I could go for either of those, or maybe the M4 shotgun.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> I've got the Remington 870 Express.
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> We have a Benelli SuperNova tactical shotgun.
~~~
I support open carry also...not that it would make a lot of difference as
everywhere you go, private business here say that weapons are not allowed
inside.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I like guns. I also support reasonable restrictions on the ability of
> people to
I feel the same way. I am not against all gun control, but I think
there is a happy medium somewhere between 'no one can own any guns'
and 'any one should be able to buy a tank'
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I like guns. I also support reasonable restrictions on the a
I like guns. I also support reasonable restrictions on the ability of
people to have them. The problem is coming up with a definition of
"reasonable". The NRA makes me want to kick them in the nuts. They are
anything but reasonable. On the other hand, I support things like open
carry, which a lot
I've got the Remington 870 Express. It's nice and loud when you're cocking
it. Still thinking of getting a pistol for my wife though. She's afraid of
the shotgun and doesn't even want to attempt shooting it. Can't say that I
blame her since it does have quite the kick. It's not near as smooth
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> I've used several different kinds of weapons, including Glock, Sig
> Sauer, snub-nosed .357, M1 carbine, black powder musket, .22 target
> pistol, and shotgun. No assault rifles that I recall. If I were going
> the rifle route, I would get e
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
> Whether or not that is worth pursuing as a policy and if it is
> constitutional in the USA is a completely different argument. But one
> is not supporting ones side well if one argues from the assumption that
> removing guns overall will have
Not really, for instance one study I read looked at compared emergency
room visits between hospitals in Seattle Washington, and Vancouver,
BC. These were demographically very similar cities. Even after
accounting for all other possible differences, the largest amount of
the differences in emergenc
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
I've used several different kinds of weapons, including Glock, Sig
Sauer, snub-nosed .357, M1 carbine, black powder musket, .22 target
pistol, and shotgun. No assault rifles that I recall. If I were going
the rifle route, I would get either a s
On 7/9/2010 2:14 PM, Sam wrote:
> Missed that, and it wasn't your original. I was paying more attention
> to this: "Less guns bought to be stolen does lead to less guns to buy
> illegally."
Different point for a different part of the conversation. Basic supply
and demand says that if there ar
Fully auto 12 guage...Yeah. Anyone who recognizes that thing will give
up before you pull the trigger.
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:45 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> The AA-12 is the ultimate weapon for a zombie invasion
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c
>
> Because to be honest, a shotgun is only going to net you 3 or 5 rounds
> before reload, that isn't enough to protect yourself from a m
Missed that, and it wasn't your original. I was paying more attention
to this: "Less guns bought to be stolen does lead to less guns to buy
illegally."
So you've changed that from less sales to less victims of gun theft?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>
> On 7/9/2010 1:34
On 7/9/2010 1:34 PM, Sam wrote:
> Did you change focus somewhere along the line?
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>> ... that those who can get them are better controlled to not allow them to
>> get to these people.
Again, I will just re-quote my original post.
~~~
Apples and oranges. The majority of gun crime in the US is centered
around the drug trade. Just as Prohibition created Al Capone and mass
violence in the 20s, the War on Drugs has created an entire generation
of violent gangs who fight over the vast profits to be made in the
illegal drug trade. Ca
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> For my own part, I'm getting a shotgun. Does anyone have a
> recommendation on a good one?
>
The AA-12 is the ultimate weapon for a zombie invasion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c
Because to be honest, a shotgun is only going to
I thought your argument was illegal guns are stolen legal ones so we
need to control the amount of legal guns. Did you change focus
somewhere along the line?
I agree some states have lax gun laws and others very strict ones.
That right there creates a problem because some will ignore interstate
c
On 7/9/2010 1:14 PM, Sam wrote:
> We already have gun control, by extending it you banish guns from more
> people. Playing with semantics doesn't change the point.
Maybe improving current gun control might might make things better.
I do not accept your theorem because it is built on a faulty a
You didn't have a message.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Typical. Can't attack the message, so you attack the messenger.
> Disinformation rule 87.
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> You really nit pick when your flustered eh
We already have gun control, by extending it you banish guns from more
people. Playing with semantics doesn't change the point.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>
> On 7/9/2010 12:51 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> So the thieves win? Focus on the crimes of having illegal guns rather
>>
A question then, if such were the case then how come countries with
very strong gun control, e.g., Canada for instance, are not overrun
with armed criminals?
Last I looked the homicide rates, and most other crime rates for
Canada, as well as firearm related suicides and accidents are far
lower o
On 7/9/2010 12:51 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> So the thieves win? Focus on the crimes of having illegal guns rather
> then *banning* the legal ones.
And I'm quoting from the email you replied to:
On 7/9/2010 12:35 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
> Gun control and *gun banishment* are two different things.
~~
Damn it. I didn't even read the
"Are you sure you want to destroy this webserver?"
confirmation message before I clicked "OK."
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:55 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> > Ya, David Thorne is the bomb. If you want to read some more of his
> kickass
> > emails check out his
And we share a 1000 mile border with Mexico. So even if you made guns
illegal in every US state, they would still flow freely into the US
from Mexico, but the only people who would get them would be
criminals.
None of that matters, of course, thanks to the Supreme Court, who has
reaffirmed the ri
That leaves a law abiding citizen defending themselves with a Glock when a
criminal breaks into their house with an AK. Bad situation if you ask me.
It may just be me but I really can't bring myself to ponder any more gun
control than we have now till we deal with the current black market for g
Typical. Can't attack the message, so you attack the messenger.
Disinformation rule 87.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You really nit pick when your flustered eh?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
h
> Ya, David Thorne is the bomb. If you want to read some more of his kickass
> emails check out his homesite:
> http://www.27bslash6.com/
I think you broke it ;)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com
You really nit pick when your flustered eh?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> When did we "ban all guns", or even suggest that all guns should be
> banned? Are you having a hyperbole day?
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Good point. While we're banning all
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>
> A large number of illegally purchased guns where at one time probably a
> legally purchased gun that was then stolen. Less guns bought to be stolen
> does lead to less guns to buy illegally.
So the thieves win? Focus on the crimes of havi
When did we "ban all guns", or even suggest that all guns should be
banned? Are you having a hyperbole day?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Good point. While we're banning all guns because some might one day
> become illegal, lets close the drug stores too.
So is your position that gun control only keeps guns from law abiding
citizens? How does that work, since there are no gun control laws
other than assault weapon bans that would prevent lawful ownership?
Or am I missing your point?
The problem is Mexico has more to do with corruption than gun co
On 7/9/2010 12:14 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
> The problem I have with gun control laws is that they don't accomplish
> anything. Most gun related crimes (80% I think was the figure but it's
> been a while since I've seen it) are committed with illegally purchased
> guns.
A large number of illegally
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> For the record I don't and likely won't for many years own a gun. I just
> think the arguments against gun control make a whole lot more sense than
> the ones against it.
>
>
For the record, you only have 2 years to get a combat rifle before
On 7/9/2010 12:14 PM, Sam wrote:
> Good point. While we're banning all guns because some might one day
> become illegal, lets close the drug stores too.
OR, conversely, regulate guns to the same level drugs and drug stores
are regulated since dangerous items should be regulated to similar degr
> My understanding is that cf sends a 301 status,
> moved permanently.
By default CF will use a 302 redirect unless you specify otherwise. Newer
versions of CF have a statuscode attribute on CFLOCATION which will let you
specify the 301 directly. On older versions you have to use CFHEADER to se
I've noticed from my logs that some crawlers will look into directories that
I do not link to on my site.
For instance, if I have the page:
www.domain.com/content/web-design/index.cfm
the se will try to crawl:
www.domain.com/content/
even if nothing on my site links to that directory.
What is t
Good point. While we're banning all guns because some might one day
become illegal, lets close the drug stores too.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
>
>> I bet the guns used weren't legal
>
> But they probably where at *one* time or the other.
The problem I have with gun control laws is that they don't accomplish
anything. Most gun related crimes (80% I think was the figure but it's
been a while since I've seen it) are committed with illegally purchased
guns. That being the case I find it hard to justify making it harder for
a law abidi
On 7/9/2010 11:33 AM, Sam wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Maureen wrote:
>> I was actually a pretty strong advocate for the 2nd amendment until my
>> son got shot at in drive-by while eating lunch at a Mexican restaurant
>> in NE Atlanta.
> I bet the guns used weren't legal
But they p
Sorted.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Eric Roberts
> It's very accurate
>
> From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
>
> that's just not accurate
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adob
Yes...because Mexico has such strong gun control laws that are enforced...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:32 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
the really bad people
It's very accurate
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:30 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
that's just not accurate
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I was actually a pretty strong advocate for the 2nd amendment until my
> son got shot at in drive-by while eating lunch at a Mexican restaurant
> in NE Atlanta.
I bet the guns used weren't legal
> Also, I spent some time working in a friend's g
the really bad people will be armed anyway. gun control does nothing
to keep guns out of the hands of people who are already dedicated
criminals. just look at mexico.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I was actually a pretty strong advocate for the 2nd amendment until my
> son
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Which also reminds me of one other joke
> What do you call an Englishman at the World Cup Final? The ref.
A tweet from musician Billy Bragg last week:
"Huge spike in sales of pink fairy tutus at Glastonbury Festival to
blokes too embarra
Ya, David Thorne is the bomb. If you want to read some more of his kickass
emails check out his homesite:
http://www.27bslash6.com/
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I cannot recall the last time I laughed so hard - this is too damn funny.
>
>
> http://jezebel.com/558256
that's just not accurate
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> And free speech or freedom of religion or freedom of expression or right to
> redress grievances against the government or due process or right to a fair
> and speedy trial or the right to be protected against unlaw
I was actually a pretty strong advocate for the 2nd amendment until my
son got shot at in drive-by while eating lunch at a Mexican restaurant
in NE Atlanta. Also, I spent some time working in a friend's gun
store. After observing some of the customers, I decided I was for
very strong gun control
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Sam wrote:
> How did it get there?
>
> Talking about it will expose all the lies used to sneak it through.
> That will cost many seats in November. Best to hide it, the less
> people know about it the less they will complain.
>
> Glad to see you're into the whole
I can't find anything about self-executing rule in the Senate. Seems
to be a house only thing. Please share.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Interestingly enough, I was just pointed to an analysis of this
> talking point and it is sort of true. The House has never done a
Are you flustered again?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> You are truly delusional Sam.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:06 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: If you can't beat 'em...
>
>
> How did i
No the response was (for the Patriot Act) that if you oppose this you are
unpatriotic and don't care about the security of America.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:15 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: If you can't beat 'em...
You are truly delusional Sam.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:06 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: If you can't beat 'em...
How did it get there?
Talking about it will expose all the lies used to sneak it through.
That will cost m
Imagine the uproar that would have occurred if that same response was
given to comments about the Patriot Act.
Just because its in place does not mean it should not be debatable.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>> The Democr
How did it get there?
Talking about it will expose all the lies used to sneak it through.
That will cost many seats in November. Best to hide it, the less
people know about it the less they will complain.
Glad to see you're into the whole sheeple are to stupid to know what's
good for them line.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Casey Dougall <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>> The Democrats blocked it because they didn't want to talk about it.
>> If Obama care is so good why hide it? Open government ha :)
>>
>
> Because it's alre
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Sam wrote:
> The Democrats blocked it because they didn't want to talk about it.
> If Obama care is so good why hide it? Open government ha :)
>
Because it's already in place, move on to other issues still open to debate.
~~~
schizophrenia has nothing to do with multiple personalities.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> I also said that they were Schizophrenic.
> So at one point in time they are Psychopathic...at another they are
> sociopathic..
>>_>
> <_<
>
> 0_0
>
> On 9 July 2010 12:38, Scott Stroz
I cannot recall the last time I laughed so hard - this is too damn funny.
http://jezebel.com/5582562/clueless-secretary-makes-for-hilarious-office-email-thread
--
Scott Stroz
---
You can make things happen, you can watch things happen or you can
wonder what the f*&k happened. - Cpt.
Noted. Carry on
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> I also said that they were Schizophrenic.
> So at one point in time they are Psychopathic...at another they are
> sociopathic..
>>_>
> <_<
>
> 0_0
>
> On 9 July 2010 12:38, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>>
>> Pretty sure, by definitio
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> Since the creation of the Congressional budget process, the House has never
> failed to pass a budget and then deemed the non-existent budget as passed.
>
> It will be interesting to see how Republicans use this for the upcoming
> elections
The Democrats blocked it because they didn't want to talk about it.
If Obama care is so good why hide it? Open government ha :)
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Obama nominated him, so he did try. However, I blame Max Baucus as
> much as I do Republicans for blocking the
Obama nominated him, so he did try. However, I blame Max Baucus as
much as I do Republicans for blocking the nomination since Baucus
didn't even schedule a hearing. He didn't want to get into the fight
and that is his choice as committee chairman, just like it is Obama's
choice as President to use
Now there's an unbiased source...
Republicans had ample opportunity to join the conversation and yet still
voted no even after they promised their votes after being given concession
after concession.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 201
I know.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I have always thought that. I think the actions of the republicans have
> been unconstitutional, very anti-democratic and anti-American.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldf
That's an idea...
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:57 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Ummm, about that budget . . .
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
> How about ending corporate welfare first? T
I have always thought that. I think the actions of the republicans have
been unconstitutional, very anti-democratic and anti-American.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:53 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: If you can't beat '
On 7/9/2010 9:40 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
> It's not the positions that are dishonest. It's how the two sides talk
> about each other. If they were honest they'd both admit that the other
> side has a point and we'd actually be able to move towards resolving the
> issue instead of just endlessly ar
How do we know since he didn't even try?
Democrats wanted to avoid another health care debate.
Krauthammer says it best:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/08/krauthammer_democrats_dont_want_health_care_debated_again.html
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> It
I also said that they were Schizophrenic.
So at one point in time they are Psychopathic...at another they are
sociopathic..
>_>
<_<
0_0
On 9 July 2010 12:38, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Pretty sure, by definition, one cannot be a psychopath and sociopath.
>
> IIRC: psychopath is unable to determine
It also doesn't mean that he shouldn't wield it. We can see a big
difference though in the Bush use of recession appointments (which I think
he misused) and how Obama is using them. Bush used a recession appointment
to appoint someone that Congress already rejected (twice at that point if I
reme
It's not the positions that are dishonest. It's how the two sides talk
about each other. If they were honest they'd both admit that the other
side has a point and we'd actually be able to move towards resolving the
issue instead of just endlessly arguing about it.
-Original Message-
From:
Pretty sure, by definition, one cannot be a psychopath and sociopath.
IIRC: psychopath is unable to determine right from wrong, sociopath
can tell the difference between right and wrong, but does not care.
*splits hairs*
:D
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Once you start seei
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
> Neither side is in the least measure honest or objective. Most who
> advocate the end of welfare simply feel that it's not the government's
> place to run what amounts to a charity that we're all required to donate
> to by law (and they have a
No...they allow you to stream them online.
-Original Message-
From: Sisk, Kris [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 9:27 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Netbook movies for travel
Doesn't Netflix allow you to download movies you rent now?
~~~
What isn't honest about those positions?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
>
> Neither side is in the least measure honest or objective. Most who
> advocate the end of welfare simply feel that it's not the government's
> place to run what amounts to a charity that we're all requi
White flight is a myth Jerry. There is a cyclical "churning" of people in
urban environments. We see that here in Chicago and it has been happening
since Chicago was founded. That is why we have housing projects bordering
multi-million dollar residences in the Gold Coast in Chicago. Ever few
y
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> the big redwood at the back of the house:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/59807...@n00/4769951962/
>
> the crown of the tree:
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/59807...@n00/4769951956/
>
> there are a number of other big trees on the propert
Neither side is in the least measure honest or objective. Most who
advocate the end of welfare simply feel that it's not the government's
place to run what amounts to a charity that we're all required to donate
to by law (and they have a point). Most who say we need Medicare simply
feel that the g
Afraid of or tired of?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:35 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: If you can't beat 'em...
...do an end around.
http://nyti.ms/caLJqZ
Not sure how I feel about this.
On one hand, the Republicans wer
Is ti happy hour already?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Once you start seeing Corporations as Individuals your society is on the way
> to implosion.
>
> Corporations , if they are individuals, are all psychopathic, schizophrenic
> sociopaths.
>
> Those who oppose the end of
Or get the money from Iraqi oil like we were supposed to?
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 9:32 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Ummm, about that budget . . .
Yes, we can leave. The same old tired rhetoric about the Taliban a
Those are awesome...that is a gorgeous house. Congrats and thanks for
sharing!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 8:20 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: a couple of photos
the big redwood at the back of the house:
http://www.flic
That is false Robert. He talked about getting out of Iraq and campaigned on
Afghanistan being the right war.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 7:50 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Ummm, about that budget . . .
Obama the can
Obama even said the his secretary of the interior did not act fast enough to
root out the corruption that existed and he has taken blame for that. The
root of the problem, however...not only the culture, but the regulations (or
deregulations) that was part of the Cheney energy task force that, fo
Once you start seeing Corporations as Individuals your society is on the way
to implosion.
Corporations , if they are individuals, are all psychopathic, schizophrenic
sociopaths.
Those who oppose the end of Medicare and Social Welfare are not phrasing
their opposition in such sensational terms.
The actions of this current administration will really have it's effects in
the last 2 years of his term and into a second term (if he get re-elected).
Stuff that he did in his first few months are taking effect now as can be
seen in the job growth from the Bush administration, that experienced se
When his administration is at fault for most of the issues that we have,
then that is exactly what they should be doing. How about this...point out
issues where Bush is blamed and he wasn't at fault...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 0
Throw them out on the street and hope they die quickly? That seems to be
the republican plan. I am beginning to believe that Republicans are not
even human anymore. One of the hallmarks of humanity, from an
anthropological standpoint, was that we started to take care of the infirm,
the poor, an
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
> How about ending corporate welfare first? Then stop sending aid to Israel.
> Next, decriminalize marijuana and tax the shit out of it. Budget problems
> solved.
How about at least restricting Social Security bennies only to those
who meet
How about ending corporate welfare first? Then stop sending aid to Israel.
Next, decriminalize marijuana and tax the shit out of it. Budget problems
solved.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 4:13 PM
To: cf-community
Subject:
They had a segment on a TV show about this guy. He is actually pretty
talented...shame his art is so impermanent.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:h...@ilsweb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:31 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: A bit more then just "wash me!"
Art fr
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:44 AM, G Money wrote:
> See now...why did ya have ta go and do that?
Playground politics? As long as the other kid reacts to it, keep teasing.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology no
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:09 AM, G Money wrote:
>> One trick pony.
>
> You crazy? Cam's full of tricks...been turning them here for years.
Hey, at least I've stopped talking about FairTax (mostly).
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the A
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Medic wrote:
>
> One trick pony.
>
You crazy? Cam's full of tricks...been turning them here for years.
--
I've seen your flag on the marble arch
Love is not a victory march
It's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah
In related news researchers are working on robots that will lie to the
public and bicker publicly over the most minor disagreements even while
quietly cooperating with each other to screw us all. They're calling it
the Repubricat.
/me runs away
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailt
One trick pony.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:44 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> See now...why did ya have ta go and do that?
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Cameron Childress >wrote:
>
> >
> > I also saw recently where they are building soccer playing robots with
> > a goal of having a robot that wil
On 7/9/2010 7:44 AM, G Money wrote:
> See now...why did ya have ta go and do that?
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Cameron Childresswrote:
Really, this could have been such a nice thread about subservient robots
working hard to meet humankind's needs. At least for awhile before
they tak
courtesy of Andy Jarrett:
--
A thanks for @bigmadkev for this little on topic gem!
Man walking along kicks a tin can and out pops a genie.
"I will grant you one wish" says the genie.
"I want to live forever" says the man.
"I can't grant wishes like that" the genie replies.
"Ok, I want to live
See now...why did ya have ta go and do that?
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> I also saw recently where they are building soccer playing robots with
> a goal of having a robot that will fall on the ground and flail around
> like a little girl by the year 2050.
>
> -Ca
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
