*chuckle*
Provoke the people and reap the backlash.
Just as France has done before the riots.
Claiming there is no discrimination against muslims and legal
immigrants in their country and then intentionally reposting an
insulting article to do nothing more than further insult a people.
Then
I want to see the shots and photos on Western television of Jesus humping Mary.
They have been made, and were part of a political cartoon against George Bush.
Why haven't these been publicised???
FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
What is wrong with CNN talking about 'Respect' for Islam? FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
I
very nice.
On 2/3/06, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to see the shots and photos on Western television of Jesus humping
Mary.
They have been made, and were part of a political cartoon against George
Bush.
Why haven't these been publicised???
FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
What is wrong with
Whatever drugs you're onplease share.
It would be nice to be this completely cluelessif even for a little
while.
Vivecyer nuts man.
I want to see the shots and photos on Western television of Jesus humping
Mary.
They have been made, and were part of a political cartoon
ok, slice our brother's heads off, video tape it, send it to your
fucking friends, and them have them send it to that tv network
that is in cahoots with bin laden, ok, cool!
reap the backlash... from a band of hoodlums. fuck them.
wtf. fuck them. fuck them. fuck them.
On 2/3/06, Vivec
oh and i forgot, all praise is due to allah, alahuh akbar...
FUCK THEM!
On 2/3/06, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, slice our brother's heads off, video tape it, send it to your
fucking friends, and them have them send it to that tv network
that is in cahoots with bin laden, ok, cool!
reap
http://www.quiznos.com/promotions/business/
--
http://single-dads.us
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195631
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription:
Isaac,
That was some damn spiffy code. I was humbled.
Everyone else just ignored you. :-p
On 1/27/06, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just needed to share this while I was still euphoric about it. :)
~|
Message:
Everyone else just ignored you. :-p
Bah! Not ignoring! Just trying to figure out how I can use this!
it is indeed damn spiffy code.
will
--
If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable.
- Carrie Fisher
Yes, I see the balance. Post a picture and you deserve death.
And the total BS about formal colonial masters is just a bit too far. Your
telling me that Iran was colonized? Saudi Arabia was colonized? This isn't
Africa we're talking about, this is an area where conquering hordes have
fought
Get off the crack. I see 'respect for Islam' almost every day on PBS. I see
cartoons in papers using religious icons all the time. Your upset because
they have not been shown on TV? Get off it. A cartoon, even one that pisses
people off is not TV news. It's something that is left in a paper
tap tap
this thing on?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195636
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe:
Did anyone see this earlier?
I just noticed it on CNN and watch the video clip
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/02/03/chase.shootout.ap/index.html
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195637
Archives:
Did you just tap two kegs?!??
Let's get ripped!
tap tap
this thing on?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195638
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription:
SQUUEEAALLL
(feedback)
sas
Scott A. Stewart
Webmaster/ Developer
11820 Parklawn Dr
Rockville, MD 20852
(301) 770-9610 x 335
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:25 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: ?
tap tap
d'oh!
'tis on, would help if I knew how to use Thunderbird.
back to your reg scheduled Friday.
Ray Champagne wrote:
tap tap
this thing on?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195640
Archives:
Not that I doubt that it is indeed spiffy, how in fact is it so? I don't
understand why this complex-looking piece of sql abstraction is an
improvement over either standard SQL or the object-relational database
mapping scheme
This is Issac's - I think it's more difficult to understand than
Former Colonial Masters refers to those countries that were...former
Colonial Masters.
I'm not wasting my time trying to show you how arrogant and provoking
the entire thing is, because you just don't want to see it that way.
As far as you and others on htis list are concerned, F*** all Muslims.
You miss the point.
CNN did not show the images because of Respect for Islam.
Can you explain that line?
What does 'Respect For Islam mean?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195643
Archives:
THEY ARE FUCKING US GEL.
how do you not see this? simply because we are the imperial
fucking dynastical power? whatever, a stone throw is a stone throw
whether i throw it at a wall or an ant.
its a whirlwind of a vicious circle that is probably never going to end.
but they are no more right
It means that they feared for their reporters lives, so they refused
to publish the pictures (or even provide links). Much as CNN has been
known to do in the past, they caved to appease the violent extremists.
They respect the fact that the violent extremists WILL try to kill
them if they print
i agree. why?
i dont see the need.
tw
On 2/3/06, Chesty Puller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I doubt that it is indeed spiffy, how in fact is it so? I don't
understand why this complex-looking piece of sql abstraction is an
improvement over either standard SQL or the object-relational
im just thinking about how i can explain to gel, that WE COULD GIVE A FUCK
what the freakin islamic jehadfucks think about us laughing at caricatures of
muhammed, really, i just dont get it.
we dont care. its more apathy than anything. its funny. who gives a fuck.
On 2/3/06, Ray Champagne
Gel,
Where did anyone (besides Tony) say or even imply F*** all Muslims?
Where did you get that?
Aren't you reading into things a little much? Is there a reason you
are so angry on this? Why do you need to lump us all together that
way?
I will say, F** all extremists Muslims who think it is ok
Man, it's Friday, I hate my job (right now), LETS GET FUCKED UP!
:)
G wrote:
Did you just tap two kegs?!??
Let's get ripped!
tap tap
this thing on?
~|
Message:
As far as you and others on htis list are concerned, F*** all Muslims.
*shrug*
This line right here shows just how misinformed, misguided, and just plain
WRONG you are..consistently. Calling someone who opposes terrorism a
bigot because those terrorists happen to be Muslim.
I take it
Respect is a two way street
My dad told me this once.
Tony wrote:
im just thinking about how i can explain to gel, that WE COULD GIVE A FUCK
what the freakin islamic jehadfucks think about us laughing at caricatures of
muhammed, really, i just dont get it.
we dont care. its more
tony i do care.
it is the perception of the rest of the world on us.
if that perception is worse then it curently is, we could be in for some
serious problems.
violence can pop up very quickly, in some very unlikly places.
like downtown detroit.
superbowl any body
agreed. I'm having a god i hate the world today kind of day.
It's causing me to say nasty things to Gel, when i should be patting him on
the head and feeding him rice cakes
Man, it's Friday, I hate my job (right now), LETS GET FUCKED UP!
:)
G wrote:
Did you just tap two kegs?!??
i like steelers for sure.
pa lama luh is the man, big ben and the bus, hines, antwaan, they are
poised to win this one!!!
tw
On 2/3/06, Paul Ihrig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tony i do care.
it is the perception of the rest of the world on us.
if that perception is worse then it curently is, we
There are 2 core issues here.
1. Islam's traditions of not depicting religious figures
2. Traditions of freedom of speech in the West.
Where does one tradition supercede the other?
It's a culture clash of heterogeneous western culture where one
religion's edicts aren't absolute and a distancing
and ive never said, fuck all muslims, i would NEVER say that, i may
have incorrectly implied that, but i would never say that. i say fuck all
radical muslim fucks... thats all.
tw
On 2/3/06, Jerry Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gel,
Where did anyone (besides Tony) say or even imply F***
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:49 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More on the Mohammad
Gel,
Where did anyone (besides Tony) say or even imply F*** all Muslims?
For what it's worth I'm getting the same vibe
ok, i dont think it get much simpler:
whats worse?
1. slicing an innocent civilians head off, video taping it, praising
allah, and sending it out to the world?
or
2. printing a freakin' cartoon caricature of a human, and not
apologizing for it?
tw
On 2/3/06, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if that's the vibe you are getting, then you should be reading more
carefully.
For what it's worth I'm getting the same vibe that Gel is.
Perhaps it's not warranted but that's what I'm getting.
Jim Davis
~|
Message:
Why is it shocking?
You tell someone to stop, they don't stop, we don't fire warning shots
usually.
We had a road block one time (called a traffic control point or TCP in Army
speak) up the road half a mile was an Afghan National Army TCP. They had a
car run through and lit it up, it headed
Actually I saw something like what you are asking for last night on Adult
Swim as part of Moral Orel.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 7:00 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Palestinian government allows terrorists to close
Or it could mean that they see the value of Respect for Religion and
people of different faiths. And just as they are sensitive about what
they would post about Christians they are similarly sensitive of what
they would post about Islam.
Sure Re Freedom of Speech the Danish newspaper, French
I'm getting it too.
On 2/3/06, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if that's the vibe you are getting, then you should be reading more
carefully.
For what it's worth I'm getting the same vibe that Gel is.
Perhaps it's not warranted but that's what I'm getting.
Jim Davis
And that position is prejudiced and bigoted against ***all Muslims***.
It is the same position the Nazis had against the Jews.
We could not give a flying f*** about them.
That's how it starts. It starts from Intolerance, it starts from
Apathy, it starts from Contempt.
This does not only offend
My body Evan was part of an IED attack where the guy brought his wife and
two kids, didn't tell them anything, killed his whole family.
What's an IED attack?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195665
I prefer data access objects, specific getters and setters as part of my
object.
By specifying columns and datatypes and so on, you get better performing
queies.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:30 AM
To:
Well, inspite of the I'm more religious tolerant than you are implication,
this was a good post.
And you are right, I don't think the paper should have published the
cartoons. The Muslim world should have responded. Should they have responded
with guns? No. Our point is simply that those who
Jim,
What do you feel a proper reaction should be to this blasphemy?
Do you think killing, shooting, kidnapping, threatening, destroying
property are valid responses?
Do you think this is a normal response?
Do you think, overall, it should be a tolerated response?
Do you think most Muslims agree
I completely agree with you, Gel, on both the subject of the matter and in
the matter that Trinidad is indeed ahead of the US and many parts of the
world with respect to religious embrace. I remember this from the time I
spent there as a young man.
I remember a lot of beautiful women in
I'm sure a lot more people are, but Gel is the most vocal.
Whereas a lot of lurkers to the list prefer to shut up in the face of
belligerent opposition.
I'm not going to repost the exact quotes that show why reasoning
individuals would be getting that impression, but Tony posted
something in a
That means you agree with me, doesn't it?
Question for you - do you have a getter and setter for every property of an
object, or just those that really need one?
- Matt
- Original Message -
From: Loathe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday,
I will say it. Fuck all real Muslims.
The image of the moderate Muslim is no more real than the christian
american. The moderate Muslim does not generally follow his religion, so I
don't have a problem with him. If you are a real follower of Islam though,
fuck you.
BTW I feel this way about
But why should we give any respect to the Jihadists and extremists? Their
warped interpretation of Islam says that they should destroy all of us. That
includes you Gel
I'm all for respecting other's religious beliefs, as long as they don't
entail the destruction of others
Scott A. Stewart
I liked it because it fit his coding model. I didn't see it as
something to apply universally, but it was an interesting new way to
think about writing queries so that they fit an approach you're
already using for other code.
I like your objectmapper too.
On 2/3/06, Chesty Puller [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:36 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More on the Mohammad
ok, i dont think it get much simpler:
whats worse?
1. slicing an innocent civilians head off, video taping it, praising
allah,
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/02/03/alabama.churchfires.ap/index.html
CENTREVILLLE, Alabama (AP) -- A series of fires damaged six rural
Alabama churches overnight, and investigators Friday were trying to
determine whether they were arson.
Most of the churches were Baptist, located near major
then i guess they need to step up as law abiding muslims and
control their uncontrolled peoples, right? if we had citizens doing
this neck slicing and other stuff, we would apprehend, stop, and move on.
they do not do this. they run scared, and praise allah.
so, yes, to those apathetic fucks,
Improvised Explosive Device.
Suicide or roadside Bombing.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:53 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: FW: American Soldiers fire on Canadian Diplomats without
warning.
My body
Just those that really need one.
Generally I find I can set them together upon object creation, and only some
of them will be changing at points after object creation.
BTW yes I agree with you.
Seems like too much abstraction to me personally.
Why not use cfinsert and cfupdate?
Tim
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- A conservative advocacy group
that urged a boycott of NBC's recently canceled drama about a
pill-popping priest turned its wrath Thursday to an upcoming Will
Grace episode that it says will mock Christ's crucifixion.
But NBC executives insist the group's
1. Muslim nations are as much colonial masters as any European has ever
been.
2. Most Muslim lands have never been under 'colonial mastery'
Using a general term like colonial masters in a conversation that has
nothing to do with colonialism is just disguising the subject.
As for arrogant and
And that position is prejudiced and bigoted against ***all Muslims***.
This does not only offend the jihadists and the extremists.Those
groups are whom the world Media is focusing on , because that's what
sells their papers and gets people watching. But believe me the
cartoon was offensive to
Oh. Thanks. I think. That's fucked up.
Loathe wrote:
Improvised Explosive Device.
Suicide or roadside Bombing.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:53 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: FW: American Soldiers
investigators Friday were trying to
determine whether they were arson.
Smart bunch they are down there in AL, eh? Do they just think it could
be coincidence?
~|
Message:
Oh, Please... I'm not giving some maniac with a warped take on religion any
respect, regardless of who the hell he is.
Scott A. Stewart
Webmaster/ Developer
11820 Parklawn Dr
Rockville, MD 20852
(301) 770-9610 x 335
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
You can't boycott Muslim Nations.
Your society would crumble.
No one stated that the reverse is not equally offensive, and incorrect.
You seem to be arguing that two wrongs make a right.
On 2/3/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for arrogant and provoking, your being totally one
The news outlet being protested against showed comics.
Al Jezeera shows beheadings of our soldiers, shows all kinds of shit.
Which is worse man?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More
The cartoons are from September. It's only an issue because of boycotts and
threats of death. If there were no threats, there would be no issue. Jews
and Christians don't threaten death when cartoons against them are posted so
there's never an issue. Again, look in Arab newspapers to see what
IED is such a funny term. I knew what it meant, but it's funny that
non-corporate produced weapons are designated by a special TLA.
On 2/3/06, Loathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Improvised Explosive Device.
Suicide or roadside Bombing.
Tim
On 2/3/06, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or it could mean that they see the value of Respect for Religion and
people of different faiths. And just as they are sensitive about what
they would post about Christians they are similarly sensitive of what
they would post about Islam.
Sure Re
Gel,
I agree that the cartoon was offensive. Even maybe deliberately offensive.
I agree that the editorial decision to run the article (including the
images) needs to be discussed to see if it was too far over the line.
I don't agree that the publisher should have been fired, but I don't
mind
Huh?? WTf?? They pulled a show because it was Offensive to Christians?
What's up with Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Speech and all that?
Why didn't they show this series?
Because it wasn't good for business. It has nothing to do with the
Freedom of Press. They had, and still do have,
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:55 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More on the Mohammad
Jim,
What do you feel a proper reaction should be to this blasphemy?
I don't know. Honestly. This isn't blasphemy to me
the religious right is STRONG here brah.
tw
On 2/3/06, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- A conservative advocacy group
that urged a boycott of NBC's recently canceled drama about a
pill-popping priest turned its wrath Thursday to an upcoming Will
Grace
Money. Without sponsors there is no show and a boycott from a large and
influential group can scare away sponsors even if there is no threat of
violence. For example, the boycott against the pictures is costing a huge
amount of money. Money speaks and moves more than violence.
NBC, a unit of
And that position is prejudiced and bigoted against ***all Muslims***.
It's sad that you cannot seperate between extremists and Muslims.
I wonder if you have the same point of view for those that burn
churches, and hang negroes in the name of God and white christian
power?
Or do you clearly
Huh?? WTf?? They pulled a show because it was Offensive to Christians?
What's up with Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Speech and all that?
Why didn't they show this series?
Welcome back Crazy Gel.
Christians have every right to try and boycott this if they want too. When
the radical
They gave you a gun?
Yikes.
I will say it. Fuck all real Muslims.
The image of the moderate Muslim is no more real than the christian
american. The moderate Muslim does not generally follow his religion, so
I
don't have a problem with him. If you are a real follower of Islam
though,
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: More on the Mohammad
The news outlet being protested against showed comics.
Al Jezeera shows beheadings of our soldiers, shows all kinds of shit.
why not just use cfquery?
On 2/3/06, Loathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use cfinsert and cfupdate?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195700
Archives:
This is the first time you have ever admitted in this thread that the
cartoon was offensive.
I do not promote nor do I agree with the violent response by extreme
individuals in various countries.
However I also do not promote the prejudice, intolerance and bigotry
displayed by many against
Because, as a business, they decided that the bad press from the
protests would outway the economic benefit from running it.
It is all about the money.
Is it fair? Nope.
The question is: Did the shows get run at all or was it removed by the
government (that is freedom of the press)
An
You seem to be having a problem seperating support for respect for
religion, and acknowledgement that something is offensive with
supporting violent protest.
On 2/3/06, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christians have every right to try and boycott this if they want too. When
the radical Christians,
No, I'm arguing that the responses are different and the response on one
side is just far too extreme. Both the west and the Muslim world publish
pictures that by accident or design offend the other. I don't see threats of
violence or boycotts against the Muslim world over a cartoon.
BTW, a
+200
On 2/3/06, G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christians have every right to try and boycott this if they want too. When
the radical Christians, dressed in masks with guns, take over the NBC
studios and demand an apology...then I'll revisit this.
No, what I am saying is if you are going to abstract your queries to that
point why not use the tags that were built for it.
It's was rhetorical, I hate those tags.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:19 PM
To: CF-Community
You seem to be mistaking support for respect for religion, tolerance,
and recognising something as being offensive to an entire religion
with support for violence.
These are two seperate issues.
On 2/3/06, Jerry Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An ancillary question is: how many bombings,
I don't see threats of
violence or boycotts against the Muslim world over a cartoon.
BTW, a boycott is still a civil response no matter how ill-thought-out it
is. threats of murder isn't.
Agreed.
On 2/3/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm arguing that the responses are
And that boys and girls is what scares the shit out of me and many other
people.
The news outlet being protested against showed comics.
Al Jezeera shows beheadings of our soldiers, shows all kinds of shit.
Which is worse man?
From your cultural viewpoint, the latter is worse.
From other
Gel, it has nothing to do with religion in this case!
I see you chose to ignore the other 5 responses that didn't support your
witch-hunt, this is about MONEY, not religion.
You are fast approaching troll status, my friend.
Vivec wrote:
You seem to be having a problem seperating support for
Yeah man, how is a cartoon culturally ever less acceptable than beheading a
hostage?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More on the Mohammad
And that boys and girls is what
Not really. It's this simple, isn't it?
- You should have respect for other people's religious viewpoints.
- If something is offensive to another people's religion, you should try to
avoid it if reasonable.
- It is offensive to intentionally do something that you know is offensive
to someone
That is messed up. It reminds me of the story early on in the war where a
pregnant woman was blown up in a car at a checkpoint, and it turned out she was
an Iraqi Army colonel who had planned the attack on the checkpoint. Sick.
My body Evan was part of an IED attack where the guy brought his
human fucking death and cartoons are similar in your brain.
WOAH!
On 2/3/06, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: More on the Mohammad
The news
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: More on the Mohammad
Yeah man, how is a cartoon culturally ever less acceptable than beheading
a
hostage?
Human life has VERY often been less valued
I think its pretty cool because I bet it works for oracle, mysql, sql2000,
access etc without changing a line of code- no small feat. Join syntax for
all those can vary vary. I do find the syntax a bit unintuitive but I find
that most of the code I see is unintuitive.
DRE
On 2/3/06, Loathe
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More on the Mohammad
human fucking death and cartoons are similar in your brain.
WOAH!
No.
Perhaps I need to be even more specific: I'm not part of
I am saying that we have advanced past that point.
If other parts of the world have not, that's their problem.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:39 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: More on the Mohammad
But should I accept that? Should I cater to it? Or should I push back
against it?
(In a non-violent way)
On 2/3/06, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:30 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject:
The argument They do it too is EXACTLY the point of this whole argument.
EVERYONE publishes cartoons offensive to someone else. That is the
very nature if a political cartoon. Often, that is the PURPOSE of a
political cartoon.
EVERYONE eventually finds something outrageously offensive. The
Several.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:18 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More on the Mohammad
They gave you a gun?
Yikes.
I will say it. Fuck all real Muslims.
The image of the moderate Muslim is no
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:46 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: More on the Mohammad
I am saying that we have advanced past that point.
If other parts of the world have not, that's their problem.
On a
Or more so than you think.
We don't have entire villages burning people, lynching people.
They still do this in places where the laws of Sharia are followed.
Listen, don't take this the wrong way, but until you have seen how people in
islamic countries actually live, nothing you say is going to
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:47 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More on the Mohammad
But should I accept that? Should I cater to it? Or should I push back
against it?
(In a non-violent way)
I never said it
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
