Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
The only thing is full relay vs insertion only. Full relay probably wouldn't work in this scenario. Because you can't define the L3 relay IP per VLAN. The AP is going to relay all DHCP requests to the specified address. I still say the way to go is static management IP on the SMs. Wait... am I

Re: [AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug

2016-08-18 Thread Bill Prince
With homeplug, it's not how close individual plugs are located because they have to go through the breaker panel. If the panel is 3 floors away, then the signal has to go down to the breaker panel, and then back up to the other homeplug unit. The total distance is the issue. bp On 8/18/2016

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
Good call on the VLANs George! I think that might be the ticket. That gives me something to try in our lab :) -Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, George Skorup wrote: > Does PC do the zero-touch config? Why can't a new SM come up and get the > option 66 info for the config URL, then download

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Does PC do the zero-touch config? Why can't a new SM come up and get the option 66 info for the config URL, then download its config which contains a static management IP? Or, what about separating things in VLANs? Put your SM management on a dedicated VLAN with its own DHCP server instance an

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
right now everything is static (mgmt and public ip) we try to deploy SMs with NAT enabled but that's not possible half the time for one reason or another. Once we move to powercode I want to use their zero touch config (dhcp option 66) to config the SM and then option 82 if the SM is bridged to gi

Re: [AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug

2016-08-18 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller
we still use those on occasion. they even make a combo now with homeplug and an access point built in that can be used as a repeater. - Original Message - From: Adam Moffett To: Animal Farm Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:38 PM Subject: [AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug Is there

Re: [AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug

2016-08-18 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller
we still use those on - Original Message - From: Adam Moffett To: Animal Farm Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:38 PM Subject: [AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug Is there any equipment manufacturer still selling broadband over powerlines equipment? I tried a cheap netgear homeplu

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jordan Gregory
Tik switch at the tower had flow control enabled on all ports. I have disabled it now. Customer is asleep now i'm sure, so I can't have them check. But I'll know more in the morning. This was happening on all SMs though, so I may fire one up just to see. Thank You, Jordan Gregory Founder / CEO

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jordan Gregory
They aren't airfiber, they are Mimosa B5s Microtik routers/switches. I didn't enable flow control, but i'll double check Thank You, Jordan Gregory Founder / CEO Hive Wireless, LLC On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:43 PM, George Skorup wrote: > What is all of the equipment involved? Have you looked

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
What is all of the equipment involved? Have you looked for CRC or FCS errors on any ethernet links? Unfortunately, the ePMP gear does not have ethernet CRC errors stats. What about flow control on your GigE interfaces? Have you ran iperf from behind the SM all the way through to your router? Y

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jordan Gregory
Everyone, I enabled the MIR profiles and set the one I am talking about to 25000/5000, the link test shows this speed perfectly, except when we do a speedtest via speedof.me or speedtest.net or anything really, it's only showing 3Mbps. I have a cambium support ticket open, but that may take a whi

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
I assume you're doing bridge mode? Use RADIUS to assign the SM's management IP. Then DHCP + Op 82 is used for the customer equipment. We just do static management IP on the SMs. Playing with NAT + DMZ on the customer side. Traceroute and other ICMP responses don't work through NAT mode, even w

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
Hu that's the conclusion we were coming to also. I'm trying to find a way to make it all automagic but that seems not possible :-/ -Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak wrote: > From how I understand it that is not possible unless you plan on managing > via the public IP. > > Opti

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Joe Novak
>From how I understand it that is not possible unless you plan on managing via the public IP. Option 82, in its simplest form, just allows accounting via the SU mac address, along with what 'circuit' (AP) it came from. I think in your situation if you want to use powercode to hand out public addre

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
Thx joe, So if it sends the same 0a:00:3e MAC for the bridged device, how do you get the dhcp server to send the management IP to the SM since that would be the same MAC?? -Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Joe Novak wrote: > Sean, > > No problem! > > Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Joe Novak
Sean, No problem! Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty sure without looking at my notes. This post describes it perfectly and also has a raw dump of the dhcp request: http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP- 450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636 OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information Circ

Re: [AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug

2016-08-18 Thread Jeremy
They also stock a version with AC passthrough for $10 more On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Jeremy wrote: > http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=12286 > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > >> Is there any equipment manufacturer still selling broadband over >> powerlines e

Re: [AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug

2016-08-18 Thread Jeremy
http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=12286 On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > Is there any equipment manufacturer still selling broadband over > powerlines equipment? > > I tried a cheap netgear homeplug kit to get data from a utility closet to > an apartment 3 floors apart

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Joe Novak
Sean, No problem! Cambium 450/EPMP behave the same way I am pretty sure without looking at my notes. This post describes it perfectly and also has a raw dump of the dhcp request: http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/DHCP-Opt-82/td-p/39636 OPTION: 82 ( 29) Relay Agent Information Circu

[AFMUG] BPL / Homeplug

2016-08-18 Thread Adam Moffett
Is there any equipment manufacturer still selling broadband over powerlines equipment? I tried a cheap netgear homeplug kit to get data from a utility closet to an apartment 3 floors apart. It works (with weak signal) in the hallway just outside the apartment, but doesn't connect from inside

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
Hey joe, Yeah we are mocking it up in our lab right now. Mainly need to know what MAC gets sent for all the different interfaces - management, NAT enabled, bridged etc. Powercode will only let you add one IP and MAC per device. Since we are in the process of importing all our data for the migra

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 14.2

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
That's kinda what I'm thinking, just go to 14.1.2 for now. On 8/18/2016 8:06 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: I'm pretty happy with 14.1.2, it's very stable :) I've had too many summer projects I'm trying to finish before it snows again to try the 14.2 beta. -Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Geor

Re: [AFMUG] 48v and -48v

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Mean Well RSD200C-48 will work just fine. Put it between your 48v UPS load side and -48 gear. The output of the RSD is floating and you should have no problem tying the + side to ground. On 8/18/2016 8:19 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote: I have a site that I am converting to DC from AC. All

Re: [AFMUG] 48v and -48v

2016-08-18 Thread Adam Moffett
Yup an isolated 48v to 48v power supply. If you connect 48v and -48v equipment to the same power supply then something bad will happen. -- Original Message -- From: "Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr." To: af@afmug.com Sent: 8/18/2016 9:19:36 PM Subject: [AFMUG] 48v and -48v I have a site th

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Joe Novak
I plan on implementing it with cambium both 450/epmp. Any specific questions? I learned a lot by taking a setting up a dhcp server with whatever verbose logging turned on and watching the requests. On Aug 18, 2016 8:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > I'm almost certain someone does... But I'm not 10

[AFMUG] 48v and -48v

2016-08-18 Thread Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr.
I have a site that I am converting to DC from AC. All of the gear powers at traditional 48v with a negative ground. I have a PTP800 though that I am told is -48v (ground tied to positive). How do I get -48v for the PTP800? The site has a NewMar DIN-UPS 48-10. It states that the outputs are iso

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
I'm almost certain someone does... But I'm not 100% Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2016 8:51 PM, "Sean Heskett" wrote: > Powercode said they had never done it and didn't know anyone who had. (I > was kinda surprised at t

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 14.2

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
I'm pretty happy with 14.1.2, it's very stable :) I've had too many summer projects I'm trying to finish before it snows again to try the 14.2 beta. -Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, George Skorup wrote: > Anyone running 14.2 official yet? I have some 14.1.2 running with most > everything e

[AFMUG] PMP450 14.2

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Anyone running 14.2 official yet? I have some 14.1.2 running with most everything else still on 13.2.1. Now 14.2.1 is in beta. Wondering if I should just wait on that.

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Erich Kaiser
We have over 2 dozen nodes (including on order nodes) with Att(3-5 new nodes a month), they can be reasonable it just depends how well you are able to negotiate and deal with their BS :) We have two major aggregation points, one in Chicago and one in Houston, can add more to Atlanta and Ashbur

Re: [AFMUG] GIGE-POE-APC and -48 radio

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Oh, I see. Chuck made things easy by marking + and - on the input block so you know what's what on the jumper diagram on the back of the card. I know he's explained this before. Apparently I'm just a little slow this week. On 8/18/2016 7:44 PM, George Skorup wrote: Yep. That's why I'm going to

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
Powercode said they had never done it and didn't know anyone who had. (I was kinda surprised at that response) Figured I'd check to see if y'all had used it. -Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Josh Luthman wrote: > Have you contacted Powercode about this or no? I figure they'd know, > their

Re: [AFMUG] GIGE-POE-APC and -48 radio

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Yep. That's why I'm going to have a RSD to separate all "-48" loads at the sites. I think I'm working on too many things at once and confusing myself and forgetting things, because I've done this before. :( On 8/18/2016 7:35 PM, Bill Prince wrote: The Trango bonds their return to chassis, reg

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Have you contacted Powercode about this or no? I figure they'd know, their wisp is Canopy. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2016 8:35 PM, "Sean Heskett" wrote: > We are in the process of migrating to powercode...it's not

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
We are in the process of migrating to powercode...it's not an easy task but I think it will be well worth it. Lots of details to figure out lol. -Sean On Thursday, August 18, 2016, Tushar Patel wrote: > You moved to powercode!!! > > Tushar > > > > On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Sean Heskett > w

Re: [AFMUG] GIGE-POE-APC and -48 radio

2016-08-18 Thread Bill Prince
The Trango bonds their return to chassis, regardless of what the POE does. So you need to check what else is on that power feed, and if any of those devices also bond to chassis. If one or more is bonding + to chassis (that's Trango), then any other that bonds - to chassis is gonna blow a fuse

Re: [AFMUG] GIGE-POE-APC and -48 radio

2016-08-18 Thread Chuck McCown
The LEDS are only a polarity indicator and no bearing on what's what. Input is totally floating. -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 6:21 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] GIGE-POE-APC and -48 radio Chuck, can you verify for me again.. the earth

[AFMUG] GIGE-POE-APC and -48 radio

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Chuck, can you verify for me again.. the earth side of this thing isn't tied to the negative side of the input block? I'd say no, because obviously the green LED is on when wired as you have them marked. And the red LCD when it's backwards. So the LEDs are just a polarity indicator and has no b

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Bill Prince
Clever. bp On 8/18/2016 4:43 PM, George Skorup wrote: Cool. If Chuck likes it, that's all that matters. Speaking of blue wires.. Generac really pisses me off. All of the 240VAC control/transfer relay wiring in a lot of their switches is all blue. Everything. Even the 12VDC side of the rela

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Jaime Solorza
Ha. We use blue wire allot for dc stuff... Red for jumpers... On Aug 18, 2016 5:43 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > Cool. If Chuck likes it, that's all that matters. > > Speaking of blue wires.. Generac really pisses me off. All of the 240VAC > control/transfer relay wiring in a lot of their switche

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Cool. If Chuck likes it, that's all that matters. Speaking of blue wires.. Generac really pisses me off. All of the 240VAC control/transfer relay wiring in a lot of their switches is all blue. Everything. Even the 12VDC side of the relay. On 8/18/2016 4:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: A man after

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Tushar Patel
You moved to powercode!!! Tushar > On Aug 18, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: > > Hey gang, > > Any experts out there have experience with DHCP option 82 + Canopy + > Powercode? If so can I pick your brain??? > > Thanks, > > Sean > >

[AFMUG] DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode

2016-08-18 Thread Sean Heskett
Hey gang, Any experts out there have experience with DHCP option 82 + Canopy + Powercode? If so can I pick your brain??? Thanks, Sean

Re: [AFMUG] Force 200 ptp long range

2016-08-18 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah, Bullets would definitely make the most sense. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > Yep Radio waves dishes > > On Aug 18, 2016 3:33 PM, "Josh Luthman" > wrote: > >> If they're single pol dishes (2005 I expect so) I'd agree, Bullets would >> be a nice solution. >> >> >> J

Re: [AFMUG] Force 200 ptp long range

2016-08-18 Thread Jaime Solorza
Yep Radio waves dishes On Aug 18, 2016 3:33 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > If they're single pol dishes (2005 I expect so) I'd agree, Bullets would > be a nice solution. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Aug 18

Re: [AFMUG] Force 200 ptp long range

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
If they're single pol dishes (2005 I expect so) I'd agree, Bullets would be a nice solution. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: > Existing 4ft dishes with Airayas I installed in 20

Re: [AFMUG] Force 200 ptp long range

2016-08-18 Thread Jaime Solorza
Existing 4ft dishes with Airayas I installed in 2005...they are rebooting every three to four days.. Easy thing to do would be to just install Bullet 5 HP version since they don't need lots of speed... On Aug 18, 2016 3:19 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote: > That would be a bit long for Force200, per

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Chuck McCown
A man after my heart on those colors. The old Automatic Electric electro mechanical step switchboards all had blue for –48 and black for return. On Aug 18, 2016 1:55 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: Copper shield? You mean the orange wires? Except for the larger twisted red/black on the power su

Re: [AFMUG] Force 200 ptp long range

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
I'd use a 3 foot dish on both sides. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > That would be a bit long for Force200, personally I would use a 3ft dish > for that distance. > > Faisal I

Re: [AFMUG] Force 200 ptp long range

2016-08-18 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
That would be a bit long for Force200, personally I would use a 3ft dish for that distance. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Jaime Solorza" > T

[AFMUG] Force 200 ptp long range

2016-08-18 Thread Jaime Solorza
Has anyone tried the Force 200 in ptp at 24 miles?

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
The terminal blocks on the bottom are the DDFL4U double-level, top fused. The left four is my +48 bus, end plate used as a separator, then the 10 on the right is the +24 bus. On 8/18/2016 8:43 AM, Matt wrote: On the bottom where did you get the DIN mount terminal strip? On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 a

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Can't say. I've used only the vinyl and haven't noticed any issues. They say it's outdoor rated. So far that seems to be true. On 8/18/2016 3:25 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: I have a lot of trouble with my Dymo skipping, but I think I got the flexible nylon tape. Is that the problem? -Original

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Piqua is ATT exclusive Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2016 3:50 PM, "Tim Reichhart" wrote: > But Josh you forget ATT isnt in our area unless you get transport from TWC > to them that is other 800 dollars for the port the

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Tim Reichhart
Heck Frontier you cant even get wholesale pricing on fiber because I keep asking about it I always get the same quote as business fiber. -Original Message- From: "Mike Hammett" To: af@afmug.com Date: 08/18/16 04:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing AT&

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Ken Hohhof
I have a lot of trouble with my Dymo skipping, but I think I got the flexible nylon tape. Is that the problem? -Original Message- From: George Skorup Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:23 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n Yep. Dymo 5200 and vinyl label tape ge

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Yep. Dymo 5200 and vinyl label tape gets used when it gets to the site. Best $100 I ever spent. On 8/18/2016 9:53 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: Wire labels, terminal labels, and fuse labels. My pet peeve. It’s pretty now, but when parts get ripped out at 2 in the morning after the lightning str

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Mike Hammett
AT&T carrier, not mobile, not ILEC. I bet they get their loops from Frontier. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Tim Reichhart" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 3:00:3

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Mike Hammett
Until you go up an order of magnitude in port size. There's only a couple vendors that are doing full ports only, though. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Chuck McCown" To: af@afmu

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Jaime Solorza
Yep... Best practices especially in an RF environment On Aug 18, 2016 1:55 PM, "George Skorup" wrote: > Copper shield? You mean the orange wires? Except for the larger twisted > red/black on the power supply/UPS/battery wires, my normal scheme is red = > +24v, orange = +48v, blue = -48v,

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Reynolds
Yes I would. I'm a combat vet and currently working at the National Information Technology Center as a contractor. On Aug 18, 2016 2:59 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" wrote: > Try satellite, where dedicated C-band capacity can vary from $1900 to > $4500 per Mbps per month, each direction, in an FDD circuit.

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Tim Reichhart
Mike ATT mobile uses frontier or TWC in my area. ATT ILEC is in dayton area/toldeo/Cleveland/Columbus area but where me and josh is at they are not in troy/lima area. -Original Message- From: "Mike Hammett" To: af@afmug.com Date: 08/18/16 03:52 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Appr

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Try satellite, where dedicated C-band capacity can vary from $1900 to $4500 per Mbps per month, each direction, in an FDD circuit. That's if you want 1:1 ratio transponder allocation (SCPC/MCPC), not a TDMA type network. Plus the cost of a 4.5 meter+ earth station on your hardware. One FCC mailing

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Chuck McCown
I have seen it lower than that. The trend is toward all you can eat for a fixed port charge. -Original Message- From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 1:52 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing Some it's $0.22/Mb, others I've

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread George Skorup
Copper shield? You mean the orange wires? Except for the larger twisted red/black on the power supply/UPS/battery wires, my normal scheme is red = +24v, orange = +48v, blue = -48v, and black is always common/return. On 8/18/2016 7:32 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote: Nice. I would shrink tube that co

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Mike Hammett
Which part of AT&T? AT&T ILEC obviously isn't everywhere. AT&T carrier is in a lot of other regions, but now ubiquitously. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Tim Reichhart" To: af@afm

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Carl Peterson
Yeah, but IP addresses are free. I'll take a /8 with that 100Mb circuit. Don't even care where you install the circuit, just need you to designate the /8 to me. k thnx On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Yeah, I was going to say this is highly geographically dependent. If > y

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Reynolds
Some it's $0.22/Mb, others I've seen $72/Mb. *shrug* So, I'm sure that pricing is good for some places, and not so good for others. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Yeah, I was going to say this is highly geographically dependent. If you're > in a very rural area of a weste

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Tim Reichhart
But Josh you forget ATT isnt in our area unless you get transport from TWC to them that is other 800 dollars for the port then transport on top of it. -Original Message- From: "Josh Luthman" To: af@afmug.com Date: 08/18/16 03:33 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Chuck McCown
I like the shrink tubing labels. Never had the machine but sure like the work when I am into something someone else built. From: Eric Kuhnke Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 1:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n I have found that "generic" labels for my Dymo 4200 ar

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Yeah, I was going to say this is highly geographically dependent. If you're in a very rural area of a western state where there's very few backhaul options to reach the nearest major city/IX point, it's quite different than buying IP transit at $0.45/Mbps on a 10GbE LANPHY handoff in Seattle or Por

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Eric Kuhnke
I have found that "generic" labels for my Dymo 4200 are now available cheaply on Amazon... Makes life easier to label everything, when you're not dealing with something that has a business model like razor handles and razor blades. Now that I know this I don't think I'd ever buy a label maker wher

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Bill Prince
That's what I'm talking about. AT&T seems to be in some kind of alternate reality. But maybe they're the only game in town some places. bp On 8/18/2016 12:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: I�ll give you a Gige for 10% the cost.

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
11/mbps for 100 meg is actually pretty good for around here. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote: > I’ll give you a Gige for 10% the cost. > > *From:* Bill Prince > *Sent:* Thursday,

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Chuck McCown
WISPA Carrier PromotionI’ll give you a Gige for 10% the cost. From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 12:51 PM To: Motorola III Subject: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing Such a deal! Only $11/Mbps for a 100 Mb connection. Forwarded Message

Re: [AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Jay Weekley
Not bad for my area. Bill Prince wrote: Such a deal! Only $11/Mbps for a 100 Mb connection. Forwarded Message WISPA Carrier Promotion Dear WISPA Members, We would like to share some *NEW REDUCED *Internet fiber pricing from AT&T in select markets. AmCom is *NOT A RESELL

[AFMUG] Fwd: [WISPA Approved Ad] New Fiber Pricing

2016-08-18 Thread Bill Prince
Such a deal! Only $11/Mbps for a 100 Mb connection. Forwarded Message WISPA Carrier Promotion Dear WISPA Members, We would like to share some *NEW REDUCED *Internet fiber pricing from AT&T in select markets. AmCom is *NOT A RESELLER* so we do not mark up prices from any c

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Chuck McCown
Yeah, like 10 base T half duplex. From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:26 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4 Do you have a speed mismatch somewhere? bp On 8/18/2016 9:18 AM, Jordan Gregory wrote: I'll let you know the

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Bill Prince
Do you have a speed mismatch somewhere? bp On 8/18/2016 9:18 AM, Jordan Gregory wrote: I'll let you know the specific settings in a second. As far as MIR, I'm fairly certain I haven't set that up. Thank You, Jordan Gregory Founder / CEO Hive Wireless, LLC On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:05 AM,

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jaime Solorza
Welcome On Aug 18, 2016 10:18 AM, "Jordan Gregory" wrote: > I'll let you know the specific settings in a second. As far as MIR, I'm > fairly certain I haven't set that up. > > Thank You, > > Jordan Gregory > Founder / CEO > Hive Wireless, LLC > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Kerry wrote: >

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jordan Gregory
I'll let you know the specific settings in a second. As far as MIR, I'm fairly certain I haven't set that up. Thank You, Jordan Gregory Founder / CEO Hive Wireless, LLC On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Kerry wrote: > Here's a couple things to check, > > Check the ap, is MIR under QOS enabled?

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Kerry
Here's a couple things to check, Check the ap, is MIR under QOS enabled? if so, there should be an entry under monitor->wireless for the sm showing the rate the sm is 'queued' at. The wireless link test will only show it passing roughly what it is queued at. Also, check the MCS column. If it;

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
The included poe brick is gig. That's being 100 could be your issue. Maybe something with flow control could solve it? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2016 12:00 PM, "Jordan Gregory" wrote: > Yes, everything we use is Gb

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jordan Gregory
Yes, everything we use is Gb at least (except for the PoE brick which is 100 for the force200). I'm running 3.0 for firmware. Thank You, Jordan Gregory Founder / CEO Hive Wireless, LLC On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Gig ports all around? I know Justin had an issue wi

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Gig ports all around? I know Justin had an issue with micro bursting, that may have been solved with a firmware update. Are you on 2.6.2.1? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2016 11:56 AM, "Jordan Gregory" wrote: > Link t

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
You can do a layer 2 link test across. You can see some really nice info in monitor > performance that tells you percentage of packets what modulation. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2016 11:53 AM, "Bill Prince" wrote:

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jordan Gregory
Link tests out at 80ish Mb by 10ish Mb Modulation is at MCS 15 Ethernet really should be an issue. If I test from the switch at the tower, I can get a full Gb to the internet and the AP is in a Gb port on that switch. Thank You, Jordan Gregory Founder / CEO Hive Wireless, LLC On Thu, Aug 18,

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Bill Prince
Haven't looked at the interface for those. It should display the phy rate and/or give you the ability to do a link test on the RF side. Right? Otherwise, you may just have an upstream problem. bp On 8/18/2016 8:51 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Where's your 3 meg limitation? Rf or Ethernet? Cha

Re: [AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Josh Luthman
Where's your 3 meg limitation? Rf or Ethernet? Changed channels? What modulation are you running? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 18, 2016 11:46 AM, "Jordan Gregory" wrote: > Good day list, > > I have a Force 200 operating

[AFMUG] New to list - issues (i think) with ePMP 2.4

2016-08-18 Thread Jordan Gregory
Good day list, I have a Force 200 operating at very good signal levels but for some reason, I can seem to get any more than 3Mbps out of the connection. Did i miss a setting somewhere? Backstory: Brand new wisp Thank You, Jordan Gregory Founder / CEO Hive Wireless, LLC

Re: [AFMUG] Little bit o pr0n

2016-08-18 Thread Mark Radabaugh
Wire labels, terminal labels, and fuse labels. My pet peeve. It’s pretty now, but when parts get ripped out at 2 in the morning after the lightning strike can you really remember what cable was in which port? That wiring won’t be so pretty once people start yanking on wires to figure out wh