RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
Okay, guys, call off the dogs! Izzy (And I dont think either of you are well-trained. J ) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/6/2004 7:31:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Whatever works -- but I don't sit and roll over. DAVEH: You will after Izzy gets done training you... ;-) JD I think if I pant right now, it would be funny. J DAVEH: :-P And..don't forget to wag your tail. -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.langlitz.com~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain Five email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/7/2004 5:48:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Okay, guys, call off the dogs! Izzy (And I dont think I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"either of you are well-trained. J ) So you think we have pretty much worn this one out ??? Ok John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey LOOKS LIKE ELSMAN
In a message dated 5/6/2004 11:05:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lets just drop it for now. Someday you will realize that there is a bit of bulldog in me. I am making it a hobby to dig up all the truth about Happy Herbert. Some of his pictures actually look like Elsman. SMITHGLUTTON, "BLESS YOUR DIRTY HEART". ---ELSMANSTEIN P.S. I SHALL TRY TO GET A ROLE ON "LITTLE RASCALS", IF YOU DON'T MIND, AND GIVE YOU AS A REFERENCE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 10:27:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: I don't understand, Elsman..??? What's the problem with revealing a few techniques you might know that would benefit other students of the Bible? Did Hubert swear you to secrecy? (And if so.why?) HE TOLD ME IN CONFIDENCE. HIS ESTATE MAY HAVE AN ASSET. IF YOU KNOW THE LITERATURE ON THE SUBJECT, THERE ARE MANY THAT HAVE MADE FORTUNES ON THEIR OWN MEMORY COURSES: -- DAVE DE BUSSCHER, B-BALL PLAYER -- JOHN LUCAS, B-BALL PLAYER IF ANYONE ON THIS LIST CONSULTED ME, I WOULD NO MORE REVEAL SUCH CONFIDENCES THAN HERE. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND LAWYER ETHICS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 2:19:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm wondering if the "Memory course" is, in fact, scientific or if that is just hype. God's Word does have a cleansing effect on both mind and heart but I don't know if this happens when it is taken out of balance and context. Wrong teaching can also bend the conscience in the wrong direction. The end never justifies the means. judyt JUDY, IF YOU DOUBT HUBERT'S MEMORY, ASK DAVID TO TELL YOU WHAT HUBERT DID RE A SPONTANEOUS QUESTION , ASKING HIM IF HE COULD RECITE ROMANS 8. ---JIM
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 1:18:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jim, you're almost there. Lets ask John f he approves of you addressing him this way. If he does not, lets set it aside and call him John, or Smithson, or John Smithson, (but not JS), okay? Perry the Moderator */ NOT THAT A LAWYER CAN REVEAL. SORRY. I ONLY TATTLE ON THAT BUTTERBALL FRAUD. ---ELSMANSTEIN/* MY PROBLEM IS THAT I ONLY "MEMORIZED" THE NAME BUTTERBALL FROM THAT OTHER SITE, WHERE WE ALL CALLED HIM BUTTERBALL, AFTER HE BRAGGED ABOUT HIS 5 FOOT HEIGHT 270 POUNDS. INDEED, ONE LAS VEGAS PREACHER SUGGESTED THAT WE ROLL BUTTERBALL DOWN THE STREET IN FRONT OF THE BELLAGIO, SO TO CONFRONT THE HOMOS AND GAMBLERS. (DID JOHN EVER ANSWER IF HE WAS AC/DC, AS DAVID ASKED?) I WILL CONSULT HUBERT'S NOTES TO SEE IF I CAN BE DE-PROGRAMMED THEN RE-PROGRAMMED. ELSMANSTEIN, AS THEY CALL ME,DERISEVLY, MOCKING THE "TOUGH JEWISH LAWYER IMAGE".
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
John S. wrote: In a previous post, you surmised that there was little to nothing written about the man because there weren't any computers at the time. Give me a break. You misunderstood me. When interesting things happen today, they get posted on the internet and pop up on search engines right away. You search the internet and think you have done your homework because of the way the internet operates today. Try to search on events that took place in 1960. It is not quite as easy. The highlights of much of Hubert's ministry was in the 1930's 40's, and then again in the 1960's. Therefore, you need to search newspapers and the like rather than the internet if you want to dig up the info you are looking for. If you are really serious about this, Bill Bright (Campus Crusade for Christ) was apparently someone famous who kept tabs on Hubert. Hubert told me that he even called upon him in the nursing home. Unfortunately, Bill Bright passed on just about four months after Hubert did last year. Still, perhaps someone at his ministry can give you some information. John wrote: I am saying that I shouldn't have to beat the bushes to find out something about a man who ministered to Billy Graham, was certificated by the Pope, converted 40,000 Jews, saved additional thousands of hippies, was shot with a .38 and healed on the way to the hospital, and the like. Your response -- increase the mythology! How do I increase the mythology? You mean that every time someone shares information, that is increasing the mythology? You claimed that there was nowhere to look, and I was saying there should be plenty to find if you look. Sorry for trying to give you hope in your quest to find out about him. John S. wrote: Lets do this. I will take back the fraud part of my criticism of HH..and transpose it to his mythology. Since he is dead, I don't need to pull a Bush and say I'm sorry. Well, if you don't apologize for the way you do research and jump to conclusions, then I will just know that you cannot be trusted when you report information to us. No offense, just the way it is if you don't think you owe an apology for this rash statement of yours. I am glad you have retracted the fraud accusation, but it really should not have taken this much to get that. John S. wrote: You are so specific about the 59 countries. Must be a source on that, huh? Outer Mongolia I'm just reporting to you what Hubert told me directly. Hubert had some great stories about Mongolia and his experience in the court system there, but if I told them to you, it would surely add to the mythology because they sound like the book of Acts. :-) John S. wrote: Anyway -- lets get back to bible study and warm and passionate discussion. Sounds good to me. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 8:36:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: HE TOLD ME IN CONFIDENCE. HIS ESTATE MAY HAVE AN ASSET. IF YOU KNOW THE LITERATURE ON THE SUBJECT, THERE ARE MANY THAT HAVE MADE FORTUNES ON THEIR OWN MEMORY COURSES: -- DAVE DE BUSSCHER, B-BALL PLAYER -- JOHN LUCAS, B-BALL PLAYER IF ANYONE ON THIS LIST CONSULTED ME, I WOULD NO MORE REVEAL SUCH CONFIDENCES THAN HERE. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND LAWYER ETHICS. More nonsense, I think. Just another reason why we cannot check out the mythology surrounding this minister to Mongolia.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
Now Im cracking up! ROFL Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND LAWYER ETHICS.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 8:55:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MY PROBLEM IS THAT I ONLY "MEMORIZED" THE NAME BUTTERBALL FROM THAT OTHER SITE, WHERE WE ALL CALLED HIM BUTTERBALL, Actually, only Elsman used this _expression_. Just another lie -- but who is counting. John
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
John, I really hope you do the homework on HH. Wouldnt that be a fascinating book? (Better than The Apostle?) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course In a message dated 5/6/2004 8:36:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: HE TOLD ME IN CONFIDENCE. HIS ESTATE MAY HAVE AN ASSET. IF YOU KNOW THE LITERATURE ON THE SUBJECT, THERE ARE MANY THAT HAVE MADE FORTUNES ON THEIR OWN MEMORY COURSES: -- DAVE DE BUSSCHER, B-BALL PLAYER -- JOHN LUCAS, B-BALL PLAYER IF ANYONE ON THIS LIST CONSULTED ME, I WOULD NO MORE REVEAL SUCH CONFIDENCES THAN HERE. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND LAWYER ETHICS. More nonsense, I think. Just another reason why we cannot check out the mythology surrounding this minister to Mongolia.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/6/2004 9:00:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John S. wrote: Anyway -- lets get back to bible study and warm and passionate discussion. Sounds good to me. Alright, then. John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 9:31:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John, I really hope you do the homework on HH. Wouldnt that be a fascinating book? (Better than The Apostle?) Izzy Truly. He sounds fascinating and his disciples sound a little gullible. The truth is probably in between somewhere. I will keep you posted. John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/6/2004 7:31:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Whatever works -- but I don't sit and roll over. DAVEH: You will after Izzy gets done training you... ;-) JD I think if I "pant" right now, it would be funny. J DAVEH: :-P And..don't forget to wag your tail. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND LAWYER ETHICS. DAVEH: You are right, Elsman. Perhaps you can explain them to us. ;-) -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
David: " I don't wast time looking up stuff like that" Did you ever say anything similar to this on the papers you submitted during your course of study in biology? Blessings, Lance - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 06, 2004 01:40 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey In a message dated 5/5/2004 7:32:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John S. wrote:... you are admitting that there is nothing out there that verifies his associations, credentials, and evangelistic successes - right? No, I am not admitting that. You can go look for them if you want. Iknew the man, so I don't waste time looking up stuff like that. Thatwould be like me trying to look up third party support for Jesusactually existing and dying for the sins of the world. What a waste oftime!I can go look them up ??? No place to look, is there David. I am told to test the spirits to see whether they are of God. My desire to verify the extraordinary claims of HH is certainly not out of line with scriptural injunction. I would expect Billy Graham to reference him somewhere. I would think Mordecai Ham would mention his name. I would expect to find some reference in Catholic literature. His PhD -- is it wrong for me to question these claims? (Keep in mind that I do not care where he earned the PhD -- just that he did as claimed.) An evangelist who converted 40,000 to 70,000 Jews should have a footnote somewhere in American historical annuals, to say the least. Thousands of hippies? What street preacher has ever had such success??? If it all be truth - only HH. And no mention of him anywhere. The historical record does not omit someone who was quietly successful at such a level of accomplishment. Why is it that he is the only HIGHLY successful street preacher without historical footnote? And why am I the bad guy for putting these questions to you expecting a real answer? John S. wrote:And if internet resources are of no account, the positives are gone as well - and there is one site that extolls his ministry. I never meant to convey that internet resources are of no account, butyou certainly should not read one or two websites and then declare thatthe man was a fraud! You need to check out what you read and considerthe bias of their presentation. Here we go with that circular logic of yours. In this paragraph you tell me to "check out" what I read. In the former paragraph, you reducible that very process (That would be like looking up third party support for Jesus .") Be swift to hear and slow to speak. Easy for you to say. David, something is wrong with this HH mythology. Maybe nothing wrong with the man but the myth seems to be something very different. Perhaps Lindsey is not the fraud in all this? But something is soarly wrong with the story. Who are his disciples? Elsman and those who are influenced by him -- who else? John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
Charles Perry Locke wrote: Jim, you're almost there. Lets ask John f he approves of you addressing him this way. If he does not, lets set it aside and call him John, or Smithson, or John Smithson, (but not JS), DAVEH: HmmJS2 might work, eh! okay? Perry the Moderator */ NOT THAT A LAWYER CAN REVEAL. SORRY. I ONLY TATTLE ON THAT BUTTERBALL FRAUD. ---ELSMANSTEIN/* -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 7:10:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: HmmJS2 might work, eh! Whatever works -- but I don't sit and roll over. JD
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:DAVEH: HmmJS2 might work, eh!John: Whatever works -- but I don't sit and roll over. jt: You wouldn't be sitting and rolling over listening to verses from HH's memory. They are intertwined with so much other stuff and come out so fast that it's like an auctioneer speaking them. I'm wondering if the "Memory course" is, in fact, scientific or if that is just hype. God's Word does have a cleansing effect on both mind and heart but I don't know if this happens when it is taken out of balance and context. Wrong teaching can also bend the conscience in the wrong direction. The end never justifies the means. judyt
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
BTW, Why does John sign his name JD sometimes? Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 7:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course Jim, you're almost there. Lets ask John f he approves of you addressing him this way. If he does not, lets set it aside and call him John, or Smithson, or John Smithson, (but not JS), okay? Perry the Moderator */ NOT THAT A LAWYER CAN REVEAL. SORRY. I ONLY TATTLE ON THAT BUTTERBALL FRAUD. ---ELSMANSTEIN/* -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 11:19:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm wondering if the "Memory course" is, in fact, scientific or if that is just hype. Experience tells me that this is just more of the mythology of Happy Hubert. And I am speaking of the "memory course." J
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 12:08:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DaveH, Perhaps the problem is that Elsman forgot what they were. J Izzy Sometimes the truth is just as funny as the fiction. Good one, my dear. J
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 12:26:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, Why does John sign his name "JD" sometimes? Izzy Rise, I am but a man. John David Smithson
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
DAVEH: LOL...Hmm.now I see why some of the masculine TTers want to keep the female felines at bay.. ShieldsFamily wrote: DaveH, Perhaps the problem is that Elsman forgot what they were. J Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course DAVEH: I don't understand, Elsman..??? What's the problem with revealing a few techniques you might know that would benefit other students of the Bible? Did Hubert swear you to secrecy? (And if so.why?) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/5/2004 10:31:06 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Thanx Judy..I find that very interesting. It apparently took Hubert a lot of effort to memorize.it wasn't just a natural talent. To memorize the NT in a half year must have required a lot of time spent repeating this procedure. I'll be curious to hear if Elsman learned any more secrets related to this technique. NOT THAT A LAWYER CAN REVEAL. SORRY. I ONLY TATTLE ON THAT BUTTERBALL FRAUD. ---ELSMANSTEIN -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/6/2004 7:10:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: HmmJS2 might work, eh! Whatever works -- but I don't sit and roll over. DAVEH: You will after Izzy gets done training you... ;-) JD -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
John S. wrote: I can go look them up ??? No place to look, is there David. I don't know why you would say that. Hubert preached in all 50 states and in 59 other countries. He was arrested 100 times, including being put in jail in Hong Kong, China, and outer Mongolia! You should be able to find lots of newspaper articles if you looked hard enough. I know that he spent 11 days in jail in Chattanooga, Tennessee. He preached at the University of California in Berkley around 1967-1969. Elsman mentioned that he was given some kind of award from Ronald Reagan. I don't understand why you are being so negative and critical. There are probably lots of places to look for information. Jerry Rubin of the Chicago 7 fame knew Hubert, and I think I remember a few years ago reading something from Jerry Rubin about Hubert. I think it might have been his paper at UC Berkley that gave Hubert the nickname, Holy Hubert. How many newspapers have you searched? Which ones did you try? To help you with his educational stuff, Hubert told me that he attended the University of Wisconsin, Taylor University, and S. Baptist Theological Seminary where he earned a Master's degree. These schools account for about 6 years of his higher education. Hubert was ordained in the Baptist denomination in 1934. He studied under the Jewish Rabbi after this time, but I never learned what his name was or where it was. I think this is where he earned the doctorate, but I'm not sure about that. John S. wrote: I am told to test the spirits to see whether they are of God. That has nothing to do with declaring Hubert a fraud after reading some sinners post their hatred for him on the Internet. Hubert isn't here ministering to you, so what is the big deal? Why do you want to defame a dead man? John S. wrote: My desire to verify the extraordinary claims of HH is certainly not out of line with scriptural injunction. I don't have any problem with you verifying any extraordinary claims. As I have said, go right ahead. For some reason you are compelled to malign Hubert as a fraud on flimsy evidence or on the lack of evidence to the contrary! Are you just trying to be spiteful toward Elsman? John S. wrote: I would expect Billy Graham to reference him somewhere. I wouldn't expect that! Billy Graham is a political man. People who commend one another stay as far away from guys like Hubert as much as possible. Hubert has no money or prestige to offer them. He is like a homeless guy, despised by the world. Furthermore, they don't know when he, under the anointing, is going to point his finger in their face and tell them, REPENT SINNER! Why don't you write Billy Graham a letter and ask him about Hubert Lindsey? We would all like to hear how he responds. John S. wrote: I would think Mordecai Ham would mention his name. Why? You don't seem to understand the world system and the way most ministries organize themselves. John S. wrote: I would expect to find some reference in Catholic literature. His PhD -- is it wrong for me to question these claims? Not at all, but it is wrong for you to declare him a fraud when you have not done your homework. John S. wrote: (Keep in mind that I do not care where he earned the PhD -- just that he did as claimed.) Why? What does it matter? I agree with Hubert that too many people put too much stock in education and diplomas. John S. wrote: An evangelist who converted 40,000 to 70,000 Jews should have a footnote somewhere in American historical annuals, to say the least. Thousands of hippies? What street preacher has ever had such success??? Hubert always emphasized his lack of success, but he was amazed when after not having a single convert for 3 years, preaching at UC Berkley, and getting beat up about 150 times by Black Panthers, the Manson family, etc., suddenly he was preaching via a communist owned microphone on a communist owned car to thousands of hippies and witnessed the greatest revival he had ever seen. Does he have any earthly recognition for his part in this? Not much. So what. God himself knows what happened, and God has some people like this in life, dedicated men who get no recognition in this life, to inspire some of the rest of us about how the last shall be first. I have no doubt that Hubert has great rewards in heaven and will have great recognition there. From the worldly media standards, nobody knows Hubert, but for those of us who did know him, we feel greatly blessed and honored. Just think of Hubert as a homeless bum who doesn't deserve any attention. Hubert would like it that way. But please do not call him a fraud based upon a few nights of searching the internet and reading the reports of the wicked. John S. wrote: The historical record does not omit someone who was quietly successful at such a level of accomplishment. Yes it does, John. Others take credit. I have seen this happen
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/6/2004 7:31:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Whatever works -- but I don't sit and roll over. DAVEH: You will after Izzy gets done training you... ;-) JD I think if I "pant" right now, it would be funny. J
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/6/2004 7:43:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't know why you would say that. Hubert preached in all 50 states and in 59 other countries. He was arrested 100 times, including being put in jail in Hong Kong, China, and outer Mongolia! You should be able to find lots of newspaper articles if you looked hard enough. I know that he spent 11 days in jail in Chattanooga, Tennessee. He preached at the University of California in Berkley around 1967-1969. Elsman mentioned that he was given some kind of award from Ronald Reagan. I don't understand why you are being so negative and critical. There are probably lots of places to look for information. Jerry Rubin of the Chicago 7 fame knew Hubert, and I think I remember a few years ago reading something from Jerry Rubin about Hubert. I think it might have been his paper at UC Berkley that gave Hubert the nickname, "Holy Hubert." How many newspapers have you searched? Which ones did you try? Outer Mongolia ??? You think you remember something ...??? The very trustworthy Elsman said ...??? In a previous post, you surmised that there was little to nothing written about the man because there weren't any computers at the time. Give me a break. I am saying that I shouldn't have to beat the bushes to find out something about a man who ministered to Billy Graham, was certificated by the Pope, converted 40,000 Jews, saved additional thousands of hippies, was shot with a .38 and healed on the way to the hospital, and the like. Your response -- increase the mythology! Lets do this. I will take back the fraud part of my criticism of HH..and transpose it to his mythology. Since he is dead, I don't need to pull a Bush and say I'm sorry. Lets just drop it for now. Someday you will realize that there is a bit of bulldog in me. I am making it a hobby to dig up all the truth about Happy Herbert. Some of his pictures actually look like Elsman. Maybe ? nah. Anyway -- lets get back to bible study and warm and passionate discussion. Your old brother John Smithson You are so specific about the 59 countries. Must be a source on that, huh? Outer Mongolia
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Lance wrote: I don't wast time looking up stuff like that Did you ever say anything similar to this on the papers you submitted during your course of study in biology? This isn't a classroom. I knew Hubert and shared some of my appreciation for him, now somebody wants me to be an expert about documenting his reality? I'm sorry if you don't understand why I don't care. John Smithson has mentioned being married. How about I ask him to prove it to me. I want to see the marriage license. Do you think John would produce it for me right away? Would he feel like he had better go get a copy of it and send it to me, because David thinks he is a fraud and is not really married? I think John would either tell me to go jump in a lake or he would just ignore me. Why should he waste the time? What's the point? That's how I feel about proving anything about Hubert. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/6/2004 8:08:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Smithson has mentioned being married. How about I ask him to prove it to me. I want to see the marriage license. Do you think John would produce it for me right away? Would he feel like he had better go get a copy of it and send it to me, because David thinks he is a fraud and is not really married? I think John would either tell me to go jump in a lake or he would just ignore me. Why should he waste the time? What's the point? That's how I feel about proving anything about Hubert. I am sorry -- but I am pretty much in stetches right now. I am laughing so hard that my wife (my supposed wife) has just walked down the hall, shut the door to my study and has gone back into the front room. The last several posts have been great. Outer Mongolia is one of the best lines of any scripted on TT. Hats off on that one. lol I am just wondering how Lance is dealing with this homosexual thing. Man, when you are "wrong" on TT, it opens doors to all kinds of speculation. lol lol Keep writing. I am too weak to leave the computer desk. Peace out. John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/5/2004 7:32:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John S. wrote: ... you are admitting that there is nothing out there that verifies his associations, credentials, and evangelistic successes - right? No, I am not admitting that. You can go look for them if you want. I knew the man, so I don't waste time looking up stuff like that. That would be like me trying to look up third party support for Jesus actually existing and dying for the sins of the world. What a waste of time! I can go look them up ??? No place to look, is there David. I am told to test the spirits to see whether they are of God. My desire to verify the extraordinary claims of HH is certainly not out of line with scriptural injunction. I would expect Billy Graham to reference him somewhere. I would think Mordecai Ham would mention his name. I would expect to find some reference in Catholic literature. His PhD -- is it wrong for me to question these claims? (Keep in mind that I do not care where he earned the PhD -- just that he did as claimed.) An evangelist who converted 40,000 to 70,000 Jews should have a footnote somewhere in American historical annuals, to say the least. Thousands of hippies? What street preacher has ever had such success??? If it all be truth - only HH. And no mention of him anywhere. The historical record does not omit someone who was quietly successful at such a level of accomplishment. Why is it that he is the only HIGHLY successful street preacher without historical footnote? And why am I the bad guy for putting these questions to you expecting a real answer? John S. wrote: And if internet resources are of no account, the positives are gone as well - and there is one site that extolls his ministry. I never meant to convey that internet resources are of no account, but you certainly should not read one or two websites and then declare that the man was a fraud! You need to check out what you read and consider the bias of their presentation. Here we go with that circular logic of yours. In this paragraph you tell me to "check out" what I read. In the former paragraph, you reducible that very process (That would be like looking up third party support for Jesus .") Be swift to hear and slow to speak. Easy for you to say. David, something is wrong with this HH mythology. Maybe nothing wrong with the man but the myth seems to be something very different. Perhaps Lindsey is not the fraud in all this? But something is soarly wrong with the story. Who are his disciples? Elsman and those who are influenced by him -- who else? John
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
John S. wrote: I have no problem admitting I am wrong about this guy, but I really need something that is reliable and verifiable. Are you admitting that you spoke about Hubert based upon something you read on the internet, not based upon your personal experience with him? I thought maybe you knew Hubert in your past. Please clarify. John S. wrote: If he was acceptable to Catholics as a street preacher. well, that is more than unusual. He would deserve the kind of credit and reverence that DM obviously has for this him. Hubert was not really a street preacher per se. At first he was a tent revivalist, and later he turned to campus preaching. In any case, are street preachers really ever accepted by anybody? Hubert's shoe-in with some of the popular people like Bill Bright, Billy Graham, Ronald Reagan and the Pope was his boldness to break up communist demonstrations in the name of Christ. They recognized his involvement with the Jesus People revival, but I don't think they really understood it. If you understand how politics works, it is real easy to understand how they would honor Hubert at a certain time in history, then forget about him the next year. Well... except maybe Bill Bright... Hubert told me that they remained buddies for many years. John S. wrote: Incidently, there is a host of information about Mordecia Ham on the net -- absolutely nothing verifiable about the good Doctor. Some men and women have established ministries and financial empires that leave a legacy. Hubert preached with some of these men and women, such as Billy Sunday, Mordecai Ham, Bill Bright, Billy Graham, Kathryn Khulman etc. However, Hubert himself lived penniless. He never even learned to drive! He was like a homeless man who lived from nickel to nickel. Elsman can probably tell us more about this than me. Hubert was truly one of a kind. It seems like God broke the mold after he made Hubert. Some more trivia: Hubert won a freckle faced contest as a child and was cast as Alphalfa in The Little Rascals. Some homework maybe for Lance: Hubert told me that he published a memory course back in the 1930's, but I have never been able to find it. I would be very interested in it if you have a way to locate it. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/5/2004 3:20:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Some homework maybe for Lance: Hubert told me that he published a memory course back in the 1930's, but I have never been able to find it. I would be very interested in it if you have a way to locate it. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. ALL: THE MEMORY COURSE WAS NEVER PUBLISHED. I KNOW THE SECRETS OF IT---VERY CLEVER, AS IT ALLOWED HUBERT TO MEMORIZE THE BIBLE. HEY, JUST TYPE IN "HOLY HUBERT LINDSEY" ON GOOGLE OR AOL (SAME) AND YOU WILL GET MUCH INFO. --JIM
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/5/2004 3:20:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Some homework maybe for Lance: Hubert told me that he published a memory course back in the 1930's, but I have never been able to find it. I would be very interested in it if you have a way to locate it. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. ALL: THE MEMORY COURSE WAS NEVER PUBLISHED. I KNOW THE SECRETS OF IT---VERY CLEVER, DAVEH: So Elsman, can you give us a brief explanation of how he did it? Seems like it would be nice for any students of the Bible to have a better handle on memorizing Scripture. AS IT ALLOWED HUBERT TO MEMORIZE THE BIBLE. HEY, JUST TYPE IN "HOLY HUBERT LINDSEY" ON GOOGLE OR AOL (SAME) AND YOU WILL GET MUCH INFO. --JIM -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/5/2004 12:20:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you admitting that you spoke about Hubert based upon something you read on the internet, not based upon your personal experience with him? I thought maybe you knew Hubert in your past. Please clarify. Sure. And you are admitting that there is nothing out there that verifies his associations, credentials, and evangelistic successes - right? And if internet resources are of no account, the positives are gone as well - and there is one site that extolls his ministry. John
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
I got this from a website Dave; there was some other stuff that didn't seem to accurate but this is the first I've read of his "memory system" The website was that of another Street Preacher by the name of Metzger Grace and Peace, judyt +++ Hubert was always an auckward and backwards lad who could never remember a thing. Feeling the Lord's calling to preach on him at 15; He knew that he must retain knowledge in order to remember the Word of God; for the sake of his preaching. He prayed and asked the Lord to give him a better memory to remedy the situation. The Lord answered him in an unsuspected way. God gave Hubert a memory course. The Lord revealed to Hubert something in which the scientists would find out for themselves later in life and confirm to the world. The Lord revealed to Hubert to write everything down in three distinct colors: red, green, and blue. Scientists would later discover that there are four major color cones in the human eye that help to stimulate the memory system of the human brain. Of course God already knew this! As a result Hubert, wrote down the Holy Scriptures in red, green, and blue; 5 times in each color, and quoted it 5 times for each color. By this he memorized the New Testament of the Holy Scriptures in six months. ++ From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/5/2004 3:20:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Some homework maybe for Lance: Hubert told me that he published amemory course back in the 1930's, but I have never been able to find it.I would be very interested in it if you have a way to locate it.Peace be with you.David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.ALL: THE MEMORY COURSE WAS NEVER PUBLISHED. I KNOW THE SECRETS OF IT---VERY CLEVER,DAVEH: So Elsman, can you give us a brief explanation of how he did it? Seems like it would be nice for any students of the Bible to have a better handle on memorizing Scripture. AS IT ALLOWED HUBERT TO MEMORIZE THE BIBLE. HEY, JUST TYPE IN "HOLY HUBERT LINDSEY" ON GOOGLE OR AOL (SAME) AND YOU WILL GET MUCH INFO. --JIM-- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
DAVEH: Thanx Judy..I find that very interesting. It apparently took Hubert a lot of effort to memorize.it wasn't just a natural talent. To memorize the NT in a half year must have required a lot of time spent repeating this procedure. I'll be curious to hear if Elsman learned any more secrets related to this technique. Judy Taylor wrote: I got this from a website Dave; there was some other stuff that didn't seem to accurate but this is the first I've read of his "memory system" The website was that of another Street Preacher by the name of Metzger Grace and Peace, judyt +++ Hubert was always an auckward and backwards lad who could never remember a thing. Feeling the Lord's calling to preach on him at 15; He knew that he must retain knowledge in order to remember the Word of God; for the sake of his preaching. He prayed and asked the Lord to give him a better memory to remedy the situation. The Lord answered him in an unsuspected way. God gave Hubert a memory course. The Lord revealed to Hubert something in which the scientists would find out for themselves later in life and confirm to the world. The Lord revealed to Hubert to write everything down in three distinct colors: red, green, and blue. Scientists would later discover that there are four major color cones in the human eye that help to stimulate the memory system of the human brain. Of course God already knew this! As a result Hubert, wrote down the Holy Scriptures in red, green, and blue; 5 times in each color, and quoted it 5 times for each color. By this he memorized the New Testament of the Holy Scriptures in six months. ++ -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
In a message dated 5/5/2004 10:31:06 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Thanx Judy..I find that very interesting. It apparently took Hubert a lot of effort to memorize.it wasn't just a natural talent. To memorize the NT in a half year must have required a lot of time spent repeating this procedure. I'll be curious to hear if Elsman learned any more secrets related to this technique. NOT THAT A LAWYER CAN REVEAL. SORRY. I ONLY TATTLE ON THAT BUTTERBALL FRAUD. ---ELSMANSTEIN
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
John S. wrote: ... you are admitting that there is nothing out there that verifies his associations, credentials, and evangelistic successes - right? No, I am not admitting that. You can go look for them if you want. I knew the man, so I don't waste time looking up stuff like that. That would be like me trying to look up third party support for Jesus actually existing and dying for the sins of the world. What a waste of time! John S. wrote: And if internet resources are of no account, the positives are gone as well - and there is one site that extolls his ministry. I never meant to convey that internet resources are of no account, but you certainly should not read one or two websites and then declare that the man was a fraud! You need to check out what you read and consider the bias of their presentation. Be swift to hear and slow to speak. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
John S. wrote: I am startled at just how little information there is on a man who was honored by Catholics, saved 40,000 (or it is 70,000) Jews, thousands and thousands of hippies - assisted Billy Graham although mention of his work is hard to impossible to find. Something wrong with this picture. I'm not surprised by it. News is fleeting. I've been on the front page of the newspapers and the top story on network television news many times. Yet, you would have trouble digging up much on me. Hubert was most active before there were any computers at all. Furthermore, he did not enter into career building and empire building that so many others do. John S. wrote: I can find probably 10 times as much verifiable information about Stroop than I can find about Ham's chief assistant. To my knowledge, Hubert was never Ham's chief assistant. These guys just join up for weeks at a time to preach revival. Hubert thought it was cool that Billy Graham got saved at a crusade where he sat on the platform and preached. After two weeks of Mordecai Ham, Hubert Lindsey (he was not yet known as Holy Hubert), and I forget who else, Billy Graham dedicated his life to Christ. Praise the Lord! Why do you want to try and prove it really happened or prove that it didn't happen? What's the big deal? Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey's Memory Course
DAVEH: I don't understand, Elsman..??? What's the problem with revealing a few techniques you might know that would benefit other students of the Bible? Did Hubert swear you to secrecy? (And if so.why?) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/5/2004 10:31:06 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DAVEH: Thanx Judy..I find that very interesting. It apparently took Hubert a lot of effort to memorize.it wasn't just a natural talent. To memorize the NT in a half year must have required a lot of time spent repeating this procedure. I'll be curious to hear if Elsman learned any more secrets related to this technique. NOT THAT A LAWYER CAN REVEAL. SORRY. I ONLY TATTLE ON THAT BUTTERBALL FRAUD. ---ELSMANSTEIN -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
David: Assuming this Hubert to have played a formative role in what I've been reading from you these past weeks(your biblical and theological statements) perhaps I (we) need to understand more of his life and work. I've already been told where I may obtain audio so I'll look into it. Lance - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 16:58 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey Judy wrote: Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. John S. wrote: Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claim to have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this? I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, Just As I Am, where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, Itinerant Evangelists. Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not know Jesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith. At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ. So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 member church -- which in fact was his service garage. His service garage? What are you talking about? I think you are mixing up information from various sources. Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote: A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred. A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was a spiritual father to me. I guess that does not surprise you. Maybe you think the same thing about me. Hubert was one of the most loving men I have ever known. He was anything but full of vile and hatred. Not even his enemies ever characterized him like this. He was beat up hundreds of times for preaching Christ, shot, stabbed, you name it. Hubert was arrested 100 times for preaching Christ and never convicted of a crime. He always turned the other cheek and loved his neighbor. Through a broken jaw, he would tell his attackers that Jesus loved them and he did too. There were many men who were converted through Hubert's unquenched love for them, and they are preaching the gospel today. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
JT: And you folks rise up en massedenouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 17:35 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. jt: God gives us the power to do whatever we are called to. Hubert'spreaching soundsa little "out there" I found the following on "The page of anxiety" on the internet: "Dr. Holy Hubert Lindsey." People would call in and ask the Doctor questions about the Bible, or to argue about Tongues, capitol punishment, salvation, and the like. Dr. Lindsey would then pronounce judgment, not just on the matter at hand, but also on the caller, Christendom, and society in general. Not one to mince words, The Doctor had apparently reached a point his life and career where he cared little what anyone thought of him or his message, and was quick to point out the callers' motives, spiritual condition, intellectual capacity or sexual orientation. Why do you and the Street Preachers appear to revere Hubert so much? Almost like a present day icon. What about Corrie Ten Boom? Was she out of God's will? A rebellious woman? She wasout speaking/teaching and was not under submission to any man. Her messages lifted up Jesus andwere not personally judgmental/demeaning (itis the ministry of the Holy Spirit to convict of sin); she didn't condemn even when confronted with the man who executed her sister in a German Prison Camp when he came fwd in one of her meetings to receive Christ. John S. wrote:Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claimto have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this?I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am,"where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not knowJesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ." So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 memberchurch -- which in fact was his service garage. jt: The above is from the internet. His Church in the 1980's was apparently a converted service garage andthe number of Jews and hippies converted under his ministry isquoted on the internet as from his own mouth.I know it's the web of a million lies but reports about Hubert's ministry are remarkably similar and the same kind of thing continues with Jed Smock, Daniel, Ruben and Spingola even to the point of fist fights. What kind of a spirit is that? Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote:A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred.A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was a spiritual father to me. I guess that does not surprise you. Maybe you think the same thing about me. Hubert was one of the most loving men I have ever known. He was anything but full of vile and hatred. Not even his enemies ever characterized him like this. He was beat up hundreds of times for preaching Christ, shot, stabbed, you name
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Hey Lance I'm not a Holy Hubert follower; too many contradictions and his style too judgmental. IMO he is more of a cultural icon. I do appreciate the ministry of the late Corrie Ten Boom but she did not teach doctrine so much asher life testified to the grace of God in such massive darkness. judyt From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] JT: And you folks rise up en massedenouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 17:35 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. jt: God gives us the power to do whatever we are called to. Hubert'spreaching soundsa little "out there" I found the following on "The page of anxiety" on the internet: "Dr. Holy Hubert Lindsey." People would call in and ask the Doctor questions about the Bible, or to argue about Tongues, capitol punishment, salvation, and the like. Dr. Lindsey would then pronounce judgment, not just on the matter at hand, but also on the caller, Christendom, and society in general. Not one to mince words, The Doctor had apparently reached a point his life and career where he cared little what anyone thought of him or his message, and was quick to point out the callers' motives, spiritual condition, intellectual capacity or sexual orientation. Why do you and the Street Preachers appear to revere Hubert so much? Almost like a present day icon. What about Corrie Ten Boom? Was she out of God's will? A rebellious woman? She wasout speaking/teaching and was not under submission to any man. Her messages lifted up Jesus andwere not personally judgmental/demeaning (itis the ministry of the Holy Spirit to convict of sin); she didn't condemn even when confronted with the man who executed her sister in a German Prison Camp when he came fwd in one of her meetings to receive Christ. John S. wrote:Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claimto have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this?I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am,"where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not knowJesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ." So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 memberchurch -- which in fact was his service garage. jt: The above is from the internet. His Church in the 1980's was apparently a converted service garage andthe number of Jews and hippies converted under his ministry isquoted on the internet as from his own mouth.I know it's the web of a million lies but reports about Hubert's ministry are remarkably similar and the same kind of thing continues with Jed Smock, Daniel, Ruben and Spingola even to the point of fist fights. What kind of a spirit is that? Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote:A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred.A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
I should add that I had never heard of Holy Hubert Lindsey until a young pastor at a church I went to spoke of him. He (like some of the men on TT) seemed in awe of him because of the beatings and abuse he had undergone at Berkley so I got the book "Bless Your Dirty Heart"years ago to see what all the fuss was about. Sad thing about it is that his own heart was probably not where it should have been, but times were tough in the 60's. I guess Hubertmade his mark in his generation andGod is the judge. But why sit at Hubert's feet when we can sit at the feet of the Master Himself? Hey Lance I'm not a Holy Hubert follower; too many contradictions and his style too judgmental. IMO he is more of a cultural icon. I do appreciate the ministry of the late Corrie Ten Boom but she did not teach doctrine so much asher life testified to the grace of God in such massive darkness. judyt From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] JT: And you folks rise up en massedenouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 17:35 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. jt: God gives us the power to do whatever we are called to. Hubert'spreaching soundsa little "out there" I found the following on "The page of anxiety" on the internet: "Dr. Holy Hubert Lindsey." People would call in and ask the Doctor questions about the Bible, or to argue about Tongues, capitol punishment, salvation, and the like. Dr. Lindsey would then pronounce judgment, not just on the matter at hand, but also on the caller, Christendom, and society in general. Not one to mince words, The Doctor had apparently reached a point his life and career where he cared little what anyone thought of him or his message, and was quick to point out the callers' motives, spiritual condition, intellectual capacity or sexual orientation. Why do you and the Street Preachers appear to revere Hubert so much? Almost like a present day icon. What about Corrie Ten Boom? Was she out of God's will? A rebellious woman? She wasout speaking/teaching and was not under submission to any man. Her messages lifted up Jesus andwere not personally judgmental/demeaning (itis the ministry of the Holy Spirit to convict of sin); she didn't condemn even when confronted with the man who executed her sister in a German Prison Camp when he came fwd in one of her meetings to receive Christ. John S. wrote:Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claimto have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this?I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am,"where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not knowJesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ." So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 memberchurch -- which in fact was his service garage. jt: The above is from the internet. His Church in the 1980's was apparently a converted service garage andthe number of Jews and hippies converted under his ministry isquoted on the internet
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Judy: I was once in a YP group when she (Ten Boom) came to tell her story. I'll never forget it or her.Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 06:44 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey Hey Lance I'm not a Holy Hubert follower; too many contradictions and his style too judgmental. IMO he is more of a cultural icon. I do appreciate the ministry of the late Corrie Ten Boom but she did not teach doctrine so much asher life testified to the grace of God in such massive darkness. judyt From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] JT: And you folks rise up en massedenouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 17:35 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. jt: God gives us the power to do whatever we are called to. Hubert'spreaching soundsa little "out there" I found the following on "The page of anxiety" on the internet: "Dr. Holy Hubert Lindsey." People would call in and ask the Doctor questions about the Bible, or to argue about Tongues, capitol punishment, salvation, and the like. Dr. Lindsey would then pronounce judgment, not just on the matter at hand, but also on the caller, Christendom, and society in general. Not one to mince words, The Doctor had apparently reached a point his life and career where he cared little what anyone thought of him or his message, and was quick to point out the callers' motives, spiritual condition, intellectual capacity or sexual orientation. Why do you and the Street Preachers appear to revere Hubert so much? Almost like a present day icon. What about Corrie Ten Boom? Was she out of God's will? A rebellious woman? She wasout speaking/teaching and was not under submission to any man. Her messages lifted up Jesus andwere not personally judgmental/demeaning (itis the ministry of the Holy Spirit to convict of sin); she didn't condemn even when confronted with the man who executed her sister in a German Prison Camp when he came fwd in one of her meetings to receive Christ. John S. wrote:Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claimto have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this?I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am,"where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not knowJesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ." So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 memberchurch -- which in fact was his service garage. jt: The above is from the internet. His Church in the 1980's was apparently a converted service garage andthe number of Jews and hippies converted under his ministry isquoted on the internet as from his own mouth.I know it's the web of a million lies but reports about Hubert's ministry are remarkably similar and the same kind of
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Christianity is indeed offensive to the natural mind; and yet it is often made offensive by its representatives for the wrong reasons. (Colin Gunton in The One, The Three and The Many) Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 06:57 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey I should add that I had never heard of Holy Hubert Lindsey until a young pastor at a church I went to spoke of him. He (like some of the men on TT) seemed in awe of him because of the beatings and abuse he had undergone at Berkley so I got the book "Bless Your Dirty Heart"years ago to see what all the fuss was about. Sad thing about it is that his own heart was probably not where it should have been, but times were tough in the 60's. I guess Hubertmade his mark in his generation andGod is the judge. But why sit at Hubert's feet when we can sit at the feet of the Master Himself? Hey Lance I'm not a Holy Hubert follower; too many contradictions and his style too judgmental. IMO he is more of a cultural icon. I do appreciate the ministry of the late Corrie Ten Boom but she did not teach doctrine so much asher life testified to the grace of God in such massive darkness. judyt From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] JT: And you folks rise up en massedenouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 17:35 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. jt: God gives us the power to do whatever we are called to. Hubert'spreaching soundsa little "out there" I found the following on "The page of anxiety" on the internet: "Dr. Holy Hubert Lindsey." People would call in and ask the Doctor questions about the Bible, or to argue about Tongues, capitol punishment, salvation, and the like. Dr. Lindsey would then pronounce judgment, not just on the matter at hand, but also on the caller, Christendom, and society in general. Not one to mince words, The Doctor had apparently reached a point his life and career where he cared little what anyone thought of him or his message, and was quick to point out the callers' motives, spiritual condition, intellectual capacity or sexual orientation. Why do you and the Street Preachers appear to revere Hubert so much? Almost like a present day icon. What about Corrie Ten Boom? Was she out of God's will? A rebellious woman? She wasout speaking/teaching and was not under submission to any man. Her messages lifted up Jesus andwere not personally judgmental/demeaning (itis the ministry of the Holy Spirit to convict of sin); she didn't condemn even when confronted with the man who executed her sister in a German Prison Camp when he came fwd in one of her meetings to receive Christ. John S. wrote:Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claimto have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this?I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am,"where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not knowJesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Any of y'all ever see the move "Delierance" with Reynolds Voight? There are times when I read SOME posts by SOME TT participants that I think I hear a banjo playing somewhere in the background. Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 06:57 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey I should add that I had never heard of Holy Hubert Lindsey until a young pastor at a church I went to spoke of him. He (like some of the men on TT) seemed in awe of him because of the beatings and abuse he had undergone at Berkley so I got the book "Bless Your Dirty Heart"years ago to see what all the fuss was about. Sad thing about it is that his own heart was probably not where it should have been, but times were tough in the 60's. I guess Hubertmade his mark in his generation andGod is the judge. But why sit at Hubert's feet when we can sit at the feet of the Master Himself? Hey Lance I'm not a Holy Hubert follower; too many contradictions and his style too judgmental. IMO he is more of a cultural icon. I do appreciate the ministry of the late Corrie Ten Boom but she did not teach doctrine so much asher life testified to the grace of God in such massive darkness. judyt From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] JT: And you folks rise up en massedenouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 17:35 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. jt: God gives us the power to do whatever we are called to. Hubert'spreaching soundsa little "out there" I found the following on "The page of anxiety" on the internet: "Dr. Holy Hubert Lindsey." People would call in and ask the Doctor questions about the Bible, or to argue about Tongues, capitol punishment, salvation, and the like. Dr. Lindsey would then pronounce judgment, not just on the matter at hand, but also on the caller, Christendom, and society in general. Not one to mince words, The Doctor had apparently reached a point his life and career where he cared little what anyone thought of him or his message, and was quick to point out the callers' motives, spiritual condition, intellectual capacity or sexual orientation. Why do you and the Street Preachers appear to revere Hubert so much? Almost like a present day icon. What about Corrie Ten Boom? Was she out of God's will? A rebellious woman? She wasout speaking/teaching and was not under submission to any man. Her messages lifted up Jesus andwere not personally judgmental/demeaning (itis the ministry of the Holy Spirit to convict of sin); she didn't condemn even when confronted with the man who executed her sister in a German Prison Camp when he came fwd in one of her meetings to receive Christ. John S. wrote:Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claimto have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this?I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am,"where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not knowJesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Lance wrote: I've already been told where I may obtain audio so I'll look into it. I hope you mean going to Rick Roehm to get some CD's of Hubert's sermons rather than that website that is against Hubert. Going to that website that John S. recommended is like going to the democratic party to find out about George Bush. Don't believe everything you hear there. Hubert was credited by many with being the focal point of the Jesus People Movement on the West Coast in the late 1960's. In other words, some credit him with that revival. Of course, God really is the one who does such, but Hubert was used by God in fomenting that work of God. Hubert is going to be a tough one to learn about. He did not build a personal empire like many ministers. He was not a writer like those who have left us a legacy. Although he earned a Ph.D., he never flaunted it and nobody I knew called him Doctor Lindsey. He was just Hubert. He was like the apostles of Christ who went down in history without us knowing much of what they did, those apostles who left us no writings, like Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Lebbaeus, and Simon Zelotes. His testimony was his life, and it greatly touched those who were blessed to have encountered him. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Judy wrote: I do appreciate the ministry of the late Corrie Ten Boom but she did not teach doctrine so much as her life testified to the grace of God in such massive darkness. I met Corrie before too, but Hubert affected my life much more. Nothing against Corrie. She was a sweet woman. Kathryn Khulman affected my life much more than Corrie did. She was a truly humble and fully dedicated and consecrated person. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
David: Ph.D. in what field of study? Lance - Original Message - From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 08:31 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey Lance wrote: I've already been told where I may obtain audio so I'll look into it. I hope you mean going to Rick Roehm to get some CD's of Hubert's sermons rather than that website that is against Hubert. Going to that website that John S. recommended is like going to the democratic party to find out about George Bush. Don't believe everything you hear there. Hubert was credited by many with being the focal point of the Jesus People Movement on the West Coast in the late 1960's. In other words, some credit him with that revival. Of course, God really is the one who does such, but Hubert was used by God in fomenting that work of God. Hubert is going to be a tough one to learn about. He did not build a personal empire like many ministers. He was not a writer like those who have left us a legacy. Although he earned a Ph.D., he never flaunted it and nobody I knew called him Doctor Lindsey. He was just Hubert. He was like the apostles of Christ who went down in history without us knowing much of what they did, those apostles who left us no writings, like Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Lebbaeus, and Simon Zelotes. His testimony was his life, and it greatly touched those who were blessed to have encountered him. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
I am interested as well. What DM wrote below specificial and in regard to Lindsey is a statement of "fact" base entirely upon surmise -- as near as I can see. Grahams book book confirms "just about" everything in Hubmert's testimony but without mention of Hubert by name - but the tyle of preaching by Ham is the same as Lindsey, so he must have been there. I have no problem admitting I am wrong about this guy, but I really need something that is reliable and verifiable. If he was acceptable to Catholics as a street preacher. well, that is more than unusual. He would deserve the kind of credit and reverence that DM obviously has for this him. Incidently, there is a host of information about Mordecia Ham on the net -- absolutely nothing verifiable about the good Doctor. In fact, the only information about Lindsey I can find wants me to pay for it -- kind of like the money changers of old. The only positive information I can find is on a site that supports the Toronto Vineyard Church -- not a good reference from my point of view (and I am pentecostle). John In a message dated 5/4/2004 2:21:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David: Assuming this Hubert to have played a formative role in what I've been reading from you these past weeks(your biblical and theological statements) perhaps I (we) need to understand more of his life and work. I've already been told where I may obtain audio so I'll look into it. Lance - Original Message - From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 03, 2004 16:58 Subject: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey Judy wrote: Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. John S. wrote: Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claim to have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this? I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am," where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not know Jesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ." So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 member church -- which in fact was his service garage. His service garage? What are you talking about? I think you are mixing up information from various sources. Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote: A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred. A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was a spiritual father to me. I guess that does not surprise you. Maybe you think the same thing about me. Hubert was one of the most loving men I have ever known. He was anything but full of vile and hatred. Not even his enemies ever characterized him like this. He was beat up hundreds of times for preaching Christ, shot, stabbed, you name it. Hubert was arrested 100 times for preaching Christ and never convicted of a crime. He always turned the other cheek and loved his neighbor. Through a broken jaw, he would tell his attackers that Jesus loved them and he did too. There were many men who were converted through Hubert's unquenched love for them, and they are preaching the gospel today. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/4/2004 2:43:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JT: And you folks rise up en masse denouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance Actually, Lance brings up a very good point. Tradition. A tough subject. Why do we not support baptism for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), foot washing, head coverings and the like while enforcing repentance for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), womans place in leadership, and the like Is there a hermeneutical rule that gets rid of some and keeps others? John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
John: Yes there is! Lance - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 09:29 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey In a message dated 5/4/2004 2:43:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JT: And you folks rise up en masse denouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. LanceActually, Lance brings up a very good point. Tradition. A tough subject. Why do we not support baptism for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), foot washing, head coverings and the like while enforcing repentance for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), womans place in leadership, and the like Is there a hermeneutical rule that gets rid of some and keeps others? John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Some of that which each teaches is true, some false. Some of that which is false is harmful, some not. Think of a center point out which comes a spiral.The center is a Person. The spiral is that which we say/teach concerning Him via the Word/His Words If the level of inexactitude reflected on TT were similarly reflected in "Rocket Science" well...(BOOM!!) Sadly (in my opinion) some on TT believe themselves to be THE exception. I addressed this in an earlier post which DM dismissed (mistakenly) with a verbal flourish. David, the little equation includes you like it or not. Lance From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 09:29 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey In a message dated 5/4/2004 2:43:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JT: And you folks rise up en masse denouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. LanceActually, Lance brings up a very good point. Tradition. A tough subject. Why do we not support baptism for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), foot washing, head coverings and the like while enforcing repentance for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), womans place in leadership, and the like Is there a hermeneutical rule that gets rid of some and keeps others? John
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Lance, Oh, so true! (Surely, I am the exception!!!) J But in all seriousness, that is one reason I dont like to argue (versus polite, serious discussion) about doctrineespecially non-essential doctrine. Who among us can say I am totally right and you are totally wrong? (Well, other than a couple of you out there.) There are many ways to read and interpret the Word, and any sincere person can be half a bubble off. They dont need human condemnation for that. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 9:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey Some of that which each teaches is true, some false. Some of that which is false is harmful, some not. Think of a center point out which comes a spiral.The center is a Person. The spiral is that which we say/teach concerning Him via the Word/His Words If the level of inexactitude reflected on TT were similarly reflected in Rocket Science well...(BOOM!!) Sadly (in my opinion) some on TT believe themselves to be THE exception. I addressed this in an earlier post which DM dismissed (mistakenly) with a verbal flourish. David, the little equation includes you like it or not. Lance From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 09:29 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey In a message dated 5/4/2004 2:43:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JT: And you folks rise up en masse denouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance Actually, Lance brings up a very good point. Tradition. A tough subject. Why do we not support baptism for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), foot washing, head coverings and the like while enforcing repentance for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), womans place in leadership, and the like Is there a hermeneutical rule that gets rid of some and keeps others? John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey----WEBSITE OPPOSED?
In a message dated 5/4/2004 8:32:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I hope you mean going to Rick Roehm to get some CD's of Hubert's sermons rather than that website that is against Hubert. Going to that website that John S. recommended is like going to the democratic party to find out about George Bush. Don't believe everything you hear there. MAY I INQUIRE AS TO THE EXACT WEBSITE THAT IS AGAINST HUBERT? I WOULD LIKE TO CHECK IT OUT. ---JIM
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey THE SICKNESS OF JOHN SMITHSON
Izzy, et al, remember the warning I gave regarding a comment Barr made about your marriage -- ""Don't bite on this one ... " or words to that effect? Elsman is the elder of this band of thugs. This is the way they fight -- they just make up stuff and hope it ruins your day. This coming from a man who claims holiness as his _expression_ of faith. John n a message dated 5/3/2004 8:35:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 5/3/2004 11:21:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: material. Lest we forget, DavidM has good things to say about Elsman - a man who dispises Miller and treats him like a step-mom. John JOHN, YOU ARE A TROUBLE-CAUSING LOSER THAT DIVORCED AND GOT KICKED FROM PASTOR -LIFE AFTER 14 YEARS AS A SENIOR PASTOR. YOU NOW ARE A COMMON WORKMAN, PLAYING WITH PRIVATE COUNSELING AT NIGHT. THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU, AND YOU DON'T EVEN GET ALONG WITH YOUR SONS. YOU ARE AN OBVIOUS GLUTTON, CONFESSING TO A WEIGHT OF 270 POUNDS ON A 5 FOOT FRAME. LOW SELF-ESTEEM. DAVID MILLER AND I ARE OLD FRIENDS AND SHARE MOST OF THEOLOGY. WE ARE BOTH WELCOME AT EACH OTHERS HOMES, AND HAVE SOCIALIZED IN THE PAST. YOU ARE A LIAR AND TROUBLE-CAUSER. OF COURSE, WE LIKE TO DEBATE. ---ELSMAN
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey THE SICKNESS OF JOHN SMITHSON
John, Fortunately I dont even remember what comment Barr made about my marriage, so it hasnt ruined my day. J Actually, Chris is Daniels mentor, but I dont believe either of them know Elsman personally. However, Elsman seems to be the leader of the pack on TT. (Simply because his print size is larger?) Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey THE SICKNESS OF JOHN SMITHSON Izzy, et al, remember the warning I gave regarding a comment Barr made about your marriage -- Don't bite on this one ... or words to that effect? Elsman is the elder of this band of thugs. This is the way they fight -- they just make up stuff and hope it ruins your day. This coming from a man who claims holiness as his _expression_ of faith. John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey DavidM
In a message dated 5/4/2004 5:32:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hubert is going to be a tough one to learn about. He did not build a personal empire like many ministers. He was not a writer like those who have left us a legacy. Although he earned a Ph.D., he never flaunted it and nobody I knew called him Doctor Lindsey. He was just Hubert. He was like the apostles of Christ who went down in history without us knowing much of what they did, those apostles who left us no writings, like Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Lebbaeus, and Simon Zelotes. His testimony was his life, and it greatly touched those who were blessed to have encountered him. In fact, I cannot find any sites putting out Hubert propaganda that is not a for-profit enterprise. DavidM, you need to understand that I am very much opposed to anyone who practices his faith in the Elsman and Danny fashion. They may be good guys. They might even get things done for the Lord. but I sure that some in the first century could say the same for Alexander the copper smith. Hubert, with what little an unbiased observer can discover, is somewhat the forefather to all this thuggery (and I speak specifically of Elsman and his crew). And now, you admit there is precious little out there that would help those of us who really would like to know. Mordecai Ham was likewise a very abusive preacher -- even for his day and time. But, at least, there is information about him that is dependable. I don't expect to find material written by Lindsey nearly so much as I expect to find third party material written about a man who spoke like Ham (your admission) but was accepted by the Roman church, converted thousands of hippies, brought 40,000 Jews to the Lord and whose ministry was used by Gilly Graham. John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/4/2004 6:35:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John: Yes there is! Lance - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 09:29 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey In a message dated 5/4/2004 2:43:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JT: And you folks rise up en masse denouncing Polanyi, Torrance and Capon?? Tradition rears its head again. Soon, I'm thinking, y'all gonna acknowledge the obvious. Lance Actually, Lance brings up a very good point. Tradition. A tough subject. Why do we not support baptism for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), foot washing, head coverings and the like while enforcing repentance for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), womans place in leadership, and the like Is there a hermeneutical rule that gets rid of some and keeps others? John I'm listening. Seriously. John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey THE SICKNESS OF JOHN SMITHSON
In a message dated 5/4/2004 9:58:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John, Fortunately I dont even remember what comment Barr made about my marriage, so it hasnt ruined my day. J Actually, Chris is Daniels mentor, but I dont believe either of them know Elsman personally. However, Elsman seems to be the leader of the pack on TT. (Simply because his print size is larger?) Izzy You might have it right. J
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey DavidM
Given the time and attention being given to HH I'm guessing that it's appropriate that we're about to hear DM's reflections on HT (Holy Thomas F. Torrance). I once had a person walk in asking for "books by deadholy guys" (he didn't trust live ones). It does amuse me somewhat given the vitriolic responses to the very mention of those from whom we learnedthat nary a peep has been offered over this love/hate fest over dearly(?) departed HH.Are you folks part of a cult? Have we been duped? Chuckle Lance - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 04, 2004 12:58 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey DavidM In a message dated 5/4/2004 5:32:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hubert is going to be a tough one to learn about. He did not build apersonal empire like many ministers. He was not a writer like those whohave left us a legacy. Although he earned a Ph.D., he never flaunted itand nobody I knew called him Doctor Lindsey. He was just Hubert. Hewas like the apostles of Christ who went down in history without usknowing much of what they did, those apostles who left us no writings,like Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Lebbaeus, and Simon Zelotes. Histestimony was his life, and it greatly touched those who were blessed tohave encountered him.In fact, I cannot find any sites putting out Hubert propaganda that is not a for-profit enterprise. DavidM, you need to understand that I am very much opposed to anyone who practices his faith in the Elsman and Danny fashion. They may be good guys. They might even get things done for the Lord. but I sure that some in the first century could say the same for Alexander the copper smith. Hubert, with what little an unbiased observer can discover, is somewhat the forefather to all this thuggery (and I speak specifically of Elsman and his crew). And now, you admit there is precious little out there that would help those of us who really would like to know. Mordecai Ham was likewise a very abusive preacher -- even for his day and time. But, at least, there is information about him that is dependable. I don't expect to find material written by Lindsey nearly so much as I expect to find third party material written about a man who spoke like Ham (your admission) but was accepted by the Roman church, converted thousands of hippies, brought 40,000 Jews to the Lord and whose ministry was used by Gilly Graham. John
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/4/2004 8:29:47 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, Lance brings up a very good point. Tradition. A tough subject. Why do we not support baptism for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), foot washing, head coverings and the like while enforcing repentance for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), womans place in leadership, and the like Is there a hermeneutical rule that gets rid of some and keeps others? I do practice foot washing but not for the remission of sins. Laura
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/4/2004 2:55:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do practice foot washing but not for the remission of sins. Laura Ditto. But I do not have a rule of study that gets rid of this command and keeps the Great Comission. John Smithson
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey THE SICKNESS OF JOHN SMITHSON
Jim, can you keep this kind of talk off of the group? I feel like a baby-sitter now on TT, and that is not how TT should be operating. Try to be civil and keep personal opinions of others out of the forum. Perry the Moderator. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey THE SICKNESS OF JOHN SMITHSON Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 23:35:11 EDT In a message dated 5/3/2004 11:21:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: material. Lest we forget, DavidM has good things to say about Elsman - a man who dispises Miller and treats him like a step-mom. John JOHN, YOU ARE A TROUBLE-CAUSING LOSER THAT DIVORCED AND GOT KICKED FROM PASTOR -LIFE AFTER 14 YEARS AS A SENIOR PASTOR. YOU NOW ARE A COMMON WORKMAN, PLAYING WITH PRIVATE COUNSELING AT NIGHT. THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU, AND YOU DON'T EVEN GET ALONG WITH YOUR SONS. YOU ARE AN OBVIOUS GLUTTON, CONFESSING TO A WEIGHT OF 270 POUNDS ON A 5 FOOT FRAME. LOW SELF-ESTEEM. DAVID MILLER AND I ARE OLD FRIENDS AND SHARE MOST OF THEOLOGY. WE ARE BOTH WELCOME AT EACH OTHERS HOMES, AND HAVE SOCIALIZED IN THE PAST. YOU ARE A LIAR AND TROUBLE-CAUSER. OF COURSE, WE LIKE TO DEBATE. ---ELSMAN -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
New Vine Broadcasting Network -- type it in and search. There is infor on Hubert. Nothing that appears reliable at all. This guy (Kelli, I think is his name) tells us that Billy Graham went to Lindsey for ministry - somethin not found anywhere else. Looks to like Hubert was a street preacher and nothing more -- no Pope, no 40,000 Jews, no thousands of hippies. DavidM has good things to say about this individual - I would appreciate so trustworthy background material. Lest we forget, DavidM has good things to say about Elsman - a man who dispises Miller and treats him like a step-mom. John In a message dated 5/3/2004 3:43:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 5/3/2004 1:59:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: His service garage? What are you talking about? I think you are mixing up information from various sources. Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote: A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred. A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was a spiritual father to me. I guess that does not surprise you. Maybe you think the same thing about me. Hubert was one of the most loving men I have ever known. He was anything but full of vile and hatred. Not even his enemies ever characterized him like this. He was beat up hundreds of times for preaching Christ, shot, stabbed, you name it. Hubert was arrested 100 times for preaching Christ and never convicted of a crime. He always turned the other cheek and loved his neighbor. Through a broken jaw, he would tell his attackers that Jesus loved them and he did too. There were many men who were converted through Hubert's unquenched love for them, and they are preaching the gospel today. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. http://www.concentric.net/~Kottca/hubert/
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/3/2004 4:59:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 member church -- which in fact was his service garage. His service garage? What are you talking about? I think you are mixing up information from various sources. Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote: A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred. A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. DAVID, I JUST WROTE THESE CHARGES OFF AS THE CONTENTIONS OF MORALLY INSANE PEOPLE , PER ROMANS 3, ONE OF HUBERT'S FAVORITE CHAPTERS. JOHN AND THE WOMAN WILL HAVE TO ANSWER FOR THIS AT THE JUDGMENT , IF THEY ARE WRONG. FRANKLY, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT HUBERT THAT IS WELL- DOCUMENTED, AS I MAY DO A SHORT BIOGRAPHY OF HUBERT SOME DAY, SINCE NO ONE HAS, AND I HAVE MOST OF HIS MATERIALS. BESIDES DAVID MILLER, OTHERS LIKE JED SMOCK AND REALLY SIGNIFICANT NATIONAL PREACHERS KNEW HUBERT , AND ALWAYS THOUGHT HIGHLY OF HIM AS A PREACHER AND BIBLE SCHOLAR UNEXCELLED. THUS, BRING ON THE DOCUMENTED DIRT OR SHUT UP!! HE IS DEAD, SO YOU CAN ATTACK HIM, WITHOUT DEFAMATION CONSEQUENCES. JUST BE FACTUAL. ---JIM ELSMAN P.S. FRANKLY, HUBERT NEVER TALKED ABOUT CONVERTING BILLY GRAHAM IN MY 8 YEARS WITH HIM. HIS ONLY COMMENT ON BILLY WAS THAT HIS TENT MINISTRY RIVALED THAT OF YOUNG BILLYBEFORE HUBERT WAS TOLD BY THE LORD TO GO TO BERKLEY WITH THE REBELLIOUS STUDENTS THAT WERE SHUTTING DOWN THE COLLEGE SYSTEM IN CALIF. DURING THE V.N. WAR.
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Judy wrote: Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. John S. wrote: Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claim to have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this? I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, Just As I Am, where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, Itinerant Evangelists. Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not know Jesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith. At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ. So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 member church -- which in fact was his service garage. His service garage? What are you talking about? I think you are mixing up information from various sources. Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote: A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred. A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was a spiritual father to me. I guess that does not surprise you. Maybe you think the same thing about me. Hubert was one of the most loving men I have ever known. He was anything but full of vile and hatred. Not even his enemies ever characterized him like this. He was beat up hundreds of times for preaching Christ, shot, stabbed, you name it. Hubert was arrested 100 times for preaching Christ and never convicted of a crime. He always turned the other cheek and loved his neighbor. Through a broken jaw, he would tell his attackers that Jesus loved them and he did too. There were many men who were converted through Hubert's unquenched love for them, and they are preaching the gospel today. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:I know his claim about Billy Graham to be false How do you know that? jt: Because I remember reading that Billy Graham came fwd under the preaching of the evangelist Mordecai Ham; later I read on the internet that Hubert used to travel with Mordecai Ham and I read your claim that Hubert preached at the same Revival meetings. Still, Graham says it was under Ham's ministry that he came fwd. We can't be surethat Graham went to the meetings every night can we? Also what do you think of the other numbers - 70,000 Jews and thousands of hippies, sound like notches on a gun belt.. Grace and Peace, Judy
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
jt: I suppose I should ask Jim Ellsman - do you know if Hubert ever had a meeting with the Pope? I saw that reported also and have to wonder about it. It seems a bit out of character, but then if he studied under a Rabbi and was into so much legalism - who knows it may be so. HUBERT WAS NOT A LEGALIST---HE READ GALATIANS AS IT IS. jt: Wasn't he a dispensationalist? His ideas concerning women are on the legalistic side although in his book he had women who worked with him and helped him. DID HE MEET WITH THE POPE? YES.DID HE GET AN AWARD FROM GOV. REAGAN? YES, FOR QUELLING THE RIOTS.DID HE PROPHESY THAT TUPELO, MISS. WOULD BE HIT BY A TORNADO? YES. ELVIS' GRANDMA TOOK HIM TO SHELTER, AND SAVED LITTLE ELVIS' LIFE. ELVIS TOLD HUBERT: "ONLY WHAT I SING FOR JESUS WILL LAST." jt: Not if Elvis perishes, his music will perish with him and it didn't look too good at the end. DID HE KNOW THE CHICAGO-8 ? YES. HAYDEN, BOBBIE, THE JEWISH GUY, ETC.DID HE KNOW MANSON? YES, CLOSELY. jt: Why did he call himself Dr. Did he earn a doctorate somewhere? DidManson call for Hubert?Why no success in casting the devils out of him?FRANKLY, HE DID NOT TELL THESE STORIES MUCH, AS HE WAS ALWAYS PREACHING CHRIST. ONCE, WHEN I WAS PREACHING THE OVAL AT OHIO STATE WITH HIM, A STUDENT FLICKED A LIT CIGARETTE AT HIS FACE AT CLOSE DISTANCE. IT HIT HUBERT, AND HE WENT RIGHT ON PREACHING. jt: Sounds likehe was able tostay completely focused. Was it really the Hells Angels who destroyed his eyesight? How did they do it?DID HE HAVE MANY MIRACLES IN HIS LAST YEARS? NO.DID HE DIE IN GOOD HEALTH AND WITH RICHES? NO. HE DIED WITHOUT ANY ASSETS IN A NURSING HOME, WITHOUT HIS WIFE BLIND AFTER SEVERAL STROKES. MANY OF US CANNOT UNDERSTAND THAT IN GOD'S GOVERNMENT. YET, HE SAID THAT HE WAS NEVER DEPRESSED A DAY IN HIS LIFE. ELSMAN jt: Apparently God had some issues with him, areas that needed attention; our diseases tell off on us. The website is kind of sad, he seems to have become a caricature of himself with these people making sport of him. I hate to see that. Kind of like Samson and the Philistines. judyt
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
And where could we go to verify this information? In a message dated 5/3/2004 2:52:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 5/3/2004 5:36:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: jt: I suppose I should ask Jim Ellsman - do you know if Hubert ever had a meeting with the Pope? I saw that reported also and have to wonder about it. It seems a bit out of character, but then if he studied under a Rabbi and was into so much legalism - who knows it may be so. HUBERT WAS NOT A LEGALIST---HE READ GALATIANS AS IT IS. DID HE MEET WITH THE POPE? YES. DID HE GET AN AWARD FROM GOV. REAGAN? YES, FOR QUELLING THE RIOTS. DID HE PROPHESY THAT TUPELO, MISS. WOULD BE HIT BY A TORNADO? YES. ELVIS' GRANDMA TOOK HIM TO SHELTER, AND SAVED LITTLE ELVIS' LIFE. ELVIS TOLD HUBERT: "ONLY WHAT I SING FOR JESUS WILL LAST." DID HE KNOW THE CHICAGO-8 ? YES. HAYDEN, BOBBIE, THE JEWISH GUY, ETC. DID HE KNOW MANSON? YES, CLOSELY. FRANKLY, HE DID NOT TELL THESE STORIES MUCH, AS HE WAS ALWAYS PREACHING CHRIST. ONCE, WHEN I WAS PREACHING THE OVAL AT OHIO STATE WITH HIM, A STUDENT FLICKED A LIT CIGARETTE AT HIS FACE AT CLOSE DISTANCE. IT HIT HUBERT, AND HE WENT RIGHT ON PREACHING. DID HE HAVE MANY MIRACLES IN HIS LAST YEARS? NO. DID HE DIE IN GOOD HEALTH AND WITH RICHES? NO. HE DIED WITHOUT ANY ASSETS IN A NURSING HOME, WITHOUT HIS WIFE BLIND AFTER SEVERAL STROKES. MANY OF US CANNOT UNDERSTAND THAT IN GOD'S GOVERNMENT. YET, HE SAID THAT HE WAS NEVER DEPRESSED A DAY IN HIS LIFE. ELSMAN
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/3/2004 1:59:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: His service garage? What are you talking about? I think you are mixing up information from various sources. Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote: A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred. A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was a spiritual father to me. I guess that does not surprise you. Maybe you think the same thing about me. Hubert was one of the most loving men I have ever known. He was anything but full of vile and hatred. Not even his enemies ever characterized him like this. He was beat up hundreds of times for preaching Christ, shot, stabbed, you name it. Hubert was arrested 100 times for preaching Christ and never convicted of a crime. He always turned the other cheek and loved his neighbor. Through a broken jaw, he would tell his attackers that Jesus loved them and he did too. There were many men who were converted through Hubert's unquenched love for them, and they are preaching the gospel today. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. http://www.concentric.net/~Kottca/hubert/
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
In a message dated 5/3/2004 5:36:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: jt: I suppose I should ask Jim Ellsman - do you know if Hubert ever had a meeting with the Pope? I saw that reported also and have to wonder about it. It seems a bit out of character, but then if he studied under a Rabbi and was into so much legalism - who knows it may be so. HUBERT WAS NOT A LEGALIST---HE READ GALATIANS AS IT IS. DID HE MEET WITH THE POPE? YES. DID HE GET AN AWARD FROM GOV. REAGAN? YES, FOR QUELLING THE RIOTS. DID HE PROPHESY THAT TUPELO, MISS. WOULD BE HIT BY A TORNADO? YES. ELVIS' GRANDMA TOOK HIM TO SHELTER, AND SAVED LITTLE ELVIS' LIFE. ELVIS TOLD HUBERT: "ONLY WHAT I SING FOR JESUS WILL LAST." DID HE KNOW THE CHICAGO-8 ? YES. HAYDEN, BOBBIE, THE JEWISH GUY, ETC. DID HE KNOW MANSON? YES, CLOSELY. FRANKLY, HE DID NOT TELL THESE STORIES MUCH, AS HE WAS ALWAYS PREACHING CHRIST. ONCE, WHEN I WAS PREACHING THE OVAL AT OHIO STATE WITH HIM, A STUDENT FLICKED A LIT CIGARETTE AT HIS FACE AT CLOSE DISTANCE. IT HIT HUBERT, AND HE WENT RIGHT ON PREACHING. DID HE HAVE MANY MIRACLES IN HIS LAST YEARS? NO. DID HE DIE IN GOOD HEALTH AND WITH RICHES? NO. HE DIED WITHOUT ANY ASSETS IN A NURSING HOME, WITHOUT HIS WIFE BLIND AFTER SEVERAL STROKES. MANY OF US CANNOT UNDERSTAND THAT IN GOD'S GOVERNMENT. YET, HE SAID THAT HE WAS NEVER DEPRESSED A DAY IN HIS LIFE. ELSMAN
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Judy wrote:Hubert Lindsey sounds insane No, he was not insane, and never a braver man would you ever meet. jt: God gives us the power to do whatever we are called to. Hubert'spreaching soundsa little "out there" I found the following on "The page of anxiety" on the internet: "Dr. Holy Hubert Lindsey." People would call in and ask the Doctor questions about the Bible, or to argue about Tongues, capitol punishment, salvation, and the like. Dr. Lindsey would then pronounce judgment, not just on the matter at hand, but also on the caller, Christendom, and society in general. Not one to mince words, The Doctor had apparently reached a point his life and career where he cared little what anyone thought of him or his message, and was quick to point out the callers' motives, spiritual condition, intellectual capacity or sexual orientation. Why do you and the Street Preachers appear to revere Hubert so much? Almost like a present day icon. What about Corrie Ten Boom? Was she out of God's will? A rebellious woman? She wasout speaking/teaching and was not under submission to any man. Her messages lifted up Jesus andwere not personally judgmental/demeaning (itis the ministry of the Holy Spirit to convict of sin); she didn't condemn even when confronted with the man who executed her sister in a German Prison Camp when he came fwd in one of her meetings to receive Christ. John S. wrote:Nothing holy about Hubert -- a man who claimto have converted Bill Graham, Hubert never said that he personally, single-handedly, converted Billy Graham, if that is what you mean. Hubert was preaching a revival with Mordecai Ham, when Billy Graham responded to an altar call for salvation at the age of 16. Do you have some information that would repudiate this?I checked out Hubert's story in Billy Graham's book, "Just As I Am,"where Graham tells the whole story of his conversion at these meetings. It confirms just about everything in Hubert's testimony about it. He mentions Modecai Ham by name, just as we might expect from Hubert's account. I don't remember Graham mentioning Hubert Lindsey by name in his book, but that is not unusual to give only the primary evangelist the recognition. Billy Graham simply subtitles the chapter with, "Itinerant Evangelists." Hubert was one of those evangelists who preached this revival with Mordecai Ham where Billy Graham was converted. If you read the account from Graham, it sounds like Hubert's style of preaching all the way. He describes the sermons as being about sin, judgment and Hell. Billy Graham wrote, "What was slowly dawning on me during those weeks was the miserable realization that I did not knowJesus Christ for myself. I could not depend on my parents' faith." At the time, Billy Graham was a Presbyterian who had been baptized as an infant. Later, Billy Graham writes, "For all my previous religious upbringing and church activity, I believe that that was the moment I made my real commitment to Jesus Christ." So Hubert spoke the truth about Billy Graham's conversion. Why do you call Hubert a liar? John S. wrote: ... converted over 40.000 Jews and thousands of hippies and conducted services at a 2000 member church -- which in fact was his service garage. jt: The above is from the internet. His Church in the 1980's was apparently a converted service garage andthe number of Jews and hippies converted under his ministry isquoted on the internet as from his own mouth.I know it's the web of a million lies but reports about Hubert's ministry are remarkably similar and the same kind of thing continues with Jed Smock, Daniel, Ruben and Spingola even to the point of fist fights. What kind of a spirit is that? Did you know Hubert? Are you reporting some first hand information here, or gossip that you obtained off the internet? John S. wrote:A complete impostor, full of vile and hatred.A reprobate in the truest sense of the word. John, I am truly shocked that you would say something like this. Hubert was a spiritual father to me. I guess that does not surprise you. Maybe you think the same thing about me. Hubert was one of the most loving men I have ever known. He was anything but full of vile and hatred. Not even his enemies ever characterized him like this. He was beat up hundreds of times for preaching Christ, shot, stabbed, you name it. Hubert was arrested 100 times for preaching Christ and never convicted of a crime. He always turned the other cheek and loved his neighbor. Through a broken jaw, hewould tell his attackers that Jesus loved them and he did too. There were many men who were converted through Hubert's unquenched love for them, and they are preaching the gospel today. jt: I suppose I should ask Jim Ellsman - do you know if Hubert ever had a meeting with the Pope? I saw that reported also and have to wonder about it. It seems a bit out of character, but then if he studied under
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey
Judy wrote: I know his claim about Billy Graham to be false How do you know that? Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Lindsey THE SICKNESS OF JOHN SMITHSON
In a message dated 5/3/2004 11:21:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: material. Lest we forget, DavidM has good things to say about Elsman - a man who dispises Miller and treats him like a step-mom. John JOHN, YOU ARE A TROUBLE-CAUSING LOSER THAT DIVORCED AND GOT KICKED FROM PASTOR -LIFE AFTER 14 YEARS AS A SENIOR PASTOR. YOU NOW ARE A COMMON WORKMAN, PLAYING WITH PRIVATE COUNSELING AT NIGHT. THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU, AND YOU DON'T EVEN GET ALONG WITH YOUR SONS. YOU ARE AN OBVIOUS GLUTTON, CONFESSING TO A WEIGHT OF 270 POUNDS ON A 5 FOOT FRAME. LOW SELF-ESTEEM. DAVID MILLER AND I ARE OLD FRIENDS AND SHARE MOST OF THEOLOGY. WE ARE BOTH WELCOME AT EACH OTHERS HOMES, AND HAVE SOCIALIZED IN THE PAST. YOU ARE A LIAR AND TROUBLE-CAUSER. OF COURSE, WE LIKE TO DEBATE. ---ELSMAN
Re: Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Judy wrote: Not only that but women were used in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and apostles who were female DAVEH: ??? Where do we find female apostles in the Bible? Judy: Paul referred to a large number of servants of God, men and women, making no distinction of sex. He described Phebe as a ruler. He acknowledged Junia as an apostle, and distinguished her as "of note among the apostles" (Rom 16:7) DAVEH: Hm...Were women considered kinsmen? I suppose it may be like mankind today.all encompassing. When I read vs 7, Judy, it merely seems as though they were in the company of the apostles, rather than equating them with the apostles. Is your belief in this commonly accepted in Reformed theology? John Chrysostom wrote in a Homily on Romans: "Indeed to be an apostle at all is a great thing. But to be even amongst these of note, just consider what a great econium this is. But they were of note owing to their works, to their achievements. Oh how great is the devotion of this woman that she should even be counted worthy of the appellation of Apostle." Grace and Peace, Judy -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] DAVEH: Hm...Were women considered kinsmen? I suppose it may be like mankind today.all encompassing. Judy: Of course, Paul calls other women fellow laborers in the gospel so I see no problem with the word 'kinsmen'. DAVEH: When I read vs 7, Judy, it merely seems as though they were in the company of the apostles, rather than equating them with the apostles. Judy: Probably because you have been trained to believe that women are not supposed to have these kinds of positions in the church from the time you were 8yrs old and possibly before that. DAVEH: Is your belief in this commonly accepted in Reformed theology? Judy: No, I'm not into different theologies and this thing about women permeates most of them anyway. Judy Judy wrote: Not only that but women were used in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and apostles who were female DAVEH: ??? Where do we find female apostles in the Bible? Judy: Paul referred to a large number of servants of God, men and women, making no distinction of sex. He described Phebe as a ruler. He acknowledged Junia as an apostle, and distinguished her as "of note among the apostles" (Rom 16:7) John Chrysostom wrote in a Homily on Romans: "Indeed to be an apostle at all is a great thing. But to be even amongst these of note, just consider what a great econium this is. But they were of note owing to their works, to their achievements. Oh how great is the devotion of this woman that she should even be counted worthy of the appellation of Apostle." Grace and Peace, Judy -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] DavidM wrote: Let me quote 1 Timothy 2 for you and then quote some Torah portions that correspond to it. 1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. Judy wrote: And what does this have to do with anything relevant to us? Dosen't the prophecy in Joel and in Acts say that God's Spirit would be poured out on ALL flesh and that both men and women would prophesy and speak in other tongues. How do you do all of that in silence? DavidM: Do you realize that you are arguing with the words of Paul as written in the Bible? Why are you debating with the Bible? Judy: I'm not doing that David. I have no trouble with the Bible - I'm debating with you... DavidM: The emphasis is on exercising authority over the man. If you understand the Jewish mindset and method of teaching, it all makes perfect sense why he brings up silence. Judy: You've got that right - the Jewish mindset that is. This is not from the Torah rather it is from the Talmud or Jewish oral teachings. The Judaising party in the church were actively seeking to bring Christian wives into bondage to the Jewish oral traditions - Jewish men would thank God daily that they weren't born women. DavidM: He does not mean absolutely silent, but only in the kind of argumentative exchanges that happen among teachers and prophets digging into the Word of God. Judy: When I read silent I take it to mean silent. I don't know that the kind of argumentative exchanges that you describe are in the Spirit of the Lord. We are told in scripture that the servant of the Lord is not to strive but be patient with all men and apt to teach (2 Timothy 2:24) DavidM: Most churches, however, are very feminized and men do not function much above the feminine level. When you have feminized assemblies, these passages make no sense because men and women function in the same ways. Judy: I haven't a clue what you are talking about here, what do you mean 'feminized'? Are churches supposed to be 'masculine'? This is carnal reasoning. The scriptures teach that in Christ there is no Jew, Greek, male, female, bond or free so where does this division come from? DavidM: Women may prophesy, preach, speak in tongues, and sing as long as they do not exercise authority over men. Judy: Why should anybody be exercising authority over anybody else? We are told to subject ourselves one to another as believers and this applies to husbands and wives who are believers also. Why is so much importance given to men having authority over women. I don't see Paul living that way. He had women who labored with him in the gospel. Also the gifts Christ gave to the Church when he ascended. Are these only for men? DavidM: No. Why do you jump to such conclusions from my quoting the Bible? Judy: Because sometimes in exercising spiritual gifts there is a word of exhortation and if given by a woman she would be exercising authority over men - Are you saying that half the Church must be silent and listen to the other half? DavidM: No. Judy: Good. Not only that but women were used in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and apostles who were female and you tell me this is not contradictory? DavidM: The passage is not contradictory when we look at the context and understand what is being said. Some try and say that Jesus Christ was a cannibal and taught cannibalism, but they are lifting passages out of context and not seeking to understand the message being conveyed. Judy: I'm glad you mention understanding in the light of context. Have you studied the history of Corinth and Ephesus? Had you thought that possibly some of their social customs could be part of the problem that Paul was addressing here? What about the head covering thing? DavidM wrote: Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him. Gen 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. Judy: And what did the first Adam say? This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh (Gen 2:23) and we read of the last Adam, For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the Church; for we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones... (Eph 5:29). I wrote previously: What is the above supposed to prove in your doctrine David? DavidM: I am quoting the Torah portion being referenced by Paul in 1 Timothy 2:12-13. I'm only trying to show you that Paul got his thinking from the Torah, and so when he says in 1 Cor. 14 as saith the Torah he meant the Torah of Moses
Fw: Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Judy wrote: Not only that but women were used in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and apostles who were female DAVEH: ??? Where do we find female apostles in the Bible? Judy: Paul referred to a large number of servants of God, men and women, making no distinction of sex. He described Phebe as a ruler. He acknowledged Junia as an apostle, and distinguished her as of note among the apostles (Rom 16:7) John Chrysostom wrote in a Homily on Romans: Indeed to be an apostle at all is a great thing. But to be even amongst these of note, just consider what a great econium this is. But they were of note owing to their works, to their achievements. Oh how great is the devotion of this woman that she should even be counted worthy of the appellation of Apostle. Grace and Peace, Judy -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
DavidM wrote: Let me quote 1 Timothy 2 for you and then quote some Torah portions that correspond to it. 1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. Judy wrote: And what does this have to do with anything relevant to us? Didn't the prophecy in Joel and in Acts say that God's Spirit would be poured out on ALL flesh and that both men and women would prophesy and speak in other tongues. How do you do all of that in silence? Do you realize that you are arguing with the words of Paul as written in the Bible? Why are you debating with the Bible? The emphasis is on exercising authority over the man. If you understand the Jewish mindset and method of teaching, it all makes perfect sense why he brings up silence. He does not mean absolutely silent, but only in the kind of argumentative exchanges that happen among teachers and prophets digging into the Word of God. I have been involved with churches that allow for this also, so the meaning is perhaps more clear and obvious to me. Most churches, however, are very feminized and men do not function much above the feminine level. When you have feminized assemblies, these passages make no sense because men and women function in the same ways. Women may prophesy, preach, speak in tongues, and sing as long as they do not exercise authority over men. If dialogues ensue in the church in which men teach one another, arguing and passionately expressing their viewpoints, women should be silent in these situations. That's all the passages are saying, and hence Hubert's statement helps us out by saying that women should not tell men what to do, but they should tell the whole world what Jesus did for them. Judy wrote: Also the gifts Christ gave to the Church when he ascended. Were those only for men? No. Why do you jump to such conclusions from my quoting the Bible? Judy wrote: Are you telling me that half the Church must be in silence and listen to the other half? No. Judy wrote: Give me a break. Not only that but women were used in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and apostles who were female and you tell me this is not contradictory? The passage is not contradictory when we look at the context and understand what is being said. Some try and say that Jesus Christ was a cannibal and taught cannibalism, but they are lifting passages out of context and not seeking to understand the message being conveyed. DavidM wrote: Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him. Gen 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. Judy wrote: Yes and what is all of the above supposed to prove in your doctrine David? I am quoting the Torah portion being referenced by Paul in 1 Timothy 2:12-13. I'm only trying to show you that Paul got his thinking from the Torah, and so when he says in 1 Cor. 14 as saith the Torah he meant the Torah of Moses known to us as the first five books of the Bible. If you want to discuss what the Torah means in this regard, that is another question. First we have to agree that Paul meant Torah when he said, as saith the Torah. Judy wrote: How does this validate the idea that the woman is supposed to be 'silent'? The point is that Adam was made first, then Eve. Woman was made for man and not man for woman. Therefore, there is an order of authority here just as parents are in authority over children by virtue of them being first. God seeks to maintain that order of man being the head of the woman so that we might understand the Godhead and so that man might better understand his relationship to Christ. In teaching which is interactive, where men interrupt one another and challenge one another, this should be done decently and in order. It should be done man to man, with women being silent. DavidM wrote: 1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then
Re: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
Judy wrote: Not only that but women were used in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and apostles who were female DAVEH: ??? Where do we find female apostles in the Bible? -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
Judy wrote: I just responded to the quote you posted from Holy Hubert David. Yes it was cute as a 'one liner' but not God's heart on the matter. I disagree. I think it does capture God's heart on the matter, given the context in which it was spoken. Judy wrote: When Paul wrote thus sayeth the law he was talking about the Jewish writings or Mishnah which were comments made by the Rabbi's because the law itself says nothing about women being silent in an assembly. Wrong, Judy. We addressed this already in the past and it is discouraging to have to repeat it yet again. The Mishnah was not written until hundreds of years later. I suspect you got this from a book that was wrong and you erroneously trusted it and believed it to be true, but it is an anachronistic statement made in ignorance. Paul was teaching about what the Torah itself teaches. He even specifically teaches from the Torah on this matter in 1 Timothy 2:11-15 when he touches on this same subject. Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety. (1 Timothy 2:11-15 KJV) I could write for pages from the Torah alone about gender differences and the role of women and men. The idea that the Torah is silent about women being subject to men is bogus. Recognize this first, then let's talk about it. Judy wrote: Thank you for shedding more light on Hubert's belief. However, neither should men be ruling the Church, we are all to be led by the Spirit of Christ. Another erroneous teaching. Government is an orderly form of ruling, and the Spirit sets some in the church in governments (1 Cor. 12:28). We could discuss this in much greater detail. Where we agree is that godly rulers rule by serving, but that is not to say that men ought not rule and govern in the church. DavidM wrote: In regards to Sarah's telling Abraham what to do, she was basically undoing her previous work of telling Abraham to take Hagar to be his wife. Furthermore, she did not exercise authority over Abraham in this regard, but simply expressed her desire and let Abraham make the decision. Judy wrote: This is not the way it reads in my Bible DavidM: But Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian whom she had borne to Abraham playing with her son Isaac; so she said to Abraham Cast out this slave women with her son, for the son of this slave woman shall not be heir with my son Isaac And the thing was very displeasing to Abraham on account of his son. But God said to Abraham Be not displeased because of the lad and because of your slave woman; whatever Sarah says to you, do as she tells you for through Isaac shall your descendents be named. (Genesis 21:9-12) Yes, and notice that Sarah did not take the matter into her own hands here. She recognized Abraham's authority in the matter. Abraham listened to God, not Sarah, in this matter. Do you not see that? What if God had not agreed with Sarah, who do you think Abraham would have listened to? What do you think Sarah would have done in that situation? Would she have submitted unto Abraham or rebelled and kicked out Hagar anyway? DavidM: So from this perspective, Sarah did not rule Abraham, she did not tell Abraham what to do, but rather she regarded her husband Abraham as her lord. Judy: I don't know about ruling Abraham and I don't believe I made that claim. However, when I read the scripture above I see her telling Abraham what to do - I see Abraham being uncomfortable with it - and I see God validating what Sarah said he should do. How do you get around it, does your Bible says something different? I see Sarah as expressing her opinion to her husband and submitting to his decision in the matter. That is what a godly woman would do. Did Sarah tell Abraham what to do? In one sense, yes, but not in the sense of ruling him. I'm just trying to point out that Sarah walked in submission to Abraham in this example. She did not rule over Abraham. Rather, Abraham ruled over Sarah. If I tell my government officials not to give us any more taxes, I am in one sense telling them what to do. However, in another sense I am not able to tell them what to do. They must hear all the people and they have the power to raise or lower taxes, not me. So in another sense, I do not tell them what to do. I only express my viewpoint, and then the decision is in their hands and I must submit to it. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Judy wrote: I just responded to the quote you posted from Holy Hubert David. Yes it was cute as a 'one liner' but not God's heart on the matter. DavidM: I disagree. I think it does capture God's heart on the matter, given the context in which it was spoken. Judy wrote: When Paul wrote thus sayeth the law he was talking about the Jewish writings or Mishnah which were comments made by the Rabbi's because the law itself says nothing about women being silent in an assembly. DavidM: Wrong, Judy. We addressed this already in the past and it is discouraging to have to repeat it yet again. The Mishnah was not written until hundreds of years later. Judy: I can empathize after a fashion DavidM because it discourages me to read such legalism coming from a man with influence over a wife and five daughters. Apparently I used the wrong word, it was not the Mishnah - it is the Oral Law I am speaking of ie: over the centuries various interpretations of the Law had been added to the religious literature of Judaism. These often added regulations were intended to protect the pious Jew from unintentionally violating any Mosaic statute or ruling. By Jesus time this oral law was considered to be as binding as Scripture itself and some even argued that God had given both oral and written law to Moses at Sinai (Revell Bible Dictionary p.624) and it is this 'oral law' that so discriminates against women. DavidM: I suspect you got this from a book that was wrong and you erroneously trusted it and believed it to be true, but it is an anachronistic statement made in ignorance. Judy: Wrong DavidM. I have given this topic hours and hours of study because of the contradictions in scripture if the surface meaning is taken at face value. I suggest you give it more time and attention. DavidM: Paul was teaching about what the Torah itself teaches. He even specifically teaches from the Torah on this matter in 1 Timothy 2:11-15 when he touches on this same subject. Judy: Where do you find this in the Torah? How do you know this statement did not originate with the Judaizing party in the church at Corinth who were quoting from the Talmud? DavidM: Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety. (1 Timothy 2:11-15 KJV) I could write for pages from the Torah alone about gender differences and the role of women and men. The idea that the Torah is silent about women being subject to men is bogus. Recognize this first, then let's talk about it. Judy: I don't believe you will find the above statement anywhere in the Torah because God does not ordain the government of women by men in fact he expressly forbids it. God does not want man to be as God to woman and usurp Christ's place of authority over His own servant. Even in the sphere of marital relations the woman is not to be irresponsibly submissive to her own husband; she was to be punished as severely as he if she submitted under unsuitable conditions (see Leviticus 20:18). I wrote: Thank you for shedding more light on Hubert's belief. However, neither should men be ruling the Church, we are all to be led by the Spirit of Christ. DavidM: Another erroneous teaching. Government is an orderly form of ruling, and the Spirit sets some in the church in governments (1 Cor. 12:28). We could discuss this in much greater detail. Where we agree is that godly rulers rule by serving, but that is not to say that men ought not rule and govern in the church. Judy: God's people are to submit only to those through whom they hear the voice of Jesus. The apostle Paul said 'follow me as I follow Christ' DavidM wrote: In regards to Sarah's telling Abraham what to do, she was basically undoing her previous work of telling Abraham to take Hagar to be his wife. Furthermore, she did not exercise authority over Abraham in this regard, but simply expressed her desire and let Abraham make the decision. Judy wrote: This is not the way it reads in my Bible DavidM: But Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian whom she had borne to Abraham playing with her son Isaac; so she said to Abraham Cast out this slave women with her son, for the son of this slave woman shall not be heir with my son Isaac And the thing was very displeasing to Abraham on account of his son. But God said to Abraham Be not displeased because of the lad and because of your slave woman; whatever Sarah says to you, do as she tells you for through Isaac shall your descendents be named. (Genesis 21:9-12) DavidM: Yes, and notice that Sarah did not take the matter into her own hands here. She recognized
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
DavidM wrote: We addressed this already in the past and it is discouraging to have to repeat it yet again. The Mishnah was not written until hundreds of years later. Judy wrote: I can empathize after a fashion DavidM because it discourages me to read such legalism coming from a man with influence over a wife and five daughters. Legalism is a term with mixed meanings and is many times used in a disparaging way. Is that how you are using it here, or are you trying to complement me for sticking with what the Bible teaches? Judy wrote: Apparently I used the wrong word, it was not the Mishnah - it is the Oral Law I am speaking of ie: over the centuries various interpretations of the Law had been added to the religious literature of Judaism. These often added regulations were intended to protect the pious Jew from unintentionally violating any Mosaic statute or ruling. By Jesus time this oral law was considered to be as binding as Scripture itself and some even argued that God had given both oral and written law to Moses at Sinai (Revell Bible Dictionary p.624) and it is this 'oral law' that so discriminates against women. Fair enough history about the oral law, but you are making a huge stretch to argue that Paul supported the oral law as being authoritative for us to follow today. I simply hold to the more parsimonious viewpoint that Paul was quoting the Torah. This seems very clear when we consider the actual Torah portions that Paul quotes in 1 Timothy 2. DavidM: I suspect you got this from a book that was wrong and you erroneously trusted it and believed it to be true, but it is an anachronistic statement made in ignorance. Judy: Wrong DavidM. I have given this topic hours and hours of study because of the contradictions in scripture if the surface meaning is taken at face value. I suggest you give it more time and attention. Surely you did not make it up. If you did not make it up out of thin air, then you read it somewhere. I see no contradictions in Scripture if taken at face value. DavidM: Paul was teaching about what the Torah itself teaches. He even specifically teaches from the Torah on this matter in 1 Timothy 2:11-15 when he touches on this same subject. Judy: Where do you find this in the Torah? How do you know this statement did not originate with the Judaizing party in the church at Corinth who were quoting from the Talmud? Here you go again, repeating what you keep being told is false. There was no Talmud at the time that this was written by Paul. You admitted in this very email to making a mistake about the Mishnah (the authoritative part of the Talmud), yet here you go again claiming that some hypothetical Judaizers were quoting from the Talmud which had not yet been written! Let me quote 1 Timothy 2 for you and then quote some Torah portions that correspond to it. This is pretty basic, but for some reason you seem to be having some kind of tunnel vision that keeps you from seeing the obvious. 1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him. Gen 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. 1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. Gen 3:17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife 1Ti 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety. Gen 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] I see no contradictions in Scripture if taken at face value. Judy: How can you not, I find this incredulous DavidM: Let me quote 1 Timothy 2 for you and then quote some Torah portions that correspond to it. This is pretty basic, but for some reason you seem to be having some kind of tunnel vision that keeps you from seeing the obvious. 1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. Judy: And what does this have to do with anything relevant to us? Didn't the prophecy in Joel and in Acts say that God's Spirit would be poured out on ALL flesh and that both men and women would prophesy and speak in other tongues. How do you do all of that in silence? Also the gifts Christ gave to the Church when he ascended. Were those only for men? Are you telling me that half the Church must be in silence and listen to the other half? Give me a break. Not only that but women were used in the early Church - from the scriptures themselves we can find deaconesses, teachers, evangelists, and apostles who were female and you tell me this is not contradictory? DavidM: Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him. Gen 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. 1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Judy: Yes and what is all of the above supposed to prove in your doctrine David? How does this validate the idea that the woman is supposed to be 'silent'? DavidM: Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. Gen 3:17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife Judy: I hope you are not implying that Adam did the same as Abraham and messed up by listening to the woman .. I'm kind of getting the idea that this is what you are leading up to. DavidM: 1Ti 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety. Judy: And how does the man get saved? He too gets saved through childbearing since Christ the Messiah is the ONLY way to God and the man is also fallen... DavidM: Gen 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. So when Paul said in 1 Cor. 14, as also saith the Torah, he really meant the Torah and not the oral law of the Rabbi's. Judy: No DavidM, you've not proved anything here because the curse prophesied over the woman in Genesis 3:16 is now null and void through Christ because Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law being made a curse for us, so why would Paul put women back under that pray tell? Judy wrote: God does not want man to be as God to woman and usurp Christ's place of authority over His own servant. Even in the sphere of marital relations the woman is not to be irresponsibly submissive to her own husband; she was to be punished as severely as he if she submitted under unsuitable conditions (see Leviticus 20:18). DavidM: Equal punishment is always given to those under one's authority. Look how many died because of David's sin with Bathsheba. If I make a poor decision, my children suffer because they are under my authority. Judy: I'm not speaking of children DavidM, certainly we have a responsibility for them. But your wife stands or falls by her own choices, not yours. DavidM: The New Testament Scriptures clearly teach that the man is the head of the woman just as Christ is the head of every man. But I would have you know, that THE HEAD OF EVERY MAN IS CHRIST; AND THE HEAD OF THE WOMAN IS THE MAN; and the head of Christ is God. (1 Corinthians 11:3 KJV)
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
Judy wrote: You are right that I don't subscribe to Hubert's opinion. Judy, based on my personal relationship with Hubert, I would say that Hubert would agree with much of what you have shared. We need to be careful about being too critical of any quotes lifted out of context. For example, I could lift a quote from James about being justified by works and not by faith alone and try to say that he disagreed with Paul saying that we are justified by faith without works. Context and the people you are speaking to is very important. The quote I shared was being taught to Baptists who taught that women should never say a single word in church, but that they should be absolutely silent. Hubert first showed the absurdity of this idea, saying that such a position, if being consistent, would mean women could not even sing in church, because that would not be silence. He then showed how Paul made appeal to the law and pointed out what the law said about women. One point he made was concerning the gender differences concerning vows, how a woman's word was not taken as binding unless the man allowed it. In any case, I don't want to drag this out, but to Hubert's credit, I think it would be helpful for you to know that he was agreeing about women not ruling the church but that does not mean that women should not preach. His statement was a cute way of making that point. In regards to Sarah's telling Abraham what to do, she was basically undoing her previous work of telling Abraham to take Hagar to be his wife. Furthermore, she did not exercise authority over Abraham in this regard, but simply expressed her desire and let Abraham make the decision. So from this perspective, Sarah did not rule Abraham, she did not tell Abraham what to do, but rather she regarded her husband Abraham as her lord. In this context, I think Hubert's statement still stands and is an effective way to distinguish between the authority to declare the gospel and the authority to rule over men. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Judy wrote: You are right that I don't subscribe to Hubert's opinion. Judy, based on my personal relationship with Hubert, I would say that Hubert would agree with much of what you have shared. We need to be careful about being too critical of any quotes lifted out of context. Judy: I just responded to the quote you posted from Holy Hubert David. Yes it was cute as a 'one liner' but not God's heart on the matter. DavidM: For example, I could lift a quote from James about being justified by works and not by faith alone and try to say that he disagreed with Paul saying that we are justified by faith without works. Context and the people you are speaking to is very important. Judy: Yes .. this is why we should study and know God's Word for ourselves. DavidM: The quote I shared was being taught to Baptists who taught that women should never say a single word in church, but that they should be absolutely silent. Hubert first showed the absurdity of this idea, saying that such a position, if being consistent, would mean women could not even sing in church, because that would not be silence. Judy: Good point. DavidM: He then showed how Paul made appeal to the law and pointed out what the law said about women. Judy: When Paul wrote thus sayeth the law he was talking about the Jewish writings or Mishnah which were comments made by the Rabbi's because the law itself says nothing about women being silent in an assembley. DavidM: One point he made was concerning the gender differences concerning vows, how a woman's word was not taken as binding unless the man allowed it. Judy: If the woman was still at home and her father heard the vow and said nothing it stood; if she was married and her husband heard the vow and said nothing that one stood also. However if the men heard the vow and disapproved they could make it void and this probably had to do with the property rights which were handed down through the male. heard it, and DavidM: In any case, I don't want to drag this out, but to Hubert's credit, I think it would be helpful for you to know that he was agreeing about women not ruling the church but that does not mean that women should not preach. His statement was a cute way of making that point. Judy: Thank you for shedding more light on Hubert's belief. However, neither should men be ruling the Church, we are all to be led by the Spirit of Christ. DavidM: In regards to Sarah's telling Abraham what to do, she was basically undoing her previous work of telling Abraham to take Hagar to be his wife. Furthermore, she did not exercise authority over Abraham in this regard, but simply expressed her desire and let Abraham make the decision. Judy: This is not the way it reads in my Bible DavidM: But Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian whom she had borne to Abraham playing with her son Isaac; so she said to Abraham Cast out this slave women with her son, for the son of this slave woman shall not be heir with my son Isaac And the thing was very displeasing to Abraham on account of his son. But God said to Abraham Be not displeased because of the lad and because of your slave woman; whatever Sarah says to you, do as she tells you for through Isaac shall your descendents be named. (Genesis 21:9-12) DavidM: So from this perspective, Sarah did not rule Abraham, she did not tell Abraham what to do, but rather she regarded her husband Abraham as her lord. Judy: I don't know about ruling Abraham and I don't believe I made that claim. However, when I read the scripture above I see her telling Abraham what to do - I see Abraham being uncomfortable with it - and I see God validating what Sarah said he should do. How do you get around it, does your Bible says something different? DavidM: In this context, I think Hubert's statement still stands and is an effective way to distinguish between the authority to declare the gospel and the authority to rule over men. Judy: I liked Hubert's moxy and believe he had a godly compassion toward the unregenerate and unlovely but Jesus liberated women. Not to rule men or women but to serve as godly men are also called to serve. Grace and Peace, Judy -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert/Women
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DaveH wrote: Is there anything women can't do due to the lack of proper authority? DavidM writes: I like he way Holy Hubert worded this. Hubert Lindsey was the greatest of street preachers, in my opinion. Hubert said, Women should never tell men what to do, but they should tell the whole world what Jesus did for them. DAVEH: O.that is pretty good! Judy: You really think so DaveH? Remember it's just Holy Hubert's personal opinion and one to which God apparently does not subscribe. DAVEH: Nor apparently do you, Judy. May I suggest you tell Dean where to go so I can see how Hubert got it wrong VBG Judy: Tell Dean where to go? Are you trying to get me in trouble DaveH? You are right that I don't subscribe to Hubert's opinion. If God can use a donkey to keep an errant prophet from being killed He can and does use whoever He wants and this includes women. Under the old covenant there were Huldah (2 Kings 22:16) and Deborah (Judges 4:4) who were prophetesses, Deborah was also a judge in Israel. In the NT Jesus elevated women from the burden of prejudice when he encouraged Mary to sit at His feet and learn which He called the the better part which wouldn't be taken away from her - the first 'street preacher' was a women (the Samaritan woman at the well) and the first to see Him after the resurrection were women. Paul speaks of women who labored with him in the gospel (Phil 4:3b); and incidentally Hubert Lindsey had women who labored with him also according to his book. Philip had four daughters who prophesied (Acts 21:9); there were deaconesses Phoebe (Romans 16:1,2) and others along with Eunice and Lois who raised the boy Timothy (who had a Greek father) in the scriptures until he was qualified to become the first Bishop at Ephesus. I don't believe that women should usurp men and this kind of love and respect goes both ways. There is a natural order because God made women weaker vessels physically (1 Cor 11:3); the headship of man is in order to take responsibility and serve rather to Lord it over his wife and all other women and spiritually there is no difference because we are all one in Christ (Galatians 3:28) Grace and Peace, Judy -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert
Izzy wrote: David, Wow; what an impressive man of God. Do you know if he was a Sabbath keeper? :-) Hubert was a very big dispensationalist. He wrote a two volume set whose entire purpose was to illustrate the difference between the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God. Hubert believed that not understanding this led to all manner of misunderstandings of Scripture. The four gospels he considered irrelevant for the church. Jesus came to the lost sheep of Israel and so the gospels pertain to the kingdom of heaven, whose rejection led to the current church age. If believers did not understand this distinction of dispensations, Hubert believed that their theology would forever be confusing and illogical. Hubert was against doing anything that would be remotely Jewish. For this reason, he not only rejected Sabbath Keeping in the Seventh Day Adventist sense of observance, but like Quakers, he rejected water baptism because it was a Jewish ritual. He basically stressed the Pauline epistles as being THE Scriptures for the church age. His viewpoint was that Paul was not sent to baptize, so neither should Christians go forth baptizing. He stressed faith that comes from hearing God's Word. Hubert had this very clear view that sinners were vile and despicable, but they were that way because of original sin. They couldn't help it. Hubert often stressed this in his preaching. He would say to a student with a smile on his face, You are a poor, miserable, wretched wicked sinner! You have never done one good thing for God. You hate God. God bless your dirty heart! Hubert believed strongly in the sovereignty of God to save sinners, so until God unveiled himself to sinners, they had no choice but to go right on sinning. So he boldly rebuked and scolded sinners in the harshest terms. Because of his theology, while he appeared on the surface to be extremely harsh and condemning, there was this attitude that people could sense that he truly loved everyone. Hubert had no tolerance for Christians who continued to sin. For Hubert, it was all or nothing. Christians don't sin period, and anybody who thought otherwise were ignorant of the Scriptures. Hubert taught strongly that there was no such thing as a carnal Christian. A so-called carnal Christian was someone who still lived under the Adamic nature and was therefore not in Christ. You can't be in Christ and continue to live under the Adamic nature. A common phrase of Hubert's was, you are ignorant! Students despised that, but Hubert was a walking concordance and could quote chapter and verse for any passage that students attempted to bring up. He would quote the texts verbatim on the spot, so his phrase you are ignorant carried a lot of weight and made students stop and think just how ignorant they were of the Bible. Hubert also had an incredible sense of humor which he used to diffuse the hostility toward him that was generated from his crude and direct remarks. I have never known anyone who was faster on his feet with a humorous comeback to some mocking remark by a student. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
[TruthTalk] Holy Hubert
David, I did a web search but could not find the book you are referring to about Hubert Lindsey. Where do you find it? However I did find this wesite, http://www.concentric.net/~Kottca/hubert , which states that Holy Hubert sought to apply much of the Mosaic Law to contemporary Christians. Perhaps he really was holy after all. :-) Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Did Lot preach to Sodom? Judy wrote: Yes I hear what you are saying but we should see the Spirit of Christ in action. Of course, including the Spirit of Christ going into the Temple and chasing out those who were defiling it. We should see this same zeal in action. Judy wrote: Judy wrote: What about the side that lays down their life in love. That's the side I believe reaches the sin-sick, lonely, rejected. I've been reading Hubert Lindsey's book and this is how he ministered. He lived among the people, washed the feet of one of his hecklers when challenged and was available by telephone in time of emergency. The students grew to respect him because they knew he was genuine. Well, if you are reading Holy Hubert's book, then you should be able to get the inside scoop about what we are talking about. Hubert was the grandfather of all modern day street preachers. I do not hold a candle next to Hubert. Hubert so angered sinners that he was beat up, stabbed, shot about five different times, imprisoned over 100 times, etc. When the communists held rallies of 35,000 people, Hubert would walk up on the platform, take the microphone without invitation and take over the rally. If he was alive today, I have no doubt he would likewise do so with the homosexual rallies. As for Hubert's heart of love for the sinner, yes, we agree and try to walk in that same spirit. My phone number is always available and often I take inquisitors out to eat or go have private chats with them, or bring them to church, etc. While some students, especially the homosexual, are stirred up with hatred, others see that our love is genuine and respond to it. At the University of South Florida, there was a campus organization started by the students directly as a result of the open air preaching that we did there. I think that indicates positive response. David Miller wrote: When we stand up to that homosexual agenda and declare how harmful homosexuality is to society, we take away this cloak of respectability and reveal homosexuality for what it is from the eyes of a Holy God. Judy wrote: It's much better to hold up the light. That's what Hubert did. He held up God's standard, speaking of normal marriage and God's love between male and female to people on a campus where immorality was fast taking hold. Yes, this is what I mean by saying that we expose homosexuality. We don't just point out the wrong, but we point out how it perverts God's ordained plan of marriage. I generally teach not only on the sanctity of marriage, but on why God created gender to begin with. Of course, I also connect how promiscuous sexual relations and homosexuality violate this order of God. Judy wrote: There is a difference between condemnation and conviction. One is from the enemy and the other is from the Lord. The Scriptures teach that condemnation comes from the law. The devil doesn't condemn anyone, nor does he want to condemn anyone. He has tricked the churches with this false doctrine for many years now. It is repeated and repeated but never examined in the light of Scripture. People relate to it because nobody wants to be condemned. Nobody likes condemnation. Nevertheless, the Bible teaches that without the law, nobody was condemned, yet they still suffered from the penalty of sin, which was death. When the law came, then condemnation came. So condemnation comes not from the enemy, but from the law, and the law comes from God who is not our enemy. Judy wrote: David, all I know is that when I was out there - far away from God - I used to travel to work on a train that went by a billboard with John 3:16 on it and that billboard touched my heart more than any nut out there with a megaphone telling me that I was under condemnation and headed for hell. It would not surprise me if that billboard was put there by Bible Jim Webber or someone like him. They started the John 3:16 banners at the football games and continue to do it, having to evade police each time they do. Also, let me say that I was not reached by such methods, but I have reaped many people who were touched by it. One young man I worked with when I was a teenager believed upon Christ and was baptized. When I spoke to him of Holy Hubert Lindsey, a man I had just met just the year before, he tells me that he heard Hubert preach at a university in Louisiana just the year before. The
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert
Izzy wrote: I did a web search but could not find the book you are referring to about Hubert Lindsey. Where do you find it? I assume that the book Judy mentioned is Bless Your Dirty Heart by Holy Hubert Lindsey. The book is edited by Howard G. Earl, and published by Logos International, Plainfield, New Jersey. 1973. ISBN is 00882700170. There is a hardback edition whose ISBN is 0882700332. The book is out of print and has been for some time. It is hard to get. A search on Amazon yielded 6 used copies, and a search on Barnes Nobles brought up 5 copies. You can pay anywhere from $11.00 to $69.00 for this book. Its original price was $1.95. I was not so impressed with the book myself, but then I knew Hubert personally. Hubert was not a writer, but an oral person. He is one of the greatest preachers I have ever known. I have many of his sermons on CD which were transferred from audio tape. I don't agree with all that he taught, but he would certainly make you think. I first met Hubert in 1978. In 1993 and 1994 when I began to preach on the streets, Hubert was in a nursing home in Tampa. I was fortunate to be able to visit him almost daily. We even brought him to our home church and had him share from a reclined position on a cot. He was blind then and paralyzed on one side of his body from a stroke. He had the entire New Testament memorized and two-thirds of the Old Testament memorized, so his blindness did not hinder him from quoting Scripture and preaching directly from the text without being able to see. Hubert passed away last March and a memorial was held for him in Ohio at brother Jed Smock's campus ministers conference. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert
David, Wow; what an impressive man of God. Do you know if he was a Sabbath keeper? Izzy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 8:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Holy Hubert Izzy wrote: I did a web search but could not find the book you are referring to about Hubert Lindsey. Where do you find it? I assume that the book Judy mentioned is Bless Your Dirty Heart by Holy Hubert Lindsey. The book is edited by Howard G. Earl, and published by Logos International, Plainfield, New Jersey. 1973. ISBN is 00882700170. There is a hardback edition whose ISBN is 0882700332. The book is out of print and has been for some time. It is hard to get. A search on Amazon yielded 6 used copies, and a search on Barnes Nobles brought up 5 copies. You can pay anywhere from $11.00 to $69.00 for this book. Its original price was $1.95. I was not so impressed with the book myself, but then I knew Hubert personally. Hubert was not a writer, but an oral person. He is one of the greatest preachers I have ever known. I have many of his sermons on CD which were transferred from audio tape. I don't agree with all that he taught, but he would certainly make you think. I first met Hubert in 1978. In 1993 and 1994 when I began to preach on the streets, Hubert was in a nursing home in Tampa. I was fortunate to be able to visit him almost daily. We even brought him to our home church and had him share from a reclined position on a cot. He was blind then and paralyzed on one side of his body from a stroke. He had the entire New Testament memorized and two-thirds of the Old Testament memorized, so his blindness did not hinder him from quoting Scripture and preaching directly from the text without being able to see. Hubert passed away last March and a memorial was held for him in Ohio at brother Jed Smock's campus ministers conference. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. -- Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.