problem. Whether I press yes
 or no, it stalls at that point in the installation.


Whoa - hang one here.. You don't have any SCSI cards? 
But - from your original posting you are answering YES to the question
about SCSI drives Why?? 

What type(s) of drive do you have?

Give it another burst - this time say NO to the SCSI question..

Cheers


-- 
ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
(The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:00 AM
 To: 'Newbie'
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
 
 Chris,
 
 It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with your
 SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
 card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.
 
 --
 Mark
 
 /*  I never worry about the to-jams.
  *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
  *  it's already too late...just make sure
  *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
  */
 Registered Linux user #182496
  *   Pine 4.21   *
 
 On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:
 
  I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to
 my
  computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze.
 The
  second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD
 and
  start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It gets
 to
  a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell it
  yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet
 again,
  "Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me again,
  and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I
 tried
  running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
  snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have
 done
  an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD
 has
  Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
 
  Thanks,
  Chris Kelly
  Registered Linux user 185775
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





RE: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-19 Thread Kelly, Christopher

I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)

-Original Message-
From: John Rye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


"Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
 But, I don't have a SCSI card. That's the whole problem. Whether I press
yes
 or no, it stalls at that point in the installation.


Whoa - hang one here.. You don't have any SCSI cards? 
But - from your original posting you are answering YES to the question
about SCSI drives Why?? 

What type(s) of drive do you have?

Give it another burst - this time say NO to the SCSI question..

Cheers


-- 
ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
(The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:00 AM
 To: 'Newbie'
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
 
 Chris,
 
 It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with your
 SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
 card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.
 
 --
 Mark
 
 /*  I never worry about the to-jams.
  *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
  *  it's already too late...just make sure
  *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
  */
 Registered Linux user #182496
  *   Pine 4.21   *
 
 On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:
 
  I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to
 my
  computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze.
 The
  second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD
 and
  start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It
gets
 to
  a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell
it
  yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet
 again,
  "Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me
again,
  and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I
 tried
  running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
  snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have
 done
  an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD
 has
  Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
 
  Thanks,
  Chris Kelly
  Registered Linux user 185775
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-19 Thread Rod Baxter

If your ultra interface is a plug in card some of these look like SCSI cards
to the software. I have a promise card which always detects as a SCSI
controller.

What is your motherboard and IDE interface etc??

Rod
- Original Message -
From: "Kelly, Christopher" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:38 AM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Install problems


 I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
 Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)

 -Original Message-
 From: John Rye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:45 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


 "Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
  But, I don't have a SCSI card. That's the whole problem. Whether I press
 yes
  or no, it stalls at that point in the installation.


 Whoa - hang one here.. You don't have any SCSI cards?
 But - from your original posting you are answering YES to the question
 about SCSI drives Why??

 What type(s) of drive do you have?

 Give it another burst - this time say NO to the SCSI question..

 Cheers


 --
 ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
 (The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)


  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:00 AM
  To: 'Newbie'
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
 
  Chris,
 
  It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with your
  SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
  card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.
 
  --
  Mark
 
  /*  I never worry about the to-jams.
   *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
   *  it's already too late...just make sure
   *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
   */
  Registered Linux user #182496
   *   Pine 4.21   *
 
  On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:
 
   I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1
to
  my
   computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to
Winbloze.
  The
   second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the
CD
  and
   start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It
 gets
  to
   a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I
tell
 it
   yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet
  again,
   "Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me
 again,
   and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I
  tried
   running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit
similar
   snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have
  done
   an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the
HD
  has
   Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
  
   Thanks,
   Chris Kelly
   Registered Linux user 185775
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  









Re: [RE: [newbie] Install problems]

2000-10-19 Thread Altoine Barker

Do you have a CD burner on your computer? If you do then it is perfectly
normal for Linux to install the SCSI support as it recognizes a CD burner as a
SCSI whether it is one or not. If the answer is yes to my question then just
let it be because without it you don't have a CD burner.

Cheers
--Al


"Kelly, Christopher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)

-Original Message-
From: John Rye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


"Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
 But, I don't have a SCSI card. That's the whole problem. Whether I press
yes
 or no, it stalls at that point in the installation.


Whoa - hang one here.. You don't have any SCSI cards? 
But - from your original posting you are answering YES to the question
about SCSI drives Why?? 

What type(s) of drive do you have?

Give it another burst - this time say NO to the SCSI question..

Cheers


-- 
ICQ# 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected"
(The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972.)


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 5:00 AM
 To: 'Newbie'
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
 
 Chris,
 
 It sounds to me like the install program is having a hard time with your
 SCSI card. You might try running the installation after removing the
 card. I have a feeling that it will install just fine after that.
 
 --
 Mark
 
 /*  I never worry about the to-jams.
  *  Once I've stuck my foot in my mouth
  *  it's already too late...just make sure
  *  you chew them thoroughly before swallowing!
  */
 Registered Linux user #182496
  *   Pine 4.21   *
 
 On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 1:36pm ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] spake...:
 
  I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to
 my
  computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze.
 The
  second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD
 and
  start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It
gets
 to
  a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell
it
  yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet
 again,
  "Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me
again,
  and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I
 tried
  running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
  snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have
 done
  an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD
 has
  Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help
 
  Thanks,
  Chris Kelly
  Registered Linux user 185775
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/webmail




Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-19 Thread Dennis Myers

"Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
 I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
 Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)
 

Does LM 7.1 fully support ATA66? I seem to remember something about 7.2
would but can't recall where or when, I'm getting old and crotchetty.
Somebody know about ATA66?
-- 
Dennis M. a registered Linux User #180842




Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-10-19 Thread Rod Baxter

7.1 is supposed to support ultra66. But it depends on the chipset I think,
and if its a plug in card or not.

Rod

- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Myers" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems


 "Kelly, Christopher" wrote:
 
  I have one IDE drive hooked up to an Ultra ATA/66.
  Even if I select "no" at the prompt, it brings it back up...(sigh)
 

 Does LM 7.1 fully support ATA66? I seem to remember something about 7.2
 would but can't recall where or when, I'm getting old and crotchetty.
 Somebody know about ATA66?
 --
 Dennis M. a registered Linux User #180842









[newbie] Install problems

2000-10-18 Thread Kelly, Christopher

I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to my
computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze. The
second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD and
start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It gets to
a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell it
yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet again,
"Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me again,
and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I tried
running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have done
an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD has
Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help

Thanks,
Chris Kelly
Registered Linux user 185775






[newbie] Install problems

2000-10-18 Thread Kelly, Christopher

I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to my
computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze. The
second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD and
start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It gets to
a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell it
yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet again,
"Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me again,
and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I tried
running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have done
an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD has
Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help

Thanks,
Chris Kelly
Registered Linux user 185775






[newbie] Install problems

2000-10-18 Thread 006229

I have yet another question. Last night, I tried to add Linux MDK 7.1 to my
computer. I have a 4gig HD and the first 2gigs are devoted to Winbloze. The
second 2 are setup to take Linux. Here is my problem. I boot from the CD and
start the 7.1 install. I pick the automated install and continue. It gets to
a point were it asks me if I have any SCSI drives on my machine. I tell it
yes, pick the appropriate driver and attempt to continue. It asks yet again,
"Do you have any SCSI drives?" This time, I pick no and it asks me again,
and again, and again. I'm stuck! It will not go past this point. So, I tried
running the Customized install and the Expert install and I hit similar
snags. I'm getting very frustrated. Am I doing something wrong? I have done
an install of 7.1 before on this HD. The only difference is that the HD has
Winbloze on it now. Before it was clean. Help

Thanks,
Chris Kelly
Registered Linux user 185775











[newbie] Install Problems!

2000-10-09 Thread Jerome Everall

Hi all, newbie here :)

I recently got Mandrake 7.1 free with a magazine on a bootable CD.  
However, at some point during installation (it varies when) I get the 
error "Segmentation Fault: It appears that memory is missing as 
installation crashes", I then have to reboot.

Any ideas as to what this is?

Best Regards,

-Jerome Everall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [newbie] Install Problems!

2000-10-09 Thread Paul

It was Oct 9, 2000, 10:27, when Jerome Everall keyboarded:

Perhaps a long-shot, but check your BIOS and see if there is something
like a setting switched on called MEMORY GAP. This often kicks a 1meg hole
in memory.

Paul

I recently got Mandrake 7.1 free with a magazine on a bootable CD.  
However, at some point during installation (it varies when) I get the 
error "Segmentation Fault: It appears that memory is missing as 
installation crashes", I then have to reboot.

--
The dance becomes a trance
When the dancer becomes the dance.

http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
  -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-





Re: [RE: [newbie] Install problems]

2000-08-15 Thread Jaguar

If I remember correctly...someone on this list said it took 20 mins or more
for the CD-Rom to open for the next CD.
HTH
Jaguar

"Kelly, Christopher" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So, is there a way to add the Extension CD after the fact? My PC isn't that
 old. It is a P2-MMX 233mhz that I built myself a little while ago. I am
 running a 30X Mitsumi CD-ROM drive. Any suggestions?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Robin Regennitter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:45 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Install problems
 
 
 Well, I purchased MDKLinux 7.1 Complete which only include the installation
 disk and application.   I had tried installing it on my Old 166 mhz IBM
 Aptiva.  When I got to the end and it ask for the application CD.  My
CD-Rom
 wouldnt open.   and along side with that.   My X-windows would not get
 installed.   At first  I thought maybe the disk were damaged because I had
 installed 6.1 on it with no problem.   So   I thought well  I'll try it on
 my newer computer which is 533 Intel Celeron and surprisingly It installed
 everything including the application CD.  and Everything is working
 beautifully.   So  my guess is that my old computer is too outdated for the
 MDKLinux 7.1.
 - Original Message -
 From: Kelly, Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Newbie' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:14 AM
 Subject: [newbie] Install problems
 
 
  Hi all,
 
  I recently installed MDKLinux 7.1 and when the install got to where it
 asks
  for the "Extensions CD", my cd-rom wouldn't open. So, I skipped it. Is
 there
  a way to install it after the fact? And, has anyone else experienced this
  problem?
 
  Thanks,
  Chris Kelly
  Registered Linux user 185775
 
 
 
 


The Dogma chased the Stigma, and was hit by the Karma.


Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.




[newbie] Install problems

2000-08-14 Thread Kelly, Christopher

Hi all,

I recently installed MDKLinux 7.1 and when the install got to where it asks
for the "Extensions CD", my cd-rom wouldn't open. So, I skipped it. Is there
a way to install it after the fact? And, has anyone else experienced this
problem?

Thanks,
Chris Kelly
Registered Linux user 185775





Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-08-14 Thread Robin Regennitter

Well, I purchased MDKLinux 7.1 Complete which only include the installation
disk and application.   I had tried installing it on my Old 166 mhz IBM
Aptiva.  When I got to the end and it ask for the application CD.  My CD-Rom
wouldnt open.   and along side with that.   My X-windows would not get
installed.   At first  I thought maybe the disk were damaged because I had
installed 6.1 on it with no problem.   So   I thought well  I'll try it on
my newer computer which is 533 Intel Celeron and surprisingly It installed
everything including the application CD.  and Everything is working
beautifully.   So  my guess is that my old computer is too outdated for the
MDKLinux 7.1.
- Original Message -
From: Kelly, Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Newbie' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:14 AM
Subject: [newbie] Install problems


 Hi all,

 I recently installed MDKLinux 7.1 and when the install got to where it
asks
 for the "Extensions CD", my cd-rom wouldn't open. So, I skipped it. Is
there
 a way to install it after the fact? And, has anyone else experienced this
 problem?

 Thanks,
 Chris Kelly
 Registered Linux user 185775








[newbie] Install problems

2000-08-10 Thread Kelly, Christopher

I sent this once already but, I never saw it come up on the list...what's up
with that?

I just recently installed LM 7.1 and when it got to the part where it tells
you to put the "Extensions" CD-ROM in the drive and hit ok, I can't open my
drive. It won't open. Has this happened to anyone else? If so, how can I
load that after installation? Help!!!

 ... 
Chris




[newbie] Install problems with both 7.0 and 7.1

2000-06-24 Thread aifusionextreme



While trying to install 7.0, it jams on the second 
stage install ( when the message is written on the screen). Complete lockout, 
even the off switch doesnt function which means the bios is jamed as well. 


With 7.1, this isnt an issue, but when it reaches 
the new "find PCMCIA devices" screen, it jams wen a I say yes and it jams when I 
say no. 

On 7.0, using the pcmcia image during the beggining 
of the installtion worked fine. I got a beep and everything ( which I assumed 
meant it detected the PCMCIA card and adapter). 

I have a PCMCIA ethernet card which I would like 
installed in the install. But am willing to leave it out and do it later if 
needed, but as mentioned even if I say no to the PCMCIA detection it jams. 


So basically I cant install 7.0 or 7.1 on that box. 
Any ideas ?

Details of box:

MB: HOT565
CPU: AMD-K6-2 233
Memory: 168MB
HD: 6 GB IBM
CD: unknown
Grpahics card: S3

The Only other card is the Lucent PCI - PCMCIA 
Adapter. 


Re: [[newbie] Install problems with both 7.0 and 7.1]

2000-06-24 Thread Jaguar

"aifusionextreme" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 - 
   Attachment:  
   MIME Type: multipart/alternative 
 - 
 While trying to install 7.0, it jams on the second stage install ( when the
message is written on the screen). Complete lockout, even the off switch
doesnt function which means the bios is jamed as well. 
 
 With 7.1, this isnt an issue, but when it reaches the new "find PCMCIA
devices" screen, it jams wen a I say yes and it jams when I say no. 
 
 On 7.0, using the pcmcia image during the beggining of the installtion
worked fine. I got a beep and everything ( which I assumed meant it detected
the PCMCIA card and adapter). 

That BEEP is the hardware _ONLY_ telling you is has found a PC-Card
device...nothing to do with the OS.


 
 I have a PCMCIA ethernet card which I would like installed in the install.
But am willing to leave it out and do it later if needed, but as mentioned
even if I say no to the PCMCIA detection it jams. 
 
 So basically I cant install 7.0 or 7.1 on that box. Any ideas  ?
 
 Details of box:
 
 MB: HOT565
 CPU: AMD-K6-2 233
 Memory: 168MB
 HD: 6 GB IBM
 CD: unknown
 Grpahics card: S3
 
 The Only other card is the Lucent PCI - PCMCIA Adapter. 


The Dogma chased the Stigma, and was hit by the Karma.


Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://webmail.netscape.com.




Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2000-05-06 Thread quaylar

hmm..did u set the right monitor type ?...horizontal and vertical
frequencies ?...i had to do it manually on mandrake 6.1..dont know
whether 7.0 has already a utility to autoprobe it

a good site for help on mandrake is www.mandrakeuser.org and (of course)
www.linux-mandrake.com/en

Am Sam, 22 Apr 2000 schrieben Sie:
 I'm completely new to Linux and am having difficulties with the Mandrake
 install program. When it gets to the point where it is supposed to test
 X no window appears and the install program does not go back to the
 previous step after a period of time as the manual says it will. I have
 tried several different resolutions all with the same result so I don't
 think that is the problem. I am running a Mitsubishi 15fs monitor and a
 S3 Trio32/64 PCI, and would appreciate any help or links to sites that
 may help.




Re: [newbie] Install problems on older machines?!?!

2000-05-04 Thread Seglar Killen


After a week and a half i have found out why my computer stalled during 
install:

i loose the IRQ to my GOLDSTAR 8X atapi cdrom. why is it lost i dont know. 
When the packages start installing my cd just dies. I can eventually get it 
to work again by manually switching the power off and back on on the cd 
only, but i loose irq again after a few seconds.

So to all of you that has mandrake installed AND has done it on a GOLDSTAR 
8X cdrom i wonder: How did you do it???

Thanx to all that tried to solve my problem :)

/Jimmi Wimmersjö

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: SV: [newbie] Install problems on older machines?!?!

2000-05-02 Thread Fran Parker

Great.  But it certainly doesn't answer your problem.
:)
Bambi

Jimmi wrote:

 Do you have the 32 megs of RAM needed for Mandrake Linux?
 Bambi

 Yeah. I used to have 4*16 Mb but since i had two different types of ram the
 ramdrive crashed. i pulled two, and have two left = 32 Mb.

 Jimmi Wimmersjö wrote:
 
  I've been trying to install mandrake linux for over a week now. After
  removing half of my RAM (Different timing caused ramdrive
  crash) Changing my processor from CYRIX to AMD i still cant install
  it.
 
  When i boot from cd (GOLDSTAR 8X ATAPI cdrom) i get halfway through
  the install then DrakX freezes on me. If i try the autoboot it wont
  detect my cd (allthough i started it from the cd), I have also tried
  the hd boot floppy but then in second stage install it gives me
  "installation exited abnormaly code 9" or something. I think i've
  seen an error message on one of the screens "No space left on
  device" which is very odd, since i have approx 15GB free discspace on
  the HD i wish to install to.
 
  I know my machine is old, but do i really have to buy a new one to
  install linux?!? Mandrake claims to support all of my hardware:
 
  AMD-k6 200MHZ
  ATAPI Cdrom
  IDE Harddrive IBM 20 GB
  IDE Harddrive Seagate 2 GB
 
  I have downloaded a new hd bootdisc image and will try again
  tonight, but if anyone can help me please let me hear from you.
 
 
  Jimmi J. Wimmersjö.
 
  "Ni vet, Hjärnan , den slutar aldrig att fungera!"
 
 




SV: [newbie] Install problems on older machines?!?!

2000-05-02 Thread Jimmi


Do you have the 32 megs of RAM needed for Mandrake Linux?
Bambi

Yeah. I used to have 4*16 Mb but since i had two different types of ram the
ramdrive crashed. i pulled two, and have two left = 32 Mb.




Jimmi Wimmersjö wrote:

 I've been trying to install mandrake linux for over a week now. After
 removing half of my RAM (Different timing caused ramdrive
 crash) Changing my processor from CYRIX to AMD i still cant install
 it.

 When i boot from cd (GOLDSTAR 8X ATAPI cdrom) i get halfway through
 the install then DrakX freezes on me. If i try the autoboot it wont
 detect my cd (allthough i started it from the cd), I have also tried
 the hd boot floppy but then in second stage install it gives me
 "installation exited abnormaly code 9" or something. I think i've
 seen an error message on one of the screens "No space left on
 device" which is very odd, since i have approx 15GB free discspace on
 the HD i wish to install to.

 I know my machine is old, but do i really have to buy a new one to
 install linux?!? Mandrake claims to support all of my hardware:

 AMD-k6 200MHZ
 ATAPI Cdrom
 IDE Harddrive IBM 20 GB
 IDE Harddrive Seagate 2 GB

 I have downloaded a new hd bootdisc image and will try again
 tonight, but if anyone can help me please let me hear from you.


 Jimmi J. Wimmersjö.

 "Ni vet, Hjärnan , den slutar aldrig att fungera!"






[newbie] Install problems

2000-05-01 Thread Matthew Clegg

I have been trying (unsucessfully) to install Mandrake 6.5 for about a
week now and still cannot get my display to work properly. At the end of
the install process my card is correctly identified as an S3 Trio 32/64
PCI and my monitor type Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 15FS is on the list. When
it attempts to test the system in the final stages of the install
program it 'locks up' and does not go back as the install guide says it
will. I have tried manually entering the data from my monitors manual
but this makes no difference. I have also tried setting different
resolutions (the suggested one is 1024*760 16 bit) but this makes no
difference. If I select skip to skip the monitor test the install
program finishes sucessfully and when I type startx at the command
prompt the screen goes blank and the PC locks up again. Does anybody
have any suggestions or know whats wrong?

Matthew
Wollongong, Australia




[newbie] Install problems on older machines?!?!

2000-05-01 Thread Jimmi Wimmersjö


I've been trying to install mandrake linux for over a week now. After
removing half of my RAM (Different timing caused ramdrive
crash) Changing my processor from CYRIX to AMD i still cant install
it.

When i boot from cd (GOLDSTAR 8X ATAPI cdrom) i get halfway through
the install then DrakX freezes on me. If i try the autoboot it wont
detect my cd (allthough i started it from the cd), I have also tried
the hd boot floppy but then in second stage install it gives me
"installation exited abnormaly code 9" or something. I think i've
seen an error message on one of the screens "No space left on
device" which is very odd, since i have approx 15GB free discspace on
the HD i wish to install to.

I know my machine is old, but do i really have to buy a new one to
install linux?!? Mandrake claims to support all of my hardware:

AMD-k6 200MHZ
ATAPI Cdrom
IDE Harddrive IBM 20 GB
IDE Harddrive Seagate 2 GB

I have downloaded a new hd bootdisc image and will try again
tonight, but if anyone can help me please let me hear from you.

  
Jimmi J. Wimmersjö.

"Ni vet, Hjärnan , den slutar aldrig att fungera!"





Re: [newbie] Install problems

2000-05-01 Thread poogle

I don't know 6.5, I've only installed 7.0, are you allowing software probing
during the install, is so - don't. Have you tried configuring X using XF86Setup
(case sensitive) after the install, might work if you select a standard svga
install and then tweak it using XF86Setup afterwards

On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, you wrote:
 I have been trying (unsucessfully) to install Mandrake 6.5 for about a
 week now and still cannot get my display to work properly. At the end of
 the install process my card is correctly identified as an S3 Trio 32/64
 PCI and my monitor type Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 15FS is on the list. When
 it attempts to test the system in the final stages of the install
 program it 'locks up' and does not go back as the install guide says it
 will. I have tried manually entering the data from my monitors manual
 but this makes no difference. I have also tried setting different
 resolutions (the suggested one is 1024*760 16 bit) but this makes no
 difference. If I select skip to skip the monitor test the install
 program finishes sucessfully and when I type startx at the command
 prompt the screen goes blank and the PC locks up again. Does anybody
 have any suggestions or know whats wrong?
 
 Matthew
 Wollongong, Australia




Re: [newbie] Install problems on older machines?!?!

2000-05-01 Thread nodyak0

Have you set your PnP to DISABLE in the BIOS?  That is what I had to do
to have my install run AOK!

don
I thought I knew that I knew what I thought
But now I know that what I thought I knew
Isn't what I know I think I thought I knew.


On Mon, 1 May 2000 18:42:47 +0200 (MET DST)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jimmi_Wimmersj=F6?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 I've been trying to install mandrake linux for over a week now. After
 removing half of my RAM (Different timing caused ramdrive
 crash) Changing my processor from CYRIX to AMD i still cant install
 it.
 
 When i boot from cd (GOLDSTAR 8X ATAPI cdrom) i get halfway through
 the install then DrakX freezes on me. If i try the autoboot it wont
 detect my cd (allthough i started it from the cd), I have also tried
 the hd boot floppy but then in second stage install it gives me
 "installation exited abnormaly code 9" or something. I think i've
 seen an error message on one of the screens "No space left on
 device" which is very odd, since i have approx 15GB free discspace on
 the HD i wish to install to.
 
 I know my machine is old, but do i really have to buy a new one to
 install linux?!? Mandrake claims to support all of my hardware:
 
 AMD-k6 200MHZ
 ATAPI Cdrom
 IDE Harddrive IBM 20 GB
 IDE Harddrive Seagate 2 GB
 
 I have downloaded a new hd bootdisc image and will try again
 tonight, but if anyone can help me please let me hear from you.
 
   
   Jimmi J. Wimmersjö.
 
   "Ni vet, Hjärnan , den slutar aldrig att fungera!"
 
 


YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.




SV: [newbie] Install problems on older machines?!?!

2000-05-01 Thread Jimmi


Have you set your PnP to DISABLE in the BIOS?  That is what I had to do
to have my install run AOK!


Yeah i have..  still freezes

/Jimmi









On Mon, 1 May 2000 18:42:47 +0200 (MET DST)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jimmi_Wimmersj=F6?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I've been trying to install mandrake linux for over a week now. After
 removing half of my RAM (Different timing caused ramdrive
 crash) Changing my processor from CYRIX to AMD i still cant install
 it.

 When i boot from cd (GOLDSTAR 8X ATAPI cdrom) i get halfway through
 the install then DrakX freezes on me. If i try the autoboot it wont
 detect my cd (allthough i started it from the cd), I have also tried
 the hd boot floppy but then in second stage install it gives me
 "installation exited abnormaly code 9" or something. I think i've
 seen an error message on one of the screens "No space left on
 device" which is very odd, since i have approx 15GB free discspace on
 the HD i wish to install to.

 I know my machine is old, but do i really have to buy a new one to
 install linux?!? Mandrake claims to support all of my hardware:

 AMD-k6 200MHZ
 ATAPI Cdrom
 IDE Harddrive IBM 20 GB
 IDE Harddrive Seagate 2 GB

 I have downloaded a new hd bootdisc image and will try again
 tonight, but if anyone can help me please let me hear from you.


 Jimmi J. Wimmersjö.

 "Ni vet, Hjärnan , den slutar aldrig att fungera!"




YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.






Re: [newbie] Install problems on older machines?!?!

2000-05-01 Thread Fran Parker

Do you have the 32 megs of RAM needed for Mandrake Linux?
Bambi

Jimmi Wimmersjö wrote:

 I've been trying to install mandrake linux for over a week now. After
 removing half of my RAM (Different timing caused ramdrive
 crash) Changing my processor from CYRIX to AMD i still cant install
 it.

 When i boot from cd (GOLDSTAR 8X ATAPI cdrom) i get halfway through
 the install then DrakX freezes on me. If i try the autoboot it wont
 detect my cd (allthough i started it from the cd), I have also tried
 the hd boot floppy but then in second stage install it gives me
 "installation exited abnormaly code 9" or something. I think i've
 seen an error message on one of the screens "No space left on
 device" which is very odd, since i have approx 15GB free discspace on
 the HD i wish to install to.

 I know my machine is old, but do i really have to buy a new one to
 install linux?!? Mandrake claims to support all of my hardware:

 AMD-k6 200MHZ
 ATAPI Cdrom
 IDE Harddrive IBM 20 GB
 IDE Harddrive Seagate 2 GB

 I have downloaded a new hd bootdisc image and will try again
 tonight, but if anyone can help me please let me hear from you.


 Jimmi J. Wimmersjö.

 "Ni vet, Hjärnan , den slutar aldrig att fungera!"




[newbie] Install problems with cdrom

2000-04-30 Thread Jimmi

Hi.

I Having problems installing Mandrake from my cdrom.

The installation runs fine until i get to library gclib (GNU clib) then my
cdrom shutsdown(!) and the installation freezes.

I have a goldstar 8X cdrom on a amd k6-2 200 mhz system. I hace tried the
different install methods described on the cd (a free edition from the
swedish computermagazine pc-extra) with no luck.

plz help!

/Jimmi

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/  Jimmi WimmersjöE-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   _/
_/  Granängsringen 57Tel hem: 08-7984842
_/
_/   135 44 Tyresö  Tel mob: 070-7328947
_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/




Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2000-04-29 Thread Paul

On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Matthew Clegg wrote:

I'm completely new to Linux and am having difficulties with the Mandrake
install program. When it gets to the point where it is supposed to test
X no window appears and the install program does not go back to the
previous step after a period of time as the manual says it will. I have
tried several different resolutions all with the same result so I don't
think that is the problem. I am running a Mitsubishi 15fs monitor and a
S3 Trio32/64 PCI, and would appreciate any help or links to sites that
may help.

Sometimes it is better NOT to let the system probe the graphics card. I
know that the S3 trio is supported. Try it again, don't let the probing
happen. That should work (no warranty though, other things can be messing
things up)
Paul


)0(---)0(

Why do you need BELIEF when you KNOW?

)0([[EMAIL PROTECTED]]-)0(
http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208
Registered Linux User 174403




Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2000-04-29 Thread Eric MC DECLERCK

Paul wrote:
 
 On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Matthew Clegg wrote:
 
 I'm completely new to Linux and am having difficulties with the Mandrake
 install program. When it gets to the point where it is supposed to test
 X no window appears and the install program does not go back to the
 previous step after a period of time as the manual says it will. I have
 tried several different resolutions all with the same result so I don't
 think that is the problem. I am running a Mitsubishi 15fs monitor and a
 S3 Trio32/64 PCI, and would appreciate any help or links to sites that
 may help.
 
 Sometimes it is better NOT to let the system probe the graphics card. I
 know that the S3 trio is supported. Try it again, don't let the probing
 happen. That should work (no warranty though, other things can be messing
 things up)
 Paul
 
Right, skip the probe !! I had the same problem with my S3 Trio.
Because I installed in TEXT mode, there you can skip it. 
Eric





Re: [newbie] Install Problems

2000-04-29 Thread Po Yuen Kwok

If you are in Mandrake 7, you can get out of this by ctr-alt-backspace.  

I have similar problem using Mandrake 6.5 and RedHat 6.0.  It was also with
a Mitsubushi Monitor.  You really have to known the full specification of
your monitor really well.  Refer to the documentation that came with your
monitor.

Po
Sydney, Australia


--
From: Matthew Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Install Problems
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 19:25:47 +1000

 I'm completely new to Linux and am having difficulties with the Mandrake
 install program. When it gets to the point where it is supposed to test
 X no window appears and the install program does not go back to the
 previous step after a period of time as the manual says it will. I have
 tried several different resolutions all with the same result so I don't
 think that is the problem. I am running a Mitsubishi 15fs monitor and a
 S3 Trio32/64 PCI, and would appreciate any help or links to sites that
 may help.




Re: [newbie] install problems

2000-02-03 Thread Paul Derbyshire


Re: your concerns about needing to fumble with a floppy if you install
Linux on a separate partition, don't worry. Mandrake installs a boot menu
called "lilo" into the boot sector of your boot disk. Instead of the
Windoze banner at startup,you'll see a boot prompt "lilo boot:" and can
enter "linux" or "dos" at it -- the latter will give you the familiar
banner, the former will give you lots of colorful text messages scrolling
up the screen, and not much later, the KDE desktop. :-)

Re: Lnx4Win -- forget it. In the long term it's better to get a new
partition and format it with the ext2 filesystem. Linux will be very much
faster and more efficient that way. Make a swap partition too. Make it 4x
the size of your memory -- my machine has 64 megs of RAM, so I made a 256
meg swap partition.

Re: installing -- try putting the CD-ROM in your drive and rebooting the
machine. Some modern computer BIOSes allow booting from the CD-ROM, and the
Mandrake CD has a boot sector on it, so if you have a recent BIOS, you'll
boot right into a Mandrake installer complete with partition editing tool.

-- 
   .*.  "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not
-()circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a
   `*'  straight line."-
-- B. Mandelbrot  |http://surf.to/pgd.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ |  Paul Derbyshire
Programmer  Humanist|ICQ: 10423848|



Re: [newbie] install problems

2000-02-03 Thread M Thompson

I recommend following Paul's suggestions.  If you would prefer a GUI boot 
manager instead of LILO, then read on:

When installing Linux, be sure to install LILO to the first sector on the 
Linux partition (NOT the MBR).

To multi-boot Windows and Linux:
1) Backup your MBR (personally, I backup my MBR using "Ranish Partion 
Manager 2.38")
2) Install and setup a boot manager (I recommend XOSL)

Some possible options for boot managers are:
A) XOSL (http://www.xosl.org)-The best GUI boot manager IMHO (freeware)
B) BootMagic (http://www.powerquest.com) A commercial GUI boot manager
C) LILO
D) Ranish Partition Manager (http://www.users.intercom.com/~ranish/part/)-I 
use it to backup my MBR, but I don't use it as a boot manager. (freeware)


HTH,
Matt


From: Paul Derbyshire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 03:11:29 -0500


Re: your concerns about needing to fumble with a floppy if you install
Linux on a separate partition, don't worry. Mandrake installs a boot menu
called "lilo" into the boot sector of your boot disk. Instead of the
Windoze banner at startup,you'll see a boot prompt "lilo boot:" and can
enter "linux" or "dos" at it -- the latter will give you the familiar
banner, the former will give you lots of colorful text messages scrolling
up the screen, and not much later, the KDE desktop. :-)

Re: Lnx4Win -- forget it. In the long term it's better to get a new
partition and format it with the ext2 filesystem. Linux will be very much
faster and more efficient that way. Make a swap partition too. Make it 4x
the size of your memory -- my machine has 64 megs of RAM, so I made a 256
meg swap partition.

Re: installing -- try putting the CD-ROM in your drive and rebooting the
machine. Some modern computer BIOSes allow booting from the CD-ROM, and the
Mandrake CD has a boot sector on it, so if you have a recent BIOS, you'll
boot right into a Mandrake installer complete with partition editing tool.


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [Re: [newbie] Install problems...]

1999-11-22 Thread Simon Norris

No, my Linux box is also a desktop, and it doesn't support ATAPI devices,
which is why I do what I do!

BTW, I have actually researched connectivity for my laptop IDE interface,
apart from the size, my laptop IDE interface is the same as standard!! I'm
tempted to wire up a conector and give it a go!



- Original Message -
From: Jaguar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: [newbie] Install problems...]


WOW...your desktop ( tower ) PC supports a LAPTOP IDE interface
I am impressed.
Jaguar

"Simon Norris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Couple of suggestions;
snip
 2. This is the method I use on my machine, a variation may work on yours.
As
 I haven't got access to a CD-ROM on my Linux box, I physically take the
hard
 drive over to my main machine, and copy the files onto a FAT16 partition
on
 the hard drive. I then take it back, and install from hard drive. I can
then
 delete this install partition.
 What I'm basically suggesting is to use DOS/Windows or similar to load a
 partition from the Linux CD-ROM (If you're short on disk space, you only
 need the RPMS folder), then boot from floppy and install from hard drive.
If
 DOS can see your backpack CD-ROM, boot from a DOS floppy with the CD-ROM
 plugged in the back. Or use a DOS floppy to get the hard drive partition
 bootable, boot with the CD-ROM in place, and copy the files from there.

snip
 - Original Message -
 From: Michael D. Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 8:48 PM
 Subject: [newbie] Install problems...


 I have a WinBook Laptop computer and I am trying to figure out how to
 install Mandrake RH6.0.

 I can not get the computer to recognize the CD-ROM drive.

 Here is what is going on...

 1.  I insert the removable floppy drive and boot from the boot disk.
 2.  When I get to the point where it asks me to pick which cd-rom drive
 to use, I remove the floppy drive and insert the cd-rom drive with the
 CD #1 in it.
 3.  I went through the entire list for CD-ROM drivers and it can not
 find the cd-rom.
 4.  It is not SCSI.

 I have an external CD-ROM drive as well that hooks up to the parallel
 port as well.  I tried it and it can not be found.  The CD-ROM is a
 "Backpack".

 I tried Fdisk the hard drive and copied the 9 files from the boot disk
 to it to see if it may be a problem from swapping the CD-Rom with the
 Floppy drive.  I can not get it to boot from the hard drive.  I fdisked
 the hard drive using DOS 6.0 fdisk utility and formatted it.  I copied
 the boot disk to the hard drive and it would not boot from the hard
 drive.

 I just need to install Apache web server and X-Windows so I can show off
 a working copy of my web site when I am on the road.

 Any help would be greatly appreciated.





Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.




Re: [Re: [newbie] Install problems...]

1999-11-22 Thread Steve Philp

Simon Norris wrote:
 
 No, my Linux box is also a desktop, and it doesn't support ATAPI devices,
 which is why I do what I do!
 
 BTW, I have actually researched connectivity for my laptop IDE interface,
 apart from the size, my laptop IDE interface is the same as standard!! I'm
 tempted to wire up a conector and give it a go!

You'll also find that the 2.5" laptop IDE drives have 44 pin connectors
that are spaced much more closely together than a typical 3.5" desktop
IDE drive.  There are adapters available, but for what you get, they're
damned pricey.

-- 
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [newbie] Install problems...

1999-11-20 Thread Benjamin Montgomery

go to http://www.linux.org and do a search for laptops. It will give you the
Linux laptop page. There are some links there that go to pages that give
info about installing linux on a winbook.

- Original Message -
From: Michael D. Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 2:48 PM
Subject: [newbie] Install problems...


 I have a WinBook Laptop computer and I am trying to figure out how to
 install Mandrake RH6.0.

 I can not get the computer to recognize the CD-ROM drive.

 Here is what is going on...

 1.  I insert the removable floppy drive and boot from the boot disk.
 2.  When I get to the point where it asks me to pick which cd-rom drive
 to use, I remove the floppy drive and insert the cd-rom drive with the
 CD #1 in it.
 3.  I went through the entire list for CD-ROM drivers and it can not
 find the cd-rom.
 4.  It is not SCSI.

 I have an external CD-ROM drive as well that hooks up to the parallel
 port as well.  I tried it and it can not be found.  The CD-ROM is a
 "Backpack".

 I tried Fdisk the hard drive and copied the 9 files from the boot disk
 to it to see if it may be a problem from swapping the CD-Rom with the
 Floppy drive.  I can not get it to boot from the hard drive.  I fdisked
 the hard drive using DOS 6.0 fdisk utility and formatted it.  I copied
 the boot disk to the hard drive and it would not boot from the hard
 drive.

 I just need to install Apache web server and X-Windows so I can show off
 a working copy of my web site when I am on the road.

 Any help would be greatly appreciated.




[newbie] Install problems

1999-10-24 Thread Tagbo Ekwueme-Okoli

Hi,
I had mandrake 6.0 running on my machine and I tried to install 6.1. I got
a message with SIGSEGV(11) in it.
The upgrade stopped and I couldn't boot my machine. Now when I tried to
reinstall when I get to the part where the partitions are formatted the
process stops and I get a message with this in it.

Code 28 8b 43 18 a8 04 75 21 8b 43 18 a8 80 74 1a 8b 53 30 31 c0
kernel panic: attempted to kill the idle task
in swapper task not syncing

Does anyone know what this means

Thanks



Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-20 Thread jsm

darkknight wrote:

 On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, jsm wrote:
  Well , I've been following this thread . I also have the same problem
  with a 4 gig HD . But I'm still confused . If I create a /boot partition
  , will the Mandrake install program install the kernel and LILO it it
  automatically ? And this partition should be at the beginning of the
  drive ? Any detailed instructions that anyone can provide will be
  GREATLY appreciated !
 
  Thanks for the time !
 
 
  jsm
 

 If the /boot partition is created in the install program, then install will put
 all the files necessary in that partition. It shows up as a directory off of the
 root directory (which it is) but is also a seperate partition.
 The best way to do it is when in install and asked to set up partitions, then
 set up the /boot partition first. I just used 20 mb it is adequate enough.
 then I set up the swap partition, I just went with 127 mb probably overkill
 since I have 128 mb memory but better safe than sorry :)
 Then I set up my remaining space as a / partition (root) , I did not create any
 other partitions though many do.

 I hope this is of some use to you,

 John Love

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks for the help ! I did try that , but LILO still would not install . So as a
last resort I went to my motherboard manufacture and found a  flash for my bios (
what else could it be  ,  right ? ) . After the upgrade I'm glad to report that
everything works fine !!! I now can boot to Linux or Windows with LILO . I guess
there was a defect in my BIOS program .

Thanks !!!
jsm



Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-19 Thread John Aldrich

You don't need that driver for Linux. It *SHOULD* work just fine w/o
worrying about it, especially if you make a partition for /boot, etc.
John

- Original Message -
From: bfernand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig


 After reading the docs, I decided to not use either LILO or Boot Magic.
The
 reason being that my recently installed 13GB Maxtor drive uses a little
 driver that lives in the Master Boor Record (where LILO or BM would
reside).
 Instead, I'm using LOADLIN which came in the Linux CD. I copied the kernel
 to the C: drive (VMLINUZ) and use the following in a batch file to load
 Linux:

 c:\loadlin\loadlin  c:\vmlinuz  root=/dev/hda3  ro  vga=3

 Happy Hunting!

 Ben




Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-19 Thread darkknight

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, jsm wrote:
 Well , I've been following this thread . I also have the same problem
 with a 4 gig HD . But I'm still confused . If I create a /boot partition
 , will the Mandrake install program install the kernel and LILO it it
 automatically ? And this partition should be at the beginning of the
 drive ? Any detailed instructions that anyone can provide will be
 GREATLY appreciated !
 
 Thanks for the time !
 
 
 jsm
 

If the /boot partition is created in the install program, then install will put
all the files necessary in that partition. It shows up as a directory off of the
root directory (which it is) but is also a seperate partition.
The best way to do it is when in install and asked to set up partitions, then
set up the /boot partition first. I just used 20 mb it is adequate enough.
then I set up the swap partition, I just went with 127 mb probably overkill
since I have 128 mb memory but better safe than sorry :)
Then I set up my remaining space as a / partition (root) , I did not create any
other partitions though many do.

I hope this is of some use to you,

John Love

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-18 Thread Michael R. Batchelor

 Kernels have to be in the first 8.4 GB of a harddisk. (This is not a Linux
 bug, but a BIOS problem. Stuff like EZDrive won't help you either).
[...]
so why doesn't someone come up with a BIOS fix for this?
(although you SHOULD be able to squeeze the kernel in the
first 8.4G SOMEWHERE :-)) Or is there some technical reason
for this limitation?

It's not that easy to write a BIOS fix because there is some configuration
issues with the controller electronics. It's somehow all tied up in
backwards compatibility with old IBM PC's, but I can't remember the
specifics. Other hardware architectures don't have the problem.

MB
--
Michael R. Batchelor
Industrial Informatics  Instrumentation, Inc.



Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-17 Thread Rhichard Barth Family



Hello again "newbie Group"
Well I've got a new one, I just got a 13.0 gig WD hard drive for
free, I would like to use it all for Linux. I found that VMware uses it's
own partition inside the Linux partition, better(or it's easier) than to
use a second hard drive(Raw partition)
The only thing is the 1024 thingcan I partition the 13.0 in
fdisk without EZdrive? the Bios sees it as 8.4 gig but when I start fdisk
I see the 25228 cylinders.
When fdisk starts I get the following message:
The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 25228
there is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
and could in certain setups cause problems with:
1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., LILO)
2) booting and partitioning software from other OS's
(e.g., Dos Fdisk, OS/2 FDisk)
I was thinking of doing two partitions,
Hdc1= / at around 1208000 (give or take)
hdc2= swap at around 60
then once all is ok I would install Windows98 and NT inside the
12.0gig partition using VMware.
well what do you think?

Rhich
8150164


Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-17 Thread Rhichard Barth Family

Hey Axalon !
Boy I'm always glad to get responses from you...(not that I'm mind the rest)
So your saying:
/ boot = 20 meg
/   = a lot of harddrive  then swap?
swap
Does LM know what to put in /boot 
if not, during the install what should I put in /boot?
is this my mount point?
does LILO go into /boot? (stupid question but i'm going to make sure).
if I had a hda1 (windows 98 drive) original C:\ drive how should I mount that?
Two drives one is 3.1gig with windows, the other is 13gig all for LM
We went through this once before... in it VFat or DOS ?
I'm using LAN Bridge software with my internal LAN and I will still need to use Win98 
for now
once LM is up and running I'll be switching that computer over to server, but until 
I'm totally
up and running I have to keep
my Windows box as the server (or my wife and daughter will kill me if they can't 
"surf")

Your friend
Rhichard,


Axalon wrote:

 On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Rhichard Barth  Family wrote:

 
 
  Hello again "newbie Group"
  Well I've got a new one, I just got a 13.0 gig WD hard drive for free, I would 
like to use
  it all for Linux. I found that VMware uses it's own partition inside the Linux 
partition,
  better(or it's easier) than to use a second hard drive(Raw partition)
  The only thing is the 1024 thingcan I partition the 13.0 in fdisk without 
EZdrive? the
  Bios sees it as 8.4 gig but when I start fdisk I see the 25228 cylinders.
  When fdisk starts I get the following message:
  The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 25228
  there is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
  and could in certain setups cause problems with:
  1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., LILO)
  2) booting and partitioning software from other OS's
  (e.g., Dos Fdisk, OS/2 FDisk)
  I was thinking of doing two partitions,
  Hdc1= /  at around 1208000 (give or take)
  hdc2= swap at around 60
  then once all is ok I would install Windows98 and NT inside the 12.0gig partition 
using
  VMware.
  well what do you think?
 
 
  Rhich
  8150164
 

 Lop the first 20 megs off and call it /boot and you'll be just fine.



Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-17 Thread Axalon



On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Rhichard Barth  Family wrote:

 Hey Axalon !
 Boy I'm always glad to get responses from you...(not that I'm mind the rest)
 So your saying:
 / boot = 20 meg
 /   = a lot of harddrive  then swap?
 swap
 Does LM know what to put in /boot 
 if not, during the install what should I put in /boot?
 is this my mount point?
 does LILO go into /boot? (stupid question but i'm going to make sure).
 if I had a hda1 (windows 98 drive) original C:\ drive how should I mount that?
 Two drives one is 3.1gig with windows, the other is 13gig all for LM
 We went through this once before... in it VFat or DOS ?
 I'm using LAN Bridge software with my internal LAN and I will still need to use 
Win98 for now
 once LM is up and running I'll be switching that computer over to server, but until 
I'm totally
 up and running I have to keep
 my Windows box as the server (or my wife and daughter will kill me if they can't 
"surf")
 
 Your friend
 Rhichard,
 
The only thing thats critcal, is that the kernel lies fully within the
first 1024 cylinders. You should beable to handle all this from within
diskdruid, blank all the partitions create a linux partition of around
20mb give it mountpoint /boot, anything you do with the rest is just a
matter of preference. As for what goes into the /boot partition/directory
it won't be any/much different that whats in the /boot of your exsisting
system, a system.map kernel image and other odds and ends. You can
install lilo onto either mbr, I'd recommend hda for simplicity.
Specifing the mount point for windows partitions is easiestly handled
during install while still in diskdruid, then after install you can add
any uid= or other such customizations to the fstab line. Msdos is the
standard 8.3 nameing scheme, Vfat covers longfilenames.

Something along the lines of
/dev/hda1 /mnt/windows vfat defaults,noexec,user,uid=500 0 0

Let me know if i missed any ?'s
 

 Axalon wrote:
 
  On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Rhichard Barth  Family wrote:
 
  
  
   Hello again "newbie Group"
   Well I've got a new one, I just got a 13.0 gig WD hard drive for free, I would 
like to use
   it all for Linux. I found that VMware uses it's own partition inside the Linux 
partition,
   better(or it's easier) than to use a second hard drive(Raw partition)
   The only thing is the 1024 thingcan I partition the 13.0 in fdisk without 
EZdrive? the
   Bios sees it as 8.4 gig but when I start fdisk I see the 25228 cylinders.
   When fdisk starts I get the following message:
   The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 25228
   there is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
   and could in certain setups cause problems with:
   1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., LILO)
   2) booting and partitioning software from other OS's
   (e.g., Dos Fdisk, OS/2 FDisk)
   I was thinking of doing two partitions,
   Hdc1= /  at around 1208000 (give or take)
   hdc2= swap at around 60
   then once all is ok I would install Windows98 and NT inside the 12.0gig 
partition using
   VMware.
   well what do you think?
  
  
   Rhich
   8150164
  
 
  Lop the first 20 megs off and call it /boot and you'll be just fine.
 



Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-17 Thread Rhichard Barth Family



Axalon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Rhichard Barth  Family
wrote:
> Hey Axalon !
> Boy I'm always glad to get responses from you...(not that I'm mind
the rest)
> So your saying:
> / boot = 20 meg
> / = a lot of harddrive
then swap?
> swap
> Does LM know what to put in /boot 
> if not, during the install what should I put in /boot?
> is this my mount point?
> does LILO go into /boot? (stupid question but i'm going to make sure).
> if I had a hda1 (windows 98 drive) original C:\ drive how should
I mount that?
> Two drives one is 3.1gig with windows, the other is 13gig all for
LM
> We went through this once before... in it VFat or DOS ?
> I'm using LAN Bridge software with my internal LAN and I will still
need to use Win98 for now
> once LM is up and running I'll be switching that computer over to
server, but until I'm totally
> up and running I have to keep
> my Windows box as the server (or my wife and daughter will kill me
if they can't "surf")
>
> Your friend
> Rhichard,
The only thing thats critcal, is that the kernel lies fully within the
first 1024 cylinders. You should beable to handle all this from within
diskdruid,
OK so hdc would be:
/boot (20-50mg)
/ (being root or main
partition)= bigmg
then a swap partition (I'm figuring about 100mg)
do I need to tell the install what to put into /boot?
blank all the partitions create a linux partition
of around
20mb give it mountpoint /boot, anything you do with the rest is just
a
matter of preference. As for what goes into the /boot partition/directory
it won't be any/much different that whats in the /boot of your exsisting
system, a system.map kernel image and other odds and ends. You can
install lilo onto either mbr, I'd recommend hda for simplicity.
Specifing the mount point for windows partitions is easiestly handled
during install while still in diskdruid, then after install you can
add
any uid= or other such customizations to the fstab line. Msdos is the
standard 8.3 nameing scheme, Vfat covers longfilenames.
Something along the lines of
/dev/hda1 /mnt/windows vfat defaults,noexec,user,uid=500 0 0
Is this what I would type in diskdruid? or would this be in fstab?
I want to be able to have both Win  LM be able to swap files
e.g., downloads and such...
Also while I have your attention
is Samba the way to go with a Windows server/network?
What is Wine all about?

Let me know if i missed any ?'s

> Axalon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Rhichard Barth  Family wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello again "newbie Group"
> > > Well I've got a new one, I just got a 13.0 gig WD hard drive
for free, I would like to use
> > > it all for Linux. I found that VMware uses it's own partition
inside the Linux partition,
> > > better(or it's easier) than to use a second hard drive(Raw partition)
> > > The only thing is the 1024 thingcan I partition the 13.0
in fdisk without EZdrive? the
> > > Bios sees it as 8.4 gig but when I start fdisk I see the 25228
cylinders.
> > > When fdisk starts I get the following message:
> > > The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 25228
> > > there is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
> > > and could in certain setups cause problems with:
> > > 1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., LILO)
> > > 2) booting and partitioning software from other OS's
> > > (e.g., Dos Fdisk, OS/2 FDisk)
> > > I was thinking of doing two partitions,
> > > Hdc1= / at around 1208000 (give or take)
> > > hdc2= swap at around 60
> > > then once all is ok I would install Windows98 and NT inside the
12.0gig partition using
> > > VMware.
> > > well what do you think?
> > >
> > >
> > > Rhich
> > > 8150164
> > >
> >
> > Lop the first 20 megs off and call it /boot and you'll be just
fine.
>



Re: [newbie] install problems 13.0gig

1999-07-17 Thread Axalon


Heya, mind turning off the html your doubleing traffic..

On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Rhichard Barth  Family wrote:

 
 
 Axalon wrote:
 
  On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Rhichard Barth  Family wrote:
 
   Hey Axalon !
   Boy I'm always glad to get responses from you...(not that I'm mind the rest)
   So your saying:
   / boot = 20 meg
   /   = a lot of harddrive  then swap?
   swap
   Does LM know what to put in /boot 
   if not, during the install what should I put in /boot?
   is this my mount point?
   does LILO go into /boot? (stupid question but i'm going to make sure).
   if I had a hda1 (windows 98 drive) original C:\ drive how should I mount that?
   Two drives one is 3.1gig with windows, the other is 13gig all for LM
   We went through this once before... in it VFat or DOS ?
   I'm using LAN Bridge software with my internal LAN and I will still need to use 
Win98 for now
   once LM is up and running I'll be switching that computer over to server, but 
until I'm totally
   up and running I have to keep
   my Windows box as the server (or my wife and daughter will kill me if they can't 
"surf")
  
   Your friend
   Rhichard,
 
  The only thing thats critcal, is that the kernel lies fully within the
  first 1024 cylinders. You should beable to handle all this from within
  diskdruid,
 
 OK so hdc would be:
 /boot  (20-50mg)
 /(being root or main partition)= bigmg
 then a swap partition (I'm figuring about 100mg)
 do I need to tell the install what to put into /boot?

As long as it's specified during install it will put all the files there
by it's self.

  blank all the partitions create a linux partition of around
  20mb give it mountpoint /boot, anything you do with the rest is just a
  matter of preference. As for what goes into the /boot partition/directory
  it won't be any/much different that whats in the /boot of your exsisting
  system, a system.map kernel image and other odds and ends. You can
  install lilo onto either mbr, I'd recommend hda for simplicity.
  Specifing the mount point for windows partitions is easiestly handled
  during install while still in diskdruid, then after install you can add
  any uid= or other such customizations to the fstab line. Msdos is the
  standard 8.3 nameing scheme, Vfat covers longfilenames.
 
  Something along the lines of
  /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows vfat defaults,noexec,user,uid=500 0 0
 Is this what I would type in diskdruid? or would this be in fstab?

thats the fstab line, in diskdruid just tell it /mnt/windows or something
you really only get one option with a windows drive and thats the mount
point. The uid=500 is an optional parameter to allow user 500 read/write
access (theres also available the, gid=  umask= options to setup a "vfat"
group to deal with allowing mass access)
 
 I want to be able to have both Win  LM be able to swap files
 e.g., downloads and such...

Yes, just specify the mount point and your all set for moveing files
around as root.

 Also while I have your attention
 is Samba the way to go with a Windows server/network?

Well it's by far the simplest and cheapest sense you already have all the
required software, you can get win32 nfs clients and theres always ftp.
The howtos are for the most part simple enough for most to follow, the
registry patches are in /usr/doc/samba-(version) if your running anything
but the original windows 95.

 What is Wine all about?

Well like the documents say, Wine is an alternate implementation of the
windows API.




Re: [newbie] install problems

1999-07-12 Thread dragonlady

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
 
 I did do the uninstall. It got rid of partitions and all, but it didn't get
 rid of the boot option.
 - Original Message -
 From: Manny Styles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 7:02 PM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 6:43 PM
  Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems
 
 
   Ok, I took your advise and installed it from scratch as opposed to 4win.
   Works fine with one major exception. The only way I can boot into is to
  use
   a boot disk. I never have gotten the lilo prompt to set up my
 preferences.
  I
   still have the option for choosing OS after the BIOS check, but it's the
   same one from the 4win I tried to install and if I select linux it still
   boots up windows. To make things worse, when I use the boot disk it
 takes
   almost 10 minutes to load up, which I know isn't right. Any thoughts on
   this? Once again, thanks in advance.
  
  
  Did you read the readme.txt file in your linux4win folder (it may be
  Mandrake folder)?  It tells you how to uninstall it, and it is very
 simple.
  That way, you regain your harddisk space and get rid of the linux boot
  option.
 
  Manny Styles
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ---
  Alex, I'll take 'Things Only I Know' for $200
 
  
  NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet.  Shouldn't you?
  Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
  http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html


  linux4win does something with the config.sys file,or the msdos.sys, I
can't remember exactly which one it is,but if you start looking at
thoem,you'll find it. It also leaves another file in the root directory
that is a renamed copy of the one that it replaces/creates. find out
which one,with notepad,and rename the linux file to the apropriate
one,copy the other one to a temp dir if you aren't 100% sure it's the
right one.
(make a boot floppy just in case)


merc





Re: [newbie] install problems

1999-07-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ok, I got that part fixed, but I still can't boot into line without the boot
disk. I think I messed up lilo when I installed it. How do I run lilo from
command line or Xwin?
- Original Message -
From: Manny Styles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems



 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 10:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems


  I did do the uninstall. It got rid of partitions and all, but it didn't
 get
  rid of the boot option.
 
 snip
 When you did the uninstall, did a DOS window open changing replacing the
new
 config.sys with config.mdk (the backup)?  If it didn't, you may need to
try
 running uninstall.bat again.  If it still does not work, you will need to
do
 it by hand.
 In the C: directory, "copy config.mdk config.sys", then "del config.mdk"

 Manny Styles
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---
 Birthdays are good for you. Statistics show that the people who have the
 most live the longest.


 
 NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet.  Shouldn't you?
 Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
 http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html




Re: [newbie] install problems

1999-07-07 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 07 Jul 1999, you wrote:
 ok, I got that part fixed, but I still can't boot into line without the boot
 disk. I think I messed up lilo when I installed it. How do I run lilo from
 command line or Xwin?
Try logging in as root and running lilo from the shell prompt. On my RH6.0 install 
it's in
/sbin/lilo. The config is in /etc/lilo.conf.

 --
John Aldrich
COL Tech Support
===
Chattanooga Online Internet
423-267-8867



Re: [newbie] install problems

1999-07-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I did do the uninstall. It got rid of partitions and all, but it didn't get
rid of the boot option.
- Original Message -
From: Manny Styles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems



 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 6:43 PM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems


  Ok, I took your advise and installed it from scratch as opposed to 4win.
  Works fine with one major exception. The only way I can boot into is to
 use
  a boot disk. I never have gotten the lilo prompt to set up my
preferences.
 I
  still have the option for choosing OS after the BIOS check, but it's the
  same one from the 4win I tried to install and if I select linux it still
  boots up windows. To make things worse, when I use the boot disk it
takes
  almost 10 minutes to load up, which I know isn't right. Any thoughts on
  this? Once again, thanks in advance.
 
 
 Did you read the readme.txt file in your linux4win folder (it may be
 Mandrake folder)?  It tells you how to uninstall it, and it is very
simple.
 That way, you regain your harddisk space and get rid of the linux boot
 option.

 Manny Styles
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---
 Alex, I'll take 'Things Only I Know' for $200

 
 NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet.  Shouldn't you?
 Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
 http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html




Re: [newbie] install problems

1999-07-06 Thread Manny Styles


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] install problems


 I did do the uninstall. It got rid of partitions and all, but it didn't
get
 rid of the boot option.

snip
When you did the uninstall, did a DOS window open changing replacing the new
config.sys with config.mdk (the backup)?  If it didn't, you may need to try
running uninstall.bat again.  If it still does not work, you will need to do
it by hand.
In the C: directory, "copy config.mdk config.sys", then "del config.mdk"

Manny Styles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Birthdays are good for you. Statistics show that the people who have the
most live the longest.



NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet.  Shouldn't you?
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html



  1   2   >