Re: [sipx-users] openfire LDAP/AD integration
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > On that list I didn't see the ability to allow users to log into the user > portal with LDAP/AD credentials without having to do a (potentially harmful) > LDAP import. I didn't think of that situation, where you didn't import users, but i guess if you create all the users that match user names, then new ldap auth support should work. > This topic was brought up in > http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/msg23873.html and I think it > would be extremely useful to a lot of people. It's in 4.3 testing already, Mircea and Laurentiu are finishing some issues this week, edit pages had some issues showing errors properly. i would people to check it out after that, i'l keep people posted. For some reason I cannot find the ldap doc in the wiki, mircea, laurentiu, do you recall what page you updated? Hopefully we didn't loose it in the transition. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] after update Openfire server won't start
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > Freeswitch 1.0.6 must have made it into 4.2.1 somehow for a time period. > There are no known issues, but it hasn't been tested so I'll figure out the > downgrade instructions later this evening, assuming I can afford the luxury > wifi in donald trump's hotel. yum clean all yum downgrade sipx-freeswitch you may have to do this for each sipx-freeswitch package. Again, this is not nec, this is just to get you to the release of freeswitch that has the most testing and what new 4.2.1 installs would get. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] after update Openfire server won't start
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Tran, Ly V. wrote: > [r...@sipx ~]# md5sum /opt/openfire/lib/openfire.jar > md5sum: /opt/openfire/lib/openfire.jar: No such file or directory > > I am definitely missing the openfire.jar file. Unfortunately, I can't try > the forced install of it until after closing. Or is there a way of doing it > without having to stop/restart sipxecs? i'm sure it's too late, but considering openfire is not running now, you should have been able to run the command and restart openfire. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] after update Openfire server won't start
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Norman Branitsky wrote: > It seems the openfire.jar is missing: >> [r...@cssip1 ~]# md5sum /opt/openfire/lib/openfire.jar >> md5sum: /opt/openfire/lib/openfire.jar: No such file or directory Somehow this file disappeared. To force a reinstall of that one package, shutdown sipxecs and run rpm -Uvh --force \ http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/sipx-openfire-3.6.4-10.4.i386.rpm then try md5sum /opt/openfire/lib/openfire.jar and if ok, start sipxecs >> Also, I noticed your freeswitch version is at 1.0.6 and you should >> have 1.0.5. Somehow you got the freeswitch from 4.3 version, I'm not >> sure how. Although it probably works and is apparently not >> complaining at the moment, we should downgrade you at some point. Do >> you recall doing anything special w/freeswitch install? > I did not do anything other than hit the Update button. It's possible that freeswitch 1.0.6 wound up in the 4.2.1 repo for some brief time, but I wasn't aware of it so If anyone else see freeswitch version 1.0.6 in their sipXecs 4.2.1 installation rpm -qi sipx-freeswitch | head -n 2 please let me know. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs July 30 4.2.1 update failed
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Norman Branitsky wrote: > sipXecs installed from CentOS 5 ISO (32-bit) 1 month ago. > Successful upgrade to 4.2.1 on Monday. > Last night I saw the message saying an update was available. > The release number was lower than what I was already running > but the modules all had suffixes that were one higher. If you have any details on this, please them them along > The update produced the following messages in red at the end: > > opendir: No such file or directory > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.36854: line 1: fg: no job control > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.36854: line 2: fg: no job control > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.36854: line 3: fg: no job control > cp: cannot stat `usr/share/doc/packages/stunnel/stunnel.conf-sample': No > such file or directory I have seen the errors when upgrading stunnel before. In sipXecs 4.3 we upgraded to stunnel 4.33 and the errors went away. Mostly because the stunnel rpm spec was based on the one from sipxecs/lib and NOT the one I found on opensuse build service. We also upgraded stunnel to 4.33 based on this commit http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/22570 Although there was no explanation from mardy why an upgrade to stunnel 4.33 was nec. I think we should backport the update stunnel to sipxecs 4.2.1. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] after update Openfire server won't start
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Norman Branitsky wrote: > After the July 31 update and sipxcs restart to restore the Admin GUI, > I find that Instant Messaging server won't start. > /var/log/sipxpbx/openfire/error.log has messages like this for each of > my users: > Error storing offline presence of user: dennis > org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: > ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "ofpresence_pk" Here's what I would suggest. all these commands as root 1. shutdown sipxecs /etc/init.d/sipxecs stop 2. drop openfire db, it will be created on next startup dropdb -U postgres openfire 3. force a log rotate, assuming you're ok w/losing 6 day old logs /usr/sbin/logrotate -f /etc/logrotate.conf 4. start sipxecs (or even better restart your system) /etc/init.d/sipxecs start 5.If you still see problems, run sipx-snapshot and you can email me the snapshot (the sipx-configuration-*.tar.gz file) or make it available somewhere. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] How to enable MUC conversation logging to database and this to be persistent setting for all new chat rooms?
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ali Nebi wrote: > Yep, i will go this way. I thought that there is a fast way editing some > property files. I think we need to research a more flexible way to enable features in openfire. Playing catchup with each feature one by one seems like a silly way to approach this. Same goes for freeswitch modules. We need to think about a kit where people can assemble support for missing features on their own or at least have a way to preserve settings that need to be changed from the console. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Master-4.2.1 build error
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Wen Jun wrote: > Hi, I downloaded master-4.2.1 by git clone > "git://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git sipx". Whereas, my compile was stopped > by following error. I think I know, you have to switch to the master-4.2 branch. main devel (upstream) git checkout -b master-4.2 origin/master-4.2 last stable release git checkout -b release-4.2 origin/release-4.2 Sorry, master is default and was tracking main and then i never adjusted. Also, you should mention distribution and version and as much details. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > This fix is in updates from http://download.ezuce.com/sipfoundry/4.2.1/ ? No in fact, I should take that site down so as to not create confusion like this All updates now go into http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Write access to wiki w/o commit access?
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Joe Micciche wrote: > The wiki says to post to the list to get write access to the wiki w/o > commit access. I think i gave you correct perms, please try now > Sorry for the noise, but I'd like to request that write > access. yeah, i think we need to change that policy. I created a sipx-infrastructure list but it would have to allow anonymous posts. I'll talk to Matt P. on best way to support this. Suggestions welcome. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > So we just need to identify the actual fix and separate it from the > work that was done on unstable branch. spot was identified, fixed, built and uploaded to 4.2.1 build however to enable the fix you have to follow the instructions in http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8438 sorry it wasn't cleaner, but i wanted by default to preserve the current behaviour because it was broken for a reason AFAIK. comments welcome ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Warning about updating your sipXecs system starting now
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Tran, Ly V. wrote: > I can't seem to get this update through the GUI or via yum. The PBX was > originally 4.04 and upgraded to 4.2. I remember having to edit the > sipxecs.repo file to get the upgrade completed. Anyhow, getting this > error message: > > Downloading and installing updated packages... > > Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file. > Eg. 5.2 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet/ > removing mirrorlist with no valid mirrors: > /var/cache/yum/centos-5.2-addons/mirrorlist.txt > Package update complete. Try clearing yum cache yum clean all yum update Also, from about 9 PM - 10:30 PM EST, the 4.2.1 repo was in the middle of updating. I would say this was the issue, but your error message doesn't seem to reflect that ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] BLF List URI | Cisco SPA500 series
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Noone has stepped up to maintain such a plugin for this model, which is why > you don't find it in the sipxconfig menu as a supported device (no matter > how similar to other Cisco/Linksys products it might be). > > I have only seen a few messages regarding this model. Perhaps it would be a > good idea to check what "is" already supported before buying a device... Actually Sen Heng has submitted support for these on main line that I need to pull into 4.3. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] openfire LDAP/AD integration
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > Is it on the roadmap to be able to integrate sipX-openfire with an LDAP > or Active Directory any time soon? Yes there is a bunch of things that is mostly in 4.3.0 already that my team is having an internal demo on tomorrow. We've testing w/AD. This weekend I'm planning to import stories from our internal tracker somehow into track.sipfoundry.org. * [UC-47] - Plugin support for Karel phone * [UC-50] - Support on SuSE * [UC-66] - Enable G.729 codec for media services * [UC-83] - Enable REST service for Presence * [UC-85] - Allow queriing user's presence based on email address * [UC-91] - Upgrade RPM and CD ISO builds to CentOS 5.5 / RHEL 5.5 * [UC-251] - New splash image for the CD installer * [UC-268] - LDAP import: Add SSL/TLS support * [UC-271] - Option to enforce LDAP only authentication in user portal * [UC-272] - Make LDAP server config more prominent * [UC-297] - LDAP preview for new fields * [UC-340] - FINISH: Use LDAP to authenticate in OpenFire * [UC-361] - FIX XX-8438 - Need ability to pickup calls using aliases ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] how to reboot the gui without rebooting the system?
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Seems if you make lots of user change, the GUI will hang. > top show 100% 'java'. this is not the first time this has been reported, but no one has been able to find a simple way to reproduce it. if you do, please share. > how do I reboot the GUI without rebooting a live system? > if I reboot httpd /etc/init.d/httpd, when I got to the gui, I get 'Apache > HTTP Server Test Page powered by CentOS' As root sipxproc -r ConfigServer This should work for all services, run this to see all process names and their current state sipxproc However, i just tried this on my 4.3.0 system and my registered polycom phones rebooted. I'm not sure what that is about. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Remove from forum
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Anand Boni wrote: > Since yesterday I am being bombarded with all the postings in the sipx forum > > Can you please remove my name from the forum for now ? It's possible your settings to receive digest or no email were lost. Can you log into your account and change them? http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Music on Hold not working
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Danny Shay wrote: > We recently installed Sipx 4.2 (currently on build 4.2.1-018932 > 2010-06-22T03:27:31 build34). The phones that are in use are all LG-Nortel > LIP-68xx models, currently running 1.2.38sp firmware. > > Music on hold is not working. did it work with past releases? i.e. is this a regression? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Warning about updating your sipXecs system starting now
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 7/28/10 10:52 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > > I'm going to restore a URL that would update your sipXecs installation > to the community build when you perform your next yum update. This done, folks can now update if they want. > is this different than the one thats been bugging us since yesterday? I'm not sure what you mean here > is there a readme file listing the old bugs that were fixed? All I have is this for list of fixes http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/commits/release-4.2 but now that track.sipfoundry.org is tracking this build, we can start to generate release notes from jira for upcoming releases. > New software updates available > > The package information was last updated Jul 27, 2010 5:59 PM. > The system is currently running 4.2.0-018575 > Update details: > sipxecs 4.2.1-18591.8.1 If you update, you'd be going to. 4.2.1-018932 2010-06-22T03:26:29 build10 I tested going from the last non-community build to this build and update went fine. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] Warning about updating your sipXecs system starting now
I'm going to restore a URL that would update your sipXecs installation to the community build when you perform your next yum update. This assumes you have a yum repository setup for updates. This includes systems installed from the CD. If you no don't wish for this to happen, please delete or disable your sipxecs repo file and await your options from openscs.org site. NOTE: Going forward, I will not refer to this as the "community build", simply the sipXecs build ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] CentOS yum sipxecs baseurl
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Claudio Succa wrote: > the old > "http://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/LatestStable/CentOS/5/$basearch/RPM"; > repository seems to be no more working. Yes, I will restore the URL momentarily, but I need to send a warning out first, look for a following announcement about updating. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Error of git clone http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:07 PM, jun,wen wrote: > Is that the master-4.2 branch I expected ? "I'd like to follow the master-4.2 branch, not the fork of Avaya." It's a bit hard to interpret this but access to any code from avaya, version 4.2 or main is actually not available anymore. You may want to contact avaya for more information if that is what you wanted. Their repos was https://sipxecs.sipfoundry.org/rep/sipXecs and returns 404 now. If you wanted the official source code of sipXecs from SIPfoundry, then you've got the right code. > When I want to do the same thing on git as I did "svn co" to look for the > updated source code, should I always use get clone ? It seems to compress > and download all of the source code. here is a great cheat sheet for users coming from svn http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html so "git clone" is like "svn co", but you if you want to get updates your source you want to use "git pull origin master-4.2" ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Error of git clone http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Wen Jun wrote: > [r...@mvp01 opt]# git clone https://dhub...@github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git > sipx Looks like github may have issues with http http://support.github.com/discussions/repos/2598-clone-issues-over-http-packfile-is-not-a-git-packfile-unable-to-get-pack-index Can you try git clone git://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git sipx ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Error of git clone http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Wen Jun wrote: >> Hi, I am trying to git source at github: http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs. >> Whereas my download was stopped by following error. > > You were trying to checkout from the web site landing page. You'd want either > > https://dhub...@github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git > or for faster response if you can get this thru your firewall > git://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git > > I plan to create some documentation on this soon. Also, you propbably want to use the master-4.2 branch as it's the main development branch. It's not "master" mostly because master was based on Avaya's main which moved and i did not rejigger branches. I will be merging the few checkins on svn main including enhanced cisco phone support. the release-4.2 is the last stable release ___ Sipx-users mailing list Sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] Error of git clone http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Wen Jun wrote: > Hi, I am trying to git source at github: http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs. > Whereas my download was stopped by following error. You were trying to checkout from the web site landing page. You'd want either https://dhub...@github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git or for faster response if you can get this thru your firewall git://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs.git I plan to create some documentation on this soon. ___ Sipx-users mailing list Sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] Reminder for folks that subscribed to getting digest emails only on mailing list(s)
We were unable to restore the setting that noted you only wanted to receive digest emails only. You need to go into your mailman settings and reset this setting if you want digest emails only http://list.sipfoundry.org ___ Sipx-users mailing list Sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] track, wiki, www, download and list servers on new infrastructure
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > Couple items of note - list archives are not accessible. This will be looked into in the next few days. ___ Sipx-users mailing list Sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
[sipx-users] track, wiki, www, download and list servers on new infrastructure
Everyone's credentials should still work. If you do not have access to something you should have, please let me know. I'll send out more details tomorrow, but very tired right now. Lot's of people to thank for getting this done. Couple items of note - if you subscribed to receive digest on mailing lists, you will have to go back and reset your settings as we were not able to locate(long story) and therefore restore that data. - We *may* experience email outages tomorrow AM as our request to allow unlimited email is processed. Sorry, there was little way around this. - wiki's "recently updated" gadget is not always up to date, we need to look into this. - wiki restore was from June 22 backup, sorry, if you made edits since then. (me included) you'll have to move them over. - track.sipfoundry.org restore was from July 4th backup, this was a strategic point in time just before many issues where bulk changed for openscs. there is more work to clean this up, if you do not see something you should let me or martin know. - I purposely did not restore URL to latest stable build, the very URL many people have in their yum repos. We should discuss if we want to do this. - code.sipfoundry.org attempts to make sense of git repo, but atlassian really has no support for git yet. ___ Sipx-users mailing list Sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Re: [sipx-users] level3/acme SBC, broadworks solved
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > you got ATT? Verizon? Level3 trying to sell you enterprise SIP trunks? > > they want you to send to a different port? want to send to you on a > different port? > > Got it nailed. nice > > (hint: you don't use sipxbridge as your SBC. they go an acme SBC in front > of their servers. just create an unmanaged gateway, put on the port you > need to send to, and then in the sip account/gateway, use their SBC) Because of the port swapping wonkyness of sipXbridge and non-standard SIP message rewrite rules? Definitely make notes here, i'm sure folks would like to get this resolved. > I CAN'T SAY ENOUGH about the support from Level3. they spent several days > on this, running debugs, trying this, trying that, till it worked. > > More (including trying to find the right wiki to post this to) later. heh, fair enough. With any luck, wiki.sipfoundry.org starting tomorrow am. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Job failure doing restart of phones aftersendprofiles
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, McIlvin, Don wrote: > I must have some part of set up incomplete. What is needed for the “send > profiles” to work properly? What service is sending to the phone to initiate > the restart (i.e. message apparently timing out)? How does the phone know to > obey ( authentication/authorization )? depends on phone. but last i knew for polycom it was an unauthorized SIP NOTIFY. Phone checks to see if profile actually changed before reloading to avoid getting tricked. What could fail? phone isn't registered or not reachable but i will say i see failures for phones that i wouldn't think shouldn't fail. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
[sipx-users] outage planned for sipx services tonight
wiki, tracker, mailing list as we move to new infrastructure. if we run into problems like we did last night, we may be swapping back, I'll keep you posted. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] list servers will be down for roughly an hour
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > as we test new list servers out. sorry for any inconvenience. I > recommend #sipx IRC on freenode if you need to coordinate anything in > the mean time. list servers are back to running as they were. we may try again tomorrow night ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
[sipx-users] list servers will be down for roughly an hour
as we test new list servers out. sorry for any inconvenience. I recommend #sipx IRC on freenode if you need to coordinate anything in the mean time. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] can someone with a working wiki account
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > please reply to me off list. I only need one volunteer. I'm all set on this, thanks everyone ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
[sipx-users] can someone with a working wiki account
that * hasn't logged into staging wiki system (if you don't know what this is, your answer is probably yes to this) * willing to give me their username and password (to which you can reset immediately after) please reply to me off list. I only need one volunteer. if i find a volunteer, i will reply to this post. The new crowd server seems to not honor existing passwords and we've all reset ours so i cannot look for any issues in log file. Thank you ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > HOORAY I upgraded my test box to the latest unstable and all pickup > scenarios worked!!! Boy i was hoping you'd say that! Thanks Dale and Robert. So we just need to identify the actual fix and separate it from the work that was done on unstable branch. Robert pointed us the the area of code he think it was in, but maybe i did something wrong in my first attempt to backport. Maybe I'll have that ready by the one-month-iversary of this bug. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > Running the latest opensuse build service build (4.2.1-18890.6.2) I still > can't get that to work, same issues as before. I even resent server > profiles. Is there something I'm not doing? you are probably running the latest stable, bit not the latest unstable. I have 4.2.1-018985 2010-07-17T17:47:42 build18 Repo file here http://download.ezuce.com/sipfoundry/4.2.1-unstable/sipxecs-unstable-centos.repo This is unstable, we can still backport to stable, i just want to identify the fix is somewhere in unstable. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > After transitioning a new deparment over to sipX this morning it came to > my attention that call pickup to hunt groups was no longer working (user > gets fast busy). Directed call pickup works fine. I have snapshots with > proxy and registrar logging set to INFO but they're too big for the list. I just tried last 4.2.1 unstable build under the following setup http://track.sipfoundry.org/secure/attachment/26726/xx-8438.png In this diagram, there are 3 ways to ring the original callee phone: directly, alias and huntgroup there are 3 ways to pickup the ringing phone: *78 + directly, alias and huntgroup So overall there are 9 paths to test, 3x3 All of these paths worked for me! Paths i didn't think should work, worked. Josh, Do I have this right? If so, can you try the latest community build, if that works? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Notice: Scheduled DNS server switch for SIPfoundry tomorrow 10 PM EDT
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > All services should run as normal and still point to same servers. Update: Martin informed he was not able to perform this tonight. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 450 headset echo cancellation option
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote: > I don't know That is what my individual handset files in the tftproot > folder looked like. These are the files that are uploaded (if allowed) when > an user makes changes on their handset. Maybe we are talking about 2 > different files? I searched through the admin guide, and I couldn't find > squat on the topic. Ok, googling tells me, the http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 450 headset echo cancellation option
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: > If I'm getting this info from the correct place, it seems to change a few > things when you turn the feature on. This is from my MAC-phone.cfg file my > phone uploaded to the server. I turned the feature on and off, and grabbed > the contents of the file for each setting. > > On: > [r...@nshpbx1 tftproot]# cat 0004f22732c9-phone.cfg > > > voice.ns.hd.enable="1" voice.aes.hd.duplexBalance="7" > voice.aes.hd.enable="1" voice.aec.hd.enable="1" reg.1.ringType="10" > reg.1.fwdContact="5914780" reg.1.fwdStatus="0"/> Maybe it's been too long since I looked at this, but the system expects the phone.cfg starts out like this http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
[sipx-users] Notice: Scheduled DNS server switch for SIPfoundry tomorrow 10 PM EDT
All services should run as normal and still point to same servers. Switching DNS server is just the first step for preparing to switch each piece of the current infrastructure over to new hardware Affected sites/services scm mail (list) wiki www track sipxecs sipxtapi code admin forum I have reverse DNS setup back to mail list server. Again, you shouldn't see any change in any of the services after tomorrow evening, if you do, please tell me. If anyone wants to test these services beforehand, here are the name servers we'll be using. 64.94.136.11 64.237.45.34 64.94.136.13 69.41.170.223 212.100.247.15 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Centralized database and VM
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:13 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > VM is a particularly difficult situation. It is an "operational" component > (as opposed to a "configuragion" component), so it has to operate in more or > less real time. Are there situations particularly in branch setups where users are weighted thru DNS to always connect to the same user portal and ivr system should it be available. If the vm server had an asynchronous replication model to handle the situation when one system goes down and users all start getting temporarily directed to the single available system, would this solution solve *some* people's need? There would always be a window where vm could get lost though unless someone implements real-time replication filesystem like DRDB or GlusterFS AFAIK. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Help with Patton gateway
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Michal Bielicki wrote: > The fix is for a far newer freeswitch version than the one in sipX, so I > guess in the current sipXecs versions it is still in. Idea: I have to update FS in the unstable build for an OpenACD fix anyway, once I do someone can test this on the sipxecs unstable build. If is works, we can try to backport the issue to 4.2 stable if it applies cleanly. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Restore questions - mainly voicemail
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) > wrote: >> When I check a few voicemail boxes now, it saying they have X number of >> unheard messages. This seems to be the case on all I check. Is this >> expected? I doubt they all really had that meany unheard messaged. It >> isn't saying they are new. IF it is expected, that id fine. I just need >> to know exactly what to expect. > > speculating... voicemail heard/unheard state is stored in message xml > digest file, so those should have preserved fine. The heard/unheard > count has to be calculated constantly for MWI status. I wonder if > there is a cache somewhere that needs to be rebuilt? if you log into user portal for a given user, is the status on each message correct? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Restore questions - mainly voicemail
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: > When I check a few voicemail boxes now, it saying they have X number of > unheard messages. This seems to be the case on all I check. Is this > expected? I doubt they all really had that meany unheard messaged. It > isn't saying they are new. IF it is expected, that id fine. I just need > to know exactly what to expect. speculating... voicemail heard/unheard state is stored in message xml digest file, so those should have preserved fine. The heard/unheard count has to be calculated constantly for MWI status. I wonder if there is a cache somewhere that needs to be rebuilt? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] repo question
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:15 PM, dan wrote: > Could someone clarify the difference between the repos at > opensuse.org and ezuce.com? The builds at opensuse seem to be slightly > newer. Which one is recommended? ezuce.com are the official ones. Occasionally I'll have opensuse buildservice build a package that tests a patch and so that build would not be considered official. unfortunately, i have not got in the habit of updating ezuce.com with all the distros at the same time and I should start doing that. centos is new, fedoras may be a bit behind. we may find opensuse buildservice repos are easier to be maintain repos, but unfortunately they take a full 24hrs to update their repos after a build. many times i need to verify the build as soon as it's done. build team will improve this process over time. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] terminate registrations
2010/7/15 Miguel Jesús Díaz Macedo : > How can I terminate SIP registrations manually?, I have restarted de > registar service, but I still see the registrations as not expired if the registrar is down, and you're careful, and you're not in HA setup, you can edit /var/sipxdata/sipdb/registration.xml. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] [sipX-dev] Future of sipXecs in SIPfoundry
I just wanted to let folks know this is not about eZuce taking Avaya's place. That wouldn't be very useful. With the copyright assignment agreement out of the way, everyone one is on the same playing field. eZuce contributes because we found a way to profit in a community driven, open source software business. If you are doing the same or planning to do the same then you're just like eZuce. SIPfoundry sipXecs project needs you to have *more* control not less. eZuce recognizes that you need that control to build a successful business from sipXecs and therefore continue to stick around. As the first small step in this pledge, much of the infrastructure to run SIPfoundry will be created under accounts not tied to eZuce in as much as that is possible. I will share these accounts with various members of the community so we never have to go through this infrastructure transfer again. Martin may pull together a roadmap based on what he sees eZuce contributing, but it's not meant to reflect what get's in. I would recommend that we keep the same rules that have always applied as far as open communications about your intentions before you contribute a substantial amount of code. That brings me to source control and martin pointed folks to my git repo, but i wanted to explain a bit about this. i think it makes sense to move to a distributed source code model, and i offer to manage the upstream for as long as that is prudent. i explicitly didn't create a sipfoundry git repo because i wanted to make it clear the responsibility ultimately and initially falls on my shoulders to merge your contributions in. This is in direct contrast to a model where contributions are submitted, but no one feels obliged to do anything about accepting it. I can't guarantee I'll get this right, or that i'll be as responsive as we'd all like, but I can promise I'll do my best. Should the community agree I am not fulfilling my duties, a new repo can be declared and builds can start coming from there. Providing the ability to declare a new upstream source tree at any time will make all the difference in ensure there is only one upstream source tree. Knowing that an official source tree is only distinguished from an unofficial one by where the official builds come from. On that front, I've reached out to several non-eZuce employees that have made contributions in the past in regards to building and should they accept the responsibility, they will have all the power to produce the new official builds including ISOs. Matt White has already volunteered, thank you Matt. I feel like this time, we have a chance to get some of these finer details right and I now know it will make all the difference. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Polycom IP 430 won't register remotely
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Gary Luca wrote: > Thank you for the link regarding FTP. Do you know of any place where I can > find detailed instructions on how precisely to configure sipX for whatever > it needs in order for FTP to work for phone provisioning? On the local > network I use TFTP, which I don't mind because it is a secure network. For > the REMOTES i'd rather use FTP as it incorporates authentication. you shouldn't have to do anything except open ports in your firewall for ftp port range. sipXecs installs and configures ftp server for you complete w/default polycom ftp username and password. So this is not anymore secure than tftp, so best configure your firewall appropriately based on source IPs i would imagine. In fact, your local polycom phones are probably already using FTP. /var/log/audit/audit.log ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 450 headset echo cancellation option
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: > Where is the template file I would need to look at? I'm familiar with > polycom_sip.cfg, and I don't see anything there. > I have only changed 1 or 2 polycom settings total that had to be done > outside of the sipx web interface. doesn't look good, I just ran this [r...@sipxecs tftproot]# polycom-config 0004f2136b24-* | egrep -i '(headset|echo|cancel)' /phone1/user_preferences/up.analogHeadsetOption=0 /sip/user_preferences/up.headsetMode=0 /sip/voice/volume/voice.volume.persist.headset=0 where 0004f2136b24 is the mac address of my polycom 430 and didn't come up with anything. NOTES: * polycom-config is a script in sipXtools that flattens out the polycom xml config files, one per line and is useful for grepping * this request gives credence to keeping all settings and especially point #3 in this thread http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/22473 * If you find the setting in the polycom configuration docs, I'll be happy to tell you how to add it to your local system and get it into the next 4.2 stable build ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] "Internal Error" trying to activate in Device files 3.1.3revC for Polycom phones
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:43 PM, McIlvin, Don wrote: > The error occurred on both the "device file" page and "upload" page > after clicking .. "An internal error has occurred. Click > (here) to continue". The (here) brought me to the SipXecs config 4.2 > login page. All the other device file sets where deactivated at the > time. Only by deleting list entries so only one Polycom remained, would > it successfully activate. it also sounded like you had an internal error, you might want to check /var/log/sipxpbx/sipxconfig.log and post the error message. > Is there an XX- entry to fix this? I sure would like very much to > vote for it :). > > Making it easier to manage and apply different versions or combinations > of boot and SIP sw for varied phone models would be rather helpful. I couldn't believe there wasn't one so i created it http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8651 it's been talked about quite a while. if there was one , i couldn't find it. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Polycom IP 430 won't register remotely
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > 2. You need to provision the phone remotely via ftp (best choice) or tftp. Be sure to consider this http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8401 community build has the fix, but if you're not running the community build http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfs8q7k9_30cqgtpbcc you can study the workaround in the issue ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > *bump* I just attached a file to the issue backported-huntgroup-pickup-by-alias-fix.patch that I believe josh is running. It was my attempt to backport the fix from 4.2.1 dev to 4.2.0 stable as it was known regression, I just don't know if I got it right. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] IM group not distributed or not displayed by Bria 3.0
I'd like to resurface the issues that were raised by Tony and Paul regarding Bria 3.0 support Original can be found here http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.sipfoundry.general/25507 Bria 3.1 is still not out, but it might help improving the support in 3.0 and help those still getting by and to prepare for Bria 3.1 release. Here's what I would like to propose. I'll capture all the new bria 3.0 settings as a new phone model "Bria 3.0". I have a system (on EC2) I can open up to you guys to hammer out some of the discrepancies of what works and what doesn't because we'll be working off the same system. Then we can capture a definitive list of issues and possible workarounds. Tony, what you know about EC2, will this setup be enough to test most everything? I'll be using this as a guide to the new settings http://www.counterpath.com/assets/files/189/Bria_3_Configuration_Guide_Retail_Deployments_R1.pdf The link can be found on this page http://www.counterpath.com/bria.html&active=5 Of course I can open up testing server to others per request. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] GXV3140?
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Graeme Allen wrote: > Has the Grandstream GXV3140 been added to the configuration/provisioning > interface of SipX, if not, are there plans to add it? As an initial test, have you tried configuring it as a GXV3000? Can you (or anyone reading this) get specs on any specific settings? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Any experience with Polycom on-phone call recording?
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Jeff Gilmore wrote: > I wonder if anyone has tried this? In particular, are there any gotchas with > either firmware versions needed or with managing the profile through sipx > while using this feature? every settings should be available to you. that is a (sometimes debated) beauty of the phone configuration system. the current recommended firmware AFAIK is 3.1.3c split 4.1.4 bootrom ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Random Dropped Registrations
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:48 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > I don't know of any other way to add perl modules? you'd be running the most common platform and setup for production machines. many developers use fedora, some F10, some F12 but not for production and cpan may have an easier time installing on fedora. Unfortunate circumstance of picking a production OS with a lifespan going on 3.5 years, older when you consider it's really fedora 6. also, cpan is also a huge PITA installing of soap lite. Makes me glad i never learned perl to any real extent. sorry i cannot be of more help here. >> there is a sipXiso project to build your own ISO with your own tools >> preinstalled >> http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsdev/Building+Your+Own+CentOS+ISO > > I'm pretty sure I've always picked up my ISOs from > http://sipxecssw.org/pub/sipXecs/ > So, the above aren't the same? the project is scripts to build your own ISOs, so different in that sense. The scripts to build the ISOs you've been using are not available AFAIK hence this sipXiso project was created. I've worked out the kinks and feel pretty confident in them. I just checked and they work with CentOS 5.5 as is so they'll be the least amount to update after install and the most secure out of the box. This doesn't address your issue, just more information for those following this part of the thread. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Random Dropped Registrations
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > I guess I don't understand why so many things seem to be missing in the ISO > installs I have. Every time I try to run a program that most seem to think > should be on the system, it's not there. Maybe I need to switch over to using > a source based system? Would that make a difference? ISO is meant to get you a running system. The idea is running yum to install things after that, that are not critical to the operation of the system is not difficult for users. Trying to keep the size <650MB is getting harder and harder to do as sipXecs grows. if you have to call cpan to install modules, that's another story, capturing anything other than rpms on the iso is very difficult, simply because the OS on the ISO doesn't actually run until 2nd stage of install. there is a sipXiso project to build your own ISO with your own tools preinstalled http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsdev/Building+Your+Own+CentOS+ISO ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] How to setup another website on sipx server?
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 8:58 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > Only thing to keep in mind is that you might need to use a different port > depending on your needs and assuming this is not a problem on sipx. The > iptables filter aren't in play so other than that, I don't know why this > would not work. another thing to keep in mind, updating your machine will give a warning about not being able to update httpd.conf. you'll have to review the httpd.conf.rpmnew after each update to make there are no changes. having said that, they would be quite rare to this file. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could realistically be added after 4.2?
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Smells like an applet, but I don't see how that would make it easier. applet could build a list of calls, or servers, or phones, can you can pick them from a drop down and applet would show just that data instantly. otherwise you'd have to download full log and do a series of greps to isolate the data, run it thru log to log.xml and open each file in sipviewer. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] All phones expired after conf call
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:37 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > If you know of any way that one might build an "expert system" that could do > this diagnosis directly at the request of the administrator, rather than > requiring a trained support person, splunk is the closest thing to this. Create intelligent searches to diagnose issues. One problem with snapshots, is that the submitter never learns how to diagnose the issue, they just become a bigger burden on kind folks like you. video http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAEZY it's proprietary source, but there's a free version that is 500MB/day. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could realistically be added after 4.2?
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > 3. Have the merged.xml ready for download in sipxconfig (nice, comments > about what it is, storing it there for future reference) to display in > viewer. it might be possible to wrap the sip viewer as an applet so you have an integrated viewer or do people in general still hate applets? What's nice about this, is you drill into calls, traffic from certain servers, etc all on one webpage w/o having to download 30 separate files. i offer to mentor someone thru this > B. Wireshark with "limited" capabilities from sipxconfig, because "a badly > formed wireshark request" can be more problem than it is worth. Crippling a > system because you said log all traffic indefinitely is NOT a good idea, > sane limits should be imposed. y, tcpdump with targeted params ala http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2010/05/capture-traffic-on-your-sipxecs-server.html ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
[sipx-users] FYI: Polycom firmware 3.0.4 is not compatible w/sipxecs 4.2
I was just trying to setup a quick demo and i knew 3.0.4 wasn't the latest build but i thought it should work. The phone would hang forever until i uploaded 3.1.3c split and 4.2 bootrom. So in a nut shell, polycom out of the box (as of today and as of this specific vendor of which i'm not sure), doesn't work w/sipxecs 4.2 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Delay dialing out
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > If a pattern of excessive delays is consistently noticed for this and > other ITSPs please post the SVN revision you are using and send a > snapshot. For those using 4.2.1 built from the open build service rpm -qa | grep sipx will give you a series of list of rpms, the svn rev is the number around 18xxx, so in this example off of 4.2.1 unstable it's sipxbridge-4.2.1-18964.11.3 It's 18964. The svn rev in 4.2.1 stable is 18929 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Updating 4.2.0 to 4.2.1
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:58 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: > I'm beat, no idea how to update short of installing 4.2.1 using ISO and > restoring from a backup. Thank you all filling mike in, I was not paying attention. You all pointed him in the correct direction As far as what is in the build I stopped blindly merging around june 4th, rev 18930. I've then been cherry picking and had a few fixes of my own Commit Log http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/commits/release-4.2 I will admit i'm not sure if i've updated the builds for all distros, but i would have done centos Let me know if there's a fix i should roll in, otherwise all other updates are going into next release 4.2.2, release date TBD. I will create a wiki page will all this information, i've been so swamped i just haven't had time, sorry about any confusion. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Adding g729 to Freeswitch
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Gerald Harper wrote: > Thanks Sven, I may try this on a 4.2 box this weekend. Does anybody have any > hints, tips or suggestions? if you run into trouble, or looking for an alternative, you may try looking into these guy's FS mod http://www.howlertech.com/home/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Use one IP address for multiple gateways in sipX?
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > *bump* > On 06/26/2010 12:49 PM, Josh Patten wrote: >> *bump* you're not afraid of the double-bump ;) >> On 06/24/2010 05:39 PM, Josh Patten wrote: >>> OK I think I have figured out why this is happening and I think it's a >>> bug. What I think is happening is that sipX is processing the non-shared >>> branch gateways that match the branch of the calling user BEFORE >>> processing the shared gateways even though the shared gateways are >>> listed before the non-shared branch gateways in the dial plan. This >>> results in sipX skipping over the shared Mediant 1000 gateway and going >>> straight to the branch gateway (if it is available). I found this out by >>> seeing all my calls routing through my Adtran TA908e's which are used >>> for emergency calling when the shared Mediant 1000 is not available. Can you send before and after of these 2 files /etc/sipxpbx/mappingrules.xml /etc/sipxpbx/fallbackrules.xml to eliminate sipXconfig as problem ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group call pickup non-functional
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:22 PM, JOLY, ROBERT (ROBERT) wrote: > The bug introduced by 18076 got undone in revision 18944 so presumably hunt > group call pick up started working again after that revision... Robert, This checkin seems to exclusively deal with the addition of the relation type in the alias db. Was that the specific fix for this, or is there some isolated bug fix in here i missed in this merge set? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] ubuntu
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:47 AM, mattias jonsson wrote: > Wich ubuntu will sipbx work with? there are no binaries. the closest I know of is if you search the list, you'll find experiences compiling the source on debian. if you have patches, I'll happy review and accept them, i would really like to get binaries going there. Notes * searchable dev list http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel * although i would recommend picking a recent ubuntu version, xerces > 3.0 might have compiler issue that may be easy to fix http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.sipx.devel/22363/match=fedora+13 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] call routing from database pop
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: > It looks like Freeswitch could do this with mod_xml_curl … > I’m just not into programming pain. :-) What would be the pain point? getting the module available or working with the module? if it's getting the module available, i just went thru getting erlang module to build as part of sipx-freeswitch package and i think we should somehow find a way for sipXecs folks to drop in these modules w/o having to open up sipx-freeswitch rpm spec everytime. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Open Source SIP Client
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SIP_software kapanga is not on that list and my friend in the biz thinks it's pretty good. windows, android, windows mobile http://www.kapanga.net/ ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Sipxconfig on seperate host?
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Staffan Kerker wrote: > OK, good to know. Voicemail is not a critical application, basic SIP > routing/registration and SIP trunking is. I'll disable the voicemail > feature. for other's benefit others, voicemail would work fine. tui into voicemail would be fine, it's just web ui into voicemail would rely on nfs and the issues related to that. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Sipxconfig on seperate host?
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Staffan Kerker wrote: > Now my question is, am I missing something here that will break stuff? > > host1 (configuration only) > -- > Configuration/Management > Primary SIP Router (shutdown) > > host2 (the "new" primary) > -- > Voicemail i thought the configserver and voicemail server had to live on the same box due to local file references. nfs is an option even though it's not good at being a failover filesystem because this would just affect users not being able to view there voicemail from the web ui. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] SOAP API help?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Nathaniel Watkins
wrote:
> I need to interface with sipXecs via SOAP to add users via another web page
I'm not too familiar with where the REST api has gone, i don't see
user crud calls
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsdev/SipXconfig%27s+RESTful+API
anyone know if they're available yet?
if you go via soap
If you download the wsdl, can you configure your soap client like so
new SoapClient('./downloaded-sipxconfig.wsdl');
Otherwise there are examples for connecting via ruby, that work for you?
I haven't heard much about php attempts. wsdl can be harry to parse
for some parsers. sometimes there are 2 ways to use soap, one via the
wsdl that will warn you at runtime if you do something stupid, the
other is to ignore the wsdl and program to the web api. surprisingly,
they both have their advantages and disadvantages. i couldn't tell
you how php soap does it.
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solutionbasedonsipXecs?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Gerald Harper wrote: > Not to be rude, but who the hell made you God? This is supposed to be a > discussion of all things sipXecs and I had a question regarding SCS vs > sipXecs, not my fault the thread was hijacked to be a "does it exist" > question. I understand Avaya is your competition and suggesting they are not > going forward helps your cause, but lets not try to suppress free speech or > anything. yes, I should have prefaced my email, in my opinion, my bad and it wasn't about the original question, more about the direction it was heading. Anybody who's been following my threads knows I don't see Avaya or SCS as competition, this includes signing the contributor agreement with Avaya. For the record, I do welcome folks getting annoyed and pissed and expressing themselves. Free speech is welcomed. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] is there an AVAYA branded/commercial solutionbased onsipXecs?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Matt White wrote: > Let us know if you actual are able to buy one. As that seems to be the > issue. There is already enough confusion about SCS v.s. sipXecs on this mailing list. If someone creates a mailing list or google group to talk about SCS, it's be fine to post it here to let folks know how to get engaged into a new community related to sipXecs. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] strange problem with cisco dialplan.xml
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > sipx doesn't need, doesn't use the cisco dialplan.xml. > cisco phones were able to dial 4 digit extensions, as well as outdial > without hitting the '#' or button or waiting the 5 second timeout. On the 7960/40 phone configuration page under "Phone parameters" you can tell it what file to look for in tftp root for dialplan.xml. Also, in sipXconfig's Device Upload page where you normally upload firmware, you can upload a dialplan.xml file. Is this what you were looking for? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Updating to 4.0.4 from 3.10.3... where did CDR history go?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I did an update about 4 weeks ago to a 3.10.3 system, and brought it > up to 4.0.4. I've noticed there are no CDR's in the database prior to > the upgrade time. Did you mean "prior" or "post"? ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Robo Dial?
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Tran, Ly V. wrote: > Just found the thread in dev, > http://forum.sipfoundry.org/index.php?t=msg&goto=47588&S=85598d4474612ad > bb2100dff584a5de0 > Need to do some more reading, but looks interesting. It will probably be a new module eventually, but it will start out as a HOWTO and few patches to apply ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs configuration via SOAP?
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Josh Patten wrote: > You'll also notice some extra features in that build (assuming it's the > OpenSuSE build service one) ;-) To get the list of fixes, look for issues submitted by lazyboy that are in patch pending state. It also includes patches like fedora 12 support. http://track.sipfoundry.org/sr/jira.issueviews:searchrequest-printable/temp/SearchRequest.html?jqlQuery=issuetype+in+standardIssueTypes%28%29+AND+reporter+%3D+lazyboy+AND+status+%3D+%22Patch+Pending%22&tempMax=1000 source http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs configuration via SOAP?
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > The notes implied it had been merged to main...guess I'll go yum and see what > happens. it definitely went to 4.2 but was not built by avaya yet AFAICT. I have ISOs and RPMs that are up-to date here http://download.ezuce.com/sipfoundry/4.2.1/ISO/ Or RPMs that can be installed via this repo file http://download.ezuce.com/sipfoundry/4.2.1/sipxecs-centos.repo ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Sipxecs configuration via SOAP?
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8253 > > Looks like I can't add users via SOAP via the 4.2 iso build. Is there an > easy way (easy for a non sipx developer) to update this on my end - or am I > better off waiting? Or is there another way to achieve this (i.e. wrapping > SOAP in curl to change the authentication method)? After you install via ISO, you can simply run yum update and you'll load the latest build with the fix along with all other OS updates. This assumes the rpms on sipfoundry have been updated w/r18814 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Cannot restart Linksys phones
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Massimo Vignone wrote: > After upgraded to 4.2 release, i can't restart Linksys and Polycom > phones via GUI. you can use ngrep, tcpdump or wireshark to watch the NOTIFY message coming from sipXconfig on 5060 to compare it with the one you are sending that works. that assumes sipXconfig is generating a message, if not you can check sipxconfig.log for any errors. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] MX records for list.sipfoundry.org do not resolve
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:55 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > The gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.sipfoundry.general rss feed does't seem to be > working. I'm not sure how used this is - just thought I'd mention it. > ___ > > Isn't that Gmane's problem? Gmane seems to have started picking up emails again, but lost a number of them between the dates 6/6 and 6/9. Not a big deal i guess. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] MX records for list.sipfoundry.org do not resolve
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: > The gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.sipfoundry.general rss feed does't seem to be > working. I'm not sure how used this is - just thought I'd mention it. rss i recommend it to folks looking to watch what's going on. but i do use it for the archives and last update was 6/6. maybe it will resync soon ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Import/Export
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Abdul Mayat wrote: > I thought it would be useful to also include email > notification method and External MWI as additional fields > (these would allow a full voicemail deployment to be > uploaded). Using the REST API might be a better place to more advanced integration needs. I see import and a very light weight way to help 80% of the people ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] 3.10.2 to 4.2 with External Aliases File
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > I'd strongly urge 4.0 first. There are schema changes in 4.0 and 4.2. 4.2 > schema changes do not go back to 3.10x, so 2 steps is necessary. > No also on the aliases. I'm fairly sure the database knows how to go from any earlier version to the latest version. What I'm not sure is about the rest of the system. In addition the path is not tested as well or at all. In short, I suggest what Tony and Michael suggests. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Inconvenience: Adding lines to phones
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mossman, Paul (Paul) wrote: > Douglas wrote: >> I can put together a screen mock-up if you want. > Sure. I attached screenshots http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8462 And Dale, if autocomplete doesn't kick in, then, yes, if you simply type in the name, it should validate the user id on submit and validate it. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Inconvenience: Adding lines to phones
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Mossman, Paul (Paul) wrote: > It would be nice if the table contents updated in the backgroun as you type. > i.e. Without the need for a screen refresh. you can drop the entire search page and add one ajax text field to lines page. It would use the Tapestry/ajax integration where you just have to implement the method that returns candidates. I can put together a screen mock-up if you want. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Inconvenience: Adding lines to phones
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Mossman, Paul (Paul) wrote: > But I suspect that real world users are bothered more by the vice-versa Line > case: Adding a Phone Line to a selected User. I guess it depends if you normally add users to phones or phones to users. For adding users to phones, would auto-complete user field help? Start typing user and candidates come up. Kinda like jira. > - Since we now have auto-provisioning, the list of all unassigned Phones > will be displayed by default. In the simple case, you just select one (or > more) and click the OK button. +1 for adding phones to users: ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] primary server CDR issue
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > All that would be required to make the new version work would be to put fips > = no in the autogenerated stunnel config on the primary server I see, I've had added the fips=no in the latest build about a week ago http://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/commit/779ef106ee87c755a3738ea0371966091e63786d and it didn't work on your system because you had downgraded stunnel. You downgraded because you were the original person to discover the stunnel issue and downgraded as a workaround. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] primary server CDR issue
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Josh Patten wrote: > 4.28.1 > > The one included with the community build using the openSuSE build service. > > I'm not entirely sure why 4.28.1 was chosen. The stunnel that comes w/CentOS was apparently not sufficient for whoever added the dependency on stunnel. I could not get stunnel 4.26 to compile on CentOS 5.4 because of the dependency on the updated openssl so I went with a new one. Josh, when you had issues w/stunnel, were you on CentSO 5.2 or 5.4? If you used the Community ISO, it would be 5.4. Using an updated OS I think is important, so as soon as opensuse supports CentOS 5.5 that was released on May 15 I will rebuild the rpms and ISO. I tried executing a stunnel command w/the new cdr stunnel config and it worked fine, but maybe I missed something, I will check again ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] POLYCOM configuration - display FIRST NAME of user
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:39 PM, IT Services wrote: > As the default, the polycom phone display shows the extension number. I > want to display the first name of the user. I would think you can change the screen name field on the SIP Line Settings. For example, if the default is 2...@example.com, change it to simply Joe. Unfortunately you have to change it for every phone, unless you change the velocity template. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Latest Dev build?
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Installing fresh from this iso with manual format does not allow partition > options and formats and installs like the automatic format. i fixed this part and rebuild ISO and will test in AM. Sorry i've been slow to respond, i'm traveling ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Latest Dev build?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote: > Doug, I did a re-install from the ISO and confirmed that when I select the > installation and the format option, the system installs but it never stops > at the format screen to request the type of format. Is that something that > has been removed from the installation now, or is that a part of the issue > here? I suspect it is. I meant it to be there. I'll add it to the list. I wouldn't imagine it would be related. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
[sipx-users] Fwd: Latest Dev build?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote: > During the bootup process there was the following error - Starting > Phonelogd: Configuration file not found: "/etc/sipxpbx/phonelog-config" > (Unconfigured) i'll take a look. If the dependencies are not right, random ordering is maybe causing this. > Additionally, this error: > > SELinux is not enforcing [failed] > Sipxpbx configuration problem found! > Check SELinux is not enforcing > Selinux status is "" > It must be 'permissive' or 'Disabled" for sipxpbx > This may cause apache to fail > Edit /etc/selinux/conf and restart your system > > Selinux file was correct - it was set to disabled. yes, i see that too. benign, but still not correct > Turning the system down, the following error was displayed - Shutting down > XFS (Failed) that i don't see, I wonder if it's related to your hardware. does plain centos 5.4 install correctly? XFS? I thought it would be ext3, are you manually configuring the disk? I did see in logs you sent me earlier that openfire didn't install correctly because unpack200 wasn't avail. this happens when jdk isn't install. I will check that out as well. abdul and todd, thanks for testing. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
