On Thu Sep 29 2011 Ivan Kanis wrote:
Hi Roland,
In the function below could the line (require 'bbdb-autoloads) be
removed? Since the function is auto loaded it shouldn't require it. If
it really can't be removed how about putting
(load bbdb-autoloads t)
The reason I am requesting the
On Mon Sep 26 2011 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Why not have separate minibuffer prompts for surname and given name?
Many of my records are for Chinese people. Right now I can't be bothered
separating out the characters for surname and given name, and usually
they all get lumped into whatever
On Mon Sep 26 2011 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
While we're on the subject of features that won't be considered until
version 3 is finished, if ever
I've been writing a small function to export BBDB records according to
an arbitrary text template. I'm running up against the problem that
there
On Mon Sep 26 2011 Roland Winkler wrote:
Also, does this seem like a good idea in general? I know that we're in
some kind of feature freeze, but this would also be relatively distinct
from the rest of the codebase, and if it's an attractive idea I'd be
happy to chew on it in my spare time
On Mon Sep 26 2011 Leo wrote:
It might be desirable to export a record to a canonical sexp then we can
further write the sexp to any other formats such as vcards, xmls etc.
For example, the sexp can be a list of elements of the form:
(field parameters value)
Maybe you can explain in a
On Mon Sep 26 2011 Stefan Monnier wrote:
Direct editing maybe similar to wdired-mode could be, indeed, a
great thing. -- Yet as I said: I'll postpone such dreams till BBDB 3
has been released.
No! I want it now!
[...starts rolling on the floor screaming...]
Now! now! now! now! now!!
On Sun Sep 25 2011 Leo wrote:
I am fine with anything that allows one to enter organisation-only
records nicely. For example, dividing Lucky Star Buffet Restaurant
into firstname and lastname is not nice. We should get rid of that.
Any suggestions what to do?
It seems that again this is a
On Thu Sep 22 2011 Roland Winkler wrote:
It seems to me that something like a note field for the predicate
`person-p' with values natural, artifical, restaurant, bookstore etc
was more to the point here. Then the only thing you need to
customize is the function bbdb-display-name-organization
On Fri Sep 23 2011 Reiner Steib wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22 2011, Roland Winkler wrote:
2011-09-22 Leo sdl@gmail.com
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-pop-up-window): Remove Gnus-specific code
On Thu Sep 22 2011 Leo wrote:
But having looked at this some more, I think instead of fixing the
typos, the form should be deleted. It causes annoying point movement
from my experience. Any idea in what way it makes Gnus happy??
I am sorry, you have confused me. Which patch are you ultimately
On Thu Sep 22 2011 Leo wrote:
I propose this patch:
Done.
2011-09-22 Leo sdl@gmail.com
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-pop-up-window): Remove Gnus-specific code
which is not required anymore by recent versions of Gnus.
On Thu Sep 22 2011 Leo wrote:
It makes a different in displaying records. See:
http://i.imgur.com/0NJt1.png
Another example is one can list all organization-only records
easily.
It seems to me that something like a note field for the predicate
`person-p' with values natural, artifical,
On Wed Sep 21 2011 Leo wrote:
From a48f25ea3cc7b6f69f5c6d3ae98821bec6f6c3fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:25:52 +0800
---
lisp/bbdb-com.el |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Done
2011-09-21 Leo sdl@gmail.com
* lisp/bbdb-com.el
On Wed Sep 21 2011 Abhi Yerra wrote:
Thank you. I did not have any more changes to the base
functionality. Though possibly having an sms interface would be quite
nice. I'll see if I can add that in the near future.
Again, I do not know much would would be reasonable / desirable
here. Yet if I
On Wed Sep 21 2011 Leo wrote:
Maybe a cleaner way is to insert a new slot `organisation-p' in the
definition:
(bbdb-defstruct record
firstname lastname affix aka organization organization-p phone address mail
notes cache)
What do you think?
Maybe, I am just missing a typical
On Tue Sep 20 2011 Leo wrote:
Better support for organisation-only records. Also fix a bug when
firstname or lastname are nil. Comments welcome ;)
For those who did not browse Leo's code:
The current BBDB code assumes that a record should have a name so
that the record can be identified by
): Removed (obsolete).
* lisp/bbdb-com.el (bbdb-dial-number): Use browse-url and
bbdb-dial-function.
(bbdb-play-sound): Removed (obsolete)
2011-09-19 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb-com.el (bbdb-dial): First remove extension. Simplify.
2011-09-19 Roland
On Mon Sep 19 2011 Leo wrote:
From 2cee5c24542a8a353a910d0cf597fc5d69c92333 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:37:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Discriminate completion candidates in bbdb-add-mail-alias
Applied:
2011-09-19 Leo sdl@gmail.com
* lisp/bbdb-com.el
On Sat Sep 17 2011 Abhi Yerra wrote:
Was this patch ever committed? Gnu has my documentation under the name
Kesava Yerra.
I am sorry, it is still on my to-do list. But things are clearing up
for me, that is, I want to do it within the next days.
(I am not using bbdb (or any other emacs-related
On Wed Sep 14 2011 Carson Chittom wrote:
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
So you also might want to check that your hand-made
bbdb-autoloads.el contains an entry for bbdb-insinuate-gnus.
This was the error---or rather, bbdb-autoloads.el was messed up in a more
general way (my own
On Tue Sep 13 2011 Carson Chittom wrote:
I'm trying to set up BBDB 3 to work with Gnus. I'm using Emacs 23.3.1
on Windows XP. I know the manual at http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/bbdb.html
is for version 2, but there doesn't seem to be anything newer. Based on
this manual, I've added to
On Fri Aug 12 2011 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
I'm using git versions of gnus and bbdb, and something somewhere loves
to put a - in the minibuffer when I hit ; for
bbdb-mua-edit-notes-sender and a few other actions, I can't quite see a
pattern. I don't know who to blame for this -, but it overrides
On Sun Aug 7 2011 Peter Münster wrote:
The question was rather, if there was a function like
`bbdb-mua-edit-notes-ALL'. My solution:
--8---cut here---start-8---
(local-set-key : '(lambda () (interactive)
On Thu Aug 11 2011 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Hey, this was a great bit of information -- I've long been confused
about the best way to get someone in the database if you're not
automatically adding unknown senders. So now with a prefix arg : asks
whether to add a new record, but I don't see what
On Thu Aug 11 2011 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Take a look at the variable bbdb-mua-update-interactive-p. It
specifies what you get without / with a prefix arg. The default is
`search' without a prefix and `query' with a prefix.
Thanks for this, the docstrings were a little confusing
Good
On Sun Jul 31 2011 Johnny wrote:
I have started using aliases in bbdb and wonder if there is any setup to
autocomplete on defined aliases in the headers? Say, I have an alias
named listofmembers and want to mail them. I add this mail-alias field
to all relevant contacts, then in the To header
On Mon Aug 1 2011 Johnny wrote:
Thus, I ended up just binding M-TAB to mail-abbrev-complete-alias. If I
want to complete on a name, I use *TAB*, if an alias just *M-TAB*. It
might be nice to make aliases and names all appear by the same
completion (like cycling), but this seems like overkill
On Fri Jul 29 2011 Peter Münster wrote:
There is (bbdb-mua-edit-notes-recipients), but:
- it only takes the recipients and not the sender
What about bbdb-mua-edit-notes-sender?
By default, the behavior of these functions is being the least
aggressive
- it only takes the first recipient and
My apologizies for being invisible on this list right now. There are
other things I need to give higher priority. I'll be back and I'll
try to make sure that nothing is dropped.
Roland
On Tue May 31 2011 Abhi Yerra wrote:
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
I've had a bit more time to do
On Sat May 14 2011 Johnny wrote:
I have set up an org-agenda that includes anniversaries in the agenda
view from the bbdb database, but this breaks with bbdb 3.02 giving the
error 'bad sexp'.
I set up the agenda file using (from org-mode 6.33x info section 10.3.1):
* Anniversaries
On Sun May 15 2011 Roland Winkler wrote:
It would probably be good if the needs of org-mode could be
incorporated into the new BBDB before we declare that BBDB v3 has
reached a beta stage.)
I forgot to say:
It is an item on the todo list for BBDB v3 to provide a more complete
list for how
I thought I want to write this email to the Gnus (and BBDB) mailing
list to announce more formally to the Gnus developpers that recently
BBDB has gone through a major re-write with the ultimate goal to
make the new BBDB v3 part of GNU Emacs.
I believe that Gnus is one of the emacs packages that
On Sun May 15 2011 Matt Lundin wrote:
I'd be happy to take this on. AFAICT, there are three functions in
org-bbdb that no longer exist in bbdb v3.
bbdb-name
bbdb-company
bbdb-record-getprop
The first two can easily be defaliased to bbdb-search-organization and
bbdb-search-name. (For a
On Tue May 10 2011 Leo wrote:
On 2011-05-09 02:59 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
In principle there is no ambiguityconcerning lists and strings. All
bbdb fields except for names and individual note fields are lists
(and different notes are again forming a list).
For your issue, a cleaner
On Wed May 11 2011 Roland Winkler wrote:
So maybe it is better to put the extension we are thinking about
into bbdb-merge-note:
- If its arg LABEL is either affix, aka, organization, or mail, this
function could add a new element to the list of values of the
respective field
that nonetheless things are not fully consistent in the code.
Oh well...)
Roland
2011-05-11 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-notice-mail-hook): Rename from
bbdb-notice-hook.
(bbdb-notice-record-hook): New variable.
(bbdb-notice-hook-pending): Update doc
, the special bindings of special-mode
are not used at all in this context. The help window is only used
for displaying the help message. But the current buffer in that
moment is the minibuffer.
2011-05-11 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb-mua.el (bbdb-update-records): Fix previous patch
On Wed May 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
I use v2 for now, waiting for a clear upgrade path, i.e., the list of
symbol renamings and make-obsolete declarations.
It's all a matter of manpower which is limited. Help is always
appreciated :-)
yes, but getting rid of the help buffer by merely
On Mon May 9 2011 Reiner Steib wrote:
I am not a Gnus expert. gnus-fetch-field was used already by BBDB
v2. Is there someone reading this list who knows the (intended)
difference between gnus-fetch-field and gnus-fetch-original-field?
[ Cc-ing ding@gnus. ] I don't know. The doc strings
On Sun May 8 2011 Leo wrote:
- Another annoyance is that FIELD could only name those in NOTES.
For example:
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-rules
'((Organization (.* organization \\
does not update the organisation of the record.
When I quickly looked through some
On Sun May 8 2011 Leo wrote:
I am using latest No Gnus from Emacs-24 (trunk). It seems if a header
field in Gnus is hidden, bbdb-message-header return nil. I don't know if
this is intended.
I use the following patch in my local BBDB copy.
I am not a Gnus expert. gnus-fetch-field was used
doing any real work. You might get help from others
interested in this.
Roland
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
On Thu May 5 2011 Abhi Yerra wrote:
Since we live in a world where a majority of us rely on external
directory stores (LDAP, Google Contacts
On Sun May 8 2011 Abhi Yerra wrote:
I thought that the bbdb-dial interface was a bit antiquated. Updated
it to open using browse-url with a tel uri
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3966.txt). A custom handler can also be
specified.
You are right, the current code is probably quite old and not
Thanks for the bug report fix.
- Expansion of bbdb-auto-notes-rules looks cheap operation to me
so caching is unnecessary. Not worth the trouble of user having
to remember changing bbdb-auto-notes-rules-expanded to nil
whenever they change bbdb-auto-notes-rules.
I guess this might
* lisp/bbdb-mua.el (bbdb-auto-notes): Fix typo
2011-05-07 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb-com.el (bbdb-display-current-record): New command.
(bbdb-display-all-records): Improve docstring.
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-mode-map): Key bindings for
bbdb
On Sat Apr 30 2011 Leo wrote:
Thanks for this. I didn't know about it. But somehow I still need the
sit-for. This is the patch I am using now:
That's strange. I do not quite understand this either.
(sit-for 0) really means a call of redisplay. Why is this needed here?
I thought maybe we need
On Thu May 5 2011 Abhi Yerra wrote:
Since we live in a world where a majority of us rely on external
directory stores (LDAP, Google Contacts, etc.) would it be beneficial
to have a plugin architecture to access these external stores?
This was discussed recently on this list. -- Priorities for
On Thu May 5 2011 Marco Wahl wrote:
I tried out the bbdb-print function together with latex for getting a
nice list of the bbdb records. As suggested in bbdb-print.el I used the
tex-files bbdb-print.tex, bbdb-print-brief.tex, and bbdb-cols.tex (from
bbdb.cvs.sourceforge.net). But this does
On Thu May 5 2011 Marco Wahl wrote:
Just for the record: with the environment here (emacs24, TeX 3.1415926
(TeX Live 2010/Arch Linux)) tex could not handle the line
\catcode`ß=\active\chardefß=FF
Tex compiles when this line is deleted.
Thanks. Indeed, this line could be a relict from old
On Fri Apr 29 2011 Leo wrote:
From 97e6adcdd8813d9f857972f0e5f5ba5bbb2fc406 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:41:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Default to current record in bbdb-completing-read-records
For example, this is useful for `/ 1' to quickly limit to current
record.
I
On Fri Apr 29 2011 Leo wrote:
I think bbdb should remain at current-record when
bbdb-display-all-records.
The following is my naive attempt. `naive' in that I don't like invoking
(sit-for 0), which causes flickering but without it `search-forward' can
fail. Ideas?
Why do you need the
On Mon Apr 25 2011 Leo wrote:
I propose replace the S- prefix key with /- in these commands:
Major Mode Bindings Starting With S:
I agree that it might be useful if at some point all keybindings of
BBDB get reviewed. Yet I was wondering: what is the rationale for
your proposal? (Some
On Mon Apr 25 2011 Stefan Monnier wrote:
I'd personally even prefer if fields work as sexp, so I can just use
M-C-SPC to mark a few fields and then M-w to copy them.
I.e. hooking into forward-sexp-function would suit my fingers.
Interesting idea - though admittedly I don't know yet how this
On Thu Apr 21 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
* Ted Zlatanov g...@yvsrybtf.pbz [2011-04-21 13:20:30 -0500]:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:10:24 -0400 Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org wrote:
* Ted Zlatanov g...@yvsrybtf.pbz [2011-04-18 11:03:57 -0500]:
- set up a bbdb-vcs list for commit messages
On Sun Apr 24 2011 Leo wrote:
On 2011-04-23 04:34 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
I am tempted to say that all this can easily become fairly
complicated depending on the cultural habits for which you want to
use such a scheme, so that at best it will always only make a few
people happy
On Sun Apr 24 2011 Roland Winkler wrote:
The degree field could be renamed to a more generic affix, which,
as I said, is a list of subfields anyway. The display of both the
name field and the degree / affix field are handled by the function
bbdb-display-name-organization. So if you like, you
On Sat Apr 23 2011 Leo wrote:
On 2011-04-22 23:36 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
A rather different question is more related to the BBDB internals. In
BDBB, names are entered into a hash table that is used for things like
completion (which, by the way, would also become much more complicated
On Sun Apr 24 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
I'd use `p' and `n' to move between records and TAB only between fields
of a record. That way when you lean on TAB you don't get surprised, and
if you're on the last field you can go to the first one in a circular way.
To the best of my knowledge, none
On Sat Apr 23 2011 Leo wrote:
I have one suggestion. I think making TAB move from field to field is
useful. For example, in the following record, assume point at `R'ichard,
TAB could move from R - F - m - n - next record
Sounds like a good idea. Yet all fields except for the name field
are
On Sun Apr 24 2011 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
If I could add a rider request to this, it would be great to have a
single key command to copy the field contents to the kill ring (the way
'M' does now for the primary mail address). I often need to copy
people's details to other places, and every
On Sun Apr 24 2011 Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
Seems like preserving line breaks in multi-line fields (and removing
any left-hand whitespace) would be all the formatting you'd need
Well, I guess that extracting the field from the database with just
some base formatting should be a yet shorter way
On Fri Apr 22 2011 Leo wrote:
As stated in the subject line.
Good catch!
The degree field is possibly not named in the best way. For me,
the motivation has been in academics (which is a significant part of
my bbdb database). Yet I could envision other uses, too.
I still find the firstname +
On Sat Apr 23 2011 Leo wrote:
On 2011-04-23 03:52 +0800, Sam Steingold wrote:
there can be only one prefix but many suffixes, right? I suggest
keeping them in a list where first is the prefix and rest are the
suffixes, so that simple records without any prefixes suffixes
will have just
On Thu Apr 21 2011 Leo wrote:
I propose the following small improvement.
- (if (= bbdb-pop-up-window-size 1)
+ (if (eql bbdb-pop-up-window-size 1.0)
...so that an integer value of 1 gives one line (useful for one-line
layout) whereas 1.0 corresponds to a switch-to-buffer.
On Tue Apr 19 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
If you send 3 warnings (1 per week) before disabling the sourceforge.net
mailing list (making it just a forward address), I think that's
sufficient. We'll set up the new list on Gmane to feed into the same
gmane.emacs.bbdb.user newsgroup so people
On Mon Apr 18 2011 Leo wrote:
On 2011-04-17 07:18 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
I am sorry, it's not clear to me what you want to say here. The new
BBDB treats outgoing messages (i.e., Emacs message and mail mode)
like incoming messages in your Emacs MUA (Gnus, Rmail, VM, etc).
So you can
On Mon Apr 18 2011 Leo wrote:
On 2011-04-17 07:18 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
I am sorry, it's not clear to me what you want to say here. The new
BBDB treats outgoing messages (i.e., Emacs message and mail mode)
like incoming messages in your Emacs MUA (Gnus, Rmail, VM, etc).
So you can
On Mon Apr 18 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
The GNU ELPA is only intended for Emacs 24 and higher.
Great, thanks. Next week I'll push my old code for Emacs 27.2 to GNU
ELPA. It's already somewhat bit-rotten, but maybe some people can
still find a way how to revive it!
Roland
On Mon Apr 18 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
Now bbdb-mode is also derived from special-mode.
I think this make bbdb-mode-map inherit from special-mode-map
automatically.
I do not know if this could work (suggestions welcome).
PS. please add me (sds) to bbdb savannah. I have contributed to
On Mon Apr 18 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
RW Ted Zlatanov has kindly agreed to help collecting these copyright
RW assignments. Honestly, right now we really do not yet have an
RW overview who has contributed what to BBDB. The more we are able to
RW unfold these things, we'll try to contact the
On Mon Apr 18 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.emacs.bbdb.user as well.
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-16 18:19:20 -0500]:
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
I wonder if it makes sense to replace bbdb
On Mon Apr 18 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:18:45 -0500 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
RW Two many changes today. I lost track!
RW 2011-04-16 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
RW * lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-create-hook, bbdb-change-hook): Use defvar.
I think Savannah
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
(Actually I went further and had it work for each message *for each
function*, so if you put it on the hook a dozen times it still only got
called once. But this is a useless and arguably confusing side-effect of
the behaviour I really wanted. If you only want
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Didier Verna wrote:
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
Is anybody interested in working on the XEmacs stuff? I do not know
about XEmacs.
My schedule is pretty hectic these days but I will at some point. I've
already downloaded the new BBDB but it doesn't
On Sun Apr 17 2011 David Engster wrote:
Roland Winkler writes:
I extended (and fixed) this patch to inherit from special-mode.
Now bbdb-mode is also derived from special-mode.
Note that Emacs v22 doesn't have special-mode, so this change will make
it break on that version (or earlier
below. I have not yet figured out what I need to do in order to
update the bug tracker accordingly.)
2011-04-16 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-time-stamp-format): Includes timezone info.
2011-04-16 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* TODO: New file.
2011-04
Several people on this list have started to contribute to the new
BBDB in one or the other way. I am quite happy to see that!
I'd like to outline my view / strategy for that:
I'd be happy to see a proper release of the new BBDB in the not to
far future. To make BBDB really free software, I'd
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
I personally haven't used this much in Emacs. But since gmail does this
and I have found it useful at times, I wonder if this feature should be
part of the bbdb-mua feature set.
I am sorry, it's not clear to me what you want to say here. The new
BBDB treats
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
I wonder if it makes sense to replace bbdb-defstruct with defstruct?
What benefit(s) would you expect from that? I guess that
bbdb-defstruct is about as efficient and effective as possible for
the needs of BBDB.
Roland
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
When people use add-hook they think they are adding another function to
a hook so if this isn't the case it will surprise them. People who are
setting hook to nil is in a different thinking.
There are add-hook and remove-hook. The latter fails (now) if you
want to
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote:
On 11 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
- Finally, I fixed various bugs and improved the documentation.
I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately
BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely
rely on: bbdb
On Thu Apr 14 2011 David Engster wrote:
I shortly tested compilation, and it works more or less fine for GNU
Emacs22 to the latest GNU emacs-snapshot.
XEmacs is another matter, though. I attached the current logs for XEmacs
21.4 and 21.5. Note that your 'PUSHPATH' eval doesn't work for
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
(I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
it doesn't.)
I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
broken I'd be astonished. :)
If possible, I'd like to avoid
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
We could do the same job with a new hook which is called only once per
record, no matter how many times it is spotted by a given call to
bbdb-update-records, or with a new guarantee that the bbdb-notice-hook
would only fire once per record per call to
Two many changes today. I lost track!
2011-04-16 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-create-hook, bbdb-change-hook): Use defvar.
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial
On Thu Apr 14 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:47:11 -0500 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org wrote:
RW On Wed Apr 13 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
It should be possible to support at least Emacs 23.x and XEmacs. Gnus
does it so we can look there for potential problems
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
I suggest change all these defcustom instances something like:
(defcustom bbdb-create-hook nil
:group 'bbdb
:type 'hook)
(add-hook 'bbdb-create-hook 'bbdb-creation-date)
Agreed and thanks, that looks much cleaner!
Roland
On Thu Apr 14 2011 Stefan Monnier wrote:
I suggest change all these defcustom instances something like:
(defcustom bbdb-create-hook nil
:group 'bbdb
:type 'hook)
(add-hook 'bbdb-create-hook 'bbdb-creation-date)
Agreed and thanks, that looks much cleaner!
But then don't define
On Thu Apr 14 2011 Stefan Monnier wrote:
I suggest change all these defcustom instances something like:
(defcustom bbdb-create-hook nil
:group 'bbdb
:type 'hook)
(add-hook 'bbdb-create-hook 'bbdb-creation-date)
Agreed and thanks, that looks much cleaner!
But then don't define
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
you might consider putting the todo list into the git repo
It'll come soon.
On a similar note, I tried the new bbdb (from git) today and it does not
look ready for prime time yet. Specifically, in gnus, when the address
is marked with * (i.e., bbdb
On Tue Apr 12 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
with 2.36 devo I noticed some very weird behavior:
in gnus, when I see a message from a known user (with the real name in
the message being an AKA), it is _not_ marked with * and bbdb window is
_not_ shown, and when I hit : a new bbdb record is created
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
here is an addition:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bbdb.user:1689
From: Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org
Subject: Make John an alternate for John Doe? (y or n)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bbdb.user
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:37:35 -0400 (5 years, 38
On Wed Apr 13 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
* Stefan Monnier zbaa...@veb.hzbagerny.pn [2011-04-13 12:32:42 -0300]:
+ (when (boundp 'revert-buffer-function)
+(setq revert-buffer-function 'bbdb-revert-buffer))
I recommend to use (set (make-local-variable foo) bar) when setting
a
On Wed Apr 13 2011 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
There have been a bunch of hacks in git for the debian bbdb 2.x
package, including a bunch of bug fixes. Can you check if the problem
still appears there?
git clone git://github.com/barak/BBDB.git
will give you the tip of that development
On Wed Apr 13 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
It should be possible to support at least Emacs 23.x and XEmacs. Gnus
does it so we can look there for potential problems and solutions.
You could ask David Engster d...@randomsample.de, who's setting up a
Gnus buildbot, to do the same for BBDB.
, this is hopefully
fixed by now.)
There might be other commands lacking such a call of bbdb-records.
Bug reports welcome.
2011-04-11 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb-com.el (bbdb-complete-mail): Ensure initialization of
the database.
BBDB is avaiable at
http
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
small compilation warning fix:
diff --git a/lisp/bbdb-com.el b/lisp/bbdb-com.el
index 3c23b2b..d50be0a 100644
--- a/lisp/bbdb-com.el
+++ b/lisp/bbdb-com.el
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
(require 'mailabbrev)
(eval-and-compile
+ (autoload
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
* Roland Winkler jvax...@tah.bet [2011-04-11 10:04:28 -0500]:
Thanks for the report, though I am surprised: with my GNU Emacs 23.3.1
browse-url-url-at-point is anyway an autoloaded function. Which
version of emacs are you using?
bzr tip; just
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Ted Zlatanov wrote:
RW I just submitted a new set of changes for BBDB.
RW First of all, the most noteworthy change is that BBDB has been
RW transfered from CVS to git. So for anonymous checkout, you should
RW now use
RW git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/bbdb.git
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
I started using bbdb about 15 years ago and I accumulated a fairly large
.bbdb file. Some records there are not relevant to me all that much (a
coworker from 10 years ago), so, on one hand, I do not want to remove
the record (or its parts, like address,
401 - 500 of 559 matches
Mail list logo
